HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - October 5, 1994 (68)* Opp
CIN OF LODI
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
AGENDA TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider Planning Commission's Recommendation to approve the
following requests of Tory Piazza. Baumbach and Piazza, Inc. on Behalf of River
Pointe Partners (1) for a General Plan Amendment to Redesignate the Parcels at 1
and 11 West Turner Road (APN's 041-250-10 and 26) from HI, Heavy Industrial to
LDP, Low Density Residential; (2) to Rezone the Parcels at 1 and I 1 West Turner
Road (APN's 041-250-10 and 26) from M-2, Heavy Industrial to P -D, Planned
Development District and (3) to Certify the River Pointe Environmental Impact
Report as Adequate Environmental Documentation on the project.
MEETING DATE: October 5, 1994
PREPARED BY: Community Development Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: that the City Council conduct a Public Hearing to consider the Planning
Commission's recommendation to approve the following requests of
Terry Piazza, Baumbach and Piazza, Inc. on behalf of River Pointe
Partners:
1. for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate the parcels at 1 and 1 I West Turner Road (APN's
041-250-10 and 26) from HI, Heavy Industrial to LDR, Low Density Residential;
2. to rezone the parcels at 1 and 11 West Turner Road (APN's 041-250-10 and 26) from M-2, Heavy
Industrial to P -D, Planned Development District; and
3. to certify the River Pointc Final Environmental Impact Report as adequate environmental
documentation.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The proposed River Pointe project contains 44 single-family lots
on the north side of West Turner Road between the Rivergate
Subdivision and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way.
The site was formerly occupied by a winery and has been under redevelopment for some time. Besides a
diesel spill, the Environmental Impact Report discusses noise from the railroad, problems associated with
being adjacent to the Mokelumne River, and access from Turner Road.
The developers have reached agreement with Fish and Game and the State Lands Commission on
problems associated with the river.
The noise from trains will be mitigated by placing a sound wall on top of an engineered fill adjacent to the
railroad. The Southern Pacific Railroad Company has agreed to this solution as long as the developers
pay for the project.
dq
APPROVED.'
THOMAS A. PETERSON w,ustl o+wr
City Manager 00
CC.I
`�`$1'#}T.'S�'"+�r,: >•rat!•K:.nva -„yrs•- ,_. .... _ .. ... .�.. �, ...w._.. -.._.. ,. „,..,_. .�.. �rMr i...�^;�:a���”i�'.x�.'tK'"�•�"iv"'M"%��i�4"�.��a�,- j.Y`,
River Points Circle is proposed a a private, gated ural and the developers are hiring a Traffic F.q�eer
to mitigate any trate access problems.
If the City Council approves the above requests, River Pointe Partners wil present the Planning
Commission with a Tentative Subdivision Map. At the Tentative Map stags the State regairo and %r
public access to the Mokelumne River must be discussed and s sohition found. However, this itm is not
presently before the City Counc H.
FUNDING: Application. fees.
.Sc
' Development Director
JBS/ck
Attachments
i
'sem /7 '• +~~�1� ## "W
M•
3&717011FII
L
•fib
�•
j�
�t
ff}
_
i�
:f
1 if
Z1.4
.D
.
f
�
k
Slij
L
n
C:
MEMORANDUM, City of Lodi, Community Development Department
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: JULY 25, 1994
SUBJECT: FINDINGS OF APPROVAL FOR RIVER`POINTE SUBDIVISION
EIR
A. Environmental Impact - Riparian Habitat
The proposed project will encroach upon the riparian corridor of the Mokelumne
River. The loss of any riparian habitat would result in significant impacts to plant
and wildlife resources.
Proms Mifistations
That the applicant has agreed to leave the existing riparian habitat along the
Mokelumne River intact. All existing natural trees will be preserved, except
for any trees determined to be dead or dying. Native riparian shrubs will also
be maintained and any inappropriate plantings removed. The determination of
what plants remain or are removed will be made in consultation with the
Department of Fish and Game working with the City and the applicant.
2. It is also recommended that a buffer zone be created along the riparian corridor
that will retain the existing plants and will prohibit the future planting of plant
species that are not native to the riparian habitat. This buffer could extend
from the south bank of the river back as far as the edge of the proposed fill line
(elevation 50') of the project. A list of approved native plants that could be
planted in this area can be compiled by the City in cooperation with the
Department of Fish and Game or other qualified parties.
3. That the City accept the applicant's offer to donate fee title of a riparian habitat
located across the river from the proposed project. This parcel, located on the
north side of the river just east of the S.PP.R., is approximately 1.4 acre in size
and has a largely undisturbed growth of riparian trees and plants. The
Department of Fish and Game has examined the property and determined that
it is an excellent example of riparian habitat. In addition to the riparian area,
0
the applicant is offering an additional 50 -foot buffer sirip along the north side
to separate it from adjacent agricultural areas. The land can be held in a land
trust or other suitable instrument for the benefit of the public, At present the
area would be a scenic habitat and not open to the public.
Finding
The mitigations proposed are sufficient to offset any encroachment into the
riparian area adjacent to the Mokelumne River and the lack of public access
through the development. The dedication of the property on the north aide of the
Mokelumne River will provide a permanent area of high quality riparian habitat.
This area is largely undisturbed and is not heavily impacted by adjacent urban uses.
The quality of the plant life is high and because of its relatively isolated location,
the potential for wildlife habitat is also high.
B. Environmental Impact - Noise
The EIR found that train noise from the adjacent S.P.P.R would expose residents
of the project to levels of noise considered unacceptable for residential
development.
The applicant is proposing to construct an earthen embankment parallel to the
railroad track. The height of the embankment will vary but will be roughly
even with the railroad ballast and run the length of the project. At the point the
embankment crosses the project property line, the applicant is proposing to
construct an 8 -foot high solid masonr.v wall running parallel with the railroad
tracks. The top of the block wall will be on average approximately 20 feet
higher than the residential lots.
2. Design the proposed residences with the noise problem in mind. Keep east
facing windows and doors below the height of the soundwall. Use double or
triple pane windows on walls facing the tracks and keep houses to one story
where possible. Insulate all walls and caulk and seal all window and door
openings. Place bedrooms as far from the railroad tracks as possible.
Once the embankment and sound wall are complete and specific house
locations are determined, a new noise analysis should be required. The analysis
would determine the effectiveness of the sound wall and whether additional
measures are required. This should be done before any building permits are
issued.
Findin
The addition of the earthen embankment and the masonry sound wall will reduce
noise impacts from the S.P.P.R. to a less than significant level. The additional
requirement that a new noise analysis be done prior to issuance of any building
permits win also assure acceptable noise levels in the interiors of the proposed
residences.
C. Environmental Impact - Circulation.
The EIR suggests that the single point of access into the project from Turner Road
creates a potential safety and tnflic problem by limiting ingress and egress to the
project There also is concent agwessed about pedestrian safety for res
crossing Turner Road, particularly school children. Finally, there is concern that
onsite parking on the private street may not be sufficient to accommodate resident
and visitor parking requirements,
t" r000sed Mitiggtion
It is recommended that the developer be required to retain a qualified traffic
engineer to study these issues and incorporate their recommendations into the
development plan. a
Finding
The developer will retain a traffic engineer and incorporate their findings into the
development plan. This will reduce potential safety and circulation problems to an
acceptable level.
D. Environmental Impact - Flooding
The EIR points out that between S and 19 residential lots in the project are shown
within the 100 year flood zone. This would expose them to potential hazard from
a 100 year flood.
PropQsed Mitigation
The developer must elevate the lowest floor of any residential structure to 18
inches or more above the level of the base flood elevation. This can be achieved
by a combination regrading of the site to raise the building pads above the flood
elevation and increasing the foundation heights to place the finishede floors 18
inches above the base flood elevation. The developer will be required to provide
the City with survey map showing the elevation of every lots within the flood zone
prior to the issuance of any building permits.
Findin
The proposed mitigation will assure that all residences have finished floor
elevations at least 18 inches above the base flood elevation.
Environmental Impact
The site will have extensive grading and compaction work as a part of the
proposed project. There was extensive excavation done in prior years to remove
underground fuel tanks and contaminated soil. Much of this soil is piled around
the site.
As a part of the development a major earthen embankment will be built adjacent to
the S.P.P.it tracks to serve as a baste for the sound wall. Finally, the site will
require extensive grading to create proper flow lines and to raise portions of the
property above the flood zone line.
REMSCd Miti do
1. The developer shall retain an engineer to determine the design and stability of
the embankment and masonry wall along the railroad line. The engineer will
also inspect the work in progress to ensure its proper construction.
A soils report should also be done for all of the building lots to insure the
proper soil compaction prior to the construction of any residential structures.
m'
The proposed mitigation will assure the structural integrity of any earth work done
as a part of this development.
U
EXCERPTS FROM PLANNING SON MINE= OF AUGUST S. 1994
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Vice Chair Hitchcock opened the public hearing for the request of Terry Piazza, Baumbacb
Piazza, Inc. on behalf of River Pointe Partners for the following actions:
1. for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate the parcels at I and 11 West Turner Road frac
HI, Heavy lrrdustrial to IDR, Low Density Residential;
2. to rezone the parcels at 1 and 11 Weal Turner Road from M-2, Heavy Industrial to P -D,
Planned Development District; and
3. to recommend certification of the River Pointe Environmental Impact Report as adequate
environmental doctnrrrentatioo
Commuinity Development Director Schroeder introduced this matter for the Planning
Commission. Mr. Schroeder explained that the River Pointe project was submitted to the City
over two years ago at which time the City hired a consultant to prepare an environmental report
on the project. Following completion of the EIR, the applicant requested that the City hold off
further processing of the project until they could resolve certain issues identified by the EIR.
The applicants feel they have resolved these issues and are now asking that the City move
forward with the processing of the application. Mr. Schroeder went on to explain that the
proposal will occupy a 12.11 acre site located on the north side of Tuner Road, west of the
Southem Pacific railroad tracks. The site also backs onto the Mokelumne River which forms its
north boundary. Mr. Schroeder explained that the site had previously contained a winery facility
which was most recently owned by Italian Swiss Colony. The winery was vacant for a number
of years and was subsequently torn down and all structures removed from the property. The
applicants are requesting a change in General Plan designation from Industrial to Low Density
Residential to permit construction of a 44 -lot single-family residential which will be built
utilizing a private street system with a single access point to Turner Road. ,
Senior Planner Morimoto then briefly reviewed the environmental documents prepared for the
project. Mr. Morimoto explained that the City had retained the services of Kreines & Kreines
consulting firm to prepare an environmental impact report for the project. The EIR identified a
number of potential impacts resulting from the project. Most of these impacts, however, were
felt to be less than significant. The report identified five impacts which were considered
significant and would require some type of mitigation. The first impact was the encroachment
upon the riparian corridor of the Mokelumne River. There is a potential for loss of riparian
habitat which would result in significant impacts to plant and wildlife resources. Staff explained
that the applicants were proposing three mitigation measures for this potential impact. The first
was that the applicant leave the existing habitat along the Mokelumne River in tact. Because the
site has been heavily used as a winery, there is limited natural vegetation left on the site.
However, there are still a few trees and shrubs along the south bank of the river.
The second mitigation measure is the creation of a buffer zone along the riparian corridor that
will retain the existing plants and will prohibit the future planting of species that are not native
to the riparian habitat. Trois buffer could extend from the south bank of the river as far back as
the edge of the proposed fill line which is at elevation 50 feet of the project.
The third measure is that the City accept the applicants' offer to donate fee title of the riparian
habitat located across the river from the proposed project. This parcel, located on the north side
of the river just east of the Southern Pacific railroad tracks, is approximately 1.4 acres in size
•.+s y- .fir♦ _.. ..�.✓,ra�•o'•wy<.. ..,
and has a tamely undisturbed growth of trees and planta. The Deprutment of Fab dt Game has
examined the property and determined that it is an excelle t example of riparian habitat h
addition, tie applicant is also offaing a 504M buffer strip aloogthe march side of thus dparpm
area to separattx it from adjacent agricultural areas. This land will be held in a land trust or
other suitable inst=ve nt for tie bentAt of the public.
'Ilse Conunissm inquired about the width of the proposed buffer zone along the south side of the
river. Staffexplained than the width would vary but would average apprmdmd* 30 fed. This
would be the distance between the south bank of the river and the area being raised by grading to
bring it out of the flood ,one. The Planning Commission also had questions regarding the land
an the north side of the river which is being set aside as s riparian habitat. The Commission
asked who would own and maintain this area and if there would be access for maintenance.
Staff explained that the exact details of who would own and maintain the land has not been
worked out The City and the applicant are attempting to work with the State to find a suitable
organization to hold the land is public trust. This group would maintain the land as a sonic
easement, but it world not be open to the public for any type of active use. As far as access for
maintenance, the applicant owns the adjoining property to the north and indicated that he is
willing to allow an access easement through his property for the purpose of maintenance and
acct-rity.
The Community Development Director then read two letters, one fran the State Lards
Commission and the other from the State Fish k Game Department indicating that they are both
satisfied with the proposed mitigation n=wres and are willing to give their approval to the
proposed project.
The second significant environmental impact identified by the EIR i! the problem of noise. The
EIR found that train noise from the adjaa& Southern Pacific RR ieoad track would expose
residents of the project to levels of mise considered unacr^ptable for residential development.
Staff explained that $he applicants are proposing three mitigation measures. The first is to
construct an a arthcn embankment parallel to the railroad track. The height of the embankment
nt
will vary but will be roughly even with, Ow top of the railroad ballast. On top of this
embankment the applicants propose to constrict an 8 -foot high masonry block wall running the
entire length of the project. The top of the block wall will be: approximately 20 feet higher than
the reakWAial lots. Tdne block wall and the embanlancnt were designed to deflect some of the
train noise from the proposed project.
The second mitigation is tc,) specialty design residenccs that will be located adjacent to the
railroad track so that consideration will be gives: to all door and window openings which face the
railroad tracks. Also additional insulat:_.n and other sound deadening measures will be
incorporated into the design of the structures.
The third mitigation is to do a noise analysis of the proposed sound wall as well as the final
design and location of the houses in the project. The noise analysis will determine if the
proposed sound mitigating► r '.sures are adequate to reduce noise levels to an acceptable
residential level.
Th,e third enmroruncntal impact is the question of traffic circulation. The EIR suggests that the
sings point access into the project from Tthrnrr Road could create a potential safety and traffic
problem by limiting ingress and egress to the project. There was also concern about pedestrian
safety for people crossing from the project to the ether side of Turner Road where schools and
stores are located. The proposed mitigation is that the applicant hire a qualified traffic engineer
to prepare a detailed traffic analysis to determine if the current design of the project creates any
913
F
significant traffic hazards and if so what changes can be made to reduce the problem
Condminity Development Director Schroder indicated that Public Works Director Ronsloo
000aurned with this mitigation measure.
The fourth impact idandfied by the EIR was the potential for floodingon the project AW
Currently, a portion of the project site lies within the floodway of the Mokelumne River. The
Proposed m4gation is to elevate the lowest floor of any residential structure to 18 inches or
mese above the level of the base flood elevation. itis will be achicvW by a combination of
regrading the site to raise the building pads above the flood elevation and, in some canes,
increasing the foundation heights to place the finished floors IS inches above the base flood
elevation. The developer will be required to provide the City with a map sbowing the devadons
of every lel within the flood zone prior to issuance of any building permits.
The final awkomneatal impact is the issue of salt geology. The site has had extensive grading
and compaction work as a part of the proposed pmjccL There was extensive excavation done in
pries years to remove underground fed tanks and contaminated soil. In addition, the,applicant is
Proposing to construct a large earthen bank adjacent to the railroad trades as part of his noise .
mitigation measures. The proposed mitigations are twofold. First, the developer shall retain an
engineer to determine the design and stability of the earthen embankment and masonry wall
along the railroad tracks. The engineer will also inspect the work in progress to ensure its
proper construction. A soils report shall also be done for all of the building lots to ensure the
proper soil compaction prior to construction of any residential structures. Second, the applicant
must submit to the City a written report indicating that the property is free of any hazardous
waste or other soil contaminents in accordance with State and local regulations.
Senior Planner Morimoto indicated that based on the proposed mitigation measures developed by
the City and the applicant, it was felt that all of the significant impacts which may result from
the proposed project could be mitigated to a less than significant level.
Commissioner Schmidt inquired about the noise reduction measures. He wondered if the
construction of the block wall would in fact decrease noise levels on the adjacent properties.
Staff indicated that while the block wail would not eliminate the train noise, it would at least
deflect or reduce the level of noise to an acceptable level on the subject property. He explained
the reason the City is recommending that a noise analysis be done on the wall design is to make
sure the wall would actually achieve the desired purpose.
There being no further questions, Vice Chair Hitchcock opened the hearing to the public and
asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak on this matter. Coming forward to speak was
Terry Piazza, Baumbach & Piazza, Inc. Mr. Piazza stated that he and his clients agreed with
the mitigations outlined by staff and the EIR. He indicated that as part of the EIR they have
already done a noise analysis and the proposed earthucn berm and block wall are a result of the
noise study. He also stated that they are willing to do a traffic study if necessary. However,
they fact that the project would not create any adverse traffic problems.
'lire next speaker was Richard Thorpe. Mr. Thorpe stated he is one of the partners in the project
and that he and his partners have been working for several years to resolve some of the issues
involved with this property. He explained that one of the major hurdles was the contamination
of the soil with diesel fuel from the previous winery operation. He stated getting the
contaminated soil removed and getting the property certified as being free of contaminants has
been a long time consuming process. In response to a previous question, Mr. Thorpe stated that
he would be willing to provide administrative access to whatever party or agency takes control
of the riparian habitat area on the nor f, side of the river. He stated that this access will be
provided once the project is approved. Ha added float be is c urreatly worlds g with the
Department of Fish A game and the State Loads Caaantmion to esW)M some typeof
conservancy to own and nein the riparisn habitat property. Details of this agreement ban
not been worked out, but will be completed when the project is approved.
The next speaker was Gema Tupper,1041 Awani Drive. Mr. Tupper said he was eoace:rred
about the appearance of the proposed sound wap from the east side of the railroad tracks where
he lives. He drought the appearance could be improved by the planting of troy or shmbe on
both sides of the wap to reduce its visual impact. He also added that he did not fed the sound
wan would create any noise problems for residents an the east side of the railroad tracks.
The next speaker was Tom Murphy, 1142 Rivergate Drive. Mr. Murphy indicated be represents
two of the homeowners associations lowed in the RiveWw MdWumne subdivision. He stated
that the residents aro generally in favor of the project and would like to see the property
developed as a residential project as opposed to a commercial or industrial development. The
two areas of potential nonce-- to the Rivergate residents at the iocatien of the proposed sEreet
access into the project adjacent to three of the lots on Ri-twgm Place. He was of the opinion
that if the street could be moved further to the east or that a block wap could be constructed
along the common property line, this would help reduce any potential now problems. His
second concern was the drainage on the property. He stated that currently the River Pointe
property is approximately two feet higher than the lots in the Rivergate subdivision and some
water runs off onto the adjoining properties. He requested that some measure be taken to be
sure that once the River Pointe property is developed that the drainage be kept on-site and be
directed toward City stem drains.
There being no one else wishing to speak on this matter, Vice Chair Hitchcock closed the hearing
to the public. Following some additional discussion the Planning Commission, on a motion by
Commissioner McGladdery, second by Commissioner Marzolf, unanimously approved the
following actions:
1. a General Plan Amendment to redesignate the parcels at i and I I West Turner Road from
W, Heavy Industrial, to R -LD, Residential, Low Density;
2. to rezone the parcels at I and 11 West Turner Road from M-2, Heavy Industrial, to P -D,
Planned Development; and
3. to recommend certification of the River Pointe Environmental Impact Report as adequate
environmental documentation and to include the mitigation measures outlined by the draft, final
and supplemental EIR's as part of the conditions for approval.
0
ORDINANCE NO. 1599
AN ORDINANCE OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL
MENDING THE LAND USB ELUBW OF THE LODI GBNBRAL PLAN by
REDESIGNATINd THE PARCELS LOCATED AT 1 AND it WEST TURNER ROAD
(AM's 041-250-10 and 26) FROM HI, HSAVr INDUSTRIAL. TO
TO LDR, LOW DENSITY RESIDSNTIAL
(RIVER POINTS PROJECT)
f!!f!!f/lffiiiiiiififffilff iffffit/fiflfifif!!lffifflf!!lifflfff lfflf if
BS Ir ORDAINED BY THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AS FOLIA MS:
SECTION is. The Land Use Element of the Lodi General Pian is hereby
amended by redesignatingthe parcels located at 1 and 11 West Tumor
Road (APN's 041-2S0-10 and. 26) from HI, Heavy industrial to LDR, Low
Density Residential, as shown on the Vicinity leap, on file in the
office of the Lodi City Clerk.
ancTIOp a„+ All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith
are repealed insofar as such conflict may exist.
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be published one time in the "Lodi
pews Sentinel", a daily newspaper of general circulation printed and
published in the City of Lodi and shall be in force and take effect
thirty days from and after its passage and approval.
Attest:
JENNIFER M. PERRIN
City Clerk
Approved this day of October, 1994
JACK A. SIEGLOCK
Mayor
-1-
� +,;►Ec�S.Yv.-.......-.....�*...-m..�.r..:�s.... '-+'�3h:;.^'Y.*p'7GiE.: .N' t,�.=.yt'`p4�'C -^:i��'".�2.4'`d•'":'-,.tr�
State of California
County of San Joaquin, on.
1, Jennifer M. Perrin, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby
certify that Ordinance No. 1599 was introduced at a regular meeting of
the City Council of the City of Lodi held October 5, 1994 and was
thereafter passed, adopted and ordered to print at a regular meeting of
said Council held , 1994 by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members -
Noes: Counci.L Members -
Absent: Council Members -
Abstain: Council Members -
I further certify that Ordinance No. 1599 was approved and signed by
the Mayor on the date of its passage and the same has been published
pursuant to law.
Approved as to Form
BOSSY W. McNATT
City Attorney
1W11
JENNIFER M. PERRIN
City Clerk
fix" a..... ._•.,_..-..........,�.�..,...�.......-........nr�..--•wr � O.�z:illt�*:vlz
ORDINANCE 90. 1600
!!!!!lififf!! !!i!!
AN ORDINANCE OF THS LODI CITY COUNCIL
MWING THR OFFICIAL DISTRICT NAP OF THE CITY OF LORI
AND THRRIIBY RZZONING THE PARCELS L0CATRD AT 1 AND 11 NIST TM= ROAD
(APN's 041-250-10 AND 26) FROM M-2, HEAVr INDUSTRIAL TO P -D,
PLUUW DEVZLOPMENT DISTRICT
(RIVER POINTS PROJECT)
BE IT ORDAINZD BY THS LORI CITY COGNCIL AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Official District Map of the City of Lodi adopted by
Title 17 of the Lodi Municipal code is hereby amended as follows:
The parcels located at 1 and 11 West Turner Road (APR's 041-250-10 and
26) are hereby rezoned from M-2, Heavy Industrial to P -D, Planned
Development District, as shown shorn on vicinity map on file in the
office of the City Clerk.
SECTION 2. The above-described rezoning shall be conditioned upon the
signing by the developer and/or owner of said parcels prior to the
effective date hereof, of an agreement with Lodi Unified School
District for the provision of school facilities funding. Failure to
execute such agreement shall delete the parcel(s) subject thereto from
the effects of this ordinance.
SZCTIOIi 3- The alterations, changes, and amendments of said official
District Map of the City of Lodi herein set forth have been approved by
the City Planning Commission and by the City Council of this City after
public hearings held in conformance with provisions of Title 17 of the
-1-
Lodi Municipal Code and the law of the State of California applicable
thereto.
SBCPION 4. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict
herewith are repealed insofar as such conflict may exist.
SSCPION S. This ordinance shall be published one time in the "Lodi
News Sentinel", a daily newspaper of general circulation printed and
published in the City of Lodi and shall be in force and take effect
thirty days from and after its passage and approval.
Approved this 5th day of October 1994
JACK A. SINGID K
Mayor
Attest:
JBNNIPHR M. PERRIN
City Clerk
State of California
County of San Joaquin, ss.
I, Jennifer M. Perrin, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby
certify that Ordinance No. 1600 was introduced at a regular meeting of
the City Council of the City of Lodi held October 5, 1994 and was
thereafter passed, adopted and ordered to print at a regular meeting of
said Council held , 1994 by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members
Noes: Council Members
Absent: Council Members -
Abstain: Council Members -
-Z-
.i}!�F[RO��'.Y
U
k
I further certify that Ordinance no. 1600 was approved and signed by
the Mayor an the date of its passage and the same has been published
pursuant to law.
Approved as to Form
--- -
-;P
BOBBY W. Mdu=
City Attorney
ORD1600/TXTA.0IV
-3-
JBIQ FER M. PSRRIM
City Clerk
. -.. ?" 1';•rx ,, .--. r -^•.—.•^ .+.�+n'�V!.+:r•..env-.n. e.�.....,......._...�,.. �,,,«ur..ae.+wsv....h:nve..a: tYtY:.•r.+Yi�:'S+.Sr'.a^':
• CITY OPLOID1
Carnegie Forum
305 West Pine Street, Lodi
NOTIMOF PUBLIC HEARING
Date: October 5, 1994
Time: 7:00 p.m.
For infonnatieon regarding this notice please contact
Jennifer M. Perrin
City Clerk
Telephone: (209) 3334702
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, October 5, 1994 at the hour of
7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the City Council will conduct
a Public Hearing to consider the following matter.
a) The Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the following
requests of Terry Piazza, Baumbach & Piazza, Inc. on behalf of River
Pointe Partners:
1) for a General Plan amendment to redesignate the parcels
at 1 and 11 West Turner Road (APN 041-250-10 and 26) from
HI, Heavy industrial, to LDR, Low Density Residential;
2) to rezone the parcels at 1 and 11 West Turner Road (APN's 041-
250-10 and 26) from M-2, Heavy Industrial, to P -D, Planned
Development District; and
3) to certify the River Pointe Environmental Impact Report as
adequate environmental documentation
Information regarding this item may be obtained in the office of the Community
Development Director at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California. All interested persons
are invited to present their views and ccmments on this matter. Written statements may
be filed with the City Clerk at any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein, and oral
statements may be made at said hearing.
If you challenge the subject matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing described in this notice or in
written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk, 221 West Pine Street, at or prior to the
Public Hearing.
By Order of the Lodi
(City
Council:
J fifer *.n
C" Clerk
Dsted: August 17,1994
Ap ed as to :
G�
Bobby W. McNatt
J %CfTYCLRXW0AMSWOTX:E DOC SMSM
•
DECLARATION OF MAILING
F]
On August 18, 1994 in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, I
deposited in the United States mail, envelopes with first-class postage,
prepaid thereon, containing a copy of the notice attached hereto, marked
Exhibit W; said envelopes were addressed as is more particularly shown
on Exhibit "H" attached hereto.
There is a regular daily communication by mail between the City of Lodi,
California, and the places to which said envelopes were addressed.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on August 18, 1994, at Lodi, California.
Jennifer K. Perrin
City Clerk
J
qu ine L. T to
uty City Cler
1
� � n
DSC#01/TXTA. V=
,,�+rmrsew�vM•-• .,.. s.,: •n•,�*.. �t, s>u:�:c•q.�+wtwy,%,Y ?;`�A`.
h
1/ i
NW 1
oil
l
�.
v
W
I
a
u
n
x
�
,
�
11110,
v
1%
4.
i
r
`Y
0
v
cf:
IL
b
W
q,
.3.
`
xZZv
0.�
.►
i
>Sw
V
^
fX
L
M
i
P
•.
�
V
1
1
I
CO
J
Z
e
w
V
J
D
G
J
v
a
b
�•
-
•
us
r
1C
rd
IZ
,
'
knA
1
V
Nrl
L
J
C
!
AS
S
J
..j
C•!
-,
L
J
t.�
r
�
J
J
0
Z
C
Q
LU
D
CL
V
•£40W
mw
to
W
L6
t
C
•
NN
•.
v
r.
C
a
7E
�
I^