Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - October 1, 2003 Public Comments (2)LODI CITY COUNCIL REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CARNEGIE FORUM, 305 WEST PINE STREET WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 1, 2003 C-1 CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL The City Council Closed Session meeting of October 1, 2003, was called to order by Mayor Hitchcock at 5:05 p.m. Present: Council Members — Beckman, Hansen, Howard, Land, and Mayor Hitchcock Absent: Council Members — None Also Present: City Manager Flynn, City Attorney Hays, and City Clerk Blackston C-2 ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION a) Threatened Litigation: Government Code §54956.9(b)(3)(E); statement made to City Manager threatening relationship between City and Booster of Boys and Girls Sports (BOBS) (CA) b) Actual Litigation: Government Code §54956.9(a); one case; Friedrich v. City of Lodi. et al., Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, Case No. CV 013678 (CA) PUBLIC COMMENTS: • Eunice Friedrich distributed and reviewed 13 pages of documentation regarding Case CV 013678 (filed). Ms. Friedrich stated that she was 63 years of age and had been disabled for the past 13 years. Two of her vehicles were tagged by Code Enforcement as inoperable. One vehicle was a 1974 Plymouth, which she later sold. Her 1991 Ford Taurus was towed away on July 6, 2001. She stated that the car had current registration, was in perfect working order, and she had just renewed the insurance at the end of June. Ms. Friedrich explained that she resided on East Oak Street; however, because of the narrowness of the street, she parked the Ford Taurus on North Pleasant Avenue. Ms. Friedrich phoned the City on July 6 to inform them that nothing was wrong with the vehicle and to ask that it be returned to her. Community Improvement Manager Joseph Wood denied her request. She then spoke with City Attorney Hays and asked where the vehicle was located so that she could retrieve the contents. Ms. Friedrich stated that Mr. Hays told her he did not know where the vehicle was, as the City uses many different companies to tow vehicles, and the car was likely being crushed. One month later Ms. Friedrich discovered that the vehicle was still at J&D Towing and she was able to retrieve the contents. An employee of J&D Towing informed her that the car would not be demolished because it was in good condition. Ms. Friedrich believed that the City was wrong to have towed her vehicle and asked that she receive reimbursement. • Debby O'Dell stated that she lived across the street from Ms. Friedrich and knew that her car had been running through June 2001. • Ginny Shults reported that she had signed an affidavit stating that Ms. Friedrich's vehicle was operable and that she used the car to transport items to be sold at animal fundraisers. She commented that Ms. Friedrich was the most honest person she knew. • Toyah Shults stated that she witnessed Ms. Friedrich driving the car. • Wilma Deen stated that she had known Ms. Friedrich for ten years and described her as a Christian and person of integrity. She read her affidavit: "I, Wilma Deen, pick up my mail every day at 325 N. Pleasant Avenue. I know that Eunice Friedrich parked her car at this address to avoid vandalism hit and run. She used it for special purposes. Many times I came there when the car was not in the driveway because she was using it. I also saw it parked on the street under the shade tree last summer." VICE CHAIRMAN HIGHER EDUCATION COMMITTEES: AGING AND LONG-TERM CARE HEALTH PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, RETIREMENT AND SOCIAL SECURITY Ms. Eunice Friederich 425 East Oak Street Lodi, CA 95240 Dear Ms. Friederich: �SsuahlV Uffornin �Pgislafurr ALAN NAKANISHI ASSEMBLYMEMBER, TENTH DISTRICT September 4, 2003 lo(d STATE CAPITOL P.O. BOX 942849 SACRAMENTO, CA 94249-0010 (916)319-2010 FAX (916) 319-2110 DISTRICT OFFICE 218 WEST PINE STREET LODI, CA 95241 (209) 333-5330 FAX (209) 333-5333 Please find enclosed a copy of the letter, wjtich I have recently received, from the City of Lodi. I believe that you will find their correspondence to be self-explanatory and trust that the information provided will be helpful to you. I regret that the information is not more favorable. I sincerely hope, though, that you will not hesitate to contact me again if you feel that I may be of assistance in this or any other regard. /:XEM81 Encl. Letter Sincerely, , `C.��0,1 ems^ ALAN NAKANISHI Assemblyman, l Oth District Printed on Recycled Paper CITY COUNCIL SUSAN HITCHCOCK, Mayor EMILY HOWARD Mayor Pro Tempore JOHN BECKMAN LARRY D. HANSEN KEITH LAND August 20, 2003 d CITY OF LO CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET P.O. BOX 3006 LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910 (209)333-6823 FAX (209) 333-6842 Office of Assemblyman Alan Nakanishi Attn: Michael Babowal 218 W. Pine Street Lodi, CA 95241 Mr. Babowal, H. DIXON FLYNN City Manager SUSAN J. BLACKSTON City Clerk RANDALL A. HAYS City Attorney D 5 Z003 i In our meeting with you this afternoon, City Attorney Randy Hays and I agreed to provide you with this letter which clarifies the procedures that were followed in the abatement of alL ino vehicle belonging to Eunice Friederich from the property at 325 North Pleasant Avenue, Lodi, California. California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 22660, establishes the authority for local jurisdictions to adopt ordinances establishing procedures for the abatement and removal of abandoned, wrecked, dismantled, or inoperable vehicles from private property as public nuisances. CVC Section 22661 establishes the specific provisions that must be incorporated into that ordinance and abatement procedure to ensure due process. Following those regulations, the following actions were taken. On June 15, 2001, two inoperative vehicles were noted in the driveway of a property located at 325 N. Pleasant. (V 1) White, 4 -door, 1991 Ford Taurus California Lic. 4JGZ841 VIN IFACP52UXMG202143 (V2) White 2 -door Plymouth Duster (unknown year) No Plate No VIN Both vehicles were noted to be inoperative due to the accumulation of dirt and spiderwebs which indicated that they had not been moved in some time. Furthermore, the interiors of both vehicles were filled with boxes and miscellaneous materials which would have revented them from being o erated and then the Plymouth Duster were flat. Afthat time, each vehicle was tagged with a Notice of Intent to AaWteonoperable Vehicle and copies of each Notice were left on the corresponding vehicles. On June 21, 2001, copies of those Notices were also mailed by Certified Mail to Eunice V. Friederich as the property owner and the Registered Owner of the Ford Taurus. There were no vehicle registration records found on our inquiry for the Plymouth Duster. The Return Receipt indicates that the Certified Mailing was received and signed for by Eunice Friederich on June 26, 2001. JW 3:1Com inanity lkvciopmcntlComununity IrnpruverncntTase Tile ManagementTleasam Ave N\325 N PleasanANakanishi Memo.doc August 20, 2003 Page 2 of 3 Having received the Notices, Ms. Friederich was required to correct the violation by either showing us the vehicles were operable by starting them and moving them in forward and reverse, or store the vehicles out of public view, or remove the vehicles from the property. The deadline for this to occur was July 3, 2001. After that date, the vehicles were eligible for tow if not made operable, stored, or removed. The property was then checked on July 5, 2001 and it was noted that there was no change in the condition of the vehicles. Although not required by the CVC, I then left a Final Warning Notice on each vehicle declaring that having gone through the prescribed notification, the vehicles were eligible to be towed on or about July 6, 2001. That Notice also provided a contact number for more information regarding the abatement action. On of ce I receiv a from Ms. Friederich and att ted to call erac at the number given in the message and at her home number. There was no answer when I ca e& I had arranged for our towing service provider, J&D Auto Body, to meet me that morning at another address in the area to to a vehicle and having completed that I had another one of their tow trucks follow me to the 325 N. Pleasant property. Upon arrival, I noted that the Plymouth Duster (V2) had been removed. 1 assumed that this had been done voluntarily by Ms. Friederich. However, the Ford Taurus (V1) still was parked in the driveway and there was no chanize in the condition of the vehicle. I then had the vehicle towed and provided J&D Auto Body with the required DMV paperwork and copy of the Notice. While towing the vehicle, I was approached by a neighbor from across the street that stated that Ms. Friederich had asked her to tell me something about the vehicle being sold. There was no documentation to substantiate this, so I continued to tow the vehicle. The neighbor did state that she was aware that vehicle did not run and needed repair. Upon returning to the office I finally made phone contact with Ms. Friederich.. tated that she had the Ford Taurus sold. I advised her that we had already towed the vehicle and reminded her that'she was supposed to contact me after receiving the initial Notice to arrange an extension if necessary and that we had been through this process with a vehicle at her property before. She first claimed that the vehicle was operable, but later in the conversation admitted that the Taurus interested in it She asked where the vehicle was so she could pick it up and I advised her that per the California Vehicle Code regulations, vehicles abated through our process are not impounded and are required to be destroyed once they are towed. Upon hearing this, Ms. Friederich en ur phone conversation and contacted the City Manager's Office and spoke with Assistant City Manager Janet Keeter. At that point I went up and spoke with Janet and with City Randy Hays regarding our abatement action. August 20, 2003 Page 3 of 3 As we discussed in our meeting with you this afternoon, the 325 N. Pleasant address is not Ms. Friederich's place of residence. It was her mothers house and is used solely for storage purposes. The property is the focus of an on-going code enforcement action involving Community Improvement and Animal Control personnel, due to unsanitary conditions caused by the number of cats being kept within the residence and the accumulation of stored materials in and around the premises. I hope that this is sufficient to demonstrate that all appropriate procedures adopted as ordinance as authorized by the California Vehicle Code were indeed followed and that this is supported by the fact that the Court has ruled in favor of the City in this matter. Should you have any further questions regarding this issue, please contact either our City Attorney, Mr. Hays at 333-6701, or myself at 333-6823. Sincerely, 1Y `Joseph 'W od Community Improvement Manager Community Development Department cc: City Manager City Attorney Community Development Director Legal Owner Address Other Address You as property and/or vehicle owner are hereby notified that tl}e undersigned, pursuant to Section .10.56 020 Lodi Municipal . Codehas determined that th4mai lsts upon said jand An abandoned wrecked-c1lsrnantiefi or!nope* *01A��f lltu�r parts thereof, which constitutes a public nuisance. You as property and/or vehicle owner are hereby noilfied to abafe a1d riaisance by the removal of said vehicle or parts thereof within ten (10) days from the date of mailing of this Notice and, upon your failure to do so, the same will be abated and removed by the City of Lodi. The costs thereof, together with administrative costs, may be assessed to the owner of the land on which said vehicle, or parts thereof, are located. The property or vehicle owner may, within 10 days after the mailing of this Notice, request a public hearing, and if such a request is not received by this department with that ten (10) day period, the City of Lodi shall have the authority to. abate and remove said vehicle or parts thereof as a public nuisance and assess the costs as aforesaid without a public hearing. The property owner may submit a sworn written statement within such 10 day period denying responsibility for the presence of said vehicle or parts thereof, on said land, with any reasons for denial, and such statement shall be construed as a request for a hearing or review, at which the property owner's presence is not required. You may as the property or vehicle owner appear In person at any hearing requested by you or, in lieu thereof, the property owner may present a sworn written statement as aforesaid In time for consideration at such hearing. If it is determined that the vehicle was placed on the land without the consent of the owner of the land and that he has not acquiesced in its presence, the costs of administration or removal of the vehicle or parts thereof shall not be assessed against the property upon which the vehicle is located. THIS CODE DOES NOT APPLY to a vehicle, or parts thereof, which is completely enclosed within a building in a lawful manner where it is not visible from the street or other public or private property or. which is located behind a solid fence six feet in height. Citing Officer,1- —1-- ^T Vehicle Removed By (Owner or Tow Service) Signature Date ❑ Access Restricted Warrant Required To Abate Case Finaled By Date Remarks: Additional Violations Noted: ❑ Pursuantto LMC Section 17.60.160: Vehicles Must Be Parked on an Approved Concrete or Asphalt Driveway/Parking Pad 0 Pursuant to UHC Section 1001.19: Accumulations of Garbage, Junk, Debris and/or Weeds Must Be Removed From Premises Date of Issuance 000L�501 Date of Mailing Location of Vehicle'- Violation No. O Condition of Vehicle p Abandoned ❑ Wrecked q Dismantled � Inoperative Year Make . `ice AL Model _QQ� 7-05� Lic. No. State (-,Or Tag Expiration Color, \A tXC Vehicle Identification Number _ Xf� Body Type Z VZ Address Legal Owner Address Other Address You as property and/or vehicle owner are hereby notified that the undersigned, pursuant to Section 10.56.020 Lodi Municipal Code, has determined that there exists upon said land an abandoned, wrecked, dismantled or inoperative vehicle and/or parts thereof, which constitutes a public nuisance. You as property and/or vehicle owner are hereby notified to abate said nuisance by the removal of said vehicle or parts thereof within ten (10) days from. the date of mailing of this Notice and, upon your failure to do so, the same will be abated and removed by the City of Lodi. The costs thereof, together with administrative costs, may be assessed to the owner of the land on which said vehicle, or parts thereof, are located. The property or vehicle owner may, within 10 days after the mailing of this Notice, request a public hearing, and if such a request is not received by this department with that ten (10) day period, the City of Lodi shall have the authority to abate and remove said vehicle or parts thereof as a public nuisance and assess the costs as aforesaid without a public hearing. The property owner may submit a sworn written statement within such 10 day period denying responsibility for the presence of said vehicle or parts thereof, on said land, with any reasons for denial, and such statement shall be construed as a request for a hearing or review, at which the property owner's presence is not required. You may as the property or vehicle owner appear in person at any hearing requested by you or, in lieu thereof, the property owner may present a sworn written statement as aforesaid in time for consideration at such hearing. If it is determined that the vehicle was placed on the land without the consent of the owner of the land and that he has not acquiesced in Its presence, the costs of administration or removal of the vehicle or parts thereof shall not be assessed against the property upon which the vehicle is located. THIS CODE DOES NOT APPLY to a vehicle, or parts thereof, which is completely enclosed within a building in a lawful manner where it is not visible from the street or other public or private property or, which is located behind a solid fence six feet in height. Citing Vehicle Removed By (Owner or Tow Service) Signature Date Case Finaled By Date Remarks: vg4/a4AT -5m v . trL.�Ce-7-CCj�w�4i Additional olations Noted: ❑ Access Restricted Warrant Required To Abate 11 Pursuant to LMC Section 17.80.160: Vehicles Must Be Parked on an Approved Concrete or Asphalt Driveway/Parking Pad 0 Pursuant to UHC Section 1001.11: Accumulations of Garbage, Junk, Debris and/or Weeds Must Be Removed From Premises CITY OF LOD] Notice of Intention to Abate and Remove an Community Development Department Abandoned, Wrecked, Dismantled, or Community Improvement Division Inoperative Vehicle or Parts Thereof as a • 221 W. Pine Street - P.O. Box 3006 Lodi, CA 95241-1910 209 333-6823 Public Nuisance J Date of Issuance 000L�501 Date of Mailing Location of Vehicle'- Violation No. O Condition of Vehicle p Abandoned ❑ Wrecked q Dismantled � Inoperative Year Make . `ice AL Model _QQ� 7-05� Lic. No. State (-,Or Tag Expiration Color, \A tXC Vehicle Identification Number _ Xf� Body Type Z VZ Address Legal Owner Address Other Address You as property and/or vehicle owner are hereby notified that the undersigned, pursuant to Section 10.56.020 Lodi Municipal Code, has determined that there exists upon said land an abandoned, wrecked, dismantled or inoperative vehicle and/or parts thereof, which constitutes a public nuisance. You as property and/or vehicle owner are hereby notified to abate said nuisance by the removal of said vehicle or parts thereof within ten (10) days from. the date of mailing of this Notice and, upon your failure to do so, the same will be abated and removed by the City of Lodi. The costs thereof, together with administrative costs, may be assessed to the owner of the land on which said vehicle, or parts thereof, are located. The property or vehicle owner may, within 10 days after the mailing of this Notice, request a public hearing, and if such a request is not received by this department with that ten (10) day period, the City of Lodi shall have the authority to abate and remove said vehicle or parts thereof as a public nuisance and assess the costs as aforesaid without a public hearing. The property owner may submit a sworn written statement within such 10 day period denying responsibility for the presence of said vehicle or parts thereof, on said land, with any reasons for denial, and such statement shall be construed as a request for a hearing or review, at which the property owner's presence is not required. You may as the property or vehicle owner appear in person at any hearing requested by you or, in lieu thereof, the property owner may present a sworn written statement as aforesaid in time for consideration at such hearing. If it is determined that the vehicle was placed on the land without the consent of the owner of the land and that he has not acquiesced in Its presence, the costs of administration or removal of the vehicle or parts thereof shall not be assessed against the property upon which the vehicle is located. THIS CODE DOES NOT APPLY to a vehicle, or parts thereof, which is completely enclosed within a building in a lawful manner where it is not visible from the street or other public or private property or, which is located behind a solid fence six feet in height. Citing Vehicle Removed By (Owner or Tow Service) Signature Date Case Finaled By Date Remarks: vg4/a4AT -5m v . trL.�Ce-7-CCj�w�4i Additional olations Noted: ❑ Access Restricted Warrant Required To Abate 11 Pursuant to LMC Section 17.80.160: Vehicles Must Be Parked on an Approved Concrete or Asphalt Driveway/Parking Pad 0 Pursuant to UHC Section 1001.11: Accumulations of Garbage, Junk, Debris and/or Weeds Must Be Removed From Premises Date of Issuance Date of Mailing Location of Vehicle +'- i'J Violation No. Condition of Vehicle ❑ Abandoned ❑ Wrecked ❑ Dismantled alnoperative Year Make Tr''r Model-r^...a r Lie. No. _ �A `?`' ! _ State C O� Tag Expiration 2 Color Vehicle Identification Number Body Type -�=- Property Owner Address Registered Owner �r--- Address Legal Owner Address T Other Address Y You as property " dfor, owns{ afrl he4wR, potlfie'd that the undersigned, pursuant to Section 10,56.020 Lodi Municipal Code, has date n t rt ' land art, abandoned, wrecked, dismantled ar. Inoperative vehicle and/or parts then ra fopgrty.and/or vehtcla,ownte erebyotitied to abath`tta oulaance . by t"d r erep ..wittri�. %n (1D}days: from the date at"`m�q of this Notice and, upon,your failure tai Q sem, abated and`remaved by the City of Lodi. The costs;thereof, together with adrrririistradve.,' costs, may be as the owner of the land on which said vehicle, or parts thereof; are located. ' The property orV cls owner may, within. 10 days after. the mailing of this Notices request a Public hearing, and if such a ,.. request'{ recelved by this department with that ten.(10) day period, the City of Lodi shall have the authority to abate and remove saki veiilcle.or parts thereof as a public nuisance and. assess the costs as aforesaid without a public hearing. The - i SS J'...,i - property owae ay submit a sworn written statement within such 10 day period denying responsibility for the presence of sal �►rehlcl o "arts h=ereof, on said Iand' with an reasons^for denial, and,auch statement shall be conatrued,a a ues ,for. a, heitirin whic .the o opine esertoe:is not required-RYou iiia a�"the ro a o; vehia"caw a afw F = , • P P rill C. n pPe i s `requested b�r o ergo 'tha ptopertkr o e a e a sworn 'written s'" a afo `a ? :" r !fir w E c eeatlo lned.t veh�i" placedn t>�e�ian �i >t q d F istrati a o ; ve A Ya ompl a aA iaiiidingsa�viri � � � �� WwW I! i e Owner. T e anu .,Signa� s h Case- .inn a 8 4K Y� e �� N QS Remarks W., "rY•` t i Ji..A't�t'!.s'... +N x ti "s F a s .,� _" r t i Additional, Violations Noted: i] Pursuantto LMC Section W.60.150:.Vehicles Must Be Parked on an Approved Concrete or Asphalt Driveway/ParkingiPad ❑ Pursuant to UHC. Section 1001.11: Accumulations of Garbage, Junk, Debris and/or Weeds Must Be Removed From Premases _ µ r}fig- .. fi. fit. "s.a ARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES yn BOX 942885 ALITY ASSURED cam v APR -TO F?"ENTO, CA 94285-0001 ` t _ Y OPERATOR #10 � ❑ 83VR (REV. IW2002) ware of cx,�cw:b< �.fNrkENr W ArOreflt£M0.E5 Pubic Service Agency NONOPERATED VEHICLE NOTICE 1974 PLY ( THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ) "U Our records show that you have reported that this vehicle is not in operation. If your vehicle will continue to be stored and not operated, parked or towed on the streets or highways, disregard this notice and pay no fees. The vehicle will retain its previous expiration date and nonoperated status. Before operating, parking, or towing this vehicle on the streets or highways during the registration period of 06/12/2003 to 0611212004, renew the registration by mailing the fees and documents indicated below, with the bottom portion of this form. (See reverse side of notice) 'Nate: Your vehicle's month and day of expiration will not change when fees are paid REGISTRATION FEE $30 VEHICLE LICENSE FEE (VLF) $9 WEIGHT FEE $0 SPECIAL PLATE FEE $0 COUNTY/DISTRICT FEES $8 OWNER RESPONSIBILITY FEE $0 VLF OFFSET -$6 TOTAL. DUE PRIOR TO OPERATION $41 PYA ...:.:....... Total due If paid 1 to 10 days after operation $52 If paid 11 to 30 days after operation $57 If paid 31 to 365 days after operation $73 DETACH AND RETURN - .._. - - - For DMV Use Only 040101 36000003203035 0004100 16331527180039 Change of Address (see back) 30000003000 0000003208 36036998 32 0121111A C032403PO2 60401 Ppjpta For DMV Use Only = 003KUZ PLY ❑ ❑ ❑ 1111eul�ln�11111ulllnutl�llllun�l11111�11111t1t1�ni1#� FRIEDERICH EUNICE OR NGUYEN OANH DMV RENEWAL 425 E OAK ST P.O. SOX 942894 LODI CA 95240-2919 SACRAMENTO CA 94294-0894 II�I���l1J1�1111J���11�1!ltltl1111l111ttI��I��JII 10.56.020 Removal from private property. a written notice of appeal with the community development director within five days after the decision. 2. Such appeal shall be heard by the council which may affirm, amend, or reverse the order or take other action deemed appropriate. 3. The city clerk shall give written notice of the time and place of the hearing to the appellant and those persons specified in this title. 4. In conducting the hearing, the council shall not be limited by the technical rules of evidence. M. Removal of Vehicles. Five days after adoption of the order declaring the vehicle or parts thereof to be a public nuisance, five days from the date of mailing of notice of the decision if such notice is required by subsection K of this section, or fifteen days after such action of the governing body authorizing removal following appeal, the vehicle or parts thereof may be disposed of by removing it to a scrapyard or automobile dismantler's yard. After a vehicle has been removed, it shall not thereafter be reconstructed or made operable, unless it is a vehicle which qualifies for either horseless carriage license plates or historic vehicle license plates pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 5004, in which case, it may be reconstructed or made operable. Page 4 of 4 ' N. Notice to Department of Motor Vehicles. Within five days after the date of removal of the vehicle or parts thereof, notice shall be given to the Department of Motor Vehicles identifying the vehicle or parts thereof removed. At the same time, there shall be transmitted to the Department of Motor Vehicles any evidence of registration available, including registration certificates, certificates of title and license plates. 0. Assessment of Costs. If the administrative costs and the cost of removal which are charged against the owner of a parcel of land pursuant to subsection K of this section are not paid within thirty days of the date of the order or the final disposition of an appeal therefrom, such costs shall be assessed against the parcel of land pursuant to Section 38773.5 of the Government Code and shall be transmitted to the tax collector for collection. The assessment shall have the same priority as other city taxes. P. Unlawful to Abandon, Park, Store or Leave Vehicle. It shall be unlawful for any person to abandon, park, store or leave or permit the abandonment, parking, storing or leaving of any licensed or unlicensed vehicle or parts thereof which is in an abandoned, wrecked, dismantled or inoperative condition upon any private property or public property, not including highways, within the city for a period in excess of seven days unless such vehicle or parts thereof is completely enclosed within a building in a lawful manner where it is not plainly visible from the street or other public or private property, pcjjzless such vehicle is stored or parked in a lawful manner on pa junrivate property in connection with the business of a licensed dismantler, licensed ve4c a ea er, orar ; or when such storage or parking is necessary to the operation of a lawfullyconducted business or commercial enterprise. Q. Unlawful to Refuse to Comply With Order. It shall be unlawful for any person to fail or refuse to remove an abandoned, wrecked, dismantled or inoperative vehicle, or parts thereof, or refuse to abate such nuisance when ordered to do so in accordance with the abatement provisions of this chapter or state law where such state law is applicable. (Vehicle Code § 22660) (Ord. 1586 § 1, 1993; Ord. 1402 § 1 (part), 1987) http://www.ordlink.com/codes/lodi/_D.../10-56-020—Removal—from_private.htm 12/17/2001 ISD 63VR ',REV. 7MOO) trerto<cu.rcrw LICENSE NUMBER APublicServiceAgency NOTICE OF DELINQUENT RENEWAL 4JGZ841 Registration or Certification of Planned Nonoperation (PNO) and late payment are due. Our records show that you have not renewed the vehicle's registration or filed a PNO with the $10 filing fee. California taw requires all vehicle owners to register or, it the vehicle is not being operated, parked or towed upon a street or highway, to place a nonoperation status on file before the vehicle's registration expiration date. A PNO may be filed with a payment of a late filing fee, up to ninety days after the vehicle expiration date. After ninety days, a PNO cannot be filed. To file Planned Nonoperational (PNO) status • Determine PNO eligibility. Vehicle has not been operated (driven, moved, or parked on a street or highway) after the registration expiration date of 0210212002. • If eligible, check the PNO box and complete the Certification of Nonoperation on the bottom portion of the notice and pay the PNO amount due. Note: PNO is valid until the vehicle is operated. To Renew the vehicle registration • Pay the renewal amount due on the bottom Portion of this notice. ' Evidence of Liability Insurance is required. Return with payment. See reverse side of notice. Smog Certification is required. Please read the enclosed smog brochure. REGISTRATION FEE: VEHICLE LICENSE FEE (VLF) WEIGHT FEE (This may reflect an increase authorized by statute effective 1/1/95.) Fees and Tax COUNTY/DISTRICT FEES (Your county or district has requested these tees ) Information SPECIAL PLATE FEE for Renewal OWNER RESPONSIBILITY FEE PENALTY FEE $3o $30 $0 $0 $0 $23 VLF OFFSET (See Insert) -$20 PNO,* REMOVAL Total Late Payment Due Now $33 $70 PNO Filinis not allowed if.postmarked after 06/0312002 NOTE: AddRional penalties will be added after one year. DETACH AND MAIL WITH CHECK OR MONEY ORDER AND APPROPRIATE FORM(S) QO NOT STAPLE, TAPE OR FOLD lablic Service, Agency NONOPERATED VEHICLE NOTICE uc E NMMIIKR AJ%Z841 YR MQp1: Iy1+a1KEz:: 1991 FORD THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ) 9U Our records show that you have reported that this vehicle is not in operation. It your vehicle will continue to be stored and not operated, parked or towed on the streets or highways, disregard this notice and pay no fees. The vehicle will retain its previous expiration date and nonoperated status. Before operating, parking, or towing this vehicle on the streets or highways during the registration period of 02/02/2083 to 0210212004, renew the registration by mailing the fees and documents indicated below, with the bottom portion of this form. f FEIES REGISTRATION FEE VEHICLE LICENSE FEE (VLF) WEIGHT FEE SPECIAL PLATE FEE COUNTY/DISTRICT FEES OWNER RESPONSIBILITY FEE $30 $27 $0 $0 $8 $0 VLF OFFSET _$18 TOTAL DUE PRIOR TO OPERATION $47 LAVE P/1YMl<NT Total due If paid 1 to 10 days after operation $58 *Note: Your vehicle's month and day of expiration If paid 11 to 30 days after operation $64 If paid 31 to 365 days after operation $82 will not change when fees are paid -- —�__..__..__._._ DETACH AND RETURN --------------------------------------------- For DMV Use Only 040101 04191635080401 0004700 03331527180139 Change of Address (see back) 30000009000 0000003508 16036998 07 MIMA B111202POI 75446 POTD43 For DMV Use Only FRIEDERICH EUNICE VIOLET 425 E OAK 5T LODI CA 95240-2919 ONS NUMHEti SAKE 4JGZ841 FORD V81 1 FACP52UXM0202143 02/02/2003 $47 1:::.MAW litl0AY1411111 '� k DMV RENEWAL P.O. BOX 942894 SACRAMENTO CA 94294-0894 04a1010419163508D4a1DB04700033315271801393D00000goaa©©000035081603699807 VICE CHAIRMAN HIGHER EDUCATION COMMITTEES: AGING AND LONG-TERM CARE HEALTH PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, RETIREMENT AND SOCIAL SECURITY To Whom It May Concern - Ass-embIv Ufforn-Ta 'Xrgilslafurp ALAN NAKANISHI ASSEMBLYMEMBER, TENTH DISTRICT September 25, 2003 STATE CAPITOL P.O. BOX 942649 SACRAMENTO, CA 94249-001 (916)319-2010 FAX (916) 319-2110 DISTRICT OFFICE 218 WEST PINE STREET LODI, CA 95241 (209) 333-5330 FAX (209) 333-5333 Ms. Eunice Friederich asked me to write a letter of my recollection of what she had told me about her situation with the City of Lodi regarding her 1991 White Ford Taurus, when I was on the City Council. She informed me that her car had been towed, but it was a mistake because her car was functional. I informed Lodi City Attorney Randy Hays of this. Mr. Hays informed me that all proper steps were taken in accordance with California State law. Mr. Hays also informed me that it is improper for me to interfere. This is information that Ms. Eunice Friederich asked me to write to her in this letter. AN;mb Sincerely, IBM ALAN NAKANISHI Assemblyman, 10th District Printed on Recycled Paper