Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - January 6, 1993 (74)CITY OF LODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION AGENDA TITLE: Supplemental 1992/93 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim MEETING DATE: January 6, 1993 PREPARED BY: Assistant City Manager RECOV1MENDED ACTION: The City Council adopt the attached claim and direct staff to submit this to the San Joaquin County Council of Government (COG) for final approval. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: It is necessary for COG to give final approval in order to receive the City's allocation of transit monies available through the Transportation Development Act (TDA). This year we are submitting a claim for $1,220,297 of local transportation funds and $97,298 of State transit assistance funds. Of the total amount claimed, $1,317,595, $505,950 is for transit service. The remainder, $817,645, is available for street and road projects. The transit portion of the claim is in three parts - operations, capital, and taxi service. Operations $349,800 Capital 150,850 Taxi 5,300 $505,950 This year is somewhat unique in that in the early part of the year we were purchasing services from City Cab Company and providing subsidized rides through City Cab Company's taxi service. The capital expenditures are greater than normal in that we only purchased one vehicle last year. This budget includes the purchase of four vehicles, two minibuses, one van, and one station wagon. :he station wagon was purchased earlier this fiscal year and is in service. Bid specifications for the minibuses and minivan should be to Council on February 3, 1993. Also included are new radios and upgrade of the telephone system. APPROVED. THOMAS A. PETERSON wyclea ` City Manager CC -1 Supplemental 1992/93 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim January 6, 1993 Included in the operation budget is SOV of the salary and benefits of an Administrative Assistant to the City Manager, Ms. Janet Keeter, and SOV of my salary and benefits. Also included in the claim is an amount of $7,000 to hire the services of a consultant to provide assistance and direction in preparing our claim for federal dollars. There are a number of reporting requirements which are different and more complex than required by the San Joaquin Council of Government (COG). It is our plan to have the consultant assist No. Keeter in the preparation of the federal grant and setting in place the appropriate record keeping and monitoring procedures. we anticipate this being a one-time cost. The City Council is respectfully requested to approves this claim and direct staff to forward it to COG for final approval and distribution of funds. FUNDING: Transportation and Development Act Respectfully submitt-1, jerry L. Glenn Assistant City Manager JLG:br Attachment CCCOM681/TXTA.07A RESOLUTION NO. 93-03 aaasassaa=assssaaasaaa A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE SUPPLEMENTAL 1992/93 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIM FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FONDS asaaasaaaasmssasaasssssaasaasaaasasaaassaaasaazassaaassaasaasaasaaaaaas � i i BE IT RESOLVED, that tha Lodi City Council does hereby approve the City's Supplemental 1992/93 Transportation Development Act (TDA) claim for Local Transportation Funds (LTF) and State Transit Assistance ; Funds (STA): and i s BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Lodi City Council does hereby s authorize the .City Manager to execute the subject Claim on behalf of the City of Lodi. { Dated: January 6, 1993 aassaa:aazzasaxa:saaaasaaaaaaasasazaa:azaaaasaaaaaaaaaasazaa:saaasassaaa I hereby certify that Resolution No. 93-03 was passed and a adopted by the Lodi City Council in a regular meeting held January 6, 1993 by the following vote: i e i Ayes: Council Members - Mann, Sieglock, Snider and Pennino (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - Davenport Absent: Council Members - None AM- �M.A�.che- C .ty Clerk 93-03 RES9303/TXTA.02J F ZACAL TRANSPORTATION FUNS TO: San Joaquin County Council of Governments P.O. Box 1010 Stockton, CA 95201-1010 FROM: Applicant: CITY OF LODI Address: CITY HALL, 221 TEST PINE STREET Cont PA g59dn (City, Zip) Contact Person: JERRY L. GLENN Phone: 333-6601 ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER The City of f ndi hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes 1971 and applicable rules and regulations, thatits annual transportation claim be approved in the amount of $ 1,220,297 for fiscal year 19_ 92-93 , to be drawn from the Local Transportation Fund. When approved, please transmit this claim to the County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to this applicant is subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan. The claimant certifies that this Local Transportation Fund claim and the financial information contained therein, is reasonable and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634 and 6734. APPROVED: San Joaquin County Council of Governments By: BARTON MEAYS Title: Executive Director Date: 19 Applicant: Signed: Name: Title: Mc Date: 19 E STATE TRb.NSIT ASSISTANCE CLAIM TO: San Joaquin County Council of Governments P.O. Box 1010 Stockton, CA 95201-1010 FROM: Applicant: CITY OF LODI Address: CITY' HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET, LODI, CA 95240 (City, zip) SHARON BLAUFUS, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT -PUBLIC WORKS Contact Person: JERRY L. GLENN Phone: 333-6701 ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER This claimant, qualified pursuant to Sections 99313.6, 99314.5 and 99314.6 of the Public Utilities Code, hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes of 1971 as amended, and applicable rules and regulations, that an allocation be wade in the amount of $ 97.298 for fiscal year 1992-93 , to be drawn from the State Transit Assistance trust fund of San Joaquin County for the following purposes and in the following respective amounts: Purposes Mini buses for transit service Amounts $97,298 Allocation instruction and payment by the County Auditor to this claimant are subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved claim. The claimant certifies that this State Transit Assistance Fund Claim and the financial information contained herein, is reasonable and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634 and 6734. APPROVED: San Joaquin County Council of Governments By: BARTON MEAYS Title: Executive Director Data: 19 Applicant: Signed: Name: Title: -6- Date: 19 .w TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT APPORTIONMENTS _. Local Transportation Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment 1992-93 $ 969,412 B. Pedestrian/Bicycle Apportionment 20,196 C. Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment D. XY3� i$�XVAM X Streets 194,662 Transit E. Total Available for 1992-93 Claim(s) 1,220,297 F. Less any LTF Already Claimed 1992-93 -0- G. TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM $ 1,220,297 (Also enter on page 8, 1st column) II. State Transit Assistance Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment 1992-93 $ 46,587 B. Special Operator Apportionment 1992-93 1,124 C. Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment -0- D. Unexpended Carryover 50,519 E. Minus 2% of A. Claimed on Behalf of ( 932 ) COG for Transit Planning F. Total Available for 1992-93 Claim(s) G. Less any STA Already Claimed 1992-93 H. TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM $ (Also enter on page 8, 2nd column) -7- 97,298 -0- 97,298 1 T IMPORTANT: To avoid accidental overpayment, please identify in the space below any unexpended carryover included in the amounts being claimed above. Identify the amount of carryover and the purpose for which it is being reclaimed. Transit operations, --------------- 1. Operators claiming STA funds must meet qualifying criteria (PUC Section 99314.6). Page 17 of this form must be completed. -8- • TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT -ALLOCATIONS t, Claim Purvose I. LTF II. STA I. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Article 4 (99260)-Operatorl 321,657 97,298 Article 8 (99400(c)) Contractor operating 5,300 Article 8 (99400(e)) Contractor capital II. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE N/A Article 3 (99234) 21,000 III. ROADS AND STREETS N/A Article 8 (99400(a)) 872,340 IV. OTHER Article 8 (99400(b) N/A or 99400(d) i TOTAL TRIS CLAIM 97,298 TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM (from page 7, I. and II. G.) 1,220,297 97,298 UNCLAIMED APPORTIONMENT (TOTAL AVAIL. less TOTAL THIS CLAIM) -0- -0- IMPORTANT: To avoid accidental overpayment, please identify in the space below any unexpended carryover included in the amounts being claimed above. Identify the amount of carryover and the purpose for which it is being reclaimed. Transit operations, --------------- 1. Operators claiming STA funds must meet qualifying criteria (PUC Section 99314.6). Page 17 of this form must be completed. -8- •« PART I - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Pleas kir he FINANCIAL INFORMATION Article 4 Operator is ac or 1991-92 Please Circle 1992-93 I. OPERATING REVENUE ACTUAL or ESTIMATE Budget 401 Passenger Fares 44,394 49,395 402 Special Transit Fares 4,500 405 Charter Service Revenues 406 Auxiliary Transportation Revenues (includes advertising) 407 Non -Transportation Revenues 7,716 5,000 408 Tax Revenue (Specify:) Property Tax Sales Tax (not TDA) 409 Local Grants & Reimbursements 15,895 Purchase of Service 20,800 Local Transportation Fund(LTF) 410 Local Special Fare Assistance r 411 State Cash Grants & Reimbursements State Transit Assistance (STA) Other 412 State Special Fare Assistance 413 Federal Grants & Reimbursements (Specify) UMTA Grants 430 Contributed Services (Not Cash) 440 Subsidy from other Sector of Operations TOTAL 381,970 347,800 II. CAPITAL REVENUE 464 Capital Grants & Subsidies Specify Fed, State, Local: State Transit Assistance (STA) 67,000 97,298 Local Transportation Fund (LTF) 3,709 53,552 Non -Governmental Donations TOTAL 72,701 150,850 9M III. OPERATING EXPENSES 501 Labor 1991-92 Please Circle 1992-93 Actual or Estimate Budget *Allowable capital expenses are limited for Article 8 claimants; see 99400 (e). -10- Operators Salaries/Wages 165,865 Other Salaries/Wages 1A-100 502 Fringe Benefits 22.885 503 Services 1,255 14.700 504 Materials/Supplies Fuels/Lubricants 17,000 Tires/Tubes 9�nn Other 14,921 31,000 505 utilities 506 Casualty/Liability Costs 30,473 35,000 507 Taxes 508 Purchased Transportation Service 310,001 41,250 509 Miscellaneous Expenses 1,196 C510 Expense Transfers 511 Interest Expense 512 Leases and Rentals 513 Depreciation/Amortization Operator Funds Grant Funds _ TOTAL 357,846 347,800 IV. CAPITAL EXPENSES* Debt Service Land/Property Acquisition Vehicles 18,481 140,850 Construction Other _ 10,000 TOTAL 18,481 150,850 *Allowable capital expenses are limited for Article 8 claimants; see 99400 (e). -10- -11- OPERATIONAL INFORMATION* Actual Actual/Est. Proposed FY 1990-91 FY 1991-92 FY 1992-93 1. Patronaae a. Total Passengers 85,343 89,436 94,200 COUNTY b. Rmnuum Passengers 4,213 3,460 4,000 CDBG c. xYxatAk Passengers 147 1,015 1,200 GENERAL PUBLIC d xXL%)*xj&% Passengers 8,712 3,275 (1) 9,790 ELDERLY & e. Handicapped Passengers 72,271 75,306.(l) 79,210 2. Vehicle Miles a. Total Vehicle Miles 178,488 184,673 193,000 b. Revenue Vehicle Miles 178,488 184,673 193,000 3. Revenue Vehicle Hours 14,930 16,576 17,400 4. Revenue Vehicle Fuel Consumntign a. Diesel b. Gasoline 15,467 16,931 18,550 5. Fare Structure a. Base 1.00 1.00 1.00 b. Zone c. Youth d. Senior .50 .54 .50 e. Handicapped .50 .50 .50 f. Monthly Pass g. Other CDBG (2) 4.25 4.25 4.25 h. Average Fare .59 not valid (1) .66 (1) Mid year contractor discontinued separating general public from elderly and handicapped. (2) Ticke's fully paid for from CDBG funds. *Attach additional pages as necessary to alter or complete description -11- I L41 PART I - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Pleas_FINANCIAL INFORMATION Article 4 Operator i 1 e ac or 1991-92 Please Circle 1992-93 I. OPERATING REVENUE ACTUAL or ESTIMATE Budget 401 Passenger Fares 402 Special Tz nsit Fares 405 Charter Service Revenues 406 Auxiliary Transportation Revenues (includes advertising) 407 Non -Transportation Revenues 408 Tax Revenue (Specify:) Property Tax Sales Tax (not TDA) 409 Local Grants & Reimbursements Purchase of Service Local Transportation Fund(LTF) 29.285 X300 410 Local Special Fare Assistance 411 State Cash Grants & Reimbursements State Transit Assistance (STA) Other 412 State Special Fare Assistance 413 Federal Grants & Reimbursements (Specify) UMTA Grants 430 Contributed Services (Not Cash) _ 440 Subsidy from other Sector of Operations _ TOTAL II. CAPITAL REVENUE 464 Capital Grants & Subsidies Specify Fed, State, Local: State Transit Assistance (STA) Local Transportation Fund (LTF) Non -Governmental Donations TOTAL -9- 29,285 5,300 F III. OPERATING EXPENSES 1991-92 Please Circle 1992-93 Actual or Estimate Budget 501 Labor Operators Salaries/Wages Other Salaries/Wages _ 502 Fringe Benefits _ 503 Services 504 Materials/Supplies Fuels/Lubricants Tires/Tubes Other 505 Utilities 506 Casualty/Liability Costs 507 Taxes 508 Purchased Transportation Service 29,285 5.300 509 Miscellaneous Expenses C510 Expense Transfers 511 Interest Expense 512 Leases and Rental* 513 Depreciation/Amortization Operator Funds Grant Funds TOTAL 29,285 5,300 IV. CAPITAL EXPENSES* Debt Service Land/Property Acquis4.tion Vehicles Construction Other TOTAL *Allowable capital expenses are limited for Article 8 claimants; see 99400 (e). -10- il *Attach additional pages as necessary to alter or complete description -11- OPERATIONAL INFORMATION* Actual Actual/Est. Proposed FY 1990-91 FY 1991-92 FY 1992-93 1. Patronage a. Total Passengers 18,653 19,523 3,533., b. Revenue IPassengers 1 c. Youth Passengers d Elderly �assengers e. Handicapped Passengers 2. Vehicle Miles a. Total Vehicle Miles b. Revenue Vehicle Miles 3. Revenue Vehicle Hours 8,760 8,760 3,533 4. Revenue Vehicle Fuel Consumption Ca. Diesel b. Gasoline 5. Fare Structure a. Base i b. Zone C. Youth d. Senior e. Handicapped f. Monthly Pass q. Other h. Average Fare *Attach additional pages as necessary to alter or complete description -11- C A THREE_ YEAR _FISCAL -PLAN 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 Or-,ktating Expenses $ 345,500 $ 371,400 $ 399,250 Operating Revenues: Sources: LTF STA Federal Fares General Fund Other Total $ 134,250 $ 145,900 $ 158.500-- 134.250 145.900 158.500 55,000 56,375 57-775- 27,000 28.350 99.750 S 696,000 $ j47,925 $ An3,jr Capital Expenses $ 150,000 $ 165,000 $ 181,500 Capital Revenue 'Sources: LTF $ $ $ STA 30,000 33,000 36,300 Federal 120,000 132,000 145,200 -Other Total S 150,000 $ 165,000 $ 181,500 -12- FLEET INVENTORY (Transit Vehicle Owners Only) Vehicles to be Purchased in FY 1992-93 minibus Production # of Fuel Seat SRecial Features_ AC EP WC 'Other station wagon Make & Model Year Veh. Type Capacity Chev st. wag 1989 2 gas 5 x Dodge Caravan 1989 1 gas 7 x x Dodge Diplomat 1989 3 gas 4 x Dodge Caravan 1991 1 gas 7 x x Cher st. wag 1992 2* gas 5 x * one of thesE was purchase in 19 2-93 f hcdl year nd is included in this claim TOTAL XXXXXXXXXX XXXXX Vehicles to be Purchased in FY 1992-93 minibus 1992 or 93 3 gasol ne 12 x x station wagon 1992 1 gasol ne 5 x C = Air Conditioned EP = Environmental Package WC = Wheelchair Lift -13- Article 4 Operator TDA Requirements 1. Fare Ratio/Local Support Requirements All Article 4 claimants are required to maintain a specified ratio of fare revenue to operating cost. In addition, SMTD only is required to maintain a ratio of fare revenue plus local support to operating cost of 32%. See 99268.2 - 99268.19 for details and exemptions pertaining to ratios. A. What is this system's required farebox recovery ratio? 20% B. Does the attached budget demonstrate that this system will meet its required farehox recovery and for SMTD its farebox plus local support ratios? Nn C. Has this system utilized its grace year? NO D. Has this system been in non-compliance with its required ratio(s)? NO If yes, identify the year or years 2. Extension of service/Net.► Service An extension of service or 'new service is exempt from"the required farebox and local support ratios if: A. The extension of service or new service has been in operation for less than two full fiscal years. The two-year extension of services exclusion applies until two years after the end of the fiscal year in which the extension of services was put into operation. B. The claimant submits a report on the extension of services to the COG within 90 days after the end of the fiscal year. (For details of the report, see 6633.8(b)). Is an extension of service/new service being claimed? NO If so, has the required report been submitted for the most recently completed full fiscal year? If not, that report must accompany this claim. -14- 4. Fifteen Percent Expenditure Increase (6632) If any of the line items on the attached budget exceed by more than 153 the expenditure for that same item in the previous year's budget, then an explanation for that increase must be given below. Attach an extra page if necessary. Labor costs, maintenance costs and insurance cost are all increased because the City has taken over the operation of the system. These additional costs are all offset b) the reduction of purchase transportation. 506 - additional vehicle and replacing smaller vehicles with larger 503 - SERVICES increased advertising consulting services to assist in filing for ISTEA funcs phone and utility costs as a result of doing an in-house operation S. Narrative Description (6632) Please describe in the space below any changes in service` characteristics from the previous fiscal year. This should specifically include any substantial increase or decrease in the: geographic area served, major changes to the 5aope of operations, or addition of major new fixed facilities. Please attach an additional page if necessary. The purchase of minibuses is designed to increase capacity and to have equipment u+t hand to begin a pilot fixed route system. SPECIAL NOTES FOR RATIO CALCULATIONS SMTD - Exclude certain costs and fares as specified in the most recent Compliance Audit Report. Lodi - Exclude County service when calculating fares and expenses. County- Exclude Lathrop service when calculating fares and expense. -is- Article 8 Contractor TDA Requirements For contracted transportation service providers, the San Joaquin County Council of Governments' Executive Board has waived the farebox and local support ratios as it is empowered to do by 99405(c). The COG Board has established a two-step process. 1. Hatch Requirement For any Article 8 transit claim, no more than 90% of the total operating funds (minus depreciation) in the budget may be TDA (LTF and STA) derived. The ten percent or more matching funds may come from any other source available to the claimant besides TDA. 2. operating Cost Per Passenger objective To receive an amount of TDA operating funds (LTF and STA combined) in excess of what was claimed the previous fiscal year, the claimant must establish an operating cost ver passenger objective for the fiscal year of the claim. "Operating cost" is defined as in the TDA statutes and regulations. The objective should be a realistic one based on current and past system performance, but should be low enough to represent an "improvement" when warranted. The COG Executive Board will adopt the systemwide operating cost per passenger objective for the fiscal year of the claim. If the system failed to meet its operating cost per passenger objective in the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year of the claim, then the claimant is only eligible to file a claim for the level of TDA operating funding received in that prior fiscal year. In the case of a unified transit system, each claimant would be limited to the prior year's level of TDA operating funding. If a system wishes to be eligible for increased TDA operating funding in a future fiscal year, then the claimant should identify an operating cost per passenger objective. a. What was the level of TDA operating funding received in the previous fiscal year for this system by this claimant (LTF plus STA)? $ 29 -?AS b. Does the attached budget information demonstrate at least a 10% match of non -TDA funds in FY 1991-92? Does the FY 1992-93 budget demonstrate a 10% match of non -TDA funds? C. Is this claim requesting more TDA operating funds than were received for this system by this claimant in the previous fiscal year? NO d. If yes, did the system mee,_ its operating cost per passenger objective in the previous fiscal year? (An affirmative answer should be documented in Part "e".) -19- e. What was last year's Operating Cost per Passenger 'r Objective? What was the actual operating cost per passenger? i. FY 1991-92 Operating Cost $ ii. Total Passengers iii. Operating Cost Per Passenger f. What is the Operating Cost per Passenger Objective for this claim? iv. Budgeted Operating Cost $ V. Estimated Total Passengers vi. Projected Operating Cost per Passenger (iv/v) vii. FY 1992-93 OPERATING COST PER PASSENGER OBJECTIVE S $ viii. If this claim is for a unified transit system2, has the contributing claimant been appraised of the planned systemwide objective set in vii. above? 3. Fifteen Percent Expenditure Increase (6632) If any of the line items on the attached budget exceed by more than 15% the expenditure for that same item in the previous year's budget, then an explanation for that increase must be given below. Attach an additional page if necessary. 4. Narrative Description (6632) Please describe on an attachpa page any changes in service characteristics from the previous fiscal year. This should specifically include any substantial increase or decrease in the geographic area served, major changes to the scope of operations, or addition of major new fixed facilities. The City is dropping this subsidy in September 1992 --------------- 2If this claim is for a unified transit system (definition page 19), all calculations and numbers for operating costs per passenger must include system totals. Also contributing claimants to unif;ed transit systems should not use page 17 or 18, use page 19 Ustead. -20- w "• PART II - PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROJECTS LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND LTF Cost Project Title and Description Project Limits Total Cost C TDA 128 FUND (BICYCLE & PD.) SIDEWALK REPLACEMENTS $ 21,000 $ 21,000 TDA - 124 FUND (STREET PROJECTS) Cherokee Lane - Kettleman to Delores $181,000 Overlay analysis design 5,000 Hutchins Street widening Lodi/Pine 285,000 Handicap retrofits 15,000 Church St. ?mprovements, Kettleman to Vine 232,000 Houston Lane overlay 45,000 Street maintenance 321,000 Miscellaneous hideninc, 50,000 Miscellaneous curb and gutter replacements 20,000 Misce�laneous sidewilk replacement 29,000 Highwiy 12/Lower Sacramento Road i provenents 50,000 Traffic signals - Turner Rd/Lwr Sa ramento Rd 100,000 Cherokee Lane/Ha a Rd 150,000 Kettleman Lane/C ntral Ave. 100,000 Turner Rd/Stockt n St 100,000 Stockton St. Improvements, Lodi to Lockeford 275,000 Tokay Street Improvements, Hutchin to Fairmont 75,000 Tokay Street Improvements, Church lo Hutchins 55,000 TOTAL PROJECT 2,088,000 TDA funds available for Stree s & Roads LTF COST: TOTAL COST: L (Use additional page if necessary) -22- CITY COUNCIL PHILLIP A. PENNINO, Mayor JACK A. SIEGLOCK Mayor Pro T*ffgme RAY G. DAVENPORT STEPHEN J. MANN JOHN R. (Randy] SNIDER CITY OF LODI CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET P.O. BOX 3005 LODI• CALIFORNIA 95241-1910 (209) 3345634 FAX MR U36M January i2, 1993 San Joaquin County Council of Governments (COG) Attention: Nancy Miller P.O. Box 1010 Stockton, CA 95201-1010 Dear Ms. Miller: THOMAS A. PETERSON CIly Man"► ALICE M. RETMCHE CITY C*k 809 McNATT CTIy Attomay Enclosed please find signed copy of the Transportation Development Act Claim and Resolution ?To. 93-03 entitled, "A Resolution of the Lodi City Council Approving t1se Supplemental 1992/93 Transportation Development Act Claim for Local Transportation Funds" which was adopted at the City Council meeting of January 6, 1993. Please have the Transportation Development Act Claim signed and returned to our office at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact our office. Very truly yours, ennife M. Perrin Deputy City Clerk Attachment RESOLUTION NO. 93-03 amens asasaasasasassasas A MOLUT70N OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE SUPPLEMENTAL 1992/93 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIM FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS aassasaasaamaasa:sasssmssaasasasassaasaaaaaaaa:ssmaasasssasassasassssss BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lodi City Council does hereby approve the City's Supplemental 1992/93 Transportation Development Act (TDA) claim for Local Transportation Funds (LTF) and State Transit Assistance Funds (STA); and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Lodi City Council does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute the subject Claim on behalf of s the City of Lodi. Dated: January 6, 1993 mss=sas==azaaasaamassasaasmasssasaamm:ssssaaasmssssmaaasasasaassamsaass I hereby certify that Resolution No. 93-03 was passed and adopted by the Lodi City Council in a regular meeting held January 6, 1993 by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Mann, Sieglock, Snider and Pennino (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - Davenport Absent: Council Members - None M.-Peim Alice M.che City Clerk The rvc regoing Document is Certified To A Correct Copy Of The Original t,.- • 'n This Office. Jennifer M. Perrin City Clerk, City Of Lodi y� {v tk ,,r �t�d- !//� 4�- 93-03 RES9303/TXTA.02J STATE TRANSITASSISTANCE CLAIM TO: San Joaquin County Council of Governments P.O. Box 1010 Stockton, CA 95201-1010 FROM: Applicant: CITY OF LODI Address: CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET, LODI, CA 95240 (City, Zip) SHARON BLAUFUS, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT -PUBLIC WORKS Contact Person: JERRY L. GLENN Phone• 333-6701 ASSISTANT CITY MARAOr - This claimant, qualified pursuant to Sections 99313.6, 99314.5 and 99314.6 of the Public Utilities Code, hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes of 1971 as amended, and applicable rules and regulations, that an allocation be made in the amount of $ 97,298 for fiscal year 1992-93 , to be drawn from the State Transit Astance trust fund ­oQ San Joaquin County for the following purposes and in the following respective amounts: Purposes Mini buses for transit service Amounts $97,298 Allocation instruction and payment by the County Auditor to this claimant are subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved claim. The claimant certifies that this State Transit Assistance Fund Claim and the financial information contained herein, is reasonable and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634 and 6734. APPROVED: San Joaquin County Council of Governments By: BARTON MEAYS Title: Executive Director Date: 19 -6- Applicant: CI1'Y OF LODI Signe . Thomas A. Peterson Name: Qfx Title: Date: 19 93 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND TO: San Joaquin County Council of Governments P.O. Box 1010 Stockton, CA 95201-1010 FROM: Applicant: CITY OF LODI Address: CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STR T ODt rA Qs2dn (City, Zip) ' Contact Person: JERRY L. GLENN Phone: 333-6601 ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER The c;ry of t ndi hereby requests, in accordance with chapter 1400, Statutes 1971 and applicable rules and regulations, that its annual transportation claim be approved in the amount of $ 1,220,297 for fiscal year 1992-93 , to be drawn from the Local Transportation Fund. When approved, please transmit this claim to the County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to this applicant is subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan. The claimant certifies that this Local Transportation Fund claim and the financial information contained therein, is reasonable and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634 and 6734. APPROVED: San Joaquin County Council of Governments By: BARTON MEAYS Title: Executive Director Dz;te : 19 -5- Applicant: CITY OF LODI Signe . Thomas A. Peterson Name: __ r-ity &Aaniaer Title: Date: I. TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT APPORTIONMENTS Local Transportation Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment 1992-93 $ 969,412 B. Pedestrian/Bicycle Apportionment 20,196 C. Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment Streets 194,662 D. XV,*LXXX Transit E. Total Available for 1992-93 Claim(s) 1,2209297 F. Less any LTF Already Claimed 1992-93 -0- G. TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM $ 1,220,297 (Also enter on page 8, 1st column) II. State Transit Assistance Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment 1992-93 $ B. Special Operator Apportionment 1992-93 C. Previous Years' Unclaimed Apporticnment D. Unexpended Carryover E. Minus 2% of A. Claimed on Behalf of COG for Transit Planning F. Total Available for 1992-93 Claim(s) G. Less any STA Already Claimed 1992-93 H. TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM $ (Also enter on page 8, 2nd column) -7- 46,587 1,124 -0- 50,519 ( 932 y 97,298 -0- 97,298 1 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ALLOCATIONS Claim Purpose I. LTF II. STA I. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Article 4 (99260)-operatorl 321,657 97,298 Article 8 (99400(c)) Contractor operating 5,300 Article 8 (99400(e)) Contractor capital II. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE N/A Article 3 (99234) 21,000 III. ROADS AND STREETS N/A Article 8 (99400(a)) 872,340 IV. OTHER f Article 8 (99400(b) N/A or 99400(d) e TOTAL THIS CLAIM. 97,298 ' TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM (from page 7, I. 'and II..) 1,220,297 97,298 UNCLAIMED APPORTIONMENT (TOTAL AVAIL. less TOTAL THIS CLAIM) _-0- -0- IMEORTANT: To avoid accidental overpayment, please identify in the space below any unexpended carryover i?.cluded in the amounts being claimed above. Identify the amount mf carryover and the purpose for which it is being reclaimed. Transit operations - 1. operators claiming STA funds must meet qualifying criteria (PUC Section 99314.6). Page 17 of this form must be completed. -8- `PART I - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Pleas ir*le-mit FINANCIAL INFORMATION Article 4 Operator is ac or Q= 1992-93 Budget 49.395 4,500 5,000 r20 ,8(00 268,105 347,800 97,298 53,552 Ian QCn 1991-92 Please Circle I. OPERATING REVENUE ACTUAL or ESTIMATE 401 Passenger Fares 44,394 402 Special Transit Fares 405 Charter Service Revenues 406 Auxiliary Transportation Revenues (includes advertising) 407 Non -Transportation Revenues 7,716 408 Tax Revenue (Specify:) Property Tax Sales Tax (not TDA) 409 Local Grants & Reimbursements Purchase of Service 15,895 Local Transportation Fund(LTF) 3}3,966 410 Local Special Fare Assistance 411 State Cash Grants & Reimbursements State Transit Assistance (STA) Other 412 State Special Fare Assistance 413 Federal Grants & Reimbursements (Specify) UI4TA Grants 430 Contributed Services (Not Cash) 440 Subsidy from other Sector of Operations TOTAL 381,970 II. CAPITAL REVENUE 464 Capital Grants & Subsidies Specify Fed, State, Local: State Transit Assistance (STA) 67,000 Local Transportation Fund (LTF) 3,709 Non -Governmental Donations TOTAL 72,701 Q= 1992-93 Budget 49.395 4,500 5,000 r20 ,8(00 268,105 347,800 97,298 53,552 Ian QCn III. OPERATING EXPENSES 1991-92 Please Circle 1992-93 Actual or Estimate Budget 501 Labor IV. CAPITAL EXPENSES* Debt Service Land/Property Acquisition Vehicles 18,481 140,850 Construction Other 10,000 TOTAL 18,481 150,850 *Allowable capital expenses are limited for Article 8 claimants; see 99400 (e). -10- operators Salaries/Wages 165,865 Other Salaries/wages 18-1()() 502 Fringe Benefits 22.885 503 Services 1,255 14.700 504 Materials/Supplies Fuels/Lubricants 17,000 Tires/Tubes_s nnn Other lit 91' , '41 -non 505 utilities 506 Casualty/Liability Costs 30,473 35,000 507 Taxes 508 Purchased Transportation Service 310,001 41,250 509 Miscellaneous Expenses 1,196 510 Expense Transfers 511 Interest Expense 512 Leases and Rentals 513 Depreciation/Amortization Operator Funds Grant Funds TOTAL 357,846 347,800 IV. CAPITAL EXPENSES* Debt Service Land/Property Acquisition Vehicles 18,481 140,850 Construction Other 10,000 TOTAL 18,481 150,850 *Allowable capital expenses are limited for Article 8 claimants; see 99400 (e). -10- OPERATIONAL INFORMATION* Actual Actual/Est. Proposed FY 1990-91 FY 1991-92 FY 1992-93 1. Patronage a. Total Passengers 85,343 89,436 .50 COUNTY 4.25 4.25 b. Rammm Passengers 4,213 3,460 (1) Mid year contractor discontinued CDBG public from elderly and c. xY=&tA Passengers 147 1,015 (2) Tickets fully paid for from CDBG GENERAL PUBLIC d xE2xj x2* Passengers -1,712 3,275 (1) description ELDERLY & e. Handicapped Passengers 72,271 75,306 (1) 2. Vehicle Miles a. Total Vehicle Miles 178,488 184,673 b. Revenue Vehicle Miles 178,488 184,673 3. Revenue Vehicle Hours 4. Revenue Vehicle Fuel Consumption a. Diesel b. Gasoline 5. Fare Structure a. Base b. Zone c. Youth d. Senior e. Handicapped 14,930 16,576 94,200 4,000 1,200 9,790 79,210 193,000 193,000 17,400 15,467 16,931 18,550 1.00 1.00 1.00 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 f. Monthly Pass g. Other CDBG (2) 4.25 4.25 4.25 h. Average Fare .59 not valid (1) .66 (1) Mid year contractor discontinued separating general public from elderly and handicapped. (2) Tickets fully paid for from CDBG funds. *Attach additional pages as necessary to alter or complete description -11- PART I - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION P1ease4-:he. FINANCIAL INFORMNTION Article 4 operator is e-B�Ca�i ac or 1991-92 Please Circle 1992-93 I. OPERATING REVENUE ACTUAL or ESTIMATE Budget 401 Passenger Fares 402 Special Transit Fares 405 Charter Service Revenues 406 Auxiliary Transportation Revenues (includes advertising) 407 Non -Transportation Revenues 408 Tax Revenue (Specify:) Property Tax Sales Tax (not TDA) 409 Local Grants & Reimbursements Purchase of Service Local Transportation Fund(LTF) 29,285 5,300 410 Local Special Fare Assistance 411 State Cash Grants & Reimbursements State Transit Assistance (STA) Other 412 State Special Fare Assistance 413 Federal Grants & Reimbursements (Specify) UMTA Grants 430 Contributed Services (Not Cash) 440 Subsidy from other Sector of operations TOTAL 29,285 5,300 II. CAPITAL REVENUE 464 Capital Grants & Subsidies Specify Fed, State, Local: State Transit Assistance (STA) Local Transportation Fund (LTF) Non -Governmental Donations TOTAL -9- T III. OPERATING EXPENSES 1991-92 Please Circle 1992-93 Actual or Estimate Budget 501 Labor Operators Salaries/Wages Other Salaries/Wages 502 Fringe Benefits 503 Services 504 Materials/Supplies Fuels/Lubricants Tires/Tubes other 505 Utilities 506 Casualty/Liability Costs 507 Taxes 508 Purchased Transportation Service 29.28$ 5,300 509 Miscellaneous Expenses 510 Expense Transfers 511 Interest Expense 512 Leases and Rentals 513 Depreciation/Amortization Operator Funds Grant Funds TOTAL 299285 5,300 IV. CAPITAL EXPENSES* Debt Service Land/Property Acquisition Vehicles Construction Other TOTAL *Allowable capital expenses are limited for Article 8 claimants; see 99400 (e). -10- *Attach additional pages as necessary to alter or complete description -11- OPERATIONAL INFORMATION* Actual Actual/Est. Proposed FY 1990-91 FY 1991-92 FY 1991-93 1. Patronage a. Total Passengers 18,653 19,523 3,533 , b. Revenue !passengers c. Youth 4Passengers d Elderly Passengers e. Handicapped Passengers 2. Vehicle Miles a. Total Vehicle Miles b. Revenue Vehicle Miles 3. gevenue Vehicle Hours 8.760 8,760 3,533 4. Revenue Vehicle Fuel Consumption a. Diesel b. Gasoline 5. Fare Structure a. Base b. Zone c. Youth d. Senior e. Handicapped f. Monthly Pass g. other h. Average Fare *Attach additional pages as necessary to alter or complete description -11- THREE YEAR FISCAL PLAN Operating Expenses Operating Revenues: Sources: LTF STA Federal Fares General Fund Other Total Capital Expenses Capital Revenue Sources: LTF STA Federal Other Total 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 $ 345,500 $ 371.400 $ 399,25 0 $ 134,250 S 145,900 S 158,500 134,250 145,900 158_500 55,000 56,375 57.775 27,000 28.350 29,750____ $ 6962000 $ 747.925 $ 8O3-775 $ 150,000 $ 165,000 $ 181,500 S S S 30,000 33,000 36,300 120,000 132,000 145,200 $ 150,000 $ 165,000 $ 181,500 -12- FLEET INVENTORY (Transit Vehicle Owners Only) Vehicles to be Purchased in FY 1992-93 minibus Production I of Fuel Seat Special Featu es AC EP wC Other Make & Model Year Veh. Type Capacity Chev st. wag 1989 2 gas 5 x Dodge Caravan 1989 1 gas 7 x x Dodgc ^irloma 1989 3 gas 4 x Dodge Caravan 1991 1 gas 7 x x Chev st. wag 1992 2* gas 5 x * one of these is included was purchase in this claim i in 19 2-93 f seal year nd TOTAL XXXXXXXXXX -- XXXXX I I Vehicles to be Purchased in FY 1992-93 minibus 1992 or 93 3 gasol ne 12 x x station wagon 1992 1 I gasol ne 5 x C = Air Conditioned EP = Environmental Package wC = wheelchair Lift -13- �, Article 4 operator TDA Requirements 1. Fare Ratio/Local Support Requirements All Article 4 claimants are required to maintain a specified ratio of fare revenue to operating cost. In addition, SMTD only is required to maintain a ratio of fare revenue plus local support to operating cost of 32%. See 99268.2 - 99268.19 for details and exemptions pertaining to ratios. A. What is this system's required farebox recovery ratio? 20% B. Does the attached budget demonstrate that this system will meet its required farebox recovery and for SMTD its farebox plus local support ratios? ran C. Has this system utilized its grace year? NO 3 D. Has this system been in non-compliance with its required ratio(s)? NO If yes, identify the year or years 2. Extension of Service/New service An extension of service or new service is exempt :rom the required farebox and local support ratios if: A. The extension of service or new service has been in operation for less than two full fiscal years. The two-year extension of services exclusion applies until two years after the and of the fiscal year in which the extension of services was put into operation. B. The claimant submits a report on the extension of services to the COG within 90 days after the end of the fiscal year. (For details of the report, see 6633.8(b)). Is an extension of service/new service being claimed? NO If so, has the required report been submitted for the most recently completed full fiscal year? If not, that report must accompany this claim. -14- 4. Pifteen Percent Expenditure Increas: (6632) If any of the line items on the attached budget exceed by more than 15t the expenditure for that same item in the previous year's budget, then an explanation for that increase must be given below. Attach an axtra page if necessary. Lai:or costs, maintenance costs and insurance cost are all increased because the City has taken over the operation of the system. These additional costs are all offset by the reduction of purchase transportation. 506 - additional vehicle and replacing smaller vehicles with larger 503 - SERVICES increased advertising 3 consulting services to assist in filing for ISTEA funs phone and utility costs as a result of doing an in-house operation S. Narrative Description (6632) Please describe in the space below any changes in service h characteristics from the previous fiscal year. This should specifically include any substantial increase or decrease in the geographic area served, major changes to the scope of operations, or addition of major new fixed facilities. Please attach an additional page if necessary. The purchase of minibuses is designed to increase capacity and to have equipment on hand to begin a pilot fixed route system. SPECIAL NOTES FOR HATIO CALCULATIONS SMTD - Exclude certain costs and fares as specified in the most recent Compliance Audit Report. Lodi - Exclude County service when calculating fares and expenses. County- Exclude Lathrop service when calculating fares and expense. -13- Article 8 Contractor TDA Requirements For contracted transportation service providers, the San Joaquin County Council of Governments' Executive Board has waived the farebox and local support ratios as it is empowered to do by 99405(c). The COG Board has established a two-step process. 1. Match Requirement For any Article 8 transit claim, no more than 90% of the total operating funds (minus depreciation) in the budget may be TDA (LTF and STA) derived. The ten percent or more matching funds may come from any other source available to the claimant besides TDA. 2. Operating Cost Per Passenger objective To receive an amount of TDA operating funds (LTF and STA combined) in excess of what was claimed the previous fiscal year, the claimant must establish an operating cost ver ,passenger obiective for the fiscal year of the claim. "Operating cost" is defined as in the TDA statutes and regulations. The objective should be a realistic one based on current and past system performance, but should bi low enough to represent an "improvement" when warranted_ The COG Executive Board will adopt the systemwide operating cost per passenger objective for the fiscal year of the claim. If the system failed to meet its operating cost per passenger objective in the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year of the claim, then the claimant is only eligible to file a claim fox the level of TDA operating funding received in that prior fiscal year. In the case of a unified transit system, each claimant would be limited to the prior year's level of TDA operating funding. If a system wishes to be eligible for increased TDA operating funding in a future fiscal year, then the claimant should identify an operating cost per passenger objective. a. What was the level of TDA operating funding received in the previous fiscal year for this system by this claimant (LTY plus STA)? $ 29,285 b. Does the attached budget information demonstrate at least a 10% match of non -TDA funds in FY 1991-92? Does the FY 1992-93 budget demonstrate a 10% match of non -TDA funds? C. Is this claim requesting more TDA operating funds than were received for this system by this claimant in the previous fiscal year? NO d. If yes, did the system meet its operating cost per passenger objective in the previous fiscal year? (An affirmative answer should be docurented in Part "e".) -19- 1- e. e. What was last year's operating Cost per Passenger Objective? What was the actual operating cost per passenger? i. FY 1991-92 Operating Cost $ ii. Total Passengers iii. Operating Cost Per Passenger (i /ii) $ f. What is the operating Cost per Passenger Objective for this claim? iv. Budgeted Operating Cost V. Estimated Total Passengers vi. Projected Operating Cost per Passenger (iv/v) vii. FY 1992-93 OPERATING COST PER S S PASSENGER OBJECTIVE $ viii. If this claim is for a unified transit system2, has the contributing claimant been appraised of the planned systemwide objective set in vii. above? 3. Fifteen Percent Expenditure Increase (6632) If any of the line items on the attached budget exceed by more than 15$ the expenditure for that same item in the previous year's budget, then an explanation for that increase must be given below. Attach an additional page if necessary. 4. Narrative Description (6632) Please describe on an attached page any changes in service characteristics from the previous fiscal year. This should specifically include any substantial increase or decrease in the geographic area served, major changes to the scope of operations, or addition of major new fixed facilities. The City is dropping this subsidy in September 1992 --------------- 2If this claim is for a unified transit system (definition page 19), all calculations and numbers for operating costs per passenger must include system totals. Also contributing claimants to unified transit systems should not use page 17 or 18, use page 19 instead. -20- �f PART II - PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROTECTS LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND Project Title and Description LTF Cost Project Limits Total Cost TDA - 128 FUND (BICYCLE & PD.) SIDEWALK REPLACEMENTS 2'.,000 �ZS6 TDA - 124 FUND (STREET PROJECTS) Cherokee Lane - Kettleman to Delores 51811000 Overlay analysis design 5,000 Hutchins Street widening Lodi/Pine 285,000 . Handicap retrofits 15,000 Church St. Improvements, Kettleman to Vine 232,000 Houston Lane overlay 45,000 Street maintenance 321,000 Miscellaneous widening 50,000 Miscellaneous curb and gutter replacements 20,000 Miscellaneous sidewalk replacement 29,000 Highway 12/Lower Sacramento Road i provements 50,000 Traffic signals - Turner Rd/Lwr Sa ramento Rd 100,000 Cherokee Lane/Ha a Rd 150,000 Kettleman Lane/C ntral Ave. 100,000 Turner Rd/Stockt n St 100,000 Stockton St. Improvements, Lodi to Lockeford 275,000 Tokay Street Improvements, Hutchin to Fairmont 75,000 Tokay Street Improvements, Church lo Hutchins 55,000 TOTAL PROJECT 2,088,000 TDA funds available for Streei(s 8 Roads LTF COST: TOTAL COST: (Use additional page if necessary) -22-