HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - June 16, 1993 (55)os
CITY OF LODI
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
AGENDA TITLE: Receive San Joaquin County Council of Governments' (COG)
1993/94 Budget.
MEETING DATE: June 16, 1993
PREPARED BY: Assistant City Manager
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council ratify the 1.993/94 San Joaquin
County Council of Governments' (COG) budget.
BACKGROUND: The City has received the 1993/94 adopted COG
budget. Their executive officer has requested this
budget be placed on a forthcoming agenda prior to
June 30, 1993. The budget is nearly $400,000 less than the adopted 1992/93
budget. The major reductions are in the elimination or reduction of
professional services for specific projects.
This budget has been approved by the COG Board of Directors. Pursuant to the
COG's Joint Powers Agreement, following adoption of the budget by the Board, it
is to be presented to member agencies for ratification by each governing body.
Attached (Exhibit A) is a budget highlight memo. A COG representative will be
in attendance at Wednesday night's meeting to answer any questions
Councilmembers may have.
FUNDING: None required.
Re�ectfully submitted,
,�i�ti(1/1re.
Jerry L. Glenn
Assistant City Manager
JLG/vc
APPROVED l
THOMAS A. PETERSON racyuad paper
City Manager
JGCOGBUD/TXTA.01V CC -1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of Supervisors, San Joaquin County
City Councils of Lodi, Stockton, Manteca, Lathrop, Tracy, Ripon
and Escalon
FROM: Barton R. Meat' , xecutive Director
Executive Director
SUBJECT: ' ' COG's 1993-94 Adopted Budget
DATE: May 28, 1993
Attached is the San Joaquin County Council of Governments' (COG) budget for 1993-
94 adopted by the COG Board on May 25, 1993. The COG Joint Powers Agreement
stipulates that this budget must be sent to all member agency's governing boards for
their ratification. According to the JPA, the budget must be approved by a majority
of our local jurisdictions (five), representing over 55% of the county's population in
order to be ratified.
This year's budget takes shape in the form of a comprehensive Financial Plan. I think
you will find, as did the COG Board, that this format, which provides a three year
history of revenues and expenditures, is quite informative.
In summary, the COG operating budget overall is 6.4% or $155,840 lower than the
fiscal 1992-93 budget. This reflects the completion or near completion of certain one-
time expenses such as the Measure K Strategic Plan and the Altamont Pass Corridor
Passenger Flail Study.
The COG Board is holding in abeyance two items which must be brought back to the
Board for final approval. The first, in developing the Overall Work Plan for 1993-94,
an additional permanent planning position was requested for Regional Planning efforts.
The Board will evaluate the need for that allocation in the near future before
authorizing the actual filling position.
The second item involves the purchase of a computer overhead display. The Board
has requested a demonstration of the item before approving the pu.chase of the item.
COG Budget Tranmittal
May 28, 1993
Page 2
The following highlights of this year's budget reflect comparisons to the adoF ted
1992-93 budget:
• A 6.4% reduction in OPERATING REVENUES from 1992-93, due primarily to
a decreasing need for Measure K funds because of the completion of the
Strategic Plan and Proposition 116 Bond funds for the Altamont Study.
For the first time this year, the budget is showing the total funds over
which the Council of Governments has fiduciary responsibility. In 1993-
94, COG will be responsible for over $36 million in federal, state and
local funds above the operating funds.
• A 16.9°x6 increase in SALARIES AND BENEFITS is primarily due to the
tentative addition of one permanent and one temporary position.
• A 29.9% increase in SERVICES AND SUPPLIES as identified below.
• OFFICE EXPENSES are increased 27.1 %, the increase primarily in printing
and other expenses associated with the Ridesharing program.
• COMMUNICATIONS increased by 29.5% to reflect increased costs.
• MEMBERSHIPS increases by 16.8% primarily due to an increase in the
RCMS Users Group membership.
• MAINTENANCE -EQUIPMENT No change.
• RENTS & LEASES-EaUIPMENT increases by 54.2% to reflect increased
expenditures for copier machines in addition to a FAX machine and
postage equipment.
• TRANSPORTATION & TRAVEL remains virtually unchanged. All out of state
travel is identified in the detail worksheets.
• SPECIAL DISTRICT ACCOUNTING remains unchanged.
• ALLOCATED SERVICE COST reflects actual costs of San Joaquin County
services rendered to COG and increases by 42.9%.
• PUBLICATIONS AND LEGAL NOT10Es decreases 61.5% to reflect actual and
COG Budget Tranmittal
May 28, 1993
Page 3
expected expenditures.
• INSURANCE decreases dramatically by 56.3% reflecting the shift of
workers compensation into the salaries and benefits category.
• BUILDING MAINTENANCE decreased 50% to reflect anticipated needs for
minor effort in the Human Services Agency building.
• RENTS -STRUCTURES & GROUNDS virtually unchanged.
• OPERATING RESERvE anticipating increasing the operating reserve by nearly
$83,000.
• PROFFSSIONAL SERvIcEs decrease by nearly 70% reflecting the completion
of a number of studies.
• FIXED ASSETS decreases by 2.6% as COG. One budgeted purchase of
$7,500 for a computer overhead display must be demonstrated and
approved by the Board.
SUMMARY
The COG Board requests the ratification of this budget by the Cities and the County.
Fiscal Year 1993-94
rl
No Nx UR
FIN.M. MIL
i'UIN.
0.
'EI3113:V:m:1
San Joaquin County
Council of Governments
San Joaquin County Council of Governments
ANNUAL FINANCIAL PLAN
Fiscal Year 1993-94
CHAIR
David Ennis, Councilmember. City of Escalon
VICE -CHAIR
Clyde Bland, Mayor, City of Tracy
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Mayor Joan Darrah
Councilmember Nick Rust
Councilmember Mac Freeman
Mayor Phillip Pennino
Mayor Frank Warren
Supervisor Robert Cabral
Supe visor Ed Simas
Councilmember Jim Dale
Don MacVicar
Lowell Snyder
Ron Coale
EX OFFICIO DIRECTORS
SUBMITTED BY:
Barton R. Meays
Executive Director
City of Stockton
City of Stockton
City of Lathrop
City of Lodi
City of Manteca
County of San Joaquin
County of San Joaquin
City of Ripon
Caltrans District 10
Stockton Metropolitan
Transit District
Port of Stockton
Letter
of Transmittal
--� 3a,
Amoun
oaquin
county Council r..
:;overnments
2.0%
Regional Planning Studies
278,800
Y...b,r.
I'Ahr„p. L—b.N.I-- S.,q
L!-
Ir.n C.,runr..or S.r i•vuu,n
May 13, 1993
The Honorable Board of Directors
San Joaquin Council of Governments
Dear Chairman and Board:
Enclosed for review and consideration is the proposed Budget for the 1993-94 Fiscal Year. The
Budget is composed of a restatement, in terms of object accounts and line items,cf the Overall
Work Program adopted by this, Board at their April meeting. The Budget includes expenditures
totaling $2,282,200, which are programmed as follows:
r Dram
Amoun
Percent
Regional Transportation Plan
46,000
2.0%
Regional Planning Studies
278,800
122%
I-5 Study
28,000
1.2%
Regional Transportation Improvement Program
54,000
2.4%
Road and Street Monitoring
22,800
1.96
Transit Coordination
137,000
6.0%
Transportation Air Quality
37,000
1.6%
Transportation Air Quality Modeling
46,000
2.0900
Technical Assistanc
52,800
23%
Intergovernmental Coordination
64,400
2.8%
Projections & Forecasts
53,600
23%
Aviation & Land Use
33,900
1.5%
Congestion Management
182,600
8.0%
Regional Planning
75,600
33%
Valley MPO Coordination
46,000
2.09o'
Measure K
179,600
79%
Altamont Study
258,000
113%
COG OWP
45,500
2.0%
TDA Administration
80,000
3.5%
Community Involvement
88,600
3.9%
Rideshan ng
472.000
MM
TOTAL
2,282,2000
103.070
Regional Tramptrtation Pl ir.mnL! %Vcnc%. I -wal Tron%portatuun authurrt%. Congestiun \g,•nc.. Airp„rt Iand l,r C,rmmi—i,m
102 South S. n - - . 0 -- 'I T, • il. , ..,n C.ii. ,rr;.. 1`_ • •
ESTIMATED REVENUES
The 1993-94 Budget provides estimates of the following revenues:
Source
Amount
IL -=t
Federal
1,075,000
47.1%
State
224,400
9.8%
Regional/Local
982,800
43.1%
The anticipated revenues are composed of 3418,000 in funds carried over from prior fiscal years
and 51,864,200 in new receipts.
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
The 1993-94 Budget includes the following expenditures:
Object Class Amount Percrn
Personnel 1,026,100 45.0%
Contract Services 855,700 37.5%
Services and Supplies 362,400 15.9%
Capital Outlays 38,000 1.7%
This year's Budget contains a decrease from last year. It proposes to add one Senior Planner
which results in a 16.99 increase in Personnel Coss. Consultant Services decrease by 31.0%,
and Services and Supplies are proposed to increase by 29.9%. Capital Expenditures are
programmed to decrease by 2.6%.
ENERAL COMMENT
As I reviewed last year's Work Plan Budget, it is clear that the COG staff and the Board of
Directors have made major progress in moving the COG programs forward. To illustrate the
full extent of the COG program, a summary of the total fiscal responsibilities of the COG is
shown below:
iscal Year 1993-94
Local Transportation Authority
Transportation Development Act Funds
COG Operating Budget
Federal Transportation Program
- 2 -
S 19,000,000
10,584,200
2,282,200
6,539,000
"TOTAL S 38,405,400
This should put into prosaective the magnitude of the total COG functions. litany of these
fiduciary responsibilities are new in the last couple of years, and as our work program
illustrates, the work of the COG has tripled since 1991. Most notably the new responsibilities
to the COG in the last couple of years arc the administration of the Local Transportation Sales
Tar and the allocation of the Federal Transportation Act Funds. In the first year of
administration, I feel it would be appropriate to indicate that local governments and the COG
have responded well to the new challenges of these funds.
During this last year this COG and the seven counties to the south have been developing
cooperative arrangements between themselves and the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Quality
District. Over the course of the year, these relationships have grown to the point where the
COGS, the Air District, and Caltrans are working in a much closer relationship. During this
next year as we begin to adopt the required elements under the new federal transportation
legislation, this relationship of the valley agencies will intensify in terms of coordination and
products. The COG Directors within the valley feel this will ultimately will be beneficial in that
it will allow the greatest degree of local control, as well as satisfying federal requirements that
we develop more unified plans and programs in coordination with the Air District.
During this last year we began to build stronger relationships with the private sector within San
Joaquin County based upon the need for their involvement in our program as well as their
influence and support at the state level. This relationship needs to expand in the future and
needs to include other community entities dealing with agricultural and environmental issues.
As we begin our regional planning forum process, this relationship will be enhanced in dealing
with one of the first possible subject areas, a Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. We truly
believe that such a plan can be crafted to effectively meet the needs of the development
community as well as those of the environmentalists and at the same time, saving a great deal
of public and private resources. These may be high expectations, but we feel that through the
use of a coordinated local government approach to this problem such results are possible.
During the year the Local Transportation Authority completed its first Strategic Plan and began
its first project. That project, was completed during the year and other projects went to bid.
With the help of outside management expertise, we have been able to streamline the Manteca
Bypass Highway 120 Project by another two months and have completed the issuance of our first
series of bonds in a very beneficial interest rate. By the end of this fiscal year, we should have
completed another Measure K project and be well underway on a third project.
Two maior studies were beduring the year in the area of rail and t-ansit. The Regional
Transit Plan was completed and is in the process of implementation, to establish a countywide
transit district and to implement inter-city and inter-regiona; bus service. The rail study for the
Altamont Pass is completing its first phase with the potential for start-up demonstration rail
service over the Altamont Pass in the near term. The second phase will look at long term
feasibility of rail over, the Altamont Pass and the institutional needs for such service. At the
same time. the first phase of the 1-5 Study is coming to conclusion and has identified rail and
highwav needs for the 1-5 Cor-idor for the next thirty vears. Since both of these projects deal
with the Altamont Pass. there v.11l need to be close coordination and ultimately the development
of some type of institutional arrangement to implement improvements in both the hiat;wav and
rail portions of the Altamont Pas,. Duran; this next year a number of critical decisions will
need to be made in the area of rail and bus transit. Those decisions are imp,)rtani not only to
the rail and bus components of the transportation system, but as well to the air quality benefits
to this rezional.
In the area of Data Management, we have now received much of the 1990 Census and are
becoming a focal point for local government and private sector questions regarding the
information in the 1990 Census. In the next couple of years we hope to develop this service to
local government and the private sector into a more formal arrangement, where studies and
reports can be developed to assist their needs. We have developed a geographic information
system, which is available for use by any of our Iocai governments in displaying geographically
much of the census data.
The Rideshare Program currently is experiencing a number of important changes as greater
emphasis is placed upon getting people out of single occupant vehicles. This is a major stratdgy
of our Transportation Plan as well as the Air Quality Plan. In this next year this program will
not only expand its efforts, but will begin to administer the trip reduction program for the county
to essentially save the cities and the county the need to Staff such a program which is required
under the Congestion Management Program and as well tl ;e Air Quality Prcgram.
As a recognition of the current fiscal plight of local government, the COG continues to provide
limited technical service to its member governments. As new programs are mandated by the
federal transportation and clean air acts, the COG will attempt to provide coordination and in
fact staffing in some instances, to assist the local governments in implementing these required
prograrns.
With the adoption of the Federal Transportation Act, the Regional Transportation Plan and the
Regional Transportation Improvement Program have taken on a much greater significance. Both
Of these programs serve as planning and programming documents and are required to be fiscally
constrained so that they become realistic programming and policy guidelines for the region.
During this next year we will be adopting both of these programs, which will require that we
document that they in fact provide air quality benefit to the region. This documentation requires
extensive modeling on the part of the COG and becomes a very critical element in this region's
ap
ability to continue to receive transportation funds.
During this last year the COG and local governments developed a process for allocating the
Federal Transportation Funds that come directly to the COG. This process heavily involved the
local government uid COG staff, but resulted in a cooperative effort to program the federal
dollars for highways, transit. and other trazsp3rtation facilities. It is certainly a model of how
local governments can wort: together to make difficult allocation decisions.
COtiCLUSION
During this past year. the COG Board o; Directors ha%e faced a number of very difficult
decisions. In many cases. these de.isions required the,;, to evaluate the needs of the entire
county versus those ofa particular area. The Board is to be complimented on their ability to
make those decisions and work together as a close knit board. During this next year those
decisions will intensify as we deal with such things as air quality conformity, regional transit,
habitat conservation, difficult Measure K decisions, and other issues facing the COG. - It is even
more imperative that Iocal government take a broader perspective in policy setting to insure that
all aspects of regional concerns are being effectively considered.
I believe that the Board of Directors and staff can meet this challenge. It is my continued goal
to improve the relations between Iocal governments and to build that unity into an effective
forum to deal with the regional issues and opportunities.
Yours truly,
AAA .
BARTON. MEAYS
Executive Director
f , -UTU11
Resolution
7
• RESOLUTION
SAN JOAOUfN COUNTY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
I T -e--3
•
R-93-59
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT'S
FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 BUDGET
WHEREAS, the San Joaquin County Council of Governments serves as the Regional
Transportation Planning Agency, the Metropolitan Planning Organization, the County Airport
Land Use Commission, the Congestion Management Agency, the Regional Ridesharing Program
and the Local Transportation Authority as will as other designations; and
WHEREAS, the COG annually prepares a work program depicting the tasks that will be
performed by the organization; and
WHEREAS, it is also essential that the COG prepare a budget constrained by the resources
available to it, to carry out and fund the work scheduled in the fiscal year.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the San Joaquin County Council of Governments
does hereby approve the fiscal year 1993-94 budget and forward such to its member
governments for their review and ratification.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of May, 1993 by the following vote of the San Joaquin
County Council of G:,vernments, to wit:
AYES: Freeman, Lathrop; Darrah, Stockton; Pennino, Lodi; Bland,
Tracy; Rust, Stockton; Ennis, Escalon.
NOES: Dale, Ripon; Cabral, San Joaquin County; Simas, San Joaquin
County.
ABSENT: Warren, Manteca.
c �
DAVE ENNI
Chairman
Organization
and
Staffing
r-
SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
COG ORGANIZATION CIURT
COG BOARD AAAAkAAAA
EXECUTM
commmm
EX. D . ' OR
(SART( )W PAYS
ANDHW...
Rd)c;&i Nfolks. -
shilky Ruiz 410:1NINgrza
RANSPORTAI
..........................
T
FINANC('ADMIN
1111004ALMNSP. SnININ
F—Iff'.-MOATI-1
II �ti 1,11111,IC IN110
ITCHWAI, A.,swrAli(T
PLANNINci
1 -1 N k NVP
A.VIAIYW ANT) AIRK)RT
FoRficASIRKI
LAW) IPA! MANNINO
RKTI(HAT, PI-ANN1140
11)A ADMIN
MUSIMP K
6110tr ADMIN.
mrfurr ADN RI
Ill DIRPSUP MCI,
ANDHW...
Rd)c;&i Nfolks. -
shilky Ruiz 410:1NINgrza
RANSPORTAI
WMARCI I AND
R11a TRAMP. MAN
RI) & Yr moi)m ino
1111004ALMNSP. SnININ
MODITINI
CORRImp .1myrAp.3
ITCHWAI, A.,swrAli(T
AM QUALU - nA?ISP.
[101H.7K)IN &
FoRficASIRKI
RITP
PURI.Ir INTY)WATM [KAM" LtAIKIL
IMPSI 1ARR MA=CA TRAIM
LFONAMI
............ 0 ................
ol'AR FING
""Im Dial —.Debbie 11.110 D11
................. ........... .........................................................
PC
ter Alillijous ~---1
I [Aiya n Wang
[)%Ain& Allogua Intern.
Assistant Planner
Paul Garda
Slianin Mmuhms
Kris f1w4wadh
jilp Nd'kh:111.1 clyanslef.j-1
APRIL 20,1993
San Joaquin Copmty Council of Governments
STAFF ALLOCATION
TOTAL 18.5 16
Full -Time Positions: 18 19
Temporary/Part-Time Positions: 0.5 1
* One proposed permanent position subject to further Board action
1992-93
1993-94
Position
Number
Number
Executive Director
1
1
Deputy Executive Director
1
1
Manager, Finance/Administration
1
1
And Public Information
Senior Regional Planner
3
4*
Associate/Assistant Regional Planner
4
4
Associate/Assistant Regional Planner - Temporary
0
1
Commute Management Coordinator
1
1
Executive Secretary
1
1
Office Assistant 1/11/III
3
3
Fiscal Assistant
1
1
Ridesharing Outreach Coordinator
2
2
Student Intem
O.S
0
TOTAL 18.5 16
Full -Time Positions: 18 19
Temporary/Part-Time Positions: 0.5 1
* One proposed permanent position subject to further Board action
Name
Barton R. Meays
Andrew T. Chesley
Steven Dial
Gary Dickson
Peter Williams
Debra Hale
Nancy Miller
Steven VanDenburgh
Joel Goldberg
Haiyan Wang
Susan Nejedly
Rebecca Montes
Shirley Ruiz de Esparza
Kristine Dempewolf
1_21 ra Fariey
Sharon Matthews
Raul Garcia
Donna Aflague
Andrei Urtiew
San Joaquin. County Ccunal of Govemmerts
STAFF
Fiscal Year t 992-93
- 9 -
Position
Executive Director
Deputy Executive Director
Manager. Finance/Administration
And Public Information
Senior Regional Planner
Senior Regional Planner
Senior Regional Planner
Associate Regional Planner
Associate Regional Planner
Assistant Regional Planner
Assistant Regional Planner
Commute Management Coordinator
Executive Secretary
Office Assistant III
Office Assistant It
Office Assistant II
Fiscal Assistant
Ridesharing Outreach Coordinator
Ridesharing Outreach Coordinator
Student Intern
San Joaquin County Council of Governments
POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS & SALARY SCHEDULE
BI -WEEKLY
(Effective January 1, 1992)
Step
Position
A
B
C
D
E
Executive Director
$3,192
Deputy Executive Director
$1,909
$2,010
$2.115
$2,227
$2,344
Manager, Finance/Administration
$1,574
$1,657
$1,744
$1,836
$1,928
And Public Information
Senior Regional Planner
$1,574
$1,657
$1,744
$1,836
$1,928
Associate Regional Planner
51,364
$1,436
$1,511
$1,587
51,666
Commute Management Coordinator
$1,364
$1,436
$1,511
$1,587
$1,666
Assistant Regional Planner
$1,243
$1,305
$1,371
$1,439
$1,511
Ridesharing Outreach Coordinator
$1,077
$1,131
$1,187
$1,247
$1,309
Fiscal Assistant
$1,013
$1,066
$1,122
$1,181
$1,243
Executive Secretary
$824
$867
$913
$961
$1,011
Office Assistant til
$811
$852
$894
$939
$986
Office Assistant II
$765
$805
$848
$892
$939
Overall
Work Program
Summary
TwisponTATION EXPENDITURES BY FUNDING SOURCE
ANn RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES 1993-94 ($000)
W.1049 II II
,,,, 01 Fitt'.
601 021111:
I'll 11111 b
.111M if I I
WI a, 140"
&111 02 114A
6,001 104A
....1114 114A
IDI of it 0
.01 01 10191
$no 02 plill
01 AVIA
.111 041 1110
.... 011111:
.11, FIG V.1 I
.01 01 &At A
,mll 02 At 14
... it fit ('IN
111411 Go Mi
two of CM
0104 at fail
TOTAL
4121M
10 6,1
FjrwA
C ION
FTA
SECTS
"A
SECT IF
��Affb
fAr
IWE.
-t!!M
STATE
311110110'.
STATE
Suev.
PLUG
COW.
(-&, --.,7 1
c"W
ITA
TDA
ADMIN
SUID
M, —Tv
S.J.
CO.
F07,
VIFICIP
111116
or,
PPAV
116
�Ww
AIF
pkv
1760-
IM
COG
SJ
SIA ilbTAI.
-00
0
4f;
4,14 11
12 1)
3 i ii
It
_j#IAI45PPI All
ditfAl 101 All b Itithl. 5
I-billf I I M(1/1111111
,519 ctm WO
ISP Aill (11114% lly
JyI' AIA Lot 111t I Iw)
$fit( Al. ASSISI_
5.5
16
3 1.
6
fS
S.1
3.2
2
to
7.4-
14 4
8.4
100
1768
13
44.2
12
__^)s
12
—40.'o
40
5.5
128
IK.gVI [0(11191
us ANII
Ss i
336
7.7
.1
`36
20
111111 A#4411 Atoll 40SE
S1,1110
"HAS I'l A*011104
I IF uo.,14 coomm
Allit R
1,4411,11 all /117
6
17.9
10
T1 II
IF
I!1 II
41.11
125110
306
41) 5
42.8
25
28
17.2
is
22
40
5.5
2134
129.6
so
9
120
9
120
FLOWN
4
1100
so
11,111jul1v §"V(11 VE.—
—65.6.
6
IS
086
•11:' 11
313
1
3381
1
1
1
1
!M
5226
111
176.8
i
313.0
611,
167.0
iwo
230. 9
1
80.0 1
44.2
;mg
17.9 1-100
1
23so 1
12 0 1 2,5111:1
Financial Plan
Summary
M
4
A
San Joaquin County
Council of Governments
91-92 Act. 92-93 Est. 93-94 Prop.
Fiscal Year
t ® Revenues Expenditures
San Joaquin County Council of Governments
ADOPTED BUDGET (May 25, 1993)
Fiscal Year 1993-94
FY 1991-92 FY 1992-93 FY 1992-93 FY 1993-94
Actual Budget Estimated Adopted
REVENUES
$57,283
$68,900
$65,696
$87,600
Federal rants
5638,498
$1,094,140
$944,265
$1,075,000
State Grants
$85,800
$422.300
$283,300
$224.400
Local
$560,883
$921.600
$865,700
$982,800
Interest
$3,126
$0
$4,000
$0
Other
$0
$0
$16,300
$0
Federal Pass -Through
so
$60
$6,036,200
$6,539,000
State Pass -Through
$1,726
$3,500
5476,500
$984,200
Local Pass -Through
$10,392
$19,500
$27,500,000
528,600,000
TOTAL
$1.288;307
$2.438,040
$36,126,265
$38,405,400
Building Maintenance
$294
$2,000
$713
$1,000
EXPENDITURES
$44,757
$72,660
$72,660
$72,700
Salaries & Benefits
$717,155
$878,118
$873.870
$1,026,100
Services & Supplies
$192,411
$279.022
$295,669
$362,400
Office Expense
$57,283
$68,900
$65,696
$87,600
Communications
$12,047
$14,900
$14,900
$19,300
Memberships
$10,594
$13,950
$13,000
$16,300
Maintenance - Equipment
$3,269
$4,500
$3,000
$4,500
Rents & Leases - Equipment
$15,698
$13,940
$15,720
$21,500
Transportation & Travel
$35,685
$37,562
$37,502
$37,600
Special District - Accounting Report
so
$60
$60
$60
Allocated Service Cost
$1,726
$3,500
$3,055
$5,000
Publications & Legal Notices
$10,392
$19,500
$6,365
$12,000
Insurance
$666
$3,550
$3,000
$2,000
Building Maintenance
$294
$2,000
$713
$1,000
Rents - Structures & Grounds
$44,757
$72,660
$72,660
$72,700
Data Processing
so
$0
$12,198
so
SMTD Contractual Charges
$0
$0
$23,800
so
Operating Reserve
so
$24,000
$2,000
$82,840
Professional Services $251,071
$1.239,300
$750,000
$855,700
Fixed Assets $40.158
$39.000
$39.000
$38.000
Pass Through Administration $0
50
$34,012,700
$36,123,200
TOTAL $1,200,795
$2,435,440
$35,971,239
$38,405,400
Excess (Deficit) Revenues $87.512 $2,600 $155,026 s0
Over Expenditures
Revenue
Detail
San Joaquin County
Council of Governments
91-92 Act. 92-93 Est. 93-94 Prop.
Fiscal Year
Funding Source
® Federal a State ® Local
San Joaquin County Council of Governments
REVENUE BUDGET WORKSHEET
Fiscal Year 1993-94
FY 91-92
FY 92-93
FY 92-93
FY 93-94
Revenue Source
Actual
Budgeted
Estimated
Adopted
FEDERAL GRANTS
U.S. Department of Transportation:
Federal Transit Administration (Sec. 8 MPO)
$23,800
$108,300
$108,300
$151,400
Federal Transit Administration (Sec. 26(A)(2)
$26,376
$16,400
$16,525
$0
Federal Highway Administration (PL)
$315,322
$466,440
$316,440
$460,600
Federal Highway Administration (PL Carryover)
$C
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
Federal Highway Administration (Ridesharing)
$273,000
$353,000
$353,000
$313,000
Federal Pass -Through Administered By COG
$6,036,200
$6,539,000
SUBTOTAL
$638,498
$1,094,140
$6,980,465
$7,614,000
STATE GRANTS
California Department of Transportation:
State Subventions
$85,800
$107,300
$97,300
$85,400
State Subvention Carryover
$0
$15,000
$15,000
$10,000
Proposition 116
$0
$300,000
$171,000
$129,000
State Transit Assistance Pass Through Administered By
COG
$476,500
$084,200
SUBTOTAL
$85,800
$422,300
$759,800
$1,208,600
LOCAL
Transportation Development Act
$366,325
$273,000
$260,000
$272,000
San Joaquin County
$6,000
$6,000
$6,000
$9,200
Local Transportation Authority
$176,421
$508,000
$480,000
$422,900
State Transit Assistance
$6,000
$12,000
$12,000
$12,000
COG Fees
$6,137
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
Member Jurisdictions
$0
$4,000
$4,000
$0
Air Pollution Control District
0
$85,000
$73,000
$226,800
Air Pollution Control District Carryover
0
0
$0
$12,000
Air System Planning Funds
0
$23,600
$5,700
$17,900
Other
$0
$0
$15,000
$0
Measure K Pass -Through Administered By COG
$18,000,000
$19,000,000
Local Tranportation Fund Pass -Through Administered By
COG
$9,500,000
$9,600,000
SUBTOTAL
$560,883
5921,600
$28,365,700
$29,582,800
OTHER
Interest
$3,126
$0
$4,000
$0
Other
$0
50
516,300
$0
SUBTOTAL
$3,126
$0
$20,300
$0
TOTAL
$1,288,307
$2,438,040
$36,126,265
$38,405,400
San Joaquin County Council of Governments
ADMINISTRATIVE PASS THROUGH WORKSHEET
Fiscal Year 1993-94
Fund
Local Transportation Fund
State Transit Assistance Fund
Local Transportation Authority
FY 92-93 FY 93-94
Estimated Adopted
56,0"36,200
$5,539,000
$9,500,000
$9,600,000
$476,500
$984,200
$18,000,000
$19,000,000
TOTAL $34,012,700 $36,123,200
Expenditure
Detail
),:.:..4
San Joaquin Council of Governments
3 Year Comparison
0.8
c
° 0.6
0.4
0.'d
C
91-92 Act. 92-93 Est. 93-94 Pro.
Fiscal Year
Salaries/Benefits - sarAces & Supplies M Professional Serv. � Fixed Assets
San Joaquin County Council of Governments
EXPENDITURE BUDGET WORKSHEET -PERSONNEL
Fiscal Year 1993-94
Regular Subtotal $672,476 $683,777 $739,900
TEMPORARY/EXTRA HELP POSITIONS $13,060 $41,000
Extra Help Subtotal $13,060 $8,293 $41,000
TOTAL $685,536 $692,070 $780,900
FY 91-92 FY 92-93 FY 92-93 FY 93-94
Benefit
FY 92-93 FY 92.93
FY 93-94
Position
Adopted Estimated
Adopted
REGULAR POSITIONS
$5,482
$0
Executive Director
$89,075
$83,100
Deputy Director
$82,468
$61,000
Manager, FinancetAdmin./Public Information
$51,376
$50,200
Executive Secretary
$26,948
$26,300
Office Assistant 111
$22,146
$22,200
Office Assistant II (2)
$46,578
$47,600
Fiscal Assistant
$33,131
$32,300
Senior Planners (4)•
$115,079
$200,500
Assistant/Associate Planners (4)
$184,419
$173,300
Commute Management/Public Information Coordinator
$41,256
$43,400
Ridesharing Outreach Coordinator (2)
$56,000
$58,900
Regular Subtotal $672,476 $683,777 $739,900
TEMPORARY/EXTRA HELP POSITIONS $13,060 $41,000
Extra Help Subtotal $13,060 $8,293 $41,000
TOTAL $685,536 $692,070 $780,900
FY 91-92 FY 92-93 FY 92-93 FY 93-94
Benefit
Actual Adopted Estimated
Adopted
_
ICMA (15%)
$93,999
$111,000
County Retirement System
$5,482
$0
Cafeteria
$23,597
$47,300
Car Allowance
$3,600
$3,600
Social Security
$3,973
$0
Social Security (Medicare)
$6,984
$8,400
Group Dental
$5,634
$3,900
Group Medical
$45.000
$66,500
Vision
$1,044
$700
Workers Compensation
$1,250
$1,500
Life Insurance
$648
$800
Unemployment insurance (0.2%)
$1,371
$1,500
TOTAL
$134,335 $192,582 $181,800
$245,200
' New permanent position not to be filled pending additional action by Board
FY 91-92
FY 92-93
FY 92-93
FY 93-94
Estimate
Adopted
Estimated
Adopted
Regular Salaries
$559,418
$672,476
$683,777
$739,900
Temporary/Extra Help Salaries
523,402
$13,060
$8,293
$41,000
Fringe Benefits
$134,335
$192.582
$181,800
$245,200
$717,155
$878,118
$873,870
$1,026,100
' New permanent position not to be filled pending additional action by Board
San Joaquin County Council of Governments
EXPENDITURE BUDGET WORKSHEET -SERVICES & SUPPLIES
Fiscal Year 1993-94
Line Sub- FY 91-92
FY 92-93 FY 92-93
FY 93-94
Item Acc7 Title tine item Oescripdon Actual
Adopted Estimated,
Adopted
201 0000 Office Expense - General General Supplies
$30.000
$33.000
Printing
$15,000
$20,000
Noncapital Equip/Furniture
$2.000
$3,000
Computer Software - Licenses & Upgrades
$3,000
$6,000
Computer Memory Upgrades
$500
$3,000
Office Expense - General Subtotal
$50,000 $46,784
$65,000
202 0000 Office Expense- Postage Postage $18,500 518,500 $22,000
Office Expense - Postage Subtotal 518,500 S18,5W 522,000
203 0000 Office Expense - Subscriptions Subscriptions & Periodicals $400 $412 5600
Office Expense -Subscriptions Subtotal 5400 5412 $600
Office Expense - Subtotal $57,283 $68,900 $65,696 $87,600
206 0000 Con munica ions Pacific Bet - Ridesharing $2,500 $2,500
AT&T - Ri leshanng $1,600 $6,000
SJC Centrex -Long Distance $10,800 SWAM
14.900
209 0000 Memberships Nall Assoc/Rog. Councls
$3.000
$4.000
CalAct
$100
$100
Intl City Mgrs Assoc.
$600
$600
Amer. Assoc./Public Admin.
$100
$100
Ca1COG
$4,100
$4,100
Amer. Planning Assoc.
5800
$800
Assoc. of Commuter Trans.
$500
$500
Stockton Chamber of Comm.
$250
$300
Modesto Chamber of Comm.
$250
5300
Reg. Council Mgmt Syst User Grp.
$2,500
$3.800
Self Help Counties Coalition
$1,500
$1,500
Miscellaneous
$250
$200
Memberships - Subtotal
$10.594 $13,950 513,000
$16,300
211 0000 Mainienancs - Equipment Office Equip/Computers/Printem $4,500 $3,000 $4,5W
Maintenance - Equipment - Subtotal $3,269 $4,500 $3,000 $4,500
214 0000 Rents & Leases - Equipment Copier $7,500 S15,000
Facsirrtile Machine $1,920 $1,900
Postage Machine $2,520 $2,600
Various Rideshare Event Rentals $2,000 $2,000
Rents & Leases - Equipment - Subtotal $15,698 S13,940 $15,720 $21,500
217 0000 Transportation & Travel Statewide Rideshare Meetings
$3,000
$2,500
DOT Traating Courses 2 persons/meeting
$1,000
$1,000
Caltrans Training Workshops 4 persons/meeting
$1,000
$1,000
Mileage Reimbursement for Personal Cars
$3,000
$3,500
Meal Reimbursements for Req6red Meetings
$3,000
$3.000
CaICOG Meetings -10 personstmeeting
$5,000
$5,000
InYI City -County Management Assoc.
National Conference - Nashville, TN - 1 persor>lmtg
$1,500
$1,500
Intermodal Planning Group - 2 person/mtg
$1,000
$1,000
Tucson, AZ
RTPA/CTC/Self Help Coalition - 12 person/meetings
$2,000
$2,000
Natl Assoc. of Regional Councils -
$7,500
5 personslmtg - out of state
$7,500
Western Leadership Institute - 3 persons/meeting
$3.000
$3.000
Miscellaneous Meetings within State
$1,000
$1,000
Dinner Meeting for COG Board or Executive Com. (4-
$600
$600
RCMS Users Group - Out of State - 2 people
$2,000
$2,000
Executive Committee Retreat
$1.500
51,500
Transportation & Travel - Subtotal -- $35,685
$36,100 $36.100
$36,100
218 0000 Transportation & Travel - Other Mata Pool $250 S300
Rideshare incentives $900 5900
Transit Fares $312 5300
Transportation d Travel - Other - Subtotal $1.482 51;402 51,500
Transportation & Travel - Subtotal $35.685 $37,562 $37.502 $37.600
220 0010 Special District Accounting Report Comity Auditor Reports $60 $60 $60
Special District - Accounting Report - Subtotal SO $60 $60 $60
220
02100 Allocated Service Cost
SJC Services
$3,500
$3,055
$5,000
$11,880
Allocated Service Cost - Subtotal
-
$1,726 $3,500
$3,055
$5,000
223
0000 Publications & Legal Notices
Job Announcer eats
Legal Notices
$2.000
$17,500
52,000
510,000
Publications 3 Legal Notices - Subtotal
Deterred compensation Working Account
$10,392 $19,500
$8,365
$12,000
232
0000 Workers Compensation insurance
Workers Compensation
S1,250
$1,000
54_
Workers Compensation Insurance - Subtotal
_- --
$1,250
$1,000
SO
236
0000 Casualty Insaxancs
$2,300
$2,000
22,000
Casualty Insurance - Subtotal
$2,300
$2,000
$2.000
Insurance Subtotal $666 53,550 $3,000 $2.000
260 0000 Budding Maintenance Minor building maintenance at HSA $2,000 5713 $1,000 _
Building Maintenance - Subtotal $294 $2,000 $713 $1,000
264 0000 Rents - Strucbues & Grounds
Offices at HSA
$60.480
$60.500
Operating Reserve - Subtotal
par"
$11,880
$11,900
Miscellaneous
5300
$300
Rents - Structures 3 Grounds - Subtotal
$193,028 $279,022
S44,757 $72,660 $72,660
$72,700
238 0000 Deferred ComMsation
Deterred compensation Working Account
$617 $0 $12198
So
Deferred Compensation
$617 $0 $12,198
50_
Operating Reserve
Continue Budding Operating Reserve $24,000
$24,000
$82,840
Operating Reserve - Subtotal
$0 $24,000
$24,000
$82,840
TOTAL SERVICES a SUPPLIES
$193,028 $279,022
$271,869
$362,400
San Joaquin County Council of Governments
EXPENDITURE BUDGET WORKSHEET -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Fiscal Year 1993-94
Line FY 91-92 FY 92-93 FY 92-93 FY 93-94
Mery Work Element NoAroject Description Consultant Actual Adopted Estimated Adopted
0720 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
601.01 --Regional Transportation Plan $40,000 $0
601.02 --Regional Plannft Middies HOV Plan, Expressway Plan, Reg. Si7ce Plan $130.400 5201,700
601.03-3-5 Study Continued from previous year $20.000 $10,000
60201 -Reginal Transportation improvement Program $0 $0
603.01 -Road a Street Monitoring $37.500 $0
603.02 -Transit Coordination $0 $0
603.03 -Transportation Air Quality
40.0
603.04-Ttanaportabon Air Qw ty Monitoring
$59.300
s0
603.05-Martem Transtt Assessffiert
218.8W
$0
701.01-Tedv Teal Assistance
$0
f0
801.01-ktergoveawnental Coordination
520,000
$0
801.02 & Forecasts
$0
$0
801.03 -Airport Land Use Comrnission
$0
$0
801.04 -Congestion Maneyemert
Reg. Model Update
$0
$50,000
801.05 -Regional Planning
s0
s0
801.08 -Valley MPO Coordination
$0
$0
801.07 -Aviation Systems Plan
$0
$0
901.01 -Measure K
Preparation of required plans, Legal Services
$30,000
5501000
901.02-Aitamort Study
Parsons, OeLewv continued
$548,000
$240,000
1001.01 -COG OWP
$113,000
s0
1001.02 -TDA Administration
$0
$0
1001.03 -Community !nvolvernent
$22,500
$0
1101.01-Ridesharing
Trip Reduction Ordnance Coved., Vanpool coordination
$193,000
$159,000
Indirect
T.H. Enterprises, Legal, Audit
5145,000
TOTAL
$251,071
$7,239.300
3750,000 3855,700
COMPARISON OF PRIOR YEAR TOTALS
FY 89-90 FY 90-91 FY 91.92 FY 91-92 FY 92-93 FY 92-93 FY 93-94
Acta! Actual audgetActual Adopted Estimated_ Adopted
5219.878 $309.640 51,133,675 $251,071 $1,239.300 3750,000 •855,700
San Joaquin County Council of Governments
FIXED ASSET WORKSHEET
Fiscal Year 1993-94
Line FY 91-92 FY 92-93 FY 92-93 FY 93-94
Item Title Description Actual Adopted Estimated Adopted
451 Fixed Assets 2 486 Computers $6,000
2 Laser Printers - Replacement $8,000
1 Color Laser Printer $8,000
2 Notebook Computers $2,500
Capitalized Furniture $6,000
Computer Overhead Display • $7500
• Actual purchase subject to demonstration and final Board authorization.
Sat, Joaquin County Council cy Governments
mern1+cr Atcn,,v, ( Inc, -I f I am—p. 1 —11- Mark— Wp,ai. titin►:�n, 1 sit. ( ... .d Sat, L.dy,un
JUIN! 01 '93
Crty Maracas 01,Ce
May 27, 1993
Mr. Thomas Peterson
City Of Lodi
221 W. Pine St.
Call Box 3006
Lodi, CA 95241-1910
Dear Mr. Peterson:
Attached is a memorandum from me to your Council transmitting the fiscal
year 1993-94 budget of the Council of Governments approved by the COG Board
on May 25, 1993 and nine copies of the budget document. Pursuant to the COG's
Joint Powers Agreement, following adoption of the budget by our Board, it is to be
sent to member agencies for ratification by each governing body.
Therefore, I request that you place the COG budget for fiscal year 1993-94
on a forthcoming agenda prior to June 30, 1993 for your Council's approval.
COG staff would be pleased to appear before your policymakers to answer
any questions they might have regarding this matter.
Please let me know when this will be appearing before the Council. If you
have any questions regarding this matter, don't hesitate to contact either Steve
Dial or me at 468-3913.
Thank you for your assistance.
Res ectfully,
BARTON R. MEAYS
--'---Executive Director
Regional Transportation Planning Agency, Local Transportation Authority, Congestion Management AreW). Airport land Use Commission
102 South San Joaquin Street. 4th Floor • Pt) N", I011ie ShKi.bM. C-alili.•rncl 1)4;1111 WI 0 r'rri VIA. .yl:{ 0 F,\X. r_'il) JOS -1UR1
CITY C:IUNCIL
Pt/tl.l.lP A PENNING, Mavor
JACK A SUGI.00K
Mayor Pro Tempor-
RAYC DAVE NPORI
STEPI{EN I MANN
JOHN R (Randy) SNIDE R
CITY OF LODI
CITY HALE. 221 W[ST PINE STREET
P 0 90X 1006
1.001. Ctrl IFORNIA 95241-1910
(.") 334 5634
F AX 1.0% 111 67`15
June 4, 1993
Barton Meays
Executive Director
San Joaquin County
Council of Governments (COG)
P. O. Box 1010
Stockton, California 95201-1010
Dear Mr. Meaya:
1`110M.AS A PETERSON
City Manager
JENNIFER M PERRIN
City Clerk
908 MCNAT:
Crty Attorney
we are in receipt of your letter dated May 27, 1993 in which you
presented the fiscal year 1993/94 budget of the San Joaquin County
Council of Governments (COG).
we have scheduled this matter to be heard at the June 16, 1993 City
Council meeting, and we respectfully request that a representative from
your agency be present to answer any questions the City Council may
have. we will be mailing you an agenda for the subject meeting.
If you have any questions regarding the matter, please feel free to
contact our office.
Very truly yours,
2 til, 'de 4� l `f -'-c � �•E�
ife M. Perrin
City Clerk
JMP
CITY COUNCIL
PHILLIP A PENNINO. •- MaVor
JACK A SIEGLOCK
X,13yor Pro Tempore
RAY G DAVENPORT
STEPHEN ) MANN
JOHN R (Randy) SNIDER
CITY OF LODI
CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET
P O BOX 3006
LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241.1910
(209) 334.5634
FAX C091 111-6795
June 18, 1993
Barton Meays
Executive Director
San Joaquin County
Council of Governments (COG)
P. O. Box 1010
Stockton, California 95201-1010
Dear Mr. Meays:
w
THOMAS A PETERSON
City Manager
IENNIFER M PERRIN
City Clerk
BOB McNATT
CrtY Attorney
This is to notify you that at the City Council meeting of June 16,
1993, the City Council voted V= to ratify the 1993/94 budget of the
San Joaquin County Council of Governments (COG) in a vote of 3 - 2
(Mayor Pennino and Council Member Snider voted no on this matter).
If you have any questions regarding tha matter, please feel free to
contact our office.
very truly yoars,
J ifer W. Perrin
Ci y C1eA
bk