HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - February 16, 2022 H-01AGENDA ITEM l
f% CITY OF LODI
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
TM
AGENDA TITLE: Receive Presentation from San Joaquin Council of Governments Consultant
Regarding Lodi Greenline Feasibility Study Results
MEETING DATE: February 16, 2022
PREPARED BY: Public Works Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive presentation from San Joaquin Council of Governments
consultant regarding Lodi Greenline Feasibility Study results.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Lodi Greenline is a conceptual project that considers the
possibilities of repurposing the existing Union Pacific Railroad
(UPRR) spur line that stretches from the UPRR mainline westerly to
the community of Woodbridge. The conceptual trail would link the greater downtown Lodi area to Lodi
Lake and Woodbridge providing bike and pedestrian access to various commercial, outdoor recreational,
educational, and civic centers of the City.
On March 20, 2018, Council received information from members of Bike Lodi regarding this project, and
indicated support for further study of the concept. On November 27, 2018, the City of Lodi, with support
from Bike Lodi, applied for the Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant to obtain funding to
conduct the Lodi Greenline Feasibility Study. In May of the following year, the City received notice of a
conditional grant award in the amount of $80,750, and on August 7, 2019, Council authorized execution
of the grant program agreements.
The San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG), in partnership with the City of Lodi, retained Toole
Design Group to complete the feasibility study. The primary objective of the study was to produce a
foundational planning document detailing potential use scenarios of the 1.75 -mile railroad spur line. The
study includes evaluation of "rail -with -trail' or "rail -to -trail' options, a railroad spur line appraisal, and
various conditional assessments of the corridor. Outreach to the Lodi community regarding the potential
project included a site visit, online surveys, and two virtual community workshops.
Project staff from Toole Design Group will present findings from the study.
FISCAL IMPACT:
FUNDING AVAILABLE:
CES/FH/cd
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
C�--VZ2Q
Charles E. Swimley, Jr.
Public Works Director
APPROVED: Steve Schwabauer
Stephen Schwabauer, City Manager
\\cvcfi1v02\pubwks$\WP\C0U NCI L\2022\CC_DRAFT GreenlineFeasibiI ityStudy_JT.doc
1/27/2022
Lod'
■ ■
i Tra11
■■ ■
Feasibility
Lodi City Council M
February 1 2022
Project Team and Partners
Isaiah Anderson
Kim Anderson
POOLE
DESIGN
OZI
A L I F 0 R N I
Julia Tyack
Frank Huang
Kathryn Siddle
Gordon MacKay
Doug Bojack
1000LE
DESIGN
Kristen Lohse
Inder Grewal
�o``oiev catiFpga
&561
Presentation Agenda
1. Plan Overview
2. Alignments and Feasibility
3. Public Engagement
4. Recommended Next Steps
POOLE
DESIGN
TOO LE
D E S I G N
Plan Overv■
iew
W"61 t:
I
0
Bolster Economic Activity
Opportunities for biking and
walking trips to local businesses
and downtown Lodi
I
Contribute to
Active
Healthy and
Living
A safe off-street
bike/pedestrian path for
residents, visitors, and
disadvantaged community
members to travel to Lodi
Lake and other local
destinations
Conserve Land
Adaptive reuse of a "leftover
landscape"
Improve Livability
A public corridor for movement,
gathering and conviviality,
community expression and
pride
Contribute to Community
Character and History
Opportunities for art and
historic/cultural interpretation
Study Elements
■ Existing Conditions Analysis
■ Public Engagement
■ Corridor Analysis and Concept Designs
■ Design, Railroad, Management, Community Considerations
■ Trail Development Strategies
■ Appraisal, Opinions of Probable Cost, Funding Strategies
POOLE
DESIGN
TOO LE
D E S I G N
Almignments and
Feas'''
lbility
Cross Sections
POOLE
DESIGN
Existing Conditions
Union Pacific Railroad Spur
Looking East
Union Pacific Railroad Right -of -Way
C--� C�
30
Proposed Class I Shared Use Path
■ 12 feet wide, paved
■ 2 foot -wide soft-surFaa
shoulders on either sid
■ Meets Caltrans and
AASHTO guidelines
■ Allows for social biking
supports a mix of user:
POOLE
DESIGN
Proposed
A rail -to -trail design
where the tracks would
be removed and the
corridor would be
redeveloped as a Class
I shared use path
corridor
A Rail -to -Trail converts a railroad into a
multipurpose trail corridor supporting
recreation, mobility, and community
gathering
POOLE
DESIGN
Alternative A
Fail to Trail
Looking East
o'
Union Pacific Railroad Right -of -Way
Landscaped Area ' ;' Shared -Use Path `, ' Landscaped Area
Decomposed Decomposed
Granite Shoulder Granite Shoulder
Proposed
A rail -with -trail design
where the existing
tracks would remain
and a Class I shared
use path would be
added to the corridor,
allowing for concurrent
rail use.
A Rail -with -Trail concept preserves the
railroad and constructs a multipurpose trail
parallel to the active rail line
TOOLE
DESIGN
2'
Alternative B
Rail with Trail
Looking East
0'
Union Pacific Railroad Bight -of -Way
30'
Shared -Use Landscaped
Path Area with
DecomposedFencing
ranite Shoulder
Decomposed
Granite Shoulder
G
I
Available
space
As
I
� Utility
conflicts
Connectivity
and Land
use
Safety for all
users
User
Experience
a
TuT1Trj�
Bnsioll'.,.,., 5� "
m EilalS Ln, ,1: v 14
I P .. — _ -
C.
i— —
v
1 Lodi fake m �Ilduaie ad_ f w
rl{i aod Dr. i 3 YYfllnw Glen Df: '"'
— - Turner IS
Turner Rd.
r I M r- �Jllr'r., _ Palm',[w. P9Y19'JI1:;Ilk d
syrood1111" i L8k9 HomefDr, I =I E9 11:J -
�u l _ Clin ka A I ��i 'EU•Cka Al I I�
V41a1 Std ...-- -.... r - --
1 1 _ ii7 �IT—S}'{YQ_ '�'�'- �'--7�'�7 — z r, --s rr IT jT'[
1 i 1 _...: -'7a �n 3� _ ; ' �a'+XI [:f t
6- Turres
` F VJ
Turner Rd r Pod o !
— — V Ay'ii s Ax er I L.' I yv : r. I u
1 1 - L �erYlitie dr.' Poolrer[ Sf' ` a _#� `{ I '+''1:'51' :,I
rel
g
Ee PineC�oJet[CrCL
Elm 21
IF
'Nell Lodi Ave I a Z 93 -6 #I} lir_
El F
E.IMsripasa.wy, CP'�.. :'�4W
ti'- Y.
West Kettlem-bn Ln n $ C[Ieman Ln -or rgt 5.J1LiIF
d
sth�anaeriL
r
Ea tHarn,4I-y' rA1�ddln.Wjy �: JerryLn
r TTI
It -
�i
Land Uses CDmmrrcial Open Space ProjeoS Right of Way Other Parce s
LowOensilyPim deniial C7awrrta•unCdixed-Use PubliciQuasi-Public . Other Railrozd 0 AocrsaPoints
u
M Edium Density Rlesiderrtial M ked -Use Corricor Industrial MotelumneRiver
- High nensity ReEbdenllal Offce E3 Lodi City I imus L odl Par2els
f1
Pit
'I �j rr h'1ur�ay St.j1
I II
lroadm.ti
DESIGN GUIDELINES
Meets Caltrans/AASHTO trail width guidance
Provides ample buffers from private properties and/or
railroad
POTENTIAL CONFLICTS AND SAFETY
Allows for roadway crossing improvements to create
safe and predictable crossings
CONNECTIVITY
Connects to destinations and land uses
USER EXPERIENCE
Allows space for amenities along corridor
FLEXIBILITY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
212
Somewhat
Yes
Somewhat
Allows for future heavy rail use No Yes
Appraisal and Opinion of Probable Cost
■ Appraisal value of corridor: at $3,850,000
■ One full appraisal, one review
■ Opinion of Probable Constructions Costs
• Alternative A: Rail -to -Trail: $5,587,000
•Alternative B: Rail -with -Trail: $4,745,000
POOLE
DESIGN
TOO LE
D E S I G N
■
Engagement
Engagement to Date
■ Web presence through SJCOG
■ Internal team site tour
■ Online survey
■ Virtual community meeting
■ Bike Lodi engagement efforts
■ Ongoing opportunities for feedback
POOLE
DESIGN
Engagement Themes
■ Safety concerns, esp. at
intersections
■ Concern about City's ability
to maintain the corridor
■ Concern about nuisance
activity, homelessness
■ Excitement about potential
economic/tourism benefits
POOLE
DESIGN
99 I'm very happy that cycling is
a priority to the community.
It truly adds value. Thank
you for the opportunity to
provide input.
POOLE
DE S I G N
F F
A A A trail would be better use of
the corridor than what it
currently is, but it must be
done properly.
POOLE
DESIGN
F F
Recommended Next
Steps
TOO LE
D E S I G N
Recommended Next Steps
■ Engage with UPRR as soon as possible
■ Continue community engagement to build community trust
and support, address concerns; partner with stakeholder
champions
■ Continue planning efforts to identify best strategy, and
phasing
POOLE
DESIGN
ir
:wr :• tx
lfc
'DOW-
dim