HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - March 17, 1993 (71)os
CITY OF LODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION -
AGENDA TITLE: Planning Commission Report of March 8, 1993
MEETING DATE: March 17, 1993
PREPARED BY: Community Development Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
AGENDA ITEM RECOMMENDATION
a. Recommended conditional approval of the request of Steven Pechin,
Baumbach and Piazza, Inc. on behalf of Bennett and Compton to rezone
1235, 1237, 1259 and 1321 North Lilac Street from R -GA, Garden
Apartment Residential to P -D(31) Planned Development District No. 31
to accommodate Woodhaven Park a proposed 8.55 acre subdivision
containing 28 half-plex lots, 1 triplex lot, 1 four-plex lot and a
parcel for future development.
b. Recommended certification of the filing of a Negative Declaration by
the Community Development Director as adequate environmental
documentation on the request of Steven Pechin, Baumbach and Piazza,
Inc. on behalf of Bennett and Compton to rezone 1235, 1237, 1259 and
1321 North Lilac Street from R -GA, Garden Apartment Residential to
P -D(31), Planned Development District No. 31.
C. Recommended that the City Council take steps to make the "No Left
Turn" installation at Lilac Street and Eilers Lane similar to the
Fairmont Avenue-Kettleman Lane installation.
d, e, f, g, Information only. No action required.
h and i
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The following actions were taken at the last regular
Planning Commission meeting of March 9, 1993.
d. Conditionally approved the request of Steven Pechin, Baumbach and
Piazza, Inc. on behalf of Bennett and Compton for the approval of the
Tentative Subdivision Map of Woodhaven Park, a proposed 8.55 acre
subdivision containing 28 half-plex lots, 1 triplex lot, 1 four-plex
lot and a parcel for future development at 1235, 1237, 1259 and 1321
North Lilac Street.
This tentative map is conditioned on the City Council approving the
rezoning to P -D(31).
APPROVED:.
THOMAS A. PETERSON
19CYCled Dapl/
City Manager
CCPLAN5/TXTD.0IC cc•,
Planning Commission Report of March 8, 1993
March 17, 1993
Page two
e. Continued consideration of the following requests of Chris R. Keszler
and Fred Baker until 7:30 p.m. Monday, March 22, 1993.
1. For a General Plan Amendment to redesignate the parcel at 451
East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28) from PR, Planned Residential
to NCC, Neighborhood/Community Commercial;
2. To prezone the parcel at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28)
C -S, Commercial Shopping Center; and
3. to certify the filing of a negative declaration by the Community
Development Director as adequate environmental documentation on
the above projects.
f. Set a Public Hearing for 7:30 p.m. Monday, March 22, 1993 to consider
recommending the amendment to Title 17 of the Municipal Code (toning
Restrictions) to provide for Administrative Deviations.
g. Received correspondence from Lodi Unified District Board President,
Rick Sousa, urging continued consideration of school facilities when
approving development plans.
h. Set the following requests of Ronald B. Thomas et al for Public
Hearing at 7:30 p.m. Monday, April 12, 1993:
1. For a general plan amendment to redesignate the parcels at 13737
N. Cherokee Lane (APN 062-290-18), 2250 South Stockton Street
(APN 062-290-08), and 13845 North Cherokee Lane (APN 062-290-07)
from PR, Planned Residential to LDR, Low Density Residential;
2. to prezone the parcels at 13737 N. Cherokee Lane (APN
062-290-18), 2250 South Stockton Street (APN 062-290-08), and
13845 North Cherokee Lane (APN 062-290-07) R-2, Single- Family
Residential; and
3. to certify the filing of a negative declaration by the Community
Development Director as adequate environmental documentation on
the above projects.
i. Set the following requests of J. Jeffrey Kirst, et al for Public
Hearing at 7:30 p.m. Monday, April 12, 1993:
1. For a general plan amendment to redesignate the parcels located
within the area bounded by the Woodbridge Irrigation Canal on
the north and east, West Kettleman Lane (Hwy 12) on the south,
and Lower Sacramento Road on the west from PR, Planned
Residential, and 0, Office to LDR, Low Density Residential and
C, Office;
CCPLAN5/TXTD.01C
Planning Commission Report of March 8, 1993
March 17, 1993
Page three
2. to prezone the parcels located within the area bounded by the
Woodbridge Irrigation Canal on the north and east, West
Kettleman Lane (Hwy 12) on the south, and Lower Sacramento Road
on the west R-2, Single -Family Residential, and RCP,
Residential -Commercial -Professional; and
3. to certify the filing of a negative declaration by the Community
Development Director as adequate environmental documentation on
the above projects.
FUNDING: None required
a s chro er
C unity Development Director
JSS/cg
CCPLAN5/TXTD.01C
:pTdj Had unuffied achool d"wMet
OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT
1305 East Vine Street. Lodi, Calitomia 95240
February 18. 1993
Mr. Larry Mindt
Chairman of the City of Lodi Planning Commission
Post Office Box 3006
Lodi. CA 95241-1910
Dear Chairman Mindt and Members of the Commission:
On February 2. 1993 the Lodi Unified
Resolution 93-15 in support of the
adequate school facilities. With thia
continued support and imple r,entiodon
School District Governing Board adopted
Cl!y's C.sacral Plan policies regarding
rcaola ion we respectfully request your
of :hese most -important policies.
In the wake of SB 1287 there is a great dcai of consternation about how this bill
(and potential clean-up legislation) may affect local government
consideration of adequate school facilities in relation to new resin:;:tial
development. School districts uniformally hold the position that local agencies
do have the authority (and responsibility) to consider all aspects of the
community infrastructure. including school facilities. when deciding the
viability and benefits of new development. It appears that SB 1287 limits the
amount that can be required. but it did not remove the authority to condition
that a Mello Roos Community Facilities District be formed for provision of
school facilities.
At the present time. Lodi Unified School District is continuing to work with the
Building Industry Association on an agreeable level of mitigation. These
efforts will not be completed until this summer after the District's Future
Facilities Task Force completes its worst. In the interim. we are asking that
developers of proposed projects sign the same agreement as those: which are
nrne.nrly in fnrCo-..
We are diligently pursuing every option for the housing of all of the existing
and future students from the City of Lodi area of our District. Your
consideration of school facilities is an important and integral part of the
community planning process is acknow.edged and applauded.
Thank you.
Sincerely.
Rick Souza
President of the Governing Board
Attachment
cc: Members of the Planning Commission
Lodi ;209)331-7010 Stockton(209)953-8010
'f
BEFORE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF
THE COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION 93.15
RESOLUTION DECLARING CONTINUED SUPPORT FOR AND ADHERENCE TO THE
SCHOOL FACILITY PROVISIONS IN THE GENERAL PLAN OF
THE CITY OF LODI
WHEREAS, representatives of the school districts of San Joaquin County and
representatives of the Building Industry Association of the Delta (BIA). after a period
of lengthy and intense negotiations. reached a good faith agreement on language to
be included in the City of Lodi General Plan to assure that adequate school facilities
would be available and that the cost of these facilities would be financed in a way
that does not place an unfair economic burden upon, new development; and
WHEREAS. the language agreed upon by the Lodi Unified School District and the BIA
was jointly presented to the City of Lodi Planning Commission and City Council and
recommended for adoption as part of the General Plan: and
WHEREAS. the Lodi City Council has adopted its General Plan which includes the
language jointly recommended by the Lodi Unified School District and the BIA; and
WHEREAS, SB 1237 became law on January 1. 1993, and deals with the financing of
school facilities: and
WHEREAS, local agencies have the authority to deny new development proposals on
the basis of inadequate services or infrastructure. including school facilities:
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees of the Lodi Unified
School District hereby reaffirms its commitment to the school facility policies as
agreed to with the development community, and adopted by the Lodi City Council. and
here -by requests the continued implementation of these policies by the City of Lodi.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of February 1993. by thn following vote:
AYES: E. Oavis. Davis., R. Souza, K. Suess, S. Reberle, M. Rude. B. Weaver
NOES: None
ABSENT. None
ATS'. None
Kar Suess. Cleric of the
Board of Trustees
L
Rick Souza, Presider of the
Board of Trustees
lod"I unified .eAool d" triet
OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT 1
7 7
1305 East Vine Street, Lodi, Califomia 95240'
March 16, 1993
Mr. Phillip Pennino. Mayor
City of Lodi
221 West Pine Street
Lodi. CA 95240
Dear Mayor Pennino:
On February 2. 1993 the Lodi Unified School District Governing Board adopted
Resolution 93-15 in support of the City's General Plan policies regarding
adequate school facilities. With this resolution we respectfully request your
continued support and implementation of these most -important policies.
In the wake of SB 1287 there is a great deal of consternation about how this bill
(and potential clean-up legislation) may affect local government
consideration of adequate school facilities in relation to new residential
development. School districts uniformally hold the position that local agencies
do have the authority (and responsibility) to consider all aspects of the
community infrastructure, including school facilities. when deciding the
viability and benefits of new development. it appears that SB 1287 limits the
amount that can be required, but it did not remove the authority to condition
that a Mcllo Roos Community Facilities District be formed for provision of
school facilities.
At the present time. Lodi Unified School District is continuing to work with the
Building Industry Association on an agreeable level of mitigation. These
efforts will not be completed until this summer after the District's Future
Facilities Task Force completes its work. In the interim. we arc asking that
developers of proposed projects sign the same agreement as those which are
presently in force.
We are diligently pursuing every option for the housing of all of the existing
and future students from the City of Lodi area of our District. Your
consideration of school facilities is an important and integral part of the
community planning process is acknowledged and applauded.
Thank you.
Lod: (209) 331-7010 Stockton (209) 953-8010
�Sincerely,
Rick Souza
President of the
Governing Board
Attachment
cc: City Councilmembers
Lod: (209) 331-7010 Stockton (209) 953-8010
BEFORE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF
THE COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION 93.15
RESOLUTION DECLARING CONTINUED SUPPORT FOR AND ADHERENCE TO THE
SCHOOL FACILITY PROVISIONS IN THE GENERAL PLAN OF
THE CITY OF LODI
WHEREAS,
representatives of the school
districts of
San Joaquin County and
representatives
of the Building Industry Association of the
Delta (BIA), after a period
of lengthy and intense negotiations, reached a
good faith
agreement on language to
be included in
the City of Lodi General Plan
to assure that adequate school facilities
would be available, and that the cost of these
facilities would be financed in a way
that docs not
place an unfair economic but-'zn
upon new
development. and
WHEREAS. the language agreed upon by the Lodi Unified School District and the BIA
was jointly presented to the City of Lodi Planning Commission and City Council and
recommended for adoption as part of the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Lodi City Council has adopted its General Plan which includes the
language jointly recommended by the Lodi Unified School District and the BIA; and
WHEREAS, SB 1287 became law on January 1, 1993, and deals with the financing of
school facilities; and
WHEREAS, local agencies have the authority to deny new development proposals on
the basis of inadequate services or infrastructure, including school facilities;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees of the Lodi Unified
School District hereby reaffirms its commitment to the school facility policies as
agreed to with the development community, and adopted by the Lodi City Council. and
hereby requests the continued implementation of these policies by the City of Lodi.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of February 1993. by the following vote:
AYES: E. Davis, K. ".avis., R. Souza, K. Suess, S. lieberle, M. Rude, B. Weaver
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST: None
i
Karn Suess. Clerk of the
Board of Trustees
C2._._ '�- �--
Rick Souza, President f the
Board of Trustees
rma
DECLARATION OF MAILING
On March 19, 1993 in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, I
deposited in the United States mail, envelopes with first-class postage
prepaid thereon, containing a copy of the Notice attached hereto, marked
Exhibit "A"; said envelopes were addressed as is more particularly shown
on Exhibit "B" attached hereto.
There is a regular daily communication by mail between the City of Lodi,
California, and the places to which said envelopes were addressed.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on March 19, 1993, at Lodi, California.
Jennifer M. Perrin
City Clerk
Peg icolini
Deputy City Clerk
DEC#01/TXTA.FRM
Exhibit "A"
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, April 21, 1993 at the hour of 7:00
p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the Lodi City Council
will conduct a Public Hearing at the Carnegie Forum, 305 West Pine Street,
Lodi CA, to hear the following matter:
a) Planning Commission's recommended conditional approval of the request
of Steven Pechin, Baumbach & Piazza, Inc. on behalf of Bennett &
Compton to rezone 1235, 1237, 1259 and 1321 North Lilac Street from
R -GA, Garden Apartment Residential to P -D(31) Planned Development
District No. 31 to accommodate Woodhaven Park a proposed 8.55
acre subdivision containing 28 half-plex lots, 1 triplex lot, 1
four-plex lot and a parcel for future development.
b) Planning Commission's recommended certification of the filing of a
Negative Declaration by the Community Development Directcr as
adequate environmental documentation on the request of Steven
Pechin, Baumbach and Piazza Inc. on behalf of Bennett and Compton
to rezone 1235, 1237, 1259 and 1321 North Lilac Street from R -GA,
Garden Apartment Residential to P -D(31), Planned Development
District No. 31.
Information regarding this item may be obtained in the office of the Community
Development Director at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California. All interested
persons are invited to present their views and comments on this matter.
Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk at any time prior to the
hearing scheduled herein and oral statements may be made at said hearing.
If you challenge the subject matter in court, yoo may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing described in
this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk, 221 West
Pine Street, Lodi, California, at or prior to, the Public Hearing.
Dated: March 17, 1993
By Order of the Lodi City Council
(Iran iferPerrin
�
City Cle/Yk
Approved as to form:
Boit y W. McNatt
�.
City Attorney
NOTICE05/TXTA.02J
Exhibit "B"
PUBLIC HEARING MAILING LIST
STEVE PECHIN, BAUMBACH & PIAZZA REQUEST FOR REZONE
Steve Pechin
Baumbach & Piazza
323 West Elm Street
Lodi, California 95290
Jim Schroeder
Community Development Director
City of Lodi
CITY CQUNCIL
THOMAS A_ PETERSON
PHILLIP A._PENNINO. Mayor
CITY OF L Q I.� i_ `
City Manager
MCK A SIEGLOCK
1
JENNIFER M PERRIN
Mayor Pro Temoore
r, I^
CITY HALL. 221 WEST PIN€ ST,FiE�T (:: i (•
City Clerk
RAY C .DAVENPORT
808 McNATT
STEPHEN 1. MANN
P O. BOX 3006
City Attorney
LODI. CALIFORNIA 952411910
IOHN R. (Randy) SNIDER
(209) 334-5634
FAX 12091333-W95
March 12, 1993
Steve Pechin
8aumbach b Piazza, Inc.
323 West Elm Street
Lodi, CA 95240
Dear Steve:...
RE: Woodhaven Park
Rezoning R -GA to P -D(31)
Negative Declaration
1235, 1237, 1259 and 1321 North Lilac Street
At its meeting of Monday, March 8, 1993 the Lodi City Planning Commission
recommended to the City Council approval of your request on behalf of
Bennett and Compton Inc. to rezone 1235, 1237, 1259 and 1321 North Lilac
Street (APN's 015-170-05, 07, 08 and 09) from R -GA, Garden Apartment
Residential to P -D(31) Planned Develooment District No. 31 to accommodate
the proposed Woodhaven Park subdivision.
In a related matter the Planning Commission recommended that the City
Council certify the filing of a Negative Declaration by the Community
Development Director as adequate environmental documentation on this
project.
The Planning Commission recommended that P-0(31) conform to the following
conditions:
1. that rear and side yard setbacks conform to the requirements of the
R -GA, Garden Apartment Residential District;
2. that the front yard setback be set at 12 feet for enclosed patios;
3. that the length of driveways of Lots 48 and 49 be 171 feet from the
street right-of-way line;
4. that the front yard setback for the main buildings along the east -west
street be 171 feet from the right-of-way line.
Mr. Steven Pechin
March 12, 1993
Page 2
The recommendations have been forwarded to the City Clerk. She will inform
you of the time and place of the City Council's public hearing.
Sincerely,
jAM B. SCHROED
C unity Development Director
cc: City Clerk
Don Compton