HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - January 2, 2003 I-02MEETING DATE: January 2, 2003
PREPAREO BY. Public Works Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the city Council direct staff to pursue:
a) A long-term lease for the City Hall Annex for the Finance and Information Systems Departments;
b) A long-term lease of the retail/office space in the Lodi Station Parking Structure to the private sector,
as previously directed; and
c) Continue with plans. to rernodel the old Public Safety Building for Fire Administration,
Fire $tation No. 1, Community Development and Public Works Departments, and for City Hall to
house the Administration, Finance and Human Resources Departments,
BACKGROUND If FORMATION� The Finance Department has been located in leased space in the
City Hall Annex, 212 West Pine Street (The Beckman Building), for
approximately eight years. The lease expired on August 31, 2002.
We are presently on a month-to-month rental arrangement.
Given the issues surrounding air -borne PCE/TCE contamination relating to this facility, staff was directed
by the City Council last Spring to develop alternatives for moving the Finance Department to other office
space. This work has been done in conjunction with current planning studies for the remodel of the old
Public Safety Building once the Police Department moves to their new building in early 2004.
At a recent Shirtsleeve Session Staff presented a number of alternatives for relocating the affected
departments. The presentation handouts from that session are attached. In addition to those
alternatives, shown, staff also presented an option of leaving the Finance and IS Departments in the
Annex with the understanding that air quality and other issues staff has with the building could be
mitigated. At the conclusion of the meeting, staff indicated we would pursue these mitigations.
Since that Shirtsleeve session, the ductwork and attic space in the Annex has been cleaned and the
intehoc of the building was cleaned. Another round of air quality testing was done and the results
indicate there is no compelling reason to vacate the building based on air quality issues. We will: need
be vigilant in our maintenance schedules and there are some minor repairs/improvements to be made.
A sumr-nary of the report is also attached.
A meeting with the consultant and building staff was held on December 19, in two sessions, so that all
interested employees could attend. While most of the Finance staff attended, no one from
Information Systems attended. Finance staff was clear in their opinion that they should be moved from
the building,
APPROVED'
Dixon (Flynn --- OtVlOanager
12123/02
City Office Space
January 2, 2003
Page 2
Dealing with issues surrounding building air quality complaints in the absence of measurable air
contamination is difficult at best. While there is no question of how most of the building's employees feel
and symptoms they present, there is no consensus that any specific action will solve the problem. For
example, owners of brand-new buildings can experience similar issues.
Additional air quality testing has been done recently at City Hall and Carnegie Forum for comparison
purposes and results will be presented at the Council meeting.
In, the event Council directs that Finance be moved from the Annex, staff would recommend that one of
the options utilizing the parking. structure be selected. From the long term perspective, Option 3 which
puts Finance back in City Hall, their planned future location, makes good sense. In that case,
Information Systems would be moved to Carnegie Forum as soon as the Police Building is finished.
FUNDING: None at this time.
RCP/DCiPmf
Attachments
cc: Randy Hays, City Attorney
Vicky McAthie, Finance Director
Rad BarOam, Community Deveiopment Director
Mike Pretz. Fire Chief
Oty,
'. Officespace doc
Richard C. Pri a, Jr.
Public Works Director
Susan Blackston, City Clerk
Joanne Narloch, Human Resources Director
Jerry Adams, PoIic;e Chief
Steve Mann, Information Systems Manager
Civic Center Space
Planning
City Council Shirtsleeve Presentation — October 15, 2002
Decisions/Assumptions to Date
Council Directed that. Finance Dept. vacate Annex by
Spring 2003.
* New Police Bldg. to Rouse Police Dept. ivi 2004
Information Systems to occupy Carnegie Forum
basement following Police move to new building (2004),
Fire Station AdmIni strabo , Station 1, Public Works and
Community Development .opment to occupy cold PSB in 2005/06
fiollowIng remodel.
City administration, Finance and Human Resources to
occupy City Hall (2005!06).
Police Bldg. . izacludes 6,370 SF open space; on second
Boor for lease, future Police use after 30+!m years.
1
City Hall Space Current Issues
o Inadequate space for current Community
Development Dept. staff.
o Inadequate space for current Human
Resources Dept. staff.
Inadequate space for groot b in. other
Departments.
c3 Goal. to move full-time office staff from
basement,
I
Disclaimers
o Given the rough level of the planning for the scenarios, cost
estimates are p elimirhary and. need to be refined, However,
they should be adequate, for comparison Purposes.
ii Potential lease terms may also affect costs or feasibility of the
scenarios.
* Space layouts are also preliminary and are done to enough
detail only to deter -nine feasibility, They will sheen to be
refined. as we, work with the individual departments.
a Scenario numbers are for identification only, they do not
indicate any suggested priority,
Interim Scenarios
n Finance; & HR to Parking Structure, IS to old. Saba
Building, CTD expands to SIR. area in City Hall.
`irtance to Parking Structure, HR to mobile office,
IS to old Sales Building, CDD expands to HR. area.
5l
CDD 'T Public Works to Parking Structure, tS to
old Saks Building, Finance to City Hall, City Dalt
modifications to allow HR expansion.
4 CDD & Public Works to offsite mobile office,
Finance & IS to City .lull, Hit expansion per 3).
> Finance to City ball, CDD & Public Works Admin
to Annex., HR expansion per 3).
I
r Scenarios Not Developed
n Merit finished office space;
Insuf ici(nit space Downtown
Costs would vary deponding on location/state of building
Generally problematic for public/city staff
if Scenario d) is prefernA, we should reconsider this possibility
Mobile offices within (civic Center
Severe parking impacts
Previously disrnissed by City Council
o Lease space In Police Building
No parking improveram t
Cast For TTFs approxia-Wely $90,000
Space identified for San Joaquin County
Space, could accommodae Finance Dept. only
Parking ' )tructure, IS to Saks Bldg.
cl Sales Bldg. -- currently ]eased for PCE/TC'E Public
Document archive. Lease would Meed to be
extended.
Small portion planned for some City staff.
* Unused storage space could be converted for IS with
some additional walls, electrical & data dine work.
e Costs include;
R
S75,000 00 For tenant iniprovernents
$36,000 for lease (assumed l$ oaths)
4
in
Parking tr., IS to Saks Bldg. (ont'd
* Parking Str. — planned for lease to private developer,
* Finance & FIRwould need 7,400 SF at north end
(leaves 2,725 SF for lease).
a l- elps solve Civic Center parking and loss of Annex
parting lot on. Oak,
E3 Costs include:
$452,000 for tenant, improvements
Slightly ever half reusable by future dQveloper
) r in.
Parking t_ r ... (cont'd)
2
I
{
Parking Structure, ... (cont' d)
0 "etails - I ) . JS to Saks
Bldg. (cont'd)
9
Parking Structure... (cont'
in
'Scenario Details - 2,
1s ®a , (nt'd
m
Scenario Details - 3.) C;
* CDD & PW would neer 8,000 SF at north end
(leaves 2,725 SF for lease).
* Helps salve Civic Center parking and lass of Annex
parking lot on Oak.
* Costs include.-
$467,000
nclude; 467,000 for tenant improvements
Slightly over half reusable by future, developer
Some work in City ball, compatible with long-term- plan
Saks sante as acenarlo l)
GDD & PIA' Avail, For Lease
9
,i vetans -
Parking dare e a a co
Rall ont
10
k
10
Modifications for JAR expansion.
mobiles, Finance/IS City Hall
o Of site City -owned locations Include:
N. sick Lockeford btwn. Stockton & Washington
oget Parc site
utchins Street Square
Guild l ve,/Thnnan St. property
o Cost is approximately $400,000 and up depending
on site work needed,
o Public convenience & ether issues with moving
outside Downtown
Iff
In
13
Admin to Annex, Finance City Hall
* Minimal improvements needed in annex
* Mostly puts Finance & HR in -final places
ij Some minor improvements in City Hall to
accommodate HR & Finance similar to 3)
* PW Engineering to remain in City Hall basement
until other space available
* Main cost is continued Annex rent (no current
lease, on inonth-to-month basis)
c Parking as -is
MI
k_,,ost Summary
Civic Center Interim Space Needs Costs
Scenarios
Parking Structure (permanent)
$255,000
1) Finance & HR in
2) Finance in Parking
3) CCD & Public
4) CDD & Public .) CDD & Public
Parking Structure, !S
Structure, HR in mobile
Works In Parking
Works in offsite Works Admin to
in old Saks Building.
office, :1S in cold Saks
Structure, 1S in old
mobile office; Finance :Annex; IS stays in
$75,000
Building
Saks Building, Finance
& I:3 to City Hall ..Annex, Finance to
Item
$0
. ................
to City Hail
City Hall
Tenant Improvements
Parking Structure (permanent)
$255,000
$146,000
$266,000
$0
$0
Parking Structure (interim)
........ ... ..
$197,000
... .. ..
$178,000
................
$201,000
.............
$0
0
Saks Bldg.(interim)$75,000
$75,000
$75,000
$0
$0
Mobile Office Lease ( 42 mos)
$0
. ................
$:68,040
- $0
$246,000.
_
$0
Saks Rent ( 18 mos)
$36,000
$36,000
$36,000
$0
$0
Parking Structure 'Fent°'
$20,000
$20"000
$20,.000
$0
$0
City Hall Minor Modifications
$0
$'0
$108,000
$128,000
$108,000
Annex Hent (42 months)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$281,000
Mobile Office site work, n1j'sc
........ ......... _.
$0
$62,000
$0
$110,000
$0
loving expenses incl. data (2002103)
$53,000
$53,000
$900.000
$105,000
$72,000
. . . ....... ......... .
Total,
$636.,.000
$ 38oO40
$805,000
$589:,000
$461,000
"Permanent' subtotal.
$2.55,:040
$146,000..
$374,000
$126,.400.
$108,.00
Net (total - permanent).
___.....
$381,000
_...
$492,040
$432,000
-
$461,000.
$3 53,000
.. ...
Increased cost over renting annex.
$100,000
.. ....
$211,040
.... ..
$151,000
..._..
$180,000
$72,000
- ipotesi.
.............
.... ...
(permanent) means expenses that would likely be recouped through future
. . .. ........ ............. .. ..... ..... .........
lease or use of City property that would otherwise need to be dune
(.interim) means expenses thatwould likely be
retained by .Dinner or, redone by future tenant and of
no long-term benefit to City
Parking Structure rent based on estimated lost income from potential lease to private developer
Does not include office systems furniture for
anyplanned staff additions nor any parking improvements
Figures in italics very preliminary estimates
...................
still to be confirmed
_ ...............................
. . .
Triasterane Chemical Consulting & Analysis
Analytical & Safety Services 2798 Forest Lake
Road
City of Lodi
Public Works Department
221 West fine Street
Lodi. CA. 95241-1910
Atte: Mr. Bennis Callahan
Fleet and Facilities Manager
Mr. Callahan.
A ca po, CA. 959,9.®-9563
(209) 334-6420
December 19, 2002
Air sampling on December second, 2002, at the City of Lodi, City Hall Annex Building, located at 221 W. Pine, and
subsequent lab analysis has resulted in the recommendations contained herein.
17ris report is an executive summary listing results, recommendations and status of each item. This report will also
serve as a working document that can be utilized to track the status of each of the items requiring action.
All results are summarized in the tables listed below with a brief summary in italics following each table.
LCarbon Dioxide ane[ Carbon Monoxide
Air sampling (Dosimeter tubes), for carbon dioxide, resulted in readings that were all below the Occupational
Safety and Health Association (OSHA), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH)
and ;national Institute un Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) limits of 5000 ppm. The average carbon
dioxide (CO2) levels throughout the building were below the lower end of the American Society of Heating,
Refrigerating and Air -Conditioning Engineers, Inc. (ASHRAE) recommended g -u delines of 700 ppm above the
outdoor air concentration W, concentrations in acceptable outdoor air typically range from 300 to 500 ppm.
High ('O, concentrations in the outdoor aur can be an indicator of combustion and/or other contaminant sources.
I'lie iyproal CO2 concentration in the Stockton area is 350 ppm; therefore, the upper level for acceptable indoor
('G, concentrations is 1950 ppm, The maximum reading from any location was 859 ppm.
Air sampling (Dosimeter badge), for carbon monoxide resulted in readings that were below the ACGII-I. NIOSH and
OSTIA limits of 25 ppnr. NAAQS (National Ambient Air Quality Standards) suggest a carbon monoxide level of 9
ppm. Sample results contained a high reading of <0.63 ppm.
Carbon Dioxide & Carbon Monoxide Resu1t� �®simiter Tubes]
` n �----I ''�I ample I Sample SampleFRm104
ple � 1
1 #2
-.--. .- PEL Smith Son r Rib 11 � 1m8 � West �6t #78.. G—G TL
ASHRAE
Sam le ham Ie Sam le S7m le
OSHA Rm 919 Rm 1 Rib 111 Rm Rm 102 Rm 1p2 Gtm 111 ACG€H NAAQS
TLV
North
12102102 Dain cco
�Auntin billing 1 —Billing Break Gail'sProcessingCollections Collections Room Office_
Carbon 5000 628 j 620 704 gf / 739 783 859 688 ' 5000 -1650
Dioxide .pLmpLmppm
Carbon 25 Gpm <Q 56 r x6.69 0�59 1- <Q59 x0.59 <0.63 <0.65 25 pp --m 1 9 ppm
Monoxide rbo_
Can Bla_nk f2e1t;rence 18500 —— — — — — -
Dioxide
:Carbon lBlank Refelcnce 23.5 i
- t
Monoxide it -
+ Sample #S� Sa9p—#�1—
_T1e1210it00 .ample #1�SaSample #3 Sample�
#1#1
C _ ____
888 911 6 3
}IGXIdG
rcroon t___ ?c 0 100 �}...
1 --
Monoxide e
Carbon 161ank '2efar no5000 r 1 1 —
fatOXldP 10 - -
--------
Ca, auk
MReference 10 J —�
i C I
Monoxide lo : I I '
Air sampling for carbon dioxide, with a continuous monitoring system, resulted in only one reading above the
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air -Conditioning Engineers, Inc (ASHRAE) recomnended
upper guideline (--1050 ppm). The maximum reading was 1219 ppm, which is just above the ASHRAE
recommended upper guideline. The carbon dioxide (CO3) levels throughout the building averaged 668 and 760
ppnM which is considerably below the. (ASHRAE) recommended guidelines of 700 ppm above the outdoor air
concelu ration.
Air sampling for carbon monoxide, with a continuous monitoring system, resulted in readings that were below the
A('U(II, NIOSH and OSHA limits. NAAQS (National Ambient Air Quality Standards) suggest a carbon monoxide
level of 9 ppm. The highest reading was 7 pain, but only for one minute. The average readings were 0 and 1 ppm.
%REA
DATF
Carbon I)io8ide
122"02
t
Mtin
kA v� v4av
1v
_
9 1) 11 3,
5
X668 475
0
( est
11:40-11:59
1 198
X481 574
0
Test 3
1 142-4: 1 p
524
760 11219
1 0
Temperature Hurin
"P
Min TAvs a TMlm FAvf
1 7 48.2 1 72.4 124916.
'2 7' 39 5 83 5
?5 4 6 , 39 4 43.0
0 1-64 r 7L2 �_.
0 71.7 73.0 1 737 38 9 42.4
The chemical sampling perfbrmed.lor carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide at this location indicates there is
exo exposure to hazardous levels for these chemicals.
The results obtained from the 12/01/00 sampling that correlate to the 12/02/02 sampling locations are included
bor reference only. However, the values from the 12/07/00 sampling are not significantly different fi-oin the
12J)2/02 sampling.
Dust
'sir sampling for total dust, resulted in readings that were below the OSHA limit of] 0 mg/mIl ppm.
'rite sarnlzling peaformed far (lust at this location indicates there is no exposure to hazardous levels.
Dust samples were not collected during the 12/01/00 sampling.
1a-iehl®vogAhvle�ae (d'OEl aatcE'I'etraclalaroetlxvletre�fl'6.E-lrerchioroeih}+lenel
Air sampling for trichloroethylene resulted in readings that were all below the OSHA, ACGIFI and NIOSH limits
of 25, 50 and 25 ppm respectively. The highest: trichloroethylene concentration reported was <0.031 ppm, which
is :0.012% of the OSHA limit.
Air sampling for tetrachloroethylene resulted in readings that were all below the OSHA, ACGIFI and NIOSH
limits of 25 ppm. The highest tetrachloroethylene concentration reported was <0.012 ppm, which is <0.048% of
the OSTIA limit.
The cherazical sarnplitig performed for trichloroethylene and te£raehloroethylene at this location indicates there
is no exposure to hazardous levels for these ehernlcals.
[lie results obtained front the 12/01/00 sampling that correlate to the 12/02/02 sampling locations are included
for reference only. However, the values from the 12/01/00 sampling reported values at two locations that were
greater than the 12/02/02 sampling, but still less than the OSHA Iimits�
20e)ISI t)ge�
Air sat2lphiig for Organics per NIOSH methods 1500, 1501 and 1003 provided results that were all below the
OSHA and ACGIII limits for each of the chemicals. All concentrations were below the detection limit for the
samples.
12 02,'02
NIOSH 1500, 1501
and 1003 Sampling
g
Location
Location
Location
Location
Sample #6
#1
#2
#3
#4
OSHA
Data
Accounting
Billing/
Offices
Blank
AGGIH
PEC
Processing
Collections
Room 104
TLV
1,1,2= frichloroe.thane
10 ppm
<0,014
,0.015
<0.014
<0,014
<0.000916
10 ppm
1,1-Dichloroethane
100 ppm
<0.019
<0 020
<0.019
<0.019
<0.001
100 ppm
1,2,3-Tnchloropropane
10 Penn
<0.013
<0,013
<0.013
<0.013
<n_000829
10ppm
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
25 ppm
<0.013
<0.013
<0.013
<0.013
,0.0009315
25 ppm
,2-Diehloroetharo
1 ppm
<0.019
<0.020
<0.019
<0.019
"0-001
10 pool
1,4-Dichiorobenzeno
10 ppm
<0-013
<0.013
<0,013
<0,013
,0.0009315
10 ppm
Benzai Chloride
1 ppm
,0.015
,0.016
<0,015
<0.615
<0.0009663
1 ppm
Benzene
1 ppm
<0.024
<0.025
<0.024
<0.024
<OOol
O.5ppm
Bromochloromethane
200 ppm
<0.015
<0-015
<0.015
<0.014
<C_0009445
200 ppm
Biomotoon
0,5ppm
<0.008
<0.008
<0,008
<U07
<0-0004835
0,5 ppm
Carbon Tetrachloride
2 ppm
<0.012
<0.012
<0.012
<0_012
<0-0007945
5 ppm
Chiorobenzene
10ppm
<0.017
<0a18
<0.017
<0.017
<0.001
10ppm
Chloroform
2 ppm
<0.016
<0.017
<0,016
<0.016
,0.001
10 ppm
Cumene
50 ppm
<0.016
<0,016
<0.016
<0.016
,0.001
50 ppm
Cyclohexane
300 ppm
,0.022
<0.024
<0.023
<0.022
-0.001
100 ppm
Gydohexene
360 ppm
<0.023
<0.024
<0.023
<0.023
<0 00
300 ppm
Ethylbenzeoe
100 ppm
<0.018
<0-019
<0.018
<0,018
,0.001
100 porn
Eithylenediahlonde
1 ppm
<0-026
<0.026
<0,026
<0,026
"0-001663
10 Pam
Heptane
400 ppm
<0,019
<0.020
<0.019
,0.019
<0-000516
400 ppm
Hexachloroethane
1 ppm
<0.008
,O 008
<0.008
<0.008
"0.001
1 ppm
Hexane
50 ppm
<0,022
<0.023
<0.022
<0.022
<0-001
50 ppm
Methylchloroform
350 opm
<0.014
@.015
<0.014
<0.014
<0.001
350 ppm
Methylcycioinexane
400 ppm
<0.019
<0,020
<0.019
<0,019
,0.001
406 ppm
Naphthalene
10 pool
<0.015
<0,015
<0.015
@.015
"0.0009535
10 ppm
Octane
360 ppm
<0,017
<0.017
<0.017
<0.016
,0.601
300 ppm
;aentare
600 pprn
<0.026
,0.027
<0.026
<0.026
,6.001
600 Pool
Styrene
50 ppm
<0.015
<0.019
<0,018
<0.018
-0.001
20 ppm
Tetrachioroethene
25 Penn
<0,011
<0.012
<0.011
<0.011
,0000737
25ppm
Toluene
50 ppm
<0.021
,0.021
<0.021
<0.020
,0 .001
50 ppm
Trichloroethene
25 ppm
<0.031
<0.015
<0.014
<0.025
,0.001
25 ppm
vinyitoiuene
50 ppm
<0916
<0.017
<0.016
<0.016
,0901
50 ppm
Xylene
100 ppm
<0.018
<0.019
<0.018
<0.018
,0 .001
100 ppm
a-Methylstyrene
50 ppm
<0.016
<0.017
<0.016
<0.016
=0-001
50 ppm
p-t-Butvltoluene
1 ppm
<0.013
<0.013
<0.013
<0.013
,0.0008245
1 ppm
12/01.00
1,1,2 rich:oroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2,3-Tflahioropropane
1,2 -Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,4 -Dichicnobenzene
Benzal Chloride
Benzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromoform
Carbon Tet;achleride
Cnierobenzene
Chloroform
Cumene
Cyclohexane
Cyclohexene
Ethylbenzene
Ethyienedichlonde
Heptane
Hexachloroethane
Hexane
Methvlchioreform
Niethylcyclohexane
Naphthalene
Octane
Pentane
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyltoiuene
Xylene
a-Methylstyrene
p-t-But}ltotuene
N IOSH 1500, 1501 and 1003 Sampling
25 ppm
Sample #13
Offices
Room 104
<0.0169
<0.0228
,-0.0153
-0-0154
<0.0233
<0.0I54
<0.0178
<0.0289
<0.0174
<0.00893
--0.0147
--0.0201
-0.0189
-0.0188
<0.0268
-O) 0276
<0.0213
<0.0228
<0.0225
,0.00953
<0.0262
-0.0169
<0.0230
<0.0176
,0.0198
<0.0113
-0.0217
<0-0136
<0.0245
50 ppm
Sample #1
Sample #3
Sample #8
OSHA
Data
.Accounting
Billing/
PEL
processing
50 ppm
Collections
10 ppm
<0.0169
-0.0373
<0.0215
t00 ppm
-0.0227
--0.0503
<0.0290
10 Path
<O.G1S3
--0.0338
<0.0195
25 ppm
<0.0133
-0,03339
<0.0194
1 ppm
-0-0232
<0-0513
<0.0296
10 ppm
-0-0153
<0.0339
<0.0195
1 ppm
<0n178
<0.0393
@.0227
1 ppm
--0.0312
<09637
<0.0367
200 ppm
-0.0174
<0.0385
<0.0222
0.5 ppm
-0.00890
-0.0197
<0-0113
2 pprn
-0.6146
--0.0324
<0-0187
10 ppm
-0.0200
-9.0442
N.0255
2 ppm
--0.0188
<0,0417
<0.0240
50 ppm
-0.0187
-0.0414
<0.0239
300 ppm
-0.0267
<0-0592
<0.0341
300 ppm
-0.0274
<0.0606
<0.0349
100 ppm
<0.0212
<0-0469
@.0270
1 ppm
--0.0227
<0.0503
<0.0290
400 ppm
<0.0224
-0.0497
<0.0286
1 ppm
-0.00949
-0.0210
<0.0121
50 ppm
0-0454
--0.0578
<0.0333
350 ppm
-6-0169
<0-0373
<0.0215
400 ppm
-0.0224
-0.0507
<0.0292
10 ppm
--0.0175
-0.0388
<0.0224
300 ppm
<0.0197
<0.0436
<0.0251
500 ppm
-0.0312
0.279
09398
50 Ppm
<0.0?.16
-0.0478
<0.0275
25 ppm
6.0198
0.107
<0.0173
50 Ppm
<0.0244
<0-0540
<0-0311
25 ppm
Sample #13
Offices
Room 104
<0.0169
<0.0228
,-0.0153
-0-0154
<0.0233
<0.0I54
<0.0178
<0.0289
<0.0174
<0.00893
--0.0147
--0.0201
-0.0189
-0.0188
<0.0268
-O) 0276
<0.0213
<0.0228
<0.0225
,0.00953
<0.0262
-0.0169
<0.0230
<0.0176
,0.0198
<0.0113
-0.0217
<0-0136
<0.0245
50 ppm
-0.0190
<0,0421
<0.0243
<0,0191
100 ppm
-0,0212
-0.0469
<0.0270
-0.0213
50 ppm
-0.0190
-0.0421
<0.0243
<0.0191
1 ppm
-0.0152
-0,0336
<0.0194
<0.0152
Blank
ACGIH
TLV
<10
10 Ppm
<10
100 ppm
<10
10 ppm
<10
25ppm
<10
10 Ppm
<10
10 Pam
<10
1 ppm
<10
0,5 ppm
<10
200 pain
<10
0.5ppm
<10
5 Pont
<10
10 ppm
<10
10 ppm
<10
50 ppm
<10
100 ppm
<10
300ppm
<10
100 ppm
<10
10 Ppm
<10
400 ppm
<10
1 ppm
<10
50 ppm
<10
350ppm
<10
400 ppm
<10
10 Pam
<10
300 Ppm
<10
600 Ppm
<10
20 ppm
<10
25 ppm
<10
50 pprn
<10
25 ppm
<10
50 ppm
<10
100ppm
<10
50 ppm
<10
1 Ppm
The chenfacal sompling perfortiled for this group of NI0,VH chemicals at this location indicates there is no
exposure to hazardous levels for these chemicals.
The resins obtained from the 122/01/00 sampling that correlate to the 12/02/02 sampling locations are included
for reference only, 1-1covever, the values from the 12/01/00 sampling reported a few values that were greaten than
the 12/0102 sampling, but still less than the OSHA limits.
Fhe bald values represent the reference samples, the values in italics indicate bioaerosols values that were higher
than the reference sample, and the values underlined represent bioaerosol values that were present in the indoor
sample but not /n the reference sample. NIOSIi states that the biological levels should be equal to or less than the
outside levels and eompanson of the indoor and outdoor organisms should be similar in type. Samples 1, 2 10, 3,
4, and t i were compared to reference sample #14. Samples 5, 6, 12, 7, 8, and 4 were compared to reference
sample Y13.
Chere does net appear to be an indoor source of microbial/fungal growth or amplification in this work area at this
time. There are a few locations where the concentration of mold/fungal growth is greater than the reference
sample for that area, but these results do not indicate a major problem or cause for concern. Previous surveys of
these work areas indicated there was visible water damage in the ceiling. The water damaged building materials
should be repaired if this has not yet occurred.
Biological Sampling
[Aycelial Fragments
Pollen Coact
iota! Fungal Sparse
Altermana
?"I rWspores
Adhrnium
Ascospore=
b�pergiIlus/Pen (Ahum
3esidiospres
6ipotat'ls/Dresshler
Cieetomium
-imps `j,J` mum
CGNulana
Nsmspore
Ddium/Pe ronaGp,Ora
Pithoany: es/Ulocladlum
KustS
S nuts/fvlyxorngcetes
Stachybotrys
1 arida
U ,identlfied Con;dta _ 1.3 13 7 7
l)P =Data Proeesstng, h = Accouning; R Reference, B/C = Bilhug/Collections; O =Offices
7
7 13
The biological sampling performed at this location indicates that there does not appear to Bre are indoor source
of niticrobiakfiingal growth or amplification in this work area at this.
Ref
Ref
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample Sample.
Sample
#1
i€2
#1)
#3
#4
#11
#14
#5
0
#12
#7
#8
#9
#13
#15
DP
DP
DP
A
A
A
B/C
13/C
B/C
O
0
O
Rm
Rm
Rm
Rm
Rm
Rm
R DF A
Rm
Rm
Rm
Rm
Rm
Rm
R -8!G
8
1i3
1'13
113
112
118
112
ReoP
102
102
102
111
104
106
0
17
=
<7
7
7
13
<7
13
40
<7
13
7
7
20
0
c7
'7
<7
e7
<7
,
7
7
7
<7
7
<7
a7
<7
0
180
180
53
753
453
293
4347
1587
2073
813
720
1273
680
6033
0
7
7
20
13
13
7
47
100
97
27
113
153
40
387
520
?20
40
320
347
167
467
t3
7
7
27
33
47
40
213
73
180
27
33
100
20
200
03
13
27
13
33
40
240
3'33
20
87
87
107
1113
233
540
233
213
247
193
1667
7
7
7
7
7
i3
7
13
60
7
100
120
73
2600
647
460
453
87
473
200
3333
7
7
7
13
7
7
7
7
13
-
27
7
p
27
53
60
66
7
40
80
73
U ,identlfied Con;dta _ 1.3 13 7 7
l)P =Data Proeesstng, h = Accouning; R Reference, B/C = Bilhug/Collections; O =Offices
7
7 13
The biological sampling performed at this location indicates that there does not appear to Bre are indoor source
of niticrobiakfiingal growth or amplification in this work area at this.
Samples 2 and 3 were compared to reference sample #18. Samples 8 and 9 were compared to reference sample ##19,
Samples 13 and 16 were compared to reference sample #20.
Fha results obtained from the 12/01!00 sampling that correlate to the 12/02/02 sampling locations are Included
for reference only. However, the values from the 12/01/00 sampling (as compared to the appropriate reference
sample) are not significantly different from the 12/02/02 sampling (as compared to the appropriate reference
sample),
A summary of the CIH recommendations from the 12/2/02 sampling and the status of each are as follows:
a Assure regular maintenance of the IJVAC system is performed including changing the filters regularly
urith a medium grade filter.
a V erify the ventilaiton rate is adequate for the it Limber of occupants in this building. ASHRAE
recommends office spaces have a maximum occupancy of 7 individuals per 1000 square feet and 20
cubic feet per minute (cf n) per person of outside air to maintain acceptable indoor air quality parameters.
0 Verify the building air intakes are reasonably free from reentrainment of contaminants such as
automobile exhaust, cigarette smoke and other outdoor contaminants.
® Assure the outside vents are secured to eliminate any additional entry points to the attic for the pigeons.
0 1'lie data processing area, where the major water leak was initially reported in December 2000 appears to
be free from mold/fungal growth at this time.
Biologicals
121/01100
Sample
Sample
Sample
Sample Sample
Sample Sample
Sample
Sample
91
#3
918
#8 #9
#19#13
996
920
Dow
Accounting
Ret
Billing/ Biking/
Ref
Offices
Break
per
Processing
Collections Collections
Room
Room
104
Mycelial Fragments
<7
<7
20
<7 13
<7
<7
<7
<7
Pollen Count
<7
<7
<7
<7 7
<7
<7
<7
<7
Total Fungal Spores
80
73
1087
67 107
833
180
140
760
Altermaria
7
20
13
7
7
Ameraspores
13
13
133
20 27
60
13
27
40
Aftherium
Ascaspores
7
7
247
13 7
93
73
7
127
Aspergillus/Penrul!1um
193
133
147
Basidiospores
7
200
27 13
153
20
7
167
Cnaetumium
7
Cladosporium
60
27
247
47
340
67
280
Curvularia
Nigrospo€a
Old rimtPeronospora
7
Rusts
7
7
Smutsimyxomycetes
7
13
7 7
7
40
7
Torula
Unidentified Conlon
7
27
27
Fha results obtained from the 12/01!00 sampling that correlate to the 12/02/02 sampling locations are Included
for reference only. However, the values from the 12/01/00 sampling (as compared to the appropriate reference
sample) are not significantly different from the 12/02/02 sampling (as compared to the appropriate reference
sample),
A summary of the CIH recommendations from the 12/2/02 sampling and the status of each are as follows:
a Assure regular maintenance of the IJVAC system is performed including changing the filters regularly
urith a medium grade filter.
a V erify the ventilaiton rate is adequate for the it Limber of occupants in this building. ASHRAE
recommends office spaces have a maximum occupancy of 7 individuals per 1000 square feet and 20
cubic feet per minute (cf n) per person of outside air to maintain acceptable indoor air quality parameters.
0 Verify the building air intakes are reasonably free from reentrainment of contaminants such as
automobile exhaust, cigarette smoke and other outdoor contaminants.
® Assure the outside vents are secured to eliminate any additional entry points to the attic for the pigeons.
0 1'lie data processing area, where the major water leak was initially reported in December 2000 appears to
be free from mold/fungal growth at this time.
I hope the information provided is clear, however, if you would Like or require additional clarification, please do
not hesitate to call upon me at your convenience.
I -hank you for the opportunity to work with you on this project. I hope that I may be of assistance to you on
future projects.
Sincerely,
B.J. Fenn
Analytical Chemist Consultant
Triasterane Analytical & Safety Services
RETAIL SPACES IN TIIE NEW PARKING GARAGE
Page I of 2
Jennifer Perrin or ow 2m
-:.- --- - — -- -- ---- -- : ----- _
From: Jennifer Perrin
Gent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 8:15 AM
To: 'sheri@sheris.com'; Susan Blackston; Susan Hitchcock; Emily Howard; Keith Land; John Beckman;
Larry Hansen
Cc: Dixon Flynn; Janet Keeter; Randy Hays; Richard Prima
Subjects RE: RETAIL SPACES IN THE NEW PARKING GARAGE
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Didreckson:
This reply is to confirm that your message was received by the City Clerk's
Office and each member of the City Council. In addition, by copy of this e-mail,
we have forwarded your message to the following departments for information,
referral, or handling: 1) City Manager, 2) City Attorney, and 3) public Works
Director.
/s/ Oenn:.fer M. Perrin, Deputy City Clerk
___`-Original Message -----
From sheri@sheris.com [mailto.sheri@sheris.com]
Sent. Monday, December 30, 2002 6:02 PM
To: Susan Blackston; Susan Hitchcock; Emily Howard; Keith Land; John Beckman; Larry Hansen
Subject, RETAIL SPACES IN THE NEW PARKING GARAGE
Happy New Year to all!
into the retail spaces at the new parking garage.
Please DO NOT do this. These have been designed as retail spaces to
help continue to enhance downtown Lodi. •
on the ground floor and we do not need more.
Darrell & Sheri Didreakson
Sheri's Sonshine Nutrition Center
11212003
RETAIL SPACES INTHENEW PARKING GARAGE
Sheri Didreckson
Sheri's Sonshine Nutrition Center
6 N. School St.
Lodi, CA 95240
(209) 368-4800
1/2/2003
Page 2 of 2