HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - April 21, 1993 (69). OF
CITY OF LODI
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
TITLE: Review and Approval of Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan.
MEETING DATE: April 21, 1993
PREPARED BY: Parks and Recreation Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
That the City Council approve the proposed Park,
Recreation and Open Space Master Plan as
presented and/or make whatever changes may be
appropriate.
The City Council hired a master plan consultant and
appointed a master plan citizen committee some
eleven months ago to develop a Park, Recreation
and Open Space Master Plan for the City of Lodi.
The committee submitted the final plan to the Parks and Recreation Commission on February
2, 1993, for final public input and Commission recommendations. The Commission has
addressed the plan and its many recommendations and submit the plan to you for your
consideration and/or adoption. Attached please find Exhibit A, "Commission
recommendations," Exhibit B, "Addendum No. I from Jerry Draggoo," answering Commission
recommendations, Exhibit , updated materials/changes to the plan in general.
We ask that you review and adopt the plan (remember, this represents the future and cannot and
will not be implemented until developer impact fees are collected and/or grants become
available). This is a long-range plan that gives us specific direction.
FUNDING: None at this time.
arilyn . Field
Acting Pdrks and Recreation Director
MEF: srb
Attachments
cc: City Attorney
APPROVED:
° THOMAS IrETERSON ,�ycla fla,
City Manager
CC -1
/r�:iiT Dl. :1j
M I N U T E S
LODI PARKS AND RECREATION COi✓:MISSION MEETING
CARNEGIE FORUM
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 1993
Roll Call
Present - Commissioners: Bob Casalegno; Chad Meyer; Ed Wall; Elvera Melby;
Bob Johnson, Chairman. Staff: Ron Williamson, Director; Marilyn Field,
Recreation Superintendent; Scott Essin, Parks Superintendent; Michael Reese
Layne Van Noy, Tom Alexander, Recreation Supervisors.
Welcome - Chad Meyer, our new Commissioner.
II. Minutes - of January 19, 1993, approved as mailed on a motion by Elvera
Melby and a second by Bob Casalegno.
Ayes - Commissioners Melby, Casalegno, Johnson, Wall, Meyer.
Minutes approved.
Ill. Comments by the Public. Commission. and Staff on Non -Agenda Items -
Additions to Agenda
Rod Snoddy. Lodi Remote Control Boat Clu!2, 18808 Benedict Drive,
Woodbridge, CA 95258
Mr. Snoddy addressee the Commission in response to a letter from Staff dated
January 19, 1993, which stated that the fees for booking Lodi Lake Park for
the weekend of May 1 and 2, 1993, to hold their races, would be $500.00 per
day (trailer reservations would be in addition to this amount.) Mr. Snoddy
stated these fees are "out of the Club's range", adding that last year the Club
netted $84.00 on the races. Commission recommended that Staff look at the
fees quoted and come back to the Commission with a recommendation.
New Program Propo:,ed - Director Williamson announced a proposed Tiny Tots
Playground program and handed out literature for the Commissioner's
information. Laynd Van Noy, Recreation Super )r, will present details to the
Commission at the March Commission meeting.
Grape Bowl Press Box Project - Director Williamson reported that a bank
account has been set up at the Farmers & Merchants Bank in Lodi. The Press
Box Committee will be more than happy to receive any donations to the
project. Chairman Johnson singled out Bill Meehleis, Meehleis Modular
Buildings, for his very generous contribution to the project thus far.
Gang Task Force Committee - Commissioner Chad Meyer inquired if the Parks
and Recreation Commission was represented on this committee, and was
informed that Commissioner Bob Casalegno is a member.
-1-
1
Purchase of Softballs for Adult Soorts - The presentation by Recreation
Supervisor Mike Reese, will be addressed at the March Commission meeting.
V. Action Items
Tokay Pool Renovation Project - Director Williamson gave some background on
this project, whereby the Commission, at their Special Meeting of January 19,
1993, had requested Staff to obtain some cost estimates on the Lodi Swim
Club additions to the proposed swim pool renovation project over and above
the Lodi Unified School District items. Superintendent Field was unable to
obtain firm cost estimates but Mr. Gordon King, IL.U.S.D. architect? quoted her
a figure of $500.00 to $1,000.00, with the possibility of the cost going over
the $1,000.00 figure.
Steve Muser. Lodi City Swim Club President, 216 W. Taddei Road, Acampo,
addressed the Commission with a proposal that the Club is prepared to pay half
of the architectural fees up to $500.00.
The Commission is concerned about paying architectural fees and then find out
that the City cannot pursue the project. Director Williamson and Supervisor
Reese stated they were in favor of going ahead with the recommendation to
City Council. Director Williamson is prepared to initiate a Special Allocation
Request for the funds.
On a motion Commissioner Casalegno and a second by Commissioner Meyer,
it was recommended that the City request the architect to prepare estimates
at a cost not to exceed $1,200.00, with the Lodi City Swim Club paying
$ 500.00.
Ayes - Commissioners Casalegno, Meyer.
Noes - Commissioners Johnson, Melby, Wall.
Motion defeated.
Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan - Public Hearinq and Action
Chairman Johnson announced that "notes" from the Public Hearing of January
28, 1993, were available to the public and anyone wishing to address the
Commission on any new items not covered; jg,. these notes could do so.
Chairman Johnson also announced that the Commission's recommendations
will go before City Council Shirtsleeve meeting of March 16, 1993, with action
to be taken at their March 17, 1993, Council Meeting.
Master Plan Consultant, Mr. Jerry Draggoo, of J C Draggoo Usociates,
was introduced and addressed the Commission and the Pub' .
Commissioner Me:by inquired if a "bicycle trails" proposal prepared for the
Department in 1970 had been made available to Mr. Draggoo. Superintendent
Field will furnish Mr. Draggoo a copy of this report.
-2-
-£-
iE�u� a>IetJagw!1 o£g l enna p!a poa
!pol -pa uosiel uasua jor J15l
!pol 'JQ al eaN Zo5 L ou!uuad a!uelan
:stood leuo!1!ppe ;o Jone; ui aMods aldoad 6u!nnollol ayl
-Ops y1Jou aql uo l!eJl posodoid '(2aJV aJnleb; 01 1xaU) Jan!J uo itwil peads
l!w!l 'saloAo!q 1!w!i 'auoz ueued!J aseaJoul :suiaouoo ease ainleN aitel !pol
a ll!tuu Z) Jos!npd eaJd ainleN unnoJB led
•puane of ueld osle siauo,ss!wwoo uo!leajoaa
pue s3lJed ayl pue uosutjor• uewJle44� •luasajd aq !I!M 'ti 1ou1s, 'sios!njadns
;o pjeog Aluno:) u!nbeor• ues 'jagjea a6Joaq •ansst aa; luap!soj-uou ayl uo
'£66L '£ yoJeW jof pasodoJd sl sluaplsaJ pjo;a)130-1-sluawalO yl!nn 6u!180w y
!p l u!yoad aAOIS
VO u walk u smels euel(]
ansst aa; luaptsal-UOL pasodoJd ay:;o anssi ayi uo a%ods aldoad 6uimollo; atyl
-paysggeisa tus!ueyoaw 6u!pun; a jo ,Joel :silted
a4iow jo; a6eajoe ieuo!iippe aseyojnd of saal; ioedwi;o luawdolanao :swaoUOO
+!01 "IS wl •M CZC 'u!Oad aAOIS
i0()eH!A uw I h V4 '!POI NUFAM CGOL u!,qfjnej3jN u a
u 1)jW. ! J !U My LSOL zanWPA
j� !1� !UUl t_�ll1f?i J w L J J Q
';pO-j '3 :,J 3 OOOZJ !V )Ju Jj
'313 -slsoo dn•ucap 'aoueualulew 'uois!njadnsjloJied
Sul>tJed 'ssaooe Jana ;o uoisuedxa ;o suJaauoo 144!nn '> OOJJanp
:)�uaa$ aqi le )tied mou pasodo:c! 0441 iswe6e a-4ods aldoad ;o Jagwnu b
•:ila 'wool astwaxai.g6!am 'wA6 "a•! 'qni:)
siogjy utm-.L at;1 L410 l but.'adujoa toluaa UOTIcaJaaJ joopu! pasodoJd :suJa3uO3
ii?ii�'�±juEsi:�'SJO�Ij�j u,1•, 6j��?�U y� u w;j�iQ
0100 s,aJliJwuJo:) Ul ld Ja;seyj 0,41 UO sJactws,u pJeog -g-g'p'a 0441 ssajppP 01
'g AJcruq:ij 'Aepsaupat.% uo t3utlaaw-S-9.0-El Atyluow JetnBoj oql pualle tl!iA
4N t1.3leix *00'61lUstutio UV•,d l;jj%VVRj ILII JO ut.'tLJJtC<) SB 'UOSUyor JOUOtSSIwUI03
G, utii3t 'Zr aided 'MA s:}:;ttsgns slJods ytnoA :SlilaaUo:)
S•1.; , 1a.- c:IJJ a
ar u�,7•`._Si tjtsio�i ubarc - B
+lt:i+.i1.L C� i '.i'!t1' t: (;: Ciui1:►vcli Jcj•` �'JtJ3ti0 UOSUt�O! t)PiJ:JtE. Z)
With the close of Public comment, the Commission acted on the following
issues as outlined in the 'notes"of the Master Plan Public Hearing held January
28, 1993, as prepared by Superintendent Field.
Nature Area (adjacent to Lodi Lake Parkl - Address the need to increase the
riparian zone, look at north side of river. No trail on or to the north side of
river. Limit bicycles in this area. Control speed on the river, "no wake zone"
to control bank erosion. Lodi loop trail as written will funnel too much traffic
through the Nature Area.
Commission recommendations.
Increase the riparian zone.
Motion carried 5 - 0.
No trail on or to the north side of the river; eliminate current loop trail
proposal (that addresses a trail on the north side of the Mokelumne
River.
Motion carried 5 - 0.
Create a buffer zone on the north side of the river.
Motion carried 5 - 0.
Prohibit bicycles in the area.
Motion defeated 4 - 1.
Control speed on the river.
Motion carried 3 - 2.
Scenic Overlook Proposed Park - Need to address high clean-up costs so parcel
can be used as a park. April 1, 1992, City Council voted not to use parcel for
a park. If kept in the Master Plan, should be placed at the bottom of the
priority list. Homeowners still concerned about the access, egress impacting
their subdivision. Plan should specifically spell out how the park is designed,
for what use, how will it be maintained and supervised.
On a motion by Commissioner Casalegno and a second by Commissioner Wall,
the Commission recommended that we accept the proposal of a park at the
Scenic Ovor!ook site predicated upon clean-up costs and access/egree being
addressed.
Ayes - Commissioners Casalegno, Wall, Meyer, Melby, Johnson.
Noes - None.
Motion carried 5 - 0.
On a motion by Bob Johnson and a second by Chad Meyer, the Commission
recommended that a Scenic Overlook park be placed at No. 15 on the Plan's
proposed priority list, rather than No. 10, as listed currently.
Ls
Ayes - Commissioners Johnson, Meyer, Casalegno, Wall, Melby.
Noes - None.
Motion carried 5 - 0.
Aquatics - Statistics show in the Master Plan that participation figures are high
with regard to interest in swimming. Survey results indicated that the
community wanted more swimming. Blakely/Enze pools do not address the
aquatic needs of teens and adults (too shallow). Community cannot rely on
accessing the high school pools due to modified year-round attendance.
N.R.P.A. standards should be met. All future aquatic facilities must comply
with current ADA standards. This community needs more public pools
regardless of the high cost of construction and maintenance.
On a motion by Commission Meyer and a second by Commissioner Wail, the
Commission recommended that the Master Plan include an additional public
swimming facility.
Ayes - Commissioners Meyer, Wall, Johnson, Melby, Casalegno
Noes - None
Motion carried 5 - 0
Hutchins Street Sauare - Master Plan Consultant reviewed the Master Plan
adopted by the City Council as proposed by the Foundation Board for this site,
but felt from a cost of land and construction of a physical center, this would
be a good location - to have all activities at one site. Build -out was based on
the amount of off-street parking needs. Any additions such as the proposed
large indoor recreation center facility would impact these standards. Any
modification or removal of senior activities from the facilities that were built
with monies from the Holz will would mean the City would have to return this
money under the terms and stipulations of said will.
On a motion by Commissioner Johnson and a second by Commissioner Meyer,
the Commission recommended that the indoor recreation center not be located
at the Hutchins Street Square.
Ayes - Commissioners Johnson, Meyer, Melby, Wall, Casalegno.
Noes - None .
Motion carried 5 - 0.
Large indoor Recreation Center - Concerns were expressed from the Private
Sectorin relation to how we would operate this centerand the impact it would
have on private industry (specifically the emphasis on fitness equipment, etc.).
Profit margins are slim in commercial ventures. Believe that such a Center
would eventually put an operation such as Twin Arbors out of business. When
Hutchins Street Square opened the pool, Twin Arbors felt the impact (100
memberships were lost.
-5-
r -
On a motion by Chad Meyer and a second by Elvera Melby, the Commission
recommended a large indoor recreation center be included in the Plan with the
stipulation that the planning be sensitive to the needs of the private sector. and
the preferred location is Needham School property.
Ayes - Commissioners Meyer, Melby, Wall, Casalegno, Johnson.
Noes - None.
Motion carried 5 - 0.
Youth Sports Subsidies - Thought the Community Forums addressed that the
level of support given to youth sports should not be reduced. The community
appreciates the level of service. Decrease subsidies to adult programs and
activities but leave the youth sector alone. Subsidies are necessary for low
income families, and are really important for the single parent.
On a motion by Chad Meyer and a second by Ed Wall, the Commission
recommended that the portion of the Master Plan pertaining to youth sport
subsidies be deleted (Section VIII - 42, Item 5.) and that this issue be
addressed as a budget item.
Ayes - Commissioners Meyer, Wall, Johnson, Casalegno, Melby.
Noes - None.
Motion carried - 5 - 0.
Resident -.Non-Resident Fees - City should look at establishing resident and
non-resident fees instead of limiting participation to City residents only.
On a motion by Bob Johnson and a second by Ed Wall, the Commission
recommended that the issue of resident and non-resident fees be retained in the
proposed Plan.
Ayes - Commissioners Johnsen, Wall, Melby, Meyer, Casalegno
Noes - None
Motion carried 5 - 0
Park Ranger Program - This is not addressed in the proposed Master Plan.
Should some mention be made of the Discovery Center and the programs
promoted by the Park Ranger?
No recommendations.
City Expansion East of 99 - Nothing is addressed in the Plan with regard to
future expansion east of 99. City should investigate obtaining property
adjacent to the Mokelumne River (currently owned by Vacarreza) as ideal public
land.
No recommendations.
A
Bicycle- Pedestrian Connectors -Schematic drawing of a proposed unit should
be looked at carefully. Currently the City has such or similar items and has a
very difficult time maintaining same. These corridors become graffiti and debris
collectors.
On a motion by Bob Johnson and a second by Elvera Melby, the Commission
recommended that the proposed bicycle - pedestrian connectors remain in the
proposed Master Plan.
Ayes - Commissioners Johnson, Melby, Casalegno, Wall, Meyer
Noes- None
Motion carried 5 - 0
Bicycle Paths on Streets - Proposed paths would necessitate eliminating on -
street parking on some of the named streets.
On a motion by Bob Johnson and a second by Elvera Melby, the Commission
recommended that the Plan include bicycle paths on streets through the use of
signs or lines, and attempt to work out any needs and concerns voiced by the
City Public Works Department.
Ayes - Commissioners Johnson, Melby, Wail, Casalegno, Meyer
Noes - None
Motion carried 5 - 0
Restrooms at Neighborhood Parks - Need to address having such a facility.
Serious consideration should be given to a uni-sex facility such as ones used
in Europe (particularly France and Italy.
On a motion by Elvera Melby and a second by Chad Meyer, the Commission
recommended that restrooms should be included in all neighborhood parks as
the park is developed, such restrooms to comply with ADA standards.
Ayes - Commissioners MPlby, Meyer, Johnson
Noes - Commissioners Casalegno, Wall
Motion carried 3 - 2
On a motion by Bob Johnson and a second by Ed Wall, the Commission
formally adopts the proposed Park, Recreation Open Space Master Plan with
the exceptions/additions as outlined above.
Ayes - Commissioners Johnson, Wall, Casalegno, Meyer, Melby
Noes - None
Motion carried 5 - 0
-7-
VI Regular Agenda Items
A. Adult Softball Tournament Fee Plan - Recreation Supervisor discussed a
new plan for a Tournament Fee Schedule. This item will be addressed
at the March Commission meeting.
B. Town Hall Meetings Outline - The Commission approved the outline as
presented; Chairman Johnson expressed concerns with the department
volunteering too many budget cut suggestions.
C. Awards Citation and Installation Dinner, April - Turlock
On a motion by Bob Johnson and a second by Bob Casalegno, the
Commission recommended the following nominations:
Community Service Organizations/Business
Lodi Soroptimist Club, for their contributions to the Candy Cane Park -
piayground equipment, picnic table, litter receptacle, and automatic
sprinkler system.
Individual/Volunteer
Steve Scott, former Lodi Parks and Recreation Commissioner, for his
contribution of four years of service to the Commission.
VII. Announcements
A. Commissioner Workshoo - Tulare - February 6. 1993 - All five of our
Commissioners will be attending this workshop.
Vlll. Adjournment - The meeting adjourned at 12:00 Midnight.
Respectfully submitted,
Sharron R. Baumbach
Department Secretary
Reviewed and Edited by
Ron Williamson, Director
Parks and Recreation Department
8-
/EXHIBIT B/
ADDENDUM NO. 1
to the
Lodi Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan
The followin chanes were recommended to the draft plan by the Lodi Parks and
Recreation Commission on February 2, I993.
1. Page VIIi-26 Proposed :blokelunifte Rirer Riearirtrr Zornte
Remove second paragraph, last sentence that begins with "A proposed trail
system .......
Add a third paragraph: "Currently the speed generated by power boats on the
Mokelumne River is creatin, conflicts with non power boaters as weii as
causing river bank erosion. since the River itself is not in the city lirnits of
Lodi, jurisdiction and control of river use in this area is with the County. With
this in mind, it is recommended that San Joaquin County impose a five mile
an hour speed limit on the :lokcluntne River for that portion located within
the Lodi area."
2
Pa-
ge VIIi-27 Lodi Low Trail
Since the Lodi Loop Trail is no longer located along the north side of the
Mokelumne River, the concept of a loop trail around the Lodi urban area is
no longer feasible. The following changes are recommended:
Remove all references to the Lodi Loop Trail and replace with the following:
nrc- S!met Tr,ils
The following are recommended trails that would, for the most part, be
separated from streets. The routes shown on the Facility Plan indicate a
general route only. Specific locations will be established in the land
development process.
1. West Side Bypass Trail 4.7 Miles
This paved trail would start at the proposed DeBenedetti Park and travel in a
westerly direction to the west side of the planning area. From here, the trail
would be directed north, eventually connecting with the Woodbridge
Irrigation District Canal. Special design and fencing would be required in this
section to assure safety and access by the Irrigation District. The Trail would
then continue along the Canal until reaching the Mokelumne River. From
here it would travel upstream until reaching the trailhead at Lodi Lake Park.
w?R.
9 %S43
2. South Side Bypass Trail 3.0 Miles
This trail would begin at De Benedetti Park and travel south to the south side
of Harnev Lane. Since this road is not developed on the south side, the
opportunity exists to separate the trail from the roadway.
3. Miscellaneous Off -Street Trails
[Continue with current text]
3 Paye IX - 6 Table 34. Priority of Major Capital Protects
Move Scenic Overlook from Priority No. 10 to No. 15.
3. Page Vlli 32
Remove Item No. 7 or. Page Vill-43 regarding Ac iitional A(piatic Programs
and Facilities:
Add a new section beginning at the top of page Vill-32 with:
Indoor Swimming fool
Currently there is only one public indoor swimming pool in Lodi. It is located
at Hutchins Street Square and is used primarily for adults and seniors. 1 he
two outdoor swimming pools located at the two high schools are used by the
Lodi Swim Club but because of modifies' year-round school, access to these
two pools for training is becoming difficult.
According to the Recreation Needs Assessment (Page V-42), there is enough
demand for another indoor swimming pool in Lodi. it is recommended that
an ell -shaped indoor swimming pool be considered in the future. The
suggested location is the proposed Cochran Paris.
With the potential that the net operating cost of this type of facility could
exceed $50,000-590.000 annually, it is important that it not be designed and
programmed for predominant competitive use. Pools that are the most
successful financially are those that are multi -use in nature and attract a large
segment of the adult population.
$ Page VIIi-32 indoor Recreation Center
Remove third paragrapph that starts out 'Two alternative locations.... "
Remove all of Page Vtit-33
Replace with the following:
Two alternative locations for an indoor recreation center were studied. The
first option was to locate the proposed facility at Hutchins Street Square.
From an operation and management point of view, this option had many
positive features. At the same time, a master plan for exclusive senior and
cultural arts activities has been developed for this site and is being
01.
9 c'
implemented. Placing a recreation center in this location would require a
modification to the master plan. With this in mind, it is recommended that
Hutchins Street Square not be considered as the site for the proposed indoor
recreation center.
Paiye VIII -34 - - Remove third paragraph that starts with "Another problem
w.-ith this site .....". Replace `kith the following:
"Because of the anticipated high cost to remodel, it is recommended that the
portion of the building now being used for administrative purposes be
removed to make wav for a new recreation structure. The existing classroom
section would remain. A sketch of how this complex might be developed is
shown on the next page:"
6 Page VIII -42 Review of the Cib-'s Role in the PrivateSpans Program
Remove second paragraph that `tarts out with "In the short term and
replace with the following:
"Because this is a budget vs. service issue, it is recommended that the City
review this subsidy issue each year at budget time."
7. Page VII -1 Neighborhood Parks
Add to the third paragraph, si:ah lire and just before the sentence that starts
out "If possible ...:'
"All new restrooms should conform to ADA standards."
ppR.
9 �ggg
EX.HI i3IT C/ j
r'ity of Lodi Park and Recreation Plait Se ttinl?
An analysis of population age profiles is important because age is a mzjor determinant
of recreation Participation levels and interests. In general, the older tl.e Population, the
less they are likely to participate in active or competitive recreation activities. Overall,
youth tend to participate more frequently than other age groups and tend to favor
activities that are more active and competitive in nature. This would include activities
such as basketball, baseball, soccer. swimming, bicycling, etc. Young adults (ages 18-
35) are also active people and form the core of adult competitive sports.
Adults (ages 35-65) on the other hand, appear to have less time to devote to
recreational activities. They tend to be more concerned about maintaining a home and
a job. Recreational time is at a premium and often limited to weekends and occasional
evenings. The senior age population have more available time once they approach
retirement. They tend to favor more passive activities such as walking, gardening,
picnicking and crafts.
Population Growth
In most communities, one of the primary elements that affects future recreation
demand is population growth. Unlike many communities, Lodi has placed a limitation
on residential growth at 2% per year. This amounts to about 1,000 persons per year.
Based on this growth rate, saturation of the planning area will occur in the year 2007
and have a total city population of about 72,000 persons.
However, while the City continues to limit its growth rate, the Department of Parks and
Recreation is serving a much larger area. Currently, the policy oftheDepartment is to
serve people who live within the boundaries of the Lodi School District excluding those
who reside south of Eight Mile Road. This is called the Lodi Recreation Service Area.
According to the Lodi Unified School District, this resident population living outside
the city limits represents about 19,800 people.
The San Joaquin County Community Development Department has forecasted that by
the year 2010 the population of the recreation service area living outside the city limits
of Lodi will only grow by approximately 1,800 persons. It is our opinion that without
growth controls in place in the County, but within Lodi itself, the rate of growth in the
other communities will be substantially Iarger than what has been forecasted. Based on
this assumption we make the following population forecast:
9 �9g9
11 -5 pPR•
Cir -01 Lodi Park and Rerrearion Plan -Serring
Population Forecast
Lodi Planning Area and Service Area
Year
City Unincorporated
Total Service
21.9%
Area
Area
Misc. Services
8.5%
Mining/Construction
1992
53,186 19,800
73,000
1993
54,250 20,400
74,650
1994
55,335 21,000
76,330
1995
56,441 21,640
78,080
1996
57,570 22,280
79,850
1997
58,722 22,950
81,670
1998
59,896 23,640
83,540
2007
72,000 (1) 30,850 (2)
102,850
Source: California Department of Finance
JC Draggoo & Associates
(1)
Based on a 20% growth rate
(2)
Based on a 3% growth rate
Labor Force
An analysis of the labor force in Lodi reveals that the largest class of employment type
is in the retail trade followed by manufacturing. This suggests that Lodi is a major
market center for the region even though Stockton is close by. A breakdown of
employment classifications is listed below.
Table 5
Employment Classification 1990
City of Lodi
Type _ P-e-rc—entaae
Retail/Trade
24.7%
Manufacturing
21.9%
Professional Services
17.9°%
Misc. Services
8.5%
Mining/Construction
6.8%
Finance/Insurance/Real Estate
5.20%
Transportation/Utiliites
4.9"%
Wholesale Trade
3.9°%
Unclassified
2.6%
Agricultural/Forestry
2.1%
Business Services
1.5°%
9 `999
11-6 peR•
r
QU of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Setfin¢
Lodi income levels are roughly the same as the rest of San Joaquin County. The 1990
average median household income in Lodi was $30,635, compared to 530,739 for the
County. Income levels are important clues in recreation planning because higher
income populations tend to be more active and participate in the more expensive types
of recreation activities.
LkND USE
The basic form of the city consists of a gridiron pattern of large "superblocks" defined
by major arterial streets. These streets are generally located on section lines that
formed major dividing points during the subdivision process.
The core or central business district of Lodi is located generally in the center of the city
just west of the railroad tracks and north of Lodi Avenue. In addition to commercial
uses in the downtown, ma or shopping centers, additional office space and high density
housing are found along t�e major traffic corridors in the city. A significant amount of
land is devoted to industrial uses. This type of land is primarily concentrated along the
railroad and east of Highway 99.
As might be expected, the majority of land in the city is devoted to single family
housing. The next largest category of land uses is undeveloped land still used for
agriculture purposes. A breakdown of the land use in the planning area is shown below.
Table 6
Distribution of Land Uses -1987
Lodi Planning Area
Land Use Acres Per Cent
Single Family
2,131
31%
Multiple Family
334
5%
Commercial
369
5%
Office
65
1%
Industrial
S84
9%
Public/Oussi Public
830
12%
Detention Basins/Parks
366
S%
Agriculture
1,553
23%
Vacant
563
8%
Total
6,795
Source: City of Lodi Planning Department
1/- 7
PPR•
9 19q3
Cite of Lodi Park and Recreation Pfau Park and Facility 'Veeds
IMPACT OF POPULATION GROWTH ON RECREATION DEMAND
One of the primary elements that affects future recreation demand is popuiation
growth. As stated earlier, Lodi has placed a limitation on residential growth of 2% per
year but areas managed by the county have no such population restrictions.
A substantial number of non residents also use tiie City's programs and sport facilities.
While recognizing the impact these non residents have on the demand for these
facilities, it is the policy to continue serving them if an equitable funding mechanism
can be developed. As a result, for assessing park land needs, demand will be based on
the population within the planning area. For assessing specialized facility needs such as
sport fields, demand will be based on the current service area which is the same
boundary of the Lodi School District north of Eight Mile Road. With these
assumptions in mind, the following population characteristics will be used.
Table 26
Population Forecast
City of Lodi and Service Area
Year City Service Area
1992 53,186 73,000
2007 72,000 102,850
ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO IDENTIFYING NEEDS
There are several approaches to estimating needs for park and recreation facilities.
`They include the use of national standards, measurement of participation levels, user
M
analysis, input from surveys and public meetings, goal setting and participation
models. Since most will be used, each is briefly described below.
National Standards
Standards were first created by a group of professionals who established an easily
understood format of what "seemed to be right" based on their practical experience in
the field. These standards were felt to be most useful if stated in quantifiable terms of
acres or facilities per given population level, i.e., 10 acres of park per 1,000 population.
The most recognized standards are those published by the National Recreation and
Park Association (NRPA). In 1983 they published a report titled "Recreation, Park and
Open Space Standards", that is well recognized in the recreation field. This document
is currently being updated to reflect changes in park and recreation use patterns.
The problem with using national standards is that they do not reflect local conditions.
What is right for one community will probably not be correct for another. In addition, a
9 �g93
V-8 APR'
Civ of Lodi Park and Recreation Pl.:n Park and Faciliry Needs
Comments:
While the City is currently playing fourgames per night on lighted fields, it is our
recommendation that only three games be played. This allows more time per game and
does not create as much wear on the facility. The recommended standard of one field
per 9,200persons reflects only three games per field. This standard means that one
more field is needed at the present time to serve the service area. By ultimate buildout,
a total of l l fields or four new fields will be needed.
mmm
-VA
i
n
V- 32 01983
poR.
City of Lodi Park and Recrearinn Plan Park and Faci in- ,VeedF
SUMMARY OF LAND AND FACILITY I EEDS
Table 32
Summary of Park and Facility Needs
City of Lodi
9 �g93
V- 47 AQR-
Recommended
Existing
Demand (1)
Additional Need
Park Area or Facility
Standard
Inventory
1992
Buildout
f992
Buikfoul
Neighborhood Parks
2.5 Am/ 1,000 Pop.
83.2
133.0
Aa. 180.0 Ac.
49.8
Acm, 96.8 Am
Community Parks
1.8 Ac./1,000 Pop.
36.0
95.7
129.6
59.7
93.6
Reglor%W Parks
0.8 Ac./1,000 Pop.
43.0
42.S
57.6
(0.5)
me
General Open Space
2.1 Ac./1,000 Pop.
58.0
111.7
151.2
53.7
93.2
Special Use Areas
0.8 Am/ 1,000 Pop.
42.3
42.S
57.6
0.2
15.1
TOTAL PARK LANO
8.0 Ac./1,000 Pop.
262.5 Acres •
425.4
Am 576.0 Am
162.9
Am 3f3.3 Am
Senior Brseball Fields
l per t0,000 Pop.
7
7
10
-
3
Youth Baseball Fields
1 per 6,000 Pop.
13
12
17
-
4
Softball Fields
1 per 9,100 Pop.
7
8
11
1
4
Football Fields
1 per 18,000 Pop.
4
4
e
-
2
Soccer Fields
I per 3,800 Pop.
19
19
27
2
8
Tennis Courts
1 per 1,850 Pop.
29
40
62
11
33
Basketball Courts (outdoor)
1 per 9,000 Pop.
S
6
8
t
3
Indoor Pool Area
86.0 SF/1,000 Pop.
2,250
4.575 SF
6,192 SF
2,323 SF
3,942 SF
Gymnasium Space
I per 18,000 Pop.
2 Gyms
3 Gyms
4 Gyms
I Gym
2 Gyms
Recreation Trails
0.24 Miles/ 1,000 Pop.
2-3 Ml.
12.6 ML
17.3 Mi.
10.5 ML
15.0 ML
(1) Assumes a 1992 population of 53,1116 and a Buftdout population of 72,000.
For organized sports assumes a 1992 population of 73,000
and a year 2007 population of 102,850
• Excludes 2.7 acres of mini -parks and 68.6 acres of undeveloped park land.
9 �g93
V- 47 AQR-
Ctty ��( Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Recreation Senice Levelf
RECOMMENDED SERVICE LEVELS FOR NON RESIDENTS
The Lod �artment of Parks and Recreation currently has a policy of serving all
residents ; in the Lodi Unified School District residing north of Eipht Mile Road.
About 30 :t all users of city programs come from outside the city limits. As the city
grows, these non residents will create an even greater demand for recreation programs
and facilities.
1992 2007
City Population 53,186 72,000
Service Area Population 73,000 102,850
To illustrate how much additional demand will be created, the following table indicates
future sport facility requirements based on just city resident demand and for demand of
the entire service area.
Table 33
Additional Sport Facility Needs
Planning Area Vs. Entire Service Area
Planning Current
Sports Facility Area Only Service Area
Senior Youth Baseball Fields
1 3
Junior Youth Baseball Fields
0 4
Adult Softball Fields
1 4
Football Fields
0 2
Soccer Fields
9 8
Gymnasiums
1 2
As can be seen, providing recreation services to the current service area means a
greater demand for facilities. There are two financial issues associated with serving the
larger area. The first is that non-residents do not pay most city taxes and as a result do
not pay an equitable amount of the recreation program costs. The registration fee for
most programs, for example, does not cover the actual cost of the program. The
second issue is that non residents do not pay any of the capital cost of building facilities.
i .. .;:.:.. 'r.Az /kms sa �`3
Fpli ng...meetings with user gran the Paris and Rerreat:on Rei►tew E:olutntttee
ps, «.3K
and a ppre ltriutary discussion wtth the City Council; tfle consensuswasEthat t gCrty° {q
should corittnue to serve non residents liviing withi>z the %odz Ui ed Sc too is3ric '
`as Iong as these residents pay: their stsare'for caKZ-
itai and ntaultdnance c� id -K
suggested a roach to a for these.services is Quad on paged
PP, .. .
p y
G•7. 6
9 No'
ppR•
On, of Lodi Pork and Rccrear:nn Plan Rt,commendarrnn5
A
E
SCHC L. PAM DESIGN CQNCE"
Westgate Park Site N-4 22.0 Acres
This site is a storm water detention basin and will be expanded by
approximately 14 acres when the land to the south is developed. As it now
exists, the site has been graded to a rectangular shape with a flat bottom.
The site's only redeeming feature now is that it is all in grass. As the
remaining land is excavated to complete the basin, it is recommended that
the entire site be contoured to create a more pleasing and useable shape.
In order to maintain the same amount of storm water retention, some of the
park area now designated outside the basin will need to be slightly
excavated as well. By using this approach, the bottom can be contoured so
that it drains more rapidly.
The proposed Lodi Loop Trail is found just west of this park site. While the
area around this park has been subdivided, it is recommended that a 25'
right of way or easement be acquired west of the park site so that this park
can be connected to the trail system. Other facilities for this park should
include:
o A paved and lighted pathway around and through the park
o Two youth baseball fields
o Expansion of the playground area
o A multi -use paved court for volleyball, etc.
o An area for passive use including picnicking, open play, etc.
0 3 tennis courts
o Restroom building
1-711-S 9 ASS3
A?R
Citv of Lodi Park arrd Recreation Plan Recommendation
o Children's playground
o Muiti-ttse grass area (cricket, soccer etc.)
o Picnic areas with shelter
o Paved trails and pathway system
o Indoor swimming pool
o Restroom building
0 3 tennis courts
o 'Multi -use basketball/rollerblade/hockey court
Sketch - Site Master Plan for Cochran park
Vinewood Park Site N-10 16.0 Acres
The site is another storm water detention area- However, unlike the other
park/detention basins, this one is adjacent to a school site. Currently two
competitive youth baseball fields are found in the basin itself. Between the
basin and the school grounds is a restroom building. Because nearly all of
the site is a detention area, little additional recreation area can be
developed.
The bottom of the detention basin is used for baseball and soccer play when
conditions permit. However, during the rainy season, much of this site is
unpiavable because the ground tends to remain wet after the rains occur.
To reduce this problem, it is recommended that the bottom of one end of
1,711- 11
9 �9g3
__vs
On, of Lodi Park and Recr,,•arion Plan _ Recommendation
o Resurface the tennis courts
o Remove fence that separates tennis courts from the practice
area
o Upgrade the Ii Ming on the tennis courts
o Replace the infield grass on the senior baseball field
o Relocate and replace the children's playground
o Replace the paving from the street to the center of the site
o Upgrade the irrigation system
o Develop a group picnic area
DeBenedetti Park Site C-4 45 Acres
The City currently owns 29 acres of this site and will need a minimum of six
additional acres for a detention basin. A total of 50 acres was once
considered for a golf course but that idea was recently abandoned. It is
recommended that the city acquire an additional 16 acres to bring it to a
total of 45 acres for a detention basin and park site. With the extra land, a
grading concept can be developed that will make a large portion of the site
useable under most flooding conditions. A sketch of how this site might be
graded is shown on the next page. The primary purpose of this park site
should be for ballf%eld development.
Recommended facilities at this site should include:
o Children's playground
o Eight lighted tennis courts
o Lighted basketball court
o Two lighted senior youth baseball fields
o Two lighted youth basebail fields
o Two youth soccer fields
o Open multi -use grass area for unstructured play
o Picnic area/shelter
nxs, lrnwz Pe-crrc),-+ !�o�m
ice,-,itxc�act�.
i
C -.:e
M r,+U bAt4N l
6'l!/ - 19
�1
Cih of Lodi Park anri R, creation Ptan _ R cc�nrn:rrdari�ns
Hutchins Street Square Site S-'_ 12.0 Acres
Hutchins Street Square is an old high school site that is predominantly used
for cultural arts and senior activities. The site is managed by another city
department although the Parks and Recreation Department maintains the
facilities. Currently, the Parks and Recreation Department utilizes one of
the buildings on the site for a children's day care program.
There are plans to expand the cultural arts facilities on this site and a
separate advisory board is responsible for thc,,�& activities. The site is a
potential location for the proposed indoor recreation center. (See the
recommendations under "Indoor Recreation Center".)
Maple Square Site S-3 0.6 Acres
This small undeveloped park site is located at the southeast corner of Lodi
Avenue and Sacramento Street. It is also adjacent to the Southern Pacific
Railroad. Because the proposed Needham Recreation Complex is nearby,
it is recommended that Maple Square be sold and the proceeds used to
acquire other recreation sites.
Needham School Site S4 6.0 Acres
This site is currently owned by the Lodi Unified School District and may be
available for purchase. This site is being considered for an indoor
recreation center. Since the indoor recreation center would occupy the
space covered by school buildings, most of the playground would still be
available for outdoor recreation use. It is anticipated that this space would
provide activities in support of the proposed center. If a recreation center is
not located on the site, a portion of it should be used for a neighborhood
park.
Pixley Park Site S-5 33.0 Acres
This site currently contains 26.0 acres of land of which 25 acres are
dedicated for water detention. It is recommended that an additional seven
acres be acquired so that more grading flexibility can occur for the sport
fields. This site is recommended for a major adult softball and soccer
complex suitable for league play and tournaments. Because this site is
located in an industrial area, problems with lighting and noise should no:
occur. Facilities should include four adult softball fields, three lighted
soccer fields, six tennis courts, a restroom building and a large concession
area. The existing model airplane activity should be moved to another
location.
The undeveloped park site is also a storm water detention area and unlike
other existing detention basins, could be graded to different levels so that
VVI 23 g Igo
Qi Qf Lodi Park and Recreation Plan ftorrtnsendations
SUMMARY OF LAND REQUIREMENTS
Site Existing Proposed Total
No Site P#rte Basins Parks Perttsltl Basins La.+
M-1 Candy Cane Park 0-2 02
M-2 Century Park 2-5 2.5
SUBTOTAL 27 27
4-1 Prop. Lodi Lake H.Park (2)
Scenic Overtook
3.0
3 0
S-2
Hutchins SL Square
N-2 Van Buskirk
1.0
S-3
Maple Square (3)
0.6
1.0
N-3 Prop. Millswood Park
Needham School Site
5.0
S-5
5.0
N-4 Westgate Park
0.3
5.7
Park 8 Res Office
1.9 14, t
220
N-5 Henry Gloves Park
3.0
12.0
15.0
N-6 Emerson Park
3.0
3.0
N-7 Hale Park
3.1
3.1
N-8 Prop. Lincoln Park
3-0
3.0
N-9 Prop. Cochran Park
6.0 24.0
30.0
N-10 Vinewood Park
0.6
15.2
16.0
N-1 t American Legion Park
6.0
6.0
N-12 Blakely Perk
10.0
10.0
N-13 Prop. Kenleman Park
5.0
5.0
N-14 Prop. Village St. Park
2.0
2-0
N -1S Prop. Century Meadows
5.0
S.0
N-16 Beckman Park
0.8
15.8
1I&a
N-17 English Oaks Commons
3.7
3.7
N-18 Prop. Eastside Park
8.0
8.0
N-19 Prop. Southwest Park
1.0 24.0
25.0
.•.,SU8T07AL''•� .,�"C••.31.7
48.7 -
10.0.
'26.! �,.:•'�82.1.`;-1T9.4..:r
1 Prop. Woodbridge Park
20.0
20.0
S2 Lodi Rec Complex
31.8
31-8
C-3 Kofu Pert
10.0
10.0
C-4 Prop. DeBenedettl Park
29.0
10.0 &o
4S.0
C-5 Salts Park
1.0
2S.0
2&0
j SUBTOTAL 323 s
64.0
3t7 G: f is d 0 4 x[ 1328
R-1 Lodi take Park
43.0
13.0
5&0
SUBTDTALi'`: j.
r47t1...%
130
S-1
Scenic Overtook
3.0
3 0
S-2
Hutchins SL Square
12.0
12.0
S-3
Maple Square (3)
0.6
0.6
S-4
Needham School Site
6.0 8.0
S-5
PUl" Park
1.0 25.0
7.0 33.0
S-6
Park 8 Res Office
1.3
1.3
v SUtiiOi/ll .:; 14 9 .- 25.0
OS -1 Lodi Lake Nature Area S&0
58.0
OS -2 Prop. Mokelumne R. Area(75 Ac) (4)
OS -3 Prop. Arnalz Property
0.4 10.7 1 t 1
_
SUBTOTAL �' 58.0
-0. 4
'TOTAL z?;r R, ",1831. t37.T
28.4 B0.6 bbi x - 4959
(1) Parks to be acquired with Development Impact Fees
(2) Pan of existing Lodi Lake Park
(3) Recommend site be sold
(4) Area under easement - not ownership
L7II - 25 ; ;?.
g 19�
Cifyyef Lodi Parrs: and Recreation Plan Ra=mendarions
Sport Fields
Thepplan recommends a number of changes to sport fields in Lodi. This includes the
development of fields at new sites and the addition, deletion or conversion of sport
fields at existing park sites. The basic approach recommended in this plan is to locate
similar softball and baseball fields in complexes. If done in this manner, they will be
cheaper to build, easier to maintain and manage and more suitable for tournaments.
Soccer fields, on the other hand, have been evenly distributed throughout the
community. The plan recommends six major sport field complexes. They are:
Pixley Park
Aeult softball and soccer
Softball Complex
Womens softball and fast pitch softball
Proposed Woodbridge Park
Adult softball
Westgate park
Youth baseball
Proposed DeBenedetti Park
Senior youth baseball
Salas Park
Youth baseball
S Two temporary fields on street right-of-way property
9 �9�
V711- 31 pQS�
Existing Distribution of Fields
(Game Fields)
Proposed Distributlon of fields
I - (Game F
Site
Youth Senior
Softball/ Baseball
Baseball Baseball
Adult
Softball Soccer
Youth Senior Adult
Softball/ Baseball Softball
Baseball Baseball
Soccer
Armory Perk
1
EH]
Beckman Part
2
Blakely Parkt
t
Century School
t
Cochran Park
Ed iPark
-Emerson Park
t
1
Reese School
t
Fnaff3h Oaks Park
t t
George Washinction School
t
Grace
"e GlavesPark
1
Kotu Park
1 t
t
Lakewood
Lawrence School
t
t
Nichols Sh 1
Lodi High
t
t
Miltswoqd Park
t
t
Pixley Park
4
-Softball Complex
Sales Park
3 t
Senior ElementarySchool
! 4
Temple Baptist ChurCh
t 2 1
Tokav Hich SChool
2 2I
! 1
1 2
t
Vlnewood P rk
2
2
Westgate Park
I
1 i
2
Woodbridge Park (orool
2
1
Zuoo Field
t
S Two temporary fields on street right-of-way property
9 �9�
V711- 31 pQS�
iuhn R. (Randy) Snioer
Council Member
Lodi Parks and Recreation Department
125 N. Stockton Street
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Lodi City Council
FROM:
Je: ry Draggoo, J C Draggoo & Associates
DATE:
April 20, 1993
SUBJECT:
Issues Related to the Park and Recreation Plan
Based on what I heard at Tuesday's workshop meeting, it appears that there are a
number of issues you would tike to discuss. To make the adoption process easier,
recommend that you deal with each issue separately. When they are all resolveo,
then you can adopt the remaining parts of the Plan.
Here are the issues as I see them. You may want to add to the list.
**;�l SHOULD THE CITY DEVELOP THE WATERFRONT PARK
KNOWN AS SCENIC OVERLOOK?
Ba around: 1. There is some concern about hazardous waste on
the site. No one knows for sure if this is true. If so,
how serious problem is it?
•M-
2. The Parks and Recreation Commission recommended
this site for recreation use but felt that a survey on
hazardous waste should occur.
1. Deny site for recreation use.
2. Approve site for recreation use.
3. Approve with conditions.
ISSUE NO. 2 SHOULD THE CITY DEVELOP AN OFF/ON-STREET TRAILS
SYSTEM?
1. The Plan recommends a system of on -street and off-
street trails. The exact location of a trail will be
determined at the time of development of the
specific area. There are many options for locating
trails but it is assumed that some trails will be
located at the rear of properties.
-1-
Subject: Issues Related to the Park and Recreation Plan
Page 2 - April 20, 1993
2. The issue needs to be resolved as to how the land
will be acquired and who will pay for trail
development. Right now it is assumed that the
developer would dedicate the land, but the City
would be responsible for developing the traits.
ISSUE NO, 3 SHOULD THE CITY CONTINUE TO SERVE NON-
RESIDENTS?
Background: 1. This issue only applies to sport fields.
2. We have identified a strategy for funding the non-
resident fields. If the non-residents choose to not
participate, then, what should the City do?
3. 1 believe you should go on record as approving or
disapproving the concept of charging the non-
resident and then leave the specifics of how and
how much to the Parks and Recreation Commission,
and City Administration.
ISSUE NO, 4 SHOULD THE CITY DEVELOP AN INDOOR RECREATION
CENTER?
Background: 1. There is a major need in Lodi for gymnasium space
and places to conduct recreation programs.
2. It is my opinion that the facility would not compete
against the private clubs and would not run at a
deficit at the level suggested on Tuesday morning.
3. 1 have a drawing as to how 1 see the facility. You
are welcome to preview it if you wish.
-2-
Subject: Issues Related to the Park and Recreation Plan
Page 2 - April 20, 1993
ISSUE NO. 5 WHERE SHOULD THE RECREATION CENTER BE
LOCATED?
Comments: The original Plan recommended Hutchins Street Square.
The Parks and Recreation Commission recommended
Needham School.
ISSUE NO. 6 SHOULD THE CITY'S MASTER PLAN INCLUDE A
SWIMMING
POOL?
1.
1 did not recommend another pool because of the
existence of four swimming areas.
2.
Testimony was presented at the Parks and
Recreation Commission that a pool was needed on
the west side.
3.
1 added the word "iridoor" because I felt there was
more of a need for an indoor pool than an outdoor
pool.
Ogtions: 1.
Recommend an indoor pool.
2.
Recommend an outdoor pool.
3.
Make no recommendation for a pool.
4.
Make a recommendation for a pool but not specify
the type.
ISSUE NO. 7 WHAT SHOULD HAPPEN TO THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
MOKELUMNE RIVER?
Comments: The Plan recommends that the City (or County) acquire the
development rights to a 50-100 foot strip along the north
bank of the river. Since a trail within this area was
eliminated, the strip would become open space only and
not a park.
-3-
7
Subject: issues Related to the Park and Recreation Plan
Page 2 - April 20, 1993
ISSN NO, 8 WHEN THE PLAN IS ADOPTED, WILL IT CHANGE THE
IMPACT FEE LEVEL?
Background: The amount of improvements shown in the Pian dedicated
to impact fees is the same as what was originally proposed.
The amount of land to be acquired/dedicated by developers
is also the same amount.
ISSUE NO, 9 DO YOU AGREE WITH THE PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENTS
SHOWN ON THE TABLE ON PAGE IX -67
4-
C& 12f Lodi Park and Recreation Plan cdon Pian
PROJECT PRIORITIES
listed below are the projects described in the plan with the highest priority. While
these projects should be funded in sequence, the priorities can change as land and/or
funding becomes available. This list should be reviewed and updated each year.
Table 34
Priority of Major Capital Projects
Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
11 Lodi Loop Trail - Phase 2
238.000
12 Lodi Lake Park - phase 2
1.121.000
Funding
Priority
Proiect
Cost
Improvements
Source
16 Tokay Street Bicycle Path
20.000
17 Eastside Park Acquisition
690,000
18 Lodi take Park - Phase 3
I
Lodi Lake Park - Phase 1
$338,700
Earth Berm, boat ramp
2
Lodi Lake Access
$8,000
New access to west side
5
3
Lincoln School Acquisition
-
Acquisition
16
4
DeBenedetti Park Acquisition
1,568,000
Acquisition
Z 3
5
Pixley Park Acquisition
280,000
Acquisition
2.3
6
Indoor Rec Center Study
50,000
Feasibility Study
6
7
Lodi Loop Trail • Phase 1
94,900
Lodi Lake - Westgate Park
19
8
Mokeiumne River Access
Public access to north side
9
DeSenedetti Park - Phase 1
3.500.000
4 yields + support facilities
2.3
10
Scenic Overlook
258.800
Development
5
11 Lodi Loop Trail - Phase 2
238.000
12 Lodi Lake Park - phase 2
1.121.000
13 Miltswood Park Acquisition
-
14 Lincoln School Park
230.000
15 Indoor Recreation Center
4.500.000
16 Tokay Street Bicycle Path
20.000
17 Eastside Park Acquisition
690,000
18 Lodi take Park - Phase 3
64.000
19 Emerson Park
3SO.700
• Refer to three previous pages
OPERATIONAL IMPACTS
Westgate P to DeBenadetti P. 19
Development of west side
2.3
Joint agreement to develop
2.3
Development
16
Development
1.2, 3
L. Sac. Road to Highway 99
18
Acquisition
2.3
Entrance; parking
5
Rehabilitation
12, 15.20
As the projects shown in Table 34 above are developed, the City can expect an increase
in operational costs related to park maintenance and staff administration. Shown on
Table 35 on the next page are the expected operational costs as the projects come on
line
!X- 6
'Ali 2 () 1593
17. intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA)
California could receive more than 5200 million over a six year period for
transportation enhancement activities and facilities. Some of the eligible
projects include trail systems for pedestrians and bicycles, acquisition of
scenic easements, landscape and other scenic beautification and mitigation
of water pollution due to highway runoff. This pproggrraamm is administered by
the California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS). Currently,
this agenvy is prepazing guidelines for administering the program. While no
rules have been set, it is expected that these grants will require a local
match of 15-20%.
18. Capital Development Fund
This is a fund set up by the City to budget major capital expenditures. The
Fund is usually a six year program and reviewed annually.
19. Annual Operating Budget
Minor amounts of money for special studies or small improvement projects
are often funded out of the Department's annual budget.
PROJECT COSTS
The following is the estimated cost to complete all of the capital projects recommended
in the Plan.
Tabie 34
Improvement Costs by Facility -1992
Lodi Park and Recreation Plan
Total Impact Other
Site No. Park/Facility Cost Fees Sources
M-1
Candy Cane Park
51100
M-2
Century Park
N-1
Lodi Rake Neighborhood Park
142,300
N-2
Van Buskirk Park
93,300
N-3
Millswood Park (proposed)
1,023,000
N-4
Westgate Park (proposed)
1,164,400
N-5
F:onry Glaves Park
66.200
N-6
Errrerson Park
175,400
N-7
Hale Park
8,400
N-6
Lincoln School Park (proposed)
692,300
$1,112,900
$11,600
142,300
93,300
1,023,000
51,500
66,200
175,400
6,400
692.300
City of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Action Plan
IX -6
Total
Impact
Other
Site No
Park/Facility
Cost
Fees
Sources
N-9
Cochran Park (proposed)
1,640,700
1,640,700
N-10
Vinewood Park
124,200
124,200
N-11
American Legion Park
171,900
171,900
N-12
Blakely Park
123,700
123,700
N-13
Kettleman Lane Park (proposed)
1,062,200
1,062,200
H-14
Village Street Park (proposed)
381,400
381,400
N-15
Century Meadows Park (proposed)
914,500
914,500
N-16
Beckman Park
193,900
193,900
N-17
English Oaks Commons
31,400
31,400
N-18
Eastside Park (proposed)
1,630,400
1,630,400
N-19
Southwest Park (proposed)
478,900
478,900
C-1
Woodbridge Park (proposed)
4,084,600
3,530,700
553,900
C-2
Armory Park
450,600
450,600
C-2
Softball Complex
119,200
119,200
C-2
Zupo Field
187,700
157,700
C-3
Kofu Park
184,900
184,900
C-4
DeBenedetti Park
3,478,300
2,274,500
1,203,800
C -S
Sales Park
50,000
50,000
R-1
Lodi Lake Park
3,057,000
3.057,000
S-1
Scenic Overlook
439,100
439,100
S-2
Hutchins Street Square
S-3
Maple Square
S-4
Needham School
S-5
Pbdey Park
3.198,000
2.593.100
604.900
OS -1
Lodi Lake Nature Area
OS.2
Mokelumne River Area
OS -3
Amalz Property
50.000
50.030
Park Maintenance Stops
897,900
628,500
269,400
Indoor Recreation Center
3,567,800
2,657,800
910,000
Indoor Swimming Pool
21860.000
2,880,000
TOTAL $32.755,200
=18,524,200
$14,231,000
IX -6
C
WALP & ` MORE
PLbbc Opioioo Rm"mh & Lc' OMW AmIrm
115 Sansome Street, Suite 1100
San Francisco 941043628
Tcwpboee 4112914rM
F%wm m& 4119823181
MEMORANDUM
5 August 1992
TO: City of Lodi Parks Department
J.C. Draggoo & Associates
FROM: Bernard Walp
C SUBJECT: Notes for Discussion
Public Opinion Survey Frequency Observations
Telephone interviews now have been completed in conjunction with
the City's ongoing assessment of public recreation needs and
practices. The attached frequencies tabulate the responses to all
questions.
Also attached for your perusal are the verbatim comments to the
"soap box" question, on p. 8 of the frequencies, in which
respondents were asked to name up to three changes they would like
to see in the City's recreation system.
Interviews averaging twelve minutes in duration were conducted of
adults in four hundred randomly selected Lodi households.
Additionally, short interviews regarding only the "participation
index" on p. 3 of the frequencies, were administered to fifty Lodi
children.
The confidence interval (or "margin of error") applicable to these
survey results is +4.9 percentage points. A volume compiling
cross -tabulations and other verbatim responses is currently in
preparation.
CITY OF LODI Preliminary trequwrJes
C July 1992 Citizens Sur-ey it - 400 adults (Red. *beer noted, 60 Children)
LC Dreasoo 6 Assacs I Wato A Moore ILOD9241 P• 1
1. Oualftatlon
First, how many years s 3 years ------ 9%
have you lived in Lodi. 4-6 years ------ 10%
7-10 years ------ 10%
> 10 years ------ 72%
I'd like to ask some questions about your personal recreation
activity. When you aren't working or resting or doing chores,
how do you spend your free timet
J VERBATIM RESPONSES RECORDED J
Ra. counts (multiple responses recorded):
53
Read
2
Soccer
1 Chess
40
Fish
2
Athletics
1 Motorhome
34
TV
2
Time outside
1 Metal detecting
33
Walk
2
Horses
•1 Play games
29
Travel
2
Play pool
1 Needlework
27
Work
2
Crochet
1 Needlepoint
26
Play
2
Cars
1 Improvement
25
Golf
2
Hike
1 Time with family
21
Garden
2
Snow
1 Football
21
Camp
2
Time at river
1 Work out
20
Swim
2
Sail
1 Skateboard
18
Bike
2
Time at library
1 Couch potato
14
Waterski/jetski
2
Exercise
1 Beach
13
Church
2
Racing
1 Community
12
Tennis
2
Shoot
1 Hobbies
12
Nothing
2
Hobby
1 Magazines
C 10
Time at home
2
Run/jog
1 Teach
30
Yardwork
2
Model airplanes
1 Pray
8
Parks
2
Shop
1 RV
7
Sew
2
Take cruises
I Relax
7
Basketball
2
Drive
1 Motorcycles
7
Watersports
2
Study
1 Trap
7
Bowl
1
Guitar
6
Listen to music
1
Genealogy
6
Hunt
1
Auto
5
Play cards
1
Bake
5
Volunteer
1
Babysit
5
Dance
1
Flying
5
Visit
1
Sports
5
Boating
1
Husband
5
Time with kids
1
Track
5
Baseball
1
Housework
5
Time with grand-
1
Work with tools
children/children
1
Ice hockey
4
Computers
1
Flea market
4
Time at lake
1
Tutoring
4
Softball
I
Karate
4
Concerts/shows
1
Ranching
3
Rest
1
Knit
3
Ski
1
Stained glass
3
Sleep
1
Girl -friend
3
School
I
Act
3
Club
1
Eat
4
Woodwork
I
Drive
3
Movies
1
Rock hunting
3
Shop
1
Nintendo
2
Knit
1
Cook
2
Crossword
1
Build
2 Paint 1 Motorcycle
.in Woodbridge. subsunerr 'wtx)dbndge• for •Lodi"
CITY OF LODI PrOmfnary frequencks
July 1992 CWxeus Survey g - 400 adults land, rbere sated. SO cblldrenl
J C Draeeoo & Assoes ' Walo d Moore ILOD92A! P
Do you play any kind
of organized team sports?
/ Anted of respondents playing organized team sports: /
YES -------- 12%
NO --------- 97%
dk/na -- 0%
Which team sports do you play? /VERBATIM RESPONSES RECORDED
Raw counts (multiple responses recorded):
21 Softball
10 Baseball
6 Basketball
5 Soccer
4 Bowling
4 Volleyball
2 Football
1 Swim
1 Winter Co-ed Volleyball
1 Track Runner
1 Trap Shooting
1 water Polo
1 Doubles Tennis Team
1 Co-ed Softball
1 Bridge
1 Golf
1 Bowl
1 Gymnastics
1 Gym
CITY OF LODI Preliminary frequencies
C July 1992 CIII:ess Surrey R a 400 adults 48ed, a►ere sated. SO c►Ildreal
J.C. Draeeoo & Ali . % Ws &'.ttoore 160D92A1 Y. 3
f ASKED OF CHILD RESPONDENTS IN ADDI TIO,v TO ADULTS %
Now I'd like to run through a selected list of leisure activities
you :say or may not engage in. I'd line to know roughly how mer.:
times in a typical 30 -day period you do any of these things.
( SEQUENCE VARIED RANDOMLY FROM INTER t -IE W TO INTERVIEW /
O -S 6-10 it -is 16-20 21 up
Tennis
97%
It
It
Ot
Ot
It
Picnicking
98%
21
Os
Ot
Of
Ot
Jogging
91►
3%
3%
0%
3%
0%
Racquetball
99%
01
01
Ot
Ot
Ot
Dog training
96%
10
Ot
Os
2%
Ot
Roller skating
99%
of
Ot
Ot
Ot
Ot
Boating
97%
2%
Ot
Ot
0%
Ot
Walking for pleasure
46%
20%
13%
10%
22%
2%
Softball
981
It
0%
Ot
Ot
0%
Baseball
99%
2%
Ot
Ot
0►
01
Going out dancing
98%
2%
Ot
Ot
Ot
2%
Fishing
98%
2%
Ot
Ot
Ot
1t
Horseshoes
99%
Ot
Ot
Ot
Ot
OVA
Soccer
98%
1%
Ot
of
Ot
Of
Volleyball
99%
Ot
0%
Ot
Ot
2%
Basketball
98%
Ot
it
0•
0%
Ot
Swimming
83%
6%
4%
3%
St
3%
Bicycling for pleasure
86%
5%
4%
2%
4%
3%
Attending arts or social
classes
97%
2%
Ot
0%
It
2%
Gymnastics or aerobics
94%
2%
2%
it
it
3%
Golf
95%
3%
2%
Ot
Ot
4%
-------------
j ASKED ONLY OF ADULT RESPONDENTS
/
(•) . was there
anything on that
list
that
you'd
do
MORE of, if you
felt there
were
adequate opportunities
in Lodi?
j UNAIDED
RESPONSES /
1
CITY OF LODE PrOWnery fregwrJes
C July 1992 Citi:ems Survey ,1 400 adults (axa, where soled, SO ebildree)
!-C, -Prostoo 8 Assocs. r Wale b Moore ILOD9241 F• S
J Asked of respondents who dont parteetpate in G{v recreation programs: J
Why not -- do you not want to participate, or is there some
problem that prevents you from participating?
Raw counts (mulriple responses recorded l:
J VERBATIM RESPONSES RECORDED J
S9 sto time / too Duey / not around much
Sl I'm too old
40 I'm not interested / don't want to
36 Health / disability
33 no answer / don't know
21 Ho problem / That is not my style of life / I'm otherwise occupied
6 I'm not really aware
3 Can't afford it
2 I'm not from the city of lodi
2 1 recently moved here
2 I'm too lazy
2 1 haven't thought of it
1 I've never been invited
1 I work for the city. I think they are snobs.
1 I never got around to it
1 I plan to
1 I don't like this town
1 They're not doing a good job at cleaning i maintenance
1 I'm embarrassed
1 it's inconvenient
1 You don't have enough sports
I There's nothing available in the evening
1 The city doesn't really have anything
1 we're not able to
1 My kids are older
CITY OF LODI Preliminary frequendes
C July 199: Citiseas Survey i - 400 adults tared. -sere soird. Si ckildres/
J.C. Drattoo & Ass9es. I Wale R Moore MOD92Ji1 P. 6
2. importance of specific projects
Here'sIa list of nine kinds of PLACES that might be found in Lodi
in the future. As I read each one, please tell me whether you
think the community should give it TOP PRIORITY, M$DIUM PRIORITY,
or LOW PRIORITY:
/ SEQUENCE VARIED RANDOMLY FROM INTERVIEW TO 1NTERvIEw /
f A center for senior citizen programs and Top Priority ---- sit
activities XMIOM priority - 2at
Lor priority ---- 20t
dk/aa ---- 3%
■ An indoor swim center TOP Priority ---- 2at
MEDIUM priority - 33t
Lot priority ---- 3&t
dk/aa ---- at
Buying up Mokelumne River land for TOP Priority ---- 35%
permanent open space wmzux prior -
priority w1
Low priorit
dk/sa ---- 104
A system of trails throughout Lodi, for
Tor Priority ----
ss•
walking and bicycling
MEDIUM priority -
2st
Low priority ----
lit
dk/be ----
at
C A recreation center for sports and classes
and meetings
Tor Priority ----
MEDIUM priority -
30%
38%
/
S
Lor priority ----
269
J
dk/aa -•--
St
■ A new community park with athletic fields
TOP Priority ----
20%
WDIUM priority -
2"
LOW priority - --
tat
dk/sa ----
Et
A center for the performing arts Top Priority ---- 30%
MEDIUM priority - 331
IAM priority ---- 301
dk/� ---- 7t
Expanding the recreation opportunities at TOP Priority ---- Sat
Lodi Lake Park MEDZUN priority - 33%4-
Low priority ---- 23% "1
dk/aa -- Et
■ A new community golf course
A
TOP Priority ---- 1st
MEDIOM priority - 1st
LOW priority ---- aft
dk/aa ---- It
r
1
CITY Of LODI Preliminary frequencies
C
July 1992 l'ltltess Sune> ! - 400 adults taod,
w►ere noted. 50 t►Ildreal
J.C. Oraeeoo & Assors.:' Kato & Moore 11.009241
P. t
2. importance of specNic projects
`
I!ere's a list of nine kinds of PLACES that might
be found in uyai
in the future. As I read each one, please tell
me whether yo
think the community should give it TOP PRIORITY,
MEDIUM PRIO TY,
or LOW PRIORITY:
SEQUENCE VARIED RANDOMLY FROM INTERVIEW TO INTERVIEW I
A center for senior citizen programs and
sOP Fria ty ---- sl•
aetiviti-s
=Drum riority - 26\
Low pr ority ---- tot
dk/a ---- 31
An indoor swim center
Priority ---- 24\
IOw priority - 331
LOM priority ---- 346
dk/a ---- S\
Buying up Mokelumne River land for
top Priority ---- 3s\
permanent open space
=DIM priority - 24t
LOM priority ---- 301
dk/na ---- 10\
A system of trails throughout Lodi for
tOP Priority ---- ss\
walking and bicycling
mDluu priority - 25%
Lou priority ---- 16•
Was ---- 4\
S A recreation center for spot and classes
top Priority ---- 30\
- 34►
and meetings
mmiuw priority
IAM priority ---- 21.\
dk/a ---- 51
• A new community park wi athletic fields
for Priority ---- 20\
xtDiuN priority - 201
Low priority ---- 430
dk/oa ---- t1
■ A center for the rforming arts
top priority ---- 300
minium priority - 33\
Low priority ---- 30\
dk/a ---- 71
9 Expanding th recreation opportunities at
"P Priority- 34\
Lodi Lake P rk
y - 331
LOW priority ---- 231
dk/aa »-- at
• A new ommunity golf course
3'0P Priority --- It%
=Drum priority - 15%
LOM priority ---- 59%
dk/na ---- t\
1
CITY OF LODI Preliminary frequencies
July 1992 Cirlsess Survey ! - 400 adults tasd, +here meted, 50 elltdres/
J.C. Dtueoe d Assoes. r WMID & Noon (LOD92AI P. 7
3. Polley questions
As you may know, Lodi is growing. As plans are being made for
the future, there has been some discussion about the size and
location of new recreation facilities. SOKE PEOPLE think any new
facilities should be laroe. regional narks because they are less
expensive to operate and they provide more opportunities. OTHER
PEOPLE like small. neighborhood parks because they are closer to
more people's homes.
What do you think: would you favor LAX09, XWIOML ---- 24%
large, regional parks, or smaller, swat, ulanon"OD 60%
neighborhood parks? Gk/aa ----- tat
I ASKED ONLY OF WOOPORIDGE RESIDENTS: J
As you may know, many people who use
city parks in Lodi are people who
don't live in Lodi. Do you believe
it would be FAIR of Lodi City to
charge higher fees -- say, twice as FAIR -------- 14%
much -- for people who live outside HOT FAIR ---- 431
the Lodi City Limits? dk/na -- 43%
Currently, Lodi's adult recreation programs typically cost the
City about 25 dollars per user. People who participate pay about
13 dollars of this cost, and the taxpayers pay the rest. Do you
feel this arrangement is fair the way it is, or should the City
Ccharce hioher fees of users, or should users be charged less?
It's FAIR as is ----------- 46%
Should charge HIGHER FEES - 24%
Should charge LESS -------- 13%
dk/na ---- 17%
And what about children -- currently, Lodi's recreation programs
for children cost an average of 40 dollars per child. Children
who participate pay about 15 dollars of this cost, and the
taxpayers pay the rest. Is this arrangement fair the way it is,
or should the City charge higher fees to children who
participate, or should children be charged less?
It's FAIR as is -------------- 47%
Should charge HIGHER FEES ---- Ilt
Should charge LESS ----------- 25%
dk/na ---- 26%
As City PIanners look toward the future of Lodi, which of these
two kinds of place should get hicher priority:
f CHOICES READ IN SEQUENCE RANDOMLY ALTERNATING FROM INTERVIEW TO INTERVIEW 1
or
■ Places for ORGANIZED SPORTS ------------------------- 371
■ Places for INDIVIDUAL and PRIVATE ACTIVITIES -------- 25%
1 Vo! j Both equally ------ 23%
dk/na ------ 15%
C CITY OF LODI PrelkNnary trequencbs
July 1992 Chl:eas soney g - 400 adults land. ►erc noted. 50 c►lldreal
LC. Draertoo A Assocs. ; Nalo d Moore (1,01!92Al �• !
/ ASKED ONLY OF LORI RESIDENTS: /
As you may have heard, the Lodi Parks and Recreation Department
is having to reduce its costs. Currently they are trying to find
out ways to save two hundred thousand dollars per year. There
are several ways this could be done with cut-backs. which gilt of
these 3 cut-backs would be the best way to raise the extra
million dollars?
f CHOICES READ IN SEQUENCE RANDOMLX VARYING FROM INTERVIEW TO INTERVIEW f
S 8liminate free programs for children, and
instead charge them for participation --------------- 6►
OR
Increase the fees we charge for 211
adult recreation programs ---------------------------- 33%
OR
Eliminate the most costly adult programs,
so that others can stay at a reasonable charge ------ 42%
/ vol. / dk/na------- 191
C4. Soap box
Before we wind up: can you think of 1 to 3improvements that you
feel are most needed in the way Lodi provides recreation
opportunities?
/ VERBATIM RESPONSES RECORDED /
(multiple rrsponirt tabulated)
Facilities/sites
1716
Operations/policies
13•
Children's needs
12%
It's good as it is
11%
Program -related comments
9%
Miscellaneous
3%
Don't know / no answer
Sit
(') Cmers 400 adult respondents and 50 child respondenrs.
CITY OF LODI Preliminary frequencies
July 1992 Ciliates Survey p . 400 adults load, rlen Doted, s0 childnel
C
J.C. Drattoo & Assocs. r Waio & Moore ILOD92 Al
P.9
J. DemogrVhlcs
And now we finish with several questions for statistical
purposes. . .
First, are there children. YES -------
291
under age 16 in you: home? NO --------
711
1 Asked of respondents with children ander 18 or home )
Are any of them active in YES ------
131
organized sports outside school? NO -------
151
dk/na
01
1 Asked of respondents with children at home who art under l8 and also *06-6
in
organized sports ourside schaol /
which sports are those? / VERBA TIAI RESPU s RECORDED /
Raw counts (multiple responsts rreorded):
30 Baseball
22 Soccer
12 Basketball
9 Football
6 Swimming
C
6 Softball
4 Volleyball
4 Tennis
3 Gymnastics
3 Golf
2 Swim
I Swimming schools
1 Little League
I Hockey
1 T -ball
1 Baseball (church league)
I Senior Babe Ruth
I Ballet
Do you OWN or RENT the home where OWN -------------
791
you currently live? RENT ------------
201
dk/na/other -
It
(')And what is your age? (*)Language preference:
UNDER IS --------- 61 SPANISH ------
21
15-18 ------------ 7% ENGLISH ------
98%
19-24 ------------ 41
25-34 ------------ 81 (')Respondent's gender:
35-50 ------------ 211
51-64 ------------ 191 HALE ------
491
65 or OLDER ------ 321 FEMALE ----
51►
dk/na/refused - 39
(') Cmers 400 adult respondents and 50 child respondenrs.
r
C
CITY OF LODE PreNminary lrequencle5
July 1992 Citizens Surrey 0 - 400 adults (and, -►ere mated, 50 dlldrem)
l.C. Draeaoo & Assets. i Waly & Moore ILOD92A1 P. 10
Are you married or single? MARRIED ----------- 71%
SINGLE ------------22%
other/dk/na - 7%
Do you have a job outside the home? YES ------------ 42%
NO -------- 58•
/ ASKED OP RESPONDENTS EMPLOYED OUTSIDE THE HOME: I
VERBATIM RESPONSES RECORDED J
In what city or town do you work?
62% Lodi
23% Elsewhere in San Joaquin County
14% Elsewhere
What kind of work do you do?
21• Agricultural/serv. labor
20% Retail/clerical
170 Professional/technical
14% Skills i trades
10• Sales/entrepreneurial
7% Managerial/executive
11% Miscellaneous / no answer
Date of interview: Monday,
July
20,
1992 --
25%
Tuesday,
July
21,
1992 --
19•
Wednesday,
July
22,
1992 --
14%
Thursday,
July
23,
1992 --
21♦
Friday,
July
24,
1992 --
191
Saturday,
July
25,
1992 --
3%
Time interview completed: 9 am --- 01
10 am --- 0%
11 am --- l%
Noon ---- 11
1 pm ---0%
2 pm ---0%
3 pm --- 10%
4 pm --- 19♦
f nearest hour ) 5 pm --- 211
6 pm --- 22•
7 pm --- 10♦
8 pm --- 4%
9 pm --- 0%
F0,_
VERBATIM RESPONSES TO QUESTION:
"Can you think of 1 to 3 improvements that you feel are most needed in the way Lodi provides
recreation opportunities'"
No.
More trails.
A teen center.
It's good as it is.
1 don't know.
I think that there should be more community
related planned activities.
1'd like Lodi Lake expanded.
None ... can't think of any.
(No answer)
I'm not happy with the way they take care of
the wilderness.
They need a community center real bad.
We need a public golf course. To create
revenue.
We're dead on activities.
They need to give more info to people who
are active.
I'm not involved.
No improvement is needed.
I don't know.
No, not really.
It wouldn't matter. Everyone should pay
their way.
1
I am satisfied with what they have to offer
my kids.
None.
I don't know.
None.
They do a good job.
We need lighted facilities for nights.
None.
It's okay.
No.
I don't know about sports.
None.
Charge higher fees for adult recreation
programs.
Build more teen -oriented places.
They are adequate.
We need indoor basketball gyms. 1 want the
Pavilion opened up for indoor basketball
courts.
I don't care about anything that has to do
with recreation programs.
None.
We need more publicity of the activities.
Manage the volleyball program better.
�1
r - -
CVERBATIM RESPONSES TO QUESTION:
'Can you think of 1 to 3 improvements that you feel are most needed in the way Lodi provides
recreation opportunities?'
C
They need more places for teenagers.
There's not a lot for teenagers, like facilities
... arcades.
1 don't know.
Not really.
No answer.
There are plenty of opportunities.
No.
Games for teenagers should he promoted.
They should have activities for teenagers.
I have no opinion.
I don't know.
They're doing a good job.
I don't know.
None ... I'm blind. I wouldn't know_
We need car nights.
1 don't know.
I don't know.
The bases are coming off in the baseball
field.
Help senior citizens.
None.
We need more teen age programs.
No.
No answer.
I don't know•.
We need lower torts for gyms.
They should provide better service by
increasing facilities.
Nonc.
Things should be announced.
We need more activities for children.
don't know.
1 couldn't answer that.
We need new personnel.
None at all.
I don't know.
1 love city recreational services.
They should have a staff development
committee to cut back in administrative
costs.
We need more organized sports.
The soccer league needs better organization.
We need card games for senior citizens.
We need more teams for sports.
They have ample amounts of services.
No.
No.
7
rw—
VERBATIM RESPONSES TO QUESTION:
'Can you think of I to 3 improvements that you feel are most needed in the way Lodi provides
recreation opportunities?'
No, they're pretty good.
They should improve communication.
I don't know.
They should advertise it more.
They should do more for the boys club.
I don't know.
I don't know.
No.
We need more things for seniors.
We need more activities for kids to do.
They should have a center.
They're doing a good job.
They should open the Lake for swimming.
1 don't know.
Young kids need more sports ... for
teenagers.
Not really, it's okay.
No answer.
No problems.
They should lower fees. Other people can't
pay.
I want the Hutchins Street Square basketball
court to stay.
1 don't know.
641
3
Thcv're doing a good job.
I don't know.
We need more development in Lodi Lake
Park.
They're doing a pretty good job.
I don't know.
I have no answer.
I don't know any.
No.
There should be more swimming areas.
They should improve teenage activity.
There's no need to.
I'm not too involved.
No. It's okay, a good system.
No, not really.
Do something about waste. There is a lot of
wastes.
The kids can't afford to play sports.
I don't know.
We need more things for teenagers.
We need larger parks.
We need low something for low-income
children.
They need a lot of things for teenagers.
L5
VERBATIM RESPONSES TO QUESTION:
"Can you think of I to 3 impriovements that you feet are most needed in the way Lodi provides
recreation opportunities'"
Lodi has good recreation opportunities
already.
I have no idea.
In the light Prop. 13 they voted to pay a fee
for services. Parents should pay for children
that have substantial incomes.
They're doing a pretty good job.
We need more parks in neighborhoods.
There are no opportunities for teenagers.
No.
We don't need any improvements.
They're doing a great job.
We need more recreation activities so that
teenagers can have fun.
I'm impressed with Lodi's facilities.
They need to be available at more hours.
1 don't know.
1 want a Stairmaster and aerobics in a local
gym.
I'd like rest -rooms in the parks.
(No answer.)
I'm for putting money out for family
activities.
It's fine.
We need facilities: for theater, drama and
arts.
4
We need more swimming pools for children.
I don't know_
They have real good programs.
No answer.
No answer.
No answer.
What we spoke about sounds pretty good.
They do a good job.
The Boys and Girls Club should stay where it
is.
(No answer.)
Restore the parks on the East Side.
No answer.
No answer.
No answer.
No connections.
I don't know. I'm not interested.
They should have a motorcycle race track.
They should have an organized hockey team.
They should put better lighting in Hutchins
Square.
We need to slow down traffic.
No. They cover everything generally.
r
C
A
I --
VERBATIM
--
VERBATIM RESPONSES TO QUESTION -
'Can you think of 1 to 3 improvements that you feel are most needed in the way Lodi provides
recreation opportunities'"
They should send out flyers about activities
so we can know what's available.
I don't know.
They should allow more children to
participate in programs like sports.
We need a YMCA.
No.
No answer.
No answer.
They should do more for the swim. program.
We need teenage programs.
1 have no answer.
We need some more places for children to
play.
No.
No.
It's too political.
Let kids camp at Lodi Lake Park.
1 don't know.
No answer.
I don't know.
I don't know.
No.
None. It's big.
i
They're doing a good job as it is, here.
I don't like the charges (entry fees) at Lodi
Lake Park.
We need more public swimming pools to
offer swimming lessons on weekends.
Alone_
None.
We need better transportation.
We need more things for the teenagers ...
we need recreation for them.
I don't know.
It's very good.
They're doing fine.
I don't know.
They're doing a good job.
I'd like more info. about recreation.
No answer.
No answer.
I don't know.
They need to coordinate better with
year-round youth sports.
We need more swimming opportunities.
\ke need a big auditorium.
No answer.
F""'
CVERBATIM RESPONSES TO QUESTION:
"Can you think ori to 3 improvements that you feel are most needed in the way Lodi provides
recreation opportunities?'
C
A
We need evening recreation for working
adults.
No answer.
I'd like a more accessible recreation area for
senior citizens.
It's pretty complete already.
No answer.
I don't know.
We need more neighborhood parks.
No.
They should have more racquetball courts.
They should do more for teenagers:
activities, recreation center for kids.
They're doing a fine job.
We need a big golf course.
Nothing. They are doing a fine job.
No opinion.
They're doing a good job.
No answer.
We need a new track.
No answer.
They should put in a golf course.
Not right now.
We need teenage activities.
6
We need more things for children. %fore
activities for children during times when
Mere are no activities like during the winter
time.
They're doing a pretty good job.
Whv don't we teach these children how to
work?
We need a swimming pool at the Boys and
Girls Club.
1 have no ideas.
No answer.
They should eliminate boating at Lodi Lake.
No answer.
I don't know.
I don't know.
No answer.
Thev should give more, better programs.
They should keep the parks cleaner.
I don't know.
No answer.
I don't know.
I don't know.
We need more teenage programs.
I don't know.
Gvmnastics should have more hours and
programs.
r
( VERBATIM RESPONSES TO QUESTION:
'Can you think of I to 3 improvements that you feel are most needed in the way Lodi provides
recreation opportunities?"
C
No answer.
I can't think of any.
They should have more teenage
opportunities.
I don't know.
We need a teenage center.
They should get things done at Hutchins
Square.
They're stuck on softball ... not well rounded.
I don't know.
We need a recreation van for people to get to
Their recreation points.
Bike paths are really urgent.
No answer.
No answer.
No answer.
No answer.
No answer.
Prices for recreation should go down (less
cost).
There are not enough classes such as pottery.
They should put a park where that ugly
dump used to be.
I don't go out.
We need something for children to do.
0
No ideas.
We need buses for people who don't drive.
I don't know.
We need more parks for kids so they won't
be in gangs.
No ideas.
We need more camps.
No response.
No response.
No response.
They have excellent programs now. Leave it
alone.
No response.
No answer.
They're okay so far.
Pone.
No answer.
No answer.
They should have more sports.
No ideas.
No -- Lodi seems to do a good job.
Cheaper costs for YMCA, Twin Arbors.
I would like more ways to get into wilderness
area of Lodi Lake.
r -
CVERBATIM RESPONSES TO QUESTION:
"Can you think of Ito 3 improvements that fou feel are most nerded in the way Lodi provides
recreation opportunities?'
I'm not really knowledgeable about sports, so
I have no comment ... i couldn't say_
They should build skate parks.
They need to keep up parks better.
1 don't know ... halls with drug free
partying.
I don't know anything.
The City should put more money in for
different things for the children to play with
instead of rtlying on organizations.
Neighborhood parks would be nice.
We need a golf course.... Due to the City
Manager, this is why they don't have one.
We need more playground equipment.
It's well the way it is.
I have no ideas.
I think there should be an adult basketball
program.
No ideas.
We need to buy Mokelumne River as a top
priority.
I don't know.
No answer.
No answer.
No.
No idea.
9
Lodi needs a teen cent_r, such as for dancing
an eatery.
7
FAM
CVERBATIM RESPONSES TO QUESTION:
'Can you think of I to 3 improvements that you fret are most needed in the way Lodi provides
recreation opportunities''
C
1 don't know -
1 don't know.
1 can't think of nothing.
They should make a large community
theater.
I'd like more access to the wilderness area. or
trails.
They're doing a pretty good job.
1 don't know.
We need more sports for young kids.
We need a Community Center.
No answer.
They should reorganize the Parks & Rec.
Department.
I think they are doing a good job already_
We need more programs for children who
can't afford some sports activities.
They should make changes slowly.
We need more swimming places in Lodi.
I don't know.
We need a golf course.
They should buy up more Mokelumne River
land!
They should have a passage to the
Mokelumne River land and don't develop
any more housing there.
can't comment_
%%?c need something ... more programs
for the middle school kids.
I think that they're doing a good job already
... there is a good variety.
They're doing a good job.
I don't know.
I don'i know.
I don't know.
Address development of the River.
No answer -- Lodi does a good job.
No.
Start a soccer team.
Do more for young kids.
I don't know.
We need more organized sports.
We need more recreation on the East Side.
1 don't know.
No answer.
We need more parks.
1 don't like this town.
1 don't know.
Lodi seems to be all right the way it is
They should improve and add bike trails.
1-1
KCFREALESTATE
KIRST, COSTAMA GNA and FLEM#J�l V E D
P.O. Box 1259 4r t, l y k $: 1► 7 Located:
Woodbridge. CA 95258 „:: .: y RIVERSIDE PROFESSIONAL CENTER
PHONE 204-3340670 �►. '. i `.. "�!i?ik; 18826 N. Lower Sacramento Road Suite G
FAX 209-3341210 :::►s :G �.' Woodbridge. CA 95258
April 1$, 1993
Mr. Robert Johnson. Chairman
Parks & Recreation Commission
City of Lodi
221 W. Pine St.
Lodi, CA 95240
Dear Mr. Johnson:
I just recently received the updated material for the parks and rec master plan.
Included with that information as exhibit "A" were the minutes of the February 2,
1993 commission hearing of the toaster plan. I wanted to bring to your attention
that on page 7 of the minutes under "Bicycle - Pedestrian Connectors" my
comments were left out. I want to reiterate my full opposition to off-road bicycle
and pedestrian paths specifically north of Kealeman Lane east of Lower
Sacramento Road as well as through out the city.
I feel that it is unfair to plan and subsequently require land owners and developers
in two small regions of Lodi to design future projects around this recreational
feature that may be used by very few people and could become a nuisance to
future adjoining home owners due to potential for crime and vandalism. Also,
since Lodi has not planned and constructed off-road bicycle paths in other parts
of the city, why should they now be required to have them?
The plan also indicates that there are off-road trails planned around the west and
cast periphery of the city, one portion along the WID canal. Has the WID been
noticed of this plan? I would be curious of their opinion of encouraging the
public to walk or ride on or along the canal and the liability connected with this
proposal. Also the other major off-road trail is along Beckman Road and
Highway 99. Most of this area is already developed industrial property. There
will most likely be no dedications from owners or is this already State or City
property? How can off-road paths in the Century Meadows area be proposed now
since all of that area has been through the development plan process with some
portions now being built?
Costs of maintaining and lighting these paths should also be taken into account
due to the City's current and presumably future financial conditions. Will
dwd� r4w- '"Mi
Page 2
dedication of bicycle paths be considered as part of the park impact fee paid or
in -lieu fees for developer?
I do agree that off-road bicycle/pedestrian paths should be planned in areas that
have undeveloped features such as the river riparian area, but off -toad paths at
this late date around and through other parts of Lodi snakes no sense.
One other problem I see in this master plan is that actual costs and projected
income to finance projects associated with park acquisition and development is
not contained in the report. AU other City master plans have this analysis. At
the February 2 meeting Mr. Steve Pechin spoke requesting the inclusion of a
funding mechanism for unfunded projects. Why was this left out?
Also, I want to comment on the recommended level for park facilities on page
VI -5 of the draft report. If the City wishes more than that amount of park land
it must either mise the jMpW fee charged to deveigg or find its own source of
funds to acquire land and build parkfacilities." Lodi currently charges one of
the highest park fees in the state. I have great concern that the City is already
collecting fees in excess of statutory limits and that fee should be reviewed by the
City Council. To request additional funds from development will most likely be
challenged by the development community. Lodi has ignored the Quimby Act
and collects fees on a developed acreage amount without strict regard to
population of the project, as outlined in the act.
Please comment on these issues at the shirt sleeve meeting on April 20, 1993.
Sincerely,
J. Jeffrey Kirst
cc: Mayor Phil Pennino
Tom Peterson
Bob McNatt
Steve Pechin
r
TWIN ARBORS
.,t V 7 +C C LUES
April 16, 1993
Lodi City Council
P.O Box 3006
Lodi, CA 95240
To the members of the Lodi City Council:
T03
RECEIVED
93 App 19 PH 1: In
ClIY CIE; ;
rry( r-
, , :i
This correspondence in regarding the "Park, Recreation and
Open Space Plan" for Lodi. This plan is to be reviewed and
adopted at the April 21, ,993 City Council meeting.
According to the plan, Part VIII -32 thru VIII -35, an indoor
recreation center is being asked for. In the indoor
recreation center facilities will include Fitness/Weight
Room(s) and Racquetball courts.
As for fitness and weight rooms, World's Gym and Twin Arbors
Athletic Clubs have excess capacity and a wide range of
pricing open to the community. Twin Arbors has a use permit
and is in the process of phasing an expansion plan at the
Sunwest facility. Twin Arbors also has ten racquetball
courts. They are not at capacity either, as racquetball
across the nation has been showing a steady decline for many
years now, especially in areas with climates like Lodi.
In our business the profit margin is relatively small and
very sensitive to membership levels. You may recall that
the current owners acquired the racquetball and fitness
facility on Hutchins Street out of bankruptcy and it took
several years just to break even in this tough industry.
When Hutchins Street Square opened we lost over 100
memberships, which had quite an impact on us. This master
plan's proposed new fitness and weight rooms and racquetball
courts could easily take approximately one-third to one-half
of our membership. If you build those facilities you'll be
making a conscious decision to directly compete with and put
Lodi's open to the public, tax paying fitness centers out of
business. In our case, over 60 employees will be
unemployed.
1900 SOUTH HUTCHINS STREET
2040 COCHRAN ROAD
LODI, CALIFORNIA 95240
(209) 334-4897
own
Competition from local government and tar. -exempt
organizations is a major concern to the entire business
community. In testimony before the House Committee on Small
Business on June 29, 1988, Dr. Earl H. Hess of the U.S.
Chamber of Commerce stated, that the Chamber believes unfair
competition " is a significant and growing problem that most
injures those businesses that are most vulnerable - the
small ones."
We welcome business competition, as long as the playing
field is level and the game fair. Because of the cost
advantages available for local government i.e., tax-free
status, financing by compulsory taxes, additional funds
available at preferred interest rates, exemption from many
regulations, as well as eligibility for state and federal
subsidies - private recreation facilities cannot compete
fairly.
Why should the city be concerned about competition with
private businesses? Because it costs the government and
taxpayers money. Government agencies consume tax dollars,
while private business creates tax revenue. Unless there is
an overriding public interest involved, government ought not
to provide those services readily available from the private
sector.
This argument is equally applicable to the current situation
in Lodi. If the city continues to develop recreational
programs already offered by the private sector, those
programs will consume tax dollars, while the amount of taxes
collected - private operators are forced out of business -
will decrease.
What overriding public interest justifies the cost? None
that we know of. Is it appropriate for the city to provide
duplicate services already offered by the private sector for
it's citizens? We believe the answer should be no. Dry
cleaners, restaurants, and bowling alleys all provide
services to the general community, but no one would
seriously suggest that the government enter into these
businesses. There is no governmental necessity to providing
these recreational services to Lodi residents. It is a good
business, but not one that should be subsidized or run by
the government.
W1
It has been argued that the local government should be
allowed to offer these recreational services because these
programs offer low or affordable prices which make them
available to the entire community. While park and
recreational district user fees may be low, these user fees
represent only a portion of the cost to the taxpayer. In
one proposed facility in the midwest, the bond to finance a
park and recreational facility would have cost an average
taxpayer $300 in taxes a year. This cost will be borne by
all taxpayers, not just by the program users. When user
fees are added, the use of these public facilities can
exceed the cost of a private facility.
When we allow our tax dollars to subsidize businesses
masquerading as charities or local government, we are doing
a disservice to the community. Funds that could be used to
educate our children, combat drug abuse, child abuse or
provide for the homeless are being diverted to serve the
recreational needs of doctors, lawyers, and other
professionals. Special Assistant to the Assistant Secretary
of Treasury told the U.S. House Committee on Small Business:
The role of government generally has been
restricted to those socially important activities
not adequately supported by the private sector.
The role of the quasi -public -governmental, not-
for-profit sector should similarly be restricted
to that of supplementing, and not supplanting, the
activities of for-profit business.
We urge you to heed the words of the Department of Treasury
and support rather than harm the taxpaying businesses. As a
demonstration of your support of local business, please
remove the fitness/weight room(s) and racquetball courts
from the indoor recreation center.
Sincerely Yours,
Dennis Kaufman
General Manager, Twin Arbors Athletic Club
Lodi Taxpayer
Residence: 1914 Colombard Cir.
Lodi, CA 95240
RECEIVED
Lodi Parks and Recreation Departm5%?R
125 N. Stockton Street
Lodi, California 95240 ; ►�"; �:i'cF,l'." "
Parks 333-6888 Recreation 333-674
U"i
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lodi Park, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Committee
FROM: Ron Williamson, Parks and Recreation Director
DATE: April 6, 1993
SUBJECT: City Council Meetings
The Lodi City Council will address our Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan this month.
Please make a note of the following two meetings:
Tuesday. April 20, 1993 7:00 A.M. Shirtsleeve Meeting
Wednesday, April 21, 1993 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting
We would tike to have you attend both meetings, but Wednesday, April 21, in particular, to
support our plan efforts and be recognized for your time and interest in serving as a committee
member.
Both meetings will be held at the Carnegie Forum. We hope you will be able to attend.
RW: srb
cc: Marilyn E. Field, Recreation Superintendent
Scott Essin, Parks Superintendent
Rich Prima, Assistant City Engineer, Public Works
David Morimoto, Associate Planner, Community Development
Tom Peterson, City Manager
Jennifer Perrin, City Clerk
Jerry Draggoo, Consultant, J C Draggoo & Associates
1
r
f
Lodi Parks and Recreation Department
125 N. Stockton Street
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lodi City Council
FROM: Jerry Draggoo, J C Draggoo & Associates
DATE: April 20, 1993
SUBJECT: Issues Related to the Park and Recreation Plan
Based on what I heard at Tuesday's workshop meeting, it appears that there are a
number of issues you would like to discuss. To make the adoption process easier, I
recommend that you deal with each issue separately. When they are all resolved,
then you can adopt the remaining parts of the Plan.
Here are the issues as I see them. You may want to add to the list.
SHOULD THE CITY DEVELOP THE WATERFRONT PARK
KNOWN AS SCENIC OVERLOOK?
Background: 1. There is some concern about hazardous waste on
the site. No one knows for sure if this is true. If so,
how serious problem is it?
2. The Parks and Recreation Commission recommended
this site for recreation use but felt that a survey on
hazardous ,waste should occur.
1. Deny site for recreation use.
2. Approve site for recreation use.
3. Approve with conditions.
ISSUE NO. 2 SHOULD THE CITY DEVELOP AN OFF/ON-STREET TRAILS
SYSTEM?
1. The Plan recommends a system of on -street and off-
street traits. The exact location of a trail will be
determined at the time of development of the
specific area. There are many options for locating
trails but it is assumed that some trails will be
located at the rear of properties.
-1-
Subject: Issues Related to the Park and Recreation Plan
Page 2 - April 20, 1993
2. The issue needs to be resolved as to how the land
will be acquired and who will pay for trail
development. Right now it is assumed that the
developer would dedicate the land, but the City
would be responsible for developing the trails.
ISSUE NO. 3 SHOULD THE CITY CONTINUE TO SERVE NOW
RESIDENTS?
Background: 1. This issue only applies to sport fields.
2. We have identified a strategy for funding the non-
resident fields. If the non-residents choose to not
participate, then, what should the City do?
3. 1 believe you should go on record as approving or
disapproving the concept of charging the non-
resident and then leave the specifics of how and
how much to the Parks and Recreation Commission,
and City Administration.
ISSUE NO. 4 SHOULD THE CITY DEVELOP AN INDOOR RECREATION
CENTER?
Background: 1. There is a major need in Lodi for gymnasium space
and places to conduct recreation programs.
2. It is my opinion that the facility would not compete
against the private clubs and would not run at a
deficit at the level suggested on Tuesday morning.
3. 1 have a drawing as to how 1 see the facility. You
are welcome to preview it if you wish.
-2-
Parks & Rec. Master Plan
Committee
10/92
Mamie Starr
21634 N. Mann
Acampo, CA 95220
Bob Johnson
1311 Midvale Rd.
Lodi, CA 95240
Tim Katzakian
912 Bridle Path
Galt, CA 95632
Eddie Gonzales
108 W. Turner Rd., Ste. B
Lodi. CA 95240
Virginia Lahr
311 E. Elm Street
Lodi, CA 95240
Joe Handel
416 W. Locust St.
Lodi, CA 95240
Lyle Hoyt
2016 Jackson Ct.
Lodi, CA 95240
Roger Stafford
801 S. Mills Ave.
Lodi, CA 95242
Subject: Issues Related In the Park and Recreation Plan
Page 2 - April 20, 1993
ISSUE NO. 5 WHERE SHOULD THE RECREATION CENTER BE
LOCATED?
Comments: The original Plan recommended Hutchins Street Square.
The Parks and Recreation Commission recommended
Needham School.
IScUE NO. 6 SHOULD THE CITY'S MASTER PLAN INCLUDE A
SWIMMING POOL?
1.
1 did not recommend another pool because of the
existence of four swimming areas.
2.
Testimony was presented at the Parks and
Recreation Commission that a pool was needed on
the west side.
3.
1 added the word "indoor" because 1 felt there was
more of a need for an indoor pool than an outdoor
pool.
Ontions: 1.
Recommend an indoor pool.
2.
Recommend an outdoor pool.
3.
Make no recommendation for a pool.
4.
Make a recommendation for a pool but not specify
the type.
ISSUE NO -7 WHAT SHOULD HAPPEN TO THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
MOKELUMNE RIVER?
Comments: The Plan recommends that the City for County) acquire the
development rights to a 50-100 foot strip along the north
bank of the river. Since a trail within this area was
eliminated, the strip would become open space only and
not a park.
-3-
I
Subject: Issues Related to the Park and Recreation Plan
Page 2 - April 20, 1993
ISSUE NO, 8 WHEN THE .PLAN IS ADOPTED, WILL IT CHANGE THE
IMPACT FEE LEVEL?
Background: The amount of improvements shown in the Plan dedicated
to impact fees is the same as what was originally proposed.
The amount of land to be acquired/dedicated by developers
is also the same amount.
ISSUE NO, 9 DO YOU AGREE WITH THE PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENTS
SHOWN ON THE TABLE ON PAGE IX -6?
-4-
r
C& of Lodi Pork and Recreorion Plan ACrion Plan
IX -6
Total
Impact
Other
$Ile No
Park/Facitity
Cost
Pees
Sources
H-9
Cochran Park (proposed)
1,640,700
1,640,700
N-10
Vinewood Park
124,200
124,200
M-11
American Legion Park
171,900
171,900
H-12
Blakely Park
123,700
123,700
H-13
Kettleman Lane Park (proposed)
1,062,200
1,062,200
H-14
Village Street Park (proposed)
381.400
381.400
N-15
Century Meadows Park (proposed)
914,500
914.500
W16
Beckman Park
193.900
193.900
M-17
English Oaks Commons
31,400
31.400
N-18
Eastside Park (proposed)
1.630,400
1,630.400
H-19
Southwest Park (proposed)
478,900
478,900
C-1
Woodbridge Park (proposed)
4,084.600
3,530,700
553.900
C-2
Armory Park
450,600
450,600
C-2
Softball Complex
119.200
119.200
C-2
Zupo Field
187,700
187.700
C-3
Kofu Park
184,900
184,900
C-4
DeBenedetti Park
3,478.300
2,274.500
1,203.800
C-5
Saias Park
50.000
50.000
R-1
Lodi Lake Park
3,057,000
3,057.000
S-1
Scenic Overtook
439.100
439.100
S-2
Hutchins Street Square
S-3
Maple Square
S-4
Needham School
S-5
Pixley Park
3.198,000
2,593.100
604.900
OS -1
Lodi Lake Nature Area
OS.2
Mokelumne River Area
OS -3
Amaiz Property
50,000
50.000
Park Maintenance Shops
897,900
628.500
269.400
Indoor Recreation Center
3.567.800
2.657.800
910,000
Indoor Swimming Pool
2.860.000
2.860,000
TOTAL
$32.755,200
$18.524.200
$14,231,000
IX -6
U
17. Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA)
California could receive more than 5200 million over a six year period for
transportation enhancement activities and facilities. Some of the eligible
projects include trail systems for pedestrians and bicycles, acquisition of
scenic easements, landscape and other scenic beautification and mitigation
of water pollution due to highway runoff. This proggrraamm is administered by
the California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS). Currently,
this agency is preparing guidelines for administering the program While no
rules nave been set, it is expected that these grants will require a local
match of 15-20%.
18. Capital Development Fund
This is a fund set u.p by the City to budget major capital expenditures. The
Fund is usually a six year program and reviewed annually.
19. Annual Operating Budget
Minor amounts of money for special studies or small improvement projects
are often funded out of the Department's annual budget.
PROJECT COSTS
The following is the estimated cost to complete all of the capital projects recommended
in the Plan.
Table 34
improvenwd Coats by Facility -1992
Lodi Park and Recreation Plan
Total Irnpad other
Site No Pork/,Eaci11W Cost Fees Sourall
M-1
Candy Cane Park
$11.600
M-2
Century Park
N-1
Lodi Lake Neighborhood Park
142,300
N-2
Van Buskirk Park
93,300
N-3
Minswood Park (proposed)
1,023,000
N-4
Westgate Park (proposed)
1,164,400
N-5
Henry Gloves Park
66,200
N-6
Emerson Park
175,400
N-7
Hale Park
3,400
N -a
Uncoln School Park (proposed)
892,300
IX - S
=111,600
142,300
23.300
1,023,000
$1,112,900 51.500
66.200
175.400
0.400
692,300
r
QfY_of Lodi Park and Recreotion Plan AcrioR Plan
IX -6
Total
Impact
Other
Site No
ParkiFecilitr
GQst
Feet
Sourm
N-9
Cochran Park (proposed)
1,640,700
1,640,700
N-10
Vinewood Park
124,200
124,200
N-11
American Legion Park
171,900
171,900
N-12
Blakely Park
123,700
123,700
N-13
Kettleman lane Park (proposed)
1,082,200
1,062,200
N-14
Village Street Park (proposed)
381,400
381,400
N-15
Century Meadows Park (proposed)
914,500
914,500
N-16
Beckman Park
193.900
193,900
N-17
English Oaks Commons
31.400
31,400
H-18
Eastside Park (proposed)
1,630.400
1,630.400
N-19
Southwest Park (proposed)
478,900
478,900
C-1
Woodbridge Park (proposed)
4,084.600
3,530,700
553.900
C-2
Armory Park
450,600
450.800
C-2
Softball Complex
119,200
119.200
C-2
Zupo Field
187.700
187.700
C-3
Kofu Park
184.900
184,900
C-4
DeBenedettl Park
3.478,300
2,274,500
1,203.E
C-5
Sala$ Park
50,000
50.000
R-1
Lodi Lake Park
3,057.000
3.057.000
S-1
Scenic Overbook
439.100
439.100
S-2
Hutchins Street Square
S-3
Maple Square
S-4
Needham School
S-5
Pixley Park
3.198.000
2.593.100
604.900
OS -1
Lodi Lake Nature Area
OS.2
Mokelumne River Area
OS -3
Arnalz Property
50.000
50.000
Park Maintenance Shops
897,900
628.500
289.400
Indoor Recreation Center
3.567.800
2,657.800
910,000
Indoor Swknming Pool
2,860,000
2,880.000
TOTAL 432.755.200
=18.524,200
$14,231.000
IX -6
PETITION IN RESPONSE TO POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF
MOKELUMNE VILLAGE SCENIC OVERLOOK (OLD CITY DUMP)
AS PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE MOKELUMNE RIVER
We, the undersigned residents of Mokelumne Village, do hereby formally go on public record
that we are OPPOSED to any development of the Scenic Overlook (old City of Lodi dumpsite
located at the west end of our subdivision and highlighted on the attached map) because ade-
quate, reliable information has not been compiled and analyzed to mitigate any impacts public
access at this t ration in a residential subdivision may have.
At this point, before the makes its recommendation
to the City, and before we know their specific plans, we would like to be sure the following items
and potential impacts are addressed, appropriate mitigating measures are developed, and an
implementation, monitoring, and policing system is designed to assure the mitigating measures
are carried out, prior to any recommendations concerning public access to the Mokelumne River
through our sudivision:
1. Summary, extent and scope of project to accommodate public access
2. Exact Land Use Plan
3. Traffic and Circulation
4. Public Utilities and Services
5. Population and Impact on Housing Values
6. Fiscal Effects
7. Energy Resources
& Geology and Soils
9. Water Resources
10. Air Resources
11. Biological Resources
12. Cultural Resources
13. Noise
14. Hazardous Materials
15. Insurance liability
16. Railroad Trestle Danger
We do not believe sufficient information has been gathered to make any recommendations con-
cerning our subdivision. We, as a group are prepared to do whatever is necessary to protect our
home values and make sure all alternatives are fully explored, including the actual need for more
public access, and that appropriate and reasonab'e mitigation measures are incorporated in any
pian of development of the aforereferenced site.
Each and every homeowner undersigned would like to be put on the mailing list with any notices
of meetings, action, or decisions to be mailed directly to each homeowner so we may individ-
ually, and as a group have our input on this very critical and controversial matter.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
MOKELUMNE VILLAGE oCENIC OVERLOOK" CONCERNS PETn ijN SIGNATURE PAGES
Number Owner's Name
Address
Date
3-
a
•�•E-►N cxct� <
</o y 3�i �ll..- ,�
3 -G -Y3
5
6
c/ I
// y i
7
8
_ a
•
yy
11454(
,
10
r F fLc ff✓
^n-
11
12
13
14-
15
Z4
16
17
19
3 la' ' 3
20
21
j
23
3
24
26
9
27
blt
28
29
n., ,rc7r�
a;1 3
3-10- 13
30
f..GT • L� v�C� S-azv'
2� l �1;LiEL�.`tf'C Qf✓G'�2 JQ.
3-L-93
31
1 r: Garr-
� i !�►� 7 Cz(:✓ m. y.a h vP r L7�•
_�..
32
/ i
1►i?� r rl , 1l ,
,moi .-
33
3436
Page 1
3
j
r
9
MOKELUMNE VILLAGE SCENIC OVERLOOK" CONCERNS PETII#JN SIGNATURE PAGES
Number
Owner's Name
Address
Date
37
38
39
40
41
,,�
O AK
-n
42
_
LZL v, 4t-,,U,I
&I LJ
43
44
45
46
47
4
49
50 ��
� --
it C—, �d'�
L i3
54
'
��; �•
57
58
Y� 01/
: o f l c ►c - rv�f - 1 lit•
3% /�
59
iDu4 �N� e_
5 4 -Y
'J
61
6373
64
y �:r;) �. �1
i�Q 17?�{�:/`O.tY1P �•o�' L'
Z"�/
65
fie" cLLk z.�
1 �� `5 ftl a wn n IZ Vhf -0 Ir
67
6909f
/� `vA
- , -1
70
71
3
Page 2
FRI
Y
r
MOKELLIMNE VILLAGE SCENIC OVEALOOK- CONCERNS PETITOM SIGNATURE PAGES
Page 3
r
MOOKtWWO V{4. AGA iCMOC CMA{,,QW COUMMiO ►E'TTy ftW 64"ArUNC P^049
Number
'j kw"
Addro"
date
104a
.,
110
�"1t f Y6 M�
4 s �y � r • M, �+'rG 1.1 • Y
3 i +r 1 a
111
� t -,.� _ t
1 ' 1A 't `�'.. r!
•� ... i
112
113
114
'
115
ile
117
d `
- `"�L `_✓ �!
118
...
114
; , t :,•�
''>; /" �'�
.-
120
121
122
�1i .jlrl�.i�
10?1� i,••+h.. Jti � • LE
3 Jt' Y2
123
hIcNAa
I c) If:i A Ok
3
124
141ttttf Ut L-A,A
lo fy oiiA fit.
3 1 15
125
r r 7
126
�•
f nt�
i, 9 /
127
128
C_
129
t`J► CJ
f,,45
130
131
5
132-iy-
133
03/ M S c A
3 �Y-rte
134
L .0
/D 3 r
135
. •;.
C
136
`� 1%
�, f J •J ��
.� l�-
137
/ ^74
- -
139
_ ��%l; t
/ -1/ e� un.
�47-
140
'141
142 <
143
144
Paye 4
1
F,
CITY OF LODI
PARK AND RECREATION PLAN
ESTIMATE OF COST IMPROVEMENTS
TO IMPLEMENT THE PLAN
April 16, 1993
m
Name: (Candy Cane Park 4 t
I
E
Type: I Mini -Park j
I
Sizer. 10.2 Acres I
i
k I
I
I ± I
Unit
Total Limpact
! Improvements Ouantity Units I
Price
Cost E Fees
I ! I
I
Arrigation System ± 1; Allowance I
$8.000.00.1
$8.000.00
Trees 5 Ea.
$200.00 E
$1.000.001
r
Subtotal i
$9.000.00
Add Contingency @ 10% j
$900.00
Total Construction Cost
$9.900.00
iAdd Sales Tax 7.75%,
$767.25
{Add A/E Fees @ 10% , I
$990.00
f I i
I
TOTAL PROJECT COST
$11.657.25
I
Page 1
Name: lCentury Park l
Type: Mini-Park t 1
Size: 12.5 Acres 1 ! I
i I Unit t Total I Impact
I Imp"wernents i Ouantity I Units Price i Cost I Fees
I I I I 1
,No Improvements i
1
I I I t
I
i t
Page 2
Name: ILodi lake Neighborhood Park
j
Type: iNeighborhood Park
I
!
!
Size: X3.0 Acres
I
i
f
Unit
Total ( Impact
I Improvements Ouantity i Units
Price
Cost ! Fees
l Irrigation System
21 Ac. i
$15.000.00 '
$30.000.00
;Revise Parking
1 I Allowance '
535.000.00
$35.000.00
Playground
11 Allowance
$5.000.00
S5.000.00
( Paved Court
11 Ea.
S18.000.00 1
$18.000.00
Fencing (4') 6001 U.
$6.50
53.900.00
Misc.Improvements
1I Allowance
$18.000.00
518.000.00
( Subtotal
(
1
S109.900.00
j Add Contingency Q 1096
I
$10.990.00
Total ? o&—tRiction Cost
!
$120.890.00
Add Sales Tax 7.7596
I I
S9.368.98
,Add A/E Fees Q 10%
I
$12.089.00
I !
'
(TOTAL PROJECT COST
f I
$142.347.98
1
i
Page 3
Name: Van Buskirk Park I
Type: Neighborhood Park
I
Size: 1.0 Acres
i
I
!
Una I
Total Impact
! I Improvements Quantity ;
Units I
Price i
cost ! Fees
I
i
I
I
!Grading/Seeding
0.81
Ac. !
$11,500.00 i
$9.200.00
(Trees
101
Ea. i
$200.00
52,000.00
Playground
1
Ea. 1
$25.000.00
525,000.00
Paved Court
1 I
Ea.
$18.000.00
$18.000.00
1
Ea.
$2,000.00
$2.000.00
450
U.
58.50l
53.825.00
ments
1
Allowance i
$12,000.00
$12.
[M,',Fendng(4
!
I
572,025.00
ingency @ 10%
$7,20250
i ;Total Construction Cost
I
I
$79.227.50
1
�
Add Sales Tax 7.75%
i
$6.140.13
IAdd A/E Fees ®10%
!
$7.922.75
[TOTAL PROJECT COST
$93.290.38
Page 4
Name: 1Mdlswood Park (Proposed)
I
!
Type: I Neighborhood Park
Size: 15.0 Acres
i
!
I
j
Unit j
Total Impact
Improvements ! Quantity 1
Units
Price 1
Cost Fees
i
!
I
Cleating/Grading
51
Ac.
$6.500.001
$32.500.00
j0n-Site Drainage
1; Allowance ;
$15.000.00 i
$15,000.00
Irrigation System !
41
Ac. f
$15.000.001
$60,000.00
Electrical Service
11 Allowance 1
5115,000.00 '
$15,000.00
Site Lighting
51
Poles !
$3.000.00 !
$15,000.00
Sewer Service
2001
Lt.
$14.50
$2.900.00,
Water Service 1
2001
Lt.
$12.50
$2,500.00
Drinking Fountain ,
11
Ea. 1
$700.00 i
$700.00
Grading/Seeding !
41
Ac. 1
$11.500.00 ;
546,000.00
Trees !
351
Ea. 1
$200.001
$7,000.00
Shrubs
351 Ea.
$75.00 1
$2,625.00
Pathway System
4501 U. i
$12.90 1
$5,805.00
Picnic Shelter t
11
Ea.
$35,000.00
$35,000.00
Picnic Tables/Sites it
5i Ea. i
$850.00
$4.250.00
Playground
11 Ea.
; $25,000.00
$25,000.00
Basketball Court !
t
Ea.
j
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
Backstop i
11
Allowance
$4.500.001
$4,500.00
Restroom Budding
11
a.
1 $85,000.00
$85,000.00
Misc. Improvements i
11
Allowance
1 $20,000.00
$20.000.00
I
!
! Subtotal
i
$403,780.00
Add Contingency Q 1096
f
I
$40,378.00
Total Construction Cost
f
$444,158.00
Add Sates Tax 7.75% ;
—
—
$34,42225 1
Add A/E Fees (a? 10% '
I
i t
$44,415.80
1 Site Acquisition ;
SiAc.
$100,000.00 j
$500,000.00
1
TOTAL PROJECT COST
, !
$1,022,996.05
I
I Ll
Page 5
r
Name: Westgate Park (Proposed)
i
i
i
Type: INeighborhood Park (
I
1
I
Size: 22.0 Acres !
!
I
t
1
Unit i
Total 1
Impact
i I Improvements Quantity
Units I
Price
Cost I
Fees
I
_
Street Improvements NIC
i
Clearing/Grading NIC
On -Site Drainage i
11 Allowance ;
$25,000.00 !
525.000.00 1
$20,000.00
Irrigation System 1NIC
1
I
C
Irrigation System (Misc)
1,
Allowance ;
525.000.00
$25,000.00
$20.000.00
Electrical Service
1
Allowance
$25,000.00
$25.000.00
525.000.00
Site Lighting
101
Poles i
53,000.00
$30,000.00
$30.000.00
Sewer Service
2001
U
$14.501
$2,900.00
$2,320.00
Water Service
2001
Lf.
$12.50 ;
$2,500.00
$2,000.00
Drinking Fountain ;
1
Ea. !
$700.001
$700.00
5560.00
Grading/Seeding 'NIC
!
i
iGrading/Seeding (Misc) I
31
Ac. I
S11,500.00 1
$34,500.00
$27.600.00
Trees i
1501
Ea. 1
$200.001
$30.000.00
$30.000.00
Shrubs 1
1501
Ea. I
$75.00
511,250.00
$11,250.00
Pathway System 1
1,400
Lf. 1
$12.901
$18,060.00
$18,060.00
Parking I
351
Spaces 1
$400.00 j
$14,000.00
$11,200.00
Picnic Tables/Sites
101
Ea. 1
$850.001
$8,500.00
$8.500.00
Playground
11
Ea. 1
$35.000.00
$35,000.00
535.000.00
Tennis Courts
31
Ea. I
$21.000.00
$63,000.00
$63.000.00
_
Paved Court i
11
Ea.
.001
$18,000.00
$18,000.00
(Backstop i
2T—Ea.
$4,500.001
$9.000.001
$7,200.00
! Restroom Building
1
Ea. j
595.000.00 1
$95.000.00
$76.000.00
Park Furniture j
11
Allowance ;
$15,000.00 '
$15,000.00
$15,000.00
Misc. improvements "•
11 Allowance i
575,000.00 i
$75,000.00
$75,000.00
Subtotal i
---T—
$537,410.K[--$495.690.00
Add Contingency @ 5%
$26,870.50
$24,784.50
Total Construction Cost
;
$564,280.50
$520.474.50
I
;
Add Sales Tax 7.75%
I
!
$43,731.74
$40,336.77
Add A/E Fees Q 10%
I
$56.428.05
$52,047.45
Site Acquisition
51
Ac.
$100,000.00
$500,000.00
$500.000.00
TOTAL PROJECT COST
;
i
$1,164,440.29
$1,112,858.72
i
Note: 1 of 2 baseball fields are credited to non-resident demands. Since site is a
Neighborhood Park, 80% are creditied to impact fees.
i
Page 6
Name: Henry Glaves Park
I
E
Type: Neighborhood Park
Size: 15.0 Acres
f
Unit
Total Impact
I Improvements I Ouantity Units i
Price
Cost Fees
'Upgrade Irrigation System
It Allowance
$8.000.00 i
$8.000.00 i
Trees
151 Ea.
3200.00
53,000.001
I Pathway System 1
2.5001 Lt.
$12.901
332,250.00
Upgrade Playground
11 Allowance
$4,000.00
$4,000.00
Backstop
11 Allowance
$4.500.00
$4.500.00
Fencing
1501 I.J.
S12.00
$1.800.00 '
Subtotal
$53.550.00
Add Contingency @ 5%
$2.677.50
Total Construction Cost
I I
1
$56.227.50
!
I
!
Add Sales Tax 7.75%154.357.63
'
Add A/E Fees @ 10% !
!
{
$5.622.75 .
j
,
t TOTAL PROJECT COST
i 1
$66,207.88
1
+
,
Page 7
r
Name: {Hale Park ! ;
Type: j Neighborhood Park
Size: 15.0 Acres !
I
Una { Total Impact
! Improvements I Quantity I Units !
Price i Cost ! Fees
{Refinish Tennis Court ; 21 Ea. i
$4.200.001 $8.400.001
1 I I
i
TOTAL PROJECT COST i
58,400.00
1 I
Page 8
wM--1
Name: Lincoln Park (Proposed)
!
1
Type: ! Neighborhood Park 1
i
!
1
Size: 3.0 Acres
1
Unit
Total Impact
! Improvements Duanity
i
Units ;
Price
Cost I Fees
I
i
i
i
gearing/Grading
31
Ac.
$6,500.001
$19.500.001
Irrigation System
2!
Ac. i
$15,000.00
$30,000.00
Electrical Service
1 I Allowance
58,000.00
$8.000.00
Site Lighting !
51
Poles
$3.000.001
$15,000.00
Sewer Service 1
20011
U. !
$14.501
$2.900-001
(Water Service 1
200i
Lt. !
$12.501
$2,500.00
!Drinking Fountain
1.
Ea.
$700.001
$700.00
Grading/Seeding ,
2.51
Ac. 1
$11,500.00 1
$28.750.00
Trees
301
Ea.
5200.001
$6.000.001
Shrubs
301
Ea.
$75.001
$2,250.001
Pathway System
3001
Lf.
$12.901
$3.870.00
' Picnic Shelter
11
Ea.
$35.000.00
$3!,000.00
Picnic Tables/Sites !
41
Ea.
$850.00 1
$3,400.00
Playground
1 I
Ea.
$35.000.00 ,
535,000.00
Basketball Court 1
1i
Ea. !
$25,000.00 I
$25,000.00 1
Restroom Building !
1 l
Ea.
$85,000.00 1
$85,000.00
1
$302,870.00 1
d Contingency Q10%
$30,287.00
tal Construction Cost
,
$333,157.00
Vbtotal
dSalesTax 7.75961
i
$25.819.67d
A/E Fees @ 10%
;
1
$33,315.70
e Acquisition
31
Ac.
$100,000.00
$300,000.00TAL
PROJECT COST
,
$692.292.37 1
i
1
Page 9
r
Name: jCochran Park (Proposed)
Type: 'Neighborhood Park
I
I
I
Size: 130.0 Acres
i
I
Unit
Total I Impact
Improvements
! Quantity !
Units
_
Price
Cost I Fees
1Street Improvements
! 9001
U.
$95.50
$85.950.00
TClearing/Grading
; NIC
_
Lake Formation
; 1
Allowance
$75,000.00 i
$75.000.00
Onsite Drainage
i t I
Allowance
$35,000.00_!
535.000.00
Irrigation
Irrigation System (Misc)
jNIC 1
I 1 I Allowance j
_
$2570-00-0-01
$25,000.00 ;
Electrical Service
1 f 1
Allowance I
$45.000.00 1
$45.000.00 1
Site lighting
i 20
Poles I
53.000.00
560,000.00 j
ISewer Service
5001
U.
$14.501
$7.250.001
Water Service
j 5001
U. 1
$12.501
$6.250.00
Drinking Fountain
i 41
Ea. i
$700.001
$2.800.00
(Grading/Seeding
!NIC
(Grading/Seeding (Misc)
! 31
Ac
$11.500.00
534.500.00
jTrees
1501
Ea.
5200.00 !
530,000.00 j
Shrubs
; 1501
Ea.
$75.001
$11,250.00
Groundcover
40.0001
Sf. i
_
$1.701
568.000.00
Pa.hway System
Parking
5.3001
75
U.1
Spaces
$1 2-90 1
5400.00
$68.370.00
$30.000.00
Special Paving Area
5.000
St.
$2.50
$12.5.00
00
Picnic Tables/Sites
151
Ea.
5850.00
$12.750.00
Playground
11
Ea. j
535.000.00
Basketball Court
! 11
Ea. i
_$35.000.00
$25,000.00 1
$25.000.00
Tennis Courts
31
Ea. j
$21,000.00 j
$63,000.00
(Restroom Building
; 11
Ea.
$100,000.00 i
$100.000.00
!Park Furniture
_
11 Allowance I
$15,000.00 ;
$15,000.00
Misc. Improvements
1 1
Allowance
$75,000.00 !
$75.000.00
i
I
Subtotal
$922.620.00
Add Contingency Q 5% I
$46,131.00
j Add A/E Fees @ 10% i i i i 596,875.10
Site Acquishon i 51 Ac. 5100,000.00 j S500.000.00
r
TOTAL PROJECT COST 1 $1,540,704.30
Page 10
r
Name: JVInewood Park i
i
1
Type: ;Neighborhood Park
Size: 16.0 Acres
f
�
i
Unit l
Total Impact
Ir:provements Quantity ;
Units
Price 1
Cost Fees
Upgrade Irrigation }
101
Ac. !
52;000.00 (
$20,000.00 i
Site Lighting i
81
Poles
$3.000-001
$24.000.00 i
Trees
251
Ea. 1
S200-001
$5.000.0^
Pathway System 1
1.2501
U. 1
$12.901
$16,125.00
Playground (upgrade) 1
11 Allowance
53.000.00
$3.000.00
New Backstop ;
11 Allowance 1
$7.000.001
$7,000.00
Park Sign 1
1
Allowance
$3.000.001
$3,000.00
,Misc.Improvements
1
Allowance
$17.800.00
$17,800.00
Subtotal
I
$95.925.00 '
} }Add Contingency Q 10%
$9.592.50
To Construction Cost
i
I
$105,517.50
i
!
Add Sates Tax 7.75% '
1
58.177.61
Add A/E Fees j§_1 —0%
i
$10.551.75
TOTAL PROJECT COST
j
S124,246.86
I
Page 11
r-
Name: (American Legion Park!
I
Type: I Neighborhood Park I;
{
Size: 16.0 Acres
I
j
Una
Total Impact
I i Improvements I Quantity ,
Units I
Price i
Cost { Fees
Upgrade Irrigation I
31
Ac. I
$2.000.00 !
$6.000.00 i
Add Parking I
25i
Spaces i
5400.00
S10,000.00 1
Playground
11
Allowance !
$55.000.00
555.000.00 i
Basketball Court I
1 I
Allowance !
S25.000.00 1
$25,000.00
ReSnish Tennis Courts i
3i
Ea. 1
$3.900.001
$11,700.00 1
Mist. Improvements
1
Allowance I
525,000.00 ,
$25,000.00
I
!
!
f
Subtotal
$132,700.00 1
Add Contingency @ 10%
$13.270.00 1
'Total Construction Cost
$145,970.00 I
' Add Sales Tax 7.75%
I
1
$11,312.681
Add A/E Fees @ 10% .
i
$14,597.00 !
TOTAL PROJECT COST
!
$171,879.681
i
i
I
i
Page 12
F -
Name Blakely Park 1
i
!
Type: Neighborhood Park
l
Size: 10.0 Acres
i
i
—!
1 �—
Unit
Total I Impact
Improvements Ouantity ; Units
Price
cost 1 Fees
i
I
Upgrade Irrigation System !
1 I Allowance
$5,000.00 '
$5,000.00 ;
Special Paving Area j
2,5001 Sl.
$2.50 j
$6.250.00
Picnk: Shelter !
11 Allowance
$35,000.00
335.000.00
Picnic Tables/Sites ;
51 Ea.
$850.00
$4,250.00
Basketball Court
1 ! Allowance
$25,000.00 I
$25,000.00
Misc. Improvements I
t i Allowance j
S20,000.00J
$20,000.00 1
1
!
4
Subtotal
I !
$95,500.00
Add Contingency @ 10%
j
$9,550.00 !
Total Construction Cost
$105,050.00 j
1
!
k
Add Sales Tax 7.75%
1
$8,141.38
Add A/E Fees @ 10%
$10,505.00
TOTAL PROJECT COST
FT
$123,696.38 i
-I
'
I
Page 13
r
Name: iKettleman Lane Park
i
Type: , Neighborhood Park
Size: 5.0 Acres
Unit i
Total
i Impact
1 Improvements :. Quantity i
Units I
Price
Cost i
Fees
Clearing/Grading I
5i
Ac. !
$6.500.00 1
532.500.00
i 532,500.00
I On -Site Drainage
_
11
Allowance j
55.000.00 1
$5.000.001
$5.000-00
Irrigation System4
Ac.
$15,000.00 '
$60.000.00
560,000.00
Electrical Service i
11
Allowance
$5.000.00 1
$6,000.00
$5,000.00
Street Improvements
U.
595 50
528.650.00
; 528,650.00
Site Lighting
41
Poles 1
$3.000-001
$12,000.00 1 $12,000.00
Sewer Service +
2001
U.
$14.50 !
$2.900.00 1 $2.900.00
Water Service I
200 i
U.
312.54
$2.508.-007—$2.508.00
Grading/Seeding I51
Ac.
S11,500.001
$51,750.00
551,750.00
Trees
751
Ea I
S20Q001
$15,000.001 315,000.00
Shrubs75
Ea. 1
5.001
$5,625.001 $5,625.00
Pathway System i
1,5001
U. I
$12.90.
$19,350.00 1 $19,350.00
1 Picnic Tables/Sites
51
Ea.
$850-001
$4,250.00 ! $4.250.00
Playground !
1 i
Ea
525.000.00 1
$25.000.00
525,000.00
Tennis Courts
21
Ea
$21.000.00 1
$42,000.00 j $42,000.00
Paved Court
1 i
Ea ,
$18,000.00 1
$18.000.00
518.000.00
Backstop I
t i
Ea.
$4,500.001
54,500.00
; $4.500.00
Restroom Budding i
1
Ea
$75,000.00 1
$75,000.00 1 $75.000.00
Park Furniture +
1
Allowance
55,000.00E
$5,000.00 i $5,000.00
rMisc.Improvements y
11
Allowance
520,000.001
$20.000.001 $20.000.00
I
Subtotal j
(
$434,033.00
$434.033.00
Add Contingency @ 10%
i
f
$43,403.30 ; $43,403.30
Total Construction Cast
r
,
$477.436.30 5477,436.30
1 I
1
!
Add Sales Tax 7.75%1
1
j
$37,001.31 i 537,001.31
IAM A/E Fees @ 10% 1
j
$47,743.63
i $47,743.63
Site Acquisition 1
51
Ac.
$100.000.00 1
$500,000.00 i $500,000.00
TOTAL PROJECT COST
1
$1,062,181.24
$1,062,181.24
Page 14
Name: Village Street Paik (Proposed)
t
!
Type: Neighborhood Park
!
i
Size: 2.0 Acres
,
i
Unit ►
Total I Impact
j !Improvements ! Quantity ;
Units
Price
cost Fees
'gearing/Grading
2!
Ac.
$6.500.001
$13,000.00 i
Irrigation System i
1.51
Ac. !
515,000.00 i
$22,500.00
Grading/Seeding
1.5i
Ac.;
511,500.00 {
$17,250.00 i
Trees
35T --Ea
►
$200.001
$7,000.00
Pathway System I
1001
U.
$12.901
$1,290.00
Parking j
lo!
Spaces
$400.001
54,000.00
Picnic Tables/Sites
2!
Ea
$850.001
$1,700.00 i
Playground
t ,
Ea
$15,000.00
$15.000.00
Tennis Courts21
Ea
521,000.00 (
$42,000.00
'Paved Court
1'.
Ea !
$18.000.00 I
$18,000.00 '
Mist Improvements
It Allowance ,
$5,000.00 ►
$5,000.00
'
'
1
j Subtotal
I
$146,740.00 i
►Add Contingency @ 596
i
!
$7,337.00 i
Total Construction Cost
i,
}
$154,077.00 f
Sales Tax 7.75%
;
$11,940.97
Add A/E Fees @ 10% .
;
515,407.70 j
pAdd
Site Acquisition i
2+
Ac. ►
$100,000.00
$200,000.00
ill TOTAL PROJECT COST5381,425.67
—
Page 15
�"i
91 96ed
J
9Z'Ets'bt64
: 9Z'£ts'1•t6S
!
i
iSOO 103t`OUd -Id1Oi
00'000'009S
1001000'OOSS
00'000'00ts
'3b
!S
uolllslnb3yev.S.
1 %0t & Sae -4 3/d PPVi f
6iZ8Z'LZS
1 6t'ZOZ'LZS
t
I %SL'L xel SaleS PLA i i
i
t
5Z'8Z0'ZSES
SZ'9Z0'ZS£S
i
1SOa u0113niisuo0 teioi
SZ'E9L'9tS
! SZ-E9L'9tS
!
%s (D- Aoua6upuo0 ppd 1
00'99Z'SE£S
00'S9Z'S£ES
I IeioiQnS
00'000'015
00'000'93
i 00.000'0ts
' 00'000'StS
00.000'Otsaouernotly
i 00000'St5
It
! aouemojlv it
siuewano,duil'3SIV4�
i emvumj )Ijfrd
I
I
OIN' Bulpple woo,isaa
00.000'sn
100'000'SZS
100-000'sZ5
1 'e3
1 t
uno0 nnlallSes'
00-000'SZS
00.000'SZ5
; 00'000'SZs
'e3
i t
( punOJ5ALId l
00'00S'8S
100'009'85
! 00"Os8s
i 'e3
IOt
I sai!S/SelgelOuoldi
001000'OtS
00'000'015
i 00'00bs
sooedS
lsz
6ul)Ped
00'OvL'L5
i 00'ObL'LS
i 06'ZtS
-n
1009
i wais!(g i(eNutiedi
00'SZ9'SS
1 001SZ9'SS
00'SLS
i 'e3
!SL
; sgni4S_
00-000'sts
i 00'000'91S
; 00.00ZS
'e3
iSL
Saa,ll
00'OSL'tSS
00.OSLISS
i 00*009'ttS
'e3
iS'v
Bulpaa$/6ulpe,O,
00'000ts
0000415
(00'OOLS
I e3
it
1 uleiunoj CxuK�a
00'OSZvs
! 00'OSZ'9S
I OS'Zts
Tl
1009
aouuaSJeleM
00.000'4ZS
1 00.000'4ZS
1 00'000'£5
�_ Salod
19
_ t 6wition ails
001000'Sts
i 00'000'StS
100.000'sts
; eaueMooy I t
eolniaS te31,p8131
00'005'19S
i 00'00S'L95
00'000'Sts
! :w
iS'4
{ we S uolieblul;
00.000'915
100.000'Sts
00'000'sts
aouemopy 1 t
_
86euve,a ev.S-upl
00'00S'Z£S
00'005'ZES
! 00'OOS'9S
ot1
�S
6ulpe,�/6w,eaq
— _
i
OIN' sivaweno,duil PaJISi
sae j
upa
a_-e,d
silun
/lviuenp ; sivawano,dw)
pedwl
i lepi
I vun
_
+
—
sa,3y 0'S :arS
- ; Ved P004,ogt4 P :adi(1
—
- j
(pasoda,d) 3,ed sMopeay� Amiue: ! :eweN
J
Name: Beckman Park
i
I
Type: Neighborhood Park
i
Size: 16.6 Acres
I
i
i
4 i
UnR T
Total ! Impact
Improvements I Quantity Units I
Price t
Cost Fees
ISke Lighting
101 Poles t
$3.000.00 j
$30.000.00
Trees
251 Ea. i
SM -00
$5.000.00
Pathway System
3,0001 U. i
$12.901
$38,700.00 1
4Restroom Building
11 Allowance i
$45.000.00 j
$45.000.00 i
,Park Sign
1 I AHowance I
S2.000.001
S2.000.00 ;
Misc. improvements I
t I Allowance
$29.000.00 j
$29.000.00
i
1
'
I (Subtotal I
—r
r
$149,700.00 ;
Add Contingency @ 10%
I
$14,970.00 1 _
Total Construction Cost
i
i
5164.670.00 1
Add Saies Tax 7.75%
j
$12,761.93 1
Add A/E Fees @ 10%
(
1
$16.467.00
TOTAL PROJECT COST
S193,898.93
i
Page 17
r
Name: IEngOlsh Oaks Commons
Type: lNeighborhood Park It
!
Size: '3.7 Acres
}
_
!
UnitI
Total impact
I Improvements : Quantity i
Units i
Price
Cost Fees
► I
i
�
I
Trees 1
2.` i
Ea.
$200.001
$5.000.00
Picnic Tables/Sites !
51
Ea. 1
5850.00 ;
$4,250.00
(Park Furniture !
t
Allowance i
S5.000-001
$5.000-001
Park Sign
1 I
Allowance !
52.000.00 !
$2.000.00
Misc. improvements
1; Allowance ;
58.000.00 ,
$6.000.00
Subtotal '—
I
$24.250.00
Add Contingency Q 10%
i
,
$2.425.00
I 'Total Constriction Cost
!
j
-i
$26.675.00 1
Add Sates Tax 7.75%;
I
52.067.31 ;
Add A/E Fees @ 10% •.
!
$2.667.5001
TOTAL PROJECT COST
531,409.81
Page 18
Name: ! Eastside Park (Proposed)
Type: Neighborhood Park
Size: 18.0 Acres
1
i
Unit !
Total
Impact
I Improvements ; Quantity
Units
Price i
Cost
Fees
!
1
'Street Improvements !
40011
U. !
$95.50;
538.200.00 1
$38.200.00
Clearing/Grading
81
Ac. i
$6.500.001
$52.000.00 1
$52.000.00
On-Site Drainage (
11 Allowance
535.000.00 1
$35.000.00 i
$35.000.00
Irrigation System i
71
Ac. !
S15.000.00
$105.000.00 !
5105.000.00
Electrical Service
1 I Allowance
535.000.00 ;
$35.000.00 {
$35.000.00
Site Lighting
10{
Poles
$3.000.001
$30,000.00 i
$30.000.00
Sewer Service
5001
Lt. -
514.50 i
57.250.00
$7.250.00
Water Service
500— U. j
$12.5-0-1,
S6,250.001
$6,250.00
Drinking Fountain
21
_
Ea.
5700.00 i
$1,400.00 1
51,400.00
_
Grading/Seeding 1
71
Ea.
511.500.00 !
$60,500.00
580.500.00
Trees
501
Ea.
$200.001
$10.000.00
510,000.00
Shrubs
501
Ea.
S75.001
S3.750.0
53,750.00
Pathway System {
1.2001
U.
$12.90 i
$15.480.00
$15,480.00
Parking
25,
Spaces_
$400.00 !
510.000.00 1
$10.000.00
Picnic Tables/Sites
5i
Ea.
5850.00 i
$4.250.00 1
54,250.00
Playground
11
Ea
535,000.00
S35.000.00 i
535.000.00
Basketball Court
t !
Ea.
$25.000.00 ;
$25.000.00 !
525.000.00
Tennis Courts
2,
Ea. i
$21,000.00
542,000.00 !
$42.000.00
Restroom Building
t i
Ea i
$85.000.00 I
S85.000•00 1
$85.000.00
Park Furniture
I
Allowance i
$15,000.00
$15,000.00 !
$15.000.00
Misc. Improvements f
1 I Allowance 1
$5.000.00 '
$5.000.00 !
55,000-00
I
Subtotal
!
i
_
$641.080.00 $641,080.00
Add Contingency @ 10%
i
i
$64.108.00 *
564,108.00
Total Construction Cost
I
$705.188.00 t
$705.188.00
I ,Add Sales Tax 7.75% ;
!
j
554,652.07 !
554,652.07
Add A/E Fees @ 1096 {
!
$70.518.80
$70,518.80
Site Acquistion t
81
Ac. !
$100.000.00
$800,000.00
$800,000.00
TOTAL PROJECT COST
1
I
$1.630.358.87
$1,630,358.87
I !
I
Page 19
Name: ;Southwest Park (Proposed)
Type: ,Neighborhood Park
Size: ,25.0 Acres I
i
1 t
1
{
!
-Un it I
Total i
Impact
Improvements I Quantity !
Units
Price
Cost
Fees
Street Improvements !
9001
I.J.
$95.50 i
585.950.00 1
585.950.00
Clearing/Grading ;NIC
jOnSite Drainage I
t 1 Allowance
$15.000.00
S15,000.00.1
515,000.00
;Irrigation System ;NIC
Electrical Service
t j
Allowance
$0.00 ;
S0.00
Site lighting
101
Poles +
S3.000.00 1
530.000.00 ;
530.000.00
Sewer Service I
5001
I.J.
$14.50 I
$7.250.00 i
$7,250.00
'Water Service ;
5001
U. i
$12.50 i
$6.250.001
$6.250.00
Drinking Fountain I
2;
Ea.
S700.001
$1.400.001
$1,400.00
Grading/Seeding jNIC
I
I
Trees !
1001
Ea. I
$200.001
520.000.00 ;
S20.000.00
(Shrubs I
75;.
Ea.
$75.00 !
S5.625.00 I
55,625.00
IPathway System
1.5001
Lt.
$12.90 i
$19.350.00 !
$19.350.00
!Parking
251
Spaces
S400.00 ,
$10.000.00 i
S10.000.00
Picnic Tables/Sites
101
Ea.
$850.00
$8.500.00 I
58.500.00
Playground
11
Ea.
$35.000.001
$35.000.001
535.000.00
IPaved Court !
11
Ea. +
$18.000.00 4
$181000.00 !
318.000.00
Restroom Building I
11
Ea
$x5.000.00 1
$85.000.00 1
585.000.00
Park Furniture i
11 Allowance i
$15.000.00 1
$15.000.00 1
515.000.00
Misc. Improvements i
11 Allowance
$25.000.00 j
$25.000.00 I
525.000.00
1
I
'
Subtotal
!
;
$387.325.00
S387.325.00
jAdd Contingency @ 5%
$19.366.25 I
$19,366.25
Total Construction Cost
i
_
$406.691.25
5406,691.25
f jAdd Sales Tax 7.75%
$31,518.57 j
531.518.57
I Add A/E Fees @ 10% j
I
$40,669.13
540,669.13
i Site Acquisition INIC
1
,
TOTAL PROJECT COST
i
$478.878.95
$478,878.95
i
I
Page 20
Name: ;Woodbridge Park (Proposed)
Type: l Community Park
–
— --
QQ----------._
Size:12Acres
---- .
--
I !
Unit I
Total
I Improvements I auantity
_
Units
Price
Cost I
_Impact
Fees
(Street Improvements
9501
LF. i
S95.501
590,725.00 i
363,507.50
igearing/Grading
201
Ac.
—
$6.500.001
5130,000.00 ;
591,000.00
iOn-Site Drainage
11 Allowance
565,000.00
$65.000.00 1
$45,500.00
'Irrigation System
[Electrical Service !
17; Ac.
1 I Allowance !
_ $15.000.00 {
$65.000.00 1
5255,000-00 !
$65.000.00 '
5178,500.00
545,500.00
Site Lighting
201
Poles
$3.000.00 I
$60,000-00 ;
S42,000.00
Sewer Service !
6001
U. T
_
$14.501
$8.700.001
$6,090.00
;Water Service I
6001
U. — S12.50 (
$7,500.00 1
$5,250.00
Drinking Fountain 1
41
Ea.
$700.001
$2,800.00
$1,960.00
'Grading/Seeding
171
Ac. 1
_
$11.500.00 i
$195.500.00
5136,850.00
Trees
1501
Ea.
S200.001
$30.000.00 ,
521,000.00
Shrubs
1001
Ea.
575.00
$7,966-051
S5,250.00
Pathway System !
2.5001
U. I
$12.90 i
$32,250.00
$32.250.00
'Parking
2251
Spaces
$400.001,
S90.000.00 ;
563.000.00
Special Paving Area
9.0001
St.
52.50 1
$22,500.00
515.750.00
IPiicnic Tables/Skes
101
Ea.
5850.00 i
$8.500-001
58.500.00
Playground '
1t
Ea.
$35.000.00 i
$35,000.00 1
$35,000.00
Tennis Courts 1
41
Ea. I
$21,000.00 1
$84,000.00
$84,000.00
Paved Court i
1 I
Ea.
$18,000.00 !
$18,000.00
518.000.00
Baseball Fields • i
SI
Ea. 1
$20,000.00 1
$100,000.00
570,000.00
Bleachers (5 row)
101
Ea.
$8.900.001
$89.000.00 i
S62.300.00
Scoreboard
51
Ea. 1
$7,500.001
$37,500.001
526.250.00
Restroom/Concession
11
Ea.
$135,000.00
5135,000.00
$94,500.00
Park Furniture
t
Allowance
$15,000.00 I
$15,000.00 I-
515.000.00
Soccer Goals I
21
Ea.
$800.001
$1,600.00 1
$1.120.00
Misc. Improvements i
11 Allowance
S100,000.00 i
$100,000.00
570,000.00
I
subtotal I
`
;
$1,686,075.00
$1,238,077.50
Add Contingency @ 6%
1
!
i
$84.303.75
$61.903.88
Total Construction Cost
$1,770,37875
$1,299,981.38
t
�
Add Sales Tax 7.75% +
i
$137,204.35
$100,748.56
Add A/E Fees @ 10%
$177,037.88
$129.998.14
Site cqu.s i
201
Ac. i
$100,000.00 1
$2,000.000.00
$2.000.000.00
!
(TOTAL PROJECT COST
!
1
$4,084,620.98
$3,530,728.07
I
i
* All other costs are included in other items.
Note: 2 of the six fields are credited to non-resident demand. Therefore, 30% i
1 iof the applicable costs are not elg;not eligible '
for impact fees
Page 21
Name: (Armory Park
i
Type: 1Communiry Park
Size: 13.2 Acres
i
j
!
Unit
Total i _Impact
► I Improvements 1 Quantity ;
_
Units
Price
Cost Fees
I i I
I
I
17errtolition
t Allowance
$25.000.00
525.000.00
Irrigation System j
31
Ac
$15:000.00 I
545,000.00 ;
'Electrical Service 1
t I
Allowance ;
$5.000.001
$5.000.00
Site Lighting 1
Si
Poles
$3.000.001
$15.000.00
Sewer Service jNIC
,water service INIC
i
!
Drinking Fountain
21
Ea. i
$700.00 i
_ $1.400.00
Grading/Seeding I
31
Am I
$11.500.00 !
$34.500.00
;Trees I
25;
Ea
$200.001
$5.000.001
Shrubs I
tol
Ea
$75.001
_ $750.001
Pathway Systerst
Revise Parking !
250(
1001
U. I
Spaces !
$12.90 t
$20 i% i
$.3.225.00 1
520.000.00 1
Special Paving Area 1
3,0001
Sf.
$2.50 1
$7,500.00
Picnic Shelter ':,
1 I
Ea
$35.00.00 1
$35.000.00 1
Picnic Tables/Sites_
10i
Ea 1
S850.00 I
$8.500.00
Playground
t I
Ea
$25.000.00
$25.000.00 '
Tennis Courts 1
21
Ea. i
$21,000.00
$42.000.00 !
Upgrade Restroom
t I Allowance ;
$20,000.00
$20.000.00 1
Park Furniture j
t t Allowance 1
55.000.00 1
$5.000-001
Miss Improvements
t I Allowance ;
$50.000.00
550.000.00 1
I
I Subtotal
j
;
I
$347,875.00
I Add Contingency @ 10%
{
f
i
$34.787.50
Total Construction Cost
j
I
$382.662.50 ►-
I
Add Sales Tax 7.75% i
1
1
529.656.34 i
1 Add A/E Fees @ 10% 1
$38.266.25 i
1 ;
I
(TOTAL PROJECT COST
I
I1
$450.585.09
Page 22
Name: ISoftball Complex i
i
Type: Community Park
Size: 7.6 Acres
i
1
i
Unit
Total _ i Impact
t Improvements (quantity i Units
Price
I Cost Fees
Upgrade Ughting
t I Allowance ;
$50.000.00
$50.000.00 j
Trees
251 Ea.
$200.00
$5.000.00
Picnic Shelter
t I Ea. 1
$35.000.00 ! $35.000.00
Park Sign
1 I Allowance 1
$2.000.00
$2.000.00
(
t
Subtotal (
!
( $92,000.00 !
Add Contingency @ 10%
I $9.200.00
Total Construction Cost
(
$101.200.00 l
�
I
IAdd Sales Tax 7.75%1
$7.843.001
Add A/E Fees Q 10%
i
$10.120.00 {
I
i
M
#TOTA:L:PROJECT COST
(
$119.163.00 I
i
Page 23
Name: IZupo Field
Type: (Community Park i
Size: j3.2 Acres
j
i
I
Unit
Total Impact
Improvements i Ouantity ! Units i
Price
Cost Fees
f I
i
Upgrade Lighting
t ! Allowance
$45,000.00
545.000.00
Upgrade Bleachers
11 Allowance 1
$65,000.00
$65.000.00
New Backstop
it Allowance I
$25,000.00
525,000.00
Outfield Fencing
5501 U. 1
smoo ,
$9,900.00
i
f
Subtotal 1
i i
$144,900.00 j
Add Contingency @ 10%
$14,490.00 i
Total Construction Cost
$159,390.00
I i
Add Sales Tax 7.75%1
;
$12,352.73
Add A/E Fees @ 10% ;
$15,939.00
r
1
TOTAL PROJECT COST
1
1
$187,681.73 1
I I
I !
Page 24
Name: I Kotu Park
Type: lCommunity Park
Size: 10.0 Acres
i
Unit i
Total +. Impact
Improvements 1 Ouantity :
Units T
Price i
Cost I Fees
Upgrade Irngatlon
1
Allowance
S15,000.00
$15,000.00 1_
Upgrade Feld Lighting 1
51
Ea. !
$4,000.00E
$20,000.00
Replace Sod
11 Allowance
55.000.00
$5.000-001
New Interior Paving i
3,2001
St.
S1.251
$4,000.00
Picnic Shelter t
1,
Ea. i
535.000.00
$35,000.00
Picnic Tables/Sites
51
Ea.
$850.00
$4,250.00 1
New Playground j
11
Ea. I
$15,000.00
$15,000.00
Refinish Tennis Courts
51
Ea.
53.900.00
$19,500.00 !
Mist. Improvements
t I Allowance
525.000.00 1
$25,000.00
Subtotal
1
$142,750.00 ,
Add Contingency @ 10%
$14.275.00 I
Total Construction Cost
!
j
$157,025.00
i
;Add Sales Tax 7.75%1
i
$12,169.44
Add A/E Fees @ 10% '
$15,702.50
TOTAL PROJECT COST
5184,896.94 1
,
Page 25
r
Name: I Lodi lake Park
Type: {Regional Park E ,
Size: ;40.0 Acres
E
I
Unit
Total Impact
{ Improvements ; Ouantity Units i
Price i
Cost Fees
i
Central Park Improv. ! 1; Allowance ,
$866.000.00 '
5866.000.00 i
Lake Pensula I 1; Allowance
5375,000.00 I
5375,000.00
13 Acre She I 1 ! Allowance i
$1,816.000.00
$1.816.000.00 !
I
i
ITOTAI PROJECT COST {
i
$3.057,000.00
Page 26
r -►
Name: iDeBenedetti Park _
Type: Community Park
—
1
--- .
Size: '45.0 Acres
- - - --- --
j
1
-
-- - - - ---
Unit i
Total 1._
Impact
Improvements Ouantity
Units
Price i
Cost
_
Fees
i
---
I
Street improvements i
1,600:--
Lt. ---
S95.501
$152,800.00 1
$76,400.00
;Gearing/Grading (1)
10;
Ac. - --_$6.500.00
i
S65.000.00
$32.500.00
;Onsite Drainages
_i i Rilowance
$65.000.00 1
$65.000.00 1
$32,500.00
.Irrigation System (1) !
10;
Ac. !
$15,000.00 I
$150,000.00 1
$75,000.00
Electrical Service j
1;
Allowance
$65,000.00
$65.000.00 t
$32,500.00
_
Site Lighting - -- 1
20
Poles --
$3.000.001
560,000.00 1
$30.000.00
Field Lighting !
61
Fields !
$65,000.00 ,
$390,000.00 ;
$195,000.00
(Tennis Lighting I
81
Ea.
$9,500.00 ;
$76,000.00 1
$38,000.00
Sewer Service 1
6001
- Lt.
$14.501
$8.700.001
$4,350.00
Water Service 1
6001
_- --
U. j
S12.501
$7,500.00 i
$3.750.00
Drinking Fountain I
41
Ea. !
$700.00 1
$2.800.001
$1,400.00
Grading/Seeding (1)
101
Ac._ ii
$11,500.00 1
$115,000.00 ;
$57,500.00
ITrees _ !
1501
Ea. 1
$200.00 !
$30,000.00 I
S15,000.00
jShrubs
1001
Ea. I
$75.00 I
$7,500.00 i
$3,750.00
Pathway System 1
2,5001
U. i
$12.901
$32,250.00
$32,250.00
,Parking 1
3001
_
Spaces i
_
S400.00 ;
$120,000.00
560,000.00
Interior Paving
7,0001
Sf.
52.50 i
$17,500.00 !
58,750.00
Picnic Shelter _ I
2!
Ea. i
535,000.00 1
$70,000.00
$35,000.00
Picnic Tables/Sites
12:
Ea. ;
$850.00 1
S10,200.00 1
$5,100.00
Playground t
11
Ea. 1
$35,000.00
$35,000.00
$17,500.00
Basketball Court
1 I
Ea '
$25,000.00 1
$25,000.00 1
$25,000.00
(Tennis Courts
81
Ea. i
$21,000.00 ?
$168,000.00 i
$84,000.00
Baseball Fields (2)
11
Ea i
$20,000.00 I
$20,000.00 ;
$10,000.00
Soccer Fields (2)
21
Ea. !
$10,000.00 1
$20,000.00 '•
$10,000.00
Bleachers (5 Row) 1
81
EA !
$8,900,00
571,200.00 1
$35,600.00
IScoreboatds I
41
EA t
$7,500.001
$30,000.001
$15,000.00
(Restroom/Concession 1
1 i
EA ;
$135.000.00
$135,000.00 1
567,500.00
Park Furniture
1 I Allowance 1
$15,000.00 I
$15,000.00 s
$7,500.00
IMisc. improvements I
11
A1lowanCe 1
$40,000.00
$40,000.00 I
$20,000,00
I
I
I
Subtotal
!
!
1
52,004,450.00 I
$1,030,850.00
Add Contigency @ 596
_
$100,22250
$51,54250
Total Construction Cost
52.104,672.50
$1.082,39250
I
i
I
Add Sales Tax 7.75%1
$163,112.12 t
$83,885,42
Add A/E Fees @ 10% 1
$210,467.25 1
$108,239.25
1 !Site Acquisition ;
101
Ac. I
$100,000.00 ,
$1,000,000.00 I
51,000,000.00
! iTOTAL PROJECT COST
1
$3,478,251.87 1
_$2,274,517.17
1
I
(1) 10 acres only; rest will be covered by another accaunt
(2) All other costs are included in other items
Note: 3 of 6 fields are credited to non resident demand.
Therefore, 5096
1 lof applicable costs are not eligible for impact fees
I
Page 27
r
Name: Salas Park
Type: Community Park I
I
Size: 26.0 Acres
Unit I Total Impact
j Improvements ! Quantity ; Units i
Price I Cost Fees
!Temp. Soccer Fields I 11 Allowance !
550,000.00 ! $50.000.00 !
TOTAL PROJECT COST !
$50.000.00 1
I l i
i
Page 28
7'
6Z abed
Ow
!
saa; loedwi i0; algl61p lou ale slsoo!
apeorldde;o y60£ 'aro;ajayl -s2uap!saj uou dq pied aq ;l!m spla!; L to Z :aloN s
1un000e jayto u! papnloui aje sisoo Jaylo IM (Z) I
I
tun000e jagioue Aq pajanoo oq IpA 1sai :/+luo saiae L (t)
£O'LZt'£69'ZS
! £t-tto'86t'£s
! !
1S0p logro8d 1V1O1! I
00'000O08S
00"000'008$
00'000'00tS
'oV 18
uoillsinbov ei!S
SS'ZSZ'ZSIS
! SL'ZS9'£OZS
I
_
I %Ot @) saa3 3/V PPV I
86'810'8115
88-o£8'L9tS
! i
I %SL'L xel SaIeS PPV
09'SZ8'ZZS'tS
OS'LZ9'9£0'ZS
I
I
ISOO uollorutsuoO 18101
WStS =
OS'4L6'%S
i
!
%S 8 AouaBu!1u03 PPV
00'Ot£'OSv'iS00'09S'6£6'tS
!
! reloAnS f
00'000'OLS
100'000'OOts
00'000'00ts
aouemoitV
! t
! sluawanadw! osrW
00'000'StS
; 00'o00'9ts
i 00'000'sts
i 03ue-oliV it
I ajn1!wnd sued1
00'009116S
00'000'S£tS ! 00'000'S£ts
i 'e3
11,
1 uo!ssaou03/woonseu
00'000US
! 00'000'0£5
! 00'009'LS
i -e3
It
! spjeogajooSl
00'008'6vS
= 00"00Z't s
1 00'006'BS
i e3
18
! (mO'd 9) Sia OMIS
00"000'tZS
00.000'0£s
100'00o'Ots
i "e3
;£
j (Z) SP!aH JGoOOS
00'000'95$
00"000'08S
100"OOo'oZS
•e3
Iv
_
(Z) sPle1d Ilegaseg
00'000'9ZtS
! 00'o00'9Zts
: 00.000'tZS
j "e3
19
sunoo S!uual `
00'000'S£S
00"000'S£s
100'000'S£S
e3
I t
pun0i61Ce1d
00'00S'BS
1 00'009'8S
I o0'os85i
.e3
lot
sells/setgelo!uold
00.000'S£S
i 00'000'9£5
00'000'S£S
-e3
(t
i ja11a4S o!uo!d
00'OSZ'Z!S
00.00S'LtS
10S'ZS
"IS
1o00'L
i Burned Joualut
00'000'ZttS
; 00.000'09tS
100'00ts
' saoedS
loot,6ursued
00'OSZ'Z£S
! 00•oSZ'Z£s
i 06-ZtS
! {7
IOOS'Z
w81sAg AemtPed.
00'OSZ'SS
OO'OOS'LS
100'91.s
i e3
Tot
=. sgtiVS
00"000'tZS
I00'000'0£S
00'OOZS
i --•e3
105t
-- SmiL
00'OS£'955
' 00.00S'08S
i 00'009'tts
TG
IL
(t) BuipaaS/6ulpwJ!
00'096't5
00'008'ZS
WOOLS
- ---'E3
;v
uletuno3 6up!uua
00'o9Z'S5
; oo'oos'[S
i os'ZtS
----11—
009
-- aa!MaS Jaleyl_
_
00"060'95100
0 L 8S
I OS'a t5
--- n
1009
ao!ivDS Jamas
00'000'LSS
• 00"OOO'LSs
100"OOS'6S
!9
6u!IU6n s!uual!
00'00S'81£S
' w-ow'SSv$
I 00"000'59$
_ _--E3
spla!3_
:L
Bu1146i1
00"000'Zvs
; 00'000'09S
; 00'000'£s
1 saiod
IOZ
- - - 6u!114Sr7 ePS1
00-009'Svs
; 00'000'99S
t 00'000'$95
aouemollV
; t
- i aouuss !eopiwe!
00'009'£LS
! 00"000'SOtS
00'000'StS --,y
IL
i (t) waiws u011e6wl'
00"009'LtS
100'000'SZS
00'000'SZS
! aouemoliV
; t
! aBEupia Ovs-u0
00"098'11,£S
100'009'9117S
1 00'009'9S
oV
4
! (t) Bu!pei!D/6uueato -
o0"OZZ'08S
~00'009'v t is —
I OS -96S -----
-- -n
100Z' t
sluawanwdwl 1aa�1S
toedwl
_1soO
Ielol
aoud
Pun
-- si!un -
---
Ai!luenp : sluawano,dwl 1
- -
- - - - -
— - sa»V 0'££! :ez!S
- - - -
---- ---- -----
- eajy asn I"dS! :adAi
-, -
---
shed /Sapnd! :aweN
Ow
-7
Name: I Lodi Lake Natural Area i
Type: Open Space
Size: 58.0 Acres
Unit
Total impact
improvements I Quantity 1 Units Price cost Fees
INone
Name: iArnaiz Property
Type: j0pen Space
Size: tt.t Acres
i
Unit ! Total impact
{ { Improvements Quantity Units i
Price ! Cost f=ees
i.Misc. Improvements 1! Allowance
S50,000.00 : 550.000.00 I
jTOTAL PROJECT COST I
550.000.00
j
I !
Page 31
400
Name: 'Park Maintenance Shop i
I
Type:
_
Size:
Unit 1
Total
Impact
I Improvements Ouantity : Units ii
Price (
Cost i
Fees
Remodel Offices 1 11 Allowance !
S55.000.00 t
555.000.00 `
_S38.500.00
Gearing/Demolhion I 1 ii Allowance 1
545.000.00 !
545,000.00 f
_ 531.500.00
Main. Shops'A' 1 3,375i St. 1
$70.00 I
$236,250.00
5165,375.00
1
Main. Shops 'B" 1,8751 St. I
$35.00
$65,625.00 ►
545.937.50
Electrical Service 1 11 Allowance 1
$65.000.00
565,000.00 1
$45.500.00
Sewer/Water Service i 1 i Allowance
535.000.00 1
535.000.00 1
524.500.00
Landscaping i 11 Allowance 1
$65.000.00
565.000.00 1
$45.500.00
Paving l 30,0001 St.
$1.25
$37.500.001
526.250.00
Fueling Station ; 21 Ea_
$12,000.00 1
524,000.00 i
516.800.00
New Fencing I 9001 Lt.
$16.50 i
$14,850.00
$10,395.00
Misc. Improvements 11 All prance j
$50.000.00 1
550.000.00 1
535.000.00
i i i
I
Subtotal! I
5693.225.001
5485,257.50
Add Contingency @ 10% !
$69.322.50 1
548.525.75
'Total Constriction Cost 1
$762.547.50 !
5533.783.25
r I i
_
I
j
Add Sales Tax 7.75%1 !
$59.097.43 !
$41,368.20
iAdd A/E Fees @ 10% 1
576.254.75 i
553.378.33
ITOTAL PROJECT COST 1 !
I
$897,899.68 1
5628,529.78
V I
Note: About 3096 of the park users are non-resident. Therefore. 70% of
1
the costs are eligible for impact fees
Page 32
a
Name: I Indoor Recreation Center
Type:
Size: 32,435 Square Feet i
Unit I Total
Impact
I Improvements 1 Quantity t Units ,
-Price Cost
Fees
!Project Costs 32.4353 SF
$110.00 53.567.850.00
$2.657,800.00
{TOTAL PROJECT COST
53,567.850.00 i
52,657.800.00
T -
Page 33
Name: ;Indoor Swimming Pool!
-Type.
',,
Size,: Square Feet
P22.000
Unit i Total impact
Improvements QuantityUnitsPrice
cost I Fees
Project Costs 22,C00 Sf.
$130.00i $2.860.000,00
1TOTAL PROJECT COST
f 52.860.000-00
Page 34
—I
Name: !Emerson Park
Type: ;Neighborhood Park
S—ize-(,3.0 Acres
-7
Unit
Total Impact
(5t -iin
Improvements IWy —IL'nils--
Price
Cost Fees
!Pathway System
3001
U.
512.90
53,87020
lRestroom Budding
ii
Ea. i
585.000.00
585.000.00
Site Ughting
81
Poles I
S3.000.001
$24.000.00
Trees
201
Ea. 1
5200.00 !
54.000.00
Fencing (4') 1
4501U.
I
6.5i.
Misc. Imprnvements
I Allowance
$25.000.00 i
525—.000.-00
I ISubtotal i
s
i
1
$141.870.00
I jAdd Contingency 9 5%
i
$7.093-50
I'Total Construction Cost
$148,963.50
I
IAdd Sales Tax 7.75% i
S11.544.67
!Add A/E Fees 9 10%
$14.896.35
TOTAL PROJECT COST
j
I
S175.404.52 i
Page 35
9E abed
S8'tbl'6E6S
(
1SO0103f Oad WiOli
1 Eb'WZ'L£S
!
%01 8 Saad 3/V PPVI
1 8 t'E06'SZS
!
I %SL'1 xel sales PPV
_ - • SZ'"6'ZL£S'i
isco uollonitsuo0 leloll
SZ'691'11S
!
%G Aouabulluo0 PPVII
00'981'99ES
i
le3olqnSli
100'000'SLS
i 001000'SLS
' eouemoily ! t
sluawanoudwt -oslyli
00'000'S1S
; 00'000'SLS
I aouemolIv It
ajnywnd >Ned
00'000'S8S
100,000,s%
! 'e3
I t
6ulppng woousaul
00'000'9ZS
100'000'SZS
'e3
(flews) punoiMeld
00'OSL'Z L
00'098S
'e3
i S t
I SOPS/salgel OWOld
001009'ZS
OS'ZS
'1S
1000't
I RON 6ulned leloadS
001000'0ZS
00'0(vS
sooedg
; 0S
6uwed (
0010t9'ttS
: 06'Z1S
_
'll
1006
( waISAS l u"Md1,
00'SZ9'ZS
00'SLS
'e3
!SC
! sgwyS
' 001000'OLS
100'OOZS
I e3
I N
saa�ll
00'00S'tlS
i 'oV
I
I 6u!pa8S/6uIpeJoI
WOOLS
00'OOLS
i 'e3
I t
ulelunod 6ul)luua
OO'OSZ'9S
i OS'Z1S
1ll
1009
aowaS Jolem
00'OSZ'LS
I OS'v1S
it
ZOOS
aovuaS James,
00'000'ZtS
1 00'0001ES
I selOd
Ib
6ul146!'l ars!
i 00'000'StS
00'000'StS
aouemollV ; t
, aolntag leouloa131
i 00'000'S1S
I off
_
Z
—i iolle6ull'
001000'S£S
: 00'000'9ES
; aouemolly 't
a6eulejq evS-u0(
00'0S
00'000'SLS
aouemolly
I uolloaloJd lueg JONUI
00'009'6tS
00'009'9S
oV
!E
! 6ulpej0/6wue9t01
Saab ]Soo
aOud
S11u(�
I Al!luen0 SluawanOldwl i
loedwi letol
I Pun
�
E
a
-----
sajoy O'E' :azlg
----
i ---
--
_
eeiyastllepadS. :adA.L
)looltanO OluaOS :aweN
L
PARK, RECREATION
CITY OF LODI ACTION SLIPl
Fon ACTON *OjCATe[T.
D w p plxw p Fw Typba
ion p R.n.md Your cm 0 For FWv
❑ comment p Was in om m p Far MWVV
p Mawr p wr cr Bwk p COW— n.,a,..wd
p M..o O Fwaft cord.ct p For Ya & m.
Lata Ob. p PWw Take caw of This p Ow aurora
PHONG
RFIAa
LODI PARKS & RECREATION
125 N. STOCKTON STREET
LODI CA 95240
PARK, RECREATION
AND OPEN
SPACE PLAN
LODI, CALIFORNIA
DRAFT PIAN
� 3
3F+� n ,.1993
City of Lodi
Park and Recreation Department
rti 125 N. Stockton Street 95240
Lodi, California
Phone (209) 333-6742
MAYOR
CITY COUNCIL
PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION
Phillip Pennino
Steve Mann
Ray Davenport
Jack Sieglock
Randy Snider
Bob Casalegno
Bob Johnson (Chairman)
Elvera Melby
Chad Meyers
Ed Nall
PARKS AND RECREATION STAFF Ron Williamson - Director
Marilyn Field -RecreationSuperintendent
Layne Van Noy - Recreation Supervisor
Michael Reese - Recreation Supervisor
Tom Alexander - Recreation Supervisor
Lisa Rudoff - Recreation Supervisor
Scott Essin - Park Superintendent
Tim McGeorge - Parks Supervisor
Frank Pepper - Parks Supervisor
Steve Virrey - Draftsman
PARKS AND RECREATION Eddie Gonzales
PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE Joe Handel
Lyle Hoyt
Bob Johnson
Tim Katzakian
Virginia Lahr
Roger Stafford
Mamie Starr
CONSULTANTS JC Draggoo & Associates
1730 SW Skyline Blvd.
Portland, OR 97221
Phone (503) 297-1045
J� 2 O
X993
T
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION
Introduction t-1
Purpose of the Plan t-1
Planning Process 1-2
SECTION 11
COMMUNITY SETTING
History
11-1
Regional Location
11-1
Planning Area
11-2
Physical Features
11-2
Climate
11-2
Population Characteristics
11-2
Land Use
11-8
SECTION III
EXISTING PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES
Introduction
111-1
City Park and Recreation Facilities
111-2
Existing Trail Systems
111-7
Other Public Facilities
III -7
Private Recreation Areas and Facilities
111-8
Nearby Recreation Resources
111-9
Summary of Sports Facilities
111-9
SECTION IV
EXISTING OPERATIONS AND SERVICES
Department Organizational Structure
IV -1
Operating Budget
IV -4
Recreation Programs
IV -10
SECTION V
PARK AND FACILITY NEEDS
Introduction
V-1
National Trends in Recreation Participation
V-1
Recreation Survey
V-3
Community Workshop Meetings
V-4
Impact of Population Growth on Recreation Demand
V-8
Alternative Approaches to Identifying Needs
V-8
Methodology of Assessing Needs
V-10
Park Land Needs
V-1 I
Specialized Facility Needs
V-24
Summary of Land and Facility Needs
V-47
r
SECTION VI RECREATION SERVICE LEVELS
Current Suppliers of Recreation Services VI -1
Recommended Service Levels for Park Facilities VI -5
Recommended Service Levels for Non Residents VI -6
Recommended Service Levels for Youth Sports VI -7
Goals and Objectives VI -8
SECTION VII DEVELOPMENT POLICIES AND STANDARDS
Mini -Parks
Neighborhood Parks
Community Parks
Regional Parks
Natural Open Space Areas
Special Use Areas
Pathways and Trails
SECTION VIII RECOMMENDATIONS
Introduction
Park Facility Plan
Natural Open Space
Trails and Pathways
Miscellaneous Outdoor Recreation Areas
Indoor Recreation Center
Administration and Management Recommendations
Park Maintenance Operations
Recreation Program & Service Recommendations
Meeting ADA Requirements
SECTION IX ACTION PLAN
VI -1
VI -1
VI -3
VI -4
VI -5
VI -6
VI -8
VIII -1
VIII -4
Vill-26
Vill-27
Vlll-29
Vili-32
VIII -36
VIII -39
VIII -41
VIII -44
Introduction
DW
Criteria for Prioritizing Projects
IX -1
Funding Sources
IX -2
Project Priorities
1X-6
Operational Impacts
IX -7
Funding Recommendations for Park Maintenance
1X-8
and Operations
JAN. 2 0 1993
F
SECTION I
INTRODUCTION
�1
SECTION I
INTRODUCTION
11MTRODUCTION
Over the years Lodi has made a major effort to meet all of the recreation needs in the
community, especially in the area of organized sports. In the past, when the City was
smaller, non -city residents were encouraged to participate in recreation programs in
order to fill the classes. Today, about 73,000 persons live in the area served by the
City's recreation program and nearly 30% of all participants live outside the city limits.
While this policy of serving all residents in the area has resulted in extremely high
participation rates, it has also created an extremely large demand for major sports
facilities and other recreation programs.
To meet this demand, nearly every park in Lodi was built to serve the needs of softball,
baseball or soccer. The result is a park system emphasizing field sports at the cost of
other more leisure activities and open space.
Lodi has met the demand for leisure activities by just building more facilities.
Unfortunately, with major budget cuts in the forecast, business will not be the same as
usual. The City can no longer maintain this level of service without some assistance by
those users who live outside the city limits.
The real issue is: can or should the City continue to provide recreation services to those
who live outside the city limits? To illustrate the impact that non-residents have on
organized sports: if the city continues its present policy to serve non-residents, six more
baseball fields, six more softball fields and 12 more soccer fields will be needed in the
next 15 years. However, if the City chooses to serve its residents only, no softball or
baseball fields will be needed and only 9 more soccer fields will be needed.
While the primary emphasis in the City has been to serve organized sports, the study
revealed a need to temper this emphasis with a more balanced approach between active
and passive recreation activities. 'Tile study also revealed an interest and need for
recreation trails and open space. It is unfortunate that many opportunities for these
types of facilities have been lost.
PURPOSE OF THE PLAN
The purpose of this plan is to identifj the recreation needs in the Lodi area, develop a
strategy for meeting these needs and establish management and operational policies for
administering the program. This is a long term 15 year guide for the City to follow.
The Ian is based on the fundamental assumption that the city will continue to serve
residents outside the city limits but within the current recreation service area (the area
within the Lodi Unified School District north of Eight Mile Road). However, the plan
also assumes that these non-residents will also pay their share of the costs.
City of Lodi Park and Reaearion Pton Introduction
P"NNL ItiG PROCESS
This plan was developed through the diligent efforts of the Park and Recreation Plan
Review Committee who spent countless hours reviewing material and suggesting
policies for future recreation services. The planning study also had considerable
community involvement via public workshop meetings, a telephone survey and direct
contacts with user groups.
az:
I-2
SECTION II
COMMUNITY SETTING
SECTION II
SETTING
HISTORY
Lodi, ongtpally known as Mokelumne, was one of the first towns in the San Joaquin
Valley. It was established in 1869 while the Central Pacific Railroad was under
construction in the Valley. Mokelumne was one of several towns that emerged along
the north -south route through the valley.
Because there were several towns in the vicinity that used the word "Mokelumne" in its
description, confusion with town names sometimes caused delays in mail deliveries. As
a result, on March 26, 1874, the Wells Fargo Company officially changed the name of
the railroad station from Mokelumne to Lodi.
There are three theories as to how the name, Lodi, originated. The first theory is that
some of the first settlers brought it with them from Illinois, duplicating a name of a city
in the eastern United States. Another theory is that the town was named after a famous
race horse of the time. The third theory is that an Italian railroad worker, involved in
the bridge construction over the Mokelumne River, made references to a similar
crossing over the Abba River in Lodi, Italy.
Like most towns in the San Joaquin Valley during that time, the Central Pacific
Railroad was an integral pan of the community. The railroad brought new settlers and
_ provided a vital transportation linkage to other communities. The original townsite was
developed along Main and Sacramento Streets on both sides of the railroad tracks. The
town was officially incorporated in 1906.
REGIONAL LOCATION
The City of Lodi is located on the northern edge
of the San Joaquin County, roughly 12 miles
north of Stockton and 34 miles south of
Sacramento. It is located on State
Highway 99, a primary north -south
rn Cal
hig way in northeifornia.
Interstate 5 is about seven
miles to the west. State
Highway 12 which travels
through Lodi, provides the
major east -west connection
between these two major
freeways. The Southern
Pacific Railroad passes
through the center of
the city and links Lodi SAN FRANCiSC
with Stockton and Sacramento.-��
v�
SACRAMENTO
City of Lod% Park and Recreation o Setrine
Lodi is located within a major agricultural area and is a center for food processing and
other related services. In fact, its service area reaches far beyond Sacramento and
Stockton. Lodi is considered to be the zinfandel capitol of the world.
PLANNING AREA
The planning area for this study includes the city limits of Lodi plus the unincorporated
lands within the City's sphere of influence. The specific boundaries of the planning
area include the Mokelumne River and the Woodbridge area on the north, a line one
half mile west of Lower Sacramento Road on the west, Armstrong Road on the south
and the Central California Traction Railroad Lines on the east. The planning area
encompasses nearly 13 square miles of land area, of which 11.8 square miles are in the
existing city limits of Lodi.
PHYSICAL FEATURES
The land around Lodi is quite flat. In fact, there is no more than 15 feet of elevation
change in the entire city. As a result, rivers like the Mokelumne tend to meander and
have a relatively slow velocity. Over the years as this river meandered back and forth
across it's floodplain it has created a wide riparian zone. Lodi Lake, which was likely an
old meander of the river, was formed when the Woodbridge Irrigation District dam was
constructed.
Because there is very little elevation change in the city, heavy rainfall tends to create
surface runoff problems. To alleviate potential flooding, large storm water retention
basins have been built throughout the community to temporarily store this runoff.
These detention basins have also become major recreation and open space areas.
CLIMATE
Lodi has a diverse climate with warm dry summers and cool wet winters. The average
summer temperatures range in the lower 80's to mid 90's and the winter temperatures
range in the low to mid 41Ys. Annual precipitation is low and averages about 16.5
inches a year. Daytime humidity ranges from 45 to 60percent. In the late
afternoon/early evening, westerly winds from the San Francisco Bay effectively cool the
area and are referred to as "the Delta breeze Because of its low elevation, extensive
fog conditions often occur for several months in the winter.
POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
According to the U.S. Census, the City's 1990 population was placed at 52,874 persons.
This is a 51% increase from the 1980 population of 34,300 and has been fairly steady
over the 1980 decade. While a 5% population growth trend is expected to continue in
the region, Lodi has placed a 2070 growth restriction on new development which will
effectively reduce its future growth rate.
11-2 .W1. 2 G 1993
do
Table 1 below shows population growth for the City of Lodi as well as for Sant Joaquin
County since 1970. While the population growth rate in Lodi was less than the County
as a whole between 1970 and 1980, Lodi showed a faster rate than the County between
1980 and 1990.
Table 1
Historical Population Growth 1970-1990
City of Lodi
Year
City of Lodi
Population % increase
San Joaquin County
Population % Increase
1970
28,614
219,073
1980
34,300 19.8%
347,342 S8.6%
1990
51,874 51.2%
480.623 38.4%
Source: Lodi Planning Department
San Joaquin County Planning Department
Table 2 below, shows the population growth of Lodi by year for the 1980 decade. As
can be seen, the greatest rate of increase occurred in 1986-1988.
Table 2
Population Growth 1980-1990
City of Lodi
Year
Population
% Change
1980
34.300
1981
35.670
4.0%
1982
37.002
3.7%
1983
38,340
3.6%
1984
40.074
4.S%
1985
41.300
3.1%
1986
43.300
4.8%
1987
45.800
5.8%
1988
49.221
7.5%
1939
50,213
2.0%
1990
51,874
3.3%
Source: California State Department of Financial Management
The demographic profile for Lodi indicates an older population with less people in the
under 18 age group. This characteristic is demonstrated in Table 3 on the next page.
1
r
f Lodi Park and Recreation Plan
SerdAr
Table 3
10.9%
Age Distribution 1990
4.8%
City of Lodi/San Joaquin County
3.9%
San Joaquin
City of
County
Lodi
Under 18 29.6%
25.2%
19-64 59.3;1
59.1%
Over 65 11.1%
15.7%
Median Age 31.0
36.0
Source: 1990 U.S. Census
8.0%
A specific age breakdown of the population profile is shown below. As previously
noted, Lodi as compared to San Joaquin County has a higher percentage of population
over the age of 65 and a lower population under the age of 18.
Table 4
Population Age Breakdown 1990
City of Lodi
ategory Percentage
0-5
9.4%
6-13
10.9%
14-17
4.8%
18-20
3.9%
21-24
5.8%
25-34
18.2%
35-44
14.2%
45-54
9.7%
55-64
7.9%
65-74
7.7%
75+
8.0%
Source: 1990 U.S. Census
11-4
1
/EXHIBIT C/
City of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Settinf
An analysis of population age profiles is important because age is a major determinant
of recreation Participation levels and interests. In general, the older the Qopulation, the
less they are likely to participate in active or competitive recreation activities. Overall,
youth tend to participate more frequently than other age &roues and tend to favor
activities that are more active and competitive in nature. "[itis would include activities
such as basketball, baseball, soccer, swimming, bicycling, etc. Young adults (ages 18-
35) are also active people and form the core of adult competitive sports.
Adults (ages 35-65) on the other hand, appear to have less time to devote to
recreational activities. They tend to be more concerned about maintaining a home and
a job. Recreational time is at a premium and often limited to weekends and occasional
evenings. The senior age population have more available time once they approach
retirement. They tend to favor more passive activities such as walking, gardening,
picnicking and crafts.
Population Growth
In most communities, one of the primary elements that affects future recreation
demand is population growth. Unlike many communities, Lodi has placed a limitation
on residential growth at 2% per year. This amounts to about 1,000 persons per year.
Based on this growth rate, saturation of the planning area will occur in the year 2007
and have a total city population of about 72,000 persons.
However, while the City continues to limit its growth rate, the Department of Parks and
Recreation is serving a much larger area. Currently, the policy oftheDepartment is to
serve people who live within the boundaries of the Lodi School District excluding those
who reside south of Eight Mile Road. This is called the Lodi Recreation Service Area.
According to the Lodi Unified School District, this resident population living outside
the city limits represents about 19,800 people.
The San Joaquin County Community Development Department has forecasted that by
the year 2010 the population of the recreation service area living outside the city limits
of Lodi will only grow by,approximately 1,800 persons. It is our opinion that without
growth controls in place in thhe County, but within Lodi itself, the rate of growth in the
other communities will be substantially Iarger than what has been forecasted. Based on
this assumption we make the following population forecast:
9199,1
11-5 pyR•
City n!I odi Park and Recreation Plan Sewing
An analysis of population age profiles is important because age is;a major determinant
of recreation participation levels and interests. In general, the older the population, the
less they are likely to participate in active or competitive recreation activities. Overall,
youth tend to participate more frequently than other age groups and tend to favor
activities that are more tive and competitive in nature. This would include activities
such as basketball, base soccer, swimming, bicycling,.etc. Young adults (ages 18-
35) are also active peopi d form the core of adult competitive sports.
Adults (ages 35-65)on the 11:r hand, appear to have ,fess time to devote to
recreational activities. The d to be more concerned about maintaining a home and
a job: Recreational time is a remium and often limited to weekends and occasional
evenings. The senior age po tion have more available time once they approach
retirement. They tend to favo re passive activities such as walking, gardening,
picnicking and crafts. J
Population Growth'
In most communities, one of the elements that affects future recreation
demand is population growth. Unli ny communities, Lodi has placed a limitation
on residential growth at 2% per ye z is amounts to about 1,000 persons per year.
Based on this growth rate, satura *or the planning area will occur in the year 2007
and have a total city population of 72,000 persons.
However, while the City cont
Recreation is serving a much
serve people who live within
who reside south of Eight Mi
this resident population living
Based on this information, th
ties. 'o 1i ' n its growth rate, the Department of Parks and
1 rer are �'�'.Currently, the policy of the Department is to
;e undaies of the Lodi School District excluding those
Aoad. According to the Lodi Unified School District,
5utside thelcity limits represents about 19,800 people.
following p'*Iation forecast is made:
City of
1992
53,186
`+z 73,000
1993
54,250x,
75,200
1994
55,335:.
77,500
1995
56,441
79,800
1996
57,570
•. 82,200
1997
58,722
84,200
1998
59,896
87,200
2007
72,000
113,800
Source: California Department of Finance
JC Draggoo & Associates
WIN
r
Ca 4f Lodi Park and Recreation Paan Setting
Population Forecast
Lodi Planning Area and Service Area
Year City Unincorporated
Total Service
Area
A-
1992 53,186 19,800
1
73,000
1993 54,250 20,400
74,650
1994 55,335 21,000
76,330
1995 56,441 21,640
78,080
1996 57,570 22,280
79,850
1997 58,722 22,950
81,670
1998 59,896 23,640
83,540
2007 72,000 (1) 30,850 (2)
102,850
Source: California Department of Finance
JC Draggoo & Associates
(1) Based on a 2% growth rate
(2) Based on a 3% growth rate
Labor Force
An analysis of the labor force in Lodi reveals that the largest class of employment type
is in the retail trade followed by manufacturing. This suggests
that Lodi is a ma or
market center for the region even though Stockton is close by.
A breakdown oto
employment classifications is listed below.
Table 5
Employment Classification 1990
City of Lodi
Type Percentage
Retail/Trade
24.7%
Manufacturing
211.9%
Professional Services
17.9%
Misc. Services
8.S%
Mining/Construction
6.8%
Finance/Insurance/Heal Estate
5.2%
Transportation/Utiliites
4.9%
Wholesale Trade
3.9%
Unclassified
2.6'%
Agricultural/Forestry
2.1%
t ..� Business Services
t
1.5%
C X993
11-6
�(L
F -
City
of Lodi Park and Recrearion Plan Serrine
Labor Force
An analysis of the labor force in Lodi reveals that the largest clasf employment type
is in the retail trade followed by manufacturing. This suggests t Lodi is a mayor
market center fQr the region even though Stockton is close by breakdown of
employment cl ,,. ications is listed below.
Table 5
Employment Classificatio
City of Lodi
Retail rade a
24.7X.
Manufa ring
21.9%
Protessi 1 Services
17.9%
Misc. Se es
8.5%
Mining/CO ctio
6.8%
Finance/ins nce' I Estate
5.2%
Transportatlo'es
4.9%
Wholesale Tra ;'
3.9%
Unclassified
2.6%
,
Agricultural
2.1%
Business , . cel
1.5%
990 U.S.
Lodi income levels ai' -roughly the same astthe rest of San Joaquin County. The 1990
average median h _ hold income in Lodi vias 530,635, compared to $30,739 for the
County. Income . Is are important clues in'��ecreation platuttng because higher
income popula tend to be more active andparticipate m the more expensive types
of recreation ties. `
UND U
Ile form of the city consists of a gridiron pattern 6f large "superblocks" defined
by arterial streets. These streets are generally located on section lines that
fo major dividing points during the subdivision process:.
core or central business district of Lodi is Iocated generally -in the center of the city
t west of the railroad tracks and north of Lodi Avenue. In addition to commercial
uses in the downtown, major shopping centers, additional office space and high density
housing are found along the major traffic corridors in the city. A significant amount of
1
r
Ciry of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan _ Setdnr
Lodi income levels are roughly the same as the rest of San Joaquin County. The 1990
average median household income in Lodi was 530,635, compared to 530,739 for the
County. Income levels are important clues in recreation planning because higher
income populations tend to be more active and participate in the more expensive types
of recreation activities.
LAND USE
The basic form of the city consists of a gridiron pattern of large "superblocks" defined
by major arterial streets. These streets are generally located on section lines that
formed major dividing points during the subdivision process.
The core or central business district of Lodi is located generally in the center of the city
just west of the railroad tracks and north of Lodi Avenue. In addition to commercial
uses in the downtown, major shopping centers, additional office space and high density
housing are found along the major traffic corridors in the city. A significant amount of
land is devoted to industrial uses. This type of land is primarily concentrated along the
railroad and east of Highway 99.
As might be expected, the majority of land in the city is devoted to sin&le family
housing. The next largest category of land uses is undeveloped land still used for
agriculture purposes. A breakdown of the land use in the planning area is shown below.
Table 6
Distribution of Land Uses -1987
Lodi Planning Area
Land Use Acres Per Cent
Single Family
2,131
31%
Multiple Family
334
5%
Commercial
369
5%
Office
65
1%
Industrial
584
9%
Public/Quasi Public
830
12%
Detention Basins/Parks
366
5%
Agriculture
1,553
23%
Vacant
so
8%
Total
6,795
Source: City of Lodi Planning Department
11-7
ppR.
9190
r
Cry of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan etrinY
land is devoted to industrial uses. This type of land is primarily concentrated along the
railroad and east of Highway 99.
As might be expected, the majority of land in the city is denoted to single family
housing. Tice next largest category of land uses is undeveftQeed land still used for
agriculture purposes. A breakdown of the land use in the'planning area is shown below.
Table 6
Distribution of Land
Lodi Planninc
Single Family
f 2.131
Multiple Family
334
Commercial
369
Office
65
Industrial
584
Public/Quasi Public
830
Detention Basins/ .
s 366
Agriculture
t, 1,553
{ Vacant
�. Total.
; 563
6,795
Source: C' f Lodi
Planning bepartn
-1987
31%
5%
5%
1%
9%
12%
s%
23%
8%
r
r
SECTION III
EXISTING PARK AND
RECREATION FACILITIES
1
SECTION III
EXISTING PARK AND
RECREATION FACILITIES
INTRODUCTION
Listed below is a summary of public park and recreation facilities located within the
Lodi area. This includes lands owned by San Joaquin County and the City of Lodi.
Table 7
Sur n.:.a:; of Park and Open Space Areas
Lodi Maia Ing Area
` Special use areas include misceganeous sites that do not fit into any other category. They
often include sites such as small landscaped parcels. sports field complexes, specialized
single purpose areas and land occupied by major recreation structures.
Note: Micke Grove is a major County regional park site but is located just outside the planning area
For this reason is is not counted in the above inventory.
111- 1
JAN. 2 0 1993
No. of
Park Areas and Facilities
Acres
Sites
City Parks and Facilities
Mini -Parks
2.7
2
Neighborhood Parks
83.2
11
Community Parks
36.0
2
Regional Parks
43.0
1
Natural Open Space Areas
58.0
1
Special Use Areas
42.3
6
Undeveloped Parkland
68_¢
A
Total City Park Land
333.8
27
County Park Sites
Neighborhood Parks
2.0
1
Total County Park Land
-a
1
TOTAL PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
335.8
28
` Special use areas include misceganeous sites that do not fit into any other category. They
often include sites such as small landscaped parcels. sports field complexes, specialized
single purpose areas and land occupied by major recreation structures.
Note: Micke Grove is a major County regional park site but is located just outside the planning area
For this reason is is not counted in the above inventory.
111- 1
JAN. 2 0 1993
r
ca gf Lodi Parte end Rrcna . n n Erh no Pant and "--- rion - 'liti�r
CITY PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES
A unique circumstance in Lodi is that most parks are located along major arterial
streets. In most communities neighborhood parks are located within a neighborhood so
that it is easy to walk to them. In general, the parks seem to be rather evenly
distnbuted throughout the community. Nine of the park sites are actually storm water
detention basins. In the summer months, these basins function quite nicely as park
areas but in the winter and spring months when rains occur, they are considered unsafe
and fenced off from public use.
Nearly all of the parks are intensely developed and designed primarily for organized
sports. Lodi Lake Park and the Lodi Lake Nature Area are the exception.
Table 8
Summary of City Park Sites Owned by the
City of Lodi
Site
Acres
ActivityjFacititles
DEVELOPED PARKS
American Legion Park
6.0 Acres
4 lighted tennis courts,
Playground area,
restrooms. meeting room
Armory Park
3.2 Acres
t lighted softball field,
restrooms, concession
bulk1kV
Beckman Park
16.6 Acres
-r-df*"
24.ittie L.eeguollelds.
2 soccer field. QQsur coesse,
playground r9i000ms.
picnic area T
Candy Cane Park
0.2 Acres
Playground . e&f
Century Park
2.5 Acres
Basketball court,
playground .Q"#*
Emerson Park
3.0 Acres
Little League field. seeeer-
iieiif, restroon'4A
playground, %.up picnic
area, horseshoe pits
English Oaks Park
3.7 Acres
Playground, picnic area
111-2
r
CM of C2d Pgnr and Recreation Plan Existing Park and Recreation Facilitret
Grape Bowl
1S.0 Acres
Lighted football stadium,
lighted softball fields (2),
fieldhouse, restrooms,
concession building,
parking area
Hale Park
3.1 Acres
2 lighted tennis courts,
lighted basketball court.
meeting room. horseshoe
pits, parking area Pc.►o
Henry Giaves Park
15.0 Acres
2 soccerfie[¢
playgrouZ..'res ooms,
picnic area. par course
Hutchins Street Square
12.0 Acres
fine Arts building,
theater, muitl-use roomr
senior complex. indoor
swimming pool, child
care facility. 2 basketball
courts, soccer field, x I
sand volleyball court#,
handball court, picnic
area Oe --#O Ise F.o
John Blakely Park
10.0 Acres
Swimming pools (2),
Lillie League field,
baseball field
playgroundgroup picnic
area. basketball court,
horseshoe pits,
rewooms
Kofu Park
10.0 Acres
Lighted baseball field,
lay kfa Little league field. lighted
soccer field. S lighted
tennis couit%.0
ptayground. cnlc area,
restrooms, meeting room
tawerence Park
28 Acres
Group picnic
dog exercise area
111-3
it
_ Cif U4 i, Park and Rerxradm Plan
Ezisane Park and Recrmaon Faciliriet
Lodi Lake Park
43.0 Acres
Beach swimming area,
boat rentals, RV camping
areas. horseshoe pits,
playground area,&
restrooms, Discovery
Nature Center, group
picnic areas, dog
exercise area, boat ramp,
parking
Lodi Lake Nature Area
58.0 Acres
Nature traits, wetlands
area, amphitheater
Park and Recreation Office
1.3 Acres
Administrative Office
Softball Complex
7.6 Acres
2 lighted softball fields,
concession stand,
restrooms, picnic areas,
parking area
Acres
/
Lighted field,
Samuel Salas Park
26.0
3 softball
i lighted baseball fields, 3
lighted soccer fields.
playground area, group
picnic area, horseshoe
pits, restroomf
concession building
Tony Zupo Feld
3.2 Acres
Lighted baseball fold,
batting cage, concession
stand, restrooms
Van Buskirk Park
1.0 Acres
Playground area, multi-
use field
Vinewood Park
16.0 Acres
Softball field, Little
League fteld, 3 soccer
fields, restroomsdog
exercise area
Westgate Park
6.0 Acres
Playground area, open
lawn area
TOTAL DEVELOPED PARKS
265.2 Acres
111-4
i
CI& or 1 oX Fwk and Recreation Plan Fri coin j_Pa* and Mmadm Foctr s
UNDEVELOPED PARKS
Ed DeBenedetti Park 29.0 Acres
Lake Park West 13.0 Acres
Maple Square .6 Acres An old fire station site
Pixley Park 26.0 Acres
TOTAL UNDEVELOPED PARKS 68.6 Acres
Table 9
Summary of Park and Recreation Facilities by Type
City of Lodi
Park Type
Acres
Status
f Mini - Parks
Candy Cans Park
0.2 Acres
Developed
Century Park
2.5 Acres
Developed
TOTAL
2.7 Acres
Neighborhood Park]
American Legion Park
6.0 Acres
Developed
Beckman Park
16.5 Acres
Developed
Emerson Park
3.0 Acres
Developed
English Oaks Commons
3.7 Acres
Developed
Hale Park
3.1 Acres
(Under Construction)
Henry Glaves Park
15.0 Acres
Developed .P.�•✓is�•9t�.a
John Blakely Park
10.0 Acres
Developed
Lawerence Park
2-8 Acres
Developed
Van Buskirk Park
1.0 Acres
Developed
Vinewood Park
16.0 Acres
Developed
Westgate Park
6.0 Acres
Developed
TOTAL
83.2 Acres
111-5
r
..F�fzw, idr-um • ,,
Community Parks
Kotu Park
10.0 Acres
Developed
Samuel Salas Park
26.0 Acres
Developed
TOTAL
36.0 Acres
Regional Parks
Lodi Lake Park.
43.0 Acres
Developed
TOTAL
43.0 Acres
General Open Space Areas
Lodi lake Natural Area
58.0 Acres
Developed
TOTAL
58.0 Acres
Special Use Areas
Armory Park
3.2 Acres
7�
Developed
?
Grape Bowl
15.0 Acres
Developed g4,,vh �
Hutchins Street Square
12.0 Acres
Developed
Parks and Recreation Office
1.3 Acres
Developed
Softball Complex
7.6 Acres
Developed
Tony Zupo Field
3.2 Acres
Developed
•
TOTAL
42.3 Acres
Undeveloped Sites
Ed DeBenedettl Park
29.0 Acres
Undeveloped
Maple Street Square
.6 Acres
Old Fue Station
Pixley Park
26.0 Acres
Undeveloped
Lodi Lake Park West
13.0 Acres
Undeveloped
TOTAL
68.6 Acres
111-6
Fo
PRIVATE RECREATION AREAS AND FACILITIES
Private Parks and Facilities
Table 11
Summary of Private Indoor Recreation Facilities
Lodi Planning Area
Rgaeatlon Facilities nr.tood Activitv/Facititr
Arbor Square Cinema Theater
Moores Shou Shu Karate Studio
Physicians Weight Training Center
Cal Skate Roller Skating Rink
I Sunset Cinema Theater
-- Tokay Bowl Bowling lanes
Twin Arbors Athletic Club 3 pools (t indoor). 13 racquetball courts, I I
tennis courts, basketball court, weightroom.
aerobics
Valley Cinemas Theater
Table 12
Summary of Private Outdoor Recreational
Facilities/Misc. Facilities
Lodi Area
Recreation Facilities (Ovidcr) Activity/Facilpy
Charlie's Batting Cage Softball/baseball batting practice
Grape Festival Grounds Small exposition center
Lodi Golf Range Golf driving range �s.�,�u-ssi�.✓ �i�o Gni: y
Mojica Batting Cages Softball/baseball batting practice
111-8
As
C* of Lodi &A and Rtcau on Plan Eri.rrinr Panic and Rtaeadon Facitiritr
NEARBY RECRi MON RESOURCES
There are other recreation areas or facilities in the region that serve Lodi residents as
well. While these facilities are located outside the Planning Area, they need to be
recognized. Some of these facilities include:
Comanche Reservoir
Forest Lake Golf Course
Micke Grove Golf Links
Micke Grove Park
Oak Grove Regional Park
Sacramento/San Joaquin River Delta
Woodbridge Gotf and Country Club
Woodbridge Regional Park
SUNINIARY OF SPORTS FACILITIES
Water and day use recreation 19
Golf course ! 4
Golf course f19
Day use park
Day use park
River boating
Private golf course
Natuu,, preserve; trails
Table 13 -
Summary of Existing Sports Facilities
Lodi Area
Facilities Comments
SENIOR BASEBALL FIELDS
1 Blakely Park
1 Kofu Park
Lighted
1 Lodi High School
Practice
1 Salas Park
Lighted
2 Tokay High School
Practice (1 skinned)
1 Zupo Field
Lighted
TOTAL 7 Fields
YOUTH BASEBALL/SOFTBALL FIELDS
2 Beckman Park
4 Beckman Elementary School
1 Blakely Park
1 Emerson Park
1 English Oaks Commons
2 Erma Reese Elementary School
3 George Washington Elementary School
2 Heritage Elementary School
S Lakewood Elementary School
4 Leroy Nichols Elementary School
111-9
Game div4e
Practice
Game
Game
T Bali only
Practice
Practice
Practice
Practice
Practice
01
Ca ef Lodi Park and Recreation Plannttinp Pork and Recrcotrorr Facilitiet
4 Lodi High School
Practice
3 Needham Middle School
Practice
1 Kofu Park
Game
3 Salas Park
Game
7 Senior Elementary School
Practice
2 Seventh Day Adventist Elementary
Practice (Private)
2 Tokay High School
Practice
3 Woodbridge Middle School
Practice
2 Pinewood Park
Game
4 Vinewood Elementary School
Practice
Westgate Park
(future)
TOTAL
56 Fields)
SOFTBALL FIELDS
1
1
Armory Park
Erma Reese Mii(die School
Lighted
fhrtlypa,tiatiy-tised P,EwGyil.�
2
3
Grape Bowl
Lawrence Elementary School
Lighted
Used for tournaments only
2
Lodi Academy
(Private)
Of
Lodi High School
Not accessible
1
5:. Peters School
(Private)
2
Softball Complex
Lighted
2
Temple Baptist
Church leagues only (Private)
1
Tokay High School
Not accessible
TOTAL
16 Fields
YOUTH SOCCER FIELDS
3 Beckman Park
2 Century Park
2 Henry Graves Park
1 Hutchins Street Square
1 Kofu Park Lighted
1 Lakewood Elementary School
S Lawlirence Elementary School
3 Leroy Nichols Elementary School
)K Z Salas Park Lighted
3 Vinewood Park
TOTAL 24 Fields
III -10
r
. „r Lodi Farb and Recnorion Pia►r - F_citrinp Pc k and Rccnarion Facilities
ADULT SIZE SOCCER FIELDS
1
Erma Reese MMle School
3
Lodi High Schoo
.2
1
Salas Park
4
Senior Elementary School
1
Tokay High School
1
Woodbridge Middle School
TOTAL
FOOTBALL FIELDS
1 Grape Bowl
2 Lodi High School
1 Tokay High School
TOTAL
TENNIS COURTS
2
Hale Park
5
Kolu Park
4
Legion Park
a
Lodi High School
10
Tokay High School
TOTAL
BASKETBALL
COURTS
1
Century Park
2
Festival Grounds
1
Blakety Park
2
Hutchins Street Square
1
Hale Park
TOTAL
SWIMMING
POOLS
1
Blakely Park (Enze Pool)
1
Blakely Park (Blakely Pool)
1
Hutchins Street Square
1
Lodi High School
1
Tokay High School
TOTAL
Limited access, lighted
10 Fields
Stadium Li;"rrf--o
1 practice
Stadium
4 Football Fields
Lighted
Lighted
Lighted
29 Tennis Courts
Outdoor
Indoor, temporary
Outdoor
Outdoor
Outdoor, lighted
7 Basketball Courts
i
25 yards X 15 yards
23 yards X 12 yards
25 yard X 10 yards (Indoor)
25 yards X 25 yards 'V
25 yards X 50 meter
SECTION IV
EXISTING OPERATIONS AND SERVICES
r,N e!Lodi Park and Recreadon Plan E6sring Optra ons and S micts
SECTION IV
EXISTING OPERATIONS AND SERVICES
The Lodi Department of Parks and Recreation is the primary provider of park and
recreation services in the region. Its park system includes sport facilities, neighborhood
parks and community parks, one large regional park and a limited amount of natural
open space.
Lodi is the provider of most adult classes and sports pro&rams and shares the
responsibility for youth sports. In youth sports, the City is responsible primarily for
instruction and recreation sport programs. Private groups such as BOBS and the Lodi
Swim Club manage the more competitive sports programs.
DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
The Lodi Department of Parks and Recreation is divided into the Recreation Division
and the Parks Division. The Recreation Division is responsible for scheduling of
programs. youth and adult sports and specialized activities. The Parks Division is
responsible for maintaining the park system, sports fields and two swimming pools.
PARK AND
RECREATION
DIRECTOR
RECREATION t PARKS
DMSION DMSiON
T\' ,
r
Q1 gf Lodi Park and Recreation Plan EtislinY Operot. ns and Se�ice*
Recreation Division
The Recreation Division is divided into four basic areas of responsibility. Each area is
headed by a recreation supervisor. It is organized as follows:
PARKS AND
RECREATION
DIRECTOR
�••••••••.•••••••••• SECRETARY
RECREATION
SUPERINTENDENT '0000•••• SECRETARY
ADULT SPORTS I SPECIALITY CLASSES LSPORTS
AQUATICS YOUTH SPORTS
SPECIAL EVENTS I PLAYGROUND
Paries Division
CAMP
HUTCHINS
GOLF/TENNIS
SPECIAL EVENTS
The Parks Division is responsible for the maintenance of all outdoor and indoor
facilities and is divided into four areas of responsibility. These are indicated below.
PARKS AND
RECREA i"ION
DIRECTOR
SECRETARIAL .6000•• PARKS
SUPERINTENDENT
MW MMMMI
DRAFTING/ LPAIRIKS PARKS PARK
DESIGN RVISOR SUPERVISOR RANGER
#2 PROGRAM
IV -2
CLa 9LLodi Park and Recreation Plan E& ne Operations and Services
The two parks supervisors are responsible for all park maintenance. Their work is
divided as follows:
Parks Supervisor #1
Equipment repair/shop operator
Budding maintenance
Maintenance of-.
o Lodi Lake Park
o Emerson Park
o Le 'on Park
o Hale Park
o Hutchins Street Square (including pool)
o Pool maintenance at Blakely Park
o Other parks without sports fields
Parks Supervisor #2:
Sports field maintenance and preparation
Grounds maintenance (other parks)
Maintenance of
o B1akeIy Park
o Salas Park
o Grape Bowl
o Lawrence School field
o Zupo Field
o Armory Field
o Softball Complex
Weekend sport field operations
Currently, the Parks Division has both roving crews and people assigned to specific
parks. Parks that have people assigned to them include:
Zuppo Field
Kofu Park
Softball Complex
Grape Bowl/Armory Park
Blakely Park
Lodi Lake Park (3 people)
Emerson/Legion Park
Salas (seasonal only)
The rest of the parks are maintained by roving crews.
Out of an average of 42 maintenance employees, 6$%n or 28 are permanent employees.
Most of the seasonal employees work 7-8 months of the year and are involved to the
rehabilitation of the ball fields, weekend field prep for games and tournaments, minor
maintenance and cleanup and the collection of fees at Lodi Lake Park.
N-3
r
QM of Lodi Park and Recreation Man EsiWne Onerodons and SeMces
OPERATING BUDGET
Currently, the cost of providing park and recreation services in Lodi is about 9.6% of
the total City budget. The park and recreation budget includes park and recreation
administration, recreation programming and park maintenance. Table 14 below, shows
the percent of the City budget that goes to park and recreation services.
Table 14
Ratio of the Park and Recreation Budget to Total City Budget
City of Lodi - 1987-1992
Year
Total
City Budget •
Parks & Rec
Budget
%of
Total
87.99
17,953,522
1,695,378
9.4%
88-89
18,093,819
1,985,509
11.0%
89-90
23,291,626
2,127,973
9.1%
90-91
25,703,315
2,349,705
9.1%
91-92
27,780,345
2,601,765
9.4%
• Excludes Utility Department Budget
From the table above, one can see that the share of the parks and recreation
department budget has been fairly constant in comparison to the City budget as a
whole. Over the last five years, the parks and recreation budget has grown roughly 10%
per year.
When compared to some cities in California, Lodi's share of the budget for park and
recreation services is higher than some. In Oregon and Washington the average share
of the total city budget for cities the size of Lodi is about 10-12%.
Table 15
Ratio of Park & Rec Budget to Total City Budget
Selected Cities - 1991
city Percent Population
Lodi
9.4%
Redding
5.8%
Santa Rosa
6.6%
Sunnyvale
7.7%
Roseville
4.2%
Davis
15.1%
IV -4
53,000
67,000
120,000
117,000
45,000
72,000
r
QU QL Lodi Pork and Recreation Ron FVlfint 02fradons and Senica
Cost of Park and Recreation Services
Since the 1988-89 fiscal year, the greatest increase in the park and recreation budget
occurred in the area of parks administration, which grew 65%. The next greatest
increase occurred in recreation administration and organized sports, which grew 600,lo
and 51% respectively. Aquatics, which grew 41%. experienced a sharp decline in the
1989-90 fiscal year, but has grown rapidly over the last few years. Lodi Lake operation
and Camp Hutchins are the only two budget items that decreased from the 1988-89
fiscal year to 1991-92 fiscal year.
The growth of the park and recreation budget over the past several years can be
partially attributed to new programs, such as the Park Ranger Program and the Camp
Hutchins Day Care Program.
TOTAL $1,985,509 $2,127,973 $2,349,705 $2,601,765
Note; Budget does not include maintenance for Hutchins Street Square
Approximately 42% of the total park and recreation budget is allocated to recreation
programs. The table on the next page indicates how the department budget is divided
by function. In Lodi, the salary and benefits of the Park and Recreation Director is
evenly split between the Recreation Division and Parks Division. This cost is placed in
their respective administrative accounts. While administration represents 42% of the
cost in the Recreation Division, it should be noted that the salaries of the four
recreation supervisors are also included in this account. Normally, these labor costs
would be included in their respective programs.
IV -5
Table 16
Budget Trends 1988 to 1992
City of Lodi Park and Recreation Department
Actual
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
196$-89
1989-90
1990-91
1991-92
Recreation Administration $285,774
$348,128
$392,195
$456,410
Recreation Programs
116,087
202,616
125,610
148,695
Camp Hutchins
94,192
95,022
107,160
91,79S
Organized Sports
1561101
140.641
198,615
235,495
Aquatics
108,204
81.616
142,170
152,600
Parks Administration
153,3311
182,849
226,200
2S3,21S
Lodi Lake Operations
229,503
222,819
174,4SS
177,560
Other Park Maintenance
842,318
854,082
904,840
982,395
Park Ranger
—
—
76,460
103,600
TOTAL $1,985,509 $2,127,973 $2,349,705 $2,601,765
Note; Budget does not include maintenance for Hutchins Street Square
Approximately 42% of the total park and recreation budget is allocated to recreation
programs. The table on the next page indicates how the department budget is divided
by function. In Lodi, the salary and benefits of the Park and Recreation Director is
evenly split between the Recreation Division and Parks Division. This cost is placed in
their respective administrative accounts. While administration represents 42% of the
cost in the Recreation Division, it should be noted that the salaries of the four
recreation supervisors are also included in this account. Normally, these labor costs
would be included in their respective programs.
IV -5
r
QU of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Er4dne Qzmdons and Scmces
Table 17
Operating Budget 1991.92 FY
Department of Parks and Recreation
City of Lodi
Division Amount % of Division
Recreation Division
Administration
$456,410
42%
Playgrounds
72.368
7%
Camp Hutchins
91,795
8%
Teen/Youth Sports
88,455
8%
Miss Indoor/Outdoor Activities
14,140
1%
Aquatics
152,600
14%
Adult Sports
147,040
14%
Speciality Classes
62J95
6%
Subtotal
$1,084,995
Parks Division
Administration
$253,235
17%
Stadium Maintenance
54.415
3%
Lodi lake Park
177,560
12%
Other Parks
737,215
49%
Park Rangers
103,600
7%
Equipment Maintenance
190,765
12%
Subtotal
$1,516,790
Total Parks and Recreation Department $2,601,765
The equipment maintenance account in the Parks Division is nearly $200,000 and
represents about 12% of the total budget. Part of the equipment maintenance budget
goes to the repairing and maintenance of city meter reader vehicles, which is not part of
the park and recreation program.
Operating Revenue
Revenue for park and recreation services comes from several sources. About 85%v
comes from program fees. Excluding BOBS, the largest single source of revenue for the
Department is Camp Hutchins, which is followed closely by the adults sports program.
A breakdown of revenue for the 1991-92 year is shown below.
Iv -6
Tabte 18
Revenue Sources from Program Services
Department of Parks and Recreation 1991-92 FY
City of Lodi
Activity
Amount
Percent
Adult Sports
$83,222
18%
Softball
$63,147
Basketball
14,700
Volleyball
5.375
Playgrounds
3,433
1%
Youth Recreation Sports
7,244
2%
Aquatics
53,456
12%
Swim Lessons
15,760
Public Swim
24,737
Lake Boat Rentals
7,548
Swim League
5.410
Concessions
12,926
3%
Misc. Programs/Activities
8,493
2%
Speciality Classes
37,654
8%
Facility Rentals
48,474
11%
Camp Hutchins
99,412
22%
Misc. (1)
58,823
13%
Park Facility Rentals (2)
945
Lodi Lake Operations
39.844
9%
Subtotal
$453,926
BOBS Programs
$265,048
Swim Club
82.000
Subtotal
$347,048
(1) Includes $41,414 from the Lodi School District for mowing and $17,409 from
San Joaquin County for partial payment of county resident use of Lodi
facilities.
(2) Income from picnic shelter rental.
Total revenue from programs managed by the Parks and Recreation Department was
$441,568 in the 1991-92 FY. It should be noted that the City also collected $347,048 for
BOBS and the Lodi City Swim Club through registration fees. However, this money
was turned over to the two organizations. While this money is reflected in the budget,
the City does not control how this money is spent.
The three basic functions in the Department of Parks and Recreation is administration,
recreation programs and park maintenance. However, as stated earlier, except for
capital improvement costs which vary from year to year, the budget is broken down into
two basic divisions.
tv•7
JAN.
Qty erroii Park and Remotion Plan Edging Ope►edons and Sevices
In this study, to make a true accounting of costs for recreation and park maintenance,
the actual departmental administration costs have been separated into a separate
account. This administrative cost includes the salaries of the Parks and Recreation
Director and his secretary and costs for utilities, supplies and depreciation of equipment
for the department. Based on this analysis, the actual cost of administration is shown in
the table below. As can be seen, while the recreation division represents about 35% of
the total operating costs, it generates about 85% of the total departmental revenue.
Table 19
Comparison of revenue to Expenditures - 1991-1992 FY
City of Lodi Department of Parks and Recreation
When compared to other similar communities in California, Lodi is lower than average
in administrative and recreation program costs and higher in park maintenance costs.
As a point of reference, the table below compares Lodi with the average of seven other
comparable cities.
Table 20
Comparison of Park and Recreation Budget by Function
City of Lodi with Selected Cities -1991
Function
Total
Percent of
Total
Percent of
19%
Expenditures
Expenditures
Revenue
Revenue
56.8%
32%
Other
—
9%
Administration
S222,969
8.5%
S58,823
13.0%
Recreation Division
902,204
34.7%
345,684
76.1%
Parks Division
1,476,592
56.P*.
49,414
10.9%
Total
$2,601.765
S453,926
When compared to other similar communities in California, Lodi is lower than average
in administrative and recreation program costs and higher in park maintenance costs.
As a point of reference, the table below compares Lodi with the average of seven other
comparable cities.
Table 20
Comparison of Park and Recreation Budget by Function
City of Lodi with Selected Cities -1991
Function
Lodi
Average •
Administration
8.6%
19%
Recreation Programs
34.7%
41%
Park Maintenance
56.8%
32%
Other
—
9%
• Average of seven comparable cities in California
The table on the next page identifies the maintenance costs per acre for some selected
parks in Lodi along with the cost for the entire park system. The total maintenance cost
per acre for maintained land in Lodi is approximately 55,885. This ratio is about
average for California cities. However, it should be noted that a hiring freeze was put
in place during this period and some positions were not filled as the budget alight
Iv -8
aj
JA"J. 2 �.;J
Q! gf
t ods Parti and Rccrcadon Mn stinPQperoho+u and S�{vices
indicate. One major reason for the higher cost of park maintenance in Lodi is because
of the heavy emphasis in field sports.
Table 21
Expenditures for Park Maintenance
City of Lodi - 1991-92 FY
Area
Acres_
Budget (11
Cost/Acre
Net Cost
Cfit
Size
Stadium
15.0
554.415
$3,628
Lake Lodi
43.0
177,560
4,129
Other Parks
192.9
737,215
3,822
Division iotas
250.9 (2)
51,476,592
55,88S
(1) Excludes administrative costs but includes the Ranger Program
(2) Excludes undeveloped park land
When compared to other cities in California, Lodi is about average in terms of per
.,.� capita costs for park and recreation services. However, the relatively small amount of
revenue Lodi raises from fees for park and recreation services is of some concern
Shown in the table below is a comparison of Lodi to other cities in terms of gross and
net cost per capita for park and recreation services. Gross cost per capita is the total
operating budget excluding capital outlay divided by the population served. Net cost
per capita is net cost after revenue has been deducted.
Table 22
Operating Budget for Park and Recreation Services
Selected Cities (1991)
IV -9
JAN. 2 0 1993
Operating
Gross Cost
Net Cost
Cfit
Size
Budget • Per Capita
Per Capita
Revenue Rate
Lodi
53.186
$2.601,765
48.92
41.05
16.1%
Redding
66,462
1,430,707
$21.53
19.57
9.1%
Chico (CARD)
75.000
2.200.000
29.33
20.03
31.7%
Mission Oaks
60,000
2.144.541
35.74
2920
18.3%
Fulton -El Camino
28,000
1,782.200
63.65
48.56
23.7%
Santa Clara
93.600
6,451,853
68.92
62.28
9.6%
Santa Rosa
120.000
6,680.251
57.17
4295
24.9%
Sunnyvale
117,000
9,750,757
83.34
34.19
59.0%
• Excludes capital outlay
IV -9
JAN. 2 0 1993
City of Lodi Park and RecreationPlan Edging Q=meons and Services
The table on the previous page illustrates that among the cities surveyed. Lodi is in the
middle in terms of money spent for park and recreation services. Nowever, its revenue
rate is among the lowest. One reason for this tow rate is that nearly all of the youth
Ware managed by private groups such as BOBS and the Lodi City Swim Club.
While registration fees for BOBS programs are collected by the City, it is passed
directly to them and is not really part of the city budget. If the amount collected from
this organization was included, the revenue rate for Lodi would be about 2995.
RECREATION PROGRAMS
Lodi offers a wide range of recreation programs and activities utilizing primarily its own
facilities. In some cases, school fields and gymnasiums are used to offer tournaments
and special programs but access to them is quite limited. In the table below, the
number of panic:pants for each major category of recreation activity is shown.
Table 23
Summary of Recreation Participation 1991-1992
City of Lodi
Number of
Activit Participants
Aduft Sports
25.220
Aquatics
65,220
Camp Hutchins
1,465
Misc. Activities
1,057
Playgrounds
12,955
Specialized Classes
1.952
Youth Sports
4,47
TOTAL 112,344
A study was made of the resident location of all participants in city recreation programs
for the 1991 year. The purpose of this effort was to determine the amount of non-
resident participation. The results of that analysis is shown in the table on the next
W814Youth sports, which includes the City's recreation oriented programs and the
BOBS competitive Ieagues, are composed of roughly 30% non -city residents. Tile
remaining programs average around 16% for non -city residents.
IV -10
r
City of Lodi Park and Recrearion Plan EdFring Onerarions ani+ Services
Table 24
Non -Resident Participation in City Sponsored Recreation Programs
City of Lodi (1991-92 FY)
Program
Total
Particloants
Non -Resident
Participants Percent
Youth Sports
91,795
14.6%
14,140
(Recreation -orientated)
828
207
33%
BOBS
6.163
1,674
27%
Aquatics
929
150
16%
Speciality Classes
1,582
258
16%
Adult Sports
5,137
1,275
15%
Table 25 below shows a comparison of costs to revenue for the various recreation
programs and the various recovery rates.
Table 25
Comparison of Revenues and Expenditure (1)
City of Lodi Recreation Program (1991-1992)
% of % of Recovery
Program Cost (,21 Total Revenue (2) Total Rate
Adult Sports
Aquatics
Camp Hutchins
Miss Activities
Playground
Specialized Classes
Youth Sports
Other (3)
TOTAL
$147,040
23.4%
152,600
24.3%
91,795
14.6%
14,140
2.2%
72,360
11.5%
62,195
10.0%
88,455
14.1%
1,973,180
37,654
52,601.765
$83,222
28.4%
57%
53,456
18.2%
35%
99,412
33.9%
108%
8,493
2.9%
60%
3,433
1.2%
5%
37,654
12.9%
61%
7,244
2.5%
8%
125,448
—
$418,362 (4)
(1) Does not include cost or revenue from 1308S or the Swim Club
(2) Program costs only; does not include maintenance of sport facilities
(3) Includes all other budget amounts that are not comparable
(4) Excludes revenue from the BOBS and Swim Club program
The most profitable program in terms of offsetting operating costs is the Camp
Hutchins program. In fact, this is the only program that basically breaks even.
CN of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Urdu QZra ont and Strikes
Co-sponsored Sports Programs
The approach to youth sports in Lodi is rather unique and consists of a joint effort
between two private sports clubs and the city of Lodi. Currently the Boosters of
Boys/Girls Sports Organization (BOBS) manages all of the competitive youth sport
programs excluding swimming. 'Ile city assists in their effort by collecting all of the
registration fees and devoting one full time person to scheduling and other
administrative duties. The Board of BOBS decides how the money will be distributed
between the various sports, conducts fund raising programs and manages the leagues.
While this approach is rather costly to the city, a major benefit is that the individual
youth sport groups operate under one umbrella. This eliminates the problem of one
group competing against another for fund raising programs or access to facilities.
'Ile Lodi Swim Club is another private sport group oriented primarily towards
competitive swimming. This &roup operates somewhat independently of the city but
does use the city's two swimming pools.
BOOSTERS OF BOYS/GIRLS SPORTS ORGANIZATION
City Costs
' Salaries/benefits of umpires, etc.
Recreation administration
City overhead
BOBS Costs
Total Costs
Program Revenue
$62,397
95,984
16,151
$174,532
$246,479
$421,011
$265,048
'Lite above cost does not include field maintenance and preparation. A rough estimate
is about 5200,000. Ile operating budget for the City Swim Club is as follows:
LODI SWIM CLUB
City Costs
School rental and Blakely utilities
Recreation administration
Swim Club Costs
Total Costs
Program Revenue
IV -I2
$31,000
3,000
$34,000
$81,000
$115,000
$82,000
I
r�
SECTION V
PARK AND FACILITY NEEDS
SECTION V
PARK AND FACILITY NEEDS
INTRODUCTION
Identifying recreation needs is a very important part of the park and recreation plan.
However, quantifying these needs is difficult because many different variables influence
recreation participation and demand. In addition, personal values and interests towards
recreation vary. Wbat might be right for one community will probably not be right for
another. The problem is compounded by the fact that under -stating the need can result
in excessive use of facilities whereas over -estimating the need can mean spending
money for facilities that will not be used to their optimum level.
This section of the report analyzes the current and future need for recreation areas and
facilities in the Lodi area. To quantify the needs, demand standards have been
developed in terms of acres or facilities per 1,000 population. The planning process for
identifying these needs was accomplished as follows:
t. A random telephone survey of Lodi residents
2. The holding of two public workshop meetings for the general public
3. Contacting user groups
4. Evaluating the existing supply of recreation facilities
S. The development of desired service standards for park areas and facilities
6. The forecasting of park and facility needs by comparing current supply of facilities with
the demand.
NATIONAL TRENDS IN RECREATION PARTICIPATION
A significant number of shifts have occurred in recreation patterns in this country.
Many of these changes have come about because of changing work habits, concern
about health, population and household composition changes, rising energy costs and
other factors. The end result is that recreation interests and participation levels change.
Some of these changes and the reasons for these changes are discussed below.
A. General Changes in Recreation Interests: According to the 1989 Gallup Poll.
Americans now prefer more 'back to nature' types of activities than in the past. Activities
such as bicycle touring. camping. hiking and boating have shown significant increases
over previous years. Conversely. there have been slight declines in some of the popular
individual oriented 'body images' activities such as aerobics and weight lifting.
V -I
r
City of f n.ti Park and Rccnmien Plan Park and Fill— Ntt ,
On a national scale, the per cert of the population who participate in the more popular
recreation activities are:
Agtivity
1989
1988
Swimming
38%
36%
Fishing
29
29
Bicycling
28
24
Camping
22
19
Hiking
20
16
Pool/Bltiards
20
17
Running/Jogging
19
17
Weight training
16
19
Bicycle touring/racing
16
11
Softball
16
16
B. Recreation Participation Trends, Some of the more interesting trends in recreation
activity include:
Tennis: a slight decline in the last decade
Running/Jogging: interest has dropped in favor of walking
Skiing. a modest but steady Increase
Hunting: dropped to an ail time low
Volleyball: increased significantly in the last several years
Goll: a steady increase through the 1980 decade
Racquetball: a significant decline but now leveled off
In -rine skating: a new fad
Coed sports: increasing interest over single gender spats
C. increase in leisure time: The number of hours worked per week continues to decrease
for certain segments of the population. The concept of flex time now makes it possible
for more people to participate at non -peak hours of the week. This coupled with multiple
work shifts means that recreation facilities can be utilized at a more constant level.
D. increased interest in women's stems: With the passage of the Tide IX Amendment to
the Education Act, women are now offered equal access to sport faciitles. The result has
been a dramatic increase in recreation interests and a nearly doubling of demand for
some types of facilities.
E. Changes in technology. Changes in technology have had a significant impact on
recreation participation by making it easier to effectively participate. A good example is
skiing, where new design in skis, bindings and clothing has made A easier safer and
more comfortable to ski. Tennis has also gone through this same transformation by
developing a more flexible and forgiving racket.
F. Local interests: Climate, availability of facilities and specific interests of one individual or
group will often influence local participation in certain activities. For example, Aubum,
Washington is one of the few cities that has picklebafl courts and, as a restA is a popular
activity in that community. Some cities have more than the average amount of certain
V. 2
r
City Qf Lodi Park and Recreareon Plan Park and FaciGry Needy
facilities making that activity more popular. In Lodi, interest In previous years to develop
a major baseball program has resulted in an above-average levet of play in youth
baseball. In Redding, fast pitch softball is stal pour because the city has had
consistent national winning teams and continues to host national tournaments.
RECREATION SURVEY
During early August, a random telephone survey of over 400 households was conducted
in the Lodi and Woodbridge area. Respondents were asked a series of questions
concerning park and recreation participation and needs. Detailed information on the
survey can be found in a separate document. Below is a brief summary of the results:
o When respondents were asked to describe their most common recreation
activities, the top responses were:
1)
Reading .
2)
Fishing
3)
Walking
4
Traveling
5
Play
6�
Play Golf
7)
Gardening
8)
Camping
9
Swimming
I0�
Bicycling
o About 12% of the respondents are involved in one way or another with
organized sports.
o When respondents were asked what they would lice to do more of if the
opportunity was available, the most common responses were:
1 Walking
2 Swimming
3 Bicycling
4 Golf
o About 17% of the respondents participate in recreation programs offered
by the city. The two most common activities were softball and soccer_
V- 3
r
City of Lodi Parr and Recreation Plan Park and Facility Nee
o When asked to prioritize a list of nine major types of recreation projects,
the priority was as follows:
1) Additional trail systems
2) Another senior center
3) Additional Lodi Lake Park facilities
4 A recreation center
S) A performing arts center
6 Additional , okelumne River open space
7) An indoor swimming pool
8 More community parks
9) A public golf course
o When asked what type of parks they preferred. the respondents preferred
small neighborhood parks.
o When asked how they would like to see the parks developed, the
responses were evenly split between the creation of passive recreation
areas and active sports areas.
COMMUNITY NVORKSHOP MEETINGS
In addition to the recreation survey, two community workshops meetings were held in
July, 1992 to give residents an opportunity to idenufy issues and needs related to
recreation facilities and programs in Lodi. The meeungs were organized so that The working in groups of 6-8 persons were asked i respond to some specific issues. The
results are shown below. Tle number of comments relate to the number of groups that
responded to a specific issue.
WHAT DO YOU FEEL ARE THE MOST NEEDED RECREATION OR PARK PROGRAMS IN LODI?
No. Comments Comment
7 Large mufti -use indoor recreation complex
6 Sports P,eld complex
5 Bicycle trails
5 Youth activities
3 Basketball courts
3 Additional outdoor swimming pod (Olympic size)
3 Natural open space
2 Teen center
2 Youth sports complex
1 Use high schools for arts and performances
1 Auditorium
1 Basin parks free toren with walking teals; plant banks
V•s
C,M of Lodi Park and Recreation Man Park and Facility Needr
t Goll course
1 Horseshoe pits
I Lodi Lake - bike trails with no cars
t Indoor Shooting Range
I More parks
I Open space area with river access
I Picnic tables and BBO's
I Places to walk without traffic i.e.. railroad tracks near General Mills
I Regional greenbelts
1 Roller-skate and skateboard areas
I Senior center complex
I Senior activities
HOW SHOULD THE PARK AND RECREATION BUDGET BE BALANCED?
No. Comments Sucaestion
5 Registration fees should be raised
3 Renovate and design parks for lower maintenance
3 Cut staff levels where productivity is not efficient
3 Charge non-resident fees
2 Better coordination between city and schools
2 Increase user fees for adults
2 Encourage more private corporate Involvement
2 Park maintenance - prioritize tasks. use less turf
2 Prioritize funds - children served fust then adults
2 Apply for state or federal grants
1 Balance priorities
I Present a tax measure
I Contract out services for park maintenance
I Utilize coin operated fights at parks
I Increase taxes
I Cut programs - prioritize
1 Do not reduce park maintenance
1 Encourage more involvement by private groups
I Utilize fund raisers
1 increase fees for day care
I Increase user fees for tournaments and outside events
I Involve church group (share facilities)
I Look at entire costs
I No cuts - raise money through sponsoring organizations
I Apply a parking fee
1 Poor management
I Offer only self supporting programs
r
QQLLodi Park and Rtarrarion Plan Park an;I —,.1 --
WHAT TYPE OF PARKS SHOULD BE DEVELOPED IN THE FUTURE?
No. Comments Comment
3 Community Parks (between io-25 acres) with:
o natural area
o teen center
o senior activities
o rental facilities
2 Major Community Park (50 + Acres)
2 Neighborhood Parks with:
o soccer fields
o baseball fields
o playgrounds
o family activities
o trails
2 Mini parks should be the responsibility of service clubs and developers
I
All three types of parks are needed
1
Develop Lodi Lake (including west side)
t
Developer dedicated neighborhood parks
1
No mini park - too costly
1
Preserve Lodi lake Wilderness area
1
Regional parks
1
Golf course
I
Trail on the north bank of the River
I
Reserve space for the future
I
Riverfront park (25 acres)
PREFERRED ACTIVITIES
For flus exercise, each participant was asked to vote for their favorite projects from a list of severs
major facilities. Each person was given four dots and could place on any projects) in which they
chose_ The voting tatty was as fonows:
No. Votes Fscirty
64
Sports Field Complex
46
Multi -Ilse Recreation Center
32
City -Wide Trail System
28
Muiti-Use Aquatic Center
16
18 Hole Golf Course
11
Acquire Land Along Mokelumne River
6
Additional Neighborhood Parks
V-6
r;N d Inde Park and Recrearian Plan Pork and Facility Needy
In addition to the four questions above, participants at the workshops were asked to fill out two forms
dealing with the current recreation program On the first form. participants were given the existing level
of program emphasis (based on a per cent of the budget) in rune different recreation areas. They were
then asked to suggest changes to the program recognizing that the total had to be 100%. The results
of that effort are shown below.
RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO THE EXISTING RECREATION PROGRAM
(Tally by Participants at the Workshop Meetings)
On the second form. participants were asked to identify the share of the recreation program for each
group that should be subsidized by the City. The results were.
RECOMMENDED LEVEL OF PROGRAM SUBSIDY
(By Age Group)
Children
Existing
Recommended
%
Program Type
Level
Level
Chance
Youth/Teen Sports
12%
22%
+10%
After School Playgrounds
9%
11%
+2%
Special Events
2%
4%
+2%
Senior Citizens Services
11%
11%
—
Cufturai Arts
6%
5%
-1%
General Interest Classes
7%
5%
-2%
Aquatics ('outdoor)
19%
16%
3%
Adult Sports
17%
13%
-4%
Camp Hutchins
17%
12%
-5%
On the second form. participants were asked to identify the share of the recreation program for each
group that should be subsidized by the City. The results were.
RECOMMENDED LEVEL OF PROGRAM SUBSIDY
(By Age Group)
Children
58%
Teens
51%
Adults
3396
Senior Citizens
36%
V-7
City of Lodi Park and Recaalion Plan Park and Facility Needs
IMPACT OF POPULATION GROWTH ON RECREATION DEMAND
One of the primary elements that affects future recreation demand is population
growth. As stated earlier, Lodi has placed a limitation on residential growth of 2% per
year but areas managed by the county have no such population restrictions.
A substantial number of non residents also use the City's programs and sport facilities.
While recognizing the impact these non residents have on the demand for these
facilities, it is the policy to continue serving them if an equitable funding mechanism
can be developed. As a result, for assessing park land needs, demand will be based on
the population within the planning area. For assessing specialized facility needs such as
sport fields, demand will be based on the current service area which is the same
boundary of the Lodi School District north of Eight Mile Road. With these
assumptions in mind, the following population characteristics will be used.
Table 26
Population Forecast
City of Lodi and Service Area
Year City Service Area
rte. 1992 53,186 73,000
2007 72,000 102,850
ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO IDENTIFYING NEEDS
There are several approaches to estimating needs for park and recreation facilities.
They include the use of national standards, measurement of participation levels, user
trend analysis, input from surveys and public meetings, goal setting and participation
models. Since most will be used, each is briefly described below.
National Standards
Standards were first created by a group of professionals who established an easily
understood format of what "seemed to be right" based on their practical experience in
the field. These standards were felt to be most useful if stated in quantifiable terms of
acres or facilities per givenpopulation level, i.e., 10 acres of park per 1,000 population.
The most recognized standards are those published by the National Recreation and
Park Association (NRPA). In 1983 they published a report titled "Recreation, Park and
Open Space Standards", that is well recognized in the recreation field. This document
is currently being updated to reflect changes in park and recreation use patterns.
The problem with using national standards is that they do not reflect local conditions.
What is right for one community will probably not be correct for another. In addition, a
9 Ig93
V-3 WI
Civ of Lodi Park and Recce Aon Plum Park aged Fgdit V�
IMPACT OF POPULATION GROWTH ON RECREATION DEMAND
One of the primary elements that affects future recreation demand 4populatien
growth. As stated earlier, Lodi has placed a limitation on residential growth of 2% per
year but areas aged by the county have no such population restrictions.
A substantial number of non residents also use the City's programs and spon facilities.
While recognizing tFA impact these non residents have on thGdemand for these
facilities, it is the poll to continue serving them if an equitable fundings mechanism
can be developed. As esult, for assessing park land needs. demand will be based on
the population within th tanning area. For assessingspecialized facility needs such as
sport fields, demand will based on the current seOW area which is the same
boundary of the Lodi Schob istrict north of Eigtit;le Road. With these
assumptions in mind, the fo 'ng population characteristics will be used.
Forecast
Service Area
1992 53.186 73,000
2007
z`7� 00 113.800
ret
ALTERNATIVE APPRO CHES TO 1DENT1 `: '�1G NEEDS
There are several apoaches to esurnating needs k and recreation facilities.
They include the of national standards, measure to of participation levels, user
trend analysis, in om surveys and public meetings, setting and participation
mo&ls. Since will be used, each is briefly describe below.
National St s
'
Standards a first created by a group of professionals who c blished an easily
understo,_ >`ormat of what "seemed to be right" based on their ` cticai ex�pperience in
the field; Ihese standards were felt to be most useful if stated to antiE a terms of
acres ciIities per given population level, i.e., IO acres of park r 1,000 population.
The f ' t recognized standards are those published by the Nation;ftecreation and
P ciation (NRPA). In 1983 they published a report titled "RUreation, Park and
O 'Space Standards", that is well recognized in the recreation fieldN?11,is document
rrently being updated to reflect changes in park and recreation use patterns.
e problem with using national standards is that they do not reflect local conditions.
at is right for one community will probably not be correct for another. In addition, a
r
Gtv of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Park and Facility Nerdt
standard for a large city in southern California would not be suitable for Lodi. Because
of this, national standards are only used as guidelines.
Participation Levels Analysis
Recognizing the need to reflect local conditions, approximately 15 years ago, 3C
Draggoo & Associates began measuring per capita recreation participation levels in
everycommunity studied. This participation level is measured in terms of number of
occasions in a given 30 day period when that activity is in season. The activity level is
then compared to other similar communities or with the average of all recent
cotnmumues surveyed. This overall average is called Vie Participation Average.
User Trend Analysis
With this approach, facility► demand estimates are developed by extrapolating historical
use statistics for each facility. If local statistical information is used, the results can be
reasonably accurate because they reflect use in the specific community. However, the
trend analysis approach can be influenced by local conditions or current trends in
recreation interests. As an example, if one charts tennis playing over the last twenty
years, a cycle of interest and level of play emerges. Also, operating conditions such as
quality of the facility, its location. user fees and hours of operation can all play an
important role in the level of use. This method is sometimes used to forecast team
registration if the number of facilities remains constant.
Recreation Surveys
Using the questionnaire approach, future facility needs are sometimes developed from
tel
survey information on user charactenstics, participation patterns, o tenons
and perceived needs. If the questionnaires are drawn from a statistically valid sample, a
good reliable sampling of information can be derived.
Public Meetings
Some communities rely quite heavily on input from the general public to assess the
needs. However, this approach may not reflect the true community need because
special interest groups often do not represent the true community's interest. Note that
the results from the telephone survey sometimes varied considerably from the results of
the workshop meetings.
V-9
CAI of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Pw* and Facility Ntedt
Goals
In some instances, community goals are expressed as the need without quantifiable or
statistical analysis to support the goal: An example might be, 'It is our goal to maintain
a standard of 10% of the community to parks and open space% Goals reflect a
community's desire. While this approach is not the most ideal, in some instances it is
the only option possible. It is a valid approach if the goal can be supported by a true
evaluation of community values and desires.
Participation Models
Participation models are refined statistical formulas used to establish a quantifiable
standard. They are based on actual participation characteristics taken from diaries of
individual participants. When a large sampling is taken, a fairly accurate statistical
profile can be made.
The most accurate participation models are developed for a specific type of area or
facility. Unfortunately, these models are very costly to develop because of the data
needed and they usually only deal with one type of facility.
METHODOLOGY OF ASSESSING NEEDS IN LODI
The method used to forecast park and facility needs in the Lodi area was to develop a
service level standard. This standard was then used to estimate in quantifiable terms
the number of acres or facilities needed to meet the recreation demand in the area. By
attaching the standard to a population variable, it is easy to forecast future needs as the
population grows.
Approach Used to Assess Park Land Needs
Developing a statement of land needs for park areas and open space is the most
difficult of all types of needs analysis because it is dependent upon many community
values and variables. Even the classification of park and open space is sometimes hard
to define. What constitutes a park or open space area? Should school playgrounds be
considered; or private golf courses, commercial landscaped areas, roof top patios or
church recreation areas? Once one defines park and open space as that beyond the
traditional recreation area, the possibilities become endless. To keep away from this
problem, it is recommended that only normal public land used primarily for recreation
or open space use be counted in the standard. This is not to say that school
playgrounds, for example, cannot be used for recreation purposes.
In Lodi, drainage detention basins were built for storing storm water. However,
because the need to store storm water mainly occurs during the winter months, the
detention basins have been designed to serve recreation purposes as well. Because of
this, the recommended standards reflect the land acreage to these basins.
V- 70
a
City of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Park and li NeC&
To determine specific park land needs for Lodi, several analytical methods were used.
These included a comparison to the NRPA Standards, a comparison to other similar
communities, land availability, results of the survey, national trends, financial feasibility
and a look at areas of Lodi that are not now being served by parks and open space. It
should be noted that even with all the statistical information available, a certain amount
of subjective analysis and professional experience must be used to quantify the
standards.
Approach Used to Assess Specialized Facility Needs
Establishing needs for specialized facilities such as sport fields, trail systems, swimming
pools, etc. was also derived from several analytical approaches. They included
information on present recreation participation levels, needs expressed in the survey,
NRPA Standards, input from user groups, trends identified at the national level,
existing numbers of sport teams, play and practice time requirements and mathematical
models developed over the years from other studies.
PARK LAND NEEDS
Starting below, recommended standards for specific types of park areas are liven. in
many cases, comparisons to the NRPA Standard or other communities are given.
These comparisons are given in the form of the "existing ratio". This is the ratio of
existing park land divided by the existing population and is expressed in terms of acres
per 1,000 population. This information is provided to give the reader some indication
of what other communities have in terms of park land but should not be used by itself to
establish a standard.
`M• 2 C '.333
r
Coy of Lodi Parc and Recreation on Pang and Facility'yerit
Existing Inventory
There are currently 27 park and open space sites located in Lodi. These are
summarized below.
Table 27
Existing Park Inventory
City of Lodi
No. No. Acres in
Park Type Sites Acres Detention Areas
Mini -Parks
2
2.7
—
Neighborhood Parks
11
83.2
48.7
Community Parks
2
36.0
35.0
Regional Parks
1
43.0
—
Natural Open Space Areas
1
58.0
—
Special Use Areas •
6
42.3
—
Undeveloped Areas
48�_6
54.0
TOTAL
27
333.8
137.7
• Special use areas include miscellaneous sites that do not Fit into any other category. They
include small landscaped parcels, single purpose facilities, sport complexes and land occupied
by major recreation structures.
Nini-Parks
Definitign
Mitzi -parks. tot lots and children's playgrounds are all small single purpose playlots
designed nmarily for small children. Because of their size, facilities are usually limited
to a smallopengrass area, a children's playground and an occasional picnic site.
Currently, there are two mini -parks in Lodi. They are:
Candy Cane Park 0.2 Acres Developed
Century Park 2.5 Acres Developed
TOTAL 2.7 Acres
On a per acre basis, they are very expensive to construct and maintain and generally
attract a very limited population Sometimes this type of park is popular to new
subdivisions which have a high ratio of young children. However, as the neighborhood
grows older, this type of park will attract very little use due to the limited size and types
of facilities.
V- 12
r -1
QU o/ Lodi Park and Recrratinn Pfan Park and FocifitY Nrrds
No standard for this type of park is recommended. Only when no other options are
available should additional stunt parks be acquired or developed. This should only
occur in areas that are fully developed or where vacant land is scarce.
Neighborhood Parks
Definition:
Neighborhood parks are a combination playground and park designed .primarily for
non -supervised, non -organized recreation activities. In addition to their recreation
value, they also provide a source of open space and aesthetic quality in the
neighborhood. See page VI -1 for a farther definition of neighborhood parks.
n i
Currently, there are 11 park sites in Lodi that fit this category. The average size is
about seven acres. Three of the existing neighborhood park sites are less than three
acres in size but because of facilities they contain and the function they serve, have
been classified as neighborhood parks. The existing neighborhood parks include:
American Legion Park
6.0 Acres
Beckman Park
16.6 Acres
Emerson Park
3.0 Acres
English Oaks Commons
3.7 Acres
Hale Park
3.1 Acres
Henry Glaves Park
15.0 Acres
John Blakely Park
10.0 Acres
Lawrence Park
2.8 Acres
Van Buskirk Park
1.0 Acres
Vinewood Park
16.0 Acres
Westgate Park
6.0 Acres
TOTAL 83.2 Acres
While it is sometimes difficult to compare communities in teens of park land, a look at
other cities does help to show the range that is possible. When the ratio of
neighborhood parks to population is analyzed. Lodi is about average.
V_ 13
r
C& of WiP_ark and Rtcseariat Plan Park and F468M Yredjr
City
Table 28
Existing Neighborhood Park Service Levels
Selected Cities
1991 Population Existing Ratio(11
Lodi
52,700
1.5
Chico(2)
75.000
0.1
Davis
47,600
1.0
Manteca
41,650
2.S
Merced
57.400
0.5
Redding
69.900
0.4
Roseville
47,050
2.1
Turtock
43,900
0.S
Woodland
41.200
0.5
NRPA Recommendation 1-2 Acres
(1) Existing ratio of acres/1,000 population
(2) Population of Park District
Determination of the standard:
1. Comparison to otherstandards: The NRPA recommends 1-2 acres per 1,000
population. Lodi s current ratio of 1.6 acres/ 1,000 is well within this
standard. When compared to other communities in the region, it is about
average, although the range varies considerably.
2. Service area: 'The service area of a neighborhood park is about a half mile
radius. Users of a neighborhood park should not have to cross a major
arterial street or other barrier to reach a park. However, in Lodi, most of the
neighborhood parks are located on arterial streets and thus do not meet this
requirement. Using the service area of a half mile radius, several existing
areas of Lodi are not being served by neighborhood parks. This includes the
extreme north area of Lodi, the areas just west of Highway 99 and the
unincorporated area along the western edge of the city.
I SwvOV Workshops: The participants at the community workshop meetings
expressed an interest in the larger community parks because they can
accommodate more facilities. However, the results of the telephone survey
indicated more interest in the smaller neighborhood parks.
4. User trends: The trend in most growing communities where land is available
is to develop larger parks because they can accommodate more facilities, are
cheaper on a per acre basis to maintain and can be more easily programmed.
In older communities where park land is scarce, the smaller neighborhood
park is more popular.
V- 14
r
QU 2( Lodi Park and Remotion Plan Pork and Focili Mmm
5. Goals/Policies: The current City practice is to develop neighborhood parks
in conjunction with storm water detention basins. The City has established a
standard of 3.9 acres per 1000 population for community and neighborhood
park facilities. This standard excludes school sites and detention basins.
Recommendations: (Neighborhood Parks)
Comments:
Based on the service area analysis, about nine additional neighborhood park sites are
needed to completely sErve the city and its pplanning area. Using an average of eivht
acres per site, this is ejuivalent to roughly 72 acres of additions[ land. However, in
some portions of the city, land suitable for park development is scarce.
The standard of 2.5 acres/1,000 population means that about 50 acres of neighborhood
park land is presently needed.
However, if the Cit chooses to maintain its present standard of 1.6 acres/1,000
population, either fewer parks will be developed or they will be smaller. The standard
of 1.6 acres/1,000 population is a reduction of 72 acres of neighborhood park at
buildout.
Community Park Needs
Definition:
A community park is planned primarily to provide active and structured recreation
opportunities for young people and adults. In general. community park facilities art:
designed for organized activities and sports, although individual and family activities
are also encouraged. Where there are no neighborhood parks, the community park can
also serve this function. While the City of Lodi has one community park of ten acres,
they usually exceed 20 acres in size and often have sport fields or similar facilities as the
central focus of the park.
V- 15
111114Pst Standard {
1-2AQes/I,000Popufanori s
I d Aae11,000 Populatton:
Recdmmerided Standard
-
ZSiirres/1;000 Populatco),
Comments:
Based on the service area analysis, about nine additional neighborhood park sites are
needed to completely sErve the city and its pplanning area. Using an average of eivht
acres per site, this is ejuivalent to roughly 72 acres of additions[ land. However, in
some portions of the city, land suitable for park development is scarce.
The standard of 2.5 acres/1,000 population means that about 50 acres of neighborhood
park land is presently needed.
However, if the Cit chooses to maintain its present standard of 1.6 acres/1,000
population, either fewer parks will be developed or they will be smaller. The standard
of 1.6 acres/1,000 population is a reduction of 72 acres of neighborhood park at
buildout.
Community Park Needs
Definition:
A community park is planned primarily to provide active and structured recreation
opportunities for young people and adults. In general. community park facilities art:
designed for organized activities and sports, although individual and family activities
are also encouraged. Where there are no neighborhood parks, the community park can
also serve this function. While the City of Lodi has one community park of ten acres,
they usually exceed 20 acres in size and often have sport fields or similar facilities as the
central focus of the park.
V- 15
& gf L Park and Recreation Pran Park and Foci'i 4trrdt
The two community parks in Lodi are Salas Park and Kofu Park. The existing
community park sites are:
Kofu Park 10.0 Acres
Samuel Salas Park 26.0 Acres
TOTAL 36.0 Acres
When compared to other cities, Lodi is considerably short in community park land.
Table 28
Existing Community Park Service Levels
Selected Cities
city 1991 Population - Existing Ratio(l)
Lodi
52,700
0.6
Chico(2)
75.000
1.3
Davis
47,600
2.2
Manteca
41,650
0.4
Merced
57.400
1.0
Redding
69.900
1.1
Roseville
47.050
0.4
Turlock
43.900
1.1
Woodland
41,200
0.8
NRPA Recommendation 5-8 Acres
(i). Existing ratio of acres/1,000 population
(2) Population of Park District
Determination of the standard:
1. Comparison to other standards: The NRPA recommends 5-8 acres per 1,000
population. Lodi's current ratio of 0.7 acres/1,000 is well below this
standard. When compared to other communities in the region, Lodi is below
average.
I Service area: The service area of a community park averages about a 1-2
mile radius. In Lodi, the northern and eastern portions of the City are not
currently served by community parks.
V- 16
r
ci7 of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Park and Facility Needs
3. Surveys R'orkshops: While the community workshop meetings revealed a
preference of the larger community parks over the smaller neighborhood
parks, the telephone survey indicated just the opposite.
4. User trends: 'Ilse larger multi -service community parks have become popular
because they provide a wider range of activities, are easier to program and
are cheaper to maintain on a per -acre basis.
5. Goals/Policies: The city has established a standard of 3.9 acres per 1,000
population for community and neighborhood park facilities, which excludes
school sites and detention. basins.
Recommendation: (Community Parks)
NRPA Stmtdard'Y
5-8 acres.'' 400 populano►i
Present Ratty �tK�
a7 acres/I,000 populattoir z X
�. �",'�. �� Y.a' � Y�f e� "•.�.� : - .� - -t :w x : -. >".�. 2 r fps � ..y s.;
Xet ommended Stirndarrl.. 18 acnes/1,000 Dopulaaon
Qomments:
The recommended standard of 1.8 acres per 1,000 population means that the City
currently needs about 60 additional acres of land for community parks. By the year
2007, the number will rise to about 94 acres.
Regional Parks Needs
Definition:
Regional parks are large recreation areas that serve the entire region. Often they
attract visitors far beyond the boundaries of the City. They usually exceed 100 acres in
size and may focus on one ani ue feature or offer a wide rangeof activities and
facilities. Typical regional par include areas for golfing, picnicking, boating, fishing,
swimming, camping and hiking. State and county parks often fit this category.
An i
Lodi currently has one regional park, which is Lodi lake Park. 'Ilse major features that
make this a regional park are the lake, Mokelumne River, swimming beach and the
large picnic areas. While this 43.0 acre site is small for a regional park, it is very unique
and attracts visitors well beyond the city limits of Lodi.
V- 17
r �1
Gry of Lodi Panty and Recreation Plan Park and Egcrli& Nsedr
Table 29
Existing Regional Park Service Levels
Selected Cities
City 1991 Population Existing Ratio(l)
Lodi
$2,700
0.8
Chico(2)
75,000
31.3
Merced
S7,400
0.7
Redding
69.900
1.1
Roseville
47,050
3.2
Woodland
41.200
1.S
NRPA Recommendation 5-10 Acres
(1) Existing ratio o1 acres/t,000 population
(2) includes Bidwell Park, which contains over 2,000 acres of land
Determination of the standard:
1. Comparison to other standards: The NRPA recommends 5-10 acres per 1000
population. The 0.3 acres/ 1,000 population is substantially lower than most
comparable communities.
2. Service area: The service area of a regional park depends upon the facilities
and activities it offers. In the case of the Lodi Lake Park, it serves the entire.
community and areas beyond.
3. Survey/Workslwps: The participants at the community workshop meetings
expressed a need for additional land adjacent to Lake Lodi Park and for the
development of the west side of the Lake.
4. User trends: Opportunities to develop large regional parks seldom occur. A
city should consider itself fortunate to have such a park
5. Goals/Policies: 'There are no city policies concerning regional park
development.
Recommendation: (Regional Pants)
V- 18
City of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Park and Faciliry ,1/eeds
Qomments:
Ile recommended standard reflects the same ratio as what now exists. When the City
reaches saturation population, an additional demand of 17 acres of regt'onal park land
will exist. "This is equivalent to the amount of undeveloped land found west of Lodi
Lake.
Natural Open Space Needs
Definition:
Open space is defined as undeveloped land primarily left in its natural environment
with recreation uses as a secondary objective. It is usuaIIy owned or managed by a
governmental agency and may or may not have public access. This type of land often
includes wetlands, large wooded areas or other similar spaces. In some cases,
environmentally sensitive areas are considered as open space and can include wildlife
habitats, stream and creek corridors, or unique or endangered plant species.
n i
The 58 acre Lodi Lake Nature Area is the only site that meets this category.
It is difficult to compare open space because the definition of open space varies widely
between communities. Listed on the following page are some comparative ratios for
several communities.
Table 30
Existing Open Space Service Levels
Selected Cities
City 1991 Population Existing Ratio(i)
Lodi 52,700 1.1
Davis 47,600 1.5
Redding 69,900 9.8
NRPA Recommendation None
(1) Existing ratio of acres/1,000 population
V- 19
r -I
00v of Lodi Park and Recrration Plart Park and Focili Nrr
Determination of the standard:
1. Comparison to other standards: The NRPA does not have a standard for
open space. Many communities in California have very little open space. In
the northern states of Oregon and Washington. open space is considered very
important in targe urban areas.
2. Service area: There is not a defined service area for open space. It is
dependent upon the function it serves.
3. Surve)/ orkshop: Several of the participants indicated that there was some
interest to preserving land along the Mokelumne River as natural open
space.
4. User trends: In Iarge urban areas there has become a greater awareness of
the value of open space. In Lodi, there are very few opportunities left for
preserving open space areas. The last remaining area to the vicinity is along
the Mokelumne River.
5. Goals/Policies: The City's current policy is to preserve and protect
significant open space areas and natural habitat. The City also intends to
encourage the County to preserve the north bank of the Mokelumne River.
However, to this point virtually no land has been acquired or preserved along
the River.
Recommendation: (Natural Open Space)
Comments:
The recommended standard of 21 acres/1,004 population means that there is a current
need for about 54 acres of land and that this number will rise to about 93 acres by
buildout. Because there are very few opportunities for open space preservation,
acquisition of additional sites should occur as soon as possible.
City of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Park and Eq "11i
Special Use areas
Definition:
Special use areas are miscellaneous public recreation areas or Iand occupied by a
specialized facility. Some of the uses that fall into this classification include small or
special landscaped areas, community gardens, single purpose sites used for field sports
or sites occupied by recreation buildings such as a senior or community center.
n is
In Lodi, this classification includes the following sites:
Armory Park
3.2 Acres
Grape Bowl
15.0 Acres
Hutchins Street Square
10.0 Acres
Parks and Recreation Orrice
1.3 Acres
Softball Complex
7.6 Acres
Tony Zupo Field
3.3 Acres
TOTAL 42.3 Acres
Determination of the standard:
1. Comparison to other standards: There is no specific NRPA standard for
special use areas.
2. Service area: There is not a defined service area for special use areas
considering the various types of facilities it could encompass.
3. Survey/Workshop: There were many participants in the community
workshops that expressed an interest in developing a sports field complex
and another swimming pool facility. Both of these facilities would fall under
the category of special use areas.
Recommendation: (Special Use Areas)
V-21
1
ny_of Lodi Pante and Recreation Plan Park and fociliN Nerds
f ;omments:
The standard maintains the present ratio. This amount plus the DeBenedetti park
would provide enough space for a community center, a sports field complex plus some
miscellaneous areas.
Total Park Land
Park sites can be classified into three basic types: (1) sites that are close to most
residents such as neighborhood and community parks, (2) sites that serve an area
beyond the city such as regional parks and open space areas and (3) special use sites.
NPA suggests that a "core' system of parks consisting primarily of type 1 should range
from 6.25 to 10.5 acres per 1,000 po ulation. For Lodi, the present ratio is 2.2 acres
and the standard recommended in this report is 3.4 acres.
In addition to the present inventory of park land, there is an additional 68.6 acres of
undeveloped park sites. These include:
Ed DeBenedetti Park
29.0 Acres
Undeveloped
Maple Square
.6 Acres
Undeveloped
Pixley Park
26.0 Acres
Undeveloped
Lake Park West
13.0 Acres
Undeveloped
TOTAL 68.6 Acres
While the amount of park land varies between communities, it is sometimes helpful to
make comparisons. Table 31 provides this information for reference purposes only.
Table 31
Total Park Land Service Levels
Selected Citks
city 1991 Population Existing Ration]
Lodi
52.700
g•5
Chico(2)
75.000
33.1
Davis
47.600
6.9
Manteca
41,650
4.1
Redding
69.900
13.81
Roseville
47.050
5.7
Turlock
43.900
2.8
Woodland
41,200
2.7
NRPA Recommendation
15-20 Acres
(1) Existing ratio of acres/1,000 population
(2) Population of the Park District. includes Bidwell Park
V- 22
- fir fZ -A
•23rds undo leinieu aq pinoM swn IST pue salts:gmd padolanapun se sistxa
Apeaile purl 3o sang 04 Alieau `inoplmq ie papaau st purl jo sane £'£1 £ ieuop!ppe
ue iegi suraw uoneln od 000`1 iod sanr 0•g jo piepuels papuaurwno32i oqi optla
:sjuawwoo
p?Orr 3y :lO�d rr Vim V,gq'€g""G22IlIUOJ2�
?. "Aa�a'yS'n "° '.:$¢6,{�as!se ,e.r,,.. . �.., isget''.itiY +y�wc}.}: 3.
Oxy `uouvindodOOp7/ F''9dd;1a
uo:tolridod 000`I/ OZ
PJS`l;'d?INx'
� s �.: r x +T r E: ,u 3`,,.a� s 2�"�° y x�'f•+3 � x. s x�, y
(Puel Ved NMI) :u i;e u ww b8—
r- I
CjMof Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Park and FacrirNVeedr
SPECIALIZED FACILITY NEEDS
Senior Youth Baseball Fields
90• bases: 300 - 320' outfield dimension
n i
This is one of the youth sportsprograms that is managed by the Boosters of Boys/Girls
Sports Organization (BOBS). In this program there are 23 baseball teams ranging to
age from 13-18.
Senior Babe Ruth (ages 16-18) 2 Teams
Babe Ruth (ages 13-15) 21 Teams
The senior youth baseball program utilize seven fields, three of which are used only for
practice. However, Zupo Field is often rented out to private &coups and has very
Iinuted availability for the Senior Youth Baseball program Lasted below are the fields
used for this baseball program:
1 Blakely Park
Unlighted
1 Kofu Park
Lighted
1 Lodi High School
Practice only
1 Samuel Saias Park
Lighted
2 Tokay High School
Practice only
1 Zupo Fetd
Lighted
7 TOTAL
Qetermination of the sant, r�Si:
1. Comparison to other standards: The NRPA standard for baseball fields is
one field per 5,000 population. The City of Lodi has a ratio of one field per
3.650 population if both senior and youth baseball fields are combined
2. Service area: The NRPA standard recommends a service area of 1/4 to 1/2
mile radius. In Lodi, the distribution of fields appears to be fairly well
dispersed throughout the City.
3. Survey/Workshop: The participants at the community workshops identified a
sports complex as a high priority.
4_ User trends: On the national scale, baseball has increased by nearly 501-75
since 1984.
5. Participation: Participation in youth baseball is extremely high in Lodi. In
Chico, which has about the same population as Lodi, the program is 75%
smaller.
V- 24
City of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Park and Faeility filer
6. Field demand- Nearly all of the teams play 1-2 games a week and practice 2-
3 times a week. A breakdown of the teams and the number of games or
practices is listed below.
No. No. Practices No. Games Total/
league Teams oer Week oer Week Week
Senior Babe Ruth (age 16-18)
Practice 23 — 6
Games 2— 1 1
Babe Ruth (age 13-15)
Practice 21 2 — 42
Games 21 — 2 21
From the above analysis, there is an existing demand for 70 games per week.
Supply is based on the amount of practice and play a field can accommodate in a
week. Currently, unlighted fields can accommodate one game a night during the
week and 4 games on Saturday. Lighted fields can accommodate two games a
night. Vere are currently three li&hted fields and four unlighted fields used for
baseball. With these assumptions to mind, we have:
70 games/practice per week demand
98 games/practice fields can accommodate
Based on the analysis above. there is a current surplus of 18 games a week, which is
equivalent to roughly one field. However, if Zupo field is removed from the inventory
for most play, there are just enough fields.
Recommendations: (Senior Youth Baseball fields)
Comments:
The above recommended standard recommends retaining the current ratio of senior
baseball fields.
V- IC
r
CN of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Pork and Facili Nee
Youth Baseball/Softball Fields
60' bases; 200-250' outfield dimension
An i
The youth baseball program is also managed by the Boosters of Boys/Girls Sports
Organization (BOBS). Below is a list youth baseball/softball teams in the Lodi area.
Boys: Bambino -Junior Babe Ruth (ages 11-12)
26Teams
Farm League (age 10)
14 Teams
Rookie League (age 9)
13 Teams
Instruction League (age s)
14 Teams
T Ball League (ages 7 and under)
30 Teams
Girls: Softball (ages 13-16)
7Teams
Softball (ages 11-12)
10 Teams
Softball (ages 9-10)
7 Teams
Softball (ages 8-9)
6 Teams
Total 127 Teams
Tice 127 teams currently play theirgames on 13 fields. "lite remaining 46 fields are used
for practice only. Below is a breakdown of the fields used for youth baseball/softball.
2 Beckman Park
T -Ball only
4 Beckman Elementary School
Practice
I Blakely Park
Game
1 Emerson Park
Game
1 English Oaks Common
T Bap only
2 Enna Reese -iementary School
Practice
3 George Washington Elem. School
Practice
2 Heritage Elementary School
Practice
1 Kofu Park
Game
5 Lakewood Elementary School
Practice
4 Leroy Nichols Eleni. School
Practice
4 Lodi High School
Practice
3 Needham Middle School
Practice
3 Salas Park
Game; Lighted
7 Senior Elementary School
Practice
2 Seventh Day Adventist School
Practice
2 Tokay High School
Game
2 Vinewood Park
Game
4 Vinewood Elementary School
Practice
3 Westgate Park
(future)
3 Woodbridge Middle School
Practice
59 TOTAL (13 Game Fields)
V- 26
01
rim !2f Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Park and Facili Nee
Determination of the standard:
1. Comppariaotherstandards: 'Ilse NRPA standard for all baseball fields is
one 6eIdIf both senior and youth baseball fields are
combini has a ratio of one field per 3.650 population For youth
baseball only, the current ratio is one field per 5,615 persons.
2. Service area: 'lite NRPA standard recommends a service area of 1/4 to 1/2
mile radius. In Lodi, practice youth baseball/softball fields are located
primarily at middle and elementary schools, and the game fields are located
at city parks. For the most part, the distribution of fields appears to be
evenly dispersed throughout the City.
3. SurveylWorWipp: In the community workshop meeting, there was some
interest to developin a youth sports complex. This could include several
baseball or softball fields developed at one location. Youth baseball fields
could be one of several facilities located at the sports complex.
4. Usertrends: On the national scale, vouth baseball has increased by nearly
50% since 1934. It is assumed that this interest will carry over into the older
age groups such as American Legion or Senior Babe Ruth Baseball.
5. Goals/Policies: like baseball, there are no specific goals or policies on the
development of youth baseball fields.
6. Participation: Due to the local enthusiasm in youth sports, organized sports,
such as baseball, is expected to have a higher participation level.
7. Field demand :Most of the teams play one to two games a week and practice
once or twice a week Based on the information above, we have:
No. No. Practices No. Games Total/
Teams Per Week Per Week Week
Bambino - Jr Babe Ruth (age 11-12)
Practice 26 2 — 52
Game 26 — 2 26
Farm League (age 10)
Practice 14 1 — 14
Game 14 — 1.5 10.5
Rookie League (age 9)
Practice 13 1 — 13
Game 13 — 1.5 9.75
Instruct. League (age 8)
Practice 14 3 — 42
Game 14 — t 7
V-27
Ca Qf rod Park and Recmation Plan Park and F.-- NitQt
No. No. Practices No. Games Total/
"'ti
74 Currently, unlighted fields for this group can accommodate one game a night
during the week and 6 games on Saturday. Lighted fields can accommodate two
aures a night. Of the 13 fields used for games, three of the fields are lighted.
With these assumptions in mind, we have:
92 games per week demand
158 games fields can accommodate
Based on the analysis above, there is a surplus of 66 games per week which is
equivalent to roughly 3 fields.
Recommendations: (Youth baseball/softball fields)
V- 28
Team
Per Week
Per Week
Week
T -Sall (age 7 & under)
Practice
30
3
—
90
Game
30
—
i
is
Girls Softball (age 13-16)
Practice
7
1
—
7
Game
7
—
2
7
Girls Softball (age 11-12)
Practice
10
1
—
10
Game
10
—
2
10
Girls Softball (age 9-10)
Practice
7
2
—
14
Game
7
—
1
3.5
Girls Softball (age 9-9)
Practice
6
2
—
12
Game 6
6
—
1
3
"'ti
74 Currently, unlighted fields for this group can accommodate one game a night
during the week and 6 games on Saturday. Lighted fields can accommodate two
aures a night. Of the 13 fields used for games, three of the fields are lighted.
With these assumptions in mind, we have:
92 games per week demand
158 games fields can accommodate
Based on the analysis above, there is a surplus of 66 games per week which is
equivalent to roughly 3 fields.
Recommendations: (Youth baseball/softball fields)
V- 28
Q& of Lodi Park and Rc=adon Plan Park and Facility Nee
Comments:
The recommended standard recognizes a surplus of youth baseball/softball fields.
Based on the recommended standard. no additional fields are needed to meet the
current demand within the Lodi Unified School District service area. Likewise, no
additional facilities are needed to meet the demand of the city.
Y. ?9
r
Ch o/ L M Park and Reereydon Plan Panic and FacrliN Net
Adult Softball Fields
275.300' outfield for slow pitch; 225• for men's fast pitch and 250' outfield for women's slow Ditch.
n i
The adult softball program is managed by the Lodi Parks and Recreation Department.
In addition to providing its own recreation program, the City is also responsible for the
scheduling of the church leagues and the senior softball program. A breakdown of the
summer adult softball teams is shown below.
# Teams
League (Summer League)
Church Teams
Senior Teams
Women (fast pitch)
Men (fast pitch)
Women (slow pitch)
Men (stow pitch)
Total
16 Teams
5 Teams
14 Teams
22 Teams
25 Teams
132 Teams
214 Teams
While there are 15 fields in the Lodi area, only 10 fields are used for softball, which
includes two fields used exclusively for church league teams and three that are used
only for tournaments.
1 Armory Park Lighted
2 Grape Bowl Lighted
3 Lawrence Elementary School Used for tournaments only
2 Softball Complex Lighted
2 Temple Baptist Church Used for church league only
The ten fields represent a ratio of one field per 7,300 population and is about the same
as Chico (CARD), which also has a very large adult softball program
Lodi
Redding
CARD
Rosevile
Vacaville
1 field per 7,300 population
1 field per 9.495 population
1 field per 7,500 population
1 field pelf 3A O population
1 Reid per 2.059 population
The five senior teams play during the daytime hours, which does not interfere with the
prime evening hours. For purposes of this evaluation, an inventory of seven fields and
209 teams will be used.
V-30
7
Ory of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Pork and Facility Wttdl
Determinatin of the st nuc ate:
1. Comparison to other standards: The NRPA standard for softball is I field
per 5,000 population. With Lodi's ratio of one field per 10,428 population, it
is well below the recommended standard.
2. Service area: According to the NRPA, the service area for softball fields is
1/4 to 1/2 mile radius. In terms of distribution, the existing softball fields are
concentrated in the northeast portion of the City.
3. SurveyliVorkshop: The participants at the two community workshops
indicated a great need for softball fields, particularly in a complex.
4. User trends: Interest in softball has remained somewhat constant for the last
ten years.
5. Field demand Most of the teams play one game a week and have no
practices. There are currently five lighted fields used for softball play.
Assuming four games a night can be played on lighted fields, we have:
No. No. Practices No. Games Total
League
Teams per Week
per Week
Week
Women (fast pitch)
14 —
1
T
Men (fast pitch)
22 —
1
t1
Women (stow pitch)
25 —
1
12-5
Men (slow pitch)
132 —
1
66
Church leagues
16 —
1
8
96.5 games per week demand
100 games fields can accommodate
Recommendation: (adult softball fields)
a ,meq
t
�'�PreSenc�au2t�K_att Ma> '• � l field+per° 0,:4?.��ro
g ecommended �thndard I frelclper 9;lD�po�yufwotro r
tv 2wY`4".s.'"`W3
V-31
l
Gry of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Park and Facility Need,
Comments:
While the City is currently playing four games per night on lighted fields, it is our
recommendation that only three games be played. This allows more time per game and
does not create as much wear on the facility. The recommended standard of one field
per 9,100 persons reflects only three games per field. This standard means that one
more field is needed at the present time to serve the service area. By ultimate buildout,
a total of 11 fields or four new fields will be needed.
V- 32 C,
ppR•
Q]N of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Park an L&cffMNkt �
NN
Comments:
While the City is cu ntly playing four games per night on lighted fieldi, it is our
recommendation that . y three games be plaved. -17his allows more time per game and
does not create as muc ear on the facility. the recommended stAdard of one field
per 9,100 persons reflec my threegarnes per field. This standard means that one
more field is needed at th ' resent time to serve the service arSA;, By ultimate buildout,
a total of 13 Fields or six ne�.fields will be needed. J7 -
Jt
Q0
MIUM
F".A'f Ar CA
10
-5C5A
'15" cjk SMI
El
N
to
Ctv of Lodi Pack and Recreation Plan Park and Facft Needs
Soccer Fields
Field Dimensions: youth soccer SS x 100 yards; junior soccer 6S x 110 Yards; adult soccer 75 x 120 yanb
An i :
The youth soccer program is managed by the Boosters of Boys/Girls Sports
Organization (BOBS). There are 96 boys and girls teams in the program.
Currently, the City does not offer an adult soccer program. However. there are some
Lodi teams that participate in the soccer program through the City of Stockton. There
are three soccer leagues in the region. They are the Stockton United League. which
contains 2 coed teams, 2 men's teams and 1 women's team; the Stockton Metro Soccer
League, which contains 2 men's teams; and the Central California Soccer League,
which contains 2 men's teams. It is also anticipated that there are individual Lodi
residents who play on Stockton teams as well. Listed below is a breakdown of soccer
teams in the Lodi area.
Adult: Stockton United Soccer League
5 Teams
Stockton Metro Soccer League
2 Teams
Central California Soccer League
2 Teams
Boys: Under 7
10 Teams
Under 8
11 Teams
Under 9
12 Teams
Under 10
7 Teams
Under 12 '
11 Teams
Under 14
6 Teams
16-19
1 Team
Competitive
1 Team
Girls: Under 8
10 Teams
Under 10
10 Teams
Under 12
7 Teams
Under 14
6 Teams
16-19
1 Team
Competitive
3 Teams
Unlike other field spore, soccer practice can occur on almost any field dimension.
With the use of portable goals, any level, open grass area will do. In Lodi as in many
communities, soccer is also played on softball and baseball fields. While this multi -use
of sport fields is an excellent use of facilities, year round soccer is now creating a
greater demand for field use.
Currently, eleven youth fields and six adult sized fields are used for games. These fields
are listed on the following page.
V-33
r
Cly of Lodi Paris and Rarration Plan Paris and Facility Vredr
Adult Fields 2 Lodi High School
4 Senior Elementary School
1 Tokay High School
1 Salas Park
Youth Fields 1 Kotu Park
S Lawrence Elementary School
3 Leroy Nichols Elementary School
2 Salas Park
19 TOTAL
Determination of the standard:
1. Comparison to other standards: The NRPA standard recommends a ratio of
1field per 10,000 population. Lodi has a much tower ratio at one field per
3.100 population.
2. Service area: "The NRPA recommends a service area of 1 to 2 miles for
soccer fields. It appears that the fields are fairly well dispersed throughout
the community.
3. Survey /Workshops: The participants of the community workshops did not
speciffally identify soccer fields as a having a high priority.
4. User trends: In the last ten years soccer has increased significantly in
popularity.
5. Field demand: Although adult soccer is not offered in Lodi, the City should
offer enough field space for this program. Most adult teams play once a
week and practice once a week. The nine existing teams, therefore, create a
demand of nine games/practices per week. An unlighted adult soccer field
will accommodate about 15 games per week assuming three games on
Saturday.
Most of teams play/practice three times a week. Up to 18 games a week can
be played on a soccer field. With these assumptions, we have:
V- 34
7
E
CI:U of Lodi Park and Recreade)n Plan Park and Focili ,V{rAs
No. No. Practices No. Games Total/
Youth: 225 games/practice per week demand (Youth)
165 games/practice fields can accommodate (Youth)
Adult: 27.5 games/practice per week demand (Adult)
60 games/practice fields can accommodate (Adult)
The above analysis indicates that there is a shortage of youth fields and surplus of adult
fields.
Recommendations: (soccer fields)
Comments•
The existing soccer program is adversely impacted by the limited daylight hours and
Boor weather conditions. During the late fall, the amount of available daylight hours
for soccer play is reduced Since many of the fields are located in detention basins,
flooding is sometimes a problem, which delays the games by as much as a week. It is
recommended that any additional game fields be :orated outside the detention basin
areas.
V-35
T
Teams Per Week
Per Week
Week
Adult
Practice
9 1
9
Game
9
1
4.5
Boys/Girls (16.19) Comp.
Practice
6 2
12
Game
6
1
3
Youth (Boys/Girls 7-14)
Practice
90 2
180
Games
90
1
45
Youth: 225 games/practice per week demand (Youth)
165 games/practice fields can accommodate (Youth)
Adult: 27.5 games/practice per week demand (Adult)
60 games/practice fields can accommodate (Adult)
The above analysis indicates that there is a shortage of youth fields and surplus of adult
fields.
Recommendations: (soccer fields)
Comments•
The existing soccer program is adversely impacted by the limited daylight hours and
Boor weather conditions. During the late fall, the amount of available daylight hours
for soccer play is reduced Since many of the fields are located in detention basins,
flooding is sometimes a problem, which delays the games by as much as a week. It is
recommended that any additional game fields be :orated outside the detention basin
areas.
V-35
T
GN of Lodi Pork and Recrearion Plgn Park and Fgcfli� dr
Football Fields
n 1 i
Currently, there are two football programs in the Lodi area. The tackle football
program is managed by the Delta Valley Football League. The season runs from
September to November. Presently, there are four teams from the Lodi area with the
ages of the participants ranging from novice to 10-14 years.
In addition to the tackle football program, there is a flag football program offered by
the City. 'ibis program contains 16 teams with the ages of the participants ranging from
8-14 years.
The two programs use a total of four fields for games. These are:
I Grape Bowl (tackle)
2 Needham Middle School (flag)
I Zupo Field (tackle)
�iPaG: ic�c --s . ;?-- 0,44jt N.04084 "-
Determination
Determination of the standard:
1. Comparison to other standards: The NRPA standard for football fields is 1
field per 20,000 population Lodi has a slightly lower ratio at one field per
18,250 persons.
2. Service area: The NRPA recommends a service area of 15 to 30 minutes
travel time. Nearly all the fields in Lodi can be reached within this period of
time. In terms of the distribution, the fields are concentrated in one portion
of the city.
3. Survey1Workshops. None of the comments addressed the need for
additional football fields.
4. User trends: While interest in tackle foot is decreasing, interest in flag
football is increasing. At the present time, the flag program in Lodi is at
capacity.
S. Field demand: Tackle football teams play once a week and practice four
times a week. Games are played at the stadium and practices are held at the
stadium and at Zupo field. The flag football teams practice twice a week and
play games on Saturday. Practices and games are played at Needham
School.
V- 36
IN
Q& Rf Lo& Park mrd Recreation Plan Pak and Fasilr Nerd,
No. No. Practices No. Games Total/
Teams Per Week Per Week Week
Tackle
Practice 4 4 — 16
Game 4 — 1 2
Flag
Practice 16 2 — 32
Game 16 — 1 a
The above analysis indicates a slight shortage of fields.
Recommendations: (football fields)
.GiY Yn ny .,#'•z`r`y,.3a
v %': �,. a Y• t ). •i ..5� f y lZ,.
NRP` Standard r w I,{eld per 28000
Present lrivent� 4 fretds�'�` x x
�ese�it' aCrlttyRaft � g� freldper�1�2SOpopulateont ,�"�-
�r �,,. ecc`f�ramende�Sfanda�rf. "� t,. I frel�P� `8i���h7�DlliRi1011`' r.2°.� h
Comments•
While the above analysis indicates a slight shortage in football fields, the real need is
for practice space. This could be satisfied by using additional school fields. However, if
the flag. football program continues to grow at the rate is has in the past, one additional
field %roll be needed. Based on a standard of 1 field per 18,000 population, one
additional field is recommended at the present time.
V- 37 .IAN. 2 0 w3
i
Win' of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Pork and Facility Veecz
Tennis Courts
Analysis:
There currently are 29 tennis courts in Lodi located at school sites or in city parks.
There are no public indoor tennis facilities in the Lodi area but there are nine private
courts at a racquet club. The existing inventory is as follows:
2 Hate Park Lighted
5 Kofu Park Lighted
4 Legion Park Lighted
8 Lodi High School
12 Tokay High School
29 Total
The 29 courts in Lodi represent a ratio of one court per 1.834 persons (based on the city
• population). This ratio is low when compared to other cities.
Lodi 1 court per 1,834 population
Redding
t court per 2.593 population
CARD
1 court per 1.875 population
Fulton -EI Camino
1 court per 1.938 population
Mission Oaks
1 court per 2.714 population
Santa para
1 court per 3.744 population
Santa Rosa
1 court per 5.454 population
Sunnyvale
1 court per 2.127 population
Determination of the standard:
1. Comparison to other standards: Lodi has a lower ratio than recommended by
NRPA.
2. Service area: Eighteen of the 29 courts are located on school grounds. None
are located in the northwest or southwest portions of the city.
3. Stuvey/Worksliop: There were no comments in the community workshop
meetings that specifically addressed the need for additional tennis courts.
4. User trends: On a national scale, interest in tennis has remained about the
same for the last ten years.
5. Participation: It appears from the number of courts that tennis has a fairly
high participation level.
V- 38
r
CiN of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Park and F jdbLNee e
7. Court demand: Lodi has about the same ratio of tetuus Courts as Chico
(CARD). This agency felt with that ratio they were meeting the demand. it
should be kept in mind that a private racquet club with nine; courts is serving
part of the demand in Lodi.
Recommendations: (Tennis Courts)
Comments:
While the recomm- ended standare indicates an adequate supply of courts, they are not
evenly distributed around the city. Areas in the southwest and northwest are currently
without tennis courts. When the Cit,, reaches saturation, an additional 33 courts will be
needed. These new courts should be loc:.ted in the above described areas.
V- 39
JAN. 2 G ;;3
r
Cay at Lodi Pont and Recreation Plan Pant and Faclliry Ne --
Outdoor
-
Outdoor Basketball Courts
n i
Currently, there are two full size basketball court in Lodi. In addition, there are several
shooting hoops at school sites and other city parks. The existing courts are listed below.
I Hate Park
Full court
I Blakely Park
Full court
1 Century Park
Full court
2 Hutchins Street Square
Full court
S Total Basketball Courts
In the last several years, outdoor basketball has become very popular. The most heavily
used facilities are these that simulate the full indoor court conditions. This is one of the
reasons that the courts at Hutchins Street Square and Blakely Park are so popular.
One problem with quality outdoor basketball courts is that they often attract users from
outside the neighborhood. This sometimes creates tension between the local residents
as well as local user groups.
Recommendations: (Outdoor Basketball Courts)
Comments:
The recommended standard of one court_per 10,000 is based on a service ratio of about
1-11/2 miles. This standard means that five additional courts wilt be needed when the
city reaches saturation.
�I
Qj gf Lodi Park and Recmarion Pfan Park and Faeilrry Nerds
Swimming Pools (indoor)
25 meter 6 lane pool = 3,608 sq. R water area; 2S yard x 25 meter •L' pool = 4.996 sq. ft water area; 50
meter s 8 lane pool = 8,610 sq. R. water arm
n i i
The only public indoor pool in the Lodi area is located at Hutchins Street Square. It is
a 25 yard x 10 yard pool and used primarily for senior programs. While public indoor
swimmin in Lodi is very limited, the swimming season is only a few days longer than in
the Pacif c Northwest where indoor pools are very popular.
Determination of the standard:
1. Comparison to other standards: The NRPA standard is 1 pool per 20,000
population.
2. Service area: The NRPA service area is 15 - 30 minutes travel time.
3. Survey/Workshops: Several comments were received on need for a large
outdoor pool.
4. User trends: Swimming is usually one of the top recreation activities in the
country.
5. Demand model: The survey indicated a somewhat lower than average
amount of swimming participation in Lodi_ As an example, per capita
participation for recent cities we have studied are:
Lodi
3.4 occasions
Redding
5.2
Chico
5.5
FEC
2.4
The per capita outdoor swimming rate in Lodi is currently 3.4 occasions.
However, only about 5.10015 of the swims would take place in a public pool in
a winter month. An indoor pool should be designed for winter use demand.
Based on an existing population of 53,186 we have:
5.2 x 53,186 x 5% = 13,828 Swims
V - -$I
City of Loi Park and Rterearion Plan Panic and Facility Nrr�e
It is a fact that 75% of all swimming takes place in shallow water (water 5
feet or less). Using this information. we shall first determine shallow water
requirements and then deep water requirements.
Shallow Water Demand
Multiply 14,467 monthly swims x 7517o = 10,850 shallow swims
Divide by average of 30 days per month = 362 daily swims
Multiply by the 60% peak load factor = 217 peak swimmers
Multiply by 12 sq. ft. per swimmer = 2,604 sq. ft. water area
demand
Deep Water Demand
Multiplyy 14,467 monthly swims x 25% = 3,617 deep water swims
Divide by average of 30 days per month = 121 daily swims
Multiply by the 60% peak load factor = 73 peak swimmers
Multiply by 27 sq. ft. per swimmer = 1,971 sq, n. water area
demand
Total Indoor Pool Area Demand: 4.S7S sq. R water area
Recommendations: (indoor pool area)
Comments:
The recommended standard means that there is a present demand for 4,575 square feet
of indoor pool area. If the Hutchins Street Square pool area is deducted from this
amount, it means that there is a net unmet demand of 2,325 square feet of pool area.
This amount is not enough to justify another pool at this time.
7
CM Qj L,,,i; Pork and Rtcrearion Plan Park and Facitiry %'tt
Gymnasium Space
Basketball -50'%S4', Volleyball - 30N60'
n i
The City of Lodi offers an adult basketball and volleyball program by renting sQace and
installing two temporary floors at the Grape Pavilion. Below is a breakdown of teams
in the two programs:
No. No. Practices No. Games Total/
The basketball program is played on the two courts at the Grape Pavilion. The season
begins in mid-October and runs through mid-January. These courts provide two games
each per night plus four games per court on Friday. These two courts will support up to
24 games per week.
The demand for adult basketball is currently 21 games per week. The youth Ieague
plays during the early evening so as not to interfere with the adult programs.
The volleyball program begins once the basketball program is finished. This consists of
12 men's teams and 20 coed teams. The season begins in mid-January and extends
through mid-March. The demand for volleyball is 16 games a week In addition, the
high school program has 4 teams that play through March and April
A summary of the demand for basketball and volleyball is shown below.
Basketball:
Adult: 21 games/practice per week demand (Adult)
24 games/practice gyms can accommodate (Adult)
V. 43
Teams Per Week
Per Week
Week
Adult Basketball
Game
42 —
1
21
Youth Basketball
Game
40 —
2
40
Adult Volleyball
Game
32
1
16
Youth Volleyball
Practice
4 1
—
4
Game
4 —
1
2
The basketball program is played on the two courts at the Grape Pavilion. The season
begins in mid-October and runs through mid-January. These courts provide two games
each per night plus four games per court on Friday. These two courts will support up to
24 games per week.
The demand for adult basketball is currently 21 games per week. The youth Ieague
plays during the early evening so as not to interfere with the adult programs.
The volleyball program begins once the basketball program is finished. This consists of
12 men's teams and 20 coed teams. The season begins in mid-January and extends
through mid-March. The demand for volleyball is 16 games a week In addition, the
high school program has 4 teams that play through March and April
A summary of the demand for basketball and volleyball is shown below.
Basketball:
Adult: 21 games/practice per week demand (Adult)
24 games/practice gyms can accommodate (Adult)
V. 43
r
City of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Pork ort jr__ �•r
Volleyball:
Adult: 16 games/practice per week demand
36 games/practice gyms can accommodate
Youth: 6 games/practice per week demand
36 games/practice gyms can accommodate
Based on the above analysis, there is a slight surplus of gym time for basketball as well
as volleyball. Currently, the basketball program could accommodate an additional 3
games a week or 6 teams. The volleyball program could accommodate an additional 20
games a week.
Recommendations: (gymnasiums)
Comments:
One of the problems with the courts at the Grape Pavilion is that they are only
available for a limited time of the year. in addition, a gym f..1or must be assembled for
the facility to be useable. The two gym floors provide enough space for either
volleyball or basketball but not at the same time. Other gym -related activities are quite
restncted. If a permanent structure was constructed, a much larger year-round program
could be offered in volleyball, basketball and other activities.
Access to school facilities has been severely restricted. School gyms are used for their
programs and by the youth basketball program. Unfortunately, demand for school gyms
occurs at the same time as for the recreation programs offered by the City.
Based on the standard of i court per 18,000 population, one additional gymnasium
court is presently needed.
llRrr� "' r $
F court So 000 ELilion
'lt101X
n,y
2 COtLl7S o- �
� t� X o s:
court per 26600' opulatlon S,
ctedStan'
fh& '
Comments:
One of the problems with the courts at the Grape Pavilion is that they are only
available for a limited time of the year. in addition, a gym f..1or must be assembled for
the facility to be useable. The two gym floors provide enough space for either
volleyball or basketball but not at the same time. Other gym -related activities are quite
restncted. If a permanent structure was constructed, a much larger year-round program
could be offered in volleyball, basketball and other activities.
Access to school facilities has been severely restricted. School gyms are used for their
programs and by the youth basketball program. Unfortunately, demand for school gyms
occurs at the same time as for the recreation programs offered by the City.
Based on the standard of i court per 18,000 population, one additional gymnasium
court is presently needed.
URI
Q:M.(L"d1 Park and Recreation Plan - Park and Facility
Recreation Traits
An I
Currently, there are 0.5 miles of paved bicycle traits and 1.8 miles of unpaved nature
trails in the Lodi area. All are located in the Lake Lodi Wilderness area.
Determination of the standard:
1. Comparison to othersrandards: There are no national standards for
recreation trails
2. Survey/ orkshgps- The workshop meetings revealed some interest in trails.
The telephone survey indicated considerable trail activity at the present time.
3. User trends: Interest in trail related activities (walking, hiking, bicycling,
rollerblading. jogging etc., have shown a remarkable increase in the last five
years. Most trail activity is now occurring on sidewalks or in the streets. The
trails at Lake Lodi Wilderness Area receive considerable use because they
are the only trails in the entire Lodi area.
4. Demand model: The following analysis and recommendations are for
recreation related off-street pedestrian and bicycle paths. The mathematical
model we have developed for identifying trail need activities is shown below.
This information has been developed over the years by comparing
participation and trail systems in other communities. The total annual
occasions shown is for nature walks, walking for pleasure, bicycling and
jogging/running-
A. Total participation: 798,000 annual occasions
B. % of use on average peak day: 1.3%
C. % who wish to use trail: 15%b
D. Occasions per mite: 12
E. Turnover rate: 10
Formula: A x B x = miles of trail presently needed
DxE
Standard: 0.24 miles per 1,000 population
V- 45
�I
=-8271M = . , t _
Recommendations: (trails)
r`��1tY6/ti0lf' j, .e�2-3
-N'tll�S•�^^ `^�+' �.si Ya. i.. •�:;
Y°� fsertl FuCrl/l)► i[1lt04 1'`" kx" D 04ms7sprr1;000populattort
:,�F,.,,, t aF¢ g a B.' w• v ' 'ti
$ a ,t'".y;1' �•:J�g, u �,dF .G.. .n a55 '° % :` 'r` ts' .. '�•:, .,y �.ix�fe�y^76 'f+ + ✓
,�< Keeommende' Standctrri:; :; , ;� 0.24 meta per 1000 populatton At
r33rrtz aXyytwy�x y r v q- �pr��xx 4 .s%'��f?��kor
Qomments:
The recommended standard reflects a total current demand of 12.8 miles of off-street
recreation trails. Because Lodi has little opportunity to acquire natural open space
which would be suitable for non -paved hiking trails, approximately 90% of the trails
should be paved.
The recommended standard means that an additional 10.5 miles of trail are presently
needed.
V. 4.6
T
Cir? of Lodi Pork and Recnadon Plan Park and Facility Aferdjr
SUMMARY OF LAND AND FACILITY NEEDS
r80 32
Summary of Park and Facility Needs
City of Lodi
(1) Assumes a 1992 population of 53,186 and a Buildout population of 72,000. For organized sports assumes a 1992 population of 73,000
and a year 2007 population of 102,050
• Excludes 2.7 acres of mint perks and 68.6 saes of undeveloped park land.
9 No
V- 47 AQR
Recommended
Existing
Demand (1)
Additional Head
Perk Area or Facility
StandaM
Inventory
1492 _uNdout
1992
Bu110out
Neighborhood Parks
2.5 Ac./1,000 Pop.
83.2
133.0 Ac.
180.0 Aa
49.9
Ac. 96.8 AC.
Community Parks
1.8 Ac./1,000 Pop.
36.0
95.7
129.6
59.7
93.6
Regional Parks
0.9 At«/1,000 Pop.
43.0
42.S
$7.6
(0.5)
44.8
General Open Space
2.1 Ac./1,000 Pop.
58.0
111.7
151.2
S3.7
93.2
Special Use Areas
0.8 AC/1,000 Pop.
42.3
42.S
37.6
0.2
15.1
TOTAL PARK LAND
&0 Ac./1,000 Pop.
262.5 Acres •
42S.4 Ac.
$76.0 Ac.
162.9
Ac. 313.3 Ac.
Sensor Baseball Fields
1 per 10,000 Pop.
7
7
10
-
3
Youth Baseball Fields
1 per 6,000 Pop.
13
12
17
-
4
Sottb*# Fields
1 Per 9,100 Pop.
7
8
11
1
4
Football Fields
1 par 18,000 Pop.
4
4
6
-
2
Soccer Fields
d per 3,800 Pop.
19
19
27
2
a
Tennis Courts
1 per 1,850 Pop.
29
40
62
11
33
Basketball Courts (outdoor)
1 par 9,000 Pop.
S
6
0
1
3
Indoor Pool Area
86.0 SF/1,000 Pop.
2,250
4,575 SF
6,192 SF
2,325 SF
3,942 SF
Gymnasium Space
I per 10,000 Pop.
2 Gyms
3 Gyms
4 Gyms
1 Gyr..
2 Gyms
Retie~ Trails
0.24 miles/1,000 Pop.
2.3 Mt.
12.6 ML
17.3 ML
10.5 ML
4S.0 MI.
(1) Assumes a 1992 population of 53,186 and a Buildout population of 72,000. For organized sports assumes a 1992 population of 73,000
and a year 2007 population of 102,050
• Excludes 2.7 acres of mint perks and 68.6 saes of undeveloped park land.
9 No
V- 47 AQR
.JAN. 2 0 S;3
GN of Lodi Park
and Recreation Plan
ark ger ! Fociliry
1V...ie
SUMMARY OF
LAND AND FACILITY NEEDS
Table 32
i
Summary of Park and Facility Needi#
City of Lodi:=.'
Recommend
Existing
fr {
f"`:" Demand (1)
Additional Need
Parc Area or Facility
Standard •
Inventory -"IM
Buildout
1992
Buildout
I* a�
Neighborhood Parks
2.5 Ac./1,000 Pop.
63.2 J ,'.
133.0 Ac.
160.0 AC.
49.0
Ac. 96.8 Ac.
Community Parks
1.8 Ac./1,000 Pop.
36.0 :'.
95.7
129.6
59.7
93.6
Regional Parks
0.8 Ac./1,000 Pop.
43.0 r
42.5
57.6
(0.5)
14.6
General Open Space
2.1 Ac./1,000 Pop.
S8.0
tit.?
151.2
53.7
93.2
Special Use Areas
0.8 Ac./1,000 Pop.
42.3 y
42.5
57.6
0.2
1S.1
TOTAL PARK LAND
8.0 Ac./1,000 Pop
264Acres •
42S.4 Ac.
576.0 Ac.
162.9
Ac. 313.3 At-
Senior Baseball Fields
1 per 10,000 Pop.
r`.'': 7
7
12
-
5
Youth Baseball Fields
1 per 6,000 Pop.
' ' /3
12
19
6
Softball Fields
1 per 9,100 Pop
7
8
13
1
6
Football Fields
t per 18,000 Pop.
4
4
7
-
3
Soccer Fields
t per 3,800 Pop.
19
19
30
2
t]
Tennis Cowls
1 per 1,850 Pop._`
40
62
1 t
33
Basketball Courts (outdoor)
f per 9,000 Pop.
¢''
6
s
1
3
7}
Indoor Pool Area
88.0 SF/1,000 Pop.
�f': 2,250
4,575 SF
6,192 SF
2,325 SF
3,942 SF
Gymnasium Space
t per 18,000 Pop.
.p .. 2 Gyms
3 Gyms
4 Gyms
t Gym
2 Gyms
Recreation Traits
0.24 mites/1,000 Pop.:;
2.3 ML
12.8 ML
17.3 ML
10.5 ML
15.0 ML
() Buildout
Assumes a 1992 population
of 51186 arida
population of 72,0
For organized sports
assumes
a 1992 population
of 73,000
and a year 2007 population of 113,800
Excludes 2-7 acres of mini-parks and 8>t -cres
of undeveloped park land.
.JAN. 2 0 S;3
T
RECREATION SERVICE LEVELS
SECTION VI
RECREATION SERVICE LEVELS
INTRODUCTION
An important element of this study was the determination of alternative recreation
service levels for the City. In the past. Lodi offered a very high level of service,
particularly in organized sports. However, with an impending budget shortfall in the
forecast, these service levels needed to be re-evaluated.
In this section, an evaluation of current service levels are made. The City of Lodi
cannot and should not attempt to meet all the needs demanded by residents in the area.
Other suppliers of service including private sportgroups, other public agencies and
commercial operators need to also assume part of the responsibility. The issue is then,
what services and to what level should the city offer?
CURRENT SUPPLIERS OF RECREATION SERVICES
One of the fust steps in establishing service levels was to identify the current providers
of recreation services in the Lodi area and note where voids and overlaps occur. To
help identify where duplication and services are missing, the following recreation
facility and service matrixes were prepared. These illustrate the role that each provider
currently assumes in terms of providing land, development and operations,
programming, funding and/or planning. Each of the major providers has been
evaluated according to the following level of responsibility.
o Primary responsibility is defined as a leadership role.
o Partial responsibility is defined as a limited involvement.
o Secondary role is defined as a supportive role.
Y7 - 1
r
EXISTING RECREATION PROVIDERS
Facility Evaluation
RECREATION
CITY OF LODI
REC. OEPT.
.. .
monsoonal
l■g/
mos/o��4
monsoms!
i■v■■^
• ll• ■■■■NI/n//nm
i■/■■EEEEZENEI■■/I//rn/1
4D PRIMARY 0 PARUAL Q SECONOARY
I land 2 Oevelopment and/or Operation 3 Programming 4 Furring 5 Planning
Mlcke Grow Pak savers the Lodi arca low Is located oubida the planning was
Observations of the Facility Service Matt ix:
t. The City is the principle provider of neighborhood park facilities in the Lodi area.
However, San Joaquin County owns and operates one park site in the Woodbridge area
In addition. Hutchins Street Square, which is managed by another city department, also
provides some neighborhood park facilities.
2. The City of Lodi Parks and Recreation Department is the only provider of community
parks in the region.
1/7-2
�1
am
U
I Lodi Lake Park is the only regional park in the planning area. However. h is also
Important to note that San Joaquin County operates Micke Grove Park which is located
just outside the Lodi planning area.
4. The only natural open space in the planning area that is under public ownership is Lodi
Lake. Nature Area
S. Except for several church fields, the Lodi Unified Serol District and the City provide all
of the sport fields in the region. When the sport is in season. the City maintains most of
the school fields.
t3 The only public Indoor pool in Lodi is located at Hutchins Street Square. This pod is
used for adult programs.
7. There are foto outdoor pods in Lodi including two at Blakely Park and one each at the
two high schools.
S. Lodi Lake Park and the Lodi Lake Nature Area provide the only public access to the
Mokefumne River. Except for Lodi Lake Park, there are no developed parks along the
river.
9. Lodi Lake Nature Area has the only off-street hiking and biking tra@s in the area
10. Hutchins Street Square is the primary provider of ctlturaf arts w gn the planning area
11. There are two private senior centers in Lodi and are at Hutchins Street Square.
1? -3
JAN. 2 0 1993
EXISTING RECREATION PROVIDERS
Program Evaluation
•
PROGRAMS•
SERVICES
•
• ♦. r
AEC. DEPT.
• r • .
O SECONDARY
1 Administration 2
Scheduling
3 InStruCUM a
Fun&V S RX
-Ing
NINON
"4110=111
ii111iaai°0
NINON
111101 10:0111 ED
�■/■■■■■/■�E/"E/
RISEN tMUM]
0 2; 1111112131:01
no I
NINON
cOco,■c■■
1■111■0o�
MCI ■■■111■11■1100aao
......
looms
02aoa0■111■
Olson looms
Observations of the Recreation Program Service Matrix
1. Aquatic programs are shared by the City and the Lodi Swim pub. The City is primarily
responsible for lessons and general recreation swimming_ The Swim Club manages the
competitive swimming program.
2. Indoor adult sports, such as basketball and volleyball are primarily offered by the Parks
and Recreation DepartmenL Church organizations provide space for some indoor
sports.
P7 . 4
,lnll. 2 0 199
PRU&ARY
o
PARTIAL
O SECONDARY
1 Administration 2
Scheduling
3 InStruCUM a
Fun&V S RX
-Ing
Observations of the Recreation Program Service Matrix
1. Aquatic programs are shared by the City and the Lodi Swim pub. The City is primarily
responsible for lessons and general recreation swimming_ The Swim Club manages the
competitive swimming program.
2. Indoor adult sports, such as basketball and volleyball are primarily offered by the Parks
and Recreation DepartmenL Church organizations provide space for some indoor
sports.
P7 . 4
,lnll. 2 0 199
City of Lode Park and Recreation Plan Recreation Senice Levels
3. The Park and Recreation Department is responsible for most of the outdoor adult sports
programs. The exception Is the adult soccer program which is managed by the City of
Stockton.
4. The competitive youth sports program is jointly provided by the Parks and Recreation
Department and the BOBS organization.
5. Low key competitive youth sports programs and general sport instruction are mostly
provided by the Parks and Recreation Department The Lodi Unified Scholl District
plays a supportive role by providing most of the fields.
6. Health and fitness classes are offered mostly by private clubs and organizations.
Hutchins Street Square offers space for some privately -offered fitness programs.
7. The Parks and Recreation Department is a major provider of child care in the area
8. The City of Lodi Parks and Recreation Department offers a limited program in the area of
outdoor nature activities and programs.
9. The cultural arts program is almost exclusively offered by Hutchins Street Square.
However. most of the programs are oriented towards performances and exhibits. Very
few programs by them are offered in the area of instniction, art appreciation or general
interest
RECOMMENDED SERVICE LEVELS FOR PARK FACILITIES
Currently, the City of Lodi requires developers to pay a fee for the impacts created by
their projects. These fees go towards the acquisition and development of streets, sewer
and water systems, drainage facilities, parks, etc. In order to determine the fee
associated for park impacts, the City has set a desired standard of 3.4 acres of park land
per 1,000 persons served. This means that by buildout (about the year 2007), the
development community will have paid park fees to purchase and develop about 81
acres of land. If the City wishes more than that amount of park land, it mus, either
raise the impact fee charged to the developer or find its own source of funds !o acquire
land and build park facilities.
P7- 5 JAN. 2 0 1393
Cj�ro of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Recnation Service Level
RECOMMENDED SERVICE LEVELS FOR NON RESIDENTS
The Lodi Department of Parks and Recreation currently has a policy of serving all
residents living in the Lodi Unified School District residing north of Eipht Mile Road.
About 30% of all users of city programs come from outside the city lirnits. As the city
grows, these non residents will create an even greater demand for recreation programs
and facilities.
1992 2007
City Population 53,186 72,000
Service Area Population 73,000 102,850
To illustrate how much additional demand will be created, the following table indicates
future sport facility requirements based on just city resident demand and for demand of
the entire service area.
Table 33
Additional Sport Facility Needs
Planning Area Vs. Entire Service Area
Planning Current
Soorts Facility Area Only Service Area
Senior Youth Baseball Fields
1 3
Junior Youth Baseball Fields
0 4
Adult Softball Fields
1 4
Football Fields
0 2
Soccer Fields
9 8
Gymnasiums
1 2
As can be seen, providing recreation services to the current service area means a
greater demand for facilities. There are two financial issues associated with serving the
larger area. The first is that non-residents do not pay most city taxes and as a result do
not pay an equitable amount of the recreation program costs. The registration fee for
most programs, for example, does not cover the actual cost of the program. The
second issue is that non residents do not pay any of the capital cost of building facilities.
fi0"ffil h ;meetings with user grou the Pa€Ir and Reareatioa Mew Cbmtut t
B a s>a: r - a: avr , �r
nil znwai�rdiscussion wzth the 1 I Catmcil* Lite cons �istts A Flat e
sTiotiiYtittinue to serve non residents living vvithIatle lInSciioo�sri`
�as<xoti�these residents -gay their share for capital'"auid xtt�tnten�u��b:�� a
sttggestedapproach to gay for these sezvtces is oirttdtn page .�'„ 4.
1,7-6
q 1983
WR -
it
ark and Recrearion Plan Recreadon Semi
s
RECOMMENDED SERVICE LEVELS FOR NON RESIDENTS
The Lodi Departm t of Parks and Recreation currently has a policy of serving all
residents living in th Lodi Unified School District residing north of Eig� dile Road.
About 30% of all use of city programs come from outside the city li{ifi*t As the city
grows, these non resi nts will create an even greater demand for re�cc tition progran►s
and facilities. I::r
City Populati
Service Area
�r.
1942 2007
53,186 72,000
73,000 113,000
To illustrate how much addit1o'bal demand will be created, the following table indicates
future sport facility requiremets based on just citylresident demand and for demand of
the entire service area
' l
Table 0
Addlti al Sport Facility Needs
Planning a Vs. Current Service Area
y ai
Planning
Current
Sports Facility Area Only Service
Area
Senior Youth Baseball FieMs ', 1; I
5
Junior Youth Baseball. Ef ids ,� 0
6
Adult Softball Fields:`,': 0
6
Football Fields
4
Soccer Fields , j� 9
13
Gymnasiums ,. ; I
2
As can be seen, pro recreation services. t' current service area means a
Fa
demand fo cues. There are two fiial issues associated with serving the
Larger area The is that non-residents do tiay most city taxes and as a result do
not pay an equi amount of the recreatioAkk'',
"ram costs. The registration fee for
most progr _ example, does not cover tual cost of the program. T'he
second issue at non residents do not pay the capital cost of building facilities.
`� • �, • l , fIrm . L .
RECOMMENDED SERVICE LEVELS FOR YOUTH SPORTS
Currently, the youth sports program is managed as a joint effort between the City and
two private sport organizations: the Boosters of Boys/Girls Sports Organization
(BOBS) and the Lodi City Swim Club. For the most part, the City's sport programs are
oriented towards instruction and recreation sports. whereas the two private clubs stress
a higher competitive level.
The Lodi City Club is independently run and only looks to the City for financial help to
rent pool time from the Lodi Unified School District. Tice joint partnership between
the City and BOBS, however. is rather unique. For this program, the City collects the
registration fees and turns it directly over to the Board of Directors of BOBS. A city
staff member sits on the BOBS Board and has ultimate veto power. One full time and
one part time staff member is assigned to this program. The city cost to run BOBS is
about 5174,000 annually and for the City Swim Club it is about 534,000.
While expensive, the real benefit of BOBS is that the individual sports groups operate
under one umbrella thereby eliminating the problem of groups competing against each
other for fields or operating revenue.
To help reduce the cost to the City for these two program, the following options are
available:
1. Exclude youth sports from the City program: This means that the
individual team sports would be on their own to build and manage fields.
The issue with this approach is what to do with the existing fields.
2. City provide fields and scheduling only: This approach would leave field
preparation and the management of the individual sports to the individual
private organizations.
3. Create a completely independent organization to run youth sports: This
approach would leave BOBS intact but they would need to hire an executive
director to manage the program. Registration fees would be raised to pay
for this cost.
4. Reduce the amount of subsidy paid to BOBS and the Lodi Swim Club.
Recoriitriendatian. It is reconiritended tliartie City itduce ztssu"bsidjrfio liotTi
A n prggrazns and'evaluate the subsidized amoun - ea&rar
V7- 7 jwj. 2 u „73
QjLodi Park and Recreation P/on Recreation Seni a r.uirt
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The preparation of goals and objectives is an important part of the planning process
because they provide a sense of direction and intent in providing leisure services. They
also form the basic framework for the park and recreation plan itself.
Agoal is essentially a broad statement describing a level of service the City wishes to
achieve. As a rule. goals do not change over time unless community values or economic
conditions force a change. Objectives. on the other hand. are more precise statements
that describe a means of achieving a stated goal. Objectives may change over time and
if stated with time limits can be an effective way to measure the success and
effectiveness of the park and recreation program.
Goal:
A'goal tii a"siatemeik of the City's aspirations as it relat t zJ'
es a -
park and recreation services.: h Is the desirabii_quality whiCtti`F w
the City wishes to achieve::>a goal must be realistic and nexibis
enougH'to allow s disciis ion o! how it is to be achieved: ' x:
Goals are long-range and "usually remain
throughout t!t@ yptacslca! lite Of the plan. <:.? r
Objectives:
Objeclivesarewor�iungand`rrteasurabtestatetneits:whktt,x
f.. der ify;specitic steps needed to achieve Me statedgo"af. Often
o ie goat vnit have a number of objectivexMIR IF �>a"
The following is a list of recommended goals and objectives oriented to park and
recreation services for the City of Lodi.
14 M- E
Provide a wide range of park and recreation services for all interests and age groups.
•. K
1. Maintain an operating budget reflective of what the community needs and can afford.
67-S
r
1. Maintain an operating budget milective of what the community needs and can afford.
2_ Continue to serve all residents within the Lodi Unified School District living north of Eight
Mile Road as long as these residents pay for their share of maintenance and capital costs.
Develop a financing mechanism for the cost of new facilities and their on.
going operations,
3. Be the primary coordinating agency for recreation services to the Lodi arta.
d. Continue to coordinate with the Lodi Unified School District for utilization of school
facilities for recreation purposes.
S. Pursue joint ventures with private groups or individuals to develop new recreatfou
opportunities.
6. Maintain a high profile in the community to promote recreation activity in Lodl.
7. Provide an equitable distribution of recreation resources among organized sports, general
recreation programs and park operations.
8. Assist special interest groups to organize and offer their own programs and services.
9. Promote community involvement in establishing and monitoring the leisure services
program.
to. Provide park facilities and recreation programs that meet the needs of special populations,
especially the elderly and disabled.
AADMINISTRt�1'ITONAND,OPERATIONS
✓,ck"..7'
Develop a staff organization that provides professional services at an efticfent financial level.
Mkin.
1. Promote personal staff growth and development by encouraging participation in
educational classes and training seminars.
2. Teach and promote good public relations among all staff members.
3. Promote the use of volunteers in park operations and recreation programs to help extend
overall recreation services to the community.
17-9
JAN. 2 0 1993
• • ir,
7UMMMOMES 1 • IL1i7=•[ti i`�
4. Strengthen public relations and publicity efforts to better inform citizens of the .eel doo
opportunities available in the community. Develop annual reports and other information
that Identities the operations conducted by the Department
S. Develop methods to promote staff Involvement and communications between the various
operations of the Department.
6. Encourage the use of advisory boards to help encourage public involvement and
participation.
PARK AND QPENSPACE SYSTEM
+:.s... c;� •Yx `:-. r... y,.iT7;W.. .. >:. ,..•ac •.n. �'w� z f.'. ?. �.... '�w�.'° ..Sr-K'''.>a
C(W
Pr%>zte a high quality park system offering a wide variety of recreation opportunities.
Obicctives
1. Develop a neighborhood park system that is conveniently located to most residents in Lodi.
2. Develop and maintain a high quality or Improvements for park areas and facilities.
3. Develop different types or parks to meet specific community needs.
4. Develop facilities that are interesting to visit and use and are an attractive part of the
community.
S. Actively seek ways to provide neighborhood park opportunities in developed portions of the
community.
6. Develop a multi -use trail systems to serve as linkages between parks, neighborhoods wW
other parts of Lodi.
7. Upgrade adsting parks to meet neighborhood and ADA requirements.
L Preserve areas along the Mokelumne River for nature preservation and public enjoymeaL
Increase the number of public access points to the River.
RECREATION PROGRAMS AND AIC N ES
Goat
Provide a wide variety of indoor and outdoor recreation opportunities to meet leisure needs.
VI. 10
--1
jirL 2 Q 1993
1. Be a catalyst to see that all recreation interests are met Warm possible, encourage others
to meet part of the demand.
2. When possible. provide space and opportunity for private groups and commercial interests
to conduct recreation programs.
3. On an annual basis evaluate Individual recreation programs in terms of persons served,
overall community interests and costs.
4. Increase the revenue ratio for recreation services.
S. Expand the recreation program when facilities and staffing keds permit.
6. Organise and conduct special recreation programs which contribute to ethnic identiy and
pride.
7. Be innovative in offering new and interesting recreation programs.
S. Develop a fees and charges policy that balances the cost and ability to pay. This means that
the fees for some programs might help to defer the cost of others.
PARKOPERATION'�ND MAINTENA1�iCi?;: `"' `'_'�"
PMS
Provide a high quality and efficient levet of maintenance for all park areas and facilities in Lodi.
1. Maintain pant and recreation facilities In a manner to make them safe, attractive and a
positive part of the neighborhood.
2. Encourage the ttse of volunteers for some special park maintenance projects.
3. Develop a police -sponsored neighborhood block watch program to increase a feeling of
safety In the parks and reduce vandalism.
4. Umlop a parks maintenance management system that places the emphasis on the safety.
comfort and satisfaction or the park users.
5. Provide or offer training programs for permanent employees to enhance professional
maintenance operations.
6. Increase the ratio of seasonal help to permanent employees.
1,7- 11
.1A1'1 2 r '373
1
H
7. Explore the feasibility of contracting out some malotcaaace tasks.
& Preserve and enhance areas of environmental and historical value.
9. Encourage the development of county and state regional park development in the area.
10. Work with all jurisdictions and levels of government to help maximize public use of existing
and potential recreation resources.
9/7- 12
.lAli. 2 r 1511
r
SECTION 'VII
DEVELOPMENT POLICIES AND STANDARDS
i
SECTION VII
PARK DESIGN POLICIES AND STANDARDS
MINI - PARKS
Definition:
Mini -parks, tot lots or children'splaygrounds are all small single purpose playlots
designed pnrttarily for small children. 'Tiley are small in size and are often limited to a
single residential lot. Usually they do not exceed one acre in area. Because of their
size, facilities are usually limited to a small grass area, a children's playground and a
bench or picnic table.
On a per acre basis, they are very expensive to construct and maintain. and generally
attract a very small population. 'This type of park is popular in new subdivisions where
young children are prominent. However, as the subdivision grows older, the usage of
this type of park will decrease due to its single purpose facilities.
Policies and Development Criteria:
1. No parks of this type should be developed unless there are no other options
available for adequate park land. In no case should the site be less than one
acre in size.
Definition:
Neighborhood park are a combination playground and park designed primarily for
non -supervised, non- organized recreation activities. 'Iiiey are generally small in size (3-
10 acres) and usually serve a radius of approximately one half mile. At average
residenual densities, this amounts to about 5,000-7,500 residents.
Since these parks are located within walking and bicycling distance of most users, the
activities they offer become a daily pastime for the neighborhood children. While it is
not necessarily the rule, neighborhood parks sometimes provide space for organized
community events. Often neighborhood parks are located adjacent to or on school
property. If this is the case, a smaller park site will be adequate.
In general, facilities recommended for a neighborhood park include a children's
playground,.picnic facilities, trails, natural/landscaped areas and a multi -use open field
for soccer, little league baseball, etc. While restrooms are sometimes located in
neighborhood parks, it is recommended that they only be provided in the larger parks
where users may come from an area beyond the immediate neighborhood. In many
instances, single -occupancy restroom units should be considered. If possible, residential
lots sbould not directly abut the park.
M-1
implemented. Placing a recreation center in this location would require a
_ modification to the master plan. With this in mind, it is recommended that
Hutchins Street Square not be considered as the site for the proposed indoor
recreation center.
Page Vlll-34 - Remove third paragraph that starts with "Another problem
.
with this site ...", Replace with the following:
"Because of the anticipated high cost to remodel, it is recommended that the
portion of the building now being used for administrative purposes be
removed to make way for a new recreation structure. The existing classroom
section would remain. A sketch of how this complex might be developed is
shown on the next page."
6 P,2,ge V 111-42 Review of the Obel Role in the Private Souris Program
Remove secondparagraph that starts out with "1n the short term ...." and
replace with the following:
"Because this is a budget vs. service issue, it is recommended that the City
review this subsidy issue each year at budget time."
7 Page VII -1 Neiehhorhood Parks
Add to the third paragraph; sixth line and just bcfore the sentence that starts
out "If possible...."
"All new restrooms should conform to ADA standards." ;
9 %g93
Pte'
ory O% Lodi Pads and Recrc9602 Plan lic-rs and Gnndords
Except for what now exists, sport fields in neighborhood parks should be limited to
practice only. Field lighting should be prohibited.
P-'icies and Development Criteria:
1. Neighborhood parks should be no smaller than three acres in size with five
to seven acres being the optimum. If located adjacent to a school, they can
be much smaller. if developed as part of a detention basin, at least 25%
should be located above normal flooding conditions.
2. Parks should provide space for both active and passive uses.
3. Multi -use sport fields for competitive play should be discouraged from
neighborhood parks and be located in special complexes or community
parks.
4. if possible, neighborhood parks should have considerable visibility from
public streets.
5. Appropriate facilities for a neighborhood park include:
o Multi -use practice fields for : s
softball, soccer and youth baseball
o Children's playground '` ��'
o Unstructured open play area _ W«
for pick-up games
A.
U Paved games court for
(basketball, volleyball etc.) mss»"
i
atltn eu�atlenan� iM,
� � 0•i
o Tennis courts
o Picnic area with shelter building
www
o On-site paved trail systems sMya-,
2
6. Parking requirements: Minimum of 3 •'
spaces per acre of active park area.
However, if the site has adequate s
on -street parking, that does not.1 I,��"PN1&""4
conflict with adjoining uses then
the parking ratio can be reduced
The park should be designed to encourage
access by foot or bicycle.
�-7I-2
t
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK
-1
r
City of 4oQLPQ►* ono Reenoti P'un _ Q{n�n►ent P�liciet and Standordt
7. Site selection criteria:
o The site should be reasonably central to the neighborhood it serves.
o Locating parks immediately adjacent to residential homes should be
avoided in order to reduce light and noise impacts on adjoining
properties.
o Access to the site should be via a local residential street. If located on
a busy arterial stree% appropriate fencing and other safety steps
should be taken.
o If possible, walking distance should not exceed one half mile for the
area it serves and the need to cross busy arterial streets or other
physical barriers should be discouraged.
COMMUNITY PARKS
Definition:
A community park is primarily oriented towards active and structured recreation uses.
In general, community parks are designed for organized sports and community -wide
events. In some cases, community parks also provide indoor facilities or specialized
facilities of a community -wide interest.
Where there are no neighborhood parks, the community park can also serve this '
function. Community parks serve a much larger area and offer more facilities. Their
service area is about a one mile radius and w111 support a population of approximately
12,000-15.000 persons depending upon the size and nature of facilities. As a result, they
require more to terms of support facilities such as parking, restrooms, play areas, etc.
They usually exceed 20 acres in size and often have sport fields or similar facilities as
the central focus of the park.
Community pparks are also good locations for a grouping of facilities. For example,
while a netgFiborhood park might have one or two tenors courts, it is appropriate to
group 5-6 tennis courts in a community park. This approach results in more efficient
way to build and manage facilities.
Policies and Development Criteria:
1. Excluding detention areas, the minimum size should be 15 acres with the
optimum being about 25 acres.
2. At least 2595' of the site should be usable at all times of the year for
recreation use.
3. The park should contain Iand for both active and passive uses. Adequate
quiet spaces should be provided-
P71- 3
�1
r
rG& of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan DetiY�M►nenr Policies and Siandords
4.
5.
6.
Appropriate facilities include:.
o Sport fields for league play
o Tennis courts
0 Passive open play areas
o Restrooms ,;t�-•�, :°
o Picnic facilities and shelter buildings
•s
o Trail systems
E
o Special landscaped areas"
`, sF
o Paved ggames court for basketball
and volleyball
o Children's playground t.
4
o Space for special outdoor events .,,..._•`
Parking requirements:
o Dependent upon the activities: Use 50 spaces per ballfield plus 5
spaces per acre of other active use.
Site selection criteria:
o The site should be reasonably central to the area it serves.
o The park should have excellent access and be located on an arterial or
collector street.
0 If possible, the site should have heavy landscaped setbacks to help
buffer active uses from res-dential areas.
o Locating parks immediately adjacent to residential homes should be
avoided in order to reduce light and noise impacts on adjoining
properties.
REGIONAL PARKS
Definition:
Regional parks are large recreational areas that serve an entire region. They are
usually large in size and often include one specific use or feature that makes the park
unique. '1%40st these parks are limited to passive uses only and can attract large numbers
of people from a wide region.
�"I
rIQ& of Lodi Pork and Rccmation No DnYlon�+cnt olici�s and Stando►�r
Policies and Development Criteria:
1. The Regional Park should be designed to meet a wide range of activities and
interests but should emphasize the features that makes it unique.
2. If the site will attract larg: volumes of traffic, access should be via an arterial
street.
3. Facilities in the park will. be dependent upon its natural features and its intended
use. Possible facilities could include:
o Viewpoints
o Trail systems
o Special or unique physical natural features. such as a lake or river
o Picnic areas
o Open play areas
o Nature interpretative areas
o Horticultural gardens
o Group picnic areas
4. Parking requirements will be dependent upon the activities offered.
5. Location criteria: ,
o Location is most often determined by the features it can offer.
o Access should be from an arterial street if traffic volumes may be high.
o Heavily wooded sites can be appropriate.
o Environmentally sensitive sites are appropriate if protected from active visitor
use.
NATURAL OPEN SPACE AREAS
Definition:
Na:aral open space is land left in an undeveloped state and where public use is limited.
In many cases. environmentally sensitive areas are designated as open space and
include wetlands. wildlife habitats, river and creek corridors or land containing unique
or endangered plant species.
F I
9& gf Loi Park and Recreation Plan Development Policies and Standards
Policies and Development Criteria:
1. Prior to acquiring an open space site, a thorough site analysis should be
made to determine if unique qualities and conditions exist that warrant th-
open space designation.
2. Where feasible, public access into these areas should be permitted but
environmentally sensitive areas protected from public over -use.
3. Improvements should be kept to a minimum with protection of the natural
environment emphasized. Trail systems are permitted.
4. The City should place its emphasis on acquiring open space that is
environmentally sensitive or otherwise valuable for outdoor recreation.
5 Farm land can be identified as open space if its use is to separate urban
areas or provide other separation.
SPECIAL USE AREAS
Definition:
Special use areas are public recreation land occupied by a special activirf or uses that
do not fit into any other category. Some of the present facilities that fall into this
classification include special landscaped areas, the softball complex, Zupo Field, the
Grape Bowl and Hutchins Street Square.
Policies and Development Criteria:
1. Prior to the addition of any type of special use area, the City should prepare
a detailed analysis of maintenance and operational costs.
V11-6
ry of Lam% park and Recrradon Plan Vn fY omen( Policies and Srandardr
SUMMARY OF PARK DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
TY a Service Area Size Standard ChaEUteristics
Mni-Parks/
1/4 mile radius
Less than
None
Small, very
Tot Lots
of most
3 acres
few
residences
facilities
Neighborhood
1/2 mile radius
5-15 Acres
2.5 acres per
50% of site
Parks
of most
1.000
should be
residences
population
flat and
usable:
contains
active and
passive
spaces
Community
1-2 mile radius
20-30 Acres
1.8 acres per
At least 10
Parks
of most
1.000
acres should
residences
population
be utilized
for active
recreation
Regional
Community or
50 acres or
0.8 acres per
Centered
Parks
region
more
1,000
around a
population
unique
feature
Natural Open
Community
Varies
2.1 acres per
Environmental
Space Areas
t,OUo
sensitive
population
area and
agricultural
lands
Special Use
Community or
Varies
0.8 acres per
Areas that
Areas
region
1.000
contain indoor
population
facilities:
single -use
Wiles and
miscellaneous
areas
C t:U of Lodi Park and Recrtation Plan Dtvrlopmenr Policir� mrd Stondards
PATHWAYS AND TRAILS
Definition:
Pathways and trails are designed to provide walking, bicycling and other non -motorized
means of linking various parts of the community. Trails can be designed for a sin&le
type of activity or be multi-purpose in nature. They should be more recreation -oriented
in nature rather than emphasizing a transportation system. Both paved and unpaved
trails are appropriate. in this study, trails of a recreation nature are being emphasized.
This is not to say that some recreation trails might be on a street in order to complete a
segment.
Some of the possible recreation trail uses include: bicycle and mountain bike riding,
walking, hiking, horseback riding and nature walks.
Policies and Development Criteria:
1. The primarypurpose of recreation trails is to provide a recreation
experience. Transportation to other parts of the community should be the
secondary objective.
=-1
2. Whenever possible, recreation trails should not be part of a street roadway.
3. Recreation trails should be interesting to the user and capitalize on scenery
or other enjoyable sights. Trails which follow natural water courses,
traverse interesting scenery or cross areas of outstanding beauty should
provide an interesting and enjoyable experience for the trail user.
4. Trails should belooped and interconnected to provide a variety of trail
lengths and destinations.
5. Trail routes should take into account soil conditions, surface drainage and
other physical limitations that could impact the area from over -use.
6. Where trait routes use existing streets, the pathway should be designed to
minimize the conflicts between motorists and the user.
7. Some trails should be designed for the physically disabled.
8. The trail system should be designed to link various parts of the community
as well as existing park sites.
9. Where off-street trails are routed through a proposed project, the developer
should be required to dedicate the land but not pay for its construction
costs.
1,71-8 JAN. 2 0 1993
QU 0l di Park and Rt rtati n Pfan Dt+tfonmtnt Policits and Standards
r
v-
LL�.D �Gyrzol�C-D
m
s,
-
_ 1 n"
xi{y
' K -KC O MSN• -
12• t7L71D�T�(•'L_
MULTI- Fuhpc)t)r- TP, NWb
c OWN
14 DaI?NtCLV-
t .e rem MetH vAosca
"I-9
City of Lodi Park and Recreation Man n-YlQpment Policies and Sfandordt
�— e -)
'fPA1... "MrOl.iQN .tJL$;PM,�10N
�Y1
1,71- 10
JAN. 2 : 1-t:,3
r
SECTION VIII
RECOMMENDATIONS
RE COTMINIENDATI0NS
INTRODUCTION
In this section, specific recommendations are made for the acquisition, development,
operation and management of the park and recreation system in Lodi. These
recommendations are divided into the following elements:
t. Park Facility Pian
2 Natural Open Space
3. Trails and Pathways
4. Miscellaneous Outdoor Recreation Areas and Facilities
5. indoor Recreation Center
6. Administration and Management Recommendations
7. Park Maintenance Operations
a. Recreation Program and Service Recommendations
9. Meeting ADA Requirements
The recommendations contained in this section are guided by seven primary objectives.
These are:
aop a plan that reflects the _CiV's ability to finance the
ilk — * -&- - "' '' atior ;needs ii `itie comiriE
nmends new approaches to parirdesign
F-
Ciry of Lndi Park and Rtc�to►ion Pton Rrco�nmtndvrions
3. Develop more opportunity for indoor recreation activities.
The Plan makes specific recommendations for additional indoor
recreation space.
` 4 Increase public access to the Mokelumne River.
This unique open space area ' one of the"most important but'
'underutilized recreation resources in the Lodi area. RecognWng .
its Importance. the 'pian• makes a strong commitment to
preservingthus open space area and making it more accesssbte to
the public.
x 6 F ,.Meeting Sports Fie td Demand
WNW
�"`' 1�a�`e �' cwfg •';.'`
�d eZ?I �, e '�C„Ya''t� yk<
in�general.-,there;are ea^� . tjgh spat fields to serve N eras j
but a shdgage vrilf`occut it the CV..continues o serve'.nax r
ai wa.;a•. - ,.
residents.; Eiowe�?erathe aty's present pW'ic+s b prowde°°
} € organized sport"facTities and cecreatibn prograrns;to nod
E residents. ¢White the plpq., oes not recommend g:tfus
a �x poFicy, �t does recommend ways for non-residents to Ip payfiot�--�
�,�. � � ��,�.;�th,�ese facTtfes.:�`,�`�:��� �.. �, •, '�� ,��: �.�. .f �t�; �`"
��� �• -� 1��`�-@. �.i..„^rs..s��?2:H'�i�. ,.•. "C” .""�`�'tr;�g. �� �fi�s.�'�a'F.°P's •,
7
City!2f Lodi Park and Rkrear
7.. Provide park facilities convenient to all persons living In Lodi.
The Plan recommends the location of new park sites to serve the
devOopirig'porticins of the community. It also addresses ways to
provide re&eatlorfareas in developed neighborhoods of Lodi
..Yvhekre parks'dre not currently found.
Develop new park facilities In areas outside the storm
drain
a4io-d6tentl
on basins.,
Manyb, in 6"parks Lodi have d in drainage
*i�While
ash these basins make good park sites in the summer'-,
'.'�
mont un
hs d U -ng the -rainy season they, become unusable.. This
Aarly becomes a problem in Ni fail and r
all for spring
6 .
V this problem, the Plan recommends new.,
-.=6b6lf.i'Recogn`ux
:grading concepts In drainage basins and the development of.,
sport f5cilitlesdutside'the basins.,:!
171!-3
I�
City of Lodi Pork and Recrea n Pl4n Recommendareona
11. PARK FACILITY PL.1N I
The park facility plan is a physical layout of parks. open space, trail systems and other
recreation areas. The ideal park system for a commutur� is one that is composed of
several different types or classifications of parks, each offering a different type of
recreation experience. By recognizing that different types of parks serve different
purposes, a parksystem can be developed that is easy to manage, more efficient to
maintain and tends to reduce conflicts between park users and adjoining neighbors.
In Lodi, most of the parks were intended to function as neighborhood parks but
because of their location. use and facilities. have become pnmanly a place for
organized sports commonly found in community parks. The result is st&nificant impacts
to adjoining neighborhoods in terms of noise, light and traffic. In addition, these sport
parks are not meeting all of the recreation and leisure needs in the community. One of
the objectives of this plan is to provide a more balanced system between active and
passive space and provide new recreational opportunities not currently found in Lodi.
Starting on the next page are recommendations for five types of park areas for Lodi.
Each park site is given a reference number indicating the type of park and its location
in the following text. The following code is used to identify the type of park area.
_ M
Mini -Parks
N
Neighborhood Parks
C
Community Parks
R
Regional Parks
S
Special Use Areas
It is the intent of this plan to only show the general location of future park sites and
open space areas. The exact size and shape will be determined at the time of
acquisition. However, when acquisition and development occurs, the site should meet
the design policies and standards developed in Section VII.
"1i . 4
PARKS AND
RECREATION
MASTER PLAN
CITY OF LODI,
CALIFORNIA
LEGS
M EXISTING PARK AND
RECREATION FACILITIES
UNDEVELOPED PARK LAND
PROPOSED PARK AND
RECREATION FACILTTIES
OPEN SPACE AREAS
EZ) COMMUNITY GREENBELT
• • OFF-STREET RECREATION TRAILS
• • • • ON -STREET BICYCLE PATH
(sae oumbm are for ideotlllesdou purposes only. Please
refer to the test for spcdfk dtscussloa on indisldad sites.)
FACILITY PLAN
Jit. 2 O 1991
Vttl-.5"
r
MINI -PARKS
As noted in the park design standards, it is recommended that the City no longer
acquire or develop additional small mini -parks. For the two existing mini -parts, the
following recommendations are made:
Candy Cane Park Site M-1 0.2 Acres
This site is located off Holly Drive and was recently upgraded through the
financial efforts of the Lodi Soroptimist Club. The site is located in an area
of the city that is severely short of park facilities but unfortunately this park
is only large enough to accommodate a children's Ptaypround. Because of
its size, only minor improvements can be made. They include:
o Installation of an automatic irrigation system
o Add additional trees
Century Park Site M-2 2.5 Acres
Century Park is actually an extension of Century Boulevard and is located
between Church Street and the Southern Pacific Railroad. Eventually the
street will be extended across the railroad tracks connecting to Stockton
Street. Once the street is extended, there will be very little of the park aria
left. Since the park is a temporary facility, any improvements should be
minimal.
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
It is the intent of the plan to provide a neighborhood park within convenient walking
distance of most residential areas. In order to achieve this objective it will require the
acquisition of new sites, upgrading of existing sites and in several instances the
development of recreation areas on school grounds.
Lodi Lake Neighborhood Park Site N-1 Neighborhood Park
The Lakewood School neighborhood does not have a park to serve its
needs. Since this part of the city is fully develo epeq, fewtions are
available. One options studied was to develop LakewoodSchool
playground into a neighborhood park but this approach proved to be
unfeasible. The only other option was to develop the southeast portion of
Lodi Lake Park into a neighborhood park. Since it is recommended that
the entrance to Lodi Lake Park be moved to the west side of the Lake, the
existing park area adjacent to Turner Road could be developed as a
neighborhood park. See the discussion on Site R-l(on page ) for a
detailed description of how the Lodi Lake area could be deve ped.
1,711-6
JAN. 2 C 1.i:3
r
Possible facilities for this new neighborhood park area could include:
o New children's playground
o Multi -use pave court
o Open grass play area
o Site fencing along Turner Road
Van Buskirk Park Site N -Z 1.0 Acres
This park is located off Pleasant Avenue and Daisy Avenue and is found in
a portion of the city deficient in neighborhood park facilities. It is
unfortunate that no other park land is available in the area and that the
gark itself is so small. Until recently the park was essentially a small
aseba116eld. However, because of the size of the park. the ballfield
created many problems with long balls hit over the fence into adjacent
homes.
The balifield has been removed and other facilities now need to be added.
Because of its size, the park should be restricted to passive uses only.
Before any development occurs, a master plan should be completed.
Recommended improvements to the park should include:
o Rand the playground and add curbing, walls and seating areas
o Add a small multi-purpose paved court
o Plant new turf
o Add trees and landscaping
o Install a new park sign
o Construct a low fence around the site for safety purposes
Proposed Park 0111illsmood School) Site N-3 5 Acres
It is recommended that the City and the Lodi Unified School District jjointly
develop this site f'or a middle school and neighborhood park. It is a 20 acre
site already owned by the School District anis located west of Mills
Avenue and north of Elm Street. If rive acres of the site could be reserved
for primarily recreation use, a very suitable neighborhood park could be
developed. In addition, by jo;ntly developing and sharing facilities, less land
would be needed for comma : spaces such as parking, playgrounds, sport
fields, etc
Recommended facilities for this park should include:
o Youth baseball field
o Soccer field
o Children's playground
o Basketball court
o Picnic area with shelter
o Paved trail system
Hft - 7 JAN. 2 G 1993
Cityof Lodi Park and Recreation Plan __ Recommendations
a-7t� a-; ------------- - � - f– —, -�
j• `
f
SCMOOL,.ARK DCS" COMMIT
Westgate Park Site N4 22.0 Acres
This site is a storm water detention basin and will be expanded by
approximately 14 acres when the land to the south is developed. As it now
exists, the site has been graded to a rectangular shape with a flat bottom.
The site's only redeeming feature now is that it is all in grass. As the
remaining land is excavated to complete the basin, it is recommended that
the entire site be contoured to create a more pleasing and useable shape.
In order to maintain the same amount of storm water retention, some of the
park area now designated outside the basin will need to be slightly
excavated as well. By using this approach, the bottom can be contoured so
that it drains more rapidly.
The proposed Lodi Loop Trail is found just west of this park site. While the
area around this park has been subdivided, it is recommended that a 25'
right of way or easemeat be acquired west of the park site so that this park
can be connected to the trail system. Other facilities for this park should
inch -de:
o A paved and lightedathway around and through the park
o Two youth baseball fields
o Expansion of the playground area
o A multi -use paved court for volleyball, etc.
o An area for passive use including picnicking, open play, etc.
0 3 tennis courts
o Restroom building
VIII - 8 91993
pQR•
ago
Westgate Park Site N4 20.0 Acres
This site is a storm watdetention basin and will be expanded by
approximately 14 acrqpAvhen the land to the south is developed. As it now
exists, the site has n graded,to a rectangular shape with a flat bottom.
The site's only red.' ming feature. now is that it is all in grass. As the
remaining land cavated to complete the basin, it is recommended that
the entire site, contoured to create a more pleasing and useable shape.
In order to twin the same amount of storm water retention, some of the
park area designated outside the basin will need to be slightly
excavate well. By using this approach, the bottom can be contoured so
that it dr_ more rapidly. a
The posed Lodi Loop Trail is found 'lust west of this park site. While the
area ound this park has been subdivided;• it is recommended that a25'
ri of way or easement be acquired west of lite park site so that this park
be connected to the trail system. Other futilities for this park should
- clude:
o A paved and lightedathway around -•and through the park
o Two youth baseball gelds
o Expansion of the playground area
o A multi -use paved court for volleyball, etc.
o An area for passive use including picnicking;,open play, etc.
0 3 tennis courts
o Restroom building
r, JAN- 2 t :;:3
C& of Lodi M 7nd Rrcm dm Plan Recom�s
Henry Glaves Park Site N -S 1S.0 Acres
Henry Glaves Park is also a storm water detention site. Because it does
store storm water during the rainy season, use of the park is significantly
restricted in both the types of facilities that can be provided and the season
of use. Because of these factors, only minor improvements are
recommended. They include:
o Construct a paved and lighted pathway around the park
o Add a T ball field
o Upgrade the playground equipment
o Upgrade the irrigation system
o Add/replace trees
o Locate a space for frisbee golf
o Put protective fencing between playground and basin
Emerson Park Site N-6 3.0 Acres
Emerson Park is located in the older part of the city and has seen some
major rehabilitation projects in recent years. Recently, the Lions Club
financed the construction of a picnic shelter building, new playground
equipment, benches and tables ants a walkway through the park.
One of the major problems with this site is the existence of a small
undersized youth baseball field. lite site is too small for organized sports
and the use conflicts with the other children's activities. As a result, the
ballfield should be removed and replaced with other activity spaces.
Because of the parks' location and the existence of a major children's
playground, it is recommended that this entire site take on a theme oriented
towards children's activities. Other uses that could be added to further this
theme include a small stage for puppet shows, etc, a small interpretive and
discovery building for children, a place specifically reserved for birthday
parties, special play equipment, etc Other improvements to the park
should include:
o Replacement of the restroom building
o Add additional lighted pathways through the park
o Add trees and landscaping on the west side
o Add a low fence around the edge of the park for safety purposes
Hale Park Site N-7 3.1 Acres
This park is located directly across the street from the office of the Parks
and Recreation Department. The site is currently being renovated and only
the two tennis courts and the parking lot will remain_ Once completed, this
park will contain a children's playground, picnic areas, a small recreation
1/711.9 JAN 2
C• 1293
Iry of Lod; D�-rc and Rearatiat Pfan Rrcommrndo�ion�
building, a restroom building, a lighted basketball court and two horseshoe
pits.
Proposed Park (Lincoln School) Site N-8 3.0 Acres
A neighborhood park is badly needed west of Cherokee Lane and south of
Pine Street. While the ideal location would be in the vicinity of Tokay
Street, no vacant land exists in this area. As an alternative, it is
recommended that the City consider acquiring a portion of the old Lincoln
School site. While it would be preferred to acquire the whole site, the
frontase of this property has considerable commercial value. With this in
mind, it is recommended that the west 200-300' be acquired. This would
yield a park site of approximately two acres. While this size is smaller than
what is normally recommended, it is better than no park at all.
Recommended facilities for this site could include:
o Children's Playground
o Open mulu-purpose lawn area
o Picnic area with shelter
o Trees and landscaping
0 2 tennis courts
Proposed Cochran Park Site N-9 30 Aches
This proposed park includes a future 25 acre storm wate. detention basin.
One acre of the site has been allocated for park purposes and another five
acres is recommended for more active park space.
Because this site will primarily be drainage basin, it is recommended that a
permanent water feature be a part of the park concept. With this as the
theme, the park could then be graded to several levels so that a portion of
the site is above normal storm water conditions most of the tine. This
approach will require a deeper basin in some areas but can result in some
interesting and useable spaces.
At the lowest level it is recommended that a 2-3 acre water feature become
a permanent part of the park. This small lake should have some shoreline
with direct access to the water but some portions should be planted with
aquatic plant materials to help treat the water through the biofiltration
process. A large water fountain or bubbler could also be added that would
add interest and motion and also help treat the water. It is not the intent of
this concept to develop a lake for swimming or boating. Its primary
function is to provide scenic views and passive enjoyment. The upper level
of the park could be devoted to more active activities. Features to the park
should include:
V111- 1a JAN. 2 0 1393
Q:ry of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Recommendations
o Children's playground
o ;Multi -use grass area (cricket, soccer etc.)
o Picnic areas with shelter
o Paved trails and pathway system
o Indoor swimming pool
o Restroom building
0 3 tennis courts
o Multi -use basketball/rollerblade/hockey court
Sketch - Site Master Plan for Cochran park
Vinewood Park Site N-10 16.0 Acres
The site is another storm water detention area- However, unlike the other
park/detention basins, this one is adjacent to a school site. Currently two
competitive youth baseball fields are found in the basin itself Between the
basin and the school grounds is a restroom buildin&. Because nearly all of
the site is a detention area, little additional recreation area can be
developed
The bottom of the detention basin is used for baseball and soccer play when
conditions permit. However, during the rainy season, much of this site is
unplayable because the ground tends to remain wet after the rains occur.
To reduce this problem, it is recommended that the bottom of one end of
P711 - 11 0
9 �9�
i 13771u••t�.a
o Children's playground
o Multi -use grass area (cricket, soccer etc.)
o Picnic areas with shelter
o Paved trails and pathway system
o Soccer field
o Restroom building
0 3 tennis courts
o ulti-use basketball/rollerblade/hockey court
t
Sketch - Site er Plan for Cochran park
i
r " od Park Site 10 16.0 Acres
Ae site is another storm water detention area. However, unlike the other
ark/detention basins, this one is adjacent to a ool site. Currently two
competitive youth baseball fields are found in the asin itself. Between the
basin and the school grounds is a restroom buildin ' ; Because nearly all of
the site is a detention area, little additional recrean � area can be
developed.
The bottom of the detention basin is used for baseball and soccer play when
conditions permit- However, during the rainy season, much of this site is
unplayable because the ground tends to remain wet after the rains occur.
To reduce this problem, it is recommended that the bottom of one end of
JAN. 2 � '393
C& of Lodi Pgrk and Recreadm Plan Recommendarioru
the basin be dug to a lower level creating a greater slope for drainage. This
approach will help to drain the fields more quickly and also create more
storm water retention.
The current restroom building receives considerable vandalism. Part of this
problem is caused by its poor location and part can be attributed to the
design of the building itself. To offset this problem, the city should consider
a single occupancy type of restroom building with a location closer to the
street. Other minor improvements recommended for this site include:
o Develop an area for passive recreation use such as picnic
facilities, seating areas, tables. etc.
o Install a new backstop on the northeast diamond
o Construct a paved and lighted pathway around the edge of the
rk
Up
o Upgrade the irrigation system
o Add/replace trees
o Install new park signs
American Legion Park Site N-11 6.0 Acres
This site is located at the corner of Hutchins and Vine Streets and is one of
the few parks in the City that is orientated primarily towards passive
recreational use. This park has several operational problems. One is that
the playground equipment is quite old and spread out over a large area- A
second problem is that there is no off-street parking. Under normal
conditions, on -street parking is adequate but when the recreation building is
used, some choose to use the walkway as a vehicle access and park adjacent
to the building.
Because of these problems and the need for a basketball court in the area,
the city should first develop a master pian for the site. From an operational
view, the playground equipment should be replaced and condensed into a
smaller area. Because of the existing walls, berms and other features, a very
interesting playground could be achieved.
Some off-street parking and a basketball court should be provided but their
exact location will take some study. While there has been some discussion
to expand the recreation building, this is not recommended. In fact, this
space mi, -`it not be needed when a new indoor recreation building is
developed in another location. Other improvements should include:
o Consolidate and replace playground equipment
o Construct a lighted basketball court
o Resurface tennis courts
o Upgrade the irrigation system
o Add off-street parking (12-15 spaces)
1,111- 12 JAN. 2 0 1993
r
QV of Lodi Parc and Rttnaliort Plate Recommendadam
John Blakely Park Site N -L' 10.0 Acres
This site is a single large block of land bordered by Stockton Street on the
west, Mission Street on the north, Washington Street on the east and Poplar
Street on the south. It currently has two swimming pools, two youth
baseball fields, a basketball court, children's playground and a restroom
building. Current plans call for placing a Boys and Girls Club Building on
the site where the basketball court now exists.
Because few parks are found in this • art of town, the park serves a
population beyond its capacity- Adding to the problem is the fact that the
two baseball fields are fenced, so Vaile part of the park is operating beyond
capacity, a portion of the park sits idle.
In the long run, it is recommended that the senior baseball field be replaced
with a soccer field. This will help to open up the park for other activities.
While this will create a hardship for high school baseball practice, there are
other fields proposed that will serve this purpose.
Recognizing that the City has made a commitment To the Boys and Girls
Club to allow the construction of their building on this site, other alternative
locations should continue to be explored. Some other options might include
the Needham School Site, the old Lincoln School site or Maple Street
Square.
Minor improvements recommended at Blakely Park should include:
o Relocate the horseshoe pits
o Remove the senior baseball field and replace with a soccer field
o Add small individual picnic areas
o Add shelter building to group picnic area
o Upgrade the irrigation system (some areas not covered)
o Add second basketball court
o Add a large multi -use paved area for special events
Proposed Kettleman Lane Park Site N-13 5 Acres
This proposed site should be located north of Kettleman Lane between
Lower Sacramento Road and the extension of Mills Avenue. It is
recommended that a five acre neighborhood park site be acquired in this
area to serve this future subdivision. Possible facilities for this park could
include:
o Multi -use practice playfields for soccer and baseball
o Children's playground
o ;Multi -use paved court
o Two tennis courts
o Picnic area
o Paved trail and pathway system
1/711- 13 JAN. 2 0 1933
r
City Qf! ¢di Park and Recreation Plan _ogtnmcgj&
Proposed Village Street Park Site N-14 2 Acres
It is recommended that the City acquire a park site to replace Century Park
when the street is extended. The recommended location is off the extension
of Village Street adjacent to the railroad tracks. While this is not an ideal
location and the site is long and narrow, it can become a workable Park
facility through some innovative design efforts. Recommended facilities for
this park should include:
o Children's playground
o Multi -use paved court
o Picric areas
o Multi -use open grass play area
0 2 tennis courts
Proposed Century Meadows Park Site N-15 5 Acres
This proposed park should be located south of Kettleman Lane and east of
the proposed DeBenedetti Park site. It should be located somewhat in the
center of this undeveloped area and be designed to serve just this
neighborhood. It may be possible to locate this park adjacent to the
proposed Century Meadows Elementary School. By developing a ppark
_ adjacent to the proposed elementary school, some joint use of �ac°ilities
could occur.
Recommended facilities should include:
o Children's playground
o Basketball court
o Picnic area with shelters
o Paved trail and pathway system
o General passive area for picnicking, etc.
Beckman Park Site N-16 16.6 Acres
This site is primarily a storm water detention basin. Only 1.6 acres of land
is located outside the basin Because the basin is subject to flooding every
year, the types of recreation facilities that can be placed here are quite
limited.
The bottom of the detention basin is used for soccer play when conditions
permit. However, the fall soccer season and the rainy season coincide,
thereby making this area unplayable much of the time. Compounding this
problem is the fact that once the basin becomes wet, it takes quite some
time to dry. To reduce this problem, it is recommended that the bottom of
one end of the basin be du& to a lower level creating a greater slope for
v drainage. This approach will help to drain the fields more quickly and also
create more storm water retention.
VI71- 14 JAN 2 0 1393
r
I
r
City o! Lodi At* and Rmnearion Plan Rccommendorions
Recommended improvements to this park site should include:
o Construct a lighted and paved pathway around the park,
restroom and playground (outside the fence)
o Upgrade restroom facilities
o Add/replace trees and landscaping
o Install new park sign
English Oaks Commons Site N-17 3.7 Acres
Thispark siteis irregular in shape and is one of the few that is not bordered
on all sides by streets. The park has a direct connection to Beckman School
and is in good condition. Because the park adjoins many homes, any
increase in activity in the ark could be met by resistance from the
neighborhood. In light ofthis, it is recommended that the T ball field be
removed from this park. Minor improvements should include:
o Add benches along the walkways
o Add trees and landscaping along the abutting properties
o Install new park signs
o Add picnic tables
Proposed Eastside Park Site N-18 8 Acres
This proposed park site should be located west of Cherokee Lane and north
of Harney Lane. It is recommended that the City acquire and develop a
neighborhood park of approximately eight acres to serve this neighborhood.
This park site is especially important because no other parks designed for
leisure activities are found in this entire quadrant of the city. Facilities at
this site should include:
o Children's playground
o Basketball court
o Two practice youth soccer fields
o Restroom building
o Open multi-purpose lawn area
o Picnic area/shelter
0 2 tennis courts
Proposed Southwest Park Site N-19 25 Acres
This site is another designated detention basin with only one acre of the 25
reserved for recreation use. As with the other sites, it is recommended that
it be graded for more useable space. Because the proposed DeBenedetti
Community Park is nearby, the proposed neighborhood park should be
passive in nature with the emphasis placed on non -sport facilities. This
W11- 15
1
J" N'. 2 G 1993
would be a good location for group picnic facilities. Possible facilities for
this site could include:
o Larg group picnic areas
o Mu ti -use open grass areas
o Picnic shelter buildings
o Off-street parking
o Small children's playground
o Paved walkways and trails
o Trail connection to the Lodi Loop Trail
COMMUNITY PARKS .
The intent of the plan is to develop five community parks that will serve the entire Lodi
area. These parks will be larger than the traditional neighborhood park and provide
more recreation facilities and activities. One of the major changes to the city s present
park system is to combine the Grape Bowl, the Softball Complex, Zupo Field and
Lawrence Park into one recreation area. This concept is further desrn'bed in this
section.
Proposed Woodbridge Park Site C-1 20 Acres
A large community park containing sport fields is needed in the northwest
part of the community. Unfortunately, the only two land options are north
of Turner Road and west of Woodhaven Road or an area outside the
Planning Area. While it must be recognized that this park would also serve
county residents, it is assumed that in the future this enure area will be
annexed to the City. If a site is acquired, it will require the cooperation of
the County.
This park when completed could connect directly to the Lodi
Loop Trail System. Recommended facilities for this park site should
include:
o Children's playground equipment
o Four lighted tennis courts
o Multi -use paved court
o Two senior youth baseball fields
o Three adult softball fields
o One youth soccer field
o Open multi-purpose grass area '
o Internal trail system
o Restroom/concessior, building
Proposed Lodi Recreation Complex Site C-2 31.8 Acres
This proposed park site would serve the entire northeast part of the city.
The concept is to combine the facilities of Lawrence Park, Armory Park,
Zupo Field and the Grape Bowl into one recreation complex. Currently
Ylll • 16 2 0 1993
r
each of these park areas function independently of each other. The heart of
this approach is to vacate portions of Lawrence Avenue and Washington
Street and to remove the softball field from Armory Park. By eliminating
the two streets, more parking can be developed and direct linkages can be
formed between the various recreation areas. A sketch of how this can be
achieved is shown below.
i
amu, CAPE BOWL
ccMnEx ) t
H1 � zuPo FMELDTONOCOURn
/
N
G w LAWRENCE PARK 5
PROPOSED LODI
RECREATION COMPLEX
The current field at Armory Park is much too short for softball and the
space now occupied by the field could be converted to more passive spaces
to support of the other surrounding activities.
In the long run, the City should consider trading or selling the Grape Bowl
to the Lodi Unified School District. This facility is oriented more towards
competitive programs and is more appropriate for the school district to
manage. The loss of the recreation use for softball and football could easily
be replaced at a community park.
1,711-17
-.4" 2 0 1993
r
City I Lodi Park and Recreadan Plan Recorrrnrendario2
Additions and improvements to the recreation complex should include:
Armory Field
o Remove softball field
o Add a major piece of playground equipment
o Develop two Ughted tennis courts
o Create an open multi -use grass area
o Add a small group picnic area with a shelter
o Vacate Washington Street and Lawrence Avenue
o Add trees and landscaping
o Add park sign
Softball Complex
o Upgrade the lighting and electrical system
o Add shelter building for concessions
o Add more trees and landscaping
o Install new sign
Crape Bowl
o Improvements should be kept to the minimum
o Transfer to the Lodi Unified Sehc at District
Zupo Field
o Upgrade lighting and electrical system
o Replace outfield fence
o Replace backstop and bleachers
Kofu Park Site C-3 10.0 Acres
Kofu Park is one of the two existing community parks in the Lodi area. As
with many of the other existing parks in Lodi, its primary emphasis is on
organized sports. There does exist, however, an open area that is only used
for soccer and unstructured play. While there has been some thought to
place a baseball or soccer field in this area, it is recommended that it
remain as unrestricted open space and used for general leisure activity.
In addition, it is recommended that a pedestrian bridge be constructed
across the Woodbridge Irrigation Canal to Iink this park with a proposed
trait system to the west. With this trail connector it will then be possible to
link Kofu Park with the Lodi Loop Trait located west of the park. Other
improvements to the site should include:
M1- 18 Jf,N. 2 C 1993
ar—
Cite of Lodi Park and Recreation Man RecomneendarionS
o Resurface the tennis courts
o Remove fence that separates tennis courts from the practice
area
o Upgrade the lighting on the tennis courts
o Replace the infield grass on the senior baseball field
o Relocate and replace the children's playground
o Replace the paving from the street to the center of the site
o Upgrade the irrigation system
o Develop a group picnic area
DeBenedetti Park Site C4 45 Acres
The City currently owns 29 acres of this site and will need a minimum of six
additional acres for a detention basin. A total of 50 acres was once
considered for a golf course but that idea was recently abandoned. It is
recommended that the city acquire an additional 16 acres to bring it to a
total of 45 acres for a detention basin and park site. With the extra land, a
grading concept can be developed that will make a large portion of the site
useable under most flooding conditions. A sketch of how this site might be
graded is shown on the next page. The primary purpose of this park site
should be for ballfield development.
Recommended facilities at this site should include:
o Children's playground
o Eight lighted tennis courts
o Lighted basketball court
o Two lighted senior youth baseball fields
o Two lighted youth baseball fields
o Two youth soccer fields
o Open multi -use grass area for unstructured play
o Picnic area/shelter
exxinwa Aa—e rric" Dm*H
CA tiN rXFP4-�
I
tX1_5T -t(a tAtxtl
V111 19
I t�cc�ct�t.
I
9
PFR'
o Resurface the tennis courts
o Remove fence that separates tennis courts from the practice
area
o Upgrade the lighting on the tennis courts
o Replace the infield grass on the senior baseball field
o Relocate and replace the children's playground
o Replace the paving from the street to the center of the site
o Upgrade the irrigation system
o Develop a group picnic area
DeBenedetti Park Site C4 45 Acres
The City currently owns 29 acres of this site and will need a minimum of six
additional acres for a detention basin. A total of 50 acres was once
considered fol a golf course but that idea was recently abandoned. It is
recommended that the city acquire an additional 16 acres to bring it to a
total of 45 acres fora detention basin and park site. With the extra land, a
grading concept can be developed that will make a Iarge portion of the site
useable under most flooding conditions. A sketch of how this site might be
graded is shown on the next page: The primary purpose of this park site
should be for ballfield development.
Recommended facilities at this site should include:
o Children's playground
o Eight lighted tennis courts
o Lighted basketball court
o Three lighted senior youth baseball fields
o Three lighted youth baseball fields
o One youth soccer field
o Open multi -use grass area for unstructured play
o Picnic area/shelter
txtyfltiCa Re'txr�-+ o�ty
j� b0�'rlt-FCa b4�{
1 , �„gy'fGUR��D z��TSDH PSH
`�(4ErL Et✓Lp
1
V111 19
�accx�x cam.
90001 --ii
�• 2 011993
r
An
Q& of Lodi Parrs and Recnarion Plan Reemnr;rendadonr
Salas Park Site C-5 26.0 Acres
This park is primarily used as a youth sports complex and is relatively new.
Currendy. the land to the north is undeveloped and eventually a portion will
be used for the extension of Century Boulevard. In the interim, it is
recommended that this undeveloped land be developed into two unlighted
soccer fields. This would provide two additional soccer fields that are not
located in drainage basins. However, it must be kept in mind that these two
fields and one at Century Park will be removed when Century Boulevard is
extended across the railroad tracks.
REGIONAL PARKS
Lodi has one regional park within the community. However, it should be noted that the
County manages the Iarge regional Micke Grove Park which is located just south of the
planning area.
Lodi Lake Park Site R-1 Regional Park
This site is the largest and most heavily used recreation area in the city.
Currently, the park is used primarily for passive recreational activities such
as picnicking, walking, swimming, fishing and non -powered boating. There
currently are four pnmary operational issues associated with this park. The
first is problems created by boating on the Mokelumne River. Because the
park has a boat ramp, boaters wishing to use the river must access it via
Lodi Lake. In addition, excessive boating on the river sometimes creates
conflicts between park users and the boaters as well as eroding the river
bank.
The second issue is that the City currently owns 13 acres of undeveloped
land on the west side of Lodi Lake. It is a very prime piece of lake front
property but access is limited and it sits behind the levee.
The third issue is found at the entrance to the park. When entering, the
first items that come into view are some very old and dilapidated buildings.
Associated with this is a parking lot that is irregular in shape and badly
damaged by tree roots. The point is, that the entrancz does not create an
exciting and interesting setting for the park.
The final issue is one of general traffic circulation. There is only one access
route to the back of the park and it is very narrow along the east side of the
lake. This sometimes creates a major conflict between automobiles and
pedestrians.
1,711-20
JAIL. 2 0 1993
To solve these problems, the following physical changes are recommended:
(see sketch on next page).
It is recommended that a new Park entrance be made from Lower
Sacramento Road. This would replace the entrance now found on Turner
Road. The new entrance would gain access to the 13 acre undeveloped
parcel on the lake.
To make the lake more independent of the river, it is recommended that an
earth dam be constructed between the lake and the river. This dam would
also provide automobile access to the backside of the park. However, by
constructing the dam it would require moving the boat ramp to another
location. A suggested site is by the new entrance road.
Once the new access to the rear of the park site is completed, the existing
road along the east side of the park could be abandoned. This would then
eliminate one of the congestion points that now exists. In its place would be
a trail connecting the nature area with the front of the park. For the 13 acre
undeveloped site, it is recommended that it be developed into a major day
use area with the paddle boat and other concessions moved to this location.
For the south side of the park which is currently the entrance to the park, it
is recommended that it be designed more for the use of the local
neighborhood. Improvements should include removing much of the paved
parking, upgrading the playground and providing more passive grass areas
between users. See also site N-1 on page
Other minor improvements should include:
o Create new entrance from the west side
o Reduce and improve paving in the south parking areas
o Recontour lake bottom to facilitate drainage and water quality
o Upgrade the south picnic area
o Construct new boat house and storage facility on west side
o Construct a new ranger office and workshop on west side
o Construct a retaining wall in the beach area
o Install automatic irrigation system on south side
o Expand beach area
o Add restrooms at Hughes Beach
o Develop a whole new signage system for the park
o Add new sewer and water service lines
o Upgrade electrical system in camper area
o Construct a new trail system throughout the park
o Add unpaved trails along the dike
V111- 21 JW
Man QM lI t o& Park and Recrrelon Pan Recommendations
"4010 a"Irss.ca
Lodi Lake Park Expansion
SPECIAL USE AREAS
corNeat reeca.e�
Scenic Overlook Site S-1 3.0 Acres
This site is located on the south side of the Mokelumne River and east of
the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks. It is owned by the City and at one
time was considered for a riverfront park. However, concern over access
and over -use of the park defeated the proposal.
It is recommended that this site be reconsidered for a park. There is very
little of the river available to the general public and it would be unfortunate
if the entire city population was denied a second riverfront opportunity. It
is susgested that this site be developed for passive uses only, such as
picnicking and general leisure play. Boating access should be restricted and
the overall amount of use could be limited by the design. A subdivision
currently under consideration on the west side of the railroad tracks could
provide access to the park site.
9,711-22 JAR. 2 -
Cit of Lodi Park and Recreation Plait Recom,nendarions
Hutchins Street Square Site S-2 12.0 Acres
Hutchins Street Square is an old high school site that is predominantly used
for cultural arts and senior activities. The site is managed by another city
department although the Parks and Recreation Department maintains the
facilities. Currently, the Parks and Recreation Department utilizes one of
the buildings on the site for a children's day care program.
There are plans to expand the cultural arts facilities on this site and a
separate advisory board is responsible for those activities. The site is a
potential location for the proposed indoor recreation center. (See the
recommendations under "Indoor Recreation Center".)
Maple Square Site S-3 0.6 Acres
This small undeveloped park site is located at the southeast corner of Lodi
Avenue and Sacramento Street. It is also adjacent to the Southern Pacific
Railroad. Because the proposed Needham Recreation Complex is nearby,
it is recommended that Maple Squar: be sold and the proceeds used to
acquire other recreation sites.
Needham School Site S4 6.0 Acres
This site is currently owned by the Lodi Unified School District and may be
available for purchase. This site is being considered for an indoor
recreation center. Since the indoor recreation center would occupy the
space covered by school buildings, most of the playground would still be
available for outdoor recreation use. It is anticipated that this space would
provide activities in support of the proposed center. If a recreation center is
not located on the site, a portion of it should be used for a neighborhood
park.
Pixley Park Site S-5 . 33.0 Acres
This site currently contains 26.0 acres of land of which 25 acres are
dedicated for water detention. It is recommended that an additional seven
acres be acquired so that more grading flexibility can occur for the sport
fields. This site is recommended for a major adult softball and soccer
complex suitable for league play and tournaments. Because this site is
located in an industrial area, problems with lighting and noise should not
occur. Faciliti- s should include four adult softball fields, three lighted
soccer fields, six tennis courts, a restroom building and a large concession
area. The existing model airplane activity should be moved to another
location.
The undeveloped park site is also a storm water detention area and unlike
other existing detention basins, could be graded to different levels so that
VII/ -23 9�g99
r
I
CRY Qf Lodi Pam and Recmation Man V—
Hutchins Street Square
Site S-2 12.0 Acres
Hutchins Street Square is an old high school site that is predominantly used
for cultural arts and senior activities. The site is managed by another city
department although the Parks and Recreation Department maintains the
facilities. Currently, the Parks and Recreation Department utilizes one of
the buildings on the site for a children's day care program.
There artans to expand the cultural arts facilities on this site and a
separateJavisory board is responsible for those activities: The site is a
potential 1 tion for the proposed indoor recreation anter. (See the
recommend 'ons under "Indoor Recreation CenterF)
s r
Maple Square Site S•3 ' 0.6 Acres
This small undevel •d park site is located at the southeast corner of Lodi
Avenue and Sacram o Street. It is also ad'acent to the Southern Pacific
Railroad. Because the oposed Needham recreation Complex is nearby,
it is recommended that le Square be sold and the proceeds used to
acquire other recreation s
Needham School
This site is currently owned by'the i
available for purchase. 711&esite is
recreation center. Since tlie indoor re
space covered by schooi,tWIdings, most
available for outdoor necreeation use. It
provide activities in support of the propo
not located on the site, a portion of it s
park. All
Site S-4
6.0 Acres
Unified School District and may be
g considered for an indoor
eation center would occupy the
the playground would still be
is ' ticipated that this space would
se renter. If a recreation center is
hould _ used for a neighborhood
Pixley Park ,j.; Site S -S 33.0 Acres
11is site `eptly contains 26.0 acres of land of which acres are
dedicate foytvater detention It is recommended that additional seven
acres be acj aired so that more grading flexibility can or the sport
field site is recommended for a major adult softball d soccer
complex/suitable for league play and tournaments. Because site is
to ed'in.an industrial area, problems with lighting and noise uld. not
occur.` Facilities should include five adult softball fields, two ligh soccer
fields, six tennis courts, a restroom building and a Iarge concession a.
The existing model airplane activity should be moved to another it"
n.
e undeveloped park site is also a storm water detention area and unlike
% other existing detention basins, could be graded to different levels so that
some portions would experience less flooding than others. It is
23 JAN. 2 C,: 1;33
-1
City of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Recommendations
SUMMARY OF LAND REQUIREMENTS
Existing Proposed Tots
No SRO Parks assons Parks ftp*sfll SOSMs Land
61-1 Candy Cans Park
0.2
02
6t-2 Century Park
2.5
LIS
V - I I .. . -2.7
2-7
N-1 Prop. Lod Lake H.Pork (2)
S-6 Park & Roe Office 1.3
N-2 Van Buskirk
1.0
1.0
N-3 Prop. MR! 1 -- Park
58.0
5.0 5.0
N4 Westgaft Park
0.3 5.7
1.9 I'Ll ZLO
" Henry Gloves Park
3.0 120
15.0
N-8 Emerson Park
3.0
3.0
N-7 Male Park
2.1
3.1
K4 Prop. Lincoln Park
3.0 3.0
H-9 Prop. Cothran Park
6.0 24.0 30.0
N-10 VkwrAood Park
O i 15.2
15.0
M-11 American Legion Park
11.0
60
U-12 Blakely Park
10.0
10.0
M-13 Prop. Kettleman Park
5.0 5.0
M-14 Prop. Wage, St. Park
2.0 LO
WIS Prop. Century Meadows
Lo 5.0
WIN Beckman Park
0.8 15.8
1141.11
N- English Oaks Commons
3.7
3.7
N -%A Prom Eastside park
LO 8.0
U-19 Prom Southwest P&A
1.0 24.0 25.0
7� 'V A
C-1 Prop. Woodbridge Park
20.0 20.0
C-2 Lodi Bee Complex
31.i
31.8
C-3 Kofu Park
10.0
10.0
C-4 Prop. DeGenedold Park
29.0
10,11 LO 45.0
C-3 Sal" Pot
1.0 2&0d
26.0
W
t4 .,f
-1. .., A-f;x� �71
KOM- SA! -
P,l Lodi Lake Park
4"
134 56.0
cc
S-1 Scenic Overlook
3A 3.0
S-2 Hutchins SL Square 12.0
12.0
S-3 Maple Square (3) 0.6
0.6
S-4 Needham School SRO
5.0 41.0
S-5 Pbfty park Ii.0 25.0 7.0 33.0
S-6 Park & Roe Office 1.3
X., A7
5L
OS -1 Lodi take Nature Area S&O
58.0
OS -2 Prop. Mokolumm FL AMUS AQ (4)
OS3 Prop. Arnalz
0.1 10.7 11.1
137.7 6d.1 ti 425-9,.
(1) P*03 to be acquired with 0,ovellopment Impact Fees
(2) Put of oxWft Lodi Lake Park
(3) Recommend site be sold
(4) Area under essemern - not ownership
W11-25 -
4',
i U Qf Wi Pork and Regmation Plan 0-
--
SUMMARY OF IXND REQUIREMENTS
i
The le below summarizes the land requirements needed to deyoop the plan
desc on the previous pages. It includes existing park land as,�ivvelll as land reserved
for de 'on basins.
•�y
to Existing P)6posed Toul
JAN. 2 C :a"yi
r;t
M- Cane Put
M-2 Park
2.S
2.3
$
2 7
2.7
N-1 Prof. N.Park
/Y
N-2 Van suss.
1.0
;
I-
N -3 Prop.
N-4 Westgate Park
0.3 %yf 5.7
1.9
t41
22.0
N -S Henry Glaves P ll,
3.0 .
r
12.0
15.0
N4 Emerson Park �..
3.0 _ i ;
3.0
N-7 Male Park M
3.1; .'
3.t
N -a Prop. Lincoln Park
, .
`
3.0
3.0
N-9 Prop. Cocinn Park
6.0
24.0
30.0
N-10 VlnewoW Part
IS -2
16.0
N-11 American Legion Part re
o
6.0
N-12 Blakely Park
10.0
N-13 Prop. KeOteman Park t-�
S 0
S.0
N-14 Prop. V01age SL Park /:
2.0
2.0
N-15 Prop. Century Mead
N -is Beckman Park
15.6
16.6
N• 17 English Oaks Cw"ons
3.T
3.7
N-18 Prop. Eastside Park"
8.0
6.0
N-19 Proo, Southwest Park
1.0
24.0
2S.0
SUBTOTAL -V'
31.7
36.9
62-t
179.4
C11 Prop. y%podbridge Park
20.0
20.0
C-2 Lodi 0"Comples
31.6
31 .6
C-3 Kokt
10.0
10.0
C -s Oesenedam Part
29.0
10.0
LO
45.0
er
C -S Pk
t.0
25.0
26.0
R$tr6TOTAL v
32
640 "
. '. ...{
Lo _
t32i
t Lodi take Park...:''.:?.;
43.0
11101�..
S"
I1 Scenic Overlook
3.0
2.0
1 ' S-2 Hitchins SL Square
1:0
12.0
S-3 Maple Square (0.6 Aa.)
S-4 Needham School
S-5 Pixley Park
1.0
2S.0
6.06.0
7.0
•
33,0
S-6 Park 5 Ree OtfiC
SUBTOTAL
14.3
2S.0
18.0
+SS 3
OS -1 Lodi Lake Nature Area
Sa.o
rfNS
OS -2 Prop. Mokelumne River Area
75.0
OS -3 Proo. Amaiz Pro
15.0
SUBTOTAL
54LO
90.0
14LO
TOTAL
162-5
137.7
164.6
67.4
5702
JAN. 2 C :a"yi
/EXHIBIT B/ I
ADDENDUM NO. i
to the
Lodi Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan
The following changes were recommended to the draft plan by the Lodi Parks and
Recreation Commission on February 2, 1993.
1. Page VIII -26 Proposed Mokeliunne River Riparian Zone
Remove second paragraph, last sentence that begins with "A proposed trail
system ......
Add a third paragraph: "Currently the speed generated by power boats on the
Mokelumne River is creating conflicts with non power boaters as weil as
causing river bank erosion. Since the River itself is not in the city limits of
Lodi, jurisdiction and control of river use in this area is with the County. With
this in mind, it is recommended that San Joaquin County impose a five mile
an hour speed limit on the Mokelumne River for that portion located within
the Lodi area."
2 Page Vilt-27 Lodi Lg O= %rpfl
Since the Lodi Loop Trail is no longer located along the north side of the
Mokelumne River, the concept of a loop trail around the Lodi ,,rban area is
no longer feasible. The following changes are recommended:
Remove all references to the Lodi Loop Trail and replace with the following:
Off - St;eet 'I'rAls
The following are recommended trails that would, for the most part, be
separated from streets. The routes shown on the Facility Plan indicate a
general route only. Specific locations will be established in the land
development process.
1. West Side Bypass Trail 4.7 Miles
This paved trail would start at the proposed DeBenedetti Park and travel in a
westerly direction to the west side of the planning area. From here, the trail
would be directed north, eventually connecting with the Woodbridge
Irrigation District Canal. Special design and fencing would be required in this
section to assure safety and access by the Irrigation District. The "frail would
then continue along the Canal until reaching the Mokelumne River. From
here it would travel upstream until reaching the trailhead at Lodi Lake Park.
g S9�
r
2. NATURAL OPEN SPACE
While the public workshop meetings, and the survey indicated considerable interest in
natural open space, Lodi has very little of this type of land in public ownership and few
additional opportunities exist. Tice only public site in the area is Lodi Lake Nature
Area. The single &reatest opportunity to acquire additional natural open space is along
the Mokelumne River. If this natural resource is to be t)reserved for oublie enioyment.
the right to its access must be preserved now. Nearly the entire south side of the river is
already restricted from public access.
Lodi Lake Nature Area Site OS -1 58.8 Acres
This site is located adjacent to Lodi Lake Park and is intended to preserve
the riparian and natural open space area alon& the river. Both paved and
unpaved trails are found on the site. While this park has a very peaceful
setting, the atmosphere is sometimes interrupted by the sounds and
activities of motorized boats and jet skis.
No major improvements or changes are recommended for this site. The
risk the city has with this site is that overuse could reduce the enjoyment
and experience it offers. Minor improvements should include:
o Protect the river bank from erosion
o Construct an informational kiosk
o Construct fence along levee
IN Famw 7S Acres
As stated earlier. most of the south side of the Mokelumne River has been
developed for residential use. While the north side is outside the city limits
of Lodi, it is the area that Lodi residents see when they view across the
River. The north side is undeveloped but it will be just a matter of time
before development occurs.
It is recommended that the City, on -its own or in conjunction with the
County or State Fish and Game, acquire the development rights or at the
very least a 50-100' public access easement along the river's edge. A
proposed trail system is recommended along this north shore and is
discussed in the Trails Section.
Proposed Arnaiz Property Site OS -3 15 Acres
This site is ad'acent to the freeway and would be a primary river crossing
point for the adi Loop Trail.
W11-26
JAN. 2 0 '993
/EXHIBIT B/
ADDENDUM NO. 1
to the
Lodi Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan
The following changes were recommended to the draft plan by the Lodi Parks and
Recreation Commission on February 2, 1993.
,='! ► ' �!1! r
Remove second paragraph, last sentence that begins with "A proposed trail
system..-..
Add a third paragraph: "Currently the speed generated by power boats on the
Mokelumne River is creating conflicts with non power boaters as weil as
causing river bank erosion. Since the River itself is not in the city limits of
Lodi, jurisdiction and control of river use in this area is with the County. With
this in mind, it is recommended that San Joaquin County impose a five mile
an hour speed limit on the Mokelumne River for that portion located within
the Lodi area."
Since the Lodi Loop Trail is no longer located along the north side of the
Mokelumne River, the concept of a loop trail around the Lodi urban area is
no longer feasible. The following changes are recommended:
Remove all references to the Lodi Loop Trail and replace with the following:
Off - Str—eet Trsils
The following are recommended trails that would, for the most part, be
separated from streets. The routes shown on the Facility Plan indicate a
general route only. Specific locations will be established to the land
development process.
1. West Side Bypass Trail 4.7 Miles
This paved trail would start at the proposed DeBenedetti Park and travel in a
westerly direction to the west side of the planning area. From here, the trail
would be directed north. eventually connecting with the Woodbridge
Irrigation District Canal. Special design and fencing would be required in this
section to assure safety and access by the Irrigation District. The Trail would
then continue along the Canal until reaching the Mokelumne River. From
here it would travel upstream until reaching the trailhead at Lodi Lake Park.
9 �g93
O
,.� 2. South Side Bvpass Trail 3.0 Miles
This trail would begin at De3enedetti Park and travel south to the south side
of liarnev Lane. Since this road is not developed on the south side. the
opportunity exists to separate the trail from the roadway.
3. Miscellaneous Off -Street Trails
(Continue with current text]
3. Page IX - 6 Table 34, Priority of Major -Capital PrQi r�tc
Move Scenic Overlook from Priority No. 10 to No. 15.
4. Page V111-32
Remove Item No. 7 on Page Vlll-43 regarding Additional Arli►atic Programs
and Facilities:
Add a new section beginning at the top of page Vlll-32 with:
Indoor Swimming Pool
Currently there is only one public indoor swimming pool in Lodi. It is located
at Hutchins Street Square and is used primarily for adults and seniots. The
two outdoor swimming pools located at the two high schools are used by the
Lodi Swim Club but because of modified year-round school, access to these
two pools for training is becoming difficult.
According to the Recreation Needs Assessment (Page V42), there is enough
demand for another indoor swimming pool in Lodi. It is recommended that
an ell -shaped indoor swimming pool be considered in the future. The
suggested iocat;on is the proposed Cochran Park.
With the potential that the net operating cost of this type of facility could
exceed S50,000 -S90,000 annually, it is important that it not be designed and
programmed for predominant competitive use. Pools that arc th.c
successful financially are those that are multi -use in nature and attract a large
segment of the adult population.
a. Page VIII -32 indoor Recreation Center
Remove third pparagra h that starts out Two alternative locations.... "
Remove all of pa e V I I-33
Replace with the following:
Two alternative locations for an indoor recreation center were studied. The
first option was to locate the proposed facility at Hutchins Street Square.
From an operation and management point of view, this option had many
positive features. At the same time, a master plan for exclusive senior and
cultural arts activities has been developed for this site and is being
tom- 9 .10�.
1
i
aN 2' Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Rccanrnendations
TRAILS AND PATHWAYS
F
The Needs Assessment revealed a strong desire on the part of residents of Lodi to have
a trail system for walking and bicycling. Unfortunately many of the opportunities have
been lost. However. by using undeveloped Iand. the Mokelumne River corridor, the
Woodbridge Irriggation District Canal and existing streets, a city=wide trail system can
be developed. V recommended trail system is essentially three types: an off-street
loop trail system around the city, a series of off-street connector routes to the loop trail
and a series of cross town on -street bicycle paths.
Discussed below are recommendations for a trails system for Lodi. See the Facilities
Plan for a graphic description of the trails.
Off -Street
This trail system circles the entire city and for the most part would be
separated from streets. All but 2.3 miles of the trail system would be paved;
that being the portion on the north side of the Mokelumne River. The
primary user of this trail would be walkers, hikers and bicyclists.
Starting at the southwest corner of the community at the proposed
Southwest Park (Site N-19), the trail would travel northward through the
undeveloped portion of the city or along the edge of the agricultural area.
'Ibis part of the trail would be paved and would connect two additional
parks on the way. Starting at Westgate Park, the trail would use the right of
way of the Woodbridge Irrigation District Canal. A bridge crossing would
be required to connect to Westgate Park.
The trail would then travel through Lodi Lake Park and the Nature Area.
A river crossing is proposed so that the trail can continue on the north side
of the Mokelumne River. Once the trail reaches Highway 99, the trail
crosses back to the south side of the river.
The east portion of the loop will be paved and located between the freeway
and Beckman Road. This segment connects to Pixley Park. 'Ile south
portion of the loop is recommended for the south side of Harney Lane.
:Miscellaneous Off -Street Trails
Salas Park Connector
0.7 Mies
Paved
Beckman P it Connector
1.0 Miles
Paved
Kofu Park Connection
t.4 Mies
Paved
Upstream River Route
1.4 Maes
Unpaved
Macke Grove Park Connector
1.1 Mies
Paved
t7ll • 27
JAN. 2 0 1-993
r
QM of Lodi Park and Recreadon Plan Recammendadoar
On -Street Bicycle Routes
The following streets are recommended to be striped and signed for bicycle
routes:
Turner Road
3.0 Mies
Bm Street
24 Mies
Tokay Street
2.0 Mies
Century Bodeward
2:.0 Mies
Stockton Street
3A Mies
Ham lane
3.0 Mies
Lower Sacramento Road
3.21%s
1,711.28
JAN. 2 0 1993
r
Ct:tv of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Recommendations
4. MISCELLANEOUS OUTDOOR RECREATION AREAS AND FACILITIES
In -Line Skating
In-line skating has become a very popular recreation activity. Because of the speed and
maneuverability of these skates, co icts often occur between skaters and other trail or
sidewalk users. Recently, rollerblade hockey has become a new recreation sport and is
creating a demand for large paved surfaces.
It is recommended that a large multi-purpose paved court be developed that could be
used for volleyball, basketball, hockey and other sports requiring a paved surface.
While the ideal dimension for a hockey court is 85'x 200', a compromise size for the
above described activities is 70'x 140'. A 6" curb should be constructed around the
court to keep the puck (ball) in play. The recommended location for this facility is at
the proposed Cochran Park.
Cricket
Cricket is becoming more popular in Lodi as more nationalities move into the area.
Currently, this activity is played at Blakely Park on a portion of the Senior Babe Ruth
Baseball Field. This is not an ideal location because of the skinned infield.
Unfortunately no other parks in Lodi are suitable because of existing sport fields. It is
recommended that a multi -use recreation field be developed at the proposed Cochran
Park. This field could be used for Cricket as well as soccer or other activity that does
not require permanent facilities.
Golf Course
The City recently proposed but did not receive any bids by private contractors to build
and operate a small 9 -hole golf course on the DeBenedetti parcel. For a community
the size of Lodi, it is our opinion that it is not economically feasible to build and
operate a golf course of this small size.
It is recommended that the City study the feasibility of building a standard 18 dole golf
course on property it owns near the Sewer Treatment Plant west of town. While this
location is several miles from Lodi. it has excellent visibility from the freeway and
adequate land is available. It is common practice for public golf courses to generate
considerable operating revenue.
"if -29
JAN. 2 G 1,90
r
12M gf Lodi Paris and Recreation Plan Recommendations
Outdoor Basketball Courts
The need for outdoor basketball courts is particularly importai► in Lodi because of the
lack of indoor courts. The most successful and heavily used courts are those that
simulate full court play and are very visible from the street. Basketball is as much a
social event as a recreation activity. Because of this. the court should be near the street
where people can see and be seen.
Recommended Basketball Court Locations
(Full Sized Outdoor Courts)
Park Site Site # Existin_ _Proposed
Prop. Millswood Park
N-3
1
Hale Park
N-7
t
Prop. Cochran Park
N-9
1
American Legion park
N-11
1
Blakely Park
N-12
1
Prop. Century Meadows
N-15
Prop. Eastside Park
N-18
1
Hutchins Street Square
S-2
•
Century Park
M-2
• it Is anticipated that the one existing court at
Century Park and the two at Hutchins Street Square will be removed.
Tennis Courts
Recommended Tennis Court Locations
Park Site
Site #
Existing
Proposed
Prop. Westgate Park
N-4
2
Hale Park
N-7
2
Prop. Lincoln Park
N-8
2
Prop. Cochran Park
N-9
3
American Legion Park
N-11
4
Prop. Kettleman Park
N-13
2
Prop. Village SL Park
N-14
2
Prop. Eastside Park
N-18
2
Prop. Woodbridge Park
C-1
4
Lodi Res Complex
C-2
2
Kofu Parf,
C-3
5
Prop. DeBenedetti Park
C-4
a
Pixley Park
S-5
8
Lodi High School
8
Tokay High School
10
Vlll - 30
JAIL. 2
A -IN
.-use
C'iry of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Recomm ndations
Sport Fields
The plan recommends a number of changes to sport fields in Lodi. This includes the
development of fields at new sites and the addition, deletion or conversion of sport
fields at existing park sites. The basic approach recommended in this plan is to locate
similar softball and baseball fields in complexes. if done in this manner, they will be
cheaper to build, easier to maintain and rianage and more suitable for tournaments.
Soccer fields, on the other hand, have been evenly distributed throughout the
community. The plan recommends six major sport field complexes. They are:
Pbdey Park
Softball Complex
Proposed Woodbridge Park
Westgate park
Proposed DeBenedetti Park
Salas Park
Adult softball and soccer
Womens softball and fast pitch sottball
Adult softball
Youth baseball
Senior youth baseball
Youth baseball
• Two temporary fields on street right-of-woY ProP"
V111- 31 wil-
919CA
u•
Youth S*niot Adult
Softball/ Baseball Softball Soccer
Baseball Baseball
a =--7wAliz
TTE
1 10
ill 11 .^.1.•.•.
------��!
-.ro.l i L
��----_-__-
-111. . r. . _L•:.
----�--_
y1L'. -fl iiL .l L•.•
� _�---�
----
• 1 •1.• 1 . .11•x.
��_
��—�
.. t .l.
----�—�—
• Two temporary fields on street right-of-woY ProP"
V111- 31 wil-
919CA
r
GN of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Recommeredetitint
Snl ll: As
t
The I `recommends a number of changes to sport fields in Lodi. This includes the
develop t of fields at new sites and the addition, deletion or conversion of sport
fields at e g park sites. The basic approach recommended in this plan is to locate
similar soft b sand baseball fields in complexes. If done in this tztanner, they will be
cheaper to but easier to maintain and manage and more suitable for tournaments.
Soccer fields, o he other hand, have been evenly distributed throughout the
community. The recommends six major sport field complexes. They are:
Pbdey Park Adult softball and,-qbccer
Softball Comps Women softbait and last pitch softball
Proposed Wood b a Park Adult softball
Westgate park Youth baset
Proposed DeBenede ark Senior youth baseball
Salas Park Youth baseball
How the fields will be specifical llocated i;'shown in the figure below.
s'Tli - 31
JAtl. 2 0 !993
Exists
g0
ution of Fields
Fields(Game
Proposed Distribution of Fields
Fields)
Site
Youth ;'Sen�
Sollbalt/j Sasebal
Baseball, Baseball
r`
Adult
Soltball
=
Soccer
Youth Senior
Softball/ Baseball
Baseball Baseball
Adult
Soltbad
Soccer
Armory Park
Beckman Park
/2
`•
2
Z
Blakely Park
1 t
t
Centwy Schoolt
Cochran Pa i
t
Ed DeBenedeffi Park3.
�'4
Envers9a Pa
1
Erma Reese Schoolr '
t
-Enallsh Oaks Park}
Wa h t
Grosm Bowl hr
2
t
Henry Glayes Pa
t
K t
t
t
-Lakewood
Lawreme SC
3
5
2', °,
Leroy N
+.
l
2
e, 2
t
Mills rk sed
t
ixl
S
2
-Softbocomplex2
2
Park
2 t
7
Elementary School
4
I 8e t rch
2
ti
t
1H h S h
2 2
t
t
P
westaelt Pal
2
2
2
MeMbrift Park r
�>
t
Zu Fi k!
t
t
s'Tli - 31
JAtl. 2 0 !993
r
Q& of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Recommendations
5. INDOOR RECREATION CENTER
The survey and workshop meetings revealed considerable interest for an indoor
recreation center. The needs assessment indicated a specific need for a gymnasium and
places for the city to conduct recreation classes. Currently the City has no indoor
facilities and access to schoolgyms and classrooms is very restricted. The City now
leases a portion of the Grape Festival and a small building next to their department for
basketball, volleyball and other recreation classes.
Design Requirements for a Successful Indoor Recreation Facility
1. A recreation center should be somewhat centralized in the community and be very visible
to the passing public.
2. The facility should provide a wide range of facilities and activities of interest to all age
groups -
3. Spaces should be provided for competitive and active sports. passive activities.
receptions and general leisure.
_ A. Muhl -use spaces should be favored over single purpose spaces. Flexibility is very
Important
S. The building should be attractive with a comfortable environment suitable for both active
and leisure activities. Active recreation spaces should be dearly separated from passive
spaces.
6. If tease space Is developed as part of the facility. it should be considered as temporary
and a place for future expansion.
-t 7. Activities and spaces that generate revenue is very important This will help to offset the
operating cost.
An analysis of facility needs and requirements to generate adequate revenue revealed
that in order for a center to be reasonably financially successful, the center would
compete with Hutchins Street Square.
Two alternative Iocations for a recreation center were studied. The first option was to
iocate the proposed facility at Hutchins Street Square. From an operational and
financial point of view, this is by far the most desired alternative because it combines all
recreation and cultural arts activities into one location. Substantial savings could occur
by combining the administrative functions of the two departments. The recreation
center could also provide some additional meeting and reception space that is needed
in the community. By placing the center on the west side of the site, it would not effect
the future expansion of the proposed auditorium. This option also has the advantage of
sharing parking facilities between cultural arts activities and recreation activities. It
does, however, remove a substantial amount of the open space now occupied by the
soccer field. The four elements should include:
Villi - 32
JAN. 2 G 1993
2. South Side Bypass Trail 3.0 Miles
This trail would be&in at De Benedetti Park and travel south to the south side
R, of Harney Lane. Since this road is not developed on the south side, the
opportunity exists to separate the trail from the roadway.
3. Miscellaneous Off -Street Trails
[Continue with current text]
3 Page iX - 6 Table 34 Priority of Maior Capital PrQjects
Move Scenic Overtook from Priority No. 10 to No. 15.
4. Page Vill-32
Remove Item No. 7 on Page VIII -43 regarding Additional Agnatic Programs
and Facilities:
Add anew section beginning at the top of page Vlll-32 with:
Indoor Swimming Pool
Currently there is only one public indoor swimming pool in Lodi. It is located
at Hutchins Street Square and is used primarily for adults and seniors. Ilse
two outdoor swimming pools located at the two high schools are used by the
Lodi Swim Club but because of modified year-round school, access to these
two pools for training is becoming difficult.
Accordin� to the Recreation Needs Assessment (Page V-42), there is enough
demand .or another indoor swimming pool in Lodi. It is recommended that
an ell -shaped indoor swimming pool a considered in the future. The
suggested location is the proposed Cochran Park.
With the potential that the net operating cost of this type of facility could
exceed S50,000 -S90,000 annually, it is important that it not be designed and
programmed for predominant competitive use. Pools that are the most
successful financially are those. that are multi -use in nature and attract a large
segment of the adult population.
5. Page VHI 32 Indoor Recreation Center
Remove third paragraph that starts out "Two alternative locations.... "
Remove all of Page Vill-33
Replace with the following:
Two alternative locations for an indoor recreation center were studied. The
first option was to locate the proposed facility at Hutchins Street Square.
From an operation and management point of view, this option had many
positive features. At the same time, a master plan for exclusive senior and
cultural arts cctivities has been developed for this site and is being
T
implemented. Placing a recreation center in this location would require a
modification to the master plan. With this in mind, it is recommended that
Hutchins Street Square not be considered as the site for the proposed indoor
recreation center.
Page VIII -34 - - Remove third paragraph that starts with "Another problem
with this site ....:.. Replace with the following:
"Because of the anticipated high cost to remodel, it is recommended that the
portion of the building now being used for administrative purposes be
removed to make way for a new recreation structure. The existing classroom
section would remain. A sketch of how this complex might be developed is
shown on the next page."
Pane VIII -4? _ Review of the Citv's Role inthe Private Snorts Proeram
Remove second naragraph that starts out with "In the short term ..." and
replace with the following:
"Because this is a budget vs. service issue, it is recommended that the City
review this subsidy issue each year at budget time"
7. Page VII -1 Netl4rhorhood Parkt
Add to the third paragraph, sixth fine and dust before the sentence that starts
out "If possible...."
"All new restrooms should conform to ADA standards."
QN of Lodi Park and Recreation Pian Rccommendationf
Recreation Element
24,000 Square Feet
o Teen Center
o Shower/Locker Rooms
o Fitness/Weight Room
a Racquetball Covets (3)
o Gymnasium
Administrative Element
2,600 Square Feet
0 Administrative space for the Parks and
Recreation Department
(excluding the Maintenance Division)
Classrooms/Reception
5,300 Square Feet
o Small meeting rooms
o Recreation classrooms
o Reception/multi-purpose room
Day Care Center
Existing
TOTAL
31,900 Square Feet
11 ri
w"_0I�
of
A CAD
Ip A a ,
l'►� �t.1wnr..
a
Mn:
n:
O O o v �s►LILI•
gra
All
o ,e, ra l�24m•
i�d�o�j
,Ii
�O
- �,/At1iuT tt•
V111- 33
`�'�N• 2 0 1993
r
Ct& 9[Lodi Pak and Recreation Plan Recornmendadons
The second option studied was to locate a recreation center at Needham School. In this
approach, the city would acquire the site from the Lodi Unified School District and
remodel the buildings for a recreation center and day care facility. A new gymnasium
would be added to the complex. This site could also become the home for the Boys and
Girls Club.
This option has the advantages of ample site size, the opportunity to provide outdoor
recreation space and the reuse of an existing facility. Placing.the Bo and Girls Club
on the site also gives them the opportunity to use city recreation facilities as well. The
disadvantage of this option is that a duplication of administrative space would occur
and the city would need to purchase the property. There would also be considerable
cost in building remodel. it is known that asbestos still exists in parts of the building
and this problem will be costly to remove.
Another problem with this site is that in order for a recreation center to operate at a
reasonable financial level, it would compete with the activities and spaces found at
Hutchins Street Square.
The five elements of the complex would be as follows:
Recreation element 24,000 Square Feet
i._
o Teen Center
o Shower/Locker Rooms
o Fitness/Weight Room
o Racquetball Courts (3)
o Gymnasium
Administrative Element 2,600 Square Feet
o Administrative space for the Parks and Recreation Department (excluding park
maintenance)
Meeting/Classrooms
o Small meeting rooms
o Recreation class rooms
o Mufti -purpose reception room
Day Care Center
Boys/Girls Club
o Activity rooms
TOTAL
1?!/ • 34
5,300 Square Feet
3,500 Square Feet
4,900 Square Feet
40,300 Square Feet
JAN. 2 0 1993
rQ& Q[ r „w: nark and Rearadon Pian Rttommendadons
Z
k ..-
(-44U� 5T.
PLtA :,?NT AVr—_
"ll •3S
JAN. 2 0 1993
I
Cit of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Retommendaltons
6. ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
The following are suggested changes for managing the Parks and Recreation
Department.
1. Develop a new cost accounting system
The recently completed David M. Griffith report demonstrated the difficulty of
identifying the costs of the various programs offered by the Parks and Recreation
Department. Because the Department is expecting a tighter budget in the future,
it needs to have this type of information in order to determine if programs can be
cut, fees increased or other changes made.
To obtain this information, an internal method of cost accounting will be
required. Costs as well as revenue should be identified for each program. This
should also be done for maintenance operations as well. (Refer to Park
Maintenance Operations for recommendations on how maintenance costs can be
assigned. Also see item #2 below for recommendations on reorganizing the
Department.)
2. Create three divisions within the Parks and Recreation Department
Currently the Department is divided into two divisions; a recreation division and
a parks division. Within each of these divisions is listed a budget item called
administration. Currently the administrative costs of the Director is divided
equally between the two divisions. All of the costs of the recreation coordinators
are shown in the recreation division under administration. The problem with this
approach is that when one analyzes the budget it appears that administration cost
is a major part of the budget when in reality this is not true. All of the recreation
coordinators are service providers and their costs should be listed under the
specific programs they manage. Making these changes will help to identify the
true costs or services and reduce the appearance that the Department is top heavy
in administration.
3. Prepare a Zero Based Budget
Because the Department is facing significant cuts in its budget, now is the time to
develop a budget based on projected costs for each item rather than just adding or
subtracting a percentage from last year's budget. This process will help to weed
out costs that are excessive and force an evaluation of each service offered by the
department.
Vlll - 36
7
J H- 2 0 1993
1
4. Emphasize the importance of Revenue
When budgets get tight, the first thought is to cut costs. Vowever, increasing
revenue can have the same net result. In Lodi, the revenue rate is only 16 %
which is considered to be very low. While part of the reason for this tow rate is
the lack of revenue producing facilities, another primary reason is that the
Department charges very little for its services. It is not uncommon for the
recreation division of a parks and recreation agency to nearly break even on its
operation. But it does require a diligent effort to control costs and generate
revenue whe. a it can.
In the past, Lodi has not concerned itself with this issue and instead felt that the
level o. service was more important than the cost. This is now changing and the
staff needs to understand that in order to keep in business it must operate in a
very efficient manner.
S. Annual G021s and Work Program
Each year at the beginning of the budget process, the staff of the Parks and
Recreation Department should set goals and specific work tasks for the
forthcomingyear. This process gives the staff direction on what is to be
accomplished for the year. At the end of the year an evaluation should be made
to determine if the goals were met.
6. Prepare Department Policy Manual
To help maintain a level of consistency, a policy manual should be prepared that
deals with the various operations managed by the Parks and Recreation
Department. Once in place, it will help the staff to administer the various
programs and help eliminate small issues becoming big ones at the City Council
level.
7. Move the Park and Recreation Department
It is recommended that when a new recreation center is built, the administrative
staff and the Recreation Division move into this facility. This then makes the
present site entirely available for the Park Maimenance Division.
1,711-37
QX of Lodi Pon@ and Recreation Plan Recommendaeont
8. Develop a Marketing Plan
To promote more interest in programs and services, the Department should
aggressively promote and market its recreation services. This marketing effort
should include:
o Special news releases
o Increased advertisements on special recreation activities.
o The use of attention devices to promote activities.
o Preparation of individual brochures describing special facilities.
programs or activities.
9. Annual Report
The Department should prepare an annual report describing the activities,
participation levels and changes and other operating information that occurred
over the past year. This document should be prepared in a professional manner
and widely distributed. It is a very valuable document at budget time.
VU! - 38
JAN. 2 0 1993
1
r
Oty 2[Lodi Panic and Rearation Plan Rrconimendarions
7. PARK MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS
Increase the Ratio of Seasonal to Permanent Perionnel
Currently, the Department maintains a fairly high ratio of permanent employees.
With the anticipated budget reductions, the current intent is to reduce the amount
of seasonal employees. While it is admirable to maintain its permanent work
force, in the long term the City should replace departing permanent employees
with seasonal employees. The cost savings can be substantial. For instance, a
seasonal employee may cost the City about $7.00 per hour including benefits, but
a permanent employee may be as much as 522.00 per hour.
The downside of this approach is that seasonal employees need more direction
and often do not return the second year (the average is about 25-30%). This
approach would require more training on the part of the permanent crew to
become crew chiefs.
2. Develop a Park Maintenance Management Plan
It is recommended that the Department develop a park maintenance plan. With
this concept, maintenance and time standards are established, priorities are
identified and yearly work schedules prepared. By approaching park and facility
maintenance on a systematic basis, crisis planning can be reduced and
maintenance tasks spread out more evenly over the year. The result can be a
reduction in costs while maintaining the same level and quality of maintenance.
3. Sports Field Maintenance
Each year the Maintenance Division renovates, to a certain extent, every infield
of every baseball and softball f:eld used by the City. This amounts to about 22
fields every year. Most renovation is directed towards eliminating a "tip" mused
by infield material pushed to the edge of the grass. If left long enough, this lip
can cause the ball to bounce up into the face of the player. 'There are many
causes of this lip to form including improper dragging of the fields and just
normal play. On the weekends, the fields are often prepared an excessive
number of times. Also by allotting too little time, theineld material is often
thrown into the grass by dragging at too high rate of speed.
To remove this lip, the sod adjacent to the infield is lifted, the extra material
removed and the sod replaced. Last year the Maintenance Division had five
seasonal employees spend three months at this task.
While this level of service is excellent, it is quite costly. Part of the problem can
be alleviated by allotting more time to drag afield and dragging less times. To
help cut costs in this area, it is recommended that field renovation be spread out
over a three year period.
1/711-39
JF; 2 G 1393
r
4. Change the Work Crew Format
Currently the Maintenance Division assigns some personnel permanently to one
facility while others work on roving crews. It is our observation that while the
level of maintenance is higher where personnel is assigned to one facility, the cost
is also higher.
Except for the mowing crews, it is recommended that the maintenance staff be
assigned to crews of two persons with each assigned one utility vehicle. Crews can
be assigned to specific areas of their expertise or they can be assigned a series of
parks. By combining the right personnel to a crew, considerable more work can
be achieved.
S. Offer Incentives for Skill Improvements
It has been our observation that the reason for many practices in the Department
is that "it always been done that way". 'Kris is especially true in the Maintenance
Division. It is recommended that the staff be encouraged to attend special
training programs and look at new ways of maintaining and mansgtng park and
recreation facilities. To encourage the staff to attend and successfully complete a
training program, the City should pay for the education and provide salary
incentives.
6. Contract Out Some Maintenance Services
It is recommended that the Maintenance Division consider contracting out some
of its maintenance tasks. Some tasks such as restroom cleaning. garbage pickup
and other work that is labor intensive and does not require a special skill can be
completed considerably cheaper by a private contractor. Some tasks, such as
mowing that requires special equipment, is often not any cheaper.
Some communities have gone heavily into contract services. Some have been
successful while others have not. This approach requires a very specific set of
specifications and city personnel need to monitor the contractor's operation on a
daily basis.
7. Park Security
Some communities in Southern California and even in the Sacramento area have
experienced considerable problems with gangs and other undesirables in the
parks. Lodi has been fortunate in that serious problems have not yet arrived.
The Parks and Recreation Department currently has unarmed security patrols.
While there are often requests to place armed security personnel in parks, the
City should resist this approach. This can be a high Iiability risk and should be
left to the Police Department.
Vlrl - 40
JAN. 2 ;3-J3
1
Because of these concerns for personal safety, parks need to be designed and
maintained differently than they have in the past. Parks need to be open and
visible. The use of landscape screens to divide use areas are not now
recommended and buildings need to be placed so that the entrance faces a public
view. These and many other design issues need to be considered when any new
park in Lodi is developed.
8. RECREATION PROGRAM AND SERVICE RECONI UMENDATIONS
The City currently offers a fairly extensive recreation program although the emphasis
has always been in the area of organized sports. Some of the additions and changes
that should be considered in the recreation program are:
1. Area of Service
As stated earlier in this report, the Parks and Recreation Department serves an
area much larger than the city itself. In fact nearly 30% of the users come from
outside the city limits. Because of the Department's budget squeeze, it will not be
able to build facilities and serve the residents who live outside the city unless
some financial assistance occurs.
There are two financial issues associated with the above problem. The first is that
outside residents do not pay most city taxes and as a result do not pay an
equitable amount of the recreation program costs. Thereggitstration fee for most
programs does not cover the actual cost of the program. We second issue is the
capital cost of building facilities. This cost is borne exclusively by city residents.
To pay for programs and services by residents living outside the city, the following
approach is recommended:
1. The County should initiate and collect impact fees for any residential
development occurring outside the city limits but within the recreation
service area of Lodi. This money would be used to build sports fields
and indoor recreation facilities. 'Me fee would not ap I to general
construction. It is assumed that all sport facilities wouTN located
within ►he planning area of Lodi.
2. County residents living in the service area but outside the city Iimits
should be asked to create a special recreation taxing district. This taxing
district would raise revenue for the operation of sport fields, indoor
facilities and recreation programs within the Lodi area.
This approach places the burden on the non-resident users to tax themselves to
use city facilities. If they refuse, then the city should serve its residents only.
� I ISI I� IJ • l I IY 1
2. Fees and Charges Policy
The City needs to continue to review its fees and charges policy. Once costs and
revenue can be determined for each program, a better assessment of fees can be
determined. Also the City needs to go on record as to its policy on subsidizing the
various programs it offers.
3. Change to a Quarterly Attendance Report
Currently the Recreation Division prepares a monthly report on the number of
participants in each of its programs. This approach is time consuming and
somewhat difficult. By changing to a quarterly report, a more accurate accounting
can be made at much less efffon.
4. Balance the Recreation Program
The recreation program is heavily oriented to organized sports. Most of the effort
in past years has been to build sport fields rather than any indoor recreation
facilities. While it is not to say that organized sports is very important in Lodi,
more emphasis should be placed on other programs as well. The Department
should consider the needs of all residents of the area.
f
Lodi has a unique partnership with BOBS and the Lodi Swim Club. These two
private groups provide an extensive high level competitive youth sports program.
e City shares in these programs by providing administrative and other costs
amountin to about $175.000 annually for BOBS and $30,000 for the Swim Club.
'lite actual cost is much higher if actual facility maintenance was added in. It is
our opinion that this amount of subsidy to a competitive program is excessive.
In the short term, the City should reduce this subsidy by half but in the long run,
these twoprivate groups should independently run their own program and the
City provide field maintenance. The private groups should do their own field
preparation for games. For the Swim Club the City should make its own outdoor
pool available to them but not pay for rental of the school pool.
Vlll - 42
��
JAN- 2 G 1943
r
A
implemented. Placing a recreation center in this location would require a
modification to the master plan. With this in mind, it is recommended that
Hutchins Street Square not be considered as the site for the proposed indoor
recreation center.
Page VIII -34 - - Remove third paragraph that starts with "Another problem
with this site ....... Replace with the following:
"Because of the anticipated high cost to remodel, it is recommended that the
portion of the building now being used for administrative purposes be
removed to make way for a new recreation structure. The existing classroom
section would remain. A sketch of how this complex might be developed is
shown on the next page."
6. Page VIII -42 Review of the CiN's Role in the Pr;twre Sans Ew=z
Remove second paragraph that starts out with "in the short term...." and
replace with the following:
"Because this is a budget vs. service issue, it is recommended that the City
review this subsidy issue each year at budget time."
7. Page VII -I Neighborhood Parks
Add to the third paragraph; sixth line and just w fare the sentence that starts
out "If possible...."
"All new restrooms should conform to ADA standards_"
r
PYR'
6. Cultural Arts
When Hutchins Street Square was created, the understanding was that this
organization would offer a complete community arts program. Prior to this,
cultural aro programs were offered by the Parks and Recreation Department.
Unfortunately, Hutchins Street Square is not meeting the needs of all age groups
and interests. Many of the cultural arts programs. especially those related to
instruction, education and general appreciation classes, are not being offered.
Without a community arts plan, the intent and goals of this program are unclear.
The City needs to decide how all of the cultural arts needs in the community will
be met. This could be achieved by one city department or continue as it has in
the past. However. the most important task at hand is for t:ie two departments
to meet and decide how and who will provide all of the cultural arts needs in the
communidy.
7. Additional Aquatic Programs and Facilities
Currently there are two outdoor pools at Blakely Park, one each at the two high
schools and an indoor pool at Hutchins Street Square. Outdoor swimming also
occurs at Ledi Lake Park. A majority of pool use at the Blakely Park and Tokay
High School is for a competitive program sponsored by the Lodi Swim Clt.h.
While it is true that there is not an outdoor swimming pool on the west side of
Lodi, there are many opportunities to swim in the community. Adding another
pool to this area would be a nice feature but would be very costly to build and
maintain. In light of a:? the other recreation facilities that are needed in Lodi,
another swimming pool seems tike a luxury.
& Additional Recreation Programs
While the tack of facilities restricts the addition of some programs, there are
options and approaches that should be considered. It is important to note that
expanding the recreation program does not necessarily mean increasing the
operating budet. In most cases, registration fees will pay for all of the program
costs- Some of the new programs the City should consider are:
Provide a day care program for school-age children for the time immediately
before and after school. Some of this service is offered as an after school
program during the summer only.
11711-43
JAN. 2 C 7993
�, ct MGWIZ1=1 r� 191T,
o Offer an iidoor playground program utilizing the gymnasium floor at the
Grape Festival grounds. The portable gym is not used in the morning hours
and could be available for other activities. This program is a parent
supervised non -structured activity. Essentially, the city would provide the
space and some play equipment. Parents would pay a fee (approximately S2)
to use the facilities. This program can be quite successful during the winter
months.
o Provide speciality cultural arts programs in the area of instruction, general
appreciation and education.
o Develop an outdoor education and interpretation program. Currently, a very
limited program is offered in the summer months at the Discovery Center at
Lodi Lake Park. This program should be expanded to include tours and
education as well.
o Offer a very limited senior program oriented to outdoor health and fitness
programs.
o Develop a teen program for non -structured activities and counseling.
o Offer education and technical training programs. This program is sometimes
offered by the Lodi Unified School District, but its results have not been
consistent.
o Expand the number of special events. Special events can reach a large
portion of the community at relatively little cost. It is also an opportunity for
the Parks and Recreation Department to expand its visibility in the
community.
9. MEETING ADA REQUIREMENTS
In 1990, Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which is the most
recent in a series of laws relating to handicap access. The intent of this law was to
strengthen the accessibility requirements for all facilities used by the public. As it
relates to park and recreation facilities, the law is intended to insure that a person with
a disability has the same opportunity to achieve their recreation goals as those without a
disability.
Essential to the ADA is the belief that services, programs and facilities shall be
provided in the most integrated setting possible. A public agency is not obligated to
guarantee participation but to only provide the opportunity. It. addition, structural
changes are not necessarily required if other methods will result in equal access.
X711- 44
c (; X533
it
C,p, of Lodi Park and Rrcnadon Plan ft -
The definition of disability varies widely and includes a variety of impairments and
limitations. This includes people with mobility impairments, visual limitations, hearing
impairments, mental retardation, learning impairments and emotional disabilities. In
addiuon, it includes elderly citizens as well as people with temporary disabilities, such
as a broken atm or leg. It is estimated that 57% of the population has some sort of
disability or physical limitation.
Meeting ADA Requirements for Existing Facilities
The approach to meeting accessibility re uirements for existing park and recreational
facilities is based on the significance and/or relative level of development of the site.
The more significant and intensively used a recreation area becomes, the greater the
accessibility must become. Recreation areas that are highly developed such as
neighborhood parks, community parks or special itse areas require a high level of
accessibility. These types of recreation areas should be accessible to people with all
types of disabilities. In contrast, very passive areas, such as natural open space that has
little development and seldom used, requires less accessibility. Determining the level of
access is shown by the figure on the next page.
High
Level of
Development Medium
Low
Significance of Site/Feature
High Medium Low
Where evaluation of existing facilities becomes difficult is when an accommodation
would result in a substantial economic burden or would require a major change to the
nature of service. Under these conditions, a park and recreation agency may refuse to
make the accommodations. However, determining a substantial economic burden is
difficult. Factors that should be considered include: the cost of change as it relates to
the overall operating budget of the agency, the actual cost of the change, the number of
individuals who would benefit and the availability of existing funds within the current
operating budget.
A majority of the parks in Lodi will require significant modifications to comply with the
new ADA requirements because the parks are highly developed and extensively used.
Vlll - ;S
JAN. 2 1 1293
1 r .' '.i � • 7! 1 rt j { r1{{ • � r
itteeting ADA Requirements for New Facilities
Meeting ADA requirements for new development is easier and slightly different. The
development of new parks and recreation facilities allows a greater flexibility in terms
of design opportunities for disabled. Because the intent of ADA is toprovide a
disabled person with the opportunity to experience a full range of recreational
opportunities, new park and recreation facilities should be designed to provide
expenences for all ability levels. Individuals with disabilities who enjoy a challenge
should be accommodated as well as those who prefer easier outdoor recreation
experiences. Ideally, individual sites should provide a full range of opportunities for
those disabilities.
However, due to size and. physical characteristics of some sites, offering a variety of
ability levels is not always possible. Due to their size, larger sites often have a greater
opportunity for accommodating varying levels of development and as a result may
require greater accessibility. In general, recreational facilities should provide the
highest practical level of access to people with disabilities. Keep in mind, however, that
access to facilities may be limited due to physical features of the site.
Accessibility Requirements
The following is the basic accessibility requirements as identified by the Uniform
Federal Accessibility Standards. These standards should be modified according to the
q level of accessibility required of the site.
1. Parking/Access Routes
o One designated handicapped space per 25 total spaces.
o Eight wide parking space with T wide access aisle for cars and 8! access aisle for
vans.
0 50% of handicap spaces for cars and 50% spaces for vans.
2. Pathways/Trails/Ramps
o A handicap accessible pathway must be provided to all features of the park.
o Ramp required it slope is greater than 1:20 (556).
o Maximum slope on ramp is 1:16 (6.2556).
o Ramp landings 5 feet by 5 feet for every 30 inch rise.
o Ramp width is 3 feet minimum.
o Two inch high curbs are required along edge of ramp.
o Ramps must have a hard non -site surface.
o Handrails are required on ramps and trails with steep cross slopes.
o Pathways and trail grades should not exceed 1:20 (556).
o Width of pathwa;•s and trails for one-way access is 4 feet and for two-way is 5 feet
o Tactile warnings should be provided along surfaces of potentially dangerous areas
3. Fishing Facilities
o The connection between the fishing pad and pathway should be hard surfaced.
o A curb and/or railing should be provided at water's edge.
o Two accessible fishing stations are required for each accessible parking space.
o Each fishing station should consist of 4 linear feet of fishing area on a dock cr S linear
feet of fishing area on shore pads.
o Shade and shelter should be provided for each station.
1,711-46
�"'t 2 0 i393
1
n of Lodi
Park
and Rarration Pfan t[anrnt�dp�{Znj
4.
Boating Facilities
o
Docks, piers and gangways must meet accessible pathway and ramp requirements.
o
Curbs and/or railings are required.
5.
Restrooms
o
Connection between restrooms and pathway should be hard surfaced.
o
Facilities such as toilets, stalls and sinks should be designed to meet accessible
requirements.
&
Playgrounds
o
Connection between playground and parking should be hard surfaced and meet
required design standards.
o
Entrance to the playground should be appropriately signed.
o
Pathway from the entrance of the playground to the primary play areas shall be fully
accessible.
o
At least 30% of the play equipment shall be accessible and easily reached from the
playground path of travel.
o
The playground equipment should encourage interaction between children with and
without disabilities.
o
The sensation of activity (such as swinging, spinning etc.) shall be equally available
to those with disabilities.
o
Surface material beneath the play equipment should be firm and levet to permit
^�v
unassisted travel by a parson in a wheelchair.
.i
7.
Picnic
Areas
o
Locate on level grade.
o
Pad beneath the picnic pad should be hard surfaced.
o
Connection between picnic pad and pathway should be hard surfaced
o
Facilities such as tables, benches and grit should be designed to meet accessible
requirements.
8.
Beach/Waterfront
o
Some portion of the beach must be firm to the water's edge.
o
Access into the water must be firm and safe.
9. Information/Signage
o Site information related to accessblity should be made available in public
documents.
o If the park has an entrance that is not accessible, then a sign must be provided
indicating where an accessible entrance is located.
o Site signage is required that designates if the park is accessible for those with
disablitkm
10. Miscellaneous Facilities
o Conveniences such as drinking fountains must be located along a walkway and
accessible to the disabled.
V711- 47
r
SECTION IX
ACTION PLAN
Jars. 2 �- :993
ro"o
ai
SECTION IX
ACTION PLAN
INTRODUCTION
Recommendations for park sites, trails, open space and other facilities are identified in
Section VII of this report. Resources to develop these improvements are identified in
this section and will come from many sources. Some of these funding sources are new
to the City whereas others have been utilized in the past. The intent of this section of
the plan is to identsa six year strategy for funding park and facility improvements.
This strategy identi tes when a certain action should occur and the source of funding.
The summary of this planning process is shown in the six year capital improvement plan
identified in Table 34 listed on page IX -b.
CRITERIA FOR PRIORITIZING PROJECTS
The following criteria are recommended for prioritizing project in the capital
improvement plan. The listing of criteria are not in any pnonty.
o The acquisition of park property should occur ahead of development and
have the highest priority. Park development will occur as grants or
development impact fees become available.
o The right of public access to the Mokelumne River should have a high
priority.
o Trail development should be an on-going process.
o The development of sports fields should have a medium priority because
facilities already exist
o The development of a recreation center should have a high priority because
location of a site needs to be determined now. This is especially true if the
Needham School site is selected.
o The acquisition of park property at Lincoln School should have a very high
priority because of impending decisions regarding this site by the school
district.
o The further development of Lodi Lake Park should have a high priority
because of the city has received a grant for boat ramp improvements. A
new master plan needs to be developed immediately.
o Further exploration of the feasibility of developing a golf course should
have a medium priority.
JAN. 2 0 1993
r
� ♦ 1I � 11 !J I
V �J
FUNDING SOURCES
1. Utility Tax
This tax could have raise several million dollars annually. Some of this
money could have been targeted for park and facility improvements. The
tax can be imposed on electrical, water, telephone, gas and cable TV
service. State enabling legislation permits a maximum rate of 7%.
2. Park -in -Lieu Fees
The intent of this concept is to acquire or set aside park land at the time of
subdivision approval. The subdivider may pay a fee based on the number of
housing units proposed or dedicate land of equal value. All money
collected must be spent within a benefit area of the project. The City
already has this program in place.
3. Park Development Fees
The focus of Ttte Park Development Fee is to provide money for the
development of park sites. These fees can be used city-wide and can
supplement the to -lieu fee. The Park Development Fee cannot be used for
maintenance or recreation programs. They are paid by the homeowner at
the time of purchase. The City already has this program in place.
4. Real Estate Transfer Tax
This is a new type of tax imposed when real estate is bought or sold. It can
be imposed on certain types of transactions or for all sales. The money
collected can be used for recreation projects as well as for other types of city
improvements.
S. General Obligation Bond
These are voter approved bonds with the assessment placed on r
property. Passage requires a 66 2/3rds majority approval by the voters. In
California, this is a very difficult type of measure to pass.
6. Landscape and Lighting Act
This funding mechanism allows the City to assess housing units or land
parcels on an even -value basis regardless of the assessed valuation. The
assessment money can be used for park land acquisition, development
and/or maintenance. The City can choose to use the revenue on a gay -as -
you -go basis or can sell bonds in order to receive a lump sum amount. The
IX - 2
...:�. 2 0 1993
r
QU of Lodi Park and Rmrradon Plan ' Acdort Plan
bonds are then paid back from the annual revenue generated from the
assessment.
This act has become very popular in recent years. It does not require voter
approval unless 50% of the affected residents oppose the assessment.
7. joint Public/Private Partnership
This concept is relatively new to park and recreation agencies. The basic
approach is for a public agency to enter into a working agreement with a
private corporation to help fund. build and/or operate a public facility.
Generally, the three primary incentives that a public agency can offer is free
land to place a facility (usually a park or other piece of public land), certain
tax advantages and access to the facility. While the public agency may have
to give up certain responsibilities or control, it is one way of obtaining
public facilities at a lower cost.
S. Certificates of Participation
This is a lease -purchase approach in which the City sells Certificates of
Participations IPCOVs) to a lending institution. The City then pays the loan
Off from revenue produced by the facility or from its general operatingg
budget. The lending institution holds title to the property until the COP's
are repaid. 'this procedure does not require a vote of the public.
9. Revenue Bonds
This concept is somewhat similar to Certificates of Participation except it
requires voter approval and as a result the interest costs are less. Revenue
from the operation of the facility is used to pay for capital cost and debt
service.
10. Land and Water Conservation Fund
This is a federal grant program for the acquisition and development of
parks and open space. At one time this was asignificant funding source but
over the years the federal goverrunent has found ways to divert the money
to other programs. It requires a 50% local match.
11. Roberti/Zberg/Harris Urban Open Space and Recreation Grant Program
This is a state funded program with sources coming from vehicle license
registration, cigarette tax and other sources. About 83% of the allocated
amount is distributed to public agencies on a per capita basis and 17% is
distributed in a statewide competition. This program requires a 30% local
match and may only be used for acquisition and development.
lX-3
.:AIV. 2 ^ '»a
C& of Lodi Park and Fecrration Plan Diction Plan
12. Special Legislative Appropriations
These are special approppriations created during the state budgetin& process.
They are based on the ability of local legislators to influence spending for
projects in their community. Based on the current financial condition of the
state, it is doubtful if this program will be popular for the next several years.
13. Private Grants and Foundations
Private grants and foundations provide money for a wide range of Projects.
T'tey are sometimes difficult to find and equally difficult to secure because
of the open competition. They usually fund unique projects or ones of
extreme need.
14. HUD Grants
Grants form the Federal Department Of Housing and Urban Development
for a wide variety of projects. Most are distributed in the lower income
areas of the community. Grants can be.up to a 100%. Generally, areas east
of the railroad tracks are eligible for this program. Hale Park
improvements were funded by this program.
15. Transfer of Development Rights
A process wherein the development rights of a specific parcel of desired
open space land is transferred to a second parcel of land more suitable for
development. The second parcel is then permitted a higher level of
development. If the two parcels are owned by two different land owners
the increased value of the second parcel is given to the owner of the first
parcel.
16. Urban Forestry Grants
There are two funding grant programs in the area of urban forestry. The
first is funded by the U.S. Small Business Administration and provides
grants to purchase and plant trees. Urban street tree planting programs are
sometimes funded by this method.
17. Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA)
California could receive more than 5200 million over a six year period for
transportation enhancement activities and facilities. Some of the eligible
projects inefude trail systems for pedestrians and bicycles, acquisition of
scenic easements, landscape and other scenic beautification and mitigation
of water pollution due to highway runoff. This program is administered by
IX -4
JAM. 2 0 1993
1
7
City of Lodi Park and Rccroadon Plan Action Plan
18. Urban Forestry Grants
There are two funding grant programs in the area of urban forestry. The
first is funded by the U.S. Small Business Administration and provides
grants to purchase and plant trees. Urban street tree planting programs are
sometimes funded by this method.
19. Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA)
California could receive more than S200 million over a six year period for
transportation enhancement activities and facilities. Some of the eligible
projects include trail systems for pedestrians and bicycles, acquisition of
scenic easements, landscape and other scenic beautification and mitigation
of water pollution due to highway runoff. This program administered by
the California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS). Currently.
this agency is preparing guidelines for administering the program. While no
rules have been set, it is expected that these grants will require a local
match of 15-20%.
LC - 5 JAN. 2 0 093
2. South Side Bypass Trail 3.0 Mites
This trail would begin at DeBenedetti Park and travel south to the south side
of Harney Lane. Since this road is not developed on the south side. the
opportunity exists to separate the trail from the roadway.
3. Miscellaneous Off -Street Trails
(Continue with current text]
JIM MWIME
Move Scenic Overlook from Priority No. 10 to No. 15.
4. Page VIII -32
Remove Item No. 7 on Page Vlll-43 regarding Additional Aquatic Programs
and Facilities:
Add a nev. section beginning at the top of page Vill-32 with:
Indoor Swimming Pool
Currently there is only one public indoor swimming pool in Lodi. It is located
at Hutchins Street Square and is used primarily for adults and seniots. Tlie
two outdoor swimming pools located at the two high schools are used by the
Lodi Swim Club but because of modified year-round school. access to these
two pools for training is becoming difficult.
According to the Recreation Needs Assessment (Page V-42), there is enough
demand for another indoor swimming pool in Lodi. It is recommended that
an ell -shaped indoor swimming pool be considered in the future. The
suggested location is the proposed Cochran Park.
With the potential that the net operating cost of this type of facility could
exceed 550,000-540,000 annually, it is important that it not be designed and
programmed for predominant competitive use. Pools that are the most
successful financially are those that are multi -use in nature and attract a large
segment of the adult population.
5. Page V!11-32 Indoor Recreation Center
Remove third paragraph that starts out 'Two alternative locations.... "
Remove all of Page VIII -33
Replace with the following:
Two alternative locations for an indoor recreation center were studied. The
first option was to locate the proposed facility at Hutchins Street Square.
From an operation and management point of view, this option had many
positive features. At the same time, a master plan for exclusive senior and
cultural arts activities has been developed for this site and is being
I,pR.
9 mac'
�1_
r
C& Qf Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Action Plan
PROJECT PRIORITIES
Listed below are the projects described in the plan with the highest priority. While
these projects should be funded in sequence, thepriorities can change as land and/or
funding becomes available. This list should be reviewed and updated each year.
Table 34
Priority of Major Capital Projects
Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Funding
Priority
Proiecl
Cost
Improvements
Source •
1
Lodi Lake Park - Phase t
S338.700
Earth Berm, twat ramp
2
Lodi Lake Access
58,000
New access to west side
S
3
Lincoln School Acquisition
-
Acquisition
16
4
OeBenedetti Park Acquisition
1,568,000
Acquisition
2.3
S
Pixley Park Acquisition
280,000
Acquisition
2.3
6
Indoor Rec Center Study
so,000
Feasibility Study
6
7
Lodi Loop Trail - Phase 1
94,900
Lodi Lake - Westgate Park
19
a
Mokelumne River Access
-
Public access to north side
9
DeBenedeni Park - Phase 1
3,500,000
4 fields i support facilities
43
X10
Scenic Overlook
258,800
Development
5
//1
t 1
Lodi Loop Trail - Phase 2
238,000
Westgate P to Deeenedetti P.
19
12
Lodi take Park - phase 2
1,121.000
Development of west side
2.3
13
Miilswood Park Acquisition
Joint agreement to develop
2,3
14
Lincoln School Park
230.000
Development
16
15
Indoor Recreation Center
4.500.000
Developmem
1, 2.3
16
Tokay Street Bicycle Path
20,000
L Sar- Road to Highway 99
119
17
Eastside Park Acquisition
690,000
Acquisition
2, 3
18
Lodi Lake Park - Phase 3
64,000
Entrance; parking
S
19
Emerson Park
350.700
Rehabilitation
12. 15.20
• Refer to three previous pages
OPERATIONAL IMPACTS
As the projects shown in Table 34 above are developed, the City can expect an increase
in operational costs related to park maintenance and staff administration.
Shown on
_ Table 35 on the next page are the expected operational costs as the projects come on
line
1X - 6
J"41N. 2 0 1993
Cim of Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Action Man
Table 35
Added Maintenance and Operational Costs
Park. Recreation and Open Space Plan
Added Maint. Accumulative
Proiect & Operational Cot Costs
Lodi take Park • Phase t
-
-
LodiLake Access
-
-
Lincoln School Acquisition
-
-
DeBenedetti Park Acquisition
Pixley Park Acquisition
-
-
Indoor Ree Center Study
-
Lodi Loop Trail • Phase 1
5,300
5,300
Mokelumne River Access
-
DeBenedettl Park - Phase 1
160,000
165.300
Scenic Overtook
24,900
190,200
Lodi Loop Trait . Phase 2
16,400
206,600
Lodi Lake Park -phase 2
82,550
289,150
Millswood Park Acquisition
-
-
Lincoln School Park
16,600
305,750
Indoor Recreation Center
150,000
455,750
Tokay Street Bicycle Path
-
-
Eastside Park Acquisition
-
-
Lodi take Park - Phase 3
-
Emerson Park
-
-
FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PARK MAiNTBNA4NCE AND
OPERATIONS
The City needs to be aware that as more park and recreation facilities are made
available, a corresponding increase in maintenance and operational costs will occur. It
should not expect to absorb these added costs by decreasing the current level of
maintenance.
'Mere are, however, several funding alternatives available for both short term and Ion
g
term financing. One o; the short term approaches is a one year serial levy. This would
need to be approved by the voters but is sometimes used when a critical situation
occurs.
A more equitable and feasible solution is to develop a Landscape and Lighting District.
This is discussed on page IX -3.
l.Y-7 2--)993
,^
APPENDIX
T
ANALYSIS OF CITY RECREATION AREAS AND FACILITIES
AMERICAN LEGION PARK 5.6 Acres I
This 5.6 acre park is located at the corner of Hutchins Street and Vine Street and is
bordered by two streets and residential housing on the other. The primary access to the
site is off Vine Street. Presently, there is no off-street parking associated with the park.
The site is generally level with large trees scattered throughout the site, particularly in
the picnic area. The park contains four lighted tennis courts, a children's playground,
an open lawn area, a small restroom/recreation center called the Lee Jones Recreation
Building. Paved pathways connect the various activity spaces together.
There is some opportunity to add activity spaces but would require the consolidation or
moving of the playground. Before this is done, one needs to evaluate the need for more
facilities against the potential of overcrowding the park. The irrigation system also
needs upr&radin$ because of inadequate coverage and lack of water pressure. Aside
from the irrigation system, the overall condition of the park is quite good.
ARMORY PARK 3.2 Acres
This 3.2 acre park is located off Stockton Street and Lawrence Avenue, just north of the
Armory Building. It is primanly a softball field and nothing else. Currently, there is no
off-street parking to the park although there is ample on -street parking. However,
some parking does occur between the outfield fence and the street. Courageous players
who park here risk the chance of a home run damaging the car.
Facilities at this site include a lighted softball field, a small restroom building and a
concession stand. In the southwest corner of the site the Police Department has a dog
training area. Nothing of permanent nature is located here and the facilities could be
moved if needed. The softball field is not of regulation length and requires an
exceptionally high outfield fence and special playing rules.
There has been some discussion about constructing a new press box behind home plate.
If this occurs, space will be allocated for a person who manages the night time sport
program. In addition to the press box, there is a need to upgrade the electrical system.
For the mostpart, this site is too small for an adult softball Geld. Some additional
outfield length could be acTjired by orienting the field to the northwest. However, this
is not the best field orientation and it may be cheaper in the long run to make it into a
youth baseball field.
r
CRY of Lodi Park and Recrfarion Plon _ perndiz
BECKNMV PARK 16.6 Acres
This 16.6 acre park is located at the corner of Century Boulevard and Ham Lane, near
Tokay High School. The site is bordered by streets on three sides and the Woodbridge
Irrigation Canal on the other. At the present time, there is no off-street parking.
A primary function of this site is to detain storm water during heavy rains. The park
consists of two primary areas: the 15.8 acre retention basin and the 0.8 acre upland
park area. The detention basin contains three soccer fields and two practice ballfields.
I lie ballfields are used primarily for T•ball. The entire retention area is completely
fenced to keep the public out during times of heavy rains. The upland park area is
located around the edge of the basin and contains a children's playground, several
exercise stations, a restroom building and a small picnic area.
Inadequate irrigation coverage and poor water pressure Ieaves dry turf areas during the
summer. Aside from the irrigation system, the park is in good condition.
CANDY CANE PARK 2 Acres
This small park is located on Holly Drive between Lake Street and Gerard Drive. It
backs up to two homes and is less than 100 feet deep. This park was recently upgraded
and includes a small grass area and a children's playground. The site is too small for
any additional recreation facilities.
The lack of an automatic irrigation system will require hand watering. Overall, the site
is in very good condition.
CENTURY PARK 2.5 Acres
This 2.5 park site is located at the eastern end of Century Drive, just west of the Central
Pacific Railroad right-of-way. This site is actually an undeveloped street right-of-way
that will eventually be extended across the railroad tracks.
'Ilse site is flat with no trees. Facilities at the site include a children's pla, ound, a
basketball court, a volleyball court and a Iarge open grass area. Overall, the park is in
poor condition and due to its temporary nature has not been adequately developed.
While there is opportunity to add other facilities, its temporary nature precludes the
desire to spend the money. Perhaps the best idea is to remove all of the existing
facilities and convert the site into a soccer field. Once the extension of Century
Boulevard is completed, a new park site will be needed to serve the residents of the
area.
A 2
7
Citi of Lodi Part and Recreation Pion Antxndir
ED DEBENEDETII PARK 51.0 Acres
This 51.0 acre undeveloped park site is located on the east side of Lower Sacramento
Road, half way between Kettleman Lane and Harney Lane. At the present time this
site is being considered for the development of a golf course.
EMERSON PARK 2.0 Acres
This park is located on the corner of Elm Street and Hutchins Street. The site is
surrounded by streets on three sides and residential housing on the other. The main
access to the site is off Hutchins Street. No off-street parxing is provided although the
three streets offer adequate parking. Recently this park underwent some improvements
including two new playground areas and a group picnic area.
The western or active portion of the site contains a youth baseball field. The eastern
half of the site is designed for more passive activities and includes two playgrounds, a
restroom, a group picruc area, two horseshoe pits and a paved pathway.
The overall condition of the site is in good condition except for some dry turf areas
caused by inadequate coverage of the irrigation system. 'mere is very little opportunity
to add facilities to the site.
ENGLISH OAKS COMMONS PARK 3.7 Acres
This 3.7 acre site is a small neighborhood park located in the center of a residential
neighborhood. The site is essentially a common area between two residential
neighborhoods. Facilities at the site include a children's playground, an open lawn area
and a lighted pathway.
Overall, the facilities at the site are in good condition except for the turf. The lack of
adequate water coverage leaves some dry turf ares. Some additional facilities could be
added to the site but it may make the park too cluttered.
GRAPE BOWL 15.0 Acres
This 15.0 acre site is essentially a football stadium with earth mounded on the sides to
create seating areas. "Ilse playing surface which is at grade with surrounding area is
about 30 feet below the top of the bowl. Along each side of the stadium is a
restroom/concession building. Access to the site is from Stockton Street on the west or
Lawrence Street on the east. Off-street parking is located at the north and east sides of
the stadium. At the east end of the stadium is an old building used as dressing rooms.
Although this facility is primarily a football stadium, two small softball diamonds are
created for summer use.
The stadium itself is completely fenced to control the crowds. The outer slopes of the
stadium are heavily planted with trees and large shrubs to help conceal the complex
A-3
&I
my of Lodi Park and Recrrad&t Plan Anntndix
The complex needs some upgrading of the electrical system. During peak usage, there
is insufficient power to operate the facilities in the concession buildings.
HALE PARK 2.6 Acres
This 2.6 acre park site is located on Stockton Street directly across from the Park and
Recreation Department offices. The site is bordered on all four sides by streets.
Currently the park is undergoing major rehabilitation. Essentially the only two features
to remain will be the trees, two tennis courts and the parking lot.
Planned improvements to the site include a children's playground area, a picnic area,
small recreation building, a restroom facility, a lighted basketball court and two
horseshoe pits.
HENRY GLAVES PARK 12.6 Acres
This 12.6 acre park is located off Oxford Way and is bordered by two streets, a church
and residentiar home. Currently, no off-street parking is provided.
'This site is another retention basin with about 9.6 acres of the site serviaa& this purpose.
Within this basin are two soccer fields. As with the other similar sites. it is fenced for
safety. The upland portion of the park site contains about three acre, .;f'.^nd and
consists of a children's playground, several exercise stations, a restroom buiiding and a
small picnic area.
The irrigation system within this park is also inadequate leaving dry turf areas. Aside
from the irrigation system, the site. appear to be in good condition. None of the
facilities on the site are accessible to those with disabilities.
Some additional facilities could be added to this site especially the area immediately
behind the restroom building.
HUTCHLNS STREET SQUARE . 10.0 Acres
Hutchins Street Square is the site of an old high school building that has been
rehabilitated for senior and cultural arts activities. This 10.0 acre site is located on
Hutchins Street but access is from Oak Street. The site is bordered on all four sides by
streets. This is one of the few recreation areas in the city that provides adequate off-
street parking.
This site is actually not operated by the Parks and Recreation Department but managed
by another city agency. The Parks and Recreation Department does operate one of the
buildings as a day care center.
Facilities on the site include administrative offices, meeting/work space, an art gallery,
a very nice multi -use meeting room, an indoor swimming pool, a multi -use gymnasium
and a senior activities center. Outdoors, a large open grass area is used for soccer and
volleyball.
A - t
r
C& 9L Lodi Perk and Rccrradon Plan .iorundir
The rehabilitation effort of the old school building is a credit to the city. Currently a
fund raising effort is in the planning stage to raise money to complete the restoration of
the 900 seat performing arts facility.
JOHN BLAKELY PARK 9.0 Acres
This 9.0 acre park is located on Stockton Street and is also bordered by streets on all
four sides. The main access to the site is off Poplar Street.
Facilities on the site include two outdoor swimming pools, a children's playground. an
open Iawn area, a restroom building, a group picnic area, two youth baseball fields and
a basketball court. Paved pathways connect the various activity spaces.
Overall, the site is in moderate condition. One. of the major problems is associated with
the irrigation system. Dry turf areas are quite pre,,alent. This park receives an extreme
amount of use.
KOFU PARK 10.0 Acres
This 10.0 acre park is located off Ham Lane and is bordered by streets on two sides, the
Municipal Services Center on the third and the Woodbridge Irrigation Canal on the
fourth. Off-street parking is quite limited in the park.
This park also serves as a drainage retention basin. However, this site is substantially
more developed for recreational purposes than some of the other retention basin sites.
The basin itself consists of approximately nine acres of land and contains two youth
baseball fields, a soccer field and a playground area. This area is completely fenced for
safety. The upper portion of this site contains the parking area, five lighted tennis
courts and a restroom/concession building.
LODI LAKE NATURE AREA 101.0 Acres
This site is the most heavily used park in the city's park system. It is located adjacent to
the MokeIurnne River and has direct boating access from the River to the Lake. The
park site is essentially twa distinct parts• the lake and its surrounding use areas and a
natural open space area Iocated along the neer. 'Tills open space which contains about
58 acres of land is essentially the only undeveloped open space in Lodi. The river,
which borders the Park for approximately feet allows power boating. The boats
not only cause considerable noise Ina rather pristine setting but the wake from the
boats is creating erosion along the bank.
Activities in the park include non -powered boating, swimming, fishing and picnicking.
Three large picnic shelters can be reserved for group picnics. A bathhouse and formal
swimming beach is found on the south side cf the lake. On the east side of the park is
located the natural open space. Within this area are paved and non paved trails.
&I
r -
Qv of Lodf Park and Recreation Plan dgaodir
r� Also included on the Lake is a boat ramp. Power boats can use the fake as access to the
River. A gate across the entrance to the River controls boating access. The lake level
is controlled by the Mokelumne River. The level of the river itself is controlled by a
dam. Without the dam the River would be too tow to allow power boating. There has
been a proposal to build a earthen dam to physically separate the lake from the river.
This would make the lake more independent of the river.
Approximately 13 acres located on the west side of the lake is currently undeveloped.
Several proposals have been made for its use but the primary problem with its location
is lack of access. If a secondary access could be developed, it would relieve a traffic
problem along the north side of the take.
One of the major Problems with this park site deals with the conflicting recreation uses.
The purpose of this park is to provide a quiet setting for passive recreation not found in
other parks in the Lodi system. Tice natural open space area preserve various forms of
wildlife and plant materials in their natural setting. Conflicting with this setting are the
sounds and activities of motorized boats and jet skis.
One of the greatest needs in this park is an automatic irrigation system.
LAWRENCE PARK 6.7 Acres
This 6.7 acre site is located, ji,st west of the Grape Festival Grounds behind the fence of
Zupo Field. The park is bordered by streets on three sides and Zupo Field on the
other. The main access to the site is off Lockeford Street.
Facilities on the site include a children's playground, restroom, group picnic area, off -
leash dog training area and open lawn area. Large trees make a pristine setting for this
park.
MAPLE SQUARE . .6 Acres
This small undeveloped park site is located off Lodi Avenue adjacent to the Southern
Pacific Railroad. This site was at one time an old fire station While the building
remains, it is unused.
PIXLEY PARK .17.0 Acres
"This 17.0 acre undeveloped park is Iocated on the east side of town off Beckman Road.
Currently the only recreation facility on this site is a paved model airplane airstrip. A
major portion of the site will be used as a storm water retention basin. Although a final
plan has not been developed for the park, facilities being considered include two
softball fields, a soccer field, a restroom building, a small recreation building, a
children's playground, an off-street parking area and a picnic area.
A-6
low
City QLodi Park and Rccrearion Plan A=ndk
SAIMIJEL SALAS PARK 21.0 Acres
This park is located off Stockton Street and is bordered by streets on two sides the
Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way on the third and industry on the fourth. A 16 -
acre storm water retention basin makes up a significant part of 0 -is park area. Within
the retention basin is a baseball field, three softball fields and two soccer fields. This
area is completely fenced.
The upland portion of the park site which contains about five acres of land, has a
restroom building, a shelter building, a children's playground, three horseshoe pits and
a large parking lot.
Being a rather new park site, it is in good condition. The exception is the playground
equipment which needs some replacement.
There is some opportunity for expansion of the park. A acre area north of the
site is vacant and is part of the Century Drive extension. T -c-5-50 be used for park
purposes now but a portion of it will eventually be used for a street right-of-way.
SOFTBALL COMPLEX 7.6 Acres
This park is used exclusively for softball play. Access to the site is from Stockton Street.
Facilities at the site include two softball fields. a restroom building, a concession
building and a large paved parking lot.
Overall the site is in good condition. However, the Fields are shorter than regulation
length thereby restricting their use to coed and woman's fast pitch play. The outfield
fences could be extended to meet minimum standards but would eliminate about 18
parking spaces and require moving the light poles.
TONY ZUPO FIELD 33 Acres
Zupo Field is the City's premier baseball field used for semi -pro ball as well as general
recreation use. Facilities on the site include a baseball stadium, a concession budding,
a restroom facility and a batting cage. An old unused restroom building still remains on
the site.
Overall the site is in reasonably good condition. There is some to upgrade the electrical
system and the outfield fence needs to be replaced. Tile stadium will not meet the
minimum handicap access standards.
A-
-T
Cia of Lodi Park and Recr-ation Plan Anrundir
VAN BUSKIRK PARK 1.0 Acres
This small park is located at the corner of Pleasant Avenue and Daisy Street. The park
is a stud+ of contradictory uses. This consists of an open lawn area and an extensive
children s playground. At one time, this site contained a youth baseball field. However.
because of the limited size of the site and close proximity of the adjacent land uses, the
baseball field was remove in June of 1992.
VINEWOOD PARK 12.0 Anes
This park site contains a nine acre storm water retention basin and is located off Tokay
Street. The site is bordered by streets on two sides, Vinewood Elementary School on
the third and housing on the fourth. Currently, there is no off-street parking is available
at this site.
Within the retention basin are located a baseball field, a softball field and three soccer
fields. The entire basin is fenced. 'Ile surroundin& upland area consisting of three
acres of land contains a restroom/concession building and an off -leash dog training
area.
The only problem associated with the site is the condition of the restroom building and
the irrigation system. The restrooms are old and need substantial upgrading. The
irrigation system is not adequately covering the turf areas.
There is some opportunity for the addition of facilities in this park. The area south of
the baseball bailfield is available. It may also be possible to use some of the school
grounds for additional facilities.
I WESTGATE PARK 6.0 Acres I
This park site is essentially a storm water retention area. It is now an open grass area
with trees planted round the upland perimeter of the site. Once the neighborhood to
the south is developed, the other half of the detention basin will be developed. like the
other detention basins, only a limited amount of upland area will be available for
recreation use.
At the present, there are no noticeable problems with site. It is important that once the
additional Iand is acquired and developed, that the facilities be designed to
accommodate those with disabilities.
A - S
It
Table A•1
Pixley Park Sports Complex
Projected Annual Operating Cost
Salaries & Wages $104,527 See Table A-2
Cost of Goods Sold $50,000 Assume 50% of gross receipts
Administrative Costs/Supplles $15,000
Utilities $25,330 $18,000 annually for electricity; $50/mo. for sewer; $5,000 annually
for water; $40 mo. for garbage; $800 annually for gas; $450 annually
for telephone.
Insurance Assumes City's blanket policy will cover the Sports Complex
Equipment Maintenance/Repair $5,500
Umpires (League play only) $21,000 Softball: 5 fields x 3 games/night x 5 nights x 14 weeks = 1,050
games x $30/game = $31,500.
Awards $3.500 Awards for league play only
General Park Maint. Supplies $18,000 Fertilizer. restroom supplies etc.
TOTAL: 5242,857 _
`"n
Table A-2
Labor Requirements
General Park Maintenance
1 Full time position C
Personnel
Total
Hourly
Annual
Maintenance/Oaerstor Task
Tyne
Hours
(late
Labor Cost
General Tasks
1 Seasonal (weekends) B
192
7.15
1,373
8 hours per weekend (24 weekends)
General Park Mowing
Gang Mowing (12')
A
165
$21.50
$3,548
35 times @ 6 hrs. as.
72- Mower
A
99
21.50
2,129
35 times @ 4 hrs. ea.
Trim Mowing
8
66
7.15
472
35 times @ 3 hrs. as.
Mowing Play Fields (2nd time)
A
66
21.60
1,419
35 times @ 3 hrs. ea.
General Park Maintenance
1 Full time position C
2,080
19.00
39,520
General maintenance
1 Seasonal (May -Oct) B
1,040
7.15
7,436
Field prep., cleanup
1 Seasonal (weekends) B
192
7.15
1,373
8 hours per weekend (24 weekends)
Weekend Tournament Crew
Part time - 2 people (1) D
768
7.15
5,491
Field prep., cleanup (12 weekends)
Security - 2 people D
768
7.15
6,491
Security; tickets (12 weekends)
Concessions (2) D
1,920
7.15
13,728
Run concessions
Facility Park Supervisor E
1,040
23.00
23.920
Manages facility
$104,527
Personnel Type
A, 8, C Permanent Employee @ =18/hr +
38% Benefits
D Part Time Seasonal Employee
E Permarant Employee; Assume 50% of time will be charged to
the Sports Complex
and 50% to other city programs.
(1) 16 weekends @ 24 hrs, each
(2) 2 persons per night for 120 nights @ 4 tus.; 3 persons on
I
duty on weekends Q 16
weekends x 20 hrs. (8 month season)
I
9