HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - August 16, 1995 (45)CITY OF LODI
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Cq[1F �P
AGENDA TITLE: Mokelumne River Conjunctive Use Joint Project Study Agreement between
San Joaquin Parties and East Bay Municipal Utility District
MEETING DATE: August 16, 1995
PREPARED BY: Public Works Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the attached
agreement.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the City Council meeting of June 7, 1995, staff presented, for
information only, a recap of the East San Joaquin Parties/East Bay
Municipal Utility District Joint Conjunctive Use Project. A copy of
this Council Communication is attached. This agreement covers the
initial preliminary study phase. As indicated in the Council Communication, each participating agency is
being asked to execute the agreement even though the funding for the San Joaquin County agencies is
being made through the County's Water Zone Investigation II fund account.
FUNDING: San Joaquin County funds
JLRIIm
Attachments
cc: WID, Attn: Andy Christensen, Manager
Water/Wastewater Superintendent
ev
Z
k . Ronsko
Works Director
APPROVED:
THOMAS A. PETERSON recycled paper
City Manager
CONJUSUDOC CW95
A _qs- 3.2 II__)
JOINT PROJECT STUDY AGREEMENT
San Joaquin Conjunctive Use Project
East San Joaquin Parties (ESJP)
and East Bay Municipal Utility District
MAT 2 1995
-IS AGRET-MENT is made and entered into this day of
95, by and between East Say municipal Utility District, a
^�blic coYxrat_o::. ::erein-afzer called ' DI.STR-C 1', ' and z.' -.e
-aster:'_ San Joaquin ?art -es, ccnsisting of Woodbridge irr-y^atiCn
._strict. Fort. San Joaquin Water Ccnservat-on District, Central
San Joaquin Water CL
t.1�
onservation istri ct, St�ojckto,71 East water /�
J_stric . Cif- Lodi, City of Stockton, SGig JcaVuin C� unzy, and
San ']caer,;Cou^ty :'_ccd Control and Water Conservation
-str=Ct, .`.ere-nafter collectively referred to as
WITMES SETH
'WHEREAS DISTR=CT's Board of Directors adopted a Water Supply.
Ya-ase-ent Action ?_an on January 24, 1595, th.az includes
eval'uatioP of conjunctive use project alternatives with '-:SJ? that
incorporate thme Mokelum.^e River and the District's A--merican River
e nuitlerent inzo a San Joacra-in County cased conjunctive use
.progra-m.; and
WHEREAS =SJ? and DISTRICT desires to develop alternatives for a
oi.,. project (said develo�_.ent of alternatives being referred to
herein for purposes of this agreement as "?roject") to meet t_^.e
present and fu':ure wale_ needs o-" ESJ? while =,eeting D_SiRICT's
=_cure dry year water needs; and
WHEREAS ;_STRICT and ESJ? rec_uire professicr_al services to assist
w_ _ t e formulation. of ?roj ect alternatives. said Services to be
provided by MON GOMER`_' WATSON AvERICA (^erei:.a__er Called „NWA„)
�0Y_- EtiG_ti=_3_tiG (nereInatter Ca_:ec "�Gy__
G_OTE- C.='_ ICA: firms (berei nafter called"GEOTMC::VICP?. ) ; and
WHEREAS D=S T R=C':' And ESQ' _.rte::d
to s. -.are t= a CCStS C=
pr:.fessior.al services for t.^_is Project on an eC'u_l basis;
NOW, 7=r_=O=r, 77 .S ?r-L-i:P�_J 3GR__7 +^y ESJ, and D=c^ _C- as
ows.
1. `rNA Corract DT_S: <_C' will enter into a conn acc -th `rwA
.to develCp ? roject alternatives for an amount nt not-tc-exceed
S:49,707. Said ^!WA seryices are described 'n toe Scope of
Work attac-ed :^_ereto as Ex::^.ibit A and incorporated herein.
r^+vA will provide copies o all reports, correspondence,
i. -.voices and work oroC:c;.s for :.^.=s rrojeC_ to 'unless
ot::erwi_ce _peci=ied by .SJ?. ?ay -mens byD.S^RT_C' =o :rWA 'cr
said services will contribute to DIS7R=CT's Share of =otal
Costs as defined ::erein. D_cTRICT s^all provide copies o=
all invoices received n!WA _`^vr Z: -JS to
:3;69-6
joint Project Agreement
?SJP and East Say Municipal Uti?ity District
=g. 2
2. BOYLE Contract: ESJ? will enter into a contract with BOYLE
to provide technical services for this Project for an amount
not to exceed 550,000. BOYLE shall have access to
information being developed for each engineering task's
developm=ent to the satisfaction of the =SJ?'s Technical
':ern. Said services are described in rife Scope of Wo_{
atta=.ed hereto as Exaibi- 3 and incorporated i:ere_n.
?ay-enz by ESJ? to ACYLE =c= said services ,a=1_ cont=_bate
to ESJ?'s Share of Total Costs as defined herein. SSj?
s all provide copies of al_ __^.voices received from BOYLE for
this Project to DISTRICT.
3. G_0 -EC I=CAL Contac- -:,Su-? will enter into a contract wit -h
G7 -OT= -C.'-',- AL for so_'_ exp'_c_ ati on to evaluate percolation
alc g tae exte.s_o . ofye : olsom SouthCanal a__gn enz, for
-mo
an aunt not to exceedS30,C00. Payment by SSJ? to
GEOTECHNIC L, for said services willcontribute -o. `SJ? ' S
Share of Total Costs as defined herein. ESJ? shall Provide
copies of all invoices received fro.Z GEOTEC:-NTC.. for this
Project to DISTRICT.
4. Total Costs: Total Costs for MWA, BOYLE, and GEOTECHNICAL
slaallTnot exceed S629,907 aid shall be bor..e equally as
follows:
Not -to -exceed Limits Distzic z
5549,907 ;!WA services' $274,954 5274,9:4
S 50,000 BOYLE services S 25,000 S 25,000
S 30.000 GEOT?C::.TICAL services S =5.000 S 15.300
5629,907 Maximum Total Costs S314,954 5314,9$4
Cost co D ST?T--CT DIS:�_CT'S Share of Total - Costs shall_ be
SCIS of the suM of costs payable to MWA. BOYL_. a -d
G=OT:Cz-.-IN XAL for this Project up to a maximum of $314,954.
.1iTCTZIC— ;,,/411 Satafy its raS=0:1S1✓1lltV ivr CvSt$ j,nw�g
pa +«eats to MWA fol" services specified i:: Exh:'_bit A of this
Agreement. DISTRICT a.nd ES7_ recognize that costs =or MWA
are expected to exceed costs for =OYL_ and G_OT-CEN'sC:,. if
t e sura of. DISTRICT payme-nts to MWA exceed DT-STST-CT's Share
of ,oral Costs, DIST._CT will be entitled to-eimburse:-ert
fror,. -SJ? as def. -ed h.erei n.
6. Cost to =SJ? ESJ?'s Share of Total Costs shall be SCIS of
tate sum of costs payable to r -WA, 30YLE, and G_OT=C .V=CAL for
ti -is ?roject up to a maxi=lm cr 5314,954. The San Joaquin.
County Flood Control and Water Conservation District scall
be billed for and shall nay t. --e share of the ESJ?. ESJ?
through the Saiz Joaquin County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District will satisfy their responsibility for
77Nt /22'651? SJr_:195-C=-?5/3
??569-6
Joint ?roject Agreement
?SJ? and Cast Say Municipal Ut_l;ty Distr=ct
?g. 3
costs through payments to BOYLS and GEOTECHNICAL for
services specified in this Agreement, and through
rei.-mburse Lenz to DISTRICT as needed to equalize =SJ?'s and
DIST3ICT's -otal Costs.
7 Ze:-n:'`rse_ enz If rei::lbu'rseme.^.t is needed to eC',:al_ze "oral
Costs for =S�7? and DISTRICT, such re_:obti'rse :ent s"_al1
cc=ence cn a mutually acce . table schedule, , however, n no
event shall such schedule extend beyond 3E mcn% s from t=e
effective Cate o= this Agreehent unless -=greed to in
writing by =S;;, and DISTR=C". _' such re_::burse-e nt has nct
been competed within 18 months of :'--.e e==active date of
this Agreement, interest snali t^en accrue on t.e unpaid
ball once at t'at time at the rate of eieat percent per annum.
8. Other Terms .his Agreement s all be effective upon
exec '! V DTzTRT_CT and "d - ry ^'-s Sa=. �CaCuiZ
c: 3ca_.. oA. S. �s%04
Ccumy and the San Joaqui:l County Flood Control and water
Conservation District and shall continue ^rough the
completion of ? ..,b
roject studies and the reiursener.. period.
This Agreene"t constitutes the entire understanding o: £SJ?
and DT -STRICT with respect to test sh-aring for tis Project-.
All azendments to this Agreement shall be in writing and
shall be effective upon execution by DISTRICT and Board of
Supervisors, San Joaquin county and the San woaeuin County
Flood Control and water Conservation District.
1N WITNESS w =_R=0_ t e parties .ereto execute thL_s AG?_ MENT in
dup`icate-
Date:
:y:
ucrge Carrasco
GENERAL Y'1i\AG=R
ON :EXT ?AGE -1
T7045/2215517iS/ect/05-03-95/3
S2559-5
Joint ?roject Agreement
=S.7? and East Bay Municipal Utility District
°g. 4
.AST SAV jQAOUIN PARTIES
MAY 2 1995
Date:
(Attest. )
Daze:
(Attest: )
Date:
(Attest: )
Date:
(Attest: }
Date:
(Attest: )
GEORGE L. BARBER
By:
George L. Bar-'-er
Board of suzervisors
County of San „ cacui n
G d t .a
Board of S�-erviscrs c'^e
San ,;oaqu_n County �'ocd
Control 3::d wa er
Conservation District
By:
Woodbridge=rrigation District
By:
Board o_ directors
North San CCaquin water
Conse:vat_on D_st__cc
3v:
City c 7 CA
By:
Board of Directors
Stockton =ast Water D=strict
7-7
33569-6
Joint Project Agreement
=SJ? and =ast ?ay Municipal Utility District
?g. 5
EAST SA.N JOAOUIN PARTIES (Cont' d)
Date:
(Attest:
Daze:
3y:
-Ay:
City of SLockzcn
Board of Directors
Central San Joaquin water
Con serva :.o n his zr ct
77^Z5/22:65/?.:5/e--:/C5-C3-95/3
33569-6
EXHIBIT A
ITEM 2 - EBM D WATER SUPPLY ACTION PLAN
SCOPE OF WORK
The project objective is to meet the present and future water needs of the Eastern San
Joaquin Parties (ESJP) while meeting EBMUTD's future dry year water needs. The
objective of this scope of work is to identify a short list of one or more alternative plans that
would achieve the project objectives. Data, tools and analytical results developed in Phase
I of the Mokelumne Aquifer Recharge and Stora_e Project (.MARS) will be used to the
extent possible and practicable in this work to minimize costs and provide consistency of
analyses and results between the two efforts. In particular, the San Joaquin County IGSVf
and the GIS originJly developed for Phase 1 MARS will serve as L` a basic analytical tools
for this work.
STAGE I - DEVELOP PROJECT BASIS
Activities completed in this stage are intended to provide the nandamental knowledge and
understanding required to support subsequent for^tulation of coherent alternative plans that
would achieve the project objectives.
Task A Evaluate Water ;Heeds and Potential Water Sources
1. Using the San Joaquin Counrl IGSM, evaluate dhe following:
- Total yearly quantity of water required to stop saline intrusion and initiate
basin storage recovery,
- Minimum groundwater elevation(s) required to have no further saline
intrusion (threshold elevation),
- Annual average volume of water required to achieve threshold elevation in
S years, 10 years '
- Annual average quantiry of water required to me;.t joint project goals with
rroudwater elevations always above threshold elevation,
- Dry year water supply if :00.000 aflyr is available in wee years, dry year
water supply if 400,000 aflyr is available in wet years. -
Describe the basis and evaluate the following potential water sources:
2. EB.MUD A.* a:;can River water service ceraract delivered froan the Folsom South
Canal (FSC), as conditioned by the Hodge Decision.
3. Mokelumne River water unused within EBM'UD entitlements, assuming EB-MU)'s
settlement offer to FERC defines instream flow requirements.
4. Star:islaus River water associated %vith USBR water service contracts with Central
San Joaquin Nater Conservation District (=9,000 acre-feet titre) and Stockton East
Water District (106,000 acre-feet interim). assurzing USBR operates New Melones
to meet D1422.
Existine ESJP entitlements, including those for water from the lfokelumne and
Calaveras Rivers.
6. San Joaquin County American River permit application Z0165-7. alternative B.
diversion at Nimbus Dam.
7. Potential diversion of currently unregulated flows from the Mokelumne, American.
Calaveras, and Stanisiaus Rivers. and the streams flowing into Farrington
Reservoir. assuming EBMLU offer to FERC instream flows for the Nfokelumne,
and D 1422 compliance for the Stanislaus.
S. Reclaimed wastewater from Lodi and Stockton, other than Section. 1435.
9. Diversions -14-om the Sacramento River/Delta.
10. Possible assi;nmem or transfer of sure flings or reserved water rights on the
Mokelumne, assuming inst earn Bows as specified in EB` UD's July 16, 1993
offer of se:Lle :fent to ) IHRC.
For each potential source, describe existing water right conditions, crenare baseline
monthly water availability hydrographs, and identify relevant reliability and
i,:,plementabiiity issUes associated with water right priority, related regional water
management initiatives, and apparent statutory and institutional constraints. All analyses
will assume no ch=ange in Oakdale I.D. and South San Joaquin I.D. service area or
consumptive use.
Deliverable: Task report presenting the results of this task.
Task B Establish Design Criteria
Supplement Task Report 3.1, prepared under the original contract, as required to serve as
the design criteria basis for subsequent facilities layout and cost estimating work.
Suaolement al criteria are expected to include right-of-way dimensions associated with large
canals and large diameter nipe, tunnel design and cost criteria, and assu^.options re=arding
'facilities design capacities based on Task A results.
Delivemble: Revised Task Report 3.I
Task C Establish Evaluation Criteria
Prepare a brief memcr,_ndum describing the four general evaluation criteri=a developed
under Task 2.1 of `e erie;nal contract scope of services and their applicability to this
work. Prtseat this evaluation/screening aimroaeh to EBVILD and ESJP represe:mta*,.ves,
snake necessary cot-ections. and finalize the criteria to be used subsequently.
Deliverable: Bref draft memorandum oresentin_g criteria, finalized to reflect
ESJPiLBtIUD consensus.
Task D Lav Out Facilities
T,zrouga =:d investigation. establish an acparently viable ali--anmert and location for each
of the majcr facilities associated with each altemarive and display each alignment and the
location of key facilities on USGS 7.5 minute quad mapping and GIS mapping. Input the
corridors tc e proiect CIS and perform constraints analvses as .ie.—ped to test the i zlidiry
of each con -:der (it is assumed that the coverage of the GIS will be expanded by others to
cover the required project area). Verity the resulting siting in the field. Conduct a --roup
2
tour of the ali;nmenas, facility locations, and points of interest to elicit local comment and
confirm routing and shin; assumptions. Size each facility and develop hydraulic profiles
for each faeility.
Unlined flat canal from terminus of FSC to Peters along the original FSC
alignment. sized to:
• deliver water for direct and in -lieu recharge to irrigators,
• convey available streamflows for groundwater recharge by means of canal
seepage, and -
• supply various potential and existing storage reservoirs.
Analvses and estimates will differentiate reaches from Dry Creek to Peters and Dry
Creek to FSC terminus, to provide for consideration of phased constriction.
2. Camanche diversion to Bear Creek as evaluated under Task 2.3 of the orisinal
contract scone of services.
3. Diversion facilities from Dry Creek. .1yfokelutrtne River, Calaveras River, and
(tvgical) lesser water courses into the unlined flat canal.
4. LmDrovern= and expansion of irrigation distribution systems and on-farm
irrigation systems to reasonably maximize in -lieu recharge (switching groundwater
Pumpers to surface water in wet years),. direct recharge (infiltration or injection),
and 'indirect recharge through increased irrigation efficiencies in:
a. Central San Joaquin Water Conservation District,
b. Stockton East Water District,
C. North San Joaquin Water Conservation District, and
d. Woodbridge Irritation District (agricultural exchange not considered
in WID).
6. Direct to aqueduct extraction well system as evaluated under Task 2.3 of the
original Contract scope of services.
6. Sacramento River diversion upstream of the Sacramento Resioral Wastewater
Treatment Plant discharge from the vicinity of Freeport to the unlined flat canal
described above
7. Diversion :roan Beaver Slou_h to unlined flat canal.
S. Nfokelumne .aqueduct delivery to portions of ESJP as evaluated under. Task 2.3 of
the original contract scope of services.
9. Pirelire from existing EB.vIL-D turnout from the FSC to the Nlokelutrme Aqueducts
to free up like volumes of tilokelu„tne River water for the ESJP/EBN%fUD
conjunctive use project.
10. Pipeline from the terminus of the FSC to the Mokelurnne Aqueduct to free up like
volumes of %lokelumne River water for the ESJP/F.B'A%1L'D conjunctive use project.
11. gleans for diverting water from the flat, unlined canal described in (1) above, to the
Mokelunme aqueducts.
3
Deliverable: Layout of each facility with listing of key design assumptions and facility
Characteristics.
Task F Identify Environmental Effects
Based on field review of the alignment corridors identified in Task D, identify siting
constraints based on environmental and regulatory considerations. Identify and evaluate
issues associated with siting new diversion facilides on the Sacramento River upstream of
the Sacramento Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant discharge, and at Beaver Slough.
Review issues associated with impacts on instream flows in the Lower American River_
Deliverable: Task report presenting the resuits of this task.
Task G Prepare Cost Estimates
Prepare reconnaissance level estimates of capital and recurring costs associated with each
of the facilities listed under Task D.
Deliverables: Task report presenting the results of this task.
STAGE II • ALTERNATIVES FORMULATION AND EVALUATION
Activities completed in this stage are intended to result in identification of a small number of
the best viable alternative plans that would achieve the project objectives.
Task H Assemble alternatives
Based on the results of Tasks 1 through 7,. screen potential water sources and facilities
defined under Task D against the four general evaluation criteria used for Task ?.I of the
original contract scope of services. Assemble the remaining sources and facilities;
including conveyance, recharge, extraction, and storage facilities; into approximately three
alternative plans for Nrther analyses and evaluation. Agricultural exchange with
Woodbridge Irrigation District not considered.
Deliverable: Task report presenting the results of this task.
Task I Evaluate Project Performance
Using the San Joacuin County IGSM developed under Task 1.6 of the orisinal scope of
services, evaluate quantity and quality impacts on groundwater and surface water resources
resulting from operation of approximately three altemadves identified in Task H including
considerat=.on of generalized offstre= storage options. Use PROSrM to evaluate impacts
on CVP deliveries, SIN -P deliveries, and Delta outflows. Quantify benefits accruing to
project pa:-zicipants and groundwater pumpers in the project area resufting fron operation of
each alternative.
Deliverable: Task report presenting the results of this task.
Task J Evaluate Implementation Issues
Identify wmd discuss institutional and revelatory issues associated with implementation of
approximately three alternatives. Develop recommended strategies for configuring and/or
implernentin_ alternatives to enhance implementability.
4
Deliverable: Task report presenting the results of this task.
Task K Compare/Rank Alternatives
Compare and rank the alternatives on the bases of completeness. efficiency (including cost
estimates), effectiveness and acceptability as defined under Task 2.1 of the original contract
scope of services.
Deliverable: Task retort presenting the results of this task.
Task L Develop Cost Sharing Strategies
Identify and develop various means for quantifying benefits and identifying cost share
responsibilities for a joint program. Identify potential project participants' "ability to pay"
for project water service. Apply each identified means to the alternatives assembled in Task
H.
Deliverable: Task repo,, presenting the results of this task.
Task M Prepare Draft Report
Prepare a draft report documenting the alternatives identification, evaluation and
comparison work.
Deliverable: Draft revort.
Task N Coordinate Project Activities
Coordinate and manage all project activities, arrange and conduct project meetings: prepare
monthly invoices, progress reports, and schedule updates: and make presentations to the
EBMLTD Board and to d. a San Joatluin County Water Advisory Commission and/or its
Technical Advisory Com r- nee. Assume the following meetines:
- 10 biweelt±v meetings in Stockton
- S nonthly TAC net:ines in Stockton.
Assume the followine presentatiors:
-two EB MUD Bo2:d workshops
- mo ESJP Board -equivalent workshops.
Deliverables: A_enda and advance written rnaterials for each for -mal -^.d
presentation; minutes for each formal meeting: presentations.
Task 0 Prepare Final Report
Incorporate client cotraments into the draft report xnd finalize the document -
Deliverable: Final report.
5
San Joaquin Conjunctive Use Project
Scope of Work
E UBBIT B
The primary role of Boyle Engineering Corporation (Boyle) during the project investigation shat] be as
technical advisor to the l=ast San Joaquin Parties (ESJP). The general tasks of Bovie consist of the
following:
1. Provide engineering guidance and comments to data and other technical information that is to be
developed by Montgomery Watson America (?1r WA) (i.e., alternative development schemes,
agricultural distribution system, etc.).
2. Assist the ESJP Technic -i Comrutte-- in providing review comments to Task Reports and Draft
Report prepared by MWA.
3. • Participate in biweekly project and monthly TAC meetings.
4. Participate in ESJP Technical Committee and ESJP board meetings for the purpose of further
defuuag the potential benefits and/or deficiencies in alternative project plans_
rn=ro19700/19 APHI. 1,995 E30YE-E
CITY OF LODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
AGENDA TITLE: East San Joaquin Parties/East Bay Municipal Utility District
Joint Conjunctive Use Project (Information Only)
MEETING DATE June 7, 1995
PREPARED BY: Public Works Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: This material is being presented to the City Council for its information.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: A committee, appointed by Supervisor Barber, has been working
with East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) for approximately a
year to develop the Water Banking/ Conjunctive Use Project. A
copy of the Agreement initiating preliminary study is attached as
Exhibit 1. The City of Lodi will be asked to sign this Agreement at a later date. All costs under this
Agreement will be the responsibility of EBMUD and San Joaquin County. The major principles of the
Project include:
• stop the overdraft of the East San Joaquin groundwater basin
• restore this groundwater basin to a reasonable level
• stop saline intrusion
• provide the water needs to the East San Joaquin Parties (ESJP)
• supply EBMUD with dry -year water
The ESJP include the following agencies- . -
• Woodbridge Irrigation District (WID)
• North San Joaquin Water Conservation District (NSJWCD)
• Central San Joaquin County Water Conservation District (CSJCWCD)
• Stockton East Water District (SEWD)
• City of Lodi
• City of Stockton
• San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
The ESJP Technical Committee, a subcommittee of the Water Policy Committee, is presently -working
with EBMUD engineers to develop a formai work plan. As part of the work plan, some of the major
water sources to be considered are:
•
wet -year Mokelumne River water supply
• existing entitlements of ESJP from the Mokelumne and Calaveras rivers
• EBMUD's American River supply
APPROVED:
THOMAS A- PETERSON r.ere�.e a.o.r
City Manager
CONJUSEAOC RAG
East San Joaquin Parties/East Bay Municipal Utility District Jcint Conjun44ve Use Project
(Information Only)
June 7, 1995
Page 2
• USSR/SEWD/CSJWCD contracts
• 1485 Water (treated wastewater from Stockton released to Delta)
reclaimed wastewater from City of Lodi and City of Stockton
Some of the needed facilities include an unlined canal between Folsom Canal and Farmington Canal,
and new irrigation distribution systems to serve surface water in lieu of groundwater. A pian showing
the canal alignment is attached as Exhibit 2.
The total preliminary study project costs are approximately $630,000. These costs are to be shared
equally between EBMUD and San Joaquin County. The majority of the work will be performed by
Montgomery Watson consulting engineers. The ESJP Technical Committee has also retained
Boyle Engineering as its consultant to work with them. The total County's share is approximately
$315,000 and will be funded by the County using its Water Zone Investigation II funds. A time
schedule for this work is attached as Exhibit 3.
Also attached for your information is a document entitled `Undercurrents Developed by EBMUD
and ESJP' which provides more general information on this joint project
Andy Christensen, from WID, is the Chairman of the ESJP Technical Committee. He will be at the
Council Meeting to help answer any questions you may have related to this project.
FUNDING: San Joaquin County funds.
Jade Ronsko
bliic orks Director
JLRJim
Attachments
ca WID, Attn: Andy Christensen. Manager
WaterMastewater Supedrrtendent
5f31M