HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - May 19, 2004 E-11AGENDA ITEM Efoll
CITY OF LODI
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
7M
AGENDA TITLE: Adopt Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to File the Claim for 2003104
Transportation Development Act (TDA) Funds in the Amount of $2,013,810
from the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and $5,609 from State Transit
Assistance (STA)
MEETING DATE: May 19, 2004
PREPARED BY: Public Works Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the
City Manager to file the attached claim for the 2003/2004
Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds in the amount of
$2,013,810 from the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and $5,609
from State Transit Assistance (STA).
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Each year, the City of Lodi receives an apportionment of TDA funds
to support Lodi's transit operations and pedestrian/bicycle costs.
These are State transportation funds that are primarily for
non -vehicular transportation but can be used on roads if those other
needs are being met. They are channeled through the Council of Governments, our regional
transportation planning agency. The claim for fiscal year 200312004, including pedestrian/bike and 3%
for San Joaquin Council of Governments planning, is $2,013,810 from the LTF and $5,609 from STA.
The City Council should be aware that our transit operations, Dial -A -Ride and GrapeLine, are fully funded
with formula dollars from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), TDA, and other competitive sources of
funds. Transit is not dependent on any General Fund money. We intend to continue to use TDA funds
for transit, pedestrian, and bicycle -related projects and maintenance as much as possible.
FUNDING
Prepared by Tiffani M. Fink.
RCP/DJCIpmf
Attachment
cc: Finance Director
City Engineer
C2004TDACIaIm doc
None required.
Transportation Manager
APPROVED:
ar- Richardo. Prima, Jr.
Public Works Director
Dixon `Flynn, City Manager
5/1312004
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND
TO: San Joaquin Council of Governments
6 South E1 Dorado Street, Suite 400
Stockton, CA 95202
FROM: City of Lodi
(applicant)
ADDRESS: 221 West Pine Street Lodi, CA 95240
(city, zip)
CONTACT PERSON: Ti ffani Fink, Trans Mgr PHONE: 209-333-6800 x2678
The City of Lodi hereby requests, in accordance
with Chapter 1400, Statutes 1971 and applicable rules and regula-
tions, that its annual transportation claim be approved in the
amount of $ 2,013,810 for fiscal year 2003/2004 to be drawn
from the Local Transportation Fund.
When approved, please transmit this claim to the County Auditor for
payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor
to this applicant is subject to such monies being on hand and
available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies
will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved
annual financial plan.
The claimant certifies that this Local Transportation Fund claim
and the financial information contained therein, is reasonable and
accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned
information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds
for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634
and 6734.
APPROVED:
San Joaquin Council
of Governments
By.
JULIA E. GREENE
Executive Director
Date:
Applicant:
Signed:
20
P
Name:
H. Dixon Flynn
Title: City Manager
Date:
20
STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE CLAIM
TO: San Joaa_uin Council of Governments
6 South E1 Dorado Street, Suite 400
Stockton, CA 95202
FROM: City of Lodi
(applicant)
ADDRESS: 221 West Pine Street Lodi. CA 95240
(city, zip)
CONTACT PERSON: Tiffani Fink, Trans Mgr PHONE: 209-333-6800 x2678
This claimant, qualified pursuant to Sections 99313.6, 99314.5
and 99314.6 of the Public Utilities Code, hereby requests, in
accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes of 1971 as amended, and
applicable rules and regulations, that an allocation be made in
the amount of $ 5,609 for fiscal year 2003/2004, to be
drawn from the State Transit Assistance trust fund of San Joaauin
County. -
Allocation instruction and payment by the County Auditor to this
claimant are subject to such monies being on hand and available for
distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used
only in accordance with the terms of the approved claim.
The claimant certifies that this State Transit Assistance Fund
Claim and the financial information contained herein, is reasonable
and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforemen-
tioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for
funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC
Section 6634 and 6734.
APPROVED:
San Joaquin Council
of Governments
By:
JULIA E. GREENE
Executive Director
Date:
Applicant:
Signed:
20
7
Name:
H. ixon Rynn
Title: City Manager
Date.
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT APPORTIONMENTS
I. Local Transportation Fund Available Apportionment
A.
Area Apportionment 2003/04
$1,854,008
B.
Pedestrian/Bicycle Apportionment
39,367
C.
Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment
61,384
D.
Unexpended Carryover
0
E.
3% for COG Transit Planning
59,051
F.
Total Available for 2003-04 Claims (s)
2,013,810
G.
Less any LTF Already Claimed 2003-04
H.
TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM
$2,013,810
(Also enter on page 9, 1 st column)
I.
Actual net funds available (H-D-E=I)
$1,954,759
I1. State Transit Assistance Fund Available Apportionment
A.
Area Apportionment 2003/04
$0
B.
Special Operator Apportionment 2003-04
5,327
C.
Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment
282
D.
Unexpended Carryover
0
E.
2% for COG Transit Planning
F.
Total Available for 2003-04 Claims (s)
5,609
G.
Less any STA Already Claimed 2003-04
0
H.
TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM
$5,609
(Also enter on page 9, 2nd column)
I.
Actual net funds available (H-D-E=I)
$5,609
8
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ALLOCATIONS
Claim Purpose I. LTF II. STA
I. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
Article 4 (99260) - Operator' $0
CCR Sec 6730(a) Public Transit $5,609
Article 8 (99400 ( c ))
Contractor operating 1,802,392 _
Article 8 (99400 ( e ))
Contractor capital 0 _
Article 8 (99400 ( b ))
Passenger Rail Service
Operations & Capital
TDA Administration - SJCOG 59,051
II. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE
Article 3 (99234) 39,367
III. ROADS AND STREETS
Article 8 (99400 ( a )) 113,000
IV. OTHER
Article 8 (99400 (b,c,d,e)) 0
V. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Transportation Planning
IC
C
0
C
TOTAL THIS CLAIM $2,013,810 $5,609
TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM
(from page 8, I. H. and II. H.) $2,013,810 $5,609
UNCLAIMED APPORTIONMENT
(TOTAL AVAIL. Less TOTAL THIS CLAIM) $0 $0
IMPORTANT. To avoid accidental overpayment, please idents and itemize in the space below
any unexpended carryover included in the amounts being claimed above. Identify the amount of carryover
and the purpose for which it is being reclaimed. Attach pages as necessary.
Unexpended Carryover in TDA Fund being reclaimed for Transit Operations: $0
Operators claiming STA funds must meet qualifying criteria (PUC Section 99314.6).
Page 17 of this form must be completed.
9
PART I - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
PLEASE CIRCLE EITHER: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Article 4 Operator
Article 8 Contractor
2002-2003
Actual
401 Passenger Fares
402 Special Transit Fares
405 Charter Service Revenue
406 Auxiliary Transportation
Revenues (includes advertising)
407 Non -transportation Revenues
Property Tax
408 Tax Revenue (Specify:)
Property Tax
Sales Tax - Measure K
409 Local Grants & Reimbursements
Purchase of Service
Local Transportation Fund (LTF)
410 Local Special Fare Assistance
411 State Cash Grants and Reimbursements
State Transit Assistance (STA)
Other: Interest
Other: Miscellaneous
412 State Special Fare Assistance
413 Federal Grants & Reimbursements
(Specify) FTA Grants
430 Contributed Services (Not Cash)
440 Subsidy from other Sector of
Operations
TOTAL
II. CAPITAL REVENUE
464 Capital Grants & Subsidies
Specify Fed, State, Local:
Federal 5307
Air District
State
Measure K
State Transit Assistance (STA)
Local Transportation Fund (LTF)
Other
TOTAL
0
0
1,771,032
0
7.285
0
0
157,337
$2,173,591
400,000
0
0
0
0
$400,000
10
2003-2004
Budget
0
1,802,392
5,609
0
286,704
$2,339,705
514,912
0
0
0
0
0
0
$514,912
III. OPERATING EXPENSES
2002-2003
Actual
501
Labor
Operators Salaries/Wages
$D
Other Salaries/Wages
63,543
502
Fringe Benefits
6,101
503
Services
210,156
504
Materials/Supplies
Fuels/Lubricants
148,457
Tires/Tubes
239,953
Other
47,661
505
Utilities
77,945
506
Casualty/Liability Costs
95,010
507
Taxes
250
508
Purchased Transportation Service
1,284,515
509
Miscellaneous Expenses
0
510
Expense Transfers
0
511
Interest Expense
512
Leases and Rentals
513
Depreciation/Amortization
Operator Funds
Grant Funds
TOTAL
$ 2,173,591
IV.
CAPITAL EXPENSES*
Debt Service
Land Property Acquisition
0
Vehicles
300,000
Construction
0
Other
100,000
TOTAL
$ 400,000
* Allowable capital expenses are limited for Article 8 claimants;
see 99400 (e).
11
2003-2004
Budget
$0
83,680
13,330
181,965
90,000
170,000
27,755
110,000
1,661,979
$ 2,339,705
0
0
150,000
0
2
0= 2RATIC7NA-L INPORY--TION*
oa`ronaae
a. Total Passege_s
JD . Revenue Passengers
c. Youth Passengers
d. Elderly Passengers
e. Handicapped Passengers
Vehicle Miles
a. Total Vehicle M_'_es
b. Revenue Vehicle Miles
Revenue Vehicle Hours
Revenue Vehicle Fuel
Consumotion
a. Diesel
b. Gasoline
Fare Structure
a. Base
b. Zone
c. Youth
d. Senior
e. Handicapped
f. Monthly Pass
g Other
h. Average Fare
Actual Actual/-st. P onosed
FY 2.00-1-02 FY 2002-03 V 2003-04
518,805 520,886 540,000
48,679 48,305 50,000
Included in the Elderly Passenger Count
520,169
45,127 48,788.58 50,000
.50/ 2.00 .50/ 2.00 .50/ 2.00
.25/ 1.00 .25/ 1.00 .25/ 1.00
.25/ 1.00 .25/ 1.00 .25/ 1.00
$20 General/ $10 Senior/ Disabled/ Medicare
.30/ 1.36 .30/ 1.36 .30/ 1.36
*attach additional pages as necessary to alter or compiete description
12
THREE YEAR FISCAL PLAN
13
2003-04
2004-2005
2005-2006
Operating
Expenses
$ _2.3gg-
959
$
2,51515,659
$
2,600,000
Operating
Revenues:
Sources:
LTF
$
1,802,392
$
1,700,000
$
1,750,000
STA
5,609
5,000
5,000
Federal
286,704
660,000
595,000
Fares
245,000
250.000
250,000
General Fund
0
0
0
Other
0
0
0
Total
$ 2,339,705
$
2,615,000
$
2,600,000
Capital Expenses
$
514,912
$
440,000
$
500;000
Capital Revenue
Sources:
LTF
$
0
$
0
$
0
STA
0
0
0
Federal
514,912
440,000
500,000
Other
0
0
0
Total
$
514,912
$
440,000
$
500,000
13
F Lt E T I VENTORY
iI 7ansir "e:scle Owner- Only)
Make & Model
Year
rr of
Vehicles
Fuel
Tvpe
Srandard
Seat
Capacity-
- Wheel-
chair
PosnionLs
Ramp
(yin)
Lift
(y, r:;
CNG DAR Buses i 2001 I
6 I
CNG I
48
24
n l
y
NABI Low Floor 2000 I
5 I
CNG I
185
10
y
n
Amtrans Senator' 1991 !
1 I
CNG I
33
2
n l
y
Ford Senator 1996 I
2
! UNL (
44 I
10
n l
y
Ford Senator
1996
3 I UNL
66 !
6 !
n I
y
Ford E-350 , 1995 !
5 ! CNG
16
10
n
y
Ford E-350
11995
! 2
I CNG
I 16
! 4
I n
y
ICNG
37I
2
n
!
I
I
!
i
I
I
i
f
I
I
I
TOTAL
I NA
I 25
NA
445
I 66
Vehicles to be Purchased in FY 2003-2004
II No vehicles are scheduled for pprchase.I I I I II
14
tiTi::LE 4 OPERATOR TDA REQUIaMXXXTS
1. Fere Ratic/Local Support Regairememts
F' 1 P -r -i cle 4 cla_mancs are rec-aired to maintai-n a spec -Lf -'Led ratio
ct _ are revenue to open -ng �_ cost . : add=_.c. SMS �`^ on y is
re: -u - red to mair_tai-- a ratio of =are revenue -.-'-us local suoDcrt to
ooerat-;Lna cosc of 32'1. See 99263.2 - 99268. _9 for dez__ls alid
exempt ons pe_rtaln'Ing to ra_:.cs
A. what is this system's required farebox recovery ratio?
3. Does the attached budget demonstrate "at _'s Sv�cem W.i1
mee- i is regTlzred (arebox recovery and for __s fareocx
Dlus local su.DDcrt ratios?
C. Has this syszem utilized its grace year?
as his system ween i n0P_-COI D__� Ce W--_- --S -eC(u4 re
rat, _ _ _
if yes, identify the year or years
2. Extension of Service/New Service
An extension of service or new service is exem_)t from the
required farebox and local sunoort ratios if:
A. The extension of service or new service has been iZ operation
for less than two full fiscal years. The two-year extension
of services exclusion aoolies ur_til two years after the end
of the fiscal year in which the extension of services was put -
in t o
utinto operation_.
B. The claimant submits a report on the extension_ of services
to the COG within_ 90 days after the end of the fiscal year.
(For details of the report, see 6633.8(b)).
is an extension of service/new service being claimed?
if so, has the required report been submitted for the most
recently completed full fiscal year? 2f not, that
report must accompany this claim.
?5
perato=' s STS, u4:__ =y _ l� �r_'_a ( 9 _ :. 6 ) EXPLAISAT10N
3Dera_.._ :-L1-as., iilee =_e Cf _wzv e_ --c_-' eaci S: ::a .De _ore
STAfunds may be allocates -or operating our-aoses:
=_) 'T'`_'?e opera or I .. cperating Cos- per revenue ve�i_c_e 0u'r, in
t'le latest yea_ for wn_ch aud_.ed data are available, must
:ot exceed tale sural of the preceding yea--, s operat=ring cost
per revenue vehicle rout' and an amount ecrual to := he chancre
in the Consumer Price Index (CPI)` multiplied by the pre-
ceding yea='s operating cost per revenue vesicle hour.
The formula below accomplishes this exercise:
(opcost/RVH) FY02 5 [ (opcost/RVH) FY01] * [1.0246] 0P
a) The operator's average operating cost per reve=rue vehicle
hour, in the latest ree years for which. audited data are
avµi lwble, rust nog exceed the sum of the average c the
operating cost pe_ revenue ve':-isle hour _or the three
vears preced4 nag the _atest year for wh ' cn auu=sed data are
available and an amount eaual _o the average C_`lange In the
CPI for the same period. The formula below accomplishes
this exercise:
AVG(opcost/RVH)FY00,01,02 5 {AVG(opcost/RVH)FY99,00,01}
{1.0439}
As used here, Operating Costs are defined by pUC SeCtion 99247:
All costs in the operating expense object classes exclusive
of the costs in tate depreciation and amortization expense
object class, and exclusive of all direct costs for providing
charter services, and exclusive of all vehicle lease costs.
STA allows for other exclusions, to be granted by the COC, if
deemed appropriate. These additional operating cost exclusions
include:
_) Exclusion of cost increases beyond the change in the CPI
for fuel, alternative fuel programs, insurance, or state
and federal mandates.
2) Exclusion of start-up costs for new ser-sices.for a aeriod
of not more than two years (refer to PUC Section 99268..8
nor a definition of new service).
If you wish to claim these exclusions when calculating the
operation cost per revenue vehicle hour, you must state the
reeuest and show calculations in support of the cost to be
excluded. -
Percentage change across fiscal years using the California CPT_.
16
p,�rsuan-_ c.. P77C Sect_on 9�2_"_.- L -on to an oLera-_or for failure Lo meet the STA e==_c_er°c'v
criteria wil-! be .retained by COG =or real location_ to t1lat
one_"ator 'for two vears _ol'lcw-nC .._]e year of
STA funds not allocated before the commencement of the third yea=
-_Lowing the Year o= t=ie eli .,_bi l itv shall be reallocatedo
cost ec=ect_ve, high priority~regicnal trans_-_ activities, as
determined by the COG.
The following documents per -_air, to he new STA eff lc i ei cv s anda-rds
a-ld are ava=fable at your recrues-_ .
PUC Section -0931-4.6, also know-- as C -latter 35 Stazutes of
991 (SB 3 -?Capp) -
'T'he linor_n Svstam of Accounts for Public Trans Oz)e= a -_o_
C'onsi -per Price index :Data for ��._1fGrTl.a, January, _r81
through October, 2002.
Transportation Development Act Audit Reports, FY 1992 through
FY 2002.
Please complete the attached worksheet to determine .if you fully
qplali fy for your STA apportionment. TDP_ Audit reports will
address this efficiency criteria.
17
7perat.or=s STA Qu lifyi.ag ..ri.teria (99314.6) - WORMSEEF_
FISCAL YEA -P, 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03
(use audited data)
A. O-oerating Cos-
S. Ooeratirc Cos`
Exc=us-ons
2.
3.
c
C. Adjusted Operating
Cost
J. Revenue vehicle
Ours
E. RTF. Exclusions:
7
3.
(if more, snow on separate sheet)
F. Adjusted RVH
(D -E)
G. Ot>eratincr Cost
2()03-0^_
per RVH
(C+F)
W
X (
v Z
Efficiency Standard 1 .
Z must be less than or
equal to (Y)*(1.0246)
Snow calculation:
Efficiency Standard 2:
((X+Y+Z)=3] must be less than or equal to <(W+X+Y)=3)>*(1.0439)
Show calculation_:
--------For COG use onl--------------------- -
Onerator qualifies under: Standard 1 Yes No
- Standard 2 Yes No
18
4. r^_tteen Percent Expenditure Increase (6632)
l= any o= -he __ne items on the a --ached budget exceed by more than _30
the expenditure for that Same item in Lhe previ�L'S Vecar' S budget, then
cn explanation for -hat increase must be riven below. A -tach an ex-ra
cage if necessary.
S. Narrative Description (6632)
Please describe in the space below any changes in service characteris-
tics from the previous -riscal year. This should specifically include
any substantial increase or decrease in the geographic area served,
major changes to the scope of operations, or addition of major new fixed
facili ties. Please attach an additional page if necessary.
6. Certification by the California Highway Patrol (6632)
Please attach a certification_ from the CHP verifying that the
operator is in compliance with Section 1808.1 of the California
Vehicle Code. This section concerns the "Driver's Pull Notice
participation"
Is a Certificate Attached? Yes No
SPECK NOTES FOR RATIO CALCULATIONS
SMART - Exclude certain costs and fares as specified in the most
recent Compliance Audit Renort.
19
or cor_tracted cransocrpatior_ sery-ice providers, the San uoaguin
Counc__ of Governments' Executive Board 1 --as waived =he :arebox and
local sunDort ratios as _� is emnowered tG d0 by 99 :05 (C) �' ie COC
Board has established a two-step process.
NOT -E. CGntribut_rg Claimants should proceed to page 2
1. Match Requirement
cr anv article 8 transit claim, no more than 900 of the total
ooeraz_ng funds (minus depreciation) in the budc_et may be TDP (.MV
and STA) derived. The ten percent or more matching funds may come
=nomnti' =-e- S011rCe available t0 the Claimant beSiCPS TDA.
2. Operating Cost Per Passenger Objective
To receive an amount of TDA operating funds (LTF and STA combined)
in excess of what was claimed the previous fiscal year, the
claimant must establish an operating cost Der Dassencer objective
for the fiscal year of the claim. "O_Derating cost" is defined as
in the TDP. statutes and regulations. The objective should be a
realistic one based on current and past system performance, but
should be low enough to represent an "improvement" when warranted.
The COG Board will adopt the system -wide operating cost per
passenger objective for the fiscal year of the claim. Operating
cost per passenger objectives muse established by November of each
fiscal year.
if the system failed to meet its operating cost per passenger
objective in the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year of the claim,
then the claimant is only eligible to file a claim for the level of-
TDA
fTDA operating funding received in that prior fiscal year. in the
case of a unified transit system, each claimant would be limited to
the prior year's level of TDA operating funding. if a system
wishes to be eligible for increased TDA operating funding in a
Z fiscal year, then the claimant should identify an operating
cost Der passenger objective.
a. What was the level of TDA operating funding received in the
previous fiscal year for this system by this claimant (LTF
Dius STA) ? $ ! ,
b. Does the attached budget information demonstrate at least a
10% match of non -TDA funds in FY 2001-02? lS
-T—
Does the FY 2002-2003 budget demonstrate a 100i match of non -
TDA funds? 14 C115
J
20
d
e
fiscal year. no
If yes, di^ the system meet its operating cos_ _Der passenger
objective in r
i_ he previous f. i seal ye. r? yes
(Aa-_ _rmati v e arlswer s'_1oL' l d be documented ___ Part Ile o )
What was the last year's Operating Cosi. per Passenger Oi+jec-
tive? $6.50
What was -he actual operating cost per passenger?
i EV 2002-2003 CDerating Cost $ 2,173,591.37
Total Passengers 520,886
iii. ODeratina Cost Per Passenger
-i iii) 4.17
What is the Operating Cost _Der Passenger ObjecD_ve for this
claim?
iv. Budgeted Operating Cost $ 2,338,959
V. Estimated Total Passengers 540,000
vi. Projected Operating Cost
per Passenger (iv/v) $. 4.33
vii. FY 2003-2004 UPERAThvG COST PER
PASSENGER OBJ ECT V E $ 8..65
THE PROJECTED 03-04 OPERATING COST PER PASSENGER (vi) MUST BE
LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO THE 03-04 OPERATING COST PER -PASSENGER
OBJECTIVE (vii)!
viii. If this claim is for a unified transit system z, has
the contributing claimant been appraised of the
pl vrd system -wide objective set in vii. above?.
' If this claim is for a unified transit system (definition page 23), all
calculations and numbers for operating costs per passenger must include system
totals.
21
3 . - _ f teen Percent Expendi tare Increase ( 6 63 2 )
i ar_y of the line _tems on the attached hudget exceed by more than
i55, the expenditure -cr that same item in the previous vearIs
budget, then an explanation nor that increase must be c_ven be low.
Attach an addi`ional race if necessary.
The additional expenditure to the Transit Administration sublet service accounts
was due to the addition for Security at Lodi Station and Lodi Station Parking
Structure.
4. Narrative Description (6632)
Please describe below any changes in service characteristics =rcm
the previous 7 -fiscal year. This should specifically inc'ude any
suhsua__tial increase or decrease in the geographic area se=ed,
major changes to t he scope O' Operati OP_S, Or aadiziOn O. major new
_Xeu rac-*71L_eS.
Operations costs saw an increase of almost $175,000 this year due to the additional
operations costs associated with the Parking Structure, Security, as well as electric
and cleaning.
22
11CLE b CONTRACTOR TDA REQUIRE,MEN'SS (CONTRIEUI
c—asa ' a�:11. - - --d - rant - 1: 3VSLem 11 -_^els L•aCe is zo ce 1 -:Sea
by_= ^r :ter: �__:C_1c1_lam n rarer _ a` p age S 20 iiroLC 22.
I I - - '.j - 11 i d G s - e e _
,.._., L elm �._..._.S_- .�7 J-�-.:1 _J /..�-� e one L at aJ ... �� JQm _r, -
S__' CLL'_e ~:.rougrnout the service area, but Whose exLens=s are
C a -.-icer :.v tw(-O Q---er.--_—. TJ _ C! aJman-s. Ad(1 - t_ C'_'ld'__T
Gua____i as a un_Jff_e•d trans_ sys-em, all system TD. -,\i funaln g must
be claimed under Article 8 ('both claimants). "Ccntributing
Claimant" is de -Fined as the claimant contributing a minority of the
uni=ied transit systemm I S TDt? -funds . The claimant furnishing the
majorit_;i of TDA funds is de=_ned as the llprimary claimant. 11
Curie neer re =O-_ow=T'G ' JCa_ trans services Gua! _fy as uni f i ea
tr a ---s s•vs ems
FY 2003-2004 ij i = e T ^- iSi - —Sys --.=ms -his
Tracy Trans SKART
Tracy Taxi SMART
Escalon Public Transit System SMART
Manteca Dial a Ride SMART
Lathroo SMART
"Contributing claimants" need to answer the following questions:
1. Systemwide operating cost per passenger objective for r^Y
2003-2004 identified in primary claimant's adopted transit
claim
(from that claim, page 21, (2) f. vii.)
2. Date of primary claimant's adopted transit claim (or antici-
pated suture date, if not yet adopted)
IMPORTANT:
The operating cost per passenger objective identified above (page
21, (2) f. vii) will be applied uniformly to the total of City
and SMART TDA funds used by the unified transit system, to
determine eligibility for increased TDA funding as explained on
page 20. Separate calculations will not be done for City and
SMART.
23
DART IT --PEDE:STRLL AND ByCzC.LE PROJECTS
LOCAL TIPANSPORTATTION FUND
Project T --'`!.e & OescrIotlor_
New Sidewalk Installation
Downtown Improvements
Alley Reconstruction
?— o j ect Limits
School Street to
Sacramento
LTF Cost
Total Cost
se additional Daaes it necessary)
24
LTF Cost
Total. Cost
36,000 total,co
15,000 Total os
30,000 Total los
39,367 LTF Co$t
st
t
t
PART III - -ROAD AUND STREET PROJE`TS
Please trovide the requested _n=o=natior_ for each-roiect being
identified for Transportation Levelooment Act fundina.
LOCAL TR NSPORTATION F LIND
Project & Description_
New Sidewalk Installation
Lodi Avenue Overlay
Downtown Improvements
Lodi Ave/ Mills Signal Interconnect
Kettleman Lane Median Project
Proiect =sty
LTF Cost :
Total Cost :
(Use additional pages if necessary)
25
LTF Cpgt
Tota! Cos--
14,000
os_14,000
20,000
35,000
33,600
9,887
112,487.26
PART I - OTHER PUB POSES
_s possible tia� a china --a -Cay wish to ex--e-.-,d TDA_ ._,a NQS _;.
pL'r-jOses allowed w" L^i' the Act, but no -1- covered by --he three
Urevl.ous t_7artS . TDA funds may be c-l..,imed under Article 8 ccn sis-
tent with section 9940C Of --.,e 'DA. To compete this seco_o-r on
attached pages, identi y:
i. Project title
_i. Aonlicable subdiv_s=on of section_ 99400
Project description
iv. �stimated totes= cost
v. TDA contribution to that total
A seTJ''araLe page or pages should be submi_ted ffsr earn s-_ eciLic
project or purpose.
It is strongly recommended that the claimant consult with COG stag
before completing this section.
M:1TDAVTDA-04Vc acim04 , wpd
March 12, 2003 (3:002M)
26
ifl . y' . 0
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby
approve the City 2003-04 Transportation Development Act (TDA) claim for Local
Transportation Funds (LTF) in the following amounts:
$2,013,810,00 Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds
5,60 .00 State Transit Assistance (STA)
RE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby authorize the
City !Manager to execute the claim on behalf of the City of Lodi.
Dated: .. 004
I hereby certify that Resolution Na 2004-100 was passed and adopted by Ra
CouncilCity a held • iii rfollowingvote:
t1F. *Hitchcock,r ♦ Land, a
Mayor
1�30-Nqj
Sity Clerk
2004-100