The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Report - October 20, 1993 (63)CITY OF LODI AGENDA TITLE: Approval of Non -Resident Fees MEETING DATE: October 20, 1993 PREPARED BY: Parks and Recreation Director COUNCIL COMMUNICATION RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council review and adopt the schedule of non-resident fees. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At various times (3 to 4) over the last five+ months, the Parks and Recreation Commission has reviewed the possibility of creating non-resident fees for those citizens Irving outside the City limits of Lodi and within the Lodi Unified School District boundaries (our program service area). Each time we have addressed this issue we have not received majority support from the Commission members. Concerns from their "Lodians" have included: that they spend their money in Lodi although they live outside the city limits, they can't get factual information about residents/non-residents, concerns of eliminating people from the programs, etc. The first real step toward non-resident fees occurred some five years ago when the Council adopted a resident/non-resident entry fee schedule for vehicles at Lodi Lake Park ($2 resident/$3 non-resident). Recently, the City became involved in a Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan with consultant Jerry Dragoo of Dragon & Associates. Mr. Dragon pointed out operations and capital costs were not being paid by non-residents. This triggered another look at ron-resident fees. Commission Chairman Bob Johnson asked Commissioner Bob Casalegno to chair a non-resident fee (operations) committee and return to the Commission with a proposal. The committee included City Engineer Rich Prima, Finance Director Dixon Flynn, Commissioner Chad Meyer, Diana Slawson (non-resident/rural east area), Daphne Felde (non-resident, rural west area), and Parks and Recreation Director Ron Williamson. A very extensive report (Exhibit A) was done by Mr. Prima, general information on City finances and funds was supplied by Mr. Flynn, and attendance information (Exhibit B) was provided by Parks and Recreation for the committee's review. The bottom line was that operationally, the lowest figure produced was $27 per registrationper person as a non- resident. This means that each time a non-resident signs up for an activity, $27 is not accounted for to cover operational costs. The committee proposed a very basic 5/15 plan for youth, teen, and adult participants. This means that each time a non-resident youth or teen registers for a program he or she must pay an additional $5 for registration; an adult non-resident participant will pay an additional $15. Exceptions to this would be the Lodi City Swim Club and Camp Hutchins, which are year-round programs and basically equal three seasons. For this reason the committee felt $15 per year a fair fee. See Exhibit C, Non -Resident Fee Proposal. The commission voted at their meeting of September 7, 1993, 4-1 in support of the non-resident fee as presented. See Exhibit D, Parks and Recreation Commission Communication and page 4 of that meeting's minutes. APPROVED. _ THOMAS A. PETERSON City Manager CC -1 CITYCOUM1020 COM October 12. 1993 Approval of Non -Resident Fees October 20, 1993 04 Page Two No capital improvement plan was addressed at this time, but should be. it should also be mentioned that falsifying of addresses will probably take place and it will mean work on stafrs part to verily addresses to make sure non- resident fees are being paid. FUNDING: No expense. Revenue potential from $20,000 to $25,000 depending upon acceptance of new fees, registrations, and honesty in acknowledging non -residency. RWJsh cc: City Attorney CRYCOUM502O.COM on Williamson Parks and Recreation Director Oclobw 12.190 M. T A ME1.1ORANDUM. City of Lodi. Public Works Department TO: Parks b Recreation Director FROM: Assistant City Engineer DATE: July 28,1993 SUBJECT: Parks & Recreation Master Plan - Non -Resident Fees Staff discussions and public comments on the subject of a non-resident fee for recreation programs have centered on'How muchr and 'How do you come up with that numbefY. Non residents feel they contribute to the City's economy through sales taxes and should not be unduly penalized when they participate in City programs. On the other hand. City residents pay property taxes and other charges that support these programs in addition to sales taxes. To get a handle on these numbers, l prepared the attached spreadsheet based on the 1992193 budget and additional Information from the draft Parks & Recreation Master Plan and conversations with various staff persons. I have updated it in response to our discussions on July 27 regarding the Parks maintenance budget. Assumptions and'cautions' are described below. Note that'non-residents• is intended to mean County residents in the Lodi service area and does not include other County residents or travelers. Population These figures are from the Master Plan. The non-resident population was questioned earlier, mairdy in the context of the future population. Since this analysis is based on present population, that concern Is moot For this analysis. non-residents comprtse 27% of the service area population. Note that if this figure were lower, the calculated non- resident fee would go up. Revenue These are the General Fund revenues which support the Parks & Recreation Dept. and the other non-utility functions. Refuse collection revenue (and expense) has been excluded. Charges for services includes roughly $367,000 in recreation. concession and Camp Hutchins fees. Since they do not exceed the cost of these programs and are not directly related to the non-resident issue, they were not separated. Sales Tax This is the main revenue that is affected by non-residents. Since It Is nearly one-quarter of the General Fund revenue, it has the most Influence on this analysis. The question to be answered is 'How much of that amount comes from non-residents?'. Unfortunately, there is no precise way to answer this. 1 started with the percentage based on the population (27%) and modified it by the adjustment factor of 60% shown in Note 2. To evaluate this factor, one could consider it as an indication of how much a non- resident spends in the City compared to a resident. Certainly in that context, a Woodbridge resident Is more like a City resident than a Lockeford or Clements resident. On the average. a 60% factor seems reasonable. Thus, 16% (60% of 27%) of sales tax revenue is attributed to non-residents. As a check on this, I asked the San Joaquin County COG to check the traffic model. This 'mufti -county' model includes Galt and other areas adjacent to San Joaquin County. It is po&,ible to separately count retail trips in the model by zone. According to data from the model, roughly 30% of Lodi s retail trips originate outside the City. This is higher than the 16% described above, however, this figure includes all zones outside the City (Galt, north Stockton, etc.). Also, the zones do not exactly follow the City limits nor do they account for shopping patterns. County Revenue The amount ($14,800) contributed by San Joaquin Co. towards the City's recreation program is included, although I understand this may be substantially reduced cr even zero this year. The amount is relatively small, less than $4.00 per con -resident participant. Total Revenue With the abov.: assumptions and those shown in the spreadsheet, the total revenua from non-residents is approximately $860,000. 6 egg Appropriations The budgets for the various general fund functions are shown on the right side of the spreadsheet. The portions attributable to non-residents were derived from a number of sources as indicated in the notes. The various administrative and other costs shown as 'overhead' were estimated from data shown in the Griffith study and then prorated to the other functions. Parks The amount under parks attributed to non-residents was based on the recreation percentage multiplied by 40%. This 40% represents the portion of the parks budget that pertains to sports facility maintenance and includes the prorated share of parks division administration and vehicle maintenance. This calculation is snown in the lower left comer of the spreadsheet. Recreation The amount for recreation Is !rased on the participation survey provided by you. The average non-resident participation was 29% or 3,828 participations. No effort was made to break costs. revenue and participation down by type of activity. 1 felt the accuracy of this analysis would not warrant that level of detail. Also. there were comments made at the public meetings about calculating only the incremental cost to serve non-residents. 1 did not do this for two reasons. one, the data was not available and twoj this is a policy decision that should be left to the CounclL To only use the incremental cost would be saying we're giving non-resktents a better deal than existing City residents and priority over new residents. Total Cost With the above assumptions and those shown In the spreadsheet, the total cost attn"butabie to non-residents is approximately $1,084.000. Prorated Revenue The last column on the right is the total arevenue from non-residents' prorated to each of the cost functions. This was done based on the assumption that an general fund revenues are equally spread to all general fund expenses. Tile only exception was that the County contribution was added to Recreation revenue figure. Net cost The net cost difference for all functions Is a shortfall of just over $200.000. The Parks 3 Recreation share of the difference. including a small amount for overhead is 3101.800 (shown underlined). Net per non -res. The average net cost per non-resident participant based on the assumptions shown Is $27. (The net cost divided by 3828 participants.) As noted earlier, the major Mem influencing this number is the sales tax factor. This average net cost for various sales tax assumptions is shown In the box. The "break even' point is 73%. Remember. these are average figures and it may be desirable to charge different amounts for the various programs. Please do not regard this analysis as the definitive answer on non-resident fees. I tried to a relatively simple way to account for the revenues and casts associated with non-residents. The issue is complicated and a major accounting study would be needed to do a precise job on the cost side and M's not dear if we could ever get a good analysis on the revenue side. The decision Is certainly a political one. Other considerations. such as what other cities are doing. should be considered. Hopefully. this analysis will provide some help in making that decision. We should also mention that the cost of new facilities will need to be covered at some point. Perhaps a portion of a non-resident fee could be set aside for capital improvements. I'm available to answer questions or present this analysis at future meetings if you wish. Give me a call if you have any questions. JL o Richard C. Prima, JJ Assistant City Engineer attactawd cc: Finance Director NONRESFE.DOC �\ EXHIBIT A to ' s ut n N a .- ` en.-ooRi -.==P.R 6P 5 _ Sg3s mw din a Sala �e E)MTBIT B LODI PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1992-1993 ATTENDANCE FIGURES/NON-RESIDENT COUNT ACTIVITY TOTAL PARTICIPANTS NON-RESIDENTS % OF NON- ONACTIVITY RESIDENTS ADULT SPORTS SUMMER SOFTBALL Mens Fast 279 84 31% Womens Fast 134 40 30% Mens Comp Slow 987 338 35% Mens Rec Slow 649 191 30% Womens Slow 482 154 32% Mens Church Slow 293 81 28% Total 2,824 888 32% FALL SOFTBALL Mens Comp Slow 469 157 34% Mens Rec Slow 376 122 33% Coed Slow 747 228 31% Total 1,592 507 32% BIG VALLEY SENIORS 72 42 59% BASKETBALL 478 195 41% VOLLEYBALL Mens 67 22 33% Coed 280 101 37% Total 347 123 36% 0/4/Y.} rage f of E)GUSIT B LODI PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1992-1993 ATTENDANCE FIGURESWON-RESIDENT COUNT ACTIVITY TOTAL PARTICIPANTS NON-RESIDENTS % OF NON - RESIDENTS AQUATICS Swim Lessons 1,297 332 26% Summer League 383 106 28% Total 1,680 438 27% SPECIAL EVENTS Mayor's Golf 58 12 21% Christmas Tree Run 92 41 45% Total 150 53 36% SPECIALTY CLASSES 1,026 298 29% ADULT TENNIS 55 7 13% JUNIOR TENNIS 147 15 10% GOLF 77 30 39% CHEERLEADING 51 9 18% CAMP HUTCHINS 239 60 25% Ways rage tot 17�,1�1 Y LODI PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1992-1993 ATTENDANCE FIGURES/NON-RESIDENT COUNT ACTIVTTY TOTAL PARTICIPANTS NON-RESIDENTS 96 OF NON- RESIDENTS YOUTH SPORTS Senior Babe Ruth (BOBS) 42 10 24% Baseball (BOBS) 1,673 450 27% Softball (BOBS) 424 131 31% Comet Basketball (BOBS) 101 22 22% Soccer Rec/Comp (BOBS) 1,226 306 25% Delta Football (BOBS) 184 44 24% Total (BOBS Programs) 3,650 963 26% Jr. Basketball (City) 369 143 39% Jr. Volleyball (City) 64 11 1796 Jr. Flag Football (City) 165 46 28% Total (City Programs) 598 200 33% GRAND TOTAL 12,986 3,828 29% Note: Attendance that can be counted by physical reigstration forms, that include an address. Page of 3 7.9% 13.6! Lodi Parks and Recreation Department 1992-1993 ATTENDANCE FIGURES 39.0% 20.3% RESIDENTS Ut 6 7.6% 1 "A% v.or 26.2% NON-RESIDENTS 414% 5.2% ❑ Adult Sports* ® Tennis* * Special Events ®Spec. Classes Aquatics ® Golf BOB'' Youth Sports ® City Youth Sports ® Cheerleading ® Camp Hutchins *ADULT SPORTS consists of Summer Softball, Fail Softball, Bas%etball, Volleyball & Big Valley Seniors "TENNIS consists of Adult Tennis & Junior Tennis F Camp Hutchins Cheerleading City Youth Sports BOBS Youth Sports Golf Aquatics Spec. Classes Special Events Tennis* Adult Sports** Lodi Parks and Recreation Department 1992-1993 ATTENDANCE FIGURES *TENNIS consists of Adult Tznnis & Junior Tennis "ADULT SPORTS consists of Summer Softball, Fail Softball, Basketball, Volleyball & &g Valley Seniors ® Residents ® Non -Residents X LODI PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NON-RESIDENT FEE PROPOSAL BY PROGRAM/ACTIVITY OR PARK USES Activity Area User Current Fee Proposed Non -Resident Fee Youth Adult Sr Citizen PLAYGROUNDS Y $1.00 per day * N/A YOUTH/TEEN SPORTS City Rec. Sports League Y $15 to $20 $5.00 B.O.B.S. Sports Y $25 to $125 $5.00 Tournaments Y Facility fee N/A AQUATICS Public Swim Y/A/Sr $.75 to $1.25/swim * N/A * N/A * N/A Swim Lessons Y $12.00/two weeks • $5.00 Summer Swim League Y $15 per program • $5.00 Boat Rentals Y/A/Sr $2 to $5 per use + N/A * N/A * N/A Lodi City Swim Club Y $25 to $35 per mo * $15.00/yr Water Polo Y * $5.00/ season ZS/ lu/93 Page i of 11 LODI PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NON-RESIDENT FEE PROPOSAL BY PROGRAM/ACTIVITY OR PARK USES Activity Area User Current Fee Proposed Non -Resident Fee Youth Adult Sr Citizen ADULT SPORTS Softball A $200 to 5400 $15.00 Basketball A $200 to $400 $15.00 Volleyball A $100 to $200 $15.00 Rental of Facility A Diamond rental N/A Big Valley Seniors Sr Diamond rental N/A Tournament A/Sr Diamond rental NIA SPECIALTY CLASSES Y/A/Sr $20 to $4S per class * $5.00 * $5.00 * $5.00 MISC INDOOR/OUTDOOR Y/A Sponsored events * N/A * N/A * N/A Special Events, Camps, Clinics, Class, Events CAMP HUTCHINS Y $50 to $75 per week * $15.00/yr age o 3 -1 H 0 LODI PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NON-RESIDENT FEE PROPOSAL BY PROGRAWACTIVITY OR PARK USES Activity Area User Current Fee Proposed Non -Resident Fee Youth Adult Sr Citizen PARK USES Y/A/Sr RV Units (overnight parking) N/A N/A N/A Picnics (shelter rentals) N/A N/A N/A Boat Ramp (uses) N/A N/A N/A Facility Rentals (perks or facilities) N/A N/A N/A Picnic Kit N/A N/A N/A *Indicates age group to be considered for non-resident fees 8/10193 Page 3 of 3 Y C� H H H z E 3IT D PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION COMMUNICATION TO: The Lodi Parks & Recreation Commission DATE OF MEETING: 8/24193 FROM: The Director's Office SUBJECT: Non -Resident Fees - Task Force Committee Report from Commissioners Casalegno and Meyer RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the Parks and Recreation Commission review and implement the following non-resident fees: $5.00 per youth activities; $15.00 per adult activities; and/or $5.00 per senior citizen activities. Exceptions: $15.00 per year Lodi City Swim Club and $15.00 per year Camp Hutchins. Additionally, a $5.00 per class for all age groups for special intereu fee classes. The above recommended fees would be above and beyond the activity base registration fee. PREPARED BY: Ron Williamson, Parks and Recreation Director. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Members of the Task Force Committee were Commissioners Bob Casalegno (Chairman) and Chad Meyer; Richard Prima, Public Works Department; Dixon Flynn, Finance Department Director; Diana Slawson, non-resident rural east area; Daphne Felde, non-resident rural west area; and Ron Williamson, Parks and kecreation Director. This committee was charged by the Parks and Recreation Commission to develop a non-resident fee schedule for activities. Two meetings and lengthy discussions were held. The above fees address operations -related fees; and not capital. A combination of related information; i.e., (1) a report from Richard Prima, which his summary suggested $27.00 per registration per activity; (2) Mr. Meyer suggested a higher figure by his computation, and (3) another figure was generated by Finance Director Dixon Flynn. The bottom line is, there is no singular and exact way to figure operations costs by non- residents. It was therefore suggested using the survey materials from surrounding communities (that compare to Lodi), in that there is a need to develop a fee schedule for non-residents, the Committee took the position of let's pick a figure and start low, to be comparable to survey cities. Therefore, the basic fees of $5.00 per youth, $15.00 per adult and $5.00 per senior citizen (per activity registration) were basic fees with which to start. The exceptions would be, Lodi City Swim Club (three quarters) $15.00 annually; Camp Hutchins, $15.00 additional registration fee annually, ::nd $5.00 across-the-board for special interest fee classes, which basically already cover 100% + of their direct cost and a need for enough people to conduct the classes (10 to 15 per class) without interference of high fees that would discourage registrations and disallow the conducting of the said class. Therefore, the above fee schedule is recommended and should periodically be reviewed. Commission Communication Non -Resident Fees - Task Force Committee Report Meeting Date: August 24, 1993 Page 2 As far as capital dollars to recover the cost for facility construction, it was the position of the Committee to first get the correct and accepted non-resident population figures settled and then approach a plan. Assessment districts/development impact fees seem out of the question, especially when the assessed area could be 8 to 15 miles from facilities to be built; i.e., Lockeford/Clements area and facilities in Lodi. The whole issue should be addressed after the adoption of the Park, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan by the Commission and more time can be spent looking into possible options. FUNDING: Using the non-resident figures generated in the Recreation Dep'artment's report, approximately 1,800 adults (527.000) and 1,700 youth ($8.500) participating in department programs in 1992-1993, a total of V5M could be recovered by these new fees. RW:srb --LINLn'ES, PARKS 6 RECREPSIM 00MUSSION, SF'1'E MER 7, 1993 EXHIBIT D C. Non -Res. it Fees Task Force Report Commissioner Casalegno reported on two meetings o! the Task Force. It is anticipated that the increased non-resident fees would generate approximately $35,500 additional revenue. Non-residents owning a business in Lodi would be given resident status. Commissioner Meyer noted that the intention is to create additional revenue but still maintain participation. Richard Prima, Assistant City Engineer, gave background on the studies he had conducted explaining that with sales tax is difficult to come up with a "hard number" for non-resident contribution. Chairman Johnson questioned if property, water, sewer taxes, etc. had been factored. Mr. Prima confirmed they were included. At this point, Chairman Johnson opened up the meeting for public comment. Speaking on the above were - Terry Wisdom, Hwy 99. AcampQ - tie requested clarification on what constitutes a non-resident and if fees for youth sports go into youth sports or the general fund. Norm Parkin, 7770 East Orchard. Acampo - Questioned the amount of property tax going to Parks and Recreation. Jim Jones, 48 North Allen Drive. Lodi - He feels the delays should stop and go ahead with the non-resident fees now. Frank Alegre. 2000 Edgewood Drive, Lodi - Stated that he agrees with the non-resident fee and would like to see half of the fees go back into the upkeep of parks and ball diamonds. Director Williamson spoke regarding assessment or developmental impact fees for special projects as another alternative to address capital improvements. Commissioner Wall expressed concern regarding dual participation and fees for non-resident rentals of facilities. Chairman Johnson stated that he felt waiting for the master plan may be the best way to go and he feels that in light of budget restraints the proposed fees are too low. On a motion by Commissioner Wall and second by Commissioner Meyer, the commission recommended accepting the fees as submitted by the task force. Ayes - Commissioners Casalegno, Wall, Melby, Meyer Noes - Commissioner Johnson Motion carried 4 - 1 PRCMIV.SEP -4- ABSOLUTION NO. 93-13° aaaaaysaaaaasaasasaaa � A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL APPROVING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NON-RESIDENT FEE PROPOSAL BY PROGRAM/ACTIVITY OR PARK USES aoocaaxcaaaaaaazaaasaazaasssssaasaaaaas=as=aaaaasxaaaxssasazazaassasaas BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lodi City Council does hereby approve the Parks and Recreation Department Non -Resident Fee Proposal by Program/Activity or Park Uses, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by reference. Dated: October 20, 1993 sssaaaaasaszsaasaaaaaaasaaaaasasaaaaazaaaaaaxsaaaaasaaaasaxaaaasaaa:a:a I hereby certify that Resolution No. 93-135 was passed and adopted by the Lodi City Council in a regular meeting held October 20, 1993 by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Noes: Council Members - Absent: Council Members - Jennifer M. Perrin City Clerk 93-135 RES93135/TXTA.01V LODI PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NON-RESIDENT FEE PROPOSAL BY PROGRAM/ACTIYTTY OR PARK USES Activity Area User Current Fee 1 Proposed Non -Resident Fee Youth Adult Sr Citizen IPLAYGROUNDS Y $1.00 per day * N/A I YOUTH/TEEN SPORTS City Rec. Sports League Y $15 to S20 $5.00 I �i B.O.B.S. Spore Y $25 to 5125 $5.00 I Tourna.aents Y Facility fee N/A AQUATICS Public Swim Y/A/Sr S.75 to $1.25/swim * N/A • N/A * NIA �I Swim Lessons Y $12.00/two weeks • $5.00 Swim League Y $15 per program * S5.00 fSummer &,at Rentals Y/A/Sr $2 to $5 per use * NIA ' N/A • N/A Lodi City Swim Club Y $25 to $35 per mo * $15.00/yr Water Polo Y ( * $5.001 season 8/10/93 Page 1 of 3 LODI PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NON-RESIDENT FEE PROPOSAL BY PROGRAM/ACTIVITY OR PARK USES Activity Area User Current Fee Proposed Non.Rcjident Fee Youth Adult Sr Citizen ADULT SPORTS Softball A $200 to $400 $15.00 Basketball A $200 to $400 $15.00 Volleyball A 5100 to 5200 $15.00 Rental of Facility A Diamond rental N/A Big Valley Seniors Sr Diamond rental N/A Tournament A/Sr Diamond rental N/A SPECIALTY CLASSES Y/A/Sr $20 to $45 per class * $5.00 * $5.00 * $5.00 MISC C4DOORIOUTDOOR Y/A Sponsored events * N/A * N/A * N/A Special Events, Camps, Clinics, Class, Events CANT HUTCHINS Y $SO to $75 per week * 515.00/yr V/ ■V/7J e 2 o LODI PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NON-RESIDENT FEE PROPOSAL BY PROGRAWACTWITY OR PARK USES Activity Area User Current Fee Proposed Non -Resident Fee Youth Adult Sr Citizen PARK USES Y/A/Sr RV Units (overnight parking) N/A N/A N/A Picnics (shelter rentals) N/A N/A N/A Boat Ramp (uses) N/A NIA N/A Facility Rentals (parks or facilities) N/A N/A N/A Picnic Kit N/A N/A N/A •Indicates age group to be considered for non-resident fees 8/10/93 Page 3 of RESOLUTION NO. 93-13 ` ssassissasssssss:rias A RESOLUTION OF THE L0DI CITY COUNCIL APPROVING PARRS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NON-RESIDENT FES PROPOSAL BY PROGRAM/ACTIVITY OR PARK USES aaaoasaaaaaaaaaaaassaaxaossaasaaaaaasasassaxassaaaaaasasa BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lodi City Council does hereby approve the Parks and Recreation Department Non -Resident Fee Proposal by Program/Activity or Park Uses, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by reference. Dated: October 20, 1993 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaoaaaaaaaaasaxaaaxaaaaaaaaxaaaasaaxaaaaxaaaasasasaassasass I hereby certify that Resolution No. 93-133 was passed and adopted by the Lodi City Council in a regular meeting held October 20, 1993 by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Sieglock, Snider and Pennino Noes: Council Members - Davenport and Mann Absent: Council Members - None ifer . Perrin City Clerk 93-133 RES93133/TXTA.02J W a a 0 a> a W Q A� O� �V d0 C4 a WV �. oppG � Z� as C/) 0 04 ¢a aw pw O W z 0 z ti�a b Q 4 . z zz v w a+ Q z �a o� _Q � LL V 0 N N i� ifi r9 vi {A iA iA Ld to N V3 a 0 d a ..r U CLO ed M4 W ts. ad O M S z d1 � , LL Q d .M� 8 8 8 S Q a a a O w w w 7 b � � x -H -H � V � 3 `� Q�7 > d a+ S Q C.7 Q V L y V Cl to 'by O _O O O O O V S pO O S cd O oO vai vii a H N � v a w� 0 '� V d > t0 F� CLI > V v/i oG V) v) U LODI PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NON-RESIDENT FEE PROPOSAL BY PROGRAM/ACTWITY OR PARK USES Activity Area User Current Fee Proposed Non -Resident Fee Youth Adult Sr Citizen PARK USES Y/A/Sr RV Units (overnight pariing) N/A N/A N/A Picnics (shelter rentals) N/A N/A N/A Boat Ramp (uses) N/A N/A N/A Facility Rentals (parks or facilities) N/A N/A N/A Picnic Kit N/A N/A N/A 'Indicates ageg roup to be considered for non-resident fees U10/93 Page 3 of 3