HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - May 7, 2003 E-14CIOUNCIL COMMUNICATION
AGENDA TITLE: Adopt Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to File the Claim for 2002/03
Transportation Development Act (TDA) Funds in the Amount of $2,043,031
(Claiming $279,234 in Unexpended Carryover for Transit Operations) from the
Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and $7,285 from State Transit Assistance (STA)
MEETINGDATE; flay 7,2003
PREPARED Y. Pub4ic Works Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to
file the claim for 2002/03 TDA funds in the amount of $2,043,031
(claiming $279,284 in unexpended carryover for Transit operations) from
the LTF and $7,285 from STA.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Each year, the City of Lodi receives an apportionment of TDA funds
to support Lodi's transit operations and pod estria n/b i cycle costs.
These are State transportation funds that are primarily for
non -vehicular transportation but can be used on roads if those
other needs are being met. They are channeled through the Council of Governments, our regional
transportation planning. agency. The claim for fiscal year 2002/03, including pedestrian/bike and 3% for
San Joaquin Council of Governments planning, is $2,043,031 from the LTF and $7,285 from STA (see
attached),
The City Council should be aware that our transit operations, Diai-A-Ride and GrapeLine, are fuliy
funded with formula dollars from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), TDA, and other competitive
sources of funds. Transit is not dependent on any General Fund money. We intend to continue to use
TDA funds for transit-, pedestrian-, and bicycle -related projects and maintenance as much as possible.
FUNDING: Not applicable.
Prepared by Tiffam Fink, Transportation Manager
RCP11_F/pmf
Attachment
cc: Randy Hay,,,, City Attorney
Ruby Paisto, Accountin g Manager
APPROVED:
Dixon
Richard C. Prima, Jr,
Public Works Director
n --
C"DAGImm U4121103
TO: Son Joaquin Council of Governments
6 South 21 borado Street, Suite 400
Stockton, CA 95202
FROM: C i ty of Lodi, California
(applicant)
ADDRESS: 221 WeSt Pine Street Lodi, Californiz 95240
---------------
(city, zip)
CONTACT PERSONa — Tiffani M. Fink PHONE: 209-333-.6800. x267.8
The CLIV of hereby requests, in accordance
with Chapter 1400, Statutes 1971 and applicable rules and regula-
Lions, that iLs annual tvansportation claim be approved in the
amount of $2,043,031,00 for fiscal year 2002 2003 , to be drawT-
from the Local Transportation Fund.
When approved, please transmit thi
payment. Approval of the claim a
to this applicant is subject to
available for di5tribution, and 0
will be used only in accordance
annual financial plan.
3 claim to the County Auditor for
id payment by the County Auditor
such monies being on hand and
the provisions that such Monies
with the terms of the approved
The claimant certifies that this Local Transportation Fund claim
and the financial information Qontained therein, is reasonable and
accurate to the best of my knowAdge, and that the aforementioned
information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds
for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634
and 6734.
APPROVED:
San Joaquin Council
of Governments
By -.
JULIA E. GREENE
Executive Director
Date- 20
Applicant -
Signed:
6
Name:
Title - _Ci ty_Manager
Dote I
20
TO. San Joaquin Council of Governments
6 So-Ljth B! Dorado Street, Suite 400
Stockton, �A 95202
FROM: City of Lodi, California
(applicant)
ADDRESS
%city, zip)
CONTACT PERSON.- Tiffani M. Fink PHONE: 209-333-6800 x 2678.
This claimant, qualified pursuant to Sections 99313,6, 99314.5
and 99314.6 of the PubliC Utilities Code, hereby requests, in
accordance with Chapter 1.400, Statutes of 1971 as amended, and
applicable rules and regulations, that an allocation be made in
the amount of $ for fiscal year ggp21200_, to be
drawn from the State Trans -it Assistance trust fund of San Joaquin
cou"atv,
Allocation instz,,uction and payment by the County Auditor to this
claimant are subject to such monies being on hand and available for
distribution, and to, the provisions that such monies will be used
only in accordance with the terms of the approved claim.
The, claimant certifies that this State Transit Assistance Fund
Claim and the financial information contained herein, is reasonable
and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforemen-
tioned info,-mation indicates the eligibility of this claiman.t for
funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC
Section. 6634 and 6734.
APPROVED: Name
San Joaquin Council
of Governments
By
JULIA E. GREENE
Execi.itive Director
Date- 20
Applicant:
Signed:
7
'Title; -Liu_M"A92r_
Date:
20
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT APPORTIONMENTS
1. Local Transportation Fend available Apportionment
A.
Area Apportionment 2012W
$1,727, I C12
13,
Pcdc.strian/Bicycle Apportionment
36,6.45
C,
Previous Years` Unclairned ATx portiC3itmont
0
D)
Urwxpendecl Carryover
279;284
E
3% for C.OGFransit Planning
54,968
F.
Total Available, i4r 2002-03 Claims (s)
2,097,999
G
Doss any I -TF Already C la:imed 2002-03
IT,
TOTAL A.L AVAILABL FOR THIS CLAIM.
$2,097,999
(Aku enter on Page 9, 1 st columin)
3,
Actual net funds available (-D-E=T)
$1,763,747
II. Stats Transit Assistance Fund Available Apportionment
A.
Area Appottionment 20432/03
$0
B,
Special Oporato.r Apportionment 2002-03
„ n. TR 4,748
C.
Previous oars' Unclaimed Apportionment
2,537
D.
Unexpended Carryover
0
E.
2% for COG Transit Planning
F,
Total Available foo 2002-03 Claims (s)
� 7,285
C1,
Less any STA Already Claimed 2002-03
0
1-1.
TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM
$7,285
(Also enter on page 9; 2nd column)
I.
Actual not fbnds available (H -D-5=1)
$7285
9
TRANSPORTATION EVEL PM i `l AC's' ALLOCATIONS
`ION
lam PuffoseI. LTF II, STA
L PUBLIC: TRANSPORTATION
Article 4 (99260) - Operator' $0
Cis Ser, 6730(x) Public Transit $7,285
Article 8 (99400 (c))
Contractor operating 1,951,418
Arklc 8 (99400 (Q))
Contractor capital 0 0
Article 8 (99400 (b ))
Passenpi, Rail So.rvicc
Operations & Capital
'FDA Administration
II. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE
Article 3 (99234j
HL ROADS AND STREETS
Article 8 (99400 (a))
lvOTHER.
Article; 8 (99400 (b,c,d,e))
V. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
54,968
36,645
0 0
0 0
Transportation Planning 54,968 0
` OTAl. THIS CLAIM $2,097,999 $7,285
TOTAL AVAILABLE, ABLE, FOR TRIS CLAIM
(from page 8, I, H. and I'I. H.)
UNCLAIMED APPORTIONMENT
$2,097,999 57,285
t OTAL AVAIL„ Less TOTAL THIS CLAIM) $0 $.0
L,t1;t P€3RTo avoid accidental overpayment, please idents and itemize in the space below
any unexpanded earryover included in the amounts being claimed above. Identify the amount of carryover
and the purpose for which it i,s Wing reclaimed. Attach pages as necessary,
Unexpended Carryover in TDA Fund being reciaianed for Transit Operations, $279,284
Opgrators claiming STA funds must onset qualifying criteria (PUC Section 99314.6),
Pago 17 oCthis form must be completed.
9
k
Artich 4 Operator
._...
r rtic(0 8 Contractor �
401. P,,,, sse ngei F a.r ("s
402 Special Transit Dares
405 Charter Service: Revenue
406 Auxiliary :fraiisporlation
Revenues (iuc ndes adveri�isimO
407 None iransportoion Revenues
property Tax
40S T aN Reve.tatne (Spcc,ify�)
Property Ta;.
Salts Tax - ivlcasui-e K
409 Local Grants & Reirnbursernienat~s
Purchase of Sci %ice
Local Transportation Fmid (f,TF)
410 Local Special Fares Assistance
411 Statc Cash ( grants and R.eimbursemci
Sw�,, Tranit Assistance (STA)
Offier_ interest
Other: i�-lisccllanaeous
412 Stan- Special Fare Assistance
413 Federal Grants & P.eirnbuBements
(Sp(-cify) FTA Grants
430 Contribut0 Services (Not Cash)
440 Subsidy froux catNer S; ,ctor of
C.Sp erG€6oub
TOJAi,
11. CAPITAI, REVENUE
464 Capital Grants & Subsidies
Specify Fled, State, Local:
i��L al
Aix' L)istrict
State
lyleasure, K
State Transit Assistaiwc. (STA)
T-ocal Transportation Fund (L,TF )
Other
TOTAL,
GPERA'rING EXPENSES
301
labor"
509
Operators Salaries/Wages
514
011501salaries/Wages
502
Fringe Benefits
`03
Services
5104
\1ner,als's ppres
Fuels/Luhricants
"fires'-rubcs
Vehicle Maintenance
305
l itilities
306
Casuitty/Liability Costs
56;
Faxes
SCS
Purchased Transportation Service
509
Miscellaneous Expenses
514
Pxpense Transfers
51 i
interest Expense
512
Leases and Rentals
5 t 3
Depreciation/Amortization
Operator Funds
Grant Funds
1O'TAZ
IN% CAPITAL EXPENSES*
Debt Service
Land Property Acquisition
Vehicles
Construction
Other
TO FAL
* Allowable capital expenses are limited for Article 8
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION*
Actual
Actual
Proposed
FY 2000-01
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
I, Paix 1lge
a. Totat Passengers (including elderly)
438,932
518,805
530,000
b. Revenue Passengers
c. Youth Passengers
d. Elderly and lIandirapped
51,863
48,679
50,000
Passengers
2, Vehicle Miles
a. Total Vehicle Miles
0
0
0
b_ Revenue Vehicle Miles
504,010
520,169
520,169
3, Revenue Vehicle Hours
45,535
45,127
45,500
4. Revenue Vehicle Fuel
C_onsut7l 11
a. Diesel
0
0
0
b. Gasoline
0
0
0
c. CNG
0
0
0
5. Fare Structure
Fixed/D.A.R.
Fixed/D.A.R.
a. Base
50.50/$2.00
$0.5052.00
$050/$2.00
b. Ione
C, Youth
d. Senior
$0.25/$1,00
$0.25/$1.00
$0.25/$1.00
e. Handicapped
$0.25;$1,00
$0.25!$1.00
$0,25/$100
"i M nthly Pas
$20 -General, $10-Senior/Disabled/Medicare
g. Other
h. Average Fare
$0291$1.07
$0.31$1.36
$0.3/$1.35
*Attach additional pages as necessary to alter
or complete description
12
THREE YEAR
Operating Expenses
Operating Revenues:
Sources: L.TF
STA
Federal
Fue:s
Gleirmi Fund
Rew
Measure i
Toral
Capital Expenses
Capital Revenue:
Sources: LTF
STA
Federal
Air District
Other
N/Icasure K
Total
13
FLEET INVENTORY
(Transit Vehicle Owners Only)
Vehicles to be Purchased in FY 2002/03
0
0
TOTAL 6 0 0 N/A NIA
14
Standard
# Wheel-
(
i# of
Fuel
Seat
chair
Ramp
Lift
Malce S: Model
Year
Vehicles
Type
Capacity
Positions
(y/n)
(yhr)
Chevrolet Caprice
1994
1
tINL
5
0
n
n
Ford F 350
1993
2
IDSL
18
4
n
y
Ford F 350
1994
2
CNG
16
4
n
y
Ford E350
1995
5
CNG
16
10
n
y
Mord Senator
1996
3
UNL
66
6
n
v
Ford Senator
1996
2
UNL
44
10
n
y
Amtrans Senator
1991
I
CNG
33
2
n
y
N ABI Low -Floor
2000
5
CNG
185
10
y
n
CNG DAR Ruses
2001
6
CNG
48
24
n
y
TOTAL
N/A
27
iNT/A
1 431
1 70
1 N/A
N/A
Vehicles to be Purchased in FY 2002/03
0
0
TOTAL 6 0 0 N/A NIA
14
ARTICLE 4 OPERATOR TDA REQUIREIIIENTS N14
1. Fare Ratio/Local Support Requirements
All Article
4 claimants are required to
maintain a
specified ratio
of fare revenue to operating cost.
in addition, SMART only is
required to
maintain a ratio of fare revenue plus
local support to
operating cost of 32%. See 99268.2
- 99268.19
for details and
exemptions
pertaining to ratios.
A. What is this system's required farebox recovery ratio?
B. Does the attached budget demonstrate that this system will
meet its required farebox recovery and for SMART its farebox
plus local support ratios?
C. Has this system utilized its grace year?
D. Has this system been in non-compliance with its required
ratio?
If yes, identify the year or years
2. Extension of Service/New Service MIA
An extension of service or new service is exempt from the
reTul--ed farebox and local support ratios if:
(
A. The extension of service or new service has been in operation
for less than two full fiscal years. The two-year extension
of services exclusion applies until two years after the end
of the fiscal year.- in which the extension of services was put
into operation.
B. The claimant submits a report on the extension of services
to the COG within 90 days after the end of the fiscal year.
(For details of the report, see 6633.8(b)).
Is an extension of service/new service being claimed?
If so, has the required report been submitted for the most
recently completed full fiscal year? If not, that
report must accompany this claim.
15
3. Operator's STA Qualifying Criteria (99314.6) EXPLANATION O/A
A transit operator must meet one of two efficiency standards before
STA funds may be allocated for qpe:Iatn
purposes:
A) The operator's operating cost per revenue vehicle hour, in
the latest year for which audited data are available, must
not exceed the sum of the preceding year's operating cost
per revenue vehicle hour and an amount equal to the change
in the Consumer Price Index (CPI)' multiplied by the pre-
ceding year's operating cost per revenue vehicle hour.
The formula below accomplishes this exercise:
(opcost/RV'H)FY01 < [(opcost/RVH)FYOO] * [1.0764] OR
B) The operator's average operating cost per revenue vehicle
hour, in the latest three years for which audited data are
available, must net exceed the sum of the average of the
operating cost per revenue vehicle hour for the three
years preceding the latest year for which audited data are
available and an amount equal to the average change in the
CPI for the same period. The formula below accomplishes
this exercise:
AVG(opoost/RV'H)FY99,00,0l S fAVG(opcost/RV-H)FY98,99,00)
(1_04221
As used here. operating Costs are defined by Ruc Section 99247:
All costs in the operating expense- object classes exclusive
of the costs in the depreciation and amortization expense
object class, and exclusive of all direct costs for providing
charter sex -vices, and exclusive of all vehicle lease costs.
STA allows for other exclusions, to be granted by the COG, if
deemed appropriate. These additional operating cost exclusions
include:
1) Exclusion of cost increases beyond the change in the CPI
for fuel, alternative fuel programs, insurance, or state
and federal mandates,
2) Exclusion of start-up costs for new services for a period
of not more than two years (refer to PUC Section 99268.8
for a definition of new service).
If you wish to claim these exclusions when calculating the
operation cost per revenue vehicle hour, you must State the
request and show calculations in support of the cost to be
excluded.
Percentage change across fiscal years using the California CP1.
in
Pursuant to PUC Section 99314.6 (c), funds withheld from alloca-
tion to an operator for failure to meet the STA efficiency
criteria will be retained by COG for reallocation to that
operator for two years following the year of ineligibility. Any
STA funds not allocated before the commencement of the third year
following the year of the eligibility shall be reallocated to
cost effective, high priority regional transit activities, as
determined by the COG.
The following documents pertain to the new STA efficiency standards
and are available at your request:
PUC Section 99314.6, also known as Chapter 35 Statutes of
1991 (SB 3 -Kopp'.
The Uniform System of Accounts for Public Transit operators.
Consumer Price Index Data for, California, January, 1981
through July -August, 2001.
Transportation Development Act Audit Reports, FY 1992 through
FY 20011
Please complete the attached worksheet to determine if you fully
qualify for your STA apportionment. TDA Audit reports will
address this efficiency criteria.
M
3. Operator's STA Qualifying Criteria (99314.6) _ WORKSHEET
FISCAL 1999-00 2000--01 2001-02 2002-03
(use audited data) _
A. Operating Cost _
B. Operating Cost
Exclusions:
i.
3,
C. adjusted operating
Cost (A -B)
D. Revenue Vehicle^
Hours (RVI -1)
E. RVH Exclusions:
7
-----
3. — Tm
(if more, show on separate sheet)
F. Adjusted RVr_-1
(D -E)
G. Operating Cost
per RVH
(C=F)
W
Efficiency Standard 1:
Z must be Tess than or equal to (Y)*(1.019$)
Show calculation:
Efficiency Standard 2:
;(X+Y+Z)=31 must be less than or equal to <(W+X+Y)--3)>*(1.0201)
Show calculation:
___=====For COG use
Operator qualifies under: Standard 1 Yes No
Standard 2 Yes No
18
4. Fifteen Percent Expenditure increase (6632)
IEL any of the 'line items on the attached budget exceed by more than 15%
the expenditure for that same item in the previous year's budget, then
an explanation for that increase must be given below. Attach an extra
page if necessary.
The costs associated with services and utilities increased more than 15% last year
due to additional costs for security and power -at the Lodi Station Parking Structure.
5. Narrative Description (6632) N/A
Please describe in the space below any changes in service characteris-
tics from the previous fiscal year. This should specifically include
any substantial increase or decrease in the geographic area served,
major changes to the scope of operations, or addition of major new fixed
facilities. Please attach an additional page if necessary.
6. Certification by the California Highway Patrol (6632) N1 A
Please attach a certification from the CHP verifying that the
operator is in compliance with Section 1808.1 of the California
Vehicle Code. This section concerns the "Driver's Pull Notice
participation"
Is a Certificate Attached? Yes No
�EJPECLAL NOTES E'QR RA' IO CA]aCULATIQNS
1_
SMART - Exclude certain costs and fares as specified in the most
recent Complia�ncg A dit Re art.
�l
M
Article 8 Contractor TDA Requirementb
For contracted transportation service providers, the San Joaquin
Council of Governments' Executive Board has waived the farebox and
local support ratios as it is empowered to do by 99405(c). The COG
Board has established a two-step process.
NOTE: Contributing claimants should proceed to page 23,
Match Requirement
For any Article 8 transit claim, no more than 90% of the total
operating funds (minus depreciation) in the budget may be TDA (LTF
,and STA) derived. The ten percent or more matching funds may come
from any other source available to the claimant besides TDA.
2. Operating Cost Per Passenger Objective
To receive an amount of TDA operating funds (LTF and STA combined)
wn excess of what was claimed the previous fiscal year, the
claimant must establish an 2PQx_at_ing._cost per oassenggK-objective
for the fiscal year of the claim. "Operating cost,, is defined as
in the TDA statutes and regulations. The'objective should be a
realistic one based on current and past system performance, but
should be low enough to represent an "improvement" when warranted.
The COG Board will adopt the system' --wide operating cost per
passenger objective for the fiscal year of the claim. Operating
cost per passenger objectives most established by November of each
fiscal. year,
if the system failed to meet its operating cost per passenger
ob'ective in the 'fiscal year prior to the fiscal year of the claim,
then the claimant is only eligible to file a claim for the level of
TDA operating funding received in that prior fiscal year. In the
case of a unified transit system, each claimant would be limited to
the prior year's 'Level of TDA operating funding, if a system
wishes to be eligible for increased TDA operating funding in a
future fiscal year, then the claimant should identify an operating
cost per passenger objective,
a. What was the level. of TDA operating funding received in the
previous fiscal year for this system by this claimant (LTF
plus STA) ? $ IMZ�Z72___ '
b. Does the attached budget information demonstrate at least a
10% match of non -TDA funds in FY 2001-02? yes
Does the FY 2002-2003 budget demonstrate a 10% match of non -
TDA funds? _YS-a—
BE
9
d
e
To this claim requesting more TDA operating funds than were
received for this system by this claimant in the previous
fiscal, year? _yes --
if yes, did the system meet its operating cost per passenger
objective in the previous fiscal year? ye& -
(An affirmative answer should be documented in Part "e"')
What wthe last year's Operating Cost per Passenger Objec-
tive? 7, 89
What was the actual operating cost per passenger?
--2002 1
FY 2001 operating Cost $ --2,3a6,403- 6 5
ii.. Total Passengers 518,805
Operating Cost Per Passenger
(i /ii) $ 4 45
What is the Operating Cost per Passenger Objective for this
claim?
iv, Budgeted Operating Cost $ 2,381,117
v. Estimated Tote' Passengers 5:30000
vi.
30OLOvi. Projected Operating Cost
per Passenger (iv/v)
$ a act
vii. FY 2002-2003 OPERATING COST PER
PASSENGER OBJECTIVE $ 6.50
THE PROJECTED 02-03 OPERATING COST PER PASSENGER (vi) MUST BE
LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO THE 02-03 OPERATING COST PER PASSENGER
OBJECTIVE (vii) 1
viii. If this claim is for a unified transit system2, has
the contributing claimant been appraised of the
planned system --wide objective set in vii. above?
2 If this claim is for a unified transit system (definition page 23), all
calculations and numbers for operating costs per passenger must include system
totals.
a
3. Fifteen Percent Expenditure Increase (6632) N /A
if any of the line items or, the attached budget exceed by more than
15% the expenditure- for that same item in the previous year's
budget, then an explanation for that increase must be given below.
Attach an additional page if necessary,
4. Narrative Description (6632)
MR
Please describe below any changes in service characteristics from
the previous fiscal year. This should specifically include any
substantial increase or decrease in the geographic area served,
Major changes to the scope of operations, or addition of major new
fixed facilites,
M
.ARTICLE 8 CONTRACTOR TDA REQUIREMENTS (CONTRlBUTING CLAIMANTS) NIA
In the case of a "unified -transit -gy-st.—em, " this page is to be used
by the "contributing claimant" rather than pages 20 through 22. A
"unified transit system,, is'defined as one that has the same fare
structure throughout the service area, but whose TDA expenses are
claimed separately by two different TDA claimants. Additionally,
to qualify as a unified transit system, all system TDA funding must
be claimed under Article 8 (both claimants). "Contributing
claimant" is defined as the claimant contributing a minority of the
unified transit system's TDA funds. The claimant furnishing the
majority of TDA funds is defined as the "primary claimant,'"
Currently, the following local transit services qualify as unified
transit systems:
E.Y.2-0-011-9-02 Unified
Tracy Trans
Tracy Taxi
Escalon Public
Manteca Dial a
Lathrop
Transit System
Ride
111—!SEa�Used �b
SMART
SMART
SMART
SMART
SMART
"Contributing claimants" need to answer the following questions:
Systemwide operating cost per passenger objective for FY
2002-2003 identified in primary claimant's adopted transit
claim
(from that claim, page 21, (2) f, vii.)
Date of primary claimant's adopted transit claim (or antici-
Dated future date, if not- yet adopted)
I_MPORTANT.
The operating cost per passenger objective identified above (page
21, (2) f. vii) will be applied uniformly to the total of City
and SMART TDA funds used by the unified transit system, to
determine eligibility for increased TDA funding as explained on
page 20. Separate calculations will not be done for City and
SMART.
a
PART Il - PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROJECTS
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND
LTF Cost
Project "Citta & Description Project Listing Total Cost
24
PART111 - STREET AND ROAD PROJECTS
Please provide the requested information for each project being
identified for Transportation Development Act funding,
LOCAL TRANSPol:TATION FUND
LTF Cost
Project Title & Description Project Listing Total Cost
25
z
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby
approve the City 2002-03 Transportation Development Act (TDA) claim for Local
Transportation Funds (LTF) in the following amounts:
7,285.00 State Transit Assistance (STA)
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby authorize the
City Manager to execute the claim on behalf of the City of Lodi.
Dated: May 7, 2003
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2003-78 was passed and adopted by the Lodi
City Council in a regular meeting held May 7, 2003, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL (MEMBERS — Beckman, Hansen, Howard, Land, and
Mayor Hitchcock
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None
l
SUSAN J.BLACKSTON
City Clerk
FOR
ITEM E.14
The enclosed revisions to the Transportation Development Act Claim reflect minor
changes the City received last minute from the San Joaquin Council of Governments,
which acts as the administrator of the claim. The increase to the Local Transportation
Fund amount reflects the addition of COG's administrative costs into the claim amount.
The actual amount that the City will receive remains unchanged from the original
Council Communication,
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION ?UND
TO: San Joaquin Council of Governments
6 South Q barado Street, Suite 400
Stockton, CA 95202
ROMs City of Lodi, California
(applicant)'
ADDRE, S S 221 a . . . . . . eqtLgdi_,_cal ifornia 95240
(city, zip)
COXTACT pBRsoN:_Tiff ani
_..M, QRk PHONE,— 2,09-333-6BOO x2618
The Ci of L hereby requests, in accordance
. AY -_0
With Chapter 1400, Statutes 1971 and applicable rules and regula-
tions, that its annual transportation claim be approved in the
amount of $_ 2,097,999 for fiscal year _99QL20Q!_, to be drawn
from the Local Transportation Fund,
When approved, please transmit this claim to the County Auditor for
payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor
to this applicant is subject to such monies being on hand and
available for distribution, and to the provisions that ouch monies
will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved
annual financial plan,
The claimant certifies
s that this Local Transportation Fund claim
and the financial information contained therein, is reascon ible and
accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforemention,ed
information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds
for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634
and 6734,
APPROVED:
San Joaquin Council
of Governments
By E
UULIA B. GE NE
Executive Director
Date -
Applicant
Signed:
20
19
Name -
T i t 1e r
Date -
20_
PLEASE CIRCLE EITHER.,
z-ticle =I Operator
Pt'ticie 8 Contractor�
401 l'ts.ssett er E sat es
402 Sl7eci.<ti .f,rx w"it :Fares
� W( Uhartrt surviceReienue
406 _4 m0i.ary :f azaspori:atiott
!u�:c,-.,
..rzti'us (Includes a[.ve't'tisttlg)
4107 Nml-h-aim�portation Revenues
PropertN, Fax
408 Fax Rovelttse t;specify: )
Property Tax
Sales'Fa.x - Measure K
409 I,€cal.. (xrants & r u-nbw-seMeDts
Put'dmse of Servic�
I-oc,ai IItansportanoti Fund (IA. -F)
'1 E.) i :Hart Sp(czial Fare Assistance
4 I t Starz Cash Grants and Reimburse mei
t:..tc t3a.sitAssista:tce (STA)
Ot.h,er: Interest
Ott.r~ miscelIlancocas
412 State Spt, ciat Dare Assistance
41 1 (Ae.ai (_grants & ofi-nburse;.r eats
(Spot: J,-,! FTA Grants
43 €} C oi.itributed Servicas (Not Cash)
=NICD `rlbsjd, tiom otbci Sector of
i}21c'I'attf3S15
TOTAL
L
11, CAPI"FAL REVENUE
464 Capiml Gree rt:s & SUbsiclies
`�rwcifv Fed, Statu, [soca[:
I �.cir�t �ti
,:fir District
Share
�4eastrrey:K
S1:aIC f-t-,t11Sit Assistance (STA)
Local transportation Fund (1:.,`]T)
f:3tl��tr
TO rA1_
M. OPERATING EXPENSES
a
1 z
>a
OperawisSalaries/Wages
s,
OffierSalaries/wages
�02
F1 Inge Belle fits
I
': a
:s
n s
,l,ra wmits
u. Funds
>Aid>-.Ma.r
m
rtilitles
>»
: Costs
z
«l a: capital experiscs are I a for Arfide:
Purchased n , m Service
>a
Miscellaneous ma
s,
e Flarisfels
sI
interest
I
Leases and Rentals
s>Depreciation
a :
Operator a
u. Funds
OTAL
m
CAPITAL aa
Dclat Sca vic,
and rzzAcquisition
Consfluctioll
Other
. ±
«l a: capital experiscs are I a for Arfide:
Is this claim requesting more, TDA operating funds" than ei y
eceived for this system by akzis claimant in,ahe; Pzevaos�"
fiscal year.
d. If yes, did the -system meet its operating cost per passetager
objective in the previous fiscal year? „� a
(Au affirmative answer should be documented in Part f�i`..
e. What was the last year's Operating Cost per Passenger Ob er
tive? $7.89
What was the actual operating cost per passenger?
i, FY 2001-2002 Operating Cost $ 2,345,280
ii. Total Passengers 518,805
,l AA . Operating Cost Per Passenger
(i /ii) $ _4.52
f, What is the Operating Cost per Passenger Objective for this
claim?
iv. Budgeted Operating Cost $ 2,381,217
V. Estimated Total Passengers 530,000
vi, Projected Operating Cost
per Passenger (iv/v) $
vii. FY 2002-2003 OPERATING COST PER
PASSENGER OBJECTIVE $ 6,50
THE PROUECTED 02-03 OPERATING COST PER PASSENGER (vi) MUST BE
LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO THE 02-03 OPERATING COST PER PASSENGER
OI3ITECTIVE (vii) ! -
viii. If this claim is for a unified transit systemz, has
the contributing claimant been appraised of the
planned system -wide objective set in vii. above?
If this ciazm is for a unified transit system (definition page 23), all
calculations and numbers for operating costs per passenger must include system
totals.
21
F ?SRT H - PEDESTRIAN ANIS BICYCLE PROJECTS
I OC Ai M,� NSPORIA ZION FUND
_LTF Cost
Plojeci Title & Description Project Listing Total Cost
24