Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - January 5, 2022 G-02 PHAGENDA ITEM Go 2, CITY OF LODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TM AGENDA TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider Adopting a Resolution Setting the San Joaquin County Multi -Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan Development Fees For 2022 MEETING DATE: January 5, 2022 PREPARED BY: Community Development Department RECOMMENDED ACTION: Public hearing to consider adopting a resolution setting the San Joaquin County Multi -Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan development fees for 2022. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On February 21, 2001, the City of Lodi adopted the San Joaquin County Multi -Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP). The Plan includes a schedule of fees to be paid by property owners who propose to develop their property with non-agricultural uses. These fees are used to mitigate for the cumulative impacts of new development on habitat lands within Lodi and San Joaquin County. It is necessary for all jurisdictions covered by the Plan to approve the Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) fees in order for the jurisdiction to continue to participate in the Plan. The fees are reviewed on an annual basis. The 2022 per acre fees for all categories of habitat land have an overall increase of 12.7 percent in the most impacted categories of Agricultural and Natural habitat classifications from the prior year primarily to a rise in the land acquisition component for agricultural land price values of comparable sales and an unusually robust rise in the reported Consumer Price Index (CPI) for Categories B and C. Open Space lands have increased from $8,682 to $9,781. Agriculture and Natural lands (the two largest categories) have increased from $17,363 to $19,561. Fees for Vernal Pool (grasslands) habitat lands increased from $71,544 to $80,453 and Vernal Pool (wetted lands) increased from $161,286 to $174,040. The San Joaquin Council of Governments Board approved the attached HCP fee schedule for 2022 during their September 2021 board meeting. The Board coordinates the review of land costs to ensure that the current land mitigation costs will satisfy habitat conservation and purchases. All local jurisdictions are requested to approve the new fee schedule that will take effect on January 1, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable. FUNDING AVAILABLE: Not applicable. John . Della Monica, Jr. Com nity Development Director Attachments: 1) Fee Schedule for 2022 2) SJCOG Staff Report with Fee Analysis Update Summary APPROVED: Steve Schwabauer Stephen Schwabauer, City Manager SJCDG, Inc. Leo tuber CHAIR Robert Rmknm VICECHAIR Dime Nguyen PRESIDENr Member Agencies CPTRSOF ESCALON, LATHROP, LODL MANTECA, RIPON, STOCKTON, TRACY, AND THECOUNI'YOF SANJOAQUIN SJCOG, Inc. 555 East Weber Avenue • Stockton, CA 95202 • (209) 235-0600 • FAX (209) 235-0438 San Joaquin County Multi -Species Habitat Conservation & Open Space Plan (SJMSCP) 2022 Updated Habitat Fees* Habitat Type Fee Per Acre Multi -Purpose Open Space $91781 Natural $19,561 Agriculture $19,561 Vernal Pool - uplands $80,453 Vernal Pool - wetted $1741040 * Effective January 1, 2022—December 31, 2022 2022 Endowment Fees with In -lieu Land** ** Effective January 1, 2022 — December 31, 2022 in lieu of fees to be used as the endowment for the dedicated land preserves (Category B + Q based on impacted acres. VELB Mitigation A special fee category shall apply when removal of the Valley Elderberry Long -horned Beatle (VELB) habitat of elderberry shrubs occurs. The fee shall be paid to SJCDG, Inc. or a VELB mitigation bank approved by the Permitting Agencies. The current fee, as established in the VELB Conservation Fund Account managed by the Center for Natural Lands Management, and approved by the USFWS, is $1,800 per VELB Unit (one unit= one stem over 1" in diameter at ground level which is removed). Fees shall be established by the JPA during preconstruction surveys (i.e., counts of stems to be removed with and without exit holes shall be completed during preconstruction surveys) and shall be paid to the JPA prior to ground disturbance or stem removal, whichever comes first. Enhancement Land TOTAL PER Type of Preserve Cost/acre Management ACRE Cost/acre ENDOWMENT Agricultural Habitat Lands $5,256.00 $710.96 $5,966.96 Natural Lands $5,256.00 $710.96 $5,966.96 Vernal Pool Habitat Vernal Pool Grasslands $13,390.00 $1,756.01 $15,146.01 Vernal Pool Wetted $108,136.00 $1,721.56 $109,857.56 ** Effective January 1, 2022 — December 31, 2022 in lieu of fees to be used as the endowment for the dedicated land preserves (Category B + Q based on impacted acres. VELB Mitigation A special fee category shall apply when removal of the Valley Elderberry Long -horned Beatle (VELB) habitat of elderberry shrubs occurs. The fee shall be paid to SJCDG, Inc. or a VELB mitigation bank approved by the Permitting Agencies. The current fee, as established in the VELB Conservation Fund Account managed by the Center for Natural Lands Management, and approved by the USFWS, is $1,800 per VELB Unit (one unit= one stem over 1" in diameter at ground level which is removed). Fees shall be established by the JPA during preconstruction surveys (i.e., counts of stems to be removed with and without exit holes shall be completed during preconstruction surveys) and shall be paid to the JPA prior to ground disturbance or stem removal, whichever comes first. September 2021 SJCOG, Inc. STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: 2022 SJMSCP Development Fee Annual Adjustment RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Approve the 2022 SJMSCP Development Fees as Adjusted Pursuant to the Financial Analysis Model SUMMARY: Using the adopted five-year financial analysis model to the San Joaquin County Multi -Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP) the SJCOG Inc. staff, HTAC Financial Subcommittee members (Table 1) and consultants undertook the annual analysis in summer 2021. The goal of the annual analysis is to establish the next year's habitat plan fees paid by the development project. The fees are for impacts under the countywide SJMSCP permits as defined in the three fee model categories (Category A — Acquisition; 2022 SJMSCP Fees Category B - Assessment and Enhancement; and Category C - Land Management and Administration). Table 1— HTAC Financial Subcommittee Members: John Beckman, BIA Matt Diaz, Stockton Ian Ralston, CDFW Dan Gifford, Conservation Megan Aguirre, SJ County The proposed 2022 SJMSCP development fees were adjusted using the recommended 2020 SJMSCP Five -Year Financial Model Update for the respective categories and are compared to the 2021 SJMSCP Development fees (Table 2) in the most common habitat categories under the plan. The change is an overall increase of 12.7% in the most impacted categories of Agricultural and Natural habitat classifications from the prior year. The increase is due primarily to a rise in the land acquisition component (Category A) for agricultural land 12.7% price values of comparable sales and an unusually robust rise in the reported Consumer Price Index (CPI) for Categories B and C. Table 2- Compared 2022 & 2021 SJMSCP Development Fees — Most Common Fee Habitat Types 2022 Fee - Proposed 2021 Fee - Adopted Difference Percent Change Agricultural/Natural $19,561 $17,363 $2,198 12.7% Table 3 illustrates the history of the SJMSCP development fees over the years since the funding shortfall was noted by the permitting agencies in 2006. The fees can fluctuate primarily based on the Category A - acquisition component of the fee formula over time. Table 3- History and Annual Percentage Change for SJMSCP Development Fees Projects participating under the SJMSCP benefit from a predetermined streamlined processing of the project rather than navigating through a potentially very long, cumbersome and expensive regulatory process outside the habitat plan. By opting for participation, the project proponent can choose any number of ways to provide mitigation for the impacts of the project through the plan and even control much of the mitigation costs if desired. The options are: 1. Pay a fee. 2. Redesign the project to avoid/minimize impacts. 3. Provide land in lieu of the SJMSCP fee, which the project proponent will negotiate the easement/fee title costs (Category A component). 4. Any combination of the above options. And if those options are not sufficient, the project proponent can choose to not participate in the plan (opt out) and fulfill mitigation requirements on their own with state and federal permitting agencies independently. RECOMMENDATION: The HTAC Financial Subcommittee, HTAC and SJCOG, Inc. staff recommend the Board Approve the 2022 SJMSCP Development Fees as Adjusted Pursuant to the Financial Analysis Model. FISCAL IMPACT: Development fees provide funding for SJCOG Inc. to mitigate project impacts covered under the SJMSCP permits for the subsequent calendar year beginning January 1. BACKGROUND: 2007 Fee Category Financial 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Update# Multi -Purpose $6,511 $6,165 $7,052 $7,307 $6,631 $7,195 $6,364 $6,656 $7,281 $7,807 $8,905 $9,701 $6,700 $6,412 $8,682 $9,781 Open space $13,022 $12,329 $14,104 $14,615 $13,262 $14,372 $12,711 $13,295 $14,543 $15,596 $17,808 $19,400 $13,399 $12,822 $17,363 $19,561 Agriculture/Natural $69,858 $71,125 $78,353 $80,760 $77,720 $81,989 $78,311 $80,972 $85,631 $90,273 $109,737 $116,871 $101,033 $100,788 $161,286 $174,040 (wetted) (wetted) (wetted) (wetted) (wetted) (wetted) (wetted) (wetted) (wetted) (wetted) (wetted) (wetted) (wetted) (wetted) (wetted) (wetted) Vernal Pools $34,958 $35,143 $40,565 $42,071 $38,328 $41,534 $37,087 $39,047 $42,784 $46,869 $66,437 $72,523 $54,576 $52,833 $71,544 $80,453 (upland) (upland) (upland) (upland) (upland) (upland) (upland) (upland) (upland) (upland) (upland) (upland) (upland) (upland) (upland) (upland) Percentage of -5.3% -5.3% 14.4% 3.6% -9.3% 8.4% -11.6% 4.6% A4% Z2% 14.2% 8.9% -30.9% -4.3% 35.4% Change Yearly Projects participating under the SJMSCP benefit from a predetermined streamlined processing of the project rather than navigating through a potentially very long, cumbersome and expensive regulatory process outside the habitat plan. By opting for participation, the project proponent can choose any number of ways to provide mitigation for the impacts of the project through the plan and even control much of the mitigation costs if desired. The options are: 1. Pay a fee. 2. Redesign the project to avoid/minimize impacts. 3. Provide land in lieu of the SJMSCP fee, which the project proponent will negotiate the easement/fee title costs (Category A component). 4. Any combination of the above options. And if those options are not sufficient, the project proponent can choose to not participate in the plan (opt out) and fulfill mitigation requirements on their own with state and federal permitting agencies independently. RECOMMENDATION: The HTAC Financial Subcommittee, HTAC and SJCOG, Inc. staff recommend the Board Approve the 2022 SJMSCP Development Fees as Adjusted Pursuant to the Financial Analysis Model. FISCAL IMPACT: Development fees provide funding for SJCOG Inc. to mitigate project impacts covered under the SJMSCP permits for the subsequent calendar year beginning January 1. BACKGROUND: Annually, the SJMSCP development fees are reviewed and calculated using a formula method adopted under the habitat. The three components of the formula are adjusted using a specific mechanism, which relates to the individual component in the fee based on the most current data. The development fees established must be adopted by each of the jurisdictions and would become effective on January 1 of the subsequent year for projects using the SJMSCP. Cat A Cat B Cat C Fee Category A (Acquisition) — Comparable Land Sales This category is directly related to land valuation based on comparable land sales in San Joaquin County in specific zones of the plan area (Central Zone, Central Southwest Transition Zone and Delta Zone) over an established two-year period meeting the established criteria used for comparable land sales (Attachment 1). Cost estimates for this category will continue to be evaluated on a yearly basis by taking all qualified fee title comparable sales in each zone to set a weighted cost per acre. The model update results in a 15.8% increase in the Agricultural/Natural Habitat types of Category A (Acquisition) component to be $13,594. The reason for the increase is the rise in comparable fee title land sale values. Category B (Assessment and Enhancement) — Refined Cost Factors with Consumer Price Index and Model Data Update The Category B component of the fee is adjusted using several factors including the California Consumer Price Index (CPI), as reported by the California Department of Finance for the preceding 12 -month fiscal year (June 2020 — June 2021) and from the updated model numbers completed annually based on the SJMSCP Annual Report. The unit cost factors (per acre or per year for some items) are adjusted only by the CPI (the California CPI calculation was an increase of 4.4%). But, the total cost for Category B is also a function of the SJMSCP Annual Report data updated annually (acres remaining to be acquired and the number of years remaining in the permit term; the fee per acre is a function of those total calculated costs and the land conversion acres remaining). These parts all feed into the fee model. The model update results in a 6.4% increase in the Agricultural/Natural Habitat types of Category B (Assessment and Enhancement) component to be $5,256. Category C (Management, Monitoring and Administration) — Refined Cost Factors/Long Term Investment with Consumer Price Index Annual cost updates use the California Consumer Price Index (CPI), as reported by the California Department of Finance, for the preceding 12 -month fiscal year (June 2020 — June 2021) to keep up with inflation on an annual basis. The model update results in a 4.4% increase in the Agricultural/Natural Habitat types of Category C (Management, Monitoring and Administration) component from prior years to be $710.96. In summary, the SJMSCP fees is calculated using the SJMSCP Financial Analysis formula model shown in the final proposed fee table 4 below and Attachment 2 (SJMSCP Cost and 2022 Fee Analysis). The overall result in the fee analysis is a 12.7% increase in the most impacted Agricultural and Natural Habitat Classifications fees for 2022. Table 4 - 2022 SJMSCP Development Fees - Proposed Habitat Type Category A Category B Category C Total Fee Rounded Fee Other Open Space $6,797.00 $2,628.00 $356.00 $9,781.00 $9,781 Natural/Ag Lands $13,594.00 $5,256.00 $710.96 $19,560.96 $19,561 Vernal Pool Grasslands $65,307.00 $13,390.00 $1,756.01 $80,453.01 $80,453 Vernal Pool Wetted $64,182.00 $108,136.00 $1,721.56 $174,039.56 $174,040 COMMITTEE ACTIONS: • HTAC FINANICAL SUBCOMMITTEE: Recommended Approval to HTAC • HTAC: Recommended Approval to SJCOG Inc. Board • Management and Finance: Information • Executive Committee: Information • SJCOG Inc. Board: Action Required Prepared by: Steven Mayo, Program Manager Attachment 1— 2022 Fee Study Property List - Props 24 Month DRAB MATERIAL ONLY Attachment t mscP comparable land Sales TAU. Central Zone Properties Analysis Date - lune/August 2021 Address APN Zone Sale Date Price Acres PricelAcre Hab Type Appreciated Price Appreciated Price�Acre Tdleb. Delto Properties Address APN Zone Sale Date Price Acres PricelAcre Hab Type Appreciated Price Appreciated Price)Acre •• 1 �® 11 1®�® 11� 29933 Lommets Rd, Troey, CA rhosi,,iom aim IN 01111 11 1 1 � •1 ®� 11 1��® 11® '.i •• . - ` 1 ®® 11 1� 111® 11 1 1 Tdleb. Delto Properties Address APN Zone Sale Date Price Acres PricelAcre Hab Type Appreciated Price Appreciated Price)Acre IUTAL I oibA8b�000.WI llbl,bsl p15401.111 1 D111UJMI,uul sss,eu.rnl TdlnC. Southwest Zone Properties TTUSEU Address APN Zone Sale Date Price Acres PricelAcre Hab Tyne Appreciated Price Appreciated PdcelAcre TOTAL •• 1 �® 11 1®�® 11� IUTAL I oibA8b�000.WI llbl,bsl p15401.111 1 D111UJMI,uul sss,eu.rnl TdlnC. Southwest Zone Properties TTUSEU Address APN Zone Sale Date Price Acres PricelAcre Hab Tyne Appreciated Price Appreciated PdcelAcre TOTAL Attachment 2 — SJMSCP Cost and Fee Analysis 2022 Update FINANCIAL ANALYSIS UPDATE Final Adopted August 27, 2020 Table of Contents Notes to User Fee Summary Comparison Al PerAcreCostFactorsbyZone A2 PerAcreAcquisitionCost A3 AcquisitionCostHabitatType A4 AcquisitionFEE B1 PreserveEnhancementCost B2 AssessmentEnhancementCost B3 AssessEnhancementCostAl location B4 AssessmentEnhancementFEE C MonitoringAdminFEE For 5 -Year Update Only => C1 MonitoringCost C2 PMAdminCost C3 Permit Term Cost Adjustments C4 Endowment C5 MonitoringAdminCostAlloc C6 MonitoringAdminFEE Source for update acres => 1 SJMSCP Acres 6_4_2015 2.1 RemainingPreservetoAcquire 2.2 Preserves_ Habitat_ Zone_ 2019 3 Cumulative Take_Remaining 4 PreserveAcquisitionSchedule Fund Balance Analysis => 5 Fund Bala nceAllocation 131 ExistingPreserveEnhanceCost List of worksheet tabs and contents Model overview and instructions for annual updates Table showing calculated fee amounts by habitat type and category; comparison to adopted fees; linked from other sheets; includes California CPI factor for Category C annual update Per acre easement cost factors by zone based on input from comparables and appraisal analysis Weighted acquisition cost factors by habitat type based on distribution of preserves by zone; adds transaction costs Total acquisition cost by habitat type, for preserves remaining to be acquired Category A fee by habitat type, based on remaining land conversion Weighted enhancement cost factors by habitat type based on estimate of acres enhanced and detailed per acre enhancement cost factors All assessment and enhancement cost factors by habitat type, for preserves remaining to be acquired Total assessment and enhancement cost by habitat type, remainder of permit term, for preserves remaining to be acquired Category B fee by habitat type, based on remaining land conversion Category C fee by habitat type, based on remaining land conversion; links to summary comparison for annual update Workbook break: the following tabs for Category C are only used in the 5 -year economic analysis update Monitoring cost factors by habitat type, including post -permit annual cost; costs for remainder of permit term, all preserve acres Project management and administrative cost factors, including post -permit annual cost; costs for remainder of permit term, all preserve acr Category C fund balance deducted from Category C costs remainder of permit term to calculate net cost for cost allocation and fee Endowment cash flow, return assumptions, and total in year 51 to support post -permit annual cost Total monitoring, management, and administrative cost by habitat type, remainder of permit term and endowment for post permit cost Category C fee by habitat type, based on remaining land conversion Workbook break: the following tabs are updated annually and every 5 years for acres inputs Land conversion and preserve acres by habitat type for the 50 -year permit term (source table) Preserve Acres, Total and Remaining to be Acquired (from Table 1 and Annual Report updates) Detail on preserve acquisition by habitat type and zone for use in monitoring cost estimates (not used in annual updates) Allowed and Remaining Incidental Take Acreage (from Table 1 and Annual Report updates) Preserve Acquisition Schedule, All Habitat Types, by Index Zone, Remaining Permit Term (from Table 2.1 and 2.2) Workbook break: the following tabs are updated every 5 years for Category C cost analysis Allocation of Fund Balance to Category B and Category C (permit term) and post -permit endowment Estimate of enhancement costs on existing preserves with updated cost factors, to allocate fund balance to Category B DRAFT SJMSCP Cost and Fee Analysis 2022 Update_For Annual Updates_Mayo July 2021_2020 Annual w CPI - TABLE OF CONTENTS - 8/12/2021 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS UPDATE Final Adopted August 27, 2020 Category A Category B Category C DRAFT SJMSCP Cost and Fee Analysis 2022 Update_For Annual Updates_Mayo July 2021_2020 Annual w CPI - Fee Summary Comparison - 8/12/2021 Monitoring, Assessment & Management & 2022 Fees - Proposed Acquisition Enhancement Administration, & Total Total Rounded Percent Difference Acquisition Enhancement Post -permit Total Total Rounded Enhancement Endowment Other Open Space $6,797.00 $2,628.00 $356.00 $9,781.00 $9,781 Natural/Ag Lands $13,594.00 $5,256.00 $710.96 $19,560.96 $19,561 Vernal Pool Grasslands $65,307.00 $13,390.00 $1,756.01 $80,453.01 $80,453 Vernal Pool Wetted $64,182.00 $108,136.00 $1,721.56 $174,039.56 $174,040 Vernal Pool Wetted Category A Category B Category C $12,754 $12,754 Vernal Pool Wetted 14.5%1 4.4%1 Monitoring, 7.9%1 7.9% Assessment & Management & 2021 Fees - Adopted Acquisition Enhancement Administration, & Total Total Rounded Post -permit Endowment Other Open Space $5,870.00 $2,471.00 $341.00 $8,682.00 $8,682 Natural/Ag Lands $11,740.00 $4,942.00 $681.00 $17,363.00 $17,363 Vernal Pool Grasslands $57,036.00 $12,826.00 $1,682.00 $71,544.00 $71,544 Vernal Pool Wetted $56,057.00 $103,580.00 $1,649.00 $161,286.00 $161,286 DRAFT SJMSCP Cost and Fee Analysis 2022 Update_For Annual Updates_Mayo July 2021_2020 Annual w CPI - Fee Summary Comparison - 8/12/2021 Monitoring, Assessment & Management & Difference Per Acre ($) Acquisition Assessment & Administration, & Total Total Rounded Percent Difference Acquisition Enhancement Administration, & Total Total Rounded Enhancement Post -permit Endowment Other Open Space $927 $157 $15 $1,099 $1,099 Natural/Ag Lands $1,854 $314 $30 $2,198 $2,198 Vernal Pool Grasslands $8,271 $564 $74 $8,909 $8,909 Vernal Pool Wetted $8,125 $4,556 $73 $12,754 $12,754 DRAFT SJMSCP Cost and Fee Analysis 2022 Update_For Annual Updates_Mayo July 2021_2020 Annual w CPI - Fee Summary Comparison - 8/12/2021 Monitoring, Management & Assessment & Percent Difference Acquisition Administration, & Total Total Rounded Enhancement Post -permit Endowment Other Open Space 15.8% 6.4% 4.4% 12.7% 12.7% Natural/Ag Lands 15.8% 6.4% 4.4% 12.7% 12.7% Vernal Pool Grasslands 14.5%1 4.4%1 4.4%1 12.5%1 12.5% Vernal Pool Wetted 14.5%1 4.4%1 4.4%1 7.9%1 7.9% DRAFT SJMSCP Cost and Fee Analysis 2022 Update_For Annual Updates_Mayo July 2021_2020 Annual w CPI - Fee Summary Comparison - 8/12/2021 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS UPDATE Final Adopted August 27, 2020 TABLE A.1 2020 Five -Year Economic Analysis and Fee Update SJMSCP Fee Update - 2021 (for 2022 SJMSCP Development Fee Cycle) Category A Per -Acre Acquisition Cost Factors by Zone (2021 dollars) Primary Zone of Southwest Central Zone the Delta Zone s Fee title value' a $25,532 $15,373 na Easement percent of fee title value b 56% 56% na Easement costs a x b $14,298 $8,609 $1,000 1. SJCOG, Inc. Fee Study Property List, Table A and Table B 2. SJCOG, Inc. Appraisals as of June 2020 3. Based on standard easement cost in Southwest Zone of $1,000/acre. DRAFT SJMSCP Cost and Fee Analysis 2022 Update_For Annual Updates_Mayo July 2021_2020 Annual w CPI - Al PerAcreCostFactorsbyZone - 8/12/2021 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS UPDATE Final Adopted August 27, 2020 TABLE A.2 2020 Five -Year Economic Analysis and Fee Update SJMSCP Fee Update - 2021 (for 2022 SJMSCP Development Fee Cycle) Per Acre Acquisition Cost by Preserve/Habitat Type (2021 dollars) 1. See Table A.1. 2. Percent of total lands in each category assumed to be in a given zone. Based on 1996 Economic Analysis. 3. Weighted average cost based on generalized proportion of total preserve land in each zone. Assumes easement acquisition for lands categorized as agriculture and all natural lands except vernal pool habitat. 4. Assumes fee title acquisition for vernal pool lands. Vernal pool habitat fee title land costs assumed to be about 80% of average Central Zone fee title costs. 5. Transaction costs include biological baseline reporting, appraisal, escrow, and survey costs. Costs are estimated at 5 percent of acquisition cost. DRAFT SJMSCP Cost and Fee Analysis 2022 Update_For Annual Updates_Mayo July 2021_2020 Annual w CPI - A2 PerAcreAcquisitionCost - 8/12/2021 SJMSCP Zone Total Land Total Primary Zone of Southwest Weighted Transaction s Acquisition Central Zone the Delta Zone Acquisition q Costs Costs Per Preserve/Habitat Type Cost Acre A B C A + B + C = D Dx5%=E D + E Easement cost by zone 1 d $14,298 $8,609 $1,000 Agricultural Lands Percent in zone z e 98% 2% 0% Weighted costs 3 d x e $14,040 $155 $0 $14,195 $710 $14,905 Natural Lands Non -vernal pool natural lands Percent in zone z f 77% 4% 18% Weighted costs 3 d x f $11,046 $382 $183 $11,611 $581 $12,192 Vernal pool grasslands 4 n/a n/a n/a $20,426 $1,021 $21,447 Vernal pool wetted 4 n/a n/a n/a $20,426 $1,021 $21,447 1. See Table A.1. 2. Percent of total lands in each category assumed to be in a given zone. Based on 1996 Economic Analysis. 3. Weighted average cost based on generalized proportion of total preserve land in each zone. Assumes easement acquisition for lands categorized as agriculture and all natural lands except vernal pool habitat. 4. Assumes fee title acquisition for vernal pool lands. Vernal pool habitat fee title land costs assumed to be about 80% of average Central Zone fee title costs. 5. Transaction costs include biological baseline reporting, appraisal, escrow, and survey costs. Costs are estimated at 5 percent of acquisition cost. DRAFT SJMSCP Cost and Fee Analysis 2022 Update_For Annual Updates_Mayo July 2021_2020 Annual w CPI - A2 PerAcreAcquisitionCost - 8/12/2021 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS UPDATE Final Adopted August 27, 2020 TABLE A.3 2020 Five -Year Economic Analysis and Fee Update SJMSCP Fee Update - 2021 (for 2022 SJMSCP Development Fee Cycle) Total Acquisition Costs by Habitat Type, Remainder of Permit Term ( dollars) Preserves by Habitat Type Land Acquisition Cost Per Acre Preserve Acres Remaining to be Acquired Total Costs of Acquisition Agricultural lands $14,905 39,864.48 $594,180,089 Natural lands Non -vernal pool natural lands $12,192 24,321.84 $296,531,873 Total for Non -vernal pool Natural /Ag Lan $13,877 64,186.32 $890,711,962 Vernal pool grasslands $21,447 15,720.66 $337,160,888 Vernal pool wetted $21,447 2,115.00 $45,360,405 Sources: SJCOG, Inc., SJMSCP 2020 Annual Report, and Hausrath Economics Group. DRAFT SJMSCP Cost and Fee Analysis 2022 Update_For Annual Updates_Mayo July 2021_2020 Annual w CPI - A3 AcquisitionCostHabitatType - 8/12/2021 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS UPDATE Final Adopted August 27, 2020 TABLE A.4 2020 Five -Year Economic Analysis and Fee Update SJMSCP Fee Update - 2021 (for 2022 SJMSCP Development Fee Cycle) Category A Acquisition Fee Calculations (2021 dollars) Habitat Type Costs associated with non -vernal pool natural/agricultural lands conversic Natural (non vernal pool)/Agricultural land conversion (acres) , remaining Multi-purpose open space conversion (acres), remaining' Multiplier for natural/agricultural land conversion Multiplier for multi-ourpose open space conversion' Acquisition Component of Natural (non vernal pool)/Agricultural Lands Acquisition Component of Multi -Purpose Open Space Fee' Costs associated with vernal pool grasslands Vernal pool grassland conversion (acres), remaining Acquisition Component of Vernal Pool Grasslands Fee Costs associated with vernal pool wetted Vernal pool wetted conversion (acres), remaining Acquisition Component of Vernal Pool Wetted Fee Preserve Land Acquisition $890,711,962 48,349.32 34,349.31 1 0.5 $13,594 $6,797 $337,160,888 5,162.74 $65,307 $45,360,405 706.75 $64,182 1. As described in SJMSCP Section 7.4.1.2, the fee calculation allocates the costs associated with agricultural habitat and non -vernal pool natural lands preserves to conversion of both those high value lands (agricultural land and non - vernal pool natural land) and lower value multi-purpose open space. In other words, the SJMSCP does not enhance multi-purpose open space lands but allocates some of the costs of enhancements on agricultural and natural lands preserves to the conversion of multi-purpose open space lands to assist with the financing of those enhancements. Sources: SJCOG, Inc., SJMSCP 2019 Annual Report, and Hausrath Economics Group. DRAFT SJMSCP Cost and Fee Analysis 2022 Update_For Annual Updates_Mayo July 2021_2020 Annual w CPI - A4 AcquisitionFEE - 8/12/2021 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS UPDATE Final Adopted August 27, 2020 TABLE B.1 2020 Five -Year Economic Analysis and Fee Update SJMSCP Fee Update - 2021 (for 2022 SJMSCP Development Fee Cycle) Category B Assessment, Planning, Restoration and Enhancement SJMSCP Preserve land by habitat type, enhancement analysis, and enhancement cost per preserve acre (2021 dollars) Habitat Type Total Preserve Acres (including neighboring lands preserves) Percent of Preserve Acres Enhanced' Acres Benefiting from Enhancements Hedgerow or Other Linear Habitat Feature ( acres)z Enhancement Cost per Acre Total Enhancement Cost Enhancement Cost per Preserve Acre 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Agricultural Habitat Land S4 57,935 10% 5,794 776 $74,124 $57,520,224 $993 Natural Lands Ditches 378 33% 126 $323,640 $40,778,640 Grasslands 14,559 33% 4,853 $20,462 $99,304,027 Oak woodlands 858 33% 286 $30,276 $8,658,936 Riparian 2,725 33% 908 $88,740 $80,605,500 Submerged aquatic in the Dell 10 100% 10 $61,596 $615,960 Subtotal 18,530 6,183 $37,191 $229,963,063 Other natural land S5 6,445 33% 2,148 $37,191 $79,898,218 Subtotal Non VP Natural 24,975 $309,861,281 $12,407 Vernal pool wetted 2,121 33% 707 $108,263 $76,541,800 $36,088 Vernal pool grasslands 15,811 33% 5,270 $13,050 $68,777,850 $4,350 Subtotal All Natural Lands 42,907 14,309 $455,180,931 Total 100,842 20,103 $512,701,155 1. Enhancement criteria derived from the SJMSCP, Section 5.4.6. 2. Unlike most other habitat types, agricultural lands are enhanced by treating linear teatures that run along the edge of or through tields--teatures such as roads or drainage ditches. In these cases, the land area of direct enhancement activity is substantially less than that area benefiting from the enhancement. This has the advantage of minimizing impacts to agricultural land production. Installing pollinator hedgerows at the edges of fields and grassland borders along irrigation and drainage ditches, and planting nest trees and associated shrubs and grasses, are enhancements used in the cost analysis to represent the range of types of agricultural land enhancements outlined in the SJMSCP. In addition to benefits to species, these linear features offer benefits of preventing soil erosion and reducing costs for weed control and linear water conveyance infrastructure maintenance. They also enhance the entire field they are associated with, meeting the 10 percent enhancement criterion while also minimizing loss of productive agricultural land. The enhancement cost estimate for agricultural lands is therefore based on the acres of hedgerow or other linear feature multiplied by the cost per acre to install hedeerows and similar linear features. 3. The enhancement cost applies to the acres where construction and/or installation actually takes place. In the case of hedgerows or other linear features, this is only the relatively small area of activity, not the total area that is thereby enhanced. Enhancement cost includes costs for materials, construction labor, and equipment. In addition to the installation activity, the cost per enhanced acre also includes a cost for project oversight and contract adminstration and three years of maintenance and monitoring. For vernal pool wetted restoration, the cost includes 5 monitoring years during a 10 year post -restoration monitoring period. 4. For agricultural habitat lands, a SJMSCP describes a broad range of enhancement activities and a generalized target of 10 percent enhancement; providing benefits to species without substantially reducing the amount of agricultural land in production. This can be achieved by implementing the linear features described in footnote 2. Pollinator hedgerows or similar linear features enhance the entire field that they are associated with, thereby counting toward the 10 percent enhancement criteria while taking substantially less land out of production. 5. Estimated based on the weighted average cost for all other non -vernal pool natural lands. Sources: Table A.1, SJCOG, Inc., ICF, and Hausrath Economics Group DRAFT SJMSCP Cost and Fee Analysis 2022 Update_For Annual Updates_Mayo July 2021_2020 Annual w CPI - B1 PreserveEnhancementCost - 8/12/2021 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS UPDATE Final Adopted August 27, 2020 TABLE B.2 2020 Five -Year Economic Analysis and Fee Update SJMSCP Fee Update - 2021 (for 2022 SJMSCP Development Fee Cycle) Category B Assessment, Planning, Restoration and Enhancement Cost Factors (2021 dollars) Remainder of Permit Term Remaining years in permit term 30 1 used in formulae below to calculate costs for the remainder of the permi Biological Site Assessment Number of site visits per year Annual cost Total Site Assessment cost remainder of permit term Preserve Management Plan Preparation 8 assumes 6 hours per visit $7,266 $217,980 Number of management plans per year 12 assumes 40 hours per plan Annual cost $72,662 Total Preserve Management Plan cost remainder of permit t $2,179,860 Preserve Enhancement Plan Preparation Average cost per enhancement plan $4,239 assumes 28 hours per plan for each enhancement project Average acres per project 240 Average cost per preserve acre $18 Preserve Enhancements on Agricultural Lands Enhancement cost per preserve acre Preserve Enhancements on Non -Vernal Pool Natural Lands Enhancement cost per preserve acre Vernal Pool Creation/Enhancement Enhancement cost per preserve acre $993 from Table 131 $12,407 from Table B1 $36,088 Ifrom Table 131 Vernal Pool Upland Grassland Enhancement Enhancement cost per preserve acre $4,350 from Table B1 Sources: SJCOG, Inc., SJMSCP 2019 Annual Report, ICF, and Hausrath Economics Group. DRAFT SJMSCP Cost and Fee Analysis 2022 Update_For Annual Updates_Mayo July 2021_2020 Annual w CPI - B2 AssessmentEnhancementCost - 8/12/2021 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS UPDATE Final Adopted August 27, 2020 TABLE B.3 2020 Five -Year Economic Analysis and Fee Update SJMSCP Fee Update - 2021 (for 2022 SJMSCP Development Fee Cycle) Category B Assessment, Planning, Restoration and Enhancement ( dollars) Cost Allocation by Habitat Type Remainder of Permit Term 1. Includes 600 acres of neighboring lands preserves. 2. SJCOG, Inc. spending through 12/31/19 on site visits and preserve management plans totals at least $400,000; assume all of these types of costs for existing preserves are included in spe Sources: SJCOG, Inc., SJMSCP 2019 Annual Report, ICF, and Hausrath Economics Group. DRAFT SJMSCP Cost and Fee Analysis 2022 Update_For Annual Updates_Mayo July 2021_2020 Annual w CPI - B3 Assess EnhancementCostAlloc - 8/12/2021 Costs - Remainder of Permit Term Total cost allocated by preserve type multiplied by preserve Cost per acre multiplied by percent of total preserve acres remaining acres remaining to be preserve acres remaining to be to be acquired acquired acquired Acres Remaining Percent Biological Site Preserve Preserve Enhancement Preserve Vernal Pool Preserves by Habitat Type to be Acquired1 of Total Assessment Management Plans Plans Enhancements Restoration Agricultural lands 39,864.48 49% $105,943 $1,059,460 $717,561 $39,579,078 na Non -vernal pool natural lands 24,321.84 30% 64,637 646,390 437,793 $301,757,618 na Vernal pool grasslands 15,720.66 19% 41,779 417,801 282,972 $68,384,849 na Vernal pool wetted 2,115.00 3% 5,621 56,209 38,070 na $76,325,274 82,021.98 100% $217,980 $2,179,860 $1,476,396 $409,721,545 $76,325,274 1. Includes 600 acres of neighboring lands preserves. 2. SJCOG, Inc. spending through 12/31/19 on site visits and preserve management plans totals at least $400,000; assume all of these types of costs for existing preserves are included in spe Sources: SJCOG, Inc., SJMSCP 2019 Annual Report, ICF, and Hausrath Economics Group. DRAFT SJMSCP Cost and Fee Analysis 2022 Update_For Annual Updates_Mayo July 2021_2020 Annual w CPI - B3 Assess EnhancementCostAlloc - 8/12/2021 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS UPDATE Final Adopted August 27, 2020 TABLE B.4 2020 Five -Year Economic Analysis and Fee Update SJMSCP Fee Update - 2021 (for 2022 SJMSCP Development Fee Cycle) Category B Assessment, Planning, Restoration and Enhancement Fee Calculations (2021 dollars) Remainder of Permit Term Habitat Type Biological Site Assessment Preserve Preserve Managemen Enhancement t Plans Plans Agricultural and Non VP Natural Land Enhancement Totalfor Agricultural and Non VP Natural Land (incl. assessment and plans) Vernal Pool Restoration / Enhancement Total for Vernal Pool (incl. assessment and plans) Costs associated with non -vernal pool natural/agricultural lands convers $170,580 $1,705,850 $1,155,354 $341,336,696 $344,368,480 Natural (non vernal pool)/Agricultural land conversion (acres), remaininE 48,349.32 48,349.32 48,349.32 48,349.32 48,349.32 Multi-purpose open space conversion (acres), remaining' 34,349.31 34,349.31 34,349.31 34,349.31 34,349.31 Multiplier for natural/agricultural land conversion 1 1 1 1 1 Multiplier for multi-purpose open space conversion' 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Assessment & Enhancement Component of Natural (non -vernal pool)/Agricultural Lands Fee $3 $26 $18 $5,209 $5,256 Assessment & Enhancement Component of Multi -Purpose Open Space $2 $13 $9 $2,605 $2,628 Costs associated with vernal pool grasslands $41,779 $417,801 $282,972 $68,384,849 $69,127,401 Vernal pool grassland conversion (acres), remaining 5,162.74 5,162.74 5,162.74 5,162.74 5,162.7 Assessment & Enhancement Component of Vernal Pool Grasslands Fe $8 $81 $55 $13,246 $13,390 Costs associated with vernal pool wetted $5,621 $56,209 $38,070 $76,325,274 $76,425,174 Vernal pool wetted conversion (acres), remaining 706.75 706.75 706.75 706.75 706.8 Assessment & Enhancement Component of Vernal Pool Wetted Fee $8 $80 $54 $107,995 $108,136 1. As described in SJMSCP Section 7.4.1.2, the fee calculation allocates the costs associated with agricultural habitat and non -vernal pool natural lands preserves to conversion of both those high value lands (agricultural land and non -vernal pool natural land) and lower value multi-purpose open space. In other words, the SJMSCP does not enhance multi-purpose open space lands but allocates some of the costs of enhancements on agricultural and natural lands preserves to the conversion of multi-purpose open space lands to assist with the financing of those enhancements. Sources: SJCOG, Inc., SJMSCP 2019 Annual Report, ICF, and Hausrath Economics Group. DRAFT SJMSCP Cost and Fee Analysis 2022 Update_For Annual Updates_Mayo July 2021_2020 Annual w CPI - 134 AssessmentEnhancementFEE - 8/12/2021 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS UPDATE Final Adopted August 27, 2020 TABLE C.5 for Annual Update 2020 Five -Year Economic Analysis and Fee Update SJMSCP Fee Update - 2021 (for 2022 SJMSCP Development Fee Cycle) Category C Monitoring and Program Management/Administration, including endowment for post -permit costs Fee Calculations (2021 dollars) Habitat Type Costs associated with non -vernal pool natural/agricultural lands conversion Non -vernal pool Natural/Agricultural land conversion (acres), remaining Multi-purpose open space conversion (acres), remaining' Multiplier for natural/agricultural land conversion Multiplier for multi-purpose open space conversion' Monitoring & Administration Component of Natural (non -vernal pool)/Agricultural Lands Fee Monitoring & Administration Component of Multi -Purpose Open Space Fe Costs associated with vernal pool grasslands Vernal pool grassland conversion (acres), remaining Monitoring & Administration Component of Vernal Pool Grasslands Fee Costs associated with vernal pool wetted Vernal pool wetted conversion (acres), remaining Monitoring & Administration Component of Vernal Pool Wetted Fee Remainder of Permit Term Post permit Total $38,737,435 49,654.31 34,494.82 1 0.5 $579 $290 $7,387,258 5,163.08 $1,431 $990,979 706.75 $1,402 Note: Net of existing fund balance allocated to Category C permit -term and post -permit costs. Post Permit of Total Fee $6,809,704 $45,547,139 49,654.31 49,654.31 34,494.82 34,494.82 1 1 0.5 0.5 $102 $681 15% $51 $341 15% $1,298,616 $8,685,874 5,163.08 5,163.08 $252 $1,682 15% $174,206 $1,165,185 706.75 706.75 $246 $1,649 15% 1. The fee calculation allocates the costs associated with agricultural habitat and non -vernal pool natural lands preserves to conversion of both those high value lands (agricultural land and non -vernal pool natural land) and lower value multi-purpose open space, thereby assisting with the financing of management and monitoring on agricultural and natural lands preserves. Sources: SJCCG, Inc., SJMSCP 2019 Annual Report, ICF, Urban Economics, and Hausrath Economics Group. DRAFT SJMSCP Cost and Fee Analysis 2022 Update_For Annual Updates_Mayo July 2021_2020 Annual w CPI - C MonitorAdminFEE - 8/12/2021 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS UPDATE Final Adopted August 27, 2020 TABLE 1 2020 Five -Year Economic Analysis and Fee Update Land Conversion and Preserve Acres by Habitat Type for the 50 -year Permit Term Habitat Type Land Conversion Number of Preserve Acres to Land Conversion Acres Total Preserve Acres for Compensation Neighboring Land Protection Preserves Total All Preserve Percent Acres Total Acres Agriculturallandsz 57,635 1.00 57,635 300 57,935 57% Natural Lands Ditches3 126 3.00 378 378 0.37% Grasslands4 4,853 3.00 14,559 14,559 14.44% Oak woodlandss 286 3.00 858 858 0.85% Riparian 900 3.00 2,700 25 2,725 2.70% Submerged aquatic in the Delta Zone 3 3.00 10 10 0.01% Vernal pool grasslands' VP - wetted surface area 707 3.00 2,121 2,121 2.10% VP - upland grassland 5,187 3.00 15,561 15,561 15.43% VP - Neighboring Land Protection preserves$ na 250 250 0.25% Other natural lands9 2,140 3.00 6,420 25 6,445 6.39% Subtotal Natural Lands 14,202 42,607 300 42,907 42.55% Total 71,837 100,242 600 100,842 100.00% NOTE: In the following footnotes, "type" refers to the mapped habitat unit identified in the SJMSCP Biological Analysis (Chapter 2). The following footnotes provide summaries only and the reader should refer to the Biological Analysis for a detailed description of each habitat type. 1. Land conversion includes results of Tier 1 and Tier 2 analyses. Agricultural land conversion includes 9,720 acres from Tier 2 Analysis and Natural Lands conversion includes 5,000 acres from Tier 2 Analysis of vernal pool conversion to orchards and vineyards and 744 acres of other natural lands conversion. 2. Neighboring Land Protection Preserves consist of ditched agricultural lands providing habitat for giant garter snake and pond turtle and other lands as needed for compensation to other covered species associated with agricultural land preserves. 3. Drainage ditches (unlined) generally found in agricultural fields (D types). 4. Valley grasslands (G types) and Foothill grasslands (G2 types). 5. Blue Oak woodlands, savanna and forests (BL types), Blue Oak Conifer woodlands, savanna and forests (BCN types), Valley Oak Woodland, savanna and forests (V types), and Mixed Oak Woodlands, savanna and forests (0 types). 6. This category includes those portions of rivers and major streams located outside the Primary Zone of the Delta (Mokelumne, Calaveras, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin Rivers). These were originally included in a separate "Riparian Zone" during the SJMSCP planning process (i.e., "Riparian" refers to a zone rather than to the "Riparian" habitat type. The Riparian Zone was "absorbed" or combined into its surrounding zone (i.e., Central/Central-Southwest) in the final SJMSCP. It generally included River and Deep water channel (W), Tributary Streams (W2), Creeks -intermittent and perennial (W3, W3 -i, W3 -p), Dead-end sloughs (W-4) and their associated riparian habitats (Great Valley Riparian - R, R2, R3, RS, R4, S, S2). This category includes 25 acres of Neighboring Lands Protection Preserves for Valley elderberry longhorn beetle habitat. 7. Vernal pool grasslands (G3 type) . 8. The vernal pool preserves for Neighboring Land Protection consist of existing vernal pools (no creation requirement). Enhancements will benefit the tiger salamander. 9. This category includes all natural land types except for Vernal Pools. Cost estimates in this category are an average of the costs of acquiring, restoring, enhancing the Natural Land categories specified in the preceding categories excluding Vernal Pools. This category also includes natural lands not included in other categories: All Water Features (W types), Channel islands (I types), tule island and mudflat (12) marsh, and Diablan sage scrub (S3 types) and all other types of Natural Lands. DRAFT SJMSCP Cost and Fee Analysis 2022 Update_For Annual Updates_Mayo July 2021_2020 Annual w CPI - 1 SJMSCP Acres 6_4_2015 - 8/12/2021 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS UPDATE Final Adopted August 27, 2020 TABLE 2.1 2020 Five -Year Economic Analysis and Fee Update Preserve Acres, Total and Remaining to be Acquired Preserve/Habitat Type Total Preserve Acres - 50 -year Permit Total Preserve Acres Acquired through 12/31/20202 Total Preserve Acres Remaining to Be Acquired (links to A.3, B.3. and C.4) Agricultural lands 57,935 11,270.519 39,864.48 Grasslands mitigating agricultural land impacts 6,800 Natural lands Ditches 378 - 378.00 Grasslands 14,559 578.510 13,980.49 Oak woodlands 858 - 858.00 Riparian 2,725 44.050 2,680.95 Submerged aquatic in the Delta 10 - 10.00 Other natural lands 6,445 30.600 6,414.40 Subtotal non-vp natural lands 24,975 653.160 24,321.84 Total Non VP Natural/Ag Lands 82,910 18,723.679 64,186.32 Vernal pool wetted 2,121 6.000 2,115.00 Vernal pool grasslands 15,811 90.345 15,720.66 Total 100,842 18,820.024 82,021.98 Notes: 1. Includes six acres of vernal pool jumpstart. 2.The Mizuno Preserve (row and field crop agricultural land preserve) is recorded at 181.449 acres (3 decimals). All other preserve acres recorded at 2 decimals or less. Sources: Table 1 in this workbook, Table 6 from Annual Reports through 2019, and SJCOG Inc. staff. DRAFT SJMSCP Cost and Fee Analysis 2022 Update_For Annual Updates_Mayo July 2021_2020 Annual w CPI - 2.1 Remain ingPreservetoAcquire - 8/12/2021 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS UPDATE Final Adopted August 27, 2020 Table 2.2 2020 Five -Year Economic Analysis and Fee Update A. Preserves Acquired by Habitat Type and Zone as of 12/31/2019 SJMSCP Index Zone Habitat Type Centrall Delta I Southwestj Vernal Pool I Total Agricultural lands 6,327.299 4,347.850 10,675.149 Natural lands Ditches Grasslands 243.250 7,121.280 7,364.530 Oak woodlands Riparian 44.050 Submerged aquatic in the Delta Other natural lands 30.600 Subtotal non-vp natural lands 317.900 - 7,121.280 - 7,439.180 Total Non VP Natural/Ag Lands 6,645.199 4,347.850 7,121.280 - 18,114.329 Vernal pool wetted 6.000 6.000 Vernal pool grasslands (upland) 71.760 18.585 90.345 Total 6,716.959 4,347.850 7,121.280 24.585 18,210.674 Source: SJMSCP 2019 Annual Report, Table 6 and Table 12 B. Preserves Acquired by Summary Habitat Type and Zone as of 12/31/2019 SJMSCP Index Zone Habitat Type centrall Delta I Southwestj Vernal Pool I Total Agricultural Land 6,327.299 4,347.850 - - 10,675.149 Natural Land 389.66 - 7,121.280 24.585 7,535.525 Total 6,716.959 4,347.850 7,121.280 24.585 18,210.674 Source: SJMSCP 2019 Annual Report, Table 6 and Table 12 C. Estimate of Future Southwest Zone Preserves, July 2020 2,500 Source: SJCOG, Inc. staff. DRAFT SJMSCP Cost and Fee Analysis 2022 Update_For Annual Updates_Mayo July 2021_2020 Annual w CPI - 2.2 Preserves_Habitat_Zone_2019 - 8/12/2021 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS UPDATE Final Adopted August 27, 2020 TABLE 3 2020 Five -Year Economic Analysis and Fee Update Allowed and Remaining Incidental Take Acreage Preserve/Habitat Type Take Authorizations - 50 -year Permit (including multi- purpose open space)' Cumulative Acres of Take through 12/31/2020 Remaining Acres of Land Conversion (links to A.4, B.4. and C.5) Agriculture 57,635 17,076.46 40,558.54 Multi-purpose (other open space) 37,465 3,115.69 34,349.31 Natural lands Vernal pool wetted 707 0.25 706.75 Vernal pool upland grassland 5,187 24.26 5,162.74 All other natural lands 8,308 517.55 7,790.78 Total 109,302 20,734.21 88,568.12 Notes: 1. Land conversion includes results of both Tier 1 and Tier 2 analysis. See Table 1 note 1. Sources: Table 1 in this workbook, SJMSCP Table 1-1 and Table 4.2-2; SJCOG, Inc., 2020 Annual Report Table 4 DRAFT SJMSCP Cost and Fee Analysis 2022 Update_For Annual Updates_Mayo July 2021_2020 Annual w CPI - 3 Cumulative Take—Remaining - 8/12/2021 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL SETTING THE SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY MULTI -SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE PLAN DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2022 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lodi adopted an ordinance establishing the authority for collection of a Development Fee for the San Joaquin County Multi -Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP) for all new developments pursuant to the SJMSCP within the City of Lodi; and WHEREAS, a "Fee Study" dated July 16, 2001, was prepared, which analyzed and identified the costs, funding, and cost -benefit of the San Joaquin County Multi -Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the SJMSCP Development Fee is to finance the goals and objectives of the SJMSCP that include, but are not limited to, preserve land acquisition, preserve enhancement, land management, and administration that compensate for such lands lost as a result of future development in the City of Lodi and in San Joaquin County; and WHEREAS, after considering the Fee Study and the testimony received at the public hearing, the Lodi City Council approved said report; and further found that the future development in the City of Lodi will need to compensate cumulative impacts to threatened, endangered, rare, and unlisted SJMSCP Covered Species and other wildlife and compensation for some non -wildlife related impacts to recreation, agriculture, scenic values and other beneficial Open Space uses; and WHEREAS, an "Updated Fee Study" was prepared in 2006, 2011, 2016 and 2020 which analyzed and identified the costs and funding of the SJMSCP; and WHEREAS, the SJMSCP Development Fees are divided into three categories: Category A — Acquisition; Category B — Enhancement; and Category C — Land Management/ Administration as seen in the table below; and 2022 SJMSCP Development Fees Habitat Type Category A B Category C Total Fee Rounded Other Open Space $6,797.00 $2,628.00 $356.00 $9,781.00 $9,781 Natural/Ag Lands $13,594.00 $5,256.00 710.96 $19,560.96 $19,561 Vernal Pool Grasslands $65,307.00 $13,390.00 $1,756.01 $80,4 3.01 $80,453 Vernal Pool Wetted $64,182.00 . $108,136.00 $1,721.56 $174,039.56 $174,040 WHEREAS, the SJMSCP Development Fees will be increased consistent with the Updated Fee Study findings for the year 2022; and WHEREAS, to ensure that the SJMSCP development fees keep pace with inflation, annual adjustments, based on the method set forth in this resolution, shall be made to the fees annually; and WHEREAS, the method of annual adjustments was modified in 2011, 2016 and again in 2020; and WHEREAS, the Updated Fee Study with the SJMSCP and the fee amendment were available for public inspection and review in the office of the City Clerk for more than ten days prior to the date of this Public Hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND DETERMINED by the City Council of the City of Lodi as follows: 1. The City Council finds and declares that the purposes and uses of the Development Fee, and the determination of the reasonable relationship between the fees' uses and the type of development project on which the fees are imposed, are all established in Ordinance 1707, and remain valid, and the City Council therefore adopts such determinations. 2. The City Council finds and declares that since adoption of Ordinance 1707, the cost of land has increased in San Joaquin County; and that in order to maintain the reasonable relationship established by Ordinance 1707, it is necessary to increase the Development Fee for the San Joaquin County Multi -Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan. 3. The Development Fee for natural lands, agricultural land, vernal pool habitat and multi- purpose open space conversion shall be consistent with the table identified in Exhibit "A" and attached hereto. 4. The Fee provided in this resolution shall be effective on January 1, 2022. 5. That the Lodi City Council hereby approves the proposed Habitat Conservation and Open Space fee adjustment. Dated: January 5, 2022 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2022-10 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held January 5, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Hothi, Khan, Kuehne, Nakanishi, and Mayor Chandler NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None YJP7NNIIFrCUSMIR vC City Clerk 2022-10 Leo tuber CHAIR Robert Ridnnan VICECHAIR Diane Nguyen PRESIDENT MenlberAgenaes CFFIFSOF ESCALON, LATHROP, LODI, MANTECA, RIPON, STOCK ON, TRACY, AND TFIECOUNYOF SANJOAQUIN Exhibit A SJCOG, Inc. 555 East Weber Avenue a Stockton, CA 95202 a (209) 235-0600 ■ FAX (209) 235-0438 San Joaquin County Multi -Species Habitat Conservation & Open Space Plan (SJMSCP) 2022 Updated Habitat Fees* Habitat Type Fee Per Acre Multi-Pul ose Open Space $9,781 Natural $19,561 Agriculture $19,561 Vernal Pool -- uplands $801453 ernal Pool - wetted $174,040 * Effective January 1, 2022 — December 31, 2022 2022 Endowment Fees with In -lieu Land** ** Effective January 1, 2022 — December 31, 2022 in lieu of fees to be used as the endowment for the dedicated land preserves (Category B + Q based on impacted acres. VELB Mitigation A special fee category shall apply when removal of the Valley Elderberry Long -horned Beatle (VELB) habitat of elderberry shrubs occurs. The fee shall be paid to SJCOG, Inc. or a VELB mitigation bank approved by the Permitting Agencies. The current fee, as established in the VELB Conservation Fund Account managed by the Center for Natural Lands Management, and approved by the USFWS, is $1,800 per VELB Unit (one unit= one stem over 1" in diameter at ground level which is removed). Fees shall be established by the JPA during preconstruction surveys (i.e., counts of stems to be removed with and without exit holes shall be completed during preconstruction surveys) and shall be paid to the JPA prior to ground disturbance or stem removal, whichever comes first. Enhancement Land TOTAL PER Type of Preserve Cost/acre Management ACRE Cost/acre ENDOWMENT Agricultural Habitat Lands $5,256.00 $710.96 $5,966.96 Natural Lands $5,256.00 $710.96 $5,966.96 Vernal Pool Habitat Vernal Pool Grasslands $13,390.00 $1,756.01 $15,146.01 Vernal Pool Wetted $108,136.00 $1,721.56 $109,857.56 ** Effective January 1, 2022 — December 31, 2022 in lieu of fees to be used as the endowment for the dedicated land preserves (Category B + Q based on impacted acres. VELB Mitigation A special fee category shall apply when removal of the Valley Elderberry Long -horned Beatle (VELB) habitat of elderberry shrubs occurs. The fee shall be paid to SJCOG, Inc. or a VELB mitigation bank approved by the Permitting Agencies. The current fee, as established in the VELB Conservation Fund Account managed by the Center for Natural Lands Management, and approved by the USFWS, is $1,800 per VELB Unit (one unit= one stem over 1" in diameter at ground level which is removed). Fees shall be established by the JPA during preconstruction surveys (i.e., counts of stems to be removed with and without exit holes shall be completed during preconstruction surveys) and shall be paid to the JPA prior to ground disturbance or stem removal, whichever comes first. 2022 San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Fees Submitted by Community Development Department In September 2021, the San Joaquin Council of Governments Board approved Habitat Conservation Plan fee schedule: Table 4 - 2022 SJMSCP Development Fees - Proposed Habitat Type ategory A Category B Category C Total Fee Rounded Fee $6,797.00 $2,628.00 $356.00 $9,781.00 $13,594.00 $5,256.00 $710.96 $19,560.96 $65,307.00 $13,390.00 $1,756.01 $80,453.01 These fee adjustments are based upon the required 5 year review financial update. The resulting 2022 per acre fees have increased by 12.7%, based on the rise in land acquisition cost as follows: • Open space lands increased from $8,682.00 to $9,781.00 • Ag. and Nature lands increased from $17,363.00 to $19.561.00 (two largest categories) • Habitat grasslands increased from $71,544.00 to $80,453.00 • Habitat wetlands increased from $161,286.00 to $1174,040.00 Recommended Action: Staff is recommending the adoption of a resolution setting the San Joaquin County Multi - Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan Development Fees for 2022 End of Presentation Please immediately confirm receipt of this fax by calling 333-6702 CITY OF LODI P.O. BOX 3006 LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910 ADVERTISING INSTRUCTIONS SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION SETTING SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY MULTI -SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE PLAN DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR 2022 PUBLISH DATE: SATURDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2021 TEAR SHEETS WANTED: One M I please SEND AFFIDAVIT AND BILL TO: JENNIFER CUSMIR, CITY CLERK LNS ACCT. #5100152 City of Lodi P.O. Box 3006 Lodi, CA 95241-1910 DATED: THURSDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2021 ORDERED BY: JENNIFER CUSMIR CITY CLERK PAMELA M. FARRIS ASSISTANT CITY CLERK KAYLEE CLAYTON ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK Verify Appearance of this Legal in the Newspaper — Copy to File Emailed to the Sentinel at legals@lodinews.com at : �ime) on I (date) (pages) forms\advins.doc DECLARATION OF POSTING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTING A RESOLUTION SETTING SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY MULTI -SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE PLAN DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR 2022 On Thursday, December 2, 2021, in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, a copy of a Notice of Public Hearing to consider adopting a resolution setting the San Joaquin County Multi -Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan Development Fees for 2022 (attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A") was posted at the following locations: Lodi City Clerk's Office Lodi City Hall Lobby Lodi Carnegie Forum WorkNet Office I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on December 2, 2021, at Lodi, California. PAMELA M. FARRIS ASSISTANT CITY CLERK ORDERED BY: JENNIFER CUSMIR CITY CLERK KAYLF_� CLAYTON ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK \\cvcfi1v0 1 \administration$\Administration\CLERK\Public Hearings\AFFADAVITS\DECPOST2.DOC CITY OF LODI NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING �. Carnegie Forum Date: January 5, 2022 `; • 305 West Pine Street, Lodi Time: 7:00 p.m. For information regarding this notice please contact: A Jennifer Cusmir�� City Clerk - Telephone: (209) 333-6702 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, January 5, 2022, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the City Council will conduct a public hearing at the Carnegie Forum, 305 West Pine Street, Lodi, to consider the following item: a) Adopting a resolution setting the San Joaquin County Multi -Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan Development Fees for 2022. Information regarding this item may be obtained in the Community Development Department, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, (209) 333-6711. All interested persons are invited to present their views and comments on this matter. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk, City Hall, 221 West Pine Street, 2nd Floor, Lodi, 95240, at any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein, and oral statements may be made at said hearing. If you challenge the subject matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk, 221 West Pine Street, at or prior to the close of the public hearing. By Order of the Lodi City Council Jennifer Cusmir Jennifer Cusmir City Clerk Dated: December 1, 2021 Approved as to form: Janice D. Magdich Janice D. Magdich City Attorney AVISO: Para obtener ayuda interpretativa con esta noticia, por favor Ilame a la oficina de la Secretaria Municipal, a las (209) 333-6702. CLERK\PUBHEAR%NOTICES%NOTCDD_DevFees 11/24/21