HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - November 1, 1995 (67)Oi
4�
CITY OF LODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
AGENDA TITLE: Public Hearing to consider the Planning Commission's recommendations that the
City Council adopt the 1995 Growth Management Allocations
MEETING DATE: November 1, 1995
PREPARED BY: Community Development Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council conduct a Public Hearing to consider the Planning
Commission's recommendations that the City Council adopt the 1995
Growth Management Allocations.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The following data is included for the City Council's review:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
FUNDING: Application Fees
in,
Attachments
Growth Management Methodology;
Growth Management Point System;
Growth Management Schedule;
An Overview of the Allocations from 1989 through 1994;
The Planning Commission's Recommendations for 1995; and
Maps of the Various Projects.
J s B. Schroe r
mmunity Development Director
APPROVED:
THOMAS A. PETER A recycled paper
City Manager
Locumenu cc -1
MEMORANDUM, City of Lodi, Community Development Department
TO: Community Development Director
FROM: Assistant Planner, Mark Meissner
DATE: Thursday, August 24, 1995
SUBJECT: GROWTH MANAGEMENT SCORING & ALLOCATION SUNffvfARY
The development plans submitted for review this year are all listed in the table below.
This memo
addresses the reasoning behind the scoring of each project and later explains the building permit
—_ allocations. The scoring of each development plan is based
on Evaluation Criteria adopted as part
of the City's Growth Management Ordinance.
1995 Development Plan Scoring Summary
CRITERIA
L
>i
V
PROJECT :
A
B `C I)t DZ D3
.< D4
E*"
F<
G H*•
;'
T .
TOT,4l5
TOWNE RANCH
7
7 200 5 8
8 4
0
8
0
0
20
101 277
PARISIS PROPERTY
5
0 200 3 0
7 0
0
10
0
0
15
10 250
THAYER PROPERTY
3
0 200 0 0
4 0
0
10
0
0
15
10 242
BRIDGETOWN
5
7 100 5 0
4 0
0
10
0
0
15
10 156
CENTURY MEADOWS 1
5
01 100 5 *
8 0
0
13
0
0
10
10 151
CENTURY MEADOWS 3
3
0 100 3 *
8 0
0
15
0
0
10
10 149
HELMLE PROPERTY
51
01 100 3 *
0 9
0
0
0
01
101
101 137
CENTURY MEADOWS 2
31
01 100 3 *
0 0
0
10
0
01
101
101 136
NOTE: PROJECTS WITH 100 PTS. FOR CRITERIA'C'HAVE REQUESTED ALLOCATIONS FOR PRIORITY AREA TWO.
' A COMMITMENT FROM DEVELOPERS TO FRONT FUNDS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF AMAJOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IS NECESSARY.
"CRITERIA DOES NOT APPLY TO SINGLE-FAMILY PROJECTS
Towne Ranch, the first project on the list, is an existing and developing project located at 3032
West Turner Road. The project is at the North-West corner of Lodi, adjacent to Turner Road to
the North, to Lower Sacramento Road to the East, to the developed Park West Subdivision to the
South, and to the Woodbridge Irrigation District Canal to the West. The points shown are based
on the approved development plan for the entire Towne Ranch project, not just the portion being
considered for allocations this year.
• The Towne Ranch project received 7 points in category A., Agricultural Land Conflicts, for
being adjacent to agricultural land on one side, the North side. Maximum points for this
category is 10.
• 7 points were awarded in category B., On-site Agricultural Land Mitigation, for designing the
subdivision with reverse -frontage lots and, a solid wall with landscaping. Maximum points for
this category is 10.
• 200 points were awarded in category C., General Location, for being located within the
Priority Area One boundary. Maximum points for this category is 200.
• 5 points were awarded in category D1., Relationship to Existing Development, for abutting to
existing development on two sides, the East and South. Maximum points for this category is
10.
• 8 points were awarded in category D2., Relationship to Public Services (Wastewater), for
extending the Master Plan sewer line in Evergreen Drive within the project boundaries. The
maximum points for this category is 10.
• 8 points were awarded in category D3., Relationship to Public Services (Water), for extending
the Master Plan water line in Evergreen Drive within the project boundaries. The maximum
points for this category is 13.
• 4 points were awarded in category D4., Relationship to Public Services (Drainage), since the
project requires the expansion of Westgate Basin. The maximum points for this category is
10.
• 0 points were awarded in category E., Promotion of Open Space, because this category does
not apply to single-family residential projects.
• 8 points were awarded in category F., Traffic (Street Improvements), for extending a Master
Plan street (Evergreen Drive) within the project boundaries.
• 0 points were awarded in category G., Housing (Affordability), because the development plan
does not specify whether there will be any affordable housing units or programs to make the
units more affordable. Maximum points for this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category H., Site Plan and Project Design, because this category
does not apply to single-family residential projects.
• 20 points were awarded in category I., Schools (Proximity). Five of the points were for being
within one half of a mile from a proposed elementary school, ten of the points were for being
within one half of a mile from a proposed middle school, and the remaining 5 points were for
also being within two miles of an existing high school. Maximum points for this category is
30.
• 10 points were awarded in category J., Fire Protection (Proximity), for being within a three
minute emergency vehicle driving time from the nearest fire station. The Automatic Aid
Agreement between the City of Lodi and the Woodbridge Rural Fire District has recently
brought this project within the three minute emergency vehicle driving distance. Maximum
points for this category is 10.
The Towne Ranch development plan received a total of 277 points, placing it at the top of the list
with the greatest development potential.
Parisis Property, the second project on the list is a new project located at 3883 East Harney
Lane. The project is near the south-east corner of Lodi, adjacent to Stockton Street on the West,
to Harney Lane on the South, to the undeveloped Richards Ranch subdivision to the North, and
the proposed Thayer Property Project to the West.
• The Parisis Property project received 5 points in category A., Agricultural Land Conflicts, for
being adjacent to agricultural land on two sides, the South and East sides. Maximum points
for this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category B., On-site Agricultural Land Mitigation, for not providing
a buffer between the project and adjacent agricultural land. Maximum points for this category
is 10.
• 200 points were awarded in category C., General Location, for being located within the
Priority Area One boundary. Maximum points for this category is 200.
• 3 points were awarded in category D1., Relationship to Existing Development, for abutting to
existing development on one side, the West. Maximum points for this category is 10.
0 points were awarded in category D2., Relationship to Public Services (Wastewater), since
the project requires the extension of wastewater lines from Bluejay Way in the Johnson Ranch
subdivision to Stockton Street through the proposed Richards Ranch and Thayer Property
developments and an undeveloped parcel north of the project site. The necessary right-of-way
has not been acquired. The maximum points for this category is 10.
• 7 points were awarded in category D3., Relationship to Public Services (Water). This score
represents the average of 10 points for being adjacent to the existing Master Plan water main
in Stockton Street designed to serve the project and 4 points for requiring the extension of a
Master Plan line outside the project boundaries but within existing right-of-way (Harney
Lane). The maximum points for this category is 13.
• 0 points were awarded in category D4., Relationship to Public Services (Drainage), since the
project requires the extension of storm drain lines from Bluejay Way in the Johnson Ranch
subdivision to Stockton Street through the proposed Richards Ranch and Thayer Property
developments and an undeveloped parcel north of the project site. The necessary right-of-way
has not been acquired. The maximum points for this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category E., Promotion of Open Space, because this category does
not apply to single-family residential projects.
MGM C:\LIBRARY\GROWTHAtA\GM95REPO.DOc 3
• 10 points were awarded in category F., Traffic (Street Improvements), will widen and
improve existing facilities (Harney Lane and Stockton Street). The maximum points for this
category is 15.
• 0 points were awarded in category G., Housing (Affordability), because the development plan
does not specify whether there will be any affordable housing units or programs to make the
units more affordable. Maximum points for this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category H., Site Plan and Project Design, because this category
does not apply to single-family residential projects.
• 15 points were awarded in category I., Schools (Pro)dmity). Ten of the points were for being
within one quarter of a mile from a proposed elementary school, and the remaining 5 points
were for also being within two miles of an existing high school. Maximum points for this
category is 30.
• 10 points were awarded in category J., Fire Protection (Proximity), for being within a three
minute emergency vehicle driving time from the nearest fire station. Maximum points for this
category is 10.
The Parisis Property development plan received a total of 250 points, placing it second on the list.
Thayer Property, the third project on the fist is a new project located at 3921 & 3953 East
Harney Lane. The project is near the south-east corner of Lodi, adjacent to the proposed Parisis
Property project on the West, to Harney Lane on the South, to the undeveloped Richards Ranch
subdivision to the North, and agricultural land to the East.
• The Thayer Property project received 3 points in category A., Agricultural Land Conflicts, for
being adjacent to agricultural land on three sides, the South, East, and West sides. Maximum
points for this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category B., On-site Agricultural Land Mitigation, for not providing
a buffer between the project and adjacent agricultural land. Maximum points for this category
is 10.
• 200 points were awarded in category C., General Location, for being located within the
Priority Area One boundary. Maximum points for this category is 200.
• 0 points were awarded in category D1., Relationship to Existing Development, because the
project is surrounded by undeveloped land. Maximum points for this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category D2., Relationship to Public Services (Wastewater), since
the project requires the extension of wastewater lines from Bluejay Way in the Johnson Ranch
subdivision to Stockton Street through the proposed Richards Ranch and Parisis Property
developments and an undeveloped parcel north of the project site. The right-of-way has not
been acquired. The maximum points for this category is 10.
• 4 points were awarded in category D3., Relationship to Public Services (Water), for extending
a Master Plan water line outside its boundaries, but within existing right-of-way (Harney
Lane). The maximum points in this category is 13.
• 0 points were awarded in category D4., Relationship to Public Services (Drainage), since the
project requires the extension of storm drain lines from Bluejay Way in the Johnson Ranch
subdivision to Stockton Street through the proposed Richards Ranch and Parisis Property
developments and an undeveloped parcel north of the project site. The right-of-way has not
been acquired. The maximum points for this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category E., Promotion of Open Space, because this category does
not apply to single-family residential projects.
• 10 points were awarded in category F., Traffic (Street Improvements), for widening and
improving an existing facility (Harney Lane). The maximum points in this category is 15.
• 0 points were awarded in category G., Housing (Affordability), because the development plan
does not specify whether there will be any affordable housing units or programs to make the
units more affordable. Maximum points for this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category H., Site Plan and Project Design, because this category
does not apply to single-family residential projects.
• 15 points were awarded in category I., Schools (Proximity). Ten of the points were for being
within one quarter of a mile from a proposed elementary school, and the remaining 5 points
were for also being within two miles of an existing high school. Maximum points for this
category is 30.
• 10 points were awarded in category J., Fire Protection (Proximity), for being within a three
minute emergency vehicle driving time from the nearest fire station. Maximum points for this
category is 10.
The Thayer Property development plan received a total of 242 points, placing it third on the list.
Bridgetown, the fourth project on the list is a new project located at 451 East Turner Road.
The project is at the North-West corner of Lodi, adjacent to the Woodbridge Irrigation District
Canal on the North and West, the City on the East, and Turner Road on the South.
• The Bridgetown project received 5 points in category A., Agricultural Land Conflicts, for
being adjacent to agricultural land on two sides, the East and North sides. Maximum points
for this category is 10.
• 7 points were awarded in category B., On-site Agricultural Land Mitigation, for providing a
buffer between the project and adjacent agricultural land. Maximum points for this category is
10.
MGM C:ILIBRARYIGROWTHNfA\GN'f95REPO.DOc 5
• 100 points were awarded in category C., General Location, for being located within the
Priority Area Two boundary. Maximum points for this category is 200.
• 5 points were awarded in category D1., Relationship to Existing Development, for abutting to
existing development on two sides, the South and East. . Maximum points for this category
is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category D2., Relationship to Public Services (Wastewater), since
the project requires extension of wastewater lines through planned projects in the Towne
Ranch development south of Turner Road. The necessary right-of-way in Towne Ranch has
not yet been acquired. The maximum points in this category is 10.
• 4 points were awarded in category D3., Relationship to Public Services (Water), for extending
Master Plan water lines outside its boundaries, but within existing right-of-way (Turner
Road). The maximum points in this category is 13.
• 0 points were awarded in category D4., Relationship to Public Services (Drainage), since the
project requires extension of storm drain lines through planned projects in the Towne Ranch
development south of Turner Road. The necessary right-of-way in Towne Ranch has not yet
been acquired. The maximum points in this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category E., Promotion of Open Space, because this category does
not apply to single-family residential projects.
• 10 points were awarded in category F., Traffic (Street improvements), for improving an
existing facility (Turner Road). The maximum points in this category is 15.
• 0 points were awarded in category G., Housing (Affordability), because the development plan
does not specify whether there will be any affordable housing units or programs to make the
units more affordable. Maximum points for this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category H., Site Plan and Project Design, because this category
does not apply to single-family residential projects.
• 15 points were awarded in category I., Schools (Proximity). Five of the points were for being
within one half of a mile from a proposed elementary school, and the remaining ten points
were for being within one half of a mile from a proposed middle school.
• 10 points were awarded in category J., Fire Protection (Proximity), for being within a three
minute emergency vehicle driving time from the nearest fire station. The Automatic Aid
Agreement between the City of Lodi and the Woodbridge Rural Fire District has recently
brought this project within the three minute emergency vehicle driving distance. Maximum
points for this category is 10.
The Bridgetown development plan received a total of 156 points, placing it fourth on the list.
Century Meadows 1, the fifth project on the list is an existing and developing project located
at 2081 West Harney Lane. The project is near the South-West corner of Lodi, adjacent to the
Century Meadows Two subdivision on the West, Century Boulevard on the North, Harney Lane
on the South, and the WED canal and the City on the East.
• The Century Meadows 1 project received 7 points in category A., Agricultural Land Conflicts,
for being adjacent to agricultural land on one side, the South side. Maximum points for this
category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category B., On-site Agricultural Land Mitigation, for providing no
buffer between the project and adjacent agricultural land. Maximum points for this category is
10.
• 100 points were awarded in category C., General Location, for being located within the
Priority Area Two boundary. Maximum points for this category is 200.
• 5 points were awarded in category DI., Relationship to Existing Development, for abutting to
existing development on two sides, the North and East. Maximum points for this category is
10.
• No points were awarded in category D2., Relationship to Public Services (Wastewater),
because a commitment from the developer/s of the Century Meadows 1 project to front funds
for the installation of a major public improvement is necessary. The project requires the
installation of the Harney Lane sewer trunk line and a lift station at the future intersection of
Harney Lane and Mills Avenue. Funds are not available in the Sewer Development Impact
Mitigation Fee Fund. The maximum points for this category is 10.
• 8 points were awarded in category D3., Relationship to Public Services (Water), for extending
a Master Plan water line within the project boundaries from Harney Lane to the proposed
Lexington Drive. The maximum points in this category is 13.
• 0 points were awarded in category D4., Relationship to Public Services (Drainage), since the
storm drains to serve this project will have to be extended to Mills Avenue through the
Century Meadows Two and Century Meadows Three projects. The necessary right-of-way
has not been acquired. The maximum points for this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category E., Promotion of Open Space, because this category does
not apply to single-family residential projects.
• 13 points were awarded in category F., Traffic (Street Improvements). This score represents
a combination of 10 points for widening and improving an existing facility (Harney Lane) and
3 points for improving circulation by providing additional access from Harney Lane to
adjacent development (proposed Muirfield Drive). The maximum points in this category is
13.
MGM C:UBRARY\GROWTH\(.a\GM95REPO.DOC 7
• 0 points were awarded in category G., Housing (Affordability), because the development plan
does not specify whether there will be any affordable housing units or programs to make the
units more affordable. Maximum points for this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category H., Site Plan and Project Design, because this category
does not apply to single -far ily residential projects.
• 10 points were awarded in category I., Schools (Proximity). Ten points were for being within
one mile of an existing high school, Tokay High.
• 10 points were awarded in category J., Fire Protection (Proximity), for being within a three
minute emergency vehicle driving time from the nearest fire station. Maximum points for this
category is 10.
The Century Meadows 1 development plan received a total of 153 points, placing it fifth on the
list.
Century Meadows 3, the sixth project on the list is an existing and developing project located
at 1933 West Harney Lane. The project is near the South-West corner of Lodi, which is near the
South-West corner of Lodi, adjacent to the Century Meadows Two subdivision on the East,
Century Boulevard on the North, Harney Lane on the South, and agricultural land to the West.
• The Century Meadows 3 project received 3 points in category A., Agricultural Land Conflicts,
for being adjacent to agricultural land on three sides, the South, East and West sides.
Maximum points for this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category B., On-site Agricultural Land Mitigation, for providing no
buffer between the project and adjacent agricultural land. Maximum points for this category is
10.
• 100 points were awarded in category C., General Location, for being located within the
Priority Area Two boundary. Maximum points for this category is 200.
• 3 points were awarded in category D1., Relationship to Existing Development, for abutting to
existing development on one side, the North. Maximum points for this category is 10.
• No points were awarded in category D2., Relationship to Public Services (Wastewater),
because a commitment from the developer/s of the Century Meadows 3 project to front funds
for the installation of a major public improvement is necessary. The project requires the
installation of the Harney Lane sewer trunk line and a lift station at the future intersection of
Harney Lane and Mills Avenue. Funds are not available in the Sewer Development Impact
Mitigation Fee Fund. The maximum points for this category is 10.
• 8 points were awarded in category D3., Relationship to Public Services (bVater), for extending
a Master Plan water line within its boundaries in the future Mills Avenue and Lexington Drive.
The maximum points in this category is 13.
• 0 points were awarded in category D4., Relationship to Public Services (Drainage), since the
project requires extension of storm drain lines to the west through the Century Meadows Four
project or the undeveloped parcel south of the Century Meadows Four project. The necessary
right-of-way has not been acquired. The maximum points for this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category E., Promotion of Open Space, because this category does
not apply to single-family residential projects.
• 15 points were awarded in category F., Traffic (Street Improvements), This score represents a
combination of 10 points for widening and improving an existing facility (Harney Lane) and 5
points for improving circulation to adjacent development by extending Mills Avenue to
Harney Lane. The maximum points in this category is 15.
• 0 points were awarded in category G., Housing (Affordability), because the development plan
does not specify whether there will be any affordable housing units or programs to make the
units more affordable. Maximum points for this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category H., Site Plan and Project Design, because this category
does not apply to single-family residential projects.
• 10 points were awarded in category I., Schools (Proximity). Ten points were awarded for
being within one mile of an existing high school, Tokay High.
• 10 points were awarded in category J., Fire Protection (Proximity), for being within a three
minute emergency vehicle driving time from the nearest fire station. Maximum points for this
category is 10.
The Century Meadows 3 development plan received a total of 149 points, it project sixth on the
Est.
Helmle Property, the seventh project on the list is a new project located at 2109 West
Kettleman Lane. The project is adjacent to the Roget property (future park) on the West, to the
Sunwest subdivision on the North, to Tienda Drive on the South, and Agricultural land to the
East.
• The Helmle Property project received 5 points in category A., Agricultural Land Conflicts, for
being adjacent to agricultural land on two sides, the South and East sides. Maximum points
for this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category B., On-site Agricultural Land Mitigation, for providing no
buffer between the project and adjacent agricultural land. Maximum points for this category is
10.
• 100 points were awarded in category C., General Location, for being located within the
Priority Area Two boundary. Maximum points for this category is 200.
MGM C:\LIBRARY\GROWTHNLi\GM95REPO.DOC 9
• 3 points were awarded in category D 1., Relationship to Existing Development, for abutting to
existing development on one side, the North. Maximum points for this category is 10.
• No points were awarded in category D2., Relationship to Public Services (Wastewater),
because a commitment from the developer/s of the Helmle Properties to front funds for the
installation of a major public improvement is necessary. The project requires the extension of
the Mills Avenue sewer trunk line and construction of a lift station at the future intersection
with Mills Avenue on the north side of Kettleman Lane. The necessary right-of-way has not
been acquired and funds are not available in the Sewer Development Impact Mitigation Fee
Fund. The maximum points in this category is 10.
• No points were awarded in category D3., Relationship to Public Services (Water), since the
water line will have to be looped to Tienda Drive or Kettleman Lane through adjacent parcels.
The right-of-way has not been acquired. The maximum points in this category is 13.
• 9 points were awarded in category D4., Relationship to Public Services (Drainage) This score
represents the average of 10 points for being adjacent to a Master Plan storm drain line
designed to serve the Project (existing 60" trunk line) and 8 points for requiring the extension
of a Master Plan storm drain line within its boundaries in the future Tienda Drive. The
maximum points in this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category E., Promotion of Open Space, because this category does
not apply to single-family residential projects.
• 0 points were awarded in category F., Traffic (Street Improvements), since the project
requires extension of a Master Plan street (Tienda Drive) outside the project boundaries and
right-of-way has not been acquired. The maximum points for this category is 15.
• 0 points were awarded in category G., Housing (Affordability), because the development plan
does not specify whether there will be any affordable housing units or programs to make the
units more affordable. Maximum points for this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category H., Site Plan and Project Design, because this category
does not apply to single-family residential projects.
• 10 points were awarded in category I., Schools (Proximity). Five points were awarded for
being within one mile of an existing middle school, Senior Elementary, and the remaining five
points were awarded for being within two miles of an existing high school, Tokay High.
• 10 points were awarded in category J., Fire Protection (Proximity), for being within a three
minute emergency vehicle driving time from the nearest fire station. Maximum points for this
category is 10.
The Helmle Property development plan received a total of 137 points, placing it seventh on the
list.
10
Century Meadows 2, the eighth project on the list is an existing and developing project located
at 1817 West Harney Lane. The project is near the South-West corner of Lodi, which is adjacent
to the Century Meadows One subdivision on the East, to the Century Meadows 3 subdivision on
the West, to Century Boulevard on the North, and Harney Lane to the South.
• The Century Meadows 2 project received 3 points in category A., Agricultural Land Conflicts,
for being adjacent to agricultural land on three sides, the South, East and West sides.
Maximum points for this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category B., On-site Agricultural Land Mitigation, for providing no
buffer between the project and adjacent agricultural land. Maximum points for this category is
10.
• 100 points were awarded in category C., General Location, for being located within the
Priority Area Two boundary. Maximum points for this category is 200.
• 3 points were awarded in category DI., Relationship to Existing Development, for abutting to
existing development on one side, the North. Maximum points for this category is 10.
• No points were awarded in category D2., Relationship to Public Services (Wastewater),
because a commitment from the developerls of the Helmle Properties to front funds for the
installation of a major public improvement is necessary. The project requires the installation
of the Harney Lane sewer trunk line and a lift station at the future intersection of Harney Lane
and Mills Avenue. Funds are not available in the Sewer Development Impact Mitigation Fee
Fund. The maximum points for this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category D3., Relationship to Public Services (Water), since this
project requires the looping of water lines through the Century Meadows One or Century
Meadows Three projects for which right-of-way is not available. The maximum points in this
category is 13.
• 0 points were awarded in category D4., Relationship to Public Services (Drainage), since this
project requires the extension of storm drain lines to Mills Avenue through the Century
Meadows Three project. The necessary right-of-way has not been acquired. The maximum
points in this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category E., Promotion of Open Space, because this category does
not apply to single-family residential projects.
• 10 points were awarded in category F., Traffic (Street Improvements), for widening and
improving an existing facility (Harney Lane). The maximum points in this category is 15.
• 0 points were awarded in category G., Housing (Affordability), because the development plan
does not specify whether there will be any affordable housing units or programs to make the
units more affordable. Maximum points for this category is 10.
• 0 points were awarded in category H., Site Plan and Project Design, because this category
does not apply to single-family residential projects. Maximum points for this category is 20.
MGM C.\LIBRARI'\GROWTHNIA\Gh195REPO.DOC 11
• 10 points were awarded in category I., Schools (Proximity). Ten points were awarded for
being within one mile of an existing high school, Tokay High. Maximum points for this
category is 30.
• 10 points were awarded in category J., Fire Protection (Proximity), for being within a three
minute emergency vehicle driving time from the nearest fire station. Maximum points for this
category is 10.
The Century Meadows 2 development plan received a total of 136 points, placing it eighth on the
list.
12
w
G\IJI�DI�-+IQ�INIOIJ
r
Land Conflicts (Adjacency)
—1041
Agricultural Land Mitigation (Buffer)
Location (Priority Area)
to Existing Development
to Public Services (Wastewater)
to Public Services (Water)
on of Open Space (Pei
(Street Improvements)
(Affordability)
Site Plan and Project Desigr
Schools (Proximity)
Fire Protection (Proximity)
City of Lodi Residential Growth Management Schedule
Adopted: September 18, 1991 under Ordinance #1521
Year
Population
2% Pop.
projection
Persons/
Household
Total units
peryear
Single Fam.@
65%
Med density @
10%
High Density @
25%
•' Sep -89
50,990
1,020
2.572
397
258
40
99
Sep -90
52,010
1,040
2.567
404
263
40
101
Sep -91
53,050
1,061
2.630
403
262
40
101
Jan -92
53,186
1,064
2.664
399
259
40
100
Jan -93
53,701
1,074
2.680
401
261
40
100
Jan -94
53,903
1,078
2.680
402
261
40
101
Jan -96
55,788
1,116
Est. 2.697
416
270
42
104
Jan -97
56,904
1,138
Est. 2.697
425
276
43
106
Jan -98
58,042
1,161
Est. 2.697
433
281
43
108
Jan -99
59,203
1,184
Est. 2.697
442
287
44
111
Jan -00
60,387
1,208
Est. 2.697
451
293
45
113
Jan -01
61,595
1,232
Est. 2.697
460
299
46
115
Jan -02
62,827
1,257
Est. 2.697
469
305
47
117
Jan -03
64,084
1,282
ESL 2.697
478
311
48
120
Jan -04
65,366
1,307
Est 2.697
488
317
49
122
Jan -05
66,673
1,333
Est 2.697
497
323
50
124
Jan -06
68,006
1,360
Est. 2.697
507
330
51
127
Jan -07
69,366
1,387
Est. 2.697
518
337
52
130
TOTALS: 1 8,398 I 5,459 I 840 ( 2,100 I
•' Sep'89 population number equals 2/3 of the population difference of Jan '89 and Jan '90 added to Jan'89.
NOTE: Population and persons per household from '89 to '95 per State Department of Finance.
Actual percentage increases in population may be higher or lower than 2%. Calculation of building permit allocations
is based on a 2% increase of the current year population figure.
1013/95 GMALL95.XLS
CITY COUNCIL AWARDED BUILDING
PERMIT ALLOCATIONS 1989 -1994
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS ALLOCATED (1989 -1994) = 2,406
SINGLE FAMILY 65% =1,564 UNITS
PROJECT
# OF UNITS
- IN SUBDIVISION
ALLOCATION
TOTALS
BANG'S RANCH
123
123
CENTURY MEADOWS 1 *
201
48
CENTURY MEADOWS 2 *
162
105
CENTURY MEADOWS 3 *
201
102
CENTURY MEADOWS 4
120
120
COLVIN RANCH
60
60
FUGAZIBROTHERS
5
5
JOHNSON RANCH 2
173
173
LODI WEST
284
284
LODI ESTATES
65
100
RICHARD'S RANCH
114
34
RIVERPOINTE
44
44
TOWNE RANCH
403
366
1,955
1,564
* Projects with land in Priority Area 2.
MEDIUM DENSITY 10% = 241 UNITS
PROJECT
'
# OF UMTS
IN SUBDIVISION
ALLOCATION
TOTALS
BANG'S RANCH **
36
0
LODI WEST
57
57
BRIDGEHAVEN
50
50
LODI ESTATES **
22
0
WOODHAVEN PARK
75
75
240
182
In 93 the Planning Commission awarded 40, 1994 medium density allocations to the Lodi West project
•* The Bangs Ranch and Lodi Estates projects each were awarded single family allocations in place oftheir medium density allocations.
HIGH DENSITY 25% = 602 UNITS
# OF UNITS ALLOCATION
PROJECT IN SU13DMSION TOTALS
BENNETT & COMPTON * 14411 0
�-
14741 0
* The Bennett and Compton project was awarded 75 medium density allocations under the project name of Woodhaven Park.
10/3/95 GMALL95.) LS
LODI, PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED BUILDING
PERMIT ALLOCATION SCHEDULE 1995
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS TO BE ALLOCATED FOR 1995 = 408
SINGLE FAMILY 65% = 265
PROJECT
ALLOCATIONS
RECEIVED'89-54
ALLOC. NEEDED
TO COMPLETE
REQUESTED
ALLoc.1995
FRI gool ,
PRS ' ;
a
_ 33�����3i3"33�, SM:
mi?N�
TOWNE RANCH
366
37
37SI
PARISIS PROPERTY
0
39
38
,
THAYER PROPERTY
0
34
34
37£>3
BRIDGETOWN
0
123
62
CENTURY MEADOWS 1
48
153
113
CENTURY MEADOWS 3
102
99
99
3141 .>;
HELMLE PROPERTY
0
61
61'..'�
CENTURY MEADOWS 2
1051
58
58
6211F-604
502
ONE SINGLE FAMILY ALLOCATION FROM 1996 WAS GRANTED TO THE PARISIS PROPERTY PROJECT
MEDIUM DENSITY 10% = 41 UNITS
No projects have requested any of the 41, 1995 allocations for medium density units.
HIGH DENSITY 25% = 99 + 101 + 101 + 100 + 100 + 101 + 102 = 704 UNITS
No projects have requested any of the 102, 1995 allocations for high density units.
Allocations from the previous years ('89-'94) are all available.
10/3/95 GMALL95MS
AII$N30 M07 - 74Y11N301S3d1
Z'oN l.IIin 'unis7m
N 7�7�c5c5
FF
G
OvOa O1N3wvaJVS
I ;I,I.I•
4- 4--� -+
0
x
Z
m
to
Z
W
0
0
u
t
2
h
W
I - y _ �, = .. _ • a�' .. '- �.r 111,,,. �, v .� �'T' �-}�� 1 �� 1 �
41 _l -` • /
NO tv d0 0 ,
-.,-
as{aro - 1 Ns� asphr 3 A
I•71'
p
jlllppp_ w.
WA
bge
R 0 R
g 11 Tif-11
am7:..
A Il 770 Y7 ! r 0 3nIY0
! 7YMYJ 10rdlSIO MOUrDIM 390121800041 N }
(391)OHMM19) 371111717.21M9v
cE I;E. •<
-D00-- e
suras � I ( r•ssaass
0.
_ LIR miu.
q
r
r
a
� n
mLl}iy �
quV�w
b� q
W.1Nse
gAmns�
Iy
��._
•
� '_
qp iq
n
-
a
_
04
I -
J
suras � I ( r•ssaass
0.
_ LIR miu.
q
r
r
-
a
_
04
suras � I ( r•ssaass
0.
-a
G
q $
r
O
w
?
Is
V
q�
iV
HHill
�
tlo
-a
G
1- I - .11 IC
rears® rli - al r
w i0A
ml ,ll9
v's twR1n suewrDRR
W.LO. CANAL
Ile Ij: Ilr F 1111, 1196, Izo 5Si I'l I22 ]t 30 $
! y
$ 27 $ A eA' �S
Its y —
III p ell ;: e7 9; e0 D es ex 03 $ i 7s m
_IDT__ _ •�_ I 3e 37 >t 96 38' 37 R•
70 I •. I.fiT._U .'.w 1 iV..' n
11] 11ar� R C m 10
v
---. Mt .. - K ;. w e1
uz 71 a a u
u n
tl9 00 do A 4 2 if
73 64
IDR I rr�--- _ >•Y.
E 53 u.an W Is
0
b _ nV_-_, Irr IIR
IA
Im �. 75 '. �! 91 57 N
E. eR
IIrDRT^ T�� 7 e _-I9r2
-
= 36
.
AS
al
-ii�ii 1i $ to
100 03
_N,- 13
los o NM
J
u
104 ice. '� 9s
107 j `-'*-----�-- • - -i'1. .
'v 1arRCYa Rlo. R1I II _ 1 s 3 g 6 e • 7
-- ..�.. _.J '' _-,� !I -- •-� r Ir' Wgliyl alw` 31
TURNER —
R 0 A
:alma snR Nan - gLR 1
a 19lw N.Ile 2.9a-na�R •'
1995 DEVELOPEYENT PUN
BRIDGETOWNE
A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION SI
TA M.. R.D E.. M.D.B.&M.. CITY OF LODI
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY. CALIFORNG
MAT. 1995 SCALE. I• - for
PREPARED FOX. PREPARED BY,
/RED BAO'A. INl DAUYBACM R PUZLL DIC.
3I7 REST LOOT AVENUE 323 r ELM STREET
LODI. CA 95!!0 LODI. G 93110
(209) 373-2ee/ (209) -m-eggs
PROPOSED PHASING AND LAND USE:
$995 A94URS1E0 ALWAVOM - EA UNITS R -g ROOM
FUTURE ALLOCATIOM - gl UNITS
A.P.X.: OVEZ230-3e A 39
SITUS ADDRESS. 451 LAST TURNER ROAD
PROPOSED IflS AIloGTlON CONTAINS 22.4 /CRL5.
FUTURE AlLOGTTON CONTAINS MJ ACRES.
6AUMBACM 6 PIAZZA / Z
—mow« I ®CIVIL RNO/NRWR■ :e►�ti:::
�I I AN sPo/
RURVRVORR DEVELOPMENT PLLAND USE
i�:.e 6 • /089
a 1 TA
Art A r H ON r r l s
O �A
T! I t Pq 21 t
e
% I
I
a
,
.
A s N r r a
fit
w
'
yy
i •
ifs roma s
v a X a 1 f N! X s T
-- --� -----------
•,rf
p
6
y
•
��
- - -�'
;yi- _
e
`- �»!"
I........... ..........
•
�. � I;� I
a
s. I Y a
s Y 0 r 7 N O a N
a 1 TA
Art A r H ON r r l s
O �A
T! I t Pq 21 t
21 t
% I
I
a 1 TA
Art A r H ON r r l s
O �A
`�^.
h c S .CSS'•'
>d
fit
w
'
yy
i •
ifs roma s
v a X a 1 f N! X s T
-- --� -----------
•,rf
p
6
y
•
��
- - -�'
;yi- _
e
`- �»!"
I........... ..........
fi
�. � I;� I
� I ' I I as
�� -----
-
4
a 'L_=_J • '�_
_—� 'L ^ � AJC i I
� �
N
%�
�, r falrm a
Irl Xs1Nso r
I
7 -
'Ara
sao rarrrX
Yg
I
-•-
-� � � ar�aInsrr
i �
OIYr
�,
t' _
� _ _' 8 I
� � it �!� w. ��, - -I•
_' _.
r •ar
.I✓a sera smart
w S -----
c
, �
t� \rte • a - G
-�- - -
i -Ill.o
O �A
`�^.
h c S .CSS'•'
>d
fit
w
yy
-- --� -----------
e q
p
6
y
a �
V
e
i -Ill.o
•; .
-- --� -----------
y
a �
I........... ..........
5
-
A
t
r+
IF
e
o ��v
' a a
f/r ri ___iawv►x . a
a SA/vp a ►/vpto/e a 4
Moo
a
' w .
p{.V
IYp p° N/ZZ7
� � a
IN
:o�
M o
Qa� � KZSO�C A
8.4
rY,,� a
if
i °
r�TT//r a L
_ t ___— S-,It•� - - ; I. _--•tea S II J-1 _L� r
a w• I, _ *I! w ,i � �i i at ala I I I
if
MA I S O N• O l S S A T P
!r
a a l r• Jr 8 N S Cr I d a 8d
f --7f--7
I
t�___ r--� �-• -II ��-:i o--w-i--Lw-��r �-�r-E 6I
I---
�J
a( r -'y 0=1'_F"z al lGf, L -=l I
l _ i•I ei a
'I
a
'r A7 r. i v n a xaa
e.rr r.rr...,a• m..r �-__r__ �e 1.—__J
i I 1 x
si sa:a e'iit @ �
WE
iLOx Wo��•p�r'1 J
W V � $ WiC WXsi
V �W S«00
W
tfl� N W �N0OOy 0
x 0 O OL\M
a ..
7rM7nr s•rs+ wso.oru '1:r
J
. t I
I� R
_ a �
na � & • .rrer� ��
i."
I�
L
Ti ■
•
v rr� LL1 R M S r 1p 1{• 9 4r - � 1
W O 2 � .Y1K•� r v
4t Y v e
gg
In uu
} } R
a = x �,
�j^s. H.
-1117
K .K
g I ( wrnus
9
8
i rfwreso. erw r 9■7 rrls0,a •00
" I I �" 4••'... M Y i I� re � / / I I I � I �I 1 I I L-_ ' _ ' ' .� ._- - .. _ � • ___ _ - _ r ' ._ ,
• L L L -L A _1 _� _J -.-'--L L--- �- L. l_ _1-L -j
--- Y rr r
11 I I 1 27 a to 1 r I �a e' 1. 1 1 a rf1 raf 1
i Il �Ua l `I_ sal .«-_I,__». f`"r;a5rf 7e �I 7r�7t 7!-.w 7s� rnl y , I ma
— �! M '•- 1' h_r "-h :I' - r I� I I �; Its rre j 1 its a its I fser • III
is 3 tf ;, p , � .: '' Is �, ,i-� � -- -. -� - - . 7 rT- w�- .- Iso —_I r
-
..I— -h o _,.- - �- -n :; J 1 I I I I r1 111 nr 1 "s s m i 1 rat au::i:r"itew
a } 1 t! a0 1 1•JAr q 1 07116 es 1, 61 p! It e0! rt to S 77 t-ipf 1 0r — ~ 1
-I -- r� .. 1_. _ �-_�--=i __ , ira ue ` ai-- a-I_a_ rsf z
1 1 }0 al sy irl `IP3 /7 1 rr el l a r 0w swim 1
-
111 r 1 w
"
li- �"-1{ � � .� {« .L_ •_ _ � , » » 1 II � I �-�- I -_ 1 I , r rIr
i }a; l •; ry I" ,1 q 1 r a r O 1 I I
. 1 Nr ' I ar /f 1, w•j-"—+--'" +, paL er ar 2, et ra_ ee as ser I rte u6,
_ _ " !• 9 -� 1'�--' v 11 -- ' y II
37 T /s_ it l I r i I I I I r la 4411. I.r r.r r1s rn
.- 1 a. a .G I , • h
C-
111 P 7 , 2/ Val 1 1 a7 3 so I 11 tr I u • 'r I ` I I I I T,lyefn ul 1 ; q, rss ;
w
L_ „ `11II ) .II .. 11 1 i 1 slew /N
1 y �- D t ir- I --•'ti V 1T' -'I—"I'll 7- - ;--"-I- 192?, 9/ a0? 6 rer_ 17 /i 1071 • 1 O 1---- -- -- -- -- -- --J 1 ■
%m as r r ar s, 21 1 `I ss a as a;r i F I ,i rat ea.N rLAct a1 rrr a
_Jl Il_.___+-sr.Jl o+i--t� 6 n -T---`'-- -_= _=~==r= J '+ 9 - -- -- -- -- -- - `' iso
T 0 1I f R a r I li 1: sew Orrero ew rrr `; raf i e t •, o I i� f,
r
i_- j r 1 a1 ss f' - t / 1 !f1 +e I I 1- j 159 f ,
I' Y IO 11 'rt l ra 11 ISt /f. r7 911; ra i 'I _ i• . �1 if lr100 row IOa11Oa IBI Iron• 169 1 ~ Ia7 /ta I11 Iaa /rr n71 r
--- ---
It
1 I 11 r ., tt rr 1 1 1 ! tat y /de rer 1 151 a .
1t
r.
u I
it
It
rw•r oars rarr,Ar rlr ee sa swear
1 I r e r I r I It r
1 I rriiii�iisr
1
1 1
1 I
1
1
1
C R CON f r L A C t
1
1 1
ALrwAAlra Ira/om
rImA2I SAM N CRONN r7ACR
O•rNs
DEVELOPMENT PLAN - 1995 ALLOCATION
C■Nrun Y MEA DO IMI TWO
SEINC A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SECTION 10, TJ N.,R.6 E., Y.D.B.& Y.,
arr OF LOD1. SAN JOAQUIN COUNTC
CALIFORNIA
MAY, 1995 SCALE: t' -100'
11.9•..1 /- pl-pe-I w
OtLNAR 1nCM IANNOACM I ruin
1707 CAST NARNtY LANt 322 OAST rim S7RSST
LOAF. G 95210 Leel, d 22210
(202) 215-1110 (209) 3ss-qH
41
,■AUMMACH 6 PIAZZA
CIVIL ■NOIN■wN.».e w,r •O•>• •",•
DMLOPEHENT PLAN LAND USE 77"
G•/097
-•moo
y
z
rNnsr, ir.nse
IIN Yl,rrrrl urwrirr - 1I 0!511, IJ +MIN,
jr (
a wrna,
1. NN aaenrnw rMNwr rra •ran.
a r.w., w -a• -n
a Isrna +Nana mr r.ar wuwn wr
DEVELOPMENT PLAN - 1995 ALLOCATION
C■Nrun Y MEA DO IMI TWO
SEINC A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SECTION 10, TJ N.,R.6 E., Y.D.B.& Y.,
arr OF LOD1. SAN JOAQUIN COUNTC
CALIFORNIA
MAY, 1995 SCALE: t' -100'
11.9•..1 /- pl-pe-I w
OtLNAR 1nCM IANNOACM I ruin
1707 CAST NARNtY LANt 322 OAST rim S7RSST
LOAF. G 95210 Leel, d 22210
(202) 215-1110 (209) 3ss-qH
41
,■AUMMACH 6 PIAZZA
CIVIL ■NOIN■wN.».e w,r •O•>• •",•
DMLOPEHENT PLAN LAND USE 77"
G•/097
•, CITY OF LODI NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Carnegie Forum Date: November 1, 1995
305 West Pine Street, Lodi Time: 7:00 p.m.
For information regarding this notice please contact:
Jennifer M. Perrin
City Clerk
Telephone: (209) 333-6702
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, November 1, 1995 at the hour of 7:00
p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the City Council will conduct a
Public Hearing to consider the following matter:
a) Consider Planning Commission's recommendation that City Council
adopt the 1995 Growth Management Allocations.
Information regarding this item may be obtained in the office of the Community
Development Director at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California. All interested persons
are invited to present their views and comments on this matter. Written statements may
be filed with the City Clerk at any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein, and oral
statements may be made at said hearing.
If you challenge the subject matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing described in this notice or in
written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk, 221 West Pine Street, at or prior to the
Public Hearing.
By Order of the Lodi City Council:
if A71�Pernn
i Clerk (/
Dated: October 5, 1995
Approd as o form:
John Luebberke
Deputy City Attorney
J1CITYURKIFORMS NOTCDO.DOC 1013195
yOF�
� �► 00
U u�
DECLARATION OF MAILING
9</FORCE
Public Hearing -1995 Growth Management Allocations
On October 5, 1995 in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, I deposited in
the United States mail, envelopes with first-class postage prepaid thereon, containing a
copy of the Notice attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A"; said envelopes were addressed
as is more particularly shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto.
There is a regular daily communication by mail between the City of Lodi, California, and
the places to which said envelopes were addressed.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on October 5, 1995, at Lodi, California.
Jennifer M. Perrin
City Clerk
J
lin L. TaylCi Clerk
decmail/forms
Delmar Batch
1767 E. Harney Lane
Lodi, CA 95240
Lewis Homes of California
9216 Kiefer Blvd.
Sacramento, CA 95827
Fred Baker & Chris Kessler
317 W. Lodi Avenue
Lodi, CA 95240
Angelos Parisis
9949 Fernwood Road
Qtnrktnn rA 94717
Lee Developments
c/o Robert L. Lee
P.O. Box 3116
San Leandro, CA 94578
J. Jeffrey Kirst
P.O. Box 1259
Woodbridge, CA 95258
Dennis Bennett
P.O. Box 1597
Lodi, CA 95241
13AUNMACH & PIAZZA
323 W. ELM STREET
ODI, CA 95240
1111111111181110 ...............
STOCKTON RECORD
ATTN: RICH HANNER
101 W. LOCUST ST. #4
LODI, CA 95240