Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - November 3, 1993 (47), OI pO CITY OF LO©I COUNCIL COMMUNICATION AGENDA TITLE: Consider Repealing Ordinance No. 854 establishing Building Setback Lines on South Stockton Street within the Incorporated Limits of the City of Lodi between Kettleman Lane and Harney Lane MEETING DATE: November 3, 1993 PREPARED BY: Community Development Director RECOMMENDED ACTION: that the City Council consider repealing Ordinance No. 854 establishing Building Setback Lines on South Stockton Street within the incorporated limits of the City of Lodi between Kettleman Lane and Harney Lane. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: When Ordinance No. 854 was adopted in 1967, its purpose was to eliminate the possible construction of buildings in the future street right-of-way and within the Zoning Ordinance setback restrictions. The Community Development Department recently received a comment from the developer of Bangs Ranch Subdivision (eastside of Stockton Street, north and south of Century Boulevard) that Ordinance No. 854 will require a 20 -foot rear yard on the reverse frontage lots along Stockton Street where the Zoning Ordinance requires only 10 feet. This excess setback requirement affects all residential developments along this portion of Stockton Street. The City Council has already approved Growth Management allocations to Colvin Ranch, Richards Ranch, and Morimoto-Neuharth properties which are similarly affected. Staff research indicates that Ordinance No. 854 is no longer needed. Subsequent actions by the City Council to adopt the General Plan - Circulation Element and the City's Standard Plans protect the future right-of-way. As previously mentioned, the Zoning Restrictions of the Municipal Code provide for the standard 10 -foot rear yard setback. Figure 2-1, Future Circulation Network (Required by 2007), of the General Plan establishes this portion of Stockton Street as a 4 -lane undivided arterial. City of Lodi Standard Plan 101 indicates that a 4 -land undivided arterial shall have an 80 -foot right-of-way. These two documents adequately protect that future Stockton Street right-of-way and make Ordinance No. 854 unnecessary. APPRGVED '"� J `� _ S� THOMAS A. PETERSON 'ecycieo Pape, /// City Manager CCPLANI8/TXTD.OIC cc-, ;Consider Repealing Ordin, a No. 854 October 27, 1993 Page 2. If the Ordinance is not repealed, it will continue to appear in preliminary Title reports for all new subdivisions along the street, and will indicate a rear yard setback for reverse frontage lots in excess of all other residential development. FUNDING: None required. m s B. Schr der o unity Development Director JBS/cg CCPLANI8/TXTD.OIC 557 ORDINANCE NO. 954 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING BUILDING SETBACK LIMES ON SOUTH STOCKTON STREET WITHIN THE INCORPORATED LLMITS OF THE CITY JF LODI BETWEEN K£TTLEMAN LANE AND HARNEY LAME The City Council of the City of Lodi does ordain as follows: Section 1. From and after the effective date of this ordinance, no building or structure, except public works appertaining to the portion of street hereinafter described, shall be erected, placed or maintained between two lines drawn parallel to and east and west of the center line of South Stockton Street from the center line of Kettleman Lane on the north to the center line of Harney Lane on the south, c .id building setback lines to be distant from the center line of South Stockton Street as follows: I. In R -I Single -Family Residential Districts, R -Z Single -Family Residential Districts, R-3 Limited Multiple -Family Residential Districts, R-4 Multiple -Family Residential-Inetihitional Districts, and C -P Commercial. Professional Office Districts the building setback shall be sixty feet from the street center line. Z. In C -I Neighborhood -Commercial Districts, C -Z Gcneral Com- mercial Districts and M Industrial Districts the building setback line shall be forty feet from the street center line. 3. In C -^u Commercial Shopping Districts the building setback line shall be ninety feet from the street center line. 4. In P -D Planned Development Districts the building setback line shall be forty feet plus any additional area established by the Planning Com- mission from the street center line. Section Z. The Chief BuDdmR Inspector of the City of Lodi shall not issue any building permit in violation hereof, and any building or structure hereafter erected between the center line above mentioned and the building GLIM r setback lines herein established shall be deemed a public nuisance and may be abated as such. Section 7. This ordinance shall be published one time in the "Lodi News' Sentinel," a daily newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- lished to the City of Lodi, i.rior to the expiration of fifteen days from the passage thereof and shall be in force and take effect thirty days from and after i asage. lr . Approved this 6th day of De mbar, • s - ,, ALD Attest! BEATRIC GARIBALDI, Ci • Clerk State of California, County of San Joaquin, as. I, Beatrice Garibaldi, City Clerk of th. City of Lodi, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 854 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council or said City held November 15, 1967, and was thereafter passed, adopted, and ordered to print at a regular meeting held December 6, 1967, by the following vote - Aye a: ote:Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Culbertson, Hunnell, Walton and Kirsten Noes: None Absent: None IYurther certify that Ordinance No. 854 was approved and signed by e- _- the Mayor on the date of its passage and the same has been publ(aholdi'Ru;Itua V to law. City Clerk at Q,-MK;astflR•M. JAN 8 1966 t r tf1 i%r' :;:•'f'• "-` RX"I V trnn! of MY OF LODi Gf 1j%I peC'!dI% *3177 n�:1. �9 i S'' � �,er ► .'., feet I�t Pa� GEOKE H. WWI. C . t' s,a.a, fa41y4MIUL now . 4 tLEOENO 6F ma•aa•...... ! LANE FREEWAY �_—..j.iMfTfYMM 4F 4 LAI46 FREEWAY O! LANE OMOED ARTERIAL • LAM .NOPIVSD 2C% ,U ----- D ARTERIAL -- 4 LANE UNOIVIOEO ARTERIAL 2A ----- 2 LANE ARTERIAL ♦ Nj 2C .............. 2 LANE COLLECTOR �r OTHER LOCAL lTREE7! ' ,U _ �LKL--�� MllfRaplANO! I14ROVEfENi! —�.�.j9Y��a--7�—r----- SO aU 2 ! . I --i ■rf n o pt 2A 0 zC._....__.:........ E .............. •L:•....... 2C ............................................................... ............................... I Lod( General Plan FIGURE 2-1. FUTURE CIRCULATION NETWORK (REQUIRED BY 2007) CITY OF LOD1 Street Sections 'rrroR`'PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT See 2.5�-*� Notes 4 & 5.12-5 . 1 � 2• Right–Of–Way(R/W) Face of Curb to Face of C 2 o) F) 2. 2.57 —1 C&S Nz3J 1 7- Vertical C,G&S. (Notes 3 & 6) ` 1 1/2:1 Max slope to ex. ground op of curb except ® driveways (See Design Stds Sec. 1.500) Nominal Face of Curb TYPICAL SECTION Rolled C G&S j A a STRUCTURAL SECTION Street Classification R W Minor Residential Standard Residential Minor Collector Major Collector Industrial (Local) Secondary Arterial Four–Lane Undivided k4inor Arterial Four–Lane Divided Major Arterial Six–Lane Divided 50' 55' 60' 68' 66' 80' 94' 118' (Notes 3 & 6) Structural section to be determined by the City. (Design Std, Sec. 1.600) `0.50'-957 R.C. Compacted Native Material (Remove & Replace) 0.50'-907 R.C. Compacted O.G. B F–F Min. C&S 34' 5.5' Rolled 39, 5.5' Rolled Structural section to be determined by the City (Design Stds Sec. 1.600) 0.20' AC (AC -3/8' Max. Aggr. Med. Gr.) •.: �: 't 52' 5.5' Vertical 52' 4.5' Vertical over 0.30' AB Min. 5.5' Vertical 0.67'-927 R.C. Compacted 0. G. j A a STRUCTURAL SECTION Street Classification R W Minor Residential Standard Residential Minor Collector Major Collector Industrial (Local) Secondary Arterial Four–Lane Undivided k4inor Arterial Four–Lane Divided Major Arterial Six–Lane Divided 50' 55' 60' 68' 66' 80' 94' 118' (Notes 3 & 6) Structural section to be determined by the City. (Design Std, Sec. 1.600) `0.50'-957 R.C. Compacted Native Material (Remove & Replace) 0.50'-907 R.C. Compacted O.G. B F–F Min. C&S 34' 5.5' Rolled 39, 5.5' Rolled 44' 5.5' Vertical 52' 5.5' Vertical 52' 4.5' Vertical 64' 5.5' Vertical 76' 5.5' Vertical 102' 5.5' Vertical SECTION DIMENSION TABLE 1. See the City Public Improvement Design 'ec. 1 for general design requirements. 2. Widening at intersections to provide additional iones may be required. 3. See Std. Plans 135 and 136 for Vertical and Rolled C,G&S respectively. 4. The area between the R/W and back of sidewalk shall be graded to 0.02' per ft and properly compacted to prevent settlement. Where wider sidewalk is required (ie. comercial areas, around hydrants, poles etc) sidewalk specifications apply. E. Private use of the R/W subject to Encroachment Permit requirements and Design Standards Sections 1.400 & 1.500. 6. See Design Stds. Section 1.500 for curb & gutter type criteria. 1C_3.. KT No! Date Revision I Apar. Approved �Y h.ate , ig� - --- -- A Works odw i RC. Structural Section A A B B B B B e A.C. 002' PAVING DETAIL AT TOE STD PLAN Dot. ` 1101 Doli 4w 6 19 A'WIT w1w11+• ...� M r •r rw•Ir nrf M • r 1r1 1 r11I osy N1m Y N1rWY . 1r 11.1 • /1A,1• ,1,.• 1r•w ME .NIIII./ .N.IIk%W Ass 1 i TIR7f f//f•d///ii IMM&M AMM MEN AR #1 I AM 'AWE •A '1 /Y -1 Cl It IMt17>t AID Mrr" ArrMAOAf tit N ANt/.M 12=8 A.LUS'dOUcr SONY9 MV7d 1N3irdO73A30 2661 IAy VnVggJ 0191Ai11 Mr,r f11H•l. n•OAy // to 01y2,00 IM/rrlY/ /{•A-fsw NIMH • slot" form from" N NIMIN urNN nlrNw•11 III -for INf N/ ►'NI/ 41 NY >i II r1 .•11 lnrM :N • M r.Y i� N+ .111'1{ A M MIi11 .. M •IM 7/ftlrflflfv f /trml u,ut .arm/ ,1, �•�'•~'�'"��...•.1 ^ -, � � � 1 � � y_ ,,.�. I , N N I r/ H N Y • 11 I{ u 1 b Il 1 • N ' � ' 071A1101 .'- -- ' , ;i ' -_• - I/ _ .: _ .. _ - ► � fid �. � -- I{ • • I I/ M III N // � N N {. • I N , • 1--1...1.._1- - '� i • M II'1 .-.- Is I 1 w Y NIN IN /A • 1•: _, •� �I � N it —! r1r 1 1{ /• I wor A M N• Ir , r N �' • 'u N N NMI '' •1 I I N of w w w w '• I •• all r.., .I'.. � J � �� r s•--- =M I r � - - 1,•{`-I Mtitl17�•�.-.--�-�T' �--:. ii -•• 1 . M' m. •. ' V N ••.' N M •IN 1 // r/ ►TION ! rI111grf /I /IIMIf nrrl /n� =��; A• F I -- • lmll i Wool .,.A rfr/rl//�Ilti .�II�•r •n •y�f � �.�L 1'- _ .-_- r. . / . . II.I� r•1 /Ift mft/f f1 ! form♦ t t ' .. • .1.Y rI1)NwY v.•�^. r 7rli �ftw � � J ifl' •r , ,raw+ r..o� �'1:�ry I .,L 4- I ,•: I I:II�a Morimoto/Neuharth Development Plan 87 Single Family Units Lodi. California I s - C F \ 1 r--STOCMY sr.: ALMOND DA.: tt�vQe Y~M f k• ..7->O 1 L� C�tL�Iw. R/�•i/' ( f JLi ' x our* /re a our* low r' —rsor s4m­=71A1171�t 7 1 0 i:--�`'4-1 — ,.. -�� zAa Vii. OGa7 afsirrC:c� atts 60 t 1 f 13• uHrr YD. I 4 �tiRT •t Y t r M J7 k s! as14 ._._ 37 h 11�• 7 s id Al 161 48 1t yo \ or xA$cx CGUAT% st war Ma. ! Sir 1 tf—N ' � F S1 .• k I • (.. • �4 /3 Ot i LiF f �� I J2 = S@ 2 r a > t0 v ' al 14 w i i .� 48 ►7 1 U _cru' —Ir t.lrtf c ' -1 •� = 14 t to i � II 1! 2i 27 -m I t9 4r tQ ' ?r 12 13 2A 1 r sr f4'+ as ..__ w. + I 06�'SLO�EYt „--- colvotm_Raqnch� I LVI - < a7Q! 39Y1Noyd e n0 der. 3 ! S •�« \'E6 Y � O�� � � � fiA• v �` •4 �1 " �• .. �•"ala, � aP2 r a - `x It O _ - R *-� jj s ZIF • M - t 1 w � � 1 1 Hifi •�♦ / 1z § � t• - V I t }tom- .r SAA _ f _ Lii•15 N �, ( �- �� Clt7f)02: I I J �I 3 1 I XMe ittetslnor ot�7ew i t ORDINANCE NO. 1587 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CaTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODI REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 854 OF THE LODI MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO BUILDING SETBACK LINES ON SOUTH STOCKTON STREET :HRREAS, When Ordinance No. 854 was adopted in 1967, its purpose was to eliminate the possible construction of buildings in the future street right-of-way and within the Zoning Ordinance setback restrictions; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department recently received a comment from the developer of Bangs Ranch Subdivision (east side of Stockton Street, north and south of Century Boulevard) that Ordinance No. 854 will require a 20 -foot rear yard cn the reverse frontage lots along Stockton Street where the Zoning Ordinance requires only 10 feet. This excess setback requirement affects all residential developments along this portion of Stockton Street. The City Council has already approved Growth Management allocations to Colvin Ranch, Richards Ranch, and Morimoto-Neuharth properties which are similarly affected; and WHEREAS, Staff research indicates that Ordinance No. 854 is no longer needed. Subsequent actions by the City Council ti adopt the General Plan - Circulation Element and the City's Standard Plans protect the future right-of-way. As previously mentioned, the Zoning Restrictions of the Municipal Code provide 2or the standard 10 -foot rear yard setback; and WHEREAS, Figure 2-1, Future Circulation Network (Required by the year 2007), of the General Plan establishes this portion. of Stockton -1- 7' Street as a ane undivided arterial. City Lodi Standard Plan 101 indicates that a 4 -land undivided arterial shall have an 80 -foot right-of-way. These two documents adequately protect that future Stockton Street right-of-way and make Ordinance No. 854 unnecessary; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Lodi as follows: SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 1587 is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION 2. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed insofar as such conflict may exist. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be published one time in the "Lodi News Sentinel", a daily newspaper of general circulation printed and published <n the City of Lodi and shall be in force and take effect thirty days from and after its passage and approval. Approved this day of PHILLIP A. PENNINO Mayor Attest: JENNIFER M. PERRIN City Clerk State of California County of San Joaquin, ss. I, Jennifer M. Perrin, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1587 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi held November 3, 1993 and was .2- thereafter pas adopted and ordered to print a regular meeting of said Council held , 1993 by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Noes: Council Members - Dbsent: Council Members - Abstain: Council Members - I further certify that Ordinance No. 1587 was approved and signed by the Mayor on the date of its passage and the same has been published pursuant to law. Approved as to Form BOBBY W. MCNAZT City Attorney ORD1587/TXTA.01V -3- JENNIFER M. PERRIN City Clerk