HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - October 16, 2018 SSLODI CITY COUNCIL
SHIRTSLEEVE SESSION
CARNEGIE FORUM, 305 WEST PINE STREET
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2018
A. Roll Call by City Clerk
An Informal Informational Meeting ("Shirtsleeve" Session) of the Lodi City Council was held
Tuesday, October 16, 2018, commencing at 7:03 a.m.
Present: Council Member Chandler, Council Member Kuehne, and Mayor Nakanishi
Absent: Council Member Johnson, and Mayor Pro Tempore Mounce
Also Present: City Manager Schwabauer, City Attorney Magdich, and City Clerk Ferraiolo
B. Topic(s)
B-1 Provide an Overview of Impact Mitigation Fee Program Update (PW)
Public Works Director Charlie Swimley provided a brief update on the 2018 Impact Mitigation Fee
Program (IMFP) update, stating this is the five-year update of the 2012 IMFP. He introduced the
consultants from Harris & Associates - Allison Bouley, Senior Director, and Adam Marston, Senior
Project Analyst.
Ms. Bouley provided a PowerPoint presentation covering the project team; IMFP history; changes
to the program; and City contributions.
Mr. Marston provided a PowerPoint presentation explaining the project review and updated fees
for transportation, police, fire, community park, neighborhood parks, general City facilities, Art in
Public Places, non -potable water, storm drainage, electrical utility, water, wastewater, and South
Wastewater Trunk Line; 2018 proposed Fee Summary (excluding electrical, water and
wastewater); 2018 IMFP proposed Water and Wastewater Fee Summary; 2018 IMFP proposed
Electrical Utility Fee Summary; and surrounding agency comparison.
John Beckman, representing the Building Industry Association, expressed support for the majority
of the fee update and provided the following comments/concerns: 1) requested an analysis be
done on the new non -potable water fee, which may create greater capacity at the treatment
facility since less water would be filtered through due to the use of recycled water, thereby,
possibly warranting a decrease in the charge developers are paying in water connection fees;
2) suggested it would be too expensive to run a line for non -potable water from the White Slough
Water Pollution Control Facility to Lodi and that it may be better to emulate Stockton by putting
water into the Delta and pulling it back out for credit, adding that the Mokelumne River could be
an option; and 3) with regard to the Art in Public Places fee, he requested that the nexus justifying
the fee be eliminated from the final report because it may cause other cities to follow suit without
researching the legalities of implementing such a fee in their communities.
City Manager Schwabuer responded that the City has not determined whether or not the non -
potable line to White Slough makes sense, especially in light of the high construction cost to
complete such a project; however, it may get to a point when the project will have to be pushed
forward when water becomes valuable enough. With regard to the Delta, Mr. Schwabauer stated
he believes the City would likely not receive credit for putting water back into the Mokelumne
River.
Mike Lusk stated he has not thoroughly digested the report, but posed questions and concerns
regarding the following: 1) why there is a difference in the water versus wastewater fee
considering the pond upgrade and other wastewater projects; 2) what the difference is between
neighborhood park and community park fees; 3) why the non -potable fee is not shown separately
1
in the water or wastewater fee, adding that the cost for the project will only get more expensive
further down the road and the City should be more proactive in charging recycling fees; 4) that
other locations with recycled water systems in place charge roughly 100 to 150 percent and that
several grand jury reports have ruled in favor of citizen impact fees on new development to pay
for those things; 5) why the fire fee did not increase much despite the new Fire Station 2 and the
outstanding loan on Fire Station 4; 6) why various street projects were not included in the impact
fees to handle those costs; 7) lack of consideration in the report for Government Code section
66001(g) relating to upgrades to existing facilities attributable to new development being included
in the impact fees so as not to place the burden on rate payers to absorb the cost; and 8) what
happened to the lost fee issue in the electric utility budget and whether rate payers will be paying
double on those loans that the building industry did not pay.
Myrna Wetzel questioned if this issue is connected in any way with residents who remodel their
homes, to which Mr. Schwabauer responded it only does when homeowners increase the square
footage of their home or increase the water, wastewater, or electric capacity, which is also true for
commercial buildings that increase their square footage.
C. Comments by Public on Non -Agenda Items
None.
D. Adjournment
No action was taken by the City Council. The meeting was adjourned at 7:50 a.m.
ATTEST:
Jennifer M. Ferraiolo
City Clerk
2
TM
CITY OF LODI
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA TITLE: Provide an Overview of the Impact Mitigation Fee Program Update
MEETING DATE: October 16, 2018 (Shirtsleeve Session)
PREPARED BY: Public Works Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Provide an overview of the Impact Mitigation Fee Program update.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Impact Mitigation Fee Program was adopted by the City Council
August 15, 2012. Additional storm drainage and neighborhood
parks Impact Mitigation Fees for commercial properties located in
the previous development agreement areas were added to the program September 4, 2013. In October
2016, Council passed Resolution 2016-188, eliminating the initial 60 percent reduction in impact fees for
low and medium -density zoning designations and infill projects of more than 10 lots.
To conform to State law, the City must perform an update to the program every five years demonstrating
a reasonable relationship between the current impact fees and the purpose for which they are charged.
In May 2017, Council authorized a Professional Services Agreement with Harris and Associates, Inc., for
preparing the 2017 IMFP update.
The Shirtsleeve presentation will discuss the proposed changes to each of the Impact Mitigation Fees within
the City's program. Staff is recommending the addition of Recycled Water to capture new development's
share of the cost of constructing the pump stations and service mains designed to facilitate the distribution
of recycled water to the end user.
The focus of the presentation will be on the proposed changes to each fee as it relates to low, medium,
and high-density development and commercial developments. The typical, current, low-density impact
fee, where the developer constructs the storm drain facilities and neighborhood park (outside of the
Southwest Wastewater Truckline Service Area) are $14,450 per unit. The proposed fee would increase
approximately 12 percent to $16,345 per unit.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
FUNDING AVAILABLE: Not applicable.
CES/CES/tdb
Charles E. Swimley`Jr.
Public Works Director
APPROVED: c="/AJ/ V`
Stephen Schwabauer, City Manager
K:\WP\IMFees\2017 IMF Update\Council\Shirtsleeve IMF Update 10-16-2018.doc
10/9/2018
2018 IMFP UPDATE
CITY COUNCIL SHIRT SLEEVE
10/16/18
Harris & Associates
HHarris & Associates
AGENDA
• Project Team
• IMFP History
• Changes to Fee Program
• Project Review & Updated Fees
• Fee Summary
• Surrounding Agency Comparison
• Set Public Hearing
• Public Hearing
.---�
—1•••--�
-, 4••%P• more
—r— s -• ti•
P.m- — •••
•mi-
-m—aPP a Pte— — Tr
— — it "n-L9-0.
LY PF i•-
7- w J
r it71.
rr
— L
• r•101
I�tr . ♦++.•--
1.
}
'
•
1•
PROJECT TEAM
Alison Bouley, PE
Senior Director, Public Finance
Harris & Associates
Adam Marston
Senior Project Analyst, Public Finance
3
IMFP HISTORY
• IMFP Study adopted in 2012. (Resolution 2012-142)
• Adopted residential fees were reduced by
approximately 60%
• IMFP Amendment in 2013. (Resolution 2013-184)
• Expanded Storm Drainage Zone 2
• Adopted a Neighborhood Park Fee
• Fee Reduction Eliminated in 2016 for Low and Medium
Density Residential (Resolution 2016-88)
Harris & Associates
HHarris & Associates
.,,t.e;''"'
RANGES T
HE FEE
PROGRAM
R
• Addition of Recycled Water IMF
Updated Project Costs Based on:
• Recent Bids and Project Costs
• Engineering News Record Construction
Cost Index (18%)
• Consumer Price Index (13%)
• Removal of Land Entitled by DA's
• Wastewater COP Refinancing
• Accounting for Required City Contributions
5
CITY CONTRIBUTIONS
Fee Component
City Contributions due to 2012 City Contributions
Fee Reduction to Date
City Contributions
Remaining
Water Treatment
$
1,317,624.00 $
- $ 1,317,624.00
Water Supply
393,576.00
393,576.00
Wastewater'
2,329,650.00
1,732,788.44
596,861.56
Transportation
291,714.00
291,714.00
Police
359,466.00
359,466.00
Fire2
Community Park3
1,858,318.00
881,339.20 976,978.80
Neighborhood Park
General City Facilities4
294,906.00
274,509.00 20,397.00
Art in Public Places
37,970.00
37,970.00
South Wastewater Trunk Line
89,242.62
89,242.62
Non -Potable Water
Storm Drainage
Electrical Utilities
455,700.00
455,700.00
Total
$ 7,428,166.62 $ 2,888,636.64 $ 4,539,529.98
' Accounts for the $3.7M Wastewater Storage Pond Project split to existing and new development (46.7%
based on the allocation of wastewater costs between existing development and additional capacity for new
development. See Table 6-1)
The City funded the expansion of Fire Station #2 with general fund monies, new developments is reimbursing
their fair share of the expansion through the IMFP.
3 Accounts for the $881,339.20 Lodi Lake Boat Dock Improvements and DeBenedetti Park Improvements
4Accounts for the $274,509.00 Childrens Section Expansion of the Library
Harris & Associates
PROJECT REVIEW
TRANSPORTATION FEE
Traffic Signals
Total Project Cost
Outside Funding Expenditures to
Sources 1 Date
Net Cost Included
in Fee Program
Mills Ave and Elm St
$400,000.00
$320,000.00
$80,000.00
Turner Rd and California St
$400,000.00
$320,000.00
$80,000.00
Turner Rd and Sacramento St
$400,000.00
$280,000.00
$120,000.00
Cherokee Ln and Elm St
$400,000.00
$280,000.00
$120,000.00
Guild Ave and Victor Rd
$785,000.00
$35,484.00
$749,516.00
Subtotal
$2,385,000.00
Roadway Improvements Total Project Cost
Guild Ave and Victor Rd (Striping 2 to 4 lane! $51,068.78
Victor Rd (4 lanes, SR99 to Guild) $6,930,763.00
West Lane (1/2 miles)
Harney Lane 2
$668,836.28
$ 31,084,431.00
$1,200,000.00
$35,484.00 $1,149,516.00 1
Outside Funding Expenditures to
Sources 1 Date
$4,153,751.00
$28,619,066.16
Net Cost Included
in Fee Program
$51,068.78
$2,777,012.00
$668,836.28
$2,465,364.84
Subtotal
$38,735,099.06
$32,772,817.16
$5,962,281.90
Total Cost of Traffic Signal and Roadway Improvements
Transportation Fund Balance
$7,111,797.90
($583,534.07)
City Contributions 3
($291,714.00)
Total Cost Allocated to Future Development
$6,236,549.83
1 Includes RTI F, RSTP, SJCOG, and Measure K funding.
2 Lower Sacramento Road to Highway 99 including Highway 99 and Harney Lane Interchange
3 City Contributions is the cumulative amount of fees lost as a result of the fee reduction adopted by Resolution
2012-142.
Harris & Associates
UPDATED FEES
TRANSPORTATION FEE
FEE INCREASE DUE TO:
• iraffic Signal Unit Cost Update
• Guild Ave and Victor Road Cost
update - $785,000
• ENR Escalation
Residential
Trip Generation
Factors DUE per Unit Cost per Unit
Low Density
1.16
1.0000 $ 922.16
Medium Density
High Density
Non -Residential
0.63
0.63
0.5431 $
0.5431 $
500.83
500.83
DUE per 1,000 SF Cost per 1,000 SF
Retail (Minor & Major)
1.96
1.6853 $
1,554.12
Office/Medical
1.42
1.2250 $
1,129.65
Industrial
0.72
0.6228
S
574.32
Category
Existing Fees Proposed Fees
Delta
Residential
Per DUE
Low Density
$ 711.00 $ 922.16
30%
Medium Density
$ 386.00 $ 500.83
30%
High Density
$ 386.00 $ 500.83
30%
Non- Residential
Per 1,000 SF
Retail (Minor & Major) - Per 1,000 SF $ 1,199.00
$ 1,554.12
30%
Office/Medical
$ 872.00 $ 1,129.65
30%
Industrial
$ 443.00 $ 574.32
30%
Institutional
N/A
N/A
N/A
ail
Harris & Associates
ROAD CLOSED
TO
THRU TRAFFIC
Lik
S! •
•
.
4:44
,..r:
•
Im
I
!> Harris & Associates
ii
ti
• a di All
51.51.11.
PROJECT REVIEW
POIICE FEF
Police Station Costs
Police Station portion of 2002 COP - Principal
Police Station portion of 2002 COP - Interest
Total Debt Service
% Attributable to Existing Development
Debt Service Allocated to Existing Development
% Attributable to Future Development Beyond 2035
Debt Service Allocated to Future Development Beyond 2035
% Attributable to Future Development thru 2035
Debt Service Allocated to Future Development thru 2035
Police Vehicle Costs
Vehicle Type
Marked Patrol
Unmarked/Administration
Traffic
Partners/Crime Prevention
Code Enforcement
Animal Control
Current # of
Vehicles
24
21
9
5
3
2
Vehicles /
Sworn Officer
0.34
0.30
0.13
0.07
0.04
0.03
Total Vehicle Cost Allocated to Future Development thru 2035
Subtotal Cost Allocated to Future Development thru 2035
Police Fee Fund Balance
City Contributions 5
Future
Vehicles 3
5.1
4.4
1.9
1.1
0.6
0.4
Average $ /
Vehicle 4
$44,583
$36,371
$20,512
$28,092
$30,616
$34,637
$14,320,000
$12,637,838
$26,957,838
66%
$17,856,530.62
19%
$5,038,920.63
15%
$4,062,386.75
Total
Cost
$225,540.61
$160,999.69
$38,912.59
$29,607.67
$19,360.14
$14,602.02
$489,022.72
$4,551,409.47
$ (250,475.15)
$ (359,466.00)
Total Cost Allocated to Future Development thru 2035
$3,941,468.32
1 Capactity allocations were developed during the 2012 fee study and the percentage of costs attributable to new development
have remained consistent.
2 Assumes a proportional growth in the employee resident -equivalent population beyond 2035.
3 Assumes an additional 15.0 sworn officers are required to serve future development through 2035.
4 Vehicle costs escalated from 2012 costs by CPI.
5 City Contributions is the cumulative amount of fees lost as a result of the fee reduction adopted by Resolution 2012-142.
9
HHarris & Associates
UPDATED FEES
POLICE FEF
FEE INCREASE DUE TO:
ENR E LalatiuIi
• CPI Escalation
Residential
Low Density
Medium Density
High Density
Non -
Residential
Retail (Minor & Major)
Office/Medical
Industrial
Residents per
Unit
2.85
2.40
2.00
Employees per
1,000 SF
2.50
4.00
1.33
Persons Served
per Unit
2.85
2.40
2.00
Persons Served
per 1,000 SF 1
1.25
2.00
0.67
DUEs per Unit
1.0000
0.8421
0.7018
DUEs per 1,000
SF
0.4386
0.7018
0.2339
Cost per Unit
$ 785.94
$ 661.84
$ 551.57
Cost per 1,000 SF
$ 344.71
$ 551.57
$ 183.83
1 Assumes a resident -to -employee ratio of 1.0 : 0.5 (i.e., 1.0 employee equaling 0.5 residents).
Category
Residential
Low Density
Medium Density
High Density
Non- Residential
Retail (Minor & Major) - Per 1,000 SF
Office/Medical
Industrial
Institutional
Existing Fees Proposed Fees Delta
$
$
$
753.00
634.00
528.00
$ 330.00
$ 528.00
$ 176.00
N/A
Per DUE
$ 785.94
$ 661.84
$ 551.57
Per 1,000 SF
$ 344.71
$ 551.57
$ 183.83
N/A
4%
4%
4%
4%
4%
4%
N/A
10
PROJECT REVIEW
FIRF
Fire Station Costs
Fire Station
Station #1
Station #2
Station #3
Station #4
Subtotal
Fire Vehicle Costs
Sq. Ft.
10,910
9,830
5,300
7,110
Vehicles and Equipment Costs Total Units
Type I Engine 6
Tillered Quint Truck 2
Straight Quint Truck 0
Mobile Command Vehicle 1
HazMat Response Unit 1
Type IV Engine
Command Vehicle
Staff Vehicle
Portable Air Supply Trailer
Subtotal
Total Estimated Replacement Cost
Attributable to Future Development
Total Replacement Cost Attributable to Future Development
Remaining Fire Costs
Outstanding Loan Balance to Water Fee Fund
Station #2 Expansion Cost ( [Future SF (9,830) - existing SF (6,200)] x $445/ SF )
Subtotal
Fire Fee Fund Balance
1
3
2
1
Cost per Sq. Ft.
$445
$445
$445
$445
Cost per Unit
$515,000
$1,500,000
$844,800
$394,240
$337,920
$168,960
$61,952
$33,792
$33,792
Estimated Replacement
Cost
$4,854,950.00
$4,374,350.00
$2,358,500.00
$3,163,950.00
$14,751,750.00
Estimated Replacement
Cost
$3,090,000.00
$3,000,000.00
$0.00
$394,240.00
$337,920.00
$168,960.00
$185,856.00
$67,584.00
$33,792.00
$7,278,352.00
$22,030,102.00
19%
$4,083,000.02
$1,024,024.89
$1,615,350.00
$2,639,374.89
($201,241.57)
Actual Cost Allocated to Future Development $2,438,133.32
Harris & Associates
UPDATED FEES
FIRE FEE
FEE INCREASE DUE TO:
• >445 per SF Cost
• Vehicle Costs
• ENR Escalation
• CPI Escalation
Residential
Low Density
Medium Density
High Density
Non -Residential
Retail (Minor & Major)
Office/Medical
Industrial
Residents per
Unit
2.85
2.40
2.00
Employees per
1,000 SF
2.50
4.00
1.33
Persons Served
per Unit
2.85
2.40
2.00
Persons Served
per 1,000 SF
1.25
2.00
0.67
DUE per Unit
1.0000
0.8421
0.7018
DUE per 1,000 SF
0.4386
0.7018
0.2339
Cost per Unit
$ 396.65
$ 334.02
$ 278.35
Cost per 1,000 SF
$
$
$
344.29
550.87
183.62
Category
Residential
Low Density
Medium Density
High Density
Non- Residential
Retail (Minor & Major) - Per 1,000 SF
Office/Medical
Industrial
Institutional
Existing Fees Proposed Fees Delta
$ 385.00
$ 324.00
$ 270.00
$ 338.00
$ 540.00
$ 180.00
N/A
Per DUE
$ 396.65
$ 334.02
$ 278.35
Per 1,000 SF
$ 344.29
$ 550.87
$ 183.62
N/A
3%
3%
3%
2%
2%
2%
N/A
Harris & Associates
Harris & Associates
H
PROJECT REVIEW
COMMUNITY PARK FEE
Cost Allocation
Park Facility
Acres in Fee
Included in Fee
Program Total Acres Program
Total Cost
Expenditures to
Date
Remaing Costs
DeBenedetti Park
24.0 24.0 100.0% $13,102,714.01
$781,860.00 $12,320,854.01
Pixley Park
27.0 27.0 100.0% $5,820,038.91
$5,820,038.91
Lodi Lake
8.0 8.0 100.0% $3,649,616.13
$75,000.00
$3,574,616.13
Total
59.0
59.0
$22,572,369.05
$21,715,509.05
Park Fee Fund Balance
($188,639.91)
City Contributions
($1,858,318.00)
Total Cost Allocated to Future Development
$19,668,551.14
13
Harris & Associates
MN
UPDATED FEES
COMMUNITY PARK FEF
FEE INCREASE DUE TO:
• Increased land cost per acre
ENR Escalation
• CPI Escalation
Residents per
Residential Unit
Low Density 2.85
Medium Density 2.40
High Density 2.00
Non -
Residential
Retail (Minor & Major)
Office/Medical
Industrial
Employees per
1,000 SF
2.50
4.00
1.33
User Equivalents
per Unit
2.85
2.40
2.00
User Equivalents
per 1,000 SF 1
0.30
0.48
0.16
DUEs per Unit
1.0000
0.8421
0.7018
Cost per Unit
$ 4,755.16
$ 4,004.32
$ 3,337.17
DUE per 1,000
SF Cost per 1,000 SF
0.1053 $
0.1684 $
0.0561 $
500.72
800.77
266.76
'Assumes a resident can utilize park facilities an average of 12 hours per day 7 days a week (84 hours)
and an employee can utilize park facilities an average of 2 hours per day 5 days a week (10 hours);
this translates to 1.0 employee equaling approx. 0.12 residents (10/84 = 0.12) in terms of potential
park utilization.
Category
Residential
Low Density
Medium Density
High Density
Non- Residential
Retail (Minor & Major) - Per 1,000 SF
Office/Medical
Industrial
Institutional
Existing Fees Proposed Fees Delta
$ 3,890.00
$ 3,276.00
$ 2,730.00
$ 406.00
$ 650.00
$ 217.00
N/A
Per DUE
$ 4,755.16
$ 4,004.32
$ 3,337.17
Per 1,000 SF
$ 500.72
$ 800.77
$ 266.76
N/A
22%
22%
22%
23%
23%
23%
N/A
14
PROJECT REVIEWail
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS FEE
Park Cost Estimate
Park A 1
Park B
Park C
Park D
Park E
Park F
Park G
Park H
Subtotal Costs
Park Fee Fund Balance
5
$ 1,128,221.64
$ 3,311,793.95
$ 676,685.40
$ 2,462,084.50
$ 676,685.40
$ 1,847,222.85
$ 1,043,583.50
11,146,277.24
$ (66,744.28)
s
Total Costs Allocated to New Development
$ 11,079,532.96
1 Park A was constructed during Rose Gate Phase I.
CITY OF L.ODf
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ii
Harris & Associates
PARKS
FEE ZONES
Legend
2018 City Limits
Future Basin
L
Future Park
i General Plan Limits
Developer Constructed Zone
WI Neighborhood Park Fee Zone
— — City Wide Zone
1 in = 3,500 ft
5/311241B
G:IESRI MapslParks%Rarks Fee Zones Legend.mxd
UPDATED FEES
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS FCC
FEE INCREASE DUE TO:
• Increased land cost per acre
• ENR Escalation
• CPI Escalation
Residential
Residents per
Unit User Equivalents per Unit DUEs per Unit Cost per Unit
Low Density 2.85
2.85 1.0000 $ 3,072.53
Medium Density 2.40
2.40 0.8421 $ 2,587.39
High Density 2.00
2.00 0.7018 $ 2,156.16
Non -Residential
Employees per
1,000 SF
User Equivalents per
Cost per 1,000
1,000 SF 1 DUE per 1,000 SF SF
Retail (Minor & Major) 2.50
0.30 0.1053
$ 323.42
Office/Medical 4.00
0.48 0.1684 $ 517.48
Industrial
1.33
0.16 0.0561 $ 172.49
1 Assumes a resident can utilize park facilities an average of 12 hours per day 7 days a week (84
hours) and an employee can utilize park facilities an average of 2 hours per day 5 days a week (10
hours); this translates to 1.0 employee equaling approx. 0.12 residents (10/84 = 0.12) in terms of
potential park utilization.
Category
Existing Fees Proposed Fees
Delta
Residential
Per DUE
Low Density
$ 2,541.00
$ 3,072.53 21%
Medium Density
$ 2,140.00
$ 2,587.39 21%
High Density
$ 1,783.00
$ 2,156.16 21%
Non- Residential
Per 1,000 SF
Retail (Minor & Major) - Per 1,000 SF
$ 266.00
$ 323.42 22%
Office/Medical
$ 428.00
$ 517.48 21%
Industrial
N/A
$ 172.49
N/A
Institutional
N/A
N/A
N/A
!>
MN
Harris & Associates
HHarris & Associates
PROJECT REVIEW
GENERA' 2ITY F"CILITIES
Costs Allocated to Existing and Future Development
Project
Existing Public Safety Building Remodel
General Plan
Total Cost
% Attributable to Existing Development
Cost Attributable to Existing Development
Attributable to Future Development
Cost Attributable to Future Development
Costs Allocated to Future Development Only
Library
General Plan Standard (Sq Ft per capita)
Future Residents
Total Sq Ft Required to Serve Future Residents
Cost per Sq Ft 2
Subtotal Library Cost Attributable to Future Development
Subtotal Cost Attributable to Future Development
Fee Program Updates 3
Total Cost Attributable to Future Development
General City Facilities Fee Fund Balance
City Contributions 4
Estimated Cost
$2,866,433
$2,252,800
$5,119,233
81%
$4,146,578.73
19%
$972,654.27
0.45
13,128
5,907.60
$461.98
$2, 729,193.05
$3,701,847.32
$844,800.00
$4,546, 647.32
$ (207,638.53)
$ (294,906.00)
Total Actual Cost Allocated to Future Development
$4,044,102.79
1 Assumes a resident -to -employee ratio of 1.0 : 0.5 (i.e., 1.0 employee equaling 0.5 residents).
2 Assumes construction of a new library facility and does not include land acquisition costs; costs have been escalated to 2017 dollars
3Total estimated cost to update the fee program at 5 -year intervals for a total of 4 updates, from 2020 through 2035.
4 City Contributions is the cumulative amount of fees lost as a result of the fee reduction adopted by Resolution 2012-142.
!> Harris & Associates
UPDATED FEES
GENERAL CITY Fi- 1TIEF
FEE INCREASE DUE TO:
- Updating the Public Safety
Remodel to reflect actual costs
• ENR Escalation
• CPI Escalation
Residential
Low Density
Medium Density
High Density
Non -Residential
Retail (Minor & Major)
Office/Medical
Industrial
Residents per
Unit
2.85
2.40
2.00
Employeesper
1,000 SF
2.50
4.00
1.33
Persons Served
per Unit
2.85
2.40
2.00
Persons Served
per 1,000 SF
1.25
2.00
0.67
DUEs per Unit
1.0000
0.8421
0.7018
Cost per Unit
$ 806.40
$ 679.07
$ 565.93
DUEs per 1,000 SF Cost per 1,000 SF
0.4386 $ 353.69
0.7018 $ 565.93
0.2339 $ 188.62
1 Excludes 50% of future development within the multi -use corridors. It is assumed that 50% of future development will
replace existing development and therefore will not increase demand on general city facilities.
Category
Residential
Low Density
Medium Density
High Density
Non- Residential
Retail (Minor & Major) - Per 1,000 SF
Office/Medical
Industrial
Institutional
Existing Fees Proposed Fees
$
$
$
$
$
$
Per DUE
617.00 $ 806.40
519.00 $ 679.07
433.00 $ 565.93
Per 1,000 SF
270.00 $ 353.69
433.00 $ 565.93
144.00 $ 188.62
N/A N/A
Delta
31%
31%
31%
31%
31%
31%
N/A
18
PROJECT REVIEW & COST PER DUE
ART IN F I it PLACES EE
Art in Public Places Replacement Costs
Existing Art
Location
Esti mated
Replacement Cost
1. Water Tower
Main Street
$59,086.91
2. Better Days Pergola
Lodi Avenue
$96,870.40
3. Grape Wall of Lodi
Wall @ Westgate
$45,056.00
4. Japantown Murals
Main Street
$32,665.60
5. PALS Mural
Kettleman Lane
$64,221.70
6. Sacramento Street Mural
Sacramento Street
$51,814.40
7. Celebrate Harvest bronze sculpture
School Street
$172,339.20
8. Cranes
Train Depot
$33,792.00
9. Bus Stop
Loel Center
$16,896.00
10. Sculpture Exhibit (rentals)
School Street
$33,792.00
11. Art Purchase - Transit Clock Tower
$5,632.00
12. Mosaics
Lodi Avenue
$2,816.00
13. Van Buskirk Park
Pleasant Avenue
$5,269.30
14. Veterans Memorial Plaza
$506,880.00
15. Lodi Avenue Gateway
$152,064.00
16. Water Shed Mural
Church & Oak St
$22,528.00
17. Segale Murals
Sacramento Street & Japantown
$84,480.00
18. Recognition Plaques
$3,564.84
19. Wall Dog Murals (10)
$112,640.00
20. School Street Gateway Arch
$878,592.00
21. Library Bike Rack
$3,214.80
22. River Friendly Bench Project
$5,563.50
23. Bicycle Rack initiative
$14,520.74
24. Heritage School Watershed Mosaic
$1,947.23
25. Seward Johnson Atelier
$25,718.40
Subtotal Replacement Cost
$2,431,965.01
Art in Public Places Fee Fund Balance
$158,032.23
Total
$2,589,997.24
Existing Persons Served
76,848
Cost per Existing Persons Served
$33.70
Harris & Associates
HHarris & Associates
UPDATED FEES
ART IN PUBLIC P! "
FEE INCREASE DUE TO:
• Adding the artwork installed
since 2012
• CPI Escalation
Residents per Persons Served Total Persons Cost per Person
Residential Units 1 Unit per Unit Served Served Total Costs Fee per Unit
Low Density 3,592 2.85 2.85 10,237 $33.70 $344,994 $96.05
Medium Density 317 2.40 2.40 761 $33.70 $25,655 $80.88
High Density 0 2.00 2.00 0 $33.70 $0 $67.40
Subtotal 3,909 10,998 $370,649
Non -Residential
Retail (Minor & Major)
Office/Medical
Industrial
Subtotal
Employees per Persons Served
Bldg SF 1 1,000 SF per 1,000 SF 2
599,271 2.50 1.25
598,000 4.00 2.00
2,221,000 1.33 0.67
3,418,271
Total Persons
Served
749
1,196
1,481
3,426
Cost per
Persons Served
$33.70
$33.70
$33.70
Total Costs
$25,244
$40,305
$49,898
$115,448
per 1,000 SF
$42.13
$67.40
$22.47
Total
14,424
$486,097
1 Excludes 50% of future development within the multi -use corridors. It is assumed that 50% of future development will replace existing development and
therefore will not increase demand on art in public places.
'Assumes a resident -to -employee ratio of 1.0 : 0.5 (i.e., 1.0 employee equaling 0.5 residents).
Category
Existing Fees Proposed Fees Delta
Residential Per DUE
Low Density $ 80.00 $ 96.05 20%
Medium Density $ 67.00 $ 80.88 21%
High Density $ 56.00 $ 67.40 20%
Non- Residential Per 1,000 SF
Retail (Minor & Major) - Per 1,000 SF $ 35.00 $ 42.13 20%
Office/Medical $ 56.00 $ 67.40 20%
Industrial $ 19.00 $ 22.47 18%
20
PROJECT REVIEW
NON -POTABLE WATER
Pumping Stations
Quantity UOM
Cost Each Construction Costs Expenditures to Date
Remaining Cost
Fencing and Gates
Asphalt Paving and Concrete
Catchbasin and Stormline
NPW Piping and Valves
Potable Water Source and Valves
Intake Structure with Fish Screens
3 Pumps (2 Duty, 1 Sustaining)
Inline Filters with Automatic Backwash
VFD Motors and Controls
Electrical Connection
Subtotal Cost for Pumping Stations
600 LF
800 SF
2 LS
2 LS
2 LS
2 LS
2 LS
2 LS
2 LS
2 LS
$350
$6
$7,000
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$80,000
$140,000
$70,000
$20,000
$210,000
$4,800
$14,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$160,000
$280,000
$140,000
$40,000
$968,800
$210,000
$4,800
$14,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$160,000
$280,000
$140,000
$40,000
$968,800
Other Capital Costs
Quantity UOM Cost per LF
Total Cost
Reimburse Harney Lane 10" NPW
Reimburse Harney Lane Water Valves
Hwy 12 Boring & Connections
L. Sacramento Borning & DeBenedetti Connection
WID Boring & Connections
Subtotal for Other Capital Costs
Contingency
Engineering and Construction Management
3,540 LF
2 LS
1 LS
1 LS
1 LS
15%
20%
$60
$2,500
$50,000
$50,000
$40,000
$212,400
$5,000
$50,000
$50,000
$40,000
$357,400
$198,930
$265,240
$212,400
$5,000
$50,000
$50,000
$40,000
$357,400
$198,930
$265,240
Total Cost for Non -Potable Water System
$1,790,370
$1,790,370
Harris & Associates
UPDATED FEES
NON -POTABLE WATER
FEE COMPARISON UNAVAILABLE:
• A Non -Potable Water fee is
being proposed as part of this
I M FP Update.
DUE Factor
Residential per Unit
Low Density 1.0000
Medium Density 0.8421
High Density 0.7018
DUE Factor
Non -Residential
Retail (Minor & Major)
Office/Medica
Industrial
per 1,000 SF
0.4148
0.4148
0.1659
Cost per
Unit
$ 378.99
$ 319.15
$ 265.98
Cost per
1,000 SF
$ 157.21
$ 157.21
$ 62.87
Category
Residential
Low Density
Medium Density
High Density
Non- Residential
Retail (Minor & Major) - Per 1,000 SF
Office/Medical
Industrial
Institutional
Existing Fees
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Proposed Fees Delta
Per DUE
$ 378.99
$ 319.15
$ 265.98
Per 1,000 SF
$ 157.21
$ 157.21
$ 62.87
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Harris & Associates
1.;ifirditteal
4 ,.t.
!> Harris & Associates
WM
0
Cal
0
L
g
LI
1
E
0
0
c
ti
Ir
TURNER RID
176 FORD S T
0
KETTLEMANLH
CITY LIMITS
GENERAL PLAN
LIMITS
City of Lodi
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Figure 7-1
STORM DRAINAGE
FEE ZONES
LEGEND
ZONE 1
DEVELOPER
CONSTRUCTED
FUTURE ANALYSIS
ZONE 2
a YJ$ 1.4 3/Fj 112 MILE
[r '200 74.100 3O?1L1 FEET
ElHarris & Associates
PROJECT REVIEW
STORM DRAINAGE Fri-
Zone 1 Basin Improvements
Zone 1
Construction Cost Expenditures to Date Remaining Costs
C -Basin Pump Station
$2,419,177.53
$2,419,177.53
C -Basin
$1,073,848.18
$1,073,848.18
Total Zone 1 Cost
$3,493,025.71
$3,493,025.71
Available SD Fee Fund Revenue
$0.00
City Contributions
$0.00
Net Storm Drainage Cost Zone 1
$3,493,025.71
F -Basin Improvements 1
Basins
Zone 2: F & 1 -Basin Watershed Areas
$9,229,597.35
$9,229,597.35
Subtotal Cost
$9,229,597.35
$9,229,597.35
I -Basin Improvements 1
Basins
$7,627,163.74
$7,627,163.74
Subtotal Cost
$7,627,163.74
$7,627,163.74
Total Zone 2 Cost
$16,856,761.09
$16,856,761.09
Available SD Fee Fund Revenue
($911,566.44)
City Contributions 2
$0.00
Net Storm Drainage Cost Zone 2
$15,945,194.65
Costs for F -Basin and I -Basin Improvements updated per the costs of the staff report for agenda item G-01 on October
16, 2013 and have been escalated by the Engineers News Record Construction Cost Index (ENR CCI).
2 City Contributions is the cumulative amount of fees lost as a result of the fee reduction adopted by Resolution 2012-
142.
UPDATED FEES
ORM DRAINAGE FEE
Residential
Zone 1
DUE per Acre Cost Per Acre Average Density
Cost Per Unit
Low Density
1.0000 $ 9,839.51 6.00
$ 1,639.92
Medium Density
1.2500 $ 12,299.39 15.00
$ 819.96
High Density
1.2500 $ 12,299.39 25.00
$ 491.98
Non -Residential
DUE per Acre
Cost Per Acre Average Density
Cost Per 1,000 SF
Retail (Minor & Major)
1.7500 $ 17,219.14 N/A
N/A
Office/Medical
1.7500 $ 17,219.14 N/A
N/A
Industrial
1.8750 $ 18,449.08 N/A
N/A
Category
Existing Fees Proposed Fees
Delta
Residential
Per DUE
Low Density
$ 1,394.00 $ 1,639.92
18%
Medium Density
$ 687.00 $ 819.96
19%
High Density
$ 561.00 $ 491.98
-12%
Non- Residential
Per 1,000 SF
Retail (Minor & Major) - Per 1,000 SF
$ 14, 640.00 $ 17, 219.14
18%
Office/Medical
$ 14, 640.00 $ 17, 219.14
18%
Industrial
$ 15, 686.00 $ 18, 449.08
18%
Harris & Associates
FEE INCREASE DUE TO:
Updated land costs per acre
• ENR Escalation
Residential
Zone 2: F -Basin & I -Basin Cost Allocation
DUE per Acre Cost Per Acre Average Density
Cost Per Unit
Low Density
1.0000
$ 28,221.58 6.00 $
4,703.60
Medium Density
1.2500
$ 35,276.98 15.00 $
2,351.80
High Density
1.2500
$ 35,276.98 25.00 $
1,411.08
Non -Residential
DUE per Acre
Cost Per Acre Average Density Cost Per 1,000 SF
Retail (Minor & Major)
1.7500
$ 49,387.77 N/A
N/A
Office/Medical
1.7500
$ 49,387.77 N/A
N/A
Industrial
1.8750
$ 52,915.46 N/A
N/A
Institutional
1.2500
$ 35,276.98
N/A
N/A
Category
Existing Fees Proposed Fees Delta
Residential
Per DUE
Low Density
$ 3, 889.00 $ 4,703.60 21%
Medium Density
$ 1, 944.00 $ 2,351.80 21%
High Density
$ 1,568.00 $ 1,411.08 -10%
Non- Residential
Per 1,000 SF
Retail (Minor & Major) - Per 1,000 SF
$ 40, 834.00 $ 49, 387.77 21%
Office/Medical
$ 40, 834.00 $ 49, 387.77 21%
Industrial
$ 43, 871.00 $ 52, 915.46 21%
24
HHarris & Associates
PROJECT REVIEW
ELECTRICAL UTILITY FEE
Facilities
Distribution Reinforcements
$1,023,169.00
Feeder Additions
$1,107,274.96
Added Bank at Industrial
$4,200,000.00
Reynolds Ranch Phase 1 Line Extension
$649,665.00
East Side Overhead Phase 1 Line Extension
$259,085.00
Future Underground North Line Extension
$390,000.00
1272 Feeder Ext for SW Dev.
$250,000.00
230 KV Intertie System
$156,000.00
Subtotal Costs Allocated to Future Development
$8,035,193.96
Electrical Fee Fund Balance
($1,009,893.08)
Reimbursement to Lodi Electrical Capital Fund from Fee Fund Balance 1
$506,318.28
City Contributions 2
($455,700.00)
Total Cost Allocated to Future Development
$7,075,919.16
1 Lodi Electrical expends all capital projects from a Lodi Electrical held capital fund to
ensure funding is available at the time the CIP is required and subsequently reimburses
these costs from the IMFP Fund Balance.
2 City Contributions is the cumulative amount of fees lost as a result of the fee reduction
adopted by Resolution 2012-142.
25
UPDATED FEES
ELECTRICAL UTILITY FEL
FEE INCREASE DUE TO:
upaated CIP Project Costs
• Addition of the 230KV Intertie
System
• ENR Escalation
Electric Utility Fees - Single Phase Panel
Single Phase Panel 208 Volts 240 Volts 480 Volts
60 amps
N/A
$
295.65
N/A
100 amps
N/A
$ 492.75 N/A
125 amps
N/A
$ 615.94 N/A
200 amps
N/A $ 985.50 N/A
400 amps
N/A $ 1,971.00 N/A
600 amps
N/A $ 2,956.50 N/A
Category
Existing Fees Proposed Fees
Delta
60 amps
$ 248.00 $ 295.65
19%
100 amps
$ 413.00 $ 492.75
19%
125 amps
$ 516.00 $ 615.94
19%
200 amps
$ 826.00 $ 985.50
19%
400 amps
$ 1,652.00 $ 15971.00
19%
600 amps
$ 2,478.00 $ 2,956.50
19%
Electric Utility Fees - Three Phase Panel
Harris & Associates
Three Phase Panel
208 Volts 240 Volts 480 Volts
200 amps
$
1,405.38 $ 1,621.59 $
3,243.18
400 amps
$ 2,810.75 $ 3,243.18 $
6,486.36
600 amps
$
4,216.13 $ 4,864.77 $ 9,729.54
800 amps $ 5,621.51 $ 6,486.36 $ 12,972.71
1000 amps $ 7,026.89 N/A $ 16,215.89
1200 amps $ 8,432.26 N/A $ 19,459.07
1600 amps $ 11,243.02 N/A $ 25,945.43
2000 amps $ 14,053.77 N/A $ 32,431.79
2500 amps
$ 17,567.22
N/A $ 40,539.73
3000 amps
$ 21,080.66
N/A $ 48,647.68
Category
Existing Fees Proposed Fees
Delta
200 amps
$ 1,178.00 $
1,405.38 19%
400 amps
$ 2,356.00 $
2,810.75 19%
600 amps
$ 3,534.00 $
4,216.13 19%
800 amps
$ 4,712.00 $
5,621.51 19%
1000 amps
$ 5,890.00 $
7,026.89 19%
1200 amps
$ 7,068.00 $
8,432.26 19%
1600 amps
$ 9,423.00 $ 11,243.02 19%
2000 amps
$ 11, 779.00 $ 14, 053.77 19%
2500 amps
$ 14, 724.00 $ 17, 567.22 19%
3000 amps
$ 17, 669.00 $ 21, 080.66 19%
26
PROJECT REVIEW
WATER FE
Water Treatment Facility Costs
Planning and Design Costs
Laboratory Testing
Environmental and Design Costs
Design Review
City Staff
Raw Water Intake Pipe Construction
Miscellaneous
Total Paid from Reserves
Construction Costs (financed)
Construction Contract (bid amount)
Wastewater Connection Fee
Site Acquisition (land cost)
Testing and Inspection
Other Construction Costs
Pall Membrane Purchase
Engr. Service - Contract Admin.
Subtotal Construction Costs
Debt Financing
2010A & 2010B Water Revenue Bonds (par) 1
Total of Annual Debt Service Payments 2
Total Water Trtmt. Costs for IMF Calculation
Total
$ 64,375
$ 3,021,724
$ 50,000
$ 210,008
$ 577,608
$
41,648
$ 3,965,363
$ 25,515,343
$ 1,096,383
$ 1,200,000
$ 419,182
$
1,235,216
$ 3,962,308
$ 742,881
$ 34,171,313
$ 38,665,000
$ 67,795,425
$ 71,760,788
New Water System Facilities
Est. Cost
1.5 MG Storage Reservoir (Well 28 Site)
Groundwater Well (South of Harney Between Mills & Hutchins)
Total Facilities Cost
Water Fee Fund Balance
City Contributions 1
Total Facilities Cost to Future Develoment
3,530,100
1,000,000
4,530,100
(592,485.03)
(393,576.00)
3,544,038.97
Harris & Associates
UPDATED FEES
WATER FEE
FEE INCREASE DUE TO:
• Updated Water Treatment
Plant Financing Costs to reflect
actual debt service
• ENR Escalation
Meter Size
Hydraulic
Capacity Factor
Water System IMF
5/8" meter
0.67 $ 2,119.42
3/4" meter
1.00 $ 3,163.31
1" meter
1.67 $ 5,282.73
11/2" meter
3.33 $ 10,533.83
2" meter
5.33 $ 16,860.45
3" meter
10.00 $ 31,633.12
4" meter
16.67 $ 52,732.40
6" meter
33.33 $ 105,433.18
8" meter
53.33
$
168, 699.41
10" meter
76.67
$
242,531.10
Category
Existing Fees Proposed Fees Delta
5/8 -inch meter
$ 2,079.00 $
2,119.42 2%
3/4 -inch meter
$ 3,103.00 $
3,163.31 2%
1 -inch meter
$ 5,181.00 $
5,282.73 2%
1 1/2 -inch meter
$ 10,332.00 $
10,533.83 2%
2 -inch meter
$ 16,537.00 $
16,860.45 2%
3 -inch meter
$ 31, 026.00 $
31,633.12 2%
4 -inch meter
$ 51,721.00 $
52,732.40 2%
6 -inch meter
$103,411.00 $
105,433.18 2%
8 -inch meter
$165,464.00 $
168,699.41 2%
10 -inch meter
$237,880.00 $
242,531.10 2%
Harris & Associates
HHarris & Associates
PROJECT REVIEW & COST PER DUE
WASTEWATER FEE
Wastewater Debt Financing
Total Wastewater Stystem Cost
Flag City 0.19 MGD Capacity Purchase
Initial Debt Financing
2016 and 2017 Refinancing
Revised Interest and Financing Costs
Total
Wastewater Treatment Improvements
Expansion from 5.8 to 6.3 mgd
Expansion from 6.3 to 8.5 mgd
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Thickening
Dewatering & Storage
Total
Wastewater Treatment IMF
Calculation
WWTP Capacity (mgd)
Capacity per DUE (gpd)
DUEs of Expanded Capacity
Growth Share of WWTP DS
$ 70, 561, 000.00
$ (5,800,000.00)
$ 64, 761, 000.00
$ (4,880,000.00)
$ 59, 881, 000.00
$ 59, 881, 000.00
WWTP Improv. Costs
$ 11, 240, 000.00
$
$
1, 976, 000.00
11, 528, 000.00
27, 341, 000.00
1, 263, 000.00
3, 930, 000.00
57,278,000.00
Total
8.50
200
42,500
Upgrade
$ 3,082,450.79
$ 1,464,741.27
$ 8, 822, 000.00
$ 13, 341, 000.00
$ 933, 997.50
$ 2, 906, 263.00
$ 30,550,452.55
Original
5.80
200
29,000
Expansion
$ 8,157,549.21
117, 347, 080.32 $ 62, 583, 441.60 $
117,159, 000.00
53.3%
511, 258.73
2, 706, 000.00
14, 003, 000.00
329, 002.50
1, 023, 737.00
26, 730, 547.45
Upgrade Expansion
27.4% 72.6%
74.1%
76.5%
48.8%
74.0%
74.0%
53.3%
Expansion portion of outstanding debt
Expansion
2.70
200
13,500
54, 763, 638.72 $
46.7%
Subscribed
0.56
25.9%
23.5%
51.2%
26.0%
26.0%
46.7%
45.3%
Available
2.14
2,811 10,689
11, 402,195.24 $ 43, 361, 443.48
20.8% 79.2%
Wastewater Treatment IMF
$ 4,056.64 per DUE
29
PROJECT REVIEW & COST PER DUE
WASTEWATER FEE
Mtr. Size
Hydr. Cap. Factor
Wastewater Treatment
IMF
5/8" meter
0.67
$
2,717.95
3/4" meter
1.00
$
4,056.64
1" meter
1.67
$
6,774.59
1 1/2" meter
3.33
$
13,508.61
2" meter
5.33
$
21,621.89
3" meter
10.00
$
40,566.40
4" meter
16.67
$
67, 624.19
6" meter
33.33
$
135,207.81
8" meter
53.33
$
216,340.61
10" meter
76.67
$
311,022.59
High Strength/High Volume Commercial and Industrial Development
Charge for Flow
$
12.57 per gpd
Charge for BOD Loading $
1,922 per ppd
Charge for SS Loading $
1,603 per ppd
Category
Existing Fees
Proposed Fees
Delta
5/8 -inch meter
$ 2,831.00 $
2,717.95 -4%
3/4 -inch meter
$ 4,225.00 $
4,056.64 -4%
1 -inch meter
$ 7,056.00 $
6,774.59 -4%
1 1/2 -inch meter
$ 14, 070.00 $
13,508.61
- 4%
2 -inch meter
$ 22, 521.00 $
21,621.89 -4%
3 -inch meter
$ 42, 253.00 $
40,566.40 -4%
4 -inch meter
$ 70,453.00 $
67,624.19 -4%
6 -inch meter
$140,828.00 $
135,207.81
- 4%
8 -inch meter
$225,333.00 $
216,340.61
- 4%
10 -inch meter
$323,951.00 $
311,022.59 -4%
FEE DECREASE DUE TO:
• Debt service refinancing
issued in 2016 and 2017
totaling $4.88
Harris & Associates
!> Harris & Associates
ii
EXISTING WASTEWATER TRUNK
HARKEY LN
LEGEND
CITY LIMITS
GENERAL PLAN
LIMITS
City of Lodi
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Figure -2
WASTEWATER FEE ZONES
-kJ
/
WWTP FEE ONLY
a 7fe ir4 31e712 "LE
7200 7400 WICK) FEET
WWTP FEE AND SOUTH WASTEWATER
TRUNK LINE IEE
SOUTH WASTEWATER TRUNK LINE
STUDY AREA
FUTURE ANALYSIS
II Harris & Associates
PROJECT REVIEW
SOUTH WASTEWATER TRUNK LINE FEE
South Wastewater Trunk Line
Quantity Unit Price Construction Cost 1 Expenditures to Date
Remaining Costs
Pump Station
1
$800,000 $1,040,000
$1,040,000
Wastewater Connection Manhole
1
$20,000 $26,000
$26,000
14" Force Main in ex. Street
1,180
$150 $230,100
$230,100
15" Wastewater Pipe
2,700
$105 $368,550
$368,550
24" Watewater Pipe in ex. Street
1,680
$190 $414,960
$414,960
24" Wastewater Pipe
14,500
$125 $2,356,250
$2,356,250
24" UPRR Crossing in 36" Casing
100 $1,000 $130,000
$130,000
24" WID Crossing
100 $1,000
$130,000
$130,000
Subtotal South Wastewater Trunk Line
$4,695,860
$4,695,860
Available South Wastewater Sewer Line Fee Fund Revenue
($21,164)
City Contributions 2
($89,243)
Total Cost Allocated to Future Development
1 Construction Cost Estimate derived from the City of Lodi Amendment to the South Wastewater Trunk Line Master Plan dated October 2017. Costs include a 30%
markup for contingency, engineering and constuction administration
2 City Contributions is the cumulative amount of fees lost as a result of the fee reduction adopted by Resolution 2012-142.
31
Harris & Associates
H
UPDATED FEES
SOUTH WASTEWATER TRU!" 1NE FEE
FEE INCREASE DUE TO:
Updated unit costs to reflect
the SWTL Master Plan
• Removal of properties east of
Highway 99
Residential
Low Density
Medium Density
High Density
Non -Residential
Retail (Minor & Major)
Office/Medical
Industrial
Gallons Per
Day
200
168
140
185
154
83
DUE Factor
per Unit
1.0000
0.8421
0.7018
DUE Factor
per 1,000 SF
0.9279
0.7733
0.4143
Cost Per Unit
$ 1,353.22
$ 1,139.55
$ 949.69
Cost Per 1,000
SF
$ 1,255.65
$ 1,046.45
$ 560.64
Category
Residential
Low Density
Medium Density
High Density
Non- Residential
Retail (Minor & Major) - Per 1,000 SF
Office/Medical
Industrial
Existing Fees Proposed Fees Delta
$
$
$
$
1,181.00
994.00
829.00
1,096.00
913.00
489.00
Per DUE
$ 1,353.22
$ 1,139.55
$ 949.69
Per 1,000 SF
$ 1,255.65
$ 1,046.45
$ 560.64
15%
15%
15%
15%
15%
15%
i
2018 IMFP PROPOSED FEE SUMMARY
FEES PER UNIT OR 1,000 SF EXCLUDING ELECTRICAL,
WATER AND WASTEWATER
ZONE 1
Category
Existing Fees Proposed Fees Delta
Low Density
$ 7,830.00 $ 9,781.27 24.92%
Medium Density $ 5,893.00 $ 7,400.07 25.57%
High Density
$ 4,964.00 $ 6,059.21 22.06%
Retail
$ 2,914.09 $ 3,692.17 26.70%
Office/Medical
$ 3,415.09 $ 4,218.69 23.53%
Industrial
$ 1,539.10 $ 1,906.03 23.84%
$12,000.00
$10,000.00
$8,000.00
$6,000.00
$4,000.00
$2,000.00
$-
Proposed Fees Existing Fees
Low Medium High Retail Office Industrial
Density Density Density (1,000 SF) (1,000 SF) (1,000 SF)
ZONE 2
Category
Existing Fees Proposed Fees Delta
Low Density
$ 12, 866.00 $ 15, 917.48 23.72%
Medium Density $ 9,290.00 $ 11,519.30 24.00%
High Density
$ 7,754.00 $ 9,134.47 17.80%
Retail
$ 3,781.42 $ 4,754.08 25.72%
Office/Medical
$ 4,444.42 $ 5,474.66 23.18%
Industrial
$ 2,186.14 $ 2,869.76 31.27%
$18,000.00
$16,000.00
$14,000.00
$12,000.00
$10,000.00
$8,000.00
$6,000.00
$4,000.00
$2,000.00
$-
Proposed Fees Existing Fees
Low Medium High Retail Office Industrial
Density Density Density (1,000 SF) (1,000 SF) (1,000 SF)
Harris & Associates
INDEX INCREASES
ENR increase from 2012-2018
was 18%.
CPI increase from 2012-2018
was 13%
DEVELOPER CONSTRUCTED
Category Existing Fees Proposed Fees
Delta
Low Density $ 7,617.00 $ 9,494.57
24.65%
Medium Density $ 6,200.00 $ 7,719.66
24.51%
High Density $ 5,232.00 $ 6,516.92
24.56%
Retail $ 3,674.00 $ 4,552.52
23.91%
Office/Medical $ 3,992.00 $ 4,869.85
21.99%
Industrial $ 1,668.00 $ 2,043.14
22.49%
$10,000.00
$9,000.00
$8,000.00
$7,000.00
$6,000.00
$5,000.00
$4,000.00
$3,000.00
$2,000.00
$1,000.00
$-
Proposed Fees Existing Fees
i
Low Medium High Retail Office Industrial
Density Density Density (1,000 SF) (1,000 SF) (1,000 SF)
33
HHarris Associates
2018 IMFP PROPOSED FEE
SUMMARY
WATER AND WASTEWATER pr
WATER FEES
Category
Existing Fees
Proposed Fees
Delta
5/8 -inch meter
$ 2,079.00 $
2,119.42
2%
3/4 -inch meter
$ 3,103.00 $
3,163.31
2%
1 -inch meter
$ 5,181.00 $
5,282.73
2%
1 1/2 -inch meter
$ 10, 332.00 $
10,533.83
2%
2 -inch meter
$ 16, 537.00 $
16,860.45
2%
3 -inch meter
$ 31, 026.00 $
31, 633.12
2%
4 -inch meter
$ 51, 721.00 $
52, 732.40
2%
6 -inch meter
$103,411.00 $
105,433.18
2%
8 -inch meter
$165,464.00 $
168,699.41
2%
10 -inch meter
$237,880.00 $
242,531.10
2%
$300,000.00
$250,000.00
$200,000.00
$150,000.00
$100,000.00
$50,000.00
$-
Proposed Fee
1 ■
Existing Fee
1 I
5/8 3/4
Inch Inch
1 1-1/2 2
Inch Inch Inch
3 4 6
Inch Inch Inch
WASTEWATER FEES
Category
Existing Fees
Proposed Fees
Delta
5/8 -inch meter
$ 2,831.00 $
2,717.95 -4%
3/4 -inch meter
$ 4,225.00 $
4,056.64 -4%
1 -inch meter
$ 7,056.00 $
6,774.59
- 4%
1 1/2 -inch meter
$ 14, 070.00 $
13,508.61 -4%
2 -inch meter
$ 22, 521.00 $
21,621.89 -4%
3 -inch meter
$ 42,253.00 $
40,566.40 -4%
4 -inch meter
$ 70,453.00 $
67, 624.19
- 4%
6 -inch meter
$140,828.00 $
135,207.81
- 4%
8 -inch meter
$225,333.00 $
216,340.61
- 4%
10 -inch meter
$323,951.00 $
311,022.59 -4%
$350,000.00
$300,000.00
$250,000.00
$200,000.00
$150,000.00
$100,000.00
$50,000.00
$
Proposed Fee
. • 1 ■
Existing Fee
it
1
8 10 5/8 3/4 1 1-1/2 2
3 4 6 8 10
Inch Inch Inch Inch Inch Inch Inch Inch
Inch Inch Inch Inch
34
Harris & Associates
H
SINGLE PHASE @ 240V
2018 IMFP PROPOSED FEE
SUMMARY
ELECTRICAL UTILITY FEF
THREE PHASE @ 208V
THREE PHASE @ 240V
THREE PHASE @ 480V
Proposed
Category Existing Fees Delta
Fees
Proposed
Category Existing Fees Delta
Fees
Proposed
Category Existing Fees Delta
Fees
Category
200 amps
400 amps
600 amps
800 amps
1000 amps
1200 amps
1600 amps
2000 amps
2500 amps
3000 amps
Proposed
Existing Fees Delta
Fees
$ 2,718.00 $ 3,243.18 19%
$ 5,437.00 $ 6,486.36 19%
$ 8,155.00 $ 9,729.54 19%
$ 10,873.00 $ 12,972.71 19%
$ 13, 591.00 $ 16, 215.89 19%
$ 16,310.00 $ 19,459.07 19%
$ 21,746.00 $ 25,945.43 19%
$ 27,183.00 $ 32,431.79 19%
$ 33, 979.00 $ 40, 539.73 19%
$ 40, 774.00 $ 48, 647.68 19%
60 amps $ 248.00 $ 295.65 19%
200 amps $ 1,178.00 $ 1,405.38 19%
200 amps $ 1,359.00 $ 1,621.59 19%
400 amps $ 2,718.00 $ 3,243.18 19%
100 amps $ 413.00 $ 492.75 19%
400 amps $ 2,356.00 $ 2,810.75 19%
125 amps $ 516.00 $ 615.94 19%
600 amps $ 4,077.00 $ 4,864.77 19%
600 amps $ 3,534.00 $ 4,216.13 19%
800 amps $ 5,437.00 $ 6,486.36 19%
200 amps $ 826.00 $ 985.50 19%
800 amps $ 4,712.00 $ 5,621.51 19%
400 amps $ 1,652.00 $ 1,971.00 19%
1000 amps N/A N/A N/A
1000 amps $ 5,890.00 $ 7,026.89 19%
600 amps
$ 2,478.00 $ 2,956.50 19%
1200 amps $ 7,068.00 $ 8,432.26 19%
1200 amps N/A N/A N/A
1600 amps N/A N/A N/A
1600 amps $ 9,423.00 $ 11,243.02 19%
2000 amps $ 11, 779.00 $ 14, 053.77 19%
2000 amps N/A N/A N/A
2500 amps $ 14, 724.00 $ 17, 567.22 19%
2500 amps N/A N/A N/A
3000 amps
$ 17, 669.00 $ 21, 080.66 19%
3000 amps
N/A N/A N/A
$3,500.00
$3,000.00
$2,500.00
$2,000.00
$1,500.00
$1,000.00
$500.00
$-
• Proposed Fee Existing Fee
.UIi • I 1
1
$25,000.00
$20,000.00
$15,000.00
$10,000.00
$5,000.00
$-
Proposed Fee
. . .1 1 lit!
1
1
60 100 125 200 400 600 200 600 1000 1600 2500
amps amps amps amps amps amps amps amps amps amps amps
$7,000.00
$6,000.00
$5,000.00
$4,000.00
$3,000.00
$2,000.00
$1,000.00
$-
Proposed Fee
P
200 amps 400 amps 600 amps 800 amps
$60,000.00
$50,000.00
$40,000.00
$30,000.00
$20,000.00
$10,000.00
$
Proposed Fee
. . . 1 1 1 1 1
1
200 600 1000 1600 2500
amps amps amps amps amps
35
SURROUNDING AGENCY COMPARISON
$50,000.00
$45,000.00
$40,000.00
$35,000.00
$30,000.00
$25,000.00
$20,000.00
$15,000.00
$10,000.00
$5,000.00
$-
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Lodi Davis Manteca Ripon Tracy Turlock
$1,600,000.00
$1,400,000.00
$1,200,000.00
$1,000,000.00
$800,000.00
$600,000.00
$400,000.00
$200,000.00
$-
GENERAL COMMERCIAL FACILITY
Lodi Davis Manteca Ripon Tracy Turlock
Harris & Associates
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Assumes a 2,000 SF home
with 3 bedrooms, 2.5
bathrooms at a density of 6
units per acre
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
Assumes a 65,000 SF building
with 200 Employees, a 3"
Water Meter and is 85%
Impervious
GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS
Lodi includes the SW Trunk
Line fee and uses Zone 2 Storm
Drainage costs
36
Harris & Associates
THANK YOU
2018 IMFP adam.marston@weareharris.com
UPDATE
Phone:
949.655.3900
E-mail.
alison.bouley@weareharris.com
Jennifer Ferraiolo
From: Charles Swimley
Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 6:06 PM
To: John Beckman (johnb@biagv.org); 'Dale Gillespie'; 'Tom Doucette'; 'Price Walker';
jwhite@grupe.com; Dennis Bennett; Darryl Browman
(DBrowman@BrowmanDevelopment.com); Aaron Zuzack
(AZuzack@BrowmanDevelopment.com); 'J. Jeffrey Kirst'; 'Michael Carouba, CCIM';
Donnie Garibaldi
Cc: 'Adam Marston'; Steve Schwabauer; Craig Hoffman; Lyman M Chang; Sean Nathan;
Rebecca Areida-Yadav; Andrew Keys; 'mclusk@softcom.net; Alison Bouley; Denise
Wiman; Karissa Kiriu; Jennifer Ferraiolo; Janice Magdich
Subject: City of Lodi Impact Fee Update
Attachments: IMFP Summary of Changes 10.8.18.pdf; IMFP Report v.1 9.25.18 Final Draft
Revisions.pdf; IMFP Fee Comparison.pdf; Shirtsleeve IMF Update 10-16-2018.doc
All,
Please find attached a draft copy of the City's IMF update, Fee Comparison, Summary of Changes and draft shirtsleeve
council report for the October 16th meeting. As you will see, the basic structure of the City's fee program remains the
same with the exception of an added Recycled Water fee. As reflected in the fee comparison, some fees increased while
others decreased. The summary of changes document provides a brief explanation as to what drove the changes
associated with each particular fee.
As noted in the draft council report, the current, low-density impact fees, where the developer constructs the storm
drain facilities and neighborhood park (outside of the Southwest Wastewater Trunkline Service Area) total $14,450 per
unit (excluding RTIF). The proposed total fee would increase approximately 12 percent to $16,345 per unit.
In 2016, Council eliminated the initial 60 percent reduction in impact fees for low and medium -density zoning
designations and infill projects of more than 10 lots. The multi -family reduction as well as the infill projects (10 lots or
less) will remain in place until December 31, 2019. Impact fees associated with those subdivisions under existing
development agreements will remain governed by the terms of their respective agreements.
We wanted to provide this information in advance of the shirtsleeve meeting to be held at Carnegie Forum on October
16, 2018 at 7:00 a.m.
Regards,
Charlie
Charles E. Swimley Jr.
Public Works Director
City of Lodi
209-333-6709
1
DECLARATION OF POSTING
On Thursday, October 11 2018, in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County,
California, a copy of the October 16, 2018, Shirtsleeve Session City Council
agenda (attached and marked as Exhibit A) was posted at 1311 Midvale Road,
Lodi, California.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on October 11, 2018, at Lodi, California.
ORDERED BY:
Posted by:
Sylvia Doming
Administrative Ierk
JENNIFER M. FERRAIOLO
CITY CLERK
(Date)/ I
DECLARATION OF POSTING
On Thursday, October 11, 2018, in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County,
California, copies of the October 16, 2018 Shirtsleeve Session agenda and
October 17, 2018 Regular Meeting agenda (attached and marked as Exhibit A)
were posted on the door of Room No. 31 of Fairmont Rehabilitation Hospital,
960 South Fairmont Avenue, Lodi, California.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on October 11, 2018, at Lodi, California,
Posted by:
iqpgLi
(signature
(Print name Fre)
Fairmont Rehabilitation Hospital
(Person who posted the agenda)
ORDERED BY:
JENNIFER M. FERRAIOLO
CITY CLERK
(0 /1g
(Date)
LODI CITY COUNCIL
Carnegie Forum
305 West Pine Street, Lodi
*and via conference call:
1311 Midvale Road
Lodi, CA 95240
Fairmont Rehab Hospital
960 S. Fairmont Avenue
Lodi, CA 95240
"SHIRTSLEEVE" SESSION
Date: October 16, 2018
Time: 7:00 a.m.
1
For information regarding this Agenda please contact:
Jennifer M. Ferraiolo
City Clerk
Telephone: (209) 333-6702
JEXHIBIT A
Informal Informational Meeting
A. Roll Call by City Clerk
B. Topic(s)
B-1 Provide an Overview of Impact Mitigation Fee Program Update (PW)
C. Comments by Public on Non -Agenda Items
D. Adjournment
Pursuant to Section 54954.2(a) of the Government Code of the State of California, this agenda was
posted at least 72 hours in advance of the scheduled meeting at a public place freely accessible to the
public 24 hours a day.
All staff reports or other written documentation relating to each item of business referred to on the agenda are on file
in the Office of the City Clerk, located at 221 W. Pine Street, Lodi, and are available for public inspection. If
requested, the agenda shall be made available in appropriate altemative formats to persons with a disability, as
required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S. C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules
and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. To make a request for disability -related modification or
accommodation contact the City Clerk's Office as soon as possible and at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.
Language interpreter requests must be received at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting to help ensure
availability. Contact Jennifer M. Ferraiolo at (209) 333-6702. Solicitudes de interpretacion de idiomas deben ser
recibidas por to menos con 72 horas de anticipacion a la reunion para ayudar a asegurar la disponibilidad. Llame a
Jennifer M. Ferraiolo (209) 333-6702.
J:\CITYCLRK AGENDA\SHIRTSLV\SHRTSLV DOC