Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - May 3, 2000 E-18AGENDA TITLE: Reimbursement to Park Place Development LLC for Costs Incurred While Acting on Behalf of the City ($74,562.87) MEETING DATE: May 3, 2000 PREPARED BY: Electric Utility Director RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council approve reimbursement to Park Place Development LLC in an amount not to exceed $74,562.87 if Pacific Bell does not provide such reimbursement by June 1, 2000. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: When a new subdivision is built within the Lodi City limits, the City places certain requirements on the developer for improvements in and around the subdivision. These requirements include surface street design and landscaping. When improvements are made to existing city streets, the relocation of existing public utilities (electric, phone, cable TV, etc.) is frequently required. If street improvements are a requirement of a developer, the costs associated with utility relocation are typically borne by the developer. If, however, street improvements are a City project to be undertaken by the City, then each utility typically pays its own costs of relocation or modification. The issue currently before the Council is related to the later circumstance. In 1975, the City acquired right-of-way along a portion of Stockton Street for a planned future street widening project. In 1992, the City approved the design of the Colvin Ranch subdivision. Since 1992, the City has moved toward narrower subdivision street requirements and has added landscaping requirements. Prior to the developer, Park Place Development LLC, beginning development of Colvin Ranch, the City requested the developer perform certain improvements beyond the scope of 1992 City requirements. (For additional right-of-way for landscaping purposes on Stockton Street.) The City believed that the costs associated with the planned widening of Stockton Street could be greatly reduced given the developer of the nearby Colvin Ranch subdivision would have necessary equipment on site. The developer agreed provided the City allow street improvements within the subdivision in accordance with our current requirements, not the 1992 requirements. The City agreed. Late in 1998 and early 1999, the City's Electric Utility Department began efforts to coordinate the undergrounding of all public utilities around the intersection of Almond Drive and Stockton Streets. The Electric Utility wanted this done prior to completion of street improvements. Around this same time, the developer was informed that Pacific Bell deemed the project to be City required as opposed to City requested. As a result, the developer was required to pay Pacific Bell $74,562.87 prior to proceeding with the street modifications. The developer paid Pacific Bell in order to maintain a reasonable construction schedule. A project delay in excess of one year ensued as the involved public utilities have attempted to coordinate their respective construction schedules. The delay has increased the developers costs of providing agreed to services on behalf of the City. The developer has, nevertheless, agreed to honor its commitment to the City. APPROVED: H. Dixon Flynn - City rYfanager 9 f CITY OF LODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION The City has attempted, in recent years, to partner where possible with local developers when such partnerships yield benefits to both the developer and the City. City staff recommends reimbursing Park Place Development LLC for monies paid to Pacific Bell in an amount not to exceed $74,562.87. City staff believes that partnerships with local developers will be difficult in the future if the City does not continue to indemnify developers for costs and specific circumstances such as these. In addition to reimbursement, the contractor will assign its rights to reimbursement from Pacific Bell to the City. FUNDING: 16062t 1(�— Business & Customer Retention Funding Approval:�"'� Vicky McAthie, Finance Director �- 4 6 X Ala .Vallow Electric Utility Director PREPARED BY: Alan N. Vallow, Electric Utility Director ANV/tl C: City Attorney Public Works Director Jeff Kirst, Park Place Development LLC APPROVED: H. Dixon Flynn - City Manager CITY COUNCIL KEITH LAND, Mayor STEPHEN J. MANN Mayor Pro Tempore SUSAN HITCHCOCK ALAN S. NAKANISHI PHILLIP A. PENNINO 32 CITY OF LODI CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET P.O. BOX 3006 LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910 (209) 333-6706 FAX (209) 333-6710 January 22, 1999 Pacific Bell Attn: Public Works Coordinator 2300 East Eight Mile Road Stockton, CA 95210 SUBJECT: South Stockton Street Improvements ®r H. DIXON FLYNN City Manager ALICE M. REIMCHE City Clerk RANDALL A. HAYS City Attorney Enclosed is a set of preliminary plans for the above project. Please mark and/or verify your utility locations on the enclosed plans and return them to the Public Works Department at your earliest convenience. Based on a field review, it is evident that this project will require you to relocate a number of poles along the east side of Stockton Street. Since construction of this project is planned for early spring of 1999, scheduling of the relocation work should done as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please contact me at 333-6759. C� Richard C. Prima, Jr. Public Works Director Enclosure bcc: Steve Pechin SOUTH STOCKTON STREET PROJECT.DOC UTILITY COORDINATING COMMITTEE MINUTES March 9, 1999 1999 The March meeting of the Utility Coordinating Committee was held on March 9, 1999, at 9:00 a.m., in the conference room on the main floor in City Hall. The following agencies and representatives were present. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Wes Fujitani, Senior Civil Engineer Sharon A. Welch, Senior Civil Engineer ELECTRIC UTILITY DEPARTMENT Dave Comer, Electrical Estimator PACIFIC BELL PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO. Ron Gibbs, Associate District Engineer MEDIA ONE Larry Legrand, Construction Supervisor BROOKS FIBER COMMUNICATIONS Each agency in attendance reviewed its project schedule and indicated its revisions in. construction dates, plus the new projects that were added since the last meeting. A copy of the revised construction schedule is attached. New items in the schedule are marked with an asterisk (*). As previously called to your attention, please note that the street widening project listed as Item #21 under Public Works Department projects requires the relocation of utility poles on both Stockton Street and Almond Drive prior to the installation of street improvements. Construction on this project is scheduled to begin no later than April 1999. Please contact Sharon Welch at 333-6800 ext. 659 to confirm that relocation of poles by the appropriate utility can be accomplished within that time frame. NEXT MEETING: April 13, 1999, 9:00 a.m. in the conference room on the main floor in City Hall. Sharon A. Welch Senior Civil Engineer Enclosures MAP.30.1999 8'25AM N©.437 P.212 %ht of way PACIFICBBELL. 2300 EM EON Mite goo Saxkim. Califomia 95210 A Pacific Teleels Company March 26, 1999 Richard C. Prima, Jr, Public Works Director City of Lodi ' P, p, Sox 3006 Lodi, CA 95241-1910 Dear Mr. Prima.: Pacific Bell is working to accommodate the relocation of facilities on South Stockton Street and Almond Drive. However, before we can proceed with construction of the job, the issue of billing needs to be addressed. Upon review of the plans for Colvin Ranch, and the conditions placed on that development, it is clear that the street improvements are a result of this project. Pursuant to California Public Utilities Commission Decision No_ 88398, any utility relocation costs resulting from development of private property are to be paid by the developer. I am aware that the City has made special arrangements with the Developer. In this instance it is between you to decide who is responsible for payment of our relocation. Once this decision has been made, please inform me so we can proceed with billing. If you have any questions, please call me on 209-474-4130. Sincerely, *Tiagner Public Works Coordinator cc: A. Rodriguez RESOLUTION NO. 2000-74 A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT BY THE CITY OF LODI TO PARK PLACE DEVELOPMENT LLC FOR MONIES PAID TO PACIFIC BELL ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- WHEREAS, when a new subdivision is built within city limits, the City places certain requirements on the developer for improvements in and around the subdivision; and WHEREAS, these requirements include surface street design and landscaping, and when improvements are made to existing City streets, the relocation of existing public utilities (electric, phone, cable TV, etc.) is frequently required; and WHEREAS, if street improvements are a requirement of a developer, the costs associated with utility relocation are typically borne by the developer, but if the street improvements are a City project to be undertaken by the City, then each utility pays its own costs of relocation or modification, which in this case is the later; and WHEREAS, prior to the developer, Park Place Development LLC, beginning development of Colvin Ranch, the City requested the developer perform certain improvements beyond the scope of 1992 City requirements providing additional right-of- way and landscaping on Stockton Street; and WHEREAS, the City believed the costs associated with the planned widening of Stockton Street could be greatly reduced given the developer of the nearby Colvin Ranch subdivision would have necessary equipment on site. The developer agreed provided that the City allow street improvements within the subdivision in accordance with our current requirements, not the 1992 requirements and the City agreed; and WHEREAS, late in 1998 and 1999, the City's Electric Utility Department began efforts to coordinate the undergrounding of all public utilities around the intersection of Almond Drive and Stockton Streets; and WHEREAS, the Electric Utility wanted this done prior to completion of street improvements, and around this time the developer was informed that Pacific Bell deemed the project to be City required as opposed to City requested; and Whereas, as a result, the developer was required to pay Pacific Bell $74,562.87 prior to proceeding with the street modifications, and did so in order to maintain a reasonable construction schedule; and WHEREAS, the project was delayed in excess of one year due to attempts of the public utilities to coordinate their respective construction schedules, which has caused increases in the developers costs of providing agreed services on behalf of the City, but nevertheless, the developer has agreed to honor its commitment to the City; and WHEREAS, the City has attempted in recent years to partner where possible with local developers when such partnerships yield benefits to both the developer and the City; and WHEREAS, City staff recommends reimbursing Park Place Development LLC for monies paid to Pacific Bell in an amount not to exceed $74,562.87; and WHEREAS, City staff believes that partnerships with local developers will be difficult in the future if the City does not continue to indemnify developers for costs and specific circumstances such as these; and WHEREAS, in addition to reimbursement, the contractor will assign its rights to reimbursement from Pacific Bell to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby approve the reimbursement by the City of Lodi to Park Place Development LLC for costs incurred while acting on behalf of the City in the amount of $74,562.87. Dated: May 3, 2000 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2000-74 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held May 3, 2000 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Hitchcock, Land, Nakanishi, Pennino and Mann (Mayor) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None AC ELINEP�k O nteri City Cle 2000-74 MAY. 3.2000 6:40AM FACSIMILE MESSAGE PACIflCS"BELL® A Paufi% Ttlaais Lempsav Pacific Telesis External Affairs 445 W. Weber Ave., Suite 236 Stockton, CA 95203 DATE: 05/02/00 # PAGE: (including cover) 18 TO: Mayor Steve Mann Mayor Pro Tempore Alan Nakanishi Council Member Susan Hitchcock Council Member Keith Land(� Cc: C,q w Ac . M&-,� Pk -.l0.11 r' %0 TELEPHONE: R• Pr MIA N, O 1 JCA,, F1 yon It NA79 FACUMILE: 333-6807 SUBJECT: Colvin Ranch N0.B02 P.1/18 MESSAGE: Pacific Bell response to council agenda item for May 3, 2000: Res. No. 2000-74 18, Reimbursement to Put Place Development LLC For costs incurred while acting on behalf of the City ($74,562.87) Connie Cochran, Director Telephone (209) 460-0121 Facsimile (209) 460-0141 E-mail connie.cochran@pactel.com MAY. 3.2000 Copals Cochran DircooaCKtermal Affairs 6:40RM 445 W Weber Avenue Ste. 130 519Ckton, CA 95203 (209)460.0121 SENT VIA FACSIMILE May 2, 2000 Richard Prima, Jr. Public Works Director City of Lodi P.O. Box 3006 Lodi, CA 93241-1910 Dear Mr. Prima, NO. 1302 P.2116 PACIFICwBELL4e A PacHlc Teleeos Company We have reviewed correspondence between Pacific Bell, City of Lodi, and R. Thomas Development, Inc. and find that the $74,562.87 has been correctly billed to the developer for relocation costs associated with the development at Colvin Ranch. Section 66473.6 of the Government Code mandates that costs associated with relocation of any existing facilities are the responsibility of the sub -divider or developer. Jane Thomas, Vice President of R. Thomas Development, Inc. signed a statement of her agreement and understanding of the charges on April 20, 1999, Job # UE1006S, CWBO# GFCIE00145 (Attachment A). The letter dated April 15, 1999 from Pacific Bell Engineer Abe Rodriquez to Jane Thomas of Park Place Development LLC (Attachment B), explains the special construction and relocation charges of $74,562.87. Pacific Bell billed the cost for relocating telecommunications facilities along Stockton Street as if we were moving aerial facilities to aerial facilities (like -for -like). The additional cost for placing telecommunications facilities underground was absorbed by Pacific Bell. The decision to relocate underground at Pacific's additional expense was made in accordance with California Public Utility Commission tariff, Schedule No. A2, Section 2.1.32 Facilities to Provide Replacement of Aerial with Underground Facilities (Attachment C). This tariff allows Pacific Bell to place our facilities underground at our own expense for structural design considerations or operating convenience. The Pacific Bell initiated decision to place our facilities underground was based on meetings and interaction with the city and the developer related to the Colvin Ranch development and the City's expressed desire, both in previous developments and with this developer, to achieve a more aesthetically appealing streetscape. These meetings, and previous requests from the City, set the course for Pacific Bell. A new aerial placement would have necessitated additional poles and support structure to accommodate the existing telecommunications facilities and anticipated growth in the area. MAY. 3.2000 6:40AM N0.602 P.3i18 Page 2 of 3 After the decision to underground along Stockton Street was communicated to all parties, a request from Mel Grande of Lodi Electric Utility was made to our engineering department, for Pacific Bell to include, at our expense, the undergrounding of telephone facilities along Almond Drive. We agreed to underground our facilities along Almond Drive at our sole expense. The actual cost of undergrounding the telephone facilities on both Stockton Street and Almond Drive is well in excess of $200,000. Your letter to our Public Works Coordinator, dated January 22, 1999 (Attaclunent D), requested that our facilities along the east side of Stockton Street be relocated. Our Public Works Coordinator, Lori Wagner, responded, in a letter dated March 26, 1999 (Attachment E), that payment would be required from the City or the developer for such relocation. The developer responded, as stated herein, by signing the agreement on April 20,1999 and issuing a check, dated April 19, 2000, for $74,562.87. The additional request to relocate facilities along Almond Drive and changes by the City of Lodi to the original trench location on Stockton Street did impact the original timeline. The developer had originally identified a utility easement along the back of the sidewalk. Your letter dated August 6, 1999, mandated that there be no poles placed adjacent to the landscape area (Attachment F). This change in available utility easement necessitated a redesign of our facilities placement and thus, further delays. Both Pacific Bell and Lodi Electric Utility experienced design and construction issues with the actual trenches along the Almond Drive stretch. Pacific Bell is working diligently to complete the Almond Drive portion. Estimated completion is the second week of May. Upon completion, we will be removing our poles along Stockton Street and Almond Drive. In the absence of Pacific Bell provided poles, it is our understanding that MediaOne has elected to place their own poles to accommodate their facilities. We did notify MediaOne of our intention to place our facilities underground. Larry LeGrand of MediaOne signed an Authorization for Joint Underground Construction on May 17, 1999 (Attachment O), as they had facilities on Pacific Bell owned poles. MediaOne decided not to participate in the undergrounding process, after having signed the agreement. Pacific Bell does not and did not agree to act as the coordinating utility for this pibjeet. We do not collect relocation fees for other companies. It is clear that discussion about the development site, improvements required, and identifying responsible parties has been going on for some time. A City of Lodi Memorandum from the Public Works Director to the Community Development Director dated April 13, 1992 (Attachment H) indicates that the developer may be responsible for costs initially and eligible for reimbursement from the City. A letter from you, in your role as city engineer, to Mr. Ronald B. Thomas, dated August 10, 1994 also indicates that the City would be responsible for costs associated with widening the streets and that the developer may obtain reimbursement as provided under Lodi Municipal Code 16.40 (Attachment I). MAY. 3.2000 6:41AM N0.802 P.4/1B Page 3 of 3 Both Government Code and California Public Utilities Commission tariffs require that relocation charges be paid by the party requesting the relocation and not passed on in the form of rates and charges to other customers. If the City of Lodi chooses to reimburse the developer, the reconciliation is a separate agreement between 1hvo parties, not a cost to be absorbed by Pacific Bell and its customers. If, in the future, the City of Lodi, desires Pacific Bell to convert aerial facilities to underground at Pacific Bell's sole expense, the City must pass an ordinance creating an underground district. This work will be performed in accordance with C.P.U.C. Tariff Schedule A2.1.32. If you have any questions or require additional documentation, please call me at 209-460- 0121. Sincerely, a#volv Connie Cochran Director, External Affairs Cc: D. Flynn, City of Lodi R. Hays, City of Lodi S. Mann, Mayor A. Nakanishi, Council Member S. Hitchcock, Council Member K. Land, Council Member P. Pennino, Council Member M. Godbey, Pacific Bell A. Rodriguez, Pacific Bell T. Schmidt, Pacific Bell L. Orteastone, Pacific Bell MAY. 3.2909— 6: 41AM-11 " 'j NQ:.2Eent A P.5/1B T A P�e� i " i� M. w # usio 6S CWBO * ...OFCIM14S I hove read ped mdenmad dw cobftm widbed at do p[evim pw. I baby mdbod s Pwft Bea s pmooed wbb die work I have ngoaeed ad spu m psy hc& Bell gl'h6 i hwum d Y a rack of mw ebandec to or anesAaim of dda p *% * MAY. 3.2009 6; 419M Altdi liment A NO. WE P.6-/18 1, Summary of CWC allhng Chum "NIGhlo""i11A" .1 111n01- W HII Wank order UMbor: Uala Rs spo*l Ommmodon CMM& for: �x S: a.s.N,s+aerN.o�e�rus . 16r7 (� of 00 to af00 pllir male 0 s eW oww 4 pops Z jointpolo 1 X pdr larmInai 1 mm ne"" housing 1 anchor and ow Labor: INN" bd not Inbd to &* aft Co MWM, 6pbft Todrq oqd Ca*ad Coda. CIRC: CaNt�lias In Nd of CotaYf�n (3�7i) npfti'MMwAmwmV Lass ewt ofjoM &wwh : $28.160.05 X35.08'ta X1800.68 $77,62UT g!waci REWIVV D AW APPMWAW 6Yo .,,+��t ` "nOW (M974401B --.MAY. 3.2000_ 6:41AM NO 802 Attachwciu n P. 7/18 • PARK PLACE DEVELOPMENT, LLC UNK FAavaa� TAAL CAIY�RR IeAA OF CdIT ,.` P.O. Box Is" !.ODI. CA 9WI-16W n�risesel LOW, CA OW @04W4-1211 4/19/99 PAY OF PACIFIC BELL $**74,562.87 Seventy -Four Th=md-Five Hundmed Sixty -Two and DOLLAR= PACIFIC BELL ENGINEERING ATTN: ABLE RODRIGUEZ 2300 E. PIG IT MILE RD. STOCKTON, CA 95210 MEMO __. 7y�✓�Ar� _ _ ._V 19000 & 261' 1: 12 L L081616 W 00 la Lb1.?1' 2ARK PLACE DEVELOPMENT, LLC PACIFIC BELL 4/191199 1213 04119/99 Bill #UE1006S 74,562.87 Checking-F&MI Ban 74,562.87 MRY. 3.2000•P% 6* 41AM Irl'1 Paint 13011 2300 E zi& Mile Rd. Smodak Ca 95207 - Pag lase Develapanent LLC P.O. soot 1598 ., Lodi, CA 91241 April 15, M9 NOR. 602ent g P . Bi 1 B PMFIt©MLU: AP&IftTOIIWCoMWN U P&d& Heti PacOWa Relocation- Colvla Raaeh SoWvidoq, Almond M and ftddma St, Lail Atm; Jaae Thames, Paet6e BOU has proaaedad wlm togwsts to PbvW as animus lar the rei0aatiao of MW brutes in baa with As CoNk PA" SubdiVWM road imin vonaamt. The mom to rpWW afo www dwW m raloeam the faeili w win be $74,%17. Plan sofa that this sidasaoe a bred a it lyrpal6s" aerial Mb a" It b ar Pacific 13e11'a inild Eve that we will be a datpot a ft C*ft ww thaalitica. No pottioa off rte work stud m aadarSrawid, wbfdt eocogdf tho elft olds aneAl:etseaooaa, is bob" to so effianaoe. no bfll" can taelude *a Mar and zawadd madowd wldt do plaeem ai of IM loot of 5O to 2400 av ieat and am MN tdpeateOf raol uu ft it ao p wWa 15efae mrovol of 1 a� ca toa ft 4667 tear end 11 polo. A ate& of 83065.20 W41 given far a patios ofjo of sonch dapaw 8W pill ooaspsr alamg A*wd Dr and Su dcoon SL, (a dastlated at Pantie DA's aur of arm far waadibasl. Vr= Paallk Bars watk h wmpbm she existtag WA DOW voift die nope of yoar rad imp avaaomb wW be In asemadow w+ A the Tax Rdwm An of 15K a 33% gtas am be paid fa edvaaaa by the appUaoa to doe t dit. la accatdapee with C.P,tI.C. &*Wft 17-09026, the 3346 gaoawp OMpanmt ARGM to as cos% raaa*W tar w* P tdby Padre 8dl tar tbc bem&ofibo app km 7ba Wllohte arc gourd Indadw a grass-sp is the moot otl18,80046. P4UMtt dor die work deaeribed above WM ts"W is advaace of eagineatiog and awww*w Once pm"#W is n #W4 Pasitla B@R w fl eppomdmreb► 60•15 da"Is v*edde amid aowPbft file wark. Please dp the attached doaamat and tbrward a do* pVabls is lP'adf k SO Is aatovit of s74,SpA7 to: PaaiAo Baa 1lgieforing Aft; Ak Radrigaes 33002NOtM&IPd. Wel", to "no 7bfra wM be no bitUfavoia Eisner, pleats anasider *b kft as a squat Or pgrm Nym have pair qua d= eeO Washis kft pisaae cd Abe Rodrlguay ft&w at 474-4061. Pleafe Include d w fbllowiog rehmee ca your abede URION&GFCU>eoa O AbaRoMpez (209)4744061 AM MAY. 3.20006: nifi1 G41—.11 FR PS REGLLARTORY ftaiiie sell Sas lrancimeo. California Attachment C' N0 . "P.9/18 PCHCO GL.P.U.Ce 7110• l�i. 3rd Revised sheet 134 Camels 2 A Revised Sheet 134 MD 2.1 1494 (Cont'd) 2.1.32 2= 90. 32 - PXCZUM TO P1a'AW= R41KACNEW CW i►RRL >M UUMMMOUND FACE I? = Wont' d) A. RZPLRCUM Of MMAL W1= lAlpabr.'llot>M FAC=TZ2G (Coat' d) 2. At the Request of Governmental Bios or Grouts of Applicants. (Cont'd) c. Tho area to be undergeoundedi ineiudew bath @idea of s street for at least am block, and d. j►rraagements are made for the @ancucceat veeoesl of all electric and connuieation aerial distribution faoilitsee is the area. 3. At the -Request of Individual Applicants. Is circumstances other than tbose covered by 1. or 2. preeedUe, where autually agreed upon by the (Utility and an applicant, aerial facilities my he replaced with wAsw9round facilities, provided tho applicant re"atinq the Oa9s pays, is advance, a noarefumdable sum equal to the estimated cost of encstruction leas the estimated net salvage value of the replaced aerial faeflitiea.i 4. At Utility Initiative. The Utility may free time to time replace smzatiozza of its aerial facilities with underpound facilities at Utility expense for atrnetural design considerations or its operating caavaaiemes. 11M 1: Includes Tncame Tax gross -up asruemt. am lifted ilk Sebedvle (T1 Ca1.P.v.C. ifo. AZ.i.3.D. Continued AoWe Leeter NO. 1ee91a 04e+s1en no. Issued by n. a. Miner Reeulaeerr mea arOSIA t fate 14 led: Ott. 14. 1941 errant:e: im 0 1 1"Z seselutlon NO, E-3243 ** TOTAL PAW. 04 ** �1 MAY. 2000 . 60 r"I 01 COL. '�� kt�I-11 FR PS RJLARTQRY �•Attachmen►C Panic Nil SM Praaoisco, California riBf1i0i1lC A1� ZIOC N0. B02 P. 10/18 Boom=GL.p.wf.t:. d0. AZ. 9rd Revised Sheat 133 CUMIs ?ad Revised Sheet 133 2.1 WZU (Cont' dl 2.1.32 .itM NO. 32 - FACUM ES TO ON= RRRLi COr AMAG iii'!ii 8'A=IM teent'd! A. itElR.iwCOM on ANAL UM MMMM=M i'M=TM (Cont' dl 1. In Areas Affeated 8y Gaberal Public Interest (Coat'd) a. upon request of the gowerniwg body the Utility will pay for the installation of so sore than 100 teat a9 each cestower's underground service commotion facility occasioned by the lmdargeouUding. The govesnUV Andy say establish a smaller footage allowance or may limit the esoust at coney to be expanded aw a "is custeser's service, or the total ascent to be expended an conswsier services is a particular project. xbe Utility will per for the iwstailatios of each eustoner'S uadergroand service casneation facility at the tin Aad Only to the extent that the electric utility pays far the custoner's vadeeglound electric service lateral. d. The Utility will replace its aerial facilities at the time and only to the extent that the andmad electric distribution facilities are replaced. Z. At the Magnet of Cloven ental Agemies or Groups of Applfcawsts. In cireusetencts other thaw those revered by 1. preceding, the Utility will replace its aerial facilities located in a specified arse with underground facilities aloe; pgblic streets and colds and oft public lands and private property aeroes whish rights -of -ley satssfwt*cy to the Utility bees been oft/nod. or say he obtained without cost or eendasoation, by the Utility Woe request by a responsible party rsprssentiaq a governoent4i agency or grasp of applicants there all of the follwing aamditions an mat: a. All property owners cowed by the aerial facilities to be replaced within a specific area designated by the gvvenowntal sgeecy or On" of applicants first ogres in writing or are required by notable legislation to pay the cost at to provide and to transfer erserakig to the Utility of the un""roued a VVertim Structure alW the puhlie ray and other Utility rights-of-way is the areal, and b. All property owners in the area are required by ecdivance or other legislation, er all agree in writing, to provide and saielaia the uadergsound Supporting etnwture on their property, AN sora is, teoiva s rye Sar 4Ross-up asawsl. as listed In schedule csf Cal.P.U.C. On. Aa.1.3.n. Continued Advice LRew:er Ne. 1098e 9"11100 rte. tame by w. 0. Wiler sasulatary Vice Fmide t ftr.e {vitae: act. 24. 1"1 e11.ee+v.e im 0 t 1991 Usalaelan ne. E-7243 MAY. 9M2�0 at kVW 2A�,10 FR PS REGULRR70RY Attachment G 094GWIHo.602 r-ep.11.18 Pacific all CAL.F.U.C. No. A.Z. SM FMCiaea, Caaiifar7 U ].et Rtvised Shoot 132 in Live of Crigiml Most 1.32 Rejected 2.1 X= (Cost Id) 2.1.32 sm NO. 32 - >IACZI.iTM 20 PROW= ifim%Acmb (W AzraAL. Wm A. f ixmm Cr AM= Wm tA1DENipO= TACXLrr BS 1. In Areas Affected 1q General Public Iaterset. The Utility will, at its expense, replace its mdating atrial facilities with useeeground facilities along public streets and made and an public �. lands and private property across which satisfactory to elle Utility have been obtained or my be obtained without cost or condaeaatien, by the utility, provided that the gaming body of the city or county in which such facilities are located has; a. betsmined after consultation with the Utility cad after holdiag public hearings an the subject. that uWergmam fag is in the general public Interest in a specified area for ane or wore of the following reasons., (1) Ouch uadergromdiW will avoid or slWnate ala udttsually heavy concentration of aerial facilities: (Z) Said street. or road or right -of -may is AA an arae eztennively wed by l` the general public end carries a heat'► undone of pedestitiatt or vehicular traffic; (3) said attest, road or right -of -ear adjoimt or paetee thwough a civic area or public recreation area or an area of tmAmal sasaie Internet to the general public. b. ~ad an ordinance creating an undergevinld distttriet in t)le area requiring, a>zg other things: (1) That all existing and future electric ad mwounication distribatiom facilities will be placed 1mMrgv=md, and (Z) !flet eeeh property a er will provide and smintain the tmdargrousd supporting structure needed on their property to futuish aerw1CS to then free the makrgrarmd facilities of the utility .rhea svah an available, except as provided in 71.)-e follabdag- /� t;oalrinu�ed Adv14t L4tler 0. 14M issued by Deet Flied: Mar. s. 1046 Det4S10h ND. Mt4rt a. conn Erfeotiwa: Aor. is. in$ emimtlre Director - Stott ftulatmv e!lalutlee No. T10914 MAY. 3.2000 6:42AM CITY COUNCIL KEITH LAND, Mayor STEPHEN I MANN Mayor Pro Tempore SUSAN HITCHCOCK ALAN $• NAKANISHI PHILLIP A. PENNINO CITY OF'LODI CITY HALL. 221 WEST PINE STREET P.O. BOX 3006 LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241.1910 (209)333-6706 .� FAX (209) 333.6710 January 22, 1999 Pacific Bell Attn: Public Works Coordinator 2300 East Bight Mlle Road Stockton, CA 95210 SUBJECT: South Stockton Street Improvements At.O R& D P.12118 H. DIXON FLYNN. CityManager ALICE M. REIMCHE City Clerk RANDALL A. HAYS City Attorney Enclosed Is a set of preliminary plans for the above project. Please mark and/or verify your utility locations on the enclosed plans and return them to the Public Works Department at your earliest convenience. Based on a field review, it is evident that this project will require you to relocate a number of poles along file east side of Stockton Street. Since construction of this project is planned for early spring of 1999, scheduling of the relocation work should done as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please contact me at 333-6759. Ai.� Richard C. Prima, Jr. Public Works Director Enclosure SOUTH STOCKTON STREET PROJECT -DOC MRY. 3.2000 6.42AM N0.802 P.13/18 Attachment E RIM of Wap 23M East Eig1R Mile Rad Stadw, Uifomia 95210 March 26, 1999 on Richard C. Prima, Jr, Public Works Director City of Lodi P. O. Box 3006 Lodi, CA 95241-1910 Dear Mr, Prima: PACIFIC BELL^ A PacifcTeloala company Pacific Bell is working to accommodate the relocation of thcilities on South Stockton Street and Almond Drive. However, before we can proceed with constnxtion of the job, the issue of billing needs to be addressed, Upon review of the plans for Colvin Ranch, and the conditions placed on that development, it is clear teat the street improvements are a result of this project. Pursuant to California Public Utilities Commission Decision No. 88398, any utility relocation costs resulting from development of private property are to be paid by the developer. I am aware that the City has made special arrangements with the Developer. In this instance it is between you to decide who is responsible for payment of our relocation. Once this decision has been made, please inform me so we can proceed with W8. If you have any questions, please call me on 209-4744130. Sincerely, toriWagner Public Works Coordinator cc: A. Rodriguez MAY. 3.2000 6:43AM CITY COUNCIL KEITH LAND, Mayor STEPHEN 1. MANN Mayor Pro Tempore SUSAN HITCHCOCK ALAN S. NAKANISHI PHILLIPA. PENNINO CITY OFLOD1 CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET P.O. BOX 3006 LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910 (209)333-6706 FAX(209)331-6710 August 6, 1999 Abe Rodrktuez, Engineer Pacific BAIL 2300 Eight Mile Road Stockton, Callibmis 95210 Jim Holt, Construction Supervisor Media One 6505 Tam O'Shenter Stockton. California 95210 SUBJECT: Colvin Ranch Development Relocation of Facilities N0.802 P.14/18 « r... ImIMT F H. DixoN FLYNN . City Manager ALICE M. REIMCHE City Clerk RANDALL A. HAYS City Attorney Due to4he ongoing controversy over the re10cetion of overhead Wanes on 81001011 Street and Almond Drive atlecent to the Colvin Ranch subdivision, we wish to elettfy the City's position regarding this matter. There 1 to be a publicly maintained landscape area between the back of sidewalk and the reverse frontage fence on the east side of Stockton Street and south aloe of Almond Drive fronting this project. There are to be no poles in the landnWe arae or in the sidewsilk adjacent to the landscape area. If new poles are desired, they must be inswo an the west side of Stockton Street and the north side of Almond Drive. If you have any questions, please contact me at (209) 333-6759. Mai fthard C. Prima, Jr- Public rPublic Works Director RCP/SAW cc: Senior Civil Engineer Fujitani Senior Civil Engineer Welch Electric Services Manager Tokey Development, Inc. R. Thomas Development, Inc. Job He. E v 1171 splaw Nota: �dt�jv Dom'•` m 6 Q9' 0 Date Conalructim Owdiball" Cmd See Reverse drr dM..%. r.,...,oet.._ G 1 S. r11 ,Attachment Authoriadian for Joint Unda2fa nd Construction . Py. � o/ 1 seJA 17w�,wO,rdw No_ a/t+e+, D len Oiurla ARC Date Revision No, tyddon pate i2 in 171 121 131.J-7-99 171 l31 CO ob leesthm Appllaent Name & Address from No. "49 .4 r 161 151 �+ Va C&NJM v To Tsadt ❑ Applielnt Ys Trench ❑ Osher Agenev Teatatiee Tldfwh Date a-8, To Trench (it 1 Ttwwb Cent Oetalt 191 Occlas"larRorwApectiva Shan 01 Total Cshts N Teencfi b 11 UehCatiAddlthip Colnpanv Ges Elect- CATV Other Lmeth Gond. Sire 1 Unit Cost TrWWA Cost Job He. E v 1171 splaw Nota: �dt�jv Dom'•` m 6 Q9' 0 Date Conalructim Owdiball" Cmd See Reverse drr MRY. 3.2000 6:43AM -w MSMORANDUM, Gey of Lodi, Public Wwb Department TO. Community Dovalopoce Director FROM: Public Wotb Director DATE: April 13, 1992 SURISCT:. Aecommaadod Voting Teahlive Map Conditions for Calvin Run& 3820 Almond Drive. Lodi, Cdiforoia Fila Moot N0.802 P.16/18 Attachment 11 RECEIVED APR ? a 1992 The fotlowiaa conditions of approval are requited for the and ax props per City *odes ad dimiltuda. all to be soeornpWbed pricy to, or concurrent with, GW map filing adds noted oWerwise: Bagtneectng ad pnp=d t of improveoM plum rod mlimse per City Public hV ovemmt DesW Snmdecde for all public impi ovements prior to Aad map fiUng• place to include: • Approved MM" map, signed by the Comoua ft Development Direetor. Detailed atility master pbra hoe all phases of the dwelpmest: Soils report Grading, drainage cad erasion control pian. 2. 01 11 of walla. xpeic systems and tmdergivad senna in cosbun ee wilt apphtabie City and Coaaq nprt meats sad ccdcA prim to approval of publi4 Wwmvaasnt plans. 3. lmdsllatim of all public utilities and street, improvements witbtn the limit of the soap, includng mostlation of conduit from the water metre box to the electric meter locum as each lot. per Public Wo& Departmmt rsquiwww, plea do knowing •o"ra• impromaco a • Curb, gutter and clyses paving along Almond Drive. to of Lot 60 (approda vely 310 feet). All public improvements to be m@Wled witbin one year of Sol soap Ming ander the term. of aur improvament agreement to be approved by the City CooucA prior to fieri map filing. 4. Depart and installation of public WVWVemm % to be in accordance with City Mauer pfms. Note drat the developer nay be eligible for r6mburaemnot from atba for bs tmet of certain tmpiwma eta (cart, pow and street paving oe Almond Drive, sant of Lot 60). 1t is the developer's respoea'bility to mgamt wimbanremsnc and submit the approprio kimmM m par *a Lodi b(micipal Code }16.40. S. Dexlicatim of areae righaof-way as Showa on the eeatative wap. 6. Dedication of public WHO easements me required by eta varieas all ty eotups" ad the City of Lodi, A aide yard easement may also be required on ata of the Iota along Stockton Susee hr a W&W Oda. Additional width should be added to one of the foes to wwmmW m dm aide yard weemeult. Thu minimum amemset width is 8 feet, mcaw wd from the property Wee. 7. Submit final map per City ad Cotmty reoremects including the following: • Waiver of axes rights alma: Stockton Street ad Almond Drive. MA4J I -MC MAY. 3.2006 6:43AM NAnwrunent ft 17i16 Receded Vemg Tmntative Mop Condit w for Colvin Rat. 3620 Almot►.. Drive. Lodi. Calibruin, R6 /919001 AprO 13. 1992 Page 2 S. Payment of the following: • Filing std proetwieg fern old ehmrses for aorvieta pmfotnssd by City boor per the Public Worlds he and Service Ca ergo Sdwdule; DeveloinoW Wpm M099M Fen per dk Public Waits Fee ad Serviar Charge .Schedule m due time of asap films (fess for Polies► Fine. Pub and Roantadon cod Caede it Cky Facilidw may be defmred until accaptmooc of public itopeovemema): • Wastsweter coonoedoa he at building permit i en see, • Raissb ueament fees per ailing asmemems (te)r 1) SSW $14.002F on Ahmed Drive Z) 60302 $14.M U on A1mo44 Drive 3) 78W06 $5.669Y an Seockhm Street 4) 77301 S6.1042 as Stoalaon Serest The above fees ate abject to periodic adjustment as provided by due impiemndipff oediamneeheaolatia. The fee abargad will be that is effect at the time of final torp mpprovol. 9. obtain the following permits: • San Joaquin Coeaty wellis "e. abaodromant permit; F'mmlly, the Public Wodv Dsp asuest has the following commeb about the project clot on phumS Commiaion may silk to 00sadar. The dear mod ownership of do fauces along Sbdwa Suvet sad Ahaond Drive ban awe bean determined. Pelades covaeraiog ownership and maiooeoroce of fmcmw along mverse fromemp lots aro cutready beans developed by City off. Tbea policies will be punted is dye City Couscil for aeticn is the very near reture ownership mad no a ftw of the paepaed S'suaee along 3tocbm Street and Ale" Drive should be requuod to cosform to the policies oar sdopW by rho City Council. Unless otherwise detetmiad by We City Council, the how will be privately owned and taah mined. JLRlSAWAm CC. Asaociats Qvil Bogieew Colvin Ranch. Atm: Ron Thomas Barrmbmeh - Pima IAW MAY. 3.2000 6:44AM CITY COUNCIL TACK A. SIECLOCK. cavo, STEPHEN I, MANN Mavor•pro Tempere RAY C. DAVENPORT PHILLIP A. PENNINO 10HN R. (Randvi SNIDER NO.e02 P.is•le Attachment I CITY OF LODI CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET P 0 BOX 3006 LOOT, CALIFORNIA 95231.1910 (?091 534.5634 Vvs , am I i i.brS August 10, 1994 c4 tws Mr, Ronald 8. Thomas CIO Colvin Ranch, a California General partnership P. 0. Box 1598 Lodi, California 95241-1598 SUBJECT; Colvin Ranch Almond Drive Street Improvements mows jk. PETERSoN CIN Xmmw JENNIFER M. PERRIN Citv Clot ROf1 MCNATT City Attam" &' -1� 30I1M R -'o ? - 3/II Iq Improvement plans for Almond Drive have been submitted in coniunction with the Lodi Estates subdivision tying north of Almond Drive and opposite the Colvin Ranch project The Lodi Estates project well include the Construction of all required street improvementg on the north side of Almond Orive. In order to provide adequate tr" lanes, it will also be necessary to widen the south side of Almond Drive four feet In addition, utility studs will be installed to service ft Colvin Ranch development, The purpose of this letter is to requeat that you consider dedicating right -at -way and installing the Almond Drive street improvements for Calvin Ranch in conjunction with the Lodi Estates subdivision. The plats for this work were submitted for fast plan check some time ago and have been returned to the engineer, 8aumbach & No= If the street improvements on the south half of Almond Drive aro not constructed at this time, the City will pay for the abovementioned widening and utility stubs and prepare a reimbursement agreement to the City for this work (Lodi Municipal Code 16,40). The reimbursement amount will include construction costs plus ten percent for administrative and engineering costs and will be recalculated annually to include an amount attributable to interest using the Engineering News Record 20 des Constriction Cost Index. The reimbursement will have to be paid at the time of development of the Colvin Rands subdivision, Please contact me at (209) 333.6706 to discuss this matter at your earliest convenience. Richard C. Prim S. Jr. City Engineer RCP/SAW cc: Assoelats CIvII Entaser Seumbach 3 Pi=o er ntlP.00r 60n1 rHoMRs_ 3 34-.WZ1