Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - October 20, 1993 (55)1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 04 October 20, 1993 REPORT BY LIVE MEDICAL .,iu+w.wa,s.s REGARDING MERGER The City Council .received. a report by Mike 1ilssen,,Lile Medical Industries, regarding the ambulance company merger. • RILE 11O, CC -6 AND CC=22 (d) ""+,,,Men, N*7101014 411 I le114 Pubk Ribbon EDELMAN 1500 Broadway New York. New York 10036 Direct (212) 70441255 Fax (212) 704-0121 Robed C. Hubbell Execu;.ve Vice President and Managing Director tees. eWs M.O. lss s Ib.Tnt $tlwb toirnadses klMass Vidor 1M 11C. Wake COT soeses Yns Ns. enlb r•an4h. NabW Wad. Woo Pools Noshed Toombs NatMarss rW ItuWlomP t;+MMns Tokyo PAUL M. VERROCHI PRESIDENT & CEO 07 B•e•rynwdt ErM. EB o =I • Bodo . 6Wooerwobo 02110 617.261.1600 • FU 617261.1610 Y BASIC REPORT HEALTH CARE SERVICES Thomas E. Sullivan (415) 627-2505 Randall J. Heppner (415) 627-2254 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE • We have initiated coverage of American Medical Response with a rating of BUY. • EMT is the leading private provider of 911 emergency response/pre-hospital care and general ambulance services in the country. • Expenditures in the emergency transport and general ambulance market are expected to reach S4.5-5.0 bil- lion in 1993 with intemal growth rates of approximate - y 10%. The private sector of the ambulance service market is consolidating rapidly as municipalities and large payer groups seek out cost effective regional and national providers to deliver increasingy sophis- ticated lc*;is of care and to meet more stringent re- sponse time goals. • EMT has taken the bad in the race to consolidate the ambulance service sector by aggressively pursuing the acquisition of key strategic operators in attractive markets. Since its initial public offering in August 1992, the company is ahead of schedule in acquiring core properties having closed seven acquisitions with annual revenues exceeding $75 million and signing a letter of intent to acquire one additional provider with annual revenues exceeding $50 million. • Our calendar 1993 EPS estimate is $0.80, increasing to $1.07 in 1994. At $20.5/8. the stock is trading at 26x our 1993 estimate and 19x our 1994 estimate. Based on a sscular growth in earnings of 30%, we have established a 12 -month price range target of $23.00-25.00 (+12-21%). July 22, 1993 DJIA: 3525 S&P 500: 445 Rating: BUY EMt �A�ER tlElnek. RES►ONCE HEALTH CAME ntSC - ez 1 i;g .)o 12 '14 s bio R7 6M� ONO u (.i..1.'. L. t '41.6.3' .3.L'.13.16 3.14_ 1 .div2.2 _ _ :c -7; ,Zi t IS? �.0 66 0 I -11 . 1 t. ^l_ • 0.3;. :.4,; C.S' 7.61T.69 i 0.691 0.47 7.69 0 1: ~ 07 . 5." t3 ! 7 1 -2 . - t -f — -r —i Tc Courtesy Mansfield Stock Service, Jersey City. New Jersey SIN 600 %1OvTGO,tJERYSTREET S.�NFRANCISCO, CALIFOR:Vti 94111 415.627 j000 MONTGOMERY Summary and Investment Conclusion We have initiated coverage of American Medical Response (EMT) with a rating of BUY. EMT is the leafing private provioer of 911 emergency response and general ambulance services in the country. Since its initial public offering in August 1992, thJ company has nearly doubled annualized revenues through an aggressive expansion plan that has featured the acquisition of eight (one of which is pending under a letter of intent) additional providers and continued strong internal growth from existing operations. Net income has grown steadily in the three quarters following the IPO and all acquisitions consummated to date have been accretive to earnings. We believe EMT is in a premier position to continue to take ad- vantage of the ongoing consolidation in the private ambulance sector and achieve sur*ained revenue and eamings growth of 30% plus based on the following: • The private sector of the a.mmbutance service market is highly fragmented with over 2,000 providers, the vast majority of which have revenues under $5 million. The mar:.et is sharply bifurcated with only a handful of large providers employing a multi -site strate- gy. The balance of providers are smaller operators focused on a single or limited local markets. The ambulance service sector is undergoing rapid consolidation as a num- ber of factors including increasingly sophisticated levels of care in 911 emergency re- sponse calls, enhanced response time requirements imposed by municipalities, the investment required to implement advanced technolonies and the emerging dominance of the mega -payer heavily favor the Viabilities of strong regional and national ambu- lance companies. • Expenditures on a "same store" basis are increasing approximately 10% annually as fa- vorable demographic trends (more of us and we're getting older), higher levels of medi- cal content associated with emergency care, and an increase in the number of inter- hospital transports stimulate both transport and price growth. • EMT has taken the lead in the race to acquire key properties in attractive markets. By securing "beachhead" positions in markets such as Denver, San Francisco, Miami, Port- land, OR, etc., EMT has secured an important competitive advantage and is favorably positioned to proceed with the second stage of its acquisition strategy with "lock -on" ac- quisitions of providers in contiguous communities. Since its IPO in August 1992, the company has successfully demonstrated this strategy in tine Colorado market by acquir- ing three private providers in the Denver. Colorado Springs, Boulder corridor over a nine month period. ■ Consolidating local acquisitions into a unified network leads to tangible cost savings and operating and financie synergies on both a regional and nationPl basis. With its recent acquisitions, we expect EMT will continue to achieve further savings and produc- tivity gains in capital intensive dispatching systems, labor, equipment purchase and as- set utilization, collection and administration of accounts receivables, insurance and maintenance. ■ Barriers to entry in the ambulance service market are very high. The technological and capital requirements of the industry have risen logarithmically over the past twenty-five years, fueling the move toward consolidation and mi '",.g the efforts of new entrants. 1 r MONTGQMERY siccunss • EMTs success in consolidating eleven (to date) independent providers into one organi- zation in Tess than a year reflects management's understanding of the independent op- erators' needs and the successful execution of its acquisition strategy. We believe the company's ability to integrate acquisitions as partners in the business with significant eq- uity positions goes a long way toward insuring optimal performance at the local level. EMT is viewed as the leader in the race to consolidate the ambulance sector and we be- lieve that existing independent providers seeking to gain liquidity through sales of their companies would prefer to join an organization of proven winners. • EMT's senior management has an extensive background in consolidating local opera- tors into strong regional networks. Through the merger of the four providers at the time of the IPO and subsequent acquisitions, EMT has also assembled operating manage- ment with unparalleled experience and stature within the ambulance service indus- try. Our EPS estimates of $0.80 in 1993 and $1.07 in 1994 are based on our confidence in the growth of the private ambulance sector, management's ability to integrate recent acquisitions and the opportuni- ties to close additional acquisitions in this consolidating sector. Our earnings model does not incorporate any upside from the company's recently announced letter of intent to acquire a California-based provider which had $50 million in annual revenues in 1992. This transaction, which remains subject to extensive due diligence and negotiations, will be incorporated into our model if and only when the probability of dos- ing the acquisition increases. EMT is currently trading at 26x our 1993 estimate of $0.80, and 19x our 1994 estimate of $1.07. We recommend purchase of the stock at this price level with a 12 -month price range target of $23.00-25.00. The following charts highlight the historical (restated to include the impact of the recent Miami acquisition which was a pooling of interests) and projected growth in revenues and eamings by quarter since the company's IPO in August 1992: Historical and Projected Revenues ($ millions) $80.0 -- $70.0 — $60.0 — $54.4 549.3 ■ $50.0 — $41.4 s44.3 $40.0 — $31 7 $31.2 $30.0 — $20.0 I I I I $62.8 $58.2 03 04 I Q1 02 03 04 I 01 02 92A 92A j 93A 93E 93E 93E 94E 94E 94E 94E $67.6 03 I $72.6 04 2 I Moo r- 56.00 — 2 E $4.00-- $2.00 — $o.00 Historical and Projected Earnings Growth MONTGQMERY swamis —$0.30 $0.25 3 $0.20 m $0.15 $o.to 03 04 01 02 03 04 ' 01 02 03 04 92A 92A 93A 93E 93E 93E 94E 94E 94E 94E Net Income Operating Income Earnings Per Share (fully taxed) Company Background American Medical Response was formed in 1992 through the merger of four leading private ambu- lance providers in California (2), Connecticut, and Delaware. Since its initial public offering in August 1992, the company has expanded considerably by acquiring seven additional providers in Mississippi, Colorado (3), Oregon, Florida and Connecticut and has also signed a letter of intent to acquire one addi- tional provider in California. As a result of these acquisitions, the company is the dominant private pro- vider of 911 emergency response and general ambulance services in the country. We forecast that the company i ill transport over 500,000 patients in 1993 in its existing service areas. EMT was the first publicly traded ambulance service company in the country. At the time of this report, EMT employs ap- proximately 2,950 people and leases or owns approximately 555 ambulances and transport vans. The Emergency Transport and General Ambulance Market Industry sources and the company believe that expenditures in the emergency transport/general ambulance market in the U.S. are conservatively estimated at $4.5-5.0 billion annually. Approximately 70% of this figure is associated with traditional 911 emergency responses with approximately 30% com- ing from general ambulance services such as inter -hospital and critical care transports. Overall :market growth is estimated to equal 10% annually. The primary factors driving growth in this sector include: ■ Favorable demographic trends as the population ages and demand for 911 emergency response services increases Expanding use of inter -hospital transports consistent with the growth in managed care Higher levels of medical content delivered in pre -hospital care situations 3 MONTGOMERY SECVI nes We believe these trends will continue to have a favorable impact on the private ambulance sector and project continued and sustainable industry growth in the foreseeable future. A snapshot of the emergency transport and general ambulance market in the U.S. today reveals a highly fragmented industry poised for consolidation. Industry sources place the number of ambulance service providers at approximately 14,000 (inducing municipal and volunteer organizations) with greater than 2,000 of these being private operators. From our viewpoint. the ambulance service industry resembles the waste management and death care (funeral homes and cemeteries) industries of the 1970s prior to the emergence of the consolidators such as Waste Management and Service Corporation. The 2,000 plus private ambulance providers are sharply bifurcated into a handful of large (>$25 mil- lion in revenues annually). multi -site operators and an overwhelming majority of small (410 million in rev- enues annually) operators serving one or limited contiguous markets. Expenditures in the private sector are estimated to be growing at a rate exceeding that of the overall 10% market growth as municipalities increasingly tum to the private sector for their 911 emergency response services in response to the bud- get crisis faced by many communities. Consolidation within the private ambulance sector is occurring as a result of competitive pressures in the industry and increasingly stringent standards imposed by municipalities and managed care provid- ers. Simpy put, larger regional operators can more cos effectively meet tougher demands for higher levels of care, shorter response times, etc. than smaller local providers. With the estimated annual savings for eliminating one redundant Advanced Life Support (ALS) ambulance from service at $400,000 annually, it is easy to envision further consolidation in the ambulance service sector as local operators seek to remain competitive. Access to capital for private ambulance providers has historically been limited to an individual op- erator's personal wealth and limited secured debt financing. Liquidity options for independent operators have also been minimal with many companies passed on to new generations within the same family. EMT's foray into the public sector has given it a unique advantage in offering acquirees an attractive exit vehide and alloy+ed the company to acquire an outstanding group of top flight operators at attractive val- uations. For a more complete analysis of the emergency transport and general ambulance market, please refer to the Montgomery Securities industry review titled "The Private Sector to the Rescue — An Overview of the 911 Emergency Response and General Ambulance Market.' 4 MONTGOMERY uLvsmu Discussion of EMT Operations 1) Existing Services and Markets American Medcal Response provides 911 emergency response in selected markets where EMT is designated the exclusive provider of these services by the municipal authority. The company also derives revenues from general ambulance services as dagrammed below. The company's strategy is to seek to expand its market penetration in the 911 emergency response sector and add incremental general am- bulance revenues where it has an established 911 emergency response network. EMT management be- lieves the 911 emergency response sector has proven to be very receptive to high quality, cost- efficient ostefficient larger private providers and offers the greatest opportunity for growth in the future. The company's revenues in 1992 were derived from the following categories: 70% 911 Emergency Response Seri ices 30% (;eneral ;kinlnilance Services - Inter -hospital Transport - Critical Care Transport - Handicapped Transport EMT's management has pursued an aggressive expansion program since its IPO in August 1992 resulting in a balanced operation with dominant positions in key markets in the westem, eastem, and southern regions of the country. Establishing a "beachhead" position in key markets allows the company to leverage off this base to proceed with lock -on" acquisitions of operators in contiguous markets and realize significant operating synergies. In addition, the incremental revenue added to its base since 1992 significantly reduces the company's exposure to any regional regulatory, pricing, or reimbursement risks and the impact of the loss of any single 911 emergency response contract. 5 MONTGOMERY sscurrncs Highlighted below are the operators currently under the EMT umbrella and the areas in which they operate: Company Location Date Acquired Regional Ambulance Vanguard Ambulance New Haven Ambulance Professional Ambulance Mobile Medic Ambulance Ambulance Service Co. Buck Medical Services A-1 Ambulance Services San Francisco Bay Area San Jose Connecticut Deiawara/New Jersey Mississippi Denver Portland, OR Boulder, CO Randle-Eastem Ambulance Miami Reed Ambulances Denver Bridgeport Ambulance Service Connecticut 911 Emergency Services of California Modesto 1PO—August 92 IPO—August 92 IPO—August 92 IPO — August 92 November 92 December 92 January 93 April 93 June 93 July 93 July 93 In Discussion 6 MONTGOMERY sacvzmss The 911 Emergency Response Business Municipalities suck as cities or counties typically contract with private ambulance providers for ex- clusive 911 emergency response services within prescribed geographic boundaries. The sophistication of the contracting process has increased in recent years with municipalities now specifying and monitor- ing response time goals, standards for care, regulated rates and other requirements. Contracts typically run 3-5 years in length with provisions for 1-2 year extensions. Contracts are generally put out for com- petitive bidding. but in most cases the close relationship between the municipality and the provider give the incumbent a distinct advantage in the bidding process. In return for agreeing to the terms of the con- tract. the company is granted the right to transport in all 911 responses. While the ambulance company may be designated the 'first responder" in certain areas, it is more common to see the local fire depart- ment be designated as first responder with the ambulance company responsible for second responder and transport. As the 911 emergency response market has developed, its visibility within a community has grown considerably. EleCted officials now view 911 emergency response as the third leg of a municipal services stool alongside police and fire services. Mayors, supervisors, council members, etc. are keenly aware that unsatisfactory response to a 911 call can end up on page one of the local media. As a result, municipal- ities are factoring in performance and quality of service as the most important considerations in awarding 911 emergency response contracts to private providers. Accordingly. those responsible for approving contracts are utilizing more objective performance measures and demanding data from candi- dates in the contracting process. We believe this trend is accelerating nationwide and heavily favors larg- er operators such as EMT that employ sophisticated technology and can point to an outstanding track record of performance in a number of markets. The ambulance service companies that EMT has brought under its umbrella have a stellar record in the 911 emergency response contract area. In evaluating suitable acquisition candidates, the company places a premium on operators with a long established record of high quality, efficient 911 emergency response service. None of the operators EMT has acquired have ever lost an existing 911 contract. We believe EMT's strong position in the emergency transport sector provides the company with significant downside protection as 911 emergency response call volume is highly statistically predictable by market served and not subject to wide volatility. The company has also recently negotiated new contracts or ex- tensions in important markets such as Santa Clara County. CA and Contra Costa County, CA giving it a portfolio of high quality 911 emergency response contracts unparalleled in the industry. The General Ambulance Service Business Broadly defined. general ambulance service includes inter -hospital transport, discharge transport, critical care transport, and transportation of the handicapped. A significant portion of general ambulance transport is related to transport to and from long-term health care facilities. The majority of the general ambulance transport market is controlled by hospitals and payers through contracts with local operators. For example, if an individual is injured in an accident in Alameda County, CA and requires emergency transport to a trauma center, that individual would be transported by EMT to the appropriate hospital. If in our example, this individual happens to be one of the 4.5 million plus members of Kaiser Permanente Health Plans (staff model HMO) and Kaiser desires to have that person in its own facility in Alameda County, EMT (which holds an inter -hospital transport contract with Kaiser) would transport that patient, once stable, from the trauma center to a Kaiser facility. By virtue of its extensive operating profile and geographic coverage, EMT has been quite successful in establishing general ambulance service contracts with key providers/payers. We believe the key to growing this sector of the business lies in the company's ability to serve the large payer groups in a par- ticular region. With its extensive regional networks in markets such as Denver, San Francisco Bay Area, 7 r �+ MONTGOMERY SECVIU770 Miami, etc., EMT has an inherent advantage over smaller competitors through its ability to offer "one-stop shopping" to the likes of a Kaiser Permanente. As managed care plans grow and control more patients in a region, EMT should control an increasing share of the non -emergency transports in its markets. 2) Economics of Transport 911 Emergency Response As highlighted earlier, revenues from 911 emergency response service account for approximately 70% of EMTs revenues. The actual per transport charge in each municipality served varies by terms of the contract, the level of medical content provided, and the type of service provided. Emergency response and transport is most commonly serviced by Advanced Life Support (ALS) ambulances that are staffed by one or two paramedl s with advanced medical training. Revenue per ALS transport averages between $350-450. In regions where Basic Life Support (BLS) response is allowed, the average revenue per trans- port is lower, primarily because BLS units are typically staffed by lower cost emergency medical techni- dans (EMTs, and hence the ticker symbol!) with less sophisticated equipment. It is worth noting here that EMT's ratio of ALS versus BLS units used for 911 emergency response calls is higher than indus- try norms and an important strategic advantage employed by the company as a barrier to entry for the competition. Contracts for 911 emergency response service require the provider to respond to all requests for emergency transport in their assigned territories. Unfortunately, not all individuals transported are capa- ble of paying all or part of the eventual charges billed by the provider. Since the paramedic doesn't re- quest a VISA card or credit history prior to administering care, the company does not know on a call -by - call basis the capability of the patient to pay the eventual charges incurred. The uncollected portion of billed revenues is termed "uncompensated care" in the ambulance industry. The level of uncompensated care in any particular service area is a key component of the ultimate value of the 911 emergency re- sponse contract and an important factor in establishing contracted rates within a community. Industry wide, uncompensated care varies widely in the 15-40% range with fluctuations noted by region and municipality. The factors impacting the level of uncompensated care are, as would be expect- ed, related to the economic well-being of the population and demographic characteristics of the commu- nity. By way of example, a provider could expect the level of uncompensated care in Harlem to be at the high end of the range while the operator holding the 911 emergency response contract in Scarsdale would experience uncompensated care levels al the low end of the scale. While the level of uncompensated care will vary widely by community, it is statistically predictable over the years and varies within a narrow range. In our previous example, if the level of uncompensated care in Harlem historically aver- aged 40%, the operator might see the level drop to 39% or rise to 41% in any given period, but rarely wou:d see a dramatic shift in either direction during the length of a contract. Because it is statistically pre- dictable within a narrow range, the level of uncompensated care can be factored into the rate schedule with a high degree of confidence when negotiating a 911 emergency response contract with the munici- pality EMTs uncompensated care has averaged 22-23% of revenues over the past few years. We believe EMT's uncompensated care expense is lower than the industry average due primarily to the quality of reimbursement in the markets served and EMT's sophisticated collection process. In evaluating the at- tractiveness and value of potential acquisitions, EMT management carefully reviews the uncompensated care profile in a service area. Revenues are reported on a gross, billed basis while uncompensated care is charged as an expense against revenues on the income statement. 8 MONTGOMERY sacaamrs General Ambulance Transport General ambulance transport revenues account for approximately 30% of EMTs revenues. The majority of general ambulance transports are handled under contracts with hospitals (discharge, inter- hospital), payers and other care providers. As most patients being transported are medically stable, the majority of these transports are handled by Basic Life Support units staffed by EMTs. Revenue per trans- port varies by region and medical content required and averages $150-250. Uncompensated care is less of a concern in this market due to the higher proportion of insured patients and some degree of selectivity in patients transported. In certain cases, high risk patients are transferred between hospitals to access advanced technol- ogy, particular surgical procedures, etc. In these cases the patients are transported in a unique ambu- lance called a critical care transport (CCT) unit, outfitted with equipment similar to that found in a hospital's intensive care unit and are usually accompanied by either a nurse or a physician. Revenues from these critical care transports can easily average $1,000-1.500 per transport The smallest element of the company's general ambulance services is its wheelchair transport ser- vices in selected regions. Revenues per transport average $50 will specially modified vans handling all handicapped transport. 3) Reimbursement EMT receives reimbursement from three primary sources: • The Private Insurer • Medicare/MediCaid • Individuals Private insurers (including managed care organizations) are billed the full amount of the charges or contracted rate. Typically, the insurer pays 80% of the charge with the insured responsible for the bal- ance. In instances where the patient is covered by Medicare, the ccmpany is reimbursed at the rate of 80% of the prevailing market rate. If the patient has no insurance and is not covered under a govemment health plan, the company bills the individual for the entire amount. In certain municipalities with a high percentage of uncompensated care, the municipality will pay a subsidy to the provider in an effort to keep the contracted rate within reasonable limits. The plethora of payers and the not inconsequential payments required of individuals make accounts receivable management and relationships with payers of paramount importance. We believe EMT has a distinct advantage in the receivables management area due to the scope of its operations and corre- sponding ability to develop real economies of scale in billing and collection. After establishing a'beach- head" position in a particular market, the company is able to consolidate the billing and receivables functions from subsequent acquisitions in the region, achieving superior cash management efficiencies and tangible cost savings. By way of example, EMT recently completed the acquisition of Bridgeport Am- bulance Services in Connecticut. With its existing presence in the Connecticut market through New Ha- ven Ambulance Service, the company will be able to consolidate the billings and receivables management into the New Haven operations and realize tangible savings in labor and overhead and more effective cash management. 9 MONTGQ,iIERY SW:W a The reimbursement profile for EMT in 1992 was approximately as follows: Reimbursement by Payer as a Percent of Revenues lincormensated car. Medicarathhedicaid 23% 28% Private Insurance Individuals 26% 23% 4) Corporate Strategy EMT is executing a specific business strategy that it believes is unique in the industry and distin- guishes the company from its competitors. The company also believes its strategy is consistent with the trends in the industry, particularty the 911 emergency response sector, toward higher standards of care and more stringent performance goals. Key elements of their business strategy include the following: ■ Focus on 911 Emergency Response: The company intends to continue to rely on 911 emergency response contacts as its primary source of revenues. Management believes significant opportunities f.A. growth exist in the 911 emergency response market as mu- nicipalities tum to the Ovate sector for assistance in cost-effectively managing their 911 emergency response systems. In addition, revenues in this market are highly predictable statistically and, given the tong -term nature of 911 emergency response contracts, very stable. In evaluating the attractiveness of acquisition candidates, management focuses on the operators' 911 emergency response component as a percent of total revenues. • Technological Leadership: Management believes it is imperative to utilize the latest technology available to maximize efficiency and productivity. In particular, the company believes cost-effective improvements are available by implementing sophisticated dis- patching systems using global positioning satellite technology, digital mapping, etc., re- ducing the level of uncompensated care by installing predictive dialers, and updating MIS systems to provide real-time data capable of identifying performance issues imme- diately. Employing the most cost-effective technology is key to managing a nationwide network ;I regional operators. ■ The Use of ALS Units in 911 Emergency Response: An important component of the company's strategy is to use Advanced Life Support units in the majority (65%) of 911 emergency response calls. Employing more highly trained paramedics, the use of ALS units parallels the trend toward increasing levels of medical content in on -scene treat- ment aad pre -hospital care. ■ Expand Operations Utilizing Experienced Management: Through its aggressive ac- quisition program, EMT has acquired literally hundreds of years of senior operating ex- perience. In all key acquisitions, existing management has remained in place and is motivated through the financial structure of the consideration paid to continue to improve performance. Having senior operating management in-house is an important element in the company's strategy to expand in existing markets to create a network of strong re- gional operators. 10 4 MONTGOMERY sucana • Maintain Community Roots: Choosing a private ambulance company to serve a com- munity's 911 emergency response requirements remains a derision that is made at a focal level. Choosing the wrong provider can be a minefield for elected officials and they naturally find solace in working with established local management. EMTs strategy of giving local operators an incentive to stay on board post -acquisition in "beachhead" properties is a key to maintaining roots in a community. 5) Acquisition Strategy As highlighted in our industry report, The Private Sector to the Rescue -An Overview of the 911 Emergency Response and General Ambulance Market' we believe the industry is poised for growth and ripe for consolidation. The future leaders in this industry sector by the end of the decade wilt be those companies that take action now to acquire strategically critical properties and begin to develop the infra- structure required to realize the operating and financial synergies inherent in consolidation. It is our belief that EMT has a substantial lead in the race to acquire key properties and that the willingness of manage- ment to be at the forefront in consolidating this industry will be rewarded in the years to come. In the short term, the company's focus is on acquiring operators in strategically important markets. These "beachhead" properties, as the company terms them, form the nucleus of a future net- work that the company develops in a region along with future "lock -on" acquisitions of smaEar providers in contiguous markets. As the network takes shape, the company expects to realize significant operating and financial synergies as discussed later in this report. Implementation of EMT's acquisition strategy will vary by the market dynamics, availability of acqui- sition candidates and other factors in any particular region. EMT's ability to be flexible with regard to tim- ing and structure of acquisitions is a key strength of the company and positions them as a strong buyer in any competitive bidding situation. The company's recent success in establishing EMT as the dominant private ambulance provider in Colorado is illustrative of the "beachhead"/"lock-on" acquisition strategy and an excellent example of its ability to be opportunistic in implementing this strategy. At the time of Its IPO, EMT had no operations in the state of Colorado. In December 1992, EMT closed the acquisition of Denver-based Ambulance Service Company, Colorado's leading private ambulance service company. In April 1993, the company closed the acquisition of A-1 Ambulance Service which serves the surrounding communities of Boulder, Colorado Springs, and Longmont. Using the previously acquired Ambulance Se, /ice company, EMT was awarded the 911 emergency response contract for Aurora, CO, a suburb of Denver and the third largest city in the state. This month, the company solidified its position in Colorado by acquiring Reed Ambulances, Inc. of Denver. With this acquisition, EMTs service in Colorado will have progressed from zero at the time of the IPO to the dominant provider in the state in a period of Tess than one year. EMT's success in acquisitions is attributable not only to a well -executed acquisition strategy, but also to its pace -setting reputation in the ambulance sector — people like to join winners! EMT's use of equity in "beachhead" acquisitions gives acquirees substantial incentives to maximize performance. The financial resources available to the company and its experience in structuring acquisitions that appeal to acquirees will be an important strategic advantage to EMT over the next 12-24 months as desirable "beachhead" properties turn over. 6) Synergies and Economies of Scale EMT's strategy of creating strong regional networks by acquiring ambulance providers in contiguous markets is rooted in the premise that operating and financial synergies will be available from consolidating the operations of several independent providers in a region. The benefits to consolidating operations in - dude tangible cost savings in labor, equipment, and overheaa as well as productivity gains as the "down - 11 i MQNTGOMERY SECURInrs time" component is reduced and asset utilization rates are increased. As an example, eliminating one redundant Advanced Life Support unit from a combined fleet can save an operator approximately $400,000 annually. As the reader can imagine, companies involved in the 911 emergency response seg- ment of the market are forced to keep a "safety stock' of units in operation to meet response time goals and cover unexpected events. Simply eliminating duplication in the safety stock in a combined operation can lead to tangible savings. Consolidating operations and the resulting synergies also presents a barrier to entry for competitors who do not enjoy similar synergies in the competitive bidding process. The operating synergies and economies of scale experienced by EMT can be categorized as both regional and national in nature. On a national basis, EMT experiences savings in the following key ex- pense categories: • Purchase of Equipment and Supplies: Bought in bulk and distributed throughout the network • Insurance: Multi-million dollar umbrella policy in place to cover all its operations • Lower Cost of Capital: Distinct advantage in acquisitions EMT also sees tangible cost savings and productivity gains when it consolidates providers in a re- gion such as the Denver market and the San Francisco Bay Area. Some of the more visible regional op- erating synergies occur in the following areas: ▪ Dispatching Systems: At the heart of optimizing equipment and labor productivity and achieving response time goals is a technologically sophisticated dispatching system. Stepping into EMTs dispatching center In Fremont, California that handles an average of 600 calfs per day for Alameda and Cofira Costa Counties, one could envision that in their spare moments (of which there are few) the operators could guide a San Francisco bound 747 into SFO International Airport. In the darkened control room are multiple op- erators seated at sophisticated communications consoles watching an array of electron- ic maps that pinpoint the exact location and status of every ambulance on the streets. Features such as satellite -based navigators, computer graphics and electronic maps for counties accurate to the block are part of an impressive array of equipment designed to enhance efficiency, pare operating costs and meet more stringent 911 emergency re- sponce contract requirements. The company esti.nates that its GPS -based dispatching system operating in the Bay area decreases the number of ambulances required to ser- vice the counties by twenty units. The productivity gains experienced result from utilizing computer derived algorithms which position units in high demand locations by the minute, significantly reducing down- time and shortening response time. Real time data on location and status allows the r'a- patchers to move units around like chess pieces to better meet anticipated demands. Aa a result, Tess ambulances are required to service an area and tangible productivity gains are realized. Smaller, local providers typically lack the capital to invest in ad- vanced dispatch systems and the call volume to justify installation of a state-of-the-art dispatching system. As the company acquires smaller operators in contiguous markets. EMTs strategy is to fold the acquiree's dispatching system into a regional center to le- verage off an infrastructure of advanced dispatch centers. In addition to tangible cost savings and productivity gains, an advanced dispatching system is a significant barrier to entry for any competitor looking at bidding on a 911 emergency services contract held by EMT. 12 MONTGOMERY arcvunn ■ Billing and Receivables: Regionalized administration of billing and management of ac- counts receivable eliminates redundancy in the collection process leafing to more effec- tive cash management. Since the payers are the same, a centralized billing function can produce a much higher collection rate per employee than several smaller providers each handling billing and collection on their own. • Maintenance: Ambulances are under extreme use and require extensive and frequent maintenance to insure 100% performance. Consolidating several maintenance centers into one facility leads to labor, equipment and overhead savings. 7) Management The strategy outlined by EMT requires management with expertise in both ambulance service op- erations and in identifying and structuring acquisitions to add value in consolidating industries. EMTs se- nior management has the optimal blend of both sides of the management coin. The management team is led by Paul Verrochi, Chairman and CEO and Dominic Puopoto, Executive Vice President and CFO. Both Mr. Verrochi and Mr. Puopolo are founders of the company. Prior to founding EMT, Mr. Verrochi and Mr. Puopolo built and managed two highly successful service industry companies through the consolida- tion of local providers into regional and national companies. The company has hundreds of years of senior operating management experience as a result of the consolidation of the original four providers at the time of the IPO and subsequent acquisitions. Paul Shirley, previously Executive Vice President of the company, was recently named Chief Operating Officer of EMT. Mr Shirley has over thirty years of expedence in the ambulance service industry and has served on numerous industry association and municipal commissions. Other key members of management in - dude: William "Earl" Riggs, Executive Vice President, with approximately thirty years of direct operating experience in the ambulance service sector, Joseph Paotette, Executive Vice President, with over twenty years of industry experience and currently the Chairman of the government affairs committee of the Amer- ican Ambulance Association; and Michael McClymont, Senior Vice President, with extensive experience in the integration of new acquisitions into a corporate structure in a variety of service organizations. In addition to the depth of senior management expertise, the company benefits from a Board of Directors with noteworthy experience in acquisitions, capital markets and health care reimbursement. One feature that attracts us to the company is its success in retaining local management after ac- quiring a "beachhead" provider. In all major acquisitions, the company has retained senior management and benefits from their invaluable ties in the community. Retaining management insures a seamless tran- sition from day one and brings with it a wealth of experience that further solidifies the company's man- agement base. From our conversations with operators recently brought under the EMT umbrella, it is evident that the company recognizes the challenges associated with rapid expansion and takes great pains to create an environment and compensation structure that rewards the acquiree for continued su- perior performance. Opportunities For Growth We believe the leadership exhibited by EMT in consolidating the private ambulance service sector and the favorable market conditions in this industry will allow the company to achieve sustainable revenue and eamings growth of 25-30% for the foreseeable future. A few of the more visible trends expected to impact the company's growth include the following: • Compelling Market Dynamics: We estimate from industry sources that the 911 emer- gency response and general ambulance market is growing at approximately 10% annu- 13 f MONTGOMERY saivaJnas ally. Contributing to this growth are increasing transport volumes as the baby boomers begin to enter their 'golden years' and a growing U.S. population, particularly in metro- politan regions on the coasts where the company is strong. Revenue per transport is also rising faster than inflation as municipalities require increasingly sophisticated levels of pre -hospital care and medical content rises. Early intervention by trained emergency personnel in the 10-20 minute "golden period' post trauma has been shown to improve the probability of recovery. As an example, the availability of a defibrillator and trained paramedics can mean the difference between lite and death for a heart attack victim. The capability to stabilize the patient on -scene and administer appropriate treatment can also significantly reduce the risks and complications associated with delayed treatment. ■ Industry Sector in Transition: The private ambulance market is evolving from a highly fragmented industry populated by numerous small providers to one in which strong na- tional and regional operators that can take advantage of the synergies available in con- solidation will prosper. The change in the structure of the industry is accelerating as more stringent performance goals and higher standards of care are demanded by municipali- ties in the 911 emergency response market. The emergence of group health care plans and their interest in contracting with providers capable of serving Targe patient popula- tions under their control is another factor behind the consolidation trend. In addition, many private providers that entered the industry in the 1960s and 1970s are looking for a liquidity vehicle to realize value. • Trend Toward Privatization: Municipally managed, tax subsidized 911 emergency re- sponse services can cost residents of a community more than contracting from a private provider and these programs are being evaluated daily to justify their continued exist- ence. Since we don't see the municipal budget picture getting any brighter, the opportu- nities for private providers such as EMT should increase. The budding trend toward public/private partnerships in which providers divide up a service area to maximize effi- ciency is a compelling development that could accelerate even further the privatization trend. ■ Leadir:.3 Consolidator in Sector: EMT management has put theory into practice by successfully closing seven acquisitions and signing a letter of intent with one other com- pany in less than a year. All of the acquisitions completed to date have been accre- tive to eamings and we foresee this pattem continuing in the future. Having proven successful in the public market since its IPO in August 1992, EMT is in a premier position to negotiate with potential sellers to bring further acquisitions under the EMT umbrella. ■ Synergistic Upside: As proven by the company in markets such as the San Francisco Bay Area and the Denver corridor, significant upside is available through operating and financial synergies in the consolidation process. EMT's management has proven capa- ble of identifying synergies in dispatching systems, Tabor and equipment utilization, in- surance, maintenance, and billing/receivables management. As future acquisitions are consolidated into the company's corporate structure, the leverage gained from these synergies will become an important component of eamings growth. 14 MONTGOMERY ssruansr Financial Overview/Forecast Assumptions American Medical Response has enjoyed substantial growth in revenues. operating income. and earnings per share over the last several years. Summary Historical and Protected Income Statements' (S millions except per share) 1E12 1= 1921 1992 1923E 1994E Revenues 365.6 384.9 3108.0 3121.2 3189.4 52612 Operating Income 45 5.5 9.5 10.3 16.4 23.3 Pre-tax Income 3.4 43 8.3 9.5 15.3 21.6 Net Income 1.9 2.4 4.7 5.9 8.8 12.5 EPS $024 30.30 30.59 50.67 50.80 51.07 • Note: results prior to the company's IPO in August 1992 are the combined results of the four separate ambu- lance companies acquired at the time of the !PO plus the financial results from the purchase of Randle -Eastern Ambulance which was treated as a pooping of interests transaction. 1) RIvenue9 EMT dervas revenues from two sources: • 911 emergency response • General ambulance services Approximately 70% of the compan/s revenues are from 911 emergency response with the balance from general ambulance services. Future revenue growth in our model will be derived from: • Existing Operations - We are assuming an internal or `same-store" growth rate of 12% for existing operations. This growth is attributable to an increase in both the number of transports and the average revenue per transport as described earlier in this report. • Acquisitions - The balance of the company's future revenue growth will come from ac- quisitions. Our model assumes the following acquisitions: 1993: One additional acquisition with an annual revenue run rate of $10 million is dosed in the fourth quarter. 1994: Four acquisitions with annual run rates of $9 million each are dosed evenly throughout the year at the beginning of each quarter resulting in $23 million of additional revenues for the year. • New Contracts - New contracts are 911 emergency response contracts that are award- ed to existing EMT operators in markets contiguous to existing service areas. For 1993 we are assuming the Aurora, CO contract in the second quarter, with $3 million in annual revenues, and one more new contract in the fourth quarter with $3 million in annual rev- enues. For 1994 we are assuming $9 million (annual ran rate) in new contracts acquired evenly throughout the year. 15 . MONTGOMERY srcvinrn Summary of Revenues by Category 1993-1994 ($ millions) 1993 1224 Existing Operations' $155.8 $233.9 Acquisitions 31.1 22.8 New Contracts 25 4.5 Total Revenues $189.4 $261.2 • Acquisitions and new contracts are added to existing operations in the following year. For example, all 1993 acquisitions and new contrails become part of existing operations in 1994 and grow at the internal growth rate for all existing operations of 12%. 2) Operating Expenses Operating expenses consist of Salaries and Benefits, Uncompensated Care, Depreciation and Am- ortization, and Other Expenses. We assume total operating expenses will decrease slightly from 91.5% of revenues in 1992 to 91.3% in 1993, and to 91.1 % in 1994. The most significant category of operating expenses is uncompensated care which, as described earlier in this report, is an expense category to ac- count for non -reimbursed ambulance services provided. The company's experience has been for uncom- pensated care to run between 22-23% of total revenues. We are conservatively assuming uncompensated care of 22.4% of revenues in 1993 and increasing slightly to 22.9% in 1994. 3) Balance Sheet EMT's balance sheet is very strong and the company is well-positioned to finance future acquisi- tions. As of March 31, 1993 EMT had working capital of $24.8 million and a debt to total capitalization ratio of 23.7%. As a result of the company's IPO in August 1992, in which the company raised over $23 million, EMT has sufficient cash for further acquisitions. in addition, the company is cash flow positive on an operating basis and also has $18.5 million available under a $30 million credit line to fund future ac- quisitions.The company expects to increase this line to $50 million in the third quarter. Note that future key acquisitions will most likely follow historical precedence and be financed mainly by stock, which his- torically has comprised 60% of the total purchase price. Details regarding the company's letter of intent to purchase 911 Emergency Services of Modesto are unavailable at publication. This acquisition, if com- pleted, is a major acquisition which could significantly alter the company's outstanding debt, cash position and capital structure depending on the terms. Accounts receivable at March 31, 1993 were approximately $40.2 million, net of allowance k 7 un- compensated care of 514.7 million. Average days outstanding is currently running at 87 days which is down from 103 and 102 days in 1992 and 1991, respectively. When EMT records revenue from a 911 emergency response, it also immediately records approximately 22-23% of this amount as a reserve against uncollected revenues. As these revenues are either collected or deemed uncollectible and cred- ited against uncompensated care, accounts receivable and the allowance are adjusted accordingly. Cur- rently, the allowance for doubtful accounts is 36.7% of accounts receivable which suggests that EMT is very conservative with respect to reserving for uncompensated care. 16 r MONTGOMERY sEcramEs Competition EMT and Rural Metro are currently the only publicly traded ambulance service companies in the industry. Rural Metro operates private fire service for rural communities in the Southwest and Florida as well as emergency transport and general ambulance services in these markets. A number of other private companies are seeking to expand through acquisition and compete directly with EMT for core 'beach- head properties. Some of the more successful but smaller private companies following a similar acqui- sition strategy include: Company Location CareLine LifeFleet Chaulk Ambulance Mercy Ambulance National Medical Transport Network(Medtrans) Southern Cal'domia Southem Cafdomia/SoutWNorthwest Northeast Midwest/South Washington/Califomia/Nevada/Texas (Recently acquired by Laidlaw Inc.). Perhaps the most significant competitors for desirable 911 emergency response contracts are the municipalities themselves. While the economic justification for going to a private operator is compelling and municipal budgets remain under pressure, the political reality of wresting control from a fire depart- ment can be an obstacle in certain cases. Private ambulance providers of 911 emergency response ser- vices must generally be approved by local fire departments within the service area. As a result, private providers are forced to walk a fine line between selling themselves as economically attractive and capable of providing a high level of service without denigrating existing service provided by municipal agencies. On the positive side, we are greatly encouraged by the growth in public/private 911 emergency response partnerships and believe this model could prove to be a most attractive solution for private providers in large urban areas. Risks ▪ The Unknown Quantity of Health Care Reform: At this stage, it is not possible to predict how health care reform and the much discussed HPICs, price freezes, managed competition, etc. will impact the private ambulance industry. However, it is our belief that any program to cover the unin- sured in a national health plan could provide a short-term boost to private providers by greatly re- ducing the level of uncompensated care. Eventually, we expect that private payers presently stuck paying a portion of every bill to compensate for the uninsured would push for lower rates and the market would retum to equilibrium. Overall, we believe EMT's earnings projections have minimal exposure to downward pressure from health care reform initiatives and could, in fact, enjoy shot .• term upside until prevailing rates adjust to account for coverage of the uninsured. ■ Shortage of Attractive Acquisition Candidates: A significant portion of the company's earnings growth is dependent on future, unannounced acquisitions. 11 attractive properties are unavailable or the price for available properties increases markedly, EMT may fall behind in its acquisition strategy. This risk is minimized by the sheer number of private operators, market dynamics that favor large 17 r MONTGOMERY sarcema3 call volume operators and our belief expressed earlier in this report that potential acquirees want to be associated with a winner like EMT. • Level of Uncompensated Care Increases: From an expense control standpoint, EMT has the least degree of control over the level of uncompensated care in any particular quarter. Should the company experience greater levels of uncompensated care than historically noted, eamings could be negatively impacted. Based on the company's tenure in markets in which it has major 911 emer- gency response contracts, we believe any short-term exposure to uncompensated care is mini- mized by the insight gained from operating in these markets for extended periods of time. Further, while the level of uncompensated care varies by community, it is highly predictable and subject to minimal volatility on a quarterly and annual basis. • Loss of a Municipal Contract: The loss of a major 911 emergency response contract would have an unfavorable impact on the company's operations. In particular, EMT's contracts to provide 911 emergency response services in Alameda County, Santa Clara County, and Contra Costa County in the San Francisco Bay Area are expected to individually provide between 3-7% of the company's revenues in 1993. Offsetting the risk of losing an 911 emergency response contract is the com- pany's tenure in providing service in their respective markets, its position as the incumbent supplier and the company's track record of 100% success in winning contracts in existing markets. Of the contracts mentioned above, all have recently been re -negotiated and extended with the earliest con- tract expiration date set for June 1994 (with a two year extension at the county's option). • Poor Results from an Acquisition: The company's earnings could be adversely impacted by un- anticipated problems in a key acquisition. Given the pace of consolidation in the industry, this risk exists for all companies at the forefront of the acquisition process. In the due diligence process of evaluating acquirees, EMT management expends considerable effort understanding operations and the characteristics of the markets it serves. We believe EMT's ability to draw on the expertise of its operating management is a key advantage in the due diligence process and minimizes the risks associated with the aggressive pace of acquisitions. Valuation At $20-5/8, EMT is trading at 26x our 1993 EPS estimate of $0.80 and 19x our 1994 EPS estimate of 51.07. We note that at this price level, the P/E as a percent of our forecasted 30% growth rate in earn- ings is 87% based on 1993 estimates a our 1994 estimates. The most direct comparable is Ru- ral/Metro which recently went public ?nd is currently trading at 21x 1993 EPS estimates and 18x 1994 EPS estimates, although preliminary secular EPS growth is forecast 'o equal 20%. In addition, we re- viewed the P/E ratio as a percent of eamings growth for leading consolidators in the death care (funeral homes and cemeteries), waste management, and medical rehabilitation areas. Our analysis shows that a sample of six companies in these sectors have an average P/E ratio of 21x 1993 estimates and a P/E over growth ratio of 1.1x. Using this analysis as a guide, we have established a 12 month price range target for EMT shares of $23-25. Again, it should be noted that at press time EMT announced an agree- ment to acquire another Califomia ambulance provider with 1992 revenues of approximately 550 million. This potential acquisition, which is expected to have a favorable impact on 1994 eamings estimates, has not been factored into our earnings model or valuation analysis. Wnen further detals are available and the certainty surrounding this transaction increases, we will adjust our eamings model accordingly. 18 MONTGOMERY srvama -4 Conclusion American Medical Response is the leading private provider of emergency transport and general am- bulance service in the country. Since its initial public offering fess than one year ago. the company has successfully executed its strategy of acquiring top flight private ambulance service providers In key mar- kets at 2ttractive valuations. Further. the company is beginning to recognize operating and financial syn- ergies from its early acquisitions resulting in both impressive revenue growth and corresponding growth in operating income. With the great deal of uncertainty surrounding health care reform and its eventual impact on health care service providers. it is refreshing to find a company in the health care sector ahead of schedule in executing its strategy with the potential for significant earnings growth and limited downside risk. We believe American Medical Response fits this profile and are initiating cover- age of the company with a BUY recommendation and a 12 -month price target of $23.00-25.00 0 (12-21 % above current levels). Thomas E. Sullivan (415) 627-2505 Randall J. Heppner (415) 627-2254 19 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE Income Statement Woos) 7...1 ..M 014.141 79444 DiSTORICIL PROIECI2 D 711.1 111.1 W 01 517 04 VIA VII VIE 171E 04110,5713 TA TIME512 IT 1710 711.1 10231 6114411 4444.1 11000 111.1 VII AI 3514A1 V4A, 1171.41 419900 : 4141.0 11011014 6'111 MVO MIM 1. 'I NA 41211.1 144.1: 444A1 NI 70 64.01 117114 I INC E4RNH3' ti4:4.406% 0,427 1140 11.721 14.317 11422 515541 U..77n9s..446 4.'10 11160 11 447 1511 1.23 1.303 '044 5311. 16554 16,610 1112 4.30 4 731 4.444 L3r.1e1...n 2.166 161 4.1 125 451 OS 20.4.64.4 410A..4lM 1.313 127 144 147 177 161 2401 0454•0644 4... . 4321 .511 7445* 76054 31430 25.137 OPERATING INCOME 1,46 5.101 4,43 2701 2.117 2.1:2 1762... 74.4..41141 1.240 1.211 471 761 115 11 13E 3A4134C423E 42011 111 4.574 2403 11141 7.310 1..4..2.77. 1410 4101 MI 1.(D I.r4 60 AEI INCOME 4240 34.1 0011 41.414 31041 N AN E SNA! IS OUTSTANDING EARNINGS PER SHARE FULLY FA %ED EPS (62%72.44.461 MA "GIN ANALYSIS REVENUES 7957 1447 7,00 1.47 .141 10.733 41517 11410 111.2 24.642 3104 9.214 4100 1 001 12.201 14.17' 4111 14.112 0212 3344 5 I. 1.315 1 471 1]10 Al 114 MS 1.1. 443 IIO�19 410 41677 41.h4 0311 17773 3241 3,44. 1412 3.517 14 253 754 311 167 4 40 3,014 3 411 4142 1710 3.577 1306 1 13 11.1 14,4 44441 117.. 41..% 124,7 4291 ILLY 10.705 1041' 11 125 11.210 341.341 50.59 50.12 50.16 511.20 50 47 50.67 031 1039 10.12 1071 10.20 10.13 042 1440% 00111 1410% 1000. MC% 1YIRATING L4PENSES N 5•1414.311.4. 661 MI% S12% MTA 471% 5174 O L'I4..p....154 C. 23J% 0.% 2202 2114 134% 223% 5.51.7 1111 1141 1L0% 147% 14 2% I1w 133..4511777 33•. 241 1w 11% 274 74% 5.444114.. a 101,1146. 27% 011 05% 0414 X14% 05% 7.411}..411771.77' 435% .74 411% 1001 IA6% 4231 07f RA TIAL INCOME 63% 04% 46% 91% 101% 174 7N.M E..... NM 11% 111 0.4 0.4 025% '3% ERI TAS INCCME 100 11 541 13% ..% 71% YET INCOME 271 13% 32% In 176 51% 7.. R... 111% 071 175% 4201 301% TO% CRU WDI R.4775 (1S PRIOR 51A0) R 204% 773% 16.% .43%.14% '31 0148.7..... 744% 742% 11.'1 143% 146% 17% 0.0457,I,,74.. 7144 713% 044*1 314% 21 5% 0.1 h.4.. 145•51•. 214% 9311 (014%) 111 346% 402 4.11.14. 711% 514% 1100.) 33014 411% 1111 14057934 777 S5... 2411 031'% 1191%1 720* 201% 0" E.O. :.106 EIS 141% 016% 249.1 170% 11% 1121-1 50.46 50.74 51122 101.24 10.14 10.11 10.22 10.21 5.43041 00244 !01541 1441" I0/3* 100* WO% 01% 074 IDYL 211% 224% 123% :71% 2221 1321 144% 110\ 153% 151% 41% 202 201 2.% 402 5% 04% 04% 000 002 01 5% 9221 1.1 0118 1074 4S% 71% 421 40% 93% ' 444 04% 04% •3444 074 102 73% 774 141 441 In 41% 4/% 401 !04 771% 433% 4211* 42.5 1101 12 2% 01% IV OA ", 11 TI 0211 419% 5171 n , 074 11% 1121 33 PS 1711 142921 111% 11% 044% .119% 101,15 1611 11 I% 7131 11 434% 116% 319% 11% 10.5 451% 502 Al% II% 40* 125% /11441 5317 417 5317 017 111.1! 01146 4.3044 44435*. 111144.4. 4141441 1.0144 1.21741 617 614 1.72 615 -_--Y 0.214 1 A6 41941 0 340 51,411 .! •,1 12.11 13.141 14710 1155: 11147 i .41.4 49110 4.71 431 1021.1 10/.2 143W 1.411 1741 160 2049 2.174 2 1 1114 497 41 665 %1 173 00 •475 77 047 42 0.4 A 04 1102 51) 1401 5QI 1.143 141 420 110 13 741 2001 S 144 5 471 1.132 7010 1141 211._ 0214 4:142 11.113 11161 1451 . 5 •tl41 . 211. 4 " 10412 i 1,11. 11014 1130 11.E 45.92 11711 ' 1:54' 102.101 50.20 5026 *42.21 51129 41417 514,4 50.0 10.25 *0.20 10.27 0.29 1407 j 11 40 61 1.014 1030% 1.547* 1054* 10101 447% 40141 403% M2* 011 A . 224% 124% 24% 23* 232% 114% 131% 7511 51)% 12116 .. 402 11* .0% 120 3402 . 0n ors .•4% nn 09% 453% 4444 01 I% 0121 N I1 5 1 . 1 51. 11 91% 01% 0" 09% la% , 0444 074 01 .•74 07% 41% 402 42% 01% 12% 41% 11 44% 41% 41 49% IM 423% .20% 411. 4101 42031 47174 1 1 ^• 43% 404% 4111 3201 .13'1 x10 10145 477% 7731 1171 599% 01% 179* 1121 4 1 , 194 174% ,13% 7141* 41. 004 661% 113% 321% 766% 4' 1% 10.1% 563% 411% 221% 204% 263% Yn 441% 1271 334% 119% AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE Summary Balance Sheet and Cash Flow Statement ($000s) Fatal Yaw LAY 1571 SI/WAWA V BALANCE SHEET MONTGOMERY S CL'B1T1L9 FY 1444 001441 FY 114) 93 14011 03HUE FY 10401 ASSETS Cub and cash eg44.a144a4 $3502 112000 14594 SANS SSA/ Aaw.d.. raaw.6M 30515 31210 50.9)0 00216 91541 Las A0elsn far .neee.p...4*N .0. 1100431 111.435/ 1171191 (33533) 131.0573 NO mom*,nea44eble 19.677 77,655 33.619 6942 6020 08..9 60.7 9.139 10000 17.000 16.000 T4161C944491 Anew 711041 46369 0314 4413 01696 pyamly ad equipment n•1 4020 10365 37061 73.432 31935 Gooderil w•1 399 11.153 .0917 6.120 683.7 08e• 2.084 7.771 7771 2771 1771 19161 A4*40• 510044 170.6 SE 472 5134.353 5163719 15AIN-HES AND STOCKHOLM 1V EQUITY Cunard 5903+44 117928 510273 021010 924031 120255 taegbe.. debt 8.031 8.9:5 19.97 36.835 37740 OOw 1511 9361 6,090 6000 6000 2..41 12.54144a 27.193 33.632 42.74* 96009 4503 Ste39e16wi .44.11y 13071 37.216 55016 10061 117221 3•404*4.5144....4 Eq.iy 114044 570018 996.672 9136.153 9144719 MAMMY CASH ROWS FY 1942 FY 1101 FY 1497 EY 1441E FY 1991E FY 1091? 0,44•1190 Aei.iiew Nat buxom 02554 14044 03.236 44014 112499 114.441 Dg44arr 5.74 3079 1096 1435 7336 10071 Amrlaaba 1213 927 561 1539 7251 1039 CO..p as smarts cep.W(b.l.. c.11) (517) (3.5021 /4.974) (9114) OI (14.365) Opowing dash 1144, 6040 4.244 4.293 4474 10241 15.74 I..eeiw0 Aari.i0.. Cask used far.cgr.nu.. 0 0 (11.900) (17 041) (11200) 114.000) ?.rd.a44 d agwpanna 119271 13713) (1.460) (5.001 (7000) (10000) 0019 (704) 1671) 997 0 0 0 Ne cwt used 46arv44wrg wawa.. (2671) (4.634) (17.441) IIl946) (14700) (24000) Fwaw48a3 A4604im Issuance of caeawa ewc6/ep•an• 94.1•..0144la d1M real/lryed) 00..9 Nat oelAwn 64.ar.mwa.c5+.9re O 0 21.724 0 0 47.111) (1,1.71 14.457) 7.011 10,060 7,006 15011 (4171 (75) 416 0 0 (7.294) 19242 9416 1000 �, 181 Nar Gray .. Calk awl Earwr.l..w 147 160 11050 330.004) 2.048 (1211) 942044390 CAA red Sga..r•1. 2555 3302 3.512 11.0 4594 6943 E.d6. CAA sad Egan,4660• 51192 13542 916.E 04.596 14962 f±A� KEY RATIOS Watling caped Amar& Iaantbl. day. odet•1edr) • e1 actemnl. .am.4,4. Dare to 4e1a1 0203480.44 Rawls -..5..00 41•(1 L awn a •var.4. 4M.pb19 aqua, Ge.d.a w. %d .1..r..8.1...qusly 510413 137016 926.101 110.290 053041 103 103 41 97 96 355% 340% 110% Hot 340% 304% 394% 711% NSI 218% 44 6% 23.69. 149% 1045 3605 44 49. 207% 339% 41 0% 39.5% 31% 300% 534% 563% 560% 21 TM study on the papa and any preceding Magee w ria a wm9W analyses of every mawul act respecting any company, industry or security. TM opinrona tiers a epressed reflect the tudgment of t1t awry at tlos Ma and an 'utast: to change. Facts hart been ootamw from sources considered rshabie, but an red guaranteed. Montgomery Securities (or Ns atfihatesl. hs partners, and1or employees may hare an /hems in the ase,raea and oprone on securities d the arae deserveW herein and may make purchases a salsa, as pnncpal a agent in secunhaa mentioned, while this report is in circulation. tWmw the information nor any opinion s.prsssed herein conwhnes a wktatation by us of the purchase or sales of any securities or options thereon Montgomery Securhlea may horn time to ere perform itawal'nent Pinkert; or other sasiws tor. or soliclI investment banking or other business from. any company mentioned in the 'spat. O Copyright 1993 Montgomery Securities 600 MO.N TGO. !ER}':STREET SAN FRA NCLSC'O, C-11. IFORNM 94111 t 7 2OOO 1 � 1 Kidder, Peabody SMALL CAP July 1,1993 EQUITY RESEARCH Company Report American Medical Response, Inc. (NYSE - EMT) Stock Rating: Outperform GAINING SHARE IN A GROWTH INDUSTRY — AMBULANCE SERVICES Recent Recent Fiscal Earnings Per Share P/E Ratio Dividend Current Range Price Yr -end 1992 1993E 1994E 1993E 1994E Rate Yield 20 - 8 19 Dec. $0.67 $0.80 $1.00 21.3 17.9 Nil Nl - INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATION We are initiating coverage of American Medical Response, a provider of ambulance services, with an Outperform rating. EMT could expand EPS by over 20% annually over the next several years. The industry is expanding 10% to 13% annually and operating leverage should lead to stronger earnings growth. EMT is the largest publicly traded pure play in this consolidating industry. Although EMT is not inexpensive on a statistical basis, we would begin to accumulate these shares for the following reasons: • EMT is purchasing the largest and best run private ambulance companies at attractive multiples of eamings and cash flow that are additive to eaming, . Eamings should increase since after about six months, operating units begin to benefit from operating economies of scale. • For the long term, the company is building an organization of elite operators, with long histories of service in their respective communities. Additional growth could take hold as the company purchases smaller operators and merges them into existing operations. The company has been acquiring larger ambulance companies for a combination of stock. debt and cash. Smaller purchases are Iicey to be for cash. • EMT has been completing acquisitions ahead of schedule. Additional acquisitions this year should lead us to increase our earnings estimates. • The valuation of the stock could improve if the number of shares held by the public increases and the average trading volume rises. We would not be surprised if the company proceeded with an offering to provide capital for future acquisitions as well as liquidity for certain operators who have previously sold their ambulance companies to EMT. Special Situations Todd M. Berko (212) 510-3727 Kidder, Peabody & Co. Incorporated BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION Valuation On a purely statistical basis. American Medical Response ap- pears fairly valued. However, our current estimates make the very conservative assumption that EMT will acquire no more companies in 1993. In addtion, we believe the market penalizes the company's valuation. as noncash charges de- press eamings. In its short History (the company was formed in early 1992 and went public midyear), company management has often exceeded expectations, and we an- ticipate upward adjustments to our eamings estimates. Heavy goodwill amortization ex- penses mask the company's real earning power. The company's mul- tiple on current -year eamings of 20.4 times is cbse to its expected growth rate. Yet. this includes sig- nificant charges from the amortization of goodwill. Excluding these charges, earnings would be $0.92 per share and the growth rate would be higher. Without goodwill expense. the company's share price could approach $20 per share. 23% above current levels. Our $0.80 per share estimate for 1993 assumes no additional ac- quisitions in the current year. Given that the company has completed five since November 1992 plus a BUSINESS 2 recently signed tetter of intent. there is the potential for additional acquisi- tions that could move estimates up $0.05 or more this year and an even greater amount in future years. The company has announced it is in negotiations to purchase an ad- d'Rional company with. perhaps, $50 million in sales. Our assumption of only modest improvements in operating margins over the next several years could also prove too conservative. The company has already hired much of the corporate staff to oversee any integration. Addition of a senior ex- ecutive expert at moving companies from the entrepreneurial to the cor- porate stage of development could further enhance margins. These improvements should begin to occur in 1994. Finally, the company has yet to substantially benefit from add-on acquisitions, which could generate a greater impact on EPS from each dollar of revenue acquired than from the company's recent acquisitions. Bridgeport Ambulance Service will soon close, becoming the first add- on acquisition. These acquisitions have yet to occur as the market to purchase Targe companies has been more robust than expected. Gaining significant market share through major acquisitions expands the number of potential add-on acquisi- tions. Reasons to Purchase • The private ambulance industry is growing 10% to 13% annually. The number of ambulance trips is increasing as the population ages and transportation between hospi- tals and other care facilities becomes more commonplace. The revenue generated per emergency trip, about two thirds of company- wide revenue. is increasing as there is a rising level of medical sophisti- cation required. An increasing number of municipalities are seeking ways to outsource this service. • Market forces continue to move owner -operated companies into larger organizations. Ambulance companies are facing increasing capital requirements and face sig- nificant obstacles when attempting to expand. By setting to a larger en- tity for stock, cash and seller debt, the owner/operator diversifies his assets, benefits from the growth in the ambulance industry, and contin- ues to operate the local company. Further, the owner/operator elimi- nates the financial pressure of having to guarantee all company debt personalty. • The concern over health care reform may provide incentives for owner -operators to diversify their assets. • There continue to be many ac- quisition opportunities. The company makes under 15 acquisi- American Medical Response is the largest publicly held provider of ambulance servsaks. This industry is expanding a! 12.5%-15% annually. providing the company with the potential for 20% EPS growth. The company acquires larger competitors for a combination of cash, stock and company debt Smaller competitors are purchased for cash. Projected 5 -Year Growth Rate 20% Shares Outanding (Millions) 10.7 Average Daily Trading Volume 19.500 Institutional Holrrings 16 % Insider Ownership 59% Book Value (199-0E) 5464 Price/Book 4 3 Revenues Per Share (1993E) 516 41 Market Cap./Revenues (1993E) 1 2 Debt as % of 1993 Capital 31.2% Est. Ret of 1993 Avg. Equity 22.2% P/E relative to S&P 500 Cashftow Per Share (1994E) 51.45 Multiple of cash now 13.8 American Med Response Inc (EMT) 20 lilill 1111 is to 1991 nm 11 1991 lWI' !... .1 i,. 1, Source. Kidder, Peabody & Co Incorporated `� tions annually and the number of 41'11) potential targets exceeds 300. While the company has concen- trated on larger acquisitions, sinal add-on acquisitions have the poten- tial to further enhance EPS. Smaller acquisitions benefit from operating economies of scale as they are usu- ., ally merged into a larger operation. • EMT has advantages when competing for acquisitiors. As the largest of two publicly held ambu- lance c,.,mpanies. EMT can offer stock as part of the acquisition pack- age. EMTs operating management is well respected as it has run some of the largest and best known inde- pendent ambulance companies. The company is completing acquisi- tions ahead of schedule and on favorable terms. • Company EPS could grow 20% annually over the next several years given industry growth (12-15%) and acquisitions. EMT purchases pri- vate companies for about 8-10 times trailing 12 -month earnings. This valuation includes the goodwit em- ptied by the acquisition. Economies of scale gained from a private company's joining a larger company increase the positive impact on eamings after about a six-month lag. a Operating managers own a targe amount of EMT's stock. In- creasing earnings raise the market value of the company and has a sig- nificant impact on the operating managers' personal net worth. • The company is negotiating an acquisition that, if completed, could acid $0.05 in earnings in 1994. Concerns • Health care reform increases uncertainty. However, under m ,st scenarios, the demand tor ambu- lance services could increase. Universal coverage could lead to reduced pricing, but this may be oft - set by lower uncompensated -care write-offs. The most negative sce- nario is a price freeze without wage controls. Kidder, Peabody Sr Co. Incorporated American Medical Response, Inc. Table 1 Market Participants Volunteer Munich Hospitals Private Source: Company estimates. • High insider ownership, particu- larly among former ambulance company owners, may lead to a sig- nificant overhang. The company is sensitive to this issue and insiders have been seling shares in an or- derly fashion. • Over time, the price of acquisi- tions may rise, particularly as additional ambulance companies come public. EMTs strategy of concentrating on core acqu'r.°ons should allow the company to gain access to many markets before competitors enter them and bid ac- quisition prices up. If the market for larger acquisitions later becomes overpriced, the company can then concentrate on add-on acquisitions. • Revenue and profit growth may slow as acquired revenues are likely to diminish as a percent of a grow- ing revenue base. Add-on acquisitions could allow EPS growth to expand more quickly than rev- enue growth. EMT will most probably make smaller acquisitions for cash axf generate not only cor- porate, but also operating economies of scale. 7,000 3,700 2,000 2,100 AN EXPANDING, FRAGMENTED INDUSTRY The ambulance industry is a $5 billion, highly fragmented industry with about 15,000 providers (see Table 1). Only about 30 companies have annual revenues in excess of $20 million (see Table 2). Growth has been about 1096 annually over the last decade, but could acceler- ate. About half the participants serve markets in which population densities are too small to support a profitable private operation. Al- though these operations may be profitable, they are too small to inter- est EMT. Increasing Demand Ambulance services has been a growth industry throughout tho 1980s. In 1980, the total market was $1.5 billion and private compa- nies represented about 33%. Ey 1990, the market grew to $4.3 billion and private companies represented 55%. The current size is estimated at $4.9 billion. By 2000. the market could reach $10 billion and private American Medical Response, Inc. Table 2 Participants' Size Annual Revenues Over $30 million $20-$30 milion $15-$20 milion $10-$15 million Under $10 million No. of Participants 8 20 70 160 1.900 3 Kidder, Peabody & Co. Inci,rporated companies could represent 66%. The number of ambulance trips has been increasing. In the past, emergency patients were trans- ported to a hospital, where they stayed until full and complete recov- ery. Now, after the initial emergency call, patients might be transported to the respective health maintenance organization of which they are a member or a hospital that specializes in a specific illness. Ad- ditional ambulance trips might bring the patient to centers housing ex- pensive test equipment. For example, Magnetic Image Reso- nance Machines and other expensive technologies are now centrally located to generate enough revenues to support the test facility. Finally, discharged patients who are not fully recovered might require ambulance ser vices if they are sent to another facility to complete recov- ery or home, where they will receive in-home health care. A short ambu- lance ride may move a patient from a $2,000 per -day bed to a $500 per - day bed. EMT provides complete patient transport services, from the most technically sophisticated criti- cal care transport to more basic services. Private ambulance services may continue to expand more quickly than the industry as a whole. Municipalities can reduce or elimi- nate the cost of ambulance services by contracting with a private com- pany. Private ambulance companies can gamer economies of scale by serving several communi- ties, justifying investments in computer software and systems to improve collections from third -party sources — Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance carriers. Service levels and response times improve as larger companies can invest in more efficient dispatching systems and improved training. Over time. municipal subsidies to private ambu- lance companies tend to tall as they become more efficient and retum some of the savings to the commu- nity to solidify their local 4 relationships. Value -Added Services About two-thirds of EMTs rev- enues are generated by providing exclusive emergency services over specific geographic areas. Ad- vanced We support ambulances contain many of the drugs and de- vices found in an emergency room plus advanced communications to talk to both the dispatch center and the local hospital. While an ambu- lance is traveling to an emergency room, physicians may give direc- tions on administering treatment and drugs to the patient. Over the past several years, the average revenue per emergency trip has been increasing. Local govern- ments are requiring more sophisticated vehicles, faster re- sponse times (often within eight minutes 90% of the time) and more highly trained employees to utilize available technology. Costs rise fur- ther as . oncems over AIDS and other blood pathogens increase the need for equipment to protect para- medics and for procedures for disposal of used equipment. The basic rite support (BLS) business leverages off the company's infrastructure required to maintain advanced life support. BLS transports patients between facilities for additional treatmeant, tests, or to discharge to another care facility. These ambulances have fewer drugs and less technol- ogy, but use the same maintenance facilities and dispatching terminals. Critical care units transport critically ill patients, who, under federal regu- lations. must receive the same level of care whether in a critical care unit or in the ambu`ance. Although it is currently only about 3-5% of the business. BLS is the fastest growing service. AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE SHOULD OUTPACE INDUSTRY GROWTH In addition to benefiting from industry growth, EMT is expanding through acquisitions. Since going public, the company has acquired o: signed a letter of intent for an esti- mated $79.3 million in annual revenues, about 40% of the esti- mated current revenue. The company's acquisitions year to date have already exceeded its budgeted plans through the end of 1993, and we expect further acquisitions that would be additive to earnings. The company is currently negotiating an acquisition that could add over $50 million in sales. In 1994 we expect acquisitions of $55 million in annual revenues. All acquisitions except one have been of larger competitors that create central locations support- ing further local expansion. Longer term, the company should begin to acquire smaller pro- viders. EMT wou'd benefit from reductions in both corporate and op- erating overhead. Typically, the physical plant of a small acquisition will close and all dispatching and maintenance functions will be handled from a central location. Ef- fective deployment of an ambulance fleet does not require strategically located garages. The most efficient dispatching system (flexible deploy- ment) requires ambulances, when on call, to be on the street. The Industry Is Moving Toward Consolidation Capital requiraments are in- creasing. Localities are requiring more rapid response times and more sophisticated ambulances. A fully loaded emergency services am- bulance now costs about $100,000 ($50,000 for the vehicle alone), and an ambulance to transport critical - care patients is $250.000. This compares to $50,000 for a more ba- sic unit. To improve response times, ambulance service compa- r'ss must either increase the size of the tleet or invest in more sophisti- cated dispatching technologies. Because of its size, American Medi- cal Response can negotiate volume discounts on equipment. Revenues Percent Change Kidder, Peabody & Co. Incorporated American Medical Response, Inc. Table 3 Earnings Model (in thousands except per share aamountr) 1991 1992 1993E 1994E $94.104 S106,433 5183,000 $236.900 28.6% 13.1% 719% 295% Expenses: Salaries and Benefits 545,614 553.364 88,900 114,700 Percentage of Revenues 485% 50.1% 48.6% 48.4% Uncompensated care 22.262 24,397 43,400 56,200 Percentage of Revenues 23.7% 22.9% 23.7% 23.7% Depreciation 2,772 3.066 5,800 7,500 Percentage of Revenues 2.9% 2.9% 32% 3.2% Other 513,717 $15,217 26,200 33.400 Percentage of Revenues 14.6% 14.3% 143% 14.1% Total expenses 584,365 $96.044 5164,300 5211,800 Earnings from operations S9,739 $10,389 518,700 S25,100 Operating Margins 10.3% 9.8% 102% 10.6% Non -Operating Expenses amortization of intangibles $927 5561 $1,400 $2,000 Interest expense. net S1,156 5747 S1,500 $1.600 Earnings before income taxes 57.656 59.081 515,800 521.500 3.201 4.089 6.900 9.400 Tax Rate 41.8% 45.0% 43.7% 43.7% Net earnings 54.455 54,992 $8.900 512.100 Percentage of Sales 4.7% 4 7% 4.9% 5.1% Pro forma net earnings (1) 54,306 55.670 58,900 512.160 Net earnings per common share 50.57 50.67 50.80 51.00 Net earnings per common share before Amort. 50.69 50.74 50.92 51.16 Weighted average common shares outstanding 7,576 8,447 11,150 12,150 (1) includes certain adjustments reflecting the move from an S coproration 5 Kidder, Peabody & Co. incorporated To finance this growth, entre- preneurs must invest additional capital or personally guarantee bank loans. even to finance accounts re- ceivables. A publicly held company has greater access to capital and can borrow at significantly lower rates. By selling to a larger ambulance company, entrepreneurs reduce their personal debt load, and get cash to diversify assets, stock to maintain an equity interest and debt from the company that generates income. The equity position is now in a larger company with profes- sional financial management and is much less reliant on any one local contract or business relationship. A larger competitor may be more adept at reacting to any changes brought about by health care reform. The entrepreneur can concentrate on his strengths, running operations, and pass off onerous accounting, insurance, systems development and finance responsibilities. . There are significant barriers to expanding into new markets and new barriers are being added. Larger competitors that wart to so- lidify their competitive position often suggest additions to municipal con- tracts. These contracts are now more likely to specify bonding re- quirements and more difficult performance criteria. Bonding may be difficult, if not impossible, for small companies to obtain. American Medical Response's Acquisition Strategy EMT currently evaluates com- panies with significant emergency services businesses, dominant mar- ket share, and a Tong -term relationship with local communities. The basic criteria include: • Dominant market share, ranging from 65% to 95-100%, in- cludes no emergency services.. • '. high proportion of sales genera,ed through providing high value-added services. Over 70% of calls may come from the local 911 6 service. and over 50% of calls re- quires paramedics_ • Exclusive contracts for emergency services over specific geographic areas. • More advanced equipment and employee trairing than the local competition. • Profitable, established op- erations with long histories in their communities. American Medical Response's current operators aver- age about 40 years of service in their communities. Acquisitions are antidilutive to earnings, and they are even more attractive on a cash flow basis. Sell- ers receive a combination of stock (500-60%), cash (20%-25%), and seller debt (20%-25%) structured to fit their needs. The company re- cently completed its first all stock transaction (a pooling). The retum on equity on a trailing basis is about 10%, but it could move closer to 16%, given a higher level of as- sumed and seller debt. The PIE ratios on trailing earnings is 8 to 10 times, below the companys publicly traded multiple. Using equity to finance acquisi- tions generates significant commitment by the former entrepre- neurs to increase EMTs profitability and market value without compro- mising quality. Once the sale is complete. the former small business owners view the stock price as a vehicle for increasing wealth, par- ticularly as they no longer gamer the cash flow from their former business and receive modest salaries. In contrast. other potential acquirers may offer a comparable price, but often offer subordinated debt, limit- ing upside potential. Other acquirers may not have EMTs depth of operating management. Increasing Profitability Through Rising Economies of Scale One of EMTs initial acquisitions has developed an advanced logisti- cal system that improves performance and cuts capital and operating expenses. Using propri- etary software. sophisticated satellite telemetry, and computer algorithms, the company's ambu- lance dispatching systems efficiently locate ambulances throughout the service areas and dispatch them within 30 seconds. As the company grows, acquired companies will ben- efit by upgrading their existing technology to the level appropriate for the call volume. Going forward. operations should continue to im- prove as an expanding revenue base would support the develop- ment system improvements. By more effectively posting am- bulances throughout the service area, the company reduces the number of ambulances and crews on the street at any one time without increasing response times. The cost savings of elimina ng a single ambulance are $100,000 for an ALS unit plus $300,000 in annual operat- ing costs. A basic life support unit costs about $50.000, plus another $250,000 annually to keep on the road. In the California market, the company operates up to 80 emer- gency ambulances, 15 less than it would otherwise need. The company can leverage cer- tain fixed costs over a larger revenue base, lowering these costs as a percentage of sales. Costs of continuing education for emergency medical technicians and paramedics are spread over a larger employee base. The program is further en- hanced as it can draw on a broader range of experience than other am- bulance companies. Computer software development, fleet mainte- nance, human resources and insurance are also prime beneficia- ries. The company now self -insures for claims within certain ranges. This saves agents' commissions of $1 million or more annually and fo- cuses management's attention on improving the company's safety record. With increased purchasing power, the company faces lower costs for ambulances, as well as for eTh T • (,) American Medical !temente, Inc. Table 4 Quarterly Earning; (In thousands, except per share amounts) Three Months Ended Three Months Ended Three Months Ended March June Sept Dec. Tots/ Match lune Sept Dec. Total Much lune Sept Dec. Taal 1992 1992 1992 1992 1992 1993E 1993E 1993E 1993E 1993E 1994E 1994E 1994E 1994E 1994E Total Revenue $25.227 526,277 526,834 528,095 5106,433 511,729 $42,090 545,094 554,087 5183,000 552,482 556,982 561,482 $65,952 5236.900 Perc:nt Change 65.41% 60.18% 6&05% 92.51% 71.919E 25.71% 35.3894 36.3496 21.94% 29.45% Expenses Salaries andtxne6ts 512,716 512.664 513,162 514,822 553,364 521,157 $20,602 521,442 525,699 588.900 $25,410 527,589 529,768 531,932 $114,700 Percent of Sales 50.495 48.296 49.0% 52.8% 50.196 50.7% 48.9% 47.6% 47.5% 48.6% 48.4% 48.496 48.4% 48.4% 48.4% Uncompensated care 5,705 6,281 6,239 6,172 24,397 9,180 9,553 10,686 13,981 43,400 12.450 13,518 14,586 15,646 56,200 Percent of Sales 22.6% 23.9% 23.3% 22.096 22.9% 22.0% 22.7% 23.7% 25.8% 23.7% 23.7% 23.7% 23.7% 23.7% 23.7% Other 54,689 54,519 54,829 54,807 18,844 8,095 7,468 8,136 59,700 33,400 10,236 10,111 11,047 511,506 42,900 Percent of Sales ILIA 51,57( IL& 1L& 17.11 17.71 12.41 17.71 ILA 11.9!& ILA 1A 12.21. DM 52.451 1$,17 Taal expenses 52121¢ 52].464 ,524.230 525.801 596.605 5.111.132 ,S) 1623 14Q2¢i S.t/311 5165.70Q 111.42Z es__1.218 jijJQQ =Q$1 S213.= Earnings from operations 52.117 52.813 52,604 82,294 59,828 53.297 54,467 54,830 54,706 517.300 54,385 55,764 56.082 56,869 523.100 Interest expense, net 5247 5258 5149 $93 5747 5300 5400 5400 5400 51,500 5325 5425 5425 5425 51,600 Farnings before income taxes 51.870 UM ILO =I 52. j 52.997 ELStfa ,59.554 , 4j)j SLUM SIM $3.334 53.Li2 HAI 521500 Income taxes 17_41 $LQ44 SL242 5321 11.214 51.2 2 1SL715 51935 SL 11 54.444 11.211 52.332 52.421 51121 59.40Q Net earnings 51,127 51,489 $753 51,623 $4,992 51,738 52,291 52,495 $2,376 58,900 52,287 53.008 53,187 53.619 512.100 EPS Common shares out. 50.14 50.20 50.17 50.16 50.67 50.16 50.20 50.21 50.22 50.80 50.20 50.25 $0.26 50.29 51.00 7,576 7,576 8,770 9.866 8,447 10,800 11,335 11,692 10,773 11,150 11,510 12,045 12001 12,644 12.150 Kidder, Peabody & Co. l�.., 4-p“rAt,t! drugs and other consumables. A SOLID REVENUE BASE The company has the charac- teristics of a regulated utility where they are the sole provider. Locali- ties grant ambulance companies rights to service a particular area. EMTs operating agreements. unlace about 50% of the largest ambulance companies. provide for exclusive operating rights over a specific geo- graphic region. Given the importance of emergency service, EMTs long history of service (often over 40 years) and the political risks attendant with changing vendors. there is a bias to maintain relation- ships if the ambulance company is meeting performance criteria and remains price competitive. Stable Payment Stream Underpricing an entrenched competitor is difficult. Net income as a percentage of sales is only 4- 5%. The current provider knows the pricing structure needed to maintain profrtabnity and has already invested in a dispatching center and equip- ment. His collection of past data on traffic patterns and accident records is proprietary information required to maximize eff..ciency. A new bidder would have to factor in the costs of a rapid investment program to be fully operational in a short period of time. Conversely. the current pro- vider would be aggrt.ssive to protect his investment. An established competitor may benefit from econo- mies of scale by servicing several localities with service contracts ex- piring at different times. A new competitor would have to absorb losses with the expectation of bid- ding away future contracts from the established competitor. Payments are made by Medi- care (an estimated 29% of revenues), Medicaid (an estimated 8%), third -party insurers (an esti- mated 28%) and private individuals (an estimated 55%). Since local 8 governments set prices. Medicare does not independently evaluate rates, paying about 80% of the aver- age area price. Private insurers and individual citizens pay the full rate. and Medicaid (which covers some elderly and AFDC) pays the least. Individuals often submit the charges to an insurance company for pay- ment. Uncompensated care represented a write-off of 22.9% of sales in 1992. When compared to the portion paid by individuals, the bad -debt ratio rises to 59%. Pricing Should Rise With Costs Emergency ambulance charges do not come under intense review by insurers as the $350-$450 per emergency trip and $150-$200 per nonemergency trip are usually dwarfed by other medical charges. Insurers can get greater cost sav- ings by concentrating on other parts of the medical establishment. Because localities set but do not pay the costs, ambulance compa- nies find it easier to pass on cost increases. Contracts have cost -of- t -wing adjustments and may be reopened if OSHA regulations. local govemment requirements or certain cost factors change. Localities may subsidize ambulance services if th' have a large popu:ation of uninsured citizens who cannot afford to pay for ambulance services. As EMT only acquires companies with a long- term history of serving specific communities, these operating com- panies have built up a long history of dealing fairy while providing one of a municipality's three vital services, making rate adjustments less diffi- cult. For nonemergency service, pric- ing is much more aggressive as it is set by negotiations with individual hospitals, clinics, HMOs and nursing homes. Hospitals and other facili- ties see cost as the most important factor. However, EMT's ability to supply a hospital or care group with al its transportation needs on a timely basis gives it a competitive advantage over small competitors that just provide nonemergency transport services. and have smaller fleets and less sophisticated dis- patching systems. HEALTH CARE REFORM CREATES UNCERTAINTY While it is too early to predict what form health care reform win take, concerns about costs could hurt the overall profitability of health care companies. However. it is pos- sible that ambulance companies may not be dealt with as harshly as other health care providers. Ambu- lance companies do not generate a retum on sales that would attract scrutiny. EMTs return on sales is only about 5.0% and this could be above the industry averages. A cut in prices that would remove at prof- its would drive some operators out of business, but would not provide a significant reduction in health care costs. If health care is extended to those currently uncovered, EMT could cut prices substantially without reducing profitability. In 1993. we -pect uncompensated care to edch 23.7% of revenues. This is significantly higher than the percent- age for heaith care providers and compares to 7% for hospitals. The vast majority of this Toss is because ambulance services are provided to all, regardless of ability to pay. EMT could do well in a health care environment dominated by large buying groups (i.e., managed competition). Because of its domi- nance in certain key markets, its ability to service broad geographic areas and its broad range of ser- vices, EMT can service a buying group's entire menu of transporta- tion needs. LEGAL LIABILITY HAS NOT BEEN A SIGNIFICANT ISSUE Ambulance drivers benefit from r• P'1 American Medical Response, Inc. Table 5 Combined Balance Sheets (in thousands) Kidder, Peabody & Co. Incorporated December 31. 1991 1992 1993E 1994E Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents 52,530 514,134 32,140 52.723 Short term investments 925 260 260 260 Atxotmtsreceivable 29.132 32,121 50,057 67,968 Allowance for tmcompensated care 10-15Q 10.779 16.798 22.808 Net 518,982 521.342 533.259 545.160 Receivable from affiliated party 332 0 0 0 • Advances so stockholders 641 0 0 0 Inventories 718 827 1,289 1,750 Prepaid expanses 1,658 1.803 3.81: 5.177 Deferred income taxes Q 1280 7.222 2.$44 Total currant assets 525,786 $42,648 $47,983 S64.909 Property and equipment, at cost: 18,482 21.308 38.090 51,366 Less, acctunulated depreciation lad 11.282 12.082 24.1$2 Net property and equipment 8.814 10.026 21.008 26,784 Other assets Goodwill 450 11,251 20,514 37,404 Acc. Amort. 51 98 1,498 3.498 399 11.153 19.016 33,906 Covenants not to compete. net 1,009 735 1.145 1.555 Other $SSi 1.987 4497 5,562 Total assets 536.858 566,549 593.249 S132,717 1, LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable 2.889 3,258 5,077 6,894 Accrued compensation. benefits and taxes 3431 4,725 7,363 9.998 Accrued expenses 1372 2,528 3.940 5349 Ltcome taxes payable 2,420 2,104 3.550 4,837 Deferred income taxes 1.457 0 0 0 Current maturities of long-term debt 4.717 4.421 36$. 3-641 Total current liabilities $16,486 517,036 523.616 530.719 Long-term debt, excluding current maturities Deferred income taxes Other liabilities Total liabilities 7,179 8.372 16,372 16.372 911 4,240 7,222 9.840 ¢2 1.144 1.783 2A21 525.199 530.792 548.993 S59.351 Stockholders' equity: Common stock 90 103 103 113 Additional paid -in capital 266 21,267 20,867 37,867 Retained earnings 11353 14,387 23,287 35,386 Note receivable from officer f1Q) Q Q Q Total stockholders' equity 511.659 535.757 544.256 573366 Commitments and contingencies Total liabilities and stockholders equity 536.858 566.549 123,212 S132.717 9 Kidder, Peabody & C't . I nc,IT, „r.it.'i S350,000 - S300.000 $250.000 S200,000 , S 150.000 a $100,000 $50,000 SO 1990 American Medical Response Inc. Chart 1 Components of Revenue Growth — R Subsequent Acquisitions 0 Initial Four Companies 1991 the Good Samaritan Rules, which appear to limit liability_ To collect damages, injured parties must prove gross negligence. Also. paramedics administer drugs while in communi- cation with a doctor, under whose license the paramedic is operating. However, given the litigious nature of our society and the increasing sophistication of ambulance equip- ment and personnel, we expect this doctrine to continue to be chal- lenged. THOUGH RECENTLY FORMED, EMT HAS EXCEEDED EXPECTA- TIONS The company was formed in February 1992 for the specific pur- pose of acquiring ambulance companies. Concurrent with the public offering, the company pur- chased four ambulance companies for $45.414,750. The consideration paid was $10,195,000 plus 10 1992 1993E 4,143,500 shares of stock valued a' $8.50 per share, the IPO price. The four initial companies wera: Re- gional Ambulance serving Alemeda and Contra Costa Counties, includ- ing the City of Oakland: Vanguard Ambulance servicing San Jose. Santa Clara and Santa Cruz Coun- ties; New Haven Ambulance located in Connecticut; and Professional Ambulance Service, serving Wilmington, Delaware. EMT, com- bining its financial strength and its local presence, recently signed a contract to service Atlantic City. N.J., on December 9, 1992, and an- other for Aurora, Colorado outside of Denver, signed only recently. Acquisitions are being com- pleted more rapidly than expected. The company has already exceeded its acquisition plans for all of 1993. Acquisitions include: • Mobile Medic based in Gulfport. Mississippi (November 4. 1992). • Ambulance Service Company of Denver, Colorado (December 23. 1994E 1995E 1992). • Buck Medical Services in Port- land, Oregon (January 11, 1993). s A-1 Ambulance, adjacent to the company's Denver operations, serv- ing Boulder, Colorado Springs, and Longmont (April 27, 1993). • Bridgeport Ambulance Service (letter of intent signed June 2, 1993). • Randle-Eastem Ambulance Service of Miami (June 1. 1993). • Reed Ambulance, also serving the Denver area (letter of intent an- nounced June 18, 1993). CONTINUED EARNINGS GROWTH EXPECTED We anticipate revenue growth of over 70% in 1993 based on internal growth and acquisitions already completed or announced. Esti- mated 1994 revenue growth of 25-30% is based on internal growth plus the acquisition of $55 million of revenues. Since November 199Z EMT acquired companies that could generate $68 rni1 on of amuaized revenues. Individual companies are expected to grow revenues 10%- 11% 0%11% annually. These anticipated acquisitions, plus internal growth. should support EPS growth from $0.67 in 1992 to an estimated $0.60 in 1993 and $1.00 in 1994. Ambulance companies have been expandng illy over the past several years. Together, the four founding companies of American Medical Response gener- ated annual revenue growth of 23% from 1989 to 1992. We are antici- pating internal company growth of 10%-12.5% over the next several years. We attribute about 5 per- centage points of this growth to an increase in the number of ambu- lance trips and the level of medical intervention in certain of these trips. Another 5 percentage points repre- sent annual price increases as the company will face higher personnel costs as agreed to in a recent union agreement Through EMT compa- nies bidding for ambulance contracts in contiguous areas, rev- enues could rise another 2.5% We anticipate a modest rise in net margins over time. The company's goal is to increase net margins from the 4-5% range to 5- 6%. When a company is first acquired. benefits should accrue within sbc months as EMT central- izes certain Overhead functions and installs advanced dispatching sys- tems. These benefits become apparent in 6.12 months. In the shod term, this may be partially of. - set as the company adds corporate staff to help absorb acquisitions. As the company matures, corporate expenses should rise Tess quickly than sales. We assume that price increases wit closely match wage increases. Kidder, Peabody & Co. Incorporated EMTs Califomia employees are urionized and have recently agreed to a three-year contract: a 6% raise this year. 5% next year, and 4% the year after. Price increases, particu- larly when related to wage hires, can whipsaw operating margins for a shod period of time. Ambulance companies cannot raise prices unti they begin to experience increased costs. Therefore. during the price review process. margins may be de- pressed. Once it is approved, the company is afowed to price even more aggressively for several months to make up for the loss of past revenues. After the second inrdrna pericxi, prices fall to the agreed-upon levels. DJIA (6/30/93): S&P (6/30/93): Todd M. Berko (212) 510-3727 3521.34 451.06 11 Kidder, Peabody & Co. Incorporated Editor. Ester Tapia Production: Elena 8. Wig The information contained in this report has been Wen from 'redeem! ststatkal services and other sots whish we deem reliable. We do not represent that itis accurate or Complete and should not be relied upon as such. Any opinions expressed herein rafted our judgment at this date and are subject! dnnye. Additional information on the seaaitles mentioned a available. now. Peabody d Co. lncorporared (Its parent or subsidiary thereof) or its employees may from thea time hold shares or operons on any Issue included In this report This report has been issued in the United Kingdom through Kidder, Peabody & Co. Ltd.. a mentor of The Securities and Fusses Authority and is not intended tar private customers In the United Kingdom. It has been approved on behalf of Kidder. Peabody & Co. Ltd. by Kidder, Peabody & Co. Incorporated. an affiliated company registered as a broker-dealer in the United States. No part of this report may be reproduced In wry manner without the written permission of Kidder. Peabody & Co. Incorporated. Coprri j W a 1953 Kidder. Peebody a Co. Incorporated. KIDDER, PEABODY a CO. INCORPORATED - 10 IANOVER SOUARE, NEW YORK, NY 10005 12 RESEARCH FLASH ktivcsi, Inc 280 i :r.?roti N1rct1 il.,rltii;tl. c:r trlt)a :JO )S251+21 Kurt 11. Kammerer AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. Largest and Leading EMS Consolidator Running Alread of Schedule Prix: 52 -Werk Range: Traded. Market cap.: Shares Out: Fiscal Ycar: S 19'/s S 19'/a -S8'/. NYSE -EMT $211.8 Million 10.795 Million December Mvmt co -managed Ila onering 14 [lir within the last three years. 'Trading range since WO on Augu4 5, 1992 Earnings Per Share 1994 Est: 1993 Est.: 1992 Act: 1991 Act: Investment Rating Reiterated: I3ny (1) S1.10 $0.85 $0.67 $0.57 VINE. ht#x...ti+. (202) 434-1706 June 22, 1993 P/E 17.8x 23.0x 29.2x 34.4x With As two annartxmants over the past three business days, American Medical Response, Inc. (AMR) has continued to demonstrate an ability to execute its founding corporuc strategic plan of leading the emergency medical services industry cansolid:tion. This past Friday, AMR announced that it has signed a Letter of Intent to acquire Road Ambulances, Inc., headquartered in Denver, Colorado. Reel's 1992 revenue from existing operations was approximately S8 million. While terms of the proposed acquisition were not disclosed, historically AMR's acquisitions have leen priced at 8x -10x the acquired company's atter-tax income. Yesterday, AMR disclosed that it has reached a preliminary understanding concerning thc acquisition of 911 Emergency Services of Modesto (Modesto), a California -baster company which had 1992 revenues in excess of S50 million. The completion of the Modesto transaction is subject to customary due diligence. 11' AMR suxssfully closes the Real transaction, it will have effectively scoured its position as the largest private provider of EMS services in the Denver metropolitan arca. To date, AMR has acquired three operators in Colorado, whose total revenues for 1992 were approximately S25.3 trillion. Additionally, the company utas awarded a ncw two ycar municipal contract to provide exclusive EMS service for Aurora, the slate's third largest city, with gross revenues of an estimated $2.7 million per year anticipated. Although tae arc more than enthusiastic about the prospects of AMR's latest negotiations in California, investors need to remain cogni• •ant of the extremely complex nature of the transaction. There arc nutncrous issues to be resolved before the tans: Bion is consummated, and as always, timing is difficult to predict. In our opinion, it is unlikely that any more than a modestly positive impact on fiscal 1993 would result from this prosposed transaction should it occur before the end of thc year. However, if it were to close before the end of 1993, we believe our projections for 1994 would prove to be conservative. Investors should note that since its IPO, AMR has acquired five private EMS companies (with two LOIS pending and one "understanding" pending) that when combined had approximately S58.1 million in revenues (over S60 million pcnding) during 1992. Remanbcr too. AMR has so far closed every LOl announced. We estimate that approximately S15 million more in acquired annualized revenue would enable the company to acct our 1993 revenue projection of S202 million. Given that over half of fiscal 19;'3 lies ahctd of us, and that AMR's acquisition program is seemingly gaining momentum, we encourage investors to remain focused on the exciting long-term prospects for AMR. We arc maintaining our twelve -to -eighteen month price target of 525 per share (29x our FY '93 EPS estimate of 085. and 22x our FY '94 EPS estimate of $ I.10). We reiterate our purchase recommendation for long-term smell -cap investors seeking aipital appreciation. . hIditiunai inrfbrrnatiurt int teen rrnnelated securities is assailable un retinal. 71a information herein has been obtained from sur,, cotisidet'd rel,:d.1;, bin is not guaranteed, and it, Ioga cr with all estimate. and forecasts, is subject t0 ' ai.g, NittIOUL report does not pUipo.1 to be a complete amtlysis of the security. issuer or industry, and is not an offer or a solicitation deems to buy or scp any sc uritis. Advent, 1,a. employees may Wee rn.'ummended these securities to certain inoeatuts prior to this publication. Mvest, Inc. may nuke a market in and Advert. Inc. or its employees may maintain position in, or buy tee sell these securities or related optima Any OTC -traded securities or 'kat -U.S. companies nta4ion d in this repot may not be .1;.u.d for sale m all Wates Consult your Account Executive. 0 1993 Advert. Inc Total revenue Co- 'eased Consolidated Income Statement (S in thousands) (Fiscal Year ends December 31) 1221 1222 1993E 1994E S 94,104 $106,433 S202,379 $270,600 Salary At benefit expense 45,613 53,364 100,981 135,300 % of revenue 48.47% 50.14% 49.90% 50.00% Uncompensated care expense 22,262 24,397 45,623 60,209 % of revenue 23.66% 22.92% 22.54% 22.25% Other 13,717 15,217 30,694 40,996 % of revenue 14.58% 14.30% 15.17% 15.15% Depreciation 2,772 3,066 5,822 8.118 % of revenue 125% 2.88% 2,iy, 3.00% Total operating expenses 84,364 96,014 183,119 244,622 Earnings from operations Operating margin 9.740 10.389 19,260 25,978 10.35% 9.76% 9.52% 9.60% Non-operating expenses: interest expense, nct 1,156 747 1,000 1,500 Amortization of intangibles 927 5.0, 1.600 2.000 Total ttott-operating expenses 2,083 1,308 2,600 3,500 Pre-tax earnings Pre-tax margin 7,657 9,081 16,660 22,478 8.14% 8.53% 8.23% 8.31% Income taxes 3,201 4,089 6,997 9,441 Tax rate 41.80% 45.03°/Q 42.00% 42.00% Nct earnings 4,456 4,992 9,663 13,037 Nct margin 4.74% 4.69% 4.77% 4.82% Tax adjustment Pro tonna net income Pro forma EPS Wtd avg. sits. out. :JL: t. 150 17801 — 4,306 5,670 9,663 13,037 S0.57 S0.67 $0.85 S1.10 7,576 8,447 11.400 11,900 ..ta .,.. • arra a ao, a.. ya.a++ .tee1 sies 01,040 .-• f w Part OR .' 1 I ; • a I' j14'ti1wJ rnsi Si ff II FF 'I� ff �1Ir .......... a.l�d II1f1.11C.111 II ,11 16 1W�t f .. SII h1r�i uU� ....... -.: .,II�,' t �.�1 � PoILJ,L�.IIILIurllWll��.�:l,I(.. Chart courtesy of Bloomberg L.P. r Ladenburg,Thalmann &Co. Inc. Investment Research Fsmblished 1876 Member, all principal exchanges Company Report Update American Medical Response, Inc. (EMT - NYSE) Rating: BUY Price 52 -Week EPS (FY December) 5/11/93 Range 1992!! 1993E 5171/2 519 5/8 -38 1/4 30.67 50.80 DMA: 34459 Previous: 50.80 Consensus: N/M S&P 500: 444 Investment Summary and Conclusion American Medical Response reported excellent QI EPS of 50.16, exceeding our estimate by 50.01. We believe that this unique company, the leading and only publicly traded provider of emergency and scheduled medical transport services, will continue to grow rapidly as it leads the way in the growth of privatization of the industry. Industry sources currently estimate that almost 50%, or S2.5 billion, of the $55 billion spent on medical transport was provided by private industry. We reiterate our full year 1993 EPS estimate of $0.80-50.85; if the rate of acquisition continues, we expect to see further acceleration in growth, and we will update our estimates. At its current price, EMT sells for 21.1x the midpoint of our 50.80-50.85 1993 earnings per share range and 17x the midpoint of our preliminary 1994 estimate of 31.00-51.05. We continue to rate the stock a BUY. 1991E 51.00 S 1.00 Nancy Moyer (212) 872-1383 May 12, 1993 Quarterly Expectation PIE 2Q Endin�un� 1993E 1991E Current Year Ago Div/Yld 21.9x 17,5x 50.18 30.20 Nil Consensus: N/M Approximate Reporting Date: July 1993 z 1s 1s 3oQ� S szs 31 199: 1993 T']]�� r, f, 110-_�U17-0o_O110.00 0-.0aootlo00o00000-0-0- Technical Opinion —From its low in March, EMT has made sequentially higher highs and lows, which is technically bullish. Overhead supply around 19 5/8 appears to be the current target. — Robert B. Ritter Chart Courtesy of Bridge Information Systems, Inc 2 1 Ladenburg, Thalmann & Co. Inc. FY December 1993 1992_ _ % Change — .' Revenues — 537.7 5252 49.4% NetEamings 51.6 S1.I12) 51.3% EPS 5016 50.14(2) 14.3% Shares Outstandia _ 10A 7.6 37.3% (I) Numbers in millions except EPS. (2) Net earnings and earnings per share for 1992 are pro forma amounts reflecting certain adjustments made to reflect income taxes that would have been payable if one of the company's subsidiaries had been subject to corporate income taxes on an OnRoir.R basis Source: Company filings. The company's acquisition program is ahead of schedule. Since EMT's initial public offering in August 1992, four beachhead acquisitions have been closed. In 1992, the company acquired Mobile Medic Ambulance Service, Inc., in Gulfport, Mississippi, and Ambulance Service Company in Denver, Colorado. The total expense for these acquisitions was 53.2 million in cash, 51.8 million in subordinated promissory notes and 611,268 shares of common stock. In the first quarter of 1993, American Medical Response completed two acquisitions: Buck Medical Services, Inc., headquartered in Portland, Oregon, for 55.5 million in c. sh and 125,085 shares of common stock and A-1 Ambulance Services, headquartered in Boulder, Colorado, for $2.1 million in cash and 306,250 shares of common stock. The two had 1992 revenues of 515 million and 58.5 million, respectively. A fifth acquisition, Randle -Eastern Atnbulance Service in Miami, Florida, is pending; we expect closure soon. The price is expected to be 391,459 shares of common stock. Randle -Eastern had estimated 1992 revenues of $15 million, and it controls 60-70% of Dade county medical transport. The company answers 911 calls in concert with the fire department, but its ambulances perform the actu:.l transport. Unlike the others, the Miami acquisition will he a pooling of interest; as a result, we anticipate a restatement of first quarter results to accommodate increased revenues (in the 515 million range), increased net income and increased shares outstanding. The net effect will likely add 50.01 to earnings per share. For the quarter, EMT's internal revenue growth acce:crated to 9.5% from 8.5% in the prior quar.er as a result of increased transports and price increases. Salaries and benefits, as a percent of revenues, fell slightly in the period from 50.4% to 50.3% as a result of favorable settlement of union negotiations, lowersalary expenses in newly acquired properties, offset by additions to corporate salaries and benefits. The company currently has 2,200 employees. Uncompen ated care fell slightly from 22.6% to 22.0% of revenues as a result of more effective billing and collection procedures and lower levels of uncompensated care in newly acquired husinesses. Other expenses, which includes a laundry list of items, rose from 15.1% of revenues to 15.8%, primarily as a result of increased corporate overhead. Pretax margin rose to 7.8% vs. 7.4% last year. On a pro -forma basis, the tax rate rose from 42.2% to 43.5%, which kept net after tax margin flat at 4.3%. Days' sales outstanding fell 14.3%, from 105 days to 90, as new management implemented better collection procedures. The company is maintaining a revenue run rate of about S185 million; we anticipate that by the second half of 1993, the run rate will ramp up to more than 5200 million. Cash decreased during the quarter to 58.I million from 521.3 million at December 31, 1992 as a result of cash used for acquisitions and the early repayment of certain indebtedness. We believe there are many lock -on acquisition candidates in the S5 million revenue range available to strengthen regional operations. Current widespread uncertainty about the future of health-care reform is encouraging small entrepreneurs to join forces with a larger market contender, better able to negotiate in a managed care environment. The combined California operation, American Medical Response West, has a GPS (Global Positioning Satellite) state-of-the-art dispatch system up and running. To ensure uninterrupted ambulance utilization, the prior computer aided system is running parallel. When management is confident that the new system will operate perfectly, the American Medical Response, Inc. Iadenburg, Thalmann & Co. Inc. 3 111.1i 11 computer aided system win be sent to Colorado. to manage. dispatch &c Denver, Colorado Sins Ikaukkt and Longmont. The computer aided system that had been used by part of American Medical R's o nse. West bcfora the merger of the two California coni,sanies is now operational in New Havvn. Amen. -an Mescal Reslnxtsc continues to build an infrasuucttue to marine its rapidly growing operations. Iota a iidon of a corporate attorney. a chief operating officer. an au4 zor, a safety and risk management officer andsuppon staff will nccr shale adding to corporate space. The added staffs, is expccird to add about SS00.000 to expenses for the yea:. The company has received a commitment from a group of banks fora S30 minion unsecured revolvingcredit fbeflity. The lending group, which is kdby Fleet Financial Group, also includes Continental Bank. N.A. and Pacific Westcort Bank. EMT expects to use the credit facility to consolidate existing debt. to finance future acquisitions. and for working capital. The facility bears interest at the prime rate or LIBOR phrs 23%. If proposed healthcare isoforms expand access for part or all of the currently uninsured. American Medical Response should benefit, even if rates are capped. Ambulance services are such a small pan of the national health cue bill that we do not anticipate they will be singled out for specific price caps, However. we do anticipate that managed competition will encourage discounting for volume in the provision of non -emergency transport (30% of 1943 revenues). This should be more than offset by increased volume. American Medical Response, Inc. Ladenburg.Thalmann &CoInc. Director of Research Frank J. Prezelski, CFA (212) 940-0136 Associate Director of Research: Robert B. Ritter (212) 872- 872-1444 Research Analysts Jyoti Aggarwala: (212) 940-0181 Specialty Retail/Apparel Marmfacturirg Barry Bryant, CFA: (212) 872-1604 Retail Frederic P. Cogen, CFA: (212) 872-1620 Technology Thomas D. Walsh: (212) 872-1592 Assistant Louis Ehrenkrantz: (212) 872-1706 Special Situations H. Erich Heinemann: (212) 940-0250 Economist Rita Lavin: (212) 940-0251 Associate Roger H. Lipton: (212) 940-0256 Food Service/Franchising Nancy Moyer. (212) 872-1383 Health Care Donald H. Newman, CFA: (212) 872-1648 Special Situations Frank J. Prezelski, CFA: (212) 940-0136 Capital Goods Robert B. Ritter: (212) 872-1444 Technical Analyst Thomas M. Ryan: (212) 940-0217 Gaming Barry Sabgal: (212) 940-0I44 Energy/Gas Distribution Utilities Eugene Starr: (212) 872-1542 Technology Consultant Ashish R.Thadhani: (212) 872-1550 Defense/Aerospace Stanley J. Goldring: (212) 872-1316 David Morris, CFA: (212) 872-1417 Alan M. Silverman, CFA: (212) 872-1527 KG Securities Division Investment Research Director of Institutional Equities Edward J. Shopkorn (212) 940-0281 Institutional Sales William Agee Gail L. Flanagan Roger H. Lipton John C. Moore, 111 Donald 11. Newman, CFA Gene Pennell Michael Redden Barry Sahgal George Thomson Institutional Trading (Listed) (Listed) (OTC) Richard E. Meyer Timothy S. Brackett Richie Markowitz Corporate Relations Suzanne Webster Research Publications Senior Editor: Sara E. Bannin Production Editor: Kristync K. Singer Production Assistant: Radha Sukhu (212) 940-0157 (212) 872-1674 (212) 940-0256 (212)872-1405 (212) 872-1648 (212)872-1304 (212) 940-0227 (212) 940-0144 (212) 872-1737 (212) 940-0118 (212) 940-0118 (212) 940-0183 (212) 872-1476 (212) 339-8889 (212)872-1462 (212) 872-1421 tadeotirg, Thalmann & Co. Inc. is a member of the New Yore Stock Escharge, Inc. and other principal escrons« and a registered U S Broker -Dealer. Ratko an advised Chau this analysis report is caned solely for informational purposes and i ata lobe coratnrd as an offsv to sell or tic aoitciunon of an offer to buy. The Information contained herein is based on sources which we believe to be .liable but u not guamntoad by is as being accurate and dors not purport to be s complete statement or ,unary of the evadable data. Any opinions expressed herein a re suremrnts of our judgment a of the date of publication and ate anbjon to change without nonce. Reproduction withow wink", permission a prohibited The firm, rot officer, di mcior , employees and customers may laves position. long or short. in de securities referred a heron, and other related socunue, and from time to time may rn vase or drrrase such position The firm (or persona related thereto) may nape a market in the securities mentioned herein, and may from time to time perform investment banking or other samc s for. or sollct investment banking « other basins, tram, and may have other velatiorahipa ,nth any :onpany mentioned in this report. Tit closirg price of American Medical Response, ire. a as 01 May 11, 1991 Additional Information 1, mailable to clients upon written regimen. Copyright ®1993: Ladenbrrrg Thabnann A Co. Inc t05-93:16 4 -T American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batter march Street Boston, MA 02110 ['hone: (617) 261-1600 - Facsimile: '617) 261-1610 Letter to Shareholders September 1993 Dear Fellow Shareholder: We are delighted to report record financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 1993. Total revenue for the second quarter was S44.8 million compared to $29.6 million for the same period in 1992, an increase of approximately 52%. Net earnings for the quarter were S2.4 million. or $0.22 per share, as compared to $1.4 million. or $0.18 per share, in the same period a year ago. an increase of more than 71% in net earnings. These record results speak for themselves and reflect the success of our business strategy and commitment. The increase in revenue and earnings compared with 1992 pro forma results were due primarily to the incremental revenue provided by acquisitions. additional service contracts which were awarded in late 1992 and a company -wide increase in the number of emergency and non-emergen.:y transports. In addition to this excellent performance. a number of other positive events took place during the quarter. We are particularly proud to welcome three new outstanding providers to American's partnership of entrepreneurs. American acquired A- I Ambulance Services, located in Boulder, CO in April: Reed Ambulance Service. Inc.. located in Denver, CO in June: and Randle -Eastern Ambulance. located in Miami. FL. also in June. The Company also began providing exclusive "911" emergency response service to the residents of Aurora. CO on June 1. With these acquisitions in the Colorado marketplace, we arc now in position to consolidate certain operational elements and bring greater efficiencies to the market. as we have done in Northern California. Since the end of the quarter. American completed the acquisition of Bridgeport Ambulance Service. Inc. in Bridgeport. CT. Bridgeport's lung -standing reputation and location make it an excellent complement to our New Haven. CT facility. American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batterymarch Street Boston, MA 02110 Phone: 617/261-1600 - Fax: 617/ 261-1610 FOR IMMEINATE RELEASE Contact: James E. McGrath Director 617/261-1600 or Ronald M. Levenson Senior Vice President & Chief Accounting Officer 617/261-1600 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSEANNOUNCES RECENT DEVELOPMENTS Boston, MA -- September 23, 1993 -- American Medical Response, Inc. ( NYSE: EMT ), the nation's leading provider of ambulance services, announced today that it has signed a Letter of Intent to acquire Life Medical Industries, Inc., headquartered in Stockton, California. Life Medical, which serves the San Joaquin County area, had revenues of approximately 54.5 million in 1992. Specific terms of the proposed acquisition were not disclosed. The completion of the transaction is subject to, among other things, negotiation of definitive agreements and the completion of customary due diligence. "In our strategic review of the industry, we came to the conclusion that a business combination would help us continue our growth by providing important additional managerial, financial and operational resources," said Louis K. Meyer, Chief Executive Officer of Life Mcdical Industries, Inc. "With American as a partner, we will continue to be able to provide the kind of quality service that we have delivered to the citizens of San Joaquin County since 1967. We're simply delighted to join the American team." "We are excited about the opportunity to add Life Medical Industries to our expanding service base in Califomia," commented Paul M. Verrochi, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of American Medical Response, Inc. "This is another example of an industry leader joining our team. Lou Meyer, who is President of the California Ambulance Association and a member of the state's Emergency Medical Services Commission, and his partners, Michael Nilssen and JoAnn Hodge, have together built an outstanding organization based on quality first." -- continued -- Separately, the Company said that on September 21, 1993, it was notified by the Denver Regional Office of the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") that the FTC is conducting a preliminary inquiry of the facts and circumstances concerning the Company's recent acquisition of Reed Ambulances, Inc. to determine whether the Reed acquisition in the Denver metropolitan area complied with federal antitrust laws. The FTC has requested that the Company provide certain information to it and the Company is currently evaluating the request and preparing its response. During the first six months of 1993, Reed had revenues of approximately $4.8 million. American Medical Response is the Ieading provider of emergency and non -emergency ambulance services in the United States. The Company currently provides ambulance services in Northern California, South Central Connecticut, Northern Delaware and Southern New Jersey, Southern and Central Mississippi, Portland, Oregon and surrounding areas, Central Colorado and Dade County, Florida. The Company's growth strategy is focused on acquiring new businesses, expanding existing operations, improving the quality and efficiency of operations, and promoting and capitalizing on tho expertise of the operating executives of its providers. # n American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batterymarch Street Boston, MA 02110 Phone: 617/261-1600 - Fax: 617/ 261-1610 FOR IMMEDIATE REL.F.ASF, Contact: James E. McGrath Director 617/261-1600 or Ronald M. Levenson Senior Vice President & Chief Accounting Officer 617/261-1600 AMERICAN AIEDICALBESPONSE ANNOUNCES INCREASE IN CREDIT LINE TO S50 MILLION Boston, MA — September 22, 1993 -- American Medical Response, Inc. (NYSE: EMT), the nation's leading provider of ambulance services, announced today that it has received a commitment from its existing lenders to increase their credit line from $30 million to $50 million. The facility, led by Fleet Bank of Massachusetts, N.A., also includes Continental Bank, N.A. and Pacific Western Bank. American intends to use the credit facility to finance acquisitions and for general working capital purposes. The credit facility, which bears interest at the prime rate, is anticipated to be closed shortly. "We are delighted that our lenders have elected to increase the Company's credit line. Our relationship with this outstanding group of institutions has proven extremely rewarding,'' said Paul M. Verrochi, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of American Medical Response, Inc. "This additional capital will help us to build upon our existing business by enabling us to continue our acquisition programs and further improve our current operations." Leo R. Breitman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fleet Bank of Massachusetts, N.A., commented, "Our relationship with American has been a truly positive one, and we look forward to building upon this relationship as American develops and expands their business." -- continued -- - 2 - American Medical Response is the leading provider of emergency and non -emergency ambulance services in the United States. The Company currently provides ambulance services in Northern California, South Central Connecticut, Northern Delaware and Southern New Jersey, Southern and Central Mississippi, Portland, Oregon and surrounding areas, Central Colorado and Dade County, Florida. The Company's growth strategy is focused on acquiring new businesses, expanding existing operations, improving the quality and efficiency of operations, and promoting and capitalizing on the expertise of the operating executives of its providers. # # # f American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batterymarch Street Boston, MA 02110 Phone: 617/261-1600 - Fax: 617/ 261-1610 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Ronald M. Levenson or Robert C. Hubbell Senior Vice President & Edelman Worldwide Chief Accounting Officer 212/704-8255 617/261-1600 AMERICAN MEDICAL R PONSE. INC. FILE; FOR PUBLIC OFFERING Boston, MA -- August 13, 1993 -- American Medical Response, Inc. ( NYSE: EMT ) announced today the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of a registration statement relating to the public offering of 2,750,000 shares of common stock. Of the 2,750,000 shares to be offered, 2,000,000 shares will be issued and sold by the Company and 750,000 shares will be sold by Selling Stockholders. Of the 2,750,000 shares to be offered, 2,200,000 shares will be offered initially to U.S. persons by the U.S. underwriters and 550,000 shares will be offered initially to non -U.S. persons by the International Managers. Certain of the Selling Stockholders have granted the underwriters an option to purchase an additional 412,500 shares to cover over -allotments. The net proceeds of the sale of shares by the Company will be used for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions and the reduction of borrowings under the Company's revolving line of credit. The U.S. offering will be managed by Lehman Brothers, Kidder, Peabody & Co. and Advest, Inc., and the international offering will be led by Lehman Brothers International (Europe), Kidder, Peabody International Limited and Advest, Inc. American Medical Response is the leading provider of emergency and non -emergency ambulance services in the United States. The Company currently provides ambulance services in Northem California, South Central Connecticut, Northern Delaware and Southern New Jersey, Southern and Central Mississippi, Portland, Oregon and surrounding areas, Central Colorado and Dade County, Florida. The Company's growth strategy is focused on acquiring new businesses, expanding existing operations, improving the quality and efficiency of operations, and promoting and capitalizing on the expertise of the operating executives of its providers. -- continued -- a - 2 - A registration statement relating to these securities has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission but has not yet become effective. These securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted prior to the time the registration statement becomes effective. This communication shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state. A copy of a preliminary prospectus relating to these securities may be obtained from the Prospectus Department, Lehman Brothers, Inc., 34 Hubert Street, 3rd Floor, New York, New York 10017. American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batterymarch Street Boston, MA 02110 Phone: 617/261-1600 • Fax: 617/ 261-1610 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Ronald M. Levenson or Robert C. Hubbell Senior Vice President & Edelman Worldwide Chief Accounting Officer 212/704-8255 6I7261-1600 AMERICAN MEDICAL_RESPONSE REPORTS INCREASED SECOND QUARTER EARNINGS — Revenue, Earnings, and EPS Reach Record Levels -- Boston, MA -- August 5, 1993 -- American Medical Response, Inc. ( NYSE: EMT) announced today total revenue of $44.8 million for the second quarter of 1993 versus $29.6 million for the same quarter of 1992, an increase of 51%. Net earnings for the quarter were $2.4 million as compared with pro forma net earnings of $1.4 million, an increase of 71% from the 1992 second quarter. Earnings per share were $0.22 as compared with pro forma earnings per share of $0.18 for the same quarter a year ago based on 11,035,618 weighted average shares outstanding versus 7,967,563 weighted average shares outstanding during the prior period. The increase in the weighted average number of shares outstanding results from the Company's initial public offering in August of 1992 and shares issued in connection with acquisitions. Total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 1993 were $86.2 million versus $58.3 million for the same period of 1992, an increase of 48%. Net earnings for the six months ended June 30, 1993 were $4.1 million as compared with pro forma net earnings of $2.4 million, an increase of 71%. Earnings per share were S0.38 as compared with pro forma earnings per share of $0.30 for the same period a year ago based on 10,916,042 weighted average shares outstanding versus 7,967,563 weighted average shares outstanding during the prior period. "Our acquisitions of beachhead operations completed since our initial public offering have been a major factor in our earnings results," commented Paul M. Verrochi, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of American Medical Response, Inc. "An increased numb.7 transports by all of our providers during the second quarter also contributed to the increases. During the second quarter, we also successfully completed the renegotiation of two of our California -- continued -- -t T - 2 - provider contracts, and the Company has continued its acquisition program, with the recent completion of our first 'lock -on' acquisition, Bridgeport Ambulance Service, Inc. of Bridgeport, Connecticut." Mr. Verrochi continued, "As our Company has expanded, we have taken important steps during the second quarter to strengthen our management team and operational capabilities. Paul T. Shirley, formerly Chief Executive Officer of our subsidiary, AMR West, was appointed Chief Operating Officer for American Medical Response, Inc. Also, Robert W. Trinkleback, formerly a Corporate Safety Manager with Federal Express, Inc. was named Corporate Director of Safety and Health. We feel confident that these appointments will further strengthen our team as we build for the future." Mr. Verrochi further commented on the preliminary understanding related to the possible acquisition of a large California-based ambulance service provider, previously announced in the second quarter, "We continue to caution our investors and analysts from drawing any conclusions on this complex transaction, and anticipate that more information will be available over the next few months." American Medical Response is the leading provider of emergency and non -emergency ambulance services in the United States. It currently serves an aggregate population of over six million people in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Mississippi, New Jersey, Oregon and Washington. In 1992, American Medical Response responded to more than 390,000 Uansports in response to calls for its services. Through the consolidation of local service providers, American intends to expand and build its service areas and maintain its position as the country's leading ambulance service provider. FINANCIAL TABLE, NEXT PAGE AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. Financial Highlights (in thousands, except per share amounts)' Three months ended Six months ended June 30. June 30. 1993 19922 129.3. 1992.2 Total revenue. S 44.778 S 29.553 S 86.190 S 58.343 Operating expenses: Salaries and benefits 21,630 14,387 42,279 29,114 Uncompensated care 9,852 7,083 19,116 13,659 Other 7,319 4,334 14,090 8,946 Depreciation... 1,194 923 2,363 1,752 Amortization of intangibles344 127 659 273 Total operating expenses 40139 26.854 78307 53.744 Earnings from operations 4,439 2,704 7,683 4,599 Interest expense, net. 203 261 433 532 Earnings before income taxes 4,236 2,443 7,250 4,067 income taxes. 1.841 1.025. 3.147 1.716 Net earnings $ 2.395 $ 1,413 $ 4.103, $ 2.351 Net earnings per common share S-222 $ 0.18 $ 0.38 $ 0.30 Weighted average shares outstanding 11.036 7.963 10.916 , 7.968 1Amounts for all periods include the results of Randle -Eastern Ambulance Service, Inc. acquired in June 1993 and accounted for as a pooling -of -interests. 2Net earnings and earnings per share for 1992 arc pro forma amounts reflecting certain adjustments made to reflect income taxes that would have been payable if one of the Company's subsidiaries had been subject to corporate income taxes on an ongoing basis. American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batterymarch Street Boston, MA 02110 Phone: 617261-1600 - Fax: 617/ 261-1610 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact Dominic J. Puopolo or Robert C. Hubbell Executive Vice President & CFO Edelman Worldwide 617/261-1600 212/704-8103 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, LNC. APPOINTS ROBERT W. TRINKLEBACK CORPORATE DIRECTOR OF SAFETY AND HEALTH Boston, Mass. — July 19, 1993 -- American Medical Response, Inc. (NYSE: EMT) today announced that Robert W. Trinkleback, CSP has been appointed Corporate Director of Safety and Health. Mr. Trinkleback had most recently been with Federal Express, Inc., where, as Corporate Safety Manager, he designed and administered corporate safety, health and environmental programs and policies. Mr. Trinkleback, 35 years old, brings extensive senior level experience to American Medical Response, Inc. During his eight-year tenure at Federal Express, Mr. Trinkleback developed and implemented safety programs to reduce vehicle accidents, address environmental and industrial hygiene concerns, and minimi?e workers compensation claims. Prior to Federal Express, Mr. Trinkleback was Manager of Safety and Risk Management for Retail Express, Inc., and prior to that was a Safety Engineering Representative for Aetna Casualty and Surety Company. Mr. Trinldeback is a graduate of West Virginia University, where he also received a Master's Degree in Industrial Safety Management. He is a Certified Safety Professional (CSP) and is an active member in the American Society of Safety Engineers. National Safety Council, and the National Association of Environmental Professionals. Mr. Trinkleback is also a former certified EMT in the state of New Jersey. Paul M. Verrochi, Chairman, CEO and President of American Medical Response, Inc. commented, "We are extremely pleased to welcome Robert Trinkleback as Corporate Director of Safety and Health. His extensive experience in building safety programs in a wide variety of areas for businesses with similar transportation modalities will be invaluable to us as we expand the scope of our activities through additional acquisitions." "1 am very excited to be joining American Medical Response, Inc., because they clearly recognize that safety and health management programs are the key determinant of insurance claims. There are substantial synergies and benefits to be realized through bringing national programs to the various locations," Mr. Trinkleback added. -- continued -- — 2 -- American American Medical Response is the leading provider of emergency and non -emergency pre- hospital care in the ambulance services industry. It currently serves an aggregate population of over six million people in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Mississippi, New Jersey, Oregon and Washington. American Medical Response responded to more than 450,000 total emergency service calls during 1992. Through the consolidation of local service providers, American intends to expand and build its service areas and maintain its position as the country's leading ambulance service provider. # # # f American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batterymarch Street Boston, MA 02110 Phone: 617/261-1600 - Fax: 617/ 261-1610 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact James E. McGrath or Robert C. Hubbell Director Edelman Worldwide 617/261-1600 212/704-8255 AMERIC N MEDICAL• RESPONSE COMPLETES CONNECTICUT ACQUISITION Boston, MA — July 16, 1993 -- American Medical Response, Inc. ( NYSE: EMT ) announced today that it has closed the acquisition of Bridgeport Ambulance Service, Inc., headquartered in Bridgeport, Connecticut. Bridgeport Ambulance, which serves the city of Bridgeport and its surrounding communities, had revenues of approximately $5.1 million in 1992. Specific terms of the acquisition were not disclosed. "Our existing beachhead operation in New Haven provides us the opportunity to realize significant synergies at Bridgeport Ambulance. In the long run, we believe that these synergies will benefit both the Bridgeport community and our patients," commented Paul M. Verrochi, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of American Medic.31 Response. "Over the past 26 years, Bridgeport Ambulance and its owner, Joe Lansing, have built an outstanding record of service, one which we intend to build upon." American Medical Response is the leading provider of emergency and non -emergency pre- hospital care in the ambulance services industry. It currently serves an aggregate population of over six million people in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Mississippi, New Jersey, Oregon and Washington. American Medical Response responded to more than 450,000 total emergency service calls during 1992. Through the consolidation of local service providers, American intends to expand and build its service areas and maintain its position as the country's leading ambulance service provider. # # # r American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batterymarch Street, Suite 300 Boston, MA 02110 Phone: 617/261-I600 - Fax: 617/ 261-1610 FOR INIIMIED A E SE Contact: James E. McGrath or Robert C. Hubbell Director Edelman Worldwide 617/261-1600 212/704-8255 AMERICAN MEDICAL_RESPONSE CLOSES PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED ACQUISITION Boston, MA — July 7, 1993 -- American Medical Response, Inc. ( NYSE: EMT ) announced today that it has closed the acquisition of Reed Ambulances, Inc., headquartered in Denver, Colorado. Reed's 1992 revenues were approximately $9 million. Specific terms of the acquisition were not disclosed. "The business combination of Reed with our two other Colorado service providers — A-1 and Ambulance Service Company — should enable us to improve service levels while holding down costs, all to the benefit of the citizens of Denver and its outlying communities," commented Paul M. Verrochi, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of American Medical Response. American Medical Response is the leading provider of emergency and non -emergency pre- hospital care in the ambulance services industry. It currently serves an aggregate population of over six million people in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Mississippi, New Jersey, Oregon and Washington. American Medical Response responded to more than 450,000 total emergency service calls during 1992. Through the consolidation of local service providers, American intends to expand and build its service areas and maintain its position as the country's leading ambulance service provider. American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batterymarch Street, Suite 300 Boston, MA 02110 Phone: 617261-1600 - Fax: 617/ 261-1610 FOR IMMED A REELEA. E Contact James E. McGrath or Matthew J. Harrington Director Edelman Worldwide 617/261-1600 212/704-8103 American MedicalResponse Reaches Preliminary Understanding with California Service Provider Boston, MA — June 22, 1993 — American Medical Response, Inc. ( NYSE: EMT) today announced that it has reached a preliminary understanding concerning the acquisition of a California-based company which had 1992 revenues in excess of $50 million. The completion of the transaction is subject to customary due diligence. "This transaction is extremely complex, and our due diligence is only now beginning. While potentially an outstanding fit with our present California operations, there are also many complications which need to be addressed before the transaction can be consummated," said Paul M. Verrochi, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of American Medical Response, Inc. American Medical Response is the leading provider of emergency and non -emergency pre- hospital care in the ambulance services industry, and is the only publicly owned ambulance service company in the United States. It currently services an aggregate population of more than six million people in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Mississippi, New Jersey, Oregon and Washington. American Medical Response intends to penetrate new areas of the country by expanding its established regions and consolidating operations. # # # American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batterymarch Street, Suite 300 Boston, MA 02110 Phone: 617/261-1600 - Fax: 617/ 261-1610 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: James E. McGrath or Matthew J. Harrington Director Edelman Worldwide 617/261-1600 212/704-8103 ,'AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE APPOINTS PAUL T. SHIRLEY AS CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER Boston, MA — June 3, 1993 -- American Medical Response, Inc. ( NYSE: EMT) today announced that Paul T. Shirley has been appointed Chief Operating Officer, a newly created position. Mr. Shirley had most recently been Chief Executive Officer of American Medical Response West, the largest subsidiary of the parent. As Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Shirley will be responsible for directing the national consolidation of American's nine current operating units. Mr. Shirley will report directly to Paul M. Verrochi, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of American Medical Response, Inc. Mr. Shirley, 53 years old, has been a leader and pioneer in the ambulance service business for over 30 years. Prior to the formation of American Medical Response, Mr. Shirley was President and Chief Executive Officer of Vanguard Ambulance Services and its predecessor, Santa Cruz Ambulance Service, since 1963. "Because of our extraordinary growth, it is time to focus on the challenge of consolidation itself, and to further develop the infrastructure and programs necessary to bring our Company to the next level of performance. This is the first of several key additions to our top-level corporate management team which we will be making over the coming months," commented Paul M. Verrochi, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of American Medical Response, Inc. "Since our Initial Public Offering last year, Paul Shirley has demonstrated time and again his exceptional leadership abilities. He has managed and directed the successful consolidation of our two large existing California providers; he has been the chief architect and builder of our key Colorado strategy, where we have already made two acquisitions and obtained a significant new municipal contract; and he has been a key player in bringing other companies and their leaders into our growing network of providers." "I am excited about the opportunity to utilize my experience at the corporate level," commented Mr. Shirley. "We will be working to improve management techniques in certain areas, such as purchasing and accounts receivable, as well as developing new quality programs, coordinating the development of technology systems, and improving management techniques. I look forward to this important set of challenges." -- continued — Mr. Shirley is also active in public affairs. He is currently a member of the California Ambulance Association, of which he was President from 1968 to 1969. He served as a member of the Santa Cruz County Planning Commission from 1965 to 1969; as a member of the State of California Narcotic Addict Evaluation Authority from 1971 to 1974; and as a member of the Board of Directors of Federal Prison Industries, Inc. from 1982 to 1991. Mr. Shirley has also served as a member of the Santa Cruz County Emergency Medical Care Commission and the State of California Emergency Medical Service Advisory Committee. American Medical Response is the leading provider of emergency and non -emergency pre- hospital care in the ambulance services industry, and is the only publicly owned ambulance service company in the United States. It currently serves an aggregate population of more than 6 million people in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Mississippi, New Jersey, Oregon and Washington. American Medical Response responded to more than 450,000 emergency service calls during 1992. Through strategic acquisitions, American Medical Response intends to r ,...: new areas of the country by expanding its established regions and consolidating operations # # # American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batterymarch Street, Suite 300 Boston, MA 02110 Phone: 617/261-1600 - Fax: 617/ 261-1610 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: James E. McGrath or Matthew J. Harrington Director Edelman Worldwide 617/261-1600 212/704-8103 :.ui 1 . 3r110111 : $ t 1 .r : • ti: SECONDISHINECUCIELSER3EICLEROYIDERLEININEESDLORADO MUNICIPAL CONTRACT: AND COMPLETES MIAMI ACQUISITION] Boston, MA — June 2, 1993 — American Medical Response, Inc. ( NYSE: EMT ) today announced that it has signed a Letter of Intent to acquire Bridgeport Ambulance Service, Inc., headquartered in Bridgeport, Connecticut; that it has been awarded an exclusive contract to provide emergency ambulance services in Aurora, Colorado; and that it successfully closed the previously -announced acquisition of Randle-Eastem Ambulance, headquartered in Miami, Florida. Sign Letter of Intent Bridgeport Ambulance, which serves the city of Bridgeport and its surrounding communities, had revenues of approximately $5.1 million in 1992. "Bridgeport Ambulance is a highly regarded provider of emergency medical services. They have a long-standing and successful record of community commitment." said Paul M. Verrochi, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of American Medical Response, Inc. "We already have a substantial presence in Connecticut through our New Haven provider, and we believe that this addition will result in a terrific business combination." "We are confident that the combination of our company with American Medical Response will produce significant benefits for our patients and the Bridgeport community as a whole," Joseph D. Lansing, President of Bridgeport Ambulance Service, Inc., said. "American is a perfect fit to continue providing the kind of quality service we've delivered since 1966." The completion of the transaction is subject to negotiation and execution of definitive agreements and the completion of customary due diligence. Specific terms of the proposed acquisition were not disclosed. — continued — 7 -2_ , ' warded Denver Contract The Company also announced that it has recently been awarded a new municipal contract to provide exclusive emergency medical transportation services for the community of Aurora, Colorado, the third largest city in Colorado with a population of 232,000. This contract, which has an initial two-year term, was awarded to American's subsidiary Ambulance Service Company in Denver. The Company began providing service yesterday, June 1st. The Company estimates gross revenues at $2.7 million per year with approximately 9500 transports per year, and expects possible additional revenues from hospitals and nursing homes. Carl Unrein, CEO of American's subsidiary Ambulance Service Company, commented, "We are delighted to add Aurora to our expanding service area, and believe wecan improve the standards of delivered care and response times in the community." Completes Florida Acquisition American Medical Response also announced that it has successfully completed its previously announced acquisition of Randle -Eastern Ambulance, headquartered in Miami, Florida. Randle -Eastern, which serves the Dade County area, had 1992 revenues of approximately $17 million. The acquisition was accounted for on a pooling -of -interests basis. "During our due diligence process, we came to the conclusion that Randle -Eastern represents a terrific base for future expansion in the important Florida market. This is a first-class operation with a strong management team that can use American's additional resources to further build its territory," commented Mr. Verrochi. Robert L. Garner, President of Randle -Eastern Ambulance, commented, "We are excited about being a part of American Medical Response. I am convinced that joining forces with them will benefit both our patients and our company over the long-term." American Medical Response is the leading provider of emergency and non -emergency pre- hospital care in the ambulance services industry, and is the only publicly owned ambulance service company in the United States. It currently serves an aggregate population of more than 6 million people in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Mississippi, New Jersey, Oregon and Washington. American Medical Response responded to more than 450,000 emergency service calls during 1992. Through strategic acquisitions, American Medical Response intends to penetrate new areas of the country by expanding its established regions a.id consolidating operations. # # # American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batterymarch Street Boston, MA 02110 Telephone: (617)261-1600 - Facsimile: (617) 261-1610 Paul M. Verroclu Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Paul M. Verrochi, 44, has spent his career prior to the formation of American Medical Response, Inc. starting, building, and managing two highly successful quality service companies. In 1972, Mr. Verrochi founded Omni Building Services, a janitorial services firm which he built from inception to more than 10,000 employees over a 14 -year period. When Omni was sold to ADT Limited in 1984, he continued to manage the business for an additional two years. In 1987, Mr. Verrochi created American Environmental Group, Inc. through the merger and subsequent consolidation of several small asbestos removal concerns. In 1989, the Company was merged with Allwaste, Inc., a national publicly -held environmental corporation. Beginning in 1991, Mr. Verrochi created a business plan to consolidate the ambulance services business. American Medical Response, Inc. was formed in February 1992 with that express aim, and in a short period of time has become the pre-eminent force in its field. As with Omni and American Environmental group, the Company competes on the basis of quality in a fragmented industry where economies of scale and synergies can be translated into profit and into building further competitive barriers to entry. During his tenure at Omni/ADT and American Environmental Group/Aliwaste, Mr. Verrochi completed over 30 acquisitions. Mr. Verrochi received his B.S. degree from the United States Merchant Marine Academy at Kings Point, New York. 1 American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batterymarch Street Boston, MA 02110 Telephone: (617) 261-1600 - Facsimile: (617) 261-1610 Paul T. Shirley Director, Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President Paul T. Shirley, 53, is Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President and a Director of American Medical Response, Inc. He has been in the ambulance business since 1963, when he began serving as President of Vanguard Ambulance Services (formerly PacMed), one of the founding companies of American Medical Response, Inc. Until recently assuming the position as Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Shirley was Chief Executive Officer of AMR West, the Company's largest subsidiary. Mr. Shirley has extensive experience in both the management and acquisition of ambulance services, having completed several acquisitions to form Vanguard. As Chief Operating Officer, he is responsible for the integration and consolidation of the Company's newly - acquired businesses, and he also plays an active role in corporate strategy and acquisition planning. Mr. Shirley has been the President of the California Ambulance Association and remains active in both that organization and the American Ambulance Association. His record of public service includes having been appointed by the President of the United States to the Board of Directors of Federal Prison Industries, Inc. and by the Governor of California to the Narcotic Addict Evaluation Authority. He is also active in other civic affairs. I American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batterymarch Street Boston, MA 02110 Telephone: (617) 261-1600 - Facsimile: (617) 261-1610 Dominic J. Puopolo Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Dominic J. Puopolo, 50, has been Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and a Director of American Medical Response, Inc. since its inception in February of 1992. Mr. Puopolo is an original founder of the Company. He is responsible for the Company's financial policies and procedures, acquisition program and strategic planning. In 1987, Mr. Puopolo co-founded American Environmental Group, which was created through the acquisition, merger and consolidation of several asbestos abatement service companies located in New England. In 1989 American Environmental Group merged with Aliwaste, Inc. a national, publicly -held, environmental service company. Mr. Puopolo continued to serve as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of that division through 1990. From 1983 to 1987, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Omni Building Services, Inc., a janitorial services firm. The company merged with ADT, Ltd. in 1984, and he continued to serve as Chief Financial Officer of ADT Maintenance Service, Inc: s Northeast Region. Mr. Puopolo was responsible for the company's financial policies and the acquisition program. Mr. Puopolo received a Bachelor of Science degree from Northeastern University and a Masters of Business Administration from Suffolk University. Mr. Puopolo is a Certified Public Accountant. He is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc., Massachusetts Society of Certified Public Accountants, Inc., and the National Association of Accountants. American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batterymarch Street Boston, MA 02110 Telephone: (617) 261-1600 - Facsimile: (617) 261-1610 Michael J. McClymont Senior Vice President Michael J. McClymont, 50, is Senior Vice President of American Medical Response, Inc. He has spent his entire career in service industries. Prior to joining American Medical Response, Inc., Mr. McClymont worked exclusively on operational and financial analysis of acquisitions at Exel Holdings, Ltd. In 1989, Mr. McClymont was President and Chief Operating Officer of Mycor Services, a food and vending service company. From 1988 to 1989, he•was President of Food Concepts, Inc., an indirect subsidiary of ADT. From 1985 to 1988, Mr. McClymont served as Vice President of business development for ADT Maintenance Services where he was responsible for numerous service company acquisitions. From 1984 to 1985, Mr. McClymont served as a regional =lager for Canteen Services where he managed P&L operations in the greater New York area. From 1979 to 1984, he served as a Vice President for vending operations at ARA Services with full P&L responsibility for all vending services located in the Northeast. Mr. McClymont received both his B.S. and M.B.A. degrees from Manhattan College in Riverdale, New York. American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batterymarch Street Boston, MA 02110 Telephone: (617) 261-1600 - Facsimile: (617) 261-1610 Ronald M. Levenson Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer Ronald M. Levenson, 36, is Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Assistant Secretary of American Medical Response, Inc. From 1985 to September of 1992, he was a Senior Manager at KPMG Peat Marwick, a public accounting firm, where he had been employed since 1979. While at Peat Marwick, Mr. Levenson specialized in providing professional accounting and auditing services to publicly held companies. He is experienced in working with initial and secondary offering.. of common stock, mergers and acquisitions and leveraged buyouts. Mr. Levenson is also a former lecturer in accounting at the Boston University School of Law and Northeastern University. Mr. Levenson received his B.A. degree from Northeastern University. He is a Certified Public Accountant and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Massachusetts Society of Certified Public Accountants. American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batter,march Street Boston, MA 02110 Telephone: (617) 261-1600 - Facsimile: (617) 261-1610 William E '1 r" Rim Executive Vice President, Director William E. Riggs, 51, is Executive Vice President and Director of American Medical Response, Inc. as well as Chief Executive Officer of American Medical Response West. Through his 29 year tenure in the ambulance service business, Mr. Riggs has come to be recognized as one of the "founding fathers" of the modern ambulance industry, building Regional Ambulance into the largest and most respected ambulance service provider in California. Mr. Riggs has also played a leadership role in developing and pioneering the emergency medical service systems for Alameda and Contra Costa counties. He has served as a member of the emergency Medical Care Committee for Alameda county. In addition, he has served on the Governor's State Task Force on Earthquake Preparedness and was appointed to the State Legislature Joint Commission on Police, Fire and Medical Services. He has also served as a Director of the American Association and past president of the California Ambulance Association. American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batteryinarch Street Boston, MA 02110 Telephone: (617) 261-1600 - Facsimile: (617) 261-1610 Joseph R. Paolella Executive Vice President, Director Joseph R. Paolella, 42, is Executive Vice President and a Director of American Medical Response, Inc. Mr. Paolella has been in the ambulance services business since 1975. He is currently President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of New Haven Ambulance Service Inc., one of the founding companies of American Medical Response, Inc. His responsibilities include managing corporate operations, financial planning, administrative services and public affairs. Mr. Paolella currently serves as Chairman of the Government Affairs Committee oldie American Ambulance Association, the national trade association of the ambulance industry. This coLunittee is responsible for representing industry positions on EMS laws and regulations promulgated by Congress and the Health Care Finance Administration. He was a founding Director of the Connecticut Ambulance Association and served as its President for eight years. He was also a member of the Connecticut Advisory Committee on Emergency Medical Services. Mr Paolella received the Outstanding Achievement Award in emergency medical services in 1988 given by the State of Connecticut Department of Health Services. He was also the recipient of the J. Walter Shaeffer Memorial Award for Excellence presented by the American Ambulance Association in 1990. Mr. Paolella received his B.A. degree from Georgetown University. 1 American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batteryrnarch Street Boston, MA 02110 Telephone: (617) 261-1600 - Facsimile: (617) 261-1610 James E. McGrath Director James E. McGrath, 38, is a recognized expert in the fields of corporate development and finance. Over his career, he has been a founding principal of, or early investor in, over 50 companies, many of which have become publicly -held. He has been involved in venture capital, leveraged acquisitions, joint ventures, limited partnerships, and many other financial vehicles. Mr. McGrath is also currently Chairman of the Board of Directors of Perceptron, Inc. (OTC - PRCP), a leading imaging solutions corporation. From 1987 through 1989, he was Managing Director and a partner at William E. Simon & Sons, Inc., where he was responsible for investing in and overseeing more than one hundred million dollars of private investments in many industries. Prior to that, Mr. McGrath was a Corporate Senior Vice President of E.F. Hutton & Company, Inc., where, among other responsibilities, he was President of the venture capital division and head of the firm's merchant banking activities, which together represented approximately $150 million of investments. Previously, he was Chairman and CEO of McLaughlin, Inc., a large private Western construction firm. In that capacity, he helped build the Stoneway Concrete division into the largest and most profitable ready -mix concrete company in the Pacific Northwest, principally through acquisition and consolidation. He began his career at Bain & Company, a large strategic planning and consulting firm. Mr. McGrath received his A.B. degree from Harvard College and his M.B.A. degree from the Harvard '3usiness School. American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batterymarch Street Boston, MA 02110 Telephone: (617) 261-1600 - Facsimile: (617) 261-1610 Michael A. Baker Director Michael A. Baker, 47, is President of Notre Capital Ventures, Ltd. and a recognized expert in the field of mergers and acquisitions and in the formation of new organizations utilizing reorganization accounting. Mr. Baker is both a lawyer and CPA. He was involved in the acquisition of over 500 companies while serving as Associate General Counsel of Browning- Ferris Industries, Inc. Mr. Baker was a founder of Allwaste, Inc.; ENSR Corporation; Sanifill, Inc.; and American Medical Response, Inc. Mr. Baker also helped establish and direct the acquisition programs at each of those companies, which in aggregate have produced more than one hundred acquisitions. Mr. Baker is a frequent lecturer at legal conferences and industry meetings on the topic of business planning and mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Baker was a faculty member at the University of Houston Law Center from 1971 until 1985. Mr. Baker received both his Juris Doctorate, summa cum laude, and his Bachelor of Business Adminstration, cum laude, from the University of Houston. American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batterymarch Street Boston, MA 02110 Telephone: (617) 261-1600 - Facsimile: (617) 261-1610 David B. Hammond Director David B. Hammond, 48, is a well-regarded expert both in developing sophisticated financial systems and controls, and arranging large and complex financial transactions. Mr. Hammond is currently Deputy Chairman of ADT Limited and•has been on ADT's board of directors since September 1984. From 1981 to 1984, he was a director of Hawley Group PLC, the predecessor company of ADT. From 1973 to 1980, Mr. Hammond was employed by Thorn -EMI plc in various senior financial positions including Financial and commercial Director of the Entertainment Division. Previous to that, he was employed by both Touche Ross & Co. and Arthur Andersen & Co. Mr. Hammond is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants, and a Fellow of the United Kingdom Institute of Taxation. Over his career, Mr. Hammond has also served on numerous boards of directors in many different countries. American Medical Response, Inc. 67 Batterymarch Street Boston, MA 02110 Telephone: (617) 261-1600 - Facsimile: 1,617) 261-1610 John Larkin Thompson Director John L. Thompson, 62, is currently of Counsel to the Foston law firm of Nutter, McClennen and Fish. In September of 1992, he retired as President and CEO of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, the largest health insurer in Massachusetts with a premium volume in 1991 of $3.2 billion. He served as President and CEO of the company from 1987 to 1992. Prior to that he was President and CEO of Blue Shield of Massachusetts from 1970 to 1987 when the company merged with Blue Cross of Massachusetts. Previously, Mr. Thompson was an attorney with the Boston law firm of Palmer & Dodge. During the past 20 years, Mr. Thompson has been a member of various health related and civic organizations, including the National Advisory Council on Health Care technology Assessment; the Health Insurance Benefits Council; the Advisory Panel on National Health Insurance, Subcommittee on Health, Committee on Ways and Means, U.S. House of Representatives; and, as Vice Chairman, Advisory Board of Emergency Medical Services, Commonwealth of Massachusetts. He currently serves as the Chairman of the Boston Public Library Foundation and previously served as the Chairman of the Untied Way of Massachusetts Bay, Chairman of the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce, and as Chairman of the New England Aquarium. Mr. Thompson also serves as a Director of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts and as a Director of EG&G, Inc. of Wellesley, a diversified technical manufacturing company. Mr. Thompson received his B.S. degree from Villonova University; his M.S. degree from Columbia University Graduate School of Business; and his law degree from Boston University School of Law. American Medical Response, Inc. 1992 Annual Report Prv,.•ir)irr i 1. nrre/e-nce/ .)Irr)irrr/ .Cervi, r.. /0 Our (•,rnrertneri/ir.,... 11 "hr» /: very Second (•1,11,110 r American Medical Response, Inc. is the nation's premier provider of emergency and non- _, . , pre -hospital care and other general ambulance services. The Company is the leader in an exciting and rapidly growing industry which is nearly $5 billion in size. American was formed on August 5, 1992 through the merg- er of Regional Ambulance. Inc. (Fremont. California). Vanguard Ambulance Services (San Jose, California), New Haven Ambu- lance Service, Inc. (New Haven. Connecticut) and Professional Ambulance Service, Inc. (Wilmington. Delaware). Since August, •1 a additional service providers have joined our grow- ing family of companies: Mobile Medic Ambulance Service, Inc. (Gulfport. Mississippi), Ambulance Service Company (Denver, Colorado), and Buck Medical Services, Inc. (Portland, Oregon). By the end of 1992, American served an aggregate popula- tion of more than five million people and responded to more than 400,000 calls. Through strategic acquisitions. American intends to penetrate new areas of the country while expanding its services in established regions. fa, S106.4 1 94.1 73.1 56.0 39.3 Financial Highlights (in thousands. except per share amounts) Total Revenue Year -ended December 31. 1992 1991 S106,433 $94.104 Net Earnings (pro forma) $ 5,670 S 4.306 Earnings Per Share (pro forma) S 0.67 S 0.57 \,'eightet1 Average Shares Outstanding 8,447 7,57E Total Revenue 88 89 90 91 92 Net Ea g. (pro forma/ 55.7 4.3 2.1 1.6 .9 88 89 90 91 92 Earning% 1'er Share (pro forma) S.67 .57 .28 .22 .12 88 89 90 91 92 1 r Letter to The Shareholders Ir° 11ffiel.‘ .1...14thV.1,11 fit! th, t i:ttl. ..nLi ,11.i-• 111‘.•1tItrntr nn ,r1•1 I•Lt-11, i.!1:I1101,1t% 1'0; .1:ncr 1111.• '1,l'IL't•T httlf it! ttt:f t,t111/,', .111ti t‘t.:1 tt. ',Li- t.lt••! ‘0.1 •Itt. \.t".• Stt, !, ., CS t ••1.t!I 11. It• I• 2 I .1It• F 2 Itt Ut,.111 f.14,1illt• .0101 Itt [11,1: \\ !tt"...t! 22 iittlitit11.2 1111,211 /21112 1,1 • 2:I, \ Itt 2 2 I -,,!: • -21111", I t I • I ; \`` -'1 lus. •• • In addition to the utntinued growth and success of our four founding companies. w e have augmented our growth by acquiring "beachhead facilities" in new regions and also by expanding our services into areas that are contiguous to com- munities we currently serve. In November, we completed our first acquisition. Mobile Medic Ambulance Service of Gulfport. Mississippi. in December. we completed the acquisition of :Ambulance Service Company in Denver, Colorado. In January 1993, we completed the acquisition of Huck Medical Services. Lased in Portland, Oregon. The first concrete example of our progress in expanding services into areas adjacent to those we currently serve is the recent contract awarded to our Delaware operation. In December, we signed a three- year. approximately S4 million contract with the municipality of Atlantic City. New Jersey. Internally. the consolidation and streamlining of functions in the San Fran- cisco Bay Area continues b} Regional Ambulance and Vanguard Ambulance, two of the "founding companies-. Now known as American Medical Response West. these two companies are largely housed under one roof. Bu..ine w Strategy Our business strategy is based on acquiring operations that share several common winning elements. We believe the following elements will become the stan- dards against which other companies will be measured: The ere Amsric predicat belief that acquisition program at a fat ()rabic rate. We also have estab- lished an insurance program that has consolidated our insur- ance coverage on a national Iwai. Community Commitment As an industry leader, we recognize our obligation to set an example. \Ve take our role as community citizens seriously. During 1993 we will be making a significant financial contribution to the communities we serve. 1 am pleased to announce that each of ■ t ton or our current locations will be ,naking a con- tribution to support their local public school systems. Together we can make a difference in helping address our nation's critical public education problem. Over the next six months, we will be announcing further details of the innovative and unique educational program we intend to create. We hope our commitment will serve as a challenge to other corporations to join us in this important endeavor. an weir ed on our and off of amb the quality Delaney COM pan la entergene utencs • and the y services they prey be snhanc consol A Our operations are committed to providing exceptional quality service. Our services are provided primarily by paramedics. recipients of the highest level of medical CC iilicatiun in the ambulance industry. A Our providers manage -911 " response in their respective areas and enjoy significant market share positions. ♦ Our operations feature the industry's most technologically advanced dispatch and operating systems. A Our providers are deeply rooted within their respective communities. We also are consolidating and streamlining certain func- tions at the corporate level. such as banking and insurace. .American has received a cornmittnent from a group of batiks for a S30 million unsecured revolving credit facility. The Com- pany intends to use the credit facility to consolidate existing debt. to finance future acquisitions and for general working capital purposes. The lending group is led by the Fleet Finan- cial Group. This centralized credit facility should protide suffi- cient cash availability for the foreseeable lustre to continue „ur Ids could ed through Idation. LookingAbcad American's performance always has been driven by the need to contain costs associated with delivering superior emer- gency and non -emergency health care. We welcome the Clinton Administration's emphasis on containing costs. We believe that the President's pledge to broaden access to health care. particularly for the uninsured and underinsured, could prove beneficial for the Company. in addition, we are proud that the Administration's ideas echo American's strategy of producing cost efficiencies. In sum. we believe that in the short time since August we have made significant strides toward achieving our initial objectives- in recognizing this success. it is important to thank .\,nerican's employees for their dedication. Together. we look forward to building upon this Inundation and achieving continued success and growth in 1993. \\'e appreciate your commitment as shareholders and your continued interest in American Medical Response. \Ve Zook forward to returning this trust as every member dour hard-working team contributes to improving the delivery of emergency and non -emergency ambulance service throughout the United States. Sincerely, Paul M. \'errochi ( /iuirnurrr. C.ble A:Welds e Uriieer ural Predict vrl 3 Overview I Il t•'t.tin nn` IlAlni ,1I t. 1 M,i,ti 1 1111;it.tin.tt }n t tiii't;lnti tonnnug ttl grins lh ill tht.- 111'11)4. the founder. of .lmtrit;ul .,Uctli4 al lit.poni.t' Iticntitit'ii 1111 erneretnit anti 114/11-1:111121g1:114...\ 1,r-c-ho.pit.tl .Irttl .Itnh411.1n1c "WI-% ICC, 1,11>1nt.,.t. 11.i141412: .11141141.11t, 1114 1,t•ne}it from a nationally initip-ate i . tIo.it h. Su!.. pin -line 11,i,. contlu.ion .In• ill• nunlcrnu, 411.111_1. of curring l,olll 111.1111 .41141 otlt,111C of 111t 1111111.111\ /intering the .l/at),-or.lyr erj /ittteryeney Tra,r.ya,r! .111hnueh 11'rlltlt'r.111 n%crlool.ttl 111 .11,1 11...11,11, 411 ,hti .l1111-1.Ire1,111,1:_1.Ike t01,146;tt.;1111111ha• (•.111 ell r.tpiIll' along 111th 4,ther .1'To, In Ow intlht.Il (4111 ,11"1'11.,. NtII .tllltltll.tIIi t' \5.1• ItilI i l'll i•:.4. .111 1111.1111104,.1.11 . 1,t14.1 111:4 4 1.14. 111.41 141141 141• 1.4114 ( 1, 141111 1,11111.11C.1 .41:.1 4 -11,,41d, 4.1 .1111nin:.1(: ulc Ill \ ' 4 ,11111 4 Today. pre -hospital medical care Is comparable to that Lound In many emergency rooms.- T111- 111- .1411.11111•. 111 111 1,1141,1111.11 1111.'4114..11 1 .111• Holt Irtlutrc 1'11 t.1 Ic111...1 tr.unin_ 111111.1111.1_1111 .‘ II,II114 .11 14.'4.1111R 1.411. ,41111 ,.n.oncllit.. th.' 1.it1tr 1,1•ir1C 1111 n11,.I hi_hlt' 11.1111111 an1L,t1l.ntt-c 1.11,1111Ion.It. E1111.1.!.41•114 .1 ptr.ol•'ntl u.( the 1114111,111\ ., mn>t ail\.411. (11 tnittI2tn.1 in. tht.11 ct1uip111cnt tVcl\' 11.1\. olttn in Ow ,o.l ilo.ult .11141 non-.Itrllt tn.\ 11-4,11- 1111.111 • n,11-ttltlll. i111.1_i11,1de. 1114'n.1110n.L.t_1141.I11/111/1.111Ic t11itc. pltnIltt'1 \1111111.1114'1114,\..II11.1.11111.1 t1/111pt11tl\t' .1111.1_t•-• tt,l 4.\.41111.1t, lilt l.,n,1,:o,\••. L1r_t ..Ic 11111'4 11.4,11112 11111.'1.1111• .11111(( .lmcritnn 111al lluilc :.1.11C-Iti•iftt-.tit 1.111illrllt•rl( ttr h'.. t11.111 the t'nrilI)t.ti- 11011, 1t hilt elr.tltl t tt (nut 1 t,11/1114' tn..hl•. 111t C1,111- '1.01,1 11, .14 1111'1 1- dill lent 14.'. 111 .114...1, .Ill 11 .1. It.114king .1111 111.111.1114 t >1111 11 t•..111.111114:-. 411 ,1 .111' .11.11 .1111111 \1111914..11 It, {.: u\ 1111• 114.111.1 .1.11.1111111 1,(1.1111111.1 11.1.1111 ,411.1 '.11 1111„ l' . lnl-i.ltlllll 1111,11111,1" 1111111'tlt ..111 ,.11.1.1;.!• .1 '.curly Si Billion Industry \mbt.,ance s_rvice expenditures total nearly S5 billion annually. While this may seem small in the context of the nearly SI trillion health-care industry. pre -hospital medical care is as vital as police and lire departments to the health and well-being of ever- community member. Moreover, the size of the ambulance industry. measured in Meal value of services. is continuing to grow as the demand and need for enhanced services increases. The private sector. in which American partici- pates. has been growing at over ION, annual- ly during the last decade. in this now large business. there are over 2.100 private providers of ambulance services. As a result. the opportunities for consolidation are enor- mous since less than 2°44 of these providers generate annual revenue of over $20 million. As the only publicly traded company exclu- sively devoted to pre -hospital medical carr — organized and operating on a national scale — American is e <ceptionally w. -ll - positioned to capitalize 00 the industr's need to provide a uniformly high level of service and deliver savings through cost efficiencies. The ambulance industry's growth i• driven by the Iollowing factors: A The aging of America — .1s people li%e longer. they have an increasing need for medically complex movement not only between home and hospital. but also 1.etateen hospital and long-term care fat hits• or nursing flames - h Growth of outpatient -este facilities Cse oItilese facilities alien necessitates an ambulance trip to and from another location. fps adnrin..Jn:!e✓.r ,.1 L•eJh � . i/ Iw aver. rr.•1114.4 pbvfevfnl mcSwa/ rgruprnrnf, r.• 1..nJ1rl..n '.aprfalarriwI.. A The growth of in-. • health care -- 141-hnnle I are enables many patients - •-e.eive treatment at 1101411 cl 1,1 though they arc sail! quite ill. Olsen they require ambu- lance ser-vites upon di,chare,e from the 110.pn:d A Greater sp(( ialinuion of hospitals .uu1 m.,1lagt•rl ( are - \1.Irll specialty medical procedures .arc perfo1m141 in tela cr hnspil.ds Iv>uiting in increas.d 11)1.1-114/5pit.li Ir.uis- port..11so, many 1 \lOs rvqunc tkat :m(c st..I h....ul>- ai 1'1 Ling p.Itiellt 1111151 L1 MA115110rtld 10.. ttlell11,1. 1' Laspit:Il lion "1.4 ptuyidcr•s ser'i(c p1 al hied. st financial t'nrlditiwl. each .and every ant A An increased emphasis on higher levels of medical care at the accident scene — (:ornmunities are more fre- quently demanding higher levels of carr in the pre -hospital setting. A 1 ArAvretl response -time thresholds — larly intervention can potentially curtail costly medical procedures. shorten recovery lime. and ultimately lower overall individual health-care costs. • Taken together. these factors drive- what rivewhat American believes is sustainable and non-cyclical growth. The Company expects that these factors will continue to be impor- tant because ambulance ser•i.es are absolutely vital and. unlike some other areas of health care. are not generally viewed as discretionary. In .addition. many municipalities which have traditionally operated their own emergency nodical response systems are under increased pressure to control costs. Among the alternatives a-•ail.able is the use of private sector providers. Many small rnunicip.ditics are recognizing t 11.0. by banding together and entering into a single contract. they can achieve better service at a lower overall cost. In this changing arena. the awarding of ex, lusi( a municipal contracts typically is hasea1 111,1 only on cost c(n511 lerat4041,.. but more importantly on a quantitative eyalua- response 11101. medical track record. level o1. .1f1 expertise. quality of management. and American is (tell positioned to compete 00 of these criteria. .Im€riran - .It Thr Firer/rant Ainvri(.ol is .11 the lorel10111 Of .1 dynamic and changing inclustn. Pram !ht. Co111p.all'5 ill(eptian. its goal has been to Le the nation's leading pi owlder of high quality emergency and non-vinergen(5 pre -hospital (art. .15 all industry leadel. the 04.111 lis �i1,n in; ail nl.lrumcnt.il ink1 in lily development of a1111f11I-1)l gll.11 ill .Ind 111I.Is111e1111111 sta11•1.1 Ips. 5 A.L1t1 .un Lime 111 nt cl 2:21111c.11. l 1cin.•11Z,•101 inr4ih.11 0 ,11111.:.,11-.,:,<!-r/11.1a1;..,-,011,„ nt, !Me/ 110. 111111..,! .111 11,1nmuIIII nn :::�,.-� -111, d !n • 1111 , r, . .11, 1.:.:,• \11c..n' 1 , 1 1:.11-;.11:1 n,l 0111111, .,n.! !:,,111 L. .1,11,1.1 11,11•.11:1,...;•,. (: :'111:: \ r. 19,111 :LW dlil„!1 1111 l ; c /1n.d,wu•,t! Supr11L'ri14 111.y.1., . , 6 11.1,„1101.10u,.<c<•,I, <.I1tjnllcr•..1n11 .1 >: 1.-.11 l0 11.01.111, .,.11111 141 44111111.1:11. ;,11.1 .11111 .11.In11111i' ilcct..\nur- 1..111 ..a1.-1111. 11.0 1.111` ,.1,1‘.•111 1. 1111 1.11 _v.l ,.1-11.•111 011c1.1t...1 .11, ,k1!11.111.11111. .1.1111c11101;1,IcI 1111111.1 \.'1111..1%Icr11 .11!.1.,. ;111 ( „11.111, 111 nu,nu.,. ,,11 h11.lrnc ri1„,<•1nrn1 .11111 1.1 +.<. \1L11n,n1..Ih IhO .,>tcln<u1n- y,:11. - 111 -1.111.•1, .11 111. nf, 11. < 111 .lmuL.ti» 11.,-11 {,.1.0, ,111 _1.7:•11,,111,1.1 I.-1dt: ;u c•..11111_ 11,,111 ,u11<1111.n1.. lilt• •lcm )"1 i1<1,i111 11, 11c11111„.. I;... 11�c 1111• 111 1, 11 1_< 111.11111 1111111- i • • A Partner..hip.ef Entrepreneur.. American's management team is seasoned and experi- enced. The founding partners and the individuals who have joined the team through acquisition are well-respected industry leaders who have made important contributions to their profession and in their comtnunities. Identifying and encouraging the development of managers co:.unitted to the growth and enhancement of ambulance services is an impor- tant priority for American. Corporate Growth Strategy American's disciplined corporate growth is based on a three -pronged strategy: target suitable regions of the country and acquire providers to serve as regional headquarters known as "beachhead facilities"; expand services in these areas through additional "lock -on' acquisitions contiguous to the beachhead facilities; and grow internally by providing additional services and streamlining operations. In many respects. American's acquisition criteria mirror the qualities desired by municipalities when awarding a con- tract. In selecting the appropriate emergency care provider, cost is by no means the only consideration. A provider's crack record —in the areas of quality. delivery and efficiency of service — is of paramount importance. Nene/fitting front a Changing ('.S. Health Care E'neir.rnn:ent During the first months (lithe Clint ,n Adrninistration, a new outline of the legislative and regulatory direction fir the L.S. health-care system will become evident. American believes it can benefit over the long term from the Presidents dedication to addressing national health-care concerns. The issues on the national agenda are consistent with those faced by ambulance service providers: how to deliver the best ser- vice to all people while ensuring the highest quality of care. American believes that concepts such as managed competi- tion and global budgeting are parallel wi:h American's corpo- rate objective of achieving efficiencies through cost containment and consolidation. Ambulance Services are provided without consideration of a patient's ability to pay. I:.cI 'sive contracts. subsidies. permission to increase prices and other measures have been .ntrotluced by local governments to ease the burden of uncompensated care on private providers. American believes the introduction of some form of national health-care plan — one that increases access to health care and thereby reduces the level of uncompensated care — could benefit American. as well as consumers. F.. !R Via•. (14.1()pnrfiny (f(/hrr.,tIMR v.,. with rirnrm,.tn:• Parra•r Skiff -Sown mJ !)a..& 7 Oar Ce,nmunitieo Come Firrt American's providers have been important members of their communities for many -years. Buck Medical Services and Ambu- lance Service Company are the oldest. commencing operations in 1913 and 1920. respectively. Together with police and fire departments, American pro- vides the essential ingredients of a community's emergency response capabilities. The Company greatly values the trust placed in it by its communities. American's service providers actively par- ticipate in community volunteer programs that include health fairs. local school education and career programs. American's profitability is the reward for delivering the high- est quality ser -ice in the most efficient manner. The Company's commitment is to return the trust and confidence of the communi- ties it serves with every emergency and non -emergency response. B .�rnrri vu i earpl rvnr.. rvpuiari.v intntihi:r orbm/- rbif brn to the . ball(nrxo and nvankr,'ft& rnrrr- !rrn y m. dmvl 11, 7•04, American Medical Response's Current Service Areas American ,ilalirull?Ggpw&Y lar Selected btn.ncial Data 10 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 11 • independent AuditorsReport 13 Consolidated Balance Sheets 14 Consolidated Statements of Earnings 15 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity 16 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 17 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 18 6 r S I�et�d Flri'�sloial.Data-: (in tbwuan i.. except pee Ayr amounts) Earning. Data: Total revenue. 1992"' 1991 1990 1989 1988 S106,433 S94.104 573:148 556.027 S39.320 Operating expenses: Salaries and benefits 53,364 45.614 36.012 28.037 20.431 Uncompensated care 24,397 22.262 16,413 11,485 7.660 Other 15,217 13,717 11,947 9,563 6.999 Depreciation 3,066 2,772 2.518 1.977 1,033 Total operating expenses 96,044 84.365 66.890 51,062 36,123 Earnings from operations ... 10.389 9.739 6.258 4.965 3.197 Nonoperating expenses: Interest expense. net 747 1,156 1.170 1.076 626 Amortization of intangibles 561 927 1,313__921 951 Total,nonoperating expenses 1,308_ 2,083 2.483 _ _ _ _ ---097-------1:577. Earnings before income taxes 9,081 7,656 3,775 2.968 1.620 Income taxes 4,089 3.201 1,556 1.190 ..__ -__623 Net earnings $ 4,992 S 4,455 $ 2.219 S 1,778 $ 997 Pro forma net earnings(2) S 5,670 S 4,306 $ 2.091 S 1,631 $ 889 Pro forma net earnings per common share S .67 S .57 $ .28 $ .22 S .12 Weighted average common shares outstanding 8.447 7.576 7,576 7.576 7,576 Blance, Sheet Data: Working capital $ 25,612 $ 9,300 $ 6.688 $ 6,674 $ 3,505 8.814 7.687 6.285 3.442 Property tpe�and equipment, net ts 66,5 9 36,858 30,059 26.185 16,568 Long -term -debt. net of current maturities 8,372 7.179 8.392 9,010 5,493 Stockholders' equity 35,757 11.659 7,901 6,217 4,439 (1) lncludv for moult' olelleb lr Medic timbulancr Sash, inc. (acquired on November 4, 1992) and Ambulance Stroke Company (acquired on Dc.wnI rr2i, 1992) from for elate of aequioition.a Ser note 2 to the eon di4rtedfenancial oiatrrnrnta. (2) Certain ar ja.tmente hare Iven made to net earning.. to reflect ineame ta.te.. that ..rah► bare pend pr yaile by one 41,5e Company:, my ealr.idaanu tbat ma. an S corporation fo^ federal income tax purpmw during the prri,ab prorated. See note 4 to thr anr,rnbilated financial.•tatemente. 10 • Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Year Ended December 31. 1992 Compared to the Year Ended December 31. 1991 Overview The Company's net earnings on a pro forma basis amount- ed to $5.7 million or S.67 per share for the year ended Decem- ber 31. 1992. as compared with pro forma net earnings 01'54.3 million or 5.57 per share for 1991. The improvement in pro forma net earnings results from increased transports, increased rates. an increase in fixed government subsidies, an upgrade of basic life support services to paramedic services, a reduction in net interest expense. and a reduction in the pro forma effective tax rate. The increase in pro forma earnings , per share results from the increase in net earnings, which is partly offset by an increase in the weighted average number of shares outstanding resulting from the initial public offering and shares issued in connection with the acquisitions. Rr.,aa t., of Operation.. The Company's total revenue amounted to 5106.4 million for the year ended December 31, 1992 as compared with $94.1 million for 1991. an increase of 512.3 tnillion or 13%. The increase in total revenue results from approximately 16,000 more ambulance transports in 1992 as compared with 1991. rate increases received in certain areas, an upgrade of basic life support services to paramedic services and an increase in fixed government subsidies. The acquisitions discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements contributed approximately 52 million to total revenue for 1992. Salaries and benefits expense amounted to 553.4 million for 1992 as compared with $45.6 million for 1991, an increase of'57.8 million or 17%. As a percentage of total revenue, salaries and benefits increased to 50.1% for 1992 from 48.5% in 1991. The increase was primarily the result of higher staffing levels required to satisfy contractual obligations for faster response times in certain areas, the changing mix to paramedic from EMT personnel in order to provide enhanced paramedic services. generally higher labor costs due to wage increases. and the addition of corporate salaries and benefits which did not exist in the prior year. Uncompensated care expense amounted to 524.4 million for 1992 as compared with 522.3 million for 1991, an increase of $2.1 million or 9.6%. As a percentage of total revenue. uncompensated care was 22.9% and 23.6% for the years ended December 31, 1992 and 1991, respectively. The dollar increase in uncompensated care expense results primarily from the growth in the Company's business. Other operating expenses were 515.2 million for 1992 as compared with 513.7 million for 1991. an increase 01'51.5 million or 10.9%. The increase in other operating expenses was a result of the growth of total revenues and the addition of corporate expenses which did not exist in the prioryear. However. as a percentage of total revenue. other operating expenses remained consistent at 14.3% for 1992 .,s compared to 14.6% for 1991. Depreciation expense increased by 5294.000 for 1992 as compared to 1991. The increase was attributable to new vehicle purchases and depreciation expense related to the property and equipment acquired in connection with the purchase of Mobile Medic Ambulance Service. Inc. As a percentage of total revenue, depreciation expense remained consistent at 29% for both 1992 and 1991. Net interest expense decreased by 5409,000 for 1992 as _ompared to 1991. This decrease was the result of the contin- ued decline in botrming rates, the decline in the average amount of debt outstanding. and an increase in investment income derived from the remaining net proceeds of the initial public offering. Amortization of intangibles decreased by 3366.000 for 1992 as compared to 1991 because of certain goodwill amounts becoming fully amortized in 1991. Amortization of intangibles will increase in the future as a result of goodwill recorded in connection with the Company's acquisitions. Prior to the merger with the Company, one of the Prede- cessor Companies was taxed as an S corporation. As an S corporation. income tares were not required to be provided in this subsidiary's financial statements. In August 1992, concurrent with the merger. this S corporation status was terminated and the method of accounting for tax purposes changed from the cash to the accrual method. Deferred income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 1992, includes 5780.000 attributable to this termination of S corpo- ration status. Pro forma income tax expense for theyears ended Decem- ber 31. I992. 1991 and 1990 are tax amounts which would have been recorded had this subsidiary been a C corporation during those years. lithe subsidiary fiad been subject to corporate income taxes on an ongoing basis. income tax exp, •nse would have been $3.4 million for 1992 and 1991. The effective tart rate for 1992 was 37.5% as compared with 43.7% for 1991. The decline in the effective tax rate results from a favorable resolution of an IRS examination for which amounts had previously been expensed in the Company'.: financial statements. combined with a decrease in amounts which are not deductible for tax purposes. Li tuiddy and Capita! Retnart , in August, 1992. the Company completed its it: $ial public offering of 3 million shares of common stock at a price of 58.50 per share. The proceeds, net of underwriting discounts and expenses of the offering. were approximately $2:.5 mil- lion. Concurrent with the completion of the initial public offering. the Company paid approximately $10.2 million to the stockholders of the Predecessor Companies and issued an aggregate 4.1 million shares of common stock in connection with the acquisition by merger of those companies with American. On September 3. 1992, the Company sold an additional 300.000 shares of common stock pursuant to an over -allotment option granted to the underwriters in connec- tion with the Company's initial public offering. The proceeds, net of underwriting discounts. were 52.4 million. Working capital at December3l, 1992 amounted to 525.6 million as compared to $9.3 million at December 31. 1991. an increase <4516.3 million. This increase results primarily from the remaining net proceeds received from the Company's initial public offering, after paying the cash portion of the purchase price for the acquisition of the Predecessor Compa- nies. repayment of certain indebtedness and cash paid for subsequent acquisitions. In addition, working capital vas enhanced as cash generated from operations exceeded cash requirements. Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments were S14.4 million at December 31. 1992 as compared with 53.5 million at December 31. 1991. an increase of 510.9 mil- lion. Net cash generated fly operations during 1992 was 55.1 million. 11 --t The Company had additions to vehicles and other operat- ing equipment of $2.2 million. For these additions. thc Com- pany paid $1A million in cash while $.8 million was financed by notes and capital lease obligations. At December 31, 1992, the Company had total outstanding debt of $12.8 million. compared with $11.9 million at Decem- ber 31, 1991. The increase was a result of debt issued and assumed in connection with the acquisitions of Mobile Medic Ambulance Service and Ambulance Service Company, the financing of vehicles and other equipment, and debt issued by one of the Company's subsidiaries to repurchase common stock of the Predecessor Company. These increases were offset by debt repayments of 55.7 million. Certain debt obligations of the Company's subsidiaries were personally guaranteed by the former stockholders of the subsidiaries prior to the acquisitions. At December 31, 1992. the outstanding amount of such indebtedness was approxi- mately 56.0 minion. The Company has agreed to use its best efforts to have .c personal guarantees released and to pay or refinance such indebtedness in the event that the guarantees cannot be released. In connection with the mergers discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. certain operating entities changed from the cash to the accrual method of accounting for tax purposes. The resulting difference in taxable income is being recognized for tax purposes over a four year period beginning with the current year. This change resulted in an increase in current income tax expense for 1992 and a decrease in the deferred tax liability as of December 31, 1992, as compared with December 31, 1991. The taxes expected to be payable in subs_quent years are included as a component of non-current deferred income tax liabilities. During 1992. the Company acquired two providers of emergency and non -emergency pre -hospital care. On November 4. 1992. the Company acquired Mobile Medic Ambulance Service. Inc. located. in Gulfport. Mississippi. and on December 23, 1992, the Company acquired Ambulance Service Company located in Denver. Colorado. The total paid for these acquisitions was 53.2 million in cash. 51.780.000 in subordinated promissory notes and 611,268 shares of the Company's common stock. On January 11. 1993. the Company acquired Buck Med- ical Services. Inc.. a provider of emergency and non -emer- gency pre -hospital care, located in Portland. Oregon. The purchase price consisted of 55.5 million in cash and 125,085 shares of the Company's common stock. Current financial resources and anticipated funds generat- ed by operations are expected to be adequate to meet the Company's operating cash requirements in the foreseeable future. The Company plans to use a combination of cash and securities in connection with its acquisition program. The Company has an effective Shelf Registration Statement on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission covering 2.000,000 shares of common stock. of which 1.263.647 shares remain available after the acquisition of Buck Medical Ser- vices. Inc.. fix issuance in connection with the acquisition of other businesses by the Company. The Company has received a commitment from a group of banks for a S30 mil- lion credit facility to refinance certain existing indebtedness. for acquisitions and working capital purposes. in the event that the Company is unable to secure this financing or a suit- able financing alternative. or that acquisition candidates are reluctant to accept the Company's securities. the Company's growth strategy could be adversely affected. 12 Certain health care reforms are presently being considered .0 the federal level. The Company is unable to predict the impact any health care reform will have on its operations. Year Ended December 31. 1991 Compared to the Year Ended December 31. 1990 Overview The Company's net earnings on a pro forma basis amount- ed to 54.3 million or 5.57 per share for the year ended December 31, 1991, as compared with pro forma net earn- ings of 52.1 million or $ 28 per share for 1990. The improve- ment in pro forma net earnings results from increased trans- ports. increased rates, an upgrade of basic life support services to paramedic services, and a reduction in the pro forma cffe; tive tax rate. The increase in pro forma earnings per share results from the increase in net earnings. Re. into of Operation.. The Company's total revenue amounted to 594.1 million for the year ended December 31. 1991 as compared with 573.1 million for 1990. an increase of $21.0 million or 28.7%. The increase in total revenue results from approximately 28.000 more ambulance transports in 1991 as compared with 190. The increase in transports was due primarily to increased transports provided in an expanded area of Alame- da County where the City of Oakland was included for a full year in 1991 as compared to a six month period in 1990. Enhanced paramedic services and general rate increases also resulted in higher average revenues per transport. Salaries and benefits expense amounted to $45.6 million for 1991 as compared with 536.0 million for 1990, an increase of 59.6 million or 26.7%. As a percentage of total revenue, salaries and benefits decreased to 48.5% for 1991 from 49.2% in 1990. The dollar increase was primarily the result of the heneral growth of the Company's business and generally igher labor costs due to wage increases. Uncompensated care expense amounted to 522.3 million for 1991 as compared with $16.4 million for 1990, an increase of 55.8 million or 35.6%. As a percentage of total revenue, uncompensated care increased to 23.6% for 1991 from 22.4% For 1990. The increase results primarily from a significant change in patient demographics resulting from the provision of services in the Oakland. California area for a full year in 1991 compared to a six month period in 1990. Depreciation expense increased to $2.8 million for 1991 from $2.5 million for 1990. an increase of 5.3 million or 10.1%. Other expenses were S13.7 million for 1991 as compared with S 11.9 million for 1990. an increase of $1.8 million or 14.8%. As a percentage of total revenue. other expenses decreased to 14.6% from 16.3%. Amortization of intangibles decreased to S.9 million in 1991 from 51.3 million in 1990, a decrease of $.4 million or Net interest expense decreased by 514,000 for 1991 as compared to 1990. This decrease was the result of the general decline in borrowing rates. i t Independent Auditors' Report The Board of Directors American Medical Response. Inc.• We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of American Medical Response, Inc. and subsidiaries (the_ 'Company") as of December 31, 1992 and 1991. and the related consolidated statements of carbings, stockholders' equity, and . cash flows for each of the years in the three yerr period ended December 31, 1992. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial state - menu based on our audits. • We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain . eaaonable assurance about whether the financial statements age free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial.statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management. as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. . In our opinion. the consolidated Financial statements referred to above present fairly. in all material respects. the financial position of American Medical Response, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1992 and 1991rand the results of their opera • - tions and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, I992, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Boston. Massachusetts February 25. 1993 14*k 6- RAAA,Jui 13 Consolidatsd;8afsttcs a hysts American Medical Ri.pnrde, hit - fin e6.w.wn,L. except .dun dimwit,./ December 51, 1992 1991 Asset* Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents 814,134 $ 2,530 Short term investments 260 925 Accounts receivable, less t*iiowance for uncompensated care of $10.779 and $10,150 at December 31, 1992 and 1991. respectively 21,342 18.982 Advances to stockholders and affiliated parties — 973 Inventories 827 718 Prepaid expenses and other receivables 1,805 1.658 Deferred income taxes _ _4,._,....._..__._ _ Total current assets 2423.048 25,786 Property and equipment, net . 10,026 _8,814 Noncurrent assets: Cost in excess of net assets acquired. net 11.153 399 Covenants not to compete. net 735 1.009 Other - .1,987 -______ 850 Total noncurrent assets 13,875 .__ 2.258 Total assets $66,549 $36,858 Llabtlltlaa and Stoekholdara' Equity Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ 3,258 $ 2.889 Accrued compensation. benefits and taxes 4,725 3,631 Accrued expenses 2,528 1.372 Income .axes payable 2,10-1 2,420 Deferred income taxes — 1,457 Current maturities of debt 4,121.. 4,7)' Total current liabilities ,.1.7X6._. 16,486 Noncurrent liabilities: Long-term debt 8,372 7,179 Deferred income taxes 4,240 911 Other liabilities 1,144 623 Total noncurrent liabilities 13,756 _ ___8,713 Total liabilities _30,792_ _ 25,199 Stockholders' equity: Preferred stock. $.01 par value, 500.003 shares authorized. nnne issued Common stock. $.01 par value. 25,000.000 shares authorized. 10.292.369 shares issued and outstanding at 1)ecem' 31. 1992 103 — Commou stock, predecessor companies — 90 Additional paid -in capital 21,267 266 Retained earnings 1-1,387 11,353 Notes receivable from stockholders — (50) Total stockholders' equity 35.757 11,659 Cornmitrn'mts and contingencies Total liabilities and stockholders' equity 566,5-19 536.858 Ste accomptnyi',g note: i, ron..Gdatedfinal/ad .datrnrutt.. 14 a • • Conselldatsd-8tatsnntttts.: o1=°Barntnps---. Anzeriran.tln)fra: Re.ronoe, !nr- (a9 hondanar, arrrpf prr..i.arr amount -4 Total revenue llzrm/er 31, 1992 1991 1990 S106,433 $94,104 $73.148 Operating expenses: Salaries and benefits 53,364 45,614 36.012 Uncompensated care 24,397 22.262 16,413 Other 15,217 13.717 11,947, Depreciation 3,066_ 2,772 ___ 2,518 Total operating expenses 966044 _ -__ 84,3615 — 66.R�0 Earnings from operations 10,389 9,739 __5.255 Nonoperating expenses: Interest expense. net 747 1.156 1;170 Amortization of intangibles 561 927 1AI3 Total nonoperating expenses -_1ri08_—_—_083--2.483-- Earn ings .483Earnings before income taxes 9,081 - 7,656 3,775 Income taxes 4,089 3,20I 1,556 Net earnings $ 4,992 $ 4,455 $ 2,219 Pro Forma Data (unaudlted—a.a nota 4) Historical net earnings Pro forma income taxes (benefit) $ 4,992 $ 4,455 -S 2.219 __ (678) _ 149__ 128. Pro forma net earnings $ 5,670 $ 4,306 $ 2,091 Pro forma net earnings per common share Weighted average common shares outstandin, See nm mpanying nota. to rondo(,SafrJJwvm a1..?atrnirnts. $ 0.67 $ 0.57 $ 0.28 8,447 7,576 7,576 r :Cvnsolldtrtod Stat-orrtnnto of Stockholdur! •Equ$ty Americas Medical Rt, pon..r, (in t6xavmL) Common Stork Additional Tufa! Common Stork Pmkte.wr Pain! -in Retained Notew Stackboiderr' Sbarm Amount Compania, Capital F.trnings Reetivable Equity Balance et December 31, 1999 - $ - $ 91 $ 272$ 5,854 $ - S 6.217 Note receivable from officer for - - purchase of common stock - - - - - (60) (60) Distributions to stockholders - - - - (475) - (475) Net earnings - .. _ - 2.219 - 2.219 Bel.nc. at D.c.mb.r 31.1990 - - 91 - 272- 7,598 (60) 7,9017 Repayment of note receivable - - - - - 10 '10 Stock. repurchase - - (1) (6) (700) - (707) Net earnings - - - - 4,455 -4.455 Delano* et December 31. 1991 - - 90 266 11,353 (50) .1 659 Repurchase and retirement of common stock - Regional - - (1) (12) (1.803) - (1,816) Initial issuance of common stock 2.730 27 - 48 - (1) 74 Repurchase and retirement of common stock (510) (5) - (9) - - (14) Distribution to stockholders - Professional (155) - (155) Issuance of stock 3.000 30 - 21,435 - - 21.465 Distribution of cash portion of purchase price for acquisition of Predecessor Companies - - - (10,195) - - (10,195) Distribution of stock portion of purchase price for acquisition and elimination of Predecessor Companies' stock 4,143 42 (89) .47 - - - Repayment of notes receivable - - - _ - 51 51 Issuance of common stock 300 3 - 2,369 - - 2,372 Stock options exercised 18 - - 127 - - 127 Tax benefit from exercise of stock options - - - 70 - - 70 Issuance of stork in connection with acquisitions 611 6 - 7,121 - - 7,127 Net earnings ' -. _ -.. - - 4,992 - --- -,- - D 4 7)2 Balance at .c.mb.r 31, 1992 10.292 $103 S - -- S 21.267 -_-- $14,387 � -----$35.757 See aawt ranyeng note, to toomolittated i aneial etatemenL.. 16 COn.O,/ldsitsd Statements of "Cash -Flows. rlmeeit•,rrt.1ft4e dRar.aca.lm•. (ia th000e ut.) December il. Cash flows from operating activities: 1992 1991 1990 Net earnings $ 4,992 $ 4.455 $ 2.219 Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation 3,066 2.772 2.518, Amortization of intangible assets 56! 927 :,313 Deferred income taxes (2,365) 1,002 784 Changes in assets and liabilities. net of acquisitions: - .Accounts receivable 124 (5,561) (1,522) Other current assets (11) (503) " 68 Other assets (1.101) 418 (1.043) Accounts payable and accrued expenses (382) 265 891 Accrued compensation. benefits and taxes 347 1,439 582 " Income taxesable Pay (626) 705 (727) Other liabilities -_--.•_2 _-.. • .. _._.._ _(.l.q_...__._r--- . __ Net cash rovided by operating activities -5-129- 5•763 5.b31 Cash flows from investing activities: Acquisition of Predecessor Companies (10,195) Acquisitions, net of cash acquired (1.785) - - Purchase of short term investments - (930) (ire 7) Proceeds from sale of short term investments 665 634 73 Purchase of property and equipment. net (1,408) (3.585) (1.516) Purchase of stock and covenant not to compete - (375) -- Repayment of advances to related panics 332 Net cash used for investing activities __ ... _.__.. i -..___.___O $ (12,39!) (4,056) _..__. (2,220) Cash flows from financing activities: Proceeds front issuance of common stock 23,911 Repurchase and retirement of common stock (314) Proceeds from exercise of stock options 127 - - Proceeds from borrowings 316 2.906 1,492 Repayment ..fborrowings (5,149) (3.868) (3,642) Principal islyuients on capital lease obligations (562) (127) (172) Net advances to stockholders 6-11 (300) 66 Distribution to stockholders (155) - (475) Repayment of notes receivable for stock 51 10 - Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities 18,866 - (1,379)__ _ _ (2,751) Incre..se in cash and cash equivalents 11,604 328 580 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 2,530 2.202____Lap Cash and cash equivalents at end ofyear $ 14,134 S 2,530 . $ 2.202 Supplemental disclosure of cash flow in!".rmation: Cash paid du.-ing the year for: Interest $ 1.084 $ 1.338 $ 1,389 Income taxes S 7,026 $ 1,240 $ 1.095 Supplemental schedule of non-cash transactiorx: Issuance of debt and equipment for repurchase of Predecessor Company common stock S 1,516 S 332 S - Issuance of debt for non -compete agreement $ 240 $ 3-40 S - Issuance of debt for equipment purchases $ 79! $ 579 5 2,361 Property acquired under capital lease S 38 $ 189 $ 471 Acquisitions: Assets acquired S 17.037 S - S — Liabilities assumed and issued (6,710) Common stock issued (7,127) Cash paid 3,200 Less cash acquired (1,415) Net cash paid for acquisitions S 1,785 See aa:vnpanytngnote: fn ,;,r,.•nL,tlie,, ire.rn.Y.r(.'taten,nrt... 17 P4otiss to ConaotidatSd Ftnsncist Statiom.nts American ilfedi vl Re pon..r, Inc. Lk rminr 51, 1992, 1991 and !9S e (1) Summary of Significant Accounting PoIlei•• PrincYplwof C.rn olidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of American Medical Response. Inc. ("American" or the "Company") and its subsidiaries; American Medical Response - West, formerly Vanguard Ambulance Services ("AMR West"), Regional Ambulance. Inc. ("Regional'). New Haven Ambulance Service, Inc. ("New Haven"). Professional Ambu- lance Service, Inc. ("Professional'), Mobile Medic Ambu- lance Service, Inc. ("Mobile Medic") and Ambulance Service Company ("Ambulance Service). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Recta wificatans Certain amounts for the prir'r periods have been reclassi- fied to conform with the current period presentation. Cab and Ca.b Egui,+alrnL. For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid instruments with an original matu- rity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Short Term inec tments Short • :i -m investments consist primarily of marketable equity securities which are stated at lower of cost or market. Account., Receivable and Nit Revenue Accounts receivable and net revenue are reported at the estimated net billable amounts due from patients. third -party payort and others for services rendered. net of contractual adjustments, which represent the difference between gross billable charges and the portion of those charges allowable by third -party payors. tJnr.vnpcn.•ated Care Uncompensated care results when ambulance service is provided to patients for which the Company receives no reim- bursement. The Company expects payment tor its charges each time ambulance transportation is provided. In,rntorie.• Inventories consist primarily of medic:.) supplies and are stated at the lower of cost (first -in. first -out) or market Preperty and Equipment Property and equipment are stated at cost. Property and equipment under capital leases are stared at th' present value of minimum lease payments at the inception of the lease. Depr:•-iation and amortization are provided using the straigh•-lin, method over the estimated useful lives of proper- ty and equipment. Property and equipment held under capi- tal leases and leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease tern: or estimated useful life of the asse.. Amortization ofass"ts subject to capital leases is included in depreciation expense. 18 Coot in E ce.y of Net it.. eL. Acquired Cost in excess of net assets acquired is amortized straight- line over the period of expected benefit, but not in excess of twenty-five years. Accumulated amortization amounted to $98,000 and S51.000 at December 31. 1992 and 1991. respec- tively. aivenant., Not To Compete Covenants not to compete are amortized using the straight- line method over the term of the agreements. Income Tau. Income taxes are provided based upon provisions of State• ment of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109. "Account- ing for Income Taxes", which requires recognition of deferred income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of "temporary differences" by applying enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future years to,lifferences between the financial statement carrying amounts : nd the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. The effect on the deferred taxes of changes in the tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Earning., Per Share Earnings per share are computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding plus common stock equivalents related to stork options and warrants. if such common stock equivalents cause dilution in earnings per share in excess of 3%. Earnings per share fur all periods prior to the initial public offering have been computer! based on weighted average shares outstanding of 7,5%6,089 whirl, consist of (i) 2,220,001 !ounders'shares outstanding prior tom, the initial public offer- ing, (ii) 4,143,500 shares iss':ed in connection with the merger described in note 2. (iii) 1,199,4 12 shares to reflect on a pro forma basis the sale of a sufficient number of shares to pro- vide funds to pay the $10,195,000 cash portion of the pur- chase price of the merger, and (iv) 13,176 shares considered as outstanding as a result of the application of the treasury stock method to certain outstanding options. (2) Reorganization and Acquisitions The J!ergcr ane) Rr,rrgaar-ahvn In August, 1992. concurrent with the initial public offering of the Company's common stock, the Company acquired by merger lour ambulance service providers. Region sl, AMR Rest, New f Leven and Professional (the "Predecessor Com- panies"). Put Quant to the terms of rhe merger agreements with eacF. of the Predecessor Companit s, the Company paid a total of S10,195.600 in cash and 4.143.500 shares of common stock for such companies as set .ort}; below. Regional - The Company acquired by merger all of the out- standing shares of `l-giona) for S2.830,000 to cash and Notes to Coneolldated Financial Statemanis American ,1lediral R, .i..e. I, . 1.991,859 shares of common stock. The Company also entered into a live -year non -competition agreement and a three-year employment contract with one of the stockholders and appointed such stockholder to the Company's board of directors. AMR West - The Company acquired by merger all of the outstanding shares of AMR West for S3,800,000 in cash as d 1.503,160 shares of common stock. An additional 100,000 shares of common stock will be paid in the event that AMR West obtains a particular contract for emergency ambulance services by March 1994. The Company also entered into five-year non -competition agreements and three- year employment agreements with two stockholders and appointed one of the stockholders to the Company's board of directors. New Haven - The Company acquired by merger all of the outstanding shares of New Haven for 52.940,000 in cash and 634.145 shares of common stock. The Company also entered into five-year non -competition agreements with two stock- holders. a three-year employment contract with one stock- holder and appointed such stockholder to the Company's board of directors. Professional - The Company acquired by merger all of the outstanding shares of Professional for $625,000 in cash and 214.336 shares of common stock. The Company also entered into five-year non -competition agreements and three-year employment contracts with the two stockholders of Profes- sional. The consolidated operations of American subsequent to the transaction are substantially identical to the combined operations of the individual Predecessor Companies prior to the transaction. Additionally, as a result of the mergers, the owners of the Predecessor Companies are significant stock- holders of American. Accordingly, the aforementioned mergers were accounted for as a combination of the Prede- cessor Companies and American at historical cost. The assets and liabilities are presented at their historical values aid stockholders' equity has not been adjusted as a result of the mergers. Acgau.itarn., During 1992; the Company- also acquired two providers of emergency and non -emergency pre -hospital care. On Novem- ber 4. 1992. the Company acquired Mobile Medi Ambulance Service, Inc., located in Gulfport. Mississippi and on Decem- ber 25. 1992, the Company acquired Ambulance Service Company. located in Denver. Colorado. The total paid consisted of 53.2 million in cash. S1.780,000 in subordinated promissory notes and 611.268 shares (lithe Company's common stock. The acquisitions have been accounted for as purchases and. accordingly, their results of operations have been includ- ed in the consolidated financial statements from their date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price and expenses associated with the acquisitions over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwilL The following unaudited pro forma results of operations give effect to the acquisitions as if the transactions had • occurred at the beginning of 1991. Such pro forma financial information reflects certain adjustments including amortizes - tion of goodwill. income tax effects. and the increase in the weighted average shares outstanding. This pro forma infor- mation does not necessarily reflect the results of operations which would have occurred had the acquisitions taken place at the beginning of 1991 and is not necessarily indicative of results which may be obtained in the future (in thousands, except per share amounts): Total revenue Earnings before income tares Net earnings Pro forma net earnings Pro forma earnings per share (3) Property end Equipment 1992 1991 (u tail -- S12-1,731 $110.345 10,416 - 7.767 5,571 4,335 6,167 4,206 .69 .51 I'roprrl y aad Equipmee( Property and equipment consist of the following at Decem- ber 31 (in thousands): Vehicles Land. buildings and leasehold improvements Equipment Furniture and fixtures Less accumulated depreciation Net propene and equipment 1992 _... 1991 512,181 $10,110 1,25-1 1,204 5,478 5.357 2,395 _ _ 1.811 21,308 ! 18,482 13.282 9.668 $10,026 $8.314 (pearling Ita.v.. The Company is obligated under a number of non -cance- lable operating leases for premises and equipment expiring in various years through the year 2000. Total reit expense amounted to S2.351,000, $2.095,000 and S1,t,g4,000 for the years ended December 31, 1992, 1991 and 1990, respectively. 19 Minimum future rentals under non -cancelable operating leases (including leases with related parties discussed in Note 8) as of December 31 are as follows (in thousa:.ds): 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Thereafter To'al minimum lease pavmeata (4) Income T Amount The provision for Federal and state income taxes for the years ended December 31 consists of the following (ir. thou- sands): 1992_ 1991 1990 52.119 Current: 1,904 Federal S 5,267 51,701 5 573 1.631 State -1,187 498 191 1.308 6.45.1---2,19-9----7-71_-_--- _---- _ 972 Deferred: 1.660 Federal (1.811) 734 611 State ____(g4) ____1268 .173_ 59594 (2i65Z 3 .002 __, 784 Total $ 4,089 $3.201 51,556 For the year ended December 31, 1992, income tax benefits of 570,000 were allocated to additional paid -in capital for tax benefits associated with the exercise of non-qualified stock options. The following table reconciles the Federal statutory income tax rate and the Company's effective income tax rate for the years ended December 31: The components of the deferred tax asses and liabilities as of December 31 are as follows (in thousands): Deferred tax assets: Allowance for uncompensated care Accrued expenses and other liabilities Other Deferred tax liabilities: Cash to accrual amounting Intangible assets Property and equipment Change in arco; rating method Other Net deferred tax asset (liability) '992 1991 54,409 51.588 2,112 - 57 6,578 1.588 - 3.045 107 - 841 635 5,552 82 38 _ 194 (6438) S 40 5(2.368) At December 31. the net deferred tax asset (liability) con- sists ()idle following (in thousands): 1992 1991 Deferred tax asset (liability) -current 54,280 5(1,457) Deferred tax asset (liability) - long term (4,240) _ (911) Net deferred income tax asset (liability) S 40 S(2.368) Included in the gross deferred tax assets and liabilities are deferred tax (benefits) and deferred tar expense of 5(438.000) and $395,000 respectively, relating to allowances for uncom- pensated care and a change in accounting method, recorded as a result of the acquisitions of Mobile Medic and Ambulance Service. 20 Provision for income taxes at Federal statutory rate State taxes, net of Federal benefit Amortization of goodwill Subchapter $ earnings Change in tax status Other. net 1992--._.-1991 1990_ 34.0 % 34.0 % 34.0% 5.9 • 7.0 6.7 .2 1.3 3.2 (.7) (2.1) (3.4) 8.6 - - (3=0)— 11.6 .7 45.0% 41.8% 41.2% Change un Tar Accounting .f eebod In connection with the mergers discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, certain operating entities changed from the cash to the accrual method of accounting for tax purpot• a. Th. resulting difference in taxable income is being recogn. .or tax purposes over a four-year period beginning with the current year. Change in Tac Stara.+ Prior to the merger with the Company. one of the Predeces- sor Companies was taxed as an S corporation. As an S corpo- ration, income taxes were not required to be provided in this subsidiary's financial statements. In August 1992. conct.rrent with the merger. this S corporation status terminated and the method of accounting for tax purposes changed from the cash to the accrual method. Deferred income tax expense for the tear ended December 31. 1992, includes 5780,000 attributable to this termination of S corporation status. Pro forma income tax expense for the years ended December 31. 1992, 1991 and 1990, are tax amounts which would have been recorded had this subsidiary been a C corporation during those years. r Notes._to Consolidated Financial Stat•metnts American .Ile li v! lG.,p,-nre, Iec. (5) Debt Long-term debt and capital lease obligations consist of the following at December 31 (in thousands): Demand notes payable. unsecured. interest rates ranging from 675% to 7.5% Demand notes payable. secured. bearing interest at 10% Demand notes payable to principal stockholder. bearing interest at prime plus 2% Notes payable. secured. interest rates ranging from 6% to 16.5%. payable in installments. maturing through 1998 Notes payable to former owners and individuals. interest rates ranging from 6% to 996. payable in installments. maturing through 2007 Subordinated notes payable to stockholder and former owners. bearing interest at 796 and 7.5%. maturing through 1996 Capital lease obligations Less current maturities 1992 1991 S 273 236 S 228 5,954 3,382 1.780 1,449 12,793 4,421 94 7.500 2,436 1.357 11.896 4,717 Long-term debt. excluding current maturities S8,372 57,179 Annual maturities of long-term debt and future minimum lease payments under capital leases as of December 31, 1992 are as follows (in thousands): 1993 1994 1995 !996 1997 Thereafter Total payments Less: amounts representing interest Total obligations ander capital leases Long-term Capital debt leases S 3.685 3.641 1.888 6-13 220 1.267 SI1.344 S 880 616 299 107 18 1.920 471 S1.449 (6) Capital Stock and Additional paid -In Capital Pnfcrrrd Stock The Company is authorized to issue up to 500.000 sharp of preferred stock. S.01 par value, of which no shares are issued or outstanding. The Company's board of directors' is authorized to provide for the issuance of the preferred stock in series, to establish the number of shares to be included in each such series, and the qualifications, limitations or restric- tions thereof. This includes any voting rights. preemptive rights, conversion privileges and liquidation rights which shall be superior to the common stock. Ce,nnwn Stack The Company is authorized to issue 25,000.000 shares of' common stock, S.01 par value. of which 10.292.369 shares were issued and outstanding at December 31, 1992. The Company has an effective Shelf Registration State- ment on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission coveting 2.000,000 shares of common stock, of which 1,388,732 shares remain available at December 31. 1992 for issuance in connection with the acquisition of other business- es by the Company. In August, 1992, the Company completed an initial public offering of common stock and issued 3.000.000 share's of such stock at a price of 58.50 per share. The proceeds, net of underwriting discounts and expenses of the offering. were approximately S21,465,000. Concurrent with the completion of the public offering. the Company paid $10.195,000 to the stockholders of Regional, AMR West, New Haven, and Pro- fessional and issued an aggregate.4,143.500 shares of common stock in connection with the acquisition by merger of those companies by American. On September 3, 1992, the Compa- ny sold an additional 300.000 shares of common stock pur- suant to an overallotment option granted to the underwriters in connection with the initial public offering. The proceeds from this overallotment. net of underwriting discounts, were 52.371.500. In connection with the initial public offering, the Company issued warrants to the underwriters to purchase an additional 300,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $10.20 per share for 150,000 shares and 512.00 per share for 150.000 shares. Such warrants expire on August 5, 1997. During the period February 21. 1992 to May 22, 1992, the Company issued 2,730.001 shares of common stock to its founders at a price of 5.0273 per share. On July 17, 1992. the Company repurchased and retired 510.000 shares of founders common stock at the original purchase price of 5.3273 per share fora total of $13,923. 21 r The Company was incorporated on February 21. 1992. On June 8. 1992. the Company was reorganized as a Delaware corporation. Pursuant to the reorganization. each of the outstanding shares of the Massachusetts corporation was converted into 2,928.71 shares of common stock. result- ing in 2,730.001 shares outstanding on that date. All fi,.ancial information and share and per share information with respect to the Company's stock have been restated to reflect the shares issued in the reorganization. Cenunon Stock - Predeeemor Companitr Ail of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Pre- decessor Companies were acquired by American in connec- tion with the merger and reorganization. In Janua.y 1992, prior to the merger of Regional with American. Regional repurchased 1.600 shares of its common stock from two former employees for a total of $1,816.000. In addition, Regional entered into five year non -competition agreements with the former employees for $240,000. During 1991. Regional repurchased 800 shares of' its stock from former shareholders. A charge to retained earnings of $700,000 was recorded as a result of this transaction. (7) Commitments and Contingencies Third -Party Rate Adjrmtnmtn and Rrirnae A significant portion of the Company's net revenue is derived under Federal and state third -party reimbursement programs. These revenues are based. in part, on cost reim- bursement principles and are subject to audit and retroactive adjustment by the respective third -party fiscal intermediaries. In the opinion of management. retroactive adjustments, if any, would not be material to the financial position or results of operations of the Company_ Legal Proceeding.. The Company is party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business_ In management's opinion, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a mater- ial adverse effect on the Company's financial position. Letter., of Credit The Company has outstanding letters of credit of 5784.000 to secure payments of certain insurance policies. Such letters of credit expire in February 1993. (8) Related Party Transaction. Indemnification eigntmeaL• In connection with the merger and reorganization discussed it note 2. certain related parties have agreed to indemnify the Company up to a maximum of 51.750.000 for losses the Company may incur if one of its former insurers is unable to refund unearned premiums and pay pending claims. !ea.dng Tran..acti✓ra. The Company leases various facilities from related parties. The leases on these properties expire at various times through the year 2000. Total rent expense paid to related parties amounted to $990,000.51,020.000 and 5661.000 for the years ended December 31, 1992, 1991 and 1990, respectively. Loam, and Caob Advance" Loans and advances outstanding to related parties amount- ed to SO and $973.000 at December 31, 1992 and 1991, respectively. Notes payable to related parties amounted to SO and S94.000 at December 31. 1992 and 1991, respectively. Gru:ranty The Company has guaranteed a 52.500,000 loan owed by a . related party to a bank. This loan is secured by one of the Company's operating facilities that it leases from a related party, bears interest at prime plus I% and is'callable by the bank on or after May 1994. The related party has agreed to indemnify the Company in the event the Company is required to pay any amounts under the guaranty. C ontractua/Ag•rementr The Company purchases vehicles and repair parts from a related party. Vehicles purchased from related parties amounted to S143,000. 5306,000 and $153,000 for the yr .: rs ended December 31. 1992, 1991 and 1990. respectively. Repair parts purchased from related parties and included in expense amounted to $168,000. $159,000 and 5175.000, respectively. Accounts payable included 520,000 and 582,000 at December 31, 1992 and 1991. respectively. due to these related parties. (9) Stock Option Plans /992 414 y hlarntnr Plan The Company's 1992 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Equity Incentive Plan' was adopted on June 8, 1992 and provides for the grant of a variety of stock and stock -based awards and related benefits. The Equity Incentive Plan permits the granting of options that qualify as incentive stock options and non-qualified options. The option exercise price ',leach option shall be determined by the Board of Directors, but in the case of it.centive stock options shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant (110% in the case of incentive stock options granted to an individual with stockholdings in excess of certain limits). Subject to adjustment for stock splits and similar events, the total number of shares of Common Stock that can be issued under the Equity Incentive Plan is 800.000 shares. 4 M Notaa to Consolidated Financial 8tatarisoflta Anuriran.11e.4.al R�•r nw. tn.. /992 Stock Option I'Ltn for iS 'n-F,mpl _u ee Director.. The Company's 1992 Stock Option Plan for Non -Employ- ee Directors (the "Director Option Plan") was adopted on June 8. 1992. Pursuant to the Director Option Plan. begin- ning on the date of the first annual meeting of stockholders after the date of the initial public offering, each director who is not an employee of the Company or one of its subsidiaries and neither is a holder of five percent or more of the Compa- ny's Common Stock nor was a stockholder of the Company prior to completion of the initial public offering will receive, on the date of his or her first election as director. an option to purchase 7.500 shares of Common Stock. Thereafter, each director will be granted. at each annual meeting at which such director is elected or reelected, so long as he or she remains an eligible director, an option to acquire an additional 7,500 shares of Common Stock. The exercise price of such'options will be the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant. Each option will be non -transferable except upon death, will expire 10 years after the date of grant and will become exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of grant. Stock Option sic ti 'ity A summary of stock option activity for the year ended December 31 follows: Number of Options Outstanding at December 31. 1991 - Granted 303,100 Exercised (17.600) Cancelled _ - Outstanding at December 31, 1992 285,500 S5.00 - 12.375 Exercisable at December =1, 1992 60.875 Optive. Price Range S - 5.00 -12.375 5.00 - 8.500 (10) Employee Benefit Plans 1992 Employee Stork Pwrbase Plan The 1992 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the -Employee Stock Purchase Plan") was adopted by the Board of Direc- tors of the Company and approved by the stockholders on June 8. 1992. The Employee Stock Purchase Plate is designed to enable eligible employees to purchase shares of Common Stock at a discount on a periodic' basis through payroll deductions. All employees with at least six months of continuous service, other than employees owning 5% or more of the combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company, are eligible to participate. Purchases will occur at the end of option periods. each of six months' duration. The first such option period began January 1, 1993. The purchase price of Common Stock under the Employ- ee Stock Purchase Plan is 85% of the lesser of the value of the Common Stock at the beginning of an option period and the value of the Common Stock at the end of the option peri- od. Participants may elect under the Employee Stock Pur- chase Plan, prior to each option period, to have from 2% to 10% of their pay withheld and applied to the purchase of shares at the end of the option period. However. the Employee Stock Purchase Plan imposes a maximum of S 10.000 on the amount that may be withheld from any par- ticipant in any option period. Subject to adjustment for stock splits and similar events, a total of 100,000 shares of Common Stock has been reserved for issuance under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. None of these shares has been issued to date. Rdcrcment Plano Two of the Company's subsidiaries have defined contribu- tion 401(k) plans for the benefit of their employees. Full-time employees with one year of service and 1.000 hours are eligi- ble to participate. The total plan expense for the years ended December 31, 1992, 1991 and 1990 was $450,000, S242,000 and S359.000, respectively. Four of the Company's subsidiaries have profit sharing plans which cover substantially all of their employees. Con- tributions into the trust funds of the plans are discretionary, and the companies have the right to amend. modify or termi- nate the plans. but in no event will any portion of the contri- butions paid revert to the companies. The total profit sharing plan expense for the- years ended December 31, 1992, 1991 and 1990 was 5115.000, 5109,000 and 533.000, respectively. 23 r 3 (11) Ouartarly Financial Data (Unaudited) The Company's summary financial data (in thousands except per share amounts): Total revenue Total operating expenses Earnings front operations Earnings before income taxes Net earnings Pro forma net earnings Pro forma earnings per common share Weighted average common shares outstanding Total revenue Total operating expenses Earnings from operations Earnings before income taxes Net earnings Pro forma net earnings Pro forma earnings per common share Weighted average common shares outstanding (12) Subsequent Event• for the years ended December 31. 1992 and 1991 by quarter is as follows Year auk /inrtn1rr 31, 1992 4th Quarter 3rd Quarter 2nd Quarter Iia Quarter S28.095 25,640 2,455 2.201 L623 1.623 0.16 9.888 526.834 24.097 2.737, 2.455 753 1.482 0.17' 8.770 526.277 23.331 2,946 2.355 1,489 1.485 0.20 7.576 $25,227 22.97b 2.251 1,870 1.127 1.080 0.14 7.576. Year ended lktrradrr 51. 1991 4th Quarter 3rd Quarter 2nd Quarter 1st Quarter S26.043 23,010 3.033 2.530 1,488 1.415 0.19 7,576 $24.705 22.011 2.694 2.174 1.259 1.232 0.16 7.576 522.231 20.142 2.089 1465 926 908 0.12 7.576 $21,125 19.202 1.923 1.387 782 751 0.10 7,576 rlequrtitttnr On January 11. 1993. the Company acquired Buck Medical Services, Inc. located in Portland. Oregon. The purchase price consisted of S5.500.000 in cash and 125,085 shares of the Company's common stock. The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase. and the excess of the purchase price and expenses associated' with the acquisition over the estimated fair value of the net assets has been recorded as goodwill. The following unaudited pro forma summary give -fleet to the acquisition as if it had occurred on December 31, 1992 with respect to the pro forma balance sheet and as ;1 44. .action (along with the acquisition of Mobile Medic and Ambulance Ser- vice) had occurred at the beginning of 1991. Such 1.ro forma financial information reflects certain adjustments including amorti- zation of goodwill, income tax effects, and the increase in the weighted average shares outstanding. This pro forma information does not necessarily reflect the results of operations which would have occurred had the acquisition taken place at the beginning of 1991 and not necessarily indicative of results which may be obtained in the future (in thousands. except per share amounts): Balance Sheet: Total assets Total liabilities Total stockholders' equity Total liabilities and stockholders' equity Statements of Earnings: Total revenue Earnings before income taxes Net earnings Pro forma net earnings Pro forma earnings per share 1992 , umwddi'!rd/ S72.655 34,739 37,916 S72.6.55 1992 1991 b.n.,a.ti/rah 5143.070 5124.282 10,588 8,055 5,860 4,568 6.402 4.268 .70 .51 Credit Facility In February 1993. the Company received a cornmitment from a group of banks fora 530 million revolving credit facility to refinance existing indebtedness, for acquisitions and working capital purposes. 24 Cor.porat.` Information' Directors PAUL M. VERROCIII Chairman of the hoard MICHAEL A. BAKER DAVID B. HAMMOND Deputy Chairman ADT Limited JAMES E. McGRATH Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Fairfax Capital Partners. Inc. JOSEPH R. P,AOLELLA DOMINIC J. PUOPOLO W. EARL RIGGS PAULT. SHIRI.EY JOHN LARKIN TIHOMPSON President Emeritus Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Officers PAUL M. VERROCI iI Chairman of the Board. Chief Executive Officer and Prcsident DOMINIC J. PUOPOLO Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer JOSEPH R. PAOLELLA Executive Vice President W. EARL RIGGS Executive Vice President PAULT. SIIIRLEY Executive Vice President RONALD M. LEVENSON Senior Vice President anal Chief Accounting Officer MICHAEL J. McCLYMONT Senior Vice President JOHN K. RESTER Senior Vice President Rsywnat Company °Kleets STEPHEN C. DONOHOE President and Chief Executive Officer Professional Ambulance Service. Inc. Wilmington. DE JOSEPH R. PAOLELLA President and Chief Executive Officer New Haven Ambulance Service. Inc. New Haven, CE JOHN K. RESTER President and Chief Executive Officer Mobile Medic Ambulance Service, Inc. Gulfport. MS W. EARL RIGGS Chief Operating Officer AMR West San Jose, CA PAULT. SHIRLEY Chief Executive Officer AMR West San Jose, CA D. TRACE SKEEN President and Chief Executive Officer Buck Medical Services, Inc. Portland. OR CARL UNREIN President and Chief Executive Officer Ambulance Service Company Denver. CO Shareholder Information Transit Agent Bank of Boston Boston, MA independent Auditors; KPMG Peat Marwick Boston. MA senors Counsel: Ropes & Gray Boston, MA Stock information: Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "EMT" Anneal Matitinv Thursday. May 13, 1993 at 2:00 pm Bank of Boston 100 Federal Street Floor One Auditorium Beaton. MA 02105 - Etnetavo Ofbaee 67 Batterymarch Street Boston. MA 02110 617-261-1600 Fent 14K A copy oldie American Medical Response, Inc. Form 10-K will be ay.,ilable to stock- holders of record at no charge upon writ. . ten request to its Investor Relations' Department at 67 Batterymarch Street. Boston, MA 02110 Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related stockholder Matta: . The Company's Common Stock has been traded on the New York Stock Exchange since August 5, 1992 under the symbol "EMT'. Prior to Anglia' 5, 1992. the date of the Company's initial public offering, no established public trading market existed for the Company's Common Stock. The fol- lowing table sets forth the high and low sales prices for the Common Stock for the fiscal quarters, or portions thereof, specified: High Lim August 5, 1992 through September 30, 1992 11 ir2 8irz Quarter ended December 31, 1992 19 ss 93/4 On April 2, 1993. the last sale price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange was 516 3r4. As of March 19. 1993 there were 366 holders of record of Common Stock. The Company has not paid any cash' dividends on the Common Stock in the past and aloes not plan to pay any cash dividends on the Common Stock in the foreseeable future. The Company's Board of Directors intends. for the foreseeable future, to retain earnings to finance the expansion of the Company's business. but expects to review its dividend policy regularly. In the foresee- able future. the Company expects to obtain a credit facility that will restrict the Company's ability to pay dividends. 5. AMERICAN.MEDICAL kESPONSE. INQ. • American Medical Response. Inc. 67 13atteryrnarch Street Boston, MA 02110 617-261-1600 E ! N Cr) V C04 u M 3.O w .0 V H O C N IL O« E r 4._a o= u r sial `o � A 2 w O c a oc 4cw q a • « P «Y v TO ' 0 74 iE o C .0r0 M M 40 t 4.v V ea G V V �. poo. o 3 .1 Y H C >B u v— o A M ; s V V Eoe « c c fe V O To; E =- V C O r V c c w o N o Total (4) $ $ $ $ sr 5 (1) The Company and the Selling Stockholders have agreed to indemnify the U.S. Underwriters and the International E . Managers against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933. See "Underwriting". C ns r (2) Before deducting estimated expenses of the Offerings of S550,000 payable by the Company. C V V E E ; (3) The Company will receive $1,998,000 upon exercise of warrants held by a Selling Stockholder concurrent with the cy consummation of the Offerings. "Proceeds to Selling Stockholders" has not been adjusted to reflect payment of such amount. (4) Certain Selling Stockholders have granted the U.S. Underwriters and the International Managers a 30 -day option to purchase up to 412,500 additional shares of Common Stock solely to cover overallotmcnts, if any. If such options are exercised in full, the total "Price to Public", "Underwriting Discounts and Commissions" and "Proceeds to Selling Stockholders" will be $ $and $ respectively. Set "Underwriting". PROSPECTUS Subject to Completion, dated August 31, 1993 2,750,000 Shares wit tiV40411sMki141101111111,744:1;011F1V1k10210 Common Stock Of the 2,750,000 shares of Common Stock offered hereby, 2,000,000 shares are being sold by American Medical Response, Inc. (the "Company") and 750,000 shares are being sold by certain selling stockholders (the "Selling Stockholders"). The Company will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares being sold by the Selling Stockholders. See "Principal and Selling Stockholders". Of the 2,750,000 shares offered hereby, 2,200,000 shares are being offered initially in the United States by the U.S. Underwriters and 550,000 shares are being offered initially outside the United States by the International Managers (subject to transfers between the U.S. Underwriters and the International Managers). Such offerings are referred to collectively as the "Offerings". The offering price and underwriting discounts and commissions per share are identical for both Offerings. See "Underwriting". The Company's Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange ( the "NYSE") under the symbol "EMT". The closing pnce of the Company's Common Stock on the NYSE on August 27, 1993 was $201/4 per share. See "Price Rance of Common Stock". For information containing certain factors relating to the Offerings, see "Investment Considerations". THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. Underwriting Proceeds to Price to Discounts and Proceeds to Selling Public Commissions (1) Company (2)(3) Stockholders (3) Per Share $ $ $ $ C0 V O Oy E c 0 N - .2 at r V to . so ~ The shares of Common Stock offered by this Prospectus are offered by the U.S. Underwriters subject to pnor sale, to 0 �0.. 0 withdrawal, cancellation or modification of the offer without notice, to delivery to and acceptance by the U.S. Underwriters . "4' and to certain further conditions. It is expected that delivery of the shares of Common Stock will be made at the offices of v S . Lehman Brothers Inc., New York, New York on or about , 1993. L V — Y O O C T q V q E 2 0 C C 0 v w o 0 w Na 2 4i C g LEHMAN BROTHERS 1993 KIDDER, PEABODY & CO. NeORPOILATF.I) ADVEST, INC. :%rnerican Medical Response. Inc. ;c Fremont. California dispatch center utilizes modern technologies and a Global Positioning Satellite system to Irs.eisr in rtndnilcnce deployment. The above rnap area oreruieu•.: show the Mention of Loth emer_eney calls and arnhulanees. Providing Emergency Medical Services to Our Communities... lVhen Every Second Counts. The administration of high quality care, using advanced life support equipment, is vital long before hospital arrival. IN CONNECTION WITH THESE OFFERINGS. THE U.S. UNDERWRITERS AND THE IN- TERNATIONAL MANAGERS MAY OVER -ALLOT OR EFFECT TRANSACTIONS WHICH STABI- LIZE OR MAINTAIN THE MARKET PRICE OF THE COMMON STOCK OF THE COMPANY AT A LEVEL ABOVE THAT WHICH MIGHT OTHERWISE PREVAIL IN THE OPEN MARKET. SUCH TRANSACTIONS ;•LAY BE EFFECTED ON TIIE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, IN THE OVER- THE-COUNTER MARKET OR OTHERWISE. SUCH STABILIZING, IF COMMENCED, MAY BE DISCONTINUED AT ANY TIME. OFFERS AND SALES OF TIIE COMMON STOCK IN TILE UNITED KINGDOM. AND ADVERTISEMENTS THEREIN IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS. SEE "UNDERWRITING". AVAILABLE INFORMATION The Company is subject to thc informational requirements of thc Securities Exchange Act of 1934. as amended (the "Exchange Act"). and in accordant: therewith files reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"). Reports. proxy statements and other information filed by the Company may be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the Commission at 450 Fifth Street. N.W.. Room 1024. Washington. D.C. 20549 and at the Commission's Regional offices at 7 World Trade Center. 13th Floor, New York, New York 10648 and Northwestern Atrium Center. 500 West Madison Street. Suite 1400. Chicago, Illinois 60661. Copies of such materials may be obtained at prescribed rates upon request from thc Public Reference Scction of the Commission at 450 Fifth Street. N.W.. Washington. D.C. 20449. The Companys Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and reports. proxy statements and other information concerning the Company may be inspected and copied at the offices of the New York Stock Exclvinge. 20 Broad Street. New York, New York 10005. INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE The following d.::aments previously filed by the Company with the Commission pursuant to the Exchange Act are hereby int-ornorated by reference: (1) The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31. 1992. including the portions of the Company's Proxy Statement dated March 11, 1993 relating to its 1993 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. as amended by the amendment to the Form 10-K on Form 10-K/A dated June 11. 1993. (2) The Company's Quarterly Reports on Form I0 -Q for the quarters ended March 31 and June 30. 1993. The Companys Current Reports on Forst 8-K dated November 18. 1992. January 6. 1993. January 25. 1993. as amended by the Company's Current Report on Form 8 dated February 2. 1993. and June 29. 1993. (4) The description of the Common Stock in the Company's Registration Statement on Form 8-A (No. 1-11196). as amended. All reports and other documents filed by the Company pursuant to Section 13(a). 13(c). 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the date of this Prospectus and prior to the termination of these Offerings shall be incorporated by rcferen.e into this Prospectus and shall be deemed to be a part of this Prospectus from the date of filing of such repoits and documents. Any statement contained herein or in a document incorporated by reference shall be deemed to be modified or superseded for purposes of this Prospectus to the extent that a statement contained in this Prospectus or in any other subsequently filed document which also is or is deemed to be incorporated by reference herein modifies or supersedes such statement. Any such statement so modified or superseded shall not be deemed. except as so modified or superseded. to constitute a part of this Prospectus. The Company will provide. upon request. without charge to each person to whom a copy of this Prospectus has been delivered. a copy of any or all of the documents which have been or may be incorporated in this Prospectus by reference. other than certain exhibits to such documents. Requests for such copies should be directed to: American Medical Response. Inc.. 67 Batten march Street. Boston. Massachusetts 02110 (telephone: (617) .61-1600). (3) • PROSPECTUS SUMMARY The following summary is qualified in its entirety by the information and fi,. ,r,cial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Prospectus or incorporated by reference herein. Except as otherwise indicated. all information in this Prospectus assumes no exercise of the over -allotment notion3 granted to the U.S. Underwriters and the International Managers. Unless otherwise indicated. all references to the "Com- pany" herein include American Medical Response, Inc. and its subsidiaries. For information concerning certain factors relating to the Offerings, see "Investment Considerations". The Company American Medical Response. Inc. (the "Company") is the leading provider of emergency and non- emergency ambulance services in the United States. The Company currently provides ambulance services in Northern California (Alameda, Contra Costa. Santa Clara and Santa Cruz Counties). South Central Connecticut (the greater New Haven and Bridgeport area), Northern Delaware and Southern New Jersey, Southern and Central Mississippi. Portland, Oregon and surrounding areas. Central Colorado and Dade County, Florida. The Company provir!es emergency pre -hospital medical care and ambulance services to patients in response to "911" emergency medical calls. Additionally. the Company provides non -emergency ambulance services to patients during transfer to and from health care facilities and r.:sidcnces and nonmedical transport services to thc handicapped and thc elderly. The Company completed approximately 390.000 and 294,000 transports in response to calls for its services during 1992 and the first six months of 1993, respectively. The Company believes that expenditures for ambulance services in the United States were at least S4 billion during 1992 and have grown at approximately 10% per year over thc last decade. The growth in expenditures for ambulance services has resulted from an increase in both the number of ambulance transports and in average expenditures per transport. Demand for ambulance services has increased due to both the growth and aging of the U.S. population as well as the trend toward greater use of outpatient care facilities in response to current efforts to contain health carc costs. The Company acquired by merger four ambulance service providers concurrent with its initial public offering in August 1992 and since that time has acquired seven additional ambulance service providers. The Company's objective is to continue to be thc leading provider of emergency and non -emergency ambulance services in thc United States. The Company's growth strategy is focused on acquiring new businesses. expanding existing operations. improving the quality and efficiency of operations and promoting and capitalizing on the expertise of the operating executives of its providers. American Medical Response. Inc. was organized as a Massachusetts corporation in February 1992 and was reincorporateci in Delaware in June 1992. The Company's executive offices are located at 67 Battery - march Street. Boston. Massachusetts 02110 and its telephone number is (617) 261-1600. The Offering Common Stock to be offered: By the Company By Selling Stockholders Total Common Stock to be outstanding after the Offerings Use of proceeds NYSE symbol 1,000.000 shares 750.000 shares 2.750.000 shares 13.38/3.720 shares (1) For general corporate purposes, including acquisitions and the repayment of borrowings under the Company's revolving line of credit EMIT (t) Based on thc number of shares outstanding on August 9, 149: and includes I K(UX.X) shares being offered hereto that arc issuable upur exercise of warrants held h) a Selling Stixkholdcr Docs not include 425.350 shaves rc.crscd for i„dance upon exercise of outstanding options granted under cmplosccs and director: stock plans. 120.05/ shales ic.encd for issuance upon exercise of outstanding warrants and 1(n(X)0 shares conungcnth ',suable in connection ,sith :he acqut.iiion of enc of the Company's subsidianec 3 r Summary Financial Data (1) (in thousands, except per share amounts) Six Months Ended Jane 30, Year Ended December 31, 1993 1992 1992 1991 1990 1989 1985 Earnings Data: Total revenue $86,190 $58,343 8121,192 8108,018 884,870 865,606 $48,409 Earnings from operations 7,683 4.599 10.273 9,501 5.546 4,547 2,559 Earnings before income taxes 7,250 4,1167 9,489 8,285 4,280 3,408 1,907 Net earnings 4,103 2,402 5,239 4,843 2,528 2,050 1,173 Pro forma net earnings (2) 4,103 2,351 5,917 1,694 2.400 1,903 1,065 Pro forma net earnings per common share $ 0.38 S 0.30 8 0.67 $ 0.59 $ 0.30 $ 0.24 $ 0.13 Weighted average common shares outstanding 10,916 7,968 8,838 7,968 7,968 7.968 7,968 June 30, 1993 December 31, Actual As Adjusted (3) 1992 Balance Sheet Data: Working capital 824,550 S 51,047 827,096 Total assets 90,392 116,889 70,848 Current maturities of long-term debt 911 911 5,465 Long-term debt 19,114 4,975 8,975 Stockholders' equity 17,408 88,044 37,216 (1) For all periods presented, the summary financial data includes the combined results of the four ombulance service providers acquired by the Company in August 1992 concurrent with its initial public offering and the eesults of Randle Eastern Ambulance Service, Inc. wl,ich was acquired in June 1993 and accounted for as a pooling -of -interests. The financial data for the companies acquired by the Company from November 1992 through June 1993 and accounted far as purchases arc included from their respective dates of acquisition. The summary financial data should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements, and the related notes thereto, the Pro Forma Financial Statements, and the related notes thereto. and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations". (2) Certain adjustments have been made to net earnings to reflect income taxes that would have been payable by one of the Company's subsidiaries that was an S corporation for federal income tax purposes during the periods presented through August 1992. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. (3) Adjustcd to reflect the sale by the Company of 2.1)00.000 shares of Common Stock in the Offerings at an assumed offering price of 520.625 per share. after deduction of underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses payable by the Company, the receipt by the Company of 51,998.000 upon exercise of warrants held by a Selling Stockholder concurrent with the consummation of the Offerings and application of the net proceeds to the Company from the Offerings to reduce the Company's outstanding borrowinks under its rcvohing line or credit. 4 • 1 INVESTMENT CONSIDERATIONS The following factors should be considered together with the other information contained in this Prospectus. in evaluating an investment in the Company. Growth Strategy — Acquisition of Ambulance Senice Providers. The Company's growth strategy depends in large measure on its ability to acquire additional ambulance service providers. Competition for the acquisition of ambulance service providers is increasing as the ambulance service industry undergoes consolidation. Although thc Company has acquired seven additional ambulance service providers since it acquired four providers in August 1992. there can be no assurance that suitable additional acquisitions can be identified, consummated or successfully integrated into the Company's operations. The Company has used a combination of cash and securities as consideration for acquisitions. In the event that the Common Stock does not maintain a sufhcintt valuation or if potential acquisition candidates are unwilling to accept the Company's securities as consideration, the Company will be required to use more cash resources to continue its acquisition program. In addition. if sufficient tinancing is not available as needed on terms acceptable to the Company, the Company's acquisition program could be adversely affected. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources" and "Business — Company Strategy" and "— Competition". Limited Combined Operating History. The Company was founded in February 1992 to acquire ambulance service providers and conducted no operations until August 1992 when it acquired four providers. Since August 1992, the Company has acquired seven additional providers. Although providers acquired by the Company have substantial operating experience as separate companies, the Company has only operated as a combined entity for approximately one year. In addition, members of the Company's management group who were not members of management of the providers acquired had no prior experience in the ambulance service industry. There can be no assurance that the Company's management will be successful in integrating the combined operations of providers acquired or in implementing the Company's business strategy. See "Business — Overview" and "Management". Possible Adverse Changes in Reimbursement Rates or Coverage. A substantial majority of the Company's revenues are attributable to payments received from third -party payors, including Medicare, Medicaid and private insurers. The revenues. cash flows and profitability of the Company, like those of other companies in the health care industry. are affected by the continuing efforts of third -party payors to control expenditures for health care. In addition. reimbursement can be influenced by the financial instability of private third -party payors and by budget pressures and cost shifting by governmental payors. A reduction in coverage or reimbursement rates by third -party payors could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. See "Business — Governmental Regulation" and "— Reimbursement". Health Cure Reform. The public and the federal government have recently focused significant attention on reforming the health care system in the United States. In the last session of Coreress, numerous legislative proposals were introduced that would effect major reforms of the U.S. health care system. The Clinton Administration has pledged to bring about a reform of the nation's health care system, and, in January 1993, the Task Force on National Health Carc Reform (the "Task Force") was created and charged with preparing health care reform legislation to be presented to Congress. Among the stated concerns to be considered by thc Task Force are means to control or ..duce public and private ~,pending on health care, to reform the payment methodology for health care goods ar.; services by both the public (Medicare and Medicaid) and private sectors, which may include overall Iiinitations on federal spending for health care benefits, and to provide universal access to health care. The Company cannot predict the proposals or policy initiatives that may be enacted nor the effect any health care reforms may have on its business. No assurance can be given that any such reforms will not have a material adverse effect on the Company. Reliance on Personnel. The Company is dependent on its senior management. Although the Company has entered into employment agreements with t:iese officers. there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to retain their services. The Company is also dependent on its staff of supervisory personnel and on its staff of medical personnel. over one-half of which is covered by collective bargaining agreements. The loss of key management and other personnel, an inability to extend or renew collective bargaining agreements or an inability to attract and retain sufficient numbers of qualified employees could have an adverse effect on the Company and its operations. See "Management". Dependence on Certain Contracts. During the first six months of 1993 and 1992. the Company derived approximately 37% and 57% of its total revenue, respectively, from emergency medical ambulance services provided under contracts to provide "911" ambulance services with three counties in California and from subsidies thc Company received under these contracts. These contracts expire on various dates between June 1994 and June 1996. The cancellation or loss of any one or more of these contracts could have a material adverse effect on the Company and its operations. These contracts are subjcct to competitive bid processes or renegotiation upon expiration. See "Business — Marketing and Sales" and "— Contracts". Government Regulation. Ambulance service providers are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations that govern various aspects of their businesses. There can be no assurance that federal, state or local governments will not adopt laws or regulations that would increase the Company's cost of doing business, lower reimbursement levels or otherxise have a material adverse effect on the Company. See "Business Governmental Regulation" and "— Reimbursement". Competition. The ambulance service industr; is highly competitive. Principal participants include government entities, Targe regional ambulance service providers, hospitals and numerous local providers. Certain existing and potential competitors of the Company have significantly greater capital and other resources than the Company. Thcre can be no assurance that municipalities or health care facilities that presently contract for ambulance services will not choose to provide ambulance services directly in thc future. See "Business — Competition". Shares Eligible for Future Sale. Future sales of substantial amounts of Common Stock in the public market could adversely affect the market price of the Common Stock. Of the approximately 13.4 million shares of Common Stock that will be outstanding after the Offerings. approximately 6.7 million shares will be freely tradeable without restriction. unless held by "affiliates" of the Company, except in certain cases, subject to certain volume and manner of sale restrictions. The remaining 6.7 million shares are "restricted securities" within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and will not be eligible for resale in the public market until various times in 1994 and 1995. Of these restricted shares, approximately 5.2 million shares (assuming that the underwriters' over -allotment option is not exercised) are held by directors, executive officers, Selling Stockholders and their affiliates w•ho have agreed not to sell or otherwise dispose of any of their shares for a period of 180 days after the date of this Prospectus without the prior written consent of the representatives of the U.S. Underwriters. Upon expiration of the 180 -day period, approximately 2.0 million shares will be available immediately for sale in the public market undcr Rule 144 beginning in February 1994 and. in addition, approximately 3.6 million shares will be available for sale in the public market under Rule 144 beginning in August 1994. in each case subject to volume limitations and other restrictions. Approximately 761.000 of the shares that will be available for resale immediately after the expiration of the 180 -day lock-up period are subject to certain repurchase obligations. As of August 9, 1993, 1.578,112 shares of Common Stock are available for issuance under a shelf registration statement and generally will be freely tradeable after their issuance under Rule 145 (unless held by an affiliate). subject to the volume and manner of sale restrictions under Rule 144. In addition, the Company has tiled an S-8 registration statement under the Securities Act registering all 1.000.000 shares of Common Stock issuable under the Company's stock plans. Shares issued upon, the exercise of options generally will be freely tradeable. See "Shares Eligible for Future Sale" Control by Stockholders. Upon completion of the Offerings. directors and executive officers of the Company and their affiliates will own beneficially approximately 39% (or 36% assuming exercise of the over- allotment option) of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. As a result. these stockholders may. if they act as a group. be able to elect the Board of Directors of thc Company and to determine the outcome of certain corporate transactions and amendments to the Co.npany's Restated Certificate of incorporation and By-laws requiring stockholder approval. 6 r, • Possible Volatility of Stock Price. The market price of the Common Stock may be highly volatile. Factors such as quarter -to -quarter variations in the Company's revenues and earnings. the timing of acquisitions made by the Company. and the announcement and implementation of health cart rcform proposals could cause the market price of the Common Stock to fluctuate significantly. In addition, general economic, political and market conditions may adversely affect the market price of the Common Stock. PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK The Common Stock is traded on the NYSE under the symbol "EMT". The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices for the Common Stock from August 5, 1992, the date of the Company's initial public offering, through August 27, 1993. 1992 Law 1tig11 Third Quarter (from August 5. 1992) S 81/2 SI I Fourth Quarter 9'/. 191/4 1993 First Quarter 123A 191/2 Second Quarter 144i 201A Third Quarter (through August 27, 1993) 191/2 2234 On August 27, 1993, thc closing price of the Common Stock was 520.625. On August 9. 1993, there were 808 shareholders of record of the Common Stock. USE OF PROCEEDS The Company intends to use the net proceeds to the Company from the Offerings, estimated to be approximately S38.6 million (assuming an offering price of 520.625 and after deducting underwriting discounts and the estimated expenses of thc Offerings) for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions and the repayment of borrowings under the Company's revolving line of credit, which totalled approximately 513.0 million as of August 11. 1993. Thc Company will not receive any proceeds from the shares being sold by the Selling Stockholders but will receive 51.998,000 upon exercise of warrants held by a Selling Stockholder concurrent with the consummation of the Offerings. Pend;ng application of the proceeds. the Company intends to invest the balance in short-term investment-grade, interest bearing securities or certificates of deposit. Borrowings under the Company's revolving line of credit. which were used to refinance other indebtedness and for acquisitions and working capital purposes, bear interest at the prime rate or LIBOR plus 2.5%. The revolving line of credit matures in April 1996. After application of the proceeds from the Offerings. 530.0 million will be available to the Company under the revolving line of credit. The Company expects to borrow under the revolving line of credit as needed in connection with acquisitions and other corporate purposes. DIVIDEND POI ICY The Company has not paid any cash dividends on the Common Stock in the past and does not plan to pay any cash dividends on the Common Stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, the Company's revolving line of credit agreement prohibits thc Company from paying dividends and making other payments with respect to its capital stock in any year in excess of 50% of the Company's net income for that year. Thc Company's Board of Directors intends. for the foreseeable future. to retain earnings to finance the expansion of the Company's business, but expects to review its dividend policy regularly. 7 CAPITALIZATION The following table scts forth the Company's cash, short-term debt and capitalization at June 30, 1993, and as adjusted to reflect the sale of the shares of Common Stock offered by the Company hereby (assuming an offering price of 520.625 per share and after deducting underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses payable by the Company), the receipt by the Company of S1.998,000 upon exercise of warrants held by a Selling Stockholder concurrent with the consummation of the Offerings and application of the net proceeds to the Company from the Offerings to reduce the Company's outstanding borrowings under its revolving late of credit. This table should be read in conjunc'iur, with the Financial Statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Prospectus. June 30. 1993 As Actual Adjusted (ha thousands) Cash S 5,909 532,406 Current maturities of debt S 911 S 911 Long-term debt 19,114 4,975 Stockholders' equity_ Preferred Stock, S.01 par value. 500.000 shares authorized; notie outstanding Common Stock, S.01 par value, 25.000,000 shares authorized; 11,126,813 shares outstanding 13.306,813 'shares outstanding as adjusted (I) 111 133 Additional paid -in capital 27,385 67,999 Retained earnings 19,912 19,912 Total stockholders equity 47.408 88,044 Total capitalization 566.522 593.019 (I) Does not include 428,350 shares reserved for issua.;ce upon exercise of outstanding options granted under employees' and directors' stock plans 120,000 shares reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding warrants and 100.000 shares contingently issuablein connection with the acquisition of one of the Company's subsidiaries. 8 SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA For all periods pre.ented, the following selected financial information includes the consolidated results of the four ambulance service protiiders the Company acquired concurrent with its initial public offering and of Randle Eastern Ambulance Service Inc.. which was accounted for as a pooling -of -interests. The financial data of the companies acquired by the Company from November 1992 through June 1993 and accounted for as purchases an; included from their respective dates of acquisition. The following selected consolidated financial information with respect to the Company's consolidated statements of earnings for the years ended December 31, 1992, 1991 and 1990 and with respect to the Company's consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 1992 and 1991 have been derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements that have been audited by KPMG Peat Marwick. The selected consolidated financial information for the years ended December 31. 1989 and 1988 and for thc six-month periods ended June 30. 1993 and 1992 and for the balance sheet data as of December 31. 1990 have not been audited, but in the Company's opinion refect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of results of operations for those periods. The results of the six-month period ended lune 30, 1993 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year. The selected financial data provided below should be read in conjunction with thc accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements. and the related notes thereto, the Pro Forma Financial Statements. and the related notes thereto, and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations". SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (ns thousands, except per stare amounts) Six Months Ended June 30. Year Ended December 31. 1993 1992 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 Earnings DM= Total revenue 586.190 558,343 5121,192 5108,018 584.870 565.606 548.409 Operating expenses: Salaries and benefits 42,279 29,114 60,577 52,009 40,922 32,092 24.263 Uncompensated care 19,116 13,659 28,008 25,862 19,769 14,297 10,383 Other operating expenses 14,090 8,946 18,377 16,640 14,554 11.523 8,943 Depreciation 2.363 1.752 3.396 3.079 2,766 2,226 1,270 Amortization of intangibles 659 273 561 927 1,313 921 951 Total operating expenses.. ... , , . 78,507 53,744 110,919 98.517 79.324 61.059 45.850 Earnings from operations 7,683 4,599 10.273 9,501 5.546 4,547 2,559 Interest expense. net ........... ... .. .. 433 532 784 1,216 1,266 1,139 _ 652 Earnings before income taxes 7,250 4,067 9,489 8.285 4,280 3.408 1.907 Income taxes 3,147 1,665 4.250 3,442 1,752 1,358 734 Net earnings .. 5 4,103 5 2,402 S 5.239 S 4.843 82.528 S 2,050 S 1.173 Pru forma net camings(1) S 4.103 5 2351 $ 5,917 5 4.694 S 1400 1,903 5 1,065 Pro forma net earnings per common share 5 0.38 5 030 $ 0.67 5 0.59 5 0.30 S 0.24 5 0.13 Wcightcd average common shares outstanding .. , 10.916 7,968 8.838 7.968 7,968 7,968 7.968 Balance Sheet Data: June 30. December 31, 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 Working capital . _ . 524.550 S 27.096 510,413 S 7,538 $ 7,219 S 4,416 Property and equipment. net 15.123 10.555 9,620 8.423 6,859 3.953 Total assets 90,392 70.848 40,064 35,494 29,094 19,447 Currcnt maturities of dcbt .. ..... . ... . . 911 5.465 5.137 4.301 4.114 2.830 Long-term debt 19.114 8,975 8,031 9,28o 10.000 6.789 Stockholders' equity ... 47,408 37.216 12.871 8.725 6,732 4.682 (It Certain adjustments have been made to net earnings to reflect income taxes that could have been payable by one of the Company's subsidiaries that was an S corporation for federal income tax purposes during the periods presented through August 1992. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial St.oements. 9 r MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS introduction For all periods presented, the following financial information includes thc combined results of the four ambulance service providers the Company acquired concurrent with its initial public offering in August 1992 and of Randle Eastern Ambulance Service, Inc. which was acquired in June 1993 in a transaction accounted for as a pooling -of -interests. The companies acquired by the Company from November 1992 through June 1993 and accounted for as rirchases are included from their respective dates of acquisition. The Company's total revenue, which is comprised primarily of ambulance service fees charged to Medicare and Medicaid, to other third -party payors, including private insurance carriers and health maintenance organizations, and directly to patients. is presented net of contractual adjustments. Contractual adjustments represent the difference between gross billable charges and the portion of those charges allowable by the third -party payor. The Company's provision for uncompensated care represents the difference between net ambulance fee revenues and expected collections. Six Months Ended June 30, 1993 Compared to the Six .Months Ended June 30, 1992 Oven3ew The Company's net earnings amounted to $4.1 million or $0.38 per share for the six months ended June 30. 1993. as compared with pro forma net earnings of $2.4 million or $0.30 per share for the corresponding period of 1992. The increase in net earnings results from incremental earnings provided from acquisitions, new contracts and increases in transports. The increase in earnings per share results from the increase in net earnings, which is part1!• offset by an increase in the weighted average number of shares. The weighted average number of shares was If•,916.042 and 7.967.563 for the first six months of 1993 and 1992, respectively. The increase in the weighted average number of shares outstanding results from the initial public offering in August 1992 and shares issued in connection with acquisitions. Results of Operations The Company's total revenue amounted to SS6.2 million for the first six months of 1993 as compared with S58.3 million. for the same period of 1992. an increase of S27.9 million or 47.7%. The largest single contributor to the increase in total revenue was the incremental revenue provided from acquisitions. Also contributing to the increase was revenue generated from the Company's contract to provide exclusive "911" emergency response service to Atlantic City. New Jersey, awarded in late 1992, and an increase in the number of emergency and non -emergency transports. On June 1, 1993, the Company began providing exclusive "911" emergency response service to Aurora. Colorado. The Company is a party to three significant contracts to provide emergency "911" services. The Company derived approximately 37% and 57% of its total revenue from these contracts during the first six months of 1993 and 1992. respectively. Salaries and benefits expense as a percentage of total revenue was 49.1% and 49.9% for the first six months of 1993 and 1992. respectively. This was a result of a favorable impact of acquisitions, which in the aggregate have relatively lower labor costs. offset by the addition of corporate salaries and benefits that did not exist in the prior period and certain wage increases. It is anticipated that corporate salary expense will increase in future periods as the Company continues to implement its acquisition program and to centralize certain operating, financial. and treasury management functions. However. it is also anticipated that corporate salary expense will decrease as a percentage of total revenue as the Company continues to grow. Uncompensated care expense as a percentage of total revenue was 22.2% and 23.4% for the six months ended June 30. 1993 and 1992. respectively. The percentage decrease is due to the favorable impact of acquisitions. which in the aggregate have experienced lower uncompensated care expense as a per,:cntage of total revenuc and an improvement in the quality of thc Company's receivables. 10 Other operating expenses were 514.1 million in the first six months of 1993 as compared with 58.9 million in the same period of 1992. As a percentage of total revenue. other operating expenses increased to 16.3% in the first six months of 1993 from 15.3% in the same period of 1992. The percentage incrcasc was primarily the result of the addition of corporate expenses that did not exist in the prior period. Amortization of intangibles increased to S659,000 for the first six months of 1993 from 5273.000 for the first six months of 1992, an increase of S386.000. This increase was the result of thc cost in cxccss of net assets acquired recorded in connection with the Company's acquisitions. Amortization of intangibles will increase in the future as a result of acquisitions accounted for as purchases. Net interest expense decreased by $99,000 for the first six months of 1993 as compared to the first six months of 1992. This decrease was the result of the decline in the Company's weighted average borrowing rate and the decline in the average amount of debt outstanding. resulting primarily from implementation of the Company's revolving credit facility. The effective tax rate for the first six months of 1993 was 43.4% as compared with a pro forma effective tax rate of 42.2% for thc same period in 1992. The increase in the effective tax rate results primarily from an increase in amounts that arc not deductible for tax purposes. Pro forma income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 1992, are tax amounts that would have been recorded if one of the companies acquired at the time of the initial public offering had been a C corporation during this period. If the subsidiary had been c. bject to corporate income taxes on an ongoing basis, the Company's income tax expense would have been S1,716.000 for the first six months of 1992. In August 1993. legislation was enacted which will increase the top marginal income tax rate for corporate taxpayers. effective as of January 1, 1993. and which will implement other tax changes. The Company has not determined the effect such legislation will have on the Company. Year Ended December 31. 1992 Compared to the Year Ended December 31. 1991 Overview The Company's net earnings on a pro forma basis amounted to 55 9 million or 50.67 per share for the year ended December 31. 1992. as compared with pro forma net earnings of S4.7 million or 50.59 per share for 1991. The improvement in pro forma net earnings results from increased transports. increased rates, an increase in fixed government subsidies, an upgrade of basic life support services to paramedic services. a reduction in net interest expense. and a reduction in the pro forma effective tax rate. The increase in pro forma earnings per share results from the increase in net earnings. which is partly offset by an incrcasc in the weighted average number of shares outstanding resulting from the initial public offering and shares issued in connection with the acquisitions. Results of Operations The Company's total revenue amounted to 5121.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1992 as compared with 5108.0 million for 1991. an increase of 513.2 million or 12.2%. The largest single contributor to the increase in total revenue was the increase in ambulance transports in 1992 as compared with 1991. The balance of the increase was the result of rate increases received in certain areas, an upgrade of basic life support services to paramedic services and an increase in fixed government subsidies. The acquisitions accounted for as purchases discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contributed approximately S2.0 million to total revenue for 1992. The Company is a party to three significant contracts to provide emergency "911" services. The Company derived approximately 57% of its 'otal revenue from these contracts during 1992. Salaries and benefits expense amounted to S60.6 million for 1992 as compared with 552.0 million for 1991. an increase of 58.6 million or 16.5%. As a percentage of total revenue. salaries and benefits increased to 50.0% for 1992 from 48.1% in 1991. The increase was primarily the result of higher staffing levels required to satisfy contractual obligations for faster response times in certain areas. the changing prix to paramedic from EMT personnel in order to provide enhanced paramedic services. generally higher labor costs due to wage increases. and thc addition of corporate salaries and benefits which did not exist in thc prior year. Uncompensated care expense amounted to $28.0 million fur 1992 as compared with 525.9 million for 1991. an increase of 52.1 million or 8.3%. As a percentage of total revenue. uncompensated care was 23.1% and 23.9% for the years ended December 31, 1992 and 1991. respectively. The dollar increase in uncompen- sated care expense results primarily from the growth in the Company's business. Other operating expenses were $18.4 million for 1992 as compared with 516.6 million for 1991, an increase of $1.7 million or 10.4%. The increase in other operating expenses was a result of the growth of total revenues and the addition of corporate expenses which did not exist in the prior year. However, as a percentage of total revenue, other operating expenses remained consistent at 15.2% for 1992 as compared to 15.4% for 1991. Depreciation expense increased by $317,000 for 1992 as compared to 1991. The increase was attributable to new vehicle purchases and depreciation expense related to the property and equipment acquired in connection with the purchase of Mobile Medic Ambulance Service, Inc. As a percentage of total revenue, depreciation expense remained constant at 2.8% and 2.9%, for 1992 and 1991, respectively. Amortization of intangibles decreased by $366,000 for 1992 as compared to 1991 due to goodwill amounts becoming fully amortized in 1991. Amortization of intangibles will increase in the future as a result of goodwill recorded in connection with the Company's acquisitions. Net interest expense decreased by 5432,000 for 1992 as compared to 1991. The decrease was the result of the continued decline in borrowing rates, the decline in the - .rage amount of debt outstanding, and an increase in investment income derived from the remaining n' t,.oceeds of the initial public offering. Prior to the merger with the Company, one of the Company's subsidiaries was taxed as an S corporation. As an S corporation, income taxes were not required to be provided in this subsidiary's financial statements. In August 1992, concurrent with the merger. this S corporation status was terminated and the method of accounting for tax purposes changed from the cash to the accrual method. Deferred income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 1992. includes S780,000 attributable to this termination of S corporation status. Pro forma income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 1992, 1991 and 1990 are tax amounts which would have been recorded had this subsidiary been a C corporation during those years. If the subsidiary had been subject to corporate income taxes on an ongoing basis. income tax expense would have been 53.6 million for 1992 and 1991. The effective tax rate for 1992 was 37.6% as compared with 43.3% for 1991. The decline in the effective tax rate results from a favorable resolution of an IRS examination for which amounts had previously been expensed in the Company's financial statements. combined with a decrease in amounts which are not deductible for tax purposes. Year Ended December 31, 1991 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 1990 Overview The Company's net earnings on a pro forma basis amounted to 54.7 million or 50.59 per share for the year ended December 31, 1991, as compared with pro forma net earnings of 52.4 million or 50.30 per share for 1990. The improvement in pro forma net earnings results from increased transports, increased rates. an upgrade of basic life support services to paramedic services, and a reduction in the pro forma effective tax rate. The increase in pro forma earnings per share results from the increase in net earnings. Results of Operations The Company's total revenue amounted to 5108.0 million for the year ended December 3!. 1991 as compared with 584.9 million for 1990. an increase of S23.1 million or 27.3%. The majority of the increase in total revenue results from the increase in ambulance transports in 1991 as compared with 1990. The increase in transports was due primarily to increased transports provided in an expanded area of Alameua County where the City of Oakland was included for a full year in 1991 as compared to a six month period in 1990. Enhanced paramedic services and general rate increases also resulted in higher average revenues per transport. Salaries and benefits expense amounted to S52.0 million for 1991 as compared with S40.9 million for 1990. an increase of 511.1 million or 27.I%. As a percentage of total revenue. salaries and benefits decreased to 12 48.1% for 1991 from 48.2% in 1990. The dollar increase was primarily the result of the general growth of the Company's business and generally higher labor costs due to wage increases. Uncompensated care expense amounted to 525.9 million for 1991 as compared with $19.8 million for 1990, an increase of 56.1 million or 30.5%. As a percentage of total revenue, uncompensated carc increased to 23.9% for 1991 from 23.3% for 1990. The increase results primarily from a significant change in patient demographics resulting from thc provision of services in the Oakland, California area for a full year in 1991 compared to a six month period in 1990. Depreciation expel:- increased to 53.1 million for 1991 from 52.8 million for 1990, an increase of 5313,000 or 11.3%. Other expenses were $16.6 million for 1991 as compared with 514.6 million for 1990, an increase of S2.0 million or 14.3%. As a percentage of total revenue, other expenses decreased to 15.4% from 17.1%. Amortization of intangibles decreased to 5927.000 in 1991 from 51.3 million in 1990, a decrease of 5386.000 or 29.4%. Net interest expense decreased by 550.000 for 1991 as compared to 1990. This decrease was the result of the general decline in borrowing rates. Liquidity and Capital Resources The Company has financed its cash needs. including cash used for acquisitions. from the net proceeds of its initial public offering. borrowings under its revolving line of credit and cash from operations. Concurrent with its initial public offering in August 1992, the Company acquired four ambulance service providers for aggregate consideration consisting of S10.2 million in cash and 4.143.500 shares of Common Stock. Through June 30. 1993. the Company has made six additional acquisitions for aggregate consideration consisting of S15.5 million in cash. 54.3 million in subordinated promissory notes and 1,434,062 shares of Common Stock. The Company currently has a S30 million unsecured revolving line of credit with a group of banks consisting of Fleet Bank of Massachusetts, N.A.. Continental Bank N.A. and Pacific Western Bank. Borrowings under the line of credit have been used to refinance certain indebtedness, for acquisitions and for working capital purposes. Borrowings are limited to the lesser of 530 million and 200% of the Company's earnings before interest. income taxes, depreciation and amortization for the most recent twelve months. Interest is determined at the time of borrowing at the Company's option at either prime or LIBOR plus 2.5%. Letter of credit fees are 1.0% per annum on outstanding letters of credit that are cash collateralized and 1.5% pe- annum on outstanding letters of credit that arc not cash collateralized. Under thc agreement, the Company is required to comply with certain financial and other covenants. The line of credit matures in April 1996. As of August 11, 1993, the Company had approximately 513.0 million of borrowings and $3.5 million of letters of credit outstanding under the line of credit, and 513.5 million remained available for future borrowings. During 1992 and 1991. the Company had additions to ambulances and other operating equipment of $2.2 million and 54.4 million. respectively. During the first six months of 1993, capital expenditures were made primarily for new atnbulanccs and amounted to 53.0 million. 1t is expected that capital expenditures for the Company's existing operations for thc remainder of 1993 will be approximately 54.0 million and consist primarily of new ambulances and other operating equipment. Cash generated from operations during 1992 was 54.3 million. Cash generated from operations during the first six months of 1993 was 55.3 million. Working capital at June 30, 1993 amounted to $24.6 million as compared to 527.1 million at December 31. 1992. Current financial resources and anticipated funds generated by operations are expected to be adequate to meet the Company's operating cash requirements in the foreseeable future. The Company expects to actively continue its acquisition program. Successful implementation of thc Company's acquisition strategy depends upon its ability to acquire additional ambulance service providers. The Company plans to continue to use a combination of cash. subordinated debt and Common Stock to finance its acquisition program. I3 Subsequent Acquisitions and Pending Developments In July 1993, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Bridgeport Ambulance Service, Inc. of Bridgeport, Connecticut. The consideration paid by the Company in this transaction consisted of approximately S1.4 million in cash. a S500,000 subordinated promissory note and 58,589 shares of Common Stock. In June 1993. the Company also announced that it reached a preliminary understanding concerning the acquisition of 911 Emergency Services, Inc., a Califomia-based company which had 1992 revenues in excess of S50 million. The transaction is subject to due diligence, the negotiation of definitive documentation and the receipt of certain regulatory approvals. If the transaction is consummated the Company expects that additional shares of Common Stock will be issued. There can be no assurance that such transaction will be consummated. '4 7-11 BUSINESS Overview The Company is the leading provider of emergency and non -emergency ambulance services in the United States. The Company acquired by merger four ambulance service providers concurrent with its initial public offering in August 1992 and since that date has acquired seven additional providers. Thc Company currently provides ambulance services in Northern California (Alameda, Contra Costa, Santa Clara and Santa Cruz Counties), South Central Connecticut (the greater New Haven and Bridgeport areas). Northern Delaware and Southern New Jersey, Southern and Central Mississippi, Portland, Oregon and surrounding areas, Central Colorado and Dade County, Florida. Thc Company provides pre -hospital emergency medical care and ambulance services to patients in response to "911" emergency medical calls. Additionally, the Company provides non -emergency ambulance services to patients during transfer to and from health care facilities and residences ar .1 non-medical transport services to the handicapped and the elderly. The Company completed approxirr...tely 390,000 and 294,000 transports in response to calls for its services during 1992 and the first six months of 1993. respectively. The following table lists acquisitions made by the Company concurrent with. or subsequent to, its initial public offering in August 1992: PROVIDER Regional Ambulance, Inc. IN OPERATION SINCE 1963 American Medical Response %Vest 1964 Ncw Haven Ambulance Service. Inc. Professional Ambulance Service. Inc. 1972 1978 Mobile Medic Ambulance Service, Inc 1977 Ambulance Service Company 1920 Buck Medical Services .... 1967 A-1 Ambulance Companies 1971 Randle Eastern Ambulance Service. Inc.... _ ..... 1955 Reed Ambulances, Inc 1978 Bridgeport Ambulance Service, Inc. 1968 DATE CURRENT ACQUIRED SERVICE AREA August 1992 August 1992 August 1992 August 1992 November 1992 December 1992 January 1993 April 1993 June 1993 June 1993 July 1993 Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, California Santa Clara and Santa Cruz Counties, California Ncw Haven, Connecticut Northern Delaware and Southern New Jersey Southern and Central Mis- sissippi Denver. Colorado and surrounding areas Portland, Oregon and surrounding areas Boulder, Colorado Springs and Longmont, Colorado Dade County. Florida Denver, Colorado Bridgeport. Connecticut Industry Background The Company believes that expenditures for ambulance services in the United States were at least S4 billion during 1992 and have grown at approximately 10% per year over the last decade. The Company believes that while the industry is highly fragmented. with over 2,000 privately -owned companies, consolida- tion is occurring. In addition, the Company believes that privatization of ambulance services has occurred. The growth in expenditures for ambulance services has resulted from an increase in both the number of ambulance transports and in average expenditures per transport. Demand for ambulance services has increased due to both the growth and aging of the U.S. population as well as the trend toward the greater use of outpatient care facilities in response to current efforts to contain health care costs. Average expenditures per ambulance transport have increased over the last decade due primarily to the additional costs of providing a higher level of pre -hospital emergency medical care and shortened response times to emergency medical calls. Increasingly sophisticated life-saving techniques and medical equipment arc used by trained paramedic s 15 applying medical skills at the scene of an emergency and en route to the hospital. Immediate response to an emergency medical call is, in many casts, critical in saving a patient's life and determining the course and level of future medical care. County and municipal contracts for emergency ambulance services typically require that providers meet or exceed increasingly stringent. specifically -defined response time and other quality assurance criteria. Company Strategy Since its initial public offering in August 1992 the Company has (i) entered new service areas through acquisitions of providers in Mississippi. Colorado, Oregon and Florida. (ii) expanded certain existing service areas through the acquisition of two additional Colorado providers, and a provider in Bridgeport, Connecticut (whose operations were combined with the Company's existing New Haven operations), (iii) obtained a new service contract in Atlantic City, New Jersey. which is serviced by the Company's Delaware operations, (iv) established a national insurance program and consolidated capital resource management as part of its efforts to generate efficiencies by centralizing appropriate functions at the corporate level, and (v) built a management team with substantial operating experience in the ambulance service business. The Company's objective is to continue as the leading provider of emergency and non -emergency ambulance services in the United States. To achieve its objective, the Company's growth strategy is focused on the following three principal elements: • Acquiring new businesses. - Expanding and improving operations. • Promoting and capitalizing on the expertise and entrepreneurial spirit of the operating executives of the Company's ambulance service providers. Growth by Acquisition New Service Areas. The Company seeks to enter into new service areas by acquiring leading ambulance service providers with high quality management and strong performance records. The Company selects acquisition candidates that it believes offer attractive opportunities for intrinsic growth and "add-on" acquisitions in nearby service areas. Senior management of acquired companies in new service areas typically remains with the Company after the acquisition to manage local operations. "Add -On" Service Areas. The Company also seeks to expand existing service areas by acquiring providers in contiguous or nearby service areas. Management believes that it can enhance levels of .ervice and achieve economies of scale by integrating these providers with existing operations. Acquisition Review Process. The Company considers a number of factors in evaluating a potential acquisition candidate, including the quality of its personnel and management. its financial history and condition, its operations. the demographic characteristics of its service areas, its regulatory environment, and its fee structure and reimbursement levels. The Company has an experienced acquisition team that manages the acquisition and due diligence process. As part of the due diligence process. the Company also draws on the specific expertise of operating executives of the Company's providers. Expand and Improve Operations in addition to its acquisition strategy. the Company reeks to expand and enhance the businesses of its existing and acquired ambulance services providers. Within existing service areas, the Company's objective is to :maintain, and where appropriate, improve upon its average response time through. among other things, enhanced fleet maintenance and advanced fleet dispatching technologies. Management believes that providing enhanced levels of service within existing service areas is critical to its ability to increase the number of transports in a service area and improves its ability to retain existing service contracts and to compete for additional service contracts. The Company also seeks to improve the efficiency of its operations by consolidating certain administrative. maintenance and financial functions where appropriate. 16 i a 1 hfanagentent Philosophy The Company believes that strong. established kcal management and an entrepreneurial atmosphere are important to the Company's success. The Company encourages its providers to enhance their operations by drawing on the expertise of its other providers. The Company has assembled a management team with substantial experience in acquisitions and long records of successful management in the ambulance service business. The Company believes that the operating expertise of its management enhances the Company's acquisition due diligence process and is a shared resource available to each of the Company's providers to improve their respective operations. Typically, management of an acquired company in a new service area continues to manage local operations of the acquired business and receives an equity interest in the Company. Local management generally has autonomy in d.iily operations such as dispatching, marketing and contract supervision and is supported at the corporate level in such areas as financial and treasury management. insurance and risk management. and the development and maintenance of quality standards. Company Services T1! 't Company generally provides emergency medical ambulance services pursuant to contracts with counties and municipalities tither on an exclusive or a non-exclusive basis. Under these contracts, the Company typically provides "911" emergency ambulance services in designated service areas. In some service areas, the Comr ••.% is designated as "first responder" to emergency medical calls and in other services areas, where a public sector provider. such as the fire department, is the primary responder, the Company is designated as back-up responder and supports the first responder as needed. The Company responds to "911" calls involving lift -threatening emergencies with Advanced Life Support (ALS) ambulance units. ALS ambulance units, staffed by two paramedics or one paramedic and an emergency medical technician (EMT), are equipped with advanced life support equipment, such as cardiac monitors, defibrillators and oxygen delivery systems, and contain pharmaceuticals and medical supplies. Upon arrival at an emergency, thc ALS crew members deploy portable life support equipment, ascertain the patient's medical condition and. if required, begin life support techniques and procedures that may include airway intubation. cardiac monitoring, defibrillation of cardiac arrhythmias and thc administration of medications and intravenous solutions. As soon as medically appropriate, the patient is placed on a portable gurney and carried into the ambulance. While a paramedic monitors and treats the patient, the other crew member drives the ambulance to a hospital designated either by the patient or the particular medical protocol. En route. the ALS crew generally alerts the hospital to the patient's medical condition and, if necessary, a physician advises the attending paramedic as to treatment. Upon arrival at thc hospital, the patient is taken to the appropriate section of the hospital, usually the emergency department. Thc Company provides Basic Life Support (BLS) ambulance services in response to "911" emergency medical calls when a patient's medical condition is not life-threatening. The Company also provides BLS ambulance services to patients requiring a basic level of medical supervision during transfer to and from residences and health care facilities. These services may be provided when a home -bound patient requires examination or traattnent at a health care facility or when a hospital patient requires tests or treatments available at another facility. such as MRI testing, CAT scans, dialysis, or chemotherapy treatment. A BLS ambulance unit typically is staffed by two EMTs and equipped with medical supplies and equipment necessary to administer first aid and basic medical treatment. At the scene or while transporting the patient in the ambulance, the crew may perform BLS services which include basic airway management, hernorrhage control. stabilization of fractures. emergency childbirth and basic vehicle extrication. BLS ambulance services may be provided pursuant to contracts with counties and municipalities, health care facilities or at the request of a patient or a physician. and are either scheduled in advance or provided on an as -needed basis. The Company also provides critical care transport services to medically- unstable patients. such as cardiac patients and neonatal patients, who require critical care while being transported between health care facilities. Critical care services differ from BLS services in that the ambulance may be equipped with additional medical equipment, such as balloon pumps and isolcttcs. and may also be staffed by a medical specialist provided by 17 r the Company or by a health care facility to attend to a patient's special medical needs. Critical care services are typically provided pursuant to contracts with hospitals. health maintenance organizations and other health care facilities. In addition to ambulance services, the Company provides non-medical transportation for the handicapped and the elderly. Transportation is generally between residences or nursing homes and hospitals or other health care facilities. This service is provided in vans or coaches that contain hydraulic wheelchair lifts or ramps and are operated by drivers who generally arc trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). These services arc typically provided pursuant to contracts with nursing homes. hospitals and other health care facilities. Medical Personnel As of July 31. 1993. the Company employed 1.207 paramedics. 913 EMTs and 131 invalid coach drivers. Paramedics and EMTs must be state certified to transport patients and to perform emergency care services. Certification as an EMT typically requires completion of a minimum of 140 hours of training in a program designed by the United States Department of Transportation and supervised by state authorities. EMTs may also complete advanced training courses to become certified to provide certain additional emergency care services such as administration of intravenous fluids and advanced airway management. in addition to completion of the EMT training program. certification as a paramedic generally requires completion of over 800 hours of training in advanced patient care assessment, pharmacology, cardiology and clinical and field skills. Many of the paramedics currently employed by the Company served as EMTs for the Company prior to being certified as paramedics. Medical protocols for paramedics and EMTs are developed by local physician advisory boards. Paramedics and EMTs arc required to follow the particular medical protocols for a service arca. In addition. instructions arc conveyed on a case-by-case basis through direct communications between the ambulance crew and hospital physicians prior to the initiation of life support procedures. Both paramedics and EMTs are required to complete continuing education programs. and in some cases. to complete state supervised refresher trainin? examinations. to maintain their certifications. Cer.ification and continuing educa;ion acquirements for paramedics and EMTs vary among states and count;es_ Dispatch and Communications Because effective fleet deployment is a key factor in reducing response time. the Company uses vehicle location and detailed status plans to position its ambulances within a designated service area. The Company's dispatch center in Fremont, California uses a global positioning satellite tracking system for optimal real time deployment of its fleet in Alameda and Contra Costa counties. In certain of its designated service areas, the Company uses computers to analyze data on traffic patterns, demographics, usage frequency and similar factors to help determine optimal ambulance deployment and selections. Generally. ambulance Linits arc not stationed at fired sites but are constantly repositioned in "flexible deployment" systems to provide better coverage and reduce response time. The center that controls the deployment and dispatch of ambulances in response to "91 I" calls may be owned and operated either by the county or municipality or by the Company itself. In both cases. the control center is equipped with computer hardware and software and sophisticated communications equipment. Control centers servicing larger geographic areas may also be equipped with vehicle locating equipment that can accurately locate each vehicle in the fleet. Control centers arc responsible for fleet deployment and utilization 24 hours a day. seven days a week. Depending on the em.rgency medical dispatch system in a designated service arca. the public authority that receives ''911- emergency medical calls either dispatches the Company's ambulances directly fro.n the public control center or communicates information regarding the location and type of medical emergency to the Company's control center which in turn dispatches ambulances to the scene. In many of the Company's operations. a computer assists the dispatcher by ar.Jyzing a number of factors such as time of day. ambulance location and historical traffic patterns in order to recommend optimal ambulance selections. In all cases, a l8 dispatcher selects and dispatches thc ambulance. While the ambulance is en route to the scene. information concerning the patient's condition is relayed to the ambulance as it prepares for arrival. The Company's communication systems also allow the ambulance crew to communicate directly with the destination hospital to alert hospital medical personnel as to the arrival of the patient and the patient's condition and to receive instructions directly from hospital personnel on specific pre -hospital medical treatment. Thcsc systems also allow for close and direct coordination with other emergency service providers, such as the appropriate police and fire departments, that may also be responding to a call. Deployment and dispatch are also important factors in providing non -emergency ambulance services. The Company implements system status plans for these services that are designed to insure appropriate response times to non -emergency calls. Billing and Collection Thc Company derives a substantial majority of its revenue from reimbursement by third -party payors including payments under Medicare. Medicaid and private insurance programs, typically invoicing and collecting payments directly from third -party payors. The Company also collects payments directly from patients, including p. - ments under deductible and co-insurance provisions and otherwise. During 1992, the Company derived an estimated 29% of its net ambulance fee revenue from Medicare, 8% from Medicaid, 28% from private insurers, including prepaid health plans and other non-government sources, and 35% directly from patients. Thc Company's provision for uncompensated care is generally higher with respect to revenues derived directly from patients than for revenues derived from third -party payors. Uncompensated care represented 23.1% and 22.2% of the Company's revenue for 1992 and for the first six months of 1993, respectively. Thc Company is generally required to provide ambulance services without regard to a patient's insurance coverage or ability to pay. As a result. the Company is often not compensated for services provided to patients who are not covered by Medicare. Medicaid or private insurance. The Company has sophisticated collection systems and its colkction staff is specially trained in third party coverage and reimbursement procedures. Computerized billing and collection reports allow the Company's personnel to continually monitor open accounts. The level of uncompensated care may also be considered in determining the Company's subsidy and permitted rates under contracts with a county or municipality or with a health care facility. Marketing and Sales Contracts with countics and municipalities to provide "911" emergency services are generally obtained through a competitive bidding process. in some instances where the Company is the existing provider, the county or municipality may elect to renegotiate thc Company's existing contract instead of putting the contract out for re -bid. The Company believes that counties and municipalities consider quality of care and historical response time performance to be thc most important factors in awarding contracts although other factors, such as financial stability. personnel policies and practices. and total cost both to the municipality or county and to the public. are also considered. The Company markets its non -emergency ambulance services to hospitals. health maintenance organiza- tions. convalescent homes and other health care facilities that require a stable and reliable source of medical transportation for their patients. The Company believes that its status as a "911" provider in a designated service arca increases its visibility and enhances its marketing efforts for non -emergency services. Contracts for non -emergency services usually are based on criteria — quality of care, response time and cost — similar to those in contracts for emergency. services. The Company has recently hired a national marketing director to coordinate and enhance company -wide and local marketing efforts. To market its services both to public and private entities, the Company sponsors joint educational seminars on CPR techniques. safety planning. and emergency life-saving techniques. The Company also participates in educatioral programs fur the public. 19 Contracts The Company enters into contracts with counties and municipalities to provide "911" emergency ambulance services in designated service areas. These contracts typically specify maximum fees that the Company may charge and set forth required response times, staffing levels, types of vehicles and equipment. quality assurance and insurance coverage. Counties and municipalities may also require that the Company provide a performance bond or other assurances of financial responsibility. The amount of the subsidy that the Company receives from a county or municipality and the rates that the Company is permitted to charge for services under a contract for emergency ambulance services depend in part on the nature of the services rendered and performance requirements. The Company is a party to three contracts .o provide "911" services which cach accounted for more than IO% of the Company's total revenue for 1952. The Company derived approximately 26%. 17% and 14% of its total revenue during 1992. and 16%, 12% and 9% of its total revenue during the first six months of 1993, from contracts with Alameda, Santa Clara and Contra Costa Counties, respectively. These contracts are subject to competitive bid processes or renegotiation upon expiration. No other contract accounted for more than 5% of the Company's total revenue during the same periods. Alameda County. The Company has been under contract with Alameda County, California to provide ambulance services since 1964. Under thc Company's existing contract, the Company provides dispatch and emergency ambulance services in response to all "911" requests for emergency ambulance services in the designated Fervice area. The designated service area consists of most of Alameda County, including the City of Oakland.' ne existing contract has an initial term of four years. which expires in June 1994_ The county may, at its option. extend the contract for up to two terms of two ycars each. The county pays the Company a monthly subsidy of approximately 580.000 through thc initial term of the contract. The contract imposes financial penalties against the Company for failure to meet performance requirements and provides that the county may terminate the contract if the Company has materially breached its obligations, after notice and opportunity to cure. Santa Clara County- Thc Company has been under contract with Santa Clara County, Califon1ia to provide ambulance services since 1979. Under the Company's existing contract. which became effective in July 1993, thc Company provides "911" emergency ambulance services on an exclusive basis in most of Santa Clara County, including the City of San Jose and the Silicon Valley arca. Thc existing contract expires in June 1996 and may be extended for two one-year periods at the county's option. The county may terminate the contract for cause after notice and opportunity to cure. and also after notice in thc event of certain regulatory changes. The contract may also be terminated by either party for convenience after notice. Contra Costa County. The Company has been under contract with Contra Costa County to provide ambulance services sincc 1982. Under the Company's existing contract. the Company provides dispatch and emergency ambulance services in response to "911" emergency medical requests in most of the county which is directly north of Alameda County. Thc existing contract expires in January 1995. The contract provides for a monthly subsidy of approximately 5207.000. subject to reduction in certain instances. The county may terminate the contract if the Company fails to perform its ohliaations under the contract. Other Contracts. Thc Company also has other contracts with certain cities and counties in California, Colorado, Connecticut. Delaware. Mississippi, New Jersey and Washington to provide emergency and non- emergency ambulance services. These contracts expire at various times during 1993-9'. subject in certain cases to renewal options. The Company also has contracts with hospitals and othe: health care facilities and nursing homes to provide non -emergency and critical care ambulance serv':cs. These contracts typically provide that the Company is the first ambulance service provider contacted to provide non -emergency ambulance services to those facilities for which the Company receives a base fee, mileage reimbursement and additional fees for the use of particular medical equipment and supplies. 20 1 Competition The ambulance service industry is highly competitive. The principal participants include governmental entities. targe regional ambulance service providers, small local ambulance providers, hospitals and numerous local volunteer provriers. Ambulance service providers compete primarily on the basis of quality of service, performance and cost. The Company believes that counties and municipalities consider quality of care and historical response time performance to be the most important factors in awarding a contract, although other factors such as financial stability, personnel policies and practices and cost arc also considered. Certain existing and potential competitors of the Company have significantly greater capital and other resources than the Company. In addition. there can be no assurance that counties, municipalities, hospitals or health care facilities that presently contract for ambulance services will not choose to provide ambulance services directly in thc future. Competition for acquisitions in the ambulance service industry is expected to continue to increase as the industry undergoes consolidation. Increased competition for acquisitions may increase purchase prices for acquisitions. Governmental Regulation The Company's business is subject to governmental regulation at the federal, state and local levels. At the federal level, the Company is subject to regulations under the Occupational Safety and Health Act designed to protect employees of the Company. The federal government also recommends standards for ambulance design and construction. medical training curriculum, and designation of appropriate trauma facilities, which standards may be modified by state agencies. Each state in which the Company operates regulates various aspects of its business. The Company's business is subject to state requirements governing the licensing or certification of ambulance service providers, training and certification of medical personnel, the scope of services that may be provided by medical personnel, staffing requirements, medical control. medical procedures, communication systems, vehicles and equipment. The Company's contracts with counties in California typically prescribe maximum rates that the Company may charge for services. Some states, such as Connecticut. annually set maximum allowable rates that providers may charge for ambulance and invalid coach services, and allow providers to earn up to a fixed percentage of revenues annually. The process of determining rates may include cost reviews, analysts of levels of reimbursement from all sources and a determination of reasonable profits. The public may participate in thc hearing process of the rate setting agency. Regulatory schemes for ambulance services may vary widely from state to state. In California. counties are responsible for enforcing state requirements and standards and often set higher standards than those established by the state. In other states in which thc Company operates. counties and local communities may also impose higher standards for ambulance services providers than those established by the st-te_ Applicable federal. state and local laws and regulations are subject to change. The Company believes that it is currently in substantial compliance with regulatory requirements applicable to its ambulance service business. The Company may. however. in the future be required under these regulatory requirements to increase capital and operating expenditures in order to maintain current operations or initiate new operations. Reimbursement A substantial majority of the Company's revenue is attribut...t..c to payments received from third -party payors, including 'Medicare. Medicaid and private insurers. 1 he rcvrcues, cash flow and profitability of the Company. like those of other companies in the health care industry, :.nc „ffected by the continuing efforts of third -party payers to control expenditures for health care. The Company is s..hject to various regulatory requirements in connection with its participation in Medicare and Medicaid. Medicare is a federal hcalt}t insurance pr• .rarn for the elderly and for chronically disabled individuals that pays for ambulance services when med. :';t necessary. Medicare uses a charge - 2! r - based reimbursement system for ambulance services and. subject to the limits fired for the particular geographic arca. reimburses MTh of charges determined to be reasonable by Medicare. The patient is responsible for paying the balance of the bill. In determining reasonable charges, Medicare considers the following charge factors and applies whichever is lowest: the actual charge, the customary charge, the prevailing charge in the same locality, the amount of reimbursement for comparable services or thc inflation - indexed charge limit. Medicaid is a combined federal -state program for medical assistance to impoverished individuals who are aged, blind, or disabled or members of families with dependent children. Medicaid programs are in effect in all states in which the Company operates. Although Medicaid programs differ in certain respects from state to state, all are subject to federal requirements. State Medicaid agencies are permitted to set levels of reimbursement within federal guidelines. The Company. like other Medicare and Medicaid providers, is subject to governmental audits of its Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement claims. The Company has not. to date, experienced significant losses as a result of any such audit. As a provider of services under the Medicare and Medicaid programs, the Company is also subject to the Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse laws. These laws prohibit any bribe. kickback or rebate in return for the referral of Medicare or Medicaid patients. Violations of these prohibitions may result in civil and criminal penalties and exclusion from participation in the Medicare and Mcdicaid programs. investigations of alleged violations of these laws by ambulance providers are currently being conducted. The Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with these fraud and abuse laws. Government funding for health care programs is subject to statutory and regulatory changes. administra- tive rulings, interpretations of policy. determinations by intermediaries and governmental funding restrictions, all of which could materially increase or decrease program reimbursements for ambulance services. in recent years, Congress has consistently attempted to curb federal spending on sue* programs. No assurance can be given that future funding levels for Medicare and Mcdicaid programs will be comparable to present levels. Changes in the reimbursement policies as a result of budget cuts or othcr government action could adversely affect the Company's operations. in the most recent session of Congress. numerous legislative proposals were introduced that would effect major reforms of the U.S. health care system. Thc Clinton Administration has pledged to bring about a reform of the nation's health care system. The Company cannot predict the proposals or policy initiatives that may be enacted nor the effect any health care reform ntay have on its business. No assurance can be given that any such reform will not ha e a material adverse effect on the Company. Thc Company also receives direct reimbursement for services from health care institutions such as hospitals. health maintenance organizations and other state. federal or private entities. Reimbursement can be influenced by the financial instability of private third party payors. Reductions in coverage or reimbursement rates by third party payors could have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations. Legal Proceedings Thc Company. Regional Ambulance. Inc.. thc Company's wholly owned subsidiary ("Regional"), and William E. Riggs, an officer and director of Regional and the Company have been named as defendants in a lawsuit filed by a former stockholder of Regional on August 3. 1993 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges that during 1990 and 1991 when Regional. through Mr. Riggs. was negotiating to redeem such stockholder's shares of Regional common stock. they failed to disclose material facts relating to Regional's intention to merge with other companies and conduct a public stock offering. The complaint seeks damages in excess of S1.5 million plus interest and exemplary and punitive damages. Although the Company is unable to predict thc outcome of the proceeding. the Company believes the claims against it arc without merit and Mr. Riggs has informed the Company that he believes the claims against him and Regional are without merit and management believes the resolution of the lawsuit will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company. The Company believes that any losses that the Company and Regional might suffer by reason of or in connection with the lawsuit would be covered by an indemnity given to Regional and the Company by Mr. Riggs and his wife. who were the sole stockholders of Regional when it was acquired 1" • '' •mpany. in connection with Regional's 1992 merger into the Company. 11 • The Company is a party to litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. There can be no assurance that the Company's insurance coverage rill be adequate to cover all liabilities occurring out of such claims. In the opinion of management, any liability that the Company might incur upon the resolution of this litigation will not, in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition or results of operations of the Company. Insurance The Company has implemented a company -wide insurance program, which provides a broad range of general liability. comprehensive property damage, malpractice, worker's compensation, and other insurance coverage. Management considers the Company's insurance coverage adequate for the protection of its assets and operations, although there can be no assurance that its coverage limits will be adequate. A successful claim against the Company in excess of its insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on the Company and its financial condition. Claims against the Company. regardless of their merit or outcome, may also have an adverse effect on the Company's reputation and business. The Company is also subject to accident claims as a result of the normal operation of its fleet of ambulances. The Company has hired a corporate director of safety. health and risk management to manage and administer the Company's safety and risk programs and policies. Facilities and Equipment At July 31. 1993, the Company's fleet included 455 owned ambulances and 18 leased ambulances. The Company leases its principal executive offices in Boston, Massachusetts. The Company also leases administrative facilities and other facilities used principally for ambulance basing. garaging and ma...tenance in areas in which it provides ambulance services. The aggregate rental expense for the Company's facilities was approximately $2.3 million during 1992. Employees As of July 31. 1993. the Company had 2,409 full-time and 596 part-time employees. including 1.207 paramedics, 913 EMT's. 131 invalid coach drivers and 754 management. administrative and clerical personnel_ The Company is a party to seven collective bargaining agreements that as of July 31. 1993 covered approximately 41% of the Company's employees. The Company considers its relations with employees to be good. 23 MANAGEMENT Directors and Executive Officers The following table sets forth information concerning each of the directors and executive officers of the Company: Name Ate Po+itioa Paul M. Verrochi Dominic J. Puopolo Paul T. Shirley Joseph R. Paolella William E. Riggs Ronald M. Levenson 44 Chairman of thc Board. Chief Executive Officer, President, Director 50 Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Trcasurcr, Director 53 Executive Vice President. Chief Operating Officer. Director 42 Executive Vice President, Director 51 Executive Vicc President, Director 37 Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer Senior Vice President Senior Vicc President Director Director Director Director Michael J. McClymont 50 John K. Rester 45 Michael A. Baker (1) 47 David B. Hammond (1) (2) 48 James E. McGrath 38 John Larkin Thompson (1)(2) 62 (1) Member of the Compensation Committee. (2) Member of the Audit Committee. All officers serve at the discrction of the Board of Directors. The directors of thc Company arc elected annually for one-year terms. Paul M. Verrochi has served as Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President. and a director of the Company since its inception in February 1992. Since February 1991, he has also been a Principal of Exel Holdings. Ltd.. a privately -held investment firm he co-founded with Mr. Puopolo. From April 1989 to December 1990, Mr.Verrochi was Presidcnt of Allwaste Asbestos Abatement. Inc.. a subsidiary of Allwaste, Inc., a publicly held, national environmental company. Mr. Verrochi was a founder of American Environmen- tal Group, a regional asbestos abatement company. and served as Chairman of its Board of Directors from July 1987 until April 1989 when the company was acquired by Allwaste. In addition. Mr. Verrochi was a founder and Chairman of the Board of Omni Building Services, Inc.. a major regional janitorial service company. from September 1972 to July 1984 when the company was acquired by a subsidiary of ADT Limited ("ADT"). an international services company. From July 1984 to December i986. he was a Vice President of ADT and President of ADT Maintenance Services. Inc.'s Northeast Region. Dominic J. Puopolo has served as Executive Vice President. Chief Financial Officer. Treasurer and a director of the Company since its inception in February- 1992. Sincc February 1991. he has also been a Principal of Exel Holdings. Ltd., which he co-founded with Mr. Verrochi. From April 1989 to December 1990. Mr. Puopolo was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Aliwaste Asbestos Abatement, Inc. Mr. Puopolo was a founder of American Environmental Group and served as its Chief Financial Officer from July 1987 to April 1989. From 1983 to 1987. he was Vice President of Onini Building Services. Inc. Sir. Puopolo was Chief Financial Officer of ADT Mlaintenance Services. Inc.'s Northeast Region from Jul) 1984 to December 1986. Mr. Puopolo is a Certified Public Accountant. Paul T. Shirley has served as an Executive Vi -:e President and a director of the Company since August 1992 and has served as Chief Operating Officer of the Company since Stay 1993. SIr. Shirley was President 24 • 1 41 and Chief Executive Officer of American Medical Response West from March 1989 until August 1992 when it was acquired by the Company. From June 1963 until March 1989. he was President of Santa Cruz Ambulance Service, which in 1989 became part of American Medical Response West. Mr. Shirley is currently a member of the California Ambulance Association, of which he was President from 1968 to 1969. Mr. Shirley served as a member of the Santa Cruz County Planning Commission from 1965 to 1969 and as a member of the State of California Narcotic Addict Evaluation Authority from 1971 to 1974. Hc served as a member of the Board of Directors of Federal Prison Industries, Inc. from 1982 to 1991. Mr. Shirley has also served as a member of the Santa Cruz County Emergency Medical Care Commission and the State of California Emergency Medical Service Advisory Committee. Joseph R. Paolella has served as an Executive Vice President and a director of the Company, and President of New Haven Ambulance Services, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, since 1992. Mr. Paolella was an Executive Vice President of New Haven Ambulance, inc. from 1974 to August 1992 when it was acquired by the Company. He was a founding Director of thc Connecticut Ambulance Association and served as its President from 1980 to 1988. Mr. Paolella is currently the Chairman of the Government Affairs Committee for the American Ambulance Association which is responsible for public relations with Federal government agencies including the Health Care Finance Administration. William E. "Earl" Riggs has served as an Executive Vice President and a director of the Company since August 1992. Mr. Riggs is also Chief Executive Officer and President of Regional Ambulance, Inc. and American Medical Response West, subsidiaries of the Company. Mr. Riggs was President and Chief Executive Officer of Regional Ambulance, inc. until August 1992 when it was acquired by the Company. He co-founded Fremont Ambulance Company in 1964 and during the subsequent twenty-five year period organized Regional Ambulance. In 1974, he participated in the reorganization of the Alameda County Emergency Medical Care Committee and assisted in the development of an ambulance response system for Alameda County. Mr. Riggs has served as a member of the Committee for Benefit Assessment for thc Alameda Emergency Medical Services District as well as the Medical Services Advisory Committee of thc Governor's Emergency Task Force on Earthquake Preparedness. He has served as a Director of the American Ambulance Association, an Advisory Board Member to the Statc Legislature on Emergency Medical Services and President of the Califortia Ambulance Association. Ronald M. Levenson has served as a Senior Vice President and the Chief Accounting Officer of the Company since October 1. 1992. From 1985 to September 1992. Mr. Levenson was a senior manager at KPMG Peat Marwick, a public accounting firm, where he was employed from 1979 to 1992. Mr. Levenson is a Certified Public Accountant and is a former lecturer in accounting at the Boston University School of Law and Northeastern University. Michael J. McClymont has served as a Senior Vice President of the Company since February 1992. Since February 1991. he has been an Associate at Exel Holdings. Ltd. From 1989 to 1991. Mr. McClymont was President and Chief Operating Officer of Mycor Services. a food and vending service company. From 1988 to 1989, Mr. McClymont was President of Food Concepts. Inc.. an indirect subsidiary of ADT, which subsequent to Mr. McClymont's tenure filed a petition for bankruptcy under the federal bankruptcy laws. From 1985 to 1988. he served as Vicc President of Business Development for ADT Maintenance Services, Inc. From 1984 to 1985. Mr. McClymont served as Regional Manager at Canteen Services. In addition. from 1979 to 1984. he served as Vice President for Food and Vending Operations at ARA Services. inc. John K. Rester has served as a Senior Vice President of the Company and President of Mobile Medic Ambulance Service. Inc. a subsidiary of the Company. since November 1992. Mr. Rester was President and Chief Executive Officer of Mobile Medic Ambulance Service. inc. from 1977 to November 1992 when it was acquired by the Company. Michael A. Baker has served as a director of the Company since February' 1992. Mr. Baker is currently President of Notre Capital Ventures. Ltd. Mr. Baker was a co- founder of Sanitill. Inc.. a developer and operator of nonhazardous solid waste landfills. where he held the positions of Co -Chief Executive Officer from May 1989 through November 1989. Senior Vice President -- Corporate Development from December 1989 to October 1991. and director froni May 1989 to May 1992. From August 1987 though March 1989. Mr. )5 r Bakcr was Chief Financial Officer for ENSR Corporation, an environmental engineering consulting firm. From 1984 through 1987, Mr. Baker was a principal with the law firm of Baker & Kirk, P.C. in Houston. Texas. Mr. Baker taught at the University of Houston Law Center both full time and part time from 1971 through 1985. From 1972 through 1983. he was employed by Browning-Ferris Industries. Inc. with responsibility for the acquisition of companies in the waste industry. Mr. Baker is a director of Allwaste, Inc. David B. Hammond has served as a director of thc Company since August 1992. Mr. Hammond is also currently Deputy Chairman of ADT and has been on ADTs board of directors since September 1984. From 1981 to 1984. Mr. Hammond was a dircctor of Hawley Group PLC, the predecessor company of ADT. From 1973 to 1980, he was employed by Thorn -EMI PLC, in various senior financial positions including financial and commercial director of its Entertainment Division. Mr. Hammond is also a Chartered Accountant. James E. McGrath has served as a director of the Company since February 1992. Sincc April 1989, Mr. McGrath has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fairfax Capital Partners, Inc., a private investment firm. From June 1987 to April 1989. he was Managing Director of William E. Simon & Sons. Inc., a private merchant banking company. From September 1981 through June 1987, he was employed by EF Hutton & Company, Inc. where he served at various times as President of its venture capital subsidiary, head of thc firm's merchant banking operation and as a corporate Senior Vice President. From 1979 until 1981. Mr. McGrath was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of McLaughlin, Inc., a private construction firm. Mr. McGrath is Chairman of the Board and a director of Perceptron, Inc., a manufacturer of laser -based sensor and image processing systems. John Larkin Thompson has served as a director of the Company since August 1992. Mr. Thompson has been of counsel to the law firm Nutter, McClennen & Fish since January 1993. Mr. Thompson has been a director of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc. since 1987. From 1987 to September 1992, Mr. Thompson was President and Chief Executive Officer of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts. Inc. Mr. Thompson was President of Blue Shield of Massachusetts from 1970 until 1987 when the company merged with Blue Cross of Massachusetts. From 1964-4970 he was an attorney with the Boston law firm of Palmer & Dodge. During the past 20 years, Mr. Thompson has been a member of various regional and national health care related organizations, including the National Advisory Council on Health Care Technology Assessment. the Health Insurance Benefits Council and the Advisory Panel on National Health Insurance for the Subcommittee on Health. U.S. House of Representatives Ways and Means. Mr. Thompson also served as Vice Chairman of thc Massachusetts Advisory Board of Emergency Medical Services from 1975 to 1978. Mr. Thompson is a director of EG&G, Inc., a diversified, technical manufacturing company. Compensation vi Executive Officers The following table sets forth information with respect to compensation paid to or accrued in 1992 (beginning on the date in August 1992 when the Company acquired by merger four ambulance providers) on behalf of the Chief Executive Officer and each of the other four other most highly paid Executive Officers of the Company in 1992 (the "Named Executive Officers"). None of the Named Executive Officers has been granted any stock options. Base salary for Messrs. Verrochi and Puopolo was determined by the Company prior to its initial public offering. Base salary and certain perquisites for the other Named Executive Officers, who ars former stockholders of providers acquired by the Company, was determined by the board of directors of the Company at the timc of the acquisition of their companies. Additional compensation and increases in base salary for the Named Executive Officers will be determined by the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors. Summary Compensation Table Annual Compensation All Other Name and Principal Position Year Salary ° Mer(1) Compensation Paul M. Vcrrochi 1992 564.583 S — S— Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President Dominic J. Puopolo 1992 52,083 Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Paul T. Shirley 1992 63,462 9,198 2,083(2) Executive Vice President and Director Joseph R. Paolella 1992 60.577 — 3,000(3) Executive Vice President and Director William E Riggs 1992 X7,796 14,345 — Executive Vice President and Director (1) No Named Executive Officer, other than Messrs. Riggs and Shirley. received other compensation in excess of the lesser of $50.000 or 10% of his cash compensation. The amounts inclurtcd for Mr. Riggs and Mr. Shirley reflect the cost of perquisites provided to them by the Company, none of which exceed 259E of his total perquisites except for the cost of automobiles for Mr. Riggs of 513.095 and for Mr. Shirley of 57.998. (2) Represents the dollar values of insurance premiums paid by the Company for life insurance for the benefit of Mr. Shirley. Represents Company contributions under a profit sharing plan maintained by one of the Company's subsidiaries. (3) See footnote 8 to th. accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding certain relationships between the Company and certain of its directors and executive officers. Employment Agreements Messrs. Verrochi, Puopolo, Riggs, Shirley and Paolella have each entered into an employment agreement with the Company that entitles him to receive an annual base salary as well as such bonuses as may be authorized from time to timc by the Board of Directors. Each agreement has a term of three years expiring in 1995, with automatic extensions of ore year unless terminated, with a covenant -not -to -compete with the Company for a period of up to two years following termination of employment. The agreement requires the executive to devote his full time. attention and efforts to the business and affairs of the Company. If the Company terminates the agreement other than for cause. the Executive will be entitled to continue to receive his base salary through the end of the term. If termination is for cause as defined in the agreements, the Executive will be entitled to receive his bast salary through the date of termination. Base annual salaries for 1993 are Mr. Verrochi — S155.000, Mr. Puopolo — S125,000, Mr. Riggs — 5150.000. Mr. Shirley — S150.000 and Mr. Paolella — $150,000. 27 PRINCIPAL AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stack as of August 9, 1993 (i) individually by the Named Executive Officers and each dirt -.tor of the Company, (ii) by all executive officers and directors of the Company as a group. (iii) by each person known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the Company's outstanding Common Stock and (iv) by each of the Selling Stockholders. Except as noted below, each of the persons fisted has tole investment and voting power with respect to the shares indicated. The address of each executive officer and direct t; listed is c/o the Company. Executive Officers. Directors and S% Stockholders William E. Riggst•(4) Paul T. Shirleyt•(5) Paul M. Verrochit • (6) Dominic J. Puopolot•(7) Joseph R. Pa+lellat' James E. McGrath•(8) Michael A. Baker•(9) Michael J. McClymonl(10) John Larkin Thompson•(11) David B. Hammond• (I l ) All executive officers and directors as a group (12 persons)(12) Other Selling Stockholders Amount of Beneficial Ownership of Comsat Stock Prier to Offering Percentage Number of Ootstaadieg Sham Shares(2) 1,712,785 1,238,202 936,525 749.132 317,072 308,628 120,517 60.039 10.000 10.000 15.28% 11.05 8.36 6.68 2.83 2.75 1.08 et 5.735.193 51.06 Phillip Paolella, Jr. 292.073 Ladcnburg, Thalmann & Co. Inc.( 13) 180,000 Stephen Donohoe 160,752 Robert T. Allen(14) 67,658 Rosario Donohoe 53,584 Verrochi Family Charitable Trust (15) 25.000 Junemarie Verrochi(16) 50.000 Sonia M. Puopolo(16) 50.000 Andrea McGrath (16) 50.000 Donna McClvmont(16) 30.000 2.61 1.58 1.43 •• ie et es .• Amount of Beneficial Ownership of Comm. Steck After Offering(1) Number of Percentage Shares Outstanding �to Shses(2)(3) Oren-ellotmnt Number of Shares to Number of be Offered Shard 179,145 1,533,640 120,410 1,117,792 91,220 845,305 73.271 675,861 29.410 287,662 30.038 278,540 O 120,517 5,861 54,178 O 10,000 O 10,000 11.459E 8.35 6.31 5.05 2.15 2.08 •• 529,405 5,205,788 38.81 :3,435 278,638 180.000 0 15,615 145,137 6.340 61,318 5.205 48,379 25,000 0 4,875 45,125 4.875 45,125 4.875 45,125 2.925 27,075 2.08 0 1.08 •• 0 •• Odt •• 137,114 92,158 69,819 56.078 9.026 23.030 0 4,486 0 0 391.711 0 0 11.953 4,852 3.984 0 3,755 3,75. 3,755 2.253 t Named Executive Officer * Director of the Company. .• Less than one (1) percent. (1) Assumes no exercise of the Underwriters' over -allotment options. (2) Based on 11.208.720 shares outstanding on August 9, 1993. Includes shares icuable pursuant to warrants and options held by the respective person which may be exercised during the 60 days following the date of this Prospectus. (3) Includes the 2.000.000 sham offered by the Company hereby and 180.000 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants held by a Selling Stockholder. (4) Represents shares held by Mr. Riggs and Fr.. wife, Sharon Riggs. in a revocable trust for thcir benefit. (5) Represents 1.101.602 shares held by Mr. Slirley and his wife. Patricia Shirley, in a revocable trust for their benefit and 136,600 shares held by Mr. Shirley's children. as to which he disclaims beneficial ownership. (6) Includes (a) 50.000 sham held by Junemarie Verrochi. Mr. Verrochi's wife, as to which he disclaims beneficial ownership. of which 4.875 sham are being sold in the Offerings and an additional 3.755 shares arc subject to the Underwriters' overallotment options and (b) 25,000 shares to be transferred by Mr_ Verrochi to th_ Verrochi Family Charitable Trust. of whichMr. and Mrs. Verrochi arc the trustees. and which arc being sold in the Offerings. Includes 50.000 shares held by Sonia M. Puopolo. Mr. Puopolo's wife, as to which he disclaims beneficial ownership, of which 4.875 shares arc being sold in the Offerings and an additional 3,755 shares are subject to the Underwriters' overallotment options. Includes 50.000 shares held by Andrea McGrath, Mr. McGrath's wife, as to which he disc' 'ms beneficial ownership, of which 4,875 shares arc being sold in the Offerings and an additional 3.755 shares are subject to the Underwriters' overallotment options. (9) Owned by Wasatch Capital Corporation, a corporation owned by Mr. Baker's : hildren. Mr. Baker disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. (10) Includes 30,000 sham held by Donna McCIymont, Mr. McClymott's wife. as to which he disclaims beneficial ownership, of which 2.925 shares arc being sold in the Offerings and an additional 2.253 shares arc subject to the Underwriters' overallotment options. (11) Represents sham subject to currently exercisable options. (721 Includes shares issuahle pursuant to iptions held by executive officers and directors which may be exercised during the 60 -day period following the date of this Prospectus. (13) Represents shares issuable upon exercise of warrants to purchase Common Stack. (14) Includes 2.200 shares held by Mr. Allen's children, as to which he disclaims beneficial ownership and 2.500 shares subject to currently exercisable options (15) Represents shares that will be transferred to the Verrochi Famil} Charitable Trust by Mr. Verrochi after the effectiveness of the registration statement .4 which this Prospectus is a pan and prior to the execution of the Underwriting .Agreements. (16) Excludes shrires held ht the respective person's spouse as to which such person disclaims beneficial ownership. (71 w 28 r Shares Eligible for Future Sale Of the approximately 11,208,720 shares of Common Stock outstanding at August 9. 1993, approximately 7.2 million shares are "restricted securities" and may not be resold except pursuant to an effective registration statement or an applicable exemption from registration, including an exemption under Rule 144. The remaining shares are freely tradeable without restriction ,.:der the Securities Act, unless held by an "affiliate" of the Company as thal term is defined in Rule 144 undt.r the Securities Act (an "Affiliate") or in certain instances subject to certain restrictions under Rule 145. Approximately 4.2 million of the restricted shares were issued to former stockholders of providers acquired by the Company and are subject to contractual restrictions on transfer without the consent of the Company. These restrictions expire two years from the date of issuance of the shares. In August 1992. Messrs. Verrochi and Puopolo each entered into a Stock Restriction Agreement with the Company-, Mr. Riggs and Mr. Shirley which provides that 60% of' thc shares originally issued to him by the Company are subject to repurchase by the Company at $.01 per share in thc event of his voluntary resignation as an employee of the Company or the termination of his employment by the Company for cause. The restrictions lapse ratably each August over four years bcginning in August 1993. In addition, all restrictions lapse as to either Mr. Verrochi or Mr. Puopolo if he dies or is incapacitated. his employment is terminated by the Company other than for cause. the Company is a party to a merger or consolidation or sells all or substantially all of its assets. or either Mr. Riggs or Mr. Shirley voluntarily resigns his employment with the Company. is terminated by the Company for cause or fails to renew his employment agreement for an additional one year beyond the original three-year term. As of August 13, 1993. 422,336 shares held by Mr. Verrochi and 338,909 held by Mr. Puopolo remain subject to the restrictions. In general. under Rule 144 as currently in effect. a person (or persons whose shares are aggregated), including an Affiliate, who has beneficially owned "restricted securities" (as that term is defined in Rule 144) for a period of at least two years from the later of the date such restricted securities were acquired from the Company or the date they were acquired from an Affiliate, is entitled to sell, within any three-month period. a number of such securities that does not exceed the greater of l% of the then outstanding shares of the Company's Common Stock or the average weekly trading volume in thc Company's Common Stock during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of notice of such sale. Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to certain restriction. on the manner of sale. notice requirements. and the availability of current public information about tits Company. Affiliates may sell shares not constituting restricted securities in accordance with the foregoing volume limitations and other restrictions, but without regard to the two-year holding period. Further. under Rule 144(k), if a period of at leas::`.:.: mars has elapsed between the later of the date restricted securities were acquired from the Company and the date they were acquired from an Affiliate of thc Company. a holder of such restricted securities who is not an Affiliate of the Company at the time of the sale and has not been an Affiliate of the Company for at least three months prior to the sale would be entitled to sell the shares immediately without regard to the volume :imitations and other conditions described above. As of August 9, 1993. 1,578.112 shares of Common Stock are available for issuance under a shelf registration statement and generally will be freely tradeable after their issuance under Rule 145 (unless held by an Affiliate), subject to thc volume and manner of sale restrictions under Rule 144. In addition. the Company has filed S-8 registration statements under the Securities Act registering all 1.000.000 shares of Common Stock issuable under the Company's stock plans. Shares issued upon the exercise of options generally will be freely tradeable. At August 9. 1993, the Company had outstanding under its 1992 Equity Incentive Plan options to purchase approximately 428.350 shares, and options to acquire approximately 101.675 shares were then immediately exercisable. In addition. Advest Inc. holds warrants to purchase 120.000 shares of Common Stock which may be exercised at any time prior to August 5. 1997. Thc Company. each executive officer and director of the Company and the Selling Stockholders have agreed not to sell or otherwise dispose of any shares of Common Stock for a period of 180 days after the date of this Prospectus without the prior written consent of the Representatives of the U.S. Underwriters, except in the case of the Company in connection with certain permitted issuances described itt the Underwriting Agreements. In addition. Advest. Inc. has agreed not to sell or otherwise dispose of its warrants or shares issued upon exercise of the warrants for a period of 180 days after the date of this Prospectus. 29 St. Registration Rights After giving effect to the Offering. holders of approximately 6,000,000 shares of Common Stock will have the right, in the event the Company proposes to register under the Securities Act any Common Stock for its own account or for the account of others. subject to certain exceptions, to require the Company to include their shares in 'the registration, subject to the right of any managing underwriter of the offering to exclude some or all of the shares for marketing reasons. In addition, Advest, Inc., which holds warrants to purchase 120.000 shares of Common Stock, has the right until August 1997 to require the Company to file a registration statement covering the shares issued upon exercise of the warrants, subject to the Company's right to delay such registration for a 60 -day period under certain circumstances. The Company has also agreed to use its best. efforts to register for sale under the Securities Act shares of Common Stock issued to former stockholdera'of.. providers acquired thy Companyin the event that such holden are ' egti by required to indemnify the Cor-^an,r under the acquisition agreements. , 30 CERTAIN UNITED STATES TAX CONSEQUENCES TO FOREIGN HOLDERS The following is a discussion of certain anticipated Unit. -ti States incomc and estate tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of Common Stock applicable to Foreign Holders of Common Stock. For the purpose of this discussion, a "Foreign Holder" is any corporaticn, individual, partnership, estate or trust that is. as to the United States, a foreign corporation, a non-resident alien individual, a foreign partnership or a foreign estate or trust as such terms are defined in the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986. as amended (the "Code"). This discussion does not deal with all aspects of United States income and estate taxation. does not consider specific facts and circumstances which may be relevant to a particular Foreign Holder, and does not address foreign, state and local tax consequences which may be relevant to Foreign Holders. Furthermore, the following discussion is based on current provis;"is of the Code and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof as of the date hereof, all of which are subjcct to change. Prospective Foreign Holders are urged to consult their rat advisors regarding the United States federal, state, local and foreign income and other tax consequences of owning and disposing of Common Stock. Dividends Divjdends paid to a Foreign Holder of Common Stock will be subject to withholding of United States federal income tax at a 30% rate, or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty, unless either (i) the dividends are effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business by the Foreign Holder within the United States and the Foreign Holder properly files United States Internal Revenue Service Form 4224 (or such other applicable form that may be required by the internal Revenue Service) with the Company or its dividend paying agcnt or (ii) if a tax treaty applies, thc dividends arc attributable to a US. permanent establishment maintained by the Foreign Holder. if the dividends are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business or, if a tax treaty applies, are attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment, they wi:l be subject to the United States fedc_al income tax at the same rates :.pplicable to domestic corporations or U.S. citizens or residents, as the ase may be. In the case of a corporate Foreign Holder, such effectively connected income may also be subject to the U.S. branch profits tax, whic • is generally imposed at a 30% rate (or lower treaty rate) on the repatriated portion of the foreign corpora .ti. n's earnings and profits which are effectively connected with thc conduct of a trade or business within the United States. Foreign Holders which are partnerships or trusts may be :,object to certain additional withholding requirements. Under current United States Treasury Regulations. dividends paid to an address outside thc United States are presumed to be paid to a resident of such country for purposes of the withholding tax discussed above and. under the current interpretation of United States Treasury Regulations. for purposes of determining the applicability of a tax treaty rate. However, under proposed United States Treasury Regulations not currently in effect, a Foreign Holder of Common Stock who wishes to claim the benefit of an applicable treaty rate would be required to satisfy certain certification and other requirements. A Foreign Holder of Common Stock eligible for a reduced rate of United States withholding tax pursuant to a tax treaty may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld by filing an appropriate claim for refund with the internal Revenue Service within the time period applicable to such claims. Disposition of Common Stock A Foreign Holder generally will rJt be subject to United States federal income tax or any gain realized upon the sale or other disposition of Common Stock. unless (i) such gain is effectively connected with thc conduct of a United States trade or business of the Foreign Holder, (ii) the Foreign Holder is an individual who has a tax home in the United States and is present in the United States for a period or periods aggregating 183 days or more during the taxable year in which such disposition occurs and certain other conditions a -c met. (iii) the Foreign holder is a former citizen of the United States whose loss of citizenship within the preceding ten-year period had as one of its principal purposes the avoidance of United States tax, or (iv) the Company is, or has been at any time during the live -year period preceding the disposition, a "United States real property holding corporation" and thc Foreign Holder directiy or indirectly owned more than 5% of the vaiue of the outstanding Common Stock at any time during such five-year period. Generally, a corporation is a 31 "United States real property holding corporation" if the fair market value of its United States real property interests equals or exceeds 50% of the sum of the fair market value of its worldwide real property interests plus its other assets used or held for use in a trade or business. Foreign holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the rate at which their gain, if any, on the sale of Common Stock would be taxed if they meet any one of the four conditions described above. Backup Withholding and Information Reporting The Company must report annually to the internal Revenue Service and to each Foreign Holder the amounts of dividends paid and tax withheld with respect to such Foreign Holder's shares of Common Stack These information reporting requirements apply regardless of whether withholding was reduced or eliminated by an applicable tax treaty. This information may also be made available to the tax authorities of the country in which the Forcign Holder resides. United States backup withholding tax (imposed at a rate of 31% on dividends paid to certain holders who fail to provide in the required manner such identifying information, as the holder's name, address and taxpayer identification number, or under certain other circumstances) generally does not apply to dividends that arc subject to the 30% U.S. withholding tax or reduced tax treaty rate or to dividends paid to a Foreign Holder at an address outside the United States or otherwise to a Foreign Holder who is an "exempt recipient' (such as a corporation). The payment of the proceeds of a Foreign Holder's disposition of Common Stock to.or through a United States office of a broker will be subject to information reporting and backup withholding, unless the Foreign Holder certifies, among othcr things, its status as a Foreign Holder or otherwise establishes an exemption from backup withholding. The payment of the proceeds of a Foreign Holder's disposition of Common Stock to or through a non -United States office of a broker will not be subject to information reporting or backup withholding, unless the broker is a United States person, a controlled foreign corporation for United States tax purposes or a foreign person 50% or more of whose gross income was effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States during the three-year period ending with the close of the taxable year preceding the year of payment, in which case information reporting will apply to such payment unless such broker has documentary evidence in its files of the payee's non -United States status and has no actual knowledge to the contrary, or the payee otherwise establishes an exemption. The backup withholding and information reporting rules arc under review by the Internal Revenue Service and their application to Forcign Holders could be changed by the adoption of proposed regulation or the issuance of new regulations. Estate Tax Common Stock owned, or treated as owned. by a nonresident alien individual at the time of his death will be included in such holder's gross estate for United States federal estate tax purposes and thus will be subject to United States federal estate tax. unless an applicable estate tax treaty provides otherwise. 32 UNDERWRITING The underwriters of the United States Offering of the Common Stock (the "U.S. Underwriters"), for whom Lehman Brothers Inc., Kidder, Peabody & Co_ Incorporated and Advcst, Inc. are acting as representatives (thc "Representatives"), have severally agreed, subject to thc terms and conditions of thc U.S. Underwriting Agreement. the form of which is filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement, to purchase from the Company and thc Selling Stockholders, and the Company and the Selling Stockhol&rs have agreed to sell to the U.S. Underwriters. the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock sct forth opposite their respective names below: ?Somber of US. Underwriters Shares Lehman Brothers Inc Kidder, Peabody & Co. Incorporated Advest. Inc. Total 2,200.000 The managers of the International Offering of the Common Stock (the "International Managers"), for whom Lehman Brothers International (Europe), Kidder, Peabody International Limitcd and Advcst, Inc. arc acting as lead managers (thc "Lead Managers"), have severally agreed, subject to the terms and conditions of thc International Underwriting Agreement, the form of which is filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement, to purchase from thc Company and the Selling Stockholders, and the Company and the Selling Stockholders have agreed to sell to the International Managers, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock set forth opposite their respective names below: Number of International Managers Shares Lehman Brothers International (Europe) Kidder, Peabody International Limited Advest, Inc. Total 550.000 The U.S. Underwriting Agreement and the International Underwriting Agreement (collectively, thc "Underwriting Agreements") provide that thc obligations of the several U.S. Underwriters and the Interna- tional Managers to purchase shares of Common Stock are subject to the certain conditions contained therein, and that if any of the foregoing shares of Compton Stock are purchased by the U.S. Underwriters pursuant to the U.S. Underwriting Agreement or by the International Managers pursuant to the International Underwrit- 33 ing Agreement. all the shares of Common Stock agreed to be purchased by either the U.S. Underwriters or the international Managers. as thc case may be. pursuant to their respective Underwriting Agreements must be so purchased. Thc offering price and underwriting discounts and commissions for the United States Offering and the international Offering are identical. The closing of the United States Offering is a condition to the closing of the International Offering. and thc closing of thc International Offering is a condition to the closing of the United States Offering. The Company has been advised that the U.S. Underwriters and the International Managers propose to offer the shares of Common Stock directly to the public at the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this Prospectus, and to certain selected dealers (who may include the U.S. Underwriters and the International Managers) at such public offering price Tess a selling concession not in excess of $ per share. The selected dealers may reallow a concession not in excess of S per share to certain brokers and dealers. After the initial public offering, the public offering price. the concession to selected dealers and the reallowancc may be changed by the Representatives and the Lead Managers. The U.S. Underwriters and the International Managers have entered into an Agreement between U.S. Underwriters and international Managers pursuant to which each U.S. Underwriter has agreed that. as a part of the distribution of thc shares of Common Stock offered in the United States Offering, (a) it is not purchasing any such shares for the account of anyone other than a U.S. person and (b) it has not offered or sold, and will not offer, sell, resell or deliver. directly or indirectly. any of such shares or distribute any prospectus relating to the United States Offering to anyone other than a U.S. person. In addition, pursuant to this same Agreement, each International Manager has agreed that, as part of the distribution of the shares of Common Stock offered in the International Offering, (a) it is not purchasing any of such shares for the account of any U.S. person and (b) it has not offered or sold, and will not offer, sell or deliver. directly or indirectly, any of such shares or distribute any prospectus relating to the International Offering to any U.S. person. The foregoing limitations do not apply to stabilization transactions or to certain other transactions specified in the Underwriting Agreements and the Agreement between U.S. Underwriters and international Managers. including (i) certain purchases and sales between the U.S. Underwriters and the international Managers. (ii) certain offers, sales, resales, deliveries or distributions to or through investment advisors or other persons exercising investment discretion. (iii) purchases. offers or sales by a U.S. Underwriter who is also acting as an International Manager or by an International Manager who is also acting as a U.S. Underwriter and (iv) other transactions specifi, 'ly approved by the Representatives and the Lead Managers. Pursuant to the Agreement between U.S. Underwriters and International Managers, sales may be made between the U.S. Underwriters and thc International Managers of such number of shares of Common Stock as may be mutually agreed. Thc price of any shares so sold shall be the public offering price as then in effect for Common Stock being sold by the U.S. Underwriters and the international Managers. less an amount not greater than the selling concession allocable to such Common Stock. To the extent that there are sales between the U.S. Underwriters and the International Managers pursuant to the Agreement between U.S. Underwriters and International Managers. the number of shares initially available for sale by the U.S. Underwriters or by the International Managers may be more or Tess than the amount specified on the cover page of this Prospectus. Each International Manager has represented and agreed that (i) it has not offered or sold, and will not offer or sell. in the United Kingdom, by means of any documents. any shares of Common Stock other than to persons whose ordinary business it is to buy or sell shares or debentures, whether as principal or agent (except under circumstances which do not constitute an offer to the public within the meaning of the Companies Act of 1985): (ii) it has complied and will comply with all applicable provisions of the Financial Services Act of 1986 with respect to anything done by it in relation to the Common Stock in, from or otherwise involving the United Kingdom. and (iii) it has only issued or passed on. and will only issue or pass on to any person in the United Kingdom, any document received by it in connection with the issue of the Common Stock if that person is of a kind described in Article 9(3) of the Financial Services Act of 1986 (investment Advertise- ments) (Exemptions) Order 1988. 34 No action has been taken in any jurisdiction by the Company or thc International Managers that would permit a public offering of the shares offered pursuant to the Offerings in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required, other than the United States. Persons into whose possession this Prospectus comes are required by the Company and the International Managers to inform themselves about and to observe any restrictions as to the offering of the shares offered pursuant to the Offerings and the distribution of this Prospectus. Purchascrs of the shares offered hereby may be required to pay stamp taxes and other charges in accordance with the laws and practices of the country of purchase in addition to the offering price set forth on the cover hereof. Selling Stockholders have granted to the US. Underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 330,000 shares of Common Stock and the International Managers have been granted a similar option to purchase up to an additional 82,500 shares of Common Stock at the initial public offering price less the aggregate underwriting discount. solely to cover over -allotments if any. The options may bc exercised at any time up to 30 days after thc date of this Prospectus. To the extent that the U.S. Underwriters or the International Managers exercise such options, each of the U.S. Underwriters or the International Managers, as the case may be, will be committed, subject to certain conditions, to purchase a numbcr of option shares proportionate to such US. Underwriter's or International Manager's initial commitment. The Company and its executive officers and directors, and the Selling Stockholders, have agreed not to offer, sell or otherwise dispose of any shires of Common Stock for a period of 180 days after the date of this Prospectus without prior written consent of the Representatives, except in thc case of thc Company in connection with certain permitted issuances described in the Underwriting Agreements. Advest, Inc., which holds warrants to purchase 120,000 shares of Common Stock, has also agreed not to offer, sell or otherwise dispose of such shares for a period of 180 days after thc date of this Prospectus without the prior written consent of the other Representatives. The Company and the Selling Stockholders have agreed to indemnify the U.S. Underwriters and the International Managers against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, or to contribute to payments that the U.S. Underwriters and International Managers may be required to make in respect thereof. Advest. Inc. received its warrants as partial compensation for acting as an underwriter in the Company's initial public offering. Since the Company's initial public offering, Advest, Inc. has earned an aggregate of approximately $335.000 from the Company for consulting services rendered in connection with the structuring and negotiating of thc Company's line of credit and the implementation of the Company's acquisition program. Since October 23. 1992, the services provided to the Company by Advest, Inc. have been governed by a letter agreement which provides for fees to be paid by the Company to Advest. Inc. for specified and ongoing services and for success fees negotiated on a transaction by transaction basis. Following the effectiveness of the Registration Statement of which this Prospectus is a part, and until the execution and delivery of thc Underwriting Agreements by the Verrochi Family Charitable Trust, the Verrochi Family Charitable Trust. one of the proposed Selling Stockholders. may sell the 25,000 shares to be sold by it in a transaction n- transactions other than to the U.S. Underwriters and the International Managers. Such sales may be effected on the New York Stock Exchange, in a negotiated transaction or otherwise. at prevailing market prices or negotiated prices. The shares may be sold through one or more broker-dealers, who may be deemed to be underwriters with respect to such shares. LEGAL MATTERS The validity of the Shares offered hereby will bc passed upon for the Company by Ropes & Gray. Boston, Massachusetts, Keith F. Higgins, a partner with Ropes & Gray. is secretary of thc Company. Certain legal matters related to this Offering will be passed upon for the Underwriters by Fulhright & Jaworski L.L.P., New York. New York. 35 EXPERTS The audited consolidated financial statements of thc Company listed in the index to Financial Statements on page F-1, and included herein, and the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 1991 of Buck Medical Services, Inc. and as of and for the years ended December 31, 1992 and 1991 of Randle Eastern Ambulance Service Inc. incorporated herein by reference have been included herein and in the Registration Statcmcnt in reliance upon the reports of KPMG Peat Marwick, independent certified public accountants, appearing elsewhere herein or incorporated herein by reference, and upon thc authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing. The audited financial statements of Mobile Medic Ambulance Service, Inc. incorporated herein by - •fercnce have been incorporated herein in reliance upon the reports of Arthur Andersen & Co., independent . ablic accountants, incorporated herein by reference, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing. The audited financial statements of Ambulance Service Company incorporated herein by reference have been incorporated by reference in reliance upon the reports of Gelfond Hochstadt Pangburn Stark & Co., independent certified public accountants, incorporated by reference, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Company has filed with the Commission a Registration Statement with respect to the Common Stock offered hereby. This Prospectus. filed as part of the Registration Statement, does not contain all the information contained in the Registration Statement. certain portions of which have been omitted in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Commission. For further information with respect to the Company and the Common Stock offered hereby, reference is made to the Registration Statement including the exhibits anal schedules thereto. Statements contained in this Prospectus as to the contents or any contract or any other document are not necessarily complete, and in each instance, reference is made to thc copy of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement. each such statement being qualified in all respects by such reference. All of these documents may ba inspected without charge at the Public Reference Section of the Commission at Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies can also be obtained from the Commission at prescribed rates. 36 T INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Consolidated Financial Statements Independent Auditors' Report F-2 Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30. 1993 (unaudited) and December 31, 1992 and 1991 F-3 Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the Six Months Ended June 30, 1993 and 1992 (unaudited) and for the Years Ended December 31, 1992, 1991 and 1990 F-4 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30. 1993 (unaudited) and for the Years Ended December 31. 1992. 1991 and 1990 F-5 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 1993 and 1992 (unaudited) and for the Years Ended December 31, 1992. 1991 and 1990 F-6 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-8 Pro Forma Financial Statements Introduction F-21 Pro Forma Statement of Earnings for the Six Months Ended June 30, 1993 F-22 Pro Forma Statement of Earnings for the Year Ended December 31, 1992 F-23 Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Statements F-24 F- 1 Independent Auditors' Report The Board of Directors American Medical Response, Inc.: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of American Medical Response, Inc. and subsidiaries (the `Company") as of December 31, 1992 and 1991, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year, period ended December 31, 1992. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the". Company's managcmcnt. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. • We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements arc free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the. amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of American Medical Response, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 3!, 1992 and 1991, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1992, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Boston. Massachusetts February 25. 1993, except as to Note 1 (Basis of Presentation) which is as of June 1. 1993 KPMG Peat Marwick F-2 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE. INC. Consolidated Balance Sheets Jane 30, December 31, 1993 1992 1991 (unaudited) Assets Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents 5 5,909 514,600 S 3,542 Short tcrm investments — 260 925 Accounts receivable, less allowance for uncompensated care of 516,191, 511,655 and 510,843 28,082 22,655 19.672 Advances to stockholders and affiliated parties — — 973 Inventories 1,152 867 748 Prepaid expenses and other receivables 2,888 3.515 2,181 Deferred income taxes 5,571 4,472 — Total current assets 43,602 46.369 28,041 Property and equipment, net 15.125 10,555. 9.620 Non-current assets: Cost in excess of net assets acquired, net 29,146 11,153 399 Covenants not to compete, net - 544 735 .1,009 Other 1,975 2,036 995 Total non-current assets 31,665 " 13.924 2,403 Total assets S90.392 S70.848 540,064 Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity Current liabilities: Accounts payable S 4,264 5 3.607 5 3,159 Accrued compensation, benefits and taxes 6.273 5,094 3.964 Accrued expenses 5,536 2,787 1,627 income taxes payable 2,068 2,320 2,420 Deferred income taxes — — 1,321 Current maturities of debt 911 5.465 5,137 Total current liabilities 19,052 19,273 17,628 Non-current liabilities: Long-term debt 18,014 7,875 8,031 Subordinated note payable to related party 1,100 1.100 — Deferred income taxes 4,142 4.240 911 Other liabilities 676 1.144 623 Total non-current liabilities 23.932 14.359 9,565 Total liabilities 42,984 33,632 27.193 Stockholders' equity: Preferred stock. S.01 par value. 500.000 shares authorized, none issued Common stock, 5.01 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 11,126.813, 10,683,828 and 391,459 shares issued and outstanding 111 107 4 Common stock, predecessor companies — — 90 Additional paid -in capital 27,385 21.300 299 Retained earnings 19.912 15.809 12,528 Note receivable from stockholders — — (50) Total stockholders' equity 47,408 37,216 12,871 Commitments and contingencies Total liabilities and stockholders' equity S90.392 570.848 540.064 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. F-3 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. Consolidated Statements of Earnings (in thousands) Total revenue Operating expenses: Salaries and benefits Uncompensated care Other operating expenses Depreciation Amortization of intangibles Total operating expenses Earnings from operations Interest expense, net Earnings before income taxes Income taxes Net earnings PRO FORMA DATA (UNAUDITED — SEE NOTE 4) Historical net earnings Pro forma income taxes (benefit) Pro forma net earnings Pro forma net earnings per common share Weighted average common shares outstanding For the Stn Months Ended Jane 30, 1993 1992 (unaudited) $86,190 $58,343 S121.192 $108,018 S84,870 For the 'Fear Ended December 31, 1992 1991 1990 42,279 29,114 60,577 52,009 40,922 19,116 13,659 28,008 25,862 19.769 14.090 8,946 18,377 16.640 14,554 2,363 1,752 3,396 3,079 2.766 659 273 561 927 1.313 78,507 53,744 110,919 98.517 79,324 7,683 4,599 10.273 9.501 5,546 433 532 784 1.216 1,266 7,250 4,067 9.489 8,285 4,280 3.147 1,665 4.250 3.442 1.752 S 4,103 S 2.402 S 5.239 S 4.843 S 2.528 $ 4,103 $ 2,402 S 5.239 $ 4,843 $ 2.528 51 (678) 149 128 $ 4,103 S 2.351 S 5.917 8 4.694 S 2.400 S 0.38 $ 0.30 S 0.67 $ 0.59 $ 0.30 10.916 7,968 8.838 7,968 7,968 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements_ F-4 r AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE. INC. Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (in thousands) COMMON Common Steck Steck Additional Taal Predecessor Paid -i. Retrials/ Notes Stockholders' Shares .Amount C..paks G al Europe Receira/k Equity Balance at December 31, 1989, as previously reported — 5— S 91 5 272 S 5,854 S— S 6,217 Restatement for business acquired as a pooling-of-int..rests 391 4 33 478 515 Balance at December 31, 1989, as restated 391 4 91 305 6.332 — 6,732 Note re'eivabk from officer for purchase common stock — — — — — (60) (60). Distributions to stockholders — — — — (475) — (475) Net earnings i — 2.528 2,528 Balance at December 31. 1990 391 4 91 305 8,385 (60) 8,725 Repayment of note receivable — — — — — 10 10 Stock repurchase — — (1) (6) (700) — (707) Net earnings — i — 4,843 4,843 Balance at December 31. 1991 391 4 90 299 12,528 (50) 12,871 Repurchase and retirement of common stock — Regional — — (1) (12) (1.803) — (1,816) Initial issuance of common stock 2,730 27 — 48 — (1) 74 Repurchase and retirement of common stock (510) (5) — (9) — — (14) Distribution to stockholders — Professional — — --. (155) — (155) Issuance of stock 3,000 30 — 21.435 — — 21.465 Distribution of cash portion of purchase price for acquisition of Predecessor Companies — — — (10,'95) — — (10,195) Distribution of stock portion of purchase price for acquisitions and elimination of Predecessor Companies stock 4.143 42 (89) 47 Repayment of notes receivable — — — — — 51 51 Issuance of common stock 300 3 — 2.369 — — 2.372 Stock options exercised, including related tax benefit 18 — — 197 — — 197 Issuance of stock in connection with acquisitions 611 6 — 7.121 — — 7,127 Net earnings — — 5,239 5.239 Balance at December 31. 1992 10,683 i07 — 21.300 15,809 — 37.216 Issuance of stock in conrcction with acquisitions 432 4 — 5,939 — — 5,943 Stock options exercised. including related tax benefit 12 — — 146 — — 146 Net earnings — — 4.103 4,103 Balance at June 30. 1993, (unaudited) 11,127 5111 5— S 27,385 519.912 5-- 5 47,408 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. F-5 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands) For the Si; Moatbs Ended Ju.e 30, For the Year Ended December 31, 1993 1992 1992 1991 1990 (ataiidited) Cash flows from operating activities: Net earnings S 4,103 $ 2.402 $ 5.239 $ 4,844 $'2,528 Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: Dcprcciation 2,363 1,752 3,396 3,079 2,766 Amortization 659 273 561 927 1,313 Deferred income taxes (785) — (2,421) 1,002 784 Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: Accounts receivable (619) 144 (499) (5.391) (1,848) Other current asscts 755 (350) (1,208) (239) (132) Other asscts 98 54 (1,008) 404 (1,058) Accounts payable and accrued expenses (134) 153 (298) 81 1.249 Accrued compensation, benefits and taxes (298) 69 383 1.711 503 Income taxes payable (378) 234 (410) 6 (463) Other liabilities (468) — 524 (156) 448 Net cash p•.ovidcd by operating activitie. 5.296 4,731 4,259 6,268 6,090 Cash flows from investing activities: Acquisition of Predecessor Companies — — (10,195) Acquisitions, net of cash acquired (11,282) — (1,785) — — Purchase of short term investments (85) — (930) (777) Proc.-e& from sale of short term investments 260 — 665 634 73 Purchase of property and equipment, net (2,980) (1,247) (1,460) (3,763) (1,927) Purchase of stock and covenant not to compete — — — (375) Repayment of advances to related parties — (62) 332 Net cash used for investing activities 8(14.002) 8(1,394) $ (12,443) $ (4,434) $(2,631) F-6 o>16.34,N, A AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. Consolidated Staten:cats of Cash Flows— (Continued) (in thousands) For rhe Six Months Ended Jane 30. For the Year Ended December 31. 1993 1992 1992 1991 1990 (unandited) Cash iiows from financing activities: Proceeds from issuance of common stock $ — S 74 S 23,911 S -- S — Repurchase and retirement of common stock — — (314) Proceeds from exercise of stock options 93 — 127 — Net borrowings under credit frcility 14,139 — — — — Procecds from borrowings — — 1,407 3,144 1,811 Repayment of borrowings (14,217) (915) (5,864) (4,321) (3,942) Principal payments on capital lease obligations — — (562) (127) (172) Net advances to stockholders — (474) 641 (300) 66 Distribution to stockholders — (155) — (475) Repayment of notes receivable for stock — — 51 10 Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities 15 (1.315) 19.242 (1,594) (2,712 ) Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (8,691) 2,022 11,058 240 747 Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period 14,600 3342 3.542 3.302 2,555 Cash and cash equivalents, end of pcnod. S 5.909 S 5,564 S 14,600 $ 3.542 $ 3,302 Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid during the period for. Interest S 567 S 601 S 1,144 $ 1,398 $ 1,485 Income taxes S 4,276 S 1,677 S 7,026 $ 1,749 $ 1.291 Supplemental schedule of non-cash transactions: Issuance If debt and equipmert for repurchase of Predecessor Company common stock S — S — S 1,516 $ 332 $ Issuance of debt for non -compete agreement S — S — $ 240 $ 340 Issuance of debt for equipment purchases $ — S — $ 791 $ 579 $ 2,361 Property acquired under capital lease S — S — S 38 S 189 $ 471 Acquisitions: Assets acquired S 30.001 S — S 17,037 S — S — Liabilities assumed and issued (11,794) — (6,710) — — Common stock issued (5.943) — (7,127) Cash paid 12.264 — 3.200 Less cash acquired (982) — (1,415) — Net cash paid for acquisitions S 11.282 $ — S 1,785 S — 5 — See accoa:panying notes to consolidated financial statements. F-7 r AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 1992, 1991 and 1990 (1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation The consolidated financial statements of American Medical Response, Inc. and subsidiarics ("Ameri- can' or the "Company") have been prepared to give retroactive effect to the merger with Randle Eastern Ambulance Service, Inc. on June, 1993, which was accounted for as a pooling -of -interests. Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of American Medical Response, Inc. ("American" or the "Company") and its subsidiaries; American Medical Response West, formerly Vanguard Ambulance Services ("AMR West"). Regional Ambulance. Inc. ("Regional"), New Haven Ambulance Services, Inc. ("New Haven"). Professional Ambulance Services, Inc. ("Professional"), Mobile Medic Ambulance Service ("Mobile Medic"). Ambulance Service Company ("Ambulance Service') and Randle Eastern Ambulance Service, Inc. ("Randle"). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Reclassifications Certain amounts for the prior periods have been reclassified to conforrn with the current period presentation. Cash and Cash Equivalents For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Short Term Investments Short term investments consist primarily of marketable equity securities which are stated at lower of cost or market. Accounts Receivable and Net Revenue Accounts receivable and net revenue are reported at the estimated net billable amounts due from patients, third -party payors and others for services rendered. net of contractual adjustments. which represent the difference between gross billable charges and the portion of those charges allowable by third -party payors. L'^eontpensared Care Uncompensated carc results when ambulance service is provided to patients for which the Company receives no reimbursement. The Company expects payment for its charges each time ambulance transporta- tion is provided. Inventories Inventories consist primarily of medical supplies and are stated at the lower of cost (first -in. first -out) or market. F -R 1 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE. INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 1992. 1991 and 1990 Property and Equipment Property and equipment arc stated at cost. Property and equipment under capital leases are stated at the present value of minimum !case payments at the inception of the lease. Depreciation and amortization arc provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of property and equipment. Estimated useful lives for major assct categories are 4 years for vehicles, 20 years for buildings, 3-7 years for equipment and 3-5 years for furniture and fixtures. Equipment held under capital leases and leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the least tcrm or estimated useful life of the asset. Amortization of assets subject to capital leases is included in depreciation expense. Cost in Excess of Net Assets Acquired Cost in excess of net assets acquired is amortized straight-line over the period of expected benefit. but not in excess of twenty-five years. Accumulated amortization amounted to 598,000 and 551,000 at December 31, 1992 and 1991. respectively. Covenants Not To Compete Covenants not to compete are amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the agreements. Income Taxes Income taxes are ,,rovided based upon provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No 109. "Accounting for Income Taxes", which requires recognition of deferred income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method. deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of "temporary differences" by applying enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future years to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. The etTect on the deferred taxes of changes in the tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Earnings Per Share Earnings per share are computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding plus common stock equivalents related to stock options and warrants. if such common stock equivalents cause dilution in earnings per share in excess of 3%. Earnings per share for all periods prior to the initial public offering have been computed based on weighted average shares outstanding of 7.967,548 which consist of (i) 2,220.001 founders shares outstanding prior to the initial public offering. (ii) 4.143.500 shares issued in connection with the merger described in note 2. (iii) 1.199.412 shares to reflect on a pro forma basis the sale of a sufficient number of shares to provide funds to pay the S10,195.000 cash portion of the purchase price of the merger. (iv) 391,459 shares issued in connection with the acquisition of Randle and (v) 13.176 shares considered as outstanding as a result of the application of the treasury stock method to certain outstanding options. F-9 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 1992, 1991 and 1990 (2) Reorganization and Acquisitions The Merger and Reorganization In August, 1992, concurrent with the initial public offering of the Company's common stock, the Company acquired by merger four ambulance service providers, Regional, AMR West, New Haven and Professional (the "Predecessor Companies"). Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreements with each of the Predecessor Companies, the Company paid a total of 510.195,000 in cash and 4.:43,500 shares of common stock for such companies as set forth below. Regional — The Company acquired by merger all of the outstanding shares of Regional for 52,830,000 in cash and 1,991,859 shares of common stock. The Company also entered into a five-year non -competition agreement and a three-year employment contract with one of the stockholders and appointed such stockholder to the Company's board of directors. AMR West — The Company acquired by merger all of the outstanding shares of AMR West for 53,800,000 in cash and 1,303,160 shares of common stock. An additional 100.000 shares of common stock will be paid in the event that AMR West obtains a particular contract for emergency ambulance services by March 1994. The Company also entered into five-year non -competition agreements and three-year employment agreements with two stockholders and appointed one of the stockholders to the Company's board of directors. New Haven — The Company acquired by merger all of the outstanding shares of Ncw Haven for 82,940,000 in cash and 634,145 shares of common stock. The Company also entered into five-year non -competition agreements with two stockholders, a three-year employment contract with one stockholder and appointed such stockholder to the Company's board of directors. Professional — The Company acquired by merger all of the cutstanding shares of Professional for 5625,000 in cash and 214,336 shares of common stock. The Company also catered into five-year non -competition agreements and three-year employment contracts with the two stockholders of Professional. The consolidated operations of American subsequent to the transaction are substantially identical to the combined operations of the individual Predecessor Companies prior to the transaction. Additionally, as a result of the mergers. the owners of the Predecessor Companics are significant stockholders of American. Accordingly. the aforementioned mergers were accounted for as a combination of the Predecessor Companies and American at historical cost. The assets and liabilities are presented at their historical values and stockholders' equity has not been adjusted as a result of the mergers. F-10 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE. LNC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31. 1992, 1991 and 1990 Acquisition Accounted for as a Pooling -of -Interests In June 1993, the Company acquired all the outstanding common stack of Randle Eastern Ambu- lance, Inc. in exchange for 391,459 shares of the Company's common stock in a transaction accounted for as a pooling -of -interests. Restated total revenue and pro forma net earnings of the Company are summarized below: 1992 1991 1990 Total Pro Forma Total Pro Forma Total Pro Ferns Re,tnse Net Earnings Reresse Net Earnings Rerease Net Earnings The Company, as previously reported S 106,433 S5.670 S 94.104 S4.306 S 73.148 $2.091 Randle 14.759 247 13.914 388 11.722 309 The Company, as restated S121.192 55,917 5108.018 54.694 S 84,870 $2,400 To reflect the pooling -of -interests discussed above, pro forma earnings per share has been restated to 50.67, 50.59 and S0.30 versus 50.67, 50.57 and 50.28 as previously reported for the years ended December 31, 1992, 199! and 1990. respectively. Acquisitions Accounted for as a Purchase During 1992, the Company also acquired two providers of emergency and nen-emergency pre -hospital transportation. On November 4. 1992, the Company acquired Mobile Medic Ambriance Service, Inc.. located in Gulfport, Mississippi and on December 23. 1992. the Company acquired Ambulance Service Company, located in Denver. Colorado. The total paid consisted of 53.2 million in cash, $1 .780,000 in subordinated promissory notes and 611,268 shares of the Company's common stock. The acquisitions have been accounted for as purchases and. accordingly. their results of operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements from their date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price and expenses associated with the acquisition over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill. The following unaudited pro forma results of operations give effect to the acquisitions as if the transactions had occurred at the beginning of 1991. Such pro forma financial information reflects certain adjustments including amortization of goodwill. income tax effects, and the increase in the weighted average shares outstanding. This pro forma information does not necessarily reflect the results of operations which would have occurred had the acquisition taken place at the beginning of the respective years and is not necessarily indicative of results which may be obtained in the future (in thousands, except per share amounts): 1992 1991 (Unaudited) Total revenue S139,490 5124,259 Earnings before income taxes 10.824 8,396 Net earnings 5.818 4,723 Pro forma net earnings E.414 4,594 Pro forma earnings per share 0.69 0.53 F-11 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 1992, 1991 and 1990 (3) Property and Equipment Property and Equipment Property and equipment consist of the following at Dcccmbcr 31 (in thousands): 1992 1991 Vehicles S13,676 $11,669 Land, buildings and leasehold improvements 1,305 1,255 Equipment 5.739 5,615 Furniture and fixtures 2.434 1,850 23,154 20,389 Less accumulated depreciation 12,599 10,769 Net property and equipment S10.555 S 9,620 Operating Leases The Company is obligated under a number of non -cancelable operating leases for premises and equipment expiring in various years through the year 2000. Total rent expense amounted to 52,611,000, 52,328.000 and $1,756.000 for the ycars ended December 31. 1992, 1991 and 1990, respectively. Minimum future rentals under non -cancelable operating leases (including leases with related parties discussed in Note 8) as of December 31 are as follows (in thousands): Amount 1993 $ 2,355 1994 2,146 1995 1,864 1996 1,479 1997 987 Thereafter 1,664 Total minimum lease payments 510,495 F-12 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 1992, 1991 and 1990 (4) Income Taxes The components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31 are as follows (in thousands): 1992 1991 Dcfcrrol tax assets: Allowance for uncompensated care $ 4,522 $ 1,663 Accrued expenses and other liabilities 2,150 23 Other 98 38 6,770 1,724 Deferred tax liabilities: Cash to accrual accounting — 3,045 Intangible assets 107 — Property and equipment 841 635 Change in accounting method 5,552 82 Other 38 194 (6,538) (3,956) Net deferred asset (liability) S 232 $(2.232) At December 31, the net deferred tax asset (liability) consists of the following (in thousands): 1992 1991 Deferred income tax asset (liability) — current S 4,472 $(1,321) Deferred income tax asset (liability) — long term (4,240) (911) Net deferred income tax asset (liability) S 232 $(2,232) Included in the gross deferred tax assets and liabilities are deferred tax (benefits) and deferred tax expense of S(438.000) and S395.000. respectively. relating to allowances for uncompensated care and a change in accounting method, recorded as a result of the acquisitions of Mobile Medic a•.1 Ambulance Service Company. The provisions for Federal and state income taxes for the years ended December 3I consists of the following (in thousands): 1992 1991 1990 Current: Federal $ 5,454 $1,939 S 846 State 1,217 533 126 6,671 2,472 972 Deferred: Federal (1,859) 707 608 State (562) 263 172 (2,421) 970 780 Total S 4.250 $3,442 51,752 F-13 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 1992, 1991 and 1990 For the year ended December 31, 1992. income tax benefits of $70,000 were allocated to additional paid - in capital for tax benefits associated with the exercise of non-qualified stock options. The following table reconciles the Federal statutory incomc tax rate and the Company's effective income tax rate for the years ended December 31: 1992 1991 1990 Provision for income taxes at Federal statutory rate 34.0% 34.0- % 34.0- % State taxes. net of Federal benefit 5.7 6.7 6.5 Amortization of goodwill .2 1.3 3.2 Subchapter S earnings (.7) (2.1) (3.4) Change in tax status 8.6 — — Other. nct (3.0) 1.6 .6 44.8% 41.5% 40.9% Change in Tax Accounting Method In connection with the mergers discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, certain operating entities changed from the cash to the accrual method of accounting for tax purposes. The resulting difference in taxable income is being recognized for tax purposes over a four-year period beginning with the current year. Change in Tax Status Prior to the merger with the Company. one of the Predecessor Companies was taxed as an S corporation. As an S corporation. income taxes were not required to be provided in this subsid ary's financial statements. In August 1992, concurrent with the merger, this S corporation status terminated and the method of accounting for tax purposes changed from the cash to the accrual method. Deferred income tax expense for thc year ended December 31. 1992, includes 5780.000 attributable to this termination of S corporation status. Pro forma income tax expense for thc years ended December 31. 1992, 1991 and 1990, arc tax amounts which would have been recorded had this subsidiary been a C corporation during those years. F-14 4 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31. 1992, 1991 and 1990 (5) Debt Long-term debt and capital lease obligations consist of the following at December 31 (in thousands): 1992 1991 Demand notes payable, unsecured, interest rates ranging from 6.75% to 7.5% $ 228 $ 273 Demand notes payable, secured, bearing interest at 10% — 236 Demand notes payable to principal stockholder, bearing interest at prime plus 2% — 94 Notes payable, secured. interest rates ranging from 6% to 16.5%, payable in installments, maturing through 1998 6,771 8,625 Notes payable to former owners and individuals, interest rates ranging from 6% to 9%, payable in installments, maturing through 2007 3,529 2,583 Notes payable, unsecured, interest rales varying from 5.6% to 8%, payable in installments, maturing in 1993 683 Subordinated notes payabk to stockholders and former owners, bearing interest at 7% and 7.5%, maturing through 1996 1.780 — Capital lease obligations 1,449 1,357 14,440 13,168 Less current maturities 5,465 5,137 Long-term debt. excluding current maturities $ 8.975 $ 8,031 Annual maturities of long-term debt and future minimum lease payments under capital leases as of December 31. 1992 are as follows (in thousands): 1993 1994 1995 1905 1997 Thereafter Total payments Less: amounts representing interest Total obligations und:r capital leases Lear term Capital debt leases $ 4,729 $ 880 3,885 616 2.239 299 652 107 220 18 1.267 — 312 992 1,920 471 $ 1,449 (6) Capital Stock and Additional 1'aid-in Capital Preferred Stock The Company is authorized to issue up to 500.000 shares of preferred stock. $0.01 par value, of which no shares are issued or outstanding. The Company's board of directors is authorized to provide for the issuance of the preferred stock in series. to establish the number of shares to be included in each such series, and the qualifications. limitations or restrictions thereof. This includes any voting rights, preemptive rights, conversion privileges and liquidation rights which shall be superior to the common stock. F-15 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 1992, 1991 and 1990 Common Stock The Company is authorized to issue 25,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, of which 10,683,828 shares were issued and outstanding at December 31, 1992. The Company has an effective Shelf Registration Statement on file with thc Securities and Exchange Commission covering 2,000,000 shares of common stock, of which 1,918,370 shares remain available at December 31, 1992 for issuance in connection with the acquisition of other businesses by the Company. In August, 1992. the Company completed an initial public offering of common stock and issued 3,000,000 shares of such stock at a price of S8.50 per share. The proceeds. net of underwriting discounts and expenses of the offering, were approximately S21,465.000. Concurrent with the completion of the public offering. the Company paid 510,195.000 to thc stockholders of Regional, AMR West. New Haven, and Professional and issued an aggregate 4,143.500 shares of common stock in connection with the acquisition by merger of those companies by American. On September 3, 1992, the Company sold an additional 300,000 shares of common stock pursuant to an overallotment option granted to the underwriters in connection with the initial public offering. The proceeds from this overallotment. net of underwriting discounts, were S2.37I,500. In connection with the i:iitial public offering, the Company issued warrants to the underwriters to purchase an additional 300.000 shares of thc Company's common stock at an exercise price of $10.20 per share for 150,000 shares and 512.00 per share for 150,000 shares. Such warrants expire on August 5, 1997. During the period February 21, 1992 to May 22. 1992. thc Company issued 2,703,001 shares of common stock to its founders at a price of S0.0273 per share. On July 17, 1992. the Company repurchased and retired 510.000 sharcs of founds common stock at the original purchase price of S0.0273 per snare for a total of SI 3.923. The Company was incorporated on February 21, 1992. On June 8. 1992, the Cornpany was reorganized as a Delaware corporation. Pursuant to the reorganization. each of the outstanding shares of the Massachusetts corporation was converted into 2,928.71 shares of common stock. resulting in 2.730.001 shares outstanding on that date. All financial information and share znd per share information with respect to the Company's stock have been restated to reflect the shares issued in the reorganization. Common Stock — Predecessor Conrpanies All of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Predecessor Companies were acquired by American in connection with the merger and reorganization. In January 1992. prior to the merger of Regional with American, Regional repurchased 1,600 sharcs of its common stock from two former employees for a total of 51.816,000. In addition. Regional entered into five year non -competition agreements with the former employees for S240.000. During 1991. Regional repurchased 800 shares of its stock from former shareholders. A charge to retained earnings of S700.000 was recorded as a result of this transaction. (7) Commito,cdts and Contingencies Third -Porte Rate Adjustments and Revenue A significant portion of thc Company's net revenue is derived under Federal and stale third -party reimbursement programs. These revenues are based. in part, on cost reimbursement principles and are subject to audit and retroactive adjustment by the respective third -party fiscal i.itermediaries. In the opinion of management. retroactive adjustments if any. would not be material to the financial position or results of operations of the Company. F-16 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 1992, 1991 and 1990 Legal Proceedings The Company is party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In management's opinion. the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position. Letters of Credit The Company has outstanding letters of credit of 5784.000 to secure payments of certain insurance policies. Such letters of credit expire in February 1993. (8) Related Party Transactions Indemnification Agreements In connection with thc merger and reorganization discussed in note 2, certain related parties have agreed to indemnify the Company up to a maximum of 51,750,000 for losses the Company may incur if one of its former insurors is unable to refund unearned premiums and pay pending claims. Leasing Transactions The Company leases various facilities from rclatcd parties. The leases on these properties expire at various times through thc year 2000. Total rent exp nee paid to related parties amounted to 5990,000, 51,020,000 and S661.000 for the years ended December 31, 1992, 1991 and 1990, respectively. Loans and Cash Advances Loans and advances outstanding to related panics amounted to SO and 5973.000 at December 31, 1992 and 1991, respectively. Notes payable to rclatcd parties amounted to SO and 594,000 at December 31, 1992 and 1991, respectively. Guaranty' The Company has guaranteed a 52.500.000 loan owed by a related party to a bank. This loan is secured by one of the Company's operating facilities that it leases from a related party. bears interest at prime plus 1% and is callable by the bank on or after May 1994. Thc related party has agreed to indemnify the Company in the event the Company is required to pay any amounts under the guaranty. Contractual Agreements The Company purchases vehicles and repair parts from a rclatcd party. Vehicles purchased from related parties amounted to S143.000. 5306.000 and 5153.000 for the years ended December 31, 1992, 1991 and 1990, respectively. Repair parts purchased from related parties and included in erpense amounted to $168,000, S159.000 and S175.000. respectively. Accounts payable included 520.000 and 582,000 at December 31, 1992 and 1991. respectively, due to these related parties. (9) Stock Option Plans 1992 Equity Incentive Plan The Company's 1992 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Equity incentive Plan") was adopted on June 8, 1992 and provides for the grant of a variety of stock and stock -based awards and related benefits. The Equity F- I7 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE. INC. Notes to Consolidated Finandal Statements December 31. 1992, 1991 and 1990 Incentive Plan permits the gran ing of options that qualify as incentive stock options and non-qualified options. The option exercise price of each option shall bc determined by the Board of Directors, but in the case of incentive stock options shall not be Icss than 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant (110% in the case of incentive stock options granted to an individual with stockholdings in excess of certain limits.) Subject to adjustment for stock splits and similar events, the total number of shares of Common Stock that can be issued undcr the Equity Incentive Plan is 800.000. 1992 Stock Option for Non -Employee Directors The Company's 1992 Stock Option Plan for Non -Employee Directors (the "Dircctor Option Plan") was adopted on June 8, 1992. Pursuant to the Director Option Plan, beginning on the date of the first annual meeting of stockholders aftcr the date of the initial public offering. each director who is not an employee of the Company or one of its subsidiaries and neither is a holder of five percent or more of the Company's Common Stock nor was a stockholder of the Company prior to completion of the initial public offering will receive, on the date of his or her first election as director, an option to purchase 7,500 shares of Common Stock. Thereafter, each director will be granted, at each annual meeting at which such director is elected or reelected, so long as he or she remains an eligible director, an option to acquire an additional 7,500 shares of Common Stock. The exercise price of such options will be the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant. Each option will be non -transferable except upon death, will expire 10 years after the date of grant and will become exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of grant. Stock Option Activity A summary of stock option activity under the Company's stock option plans for the year ended December 31 follows: Number Option Price of Options Range Outstanding at December 31. 1991 — S — Granted 303.100 5.00-12.375 Exercised (17,600) 5.00- 8.500 Cancelled — — Outstanding at December 31. 1992 285.500 S5.00-12.375 Exercisable at December 31. 1992 60.875 (10) Employee Benefit Plans 1992 Employee Stock Purchase Plan The 1992 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Employee Stock Purchase Plan") was adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company and approved by the stockholders on June 8, 1992. The Employee Stock Purchasc Plan is designed to enable eligible employees to purchase shares of Common Stock at a discount on a periodic basis through payroll deductions. All employees with at least six months o: continuous service, other than employees owning 5% or more of the combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company. are eligible to participate. Purchases will occur at the end of option periods. each of six months' duration. The first such option period began January 1. 1993. F -I8 astral' t 1 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, IN( . Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 1992, 1991 and 1990 The purchase price of Common Stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan is 85% of the lesser of the value of thc Common Stock at the beginning of an option period and the value of the Common Stock at the end of the option period. Participants may elect under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. prior to each option period. to have from 2% to 10% of their pay withheld and applied to the purchase of shares at the end of' thc option period However. the Employee Stock Purchase Plan imposes a maximum of SI0,000 on the amount that may be withheld from any participant in any option period. Subject to adjustment for stock splits and similar events, a total of 100,000 shares of Common Stock has been reserved for issuance under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. None of these shares has been Issued to date. Retirement Plans Two of the Company's subsidiaries ':ave defined contribution 401(k) plans for the benefit of their employees. Full-time employees with one year of service and 1,000 hours arc eligible to,participate. The total plan expense for the years ended December 31, 1992. 1991 and 1990 was 5450.000, 5242,000"and 5339,000. respectively. Four the Company's subsidiaries have profit sharing plans which cover substantially all of their employees. Contributions into the trust funds of the plans are discretionary, and the companies have the right to amend, modify or terminate the plans, but in no event will any portion of the contributions paid revert to the companies. The total profit sharing plan expense for the years ended December 31, 1992. 1991 and 1990 was 5115.000. 5109.000 and 533.000. respectively. (11) Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) The Company's summary financial data for the years ended December 31 1992 and 1991 by quarter is as follows (in thousands except per share amounts): Year ended December 31, 1992 4t19uarter 3rd uarter 2nd Quarter 1st Quarter Total revenue 531,664 S31,185 529.558 528,785 Total operating expenses 29,237 27,938 26.854 26,890 Earnings from operations 2,427 3,247 2,704 1,895 Earnings before income taxes 2.330 3,092 2.443 1.624 Net earnings 1.700 1,137 1.4'.2 980 Pro forma net earnings 1.700 1.866 1,418 933 Pro forma earnings per common share 0.17 0.20 0.18 0.12 Weighted average com-non shares outstanding10.279 9,161 7.968 7.968 Year ended December 31, 1991 4th Quarter 3rd Quarter 2nd Quarter 1st Quarter Total revenue 529.500 S28.243 S25.639 54,636 Total operating expenses 27,028 25,716 23.500 22.273 Earnings from operations 2,472 2.527 2.139 2.363 Earnings before income taxes 2.132 2,215 1.834 2.054 Net earnings 1.273 1.284 1.092 1.194 Pro forma net earnings 1.200 1,257 1,074 1.163 Pro forma earnings per common share 0.15 0.16 0.13 0.15 Weighted average common shares outstanding7.968 7,968 7.968 7.968 F-19 r AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31. 1992, 1991 and 1990 (12) Subsequent Events Acquisition On January 11, 1993, the Company acquired Buck Medical Services, Inc. located in Portland Oregon. The purchase price consisted of 55.500,000 in cash and 125,085 shares of the Company's common stock. The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase, and the excess of the purchase price and expenses associated with the acquisition over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill. The following unaudited pro forma summary gives effect to the acquisition as if it had occurred on December 31, 1992 with respect to the pro forma balance sheet and as if the transaction (along with the acquisition of Mobile Medic and Ambulance Service) occurred at the beginning of 1991. Such pro forma financial information reflects certain adjustments including amortization of goodwill, income tax effects. and the increase in the weighted average shares outstanding. This pro forma information does not necessarily reflect the results of operations which would have occurred had the acquisition taken place at the beginning of 1991 and is not necessarily indicative of results which may be obtained in the future (in thousands, except per share amounts): 1992 (unaudited) Balance Sheet Total assets S 76,954 t Total liabilities 37,580 6 Total stockholders' equity 39,374 Total liabilities and stockholders equity $ 76.954 1992 1991 (unaudited) — Statements of Earnings: Net revenue 5157,829 5138,196 Earnings before income taxes 10,996 8,664 Net earnings 6,107 4,956 Pro forma net earnings 6,649 4,656 Pro forrna earnings per share 0.70 0.53 Credit Facility In February 1993. the Company received a commitment from a group of banks for a 530.0 million revolving credit facility to refinance existing indebtedness. for acquisitions and working capital purposes. F-20 • • AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Introduction During 1992, the Company acquired Mobile Medic Ambulance Service, Inc. ("Mobile") and Ambu- lance Service Company ("ASC") in acquisitions accounted for as purchases. During 1993, the Company acquired Buck Medical Services. Inc. ("Buck"), A -I Aw'„ulance Services ("A-1"), Inc. and Recd Ambulances. Inc. ("Reed") in transactions accounted for as purchases :.no also acquired Randle -Eastern Ambulance Service, Inc. ("Randle") in a transaction accounted for as a pooling -of -interests. The unaudited pro forma combined statements of earnings for the six months ended June 30, 1993 and for the year ended December 31, 1992 give effect to the above acquisitions accounted for as purchases as if the transactions were consummated as of . anuary 1, 1992. The pro forma financial data do not purport to represent what the Company's financial position or results of operations would actually have been if such transaction% had in fact occurred on those dates or to project the Company's financial position or results of operations for any future period. F-21 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Pro Forma Combined Statement of Earnings For the Six Months Ended June 30, 1993 (In thousands) (Unaudited) Pro form Pro form. Historical Adjustme.ts(1) Combined Total revenue S86.190 S8.317 S94,507 Expenses Salaries and benefits 42,279 4,001(2) 46,280 Uncompensated care 19,116 1,697 20,813 Other 16,453 1,986 18,439 Amortization of intangibles 659 207(3) 866 Total operating expenses 78,507 7,891 86,398 Earnings from operations 7,683 426 8,109 Interest expense, net 433 149(4) 582 Earnings before income taxes 7,250 277 7,527 Income tax expense 3,147 157(5) 3,304 Net earnings S 4,103 $ 120 $ 4,223 Historical net earnings S 4,103 S 120 $ 4,223 Pro forma income tax expense (benefit) — 108 108 Pro forma net earnings S 4.103 $ 12 $ 4,115 Pro forma net earnings per share S 0.38 — S 0.37 Weighted average shares outstanding 10.916 198(6) 11,114 See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma combined statement of earnings. F-22 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Pro Forma Combieed Statement of Earaiags For the Year Ended December 31, 1992 (In thousands) (Unaudited) Ilimori al Total revenue S121,192 Expenses Salaries and benefits 60,577 Uncompensated care 28,008 Other 21,773 Amortization of intangibles 561 Total operating expenses 110.919 Earnings from operations 10,273 Interest expense, net 784 Earnings before income taxes 9.489 Income tax expense 4,250 ]yet earnings S 5,239 Historical net earnings $ 5,239 Pro forma income tax expense (benefit) (678) Pro forma net earnings S 5,917 Pro forma net earnings per share S 0.67 Weighted average shares outstanding 8.838 Pro forma Adjastments(7) S54,095 25.061(8) 11,203 12,519(9) 1,153(10) 49,936 4.159 666(11) 3,493 1.120(12) S 2,373 S 2,373 559 S 1.814 986(13) See accompaming notes to unaudited pro forma combined statement of earnings. F-23 Pro forma Combined $175.287 85,638 39,211 34,292 1.714 160,855 14,432 1,450 12,982 5,370 S 7,6/2 S 7,612 (119) S 7.731 S 0.79 9,824 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIFS Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement of Earnings for the Six Months Ended Jane 30, 1993 (1) To include the results of A-1 and Reed as if' the acquisitions occuned at the beginning of 1993. (2) To adjust salaries and benefits to reflect the difference between existing compensation agreements and those assumed to take effect after the acquisition. (3) To record amortization of goodwill resulting from the acquisitions that were accounted for as purchases. Goodwill is assumed to be amortized by the straight Line method over 25 years. (4) To record interest expense related to the subordinated debt issued in connection with the acquisitions. (5) To record income tax effect of the pro forma adjustments. (6) To adjust the weighted average number of shares outstanding as if the shares issued in connection with the acquisitions had been outstanding since the beginning of 1993. Notes to Unaudited Pro Forms Combined Statement of Earnings for the Year Ended December 31, 1992 (7) To include the results of Mobile, ASC. Buck. A-1 and Reed as if the acquisitions occurred at the bcginning of 1992. (8) To adjust salaries and benefits to reflect the difference between existing compensation agreements and those assumed to take effect after the acquisitions. (9) To adjust rent expense as a result of the modification of certain leases. (10) To record amortization of goodwill resulting from the acquisitions that were accounted for as purchases. Goodwill is assumed to be amortized by the straight line method over 25 years. (11) To record interest expense related to the subordinated debt issucd in connection with the acquisitions. (12) To record income tax effect of pro Pm -ma adjustments. (13) To adjust thc weighted average number of shares outstanding as if thc shares issucd in connection with the acquisitions had been outstanding since the beginning of 1992. F-24 No dealer, salesperson or any other person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations not contained in this Prospectus, and, if given or made, such informa- tion or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the Company, the Selling Stockholders or the U.S. Underwriters. This Prospectus does not constitute an offer of any securities other than those to which it re- later or an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, to any person in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be unlawfuL Neither the delivery of this Prospec- tus nor any sale made hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that the information contained herein is correct as of any time subsequent to the date hereof TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Available Information 2 Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference 2 Prospectus Summary 3 Investment Considerations 5 Price Range of Common Stock 7 Use of Proceeds 7 Dividend Policy 7 Capitalization 8 Selected Financial Data 9 Managem t s Discussion and Analysis tna of F' esncial Condition and Results of Operations 10 Business 15 Management 24 Principal and Selling Stockholders 28 Certain United States Tax Consequences to Non -United States Holders 31 Underwriting 33 Legal Matters 35 Experts 36 Additional Information 36 Index to Financial Statements F-1 2,750,000 Shares fiW mg_Ldi.'e1L'l.kei toil Om :41%.74 a.diaiae+r Common Stock PROSPECTUS 1993 LEHMAN BROTHERS KIDDER, PEABODY & CO. INCORPORATED ADVEST, INC. • 0 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FARM 10-0 QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Quarter Ended June 30,1993 Commission File Number: 1-11196 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) DELAWARE (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 04-3147881 (I.R.S. Employer identification No.) 67 Batterymarch Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (617) 261-1600 (Registrant's telephone number. including arca code) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 1 5(d) of the securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES NO The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date is: Common Stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding as of August 3, 1993: 11,206,903 shares. 1 Exhibit Index on Page 17 i • ti AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. INDEX Number Ea= Part L Financial Information Item 1. Finarcial Statements Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 1)93 (unaudited) and December 31, 1992 3 Consolidated Statements of Earnings (unaudited) for the Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 1993 and 1992 4 Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity (unaudited) for the Six Months Ended June 30, 1993 5 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the Six Months Ended June 30. 1993 and 1992 6 Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements 7 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 9 Part II. Other Information Item 1. Legal Proceedings 14 Item 2. Changes in Securities 14 Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities 14 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 14 Item 5. Other Information 14 Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 14 Signature 16 Exhibit Index 17 1 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands. except share amounts) ASSETS June 30, Decanbcr 31. 1993 1992 (Unaudited) Currant assets: Cash and cash equivalents S 5,909 S 14,600 Short-term investments — 260 Accounts receivable, less allowance for uncompensated care of 516,191 at lune 30, 1993 and 511,655 at December 31. 1992 28,082 22,655 Inventories 1,152 867 Prepaid expenses and other receivables 2,888 3,515 Deferred income taxes 5571 4A72 Total sure l assets 43"602 42.369 Property and equipment, net 15.122 10_555 Non-current assets: Cost in excess of net assets acquired, net 29,146 11.153 Covenants not to compete, net 544 735 Other 1.975 2.036 Total non-current assets 31 661 13 924 Total assets LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY S 40.392 $ 70.848 Current liabilities: Accounts payable S 4,264 S 3,607 Accrued compensation, benefits and taxes 6,273 5,094 Accrued expenses 5.536 2,787 Income taxes payable 2,068 2,320 Current maturities of debt _211 5.465 Total current liabilities 19.052 19.273 Non-current liabilities: Long -tam debt 18,014 7,875 Subordinated note payable to related party 1,100 1,100 Deferred income taxes 4,142 4,240 Other liabilities 676 L144 Total non-current liabilities 23.932 14.359 Total liabilities 42.984 33.632 Stockholders' equity: Preferred stock, S.01 par value. 500.000 shares authorized. none issued Common stock, S.01 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 11,126,813 and 10,683,828 shares issued and outstanding 111 107 Additional paid -in capital 27,185 21,300 Retained earnings 19.912 15 809 Total stockholders' equity 47.408 37.216 Commitments and contingencies Total liabilities and stockholders' equity S 90 392 S ,70.848 See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements. 3 f AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS For The Three Months and Six Mooths Ended lune 30.1993 and 1992 (In thousands. except per share amounts) Three Months Ended Six Month Ended lune 30. lune 30, 6 1993 1992 1993 1992 1 (Unaudited) I Total revenue S 44.1211 S 2422 S 86.120 5 311,111 Operating Expenses: Salaries and benefits 21,630 14.387 42,279 29,114 Uncompensated care 9,852 7.083 19,116 13,659 Other 7.319 4,334 14,090 8.946 Depreciation 1,194 923 2.363 1.752 Amortization of intangibles 344 _122 __824 _221 Total operating expenses 411334 26.124 28,2121 23144 Earnings from operations 4.439 2,704 7,683 4,599 Interest expense, net 203 261 433 • 1- 12 Earnings before income taxes 4,236 2.443 7,250 4,067 Income taxes 1.841 _1.021 .3.142 L661 Net earnings $ 2.343 5 .,1.432 s —1.12.1 S L4Qj PRO FORMA DATA Historical net carvings 5 2.395 $ 1,422 S 4,103 S 2.402 Income taxes — _-4 — --al Net earnings $ .2221 $ ...1.11/1 S -.4.1111 S .2.111 Net earnings per common share $ 0.22 $ O.ig S _2..1II S —2211 Weighted average common shares outstanding 11.Q1k —MU 18.21 7.95E See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements. 4 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY For the Si: Months Ended June 30, 1993 (In thousands) (unaudited) Additional Total Cumman.510r.k Paid -in Retained Stockboldas' Sham Ammmt CaR3ta1 Finings FdgiWC Balance at December 31. 1992 10.683 S 107 S 21.300 S 15.1109 S 37.216 Stock issued for acquisitions 432 4 5.939 — 5.943 Stock options exercised, including related tax benefit 12 — 146 — 146 Net earnings — — LIM LAI Balance at June 30. 1993 . L122 S -XI S 2L,1$1 S 12.212 S See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements. 5 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS For the Six Mouths Ended Jane 30, 1993 and 1992 (Io thousands) Six Months Ended June 30. 1993 1992 (unaudited) Cash flow from operating activities Net earnings S 4.103 S 2.402 Adjustments to rcconclk net eantings to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation 2.363 1,752 Amortization of intangible assets 659 273 Deferred income taxes (785) — Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: Accounts receivable (619) 144 Other current assets 755 (350) Other assets 98 54 Accounts payable and accrued expenses (134) 133 Accrued compensation. benefits and taxes (298) 69 Income taxes payable (378) — Other liabilities (4681 Net cash provided by operating activities —5.2215 x.711 Cash flows from investing activities: Acquisitions, net of cash acquired (11,282) — Purchases (sales) of short tenn investments, net 260 (85) Capital expenditures, net. (2.980) (1.247) Advance to related parties — --(152) Net cash used for investing activities (M 002) Cash flows from financing activities: Proceeds from issuance of connnon stock — 74 Proceeds from exercise of stock options 93 Net borrowings under credit facility 14,139 — Repayment ofborrowings (14.217) (915) Net advances to stockholders Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities *5 rt__ Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (8.691) 2.022 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 8 _.W S _1421 Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid during the period for. Interest S 567 S Income taxes S 4 276 S Supplemental schedule of non-cash transactions: Issuance of debt and equipment for repurchase of Predecessor common stock S — 8 1316 Issuance of debt for non -compete agreement S — S 240 Acquisitions: Assets acquired S 30.001 S Liabilities assumed and issued (11.794) Common stock issued (5.943) Cash paid 12.264 Liss cash acquired t9R'1 1113 Net cash paid for acquisitions S 2 S See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements, 6 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE. INC. NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANr1AL STATEMENTS 1. Basis of Presentation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of American Medical Response. Inc. and its subsidiaries ("Americ+n" or the "Company"). The interim consolidated financial statements are unaudited. but in the opinion of management include all adjustments, which consist only of normal and recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of its financial position and results of operations. Results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for tIsft Aol year. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 1992. 2. Acquisitions Acquisition Accounted for as a Pooling -of -Interests In June 1993, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Randle Eastern Ambulance, Inc. in exchange for 391,459 shares of the Company's common stock in a transaction accounted for as a pooling -of -interests. Restated total revenue and pro forma net earnings of the Company are summarized below: The Company as previously rcportcd Randle The Company. as restated Three Months Ended June 30. 1992 Total Pro Forma Revenue Net Earnings S 26.277 S 1.485 3.281 S 29.55$ Six Months Ended June 30. 1992 Total Pro Forma Roam= $ 51.504 (67) _6.812 $ 1.418 S 58.343 jFarninv S 2.565 (214) S .2.351 To reflect the pooling -of -interests discussed above, pro forma net earnings per share have been restated to $0.18 and $0.30 from $0.20 and $0.34 for the three months and six months ended June 30. 1992, respectively. Acquisitions Accounted for as Purchases During 1992. the Company acquired two ambulance service providers. In November 1992, the Company acquired Mobile Medic Ambulance Service, Inc., located in Gulfport. Mississippi and in December 1992, the Company acquired Ambulance Service Company, located in Denver, Colorado. The aggregate consideration paid for these acquisitions consisted of approximately $:).2 million in cash, S1.8 million in subordinated promissory notes and 611,268 shares of the Company's common stock. During the first six months of 1993. the Company ...quircd three additional ambulance service providers. In January 1993, the Company acquired Buck Medical Services, Inc., located in Portland, Oregon. In April 1993 the Company acquired A-1 Ambulance Service located in Boulder, Colorado. In 7 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 1993, the Company acquired Reed Ambulance Service, Inc. located in Denver, Colorado. The aggregate consideration paid for these acquisitions consisted of approximately S12.3 million in cash, $2.5 million in subordinated promissory notes and 431,335 shares of the Company's common stock. These acquisitions have been accounted for as purchases and, accordingly, the results of operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price and expenses associated with each acquisition over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired has been recorded as cost in excess of net assets acquired. The following unaudited pro fonna results of operations give effect to the acquisitions as if the transactions had occurred at the beginning of 1992. Such pro forma financial information reflects certain adjustments, inciuding amortization of goodwill, income tax effects, and the increase in the weighted average shares outstanding. This pro forma information does not necessarily reflect the results of operations that would have occurred had the acquisitions taken place at the beginning of 1992 and is not necessarily indicative of results that may be obtained in the future (in thousands, except per share amounts): Total revenue Pro forma net earnings Pro forma earnings per share Subsequent Acquisitions and Recent Developments Six Months Ended ,tine 30 (unaudited) 1221 1222 $94,507 $83,915 $ 4,115 S 3,473 $ .37 $ .39 In July 1993. the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Bridgeport Ambulance Service, Inc. located in Bridgeport, Connecticut. The consideration paid for this acquisition consisted of approximately $1.4 million in cash, 58,589 shares of the Company's common stock, and $.5 million in a subordinated promissory note. In June 1993. the Company also announced that it had reached a preliminary understanding relating to the possible acquisition of an ambulance service provider located in California. This complex transaction is subject to due diligence and the negotiation of definitive agreements. 3. Credit Facility In April 1993, the Company entered into a three-year, $30 million unsecured revolving line of credit with a group of banks to refinance certain indebtedness, for acquisitions and for working capital purposes. Interest is determined at the time of borrowing at the Company's option at either prime or LIBOR plus 2.5%. Under the agreement. the Company is required to comply with certain financial and other covenants and borrowing availability is based on earnings. 8 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSIONS AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Introduction For all periods presented, the following financial information includes the combined results of the four ambulance service providers the Company acquired concurrent with its initwl public offering in August 1992 and Randle Eastern Ambulance Service, Inc. which was acquired in a transaction accounted for as a pooling -of -interests. The five companies acquired by the Company from November 1992 through June 1993 accounted for as purchases are included from their dates of acquisition. The Company's total revenue, which is comprised primarily of ambulance service fees charged to Medicare and Medicaid, to other third -patty payors, including private insurance carriers and health maintenance organizations, and directly to patients, is presented net of contractual adjustments. Contractual adjustments represent the difference between gross billable charges and the portion of those charges allowable by the third -party payor. The Company's provision for uncompensated care represents the difference between net ambulance fee revenue and expected collections. Three Months Ended June 30,1993 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 1992 Overview The Company's net earnings amounted to $2.4 million or $.22 per share for the second quarter of 1993. as compared with pro forma net earnings of $1.4 million or $.18 per share for the corresponding period of 1992. The increase in nct earnings results from incremental earnings provided from acquisitions and from the growth in business. The increase in pro forma earnings per share results from the increase in net earnings, which is partly offset by an increase in the weighted average number of shares outstanding resulting from the initial public offering and shares issued in connection with acquisitions. Results of Operations The Company's total revenue amounted to $44.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 1993, as compared with 529.6 million for the same period of 1992, an increase of $15.2 million or 51.5%. The largest single contributor to the increase in total revenue was thc incremental revenue provided from acquisitions. Also contributing to the increase was revenue generated from the Company's contract to provide exclusive "911" emergency response service to Atlantic City, New Jersey awarded in late 1992 and an increase in the number of emergency and non -emergency transports. On June 1. 1993, the Company began providing exclusive "911" emergency response service to Aurora. Colorado, the third largest city in Colorado. The Company is a party to three significant contracts to provide emergency "911" services. The Company derived approximately 37% and 58% of its total revenue from these contracts during the second quarter of 1993 and 1992. respectively. Salaries and benefits expense as a percentage of total revenue decreased to 48.3% for thc three months ended June 30. 1993, from 48.7% for the same period of 1992. This was a result of the favorable 9 1 i MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSIONS AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS impact of acquisitions, which in the aggregate have relatively lower labor costs, offset by the addition of corporate salaries and benefits which did not exist in the prior period and certain wage increases. It is anticipated that corporate salaries will increase in future periods as the Company continues to implement its acquisition program and centralize certain operating. financial and treasury management functions. However, it is also anticipated that corporate salaries will decrease as a percentage of total revenue as the Company continues to grow. Uncompensated care expense as a percentage of total revenue was 22.0% and 24.0% for the three months ended June 30, 1993, and 1992, respectively. The percentage decrease is due to the favorable impact of acquisitions, which in the aggregate have experienced lower uncompensated care expense as a percentage of total revenue, and an improvement in the quality of the Company's receivables. Other operating expenses were S7.3 million in the second quarter of 1993 as compared with S4.3 million in the same period of 1992, an increase of 68.9%. As a percentage of total revenue, other operating expenses increased to 16.4% in the second quarter of 1993 from 14.7% in the same period of 1992. The increase in other ope: - ting expenses was a result of the growth in business and the addition of corporate expenses that did not exist in the prior period. Net interest expense decreased by S58.000 for the three months ended June 30, 1993. as compared to the same period of 199'. This decrease was the result of the decline in the Company's weighted average borrowing rate and the decline in the average amount of debt outstanding, resulting primarily from the implementation of the Company's new revolving credit facility. Amortization of intangibles increased to $344,000 for the second quarter of 1993 from S 127,000 for the same period of 1992, an increase of S217,000. This was a result of the cost in excess of net assets acquired recorded in connection with the Company's acquisitions. Amortization of intangibles will increase in the future as a result of the cost in excess of net assets acquired recorded in connection with the Company's acquisitions accounted for as purchases. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 1993 was 43.5% as compared with a pro forma effective tax rate of 42.0% for the same period in 1992. The increase in the effective tax rate results primarily from an increase in amounts that are not deductible for tax purposes. Pro forma income tax expense for the second quarter of 1992. are tax amounts that would have been recorded if one of the companies acquired at the time of the initial public offering had been a C corporation during this period. If the subsidiary had been subject to corporate income taxes on an ongoing basis, the Company's income tax expense would have been S1.025,000 for the second quarter of 1992. 10 r MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSIONS AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Six Months Ended June 30, 1993 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30,1992 Overview The Company's net earnings amounted to 54.1 million or 5.38 per share for the six months ended June 30, 1993, as compared with pro forma net earnings of 52.4 million or 530 per share for the corresponding period of 1992. The increase in net earnings results from incremental earnings provided from acquisitions and from the growth in business. The increase in pro forma earnings per share results from the increase in net earnings, which is partly offset by an increase in the weightcd average number of shares outstanding resulting from the initial public offering and shares issued in connection with acquisitions. Results of Operations The Company's total revenue amounted to 586.2 million for the first six months of 1993 as compared with 558.3 million for the same period of 1992, an increase of 527.9 million or 47.7%. The largest single contributor to the increase in total revenue was the incremental revenue provided from acquisitions. Also contributing to the increase was revenue generated from the Company's contract to provide exclusive "91 1" emergency response service to Atlantic City, New Jersey au.., led in late 1992 and an increase in the number of emergency and non -emergency transports. On lune 1, 1993, the Company began providing exclusive "911" emergency response service to Aurora, Colorado, the third largest city in Colorado. The Company is a party to three significant contracts to provide emergency "911" services. The Company derived approximately 37% and 57% of its total revenue from these contracts during the first six months of 1993 and 1992, respectively. Salaries and benefits expense as a percentage of total revenue was 49.1% and 49.9% for the first six months of 1993 and 1992, respectively. This was a result of a favorable impact of acquisitions, which in the aggregate have relatively lower labor costs, offset by the addition of corporate salaries and benefits which did not exist in the prior period and certain wage increases. It is anticipated that corporate salaries will increase in future periods as the Company continues to implement its acquisition program and centralize certain operating. financial, and treasury management functions. However, it is also anticipated that corporate salaries will decrease as a percentage of total revenue as the Company continues to grow. Uncompensated care expense as a percentage of total revenue was 22.2% and 23.4% for the six months ended June 30, 1993 and 1992, respectively. The percentage decrease is due to the favorable impact of acquisitions, which in the aggregate have experienced lower uncompensated care expense as a percentage of total revenue and an improvement in the quality of the Company's receivables Other operating expenses were $14.1 million in the first six months of 1993 as compared with 58.9 million in the same period of 1992. an increase of 57.5%. As a percentage of total revenue, other operating expenses increased to 16.3% in the first six months of 1993 from 15.3% in the same period of 1992. The increase in other operating expenses was a result of the growth in business and the addition of corporate expenses that did not exist in the prior period. 1I s MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSIONS AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Net interest expense decreased by $99,000 for the first six months of 1993 as compared to the first six months of 1992. This decrease was the result of the decline in the Company's weighted average borrowing rate and the decline in the average amount of debt outstanding, resulting primarily from implementation of the Companies revolving credit facility. Amortization of intangibles increased to $659.000 for the first six months of 1993 from 5273,000 for the first six months of 1992, an increase of 3386,000. This increase was the result of the cost in excess of net assets acquired recorded in connection with the Company's acquisitions. Amortization of intangibles will increase in the future as a result of the cost in excess of net assets acquired recorded in conn:ction with the Company's acquisitions accounted for as purchases. The effective tax rate for the first six months of 1993 was 43.4% as compared with a pro forma effective tax rate of 42.2% for the same period in 1992. The increase in the effective tax rate results primarily from an increase in amounts that are not deductible for tax purposes. Pro forma income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 1992, are tax amounts that would have been recorded if one of the companies acquired at the time of the initial public offering had been a C corporation during this period. If the subsidiary had been subject to corporate income taxes on an ongoing basis, the Company's income tax expense would have been $1.716.000 for the first six months of 1992. Liquidity and Capital Resources The Company has financed its cash needs, including cash used for acquisitions. from the net proceeds of its initial public offering, borrowings under its revolving line of credit and cash from operations. Concurrent with its initial public offering in August 1992, the Company acquired four ambulance service providers for aggregate consideration consisting of $10.2 million in cash and 4,143,500 shares of Common Stock. Through June 30, 1993, the Company has made six additional acquisitions for aggregate consideration consisting of $15.5 million in cash, S4.3 million in subordinated promissory notes and 1,434,062 shares of Common Stock. The Company currently has a S30 million unsecured revolving line of credit with a group of banks consisting of Fleet Bank of Massachusetts, N.A., Continental Bank, N.A. and Pacific Western Bank. Borrowings under the line of credit have been used to refinance certain indebtedness, for acquisitions and for working capital purposes. Under the agreement. the Company is required to comply with certain financial and other covenants and borrowing availability is based on earnings. Borrowings are limited to the lesser of 330 million or 200% of the Company's earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization for the most recent twelve months. Interest is determined at the time of borrowing at the Company's option at either prime or LIBOR plus 2.5%. The line of credit matures in April 1996. As of August 4. 1993. the Company had approximately 313.0 million of borrowings and S3.5 million of letters of credit outstanding under the line and S13.5 million remained available for future borrowings. 12 0. T MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSIONS AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS During the first six months of 1993, capital expenditures were made primarily for new ambulances and amounted to S3.0 million. Cash generated from operations during the first six months of 1993 was $5.3 million. Working capital at June 30, 1993 amounted to S24.6 million as compared to S23.1 million at December 31, 1992. Current financial resources and anticipated funds generated by operations are expected to be adequate to meet the Company's operating cash requirements in the foreseeable future. The Company expects to continue its acquisition program. Successful implementation of the Company's acquisition strategy depends upon its ability to acquire related businesses. The Company plans to continue to use a combination of cash, subordinated debt and the Company's common stock to finance its acquisition program. Subsequent Acquisitions and Recent Developments In July 1993. Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Bridgeport Ambulance Service, Inc. of Bridgeport, Connecticut. The consideration paid for this acquisition consisted of approximately 51.4 million in cash, 58.589 shares of the Company's common stock. and S.5 million in a subordinated promissory note. In June 1993, the Company also announced that it had reached a preliminary understanding relating to the possible acquisition of en ambulance service provider located in California. This complex transaction is subject to due diligence and the negotiation of definitive agreements. 13 --1 .. Part I I . Other Information Item 1. Legal Proceedings Not applicable Item 2. Changes In Securities Not applicable Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities Not applicable Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders (a) The annual meeting of stockholders of the Company was held on May 13. 1993. (b) All nine directors of the Company were re-elected at the meeting as described in paragraph (c) below. (c)The voting for the directors was as follows: Nominee EQI Withheld Paul M. Verrochi 9,422,541 10,850 Dominic J. Puopolo 9,422,541 10,850 Joseph R. Paolella 9,422,741 10,650 William E. Riggs 9,422,641 10,750 Paul T. Shirley 9,422,741 10,650 James E. McGrath 9,422,641 10.750 Michael A. Baker 9,422,741 10,650 David 13. Hammond 9,422,741 10,650 John Larkin Thompson 9,422,741 10,650 (d)Not Applicable Item 5. Other Information Not applicable Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K (a) Exhibits (10.1) Agreement between the County of Santa Clara and Medevac, Inc. dated July 1, 1988, as amc ded. (10.2) Contract Extension between the County of Santa Clara and Medevac, Inc. dated as of July 1, 1993. (11) Statement regarding Computation of Earnings Per Share. (b) Reports on Form 8-K The Company filed a Form 8-K dated June 29, 1993, relative to the acquisition of Randle Eastern Ambulance Service, Inc. and the A-1 Ambulance Service Companies. The following is a list of the financial statements filed with this report: Financial statemet:ts of Randle Eastern Ambulance Service, Inc.: Independent Auditors' Report Balance Sheets at March 31, 1993 (unaudited), December 31, 1992 and December 31, 1991 14 Part I I . Other Information -(continued) Statements of Income and Retained Earnings for the Years Ended December 31, 1992 and 1991 - Statements of Income and Retained Earnings for the Three Months Ended March 31, 1993 and 1992 (unaudited) - Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 1992 and 1991 Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 1993 and 1992 (unaudited) - Notes to Financial Statements -December 31, 1992 and 1991 Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements: - Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements (unaudited) - Pro Fora Combined Balance Sheet at December 31, 1992 (unaudited) - Pro Forma Combined Balance Sheet at March 31, 1993 (unaudited) - Pro Forma Combined Statement of Earnings for the Year Ended December 31, 1992 (unaudited) - Pro Forma Combined Statement of Earnings for the Three Months Ended March 31, 1993 (unaudited) - Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant bas duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE. INC. (Registrant) August 4, 1993 /s/ Ronald M. Levenson (Date) Ronald M. Levenson Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer 16 SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE. INC. (Registrant) August 4, 1993 (Date) Ronald M. Levenson Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer 16 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. EXHIBIT INDEX The following designated exhibits have previously been filed with the Securities and Exchange k Commission under the Securities Act of 1933 as part of the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (No. 33-52702) and are incorporate herein by reference to such filing. SEC IAis rags 10.1 Agreement between the County of Santa Clara and Medevac, 10.28 Inc. dated July 1, 1988, as amended 10.2 Contract Extension between the County of Santa Clara and 10.29 Medevac, Inc. dated as of July I. 1993 11 Statement regarding computation of per share earnings Filed 18 herewith F.XHIBIT 11 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC. STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE (In thousands. except per share amounts) Thee Months Ended Six Month Ended lune 30, lune 30. 1993 1992 1993 1992 Pro Fonna net earnings available to common shareholders S-2..121 $ L418 $ 1.102 $ 2131 Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding 11,036 7,933 10,916 7.933 Common stock equivalents assumed to be outstanding total! periods 32 _ 32 Lcss reduction for treasury stock method akulation_ (19) _ (19) Pro forma weighted average common stock and common _ stock equivalents deemed outstanding 1 L036 7.9.8 10.916 -2.211 Pro forma net earnings per common share and equivalents 18 S x.22 S -Ali S X018 S 0.30 4 \ CITY OF LODI AGENDA TITLE: MEETING DATE: PREPARED BY: COUNCIL COMMUNICATION r'1 Ambulance Company Merger Report October 20, 1993 City Manager RECOMMENDED ACTION: None required. Information only. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The ambulance company serving the City of Lodi and surrounding areas (Life Medical Industries, Inc.) has been acquired by a nationwide company, American Medical Response, IL_c. Mr. Mike Nilssen, Chief Operations Officer of Life Medical Industries, Inc.. will be in attendance at Wednesday night's meeting to briefly review with the City Council the particulars of this action. FUNDING: None required TAP:br CCCOM856/TXTA.07A APPROVED Respectfully submitted, ,e .a. Thomas A. Peterson City Manager THOMAS A. PETERSON City Manager