HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - No. 2023-139RESOLUTION NO. 2023-139
A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL DECLARING PURSUANT TO
ARTICLE 8 OF THE SURPLUS LAND ACT (GOVERNMENT CODE §54220-
54234), THAT REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 17700 NORTH GUILD
AVENUE, 18021 NORTH KENNISON LANE, AND 219 SOUTH SCHOOL
STREET ARE EXEMPT SURPLUS PROPERTY AND NOT NECESSARY FOR
CITY USE; AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
DISPOSE OF EXEMPT SURPLUS LAND TO A CONTIGUOUS OWNER
WHEREAS, the City of Lodi ("City") is the owner in fee simple of certain real property
located at 17700 North Guild Avenue, 18021 North Kennison Lane, and 219 South School
Street, Lodi, San Joaquin County (collectively "the Properties") and more particularly described
in Exhibits A, B, C, and D attached hereto and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, under the Surplus Land Act (SLA), Government Code Sections §54220-
54234 ("Act"), surplus land owned in fee simple by the City must be declared either surplus land
or exempt surplus land as supported by written findings, before a local agency may take any
action to dispose of it consistent with statutory requirements, the Surplus Land Guidelines, and
a local agency's policies or procedures; and
WHEREAS, the Properties were declared surplus by the Lodi City Council by approving
Resolution No. 2021-313 on November 17, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the California Department of Housing and Community Development
published the "Guide to Exemptions from the Standard Surplus Land Act Process" in July 2022
clarifying four main categories of exemptions from the Surplus Land Act; and
WHEREAS, the real property located at 17700 North Guild Avenue qualifies as "exempt
surplus land" pursuant to Government Code section §54221(f)(1)(B) because the property is (i)
less than 5,000 square feet; (ii) not contiguous to land owned by a state or local agency that is
used for open space or low -and moderate -income housing; and (iii) the City intends to sell the
Property to an owner of contiguous land; and
WHEREAS, the real property located at 18021 North Kennison Lane qualifies as
"exempt surplus land" pursuant to Government Code section §54221(f)(1)(B) because the
property is (i) less than 10,000 square feet and has no record access; (ii) not contiguous to land
owned by a state or local agency that is used for open space or low -and moderate -income
housing; and (iii) the City intends to sell the Property to an owner of contiguous land; and
WHEREAS, the real property located at 219 South School Street qualifies as "exempt
surplus land" pursuant to Government Code section §54221(f)(1)(B) because the property is (i)
less than 5,000 square feet; (ii) not contiguous to land owned by a state or local agency that is
used for open space or low -and moderate -income housing; and (iii) the City intends to sell the
Property to an owner of contiguous land; and
WHEREAS, owners of contiguous land for the Properties have come forward to express
their intent to purchase the Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby find that
the above recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby declare pursuant
to Article 8 of the Surplus Land Act (Government Code §54220-54234), that real property
located at 17700 North Guild Avenue, 18021 North Kennison Lane, and 219 South School
Street are "exempt surplus land" pursuant to Government Code section §54221(f)(1)(B) and not
necessary for city use; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby authorize the
City Manager to dispose of exempt surplus land to an owner of contiguous property.
Dated: June 21, 2023
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2023-139 was passed and adopted by the City
Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held June 21, 2023 by the following votes:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Bregman, Craig, Nakanishi, Yepez, and
Mayor Hothi
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None
OLIVIA NASHED
City Clerk
2023-139
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-313
A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL DECLARING,
PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 8 OF THE SURPLUS LAND ACT
(GOVERNMENT CODE §§54220-54234), THAT REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 18021 NORTH KENNISON LANE,
17700 NORTH GUILD AVENUE, 219 SOUTH SCHOOL STREET,
AND 2630 SOUTH STOCKTON STREET, ARE SURPLUS LAND
AND NOT NECESSARY FOR CITY USE
WHEREAS, the City of Lodi ("City") is the owner in fee simple of certain real property
located at 18021 North Kennison Lane, 17700 North Guild Avenue, and 219 South School
Street, and 2630 South Stockton Street, Lodi, San Joaquin County (collectively "the Property"),
and more particularly described in Exhibit "A," "B," and "C" attached hereto and made a part of
hereof; and
WHEREAS, under the Surplus Property Land Act, Government Code Sections 54220-
54233 ("Act"), surplus land is land owned in fee simple by the City for which the City Council
takes formal action in a regular public meeting declaring the land is surplus and not necessary
for the City's use. The land must be declared either surplus land or exempt surplus land; and
WHEREAS, the Act requires local agencies to formally declare agency -owned
properties .as surplus land prior to taking actions to dispose of such properties and to issue
Notices of Availability to eligible entities, including school and park districts, within whose
jurisdiction the property is located, as well as to housing sponsors that have notified the State of
California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) of their interest in
surplus property; and
WHEREAS, the Property has been reviewed by City staff and has been determined
according to staff review the Property is surplus and not necessary for City use contingent upon
the creation of public utility easements as noted; and
WHEREAS, the departments of Administration, Community Development and
Neighborhood Services, Electric Utility, Fire, Internal Services, Library, Parks, Recreation, and
Cultural Services, Police Department, and Public Works have reviewed the Property, provided
written comments, and have declared the Property is not necessary for agency use; and
WHEREAS, the written comments from City departments are attached as Exhibit C.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby
declares the real property set forth below and more particularly described in Exhibit "A," "B,"
and "C" as surplus land and not necessary for City use.
1) 17700 North Guild Avenue (APN 049-130-47) — former access easement and
sanitary sewer exclusion easement; a public utility easement following the surplus
land and disposition process is not required; and
2) 219 South School Street (APN 043-011-11) — former municipal well site;
reservation of all existing and future public utility easements, as necessary, is
required; and
3) 2630 South Stockton Street (APN 058-650-01) — dedication of a former subdivision
map; reservation of all existing and future public utility easements is required; and
4) 18021 North Kennison Lane (APN 049-130-02) — former municipal well site; a
public utility easement following the surplus land and disposition process is not
required.
Dated: November 17, 2021
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2021-313 was passed and adopted by the City
Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held November 17, 2021 by the following votes:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Chandler, Khan, Kuehne, and Mayor Nakanishi
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Hothi
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None
JENNIF R CUSMIR
City Clerk
2021-313
GRANT DEED
SCHENLEY DISTILLERS CORPORATION, a Delaware corpora-
tion, the First Party, hereby GRANTS to the CITY OF LODI,
a municipal corporation, Second Party, all that real
property situated in the County of San Joaquin, State of
California, described as follows:
CantOnaing at an iron pin marking the Rection
r.•11•n 1+r' •:nlmm�n ,•rr :.l'•r1, I .11r1 1:1 • 11PI1
r� fir;
pa:, r111d I tilt, 117{ r1,f1.!�,
11.. 1
f711r`11r �• it � ++,I,1 E!, l•�Ij S, 'n+rrl t'11.1p lllyn ,:nmmetH
1•,, �.rt:•1n :fi 111 r+ j 'ill 0 '•i r1l't..I1 • r'I.n.!1.. Al • '•r,.!1
! 1 1• r I'. }}n C;', L+ 11,1111 I r11' I'Ip : I Nn 1. r1>r; 11hr nrr17
T1•,11;11 1rli5,rt r.J±I 1.1 .I •1'.1 i}SrHtlir N f?yl"
111" 4*1y,l. 60 1 1),11[11;; Lh1'rlrr • •"n (1111 -
Ii1r,,{� I'nr1• I;n Ii F,.3 1111. 'kt+•nr.� ,"-�';Sli s ..
I•,1lrt sr'n;,11rr4lall;' Itf r•I ;ns!r}r111t1. 1,111 r•
11'11" 1,51;11 M1r 1.,, 1;�f [111.1.11111
Reserving unto First Party and to its successors and
assigns forever all mineral, oil, gas or other hydrocarbon
substances rights which First Party may now have or may here-
after have.
Reserving unto First Party and its successors and
assigns forever the right of reasonable ingress and agrees
to said property in connection with maintenance of First
Party's adjacent properties,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Grant Deed has been executed
by the corporate officers of Sehenley Distillers Corporation,
hereunto duly authorized, and its corporate seal has been af-
fixed by like authority this ay of _;,•/I Vis...{ , 1946.
SCHENLEY DISTILMfis CORPORATION,
a Delawtir rutlrpocni::l,nn
By�dnr�;
!71•�r�+���r�'_f
.1 xnn )['helve., 01.11 or roll.m,.
.9TATP OF CALIFORNIA
Clla nm! 0111110 q/San F.ermrrro �aA.
nn Ihb nmr q
M th0,;." 0�r j'Liu.,a,f Me. nooff'f end Null
MJer0 ma, C L A R A I; . 11 A Y rt A'4rn,r, IL.!!
4' rn „ni7 /x, fA.
4 ••uh-,rin.ru drrhr ,�� dnew n.•dFff,4undr,n414a1,5�rrkrnnONra,SMlneJCalnn
rr y :r °!.. � � '�440,,...4
Aarrre p mr foh v.,
of
'J•I!• rnrpernNbe rRoW/,l In mrd rhnlrvnfr
n•,rrai 1 Who e0ifalw/ w 1,067a 1401101 ftj ee'e/kar�fw/y/r fn/rnrmnU, end -1114 nNN M m.
fr re• Ihul Nf h eerinmfka ,r rorpar41/0rl rflfr.ln a ' /v'Ir rhv
Uq.fe,1460 10044, earednr,d 'R'ivralrlyda0r/
IN 117TN/,;S,S INl/Iilpg171t / /law hrn4Aln 401 my Bandnnl op00d my U/AtPof Seel, If, m4 elyier
In,A••,,f• r,,r....,le.narvr f},,,,f.,,,,,f,m,Sra7enlCnlr�f$,,I„�eeJ11rcr fn lld, e110e440r�i„r nSn..Nrr4.
....�... _. r.'
My C-111" 9-f— 'toll 17, ft"! .• •.• • •• - —C,.. � ' ' •• Y
___. ... .....4... _...�
kn101f '11141M In 4011 rn41'ur r4,• 4uA aver. . r' „�"„�
Nr n1Pnn IrMe•nnn'niHe of M111erala. i1ji .••
RESOLUTION NO. 825
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO CONSENT TO THE ACMPTANCE OF
DLrEDS AND/OR GRANTS FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF LODI
RMOLVED, shat J F. BLAKCI.Y, City Clark of the City of Lodi, be and he is hereby, authorizetl In
consent to Ilia ncccptnnco of tl"d& one grants affecting rnel ettatC or Any interest thrrnln or aaaemenrs
thereon far Hnd nn behalf of the City of Lodi, Ft7 that the same MAY be flied for record fit any County
or City ntsd Cnnnty In this Stote.
This resolution is passed and adopted in accordance with Section 1158 of the Civil Code of the
State of CaGfornin as snid aoction wns nmended by the Statutc7 of 1933. Chapter 127,
Caftlfied to ba n full. tnte and correct copy of Resolution No, 825 of the
City Cmmcil of the City of Lodi, as Adopted January 6, 1936, and that the
snme has not heen resninded or revoked And is now In full force and affect.
DATED; aeptembor 17, 19911 Iai •f:r rai
1, J. F. f1LAKELY, do hereby nertify that I am the duly elected. Qualified
and acliag City Clerk of the City ❑f Lodi mentioned in the forrgning Rasa -
Mimi No. 825 a»d that f do hereby Accept, for and on behalf of sniff Cil.y
of Lodi, the within (Iced front._Sell ra8y Matillers polkorefi.on _
DATED: t9eptember 17, 1948
V `�
TOGETHER with all rind elngnlnr the tenements, hereditaments mnd appurtenances ther0unto 1lolonxIng oU lu nnyNlee epp016
udning, and the reversion end reverslana, remahxlar and romnlrnders, renp, lasum and profits thereof;
TO HAVR AND HOLD, snid lend unto amid party of the second Tart and to Its suaeeusora In governmental functions forever,
IN WITNESS WH¢RKOp, the emit part. or the fleet part Inn. , hereunto set ... ,, , ,..,head,,... . ,and 400, .. ,
Ills day end dnto fleet above written lied second party hall accepted delivery ns Is evidenced by a copy of a reeolutlon of ecaap-
Mace duly adopted by Ile City Council annexed hereto and made part hereof,
File No.
F-
L L
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TAX
STATEMENT AND RECORDED
DOCUMENTTO
CITY CLERK
CiTY OF T.ODI
CALL TIOX 3006
LODI. CALIFORNIA 95241
87049*743
• f: a I)�I;':; (1
87 JUN -4 AM Of 58
RECORDED At REQUEST OF
F16 — .."tCT FROY"ff
-- SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
DEED
_William - F. Johnson and Marian S, Johnson
do -. __ hcrche GRANT to the CI I Y 01' 1 ODI. n nutnicipaI corporation of the Stutc of California, all ilin I ren)
plopeny 6tualr In the ('it%. of Lodi, 4701111111 of Suit .Inuyoln, Slate nr Cnlifoinin, described as follows,;
A portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 5, Township 3
North, Range 7 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, being more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at. the Northwest corner of said Section 5; thence
South, 880.61 feet; thence easterly 50 feet to a point being the
Southwest corner of the Johnson property as described in the
deed filed in Book 2594 of Official Records, page 245, 5an
Joaquin County Records and the Northwest corner of the Johnson
property as described in Recorder's instrument• No, 85076299, San
Joaquin County Records, also being the True Point of Beginning;
thence South along the East line of the Central California
Troction property 60.0 feet; thence easterly parallel to the
line common to the Johnson properties above described, 60.0
fprl.; thence North, 60.0 feet; thence westerly, along the line
common to the Johnson properties, 60.0 feet to the True Point of
Beginning.
Reserving An easpment for maintenance and access more
harti mlarly di-cirribed as: B?ginninn at the Trull point of
Beginning above (h,,cribed; thence e-isterly along [hp ]ino. common
to thel Johnsmt properties, 60.0 feet; thence South, 5.0 feet;
thence westPt'ly, 60.0 feet; thence North, 5.0 feet; to the True
Pnint of Beginning.
!il i t.;t �. 1fdultiVltf
t r
'10'; ;do. !61111:a'n
This document MUST bt: nolarlted, Please attach proper nolalinl ucknowledgment.
Description approved DATE
GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENTth
, r„
w Y CALIFORNIA
81e1e of�__
On this the14_dayof--MaY--_. 19B7,beforome,
l
Counlyol BAN JOAQUIN rSS
J
DORIS J.ANNAND
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
MITITU
WILLIAM P. JOHN80IJ-And MARIAN S. JOHNSON
OOAIS 1. AH#IANO
- -•- --
NprnnYPWVC•CA4CtMWA
personally known to me
eAH
e� aoArluwcoIwo.+20. 7d' 1 IPOs
proved to me on the basis of setlelectory evidence
^-••-r�iM
to be the poison(s) whose name(s) are • subscribed to the
within Instrument, and acknowledged that they __exaeuted It
WITNE86myhand I "9 '+lanol
r .1
No'w7 aSPinnture t
711018f
NATIONAL NOTARYABeOCIATION. 83011 VNIIIMA eNd . P.0 So 412O • Wondkod H11A CA O13O54fin
This is to ceriify that ilia Interest In real property conveyed by the
Deed or Cdnm dated —tea; 14_0 I cagy from
William F. Johnson and Marian S. Johnson
to the City of Lodi. a municipal corporation, Is hereby accepted by the underxigned
pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution 3847 of the City Council of Lodl
adopted on November 21. 1973, and recorded on December 4, 1973, In Book 3823,
Page 176, Official Records of son Jonquin Comity, and the Orontce consents to
recordation thereof by Its duly authorised officer,
faAYF.D; .7unr, r111 1H7
City Clerk nl th, City of Lodi
IKf ,ill
fllie'N.o. ':� •�. y
,r'Nrrnll 11111111111�55ti� �.
When recorded, mail
recorded document to:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF LODI
CALL BOX 3006
LODI, CA 95241
ACCESS EASEMENT
AND
SANITARY SEWER EXCLUSION EASEMENT
WILLIAM F. JOHNSON and MARIAN S. JOHNSON hereby GRANT to the CITY OF LODI,
a municipal corporation, an access and maintenance easement and a sanitary
sewer exclusion easement for that certain real property in the County of
San Joaquin, State of California, described as follows:
PARCEL 1
An easement for maintenance and access being a portion of the Northwest
Quarter of Section 5, Township 3 North, Range 7 East, Mount Diablo Base
and Meridian being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the Northwast ccj^ner of said Section 5; thence South, 680,61
feet; thence easterly 50 feet to a point being the Southwest corner of the
Johnson property as described in the deed filed in Book 2594 of Official
Records, Page 245, San Joaquin County Records and the Northwest corner of
the Johnson property as described in Recorder's Instrument 1!o 95076299,
San Joaquin County Records, also being the True point of Beginning; thence
Horth along the East line of the Central California Traction property 10,0
feeti thence easterly parallel to the line common to the Johnson
properties above described, 50,0 feet; thence South, 10,0 fuet; thence
westerly, along the line common to the .Johnson properties, 60,0 feet to
the True Point of Beginning,
PARCEL II
An easement to exclude the construction of any sanitary sewer facilities
within 100 feet of the following described radius point;
Commencing at the True Point of Beginning of the above described; thence
South, 50,0 feet; thence easterly, parallel to the line common to the
Johnson properties above described 50,0 feet to the said radius point.
Said Parcel II shall be kept free of sewer lines, septic tanks, pits,
sumps, leach lines, and other potential sources of contamination, per
requirements of the California Department of Public Health for Public
Water Wells,
Grantor reserves the right to use the surface and subsurface except as
indicated above,
r.
Dated _ 'i�j'�f�Ji'�r__ �s�•C �:.r.,.., ` L��
fiirjrlan ':� �}hirrF50nVT'j-
This 15 to certify that the interest in real pro{rerty conveyed by
Deert dated Flay 14, 1987 from William F. dohnson and blarinn S. 3ohnson
to the City of Lodi, a munieipel wrporativn, is hereby acreptnd by the
tnidursigned pursuant to atlthority wriferred by Resolution 3847 of the
City of Lodi adopted on November 21, 1973, and recorded on December 4,
1973.-In•.Beok 3812, Page 13G, o#•ficiell Records of San JoajuIn Couhty,
and the frantee consents to ror.nrdation khvreaf by its duly suthdrixed
officer.
Dated;-sl,une 1, 1987
ALICE M. REIMCHE
City Clerk, City of Lodi
(Seal)
GENERAL•Ar KNOWLISDGMENT uoxo,
_.... ...-:.r•.:,:,�:_�,».sy�:••r •-'. �l+.n�n'�'v -._=; 9y av-: ����fi-,w...��•.p.r:.�:. sv. �'�r,�:vr�vi�l,.r.T�l+r
Sinte of California 14♦ h May B7
j On Ihls lho_day ql 19belore n e,
San Joaquin 95• DORTS J. ANNANn
County 01 .__. _ _
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appoared
WILLIAM F. JOHNSON and MARIAN S. JOHNSON
=;,PzPj
A'AS.NS Aq0HGA6p anNK CtlrAkiYAIn. xa, lstlA
IN personally known to me
U proved to me on the basis of aetlStaolary evidence
to be the persons) whose name(s) are---- —Subscribed to the
wlthln lnatrurrent, end arknowledgod that �:.119y _ __exoculed IL
W4iNES11m 5,dnnrinf)IG131.artst
IJr L,u •.'•, r,gl5rrn r
�r
AFTER RECORDING, RETURN TO;
San Joaquin County
Community Development Department
1010 E, Hazellon Ave,, Stockton
ATTN: Larry Matthews
Send one (1) copy to:
1 0UNTY ASrirSSOR
Space above this line for Recordors use
NOTICE OF NONRENEWAL FOR
CALIFORNIA LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT
APPLICATION NO: WN-93-ee7
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 049-130-47
Pursuant la Sad on 51245 of the Government Coda or the Stets of CeIlFornia, the County or Ban .loaf;uln
gives nolice of nanrenawsl of Call(omle Land 0onsorvhl]an C0nleaet to LO IW, CITY OF, (e+urreni Iand owner(sJ ss
shown on the Assessor's role) lar the property desodbod In the Attached legal desctlpllars, which Is a portion al
Calllonnia Land Conservation Contract Numhorr 700200 reoofdod es Insirument No.4848 BOCK 4354 PAGE
458
BY:f <i . �r �t Development Services Division.
CAPACITY CLAIM ED BY SIGNER
Stele of California
County of San Joaquln
On .Slss,SO,.IC._._. paloN me, DOM R. OE LA TORR E, Nolory Public, personally
a ppaattd LAR R Y IA&M E Wa,
personally known to me to be the person whose nanno Is
subvctlbsd Io fh9 Nlhin Instrument end acknowledged to mo that he
ss MAW the sjrw In his 0141104=011 obpaC ft and Ihal by his signaluro on
fhc tnein+mern Rin ponan, at ritio enMY upon beharl of which the person
aeied, oxett4ad the IPslrumeAl.
Wiingss my hand And WOW east.
SIGNATURE OF NOTARY
•v ice'. -.
I , �; :CHAT 7F rA rg9rrF
y� 'uL. R' • }A7y ::'�h�w�lr�lr fJ��7NV
Tr'�'+�4�.I.Isryr%i wtW s8!t
INDIVIDUALS)
Q CORPORATE
OFFICER(SI
Title(s)
PARTNER(S)
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(G)
Cl SUBSCRIBING WITNE68
C1 GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
® OTHER:
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
tint+.-._rltholllll... r;ll1�{i.r rnf.l',IUIITY
OC/El7ehf!'NT GP.Pr!R rAfEM1I l_
ARN. 049-IJO-41
THAT OERTAINREAL PR�7RERTYS/TUATED /N 7Hf QN/NTYOf S4N✓QiGN1/N, STATEOf
CUL/FORNIA
8EU474PLb7TIONOfSEMONS, 7 JTN, R. 7E., M. 0. A A/Y, I.y '%Y,YfJEOASFOLLOWS
A60FEfiX60FEETPARCEL,A9SHOWNQNREl�7RDOfsURYEY, V -0 -TO AAPRIZ 8, 198,9
IN MI. 30, PAOEJOf TH,-MV ICWINCOI)NTYR,'CORLu
U4�/41
°.ilr::il,rUIN COUNTY
t6-6abewq of art
VW44E Y. UDALL
A7..01-6 Am 9! 59
RECORDED AT REOU::ST OF
AGREEMENT FEEREFbFFE�
16695 North Rennison Lane
APN 049-130-26
rL.
THIS AGREEMENT entered into this (- day of
', 1987, by and between WILLIAM F. JOHNSON
7701 ;,Wn IAU JOHNSON, hereinafter called "Grantor," and
the CrTY OF LODI, hereinafter called "City."
W I T N E S 6 E T H:
1. Grantor agrees to grant to the City and the
City agrees to accept a grant deed for that certain real
property in the County of San Joaquin, State of California,
described as follows:
A portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section
5; Township 3 North, Range 7 East, Mt. Diablo
Base and Meridian being more particularly
described as follows:
commencing at the Northwest corner of said
Section 5; thence South, 880.61 feet; thence
easterly 50 feet to a point being the
Southwest corner of the Johnson property as
described in the deed filed in Book 2594 of
Official Records, Page 245, San Joaquin
County Records and the Northwest corner of
the Johnson property as described in
Recorder's Instrument No. 85076299, San
Joaquin County Records, also being the True
?Dint of Beginning; thence South along the
East line of the Central California Traction
property 60.0 feet; thence easterly parallel
to the line common to the Johnson properties
above described, 60.0 feet; thence North,
60.0 feet; thence westerly, along the line
common to the Johnson properties, 60.0 feet
to the True. Point of Beginning.
Reserving an easement for maintenance and
access more particularly described as:
Beginning at the True Point of Beginning
above describedf thence easterly along the
line common I:a the Johnson properties, 60.0
feet; thence South, 5.0 Feet; thence
wesLoriy, 60.0 feet; thence North, 5.0 feet;
to the True Point of Beginning.
01U4114G
Alsn an BdBeiRenL t;O exclude the cranstcuction
of any gnnit:a ry srwar fac111lies within 104
feet of the following described radius puint:
CommencinV at the 'Prue Point of DegirIiring Dr-
the
[the ahove described; thence 8tiutti, 54,0 fact;
thr,nce easterly, parallel to Lho line cnmmon
Lo Lho Johnson prnp+erties above, de.arribnd
9.0.1) r:eet to the raid radius point.
2, Grantor agrees, in addition to the above, to
grant City a 12' construction easement, 12' south of and
12' east of the above described grant deed for a period of
sir. (6) months From the date of this agreement.
]. City agreen to pay Grantgr the n+rm af;
S2,74n.nn for the property above described in pnragraphs 1
and 2 upon drilling of an acc4pLoble test we].]. by City and
whop t:ll.le is transferred to ciey free and clear of liens
and cnrumbrances nxerapt unpaid current taxes, cnvenanta,
condi: tions, restrictions, a.ltd utility eariementH of record,
of any,
4. City agrees, in addition to the cash con-
sideration, at no expense to the Grantor., to:
A. Construct and maintain a 6' chain link
fence as Ghown on the attached Exhibit A.
B, Maintain the existing ditch along the
went property line of the acquired parcel.
C. Provide Grantor with a copy of a Record
of Survey of the acquisition.
D. Provide Grantor with water for irrigation
of remainder of parre:l at 18695 N. Kennison Lane if, on
any one day, within eighteen (1.8) months of Elle City well
being on liner the differential between standing water
level and the waFer level measured when Lhe City's well is
pumping at maximum capacity is more than aix 16) feet,
The dittes.ontial taken refers to ,both measurreuients being
taken Cram Grantor's exixt.ing well 91te on t'he rmmaindar
of said parcel at 18695 N. Kennison Lane.
City acknowledges an obligation to make
Grantor whole and in order to accomplish this objective
agrees, at Grantor's option, to provide said irrigation
water by either:
-2.
W 14 T r r . .
1. providing a 2-.1/2" outlet from City main
Wa
with required backflow dmvicer and char'e fturaLrLISM Only,
going rates for City Wutr> used for ag
"I r^r•,t'; +11 ric
n% nnkl,% "rr +i !'4nl .fir i'ir
7. s I I n"lh`: r3±. r),•s:I rr P, i t y
IrV,1:ri(n w ':c•r ll+ th + n I F�1' r:wrrii 4 .rsri i'
atnrl } r :fir ,7f.r+t Ln I. l.o ('.lt(' ,r::5:.ti?Iu r(',rrlItt'.!t.� and- pr1;?hsuI•v.
I n nrS1r I:ts ;scnl7lrrlvl I ,h tll•: ,,•n1.. 41 n}t'.ir'r :Ivo F.sf mak l nq the
+:c.lnlr,' ,aii"l'`r I'!yr 1-lcy nhall UYnvtsir3 fs!rnllnq hr my -or
1 ,p ' ii • :'+,13GWjn�q opt!-nnst
(a) Returbish existing system=
(b) Install new system (pumPr motor,
electrical service),
now
(c) on-site agriculturaltilize old nwellgland
(d) install new system in new on-site
agricultural well,
V I is ursrl erstnv] FVt+,!: the C Ia7 e•1.er:t
bUL in torr eivenL,
any +�L tlyra "F""nn.' rF farted to •v
Cbm)tad and 41a
!a not
s r;)tr' St"ted
that;Sor.h r,=t-inns d tu rr^tT'is: ane
v+ qr,hrCiy n�ll I.Mt r"l
of Uvrr:
r.P(,i.ons, will
5hou'Ld a new well as ng a period +of�drilling
Provide water for firigation andnnm�ItiOf the old w+311 to County
the well and Pay r
I:Pquirements.
,xsri;, :!: I:llr'•-s'.ate$ nhjnr.-
in nrrin•r t". ngrnp tie
l'r ,-[ :r,',fl nt: I'. •_ Fi: s'N.s:' n i.il ,;4SLy -t:}4: ,.(t,., frn F,R
Cri(rp)fl,tSr7r (n[ •t rirrix7A r,r lSl_!i Il ( 1 the
C1tar; Ihr. f.11.l''s wr•11 tnal3 t,l'ynn 1.irie, Cr.stin •�wn�rzr talrltn-
e r.�sr+ed -lumping,S+'?P wal l)tb:tl nq r7n limn.
Elnt.i�lptl.n•ri a3 t r p•}}, nr owl q t1 f"'ltsn FaC rr.CCn(n
-rip, per"I-4 a:ic,;, r.hrr k rdr:I,nx (ng r.h� cntnj+l ra tie tltntlr� lyy
ru (n "rnnGF,tl II Ij-xi 51'.(n,,l 'rrw] 1 -I ^m r l:hn
rr.rrtl'�,{, and hl.I Orrt "11A CI.I.y' V w+�l t vl,n() r,r, nit I1 i nmr
�ltnli �ralntty y„11*inrr', Cf�r •zGt,w),►ilsh�t-)t+report
1t{lowazL hinu-�:t
G.ap & f.lnrt:{- r�,mpnsty
I ;s sfe fnnt rrzrpul Vr.-Id lal, mwx tnk-t r nmCir ril.nr'n wall f n
4:h�t "nnrora” cnn,litlrin. VnitTI
d'�vp r' nr. hEvr•rinr<1xtv+i rlr•n-
nn 1.1 n+a r +rl,n'rl+i LVI wi -'ts 1 ul•:sl, nnatL' h+v: I„Imp tFr' rppert
r.ri17rr3rr�,�r❑ nt:rn rggr rnsttfirux1 In
to r.),,,+,rmtn+: +':t� kil:.,. ,I. h Pr;.
MC
87049742
the "after" condition. City shall pay the increased
pumping cost on a semi-annual basis to Grantor. After a
period of two (2) years, the parties shall make reasonable
al)d good Eaith efforts to reduce the remaining term to a
lump sum payment to Grantor.
U. Should an on-site electrical service pole
be required, the city will install it at the lowest legal
height and as near the west fence line as reasonable.
F. Provide reversionary clause in grant
deed, either in an "as is" condition or restored to its
original condition, at Grantor's option.
5. Paragraph 41] above becomes null and void if
remaining parcel 1.s divided into two or more parcels or is
annexed to the City of Lodi. This paragraph shall not
apply in the event that the annexation is involuntary on
the parL of the Grantor.
6. city agrees to pay all title, escrow and
recording Fees.
7. Both parties agree to the recording of this
Agreement_ and all necessary deeds.
6. Both parties agree that they have herein set
forth the whole of their agreement. The performances of
this Agreement constitute the entire consideration and
shall relieve City of all further obligations or claims.
9. This Agreement is binding on heirs, execu-
tors, administrators and assigns of the parties hereto.
In t hR ?vnn r. R; r l• ,.I- y It : -, ..,, b Nr.: nes
�rIR+s. ,...
tpindLIAGn.; -illd COl�anall�,: Cif thio Ag•-poutrnl• Fhan.
0- [att't J I.,rOW111 Lng i p any v,li L tri r-ltferce whia Agrrsament
r r ;r. roa'.I-n i n r.lf•• F'.letr;?t th^:•nr�a , -;W l 1 In n M I h inn to
171 he r7 r -I re n rinrnAEJ U ,Iwrt:ln•1 ire+ nn tit 1, ed Lil n
r.�nt:nnihl• hr.l;,.i•r,,:yrn yr..� :InA'111,1 r:cyr•3 '+f nir t;p hra rFr.h
and dmtormi -to id 13y ..In, •:nurI. +,! •:•.rrnfrr�,•r, ir5rtad1e;t1.❑n
a0lnd r.n -nnr• jud•�mrn1 tat•�i i• r1.
11. It is understood by the Grantor that this
Agreement must be accepted by the Lodi City Council and is
void if test well provies unacceptable.
-4-
97049742
rT
IN WITNESS WHEREIF, the partles have executed
this Agreement the day an hereinabove
year
1
written.
CITY OF LODI,
A Municipal Coporation
iV1 i [,xAMT .7Ai�li5r7rt _ti
A. rrTF:ftoN --
q'O[ N `5 * ,QFi�sriN
City Manager
ATTESTi
Herein called "Grantern
Af..IC.E Ff. REYbl�fl;�� `—
City Clark
Herein called "City"
i•,• , i. r•�y''t�Nl1 tFt ,�•
�5—
CITY OF LODI WELL 5/rf )0 R
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ACQUISITION
SEC,5
--ja-w
Sr, 4k 14 0
170917 Al, Owf;.Fo)l 4'"
Johnson
Property
— 4r.
'ILL
11 *
1 AF• T
TRUE POINT OF
0111P-ii7tit'
IL
0
01
GRANT DEED
EAsr
ro'
1V
J8
--ja-w
H
�Np
N
r \ � � � � � �n'� � �
�� ,
� �.
r�} � � ��� � � � �
� �+ i o � i
•-,
Q �
L7 �
�' � � 4 �
1 � �� L• 'y r,ry'
-01)ts Inberthtre, made this I/ ie` day of... -JUNE- . 1913.- between
Ann Hatrhlns,a wldow,Edward HutchinE and Ada L,fiutchins,hln vlife,
the partl!! of the first part, and the City of Lodi (a municipal corporation), the party of the sec-
ond Plitt,
` ittressehp That for a ynitta.ble ----•---- --- consideration received, the said
part -1!13 of the first part hereby ••- -- -.. 91'tlrlt....... and convey
unto the said party of thea seennd pert and to its auccessors in governmental Functions forever,
all that crrtain piece or strip of land situate, lying and being in the City of Lodi, County of
Sall f oagrlin, State of California, Ftlrtller described as follows;
3eginzning at the NoTthwetit or,rner of Lot No, Rix ( G ) in B104t1
DIo.Seven ( 7 ) of thA Town OC Lodi.roriievlY ttokeluntne,aocoiding to the
of"Ictal JnalJ or saki town Eia Y1lea of rocord 1-11 trio ofi'10e of t)ie County
Recorder of San Joaquin County; thence running dasterly along the North
line of vaid Lot Six 29,5 feet;thmire running 9outhorly 55.5 foet; thenoe
running Weetorly 38.6 fset; therine rtmnDir, Northerly r,lorlL the Wert line
of said Lot Sf.x 55 feet to the point of beginnirt;.
Tn have slid to hold said land onto the said party of the second part and to its successors
in Kovernmentnl functions forever,7fMdtgffd fSSt7tfldt7�t�fldifdYXQt}S�If61�rYXY.Y.XY,Y.Y,Y,xxY7SXXXY,Y.Y.Y,Y
XY.xxSXXY,xXi; is x XXX Y.XxXXXisX):7.:;i:e]Hdt kY:Aft iliih,srpdh1 it>51014: t0likl:4t4'ti aw k, ftx;IJid81WAX XX
Xl.lbrdl%�7ArtA61'd: }Ag,Y.`d.M'd iQrfJiflit:C Y.:CXX'1.ti?:xXY.?:::ti?::i'I.?:'f.tiisri:-1.?:'i. X'l. i::txxXi;X:tXXXxxX;tXXXXX
71t Wltnass Whereof, the said parrieeof the first part have hereunto net tbeix -- .
hands the duy and year firat above written.
J t--Lam--L--4-k -r.
By,e'k ,Aj . ti 4 n71f I..r_1.:
,
■/�rl�Jga.-ti.:t-r..� .l��t�/y/t� ,-ap�._._v...•rf A. —
l-yy�•1 ,�ee
,%tote of Callfor x(a,
ff S,S.
Sll lilts d. .i yt. f�',i rlrrl/.� 14
p, ,Nolary 1'7t611C ill apd j'ur awl-`, r • ...Coulaly, !v lddnq ihelN6J!
rlrtly cona/Jrissiolned rt/Ir/ Ytthr/'Jr, llorso1lally rrlrr, •Prrel r
krtolole to rten.'x
trr l)r l/rr IM0,8011, reluln'rs Hotter is stth,erttrAe'd to Ileo mill/in ,llaslimilleat its Me .illlol'11rq/.....ilt
frN'? r � r., ... �`• ,$�.,r ,•r ,..,r,•.... •''q:• , � „ .ti "vrr •: t/.r � rrwy rrt�e;
'!N// tllrr .exl,;t k. it r• .. , . ( 1 � `' •err �.• 4 .. .q✓
ackeou�ledyn. In oto that ..::. �' ,rah,seriDcd tIJR
a„ ,.."'!f �•, ,,r% r.�t/r.. i ✓'.'., .c l/trreto et,a prhdC,lJ!(lltlfltlGd
in Uftlyfoo 6f iptcof, I have hereunto Not my hand, and agred
my OffBcial Seal, at mll office in tha.,...,,,.,.;
COuniy Of �-��.., ,r.'Y+ fir. ... ` . •r
the day and year rtr 1-44%G'rtrl/�r►6a first above tordtiers.
ol� r
•lf not 1gn,ma[HYe oxt"Yhgwn 10 me" xnd Ineerl tln Amur it iU11r, �t
word, "prevnl re ne on 1110 Qerh W-. ,. "
im atld for s,r,r/ c � !, ., it„' , Corudy, Siate of WIfornia,
peelmrmmlxnM Noma tr-1rlNtrn%vbttnlllltthT—Arlgrne[lu NO. full t[,B.C.xgxnl,On„eeq }IgnYlYYo qnd Bggmx,lqle,d6
Otatr of (0011forttta Ia e,
00"fw n, e.. ay.eca. I :•
On slits 4,
of fr y�,g In the year of our Lord, nlueteeo hundred odd,1f Iii &/"6,,
(iafi+rc ui3i. .rr r'r,• 4' rf.! � L '• •� ►. %a Nlunry Public In and tar en1+1 Cnunly and Stota, roalUlnp Iharah,,
iliify rnrnmlwh+m,il P+u1 11nu1111t•d, pernrinl111y f0pliAred �T,r•'},` �,//,•' // //(/�J/// / J/ r
'�" QYlr.CrTIC\y .�• J t`•� +"L •a.. -v•!.-,.4-
Itnotvn to tno to be the porion, , ,loearibed In and wheeo name
subscribed to elle within Inetrumont, and acknowledged to One thee._„ha ... executed the some,
,la Witnaotf WI�Mllf, 1 h4v4l,ernnnla eel my!lend and effi%erl mY 01114CIaI 6401 at my offlee
In the County o! inn ]onRotn, thviey and ycer In this urrllf W11Vvid'q nbovo written,
. r.. c Fy'.
vid.II rL,le r,
r, 1Pel+n,tuiVr,uuil; M t:., i„M1U�i+,.autrof r�Abar�,ia
�d%Nawt[aeMOnr-�pexex.� ' n. lwte, s<e+wr,. µix •,•„i. F,vl, 6 NUO, •
No.
CITY OF LODI +
221 WEST PINE STREET jJ
P O BOX 3006
LODI: CA 952.41
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE
The undersigned granlor(s) declare(s):
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX 9 _EXEMP D
0 Computed on the cocslrfr. ration ur vai,le of Properly conveyed; OR
❑ Compuled on the nowrlu+alivn or ruloo lass liens or encumbrances
remaining at lime of sale Signature of DaNwanl or Agent deternllning fax—Firm Nave
APN: 03B-650.01 GRANT DEED
2030 SOU TN STUCKTON STREET
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which Is hereby acknowledged,
SKINNER RANCH HOLDINGS, L.P„ a California Limped Partnership
hereby GRANT to
CITY OF LODI, a municipal corporation
the following described real property In the City of Lodi, Counly of San Joaquin, Stale of Callfornle
BATED rte? �r /J'
SEE EXHIBIT "A" attached hereto
Bart Robertson
SIA'1E OF, 'A -F('RN `` )••
COUNTY 'I
o',I'+•�.1,Y.il'•'3V,?t`Ij� before me,
r
porsonaltyAppaa,-
t+ars[Onnlly knrnvn to me (or p .t'^.rf 10 me on the I. -MM nl galls,ar.1 ry
irwdr,'rlr.•') a± h. the person�rwllo�'e name{q} lsfar_•�'a,••,;r �n•I 14 Ili^
�d}'� •.Inns
Ill and 9eknow1nrl0ed to me that the
same In hlsll]oldtian-aulhnrlratl capacliyWt W ana that by hislperl.Jhw
signatures] on IhR mslrtrment Inc pnraOrto or the entity upon behalf of
which the oerson(,a}•acled e).ccuterl the tnstnnnenl,
4-11-1
1 certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the '� 11nllf p, tygpO
I( Gemmr�elen d 19g3]le
State of Cellfornla that the foregoing paragraph Irue and af.;- �'[l{ fil5• hoary PuAUc • r,rHlarnlr
' �r r 1 . �„-, t � 3 �r'T1'�• Ssl, rr.5q,dn E7un1y
RECEIVED
Ll r,r 11 %rlie-r'1'll l4^^.
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
�A ].A 7r•' 14 t)6 5? 6h1 nn
PARTIES
CITY 0411R
!1�
r', nri U, nq IvlrlrN ryr�+r
p
WHEN RECORDED MAIL DOCUMENT ANUII�1I,
TAX STATEMENT TO
CITY OF LODI +
221 WEST PINE STREET jJ
P O BOX 3006
LODI: CA 952.41
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE
The undersigned granlor(s) declare(s):
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX 9 _EXEMP D
0 Computed on the cocslrfr. ration ur vai,le of Properly conveyed; OR
❑ Compuled on the nowrlu+alivn or ruloo lass liens or encumbrances
remaining at lime of sale Signature of DaNwanl or Agent deternllning fax—Firm Nave
APN: 03B-650.01 GRANT DEED
2030 SOU TN STUCKTON STREET
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which Is hereby acknowledged,
SKINNER RANCH HOLDINGS, L.P„ a California Limped Partnership
hereby GRANT to
CITY OF LODI, a municipal corporation
the following described real property In the City of Lodi, Counly of San Joaquin, Stale of Callfornle
BATED rte? �r /J'
SEE EXHIBIT "A" attached hereto
Bart Robertson
SIA'1E OF, 'A -F('RN `` )••
COUNTY 'I
o',I'+•�.1,Y.il'•'3V,?t`Ij� before me,
r
porsonaltyAppaa,-
t+ars[Onnlly knrnvn to me (or p .t'^.rf 10 me on the I. -MM nl galls,ar.1 ry
irwdr,'rlr.•') a± h. the person�rwllo�'e name{q} lsfar_•�'a,••,;r �n•I 14 Ili^
�d}'� •.Inns
Ill and 9eknow1nrl0ed to me that the
same In hlsll]oldtian-aulhnrlratl capacliyWt W ana that by hislperl.Jhw
signatures] on IhR mslrtrment Inc pnraOrto or the entity upon behalf of
which the oerson(,a}•acled e).ccuterl the tnstnnnenl,
4-11-1
1 certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the '� 11nllf p, tygpO
I( Gemmr�elen d 19g3]le
State of Cellfornla that the foregoing paragraph Irue and af.;- �'[l{ fil5• hoary PuAUc • r,rHlarnlr
' �r r 1 . �„-, t � 3 �r'T1'�• Ssl, rr.5q,dn E7un1y
EXHIBIT "A"
All the real property situated in the Stato of California, County of San Joaquln, City of Lodi,
located in the Northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 3 North, Range 8 East, M.Q.M.,
being a portlon of Parcel 16, as shown on the Parcel Map of" Reynolds Ranch", filed in the
office of the Recorder of San Joaquln County in Book 25 of Parcel Maps, at Page 86, being
more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Parcel 16; thence from said point of beginning,
along the northerly boundary thereof, the following two (2) courses: (1) North 87°22'20"
East, 9 5.3 8 feet; and (2) North 88"55'17" Easl, 43,92 feet; thence, leaving said northerly
boundary, South 1]014110" East, 150.62 feet; thence South 02°41'38" West, 25.49 feet;
thence South 06°04'48" We at. 86.25 feet; thence along a tangentcurve to the left, having a
radius of 46.75 feet, through a central angle of 0644618", with an arc length of 5.52 feel;
thence South 00"41'36" East, 241 94 feet; thence South 89"1810" West, 125.75 teal to the
westerly boundary of said Parcel 16; thence, along said westerly boundary, North
00°51'40" West, 505.64 feet to the point of beginning; contalning 1.533 acres, more or
less.
No. 7375
Exp. 17j-3311'1--15 04-
Thla la to airilly that the In mlt In reel ptoparty eonvayod by the dedda? Wfent
dow movf i 13a ' gl[�1t tram _
to Ih■ catty of Lod 1, a municipal corporation, Ie hrr ^ eoaspted by order of the
Undef/lgned ofgailr Wdebalf of the Oily Oounoll of Ladt pureuent to outhorily
conferred by Resolution No, 60-81 adopted by the Cly Oounall an May 3, 1909,
and the grantee aon/ante to the recordation thereof. he duly eutharleed omen
File Na,
REYNOLDS RANCH FIRE STATION
HARNEY LANE
N88'55'17"E
43.92'
95.38' 1
LLI
c/) j, S02'41'38"w
25,49'
Z PORTION OF
0 PARCEL 16S06'04'46"W
S06'04'46"W
25 P.M. 86 86,25'
1.533-1 AC.
V
---L=5.52'
R=46.75'
�71 PARCEL 16
Ep No7-15
in N
Z o
N �
z
_ +, :.75'
�.IJ +' }1 •I S89'18'30"W—
f r
r
1
0 50. 1
1" 100'
2260 Douglas Blvd.
Sults 150
r•l Rosevllle, CA 95661
Ph:916,788,2084
Fa":916.788.4408
1
EXHIBIT "B"
PORTION OF PARCEL 16, o
"REYNOLDS RANCH", 25 P.M. 86
CITY OF LODI, COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN
STATE OF GALIFORhIIA
City Owned Surplus Property
APN_
Address
1 043-011-11
219 S School Street
2 049-9.30-02
18021 N. I<ennison Lane
3 058-660-15
2630 S Stockton Street
4 049-130-47
17700 N Guild Avenue
Size
Square Ft Description
.04 -acre
1,742.4 former municipal well site
.16 -acre
6,969.6 farmer municipal well site
1.16 -acre
66,775.0 former right of way -no access
.08 -acre
3,484.8 former municpal well-slte
AV
$25,000
$8,000
$850,000
$4,000
� I
n
r
F71
� f
C.C.T. Railroad
Kennison Ave
T - rw
11 i, i
on
VIIIIII
I
EXHIBIT C
Astrida Trupovnielcs
From: Andrew Keys
Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 12:14 PM
To: Asti ida Tiupovnieks
Subject: RE: Need your review and written comment
I have reviewed and Internal Services has no need for any of the properties listed,
From: Astrida Trupovnieks
Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 12:02 PM
To: Management Team - Executive
Subject: FW: Need your review and written comment
On second thought, please allow me to provide you each with a Nllable pdf listing each property. You will be able to
make your comments about each property, Thanksl
Astrida
From: Astrida Trupovnieks
Sent: Thursday, September 9, 202111:10 AM
To: Management Team - Executive<ManagementTeam-Executive2@lodl,gov>
Subject: FW: Need your review and written comment
I heard from Recreation and Parks, LEU and Pollee, Would the remaining department heads managers please respond
with Just a couple of sentences that you reviewo(I surplus properties' legal descrlptlons, evaluated your department's
goals and objectives, and ltnvo concluded the propertles are not necessary for your department's use, This written
response Is required to meet the requirements of newer state law, If we are weak on this compliance, financial
penalties could be assessed, Can I please have this written sentonce or two back by Tuesday, the 140 of
September, Thanks.
Astrida
From: Astrida Trupovnieks r•Iti 01favnl+k+�llnrh,��nv>
Sent: Thursday, August 5, 202110:40 AM
To: Management Team - Executive<M�.n�rr.;t`111ts`IIiL.�I1t1_kKk.64rt11L3iPIr1�1Lgc1v>
Subject: FW: Need your review and written comment
Sending again, Thanks for your help, A couple of sentences describing your review of the parcels and why they are not
needed for city use would be wonderful,
Astrida
From: Astrida Trupovnieks
Sent: Friday, July 23, 20214:47 PM
Te: i'11I,7n:i(7,P_ni4:r'Ir TCai�7 Execurivn tIVIKr+t+1L►'_IfL++I I,*r�U. L+S►'�llLI��S�t+i��
Subject: Need your review and written comment
In preparation to declare these properties as surplus real property and not necessary for city use, newer state law
requires the city to prepare written findings as to what has led to the conclusion the properties are not needed for city
(agency) use. Can you please review and describe why these parcels are no longer necessary for your agency
use? There Is no guidance on the basis of the written findings except what I could find below;
Agency's Use shall Include, but not be limited to, land that is being used, or is planned to be used pursuant to a written
plan adopted by the local agency's governing board for agency work or operations, including but not limited to, utility
sites, watershed property, land being used for conservation purposes., land for demonstration, exhibition, or
educational purposes related to greenhouse gas emissions, and buffer sites near sensitive governmental uses, including,
but not limited to, waste water treatment plants.
Agency's use shall not include commercial or industrial uses or activities, including nongovernmental retail,
entertainment, or office development. Property disposed of for the sole purpose of Investment or generation of
revenue shall not be considered necessary for the agency's use."
IItIRGJ1www Itt11 ca gu+thrmmiin14y dnvuluhnwiIIIl?ytAlr litixly Itif d(hir+,hible•IlQusIng rinvtrk]hmr111. 111111
; pgs.6-7
Hoping for a reply by /August 20, Thanks!
Astrida Trupovnleks, MA, MBA
Business Development Manager
City of Lodi and Lodi Electric Utility
o (209) 333-6874
c (352) 484-4344
atl_Upuylllf!1S5��lflfll�rw
Astrida Trupovnieks
From: Sierra Brucia
Sent; Thursday, August 5, 2021 11:09 AM
To: Astrida Trupovnieks
Subject: RE: Need your review and written comment
Well, we aro trying to gather land for our Animal shelter and one of the options Is possibly one of those properties, I
would defer to Charlie on that one,
Sierra Brucla I Chief of Police
Lodi Police Department
215 W. Elm St, I Lodi, CA 95240
209,333,6725 peak 1209,339,0422 Fax
5t}ru tl4 'I aI1LROV
From: Astrida Trupovnieks <atrupovnieks@lodl.gov>
Sent: Thursday, August 5, 202111:07 AM
To: Sierra Brucia <sbrucia@lodl,gov>
Subject: RE: Need your review and written comment
Can I gay the police department has no long•tarm pians to acquire property for the Construction of additional feellltles
for administrative, operational or training use, Can I reference a strategic pian, or perhaps, make reference to the
population growth projections, police to citizen ratio? It wan"t be enough, I don't think, to say the properties are not
needed, The key Is written findings. Sorry for the bureaucracy,,,
Astrida
From: Sierra Brucia «hruc Ir1VIndI iv>
Sent: Thursday, August 5, 202110:49 AM
To: Astrida Trupovnieks <r�LrifynyniE,�hy�lnrll,@Qy>
Subject: RE: Need your review and written comment
I don't believe PQ has any stake In any of these properties,
Slerro
Sierra Bruchs I Chief of Police
Lodi Police Department
215 W, Elm St, I Wdl, CA 95240
209,333,6725 Desk 1209.$39,0422 Fax
From: Astrida Trupovnieks <pinehgvitldkslptil bgy>
Sent: Thursday, August 5, 2021 10:40 AM
Tn: Management Trani - Cxcacuiive <MAI1t1Romen1 r.,C�{li Lxet1111vnAg1Ofll,l7V;
Subject: FW: Need your review and wr}tten comment
Sending again, Thanks for your help A couple of sentences describing your review of the parcels and why they are not
needed for city use would be wonderful,
Astride
From: Astrida Trupovnieks
Sent: Friday, July 23, 20214:47 PM
To: Management Team - Executive <Mel_I.aR?n1�IliTgtl.fR f+tett!tiv.P2�+14dI,gQv>
Subject: Need your review and written comment
In preparation to declare these properties as surplus real property and not necessary for city use, newer state law
requires the city to prepare written findings as to what has led to the conclusion the properties are not needed for city
(agency) use. can you please review and describe why these parcels are no longer necessary for your agency
use? There is no guidance on the basis of the written findings except what I could find below:
"Agency's Use shall include, but not be limited to, land that Is being used, or Is planned to be used pursuant to a written
plan adopted by the local agency's governing board for agency work or operations, including but not limited to, utility
sites, watershed property, land being used for conservation purposes., land for demonstration, exhibition, or
educational purposes related to greenhouse gas emissions, and buffer sites near sensitive governmental uses, Including,
but not limited to, waste water treatment plants.
Agency's use shall not include commercial or industrial uses or activities, including nongovernmental retail,
entertainment, or office development. Property disposed of for the sole purpose of Investment or generation of
revenue shall not be considered necessary for the agency's use."
l,Irl}S LLW�Nw hrd,r.n.11nv/�,�ahtnr!In1!y rlr�u�Irapnrr�Illl�?IUhl�l.®D doynIql2aleri1jhill1i
pgs.6-7
Hoping for a reply by August 20, Thanks!
Astrida Trupovnieks, MA, MBA
Business Development Manager
City of Lodi and Lodi Electric Utility
o (209) 333-6874
c (352) 484-4344
a t, SI -Ovale ks VI lo(I i,p
Astrida irupovnieks
From:
Timothy Conn
Sent:
Thursday, August 19, 20219:16 AM
To:
Astrida Trupovnieks
Cc:
Jeff Berkheimer
Subject-.
FW: Need your review and written comment
Good morning Astrida —
I was asked to look Into these properties and our ability to release them, please find my assessments below.
Feel free to call If you have any questions.
Best,
Common name:Quick-take
(arm -chair assessment):
13021 N. Kennison lane
No Issue abandoning this one
17700 N. Guild Avenue
No issue abandoning this one
22 E. Locust Street
No issue abandoning this one
21.9 S, School Street
We have a transformer, along with primary and secondary cables sitting
on this property feeding various downtown businesses surrounding
it, It does not appear that there are any formalized PUE's In-place (not
currently necessary since the city owns it outright). Abandoning this
property would require the creation of formalized PUE's to cover our
existing and future uses.
2.630 S. Stockton Street
This property has some formalized PUE's but there appears to be some
gaps needing to be covered by new PUL, chiefly on the upper portion
on the Stockton street side as well as along all of the Harney St,
side, Abandoning this property would require the following:
1 j The creation of new formalized PUE's to fully cover our
existing and future uses.
2) We need to ensure we reserve -back all existing PUE's.
I would write-up the resolution to make this distinction, that we're
giving up the underlying property, while res ervins.hick all rxisting
PUE's, As it's written now, it seems like it could be misinterpreted that
we're giving up all interests and rights; and even if we're not, being very
explicit about this could avoid a lawsuit later,
Front: ASlrlrla 1'rupmininlo ATrUPPvIIIVt5@100I,f Qv>
Sent: Thursday, August 5, 2021 10:40 AM
To: Managonuont 1imm - Lxruitrve <M�[19fff111�rti1!"nRl lnncUtlyed�,aln1(LHRv>
Subject: FW: Need your review and written comment
$ending again, Thanks for your help, A couple of sentences describing your review of the parcels and why they are not
needed for city use would be wonderful,
Astrlda
From: Astrlda Trupovnielts
Sent; Friday, July 23, 20214:47 PM
To: -ro,11r1 Fy1ic,11Ii+m M�I���{en10n�T1"d111 I N�!t_GlLlya��ltlt I t{tfy5
Subject: Need your review and written comment
In preparation to declare these properties as surplus real property and not necessary for city use, newer state law
requires the city to prepare written findings as to what has led to the conclusion the properties are not needed for city
(agency) use. Can you please review and describe why these parcels are no longer necessary for your agency
use? There is no guidance on the basis of the written findings except what I could find below;
"Agency's Use shall Include, but not be limited to, land that is being used, or is planned to be used pursuant to a written
plan adopted by the local agency's governing board for agency work or operations, Including but not limited to, utili-y
sites, watershed property, land being used for conservation purposes., land for demonstration, exhibition, or
educational purposes related to greenhouse gas emissions, and buffer sites near sensitive governmental uses, Including,
but not limited to, waste water treatment plants.
Agency's use shall not Include commercial or industrial uses or activities, Including nongovernmental retail,
entertainment, or office development. Property disposed of for the sole purpose of Investment or generation of
revenue shall not be considered necessary for the agency's use."
httgs://Www,hal,o,gPv/community-develoRmp.nt/ptlhllc-la.n.d5-for:AffordAble-t1c�Lin -d . d
pgs.6-7
Hoping for a reply by August 20. ThaOsl
Astrida Trupovnieks, MA, MBA
Business Development Manager
City of Lodi and Lodi Electric Utility
o (209) 333-6874
c (352) 484-4344
atrupovnfe cs a lodLpov
Astrida Trupovnieks
From: Charles Swimley
Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 5:02 PM
To: Astrida Trupovnieks
Subject: RE: Need your review and written comment
Hope this Is what you are looking for,
Charlie
17700 N, Guild — This Is an easement to access the site of an abandoned water well. A new water well has been
constructed at an alternate location. The Public Works Department currently has no need to utilize that easement.
22 E. locust — This Is a vacant City parcel, The Public Works Department currently has no need to utilize that parcel
2630 S, Stockton St, - This Is a vacant City parcel that has Is currently planned for single family residential lots, The Public
Work$ Dopartment currently has not need to utilize that parcel,
219 S, School St, . This parcel Is the site of an abandoned water well, A new water well has been constructed at an
alternate location, The Publlc Works Department currently has no need to utilize that parcel,
18021 N, Kennlson Rd, — This parcel Is the site of an abandoned water well, A new water well has been constructed at an
alternate location, The Public Works Department currently has no need to utilize that parcel.
From: Astrida Trupovnleks <atrupcvnlelcs@lodi.gov>
Sent: Friday, October 1, 202110:20 AM
To: Charles Swimley <Cswimley@lodi.gov>
Subject: FW: Need your review and written comment
HI Charllel I have looked through my smalls and can't seem to determine if you replied to this. I have heard from otners
and Janice would like the comments from department heads to be an exhibit to the CC Item, I am trying to get It ready
for October 20 meeting, Moping you will reply In the next few days? IF I am mistaken about this, I apologize, and can
you send another copy of the email? Thank you,
From: Astrida Trupovnieks
Sent: Thursday, September 9, 202111:10 AM
To: Manago Tient Toon • Executive < Mailageninjil Irpnl I xt•i tri yr ).oil,,rli,l;n�:.
Subject: FW: Need your review and written comment
I heard from Recreation and Parks, LFU and Police. Would the remaining department heads managers please respond
with Just a couple of sentences that you reviewed surplus properties' legal descriptions, evaluated your department's
goals and objectives, and have concluded the properties are not necessary for your department's use, This written
response Is required to meet the requirements of newer state law, If we are weak on this compliance, financial
penaltlea could be assessed. Can I please have this written sentence or two back by Tuesday, the 1411 of
September, Thanks,
Astride
From: Astrida Trupovnieks <xtrupp.�tir±h�ar. rarii.'rru>
Sent: Thursday, August 5, 202110:40 AM
To: Management Team - Executive<MrlllnKrIngt?tTq-dM gpv>
Subject: FW: Need your review and written comment
Sending again. Thanks for your help, A couple of sentences describing your review of the parcels and why they are not
needed for city use would be wonderful,
Astrida
From: Astrida Trupovnlelcs
Sent: Friday, July 23, 20214:47 PM
To: Management I earn - Executive <Millli1AVn1Z11j-ff@JIL-L er,ytivo14 111LoV>
Subject: Need your review and written comment
In preparation to declare these properties as surplus real property and not necessary for city use, newer state law
requires the city to prepare written findings as to what has led to the conclusion the properties are not needed for city
(agency) use. Can you please review and describe why these parcels are no longer necessary for your agency
use? There is no guidance on the basis of the written findings except what I could find below:
"Agency's Use shall include, but not be limited to, land that is being used, or is planned to be used pursuant to a written
plan adopted by the local agency's governing board for agency work or operations, Including but not limited to, utility
sites, watershed property, land being used for conservation purposes., land for demonstration, exhibition, or
educational purposes related to greenhouse gas emissions, and buffer sites near sensitive governmental uses, including,
but not limited to, waste water treatment plants.
Agency's use shall not include commercial or Industrial uses or activities, including nongovernmental retail,
entertainment, or office development. Property disposed of for the sole purpose of investment or generation of
revenue shall not be considered necessary for the agency's use."
r+11.Eikill+kww ftc[I,G .H[�v/clrrrirnturuy rlruo ICiprlu!n1/[iuisl�q. IrrnclS fpr a[�prdahle houyilrJ; clFv lnuLr'+]tJ}1?W]I
; pgs,6-7
Hoping for a reply by August 20. Thanksl
Astrida Trupovnlelcs, MA, MBA
Business Development Manager
City of Lodi and Lodi Electric Utility
o (209) 333-6874
c (352) 484-4344
a trI Ilmvrtl�k5ailnclj,Rav
Astrida TrupoArnielts
From: Christina Jaromay
Sent: Friday, August 6, 2021 9:03 AM
To: Astrida Trupovnieks
Subject: Re: Need your review and written comment
l-fi Astrida,
.fust wanted to follow up on the plot that PD used for training. It is Parks property, part of Chapman Field, and
should not be surplus. Thank you.
Christi Ila Jaromay
Parks, Recreation amd Cultural Services
(209) 269-4356
From: Christina Jaromay <cjaromay a lodi.gov>
Sent: Thursday, August 5, 2021 1J:1 8:01 AM
To: Astrida Trupovnieks <atrupovniel<s@lodi.gov>
Subject: RE: Need your review and written comment
Awesome I9
Re: PD training over by Chapman Field. I didn't chime in because I'm not sure of the parcel and exactly where it Is. I do
know that now they do training near Lawrence park. Let me know If you need anything on that one.
Thank you,
From: Astrida Trupovnleks
Sent: Thursday, August 5, 202110:57 AM
To: Christina Jaromay <cjaromay@lodi.gov>
Subject: RE: Need your review and written comment
I would like It held for future devRlDpmant, top, I will pull It from the list and (resp It a pert of the demand
analyslit (tachnlcal assistance and planning grant- EPA funded) of Its hlghast and best use. The demand analysis will
uncover the reuse potential of the clty-controlled lots which I am hopino will be recreatlonal In use l,e„ aquatic center
plus other uses to revitalize the area and serve as an anchor for further private Investment,
Astrida
From: Christina Jaromay < uy�fl�Rll 1i>
Sent: Thursday, August 5, 202110:45 AM
To: Astrida Trupovnieks <11L ��uuv_oI.ekaMjdI,Rov>
Subject: RE: Need your review and written comment
HI Astrida,
I would actually not like 22 E Locust deemed as surplus. I would like that property held for future development
Thank you,
From: Astrida Trupovnieks
Sent: Thursday, August 5, 202110:40 AM
To: Management Team - Executive LwV011lv0eIndIx1V>
Subject: FW: Need your review and written coMment
Sending again, Thanks for your help. A couple of sentences describing your review of the parcels and why they are not
needed For elty use would be wonderful.
Astrida
From: Astrida Trupovnieks
Sent: Friday, July 23, 20214:47 PM
To: Management Team - Executive <IYIAnnREh�ell(1 .�I ner,Otlyr,j(Lirlurll,gov>
Subject: Need your review and written comment
In preparation to declare these properties as surplus real property and not necessary for city use, newer state law
requires the city to prepare written findings as to what has led to the conclusion the properties are not needed for city
(agency) use. Can you please review and describe why these parcels are no longer necessary for your agency
use? There is no guidance on the basis of the written findings except what I could find below:
"Agency's Use shall include, but not be limited to, land that is being used, or is planned to be used pursuant to a written
plan adopted by the local agency's governing board for agency work or operations, Including but not limited to, utility
sites, watershed property, land being used for conservation purposes., land for demonstration, exhibition, or
educational purposes related to greenhouse gas emissions, and buffer sites near sensitive governmental uses, including,
but not limited to, waste water treatment plants.
Agency's use shall not include commercial or industrial uses or activities, including nongovernmental retail,
entertainment, or office development. Property disposed of for the sole purpose of investment or generation of
revenue shall not be considered necessary for the agency's use."
htTP+S.U'vw—w cd.ItS7V1ulf1S iivIIY'IJyvtIcipmviiIlpiiIiIIr W n 0 , fqr-&nrdL�Li, iinlIiIr% cIvvul1)17ls1(!III elFlrlI
; pgs.6-7
Hoping for a reply by August 20. Thanksl
Astrida Trupovnieks, MA, MBA
Business Development Manager
City of Lodi and Lodi Electric Utility
o (209) 333-6874
c (352) 484-4344
iii w : 1Vk1,VJ!)9lj,.9t?y
EXHIBIT D
Recording Re nested By
LAW OFFICES OF STRAUSS,
NEIBAUER, KRAJEWSKI & ANDERSON
1020 Eye Street
Modesto, California 95354
When Recorded Mail To
City Clerk
City of Lodi
221 West Pine Street
Lodi, CA 95240
11min, past �?JR Kf 1 2 1876
Rnweed at rmmE5t of _ ATTORNEYS_
Oaf 4123 4 r
JAMES M JOHMSfONE, ,uou(y lecu,141
Space above this line for recorder's us(
Mail Tax Statements To Documentary Transfer Tax $0.00
CITY OF LODI,
City Iiall LAW OFFICES OF STRAUSS,
221 W. Pine NEIAALTER, KRAJEWSKI & A14DERSON
Lodi, California BY
LANCE .T., RAJE7 CT
Agent fofGRAN OR
GRANT OF EASEMENT
Preamble
This Grant of Easement is made this 2nd day of September , 1975.
by GUILD WINERIES and DISTILLERIES, a Corporation, hereinafter referred to
as "Grantor" to CITY OF LODI, hereinafter referred to as "Grantee",
Recitals
WHEREAS Grantor is the owner of certain real property commonly known as
One Winemasters' Way, City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, State of California,
hereinafter referred to as the "Servient Tenement", and described as follows:
and;
Lots 23, 24, 25, and 26 of. EDDLEMAN TRACT, according to
the Official Map thereof filed for record in Vol. 1 of Maps,
page 26, San Joaquin County Records.
EXCEPT a small tract in the Northeast corner of said Lot 23
which lies outside the boundaries of said tract, as endorsed
on the map of said EDDLEMAN TRACT.
LAW OFFICES OF
STRAUSS, NEIBAUER, SX.XXIK" & KRAJEWSKI
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
1020 EYE STREET
MODESTO, CALIFORNIA 99354
TELEPHONE 526.2211 (AREA 2.091 Ij iv
eomf. 4123 PAt t
WHEREAS, Grantee is the owner of certain real property situated in
the City of Lodi, San Joaquin_ County, State of California, hereinafter
referred to as the "Dominant Tenement", and described as follows:
A well site situated in Section Thirty -Two (32), Township
Four. (4), Range Seven (7) East, Mount Diablo Base and
Meridian.
VOW THEREFORE, the following grant of easement is made:
Grant of Easement
1. Grantor hereby grants to Grantee an easement as hereinafter
described for so long as Grantee continues to own the Dominant Tenement
and does not rent or lease the same.
Character of Easement
2, The easement granted herein is appurtenant to the Dominant
Tenement,
Description of Easement
3. The easement granted herein is a right of way for roadway purposes
of ingress and egress to Grantee's above described well site for repairs
and maintenance thereof.
Location
4. The easement granted herein is located as follows:
The South half of all that portion of Filbert Street
(40 feet wide) lying easterly of the east right of way
line of Myrtle Street (60 feet wide) in Section Thirty-
one (31), Township Four (4), Range Seven (7) East, Mount
Diablo Base and Meridian, said portion of Filbert Street
being specifically described as all that portion of the
South one-half of Filbert Street as shown on that certain
Map of EDDLEMAN TRACT, according to the Official Map
thereof filed for record in Vol. 1 of Maps, page 26,
San Joaquin County Records, being a strip of land 20 feet
wide lying Northerly of and adjacent to Lots 23 through
26 inclusive, of said EDDLEMAN TRACT.
Exclusiveness of Easement
5. The easement granted he,;#Jo,,I S dot exclusive.
STRAUs5, NEISAUER.1SWHM)FqX& KRAJEW5K1
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
1020 EYE STREET
MODESTO. CALIFORNIA 99394
TELEPHONE 526.22111AREA 2081
aao� 11;3 43
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this instrument the day
and year first written above,
GRANTOR
=�J_v
Guild Wineries and Distilleries Vda
One Winemasters' Way
Lodi, California 95240
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
State of California }
County of San J&'tqui.n ) ss
On —e _P. 2 , 1975, before me Eleanor L'inti a Notary
Public for the State of California, personally appeared :M, ar2aret 8 alrenian
l'
known to me to be the-, I.Ce-pratiiden[� of Guild Wineries and Distilleries,
the corporation that executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me
that such corporation executed the same,
NOTARY SSAL
t
Notary Pu c�
LAW OFFICES of
STRAUSS, NEIBAUER, 5XM&X=&
KRAJEWSKI
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
1020 EYE STREET
MODESTO, CALIFORNIA 76354
TELEPHONE 520 -UO (AREA 2091
.BOOK -4123 PAGE
A
44
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed
by the Deed or Grant dated September 2L 1975 _— from
GUILD WINERIES and DFSTILiEATES a Corporation , to the City of
Lodi, a municipal corporation, is hereby accepted by the undersigned
pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution 3847 of the City Council
of Lodi adopted on November 21, 1973, and recorded on December 4,
1973, In Book 3823, Page 136, Official Records of San Joaquin County,
and the Grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized
officer.
DATED: May 10, 1976
F4 t
City Clerk of the City of Lodi
(Seal)
State of California ) -
Cuunty of San Joaquin ) ss
ane/On this 10th day of JMay In the year one thousand nine hundred i
7r; , before nye, _Elmer It. W ni , a Notary Public,
Stab of California duly c0nlnsE9aioned and sworn, personally appeared
Alice Xi. Reimclte known to me to be the
Of the pablic irody described in and that executed the within instrument, and also known to
We to bzc the person sA•ho executed the within instrument on behalf of the public body therein
named. and as°knuwledged to me that satch public body executed the same.
WITNESS my hand and official seal i
Notairy Public in said State
f •OFFICIAL SEAL ,
r
ELMER H. WEIMER
r i � •� • if Nasalr wel� i
[nL 11URH 1A
y . [OOM Rf nH lugq GlN
C".1ul
Aly -en 01. Oct. n' 1776 i BOOK
......-.._...._ 41,�r3 PACE 4� FN[) 0. GO-.:;JLPJT
"Ley A "I'DW11W k
C
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CLAUDS WOOL) CO, • ;E A5T-S I M W
Gu I LD vv I vi 6-7 coo pAklly
Ing
ILIA
ay 3 AF)pm"d 6v
1 __i P�bli,.Wdrkx Glrvclo
�D-5-7G I ACE 1 Ono
1, I
!u;
MOADWAY MAINTEWPAM
=%-ry or L00%
WELL Z.VCS
Astrida Trupovnieks
From: Lyman M Chang
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2023 1:52 PM
To: Astrida Trupovnieks
Cc: Denise Wiman; Jimi Billigmeier; Sean Nathan
Subject: RE: City of Lodi Exempt Property Resolution
Attachments: 1557.pdf
The old Well 10 site you are referring to does have a recorded access easement from the adjacent property as shown on
the attached deed. However, the deed did condition that the access easement is only valid as long as the city still
operates that well site. Since we are no longer operating the well site (especially we are surplusing this land), I assume
that the access easement is no longer valid. So that's your answer. By the way, we need to retain certain easements to
maintain our storm drain and water pipelines before or concurrently with the sale.
Lyman
From: Astrida Trupovnieks <atrupovnieks@lodi.gov>
Sent: Monday, May 8, 2023 5:02 PM
To: Lyman M Chang <Ichang@lodi.gov>
Subject: FW: City of Lodi Exempt Property Resolution
The surplus lands act specifies that if a parcel is below 10,000 sf, it must also have no record access in order to be
exempt from the act. We may have discussed this before, but this has been going on so long with the state that I don't
remember if we have discussed the definition of no record access. Do you know the generally accepted definition? See
below second bullet point. I have attached a location/parcel map of 17700 North Guild and 18021 North Kennison. Can
you determine if there is no record access associated with 18021 North Kennison? Thanks for your time!
From: Wahid, Imaez@HCD <1maez.Wah1d0Shcd.ca,gav>
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:00 PM
To: Astrida Trupovnieks <atrupovnieks@lod!.eov>
Subject: RE: City of Lodi Exempt Property Resolution
Hi Astrida,
No need to apologize. Matt generally reviews surplus land disposition. My colleague Lisa and I review exempt surplus
land requests. You can directly contact us. But recommend cc'ing public lands inbox because it is the general inbox for
Surplus Land Act matters and is monitored by the team.
Thank you for providing the requested information. Just to confirm that the real property located at 18021 North
Kennison Lane Lodi, San Joaquin County is 6,969.6 square feet in area and has no record access. If yes, could we
incorporate the following key facts regarding the properties for the purpose of further specifying how the properties
qualify as "exempt surplus land" under Government Code section 54221(f)(1)(B).
The real property located at 17700 North Guild Avenue Lodi, San Joaquin County is 3,484.8 square feet in
area; and
The real property located at 18021 North Kennison Lane Lodi, San Joaquin County is 6,969.6 square feet
in area and has no record access; and
The real property located at 219 South School Street, Lodi, San Joaquin County is 1,742.4 square feet in
area; and
Also, I made clarifying edits in the attached. Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions. Also, please provide
a revise version showing the recommended changes.
Thank you,
Imaez.
From: Astrida Trupovnieks <atru ovnieks lodl. ov>
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2023 1:56 PM
To: Wahid, Imaez@HCD <Imaez.Wahid@Iicd.ca.eov>
Cc: Manweller, Mathew@HCD <Mathew.Manweller@hcd.ca,gov>
Subject: RE: City of Lodi Exempt Property Resolution
Hello: Thank you for your prompt email. I have filled out the table below, attached Exhibit A, and circled on the snip
which exemption on page 10 applies to APN-130-02. I sent the email below directly to Mathew because of the attached
email. I am sorry if I misunderstood the protocol.
From: Wahid, Imaez@HCD <lii)aer..Waliirf a)[scd,ca. o >
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2023 1:16 PM
To: Astrida Trupovnieks <atru ovnieks iodi, ov>
Cc: Janice Magdich <9ma dich 62 lodi. ov>; PublIdands@HCD <publicland5PkcI.ca.pov>
Subject: RE: City of Lodi Exempt Property Resolution
Hi Astrida,
HCD is in receipt of the "exempt surplus land" draft Resolution for the properties located at 17700 North Guild Avenue,
18021 North Kennison Lane, and 219 South School Street. I am in the process of reviewing the draft Resolution need
some additional clarification or documentation before I can proceed.
1. Could you provide the size of the parcels:
Address
Parcel Size
17700 North Guild Avenue
.08 acre, or 3,484.8 sf
18021 North Kennison Lane
.16 acre, or 6,969.6 sf
219 South School Street
.04 acre, or 1,742.4 sf
2. Could you provide a copy of Exhibit A referenced in paragraph #1 of the draft Resolution.
3. Could you explain which exemption on page 10 of the "Guide to Exemptions from the Standard Surplus Land Act
Process," you believe applies to the large property APN 130-02.
Thank you,
L6y1M u7f rtY
4
V •c
� Y
o
r'�crmxK'h
Imaez Wahid
Senior Housing Policy Specialist
Housing Accountability Unit
Housing Policy Development Division
2020 W. El Camino Avenue, Suite 500 1 Sacramento, CA 95833
Phone: 916.776.7496
00
twitter.com 0
Ifacebook.coml
HOUSING
IS KEY
landlardtenant.dre.ca, ov
From: Manweiler, Mathew@HCD <Mathew.Manweller hcd.ca. ov>
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2023 10:12 AM
To: PublicLands@HCD <public}ands@hcd.ca.eov>
Subject: FW: City of Lodi Exempt Property Resolution
This was sent directly to my inbox,
Matt
From: Astrida Trupovnieks <atrupovn#eks@lodi.eov>
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2023 3:50 PM
To: Manweller, Mathew@HCD <Mathew,Manweller hcd,ca. ov>
Cc: Janice Magdich <jma dish iodi,gov>
Subject: City of Lodi Exempt Property Resolution
Hello Mathew: I have attached a draft resolution declaring three of the four parcels exempt. In the attached email
chain, however, we discussed the appropriateness of declaring two of the four properties exempt. Consider, though,
the information contained in the "Guide to Exemptions from the Standard Surplus Land Act Process," published in
July 2022, attached. On page 10, 1 believe the decision tree provides a pathway for the larger property APN-130-02 to
also qualify for exemption. Thank you for your review.
Astrida Trupovnieks, MA MBA
Business Development Manager
City of Lodi and Lodi Electric Utility
a t runovn ie kse tod i. eov
209-333-6874 (office)
209-368-5735 (electric emergencies)
Astrida Trupovnieks
From: Jimi Billigmeier
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2023 2:21 PM
To: Astrida Trupovnieks; Lyman M Chang
Cc: Denise Wiman; Sean Nathan
Subject: RE: City of Lodi Exempt Property Resolution
Astrida, all of the conditions above must be met for a valid access easement
1. The grantor "Guild Wineries and Distilleries" grants to City of Lodi an easement as long as the City of
Lodi has title and that the City has no right to transfer the easement to other parUes.
2. The easement is burdened over the Guild Wineries property.
3. The easement is for access and roadway purposes.
As soon as the City transfers the property and no longer has ownership, the access easement expires. It is
correct to say, the City does not have the right to transfer the access easement, therefore the property will
have no record access at the time of sale.
I think this answers your question. But if your question was what if Guild Wineries property sold his property to
someone else in between the grant and now, the easement is attached to the land and remains in effect until
one of the above conditions is no longer true.
Hopefully this helps, old descriptions are murky sometimes.
Grant of Easement
1. Grantor hereby grants to Grantee an easement as hereinafter
described for so long as Grantee continues to own the Dominant Tenement
and does not recti:' or lease the sate.
Character of Easement
2. The easement granted herein is appurtenant to the Dominant
Tenement.
Description of Easement
3. The easement granted herein is a right of way for roadway purpose
tand
ingress and egress to Grantee's above described well site for repairs
maintenance thereof.
Thank you,
Jimi Billigmeier
Associate Civil Engineer/Designated Land Surveyor
City of Lodi -Public Works Dept.
U
221 W. Pine Street
Lodi, CA 95240
(209)269-4904
From: Astrida Trupovnieks <atrupovnieks@lodi.gov>
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2023 1:37 PM
To: Lyman M Chang <Ichang@lodi.gov>
Cc: Denise Wiman <dwiman@lodi.gov>; Jimi Billigmeier <jb!ll!gme!er@lodi.gov>; Sean Nathan <snathan@lodi.gov>
Subject: RE: City of Lodi Exempt Property Resolution
Hello Lyman: Thanks for the below. I don't understand something. You say below the deed
conditioned the access easement is only valid as long as the city still operates a wellsite. How
does this grant of easement by a previous owner apply to 18021 North Kennison under the
ownership of the City? I see that under Description of Easement there is a definition for
roadway purposes of ingress and engress? Does this mean that the ingress and egress as
described still exists?
From: Lyman M Chang <Irhan lodl. ov>
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2023 1:52 PM
To: Astrida Trupovnieks <atruyovnieks@iodi.gov>
Cc: Denise Wiman <d 5; Jim! Billigmeier <Lb!Ili meier IodI.ov>; Sean Nathan <snathan@lodi.gov>
Subject: RE: City of Lodi Exempt Property Resolution
The old Well 10 site you are referring to does have a recorded access easement from the adjacent property as shown on
the attached deed. However, the deed did condition that the access easement is only valid as long as the city still
operates that well site. Since we are no longer operating the well site (especially we are surplusing this land), I assume
that the access easement is no longer valid. So that's your answer. By the way, we need to retain certain easements to
maintain our storm drain and water pipelines before or concurrently with the sale.
Lyman
From: Astrida Trupovnieks <atrupovnieks lodi. ov>
Sent: Monday, May 8, 2023 5:02 PM
To: Lyman M Chang <lchan iodi. ov>
Subject: FW: City of Lodi Exempt Property Resolution
The surplus lands act specifies that if a parcel is below 10,000 sf, it must also have no record access in order to be
exempt from the act. We may have discussed this before, but this has been going on so long with the state that I don't
remember if we have discussed the definition of no record access. Do you know the generally accepted definition? See
below second bullet point. I have attached a location/parcel map of 17700 North Guild and 18021 North Kennison. Can
you determine if there is no record access associated with 18021 North Kennison? Thanks for your time!
From: Wahid, Imaez@HCD <lmaez.Wahid@hcd.ca.gov>
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2023 4:00 PM
To: Astrida Trupovnieks <atrupovnieksOa I„ odi•goy>
Subject: RE: City of Lodi Exempt Property Resolution
H! Astrida,
No need to apologize. Matt generally reviews surplus land disposition. My colleague Lisa and I review exempt surplus
land requests. You can directly contact us. But recommend cc'ing public lands inbox because it is the general inbox for
Surplus Land Act matters and is monitored by the team.
Thank you for providing the requested information. Just to confirm that the real property located at 18021 North
Kennison Lane Lodi, San Joaquin County is 6,969.6 square feet in area and has no record access. If yes, could we
incorporate the following key facts regarding the properties for the purpose of further specifying how the properties
qualify as "exempt surplus land" under Government Code section 54221(f)(1)(B).
The real property located at 17700 North Guild Avenue Lodi, San Joaquin County is 3,484.8 square feet in
area; and
The real property located at 18021 North Kennison Lane Lodi, San Joaquin County is 6,969.6 square feet
in area and has no record access; and
The real property located at 219 South School Street, Lodi, San Joaquin County is 1,742.4 square feet in
area; and
Also, I made clarifying edits in the attached. Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions. Also, please provide
a revise version showing the recommended changes.
Thank you,
Imaez.
From: Astrida Trupovnieks <atru ovnieks Jodi, ov>
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2023 1:56 PM
To: Wahid, Imaez@HCD <Imaez.Wahid @hcd.ca.gov>
Cc: Manweller, Mathew@HCD <Mathew,Manweller@hcd.ca.gov>
Subject: RE: City of Lodi Exempt Property Resolution
Hello: Thank you for your prompt email. I have filled out the table below, attached Exhibit A, and circled on the snip
which exemption on page 10 applies to APN-130-02. I sent the email below directly to Mathew because of the attached
email. I am sorry if I misunderstood the protocol.
From: Wahid, Imaez@HCD <Imaez.Wahid@hcd.ca.eov>
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2023 1:16 PM
To: Astrida Trupovnieks <atrunovnieks@lodi.gov>
Cc: Janice Magdich <1mandlch@lodEgoy>; PublicLands@HCD <publiclands@hcd-a -,cv>
Subject: RE: City of Lodi Exempt Property Resolution
Hi Astrida,
HCD is in receipt of the "exempt surplus land" draft Resolution for the properties located at 17700 North Guild Avenue,
18021 North Kennison Lane, and 219 South School Street. I am in the process of reviewing the draft Resolution need
some additional clarification or documentation before I can proceed.
1. Could you provide the size of the parcels:
Address
Parcel Size
17700 North Guild Avenue
.08 acre, or 3,484.8 sf
18021 North Kennison Lane
.16 acre, or 6,969.6 sf
219 South School Street
04 acre, or 1,742.4 sf
Could you provide a copy of Exhibit A referenced in paragraph #1 of the draft Resolution.
Could you explain which exemption on page 10 of the "Guide to Exemptions from the Standard Surplus Land Act
Process," you believe applies to the large property APN 130-02.
Thank you,
�=y
Lwitter.coml
facebook.coml
HOUSING
IS KEY
j la nd lordte na nt.d re.ca.Royi
Imaez Wahid
Senior Housing Policy Specialist
Housing Accountability Unit
Housing Policy Development Division
2020 W. EI Camino Avenue, Suite 500 1 Sacramento, CA 95833
Phone: 916.776.7496
From: Manweller, Mathew@HCD <Math_ew.Manweller@hcd.ca.goy>
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2023 10:12 AM
To: Publicl-ands@HCD <publiclands@hcd.ca.gov>
Subject: FW: City of Lodi Exempt Property Resolution
This was sent directly to my inbox.
Matt
From: Astrida Trupovnieks <atru ovnieks lod1. ov>
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2023 3:50 PM
To: Manweller, Mathew@HCD <Mathew. Manwelle r@ hcd.ca. ov>
Cc: Janice Magdich < rna Bich lodi. ov>
Subject: City of Lodi Exempt Property Resolution
Hello Mathew: I have attached a draft resolution declaring three of the four parcels exempt. In the attached email
chain, however, we discussed the appropriateness of declaring two of the four properties exempt. Consider, though,
the information contained in the "Guide to Exemptions from the Standard Surplus Land Act Process," published in
July 2022, attached. On page 10, 1 believe the decision tree provides a pathway for the larger property APN-130-02 to
also qualify for exemption. Thank you for your review.
Astrida Trupovnieks, MA MBA
Business Development Manager
City of Lodi and Lodi Electric Utility
atru ovnieks Jodi. ov
209-333-6874 (office)
209-368-5735 (electric emergencies)