HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - January 19, 1994 (30)OR
CITY OF LODI
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
AGENDA TITLE: Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan
MEETING DATE: January 19, 1994
PREPARED BY: Parks and Recreation Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council review the final points of the Master Plan and approve the
direction of the plan and support for eventual implementation.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: We have been dealing with the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan for
approximately a year and a half. This hasn't been by staff or commission's choice. but
generally due to timing and items of concern in the plan. You will recall a committee
was appointed by Mayor Pinkerton to help with direction of the plan. as well as to
conduct and be a part of public meetings. A meeting was held on the eastside at the parks and Recreation Annex and on the
westside at the Lodi High School cafeteria. A phone surrey was conducted, six to eight committee meetings were held (open
to the public, acknowledged in the Lodi News Sentinel and Stockton Record, and posted). The Parks and Recreation
Commission then held a shirtsleeve session and a final public hearing to address the plan and prepare it for Council action.
The City Council held a shirtsleeve session and a public hearing. Issues were brought to light, and now there are basically
three that remain:
1. Trailfbicycle paths in and around Lodi.
2. The indoor facility money for a community center.'
3. Woodbridge area park (Exhibit A).
As to the community center issue, please see Exhibit B as a representation of what we view as a local community center,
this includes the Renton, Washington Center as an example.
Another meeting was held, at the request of the City Council, October 5, 1993 by the Parks and Recreation Commission, which
addressed Consultant Jerry Dragoo's concerns (Exhibit C). The commission communication (Exhibit D), and the minutes of
that meeting (Exhibit E) are also attached for your information.
I forwarded a copy of the most current update of the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan to all the members of
the City Council. I hope you have been able to review this and will bring it to the council meeting on January 19.
It is my ,pope, as well as the Parks and Recreation Commission's. that we can finish the review of the plan and call it complete,
enabling us to move toward implementation. Your support and interest, in our efforts to provide opportunities, enrichment.
environmental qualifies, and space for people to breath, participate, and enjoy themselves in a very challenging and complex
world, as always, is appreciated.
FUNDING: At this time it is development impact fees, and I'm sure later we will need general fund dollars as well as
grant monies to fulfill the master plan.
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the Parks and Recreltion C.fn 4 -,ion and staff./
(ton Williamson
Parks and Recreation Director
RW/sh
cc. City Attorney
i
APPROVED. too*
A PETERSON
City Manager ecyuao Paw
cc -1
XCC,SC..M )W -V 12 1%4
J C ORAGGOO & ASSOCIATES
J
URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN
CD
PARK/RECREATION PLANNING
MEMO
TO:
Lodi City Council
FROM:
Jerry Draggoo
SUBJECT: Updated Park and Recreation Plan
DATE:
November 16,1993
EXHIBIT A
0
1730 B W. SKYLINE 9LY0.
PORTLAND. OREGON 97221
15031 297 -1005
Enclosed is an updated copy of the park and recreation plan. I have incorporated all of
the changes you have made to date. There are still several issues yet to be resolved.
1. At the last meeting, the Council seemed inclined to allocate a certain amount of
the park impact fees to Hutchins Street Square. While 1 don't agree with this idea
because this project is not strictly recreation related, you, nonetheless, can make
that decision. In a memo dated August 31, 1993, from Rich Prima, he concluded
that up to $2,100,000 of the $4,329,600 reserved for community center buildings
could be allocated to Hutchins Street Square. While there are a number of
potential methodologies to determine how the community center money could be
allocated, Rich's approach is a reasonable one.
However, talongg out the $2.1 million that would be allocated to Hutchins Street
Square leaves tF1e park development fund short. On Table 34, page IX -6 of the
plan, we have listed all of the project cost including those to be paid by park
impact fees. In order to keep the amount devoted to impact fees at the same
level as what was developed in the Nolte/McDonald report ($18.3 million), we
have had to remove some projects. According to Table 34, projects that are
eligible for impact fees but not listed are:
o minor park improvements to most new parks
o Park maintenance shop
0 indoor recreation center
0 outdoor swimming pool
o a portion of Pixley Park
Regarding this issue, I believe your choices are:
2 ,�9g9
��y 2
Page 2
November 16, 1443
Memo
1. Change the amount of money reserved for Hutchins Street Square.
2. Change the listing of projects eligible for impact fees listed in Table
3. Raise the cost of park impact fees.
2. Trails Pian: My recommendation is that you remove the trails element and
conduct a separate trails plan at a later time. I understand the County is currently
developing a trails plan at the present time. You might be able to piggy -back
onto that study.
I have removed the trails element from the plan and suggested you develop a
separate study (page VIII -25). If you agree with this idea, we can leave the report
as it is.
3. Woodbridge Park: There appeared to be a concern on the part of the City
Council about developing a large community park up in the northwest corner of
the Lodi planning area. While there is a need for such a park of this type in this
area, locating a site will be difficult. The most feasible location would be outside
the planning area and to the west of the irrigation canal.
Because of my concern for cutting cost on projects eligible for park impact fees, I
downgraded Woodbridge Park from a 20 acre community park to a 7 acre
neighborhood park. To make up space lost for sport facilities, I moved the youth
baseball fields from this proposed park to DeBenedetti Park and the adult
softball fields to Pixley ?ark.
Do you agree with this change?
1 believe the above represents the loose ends unless you have new issues. I am
prepared to meet with you when you can work me into your agenda.
0
EXHIBIT B
City ef Lodi Park and Recreation Plan Rrcornmendadons
S. INDOOR REClMn0N CENTER
The survey and workshop meetings revealed considerable interest for an indoor
recreation center. The needs assessment indicated a specific need for a gymnasium and
places for the city to conduct recreation classes. Currently the City has no indoor
facilities and access to school gyms and classrooms is very restricted. The City now
leases a portion of the Grape Festival and a small building next to their department for
basketball, volleyball and other recreation classes.
Design Requirements for a Successful Indoor Recreation Facility
1. A recreation center should be somewhat centralized to the community and be very visible
to the passing public
2. The faclih/ should provide a wide range of facilities and activities of interest to all age
groups.
3. Spaces should be provided for competitive and active sports, passive activities.
receptions and general :eisure.
4. MuRI-use spaces should be favored over single purpose spaces. Flexibility is very
important.
6. The building should be attractive with a comfortable environment suitable for both active
and leisure activitles. Active recreation spaces shoed be dearly separated from passive
spaces.
6. if lease space is developed as part of the facliry, it should be considered as temporary
and a place for future expansion.
7. Activities and spaces that generate revenue is very important This will help to offset the
operating Cosi
An analysis of facility needs and requirements to generate adequate revenue revealed
that in order for a center to be reasonably financially successful, the center would
compete with Hutchins Street Square.
Two alternative locations for a recreation center were studied. The first was to locate
the proposed facility at Hutchins Street Square. From an operational and financial
F
of view, this option has many positive features. At the same time, a master plan
for exclusive senior and cultural arts activities has been developed for this site and is
bein&, implemented. Placing a recreation center in this location would require
inodification to the masterplan. With this in mind, it is recommended that Hutchins
Street Square not be considered as the site for the proposed indoor recreation center.
The second location was at Needham School. For this site, a joint use agreement with
the Lodi Unified School District would be required. Because of the anticipated high
VTIl - 29
-11 � I, • J i 'g � J O ' T KP 1
cost to remodel the existing buildings, it is recommended that the portion of the
building now used for adnunistrative purposes be removed to make way for a new
recreation structure. The existing classroom section would remain and be either used
by the School District or by the City for recreation purposes. A sketch of how this site
could be utilized is shown below.
R
Cj4UW-J6q ItT
M -t SCw-r Ave-
V711- 30
c
ABOUT THZ CENTER
River att7'ts epleDutks� He�hGwdar
the Renton S5 MMCorrxr ui* Car>lar is idea
for area meetings. b•rqueb. parties.
athletic events and mon. Open from
6:00am to 1o:00pn, morda dwouph
Friday and Saturday from 8'OOam floe
8:000m, the Cornnwnity Center offers
tits •tlnldevartetyafaWAes
andbtsuri tints pleawree. FdbwMq b
a list of rooms and sample activities:
Gyrmsslum - Bask". voileybal,
Racquetball��kCouds-Racque�.hff eventin-
Game Room - Videoames. pool,
foosbaA, screen televlslon;
Arts & Crafts Area • dassps rentals;
Pre-Sdxoof Room - ChiidreWs classes.
rontdBarque Room - Aerobb and
dans dosses, banquets. receptlons,
eta
Fitness Ara• - SeNrdorized and free
weight equipment, cardiovascular
apparatus. stretching area:
When not scheduledfot Renton Partes
BRoaoatkmacavlties.mod
areas of the are avallabte on •
rental basis. For ormatfon on how to
rent theRenton Con isunIty Center eall
Harley Holt at 235.2590.
Rental Rates:
Resident Ratee:
Weekand Banquet Roam S500(10hotn)
Weelcilly ClBanquet Roam ns $1 Volt
(/W 3 Gats Room or Kids Keaton)
Non-Reefdent Rates:
Weekend Banquet Room =5a0(101ous)
tw
eekd3y ft" Cassrocrnss Room t
(pits & Crab Room or Kids Kerner)
(Fat Sunday rentele an additional tee of $70
we be
kr �.ea e.� �' taac++«+ we
Gym Rental Rates
Event
Haff Gymo
Full
Double G-pn S60Jhokr
Special EventFull _
Oce le Gym S90/t+ow
Friday. Saturday and Sunday fnWmwe 10
hoax rental. ?he gym is avallaWe for s
evert rental P.O. wade shows, craft
etc.) and requires an addillwat too for carpet
setup and take -dower.
Drop M 8as"cossi
Monday
uesday a Thu<Wednesday
Fliday
Saturday
pvt D
Center
Drop /n Gym Schedule
September 7,1593 through December 31, I'M
(Noun are Monde -Friday tun -i s SaturdaysSunlpm)
subret:t to ohanpe notion,
7:30am - 4m
emism
7.301111111 - 0 -
PM
Drop In Volleybei Wednesday •
(Sdwdub Is buf*d lo diarige. For updated Intorrnatlon. please cal 2352580.)
Openr Drop In Fitness Room
Monday. oMepub Friday enlor hours of operation with Ow foAowtrg exceptlons.
Wednesday Sr ay SFitness Program Sam430sm
(Free weights available �sr�rat
Friday (Free we � general
oultMl )pass 6:34T:30pm
is avallable b
Monday -Saturday 6an}10pm
CMdren may not be left unetbnded while perenta perddpete M drop in
actividee. Child care is not provided.
Gym Rentals (Basketbas. VotleybeA or Sports)
(Gym r�� e uP b two M wMb b ad www For H rffwdm criday all 236,2M.)
Spedai Closures
a 11
Od Umbor91 S ` 116
November 12.13. 19 b 20
November 24
November 25
November 26
December 3.4. 10 d 11
December 24.25 li 31 b January 1
BIRTHDAY PARTY
RENTALS
The Renton Parks i Roassitlan Do.
partment offers two difforent birthday
pacWages avallable during non-
pro-grammed hogs. The bklh&y child re -
calves a CCnnmkxdty Center hat, visor or
t -shirt Set up and dean up required bbyy
renter. For more information, call 23S
2560.
Pre -School Package: Rent the Kid's
Cornertl Des" for dvldren six yews
and under, the room Includes tables.
chairs,toys d much morin.
The fee 6- a 2 an
� party is $25 and lor
a 3 tour party is M.
Sports Package: Children 7 years to
rx+q teen an w4oy a oombinatton of
her gym rental and 1- 112 hex dess.
room romal for cake, pizza or packages_
The gym rental can W set up tot voeey
ball orbasketball. Parry size is flmfted to
25 guests and the cost Is =30
RCC Closed
Ged
Gym dosed
Gym dosed
RGO
CC dosed
Closed
RCC Open Sam -" Closed
y m dosed
RCC Closed
PASS CARD
INFORMATION
Renton Community Center 30 - Day
Fitness Pass Cards mint be shown when
entering the facility. Shidents,Msfw+gto
purchase a pass card mustpre$Ord
Current student Identification (student
body card or equivalent) when purchas-
"pass Card.
dw
AdultR$27.25
Senior/Students -$17.36
Definitions:
Seniors: 55 or Wet
Student Under 18 or Aril time student
BUSINESS OR
CORPORATE PACKAGES
Are you interested In getting your
employees Involved in fitness rotated
acovkies7 Caff Jrti Dia* at M2560 for
Information
ROOM KEY
1 W% nWalW s ARTR a CRAFTS
U STC;IA OR a LO■EY
3 PATIO 40 GAME ROOM
4 WANGUET WCOM 11 CH■CK-IN•ONSK
S WoMENU RUSTROOM 18 RECREATION OPPICES
6 MENU RUUTROOM 13 JACUZZI
7 PRESCHOOL 44 WOMUNE LOCKUROOM
16 MENU LOCKRROOM
16 POTM6E8 ARRA
17 RAOOURTOALL COURT
1 is BaUt MENT ROOM
212 RO OYM
4 d
.... .............. E
10
4 B 14 Its
3
4 Lr 9
11
2
7
8 8 ,. r 12
20 so
2 19 19 18
16 17 1'" 17
2
L
"+5 K� �°w''�x N k � ...�'� ,�."_ ' ♦ 1,t��f sem` �',. �W �
W T Y OF RENTON 1992 STAFF A FINANCIAL APPROPRIATIONS
Gnnmunity SeMms/Pafks CommirW CMAn
Person Responsible: Bill NutsJnpiller, Recreation SuperOlendem.
TOTAL REGULAR STAFFING
0.0
1990
1991
I
1901
1902
1002
own"
% Changs
POSITION ALLOCATIONS;
Actual
AdWed
Projected
P44u R
Budget 0-1--'
91 Adopted
01 Adopted
Grads Tift
14.41
13.4
13.3
13-5
^'r:
-0.1%
Overtime
10 Recreation Program Coordinator
2.0
2.0
3.0
3.0
.3.0
1.0
50.0%
8 Aso Spee It (Pronated 1a Coord)
1.0
1.0
oA
0.0
,' <OA
(1.0)
-1rA.0%
,c Maintsn4ace Custodian
2.0
2.0
2.0
--xW
ZO
0.0
0.0%
3 Administrative Clerk W
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
to
0.0
0.0%
1 AdminiatraliwGlark 1
1 0.0
10,
1-01
1.0
,TO
e n
a er
TOTAL REGULAR STAFFING
0.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
0.0
0.
TEMPORARY PART TIME
7.9
7.4
0.4
0.9
6.3
(0.9)
-t2.
TOTAL STAFFING
13.0
14.41
13.4
13.3
13-5
(61)
-0.1%
BUDGETARY APPROPRIATION:
1990
Actual
1991
Adopted
1991
oTojected
1902
Request
1992
Budge/
change
91 Adopted
% znart0e
91 Adopted
Regular Salwiss
130,811
229.630
231,030
240.010
240,010
11,3110
5.0%
Part Time Salaries
98.722
102.720
90.720
16.800
102,050
(61)
-0.1%
Overtime
2.282
2.000
2.000
2.134
2,134
134
6.7%
Personnel Benefits
46.1127
60.241
67.803
70.040
79.403
10.252
11.8%
Uniform Allowance
0
0
0
0
0
0
WA
Supplies
22.889
21.107
21.107
21,529
20.053
(1.054)
-S.0%
Professional Seeks$
0
0
0
0
0
0
WA
PouagwrolephOns/Other
0
0
0
0
0
0
WA
TraveUTraW WV
2.584
1.800
1.800
2.000
t 000
200
11.1%
Advertising
1.308
2.000
2.000
2.070
2.070
70
3.5%
Rentals and Leases
0
0
0
0
0
0
WA
Equipment Rental
0
0
0
0
0
0
WA
Public Utility Services
54.180
64.237
64,237
66.788
72.788
8.551
13.3%
Repairs b Maintenance
8.660
'8.200
18.200
17.200
132W
(3.000)
-16.S%
1)Misceltainsous
98.732
130.500
142-M
130.693
211.003
81.193
622%
Intergovernmental Services
0
0
O
0
; Y'0
0
WA
Capital Ouuay,
0
1.700
1.700
0
:~0
(1.700)
-100.0%
Exotinditure Credits
01
0
1 0
0
1 0
0
WA
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
473.101
642.141
542.034
0.59.282
748.106
105.965
10.5
Item
1990
Actual
1991
Adopted
1991
oTojected
1902
Request
1992
Budge/
change
91 Adopted
% znart0e
91 Adopted
1) MISCELLANEOUS'
49 C6 Printing d Binding
0
3.000
3.000
3.105
3.105
105
3.5%
49 37 Vandalism
0
S00
S00
S18
Sig
is
1644
49 114 Tax L.ab.tuy
0
2.000
2.000
2,070
2-3.070
24.070
1203 S;s
49 85 Sod-Susta,n,ng Programs
98.732
i 125.000
( 136.769
( 125.000
I 182.000
1 $7.200
1 456%
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS
1 98.732
( 130.500
1 142.269
1 130.693 1 211,693
1 81,193 1 62 2041
i Q�7C�1�. 1.1 . t G.,�.�' 1. C.� i- Ll:. �,Cti-�1 i ., �u�r ,. Zi'l
C� Jw�.t►. -7
c
pv6v.�,J� c.�ctift,ack.l-t`i
T }
��' c. .-� L it��,.�... c.. ,t-J--Gj`�-t l.C..a�_[ t...-+-,. t��'':--c.-a` fit„<'..' v♦ 1.��CI��--- Leri_
'� 136
EXHIBIT C
J C ORAGGOO & ASSOCIATES
J URBAN PLANNING s DESIGN
CD
PARK/ RECREATION PLANNING
September 3, 1993
City of LA
Department of Parks and Recreation
125 N. Stockton St.
Lodi, California 95240
Attn: Ron Williamson
Dear Ron,
'2730 I& W. SKYLINE 8LV0.
PORTLAND. OREGON 97221
t 603) 297 -1003
I left the meeting with the City Council more confused than ever. Frankly, I didn't get
any direction from them and am afraid that if we attempted to hold a public hearing
with them, it would get continued again.
I believe we have the following unresolved issues:
1. The trails system: Frankly at this point, my recommendation is that we take
the trails element out of the plan and just state that a specific trails plan
should be developed.
2. Indoor recreation center
o where to put it
o the amount of i:: act fees to be divided between Hutchins
Street Square and the Parks Department
3. Swimming pool: We need clarification about the type. I have been told that
it is to be an outdoor pool but the Council minutes state that they did not
determine the type. We naed clarification
4. The north side of Mokelumne River: Do we should it as open space on the
facility plan?
5. Proposed Woodbridge Community Park: What type of park will this be? If
it's a neighborhood park, we then need to distribute the fields and acres
among the other parks.
6. Proposed Village Street Park: Does it stay in?
7. The CIP: Exactly how are we to show this table?
8. Population forecast: Does the City agree with my forecast? ,90,5
1
CP
Page 2
September 3, 1943
At this point, I believe we are two meetings away from adoption. My recommendation
is that we ask the Parks Board for recommendations on the above issues and then go
back to the Council.
Would you talk to Tom and Bob to see how we should proceed. Two of the issues - the
Trails Plan and converting Woodbridge Park to a neighborhood facility could involve
considerable time in making the changes.
The last item is our fees. While it is a little subjective, I feel that we have gone the
normal distance in the development of the plan. I would like to be compensated for
any major additions or corrections that occur: While I am not going to make a big issue
out of this, I really would like a little help. I can be more precise on the cost once I
know how we are going to proceed.
Ron, I am afraid we have lost the momentum of the plan and would to keep the process
moving. With that in mind, I would to meet again as soon as we can.
Would you let me know how you want to proceed. I need to make some changes to the
cost estimates but have been holding off until we decide what to do about Woodbridge
Park and the recreation center.
incerely,
Jer�oo
JCDJgd
cc: City Manager
Mayor
Parks S Rec Commission Members
Task Force Committee Members
Richard Prima
David Morimoto
EXHIBIT D
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION COMMUNICATION
TO: The Lodi Parks & Recreation Commission DATE OF MEETING: 10/5/93
FROM: The Director's Office
SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Open Space Master Plan, Revisited
TYPE ACTION NEEDED: Review and recommendation of Commission.
PREPARED BY: Ron Williamson, Parks and Recreation Director q�, rid
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Readdress issues of the plan as presented in Mr. Dragoo's correspondence
and make suggestions as to where we should go with each.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: For over a year we have been putting together a Parks and
Recreation Open Space Master Plan. Recently at a shirtsleeve session of the City Council, various issues were
discussed and suggestions where made by the Council as to their thoughts on direction. They would like the
Commission to readdress their position and direct them again on the attached items.
You may agree, disagree, or establish new direction. Please see the attached items for discussion and
consideration.
FUNDING CONSIDERATION OR IMPACT: Provided by Development Impact Fees. Yes, some changes
in the plan will alter costs, either higher or lower. Impact fees will cover about $18,000,000 in new
construction.
RW/sh
Attachment
PRcomm _com4l oc-r
EXHIBIT E
MINUTES, PARKS AND K. 4XEATION COMMISSION
OCTOBER 8, 1993
Noes- None
Motion carried 5 - 0.
IV. Correspondence
A. Letter from Mayor regarding City of Lodi Policies on Employment Issues
B. Westgate Park - Westside Fire Station
No discussion on above, both self-explanatory.
C. Letter from Robert_Sternfels to Supervisor Barber
It was requested that Director Williamson contact Mr. Sternfels and ask
him to give a presentation to the Commission in layman's terms regarding
the ordinance discussed in the letter.
V. Action Items
A. Request to Name Point at Lodi Lake Park, "Chuck Parsons Point"
Director Williamson explained that Mr. Tony Segale had made this
request at last month's meeting. Commissioner Wall asked where the
funds for the sign would come from and how much it was anticipated to
cost. Director Williamson described several options ranging in price from
$50 up and possibilities of funding from memorials, contributions, or by
the City.
Speaking on the subject was -
Tony Segale - 215 Palomar, Lodi - Mr. Segale stated that no memorial
was in place, but he would speak to the family about their feelings on the
subject and return to the next meeting with same. He also would bring
some design and price ideas.
On a motion by Commissioner Melby and a second by Commissioner
Casalegno the idea was approved and decided to go further with report
from Mr. Segale on details at next meeting.
Ayes - Commissioners Melby, Casalegno, Wall, Johnson, Meyer
Noes- None
Motion Carried 5 - 0
B. Parks and Recreation Open Space Master Plan
Director Williamson explained that the eight questions raised in Mr. Jerry
Dragoo's letter of September 3, 1993 needed to be addressed and
recommendations made.
The trails system - Jack Ronsko, Public Works Director was in
attendance and shared with the Commission the county -wide bike
PAC DkOWMINU TE S OCT -3-
MINUTES. PARKS AND "EATION COMMISSION
OCTOBER 5, 19939
�,
trail, proposing the City work with the same.
On a motion by Commissioner Wall and second by Commissioner
Johnson, it was recommended to revise the text of the Plan to
recommend that a specific trails plan be done to comply with citizen
survey and countylcity plan.
Ayes - Commissioners Melby. Wall, Meyer, Casalegno, Johnson
Noes - None
Motion carried 5 - 0
2. Indoor recreation center.
On a motion by Commissioner Johnson and second by Commissioner
Wall it was recommended the feasibility study go forward and ask City
Council to let the Commission know what Parks and Recreation's share
of the impact fees will be before it can make any concrete
recommendations.
Ayes - Commissioners Melby, Wall, Meyer, Casalegno, Johnson
Noes - None
Motion Carried 5 - 0
3. Swimming Pool, indoor or outdoor?
It was agreed that an outdoor pool located on the west side was the
intention.
4. North side of Mokelumne River - should we use it as open space
on the facility plan?
It was agreed to continue to consider it as open space/green belt area.
5. Proposed Woodbridge Community Park
On a motion by Commissioner Melby and a second by commissioner
Johnson it was recommended that this park remain in the Plan.
Ayes - Commissioners Melby, Wall, Meyer, Casalegno, Johnson
Noes - None
Motion Carried 5 - 0
PRCONAMW1NUTES OCT -4-
MfNUTES, PARKS AND Ri TION COMMISSION:
OCTOBER 5, 1993
6. Proposed Village Street Park, does it stay in?
On a motion by Commissioner Wall and a second by Commissioner
Johnson it was recommended this park remain in the Plan.
Ayes - Commissioners Melby, Wall, Meyer, Casalegno, Johnson
Noes- None
Motion Carried 5 - 0
7. The CIP - How are we to show this table?
Director Williamson will further discuss the CIP with Richard Prima, Public
Works Department, and report same back to the Commission.
8. Population forecast
On a motion by Commissioner Johnson and a second by Commissioner
Wall it was recommended to go with the estimate to the year 2007,
provided by the Mr. Dragoo of 102,850 .
Ayes - Commissioners Melby, Wall, Meyer, Casalegno, Johnson
Noes- None
Motion Carried 5 - 0
Note: At this point, Chairman Johnson announced he would rearrange the
Agenda to allow Mr. Ronsko to speak on Regular Agenda, Item D.
VI. Recrular_Agenda - Other Reports or Updates
D. Information - Golf Course, RV Center and Wetlands Grant Proposal
Public Works Director, Jack Ronsko gave an overview of the plan,
although he expressed concerns over funding of a feasibility study, he felt
the concept is basically good and if the commission feels it is feasible.
then turn it over to the City Council's discretion.
On a motion by Commissioner Wall and a second by Commissioner
Johnson, it was recommended to request a feasibility study for a golf
course,!only.
Ayes - Commissioners Wall, Johnson
Noes - Commissioners Melby, Meyer. Casalegno
Motion defeated 2 -3
On a motion by Commissioner Casalegno and a second by Commissioner
Johnson, it was recommended to request a feasibility study for a golf
course, RV center, and wetlands area.
PRCOMMI,MINUTES OCT -5-
RESOLUTION NO. 94-10
s..xassssaaassa=axis
A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE AS ZF FULLY SST FORTH HEREIN
THE PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN
=x__x_xxxxxxxxaxxxxxxaxxxxxxxxxxxxxaaa.xxsssssaaa=xsxssxssss3as:3xs=sxas
WHEREAS, a number of public hearings and meetings were held on
the issue of the City's Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan as
required by law; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Lodi City Council that the
Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan, as amended (copies of
which are on file in the office of the City Clerk), SAVE AND EXCEPT
Article 5, Section VIII, page 29 (Indoor Recreation Center) are hereby
adopted:
Ayes: Council Members - Davenport, Mann, Pennino, Snider,
and Sieglock (Mayor)
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Lodi City Council that Article 5,
Section VIII, page 29 (Indoor Recreation Center), incorporated in the
above -referenced Parks, Recreation & Open Space Master Plan, is hereby
adopted:
Ayes. Council Members - Davenport, Mann, Pennino, and
Sieglock (Mayor)
Noes: Council Membei.s - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Abstain: Council Members - Snider
Dated: January 19, 1994
-1-
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 94-10 was passed and adopted
by the Lodi City Council in a regular meeting held January 19, 1994 by
the vote set forth above.
i�tit
ifer M Perrin
y Clerk
94-10
-2-