The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Report - January 2, 2002 G-02 PHBlue Sheet COUNCIL COMMIUNICA776N AGENDA TITLE: Conduct a Public Hearing to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation that the City Council adopt the 2001 Growth Management Allocations. MEETING DATE: January 2, 2002 PREPARED BY: Community Development Director RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council adopt the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the Year 2001 Growth Management Allocations. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Each year the City allocates residential building permits for a projected 2% growth in population for the current year. This year the City has 432 residential building permits to allocate. Of the 432 permits, 65% or 281 are for single-family residential units, 10% or 43 are for medium -density residential units such as duplexes and townhouses, and 25% or 108 are for high-density residential units such as apartments. As you will see on the "Planning Commission Recommended Building Permit Allocation Schedule" there is one project at this time requesting 74 single-family allocations, and there are 1,012 available. The number 1,012 is the sum of the 281 allocations from this year and the 741 unused single-family allocations remaining from previous year's allotments and expirations of undeveloped projects. There were no requests for medium or high-density allocations. In order to obtain building permit allocations, developers submit an application stating the number they are seeking. The number requested corresponds to an approved development plan. Development plans are scored on a set of criteria established by City ordinance. The highest scoring development plans have the greatest chance of receiving their allocation request, the lowest scoring the least chance. This year the number of allocation requests did not exceed the amount available. Competitive scoring, in this instance, did not affect the ability of the development plan to obtain allocations. Following their Public Hearing, the Planning Commission adopted the Growth Management allocation list below: Almond Wood Estates TOTAL Requested 2001 Allocations 74 74 Recommended 2001 Allocations 74 74 Almond Wood Estates: The Almond Wood Estates Development Plan is located at 1640 South Stockton Street. The project is generally located South of Kettleman Lane, north of Almond Street, and east of South Stockton Street (see vicinity map). The area of the development plan includes three separate properties that encompass approximately 14.5 -acres of land zoned R-2, Single -Family Residential, and is proposed to develop as a 74 -lot, single-family residential subdivision. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that this project receive 74 single-family allocations, which is enough to complete the development. APPROVED: H. Dixon Flynn -- City Manager 01-40.doe 01/02/02 The project area was annexed to the City in 1992 as part of the Neuharth North Annexation. The entito area was annexed with the rent of development as single -family residences, which is evident by its law- density residential general plan land use designation and single -family residential zoning. The project is within Priority Area One, which is the highest rank established by the Growth ihUnagement Ordinance. Priority Area raring is based on proximity to existing development and ease of connection to existing utilities. Each of the parcels of the project site has sat vacant and idle for ten years in anticipation of residential development. The development plan is surrounded by existing development; with the existing United Rentals commercial development to the north, the Colvin Ranch single-family residential subdivision to the south, the Fawnhaven and Noma Ranch single-family residential subdivisions to the east, and developed industrial land across South Stockton Street to the west. . Given that the development is within Priority Area One and that the project area has been within the City for a decade, staff finds that the proposed residential subdivision is appropriate and essentially an infill development. An additional project was submitted prior to this year's deadline. That project, generally located on Harney Lane between Mills Avenue and Lower Sacramento Road, has not been presented to the Planning Commission as yet. The applicant is preparing a Traffic Study pursuant to the requirements of the Public Works Department. Staff intends to process this project as soon as it is ready for consideration. FUNDING: None required Konradt Bartlam Community Development Director Prepared by: Marie Meissner, Associate Planner luluI Attachment RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE 2001 GROWTH MANAGEMENT ALLOCATIONS BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lodi City Council does hereby approve the 2001 Growth Management Allocations as recommended by the Lodi Planning Commission, as shown as follows: Requested Recommended 2001 Allocations 2001 Allocations Almond Wood Estates 74 74 TOTAL 74 74 Dated: January 2, 2002 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2002- was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held January 2, 2002, by the following vote.: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — SUSAN J. BLACKSTON City Clerk 2002- a • CITY OF LODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION AGENDA TITLE: Conduct a Public Hearing to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation that the City Council adopt the 2001 Growth Management Allocations. MEETING DATE: January 2, 2002 PREPARED BY: Community Development Director RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council adopt the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the Year 2001 Growth Management Allocations. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Each year the City allocates residential building permits for a projected 2% growth in population for the current year. This year the City has 432 residential building permits to allocate. Of the 432 permits, 65% or 281 are for single-family residential units, 10% or 43 are for medium -density residential units such as duplexes and townhouses, and 25% or 108 are for high-density residential units such as apartments. As you will see on the "Planning Commission Recommended Building Permit Allocation Schedule" there is one project at this time requesting 73 single-family allocations, and there are 1,012 available. The number 1,012 is the sum of the 281 allocations from this year and the 731 unused single-family allocations remaining from previous year's allotments and expirations of undeveloped projects. There were no requests for medium or high-density allocations. In order to obtain building permit allocations, developers submit an application stating the number they are seeking. The number requested corresponds to an approved development plan. Development plans are scored on a set of criteria established by City ordinance. The highest scoring development plans have the greatest chance of receiving their allocation request, the lowest scoring the least chance. This year the number of allocation requests did not exceed the amount available. Competitive scoring, in this instance, did not affect the ability of the development plan to obtain allocations. Following their Public Hearing, the Planning Commission adopted the Growth Management allocation list below: Requested Recommended 2000 Allocations 2000 Allocations Almond Wood Estates 73 73 TOTAL 73 73 • Almond Wood Estates: The Almond Wood Estates Development Plan is located at 1640 South Stockton Street. The project is generally located South of Kettleman Lane, north of Almond Street, and east of South Stockton Street (see vicinity map). The area of the development plan includes three separate properties that encompass approximately 14.5 -acres of land zoned R-2, Single -Family Residential, and is proposed to develop as a 73 -lot, single-family residential subdivision. The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that this project receive 73 single-family allocations, which is enough to complete the development. APPROVED: H. Dixon Flynn -- City Manager 01-40.doc 12/21/01 Council Communication Meeting Date: January 2, 2002 Page 2 The project area was annexed to the City in 1992 as part of the Neuharth North Annexation. The entire area was annexed with the intent of development as single-family residences, which is evident by its low- density residential general plan land use designation and single-family residential zoning. The project is within Priority Area One, which is the highest rank established by the Growth Management Ordinance. Priority Area ranking is based on proximity to existing development and ease of connection to existing utilities. Each of the parcels of the project site has sat vacant and idle for ten years in anticipation of residential development. The development plan is surrounded by existing development; with the existing United Rentals commercial development to the north, the Colvin Ranch single-family residential subdivision to the south, the Fawnhaven and Noma Ranch single-family residential subdivisions to the east, and developed industrial land across South Stockton Street to the west. . Given that the development is within Priority Area One and that the project area has been within the City for a decade, staff finds that the proposed residential subdivision is appropriate and essentially an infill development. An additional project was submitted prior to this year's deadline. That project, generally located on Harney Lane between Mills Avenue and Lower Sacramento Road, has not been presented to the Planning Commission as yet. The applicant is preparing a Traffic Study pursuant to the requirements of the Public Works Department. Staff intends to process this project as soon as it is ready for consideration. FUNDING: None required Konradt Bartlam Community Development Director Prepared by: Mark Meissner, Associate Planner LUT Attachment PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED BUILDING PERMIT ALLOCATION SCHEDULE 2001 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS TO BE ALLOCATED FOR 2001 = 432 PROJECT I NO AP UNITS E I NO UN TSFINALMAPI RECEIVED'89-'981ALLOCATIO TO COMPLETE D I I AL OCES 0 01 RECOMMENDEDTED ALLLOC. 000 ALMOND WOOD ESTATES 01 01 01 74 1 7TF 74 01 01 01 741 74 1 74 * 731 allocations from expirations and unused allocations from previous years are available. There are no projects to request the 43, year 2001 allocations for medium density units. * 294 allocations from expirations and unused allocations from previous years are available. There are no projects to request the 108, year 2001 allocations for high density units. * 1,225 Allocations from the previous years ('89-'00) are available_ NOTE: Due to engineering delays, only one of the two expected development plans was reviewed. We expect to review the Luckey/Lackyard Development Plan early next year. e MEMORANDUM, City of Lodi, Community Development Department To: Planning Commission From: Community Development Department Date: October 10, 2001 Subject: The request of Concord Development Inc. & Allen Liu for approval of the Almond Wood Estates Property Growth Management Development Plan for 74 single-family residences at 1640 South Stockton Street, and a recommendation of approval to the City Council to award 74 building permit allocations. SUMMARY The Almond Wood Estates Development Plan is located at 1640 South Stockton Street. The project is generally located South of Kettleman Lane, north of Almond Street, and east of South Stockton Street (see vicinity map). The area of the development plan includes three separate properties that encompass approximately 14.5 -acres of land zoned R-2, Single -Family Residential, and is proposed to develop as a 74 -lot, single-family residential subdivision. BACKGROUND The City has established a residential growth cap of a 2% population increase per year. In order to provide adequate housing for this projected increase, the City awards residential building permit allocations to project applicants. In order for a developer to receive these allocations they must make an application, which includes a development plan. The development plans are reviewed by staff (Community Development, Public Works, Fire, etc.) for their ability to meet basic engineering, zoning, and land use requirements. The City has a limit on the amount of building permits that can be allocated, and for this reason the projects are competitively scored on 13 different criteria. The criteria are based primarily on a proposed project's location to existing City services. Projects scoring highest may receive a greater recommendation or what can amount to a higher number of allocations than lower scoring projects. Each year the City allocates residential building permits for a projected 2% growth in population for the current year. This year the City has 432 residential building permits to allocate. Of the 432 permits, 65% or 281 are for single- family residential units, 10% or 43 are for medium -density residential units such as duplexes and townhouses, and 25% or 108 are for high-density residential units such as apartments. As you will see on the "Staff Recommended Building Permit Allocation Schedule" there are two projects, which have requested single-family allocations. The City has received 151 single-family allocation requests and there are 1,012 available. The project area was annexed to the City as part of Neuharth North Annexation approved in April of 1992. The area was annexed with the intent of development as single-family residences, which is evident by its General Plan land use designation, zoning, and previous project approvals. In 1994 the original development plan became the Lodi Estates Development Plan, which included an additional property and a total of 100 -lots. This plan was approved in 1994 and later obtained a tentative subdivision map, which was never finalized and ended up expiring in 1998. During the 1998 Growth Management Allocation Process the Planning Commission expired the Lodi Estates Development Plan, and the City Council subsequently expired the 100 allocations. This development plan will develop at approximately 5.2 dwelling units per acre with an average lot size of around 5,966 square -feet. The density and lot sizes are consistent with the R-2, single-family zoning of this property and the developments to the south and east. The applicants propose to begin development in early 2002 and anticipate completion of the project within the year 2002. ANALYSIS The Growth Management Ordinance was written to establish orderly development at a rate no greater than two percent per year, and to create competition between projects vying for available building permit allocations. Since the establishment of the Growth Management Ordinance in 1991, the City has grown at an average of 1.2% per year. Given that there are only two small projects this year, there is a surplus of building permit allocations and essentially no competition. As required, the projects have been scored; but pending a recommendation of approval from the Planning Commission and subsequent approval from the City Council, the project will be fully allocated and ready to obtain tentative subdivision maps. GM0101 Almond.doc The Almond Wood Estates will be adjacent to the existing United Rentals commercial development to the north, the Colvin Ranch single-family residential subdivision to the south, the Fawnhaven and Noma Ranch single-family residential subdivisions to the east, and developed industrial land across South Stockton Street to the west. The project site will front on South Stockton Street on its west boundary and Almond Drive on its south boundary. Primary access to the project area will be from South Stockton Street at its west boundary, and Almond Drive on the south boundary. Development of this project will enhance access to the existing subdivisions to the east by providing the connection of Elgin Avenue to Stockton Street and a second access point to Almond Drive via the westward extension of Ravenwood Way. As with all residential subdivisions that rear to a street, the City requires a reverse frontage wall and landscaping. This project will be conditioned to provide a 15 -foot area that will contain the curb, landscaping, meandering sidewalk, and 7 -foot tall decorative masonry wall on Stockton and Almond. Staff is also recommending what has become the standard residential street design, which includes a parkway and bow -outs at various intersections. Commercial developments rearing to residential zones are required to screen themselves from residences; however, in this situation they existed prior to the land being designated residential. For this reason, the development plan is conditioned to provide an 8 -foot tall decorative masonry block wall along its northern boundary. This project is within Priority Area One. Priority Areas One, Two and Three were established with the adoption of the Growth Management Ordinance and were ranked based on proximity to existing development and the ability to connect to existing utilities. There is about 85.19 -acres of the original 473 -acres of Priority Area One land remaining. There is approximately 47.52 -acres of Priority Area One contained in 11 parcels to the south of the Sunwest Shopping Center fronting Lower Sacramento Road, about 18.22 -acres contained in four parcels at the southeast corner of Lodi Fronting Harney Lane and Cherokee Lane, and 19.45 -acres of the 5 parcels in and adjacent to this project area. The remaining Priority Area One land South of Wal-Mart on Lower Sacramento Road and the corner of Cherokee and Harney is not within the City Limits. Given that the development is within Priority Area One and that the project area has been within the City for a decade, staff finds that the proposed project is appropriate and essentially an infill development. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Almond Wood Estates Development Plan, and recommend approval of the requested allocations to the City Council, subject to the conditions set forth in the attached Resolution. ALTERNATIVE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS • Approve the Almond Wood Estates Development Plan with Alternate Conditions • Deny the Development Plan • Continue the Request espectf mit Mark M iss er Associate Planner MGM/mgm GM0101 Almond.doc Rev' and Concur, radt Bartlam Community Development Director CITY OF LODI PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report MEETING DATE: October 10, 2001 APPLICATION NO: Growth Management Development Plan GM -01-001 REQUEST: The request of Concord Development Inc. & Allen Liu for approval of the Almond Wood Estates Property Growth Management Development Plan for 74 single-family residences at 1640 South Stockton Street, and a recommendation of approval to the City Council to award 74 building permit allocations. LOCATION: 1640 South Stockton Street (APN's: 062-060-04, 12 & 13) APPLICANT: Concord Development Inc. & Allen Liu 158 Jackson Street San Jose, CA 95112 OWNER: Same as Applicant Site Characteristics: The project area is currently vacant in anticipation of development. The area is entirely within the City limits of Lodi. The area to the north is a heavy equipment rental and construction materials center. To the west across South Stockton Street is a developed industrial area. To the east of the project site is a mature single-family residential subdivision zoned R-2, single-family. To the south of the project site is a newly developed single-family residential subdivision zoned R-2, Single -Family Residential. The project site fronts on South Stockton Street along its western boundary and Almond Drive on its southern boundary. The project site is relatively flat with no unusual or extraordinary topographic features. General Plan Designation: LDR, Low -Density Residential Zoning Designations: R-2, Single Family Residential Property Size: 14.5 acres Adiacent Zoning and Land Use: North: C -M, Commercial Light Industrial & C-2, General Commercial; GC, General Commercial. South: R-2, Single -Family Residential; LDR, Low Density Residential. East: R-2, Single -Family Residential; LDR, Low Density Residential. West: M-2, Heavy Industrial; HI, Heavy Industrial. Neighborhood Characteristics: To the north is a heavy equipment, tools rental, and bulk construction materials yard; and also a recreational vehicle sales lot. To the west of the project site are various heavy industrial uses including a towing yard, auto repair, cable TV switching facility, and miscellaneous warehouse GMO101 rAlmond.doc uses. To the east of the southern two thirds of the project site is a 4,356 square foot residential lot with a home fronting Almond Drive, and a 4.89 -acre residential lot with a home and other small buildings also fronting Almond Drive. To the east of the northern third of the project site are the Fawnhaven and Noma Ranch single-family residential subdivisions approved in 1984 and 1986. To the south of the project site is the fully developed Park Place Community or what was originally the Colvin Ranch single-family residential subdivision approved in 1992. The project site fronts on South Stockton Street along its western boundary and Almond Drive on its southern boundary. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS: Negative Declaration ND -01-06 was prepared for this project. No significant impacts are anticipated; however, mitigation measures have been required. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE: Legal Notice for the Development Plan was published on September 29, 2001. A total of 26 notices were sent to all property owners of record within a 300 -foot radius of the subject property. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the request of Concord Development Inc. & Allen Liu for the Almond Wood Estates Property Growth Management Development Plan for 74 single-family residences at 1640 South Stockton Street, and recommend approval to the City Council to award 74 building permit allocations, subject to the conditions set forth in the attached resolutions. ALTERNATIVE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS: • Approve the Almond Wood Estates Property Development Plan with Alternate Conditions • Deny the Development Plan • Continue the Request ATTACHMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Development Plan Map 3. City of Lodi Residential Growth Management Schedule 4. Staff Recommended Building Permit Allocation Schedule 5. City Council Awarded Building Permit Allocations 6. Development Plan Scoring Summary 7. Draft Resolutions 8. Negative Declaration GM0101rAlmond.doc uIciNErY MaP Z w w Y O ir W U SCALE50-0'-- - -- KETTLEMAN LANE (STATE ROUTE No. 12) MELTON BATON 062-050-13 CATHY NILSSEN 062-190-22 ANDREW STEPHENS 062-190-23 CLARENCE Ir SEVERS ON 062-190-04 R MAXWELL PROPERTIES 062-190-17 WESTERN RANCH a, C A 100' qa 0 rj PLAZA LLC 062-510-01 z o o{ p> 100' o N C N v z r2. SS z 0 Ir O< lI Or I Ory g• - m N� , — — — — — — IOm 53' N N— Qes0, a OS 0 N A < W O Z ROBERT MULLEN u m� 062-510-02 Syg 3 1Z9 _00O�,v1O� 0 7A/tl 12' o;;rorc,ATroN - :sos as 78 �' � .as F0:5 • `'Ye4 i ' KING VIDEO $QNz .09'09 .0q OS .0S : ,09 39'. ELGIN N CABLE CO AVENUE 062-510-03 6N S l ooo l6 O6 h5c o$ Z r4vii 4.�. = 100 100' 100' 1 100 70 Be'60 100' 100 VN .0J qb .Ium.• � #N 1� A�$uuZ 10O.t XW MAXWELL L 062-510-04 1 40 o a o 100 a m pp a 99' J 100' H -_,L6 OOl_—_ O�l£.99 N v 1 A U GARY ROUPPET rmn '� 7O' 94 60' 100'. A s Q J 062-050-12 \ S `3 �$. z o z 100' z D 100' m z 3 a 0.cz MAXWELL STREET o "� IQ 100'"E BYRON WEISZ�� 062-050-12 IJ u m a m 10�0__� I 100' NFD I m 0, M MELTON BATON 062-050-13 CATHY NILSSEN 062-190-22 ANDREW STEPHENS 062-190-23 CLARENCE Ir SEVERS ON 062-190-04 R MAXWELL PROPERTIES 062-190-17 c a, C A 100' qa 4 rj �e5 z Nr*1 pN 100' o n 100' z r2. SS ym g• - m .L , — — — — — — Y 53' N N— Qes0, a OS 0 a u O Z ,05 u m� 7A/tl 12' o;;rorc,ATroN c a, C A 100' r 4 rj w � z Nr*1 pN 100' o n 100' 111 F V ( N ti 100' of I RAVENWOOD WAY N rn m 10 N S Ay Z t1 ALMOND DRIVE mD x Nr*1 pN N� pD NOf C, r ym — — — — — — rti — — — — — — N N— OS 0 O Z City of Lodi Residential Growth Management Schedule 2001 Adopted: September 18, 1991 under Ordinance #1521 Year Population %Actual 2% Pop. Persons/ Total units Single Fam.@ Med density @ High Density @ Growth projection Household per year 65% 10% 25% ** 5ep-89 50,990 1,020 2.572 397 258 40 ! 99 Sep -90 52,010 1,040 2.567 i 404 263 `: 40 101 Sep -91 53,050 1,061 2.630 403 262 ! 40 101 Jan -92 ! 53,186 0.26%' 1,064 2.664 I 399 259 40 100 Jan -93 53,701 0.97%I 1,074 2.680 401 ! 261 40 100 Jan -94 i 53,903 0.38%! 1,078 2.680 i 402 261 40 101 Jan -95 ! 54,694 1.47%: 1,094 2.697 406 264 41 102 Jan -96 54,473 -0.40%' 1,089 2.662 409 266 ; 41 102 Jan -97 54,812 0.62% 1,096 2.659 412: 268 41 103 Jan -98 55,681 I 1.59% 1,114 2.684: 415 270 42 104 Jan -99 56,926 1 2.24% 1,139 2.695 423 275 j 42 106 o Jan 00 57,935 1.77%; 1,159 2-709 428 278 43 107 _ t Jan7 1,* 58 1 1 1117 is 2 71�� 3,43 St3i� 1'� t -t ',-1d 4:34�d _4pQ$. J Jan -02 59,772 2.00%' 1,195 Est. 2.710 441 287 r44 110 A, Jan -03 60,967 2.00% 1,219 Est. 2.710 450 293 45 113 0 Jan -04 62,186 2.00%i 1,244 Est. 2.710 459 298 46 115 Jan -05 63,430 2.00%: 1,269 Est. 2.710 468 304 47 117 Jan -06 64,699 2.00%. 1,294 Est. 2.710 477 310 48 119 Jan -07 : 65,993 2.00% 1,320 Est. 2.710. 487 317 49 122 TOTALS:' 8,113 5,273 811 2,028 ** Sep'89 population number equals 2/3 of the population difference of Jan '89 and Jan '90 added to Jan '89 NOTE: Population and persons per household per State Department of Finance. Actual percentage increases in population may be higher or lower than 2%. Calculation of building permit allocations is based on a 2% increase of the current year population figure. STAFF RECOMMENDED BUILDING PERMIT ALLOCATION SCHEDULE 2001 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS TO BE ALLOCATED FOR 200"1 = 432 PROJECT IINNO. ALLOCATIO1 MAPUNITS EINO UNITSFINALMAPIRECEIVED'89-'98 OCOMPLEETEDIAL OCREQUESTED IO 01RECOMMENDE A LOC. OOD ALMOND WOOD ESTATES 0 0 01 74 1 74 1 74 01 01 01 74 1 74 1 74 * 731 allocations from expirations and unused allocations frorn previous years are available. MEDIUM DENSITY 10%=337 UNITS* There are no projects to request the 43, year 2001 allocations for medium density units. * 294 allocations from expirations and unused allocations from previous years are available. There are no projects to request the 108, year 2001 allocations for high density units. * 1,225 Allocation: from the previous years ('89-'00) are available. NOTE: Due to engineering delays, only one of the two expected development plans is being reviewed at this time. We expect to bring the Luckey/Lackyard Development Plan to the Planning Commission before the end of this year. CITY COUNCIL AWARDED BUILDING PERMIT ALLOCATIONS 1989-2000 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS (1989-2000)=4 899 * 57 allocations remained from the'93 allocation year, giving the City a total of 318 single family units to allocate for 1994. ** One, 1996 single family allocation was granted to the Parisis property project in '95. Fifteen, 1996 single family allocations were awarded to the Richard's Ranch Project by resolution #96-40. Page 1 of 2 SINGLE FAMILY 65%a=3,184 PROJECT ALLOC.'S REC. '89 (1989-2000) ALLOC.'S REC. '90, ALLOC.'S REC. '91 ALLOC.'S REC. '92 ALLOC.'S REC. '93 ALLOC.'S REC. '94 * ALLOC.'S REC. '95** ALLOC.'S REC. '96€ ALLOC.'S RFC. '97 ALLOC.'S REC. '98 ALLOC.'S REC. '99 ALLOC.'S REC. '00 ALLOCATION TOTALS BANG'S RANCH 34 35 35 0 (1 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 123 BECKMAN PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 46 BRIDGETOWN 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 51 36 0 0 0 140 CENTURY MEADOWS 1 16 16 16 0 0 0 52 55 45 0 0 0 200 CENTURY MEADOWS 2 25E26L 25 0 29 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 165 CENTURY MEADOWS 3 2425 0 29 0 51 50 00 0 0 203 CENTURY MEADOWS 4 2929 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 137 COLVIN RANCH 2020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 .rteBO 43 43 - . � . 43 - . �� ,�,� � .. 44 ��.,, �,,..�t._ 0 ..._ ... , . � 0 ,� •xb� � 0 . , „ , 0 m. 0 0 0 0 173 JOHNSON RANCH 2 26 27 27 80 55 69 0 0 53 41 0 0 378 LODI WEST PARISIS PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 39 PERLEGOS PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 57 RICHARDS RANCH € 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 49 RIVERPOINTE 0 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 SASAKI PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 01 60 SUNWEST XIV 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 31 .36 0 0 0 67 THAYER PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 34 TSUTAOKA PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 01 0 0 63 TOWNE RANCH 35 1 36 36 56 52 151 1 37 0 6 6 0 0 415 25R 1 263 1 262 1 259 1 204 1 318 1 2661 265 1 236 2 1 171 1 63T 2,453 * 57 allocations remained from the'93 allocation year, giving the City a total of 318 single family units to allocate for 1994. ** One, 1996 single family allocation was granted to the Parisis property project in '95. Fifteen, 1996 single family allocations were awarded to the Richard's Ranch Project by resolution #96-40. Page 1 of 2 CITY COUNCIL AWARDED BUILDING PERMIT ALLOCATIONS 1989-2000 T(ITAI Rt=CItIGIVTIAI 11K11TC 11QAQ_')00fY1=A RQQ * In'93 the Planning Commisson awarded 40, 1994 medium density allocations to the Lodi West project. ** The Bangs Ranch and Lodi Estates projects each were awarded single family allocations in place of their medium density allocations. 11 ALLOC.'S ALLOC.'S ALLOC.'S ALLOC.'S ALLOC.'S ALLOC.'S ALLOC.'S ALLOC.'S ALLOC.'S I ALLOC.'S ALLOC.'S ALLOC.'S ALLOCATION 1 PROJECT" I REC,. '89 REC. '90 REC. '91 REC. '92 REC. '93 REC. '94 REC. '95 REC. '96 REC. '97 REC. '98 REC. '99 REC. '00 TOTALS BENNETT & COMPTON 991 45 () 1 0 -1441 01 01 01 01 01 01 0- 991 ,MEDIUM DENSITY PROJECT 1'.(1989-2000) ALLOC.'S REC. '89 ALLOC.'S REC. '90 ALLOC.'S REC. '9'I ALLOC.'S REC. '92 ALLOC.'S REC. '93 ALLOC.'S REC. '94 ALLOC.'S REC. '95 ALLOC.'S REC. '96 ALLOC.'S REC. '97 ALLOC.'S ALLOC.'S REC. '98 REC. '99 ALLOC.'S REC. '00 ALLOCATION TOTALS BANG'S RANCH ** 18 18 0 0 0 -36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LODI WEST 0 0 .� .. .... „ . HIS - : �.. IS LODI ESTATES ** 0 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 0 -57 0 - ,.�.-7777,7477r<:4 r z MOM. N. 22 0 0 -22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SASAKI PROPERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 3 0 0 103 SUNWEST GARDEN U 0 .01 01 01 0 1 0 0 1 181 0 1 01 0 18 WOODHAVEN PARK 01 0 01 01 75 1 U 1 01 0 1 01 01 01 0 75 11 401 40 1 28 1 01 132 -581 01 0 1 118 -1041 01 0 196 * In'93 the Planning Commisson awarded 40, 1994 medium density allocations to the Lodi West project. ** The Bangs Ranch and Lodi Estates projects each were awarded single family allocations in place of their medium density allocations. 11 ALLOC.'S ALLOC.'S ALLOC.'S ALLOC.'S ALLOC.'S ALLOC.'S ALLOC.'S ALLOC.'S ALLOC.'S I ALLOC.'S ALLOC.'S ALLOC.'S ALLOCATION 1 PROJECT" I REC,. '89 REC. '90 REC. '91 REC. '92 REC. '93 REC. '94 REC. '95 REC. '96 REC. '97 REC. '98 REC. '99 REC. '00 TOTALS BENNETT & COMPTON 991 45 () 1 0 -1441 01 01 01 01 01 01 0- 991 45 1 01 U -1441 01 01 01 01 01 01 O F 0 * The Bennett and Compton p-oject was awarded 75 medium density allocations under the project name of Woodhaven Park Page 2 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. P.C. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LODI RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE BUILDING PERMIT ALLOCATION SCHEDULE FOR 2001. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi has heretofore held a duly noticed meeting on the Growth Management Development Plan Allocation Schedule which includes Growth Management Application Number GM -01-001, in accordance with City Ordinance number 1521, and Resolution number 91-171. WHEREAS, the project area is made up of the following properties: 1544 & 1640 South Stockton Street & 816 Almond Drive; WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the approval of this request have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi as follows: 1. Negative Declarations have been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines provided thereunder. Further, the Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in these Negative Declarations with respect to the projects identified in this Resolution. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council, approval of a resolution adopting the Building Permit Allocation Schedule 2001 as identified in this Resolution. Dated: September 26, 2001 I hereby certify that Resolution No. was passed and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi at a regular meeting held on September 26, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: ResGrowthSchedu le.doc Secretary, Planning Commission STAFF RECOMMENDED BUILDING PERMIT ALLOCATION SCHEDULE 2001 TOTAL RESIDENTIA_ UNITS TO BE ALLOCATED FOR 2001 = 432 NO. FINAL PROJECT MAP UNITS EI NO UN TSMAPI ECEIIVED 89N98I TO COMPLEETENEEDED I AL OC.REQUESTED 0 01 RECOMMENDED ALLLOC. 2000 ALMOND WOOD ES—ATES 01 01 01 74 1 74 1 74 01 01 01 74 1 74 1 74 * 731 allocations from expirations and unused allocations from previous years are available. There are no projects to request the 43, year 2001 allocations for medium density units. * 294 allocations from expirations and unused allocations from previous years are available. HIGH DENSITY 25'Y.=1,333 UNITS There are no projects to request the 108, year 2001 allocations for high density units. * 1,225 Allocations from the previous years ('89-'00) are available. NOTE: Due to engineer ng delays, only one of the two expected development plans is being reviewed at this time. We expect to bring the Luckey/Lackyard Development Plan to the Planning Commission before the end of this year. RESOLUTION NO. PC. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LODI APPROVING THE REQUEST OF CONCORD DEVELOPMENT, INC. & ALLEN LIU FOR THE ALMOND WOOD ESTATES PROPERTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AT 1640 SOUTH STOCKTON STREET. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi has heretofore held a duly noticed meeting, as required by law, on the requested development plan to create the Almond Wood Estates Property Development Plan in accordance with City Ordinance number 1521; Resolution number 91- 170. WHEREAS, the project proponent is Concord Development, Inc. & Allen Liu, 158 Jackson Street, San Jose, CA 95112; WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the approval of this request have occurred; WHEREAS, the property is zoned R-2, Single -Family Residential; WHEREAS, the property is located at 1640 South Stockton Street (APN's 062-060-04, 12 & 13). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FOUND, DETERMINED AND RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi as follows: 1. Negative Declaration File No. ND -01-06 has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines provided thereunder. 2. It is found that approval of the development plan will result in good planning practice. 3. It is hereby found that neither the design nor planned improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 4. It is hereby found that the development plan is unlikely to cause public health problems. 5. It is further found that approval of the development plan will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of the property within the proposed parcel. 6. Growth Management Application No. GM -01-001 is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: a. An 8 -foot high decorative block wall shall be constructed along the northern boundary of the development plan to separate the residences of this development plan from the commercial properties to the north. b. The alternative street design with parkway should be used in this development. Street rights-of-way (R/W) and curb -to -curb (c -c) street widths shall be as follows: i. Elgin Avenue: 55' R/W; 34' c -c. ii. Ravenwood Way: 55' R/W; 34' c -c. iii. New north -south street parallel to Stockton Street: 1. Almond Drive to Ravenwood Way: 60' R/W; 39' c -c. 2. Ravenwood Way to Elgin Avenue: 50' R/W; 30' c -c. Res for =0101.doe iv. New north -south street parallel to Fawnhaven Way: 50' R/W; 30' c -c. c. Traffic calming measures should be provided in the form of bow -outs at the Elgin Avenue and Ravenwood Way intersections. d. The developer shall obtain an easement from the adjacent parcel owner to allow construction of the temporary turnaround south of Lots 17 and 18; or, the project layout shall be reconfigured to accommodate the required access and maneuvering room for fire protection equipment within the project boundaries using standard street designs. e. If this project is developed in phases, the following improvements shall be constructed with the first phase: i. All street and public utility improvements on Stockton Street and Almond Drive, including under grounding of existing overhead utilities and installation of a reverse frontage wall, landscaping and irrigation. ii. Traffic striping modifications in Stockton Street. f. Reverse frontage walls, landscaping and irrigation improvements are required on Stockton Street and Almond Drive and shall be constructed by the developer at the developer's expense to the approval of the Public Works Director and Community Development Director. The design of the wall shall be compatible with the existing reverse frontage walls on adjacent developments. The developer shall provide for on-going maintenance and replacement of the wall, landscaping and irrigation improvements using one of the options listed below as approved by the City Council on September 15, 1999: i. One-time, lump sum payment: The improvements shall be publicly owned and the developer shall make a lump sum prepayment to the City for on- going maintenance. The current fee is $49 per lineal foot. The fee required will be the fee in effect at the time of final map filing. ii. Homeowner's Association: The improvements shall be privately owned and the developer shall form a Homeowners Association, which will assess and collect fees from homeowners to pay for future maintenance costs. iii. Formation of a 1972 Act Landscape and Lighting District. Dated: October 10, 2001 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 01-?? was passed and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi at its meeting held on October 10, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: Res for-M0101.doc Secretary, Planning Commission Draft Minutes from October 10, 2001 PUBLIC HEARING The request of Concord Development Inc. & Allen Liu for approval of the Almond Wood Estates Property Growth Management Development Plan for 76 single-family residences at 1640 South Stockton Street, and a recommendation of approval to the City Council to award 76 building permit allocations. Associate Planner Meissner presented the matter to the Commission. This year the City had 432 building permits to allocate. Of the 432 permits, 281 were for single- family units. The subject project was the only one requesting allocations. The area of the Development Plan included three separate properties encompassing about 14.5 acres of land zoned R-2. The major access to the subdivision will be from South Stockton Street and Almond Drive. The subdivision would develop approximately 5.2 dwelling units per acre with an average lot size of 6,000 square feet. Proposed development will begin in early 2002. A few conditions for the project were a 7 -foot -high decorative masonry wall along Stockton and Almond Streets with a 15 -foot -deep landscaped area containing a meandering sidewalk, landscaped parkways, and bow -outs at the Elgin and Ravenwood intersections. An 8 -foot -tall decorative masonry block wall along the project northern boundary to separate the residences from the commercial area was also being required Staff was recommending approval of the project. Commissioner Heinitz asked about sewer and water services for the project. Community Development Director Bartlam replied the project would be connected to the existing water & sewer systems. The water supply will be addressed at the tentative map stage. Commissioner Phillips asked if Lodi Unified School District had any land reserved for a school site within the proposed project. Community Development Director Bartlam responded "no" but Richard's Ranch, which is located nearby, did have a school site. Hearing Opened to the Public Troy Wright, 2880 Tracy Blvd, Tracy, CA. Mr. Wright represented Concord Development. He was concerned about item 6 (d) on the Resolution regarding the construction of a temporary turnaround south of Lots 17 and 18. He wanted to speak with the adjacent property owner to the south to see if he could obtain an easement from them to allow the construction of the temporary turnaround. He asked if there were funds available for the wall being required between the residential development and the commercial business located next to the proposed project. Community Development Director Bartlam replied that the City would not subsides the wall that was being required. Commissioner Heinitz asked why the turnaround was being required on lots 17 & 19. Associate Planner Meissner stated that since the street was so short, the fire engines needed a place to turnaround. Curtis Jenkins, 1537 Fawnhaven Way, Lodi. Mr. Jenkins had no problem with the proposed project. He was concerned about a neighboring property that had been posted due to it being a potential fire hazard, yet the owner had done nothing. He mentioned that other surrounding vacant land needed to be cleaned up also. Commissioner McGladdery suggested that the Resolution require the turnaround only when homes are built on lots 16, 17, 18 & 19. Community Development Director Bartlam felt that the language could be modified on the Resolution to resolve the turnaround issue. The Planning Commission on motion of Commissioner McGladdery, Beckman second approved the request of Concord Development Inc. & Allen Liu for approval of the Almond Wood Estates Property Growth Management Development Plan for 76 single-family residences at 1640 South Stockton Street, and a recommendation of approval to the City Council to award 76 building permit allocations with added language to 6 (d) of the Resolution to read, "At the time lots 16, 17, 18, or 19 are developed, the developer shall obtain an easement from the adjacent parcel owner to allow construction of the temporary turnaround south of Lots 17 and 18; or, the project layout shall be reconfigured to accommodate the required access and maneuvering room for fire protection equipment within the project boundaries using standard street designs" by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: Beckman, Crabtree, Heinitz, McGladdery, and Phillips, NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: Mattheis ABSTAIN: Commissioners RESOLUTION NO. PC. 01- 27 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LODI APPROVING THE REQUEST OF CONCORD DEVELOPMENT, INC. & ALLEN LIU FOR THE ALMOND WOOD ESTATES PROPERTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT PLAN AT 1640 SOUTH STOCKTON STREET. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi has heretofore held a duly noticed meeting, as required by law, on the requested development plan to create the Almond Wood Estates Property Development Plan in accordance with City Ordinance number 1521; Resolution number 91- 170. WHEREAS, the project proponent is Concord Development, Inc. & Allen Liu, 158 Jackson Street, San Jose, CA 95112; WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the approval of this request have occurred; WHEREAS, the property is zoned R-2, Single -Family Residential; WHEREAS, the property is located at 1640 South Stockton Street (APN's 062-060-04,12 & 13). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FOUND, DETERMINED AND RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi as follows: 1. Negative Declaration File No. ND -01-06 has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines provided thereunder. 2. It is found that approval of the development plan will result in good planning practice. 3. It is hereby found that neither the design nor planned improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 4. It is hereby found that the development plan is unlikely to cause public health problems. 5. It is further found that approval of the development plan will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of the property within the proposed parcel. 6. Growth Management Application No. GM -01-001 is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: a. An 8 -foot high decorative block wall shall be constructed along the northern boundary of the development plan to separate the residences of this development plan from the commercial properties to the north. b. The alternative street design with parkway should be used in this development. Street rights-of-way (R/W) and curb -to -curb (c -c) street widths shall be as follows: i. Elgin Avenue: 55' R/W; 34' c -c. ii. Ravenwood Way: 55' R/W; 34' c -c. iii. New north -south street parallel to Stockton Street: 1. Almond Drive to Ravenwood Way: 60' R/W; 39' c -c. 2. Ravenwood Way to Elgin Avenue: 50' R/W; 30' c -c. Res0128.doc iv. New north -south street parallel to Fawnhaven Way: 50' R/W; 30' c -c. c. Traffic calming measures should be provided in the form of bow -outs at the Elgin Avenue and Ravenwood Way intersections. d. At the time lots 16, 17, 18, or 19 are developed, the developer shall obtain an easement from the adjacent parcel owner to allow construction of the temporary turnaround south of Lots 17 and 18; or, the project layout shall be reconfigured to accommodate the required access and maneuvering room for fire protection equipment within the project boundaries using standard street designs. e. If this project is developed in phases, the following improvements shall be constructed with the first phase: i. All street and public utility improvements on Stockton Street and Almond Drive, including under grounding of existing overhead utilities and installation of a reverse frontage wall, landscaping and irrigation. ii. Traffic striping modifications in Stockton Street. Reverse frontage walls, landscaping and irrigation improvements are required on Stockton Street and Almond Drive and shall be constructed by the developer at the developer's expense to the approval of the Public Works Director and Community Development Director. The design of the wall shall be compatible with the existing reverse frontage walls on adjacent developments. The developer shall provide for on-going maintenance and replacement of the wall, landscaping and irrigation improvements using one of the options listed below as approved by the City Council on September 15, 1999: i. One-time, lump sum payment: The improvements shall be publicly owned and the developer shall make a lump sum prepayment to the City for on- going maintenance. The current fee is $49 per lineal foot. The fee required will be the fee in effect at the time of final map filing. ii. Homeowner's Association: The improvements shall be privately owned and the developer shall form a Homeowners Association, which will assess and collect fees from homeowners to pay for future maintenance costs. iii. Formation of a 1972 Act Landscape and Lighting District. Dated: October 10, 2001 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 01-27 was passed and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi at its meeting held on October 10, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: Beckman, Heinitz, Phillips, McGladdery, and Crabtree NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: Mattheis ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: cretary, Plan ' mission Res0128.doc RESOLUTION NO. P.C. 01-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LODI RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE BUILDING PERMIT ALLOCATION SCHEDULE FOR 2001. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi has heretofore held a duly noticed meeting on the Growth Management Development Plan Allocation Schedule which includes Growth Management Application Numbers GM -01-001 & 2, in accordance with City Ordinance number 1521, and Resolution number 91-171. WHEREAS, the project areas are made up of the following properties: 1640 South Stockton Street & 1041 East Harney Lane. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the approval of this request have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi as follows: 1. Negative Declarations have been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines provided thereunder. Further, the Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in these Negative Declarations with respect to the projects identified in this Resolution. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council, approval of a resolution adopting the Building Permit Allocation Schedule 2001 as identified in this Resolution. Dated: October 10, 2001 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 01-28 was passed and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi at a regular meeting held on October 10, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: Beckman, Heinitz, Phillips, McGladdery, and Crabtree NOES: ABSENT: Mattheis ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Secretary, Planning Commission Res0129.doc STAFF RECOMMENDED BUILDING PERMIT ALLOCATION SCHEDULE 2001 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS TO BE ALLOCATED FOR 2001 = 432 ECOMMENDED PROJECT Il NOMAP UNITS E{ NO. UNITS INAL MAPI RECEIVED'89-'981ALLOCATIOATO COMPLEETELLOC.NEEDEDI ALLOC S 0 OI REQUETEDR AL C. 000 ALMOND WOOD ESTATES 0 I 0 0 74 74 74 01 01 01 74 1 74 1 74 * 731 allocations from expirations and unused allocations from previous years are available. IMEDIUM DENSITY 10%=337 UNITS* There are no projects to request the 43, year 2001 allocations for medium density units. * 294 allocations from expirations and unused allocations from previous years are available. HIGH DENSITY 25%=1,333 UNITS * There are no projects to request the 108, year 2001 allocations for high density units. * 1,225 Allocations from the previous years ('89-'00) are available. NOTE: Due to engineering delays, only one of the two expected development plans is being reviewed at this time. We expect to bring the Luckey/Lackyard Development Plan to the Planning Commission before the end of this year. RESOLUTION NO. 2002-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE 2001 GROWTH MANAGEMENT ALLOCATIONS BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lodi City Council does hereby approve the 2001 Growth Management Allocations as recommended by the Lodi Planning Commission, as shown as follows: Requested Recommended 2001 Allocations 2001 Allocations Almond Wood Estates 74 74 TOTAL Dated: January 2, 2002 74 74 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2002-04 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held January 2, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Hitchcock, Howard, Land, Nakanishi, and Mayor Pennino NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None SUSAN J. BLACKSTON City Clerk 2002-04 x CITY OF LORI NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Date: January 2, 2002 ` Carnegie Forum 305 West Pine Street, Lodi Time: 7:00 p.m. For information regarding this notice please contact: Susan J. Blackston City Clerk Telephone: (209) 333.6702 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, January 2, 2002 at the hour of 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the City Council will conduct a Public Hearing at the Carnegie Forum, 305 West Pine Street, Lodi, to consider the following matter: a) Planning Commission's recommendation that the City Council adopt the Growth Management Allocations. Information regarding this item may be obtained in the office of the Community Development Department Director, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California. All interested persons are invited to present their views and comments on this matter. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk at any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein, and oral statements may be made at said hearing. If you challenge the subject matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk, 221 West Pine Street, at or prior to the Public Hearing. By Order of the Lodi City Council: Susan J. Blackston City Clerk Dated: December 19, 2001 Approved as to form: �ea--,P�e Randall A. Hays City Attorney J:%CITYCLRKSFORMSWotcddplan2.doc 12/12/01 0 DECLARATION OF MAILING SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR JANUARY 2.2002 TO CONSIDER GROWTH MANAGEMENT ALLOCATIONS On December 20, 2001 in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, I deposited in the United States mail, envelopes with first-class postage prepaid thereon, containing a notification of public hearing to be held on January 2, 2002 regarding Growth Management Allocations, marked Exhibit "A"; said envelopes were addressed as is more particularly shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto. There is a regular daily communication by mail between the City of Lodi, California, and the places to which said envelopes were addressed. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on December 20, 2001, at Lodi, California. ORDERED BY: decmail/forms ORDERED BY: SUSAN BLACKSTON CITY CLERK, CITY OF LODI JENNIFER M. PERRIN DEPUTY CITY CLERK 1 ()--,ocl w- D O 1) 06205013;BACON, MELTON L & KATHERINE L ;11191 CALABASH AVE ;FONTANA ;CA;92336 2) 06206012; CONCORD DEVELOPMENT INC ;1637 CAMINO LINDO ;SOUTH PASADENA ;CA;91030 3) 06219022;NILSSEN, CATHY M TR ;612 NEVINS DR ;LODI ;CA;95242 4) 06219023;STEPHENS, ANDREW & MARGARET TR;2328 WINTERGREEN CT ;LODI ;CA;95242 5) 06233055;DAVIS, PATRICIA J ETAL ;1607 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 6) 06233090;BOWEN, CURT ETAL ;1641 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 7) 06206014;RUHL, WILBERT & R ;265 ALMOND DR ;LODI ;CA;95240 8) 06205012;ROUPPET, GARY E ;1581 S STOCKTON ST ;LODI ;CA;95240 9) 06205004;GAMBLIN, K DOUGLAS & R V TR ;3444 E JAHANT RD ;ACAMPO ;CA;95220 10) 06205011;WEISZ, BYRON L TR ETAL ;1615 S STOCKTON ST ;LODI ;CA;95240 11) 06206013;LIU, ALLEN H ;1637 CAMINO LINDO ;SOUTH PASADENA ;CA;91030 12) 06219004;SEVERSON, CLARENCE C & L ;11374 MICKIE GROVE ;LODI ;CA;95240 13) 06219017;MAXWELL PROPERTIES ;PMB 80 270 REDWOOD SHORES PKWY ;REDWOOD SHORES ;CA;94065 14) 06233 050; HERNANDEZ, GREGORY & JUTTA ;1635 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 15) 06233051; HICKEY, GARY G & PAULA ;1629 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 16) 06233052;MIRELES, GUSTAVO & MARIA M ;1623 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 17) 06233053;SINGH, HARPREET ;1617 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 18) 06233054;SISK, PHILLIP & TEENA ;1611 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 19) 06233056;ZAPARA, TERRY ETAL ;1601 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 20) 06233057;KEITHLEY, SCOTT & JENNIFER M ;1543 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 21) 06233058;JENKINS, CURTISS & EDYTHE M TR;1537 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 22) 06240001; HUGHES, GEORGE LLOYD & JANICE ;1529 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95242 23) 06240002;AKBAR, NOORUL ETAL ;134 SWAIN DR ;LODI ;CA;95240 24) 06240003;BARBA, LEANDRO JR & P ;2425 WOODLAKE CT ;LODI ;CA;95242 25) 06240004;YBARRA, ALBERT A & KRISTEN L ;1151 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 26) 06251003;KING VIDEO CABLE CO ;PO BOX 173838 ;DENVER ;CO;80217 1) 06205013;BACON, MELTON L & KATHERINE L ;11191 CALABASH AVE ;FONTANA ;CA;92336 2) 06206012; CONCORD DEVELOPMENT INC ;1637 CAMINO LINDO ;SOUTH PASADENA ;CA;91030 3) 06219022;NILSSEN, CATHY M TR ;612 NEVINS DR ;LODI ;CA;95242 4) 06219023;STEPHENS, ANDREW & MARGARET TR;2328 WINTERGREEN CT ;LODI ;CA;95242 5) 06233055;DAVIS, PATRICIA J ETAL ;1607 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 6) 06233090;BOWEN, CURT ETAL ;1641 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 7) 06206014;RUHL, WILBERT & R ;265 ALMOND DR ;LODI ;CA;95240 8) 06205012;ROUPPET, GARY E ;1581 S STOCKTON ST ;LODI ;CA;95240 9) 06205004;GAMBLIN, K DOUGLAS & R V TR ;3444 E JAHANT RD ;ACAMPO ;CA;95220 10) 06205011;WEISZ, BYRON L TR ETAL ;1615 S STOCKTON ST ;LODI ;CA;95240 11) 06206013;LIU, ALLEN H ;1637 CAMINO LINDO ;SOUTH PASADENA ;CA;91030 12) 06219004;SEVERSON, CLARENCE C & L ;11374 MICKIE GROVE ;LODI ;CA;95240 13) 06219017; MAXWELL PROPERTIES ;PMB 80 270 REDWOOD SHORES PKWY ;REDWOOD SHORES ;CA;94065 14) 06233 050; HERNANDEZ, GREGORY & JUTTA ;1635 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 15) 06233051; HICKEY, GARY G & PAULA ;1629 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 16) 06233052;MIRELES, GUSTAVO & MARIA M ;1623 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 17) 06233053;SINGH, HARPREET ;1617 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 18) 06233054;SISK, PHILLIP & TEENA ;1611 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 19) 06233056;ZAPARA, TERRY ETAL ;1601 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 20) 06233057;KEITHLEY, SCOTT & JENNIFER M ;1543 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 21) 06233058;JENKINS, CURTISS & EDYTHE M TR;1537 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 22) 06240001; HUGHES, GEORGE LLOYD & JANICE ;1529 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95242 23) 06240002;AKBAR, NOORUL ETAL ;134 SWAIN DR ;LODI ;CA;95240 24) 06240003;BARBA, LEANDRO JR & P ;2425 WOODLAKE CT ;LODI ;CA;95242 25) 06240004;YBARRA, ALBERT A & KRISTEN L ;1151 FAWNHAVEN WAY ;LODI ;CA;95240 26) 06251003;KING VIDEO CABLE CO ;PO BOX 173838 ;DENVER ;CO;80217