Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - December 17, 2003 E-17AGENDA ITEM Ew.17 CITY OF LODI %W COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TM AGENDA TITLE: Adopt Resolution Establishing and Updating Public Works Engineering Fees for Preparation of Agreements and Processing of improvement Projects MEETING DATE: December 17, 2003 PREPARED BY: Public Works Director RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council adopt a resolution establishing and updating Public Works Engineering fees for preparation of agreements and processing of improvement projects BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Council approved the current schedule of Public Works Engineering and miscellaneous fees in April 1999, and they took effect July 1, 1999. These discretionary services are typically funded in whole or in part by userfees. The proposed fee adjustments (Exhibit A) are based largely upon salary increases over the past four years, resulting from cost of living adjustments and salary survey adjustments. Several fees are comparable to the fees charged by the County and cities in the County. Fees included in this category are Plan Check, Inspection, and Improvement Agreements. A comparison of these fees for Lodi, Stockton, San Joaquin County, Tracy and Ripon is presented in Exhibit B. At the proposed schedule, Lodi fees will remain modestly below the surveyed agencies. Three new fees are recommended by staff and these are: 1) Improvement Agreement, 2) Improvement Agreement Addendum, and 3) Deferred Improvement Agreement. Over time, the breadth, scope and complexity of these agreements has grown to a level where the costs cannot reasonably be absorbed by the City. In other San Joaquin County cities, these discretionary services are charged in addition to the plan check charges for improvement projects. The fee for lot line adjustments is substantially higher than before, based on the level of effort and the fact that the original fee which was initiated in 1999 was underestimated. An annual adjustment formula based upon the Consumer Price Index (Western Region, Urban, unadjusted) is included in the fee schedule that applies to all fees except Plan Check and Inspection, as these are based on a percentage of construction costs. There was no adjustment clause in the prior fee schedule. As a result, the noted fees in Exhibit A will automatically increase on July 1 of each year. FUNDING: Not applicable. Prepared by F. wally Sandelin, City Engineer RCP/FW 5/pmf Attachments APPROVED: i Richard C. Prima, Jr. Public Works Director Flynn, City Manager CEngineenngFees. dac v 1 211 0/200 3 'La?N 1 01 RM+ WHEREAS, the Lodi Municipal Code requires the City Council, by Resolution, to sot fees for various services provided by the City of Lodi to recover those costs associated with providing specific services and programs, and WHEREAS, staff recommends increasing and establishing fees for the Public Works Department; as shown on the attached schedule narked Exhibit A and R. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lodi does hereby implement the fee schedules as attached hereto and made a pari of this Resolution. All resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are repealed insofar as such conflict may exist. This resolution shall be published one time in the Lodi News Sentinel, a daily newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the City of Lodi, and shall be in force and take effect January 15, 2004. dated: Decomber 17, 2003 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2003°244 was passed and ,adopted by .the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held December 17, 2003, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Beckman, Hitchcock, Howard, Land, and Mayor Hansen OCOUNCIL COUNCILNon@, ABSTAN. COUNCIL MEMBERS — None r SUSAN J. B'LACKSTQN City Clerk Exhibit A Engineering Fees Note Proposed Fee Revision Existing Fee Plan Check, First Submittal No Chane 90% of Estimated Final Approval Fee Plan Check, Final Approval 5.0% of first $50,000 3.0% of next $200,000 2.0% of amount over $250,000 4.5% of first $50,000 2.5% of next $200,00 1.5% of amount over $250,000 Improvement Areement 1 $1,500 None Improvement Amt. Addenda 1 $500 None Deferred Improvement Areement 1 $1,500 None Inspection 3.5% on engineered projects 2.5% on engineered projects Inspection on Overtime 1 $43.25/hour $39.90/hour Miscellaneous Encroachment Permit Sidewalk/Driveway (singleparcel) 1 $65 $50 Non -Construction 1 $32 $25 Downtown Sidewalk Encroachment 1 $32 (one-time) None Utility & Other Non -Public Construction 1 $32 plus 2.5% of construction cost for engineering and 2.5% for inspection $25 plus 2.5% of construction cost for engineering and 2.5% for inspection Document Preparation 1 $65 $50 Transportation Permits Single Trip No Chane $16 per Caltrans fee Multiple Tris No Chane $90 per Caltrans fee Other Address Chane 1 $21 $16 Street Abandonment 1 $963 plus traffic studies, if needed $750 plus traffic studies Easement Abandonment 1 $321 $250 Street Name Chane 1 $321 $250 Lot Line Adjustment 1 $1,200 $225 Impact Mitigation Fee Payment Agreement 1 $500 None These fees shall be adjusted annually by the inflation rate based on the prior calendar year as determined by the Consumer Price Index (Western Region, Urban, unadjusted). The rate of inflation (or deflation) is applied to the fees to determine the fees for the subsequent year. Said fee adjustments, if any, will be made automatically effective July 1 of each year. CEngineeringFee_ExhibitA.doc Exhibit B CEngineeringFee_Exhibit. doc 12/10/2003 Lodi Present Fee Lodi Proposed Fee Stockton Lathrop County Tracy Ripon Plan Check 4.5% of $50,000 plus 5.0% of $50,000 plus 5.5% of $25,000 plus 5.5% of $25,000 7.0% of $50,000 plus 3.5% 3.0% 2.5% of $200,000 plus 3.0% of $200,000 plus 3.0% of $225,000 plus 4.5% of $225,000 3.85% of $250,000 plus 1.5% of >$250,000 2.0% of >$250,000 2.0% of >$250,000 3.5% >$250,000 2.75% >$300,000 Inspection 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 3.0% 5% of $200,000 plus 3.5% 3.0% 3.85% of $300,000 plus 2.75% of $500,000 2.25% >$1,000,000 Improvement Agreement None $1,500 $4,000 None $900 $3,780 $1,000 Subdivision Agreement) Improvement Agreement None $500 $4,000 None None None None Addenda Deferred Improvement None $1,500 $4,000 $250 $410 $3,780 $2,000 - Agreement $4,000 CEngineeringFee_Exhibit. doc 12/10/2003 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.6 C.C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Joaquin I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested -in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the Lodi News -Sentinel, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and - published daily except Sundays and holidays, in the City of Lodi, California, County of San Joaquin and which newspaper had been adjudicated a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court, Department 3, of the County of San Joaquin, State of California, under the date of May 26th, 1953• Case Number 6599o; that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than non-pareil) has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereto on the following dates to -wit: December loth .................................................................................. all in the year 2003 I certify (or declare) under the penalty of penury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Lodi, California, this 26th day of December, 2003 Signature PFCFPLBIXS This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp Proof of Publication of Notice of Resolution No. 2003-244 6230 :e ethnically divided country we come together to debate to draft constitution but for - and by the government of resident Hamid Karzai. . The draft calls for a moderate ,lemic state dominated by a rongpresidencyy andhas yawn criticism from Islamic ard-liners who want a basic tw that is based on Islamic law sex trade sweep prompt follce call for new laws TORONTO (AP) Police in !anadWs most populous city leaded with the Ontario gov- rnment for tougher child-pro- ection laws Friday after they were compelled to release three eenage girls found during a, passive crackdown on the city's underground sex trade. Five girls, all aged 16 and 17, vere rescued the day before vhen officers. from five different Iolioe forces joined city, immi- ;ration and.child-welfare work - said in an exclusive interview with The Associated. Press that if US. troops managed to 4d Saddam Hussein in a hostile, foreign land; Colombian troops should be able to track down rebel commanders in their own homeland something they have not done in four decades. . "They found Saddam' in a hole, like a rat," the: battle -hard- ened Carreno said Thursday as he made $ whirlwind trip to - boost morale among his troops. "These gqys are rats too, hid- den id den away;in the jungle. And we can find them." CarrenP said he is targeting the seven members who make up the ruling secretariat of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombig, known as the FARC. But Carreno said his sights are really set on the top leader of the 17,000 -strong rebel group -- Manuel "Siireshot" Marulanda. _ PUBLIC 'sQICE )ody-rub andviassage ptiflors =; lnd "holis#c centers" across the The "ai treater Toronto Area. "This was. hot an issue of prostitution '©i morality," roronto police Staff Insp. Bruce 5mollet told a news conference. "This was about saving chil- dren and younger women from being forced to work in this in- dustry" But three of the five teens re- fused to go into custody, as_ is their right under Ontario's Child and Family'Services Act as: 1617 Berkeley Ave. $toekton, CA 95205 CHESTER W. WEBB 1617 Berkeley Ave. Stockton, CA 95205 This business Is Conducted by an Individ- ual. The registrants commenced or will.com- manos to transact business under the fkni- tbtsbusiness name or namesi above on 3703 11/2 a: CHESTER W. WEBB This is a now fichitious,business name state- ment. This statement was,fNad,with the Clerk of San Joaquin Csotrnty on d4ta catsd by Hie stamp; CERTIFICATION '. which only allows police to relo- con tate and protect chililmn under 12lt0/2003 . CoatonmedCopy GARY W. FREEMAN the age of 16. ASP "These aren't hookers," said D`o` Toronto police Det: Rueben Stroble. "They're children." New army; chief vows to DOC# 200$,MNM$4 capture,fill top rebel FICTITIOUS BUSINESS ARAUCA, Colombia (AP) - WILLI 321 cill The new con ander of the TI!p V of sor 27 NAME STATEMENT The following persons doing business , " _.' .� CER1 IFIGATION .ere as: CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE AND DESIGN 12lt0/2003 . CoatonmedCopy GARY W. FREEMAN 1209 Mouncq St. Lodi, CA 95240 County of San Joaquin V. PAULL Y. LERMA aaeaor-oorder-Camty Clerk AaRe Dec. 20, 27, 2009, Jan. 3, 10, 2004 --SM 731 Calan Dr. I" CA 95240 G€RI LERMA DOC# 200$,MNM$4 731 Willow Glen Dr. FICTITIOUS BUSINESS Lodi; CA 95240 NAME STATEMENT This business. is conducted by.husband The following persons are doing business and wile, as: The registrants commenced or will oom- CLEMENTS HILLS, LLC mance to transact business under the fico- 18721 Cherry Rd. thus business name or now shove on Wa. Lodl, CA 95240 s: PAUL V. LERMA MARKUS A. BOKISCH This is a new fictitious business name state- 18721. Cherry Rd. mens. Lodi, CA 95240 This statement was filed with the Cou BRAD GOEHRING Cleric of San Joaquin County on dater 241 Plains Ct. cated by filo34 CAT 1oN CA Qi i is by LLC. CMFI 12!1712003 This business conducted The 4epistf911Ss'ooRtrrlenced or will com- Conformed Copy mence to transgct business under the fid - GARY W. FREEMAN Uous business name or names gboye on County of San Joaquin 111104 Assessor-Rsoorder,County Clerk 8: MARKUS A. BOKISCH Dec. 20, 27, 2003, Jan, 3.; 10, 2004 - 6223 This Is a new fictitious business name state- ment. This statement was filed with the County DOC# 200S.Z841"4fi Clerk of San Joaquin County on date Ihdi- FIC7lTtOUS BUSINESS Gated by No stampp. CER7'iFICATION NAUt STATEMENT The following persons Are doing b4skieas ae: am'REOlIAN SAVE,MART. 3316 E: Main $t. County of San ;Joaquin Stockton, CA 95205 Asse&W Fla4gidar4 ocarty Cie* PINA KAUR Dec. 20, 27 2003; Jan.'3, 10, 2004 -6222 3¢75.Montw" BL STOCIdon. GA 95842', ir,, 1. .' Lodi, A 95240 This business is conducted by it p"er- sNp. The registrants commenced or will mm- mence to transact business under the Hdl- tious business name cc names. above 4n 111104 s: PINA KAUR This Is a new fictitious business name state- ment, k.. This statement v filed with the County Clark of San fAtin'County on data indi- Cated by file stain CE6FicA-noN 12111/2003 Conformed REr 41ARY W. F . MM County of San j6owi t Assessor-tleoorder•Crnty Clerk i Dec. 20, 27, 2003, San, 3, 10, 2004 - 6227 CASE 14UMOM PR 74487 STEVEN J. COTTRELL ... A corder -County Clerk ' t3 I% Jan 3; 10, 20(4 - :6224 Ot I3fIsrSso k i1E 11 ENT A arson iii- 'In f>}1sInOes as: 8 AMLESS RAlt�k BUTTER C 2 121 Sha�Pc g coli, CA 8 MCfJCfVNELL a w4ollducted by an Indlvld• A Law Corporatfan t Ave. i VL FRANCES ROUSH. F ROUSH and MARY Colombian army has already The registrants meted or. will com- also known as MARY F ROUSH and MATE OF MARY FRANCES ARY made a formidable New rear's mance to tressed business under the fids- ROUSH, -. - - _ti__ 1s __ 1.;11 .,4 4inim husinen name or name above on Th All hobs. beneficiaries. Creditors, 06W _.... _ . 171122003_ . Conformed Copy GARY W. FREEMAN County of Sa1r Joaquin Assessor-RgCdrder County Clerk Dec. 20, 27, 2003, Jan. 3, 10, 2004 - 6221 QOC#'20h3-853019 „! rIC I i I OW BUSINESS. NAME STATEMENT The following persons are doing buaines as: B.D.D. CLEANING; SERVICE 504 Northbank Cl. #139 Stockton, CA 9=7 JUAN M. GARCIA 504 Northbank Ct. ,$139 Stockton, CA 05207 MARIACRUZ GARCIA 504 Northbank'Cl. *139 9torJCM CA 95207 This buoiWas' is oortducted by huaba(r end wile 3 The rep(stranta .commenced or .will chi mence to transact business under the f dtil tlous business name or names .above orf 10!31103 e: JUAN M. GARCIA This is a new fictitious business name state menThis statement was Hied with the Gount Clerk of 'San Joaquin County on date Indl caked by file stamp. I CERTIFICATION ]( 30/3112.003. ggrtformed Cooppyy QARY W. FRfcEMAN County of tan Jrkr Aesessc► J3eFprsfe► County Clerk Nov. 29, Dec. 6 13, 20;:2003 - 61 t� BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODI AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the Lodi Municipat.Code requires the City Council, by Resolution,. to set tee8 for varlous servk aeprovfged by the City of Lodi.to recover those costs asooclatad with gra, vkfing specific services and pr.0grame, and WH€REAS, staff recommends Incroes" and establishing fees for the Public Works Ospsnntant, se shown on the attached schedule m 4*od Exhibit A and B. NOW,. THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lodi does t herelsy'ini 1amOrd the fear eghedulea 88 altactred hgreic and made a pan of this Readuuon� Ag,reiiclutions or'per'ts of resohrtiorts in conflict herewith are repealed insofar as such con - film may"k. . Tits ret#olutiort sltail 6a published one time in the Lodi News Sonfinel, a dail of yenarai dreulation,pdritad and published In the City of Lodi, and shall be in fol.== &Hoed January 15, 2004. Dated: December 17,2W3 therebythat Resolution No. 2003-244 was passed and adopted by the City Cour i of the City of Lad in a regular meetbng held peceirrbsr 17, 2003, by the following vote: AYES COUNCIL MEMBERS -+ Beckman, Hilchcgck, Howard, Land, and Mayor Hansen NOE& GOUNCIL.MEMBER,.I$ - None AOs&T COUNCIL' MEMBE' R$ - Norw ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None s: SUSAN J. BLACKSTON City Clerk v Exhibit A� Engineering Fees Nota Propped Fee Revision Existin Fee Plan Chock FIr� Submftw No Qhsnge. 9tri6 of Estimated Final. Approval Fee Plan Ctrailk. Final Apprewal 5.0% of first Ii50,QQ0 4.5% of first $50,000 310% of next $200,000 2.5% of next $200,000 2.0% oI amount over $250,000. 1.5% of amount over $250,000 Irnprovement4roomem 1 $1,500 None