Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - January 26, 1993She c c a 1 aw,n � G l CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 27, 1993 . BUDGET PRESENTATION FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT CC -21(b) Mayor Pennino opened the meeting and reminded the audience of the following guidelines for public input at the "Town Hall" meetings. "Specifically, the public is invited to tell the City Council: 1. what City services do you (the public), feel could be reticed or eliminated? 2. what ideas do you have for making the City more efficient? 3. what City services are you willing to pay. more for in order to maintain .them? 4. what City services are you DNWZLLINCi''to see cut, no matter what?" Police Chief Williams introduced the.subjeci�en& presented :. an overview of the responsibilities of."I'the Police Department. The Police Chief also informed :'the`;: City Council and the public that due to the increased.voii2oad. and a temporary reduction of staff in the RecoidsDivision . the Police Department is closing this section to the yublic.!'� on Wednesdays beginning February 3, 1993-until;:it is,`;CaughV-.* up on its workload. The following speakers then presented the specifics of their Divisions in the Police Department: a) Captain Larry Hansen, Patrol Division; b) Captain Jim Schick, Police Services Division; c) Sergeant Garold Murray, investigations Division; and d) Sergeant Richard Dean, Narcotics/Gang Division. Following a lengthy discussion among the Council and those who had made presentations, the Mayor then opened the hearing to the public. Speaking regarding the matter were the following: a) Frank Alegre, 2000 Edgewood Drive, Lodi; b) Virginia Snyder, 412 East Oak Street, Lodi; c) Clarence Hartley, Lodi resident; d) Arthur Price, 1053 Port Chelsea Drive, Lodi; CITY COUNCIL MEETIN.i January 27, 1993 e) Virginia Lahr, 311 East Elm Street, Lodi; and f) Jean Davenport, 445 Almond Drive•#45, Lodi. 4rI". 2 L 0 D I P 0 L I C E D E P A R T M E N T M e m o r a n d u m To: City Manager From: Police Chief Date: January 26, 1993 Subject: Closure of Records Section We have been short a polide clerk in the records section since Oct. 1992 due to maternity leave. She will not be back to work until April. Due to the budget problems we have not been able to hire additional help and the data entry and filing have been falling behind. At the time she went on leave data entry was about three days behind. At present we are thirty days behind. In addition to this we have just learned another clerk from records has been selected for jury duty in a homicide trial, expected to last at least four weeks. In order to relieve the work load on the remaining personnel I feel it is necessary to close records section to the public every wed. This will allow the remaining clerks an opportunity to complete the work without having to deal with the public. The impact on the public should be minimal as the section will still be open four days a week to provide reports, etc. Prior to implementing this on Wed. 2-3-93 we will have the news sentinel run a story and will also post a notice at the counter. i LODI POLICE DEPARTMENT An Honor to Serve ... A Duty to Protect LODI POLICE DEPARTMENT An Honor to Serve ... A Duty to Protect I POLICE DEPARTMENT I ORGANIZATION 1 JANUARY, 1993 I r..... tr.�< 12 Il ...... 4a<na-r .<.....•a OISrATCHMA1L01 FOLICE CNIEi rollwlE;:ate= j ; 1 «.Ir -air 1 I -Er41ME1R uC71RM1Y 1 ���OIIM�S!U�►�T�M�ti ►►U1aL [_ ANI I iI I CA►C11[T l71 1 1 1 :�lrE 'OEYEMr1011 I 1 t 1 INVESTIGATIONS SERVICES r l *n�j wcsrlf:Anals orrli R>ttN == wrwL CDTIIOL IrY01 COAlWO01 1�1 . ML "•:ML /ltto sVEAvliaA Ifl loft Cwft Ala rou" :rrtcta (3i1) twrIC WIT (j) C• IIIYf sEM1 r � raLla cman(13) Page 1 olarmlp $OQAMI CRIMINAL S[NG►ANT �RINT!'S IiTf•171YF i?) NUMICS OE[ICn [.1 teang Unit (2) •�•"� "•" �• aIN[ AMILm CWWIh S[Ar, Orr r Animal Control Officer Assistant Animal Control Officer Animal Control Aide (Part Time) Reserve Officer Volunteers (12) 60 LODI POLICE DEPARTMENT PATROL DIVISION Patrol Division Commander Watch Commander Lieutenant (4) Field Supervisor Seraeant (6) Page 2 JANUARY 1993 Police Records Clerk III Police Officer (35) Traffic Unit Motor Officer (3) Community Service Officer (CSO) (3) Police Explorer Volunteers (13) RECORDS Warrants Cl Traffic Cle Corresponde Data Entry L 0 D I P 0 L I C E D E P A R T M E N T SERVICES DIVISION Page 3 AILERS off sequence (6) off sequence t (1) n (1) ignoent h) JANUARY 1993 LODI POLICE DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATIONS DIVISION Page 4 Crime Anal st Community Service Officer (CSO) Page 4 LODI POLICE DEPARTMENT 20+ YEAR COMPARISON (1971 - 1993) NO. OF SWORN TOTAL LPD SWORN OFFICERS TOTAL LPD EMPLOYEES YEAR POPULATION OFFICERS per 1,000 EMPLOYEES per 1,000 1971/72 29,078 40 1.37 51 1.75 1972/73 29,950 40 1.34 51 1.70 1973/74 31,231 44 1.40 59 1.88 1974/75 31,100 44 1.41 59 1.89 1975/76 31,500 44 1.39 59 1.87 1976/77 32,150 44 1.36 59 1.83 1977/78 32,250 44 1.36 60 1.86 1978/79 32,932 48 1.45 64 1.94 1979/80 33,350 50 1.49 66 1.97 1980/81 35,221 50 1.41 66 1.87 1981/82 35,574 50 1.40 66 1.85 1982/83 36,928 50 1.35 66 1.78 1983/84 38,318 54 1.40 70 1.82 1984/85 39,475 56 1.41 74 1.87 1985/86 41,281 56 1.35 80 1.93 1986/87 43,293 60 1.38 84 1.94 1987/88 45,794 62 1.35 91 1.98 1988/89 48,042 63 1.31 96 1.99 1989/90 49,221 64 1.30 100 2.03 1990/91 50,328 68 1.35 104 2.06 1991/92 51,874 69 1.33 105 2.02 1992/93 52,539 69 1.31 105 1.99 Page 5 FISCAL YEAR 1988-1989 1989-1990 1990-1991 1991-1992 1992-1993 STAFFING CHANGES - FIVE-YEAR PERIOD TECHNICAL PATROL INVESTIGATIONS SERVICES ADMIN. TOTAL 52 12 19 6 89 54 13 20 6 93 +1 56 14 22 6 98 56 16 24 6 102 53 20 23 6 102 Above total employees do not include Reserve Officers (which are volunteer), Explorers volunteer high school students), or the Animal Shelter. Page 6 LODI POLICE DEPARTMENT FIVE-YEAR BUDGET SUMMARY Fiscal Year Total Personnel $ Total Other $ Yearly Total 1988-1989 $4,088,670 $436,870 $4,525,540 1989-1990 $4,233,561 $540,474 $4,774,035 1990-1991 $5,056,505 $608,845 $5,665,350 1991-1992 $5,512,480 $694,920 $6,207,400 1992-1993 $5,991,687 $601,473 $6,593,160 Page 6A CITIZEN COST FOR POLICE PROTECTION BASED ON AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD OF THREE (3) Household Cost City Population Police Budget Per Month Manteca 41,500 $ 4,500,000 $27.11 Lodi 52,539 $ 6,593,160 $31.37 Tracy 38,000 $ 4,788,900 $31.50 Roseville 50,000 $ 7,000,100 $35.00 Stockton 221,585 $37,000,000 $41.74 *Manteca has the lowest police staffing in San Joaquin County. Page 7 Year 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 LODI POLICE DEPARTMENT Calls For Service 41,947 42,953 44,830 42,720 57,899 This represents a 35.6% increase in calls in the last five years. Lodi population has increased approximately 9.48 in the last five years. Page 8 LODI POLICE DEPARTMENT *Calculations include all larcenies. Page 9 20+ YEAR COMPARISON (1971 - 1993) No. of PART 1 CRIME RATE YEAR POPULATION CRIMES per 1,000 '_==--xaxxoacxxaxo==a=xxcaax=-oxxcc==oc=aexxccs=xaxaaasxssas:ansa 1971/72 29,078 418 1.43 1972/73 29,950 611 2.04 1973/74 31,231 618 1.97 1974/75 31,100 752 2.41 1975/76 31,500 777 2.46 1976/77 32,150 784 2.43 1977/78 32,250 835 2.58 1978/79 32,932 1057 3.20 1979/80 33,350 *2808 8.41 1980/81 35,221 2697 7.65 1981/82 35,574 2833 7.96 1982/83 36,928 2775 7.51 1983/84 38,318 2571 6.70 1984/85 39,475 2982 7.55 1985/86 41,281 3401 8.23 1986/87 43,293 3786 8.74 1987/88 45,794 3964 8.65 1988/89 48.042 4497 9.36 1989/90 49,221 4537 9.21 1990/91 50,328 4413 8.76 1991/92 51,874 4509 8.69 1992/93 52,539 4227 8.04 *Calculations include all larcenies. Page 9 L O D I P O L I C E D E P A R T M E N T M e m o r a n d u m To: City Manager From: Police Chief Date: January 26, 1993 Subject: BUDGET REDUCTIONS The following are options I would suggest as ways to reduce the Police Department budget in the 1993-94 fiscal year. With personnel costs being 908 of our total budget it becomes obvious any meaningful cuts can only come through a reduction in personnel. It is almost certain that reductions in personnel must result in the level of service delivery, be it the loss of programs, the increase in response time, or the manner in which we provide the service. I would like to list several options for cost reduction with the approximate savings attached to each. Depending on the actual loss of revenues, any one, or a combination of the options, could be used. The first thing I have attempted to do is to cut costs without having to lay anyone off. This does not mean we would not lose positions. For instance, between now and July, there will be three retirements in the Department; Myself, Lt. Bruce Dick, and Officer Leland Schmiedt. If both my position and the Lieutenant's position were filled from the ranks we would have three vacancies on patrol. With the current hiring freeze we would be able to save approximately $187,500 in personnel costs. Obviously this would leave us with three less patrol officers. When you consider I removed one patrol officer from the street for the Gang Unit, this would make us four short on the street. We now have a choice to make. Do we reduce the level of service on the street by not responding to certain types of calls, taking them over the phone or by mail rather than assign an officer, or do we cut programs? Two officers are currently assigned to the Combined Rural and City Narcotics Enforcement Team (CRACNET). One of those positions is funded by a grant, and the funding is Page 10 January 26, 1993 Page 2 • contingent on the City funding one person for the team. By bringing these two officers back to the City we would make up for half of our manpower shortage. By the same token we would be picking up one more salary and our net savings would only be $125,000. The negative impact to this proposal would be the lack of ability to work major drug dealers. Our own narcotics unit often develops the information, but only CRACNET has the resources to pursue major dealers, which is their Main focus. A second source of manpower would be the Drug Suppression Unit (DSP). We currently have two officers assigned to this unit. The officers teach in the schools in an effort to stop drug abuse before it starts. Once again, we have one officer funded by the City, and one funded by the school district. If we were to disband this unit, we would have two additional officers for the street one of which we are noc presently funding. The negative side of disbanding this unit needs no further explanation than we are removing an investment in our future. I will discuss this further under privatization. Another possible cost reduction without loss of personnel would be to eliminate the Canine Unit. This would result in a cost savings of approximately $50,000, based on care and feeding of the animals and overtime costs. The negative aspect of this would be the loss of the dogs in searches, both building and outdoor. This could result in more danger to officers, fewer suspect apprehensions and more time spent in searches. Of equal importance is the loss in goodwill the dogs bring with the public. Further significant cost reductions would require laying off employees. If my first recommendation were to be followed, then I do not believe we could afford to lose further sworn officers. This would mean cutting non -sworn positions. While I do not believe dispatch is sacrosanct, there would be no cost savings in further cuts in that area. Due to the combination of duties, police, fire, 911 and the jail, overtime would be dictated to keep at minimum staffing levels. Historically, this unit has been undermanned due to turnover. At the present time we are one dispatcher short, another is in training (which takes six months), and a third is on light duty due to injuries. Crime Analyst: Reduction is approximately $45,000.00. This individual currently prepares bulletins for patrol on the "most wanted" individuals, and conducts research for crime trends in an effort to be proactive rather than reactive. Page 11 January 26, 1993 Page 3 Community Services Officer (CSO): Reduction is approximately $32,000.00. We currently have seven community service officers as follows: Three - Patrol One - Investigations One - Technical Services Two - Administration Prior to the current budget year there were no CSO's in the Services Division and four in Patrol. Due to the need to reduce the current budget, we eliminated one dispatch position, which was vacant at the time. Upon the retirement of Property & Evidence Technician Mack Flanders in 1987, the position was downgraded and filed by a dispatcher on special assignment for two reasons, a salary reduction and a .place to assign a dispatcher who needed a break from the stress of dispatch. Recently this position has been downgraded further and is now being filled by a CSO reassigned from patrol. We have two CSO's assigned to the Crime Prevention Unit. Their duties include: Neighborhood Watch - 3,000 Citizens Actively Participating Over 250 groups developed in Lodi 118 Group meet on a regular basis Average of 33 new groups developed each year CSO's organize and instruct all new groups 3,000 members receive a monthly newsletter Interact with and resolve neighborhood disputes Hold follow-up meetings Inform groups of activity in their area regularly Citizens Awareness - Over 1,200 Have Completed This Course 85 to 100 attend classes annually 11 week course offered twice each year Crime Prevention Fair 10,000 people attended last year Working on 7th Annual event set for May 16, 1993 Raise approximately $5,000 annually through local contributions Over 50 organizations & businesses take part in the event Page 12 January 26, 1993 Page 4 ` National Night Out Organized over 50 Neighborhood Watch groups to meet Each group was visited by the CSOs Lodi received a National Award for efforts in 1991 & 1992 Lodi's Hilborn Street -California's 1992 Grand Prize Winner Programs & Presentations Program Type 0 Programs Attendees Safety Patrol'Training it 390 K -6th School Programs 20 600 K -6th Assembly Programs 19 5,600 Preschool/After School 78 2,340 Bicycle Safety Rodeos 17 620 Tours of Police Dept. 52 780 High School & Jr. High 15 489 Citizens Awareness 22 80 Neighborhood watch Programs 33 500 Churches/Civic Groups/etc. 57 1,740 Business Safety/Security 13 210 In-touch/Home & Business 29 29 Security Checks, etc. Total 366 13,378 Student Safety Patrol - 400 Students Participate Each Year Monitor Student Safety Patrol activities weekly Secure contributions and hold annual appreciation parties Provide Safety Patrol training to students Handle all Safety Patrol complaints against drivers Special Activities *Stranger Dai:cer - Programs were given to 2,500 Lodi students and adults in an immediate response to attempted abduct' -on in January, 1992 *Red Ribbon week -3,600 Students Attended Assembly Programs *Distribute Crime Prevention Information at 10 individual Fairs, Carnivals & Special Community Events annually *Coordinate volunteers to assist in special events *Provide SID the Police Robot, McGruff the Crime Dog, and Vince and Larry (Safety Belt Dummies) at special events *Fingerprint Children Page 13 January 26, 1993 Page 5 Additional Responsibilities_ Compile informational newsletter for Neighborhood Watch Design brochures covering Crime Prevention Issues Document Police Department training on videotape Review commercial development plans for impact on law enforcement concerns Compile crime statistics for citizens Maintain Free video checkout library of over 30 tapes Communicable Disease Prevention Video - City of Lodi Safety Committee 120 Follow-up letters sent to victims regarding Police response/sarvice We could eliminate all or part of this program. To do so puts us in a reactive rather than proactive position, which I believe will ultimately cost money due to the increase in crime, requiring more police response in addition to the cost to the taxpayer in losses. We have three CSO's assigned to patrol. While the duties are interchangeable I have chosen not to lump them together at this time. Each person's duties keep them busy full t?ane . One CSO is primarily responsible for.the removal of abandoaad cars from City streets. This individual is also assigned to assist property owners who desire to have abandoned vehicles removed from their property. This is necessary as the tow services will not remove the vehicle until we have inventoried it. The second CSO position is responsible for subpoena service. In 1992 we received 2,677 subpoena's for service. A subpoena may require service on one person or several persons. In addition the person under subpoena often moves between the time of the incident and the issuance of the subpoena, requiring extra work to locate the individual. The third CSO preforms a variety of tasks which would be considered beneficial to both patrol and services division. These tasks include: setting up the radar trailer and Officer Gregory (the dummy) each morning; transporting police vehicles to MSC for both routine and emergency service; monitoring the entrance door, taking telephone reports and directing citizens to the proper location; processing tvidence which has been brought in for finge_prints, etc.; and delivering Council packets. Page 14 January 26, 1993 Page 6 In addition to the above duties, all of these CSO's are trained as Field Evidence Technicians and are called to crime scenes to attempt to locate finger prints, collect evidence and take photographs. They also handle theft reports and other crimes which would not necessarily require a patrol officer. Cay, we cut one of these positions? Yes, but not without providing less service. We must serve subpoena's and we must have the cars serviced. We would still be able to respond to abandoned vehicles but not in the proactive mode we are in at present. Administrative Assistant: Reduction is approximately ($54.114.00). This position does much of the background research for projects such as this one. The following is a list of the job responsibilities of the Administrative Assistant: Coordinate, prepare, monitor & evaluate the Police Department Budget. Approve, coordinate & monitor all purchasing for the Police Department in conjunction with the Purchasing Department. Review, prepare & submit grant applications to funding agencies. Monitor grants for compliance with government guidelines and prepare quarterly reports. Analyze data to see if goals & objectives of grant were achieved and generate final report. Conduct surveys & perform research and statistical analysis for a variety of subject matter, including crime statistics, traffic statistics, arrest & jail population analysis. Provide and evaluate specific statistical information on certain areas and crimes. Provide statistical analysis for performance evaluation of all patrol officers. Assists in the design & implementation of various operational issues (i.e. beat design for dep loymer t ) . Design & implement all departmental forms (must verify government compliance on some forms). Manage inventory of all forms. Monitor police inventory of equipment (i.e. radios, computers) Assist with revisions of various departmental policies. Generate reports (including computer graphics). Implement community service programs (In -Touch) and supervise other employee. Interface with media. Page 15 January 26, 1993 Page 7 Represent the Police Department at professional and community meetings as needed. If we eliminate this position, some of the duties could be divided up between other staff members. The area most affected would be in statistics and research, which require a great amount of tire, but would then have to be low on the list of priorities. I have asked each Division Commander to prepare an organization chart for their respective division and to list division and personnel responsibilities. These are included for your information. CIVILIANIZATION: Over the past nine years we have made every possible attempt to civilianize the department. This has been done for two reasons. The first was as a cost savings, both in salary and benefits. The second was to relieve officers from performing tasks which do not require a sworn officer. The results of this can be seen in the number of Community Service Officers we presently have. Not only has this been cost effective, but has provided a higher level of service. The reason for the higher level of service lies in the fact that when they were hired the CSO's knew what their job was going to be and wanted to do that job. Prior to that we hired sworn officers who knew those tasks were a part of their job, but in reality, they were not the important aspects. In times of cutbacks we find ourselves in a quandary. Do we cut back the number of sworn officers or civilians? If we cut the number of sworn positions and a major event occurs, will we have the necessary manpower to respond and protect public safety? If we reduce Civilians, do the sworn personnel then pick up the slack left by that vacancy? I believe it will be necessary to do a combination of things. We presently maintain a level of service which most departments reduced a number of years ago. I believe we need to: 1) Not respond to some calls, such as non -injury traffic collisions, and Page 16 January 26, 1993 Page B 2) Establish a telephone report unit to take all reports which would not require the presence of an officer. (Captain Hansen's report addresses this issue further.) SERVICES DIVISION COMMANDER: Some departments (approximately 50%) have civilianized this position, as this division head has no sworn personnel working for them. I do not believe there would be a salary savings by doing this, but we could save roughly $9,500 in benefits. DRUG SUPPRESSION PROGRAM: As I mentioned earlier in my remarks, we currently have two officers in the Drug Suppression Program, one funded by the school. Some departments have replaced the officers with civilians with a varying degree of success. This could be considered, but the results are questionable. ALARM RESPONSE: In 1992 the police department responded to 2,225 alarm calls. Of those calls approximately 15 were bonified entries, and of those 15, in only three cases was the responsible arrested. The average time spent on an alarm call is roughly 20 minutes. This means 741 man-hours in 1992. In addition to the cost in dollars is the liability. We look at each alarm as a valid alarm requiring as rapid a response as possible, placing both officers and citizens in jeopardy. I would propose that the alarm company installing the alarm respond to the alarm and notify us in those instances where there is a break in. This would reduce the officer's time responding, standing by and writing E report. It would also reduce time for dispatchers and police clerks. This is a case of a small portion of the population receiving a higher level of service and the entire community paying for it. I can think of no other area where we could use civilians. As you are aware, we have been considering the use of senior volunteers for some time and this is currently scheduled for a future shirt sleeve session. I believe this program, if properly administered, can be very valuable. Page 17 January 26, 1993 Page 9 INCREASE IN USER FEES: The David Griffith Study has identified $74,900 in user fees. I recommend we implement these fees. Page 18 STAFFING OF PATROL DIVISION 1988 (53) Division Commander (1) Patrol Lieutenant (4) Patrol Sergeant (6) Motor Officer (3) Police Officer (34) Community Svs. Officer (4) Police Records Clk III (1) PATROL PERSONNEL 1993 (53) Division Commander (1) Patrol Lieutenant (4) Patrol Sergeant (6) Motor Officer (3) Police Officer (35) Community Svs. Officer (3) Police Records Clk III (1) Patrol officers work 10 hour shifts and although it does not happen every day, it is not unusual for our officers to go from call to call the entire shift. On a busy shift there is an average of 5-7 calls waiting for an officer to clear. We average •five police officers on a shift plus a supervisor. Our average response time to a call is 11 minutes for non -emergency calls and 3-5 minutes for emergency type calls. Our calls for service have increased dramatically over the past five years: 41,947 in 1988 - 57,899 in 1992. Calls for service are incidents that require a police officer's attention such as reported crimes, suspicious circumstances, suspicious persons, traffic stops, follow-up investigations, etc. The Lodi Police Department Traffic Unit was established in 1986 with the assignment of three police officers to full time traffic enforcement. Since this program was initiated, our accidents have consistently decreased from 1,325 in 1986 to 999 in 1992. To reduce or eliminate officers from this program would definitely cause our accident rate to increase again. DUTIES OF THE PATROL DIVISION Prevent crime, detect and arrest violators of the law, protect life and property, preserve the public peace, and enforce all criminal laws of the state of California and the ordinances of the City of Lodi. SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE PATROL DIVISION 1. Respond to crimes in progress and enforce all appropriate laws 2. Respond to citizens calls for service 3. Respond to silent alarms 4. Investigate all reported crimes and document on appropriate crime reports (14,777 in 1992) 5. Investigate unusual or suspicious activities 6. Enforce traffic laws and investigate all traffic accidents Page 19 7. Develop tactical plans to address specific crime and/or community issues B. Develop and implement DUI checkpoints 9. Provide patrol and security of special events such as: • Lodi Grape Festival • Fourth of July Celebration at Lodi Lake • Field and Fair Day e Lodi Street Fair e Crime Prevention Fair • Lodi/Tokay Band Review • Numerous other events such as the triathlon, Memorial Hospital Walk for Life, March of Dimes Walkathon, etc. 10. Initiate proactive patrol activities on a continuous basis. DUTIES OF PATROL SUPERVISORS (4 Lieutenants / 6 Sergeants) 1. Coordinate activities of police officers, community service officers, motor officers and dispatchers 2. Direct personnel in major incidents 3. Review and approve all crime reports 4. Oversee Lodi City Jail operations and Dispatch Center (1700-0800 hours weekdays, 24 hours a day on weekends) 5. Investigate citizen complaints against police officers 6. Supervise major crime investigations 7. Provide direction and interpretation on enforcement of all codes and ordinances 8. Respnnd to citizen inquiries 9. Direct officers in proactive stance to deal with community concerns REDUCTIONS IN PATROL DIVISION IN PAST FIVE YEARS In 1992-93 one police officer position was taken from Patrol Division and added to the Investigations Gang Unit. In addition, one community service officer position was transferred from Patrol Division to Services Division to fill in for a vacated dispatcher position. The crime analyst position was transferred to the Investigations Division. Patrol Division now has 35 officers and 10 first line supervisors assigned to four shifts (refer to organizational chart). In addition, three police officers are assigned to motorcycles and three community service officers are assigned to Patrol Division. If police officer or community service officer positions are eliminated, the following impacts could occur: 1. Eliminate investigation of private property accidents 2. Non-injury/property damage only traffic accidents could be low priority (more than 1 hour response time) 3. Dramatic increase in our telephone reporting unit in which citizens would be required to call the police department between certain hours to report low priority type calls over the phone. Pag. 20 4. Dramatic decrease in towing of abandoned automobiles 5. Dramatic decrease in the amount of technical identification work conducted during investigations (i.e., eliminate most of the fingerprinting wort-) 6. Could result in a "cod blue" stance in which citizens would be told that we are responding to nothing but emergency type halls and to call back in one to two hours to see if an officer is available, or to call back the next day 7. Eliminate animal calls after dark and weekends 8. Reduce or eliminate civic type presentations in schools and service clubs (i.e., K-9 demos, Traffic presentations, Crime Prevention presentations, etc.) 9. Eliminate extra patrol requests 10. Loud party calls and loud stereo calls could become very low priority 11. Eliminate DUI checkpoints and reduce our ability to respond to D.U.I.R.R. calls 12. we could possibly eliminate our presence at special events such as the Fourth of July or Grape Festival, and turn that function over to private security. However, our experience has been that we end up sending officers anyway, and often times the private security personnel have created the problem 13. It is difficult to access the impact of preventive patrol tactics if the number of police officers is reduced. A patrol presence has an impact that is at the very least comforting to citizens and often prevents crimes from occurring 14. Preventive patrol tactics could be virtually eliminated and we could become reactive rather than proactive Page 21 1988 Police Captain Dispatchers (13) Records Clerks full time (5) Records Clerks part time (2) STAFFIN6: Page 22 1993 Police Captain Services Supervisor Dispatchers (14) Records Clerks full time (6) Community Service Officer (1) i STAFFING CHANGES 1988 - 1993 1. In 1988, the position of "Services Supervisor" was added to Services Division. Z. in 1990. two part tine Records Clerks positions were consolidated into one full time position. 3. In 1991, two dispatcher/jailer positions were added. 4. No positions have been added to Services Division since 1991. Page 23 DISPATCH/JAIL -SECTION: --------------------- The Lodi Police Department has fourteen (14) dispatcher/jailer positions. One position is a "Special Assignment" as the Court Liaison person. This position is rotated among dispatcher/jailers every two to four years. The remaining staff perform both dispatch and jail functions during their work hours. 1. DISPATCH: Dispatchers receive complaints and requests for police. fire, and emergency medical services from citizens entering the Police Department and via telephone. They receive. coordinate. and broadcast radio and telephone messages for police officers. Dispatch deploys fields units for general and emergency situations and monitors the status of all pciice units. They access City, County and State lar enforcement computerized information systems for police officers and the Fire Department. 2. JAIL: Jailers assist arresting officers in processing prisoners Including searching, booking, and transportation. Take custody of prisoner property and issue property receipts. Photograph and fingerprint prisoners and allow telephone access. They are responsible for care and safety of prisoners including medical screening, visitation, and meals. Jailers perform security checks and move prisoners as required. Upon the prisoner's release jailers complete release documents and return property. Page 24 RECORDS_SECTION_ ftte: W awage pay, With benefits, far each position is $30,618 amually.) 1. WARRANTS CLERA: Processes incoming, outgoing and foreign warrants (approximately 200 per month). Enters warrants into State computer system. Sends warrant abstracts to other agencies. Processes and mails warrants with citations to other agencies and processes warrants and bail for distribution to courts. Processes civil Restraining Orders, maintains Restraining Order files and enters them into State computer system. Corrects LPD computer data and does name consolidations. Processes suopoenas for records. Keeps warrant pouches/files current for officers. 2. PHOTOCOPY CLERK: Copies all police reports (an average of sixty (60) per day, and distributes to appropriate units within the police department and to State agencies as mandated. Prepares forms to notify owners of towed and stored vehicles. Performs data entry into department computer. 3. DRIVER LICENSE COMPLAINT CLERK: Prepares a daily average of 20-25 license complaint files in duplicate for District Attorney for prosecution of suspended licenses and unlicensed driver citations. Obtains Department of Motor Vehicle printouts, alleges prior convictions, retrieves and photocopies related reports. Enters citations into LPO computer. Orders office supplies for the Department. Processes mai_ for City Hall daily. Performs data entry. 4. CORRESPONDENCE CLERK: Maintains traffic accident log. Processes all correspondence requests to records, copies. mails, and files reports requested. Checks arrest files for accuracy and issues files for new arrests. Purges marijuana reports and seals records per State mandates. Conducts monthly Department of Justice validations. Bilis insurance companies for reports. Prepares background checks for other agencies. Tracks photocopier use and prepares time sheets for records personnel. Page 25 S. DAILY L06 CLERK: 4M Corrects errors in daily log. Tracks missing reports and follows up with officers. Hakes corrections to Uniform Crime Report files. Performs data entry. b. TRAFFIC CLERK: Processes and files traffic citations. Enters citation information into LPD computer. Corrects Uniform Crime Report files. Performs data entry. T. ALL CLERKS: Assist citizens at the police counter with a variety of requests. Answer and direct telephone calls, collect fees, do administrative purging of records, fax police correspondence, issue bicycle licenses. issue police clearance letters, conduct weapons registrations, and perform data entry. File reports, citations, court disposition forms, arrestee photographs, and other department records. One clerk Is assigned to Detective Division as temporary secretary when their secretary takes vacation, holiday or sick leave (an average of five weeks per year). Paae 26 SUPPORT POSITIONS: 1. COURT LIAISON: ($39,620) A special assignment for a dispatacner. Processes all arrests and routes comolaint information to the District Attorney and Courts. Processes all City permit applicants and billing for same. Fingerprints citizens. Attends daily court arraignment of prisoners in custody. Acts as liaison between Courts and District Attorney regarding problems with complaint filings. Maintains narcotics and sexual offense registration files. Processes driving under the influence forms to Department of Motor Vehicles. Issues City employee ID cards. Makes photograpns from negatives. Prepares State required monthly population and jail feeding reportsfor the Chief of Police. Prepares monthly juvenile population report for the State. Submits fingerprints to the State on unidentified persons. Substitutes as property technician in her absence. 2. PROPERTY TECHNICIAN: ((90 $35,202) Receives, maintains. and disperses all property and evidence for the Department. Inventories, orders, and receives supplies for the jail and Field 'evidence Technicians. Receives. maintains, and tracks all property records for property and evidence in the custody of LPD. Obtains court orders for destruction and dispersal of drugs, weaoons, and other property. Pick up and delivery of evidence at the Department of Justice laboratories. Maintains and disposes of bio -hazardous materials. Maintains booking camera. Cleaps and maintains photograph developer. Substitutes for Court Liaison in her absence. Page 27 SERVICES DIVISION BUDGET REDUCTION Elimination of one Records Clerk II position: Budget savings: $29,876.70 (including benefits). One Records Clerk is currently on maternity leave since October, 1992. When she left, the unit was two to three days behind on data entry, which is normal. All filing was up to date. Since her absence, the work load has been redistributed to the remaining clerks. As a result, we are approximately thirty (30) days in arrears on data entry. Filing of property reports. photograph negatives and court disposition reports are approximately tnree months in arrears. Elimination of one Dispatcher/Jailer position: Budget savings: $39,620.46 (includes benefits). One dispatch position has already been eliminated during this fiscal year. The Property Officer (special assignment for a dispatcher) position was replaced by a Community Service Officer at an annual salary savings of $4,452.48. The elimination of one dispatch position would Le the one "Overlap" dispatcher. This position is used to cover for training schools, vacations, and vacant positions which would otherwise require overtime to maintain staffing. Elimination of a dispatch position would be counter productive to the department. Dispatch requires a minimum of six months training before employee is capable of functioning without a training officer. Due to vacancies and turnover, nearly 1,000 hours of overtime has already been expended in dispatch during fiscal year 1992/93 to maintain minimum staffing levels. In the past five yearn dispatch has had a turnover of SIXTEEN (16) persons. This in a unit which only has thirteen (13) positions. I do not recommend any reduction in staffing for Services Division. Page 28 STAFFING OF POLICE !HVESTIGATIONS DIVISION 1988 STAFF (12) Division Commander Admin Clerk III Division Sergeant Persons Detective Property Detective Property Detective Juvenile Detective Co -Op Detective Narcotics Detective Narcotics Detective CRACNET Detective DSP/At Risk Detective (1/2 Paid LPD, 1/2 LUSD) 1993 STAFF (20) Division Commander Police Records Clerk III Criminal Unit Sergeant Persons Detective Persons Detective Property Detective Property Detective OSP/At Risk Detective *OSP/At Risk Detective Community Service Officer *Crime Analyst *Marco/Gang Unit Sergeant Narcotics Detective Narcotics Detective Narcotics Detective Narcotics Detective Gang Detective Gang Detective CRACNET Detective *CRACNET Detective *DSP One position paid by LUSD and one position paid by LPO for "Here's Looking At You 2000" program. This is a parallel program to DARE that was originally started with one officer, and it was found that a minimum of two Police Officers are critical to keeping this a viable program. *CRACNET One position is paid by grant funds, and is tied to us committing one position. If we pulled our one position we would lose the grant position, thus discontinuing our part of the County -Wide Task Force. *NARCO/GANG Was not an additional Sergeant position in the department. UNIT SERGEANT It was an upgrade position within Investigations Division. *CRIME ANALYST Was originally part of Patrol Division and later assigned to Investigations Division. SUMMARY: Excluding intra -departmental re -distribution of resources and one position upgrade, in the past five years the Investigations Division has experienced the addition of: Two (2) Narcotics Detectives, one (1) DSP Detective, one (1) CRACNET Detective and one (1) Community Service Officer. As stated earlier, the DSP and CRACNET positions are tied to reciprocal obligations LPD has with other agencies (LUSD & OCJP). Pace 29 M e m =1 r- .-t n] L To: Chief Williams From: Captain Adams Date: Januar-v 20. 1997 suaiect: INFORMATION FvR TOWN -HALL :"EET:NG INVESTiGFTIONS :.!VISION Criminal Investigations Unit: Total of nine (9) personnel as follows: (1) Detective Sergeant, (2) Persons Detectives, (2) Property Detectives, (2) DSP Detectives assigned to LUSD to administer the Drug Suppression Program & At Risk, after- school programs, (1) CSO Evidence Teck / Documents Investigator, (1) Crime Analyst. The assignment breakdowns for duties are as follows; Persons Detectives: Conduct original and follow-up investigations on major- crimes involving homicide, robbery, sexual assaults, Felony assault. domestic violence, rirearms offenses. child molests and abuse °: other cases as assigned. Property Detectives: Conduct original & follow-up investigations related to burglary, grand theft, possession of stolen property, auto theft, embezzlement, fraud, questioned documents / forgery & other assigned cases. DSP / At Risk Detectives: Conduct 4 th b grade classes for LUSD using "Here's Looking At You 2000" curriculum, which parallels the DARE concept. Detectives also deveiope and supervise after school programs at Woodbridge and Sr- Elementary schools, public speaking to service clubs and parents grouos to educate the community to substance abuse issues. LUSD pays the salary oi: one Detective and LPD pays the other. CSO Evidence Teck / Document Investigator: (civilian) Conducts investigations on numerous documents fraud cases fie checks) to obtain all court evidence (excluding suspect contacts) and submits cases to DA ror- criminal complaint. Crime scene evidence processing on major- crime scenes and evidence processing. This service is becoming more critical now that the State is starting --o charae cities ror various evidence services not biilao in the past. Page 30 zvaae Crime Analyst:=oncucts -ese4r= - om _ vdr 1zL: .r sources to assist :n cr-iminai investigations Ana _�taministrative "asks. Proouces the Toiiowino arocucts: Aeev'l Lodi Most Wanted Ad. Stolen =rooer-ty lists ror detectives and patrol. lists of names and photos of suspects with out=_tanoino warrants. Assists in the criminal compiaint process or _riminal history and driving records to the LSA. Investigations Unit Activity 1992: Averaae cases investigated per-nontn: Persons Detective 21 Prooerty Detective 26 unit cases ov type :'?92: Persons = 744 Prooerty = 460 Others = 315 Total = 1119 Complaints filed to the DA's Office through Investigations = 287 *(average 24 per month) Arrests made by Criminal Investigations Unit 1992 = 105 *(average 9 per month) DSP Detectives made a total of 616 presentations in 1992, to a total 16526 students, facility and parents attending. Changes in the Criminal Investigations Unit: 1) November 1992. Investiqations unit reduced by one Detective who was transferred into the Gang unit along with one patrol officer. 2) June 1992, LUSD lost State funding to DSP program, but continued funding out of general fund because of importance of this joint effort between LPD and LUSD. 3) August 1991. Crime Analyst transferred into Investigations from Petrol. This was done in conjunction with the installation of the AS400 computer system. 4) Computer terminals and printers obtained through asset seizure funds to provide the Investigations Division with a case management system to better- follow criminal cases through assignment to conclusion and prosecution. This system when completely on-line should save detective time in accessing state and local files along with more efficient case manaaement. Page 31 ±1� .nve5Li3at'_z+n5 v1510r an assioneo ='agar, =+ale wlt.n asset sei=- -e 4'unas. ''els nay creatiY 1 icr•easeo accessability to on and Detectives. Iwo Ceilular phones are uses In the lnvestioatlons Unit Basset :eizur'e/ whlcn are invaluable on certain types c-- investigations. +he -%iarcotic3 Unit is also equipped with pagers Ana cellOiar phones. NARCOTICS AND GANG UNITS: The Narcotics ano Gana Units nave a total .3f nine +.9) personnel as follows: (1) Detective Seraeant. t4) Narcotics Detectives. (2) GF:AC-NET Detectives and =' =ang Detectives. Narcotics Detectives: We -'asoons.eie -=ter _ne :nvest_gation of narcotics usage, sales +ana=:str:oution. 'hey-_or.ouct undercover investigations, write search war -rants, coordinate activities with other agencies and account --or the majority of narcotic arrests, drug and asset seizures: 1992 Arrests Felony Narcotics 114 Misdemeanor Narcotics 40 Other Felony & Misdemeanor 73 Total 227 1992 Seizures Marijuana 30 Pounds Methamphetamine IS Pounds Cocaine 12 Ounces Heroin 1 Ounce Total Street Value of Drugs Seized - $746,000. Cash and Property Seized $55,000. (LPD's approximate cut 33-30 500 ) A typical narcotics investigation including: a controlled buy using an informant, preparation of a search warrant, execution of the warrant, seizure and processing of evidence and assets, booking and interviews of suspects, preparation of reports and discussions with DA, preliminary hearing and other court appearances, takes approximately 40 hours each. Staffing minimums for basic narcotics operation include: Meeting with an informant away from LPD, ........... 2 Detectives Search warrant service ............................4 Det's & 1 Sgt Controlled buy....................................3 Detectives Buy/Bust..........................................4 Det's & i Sgt Rolling surveillance ............................... Detectives Sacramento St. surveillance & arrest..............3 Detectives Page 32 'ownnall page A CRAC-NET Detectives: LPD has two (2) Detectives committed to the Combined Rural and City Narcotics Enforcement Team (CRAC-NET). One position if funded by a state OCJP grant and is tied to our commitment to staffing the second position. The CRAC-NET Unit is based out of Stockton and it's mission is to investigate and arrest what would be termed "Large Scale" drug dealers, which require considerable investigative time and financial resources. The unit is supervised by a State Bureau of Narcotic Enforcement Agent (BNE) and is overseen by a council of Chief's of Police. Gang Unit: The Gang unit is in the developmental stages. The Gang Detectives are conducting investigations of gang related crimes, developing information on gangs and gang members in the community, they participate in the City Gang Task Force and help manage the Late Night Basketball Program. Later duties will include an intervention program in the schools, witness protection, and tactical operations. The Unit has already proved invaluable in the investigation of recent drive-by shooting cases. CHANGES IN PAST FIVE YEARS In January of 1991 a Detectives position within the Investigations Division was upgraded to Sergeant and it was becoming impossible for one Sergeant to adequately supervise fourteen employees performing a wide variety of jobs. The upgrade _ allows for one Sergeant to supervise the Criminal Investigations Unit and one Sergeant to supervise the Narcotic and Gang Units. In October of 1992 two officers were assigned to the newly formed Gang Unit. These positions were not additional LPD positions, but were existing resources. One officer was taken from Patrol Division and one officer was taken from Investigations Division. SERVICES CONTRACTED OUT Currently we send urine out to F&M Analytical Services for analysis. Up until December of 1992 the DA's Office was paying the bill out of a special fund. That fund was eliminated and now agencies are responsible for the total bill. At this time best estimates F-fe that our annual cyst will be approximately $8,000. to $10,000. Page 33 Townnall page 5 Another procedure change may ena-up costing us significantly. In the past CRAC-NET has covered the cost of clean-up of clandestine labs, through a state DOJ fund. It appears now that LPD will have to pay the clean-up costs or these drug labs. The cost for lab clean-up can range between $3.000. and $15,000. each. In 1992 LPD did four (4) lab cases and there is no reason to expect that number will decrease. Sgt. Dean & I are working with the City Attorney to determine the best way to recoup the costs from the arrestee and or property owner. At present the funding is available through asset seizure funds, but we strongly feel that the people responsible for the labs or the people owning the property who benefit from the clean-up should pay. SERVICE REDUCTIONS 1) The Criminal Investigations Unit Detectives are already stretched to minimum levels. Any reduction in Persons and Property Detectives would severely impact the ability of investigate serious crimes which impact the community. 2) Drugs and Gangs are the root cause of a number of crimes including; burglary, robbery, auto theft, assaults, domestic violence, etc.. It is unreasonable to believe that we can eliminate drugs and gangs completely, but creating an environment where being involved in drugs and gangs is not tolerated, keeps the problems in check. The Narcotics end Gang Units make Lodi a community where drug dealers and gang members feel vulnerable. A reduction in either of these units will no doubt have a ripple effect on the crime rate and the public's sense of security. 3) CRAC-NET attacks large scale and mobile drug dealers who do not limit themselves to city and county boundaries. The elimination of one il) Detective from LPD's CRAC-NET commitment would ,cease LPD's participation in this coordinated effort as the state grant would stop, thus eliminating both positions. The ripple effect could be a total elimination of the program as agencies do not participate. 4) DSP /At Risk Detectives do not normally through bad guy's in jail or seize large amounts of drugs or property, therefore traditional impressive police statistics are not available. Their effectiveness is more difficult to measure as the educate and touch the lives of young people, parents and faculty. Their mission is to teach and inspire out young people to SAY NO to drugs and substance abuse, to stand-up against peer pressure and to think for themselves and think responsibly. The non- traditional role Police Officers fill does make a difference and experts in the field all advise the "Working- Enthusiastic Police Officers" are the best people to fill this role. If we cut the program to one (1) DSP we would most likely loose funding from LUSD for their part and it is not a viable program with only one. Page 34 Townnail page 6 5) Crime Analyst position does provide valuable services to Investigations as noted. This position may oe the ONLY real area we could cut without a substantial reduction in service delivery. We would have to transfer some duties to the CSO (ie LPD Wanted) and eliminate some investigations and administrative research. The new computer system may assist us in retrieving information that the Crime Analyst normally would have done. This is a resource that is very nice to have, but in these tight economic times and budget reductions we could function without it. Although the position would be lost, the, person filling that position could presently be absorbed into the department with a current opening in the 911 dispatch area. The net savings to the City per year would be -442.357. (salary & benefits). 6) Community Support Officer (CSO) is invaluable in fraudulent documents investigations, evidence processing and major crime scene evidence collection. Although we have a criteria and screening process for acceptance of fraud documents we still do a lot of work in this area and the CSO saves us from using a Detective to investigate these cases. If we stopped all fraud documents investigations we would be in essence saying that writing bad checks in Lodi was now legal, a signal I hope we never send. Also. if the Crime Analysis position were eliminated' the CSO would be needed to do weekly projects that we would need to continue. Respectfully, Jer y Adams Co manger, Investiaations Division cc/ Sergeant Dean Sergeant !`Murray Page 35 CITY OF LODI ANIMAL CONTROL STATISTICS Page 36 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 Complaints 5,892 5,723 5,521 5,786 5,314 Miles Driven 12,713 12,938 12,681 13,289 13,477 Dogs Impounded 937 953 906 962 813 Dogs Redeemed 332 322 301 307 258 Dogs Sold 61 75 82 85 100 Dogs Destroyed 543 556 523 570 455 Cats Impounded 1,236 1,292 1,309 1,438 1,113 Cats Redeemed 65 58 63 58 42 Cats Sold 5 11 11 10 16 Cats Destroyed 1,149 1,223 1,276 1,370 1,055 Citations Issued 40 35 57 23 17 Dead Dogs Impounded 98 104 90 100 95 Dead Cats Impounded 276 307 288 250 261 Misc. Impounded 101 82 211 174 224 Misc. Fees Collected $6,539.50 $7,090.00 $7,128.50 $7,157.50 $7,428.75 License Fees Collected $2,039.00 $1,909.50 $1,862.00 $1,784.00 $1,524.00 Page 36