HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - October 19, 1994 (54)CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OCTOBER 19,1994
PETITION SUBMITTED REGARDING EAST SIDE IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE USING TOO
MUCH GOVERNMENT CONTROL
Ukhtar Khan. 439 Murray Street, Lodi, presented the City Clerk with a petition regarding
the Eastside Improvement Committee using too much govemment control„ including the
use of the Graffiti Abatement Ordinance, to gain access to private property to force people
to irnprove items other than graffiti. Mr. Khan also stated that Virginia Snyder had refused
to meet with Council Member Davenport regarding this matter.
Mayor Siegiock responded that he was very pleased with the work of Virginia Snyder and
the Eastside Improvement Committee in making Lodi a better place in which to live.
Council Member Mann responded that it was individuals, mostly neighbors, that brought
the suit against the property owner on Pine Street, not the committee. Further. Council
Member Pennino, urged Mr. Khan to meet with City Attomey McNatt to clarify any
misunderstandings that he may have.
FILE NO. CC -2(s). CC -6, CC -13 AND CC -16
PETITION TO MAYOR SEIGLOCK
OF LODI
We, the undersigned tax payers voice our concern over the east side task force with regards to
the possibility of too much government control. We feel Virginia Snider is unfair because she uses
the Graffiti Abatement Form to gain access to private property to force people to improve on
many things other than graffiti. The drive-in signed the same form to change graffiti but not to
really improve.
The drive-in and Virginia stand to gain thousands of dollars from disadvantaged property owners
in low income neighborhoods on the pretext of graffiti abatement of a so-called free service which
is untrue. Virginia Snider refused to meet with my elected councilman to discuss this so-called free
service which is an enigma.
We feel as a charity corporation Virginia has tried to match wits with people and has intimidated us
with a graffiti abatement form as the base of her existence. The city went from an "only respond to
a complaint" position to the position of a "predator," looking to pounce on taxpayers, using graffiti
abatement as a pretext to encounter people.
NAME
BUSINESS ADDRESS
.'1 Al A ,. +'C 1 y
• 7 1 '
J• -fir L/
( i' 7 3 % P 1 '-f' '-•"' -1 S 1- 6 ,.1 / '
�.�, f/7t . L •,,1. V?21/ri A.1/ii1<' 12/<i. !',•1G/
-
/ '� I %�',1 7 �—_�) �' !rte//i/i// r!J `, - /i ��� /i( .- . �, .. �- • �/-•, _� •/C7
_'/1,.A1,1I.1 J.,,1/v1 !"T'`1 1 C•t',1,. ,--,»tom► %li ‘,
/tiiI` .L'7 /1 ti H r� .4' 4 2# I.J,+Q 1 A i l r ,A cis ?:-4V
MUSuTAA /Z 1/fLA/ 1 /6 ' <r;eurn/ 4rIcAr C'A 9 5'u e
Sla1.15 t/1 N/ (1? 0 4 R‘_7:71' /c;' 2 1 / , :l)! — ? q /
1) .•
,1,
r
r
BLv cTint --(Ao
A LD T o F Re52 "1 � 111 e
1Pk-A lc V(RIN fH
4
G'iDvitpNlf M -r
\)\)6Ar\ CkA DA Jt() poDut
Q, (Q1--/ Re_ eALsoi75 et
o i cck ,i Co N<<L rt�►� 1 tAnyP
GIS moRe_I3ec1 7a coo/cap-m/4
i
poQQN poo- TlioN Dom 5 vii cop 4i/�
11/4)10Z s9 T�nE 2—(AP j.e
}}15 MI r! 1} AA/ D Re_01-Acic Fil\je- S 90-0
•
PETITION TO MAYOR SEIGLOCK
OF LODI
We, the undersigned tax payers voice our concern over the east side task force with regards to
the possibility of too much government control. We feel Virginia Snider is unfair because she uses
the Graffiti Abatement Form to gain access to private property to force people to improve on
many things other than graffiti. The drive-in signed the same form to change graffiti but not to
really improve.
The drive-in and Virginia stand to gain thousands of dollars from disadvantaged property owners
in low income neighborhoods on the pretext of graffiti abatement of a so-called free service which
is untrue. Virginia Snider refused to meet with my elected councilman to discuss this so-called free
service which is an enigma.
We feel as a charity corporation Virginia has tried to match wits with people and has intimidated us
with a graffiti abatement form as the base of her existence. The city went from an "only respond to
a complaint" position to the position of a "predator," looking to pounce on taxpayers, using graffiti
abatement as a pretext to encounter people.
NAME
c'.
1 . r
I tri %
I
A
r ,.
BUSINESS ADDRESS
/ 1�
1 , F� 1r
} rt 1•
PETITION TO MAYOR SEI LOCK
OF LODI'
We, the undersigned tax payers voice our concern over the east side task force with regards to
the possibility of too much government control. We feel Virginia Snider is unfair because she uses
the Graffiti Abatement Form to gain access to private property to force people to improve on
many things other than graffiti. The drive-in signed the same form to change graffiti but not to
really improte.
The drive-in and Virginia stand to gain thousands of dollars from disadvantaged property owners
in low income neighborhoods on the pretext of graffiti abatement of a so-called free service which
is untrue. Virginia Snider refused to meet with my elected councilman to discuss this so-called free
service which is an enigma.
We feel as a charity corporation Virginia has tried to match wits with people and has intimidated us
with a graffiti abatement form as the base of her existence. The city went from an "only respond to
a complaint" position to the position of a "predator," looking to pounce on taxpayers, using graffiti
abatement as a pretext to encounter people.
NAME
t4-tret.t4ra -J • z:-
1??A.4 ., u.-,
lcLi,� _Ri-J4'/
71At-t-A X30,�-t
BUSINESS ADDRESS
F Oe,'< 571.
e / 7 F n /G
Li3ci mt„., '
r�J
kitilkAr A ��� -1".�� ‘v-,\`\<<c,\l
,1.
„ _ 221j1./ (S14
CO
4';
cif), •C'4
(./4 ' S�•�o
• .i D -TV 6 L E .PIA U.ac r\i- L\. 1v\Ui 4C,v 51 . � +<X.i
6=7 Loii/
\\ Jr_1_Al A// K/ C)(:tc.tl.We/to -A 1 rc';a 4
PETITION TO MAYOR SEIGLOCK
OF LODI
We, the undersigned tax payers voice our concern over the east side task force with regards to
the possibility of too much government control. We feel Virginia Snider is unfair because she uses
the Graffiti Abatement Form to gain access to private property to force people to improve on
many things other than graffiti. The drive-in signed the same form to change graffiti but not to
really improve.
The drive-in and Virginia stand to gain thouse►ids of dollars from disadvantaged property owners
in low income neighborhoods on the pretext o. graffiti abatement of a so-called free service which
is untrue. Virginia Snider refused to meet with my elected councilman to discuss this so-called free
service which is an enigma.
We feel as a charity corporation Virginia has tried to match wits with people and has intimidated us
with a graffiti abatement form as the base of her existence. The city went from an "only respond to
a complaint" position to the position of a "predator," looking to pounce on taxpayers, using graffiti
abatement as a pretext to encounter people.
NAME
'L rr I
A1111/1 j 1, � • i
BUSINESS ADDRESS
/ • / , , / • • ! ( . ' / / 1
.i
/
• f
1_-,)- / / , /
I/Ji,h, ;! /I7/1!:
( •
1)1 f- 1
/. 1'f
I
✓/ ,
,c' i'.• // ,• / 1,.-,/,' N. \M it/l', r}i
•
i
i r :
'1 3
+- I
•
•
it r 71 'Y i ,i(
PETITION TO MAYOR SEIGLOCK
OF LODI
We, the undersigned tax payers voice our concern over the east side task force with regards to
the possibility of too much government control. We fee! Virginia Snider is unfair because she uses
the Graffiti Abatement Form to gain access to private property to force people to improve on
many things other than graffiti. The drive-in signed the same form to change graffiti but not to
really improve.
The drive-in and Virginia stand to gain thousands of dollars from disadvantaged property owners
in low income neighborhoods on the pretext of graffiti abatement of a so-called free service which
is untrue. Virginia Snider refused to meet with my elected councilman to discuss This so-called free
service which is an enigma.
We fee! as a charity corporation Virginia has tried to match wits with people and has intimidated us
with a graffiti abatement form as the base of her existence. The city went from an "only respond to
a complaint" position to the position of a 'predator," looking to pounce on taxpayers, using graffiti
abatement as a pretext to encounter people.
NAME
k//a AP 41(7
�-{ ,i.a f`
/ ,.�._UD
BUSINESS
•..'r-,.
ADDRESS
7- 7' 7 > l /� n % /fel / ()�
17VZ-,-1'71 44-71_•••Ic r ,y/- C. 7.--
,1t< 4c(i) 0- 1),.. /2),4-,.%-') cf.
TLr'4i i-1 �+ lj r % � i ,tel (71
( / '-
/ K L/ � )2 '
/ A l oCft f ; c. o
11 I _
PETITION TO MAYOR SEIGLOCK
OF LODI
We, the undersigned tax payers voice our concern over the east side task force with regards to
the possibility of too much government control. We feel Virginia Snider is unfair because she uses
the Graffiti Abatement Form to gain access to private property to force people to improve on
many things other than graffiti. The drive-in signed the same form to change graffiti but not to
really improve.
The drive-in and Virginia stand to gain thousands of dollars from disadvantaged property owners
in low income neighborhoods on the pretext of graffiti abatement of a so-called free service which
is untrue. Virginia Snider refused to meet with my elected councilman to discuss this so-called free
service which is an enigma.
We feel as a charity corporation Virginia has tried to match wits with people and has intimidated us
with a graffiti abatement form as the base of her existence. The city went from an "only respond to
a complaint" position to the position of a "predator," looking to pounce on taxpayers, using graffiti
abatement as a pretext :o encounter people.
J/J191.Vine 4'i. -
/./ 9,4
,4 . ?'
•
gx,,Gr
BUSINESS
CI 2 fc Lc /45-4/ ...i. A J
:1
5�Y
,, 9
-7
1-
34
ADDRESS
pit 1•t/ AGI/ `.
.��1 / .t 1
ot-
1, N/; /C r.:.4 /1.-
• •
/
,' / /-1,< / ', , • ,„/
(%
., t�A, A ..1"-
•
1"
%k?1//%7�
A
hl
L/ /47 /.R,A/
•
, <\
1— 2 A 9.
,
• PETITION TO MAYOR SEIGLOCK
OF LODI
We, the undersigned tax payers voice our concern over the east side task force with regards to
the possibility of too much government control. We feel Virginia Snider is unfair because she uses
the Graffiti Abatement Form to gain access to private property to force people to improve on
many things other than graffiti. The drive-in signed the same form to change graffiti but not to
really improve.
The drive-in and Virginia stand to gain thousands of dollars from disadvantaged property owners
in low income neighborhoods on the pretext of graffiti abatement of a so-called free service which
is untrue. Virginia Snider refused to meet with my elected councilman to discuss this so-called free
service which is an enigma.
We fee! as a charity corporation Virginia has tried to match wits with people and has intimidated us
with a graffiti abatement form as the base of her existence. The city went from an "only respond to
a complaint" position to the position of a "predator," looking to pounce on taxpayers, using graffiti
abatement as a pretext to encounter people.
1 NAME
.
BUSINESS ADDRESS
2_2 3 7- 1C r.. C &$-Y Leek,. t R , (71,7.Ja.1...-c= 412 ! '
'Vt?� , • l 47 - / tvd ' c'¢
5 it a� rfV 4 C /Z/E, s t /- . y,
y�
K ►� 11� i 11F5 k T , 14
A
M!‘:)P Lj ooD
i�Ary 4 T
J
•
- ' i4
Ica c 4 ,v) 4 )7.1_ 1 el A./ C fl r. 1 9 5114_c;
C L 11 f 1 C 1. - '( • `� a r. !.;1.- /
7 / / •/
� . /1
BVI f ,4ll/- r1 /-// ...
\(
-L-;c711•) 4:%
,4-11- :31.1ni(
S• ,.; • •- /4 ,., ,_ „�•
9 t` i
• :-/
111
• PETITION TO MAYOR SEIGLOCK
OF LODI
We, the undersigned tax payers voice our concern over the east side task force with regards to
the possibility of too much government control. We fee! Virginia Snider is unfair because she uses
the Graffiti Abatement Form to gain access to private property to force people to improve on
many things other than graffiti. The drive-in signed the same form to change graffiti but not to
really improve.
The drive-in and Virginia stand to gain thousands of dollars from disadvantaged property owners
in low income neighborhoods on the pretext of graffiti abatement of a so-called free service which
is untrue. Virginia Snider refused to meet with my elected councilman to discuss this so-called free
service which is an enigma.
We feel as a charity corporation Virginia has tried to match wits with people and has intimidated us
with a graffiti abatement form as the base of her existence. The city went from an "only respond to
a complaint" position to the position of a `predator," looking to pounce on taxpayers, using graffiti
abatement as a pretext to encounter people.
NAME
BUSINESS ADDRESS
fa A
11 r
10,
c� : i -J 1
��:' ( /
UJ.
t -j
/01 i 159 )01
i
PETITION TO MAYOR SEIGLOCK
OF LODI
We, the undersigned tax payers voice our concern over the east side task force with regards to
the possibility of too much government control. We feel Virginia Snider is unfair because she uses
the Graffiti Abatement Form to gain access to private property to force people to improve on
many things other than graffiti. The drive-in signed the same form to change graffiti but not to
really improve.
The drive-in and Virginia stand to gain thousands of dollars from disadvantaged property owners
in low income neighborhoods an the pretext of graffiti abatement of a so-called free service which
is untrue. Virginia Snider refused to meet with my elected councilman to discuss this so-called free
service which is an enigma.
We feel as a charity corporation Virginia has tried to match wits with people and has intimidated us
with a graffiti abatement form as the base of her existence. The city went from an "only respond to
a complaint" position to the position of a "predator," looking to pounce on taxpayers, using graffiti
abatement as a pretext to encounter people.
NAME
Fc.�rnwr.(.Zt
t1 -AC\ ;VA 1.4A2 t`\ 4 AN 611'l0
tV A S KI ` Al t- N 4 .ti \- (U
;L_ i1 \-k .; ' , ,\\,,
BUSINESS ADDRESS
V.1U,c 00,A \A<
it -7,,,& t /J,-/ 4 f.,ia:t4l
ti 7
; _,
f..j4 ' h 'I., `�iiG'.
i -?/
/'
t/ z
`.1 cxr.cc,:(4 Lr lcr�,
1
j
r' I ('r I L, ;I i -j
r
c`r, M wral
/