HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - September 15, 1994 (10)CI'T'Y OF LORI
w
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
AGENDA TITLE: Contract Award for Emerson Park and Lawrence Park Restroom Facilities
($97,352)
MEETING DATE: September 15, 1994
PREPARED BY: Public Works Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council adopt the attached resolution awarding the contract
for the above project to Restroom Facilities, Inc. of Reno, Nevada, in the
amount of $97.352.00, and transfer $7,056.00 from completed
Community Development Block Grant projects and $4,000.00 from the
Parks and Recreation Department's Capital Improvement Project Fund to complete this project
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Community Development Block Grant Funds have been
appropriated to replace the existing restrooms at Emerson Park
and Lawrence Park.
The Emerson Park restroom will be placed in the same location as the exis.ing restroom; at
Lawrence Park, the new restroom will be located closer to Calaveras Street. The Parks and Recreation
Department will demolish the existing restrooms at both locations. The new restroom at Emerson Park
will be equipped with a toilet and a urinal on the men's side and two toilets on the women's side of the
restroom. Lawrence Park's restroom will be built with one toilet for the men and one toilet for the
women.
The specifications for this project require pre-engineered and pre -manufactured buildings. This will
allow the new restrooms to be installed more quickly and decrease the amount of material stockpiled in
the parks during the construction period.
Pians and specifications for this project were originally approved on June 1, 1994. On July 20, 1994,
Council rejected all bids received and authorized rebidding the project The City received the following
five bids for this project on August 24, 1994:
Bidder
Location
Bid
Engineer's Estimate
$ 94,600.00
Brad Clark Construction
Lodi
$ 73,428.00
DJ Construction
San Jose
$ 92,550.00
Restroom Facilities
Reno, Nevada
$ 96,892.00
Diede Construction
Woodbridge
$ " 19,902.00
EFGC
Stockton
$ 120,000.50
APPROVED �J
THOMAS A. PETERSON ecyciee paper
Crty Manager 00
CAWAgO.DOC
976
R?"a,E
Contract Award for Emerson Park Lawrence Park Restroom Facilities ''" 7,352)
September 15, 1994
Page 2
The first two bids on this project did not meet the requirements of the spec cadons and ars
unacceptable. The third bidder, Restroom Facilities, Inc., is being recommended for the contract award.
Insufficient money has been appropriated to cover all the costs for this project Based on discussions
with the Community Development Department and the Parks and Recreation Department, it is
recommended that $11,056.00 be transferred from the following accounts:
Blakely Park Restroom Remodel (45.5-760.52) $ 3,685.00
Eastside Lighting Program (45.7-503.11) $ 3,368.00
Parks and Recreation Department Capital Improvement Project Fund $ 4,000.00
The Blakely Park Restroom Remodel and the Eastside Lighting Program projects are completed
Community Development Black Grant projects. The money remaining in the Parks and Recreation
Department's Capital Improvement Project Fund is sufficient to cover the costs for these projects.
FUNDING: Originally Budgeted: 1993/94
Budgeted Fund: Community Development Block Grant Fund
Current Appropriation: $100,266.00
Total Project Estimate: $111,322.00
Bid Opening Date: August 24, 1994
1J o:/i
Jack L. Ronsko
Public Works Director
Prepared by Wesley K Fujitani, Senior Civil Engineer
JLR/WKFBm
Attachment
cc: City Attorney
Purchasing Officer
Parks and Recreation Director
Community Development Block Grant Coordinator
D. J. Construction
CAWARD.Doc
RESOLUTION NO. 94-108
z:sats:sassszaasa====
A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL
AWARDING THE BID FOR EMERSON PARK AND LAWRENCE PARK
RESTROOM FACILITIES
saasaasaaasaaaaxasssaaaaaszssasazsasssaasaaax=sasasazzzaszsaz=saaazassz
WHEREAS, in answer to notice duly published in accordance with
law and the order of this City Council, sealed bids were received and
publicly opened on August 24, 1994 at 11:00 a.m. for the bid for
Emerson Park and Lawrence Park Restroom Facilities, described in the
specifications therefor approved by the City Council on June 1, 1994;
and
WHEREAS, said bids have been compared, checked, and tabulated and
a report thereof filed with the City Manager as follows:
Bidder wa ion Bid
Engineer's Estimate $ 94,600.00
Brad Clark Construction Lodi $ 73,428.00
DJ Construction San Jose $ 92,550.00
Restroom Facilities Reno, Nevada $ 96,892.00
Diede Construction Woodbridge $119,902.00
EFGC Stockton $120,000.50
WHEREAS, the City Manager recommends that award of the bid for
Emerson Park and Lawrence Park Restroom Facilities be made to the lowest
responsible bidder, Restroom Facilities, Inc. of Reno, Nevada;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Lodi City Council that
award of bid for Emerson Park and Lawrence Park Restroom Facilities be
and the same is hereby awarded to Restroom Facilities, Inc. of Reno,
Nevada, the lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of $97,352.00; and
BE 1T FURTHER RESOLVED that $7,056.00 be transferred from
completed Community Development Block Grant projects and $4,000.00 from
the Parks & Recreation Department's Capital Improvement Project Fund to
complete this project.
Dated: September 15, 1994
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 94-108 was passed and
adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a special meeting
held September 15, 1994 by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members - Mann, Pennino, Snider and
Sieglock (Mayor)
Noes: Council Members - Davenport
Absent: Council Members - None
fifer Perrin
City Cler
94-108
,RECIAL ALLOCATION REQUEST �.
TO: FINANCE DIRECTOR
CITY MANAGER DATE: September 15, 1994
FROM: CITY CLERK ACCOUNT NUMBER: 45.8-760.64500 $7,056.73
121.0-760.64500 $4,000.00
Request is made for funds to accomplish the following project which was not included in the
current budget.
Description of Proiect Estimated Cost
Emerson Park & Lawrence Park Restroom FacTties
$11,056.73
This special allocation, which was approved by the City Council at
its meeting of September 15, 1994, transfers funds from completed
Community Development Block Grant projects and appropriates $4,000
from the Parks and Recreation Department's Capital Improvement Project Fund.
The funds to be transferred are from the following completed projects:
Blakely Park Restrooms (45.5-760.52)
Eastside Street Lighting (45.7-503.11)
Date of Approval
Council
Current Budget
$3,688.43
3,368.30
Je for M. T rin
City Clerk
(If you need more space, use additional sheet and attach to this form.)
Amount Approved
City Manager
FUND OR ACCOUNT TO BE CHARGED
$ Prior Year Reserve
Contingent Fund $
Capital Outlay Reserve $
Utility Outlay Reserve $
45.5-760.52 $3,688.43
45.7-503.11 $3,368.30
x lynn, Fina&eirec o "
General Fund Surplus
S
S
Reimbursable Account S
Other: (Specify)
121.2 Fund $4,000
Account Number
A<(
Thomas A. Peterson, City Manager
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submit this form in duplicate to t:ie Finance Director. Distrit-ition after approval will be as follows:
1) Originating Department 2) Finance Department
PRKRSTRM. DOC
CITY COUNCIL
)ACK A SIECLOCK. Mayor
STEPHEN I MA\y
Mavor Pro Tempore
RAY G. DAVENPORT
PHILLIP A. PENNINO
JOHN R. (Raridv) SNIDER
D J Construction
1330 S. Bascom Ave., #A
San Jose, CA 95128
CITY OF LODI
CITY HAIL, 221 WEST PINE STREET
P O SOX 30()6
LOOT. CALIFORNIA 95241.1911)
(209) 334.5634
F 4%QVIt II16,4;
September 9, 1994
THOMAS PETERSON
City ManaKer
JENNIFER M PERRIN
Gtr Clerk
ROR McNATT
Gtv Attornev
SUBJECT: Contract Award for Emerson Park and Lawrence Park Restroom FacirMes
Enclosed is a copy of background information on an item that is on the City Council agenda for
the special meeting of Thursday. September 15, 1994, at 7 a.m. The meeting will be held in
the City Council Chamber, Camegie Forum, 305 West Pine Street.
TI- 's item is on the consent calendar and is usually not discussed unless a Council Member
requests discussion. The public is given an opportunity to address items on the consent
calendar at the appropriate time.
If you wish to write to the City Council, please address your letter to City Council, City of Lodi,
P. O. Box 3006, Lodi, California, 95241-1910. Be sure to allow time for the mail. Or, you may
hand -deliver the letter to City Hall, 221 West Pine Street.
If you wish to address the Council at the Council meeting, be sure to fill out a speakers card
(available at the Carnegie Forum immediately prior to me start of the meeting) and give it to
the City Clerk. If you have any questions about communicating with the Council, please
contact Jennifer Perrin, City Clerk, at (209) 333-6702.
If you have any questions about pie item itself, please call Wes Fujitani. Senior Civil Engineer,
at (209) 333-6706.
�
-ID.
, kA," (I
Jack L. Ronsko
Public Works Director
JLR/lm /
Enclosure
cc: City Clerk
NCAWARO.DCC
CITY COUNCIL
JACK A. SIECLOCK .Mayor
STEPHEN I. MANN
Mayor Pro Tempore
RAY C. DAVENPORT
PHILLIP A PENNI%O
JOHN R tRandy) SNIDER
CITY OF LODI
Restroom Facilities
120 Woodland Ave., Unit E
Reno, NV 89523
CITY HALL. 221 NEST PINE STREET
PO BOX 300b
LODI. CALIFOR`1A 95231.1910
(209) 333-5633
tAx1200- ttt-n7o>
September 9, 1994
THOMAS A PETER;ON
City Manager
JENNIFER M, PERRIN
Ctty Clerk
BOB ,WNATT
City Attorney
SUBJECT: Contract Award for Emerson Park and Lawrence Park Restroom Facilities
Enclosed is a copy of background information on an item that is on the City Council agenda for
the special meeting of Thursday, September 15, 1994, at 7 a.m. The meeting will be held in
the City Council Chamber, Carnegie Forum, 305 West Pine Street.
This item is on the consent calendar and is usually not discussed unless a Council Member
requests discussion. The public is given an opportunity to address items on the consent
calendar at the appropriate time.
If you wish to write to the City Council, please address your letter to City Council, City of Lodi,
P. O. Box 3006, Lodi, Califomia, 95241-1910. Be sure to allow time for the mail. Or, you may
hand -deliver the letter to City Hall, 221 West Pire Street.
If you wish to address the Council at the Council meeting, be sure to fill out a speaker's card
(available at the Carnegie Forum immediately prior to the start of the meeting) and give it to
the City Clerk. If you have any questions about communicating with the Council, please
contact Jennifer Perrin, City Cleric, at (209) 333-6702.
If you have any questions about the item itself, please call Wes Fujitani, Senior Civil Engineer,
at (209) 333-6706.
Ja .Ronsko
Public Works Director
JLRAm
Enclosure /
cc: City Clerk
NCAwARD.DCC
CITY COUNCIL
JACK A StECLOCK. Mayor
STEPH N I MANN
Mavor Pr; tempore
RAY G- DAVENPORT
P1111LIP A PENNINO
JOHN R (Randv) SNIDER
August 26, 1994
CITY OF LODI
CITY HALL. 221 WEST PINE STREET
P O BOX 3006
tODI. (CALIFORNIA 95241-1910
{2091333-5634
FA\ (.Wh 111 6795
Mr. Brad Clark
Brad Clark Construction
1771 LeBec Court
Lodi CA 95240
THOMAS A PETERSON
City Manager
IINNIFER M PERRIN
Crty Cirri
HOB McNATT
C dv Attorney
Re: City of Lodi Bid: Emerson & Lawrence Parks Restroom Facilities
Dear Mr. Clark:
Regarding the bid you submitted for the Emerson and Lawrence Parks
Restroom Facilities, and your request for relief, our options insofar
as immediate return of bid security are extremely limited.
State law indicates that "A bidder shall not be relieved of the bid
unless by consent of the awarding authority nor shall any change be
made in the bid because of mistake, but the bidder may bring an action
against the public entity in a court... in the county in which the bids
were opened..." (California Public Contracts Code Section 5101)
However, staff will be recommending to the City Council (the City's
awarding authority) that your bid be rejected because of failure to
include required drawings with your proposal. Upon formal rejection by
the City Council at their next meeting, Wednesday, September 7, we can
return your bid deposit. It is possible (but not likely) that the
Council will override staff's recommendation and award the contract to
you. In that event, the bid deposit would be retained until the
contract was signed.
In order to protect your rights to recover your bid deposit where a
mistake was made in preparing your bid, you must write to the City (you
may address your letter to me) no later than Monday, August 29, 1994.
In the letter, you should specify in, detail how the mistake occurred,
that the mistake made the bid materially different than you intended it
to be, and that the mistake was made in filling out the bid and not due
to error in judgment or to carelessness in inspecting the site of the
work, or in reading the plans or specifications.
Consequently, we're not able to return your bid deposit until after the
City Council has taken formal action, that is, formally rejected your
bid, or formally awarded the contract to you, and the contract has been
signed.
August 26, 1994
Mr. Brad Clark
Page 2
An option you may wish to consider, should immediate cash flow become a
serious concern for you, is to obtain a Bid Bond (the cost is typically.
1% to 3% of the bid amount). We would then return your bid deposit in
exchange for the bond, and bid security requirements would still be met.
I'm also sending copies of the California Public Contract Code sections
which apply to this matter, for your review.
If you have questions, you may call me at 333-6777 (I will be out of
the office on Monday, August 29, but will return on Tuesday), or the
City Attorney, at 333-6701.
Sincerely,
oel E. Harris
Purchasing Officer
City of Lodi
(209) 333-6777
FAX (209) 333-6791
cc: City Attorney
City Engineer
encl: Sections 5100- 5106, State Public Contracts Code
RELIEF OF BIDDERS § 5101
Pt. 1
Section
5102
Complaint; summons.
5103.
Grounds for relief.
5104.
No claim, other than notice, required to be filed.
A.
'°� .�l
5105.
Prohibition against further bidding on project.��.`
5106.
Award of contract to second or third lowest bidder.
5107.
Preference to actions under this chapter.
5108.
Applicability of chapter.
; :, ,•-,
Chapter S was added by Stat&1982, G 445, 1805, Q 2.
*�<
p.
Cron References
State Contract Act, relief of bidders, see § 10200.
§ 5100. Definitions
(a) "Public entity" means the state, Regents of the University of
California, a county, city and county, Mty, district, public authority, , ..
public agency, and any other political subdivision or public corporation in p
the state.
(b) "Bid" means any proposal submitted to a public entity in comped-
tive bidding for the construction, alteration, repair, or improvement of
any structure, building, road or other improvement of any kind.
(Added by Stats.1982. c. 435, p. 1803, § 2.)
Historical Note
Derivation: Gov.C. former § 4200, added
by Stats. 19711. c. 1584, p. 3195. § 2.
Cross References
Public entity defined. see § 1100.
Library References
Words and Phrases (Perm. Ed.)
§ 5101. Consent to relief by awarding authority; action for recov.
ery of amount forfeited; costs and attorneys' fees upon
failure of plaintiff to recover judgment; report doc.
umenting grounds for relief because of mistake
Text of section effective Jan. 1, 1986.
(a) A bidder shall not be relieved of the bid unless by consent of the
awarding authority nor shall any change be made in the bid because of
mistake. but the bidder may bring an action against the public entity in a
court of competent jurisdiction in the county in which the bids were
7
§ 5101 ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
Div. 2
opened for the recovery of the amount forfeited, without interest or
costs. If the plaintiff fans to recover judgment, the plaintiff shall pay
all costs incurred by the public entity in the suit, including a reasonable
attorney's fee to be fixed bf the court.
(b) If an awarding authority for the state consents to relieve a bidder
of a bid because of mistake, the authority shall prepare a report in
writing to document the facts establishing the existence of each element
required by Section 5103. The report shall be available for inspection as
a public record and sha.11 be filed with the State Board of Control; except
that in the case of the University of California or a California State
University, the report shall be filed with the regents and the trustees,
respectively.
(Added by Stats.1982, c. 435, p. 1803, 12. Amended by Stats.1983, c. 18, § 29,
eff. April ;.1,1983; Stats -1985, c. 262. § 1, eff. Jan. 1. 1986.)
For text of section effective until Jan. 1, 1986, see Historical
Note, post.
Law Revision Commission Comment
1983 Amendment
Section 5101 is amended to delete the cost bond provision. This
provision did not meet the constitutional standards enunciated in Beau.
dreau v. Superior Court. 14 Cal.3d 448. 535 P.2d 713, 121 Ca1.Rptr. 585
(1975), which held unconstitutional Government Code Sections 947 and
951, the cost bond provisions of the California Tort Claims Act. See
Recommendation Relating to Security for Costs, 14 Ca1.L. Revision
Comm'n Reports 319 (1978). The other changes in Section 5101 are
technical. (16 Cal.L.Rev.Comm. Reports 2239 (1982)].
Historical Note
Section 5101. added by Stats.1982. c. 435,
p. 1803. 12. *.?,ended by Stat3.1983, c. 18,
§ 29, effective until Jan. 1. 1906, provides:
"A bidder shall not be relieved of the bid
unless by consent of the awarding authority
nor shall any change be made in the bid
because of mistake. but the bidder may
bring an action against the public entity in a
court of competent jurisdiction in the coun-
ty in which the bids were opened for the
recovery of the amount forfeited, without
interest or costs. 1f the plaintiff fails to
recover judgment. the plaintiff shall pay a:l
costs incurred by the public entity in the
suit. including a reasonable attorney's fee
to bi fixed by the court."
The 1983 amendment substituted "the
bid" for "his or her bid" twice in the first
sentence of why _ is now subd. (a); changed
8
"he or she" to "the bidder" in the fust
sentence of what is now subd. (a); added
the second sentence of what is now subd.
(a): and deleted a paragraph, which read:
"The bond of an admitted surety insurer
shall be filed with the complaint, in such
sum as the coup may fix, but not less than
five hundred dollars (:500), conditioned
L''.at_ if the plaintiff fails to mover judg-
ment, he or she shall pay all costs inc.rrred
by the public entity in the suit, including a
reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the
court."
The 1985 amendment. effective Jan_ 1.
1986, designated the fust paragraph as
subd. (a); and added subd. W.
Derivation: Gov.C. former § 4201, added
by Stats.1971, c. 1584, p. 3195, § 2.
RELIEF OF BIDDERS § 5103
Pt. 1
Cron References
Forfeiture of security, State Contract Act. figure of successful bidder to execute contract,
see §4 10181. 10182
Similar provision, State Contract Act. see § 10200.
Library References
Counties 4-127. U.S. Counties 4 198.
Municipal Corporations 4-333(3). U.S. Municipal Corporations 4 1003.
States 4-354. U.S. States 4 164.
§ 5102. Complaint; summons
The complaint shall be filed, and summons served on the director of
the department or the chief of the division or other head of the public
entity under which the work is to be performed or an appearance made,
within 90 days after the opening of the bid; otherwise, the action shall be
dismissed.
(Added by Stats.1982, c. 435, p. 1803. § 2 )
Historical Note
Derivation: Gov.C. former 1 4202, added
by Stats.1971, c. 1584. p. 3196, 12.
Cross References
Commencing civil actions, see Code of Civil Procedure § 411.10 et seq.
Service of summons. see Code of Civil Procedure § 413.10 et seq.
Similar provision. State Contract Act. see § 10201.
§ 5103. Grounds for relief
The bidder shall establish to the satisfaction of the court that:
(a) A mistake was made.
(b) He or she gave the public entity written notice within five days
after the opening of the bids of the mistake, specifying in the notice in
detail how the mistake occurred.
(c) The mistake made the bid materially different than he or she
intended it to be.
(d) The mistake was made in filling out the bid and not due to error in
judgment or to carelessness in inspecting the site of the work, or in
reading the plans or specifications.
(Added by Stats. 1982, c. 335, p. 1803, § 2.)
Historical Note
Derivation: Gov.C. former 4 4203, added
by Stats. 1.V1, c. 1584. p. 3196. § 2.
9
§ 5103 ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
Div. 2
Cress Meeences
Similar provision, State Contract Act, we § 10202
Ubmry References
Counties 0-115, 116` 11&
Municipal Corporations 0-234. 235, 238.
Public Contracts 0-18.
States 0-9&
U.S. Counties § IS&
In general 1
Estoppel 3
Evidence 4
Purpose 2
U.S. Municipal Corporations if 1000,
1003.
C.T.S. Public Contracts § 14.
C.J.S. States § 164.
Notes of Decisions
1. In genera)
Gov.C. § 4200 et seq. (repealed: see. now,
§ 5100 et seq.) governing public contracts
by public entities established exclusive pro-
cedure for relieving bidder from mistake in
bid submitted to public entity. A & A Elec..
Inc. v. City of King (19;6)126 Cal.Rptr. 585,
54 C.A.3d 457.
2. Purpose
Purpose of Gov. C. § 3203 (repealed: see.
now, this section) for relieving bidder from
its mistake in bid submitted to public entity
was to provide public entity with definite
and specific information about nature of
mistake, so that public entity could make
informed decision on wbether to grant bid-
cer relief from bid_ A & A Elec., Inc. Y.
Cary of King (1976) 126 C&LRptr. 565. U
C.A.3d 457.
3. Estoppel
Where contractor indicated at trial that
estoppel was not an issue in its action to
recover bid bond from city, court of appeal
could not consider whether city attorney's
comments to contractor misled contractor
into filing late claim and thus estopped city
from challenging lateness of claim. A & A
Elec.. Inc. v. City of King (1976) 126 CaL
Rptr. 585, 54 QA -3d 457.
4. Evidence
Evidence that contractor notified city at
time bids were opened of error in its bid.
but that contractor did not give city written
notice of specific detail of mistake within
five days. did not support trial court's find.
ing that contractor had supplied "notice in
detail" of mistake in bid within meaning of
Gov. C. § 4203 (repealed; see, now. this
section) providing procedure for rectifying
mistake in public bid. A & A Elec., Inc. v.
City of King (1976) 126 CaLRptr. 585, 54
C.A.3d 457.
§ 5104. No claim. other than notice, required to be filed
Other than the notice to the public entity, no claim is required to be
filed before bringing the action.
(Added by Stats.1982, c. 435, p. 1803, § 2.)
Historical Note
Derivation: Gov.C. former § 4204, added
by Stats. 1971, c. 1584. p_ 3196, § ?-
Cross References
Similar provision. State Contract Act, see § 10203.
10
A!
RELIEF OF BIDDERS § 5106
Pt. l
§ 5105. Prohibition against further bidding on project
A bidder who claims a mistake or who forfeits his or her bid security,
shall be prohibited from participating in further bidding on the project on
which the mistake was claimed or security forfeited.
(Added by Stats.198Z c. 435, p. 1803, 1 2)
Hiistorieal Note
Derivation: Gov.C. farmer § 4205. added
by Stats.1971, t 1584, p. 3196. # 2
Cross References
Forfeiture of security. State Contract Act. failure of successful bidder to execute contract,
see §§ 10181. 10182
Similar provision. State Contract Act, see § 10204.
Library References
Counties 4-116. CJ.S. Counties § 198.
Municipal Corporations 4-337. CJ -S. Municipal Corporations § 1003.
States *:,% C.J.S. States § 164.
Notes of Decisions
1. In general
Evidence in declaratory judgment action
brought by contractor seeking determina-
tion that Gov.C. 14205 (repealed: see. now,
this section) did not bar his rebid including
evidence that only major structural change
in buildings to be eonswocted was flooring
on relocatble classrooms. with difference
in price of less than four percent of total
cost of bid, was sufficient to support find-
ing that second bid was in fact on same
project so that bar of section applied to
prevent contractor from submitting bid
Colombo Const Co., Inc. v. Panama Union
School Dist (1982) 186 Cal.Rptr. 463, 136
C.A.3d 868.
§ 5106. Award of contract to second or third lowest bidder
If the public entity deems it is for its best interest, it may, on refusal
or failure of the successful bidder to execute the contract, award it to the.
second lowest bidder.
If the second lowest bidder fails or refuses to execute the contract, the
public entity may blewise award it to the third lowest bidder.
On the failure or refusal of the second or third lowest bidder to whom
a contract is so awarded to execute it, his or her bidder's security shall
be likewise forfeited.
(Added by Stats.1982. c. 435, p. 1803. § 2)
Historical ;Vote
Derivation: Gov.C. former § 5206. added
by Stats. 19-d c. ISM. p. 3196.3 2
11