HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - May 15, 2002 G-02 PHCITY OF LODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
AGENDA TITLE: Conduct Public Hearing to consider the Planning Commission's
recommendation that the City Council approve a request by Laila Sorour for
two actions: 1) Amend the General Plan from LDR, Low Density Residential
to O, Office for 1116 South Fairmont; and 2) Rezone 1110 South Fairmont
from RCP, Residential Commercial Professional, to Residential Garden
Apartment to permit the construction of two duplexes
MEETING DATE: May 15, 2002
PREPARED BY: Associate Planner Veerkamp
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council conduct a Public Hearing to consider the
Planning Commission's recommendation that the City Council
approve the request of Laila Sorour for two actions: 1) Amend the
General Plan from LDR, Low Density Residential to O, Office for 1116 South Fairmont; and 2) Rezone
1110 South Fairmont from RCP, Residential Commercial Professional, to Residential Garden Apartment
to permit the construction of two duplexes.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On April 10, 2002, the Lodi Planning Commission unanimously
approved the aforementioned request of Laila Sorour for a General
Plan Amendment and Rezoning. The request for a land use
amendment was accompanied by a Lot Line Adjustment application. As stated by the applicant, she
wants to construct two duplexes on the parcels located at 1110 and 1116 South Fairmont, a project with
a net density of 11.6 units per acre.
Currently, each of the parcels can accommodate one single family dwelling, or multi -family dwellings to
the limits of the RCP zone, or an office use. The maximum allowed density for residential uses in the
RCP zone is 10.89 units per acre. On the other hand, the allowed density in the RGA zone, a medium
density residential zone, is 20.78 units per acre. No office uses area allowed in the RGA zone.
As a point of fact, the current General Plan and Zoning designations on 1116 S. Fairmont lack
consistency with each other. The General Plan designation needs to be changed so the two are not
conflicting. The Zoning on 1110 South Fairmont is being changed as well so both pieces have consistent
designations. Approval of this request will enable Ms. Sorour to build two duplexes on this property
(subsequent to approval of the Lot Line Adjustment).
FUNDING: None required *Z:_:_
Konradt Bartlam
Community Development Director
Prepared by: Associate Planner Veerkamp
APPROVED: ,
H. Dix n Flynn -- C Manager
0209.doc 04/23/02
MEMORANDUM, City of Lodi, Community Development Department
(1)
To: Planning Commission
From: Community Development Department
Date: April 10, 2002
Subject: Request of Laila Sorour for approval of a 1) General Plan Amendment from LDR,
Low Density Residential to O, Office for 1116 South Fairmont; and a 2) Rezoning
for 1110 South Fairmont from RCP, Residential Commercial; Professional to
Residential Garden Apartment to permit the construction of two duplexes on one
single parcel.
SUMMARY
The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment and Rezoning for two properties. The first property
is located at 1110 South Fairmont Avenue, which has a Zoning designation of RCP, Residential
Commercial Professional. The request is to change the Zoning to RGA, Residential Garden Apartment.
The second property is located at 1116 South Fairmont Avenue. Currently, the parcel has a General Plan
Designation of LDR, Low Density Residential. The request is to change the designation to O, Office.
The end result of the action, if approved, is that both parcels will have a General Plan designation of O,
Office, and a Zoning designation of RGA, Residential Garden Apartment.
As a point of information, an additional component of this project is a requested Lot Line Adjustment to
join the two individual parcels into one single parcel. The Community Development Director performs
Lot Line Adjustments administratively. If approved, the adjustment will create one piece of property
large enough to accommodate the proposed development. If the duplexes are built, the net density of the
project will be 11.4 units per acre.
BACKGROUND
The properties in question were annexed to the City of Lodi in 1953 as a part of the 501h Addition. They
were later incorporated into the West View subdivision. Neither of these two vacant parcels has ever
been developed. Most recently, a Parcel Map was filed creating two (2) parcels from three (3) parcels.
The property at 1 110 was included in this activity, but the piece of property at It 16 has never had any
map filed on it since the original approval in the 50's.
ANALYSIS
Both 1110 and 1116 South Fairmont Avenue have been vacant since they were annexed into the City. As
stated above, it has been approximately 50 years since this land became part of the incorporated city.
From a planning perspective, staff is reluctant to dissuade a project, particularly an infill project such as
this one, when it seems to make sense. Although there are several offices nearby, most notably the dental
office directly adjacent on the north, the location also has potential for medium density residential uses.
In all likelihood, some individuals may feel the location is better suited for medical or other types of
offices, but the fact is the applicant has a desire to develop two duplexes.
As a point of fact, the current General Plan and Zoning for 1116 S. Fairmont lacked consistency with
each other. The General Plan designation on one piece needed to be changed, and the Zoning on the
LW (:\Community Development\Planning�STAFFPM2002\Z-02-02.doc
other piece needed to be changed. In this way, both General Plan and Zoning will be consistent. This
action is necessary not only to rectify the current discrepancy, but also in order to prepare the parcels for
development in accordance with the applicant's request.
Currently, each of the parcels could accommodate one single family dwelling, or multi -family dwellings
to the limits of the RCP zone, or an office use. The maximum allowed density for residential uses in the
RCP zone is 10.89 units per acre. In other words, in order to build four (4) units of multiple family
housing (two duplexes on one parcel is technically multiple family) in the RCP zone, you would need to
have 16,000 square feet of land on a single parcel. The two properties in question total 15, 065 square
feet, or 935 square feet short of the aforementioned requirement.
On the other hand, the allowed density in the RGA zone, a medium density residential zone, is 20.78
units per acre. This zone allows single and multi -family residential, absent the ability to build offices.
The 15,065 square feet is adequate area to build four (4) units in the RGA zone. The maximum number
of units permitted on 15,065 square feet is up to seven (7) units, subject to landscaping setbacks, parking,
etc. As mentioned above, the net density of the proposed project is 11.6 units per acre.
Staff's opinion is that the proposed duplexes will be compatible with the surrounding land uses.
Development of duplexes at this location will not change the character of the neighborhood one way or
the other; rather the two should be compatible with each other due to the mixed character. While there
are offices on the north and across the street to the west, there are single-family homes to the east and to
the south (the corner of Fairmont and Cardinal). To the south beyond Cardinal are triplexes along both
frontages of Fairmont, which is consistent with the existing RGA zoning in that location, including the
corner with the single-family home.
Because this project is a multi -family project, the applicant will need to submit for Site Plan and
Architectural Review Committee (SPARC) approval if the General Plan and Zoning actions are
approved. Architectural design issues as well as landscaping, parking layout, screening between adjacent
land uses, etc. will be scrutinized to ensure the best possible appearance, and to minimize impacts. Staff
is comfortable that the proposed project will be a beneficial infill activity.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council the request of
Laila Sorour for approval of a 1) General Plan Amendment from LDR, Low Density Residential to O,
Office for 1116 South Fairmont; and a 2) Rezoning for 1110 South Fairmont from RCP, Residential
Commercial; Professional to Residential Garden Apartment to permit the construction of two duplexes
on one single parcel.
ALTERNATIVE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS
• Approve the Requests with Alternate Conditions
• Deny the Requests
• Continue the Requests
Respectfully Submitted,
Eric W. Veerkamp
Associate Planner
EWV
Revie d and Concur,
Konradt Bartlam
Community Development Director
LW JACommunity Development\Planning\STAFFRPI%2002\Z-02-02.doe
CITY OF LODI
PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
MEETING DATE:
APPLICATION NO:
April 10, 2002
Z-02-02; GPA -02-02
REQUEST: Approval of 1) General Plan Amendment from LDR, Low
Density Residential to O, Office for 1116 South Fairmont;
and a 2) Rezoning for 1110 South Fairmont from RCP,
Residential Commercial; Professional to Residential Garden
Apartment to permit the construction of two duplexes on one
single parcel.
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
PROPERTY OWNER:
Site Characteristics:
1110 and 1116 South Fairmont Avenue
Laila Sorour
1343 Rivergate Drive
Lodi, CA 95240
Nagui and Laila Sorour
same
General Plan Designation: 1110 Fairmont is O, Office; 1116 is LDR, Low Density
Residential
Zoning Designation: 1110 Fairmont is R -CP, Residential Commercial
Professional and 1116 Fairmont is R -GA, Residential
Garden Apartment
Property Size: 1110 Fairmont is 9,235 square feet, and 1116 Fairmont
is 5,830 square feet
Adjacent Zoning and Land Use:
North: RCP; Residential Commercial -Professional: Directly adjacent on the
north is a dental office zoned RCP. Further north are developed
medical and dental offices.
South: R -GA, Residential Garden Apartment: Directly adjacent on the south
on the corner of Cardinal St. and Mills is a single-family residence.
Further south across Cardinal St. are additional single-family and
multiple family residences.
East: R-1 and R-2, Single -Family: Directly adjacent on the east side are
residences.
U-98-07r.doc
West: RCP, Residential Commercial Professional: To the west of the subject
site is a medical office building. There are also some residences
further west along Cardinal St.
Neighborhood Characteristics:
The neighborhood is in the south central part of Lodi and is fully urbanized, with the
exception of these and a couple of other infill lots. Lodi Memorial Hospital's main
operation is nearby on the south-west corner of Fairmont Avenue and Vine Street. The
hospital and nearby offices give the neighborhood a professional office type of
appearance as well as residential. In addition to medical and dental offices, both single-
family and multi -family homes are nearby to the east as well as to the south. There is
quite a bit of traffic in the neighborhood as Ham Lane is an arterial street, and Fairmont is
a neighborhood collector street.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS:
Negative Declaration, ND -02-01 was prepared for this project. Mitigations identified in
the Negative Declaration reduce any potential adverse impacts to less than significant.
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE:
Legal Notice for the Use Permit was published on March 30, 2002. A total of 46 notices
were sent to all property owners of record within a 300 -foot -radius of the subject
property.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City
Council for a 1) General Plan Amendment from LDR, Low Density Residential to O, Office for
1116 South Fairmont; and a 2) Rezoning for 1110 South Fairmont from RCP, Residential
Commercial: Professional to Residential Garden Apartment to permit the construction of two
duplexes on one single parcel., subject to the conditions as set forth in the attached
Resolutions.
ALTERNATIVE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS:
Approve the General Plan Amendment and Rezone
Deny the General Plan Amendment and Rezone
Continue the Request
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Draft Resolutions
3. Site Plan
U-98-07r.doc
VINE STREET
{
i 3
WINDSOR
-- YORK
SITE
LOCATION -,
L{
LLJu?;
Z Q
tEU
111"o- - - w a
C* r Q
i CARDINAL STREET
ce uj z
i 126;1
X
.- - Z Lj U
Z Oa Z LU
LU
O U
KETTLEMMAN LANE
N VICINI'T'Y MAP
NOT TO SCALE
L. Sorour Duplexes
General Plan Amend and Rezone
at 1110 and 1116 S. Fairmont
GPA -Lu -02-02 and Z-02-02 3/27/02
RESOLUTION NO. P.C. 02-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LODI
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST OF LAILA SOROUR, FOR A
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, TO CHANGE FROM LDR, LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL, TO O, OFFICE FOR THE PARCEL AT 1116 SOUTH FAIRMONT
AVENUE.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi has heretofore held a duly
noticed public hearing, as required by law, on the requested Prezoning in accordance
with the Government Code and Lodi Municipal Code Chapter 17.84, Amendments;
WHEREAS, the property is located at 1 ] 16 South Fairmont Avenue, Assessor's Parcel
Number and 031-120-28;
WHEREAS, the project proponent is Laila Sorour, 1343 Rivergate Drive, Lodi;
WHEREAS, 1116 South Fairmont Avenue has a General Plan designation of LDR, Low
Density Residential;
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the approval of this request have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FOUND, DETERMINED AND RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Lodi as follows:
1. Negative Declaration File No. ND -02-01 has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines provided
thereunder. Further, the Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained
in said Negative Declaration with respect to the project identified in this Resolution.
2. It is found that the parcel to be amended with a new General Plan Designation is the parcel
located at 1116 South Fairmont Avenue, APN 031-120-28.
3. It is found that the requested General Plan Amendment for this property is not in conflict
with adopted plans or policies of the General Plan of the City and will serve sound Planning
practice.
4. Conditions contained in Resolution No. 02-08 for the Zoning portion of this application shall
be considered part of this Resolution and shall be in full force and effect.
Res0207
Dated: April 10, 2002
I. hereby certify that Resolution No. 02-07 was passed and adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Lodi at a regular meeting held on April 20, 2002, by the following
vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckman, Mattheis, McGladdery, Phillips, White, and
Chairman Crabtree
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: Heinitz
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
Secretary, Planning Commission
Res0207
Cardinal St.
General Plan Amendment for 1116 S. Fairmont Ave. b
from LDP, Low Density -residential to
n Office
File G PA -LU -02-02
RESOLUTION NO. P.C. 02-08
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LODI
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST OF LAILA SOROUR FOR A
REZONING TO CHANGE FROM RCP, RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL,
TO RGA, RESIDENTIAL GARDEN APRARTMENT FOR THE PARCEL AT 1110 SOUTH
FAIRMONT AVENUE.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi has heretofore held a duly
noticed public hearing, as required by law, on the requested Prezoning in accordance
with the Government Code and Lodi Municipal Code Chapter 17.84, Amendments;
WHEREAS, the property is located at 1110 South Fairmont, Assessor's Parcel Numbers
031-120-53;
WHEREAS, the project proponent is Laila Sorour, 1343 Rivergate Drive, Lodi;
WHEREAS, 1110 South Fairmont Avenue has a Zoning designation of RCP, Residential
Commercial Professional;
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the approval of this request have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FOUND, DETERMINED AND RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Lodi as follows:
1. Negative Declaration File No. ND -02-01 has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines provided
thereunder. Further, the Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained
in said Negative Declaration with respect to the project identified in this Resolution.
2. It is found that the parcel Rezoned is the parcel at 1110 South Fairmont Avenue,
APN 031-120-53.
3. It is found that the requested Zoning Amendment for this property is not in conflict with
adopted plans or policies of the General Plan of the City and will serve sound Planning
practice.
4. Conditions contained in Resolution No. 02-07 for the General Plan Amendment portion of
this application shall be considered part of this Resolution and shall be in full force and
effect.
Res0208
Dated: April 10, 2002
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 02-08 was passed and adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Lodi at a regular meeting held on April 10, 2002, by the following
vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckman, Mattheis, McGladdery, Phillips, White, and
Chairman Crabtree
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: Heinitz
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
Secretary, hamdng Commission
Res0208
File Z-02-02
m
D
D
m
z
! c
m
I
zaa sra sra ,ztr s
I
a
4
I
I I i
I L ------,J I
1F I J
�
1
I'
iq
I
I.----——T-j----,---LL
I I f
i
i
soa
fmm•
i
sra
,z -v -
E
Ll
NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. ND -02-01
FOR
Proposed General Plan Amendment and
Rezoning
APPLICANT: Laila Sorour
PREPARED BY:
CITY OF LODI
Community Development Department
P.O. BOX 3006
LODI, CA 95241
March, 2002
0
SECTION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
0
PAGE
PROJECTDESCRIPTION....................................................................................................................3
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM..............................................................................................3
SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS................................................................................................9
DETERMINATION.•.............................................................................................................................10
VICINITYMAP....................................................................................................................................10
N
•
CITY OF LODI
17i
General Plan Amendment and Rezoning
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project under consideration by the City consists of the following actions; a
Rezoning of the parcel at 1110 South Fairmont Avenue from R -CP, Residential -
Commercial Professional to R -GA, Residential -Garden Apartments, a General Plan
Amendment for the parcel at 1116 South Fairmont from LDR, Low Density
Residential to O, Office, as well as a Lot Merger to create one buildable lot.
If and when these activities are approved by the City of Lodi, the applicant, Lana
Sorour is proposing to construct four units (attached single family) of new
residential housing on the resulting 15,065 square foot piece of land. The properties
are located at 1110 and 1116 South Fairmont Avenue, Lodi. The precise size of the
individual units has not been determined at this point, but the available square
footage of land limits this project to four units.
Prior to any building activity, the owner is being required by the City to perform
the lot merger and the Zoning and General Plan actions.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. Project title:
1110 and 1116 S. Fairmont General Plan Amendment and Rezoning
2. Lead agency name and address:
City of Lodi Community Development Department
221 West Pine Street
Lodi, CA 95240
3. Contact person and phone number:
Eric W. Veerkamp
Associate Planner
(209) 333-6711
4. Project location:
San Joaquin County, CA.;
1110 and 1116 South Fairmont Ave.
APN No. 031-120-28 and 53
Lodi, CA 95240.
5. Project sponsor's name and address:
Lana Sorour
1343 Rivergate Drive
Lodi, CA 95240
6. General plan designation: O, Office
7. Zoning: City: RCP, Residential Commercial Professional
0 !
8. Description of project: See "Project Description" section above.
9 Surrounding land uses and setting: The subject property, currently two
individual parcels, are vacant and sit near the north east corner of Fairmont
Avenue and Cardinal Street. The parcel is bordered on the west side by the
existing Lodi Memorial Hospital East Campus, primarily the parking lot
serving medical office buildings. Directly adjacent on the east side are
developed single family parcels zoned both R-1 and R-2, Single Family (the
adjacent zoning for each parcel differs). Adjacent on the north side of the
property are office buildings lining Fairmont Avenue. Immediately adjacent
on the south is a developed single family residence on the corner of Fairmont
Avenue and Cardinal Street. Remaining properties to the south across
Cardinal Street are additional single family residences. The parcel on the
north west corner of Fairmont and Cardinal is zoned R -CP and has a
hospital office building on it. Parcels to the west of the office building are
single family residences.
10 Other public agencies whose approval is required: None
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this
project, involving at least one impact that is a ("Potentially Significant Impact" by
the checklist on the following pages.
Lf Land Use and
Planning
0 Population and
Housing
❑ Geological Problems
❑ Water
❑ Air Quality
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
❑ Transportation/Circulation ❑Public Services
❑ Biological Resources ❑Utilities and Service
Systems
❑ Energy and Mineral Resources ❑ Aesthetics
❑Hazards ❑ Cultural Resources
❑ Noise ❑ Recreation
❑ Mandatory Findings of
Significance
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposed:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by
agencies with jurisdiction over the project?
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., impacts to soils or
farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)?
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established
4
Potentially
Significant
Potentially
Unless
Less than
Significant
mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
f�
4
0
community (including a low-income or minority community)?
11 POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections?
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g.,
through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)?
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing?
III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people
to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture?
b) Seismic ground shaking?
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard?
f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from
excavation, grading or fill?
g) Subsidence of land?
h) Expansive soils?
i) Unique geologic or physical features?
•
❑ ❑
0 ❑
❑ ❑
❑ 0
❑ ❑
❑ 0
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
0
0
❑
13
0
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
0
5
0 •
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal.
All "No" Reference Source: Appendix H, #25 & Environmental Setting, Sec 3.3:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected
❑
Potentially
0 0
air quality violation?
b) Hazards to safety from design feature, (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
❑
Significant
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
❑
❑
Potentially
Unless
Less than
❑
1V. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
Significant
mitigation
Significant
No
„ „_
All No Reference Source: See Project Description
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of
❑
❑
0
❑
surface runoff.'
❑
❑
❑
0
b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as
❑
❑
❑
0
flooding?
❑
❑
❑
0
c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality
❑
❑
❑
0
(e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body?
❑
❑
❑
0
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements?
❑
❑
❑
0
f) Change in the quantity of ground water, either through direct additions or
❑
❑
❑
(21
withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavation
or through substantial loss of ground water recharge capability?
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
❑
❑
❑
0
h) Impacts to groundwater quality?
❑
❑
❑
0
I) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available
❑
❑
0
❑
for
public water supplies?
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal.
All "No" Reference Source: Appendix H, #25 & Environmental Setting, Sec 3.3:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected
❑
0
0 0
air quality violation?
b) Hazards to safety from design feature, (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
❑
❑
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
❑
❑
❑ 0
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in
❑
❑
❑ 0
climate?
❑
❑
0
d) Create objectionable odors?
❑
❑
❑ 0
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in:
All `No" Reference Source: See Project Description
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
❑
❑
El
❑
b) Hazards to safety from design feature, (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
❑
❑
❑
0
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses?
❑
❑
❑
0
d) Insufficient parking capacity onsite or offsite?
❑
❑
❑✓
❑
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
❑
❑
❑
0
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g.,
❑
❑
❑
0
bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
❑
❑
❑
0
Z
• 0
7
Potentially
Potentially
Significant
Less than
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to:
Significant
Unless
Significant
No
Impact
mitigation
Impact
Impact
Incorporated
a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not
❑
❑
❑
Q
limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds?
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees)?
13
13
13
0
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak forest, coastal
❑
❑
❑
Q
habitat, etc.)?
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal pool)?
❑
❑
❑
Q
e) Wildlife dispersal migration corridors?
❑
❑
❑
Q
VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would theproposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plan?
❑
0
[
Q
b) Use nonrenewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner?
0
❑
0
Q
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be
❑
❑
❑
Q
of future value to the region and the residents of the State?
IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances
❑
❑
❑
Q
(including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency
❑
❑
❑
Q
evacuation plan?
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard?
❑
❑
❑
Q
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards?
Q
❑
❑
Q
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees?
0
Q
❑
D
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increase in existing noise levels?
❑
❑
❑
Q
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
❑
❑
0
0
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposed have an effect upon, or result in
a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection?
❑
❑
Q
❑
b) Police protection?
❑
❑
Q
❑
c) Schools?
❑
❑
❑
Q
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
❑
❑
Q
❑
e) Other government services?
❑
❑
Q
❑
7
XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a
need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following
utilities
a) Power or natural gas?
b) Communications systems?
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tanks?
e) Storm water drainage?
f) Solid waste disposal?
g) Local or regional water supplies?
XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
Potentially
❑
❑ io
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
Significant
❑
❑ 0
Potentially
Unless
Less than
❑ p
Significant
mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
E1
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
p
EI
❑
❑
0
0
❑
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
❑
❑
❑ io
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
❑
❑
❑ 0
c) Create light or glare?
❑
❑
❑ p
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources?
0
❑
❑ [JJ
b) Disturb archaeological resources?
❑
❑
❑ Q
c) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique
❑
❑
❑ 0
ethnic cultural values?
d) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential
❑
❑
❑ 0
impact area?
XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other
0
❑
❑ 0
recreational facilities?
b) Affect recreation opportunities?
0 0
M
•
•
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less than
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Significant mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat
of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant
or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or pre -history?
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental
goals?
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly.
❑ ❑ 11 ❑
XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES.
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or
more effects have been adequately analyzed in earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D).
Earlier analyses used. None.
a) Mitigation measures. See Attached Summary for discussion.
SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS
An explanation of potentially significant impacts follows. Measures included in this
summary shall be treated as mitigation where indicated.
LAND USE AND PLANNING
a) and c)
The proposed residential project is not compatible with the current zoning and general
plan designations at 1110 and 1116 South Fairmont Avenue. For that matter, the current
zoning and general plan designation are not consistent with each other on the parcel at
1116 South Fairmont. In order to establish land use designations appropriate for the
proposed project, the Lodi Planning Commission and City Council will hear the
applicants' request for a Rezoning of the parcel at 1110 South Fairmont Avenue from R-
CP, Residential-Cominercial Professional to R -GA, Residential -Garden Apartments, and
a General Plan Amendment for the parcel at 1116 South Fairmont from LDR, Low
Density Residential to O, Office. If the General Plan and Zoning requests are approved
Z
by the City Council, any potential adverse impacts associated with conflicts with the
general plan or zoning will be reduced to less than significant.
DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and
a NEGATIVE declaration will be prepared.
0 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
0 I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
❑ 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable
legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis
as described on attached sheets' if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially
significant unless mitigated."
❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a)
have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have
been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EK including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imp%ed qphe proposed project
Signature: ` Date: 2/28/0kAeIV 112
Printed Name: Eric W. Veerkamp For: City of Lodi
VICINITY MAP
10
MINUTES
LODI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
CARNEGIE FORUM
305 WEST PINE STREET
LODI, CALIFORNIA
WEDNESDAY April 10, 2002 7:00 P.M.
The Planning Commission met and was called to order by Chairman Crabtree.
Commissioners Present: John Beckman, Tim Mattheis, David Phillips, Jonathan McGladdery, ROLL CALL
Dennis White, and and Chairman Crabtree.
Commissioners Absent: Randall Heinitz
Others Present: Konradt Bartlam, Community Development Director, J.D. Hightower, City
Planner, Mark Meissner, Associate Planner, Eric Veerkamp, Associate
Planner, and Lisa Wagner, Secretary.
The minutes of March 27, 2002 were approved as mailed. MINUTES
March 27, 2002
PUBLIC HEARINGS
The continued request of Laila Sorour for approval of a 1) General Plan Amendment
from LDR, Low Density Residential to O, Office for 1116 South Fairmont; and a 2)
Rezoning for 1110 South Fairmont from RCP, Residential Commercial; Professional to
Residential Garden Apartment to permit the construction of two duplexes on one single
parcel. Eric Veerkamp presented the matter to the commission. Mr. Veerkamp noted that
there was also a lot line adjustment application pending to join the two individual parcels into
one single parcel which would make the piece of property large enough to accommodate the
proposed development. Both 1110 and 1116 South Fairmont Avenue have been vacant since
they were annexed into the City in approximately 1950. The General Plan and Zoning for
1116 S. Fairmont lacked consistency with each other. The General Plan designation needed to
be changed to make them consistent along with the zoning change for 1110 S. Fairmont.
The location has potential for medium -density residential uses, but the applicant was desirous
of developing two duplexes. Currently each of the parcels could accommodate one single
family dwelling, or multi -family dwelling to the limits of the RCP zone, or an office use. The
two subject properties combined total 15,065 square feet. In order to build two duplexes on
one parcel in the RCP zone, 16,000 square feet of land would be needed on one single parcel;
therefore, the two parcels combined would be 935 square feet short. To build the duplexes, the
RGA zone was considered since 15,065 square feet is adequate area to build four (4) units. It
:was staff's opinion that the proposed residences will be compatible with the surrounding land
uses and would not change the character of the neighborhood.
Chairman Crabtree asked if under the present zoning could 3 homes be built upon the parcels.
Mr. Veerkamp responded "yes" and Mr. Bartlam noted that even to do the three units, at some
point staff needs to get their General Plan and Zoning Ordinance into consistency and the
subject parcels were not in consistency with each other regardless of the intended land use.
Hearing Opened to the Public
Diane Mercurio, 1019 S. Orange Avenue. Ms. Mercurio was concerned about noise and traffic
generated from the duplexes. She preferred having office buildings built on the parcel rather
than duplexes.
4-10.doc
Jim Jacobsen, Bennett Development. Mr. Jacobsen represented the applicant. He shared that
the proposed duplex buildings had already been built within the city and are upper scale
duplexes. He felt the project was good for the parcel and the proposed buildings will be
aesthetic pleasing with tile roofs, stucco exteriors, landscaping, and provide adequate parking.
A typical 6 -foot wooden fence will be located along the east property line.
Janet Wilcox, 1007 S. Orange Avenue. Ms. Wilcox was concerned about multi -density units
being built on the property. She agreed that the proposed units were aesthetically pleasing and
further noted a concern that 8 trash containers would be left on the sidewalk on refuse pick up
day from the people occupying the duplexes.
Hearing Closed to the Public
Commissioner Beckman felt the project would fit aesthetically with neighborhood and was in
favor of the project.
Commissioner Mattheis noted that even though the neighborhood has professional offices
nearby, he felt the project would blend with the neighborhood. He further noted traffic and
noise concerns would not be an issue and he did not agree with the letter received from Dr.
Neal in opposition of the project.
The Planning Commission on motion of Commissioner Mattheis, Beckman second, approved
the request of Laila Sorour for approval of a 1) General Plan Amendment from LDR, Low
Density Residential to O, Office for 1116 South Fairmont; and a 2) Rezoning for 1110 South
Fairmont from RCP, Residential Commercial; Professional to Residential Garden Apartment to
permit the construction of two duplexes on one single parcel by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckman, Mattheis, McGladdery, Phillips, White, and
Chairman Crabtree
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: Heintz
ABSTAIN: Commissioners
The request of Concord Development for approval of a Vesting Tentative Subdivision
Map for Almond Wood Estates, a 14.5 -acre, 74 -lot, Single Family Residential Subdivision
at 1640 South Stockton Street. Associate Planner Meissner presented the item to the
commission. The area of the subdivision map included three separate properties encompassing
about 14. 5 acres of land zoned R-2. The subdivision will develop at 5.2 dwelling units per
acre with an average lot size of 6,000 square feet. Access to the subdivision will be from South.
Stockton Street and Almond Drive with a connection to the east on Elgin Avenue and a future
connection to Ravenwood Way. A 7 -foot -high masonry wall will be required along South
Stockton and Almond Drive and an 8 -foot -tall masonry wall will be required along the
northern portion of the property. A condition requiring an emergency vehicle turn -around
within the subdivision was reevaluated by the Fire Department and found not to be necessary.
Staff was recommending approval of the project.
Hearing Opened to the Public
Troy Reich, David Evans & Associates, 2880 Tracy Blvd., Tracy. Mr. Reich represented
Concord Development. They have worked closely with both Planning and Public Works staff
and have found the conditions being required to be acceptable. They were very excited about
moving forward with project.
Commissioner Beckman asked Mr. Reich's if his firm had done any past work in the Lodi area.
Mr. Reich replied that their Roseville office had, and that he had worked previously with the
City Engineer when they were both employees of another firm.
4-10.doc 2
Jerry Wisenor, 808 E. Tehama Drive, Lodi. Mr. Wisenor asked what the average lot size
would be for the subject project. Mr. Meissner responded approximately 6,000 square feet.
The Planning Commission on motion of Commissioner McGladdery, Mattheis second,
approved the request of Concord Development for approval of a Vesting Tentative Subdivision
Map for Almond Wood Estates, a 14.5 -acre, 74 -lot, Single Family Residential Subdivision at
1640 South Stockton Street by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckman, Mattheis, McGladdery, Phillips, White, and
Chairman Crabtree
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: Heinitz
ABSTAIN: Commissioners
The request of Baumbach and Piazza, Inc. for approval of the Luckey/Lackyard Property
Growth Management Development Plan for 77 single-family residences at 1041 & 1171
East Harney Lane, and a recommendation of approval to the City Council to award 77
building permit allocations. Associate Planner Meissner presented the item to the
commission. The area of the Development Plan is located in the southwest portion of Lodi and
included two separate properties that encompass approximately 15.8 acres of land zoned R-2.
Each year the City allocates building permits to keep in check with their 2% growth cap.
Currently there are 938 allocations for the year 2001. The northern 13.6 acres of the project
has been dedicated for a school. The project will develop at 4.9 units per acre with an average
lot size of 6,300 square feet. The subdivision will contain typical subdivision standards with
the parkway street design. Developments to the east of the project are preparing for
development in the near future and staff found the proposed project to be appropriate and
timely and it will be a welcomed contributor to the necessary infrastructure in the area. Staff
was in favor of the project_
Commissioner Mattheis asked if Tehama Drive, located just west of the project, would connect
to the subdivision. Mr. Bartlam responded that Tehama Drive did stub at the property line of
the project and it will be connected to the project for better traffic circulation.
Commissioner Phillips asked why Sunnyside Estates was not being included in the annexation.
Mr. Bartlam responded that the City would annex properties into the City only if the property
owners decide to be annexed.
Commissioner Beckman asked where the City was on issuing high-density allocations. Mr.
Bartlam replied that there had been no high-density allocations requested or made since the
inception of the Growth Management Program. He noted that in the future he would be
making a presentation regarding the matter to the Commission.
Hearing Opened to the Public
Jerry Wisenor, 808 E. Tehama Drive, Lodi. Mr. Wisenor has lived on Tehama Drive for the
past 30 years. Mr. Wisenor's main concern was that duplexes not be allowed within the
subdivision. Mr. Luckey, the developer, has reassured him that there will only be single family
dwellings built upon the lots. Mr. Wisenor shared that he will be traveling east to gain access
to Harney Lane rather than trying to fight traffic on Lower Sacramento Road.
Robert Hathaway, 890 Tehama Drive, Lodi. Mr. Hathaway would like to tie into the City's
sewer system that will be installed with the new project.
Terry Piazza, 323 W. Elm Street, Lodi. Mr. Piazza is the Engineer for the project. He noted
that the plan being presented was revised as requested by the City Council.
Commissioner Phillips asked what type of homes would be built within the subdivision. Mr.
Piazza responded that as far as he knew, it would be single family dwellings and no duplexes.
4-10_doc 3
Maime Starr, Assistant Superintendent of Facilities for LUSD. Ms. Starr stated that they are
anxious for the project to move forward so the school could be built.
Gail Lund, Tehama Drive, Lodi. Ms. Lund shared that Sunnyside Estates is an upscale County
area consisting of 20 homes with each lot being 1/3 acre in size. She did not want Tehama
Drive connected to the new subdivision. She was concerned that housing values would be
decreased with the increased traffic.
Alice Zimmerman, 931 E. Harney Lane, Lodi. Ms. Zimmerman's property is located directly
next to the project and she had questions regarding fencing and the future widening of Harney
Lane. Mr. Bartlam responded there would be a typical 6 to 7 -foot fence between the
properties. Mr Bartlam suggested that she speak with the developer to gain more information.
He shared that Harney Lane will be widened on the north side. He invited her to come to City
Hall and speak with himself and the City Engineer regarding the street plan for Harney Lane.
Hearing Closed to the Public
The Planning Commission on motion of Commissioner McGladdery, Mattheis second,
approved the request of Baumbach and Piazza, Inc. for approval of the Luckey/Lackyard
Property Growth Management Development Plan for 77 single-family residences at 1041 &
1171 East Harney Lane, and a recommendation of approval to the City Council to award 77
building permit allocations by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckman, Mattheis, McGladdery, Phillips, White and
Chairman Crabtree
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: Heinitz
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
Announcements and Correspondence
Community Development Director Bartlam introduced J.D. Hightower, our new City Planner,
to the Commission.
ADJOURNMENT
As there was no further business to be brought before the Planning Commission, Chairman Crabtree
adjourned the session at 7:50 p.m.
Respect _illy submitted,
M
Lisa Wagner
Secretary
4-10.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-101
A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AMENDING
THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE LODI GENERAL PLAN BY
REDESIGNATING 1116 SOUTH FAIRMONT AVENUE
(APN 031-120-28) FROM LDR, LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL TO O, OFFICE
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi has heretofore held a
duly noticed public hearing as required by law on April 10, 2002; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, having found no significant impacts due
to the General Plan Amendment and Rezone being anticipated, adopted Resolution
Nos. P.C. 02-07 and P.C. 02-08 approving the same; and
WHEREAS, the City Council having held a duly noticed public hearing on May
15, 2002, hereby acts as follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lodi,
that the Land Use Element of the Lodi General Plan is hereby amended by
redesignating the parcel located at 1116 South Fairmont Avenue (APN 031-120-28)
from LDR, Low Density Residential to O, Office, as shown on Exhibit "A" attached, which
is on file in the office of the Lodi City Clerk.
Dated: May 15, 2002
-------------------
-------------------
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2002-101 was passed and adopted by the
Lodi City Council in a regular meeting held May 15, 2002 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Howard, Land, Nakanishi, and Mayor
Pennino
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Hitchcock
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None
SUSAN J. BLACKSTON
City Clerk
2002-101
General Plan Amendment for 1116 S. Fairmont Ave a
from LOR, Low Density Residential to
Office
File CPA -LU -02-02
P
ORDINANCE N0. 4I
AN ORDINANCE OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AMENDING
THE OFFICIAL DISTRICT MAP OF THE CITY OF LODI AND
THEREBY REZONING 1110 SOUTH FAIRMONT AVENUE
(APN 031-120-28) FROM RCP, RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL
PROFESSIONAL TO RESIDENTIAL GARDEN APARTMENT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Official District Map of the City of Lodi adopted by Title 17 of the Lodi
Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows:
Parcel located at 1110 South Fairmont (APN 031-120-53) is hereby
rezoned from RCP, Residential Commercial Professional, to Residential
Garden Apartment to permit construction of two duplexes, as shown on
Exhibit 'W' attached, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
Section 2. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. P.C. 02-08
recommending approval of this request for a rezone at their meeting of April 10, 2002.
Section 3 - No Mandatory Duty of Care. This ordinance is not intended to and shall not
be construed or given effect in a manner which imposes upon the City, or any officer or
employee thereof, a mandatory duty of care towards persons or property within the City
or outside of the City so as to provide a basis of civil liability for damages, except as
otherwise imposed by law.
Section 4 - Severability. If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to
any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other
provisions or applications of the ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid
provision or application. To this end, the provisions of this ordinance are severable.
The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance irrespective
of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof.
Section 5. The alterations, changes, and amendments of said Official District Map of
the City of Lodi herein set forth have been approved by the City Planning Commission
and by the City Council of this City after public hearings held in conformance with
provisions of Title 17 of the Lodi Municipal Code and the laws of the State of California
applicable thereto.
Section 6. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed
insofar as such conflict may exist.
Section 7. This ordinance shall be published one time in the "Lodi News Sentinel", a
daily newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the City of Lodi and shall
be in force and take effect thirty days from and after its passage and approval.
Approved this day of , 2002
PHILLIP A. PENNINO
Mayor
Attest:
SUSAN J. BLACKSTON
City Clerk
State of California
County of San Joaquin, ss.
I, Susan J. Blackston, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify that Ordinance No.
was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi held
May 15, 2002 and was thereafter passed, adopted and ordered to print at a regular
meeting of said Council held , 2002 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS —
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS —
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS —
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS —
further certify that Ordinance No. was approved and signed by the Mayor on the
date of its passage and the same has been published pursuant to law.
SUSAN J. BLACKSTON
City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
RANDALL A. HAYS
City Attorney
I I I
I L---
a
< RCP
�- Rl
a
J
40
Cs3
lVI,19
�I
i
'�~--
R2-
inal
St.
(J y
;e_one -1 S. S. FairmQnt Are. „
from RCF, Residential Cemmerr:ial Professional
to RC,A., Residential Garden Apartment
Fila Z-02-02 -02
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of San Joaquin
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen
years and not a party to or interested in the above
entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the
printer of the Lodi News -Sentinel, a newspaper of
general circulation, printed and published daily,
except Sundays and holidays, in the City of Lodi,
California, County of San Joaquin and which news-
paper has been adjudged a newspaper of general
circulation by the Superior Court, Department 3, of
the County of San Joaquin, State of California,
under the date of lvlay 26th, 1953. Case Number
65990; that the notice of which the annexed is a
printed copy (set in type not smaller than non-
pareil), has been published in each regular and
entire issue of said newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof on the following dates to -wit::
May 4
.........................................................................................
all in the year......, 2002
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury tha
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at Lodi, California, this ........ ..........day of
May 2002
......................................................................................... .
.........f1.,L....[/:.�1.:.:�...........................
Signature
This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
RECEIVED
1001 MAY 17 AM 9: 58
CITY CLERK
CITYtOF LODI
Proof of Publication of
Public Hearing -
..........................................................
1116 S. Fairmont &Rezone 1110
S. Fairmont
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on
wednesday, May 15, 2002 at the hour of
7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the mat-
ter may be heard, the City Council will con-
duct a Public Hearing at the Carnegie
Forum, 305 West Pine Street, Lodi, to con-
sider the following matter:
a) Planning Commission's recommendation
that the Clty Council approve a request by
Leila Sorour for two actions: 1) amend the
General Plan from LDR, Low Density
Residential to O. Office for 1116 South
Fairmont; and 2) rezone 1110 South
Fairmont from FFP,, Residential Commercial
Professional, to Residential Garden
Apartment to permit the construction of two
duplexes.
Information regarding this item may be
obtained in the office of the Community
Development Department Director, 227
West Pine Street, Lodi, Callfomia. All Inter.
ested persons are invited to present their
views and comments on this matter. Written
statements may be Bled with the City Clerk
at any time prior to the hearing scheduled
herein. and oral statements may be made at
said hearing.
If you challenge the subject matter in court,
you may be limited to raising only Mose
Issues you or someone also reload at the
Pudic Hearing described In this notice or In
written correspondence delivered to the Clry
Clerk, 221 West Pine Street, at or prior to the
Public Hearing.
By Order of the Lodi City Council
Susan J. Blackston
City Clerk
Dated: May 1, 2002
Approved as to form:
Randall A. Hays
City Attorney
May 4, 2002 —4346
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
Please immediately confirm receipt
of this fax by calling 333-6702
CITY OF LODI
P. O. BOX 3006
LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910
ADVERTISING INSTRUCTIONS
SUBJECT: Set Public Hearing for May 15, 2002 to consider Planning Commission
recommendation that Council approve requests made by Laila Sorour
to amend General Plan for 1116 S. Fairmont and rezone 1110 S. Fairmont
PUBLISH DATE: SATURDAY, MAY 4, 2002
TEAR SHEETS WANTED: Three (3) please
SEND AFFIDAVIT AND BILL TO: SUSAN BLACKSTON, CITY CLERK
City of Lodi
P.O. Box 3006
Lodi, CA 95241-1910
DATED: THURSDAY, MAY 2, 2002
ORDERED BY:
JACQUELINE L. TAYLOR
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
NIFER PERRIN
PUTY CITY CLERK
Faxed to the Sentinel at 369-1084 at (time) on (date) (pages)
Kelsey Phoned to confirm receipt of all pages at (time) Jac _Jen (initials)
formsWvins.doc
•. CITY OF LODI NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Date: May 15, 2002
Carnegie Forum
305 West Pine Street, Lodi Time: 7:00 p.m.
For information regarding this notice please contact:
Susan J. Blackston
City Clerk
Telephone: (209) 333.6702
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, May 15, 2002 at the hour of 7:00 p.m., or soon
thereafter as the matter may be heard, the City Council will conduct a Public Hearing at the Carnegie Forum,
305 West Pine Street, Lodi, to consider the following matter:
a) Planning Commission's recommendation that the City Council approve a request by Laila Sorour
for two actions: 1) amend the General Plan from LDR, Low Density Residential to 0, Office for
1116 South Fairmont; and 2) rezone 1110 South Fairmont from RCP, Residential Commercial
Professional, to Residential Garden Apartment to permit the construction of two duplexes.
Information regarding this item may be obtained in the office of the Community Development Department
Director, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California. All interested persons are invited to present their views and
comments on this matter. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk at any time prior to the hearing
scheduled herein, and oral statements may be made at said hearing.
If you challenge the subject matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the Public Hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City
Clerk, 221 West Pine Street, at or prior to the Public Hearing.
By Order of the Lodi City Council:
Susan J. Blackston
City Clerk
Dated: May 1, 2002
Approved as to form:
-,,f ;Ot��
Randall A. Hays
City Attorney
JX1TYCLRKIF0RMSWotcddp1an.doc 5/1/02
u
o0
�9<�Foac�`Q DECLARATION OF POSTING
Set Public Hearing for May 15, 2002 to consider Planning Commission
recommendation that Council approve requests by Laila Sorour:
1) amend General Plan from LDR, Low Density Residential to O. Office for
1116 S. Fairmont; and 2) rezone 1110 S. Fairmont from RCP, Residential
Commercial Professional, to Residential Garden Apartment to permit
the construction of two duplexes
On Thursday, May 2, 2002 in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, a copy of
Notice of Public Hearing of the City Council of the City of Lodi to consider requests by
Laila Sorour regarding 1116 and 1110 S. Fairmont (attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A")
was posted at the following four locations:
Lodi Public Library
Lodi City Clerk's Office
Lodi City Hall Lobby
Lodi Carnegie Forum
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on May 2, 2002 at Lodi, California.
ORDERED BY:
SUSAN J. BLACKSTON
CITY CLERK
Jacqueline L. Taylor
Deputy City Clerk
?Jrrin
Deputy City Clerk
forms\decpost.doc
may' �Up
U
44<rFb4c��Q DECLARATION OF MAILING
Set Public Hearing for May 15, 2002 to consider Planning Commission
recommendation that Council approve request by Laila Sorour
amend General Plan for 1116 S. Fairmont and rezone 1110 S. Fairmont
On May 2, 2002 in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, I deposited in the
United States mail, envelopes with first-class postage prepaid thereon, containing a
notification of public hearing to be held on March 20, 2002 regarding Planning Commission
recommendation that Council approve request by Laila Sorour to amend General Plan and
rezone for 1116 and 1110 S. Fairmont, marked Exhibit "A"; said envelopes were addressed
as is more particularly shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto.
There is a regular daily communication by mail between the City of Lodi, California, and the
places to which said envelopes were addressed.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on May 2, 2002, at Lodi, California.
ORDERED BY:
JACQUELINE L. TAYLOR
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
decmaiUforms
101 t T:fV 41a w
SUSAN BLACKSTON
CITY CLERK, CITY OF LODI
11
NIFE . PERRIN
PUTY CITY CLERK
1110 South Fairmont & 1116 South Fairmont
1) 03107044;LODI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSN ;999 S FAIRMONT AVE SUITE 25
;LODI ;CA;95240
2) 03107046;LODI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSN ;PO BOX 3004 ;LODI ;CA;95241
3) 03108008;BOHNET, ROSE B ;1109 CARDINAL ST ;LODI ;CA;95240
4) 03108010;THOMPSON, MELVIN & CAROL TR ;13050 N DEVRIES RD ;LODI
;CA;95240
5) 03108011;KOYAMA, ASA & SHIGEKO ;23090 N KENEFICK RD ;ACAMPO
;CA;95220
6) 03108012;HANNAH, JEAN PAUL C & SHELLI K;1126 GLENHURST DR ;LODI
;CA;95240
7) 03108013;LOY, MILTON H & BETTY L TR ;1127 S FAIRMONT AVE ;LODI
;CA;95240
8) 03108014;PENA, MARIA ETAL ;1132 GLENHURST DR ;LODI ;CA;95240
9) 03108015;RING, BEN G & LILLY M TR ;1133 S FAIRMONT AVE ;LODI
;CA;95240
10)03108016;JOHNSON, GEORGE S & TAMMY C ;1138 GLENHURST DR ;LODI
;CA;95242
11)03108017;NELSON, WILLIAM C & N L ;1139 S FAIRMONT AVE ;LODI
;CA;95240
12)03111001;PRIDMORE, ALOHA R TRUSTEE ;1110 W PINE ST ;LODI ;CA;95240
13)03111003;SCHWARTZMAN, HILDA O TR ETAL ;1142 S FAIRMONT ;LODI
;CA;95240
14)03111006;EVANS, THOMAS R & LAURIE ;1139 S ORANGE AVE ;LODI ;CA;95240
15)03111007;HUTTON, MICHAEL & CAROL ;1133 S ORANGE AVE ;LODI ;CA;95240
16)03111008;ROUPPET, GARY ;1581 S STOCKTON ST ;LODI ;CA;95240
17)03111009;GUENTHER, ROLAND & LAVERA ;1000 W CARDINAL ST ;LODI
;CA;95240
18)03111010;VAUGHAN, BERNIECE M TR ;2044 KENWAY CT ;LODI ;CA;95242
19)03111011;BAVENDER, DANIEL J & T A ;1126 S ORANGE AV ;LODI ;CA;95240
20)03111012;BOLIOU, PERRIE C & R I ;1132 S ORANGE ST ;LODI ;CA;95240
21) 03111024;GUENTHER, CLIFFORD W & DONNA J;900 CARDINAL ST ;LODI
;CA;95240
22)03112001;CANEPA, W W & CAROL J TR ;131 S ORANGE AVE ;LODI ;CA;95240
23)03112002;WILLE, CARL & B TRS ;1000 W YORK ST ;LODI ;CA;95240
24) 03112003; WILCOX, JANET A ;1007 S ORANGE AVE ;LODI ;CA;95240
25) 03112004;WILLIAMS, JEANNE M ;1013 S ORANGE ST ;LODI ;CA;95240
26)03112005;MERCURIO, PAT & DIANA TR ;1019 S ORANGE AVE ;LODI ;CA;95240
27) 03112007;FISCHER, GWEN LAURINE ;1025 S ORANGE AVE ;LODI ;CA;95240
20)03112008;MCMILLEN, CHARLIE TRUSTEE ;930 W PARK ST ;LODI ;CA;95240
29)03112009;FRITZ, TIMOTHY D & SUZANNE K ;920 PARK ST ;LODI ;CA;95240
30)03112021;LEE, KWOCK YEEN & FEE LAND TR ;911 CARDINAL ST ;LODI
;CA;95240
31)03112022;BAHLKE, MARIANNE ;921 CARDINAL ST ;LODI ;CA;95240
32)03112023;JOSEPH, JOANNE J ;931 CARDINAL ;LODI ;CA;95240
33)03112024;FERVIA, MARCIA TR ;2891 PRUNERIDGE ;SANTA CLARA ;CA;95051
34)03112025;KNOEFLER, LUCY C ;1007 W CARDINAL ST ;LODI ;CA;95240
35)03112027;WEAVER, JOAN C ;1031 W CARDINAL ST ;LODI ;CA;95240
36)03112035;MAYER, PAUL R & GLADYS ;930 W YORK ST ;LODI ;CA;95240
37)03112036;NICHOLS, ELMER & M A ;1006 S ORANGE AVE ;LODI ;CA;95240
38)03112048;CRAWFORD, RAYBURN E TR ;350 N EL CAMINO REAL #45 ;ENCINITAS
;CA;92024
39)03112050;KUNDERT, ALAINE ;1012 S ORANGE ST ;LODI ;CA;95240
40)03112052;PERRIN, LORETTA ;931 W PARK ;LODI ;CA;95240
41)03112054;NEAL, DAVID & BETH ;1104 S FAIRMONT AVE ;LODI ;CA;95240
42)03112010;GEIGLE, GERALD H & RHONDA TR ;910 PARK ST ;LODI ;CA;95240
43)03107045;LODI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSN ;999 S FAIRMONT AVE SUITE 25
;LODI ;CA;95240
44)03112026;LINN, JOHN S & SHARON G TR ;1011 CARDINAL ST ;LODI
;CA;95240
45)03112028;SOROUR, NAGUI & LAILA ;1343 RIVERGATE DR ;LODI ;CA;95240
Petition against the Planning Commission's recommendation that the City Council approve a request by Laila
Sorour for the action to rezone 1110 South Fairmont from RCP, Residential Commercial Professional, to
Residential Garden Apartment to permit the construction of two duplexes.
The following signatures are in favor of this petition:
1. 'J /4 LL `J
PRINT NAME
2.
PRINT NAME
PRINT NAME
veltk
/I
4.
PRINT NAME
� � P
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
SIGNATYAE
r�
c� 0
SIGNATURE
(',
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE
fy) �c;a{���, ✓') - `�'l '` x"1'1 ,� 'J )?_
PRINT NAME 1 Y ' Cs r: a ��c `e._ SIGNATUREDA tE
PRiN17 NAME
SIGNATURE
DATE
P NT NAME SIGNAT9RE DATE
8. LiY
PRINT NAME
Lk
SIGNATURE
RECEIVED
2602 MAY 15 AM in: Zl.
-M -0 �-
DATE
Petition against the Planning Commission's recommendation that the City Council approve a request by Laila
Sorour for the action to rezone 1110 South Fairmont from RCP, Residential Commercial Professional, to
Residential Garden Apartment to permit the construction of two duplexes.
9.
PRINT NAME
10.
PRINT NAME
ae .21 i "J
PRINT NAME
12.
PRINT NAME
The following signatures are in favor of this petition:
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
5�fGlqATURE
L
13.
PRINT NAME /e'Y,/ SIGNATURE
URE
f?h3/n�-
DATE
.:S - l3
DATE
r
-2-
DATE
DATE
DATE
PRINT NAME -IGNATURE DATE
15.
PRINT NAME SIGNATURE DATE
16. L d, jV c)
PRINT NAME SIGNATURE DATE
Petition against the Planning Commission's recommendation that the City Council approve a request by Laila
Sorour for the action to rezone 1110 South Fairmont from RCP, Residential Commercial Professional, to
Residential Garden Apartment to permit the construction of two duplexes.
The following signatures are in favor of this petition:
17. J) i AAf,4 ML- /? C LjR i lle.' 2 --
PRINT NAME -,o4'-e SIGNATURE EfAT9
18
PRINT NAME SIGNATURE 91(TE"
19.-6
—N L.2 A t--- — — t I
PRINT NAME fj -V' /Vc'r SIGNATURE DATE
2�-
PRINT NAME StGNATURE DATE
21NQ
PRINT NAME SIGNATURE DATE
22. 13
PRINT NAME = SIGNATURE DATE
23 -
IL
PRINT NAME SIGNATURE,/ DATE
24.
4 Ac,
PRI Nrf NAME SIGNATURE DATE
Petition against the Planning Commission's recommendation that the City Council approve a request by Laila
Sorour for the action to rezone 1110 South Fairmont from RCP, Residential Commercial Professional, to
Residential Garden Apartment to permit the construction of two duplexes.
The following signatures are in favor of this petition:
25. 11C0r11V 6, A0.5 S
PRINT NAME SIGNATURE DATE
26. ?X U
PRINT NAME SIGNATURE DATE
27��- fid' ' �-�� �- -�>- "-'� �`" , � � b.-C.-�� .•
PRINT NAME SIGNATURE DATE
PRINT NAME yxo rWA' SIGNATURE DATE
29.
PRIN. NAME SIGN URE DATE
PRINT NAME ATU DATE
PRINT NAME NA U DATE
32. 1l1 JIe('r N
PRINT NAME SIGNATURE D4<TE
CITY OF LODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
e'
AGENDA TITLE: Planning Commission Report of April 24, 2002
MEETING DATE: May 15, 2002
PREPARED BY: Community Development Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
AGENDA ITEM RECOMMENDATION
a, b & c Information only. No action required.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The following actions were taken at the last regular Planning
Commission meeting of April 24, 2002:
a. Approved the request of Michael Collins for approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map to Create
a 5 -lot Single Family Residential Subdivision at 425 & 429 West Locust Street.
b. Received Public Comment for the Lodi Redevelopment Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report
Document.
c. Presentation made by the Community Development Director regarding Update to the Growth
Management Program.
Konradt Bartlam
Community Development Director
APPROVED:
H. Di on Flynn -- Cdy Manager �, ��