HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - July 21, 1993 (50)of
CITY OF LODI
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
AGENDA TITLE: Consider ..ertifying the City of Lodi's Compliance with the
Congestion Management Program (CMP) of San Joaquin County for the
Period July 1, 1992 to June 30, 1993
MEETING DATE: July 21, 1993
PREPARED BY: Community Development Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council consider certifying that the City
of Lodi is in conformity with the Congestion Management
Plan (CMP) of San Joaquin County.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On January 1, 1992, the San Joaquin County Congestion
Management Plan (CMP) became operative for all
jurisdictions in San Joaquin County. This state mandated
program was adopted in an attempt to improve congestion on San Joaquin County's
highways and major roads and also to improve air quality in the county.
State law requires a CMP to be created and for local compliance with the CMP to be
annually monitored. The program is linked to new gasoline tax revenues which local
governments receive under the provisions of Propositions 111 and 108, approved by
the voters in June 1990. Failure to comply with CMP requirements can jeopardize the
City's share of these new revenues.
The San Joaquin County Cr -IP has a self -certification program to determine conformity
with the CMP. Annually, each jurisdiction must fiil out a check list and c*:.tify
that they are in compliance. The check list must be accompanied by a Certification
Statement adopted by the local jurisdiction's governing board, stating that to the
best of its knowledge, the jurisdiction is conforming with the CMP.
The annual monitoring to determine compliance will take place in September of every
year, with the compliance material due by July 31 each year. The Community
Development Department has determined the City is in compliance with the cIMP and
recommends that the City Council consider certifying the City's conformity.
FUNDING: None required. (�Ix A�&
James B. Schroeder
Community Development Director
Prepared by David Morimoto, Senior Planner
JBS/DM/cg
Attachments
APPROVE i,
THOMAS A. PETERSON myclea paper
City Mamom
CCCD93.35/TXTD.01C
CC -t
t
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PLAN
Self -Certification Checklist
Designated
CMP System
1.
Are there any principal arterial segments that might be considered
for addition to the CMP regional transportation system? If yes,
please add to the attached conformance documentation.
No.
Level of Service Standards
2.
Are all level of service calculations for principal arterial
segments for which the jurisdiction is listed as "lead entity" (or
which fall primarily within its jurisdiction) included in the
attached documentation?
Yes. See attached A-1 and Table 1
3.
Do any of these calculations indicate a LOS below the standard
before interregional travel has been removed?
No.
4.
Are all facility changes that may affect level of service
calculations on the CMP system included in the attached
documentation?
Yes.
Transit Standards
5.
Is all information verifying compliance with routing, frequency
1.
and coordination standards included in the attached documentation?
No. Lodi currently meets the City's transit needs by providing
general public dial -a -ride service. This service is available
weekdays from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Saturdays 9:00 a.m. to 5:00
p.m. and Sundays 12:00 noon to 5:00 p.m. The service is available
to the general public, although a majority of riders are elderly
or handicap certified. The average weekday trip count for 1992
was 330 passengers.
The City has completed an evaluation of our Transit creeds and
Assessment Plan prepared by a consultant, to determine the
direction of future transit plans. The City is proceeding with a
two-tier level of service for public transit. The two-tier:
service includes both a demand response system and a fixed route
system. The demand response system would enable the City to
continue to meet the needs of the elderly and disabled residents.
The fixad route service would provide a reliable and convenient
transit service for those whose mobility needs require more
frequent and routine service than provided under current demand
r
response system. The City hopes to implement the fixed route
system beginning in the 1994-95 fiscal year.
6. Are there any standards that the jurisdiction is having difficulty
complying with or believes that it should not be required to
comply with? If so, explain in the attached documentation.
Yes. The City is still in the planning stage for a fixed route
transit system. The City has made application for Federal funding
to implement a fixed route transit system. If the City is
successful in securing funding, we will prepare the details of
fixed route system including operating schedules, routing and
frequency and farebox structure.
7. Have policies for facilities coordination, new/reconstructed
streets and long-range transit needs been adopted by the
jurisdiction as of June 30, 1992? Will implementation policies
proceed according to a regular schedule after that date?
No. Specific policies for long-range transit needs have not been
adopted but will probably be adopted in the 1993-1994 fiscal
year. As noted in Item No. 6, the City as applied for Federal
funds that will allow us to move forward with a fixed route
system. The funding will allow us to develop a specific program
that will include facilities coordination and specific
construction projects.
The City is working with the County on the Lodi Multi -Modal
Station Feasibility and Site Location Std wit t e intent of
ringing passenger train service to-Co3i. We are also working
with COG on the Regional Transit System Plan.
Land Use Analysis Program
8. Have all land use decisions requiring CMA review been submitted to
the CMA as part of the local environmental review process? (e.g.
General plan amendments with 1,000 or more additional average
daily trips, general plan revisions, cumulative total of all
general plan amendments).
Yes. There has only been one project that fails within this CMA
review process (Bridgetown Shopping Center).
9. Have all significant impacts of the individual 1,000 additional
trip general plan revisions been mitigated? Has documentation of
the proposed mitigations and their estimated costs been submitted
to the CMA?
Yes. The Bridgetown Shopping Center project is still going
through the review process and has not been annexed to the City of
Lodi. It has been determined that the potential traffic generated
by the proposed project will not significantly affect any CMA
roadway.
t -
r --
Trip Reduction and Travel Demand Element
10. Is a description of all transportation control measures in place
or underway included in the attached documentation?
No. The City of Lodi is waiting for the Transportation Control
Measures (TMC) plan being prepared by the San Joaquin valley
Unified Air Pollution Control District. once this plan is
published and adopted, the City will adopt a trip reduction
ordinance.
Capital Improvement Program
11. Is a list of all projects requiring state Flexible Congestion
Relief, Traffic System Management or Urban Commuter Rail funds
included in the attached documentation? Jurisdictions may also
wish to include projects applying for Transit Capital Improvement
program funds on this list.
No. No projects are currently being funded by this program.
12. Is a list of all projects on the CMP system that the jurisdiction
believes will increase roadway capacity or person capacity
(transit) included in the attached documentation?
N/A.
13. Is the information in these project lists given in the Reginnal
Transportation Program format, in priority order, with estimated
costs and all proposed funding sources?
N/A.
Regional Model Analysis
14. Does the jurisdiction wish to use its own regional model to
perform CMP forecasts and analysis? If so, has the CMA approved
the use of the model?
No.
Deficiency Plans
15. Has the CMA indicated that the jurisdiction must prepare a
deficiency plan for a current or projected level of service
deficiency? If so, please list the segments(s) for which a pian
was required and when the plans(s) were submitted to the CMA.
Were these required plans accepted by the CMA? If no, explain why.
No.
CMP LOS calculations
Hutchins Street from Harney Lane to Kettleman Lane
Use urban, two-way arterials, Group C (Use Table 1)
AWT
n/o Harney Lane 12377
1993 Median AWT = 12577
LOS A
Lower Sacramento Road from Kettleman Lane to Turner Road
Use urban, two-way arterials, Group B (Use Table 1)
AWT
s/o vine Street 13775
s/o Turner Road 11500
1993 Median AWT =12639
LOS B
Table 1
AT±_"Pn=•fw L --V= V7. 5k-UriC= MA3= U VnL=JMS
e aR :1.OR 5 UfLSe3ftl�N�D (S.QOQ'� AR ,
I�aOd 3et2+e laaf.:amm+ ISM ttaatsm Dommow t9901
ZWaWA? Azr?,wmrAr a F330WA23
Cassa/.OL OA is 0.7 00mus a awmwwwa pR amd dmf 1 l•1mm� va w�a �....� 30Q OR7 rt �� m .�mm
S mmw� r pmrres►ammmr 4aum�m aasm
Lam/ Lawm� l�lddsm�v
Dram LwrS..a A 5 C D
A 8 C D L 4 931W a20W
2timmt MW LUM 1.Se07 Id= 174W 91,900 Imsoo its=
•Cmm maw 3L200 == 34.900 216Z9 a $� SLS tS�O 1.7.903 l3i.T,:J
Gown 4a.i(a 04710 Siam Sim l0 �•� lOT.100 ISLZD tsa3w 19&400
Ctsm 8 3.7.11 on t.3ulama mewamma ormr caw" a Iowa= 60_11 ams we36000.am w a Gess it
t+w/ Lan t�mdaLSwa
Dram LsrdS.w A 8 G Ct
A 9 C D = . ZIAM =I= AQNW 3aam aura
2IIvat 9.070 =00 t4.= I%= ta:m a --L= 44= MWO aLm 9L=
.arL ZM= 31.M 3LLLD 33L3 :4= a 42=0 am= 9a.'n0 tISo to==o
sorb 3fl: W 40,100 44=0 41139ir 3130 - L' l0 52.00 St= t17.. -.w t42x0 ta9W
Creme 31.e......awr acw�l
L
�a+a c tLe m zs mvintt.a mm.�. t.e torr
DI7IDED/B:iDI4IDED i�D.►'BS13�'iZ�
A a G a 3
A
4 11100 '=200 'TsoD 45am &SWO
.r a Ledswm D It
S
2boom. _ to= IZ.•!dD t4.000 M'W
COMEC =1 AND LO= 3TIL— :9
.Dot =00 210 =--W 34W
anrt =L= 4SDW 47..203 32m
j
Ctsq D DA s 13.1�mm0owa lam.levaaa pm•atal
waswq
Lamrma/
Drmwa twddS.m
A— W, e a a
Mme ubdi te �
s vent _ _ s�7o azo Ls•ao
1
. oae. ciao 70,37f �o
'
sort = = 3tuao naso �o
s
� s 020 a.�s w'.r.r rmwwan pwrsme
_ _ :<9W 37= +4200
trm~�
tht comm~ "swan" ova -mm ®,Www
.r at,. C- D a
aapV +n1mm* ere mvlaaa esanrea m.7.. 'raara.a~ aw avers" aww must vwmva+s ww m 1lm.alt as taws aaar�nmmwA o r mewr..a . a 4
2v a. tZ= 14AW
&MEOW ad UO" -am" .swat be caal.a on a eamr
4001 7L7W Sim
cart 3LOW 44000
C9sgrtmmsteae4ima)awatlwmmtiwewmemmamrswit
C
art attOmam pmammyaL►emmaa/6mmmma
L
maaasd,mem�lawsa.KSGiDOm7
L'rm�
aw..a trd.rsm.m
s
A— a- C.— a a
s
2cimtt toxo IA®
4006 3900 3207
_
s aM 30200 41000
t2
aaeep a tames stoma 4.i ..mpm.trt wwmw.emn pmsvm
assspwwrmpammrtaamOmm
C
alwmedva.�/aanawr9000m
L
comma twddsmam
3
A- C- D s
s
2a210ft _ 3.920! LAW
.Ort sZ0 =-w
a Coo. _ Ad= Sly
IIS
Creme 31.e......awr acw�l
3
Lawn taimrs..e
DI7IDED/B:iDI4IDED i�D.►'BS13�'iZ�
A a G a 3
.. _ �.aoo �o �rao
4 11100 '=200 'TsoD 45am &SWO
a matt 31SW 3a7W ea rs.=
LAOM MWOMM Lot. wme at.a Aap1>®ttSm►
• 3Aa00 3%;w 73=1 9Q,7ta '1731=
COMEC =1 AND LO= 3TIL— :9
carow"A
are" Dowe 6a 34 rmnlm"pwuwd
2 Dw1ar Tea ..
it 10-d4tswmw
Ar a e a t
waswq
2 _ SAW 14am tum I"m
3 loam =7m =am 930
Mme ubdi te �
• lai0o =Law 34.700 3LZW
1
M we Limtmrw.a .40
'
oaw s ae.,s.*..u1ltm.ramm..awrsrr
s
taw. Lwdrsawm
_ _ :<9W 37= +4200
• :sn omda a,7. maws pa .n w"d ams ,o..7. be .A w for qm w wm mq aft. : a.
tht comm~ "swan" ova -mm ®,Www
2 _ I190 IS= I7JW
aapV +n1mm* ere mvlaaa esanrea m.7.. 'raara.a~ aw avers" aww must vwmva+s ww m 1lm.alt as taws aaar�nmmwA o r mewr..a . a 4
3 _ _ W.'700 :Aam x000
&MEOW ad UO" -am" .swat be caal.a on a eamr
_ swim --.Dw —Am
7.+w T4ewwmw4.s.�.r.Amvam.anwrmr
aamaac�om v�la4 �m tamaamm
..era.aw�aww5ma7o
i
Ls� tiddSw n
Jr. C D E
2_ _ 1090.0 MM I7 7ZQ
3 _ _ tasm 2MOW mauo
4 _ _ 3.07.3 =4W =6000
came
avA pmt pmmep4,mambl.maa
�rrtdaiewwwwasawKYamq
i
taw t"ddamra
3
_
3
2 1253 I= ttL00
Ciannt be 2cw",ma.
Stmrtav —mm" d :'2+msewlrradaa 1906.
3
_ _ 71400 == 1:00
DI7IDED/B:iDI4IDED i�D.►'BS13�'iZ�
•
.. _ �.aoo �o �rao
taYK eee.vowameS e...-., aRsisat,ew.ss �se�e.m 0�0
LAOM MWOMM Lot. wme at.a Aap1>®ttSm►
T.40.WAZ
COMEC =1 AND LO= 3TIL— :9
{w*mmmme meea.otam a.mrmr
2 Dw1ar Tea ..
Lam
waswq
t
r a -a
Mme ubdi te �
2
_ _ ?'Mo LL900 t22a0
M we Limtmrw.a .40
4
_ 19=1 := zwoo
a
_ _ :<9W 37= +4200
• :sn omda a,7. maws pa .n w"d ams ,o..7. be .A w for qm w wm mq aft. : a.
tht comm~ "swan" ova -mm ®,Www
'A dawn.& Amami be uA1mm ferelwaa .n.e9s maa/are aottmaataw. .�. R 001. aM AOMmg aO�W.f' 70..W �CmYt 7.K 4 v..t tK wd�tl.f K'.fYIMCenm
aapV +n1mm* ere mvlaaa esanrea m.7.. 'raara.a~ aw avers" aww must vwmva+s ww m 1lm.alt as taws aaar�nmmwA o r mewr..a . a 4
ams *am* on tat 1950 Hlnww Caa.otr w.mw ma Flands a mbe eaAi A...ww -M mmm man Iva
&MEOW ad UO" -am" .swat be caal.a on a eamr
5Y aa.a aaww :St ua+w • maut,arr a..lminpsramN mows of w7wm &vat aoOw� s eaa msa1.
Ciannt be 2cw",ma.
Stmrtav —mm" d :'2+msewlrradaa 1906.
San Joaquin County Council of Governments
•
Mcraber Agencies: Cuia of Esealon. LWWW. Lodi. ylanteea. Ripon. Swcktua. Tracy. County of San Joaquin
Congestion Management Program
LAND USE ANALYSIS
Trip Generation Wodcsbeet:
Six Month Summary of All Active General Pian Amendments
Date July 12, 1993
Lead Agency: City of Lodi
Contact: David Norimoto
Phone (209) 333-6711
Please list information on all active General Pian Amendmmm that your jurisdiction
k received over the six momh period from July 1, 1992 to June 30, 1993.
Attach a location map for each project to tfus worimbeeL .
Project I.D. Numbers, Tides and Brief Descriptions:
Bridgetown General Plan Amendment - Redesignate 9.6 acre parcel from
8 —
Planned Residential to Neighborhood/Community Commercial to permit
construction of a shopping center.
City staff estimates that this project will generate approximately
1800 additional V.T.s per day. This is well within the capacity of
Turner Road and Lower Sacramento Road. No streets on the CMP network
will be adversely impacted.
(attach another sheet if necessary)
P9910OW Traasporlatlon Plaontn6 Agency. t.oet Transpomdeft Au,orin Congestion Matuganest Ai=c7, Airport EmW Uc Commission
1860 E. Hazelton Avenue • Stockton. California 95:03 • (=09) 468-3913 • FAX: .WF33O 1991
.�<............ uyx:a.. ._.._ ... � � 4
... ....a.w..v...>�.. Yr.r..., i».u, r.....ra.. w...w.vWwa wa.w...mvess.�q
y
Ci ty!C=ioA SLOZenew
04
This 1992-93 self-c=bSczd= w= psepsred by:
(Yezr)
David Morimoto
Name
(209) 333-6711
Phone Number
Coamnity Development, City of Lodi
Departttteot Imbdicmou
Basad upon tine self-Ceca6cadoe cmdditt bad the attached docame=gionsmtf is of tae
ophdon haat City of Lodi has c=b=d to the regof tae
U. pm$=
July 8, 1993
(�) MM)
• Goren*; Body
The City Council, City of Lodi
•Las reviewed tab oomple:nd cbeddist and
$ boY)
snppoating do or amd hay Und that dw policies and acd ms of tab imis i cdu as ra-
I ported herein comply to the zeq it for cou£oama o with the Congestion M=w mm
Pmgtam for San Joaquin Coag.
t
D� July 21. 1993
P lip Pennino
Tl*dw ' Mayor
•�y�te�aCi�c
34p
.Iovetnber b. 1991