Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Report - December 20, 2017 G-01 PH
CITY OF LODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION AGENDA ITEM TM AGENDA TITLE: Public Hearing for December 20, 2017, to Consider and Approve the 2016 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice and the 2016 ADA Transition Plan MEETING DATE: December 20, 2017 PREPARED BY: Community Development Director RECOMMENDED ACTION BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Public hearing for December 20, 2017, to consider and approve the 2016 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice and the 2016 ADA Transition Plan. A public hearing is required as part of the federal requirements of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 2016 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (Al) The City of Lodi is required to conduct an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (Al) as a grant recipient of HUD's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. In preparation of this Al, the City has analyzed factors that may impede fair housing choice, and identified a plan to overcome the impediments. Fair housing choice means each person has equal access to housing regardless of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, familial status, disability, marital status, ancestry, source of income, sexual orientation, and "any arbitrary factor" as protected under other state laws. 2016 ADA Transition Plan The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), adopted in 1990, is a comprehensive piece of federal legislation that prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities and guarantees them the same opportunities as everyone else to participate in the mainstream of American life, including the right to enjoy employment opportunities, to purchases goods and services, and to participate in state and local government programs, services, and activities. Additionally, the ADA adopts a general prohibition against discrimination as established under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. This federal law applies to employers and organizations that receive financial assistance from any federal department or agency, including the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Federal Transportation Administration (FTA). The ADA extends Section 504 to apply to all activities of the local and state governments regardless of having received federal funds. The City of Lodi's 2016 ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan (2016 ADA Transition Plan) is a two- part plan. First, it identifies and evaluates the City's programs, activities and services for whether they are inconsistent with the requirements of ADA. The second part of the plan identifies physical barriers to accessibility and the methods to be used to remove those barriers. APPROVED: e: en Sch mer, City Manager ADA Transition Plan and Al Page 2 of 2 This plan covers a fifteen year period from 2016 to 2031, and may be periodically updated by the City. Under the requirements of the plan, the City has identified the Public Works director as Section 504 coordinator and has established as grievance procedure online where residents can file a request for accommodation or grievance. Public Comment The public review and comment period for this Al and 2016 ADA Transition plan begins November 20, 2017 and ends December 20, 2017. A presentation on both documents and an opportunity for public comments and questions will be provided at the City Council shirtsleeve session held on December 5, 2017. The December 20th public hearing will provide an additional opportunity for the public to comment on these two plans. The City Council will consider public comment, approval, and adoption of both the Al and 2016 ADA Transition Plan at the December 20th City Council public hearing. Both meeting are publicly noticed. More details on these two documents will be provided in the presentations given for the December 20th public hearing. FISCAL IMPACT: Al - Not applicable. The Al contains recommend actions; however, those do not have specific outcomes or dates; and therefore no specific costs are outlined at this time. ADA Transition Plan — Not Applicable The ADA Transition Plan contains recommended actions with specific outcomes and timelines for 1) modifying City policies, practices and procedures to improve accessibility; and 2) the removal of physical barriers. For item 1), the City Section 504 Coordinator and delegated staff will coordinate implementation of the plan among departments, training staff, track and report on progress of the plan, and respond to grievances. Staff will also work on modifying policies, practices, or procedures and respond to requests for accommodations. This will be covered by existing staff and contract staff. For item 2), the City estimates approximately ten million in costs over a 15 year plan period. Because no contracts have been entered into for these improvements, there is no fiscal impact. FUNDING AVAILABLE: Not Applicable. Ste: `" wab Community Development Director SS/PC/kjc City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN DRAFT CITY OF LODI 2016 AMERICAN'S WITH DISABILITY ACT SELF-EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN Cover Page 2016 ADA Transition Plan Public Draft completed November 16, 2017 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN This page intentionally left blank City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Table of Contents SECTION 1— INTRODUCTION 1 Executive Summary ....1 Legislative Mandate ...2 ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan Requirements and Process 3 Discrimination and Accessibility 3 Undue Burden 4 Facility Survey 4 Self -Evaluation 5 Public Outreach 6 SECTION 2 — POLICIES AND PROGRAMMATIC ACCESSIBITY FINDINGS AND ACTIONS 6 Introduction 6 Programmatic Modifications 7 Findings and Recommended Actions — Citywide Programs, Activities, and Services 7 Accessible/Adaptive Equipment 8 Self -Evaluation Findings 8 Recommended Actions 8 Customer Service 8 Self -Evaluation Findings 8 Recommended Actions 8 Notice Requirements .9 Self -Evaluation Findings 10 Recommended Actions 10 Printed Information .11 Self -Evaluation Findings 11 Recommended Actions 11 Televised and Audiovisual Public Information 12 Self -Evaluation Findings 12 Recommended Actions 12 Website — City and Departmental Websites 12 Self -Evaluation Findings 12 Recommended Actions 13 Public Telephones and Communication Devices 13 Self -Evaluation Findings 13 Recommended Actions 13 Training and Staffing 14 Self -Evaluation Findings 14 Recommended Actions 14 Program Eligibility and Admission 15 Self -Evaluation Findings 15 Recommended Actions 15 Public Meetings 15 Self -Evaluation Findings 15 Recommended Actions 15 Transportation Services 16 i City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Self -Evaluation Findings 16 Recommended Actions 16 Use of Consultants for Delivering Program Services 17 Self -Evaluation Findings 17 Emergency Evacuation Procedures 17 Self -Evaluation Findings 17 Recommended Actions 17 Facilities 18 Self -Evaluation Findings 18 Recommended Actions 18 Special Events on Public Properties 18 Self -Evaluation Findings 18 Recommended Actions 18 Department Reports ....18 Administration — City Manager, City Attorney, City Clerk, and Economic Development 19 Description of Programs and Services 19 Customer Service .19 Printed Information 19 Website 19 Public Telephones and Communication Devices 20 Training and Staffing 20 Public Meetings ....20 Tours and Trips 20 Facilities 20 Community Development Department 20 Description of Programs and Services 20 Customer Service . 21 Printed Information 21 Website 21 Public Telephones and Communication Devices 21 Training and Staffing 21 Public Meetings ....21 Tours and Trips 21 Facilities 21 Electric Utility Department 22 Description of Programs and Services 22 Customer Service . 22 Printed Information 22 Website 22 Training and Staffing 22 Program Eligibility Requirements and Admission 22 Public Meetings ....22 Facilities 22 Fire Department 22 Description of Programs and Services 22 ii City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Customer Service .23 Printed Information 23 Television and Audiovisual Public Information 23 Website 23 Training and Staffing 23 Program Eligibility Requirements and Admission 23 Public Meetings ....23 Facilities 23 Internal Services Department — Finance Division 23 Description of Programs and Services 23 Customer Service .24 Printed Information 24 Audiovisual Public Information 24 Website 24 Public Telephones and Communication Devices 24 Training and Staffing 24 Program Eligibility Requirements and Admission 24 Public Meetings ....24 Facilities 24 Internal Services Department — Human Resources Division 24 Description of Programs and Services 24 Customer Service .25 Notice Requirements 25 Printed Information 25 Website 25 Public Telephones and Communication Devices 25 Training and Staffing 25 Public Meetings ....26 Transportation Services 26 Tours and Trips 26 Facilities 26 Internal Services Department — Information Technology 26 Description of Programs and Services 26 Customer Service .26 Notice Requirements 26 Television and Audiovisual Public Information 27 Training and Staffing 27 Police Department ...29 Description of Programs and Services 29 Customer Service .29 Printed Information 30 Website 30 Public Telephones and Communication Devices 30 Training and Staffing 30 Public Meetings ....30 iii City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Public Transportation 30 Special Events and Private Events on Public Properties 30 Facilities 30 Public Works 30 Customer Service .31 Notice Requirements 32 Printed Information 32 Website 32 Public Telephones and Communication Devices 32 Public Meetings ....32 Television and Audiovisual Public Information 32 Training and Staffing 32 Transportation Services 32 Facilities 32 Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services (PRCS) Department 27 Description of Programs and Services 27 Accessible/Adaptive Equipment 27 Customer Service .27 Notice Requirements 27 Printed Information 27 Television and Audiovisual Public Information 28 Website 28 Public Telephones and Communication Devices 28 Training and Staffing 28 Public Meetings ....28 Transportation Services 28 Special Events and Private Events on Public Properties 28 Facilities 28 3.0 ADA Transition Plan 33 3.2 Pedestrian Rights -of -Way (PROW) 40 4.0 ADA Policy and Complaint Procedure 43 5.0 Definitions 44 5.1 Auxiliary Aids and Services 45 5.2 Complaint 45 5.3 Disability 45 5.4 Discrimination on the Basis of Disability 45 5.5 Having a Record of Impairment 46 5.6 Physical or Mental Impairments 46 5.7 Qualified Individual with a Disability 46 5.8 Reasonable Program Modifications 46 5.9 Regarded as Having a Disability 47 5.10 Substantial Limitations of Major Life Activities 47 5.11 Undue Burden .48 iv City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 6.0 Program Accessibility Guidelines, Standards & Resources 48 6.1 Introduction 48 6.2 Federal Accessibility Standards and Regulations 48 6.3 Title II: US Department of Justice Publications 50 6.4 State of California Accessibility Standards and Regulations 52 Appendices 61 v City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN SECTION 1— INTRODUCTION Executive Summary The City's American's With Disability Act Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan (ADA Transition Plan or Plan) is being prepared to partially fulfill the requirements set forth in Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The ADA states that a public entity must reasonably modify its policies, practices, or procedures to avoid discrimination against people with disabilities. This report will assist the City of Lodi to identify policy, program, and physical barriers to accessibility and to develop barrier removal solutions that will facilitate the opportunity of access for all individuals. The City of Lodi has a long history of providing accessible services to the community. Accessible pedestrian improvements, accessible building renovations, and the inclusive delivery of services have been accomplished with consideration of the needs of people with disabilities. Maintenance of existing accessible features has been and will continue to be a priority in City of Lodi facilities. Title II of the ADA emphasizes the accessibility of programs, activities, and services. This Plan addresses these issues by providing recommendations for action steps based on a comprehensive review of current practices, including ADA Self -Evaluation Surveys that were completed by City staff regarding the delivery of services to the public. This process included every office, department, and division that provides services to the public. When it is not feasible to provide accessible City programs, activities, and services by relocating these activities to accessible facilities or providing auxiliary aids and services, the ADA requires that the City complete a transition plan describing the physical modifications to facilities that will support accessible programs. The City's Transition Plan described further in Section 3 and Appendix C is the result of a detailed evaluation of all City of Lodi municipal facilities where programs, activities, and services are available to the public. Municipal facilities include City buildings, parks, public parking lots, and City owned and managed facilities operated by private entities. Facilities that are not addressed in this ADA Title II plan include private businesses and offices, private schools, county, state, or federal facilities, places of worship, or private clubs. The facility evaluations were conducted using the ADA 2010 Standards and the California Building Code. The resulting facility reports for City buildings, parks, and other facilities are contained in the appendices to this report. Each facility report lists potential barriers, provides information about the relevant state and federal codes, includes a planning level cost estimate to remove the barrier, and indicates a barrier removal priority. The Transition Plan (Section 3) is intended to provide a framework for the continuous improvement of City facilities for people with disabilities. Barriers in City facilities will be removed systematically, citywide, based on established program priorities. It is the intent of the City of Lodi to address and remove barriers to accessibility in public buildings and parks based upon on the immediate necessity of programmatic access, degree of complexity, and overall cost. 1 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN A table contained in Section 3 describes the schedule for barrier removal in public facilities owned by the City of Lodi. This preliminary schedule represents a 15 -year plan (2016 to 2031) for barrier removal and has a total estimated cost of $10.3 million. It is the City's intent to review all barriers during the first year of the implementation of this plan and address those barriers that can be resolved through programmatic modifications. Many of the potential barriers identified are associated with facilities that currently have accessibility features which serve people with disabilities, such as designated parking, accessible restrooms, access ramps, accessible door hardware, and other code -compliant and usable features. A public meeting was held on October 15, 2014, before the Lodi City Council to outline new policies and procedures that were being enacted, including the re-establishment of the City ADA Committee and the designation of the Neighborhood Services Manager as the citywide ADA/Section 504 Coordinator. A new citywide ADA/Section 504 Coordinator has since been reassigned in the fall of 2017 to the Public Works Director. The ADA/Section 504 Coordinator is responsible for coordinating the efforts of the City to comply with Title II and for investigating any complaints that the City has violated Title II of the ADA. The ADA/Section 504 Coordinator is also responsible for coordinating the City's efforts to comply with Title 24 and all other applicable state and federal physical and program accessibility requirements. Legislative Mandate The American with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a comprehensive civil rights law for persons with disabilities in both employment and the provision of goods and services. The ADA states that its purpose is to provide a "clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities." Congress emphasized that the ADA seeks to dispel stereotypes and assumptions about disabilities and to assure equality of opportunity, full participation, independent living, and economic self-sufficiency for people with disabilities. The development of a transition plan is a requirement of the federal regulations implementing the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which requires that all organizations receiving federal funds make their programs available without discrimination toward people with disabilities. The act, which has become known as the "civil rights act" of persons with disabilities, states: No otherwise qualified handicapped individual in the United States shall, solely by reason of handicap, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. (Section 504) Subsequent to the enactment of the Rehabilitation Act, Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Act on July 26, 1990. Title II of the ADA covers the programs, activities, and services of public entities. The Department of Justice's Title II regulation adopts the general prohibitions of discrimination established under Section 504 and incorporates specific prohibitions of discrimination for the ADA. Title II provides protections to individuals with disabilities that are at least equal to those provided by the nondiscrimination provisions of Title V of the Rehabilitation Act. Specifically, the City may not, either directly or through contractual arrangements, do any of the following: • Deny persons with disabilities the opportunity to participate as members of advisory boards and commissions. 2 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN • Deny persons with disabilities the opportunity to participate in services, programs, or activities that are not separate or different from those offered to others, even if the City offers permissibly separate or different activities. • In determining the location of facilities, make selections that have the effect of excluding or discriminating against persons with disabilities. Title II of the ADA provides that public entities must identify and evaluate all programs, activities, and services and review all policies, practices, and procedures that govern administration of the entity's programs, activities, and services. This report, and certain documents incorporated by reference, establishes the City's ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan (ADA Transition Plan or Plan). ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan Requirements and Process The self-evaluation is the City's assessment of its current policies, practices, and procedures. It identifies and makes recommendations to correct those policies and practices that are inconsistent with Title II requirements. As part of the self-evaluation, the City: • Identified the City's programs, activities, and services; and • Reviewed the policies, practices, and procedures that govern the administration of the City's programs, activities, and services. The ADA sets forth specific requirements for preparation of an acceptable Transition Plan. This plan includes: • A list of the physical barriers in the City's facilities that limit the accessibility of its programs, activities, or services to individuals with disabilities; • A detailed outline of the methods to be used to remove these barriers and make the facilities accessible; • Planning -level cost estimates for their removal; • A schedule for taking the steps necessary to achieve compliance with the ADA, Title II; and • The name of the individual responsible for the plan's implementation. Discrimination and Accessibility There are two kinds of accessibility: • Program accessibility • Physical accessibility Absence of discrimination requires that both types of accessibility be provided. Program accessibility includes physical accessibility, but also entails all of the policies, practices, and procedures that permit people with disabilities to participate in programs and to access important information. Physical accessibility requires that a facility be barrier -free. Barriers include any obstacles that prevent or restrict 3 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN the entrance to or use of a facility. Program accessibility requires that individuals with disabilities be provided an equally effective opportunity to participate in or benefit from a public entity's programs and services. Program accessibility may be achieved by either structural or nonstructural methods. Nonstructural methods include acquisition or redesign of equipment, assignment of aides to beneficiaries, and provision of services at alternate sites. Programs offered by the City to the public must be accessible. Accessibility includes advertisement, orientation, eligibility, participation, testing or evaluation, physical access, provision of auxiliary aids, transportation, policies, and communication. The City may achieve program accessibility through a number of methods: • Structural methods such as altering an existing facility; • Acquisition or redesign of equipment; • Assignment of aides; and • Providing services at alternate accessible sites. When choosing a method of providing program access, the City will give priority to the method that results in the most integrated setting appropriate to encourage interaction among all users, including individuals with disabilities. In compliance with the requirements of the ADA, the City must provide equality of opportunity. Undue Burden The City is not required to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of its program or activity, would create a hazardous condition resulting in a direct threat to the participant or others, or would represent an undue financial and administrative burden. The determination that an undue burden would result must be based on an evaluation of all resources available for use in the City. For example, if a barrier removal action is judged unduly burdensome, the City must consider other options for providing access to the benefits and services of the program or activity by individuals with disabilities. Facility Survey From 2014 through 2017, the City engaged in a physical audit of facilities to identify facility barriers and identify recommendations and alterations in order to meet state and federal accessibility standards. The list of facilities surveyed included: • City -owned parks • City -owned buildings • City -owned parking lots • City -owned public rights-of-way adjacent to City -owned facilities and schools 4 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Self -Evaluation In 2014, the City of Lodi evaluated its policies, programs, and procedures to determine current levels of service and the extent to which its policies and programs created barriers to accessibility for persons with disabilities. An ADA Self -Evaluation Survey was distributed to program managers in all departments requesting information on the nature of the program, the forms and methods used to advertise the program's services and activities, a profile of current participants, the types of equipment and materials used, testing and entrance requirements, the level of staff training, and any special modifications provided. The surveys were distributed to the following departments: • Administration — City Manager, City Attorney, and City Clerk • Community Development Department — Building, Planning, and Neighborhood Services • Electric Utility Department— Customer Services, Public Benefits, and Field Services • Fire Department • Internal Services Department— Finance, Human Resources, and Information Services • Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services —Parks/Facilities, Recreation, and Hutchins Street Square • Police Department — Records/Customer Services • Public Works Department — Administration/Engineering, Transit, and Municipal Utilities Information provided in the completed ADA surveys and follow-up meetings with City staff revealed that the City's existing policies, programs, and procedures may present barriers to accessibility for people with disabilities. It is the City's intent to address the programmatic accessibility barriers in the following areas: Customer Service — Policies and practices that ensure individuals with disabilities can participate in the programs, activities, and services provided by the City. Outreach and Information — Notices, printed information, televised and audiovisual information, the City website, public telephones, and communication devices. Training and Staffing — The current level of training and experience of City staff with policies and procedures regarding the provision of services to individuals with disabilities. Programs and Activities — Program eligibility and admission, public meetings, tours and trips, transportation services, the use of consultants or contractors to provide City services, emergency evacuation procedures, special events and private events on City properties, maintenance of accessible programs, and ongoing accessibility improvements. Accessible/Adaptive Equipment — The use of automated electronic equipment and auxiliary aids to assist individuals with disabilities to participate in City programs. 5 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Public Outreach In November and December of 2016, the draft ADA Transition Plan was introduced to the general public through a number of local committee meetings, including the City ADA Committee, the ADA Citizen Advisory Panel, and the Lodi Improvement Committee, for review and comment. • ADA Coordinating Committee Meeting —July 23, 2014 • ADA Coordinating Committee Meeting — August 27, 2014 • ADA Committee and Citizen Advisory Panel — Public Meeting — September 24, 2014 • ADA Committee and Citizen Advisory Panel Public Meeting — January 14, 2015 • ADA Coordinating Committee Meeting — February 12, 2015 • ADA Coordinating Committee Meeting — March 12, 2015 • ADA Committee and Citizen Advisory Panel Public Meeting — May 27, 2015 • ADA Coordinating Committee Meeting —June 11, 2015 • ADA Committee and Citizen Advisory Panel — Public Meeting — September 1, 2015 • ADA Coordinating Committee Meeting — October 8, 2015 During November and December of 2017, the final draft ADA Transition Plan will be posted online and at City Hall for a 30 -day public comment period. The City ADA Committee, ADA Citizen Advisory Panel, and Lodi Improvement Committee will also review and comment on the final draft ADA Transition Plan. The City will hold a City Council shirt -sleeve meeting on November 28, 2017, for an in-depth review of the plan with Council. On December 20, 2017, a public meeting will be held for final comments and adoption of the ADA Transition Plan. Both meetings will be publicly noticed. The City received comments during the public outreach period; the comments are included in Appendix B. The City Council adopted the ADA Transition Plan on December 20, 2017. SECTION 2 — POLICIES AND PROGRAMMATIC ACCESSIBILITY FINDINGS AND ACTIONS Introduction Programs, activities, and services offered by the City of Lodi to the public must be accessible. Accessibility applies to all aspects of a program or service, including advertisement, orientation, eligibility, participation, testing or evaluation, physical access, provision of auxiliary aids, transportation, policies, and communication. This section details the review of current citywide policies, services, programs, and activities based on meetings with City staff and responses to the ADA Self -Evaluation from the following: • Administration — City Manager, City Attorney, and City Clerk • Community Development Department — Building, Planning, and Neighborhood Services • Electric Utility Department— Customer Services, Public Benefits, and Field Services 6 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN • Fire Department • Internal Services Department — Finance, Human Resources, and Information Services • Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services — Customer Services, Recreation, Parks/Facilities, and Hutchins Street Square • Police Department — Records/Customer Services • Public Works Department — Administration/Engineering, Transit, and Municipal Utilities The findings and recommendations in this section will serve as a basis for the implementation of specific improvements for providing access to City programs as required by law. Detailed department reports can be found in Section 2. Programmatic Modifications The ADA/Section 504 Coordinator will follow up with each department to review the recommendations contained in this Self -Evaluation Report. In those situations where a policy, program, or procedure creates a barrier to accessibility that is unique to a department or a certain program, the ADA/Section 504 Coordinator will coordinate with the department head or program manager to address the removal of the barrier in the most reasonable and accommodating manner in accordance with applicable law. Findings and Recommended Actions — Citywide Programs, Activities, and Services This section is organized into categories based on the requirements of Title II of the ADA. • Accessible/Adaptive Equipment • Customer Service • Notice Requirements • Printed Information • Televised and Audiovisual Public Information • Website • Public Telephones and Communication Devices • Training and Staffing • Program Eligibility and Admission • Public Meetings • Transportation Services • Tours and Trips • Use of Consultants for Delivering Program Services • Emergency Evacuation Procedures • Facilities • Special Events on Public Properties 7 City of Lodi - DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Accessible/Adaptive Equipment Adaptive aids are devices, controls, appliances, or items that make it possible for persons with disabilities to improve their ability to function independently and participate in programs, services, and activities offered by the City. Examples include a pen and a clipboard for a person with a hearing or speech impairment to write notes on, or accessible electronic equipment such as accessible computer stations. Self -Evaluation Findings One department reported allowing the public to use or access electronic equipment such as photocopiers and computers. Three departments reported providing adaptive aids and/or equipment. Recommended Actions 1. Provide standard equipment at each site where programs are administered to facilitate basic communications access using alternative formats. Equipment may include, but is not limited to, paper and pencil, an enlarging copy machine, and access to 711 relay service technology. By Jan. 1, 2020. 2. Collaborate with community organizations that serve people with disabilities to develop and maintain a current resource list of assistive technology equipment and sources. By Jan. 1, 2019. 3. Establish and maintain a "Resources Toolkit" of adaptive aids and human resources that should be available for use by individuals participating in City programs. Include information about the availability of specific equipment and/or individuals who are available to provide special services (e.g., American Sign Language [ASL] translation) in public information materials such as brochures and the City's website. By Jan. 1, 2019. 4. Include accessibility as a criterion for purchasing. Whenever possible, evaluate furniture and building materials purchases for compatibility with a wide range of disabilities and sensitivities. Select items that are easily adjustable or can be modified to accommodate a variety of physical and ergonomic needs when purchasing items such as furniture, site furnishings, and office systems. By Jan. 1, 2019. 5. Maintain accessible equipment already in place. By Jan. 1, 2019. Customer Service In-person interaction with the public is one of the primary functions of most City departments. Self -Evaluation Findings No department reported that it tracked accessibility requests; however, all departments reported that requests are received and responded to on an individual basis. No department reported charging an additional fee for modifying a program for a person with a disability. Few departments have a policy or procedure for making informal changes to standard operating procedures to accommodate people with disabilities. Recommended Actions 1. Continue to make appropriate modifications to regular practices to accommodate the needs of individuals with disabilities when providing customer service. By Jan. 1, 2019. 8 City of Lodi - DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2. Develop criteria for determining reasonable modifications to provide program accessibility, which may include acquisition or redesign of equipment, assignment of aides to persons with disabilities, and provision of services at alternative accessible sites. An approach should include: • Requests for reasonable modification in programs or services should be made to the department responsible for the program or service. By Jan. 1, 2019. • The department offering the program or service should meet with the individual with a disability to identify which aspects of the program limit participation and what modifications can be made. By Jan. 1, 2019. • The department offering the program or service should consult with the relevant program or service staff to determine the reasonable modification. The department offering the program or service may also consult with the City's ADA/Section 504 Coordinator or other resources providing services or information regarding persons with disabilities, as appropriate. By Jan. 1, 2019. • The department offering the program or service should document the modification(s) that was offered and the response of the person with the disability to the modification(s) offered. This documentation should be filed with the City ADA/Section 504 Coordinator's office. All accessibility requests should be tracked. The ADA requests should be analyzed periodically to look for global issues that can be addressed and problems than can be solved proactively. By Jan. 1, 2019. • If individuals with a disability are not satisfied with the results of this process, they should be directed to the City's ADA Grievance Procedure. By Jan. 1, 2019. 3. Assess the composition and needs of the population of people with disabilities. Take the necessary steps to improve communication and outreach to increase the effective participation of community members with disabilities in all City programs and activities. The ADA Citizen Advisory Panel will provide guidance and assistance with this action. By Jan. 1, 2020. 4. Create partnerships with organizations that provide services to people with disabilities to assist in communicating about accessible City programs. Keep programs up to date through increased community involvement and partnerships with organizations that offer services to persons with disabilities. By Jan. 1, 2019. 5. Publicize efforts to increase participation by persons with disabilities, which might include activities such as distributing program brochures to members of the disability community. By Jan. 1, 2019. 6. Continue the policy of not charging an additional fee for program modifications or alternative formats. By Jan. 1, 2019. Notice Requirements Title II regulations require the City to inform the public of the rights and protections provided by the ADA for access to public programs, services, and activities. 9 City of Lodi - DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Self -Evaluation Findings Most departments were unaware that the City has a nondiscrimination statement that includes persons with disabilities. Only one department reported posting a nondiscrimination statement in a location that maximizes public exposure. The nondiscrimination statement includes information about how to reach the City's ADA/Section 504 Coordinator. A few departments notify all persons that meetings, hearings, and conferences will be held in accessible locations and that adaptive aids such as assistive listening devices will be provided upon request to participants with disabilities. Nondiscrimination language is included on agendas. No department reported notifying all persons about how and with whom to file a disability complaint. Recommended Actions 1. Increase outreach to persons with disabilities and the organizations that serve them. The City should inform the public of the possible modifications that can be provided to make services, programs, and activities accessible. By Jan. 1, 2019. 2. Include the following or similar notice regarding the City's commitment to providing accessible services in all City publications that include information about City services, programs, or activities. The notice should also be placed in all City departments in a location that will maximize public exposure. By Jan. 1, 2019. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and California law, it is the policy of the City of Lodi to offer its public programs, services, and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to everyone, including individuals with disabilities. If you are a person with a disability and require information or materials in an appropriate alternative format, or if you require any other accommodation, please contact department staff. Advance notification within this guideline will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. The City ADA/Section 504 Coordinator can be reached at (209) 333-6706, pwdept@lodi.gov, or on-line at http://www.lodi.gov/accessibility.html:. More information is available at that web address as well. 3. Include nondiscrimination language on both hard copies and documents posted on the web. Include the following or similar notice regarding the City's nondiscrimination policy in all City publications that provide general information about City services, programs, or activities. By Jan. 1, 2019. POLICY ON NONDISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY In accordance with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504), the City of Lodi will neither discriminate against qualified individuals with disabilities on the basis of disability in its services, programs, or activities nor exclude or deny individuals with disabilities an equal opportunity to receive program benefits and services. 4. Ensure that the ADA/Section 504 Coordinator can communicate to the hearing impaired using the 711 California Relay Service. By Jan. 1, 2019. 10 City of Lodi - DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 5. Develop a statement regarding accessible locations and the availability of auxiliary aids upon request that is included on all public announcements, postings for City programs, and applications, including the following: • The notice of nondiscrimination. By Jan. 1, 2019. • Information regarding site accessibility, including the accessible bus route serving the program, facility, or event. By Jan. 1, 2019. • The 711 California Relay Service information, and the phone number and email address of the person who can provide assistance in meeting special needs. By Jan. 1, 2019. • A notice that information is available in alternative formats with 72 hours' notice. By Jan. 1, 2019. Printed Information In order to meet the ADA's communication standards, City departments must be able to provide information, when requested, in alternative formats such as using easy -to -understand language, Braille, large -print format, audiotape or CD, computer disk, or other formats as requested. Self -Evaluation Findings All departments provide printed information to the public. Some departments reported that they provided printed materials in alternative formats upon request. No departments reported including pictures of people with disabilities in their printed materials. A few departments reported that they provide materials in easy -to -understand language for people with learning disabilities. Recommended Actions 1. Provide information to each department on how to produce printed information in alternative formats for persons with various disabilities to ensure requests are handled in a uniform and consistent manner. By Jan. 1, 2019. 2. Publicize the City's commitment to provide program information in alternative formats on an individual basis as requested. By Jan. 1, 2019. 3. Ensure the uniformity of charges for a publication for all formats of that publication. By Jan. 1, 2019. 4. Include the following notice on all materials printed by the City that are made available to the public: This publication can be made available in alternative formats, such as Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer disk. Requests can be made by calling the ADA/Section 504 Coordinator at (209) 333-6707 (voice) or by using the 711 California Relay Service. Please allow 72 hours for your request to be processed. By Jan. 1, 2019. 5. Handle all requests for other alternative formats or lengthy documents on an individual basis, but track the requests for future reporting. By Jan. 1, 2019. 6. Provide program, facility, permit, and reservation information in a variety of formats upon request (for example, enlarged print format for persons with visual disabilities or in simple 11 City of Lodi - DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN language for persons with cognitive disabilities). Provide programmatic changes (e.g., staff assistance) upon request to assist in filling out forms or when alternative formats are unavailable or infeasible. By Jan. 1, 2019. 7. Produce meeting agendas and other public information distributed at meetings in alternative formats when requested. By Jan. 1, 2019. 8. When photos are in printed information, consider including photos of persons with disabilities. By Jan. 1, 2019. Televised and Audiovisual Public Information Televised and audiovisual information is a means for disseminating public information through presentations produced by City departments. All televised and audiovisual information must be accessible to persons with disabilities. As more and more communication is being done remotely via the rapidly changing Internet, it will be increasingly important that all communication tools maintain accessibly as technology changes. Self -Evaluation Findings Most departments that reported providing audiovisual and televised presentations do not furnish alternative formats upon request. No departments reported showing pictures of people with disabilities in their audiovisual presentations. Recommended Actions 1. Use closed captioning or other alternatives to audio presentations for City programs and for audiovisual presentations produced by the City (including videos, films, and City Council meetings) to ensure that persons with hearing impairments can benefit from the presentations. By Jan. 1, 2021. 2. When presenting PowerPoint presentations, read all slides and describe all graphics. This will allow the blind and visually impaired to fully understand the information being presented. By Jan. 1, 2020. 3. When including images in audiovisual information, consider including pictures of people with disabilities. By Jan. 1, 2019. Website — City and Departmental Websites Providing public access to City publications online is an effective means of reaching persons with disabilities. New accessibility standards for electronic and information technology covered by Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998 set forth the technical and functional performance criteria necessary for such technology to be accessible. Self -Evaluation Findings Most departments provide information about their programs on the City's website. However, no department reported including information about access for people with disabilities, such as locations of accessible parking and restrooms. No departments note that they verified their web pages as accessible 12 City of Lodi - DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN to people with visual impairments that use speaking browsers. Content is managed by various departments. Recommended Actions 1. Increase outreach to persons with disabilities by having the website include more information about the City's commitment to providing accessible services. By Jan. 1, 2019. 2. Publish the City's Policy of Nondiscrimination, including on the basis of disability, on the City's website. By Jan. 1, 2019. 3. Provide information regarding programs, facilities, permits, and reservations on the City's website in an accessible format. This information should be easily found by new web users. By Jan. 1, 2019. 4. Include the City's statement regarding accessible locations and the availability of auxiliary aids upon request on the website. By Jan. 1, 2019. 5. Continually improve the accessibility of web pages through the use of web accessibility analysis to meet and/or exceed Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act guidelines for accessibility of electronic information. Acquire the technological resources necessary to create accessible PDF and graphics files as described in ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) standards for electronic and information technology. By Jan. 1, 2019. 6. Assign one department the authority to provide standards and oversight for outside vendors who create pages and for departments that post their own documents. This action will support consistent and accessible web pages. Monitor web pages for continued compliance with accessible web page standards. By Jan. 1, 2019. 7. Train City staff members in creating accessible PDF and other electronic files for posting on City or departmental websites. By Jan. 1, 2019. 8. Use services that help web page authors create and maintain an accessible website by identifying and repairing barriers to access for individuals with disabilities. By Jan. 1, 2019. Public Telephones and Communication Devices Self -Evaluation Findings Few departments reported using the California Relay Service, or 711, to communicate with people with hearing and/or speech impairment. Few departments stated that they train their staff on how to communicate with people with hearing and/or speech impairment. Recommended Actions 1. Train staff members in the means of communicating over the telephone with a person with a hearing or speech impairment, such as the California Relay Service (CRS), or 711. By Jan. 1, 2019. 2. In all publications that list phone numbers, include information on how people with hearing and/or speech impairment can communicate with departments by phone. By Jan. 1, 2019. 13 City of Lodi - DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 3. Consider Video Remote Interpreting Services (VRI) for communicating with people with hearing and/or speech impairment. There are many situations where a live interpreter is required, such as in medical situations, but VRI is a convenient, flexible, lower-cost alternative to live interpreters. By Jan. 1, 2020. Training and Staffing Self -Evaluation Findings Few departments reported that their staff receives regular training for interacting with persons with a disability. Recommended Actions 1. Provide all City staff members with ongoing awareness and sensitivity training. By Jan. 1, 2021. 2. Train City staff members who have contact with the public about how to provide modifications and use assistive devices to make their programs, activities, and services accessible. Ensure that customer service training includes information about communicating with and providing modifications for persons with a variety of disabilities. Include program -specific adaptations, assistive devices, and modifications in each department's accessibility policy manual. 3. Develop a comprehensive disability access training program. Educate all City staff about their responsibilities under the ADA. The City's ADA/Section 504 Coordinator and department supervisors should be responsible for ensuring that staff members receive training. Reference materials that address special modifications should be included in this training. By Jan. 1, 2021. 4. Develop standard guidelines for training materials. These guidelines should include standard language that appropriately describes the City's policy on inclusion and nondiscrimination, and staff members should receive training in using the guidelines effectively. By Jan. 1, 2021. 5. Whenever staff has contact with the public and depending on operational needs, consider offering training to employees who wish to learn basic American Sign Language (ASL) communication skills. This training should emphasize basic communication skills and should not be viewed as a substitute for utilizing qualified ASL interpreters when requested. By Jan. 1, 2021. 6. Train Maintenance Services staff with respect to accessibility compliance and building codes to maintain facilities in an accessible condition. By Jan. 1, 2021. 7. Train City staff members in general building evacuation procedures for assisting persons with hearing, speech, visual, mobility, and learning disabilities in an emergency. By Jan. 1, 2021. 8. Designate one manager in each department to serve as the department's disability access liaison. The liaison will be required to complete a training program and attend periodic retraining regarding accessibility issues. By Jan. 1, 2021. 14 City of Lodi - DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Program Eligibility and Admission The public should be able to access all programs, services, and activities, regardless of disability. Admission criteria, ability to complete forms, and participation in interviews should be available to all members of the public by providing reasonable accommodations. Self -Evaluation Findings No departments reported having limitations or ratio requirements that would exclude persons with disabilities. Some departments noted that they have eligibility requirements. These requirements were physical or mental performance standards for staff based on performance and safety standards. Most program -related forms do not contain a nondiscrimination statement. Recommended Actions 1. Ensure that individuals with disabilities are not excluded from regular programs and are not required to accept special services or benefits. Involve individuals with disabilities in regular programs to the maximum extent possible. By Jan. 1, 2019. 2. Modify policies, practices, or procedures to avoid discrimination unless the modification would fundamentally alter the nature of the program or create a hazardous situation. By Jan. 1, 2019. 3. Ensure that when specific requirements that exclude or limit the participation of persons with disabilities are necessary for the safe operation of programs, those requirements are based on real risks, not on speculation, stereotypes, or generalizations. By Jan. 1, 2019. 4. Include a nondiscrimination statement on all forms. By Jan. 1, 2019. 5. When interviews are required for program participation, ensure that the meetings are held in an accessible location and that auxiliary aids are provided upon request. By Jan. 1, 2019. Public Meetings Self -Evaluation Findings Most departments hold public meetings. All meetings are required to be held in accessible locations. Some departments reported that they provide auxiliary aids upon request to allow people with disabilities to fully participate in meetings. Recommended Actions 1. Continue to schedule public meetings at accessible locations. An accessible location includes, but is not limited to, the following: wheelchair -accessible path of travel to the meeting room, accessible restrooms, accessible parking, an accessible route from transit and parking to the meeting facility, temperature control, signage, and the ability to provide access to fresh air for persons with chemical sensitivities. By Jan. 1, 2019. 2. Maintain a list of on-call American Sign Language interpreters who may be brought to meetings to assist individuals with hearing impairments (see Section 6). By Jan. 1, 2019. 3. When a fully accessible site is not available, make reasonable modifications so that an individual with a disability can participate. By Jan. 1, 2019. 15 City of Lodi - DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 4. Make information available to City staff on the types of modification requests that may be made by persons with different types of disabilities. Provide information about auxiliary aids such as different types of assistive listening systems, sign language interpreters, readers, descriptive services, and other assistive technologies like "real-time captioning." Provide guidance in the layout of the room, sign -in table, and refreshments table to ensure these features are accessible. By Jan. 1, 2019. 5. Display a notice on meeting agendas indicating the availability of accessibility modifications. By Jan. 1, 2019. 6. Prepare agendas and other meeting materials in alternative formats, when requested. By Jan. 1, 2019. 7. Allow flexibility in the time limit on speaking for individuals with communication difficulties. By Jan. 1, 2019. 8. Provide assistive listening devices at public meetings, when requested. By Jan. 1, 2019. 9. Develop a checklist for creating accessible meetings and selecting accessible meeting spaces, and make the list available to all City departments and programs. By Jan. 1, 2019. 10. Prepare a list of already accessible meeting spaces to facilitate the scheduling of meetings and/or the relocation of meetings upon request. By Jan. 1, 2019. 11. Move disability -related agenda items to the beginning of agendas when possible. Some people with disabilities are unable to stay late at meeting because they use paratransit or have fixed schedules and/or need to use personal care attendants. By Jan. 1, 2019. Transportation Services Self -Evaluation Findings Two departments reported providing transportation services to the public. One department reported that assistance is offered to people with disabilities. Recommended Actions 1. Ensure that all transportation services are provided in a way that allows people with mobility, visual, speech, hearing, and cognitive disabilities to fully participate. By Jan. 1, 2019. 2. Evaluate the trip destination to determine the level of accessibility and any accommodations or modifications that may be required. By Jan. 1, 2019. 3. If a tour route or a portion of a route is not accessible, continue the practice of rerouting the tour or providing alternate accommodation (photographs, close -captioned videos, etc.) that will allow the tour to be experienced by persons with disabilities. By Jan. 1, 2019. 4. Provide information to participants in advance of a tour or trip regarding the destination, transportation, and other characteristics of the event so that informed requests for accommodations can be made. By Jan. 1, 2019. 5. Include information about accessibility of the tour on the program's website. By Jan. 1, 2019. 16 City of Lodi - DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Use of Consultants for Delivering Program Services Self -Evaluation Findings Two departments reported the use of consultants for delivering program services. Recommended Actions No recommendations at this time due to using consultant services. Emergency Evacuation Procedures Self -Evaluation Findings Some departments were not aware if emergency evacuation procedures were available for people with disabilities. Recommended Actions 1. Develop guidelines for the evacuation of persons with disabilities in various types of emergency situations. Each department, division, or program should use these guidelines to create emergency evacuation plans. These plans should: • Address what to do when an alarm is triggered. By Jan. 1, 2019. • Establish meeting places for assistance and evacuation chairs. By Jan. 1, 2019. • Provide direction on what to do if assistance is not available. By Jan. 1, 2019. 2. Research specific suggestions for evacuation plans and procedures through the US Access Board: http://www.ada.gov/emergencyprepguide.htm and the Emergency Procedures for Employees with Disabilities in Office Occupancies document published by FEMA and the US Fire Administration. By Jan. 1, 2019. 3. Train City staff regarding emergency evacuation procedures with periodic drills, both announced and unannounced. By Jan. 1, 2019. 4. Review existing procedures dealing with emergencies to ensure that persons with disabilities can be alerted and that they can alert emergency service providers. Provide all evacuation policies and procedures in alternative formats when requested. Work with disability organizations to explore the use of other technologies, such as audible exit signs for orientation and direction, and vibrating paging systems. By Jan. 1, 2019. 5. Train public safety personnel to enable them to communicate in basic American Sign Language in the event there is an emergency condition and the area is being evacuated. For example, this training would be provided to police officers, firefighters, lifeguards, and building inspectors involved in post -disaster emergencies. By Jan. 1, 2019. 6. Take the necessary steps to ensure that emergency teams are aware of persons with disabilities in their communities who may require special assistance in the event of an emergency. By Jan. 1, 2019. 17 City of Lodi - DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 7. Provide American Sign Language interpreters at emergency facilities, on an as -needed basis. To accomplish this, form a pool of interpreters as a resource from which to draw (see Section 6). By Jan. 1, 2019. Facilities Self -Evaluation Findings No department reported that it tracked accessibility complaints related to City facilities. Recommended Actions 1. Provide information about facility accessibility in department publications, including on the department's website. By Jan. 1, 2019. 2. Track all requests relating to facility access. The ADA requests should be analyzed periodically to look for global issues that can be addressed and problems than can be solved proactively. By Jan. 1, 2019. Special Events on Public Properties Self -Evaluation Findings One department reported that it offers special events on City property. This department has a policy in place to ensure the events are accessible to people with disabilities. Recommended Actions 1. In situations where private organizations sponsor events in City facilities, inform private organizations about applicable ADA requirements. By Jan. 1, 2019. 2. Provide a checklist and information during the application process to inform organizers of their responsibility for accessibility under the ADA. The checklist and information will be available on the City's website. By Jan. 1, 2019. Department Reports This section documents the ways in which the City is currently providing accessible programs and services to the public. The following are survey summaries based on answers to the ADA Self -Evaluation Surveys for programs and services. • Administration — City Manager, City Attorney, City Clerk, and Economic Development • Community Development Department — Building, Planning, and Neighborhood Services • Electric Utility Department — Customer Services, Public Benefits, and Field Services • Fire Department • Internal Services Department— Finance, Human Resources, and Information Services • Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services — Customer Services, Recreation, Parks/Facilities, and Hutchins Street Square 18 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN • Police Department — Records/Customer Services • Public Works Department — Administration/Engineering, Transit, and Municipal Utilities Administration — City Manager, City Attorney, City Clerk, and Economic Development Description of Programs and Services The City Manager's Office is responsible for the management of all City functions. The City Attorney's Office provides legal services for the City. The City Clerk's Office coordinates and administers the City's records retention and management; maintains the legislative history, including preparation of City Council minutes, resolutions, and ordinances; and is the custodian of the City seal and all official City records. In addition, the City Clerk's Office is responsible for preparing and publishing all legal notices for the City; receiving and processing initiative petitions; administering and enforcing the Local Conflict of Interest Code, as well as federal and state laws regarding election and campaign financing disclosure; and coordinating municipal elections. Economic Development serves as the liaison between businesses and commercial districts and City government. The office provides support and assistance to both existing and prospective businesses looking to locate in Lodi. The vision of Economic Development is to preserve and enhance the business climate to ensure the City is financially stable and partners with the community in its commitment to improve the quality of life. Members of the public come into Administration offices for records, Council -related documents and questions, and election information, to file claims against the City, and to apply to serve on City boards and commissions. Customer Service • Administration has no policies or practices that could have the direct or indirect effect of excluding or limiting the participation of individuals with disabilities. • Services provided by Administration can be carried out at the entry lobby tables instead of the nearby counter where the height may be uncomfortable. • There are no circumstances in which a person with a disability would be asked to pay a fee or meet any other requirement not imposed on other program participants. • The City does not have any policies that exclude service animals. • Administration does not track accessibility requests; however, the City makes accommodations for people with disabilities upon request on an individual basis. Printed Information • Administration produces printed materials. • Administration provides printed materials in an electronic format. Website • Administration has a page on the City's website. 19 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Public Telephones and Communication Devices • Administration does not communicate by telephone with people with a hearing or speech impairment using TTY. • Administration staff has not received training on communication by telephone with persons with hearing or speech impairments with the assistance of a 711 operator. Training and Staffing • Staff in Administration have contact with the public. Public Meetings • Administration holds regular public meetings. • Public meetings, hearings, and conferences are held in accessible locations. Tours and Trips • Administration does not provide tours and trips. Facilities • City Hall • Carnegie Forum Community Development Department Description of Programs and Services The Community Development Department includes the following divisions: • Building o Responsible for performing architectural and structural plan checks, scheduling and performing building inspections, and providing general customer information services. The division is responsible for administering the California Building, Plumbing, and Electrical Codes and other applicable development regulations. • Planning o Responsible for two major activities: current and advanced planning. The division is charged with implementing the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Staff works with developers to help them meet the standards adopted by the City Council. The Planning Division provides staff to the Planning Commission and to the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committees. • Neighborhood Services o Responsible for the administration of federal funds received from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Federal funds administered by the division support programs and services for low- to moderate -income citizens and neighborhoods to increase self-sufficiency and meet needs that are otherwise not being met in the 20 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN community. The division works closely with the Lodi Improvement Committee in developing programs to improve the quality of life for Lodi residents. Customer Service • Community Development has no policies or practices that could have the direct or indirect effect of excluding or limiting the participation of individuals with disabilities. • Services provided by Community Development can be carried out at the entry lobby tables or in an adjacent conference room instead of at the nearby counter where the height may be uncomfortable. There is an accessible pull-out counter at the front counter. • There are no circumstances in which a person with a disability would be asked to pay a fee or meet any other requirement not imposed on other program participants. • The City, including Community Development, does not have any policies that exclude service animals. • Community Development tracks accessibility requests. Printed Information • Community Development produces printed materials. • Community Development will provide printed materials in a variety of alternative formats. Website • Community Development has a page on the City's website. Public Telephones and Communication Devices • Community Development does not communicate by telephone with people with a hearing or speech impairment using TTY. • Community Development staff have not received training on communication by telephone with persons with hearing or speech impairments with the assistance of a 711 operator. Training and Staffing • Community Development staff have contact with the public. Public Meetings • Community Development holds regular public meetings. Tours and Trips • Community Development does not provide tours and trips. Facilities • City Hall • Carnegie Forum 21 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Electric Utility Department Description of Programs and Services The Electric Utility Department coordinates, administers, and maintains the delivery of electric utility services throughout the community. Customer Service • The Electric Utility Department has no policies or practices that could have the direct or indirect effect of excluding or limiting the participation of individuals with disabilities. • There are no circumstances in which a person with a disability would be asked to pay a fee or meet any other requirement not imposed on other program participants. • The department does not have any policies that exclude service animals. Printed Information • The Electric Utility Department produces printed materials. Website • The Electric Utility Department has a page on the City's website. • Material for the Electric Utility Department web page is produced by the Electric Utility Department. Training and Staffing • Electric Utility Department staff have contact with the public. Program Eligibility Requirements and Admission • There are no circumstances in which the participation of a person with a disability participating in Electric Utility Department programs, services, or activities would be restricted or excluded. Public Meetings • The Electric Utility Department does not hold public meetings. Tours and Trips • The Electric Utility Department does not provide tours and trips. Facilities • Municipal Service Center Fire Department Description of Programs and Services The Fire Department provides emergency fire and medical response services to the Lodi community. It is responsible for the protection of life and property and for the enforcement of fire, life, and safety requirements through fire prevention and public education programs. 22 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Customer Service • The Fire Department has no policies or practices that could have the direct or indirect effect of excluding or limiting the participation of individuals with disabilities. • There are no circumstances in which a person with a disability would be asked to pay a fee or meet any other requirement not imposed on other program participants. • The Fire Department does not have any policies that exclude service animals. Printed Information • The Fire Department produces printed materials. Television and Audiovisual Public Information • The Fire Department produces presentations and audiovisual public information. • The Fire Department does not provide alternative formats. Website • The Fire Department has a page on the City's website; department staff are responsible for content. Training and Staffing • Fire Department staff have contact with the public. Program Eligibility Requirements and Admission • There are no circumstances in which the participation of a person with a disability participating in Fire Department programs, activities, and services would be restricted or excluded. Public Meetings • The Fire Department does not hold public meetings. Facilities • Fire Station No. 1/Fire Administration • Fire Station No. 2 • Fire Station No. 3 • Fire Station No. 4 Internal Services Department — Finance Division Description of Programs and Services The Finance Division provides fiscal and technological support services to all City departments and programs. The division manages the development and analysis of the budget, year-end audited financial statements, accounts payable, revenue tracking and collection, payroll, and the processing of all business license and other day-to-day financial transactions for the City. Finance also oversees the investment of City funds and provides strategic planning and analysis necessary to preserve the City's superior credit rating and safeguard City resources. 23 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Customer Service • There are no circumstances in which a person with a disability would be asked to pay a fee or meet any other requirement not imposed on other program participants. • The Finance Division does not have any policies that exclude service animals. • Finance provides alternatives to assist customers who are unable to stand in line for long periods of time. Printed Information • Finance produces printed materials. • Finance does not make printed materials available in alternative formats. Audiovisual Public Information • Finance does not produce audiovisual presentation for the public. Website • Finance has a page on the City's website. • The web page provides contact and financial information. Public Telephones and Communication Devices • Finance staff are trained on communication by telephone with persons with hearing or speech impairments with the assistance of a 711 operator. Training and Staffing • Finance Division staff have contact with the public. • Finance staff do not have training on interacting with people with disabilities. Program Eligibility Requirements and Admission • There are certain eligibility requirements to receive some services. • Finance provides reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities. Public Meetings • Finance does not hold public meetings. Facilities • City Hall Annex Internal Services Department — Human Resources Division Description of Programs and Services Human Resources provides employment support to all City departments. The office coordinates employee recruitment and hiring and provides ongoing salary and benefits support to the City's employees. The office works to promote positive employee and labor relations, to maximize the use of City resources toward a competitive salary and benefit program, and to minimize potential losses through a comprehensive risk management program. 24 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Customer Service • Human Resources is not aware of policies or practices that would require physical ability as an eligibility requirement. • Human Resources does not consult or work with any outside organizations or groups that assist people with disabilities. • The City, including Human Resources, does not have any policies that exclude service animals. Notice Requirements • The City, including Human Resources, has a nondiscrimination statement that includes persons with disabilities. • A nondiscrimination statement and information about how to reach the ADA/Section 504 Coordinator are included in Human Resources recruitment flyers. • Human Resources will notify all persons that meetings, hearings, interviews, and conferences will be held in accessible locations and that adaptive/auxiliary aids (such as assistive listening devices, readers for the blind, pen and paper) will be provided, upon request, to participants with disabilities. • Human Resources has a procedure for filing a disability discrimination complaint and will notify all members of the public on how and with whom to file such a complaint. Notifications are listed on recruitment flyers. Printed Information • Human Resources produces and manages printed materials. • The content of documents and publications is available in simple, easy -to -understand language for individuals with learning disabilities. Website • Human Resources has a page on the City's website. • Human Resources provides information about job descriptions, salary information, benefits, and memorandums of understanding. • Information regarding Human Resources facilities, programs, and services are created and managed by the office and in collaboration with other employees. Public Telephones and Communication Devices • Human Resources staff have been trained on communication by telephone with persons with hearing or speech impairments using a 711 operator. Training and Staffing • Human Resources staff have contact with the public. • Human Resources informs staff of their obligations and policies that enable persons with disabilities to participate in services through training, webinars, and publications. 25 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN • Human Resources does not provide emergency services. • There are no limitations or ratios for the number of people with disabilities who may participate in or be admitted to any department program. • Human Resources uses minimum qualifications and requirements described in job announcements for employment criteria. • There are no forms required for admission to programs. • Human Resources requires interviews for employment. Public Meetings • Human Resources holds public meetings for recruitment testing. • Human Resources meetings are held in accessible locations. • Human Resources does not provide American Sign Language interpreters, readers, or adaptive equipment when requested for meetings, interviews, and conferences. • Human Resources does not use consultants to conduct programs on its behalf. Transportation Services • Human Resources does not provide transportation to its programs. Tours and Trips • Human Resources does not provide tours and trips to the public. Facilities • City Hall • Carnegie Forum Internal Services Department — Information Technology Description of Programs and Services The Information Technology (IT) division IT supports key management information systems through the development and maintenance of the organization -wide network, daily desktop and office software support, systems training, web development, software updates, and equipment replacement. This division is responsible for developing a long-term technology plan for the City with a focus on mission - critical applications. Customer Service • There are no circumstances in which a person with a disability would be asked to pay a fee or meet any other requirement not imposed on other program participants. • IT does not have any policies that exclude service animals. Notice Requirements • The City, including IT, has a nondiscrimination statement that includes information about how to reach the ADA/Section 504 Coordinator. 26 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Television and Audiovisual Public Information • IT produces televised presentations of City Council meetings. • IT does not provide alternative formats to the audiovisual presentations. Training and Staffing • IT staff do not have contact with the public. Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services (PRCS) Department Description of Programs and Services The Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services (PRCS) Department operates and maintains parks and Hutchins Street Square. It also provides and coordinates recreational and cultural activities through the following three divisions: • Parks o Maintenance and operation of a variety of city parks and sports fields. • Recreation/Facilities o Management and operation of a variety of both youth and adult recreational and sports programs. • Hutchins Street Square o Maintenance and operation of the Hutchins Street Square facility as a local event and community center. Accessible/Adaptive Equipment • Assistive listening devices are made available for events/activities at Hutchins Street Square. • Adjustable tables accommodate all age levels. Paper and pens are provided. Customer Service • Some PRCS staff are not aware of a policy or procedure that allows them to make reasonable accommodations to standard operating procedures for participants and their attendants. • PRCS does not track accessibility requests. • There are no circumstances in which a person with a disability would be asked to pay a fee or meet any other requirement not imposed on other program participants. • The City, including PRCS, does not have any policies that exclude service animals. Notice Requirements • PRCS has a nondiscrimination statement that includes persons with disabilities for employment application purposes. Printed Information • PRCS produces printed materials. 27 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN • PRCS will make printed materials available in alternative formats when requested. Television and Audiovisual Public Information • PRCS makes audio recordings of its meetings. • PRCS will provide alternative formats to audio presentations. Website • PRCS has a page on the City's website. The web page is managed by PRCS staff. • PRCS provides information about classes, events, and programs. • PRCS provides information about facility amenities and access. Public Telephones and Communication Devices • PRCS staff have not received training on communication by telephone with persons with hearing or speech impairments with the assistance of a 711 operator. Training and Staffing • PRCS staff have contact with the public. • PRCS has not informed department staff of their obligation and policies that enable persons with disabilities to participate in services. • PRCS staff have not been trained on interacting with people with disabilities. Public Meetings • PRCS holds public meetings in accessible locations. Transportation Services • PRCS provides transportation services. • PRCS does not provide wheelchair -accessible transportation for people who need it to participate in the department's programs/activities. Special Events and Private Events on Public Properties • PRCS organizes special annual events on City property including summer concerts, fun runs, and the Easter egg hunt. • PRCS ensures that these events are accessible to people with disabilities. Parks/Facilities • Beckman Park • Blakely Park • Candy Cane Park • Century Meadows Park • Century Park • Chapman Field/Armory Park • DeBenedetti Park • Emerson Park 28 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN • English Oaks Commons • Glaves Park • Grape Bowl • Hale Park • Katzakian Park • Kofu Park • Lawrence Park • Legion Park • Lodi Lake Park • Maple Square Park • Peterson Park • Pixley Park • Roget Park • Rosegate Park • Salas Park • Softball Complex • Van Buskirk Park • Vinewood Park • Zupo Park Additional program locations: • Hutchins Street Square • City Hall Annex Police Department Description of Programs and Services The Police Department provides law enforcement and public safety services to the Lodi community. It is responsible for the protection of life and property, the maintenance of order, the control and prevention of crime, and the enforcement of motor vehicle laws and regulations. Primary activities related to these responsibilities include enforcement of the laws of the state and the city, investigation of crimes, apprehension of criminals, and maintenance of a crime prevention program. Customer Service • The Police Department has no policies or practices that could have the direct or indirect effect of excluding or limiting the participation of individuals with disabilities. • The Police Department does not track accessibility requests. • There are no circumstances in which a person with a disability would be asked to pay a fee or meet any other requirement not imposed on other program participants. • The Police Department does not consult or work with any outside organizations that assist people with disabilities. 29 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN • The Police Department does not have any policies that exclude service animals. Printed Information • The Police Department produces printed materials. • The Police Department does not provide alternative formats of printed materials. Website • The Police Department has a page on the City's website. • The Police Department web page has general law enforcement information and statistics. Public Telephones and Communication Devices • The Police Department communicates by telephone with persons with a hearing or speech impairment using accessible technology. • Police Department dispatch is trained in how to use accessible technology to communicate with a person with a hearing or speech impairment. Training and Staffing • Police Department staff have contact with the public. • The public is informed on an individual basis about the department's obligation and policies that enable a person with disabilities to participate in Police Department programs. • Police Department staff are trained regarding their obligation and policies that enable persons with disabilities to participate in programs and activities. • The Police Department provides emergency services. Public Meetings • The Police Department holds public meetings. • Public meetings, hearings, and conferences are held in accessible locations. Public Transportation • The Police Department does provide public transportation. Special Events and Private Events on Public Properties • The Police Department provides public safety services for special events on City properties. Facilities • Lodi Police Station Public Works Department The Public Works Department includes the following divisions: • Administration/Engineering o Planning, design, and oversight in the construction of City streets, water, wastewater, and drainage. Other functions include construction drawing and records management, 30 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN mapping and Geographic Information System maintenance and development, surveying, and cost estimating. o Also included under this division is Traffic Engineering, which is responsible for the design of the City's traffic control systems, preparing traffic studies/reports on pedestrian crossings, school crossings, parking and restricted parking zones, speed zones, and installation of stop and yield signs and traffic signals. • Transit o The Transit Division provides a daily fixed -route bus system (GrapeLine) within the city limits, ADA paratransit service (VineLine), and a door-to-door Dial -A -Ride (DAR) service for the general public (including discounted fares for seniors/disabled/Medicare recipients) within the city limits and in immediately adjacent areas. Nearly all of this activity is performed by contracted services. • Municipal Utilities o Water Services — Provides potable water to residential, commercial, and industrial customers, and provides water for adequate pressures to fire hydrants, private fire suppression systems, and private on-site hydrants. Manages all wastewater including domestic industrial and runoff flows from the City's three separate collection systems. Performs pipeline and facility maintenance. o Wastewater Treatment — Operation and maintenance of the White Slough Water Pollution Control Facility, which operates 7 days per week, 24 hours per day, and is staffed 16 hours per day. Analyzes untreated and treated wastewater; determines chemical, physical, and bacteriological characteristics; and analyzes City drinking water. o Water Treatment — Operation of the Surface Water Treatment Facility located west of Lodi Lake. Provides potable water to residential, commercial, and industrial customers in conjunction with 28 groundwater wells. In addition, the facility also monitors distribution system pressure, including fire flows, 14 stormwater lift stations, and 9 sewer lift stations. The facility is maintained, operated, and monitored 7 days a week, 24 hours per day. Customer Service • Public Works tracks accessibility requests. • There are no circumstances in which a person with a disability would be asked to pay a fee or meet any other requirement not imposed on other program participants. • The City, including Public Works, does not have any policies that exclude service animals. • The City, including Public Works, has a nondiscrimination statement that includes persons with disabilities. • The City, including Public Works, has procedures for making an accessibility complaint. 31 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Notice Requirements • Public Works has a nondiscrimination statement that includes persons with disabilities. • Transit Division staff will notify all persons that meetings, hearings, interviews, and conferences will be held in accessible locations and that adaptive/auxiliary aids (such as assistive listening devices, readers for the blind, pen and paper) will be provided, upon request, to participants with disabilities. Printed Information • Public Works produces printed materials for the public. • Public Works will enlarge documents upon request. Website • Public Works has a page on the City's website that includes City standard details, guidance specifications, information related to various engineering CIP projects, etc. The content is managed by both Public Works and other City staff. Public Telephones and Communication Devices • Public Works staff have not been trained on communication by telephone with persons with hearing or speech impairments using a 711 operator. Public Meetings • Public Works holds public meetings in accessible locations. • Public Works does not provide American Sign Language interpreters, but would send a request to the ADA/Section 504 Coordinator if one is requested. Television and Audiovisual Public Information • Public Works does not prepare audiovisual presentations via web streaming to the public. Training and Staffing • Public Works staff have contact with the public. • Most Public Works staff have not received training on interacting with people with disabilities. Transportation Services • Public Works provides transportation to the public, through contracted services with MV Transportation. Facilities • City Hall • Municipal Service Center • Transit Station • Water Treatment Facility • White Slough Waste Treatment Facility 32 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN SECTION 3 -TRANSITION PLAN Title II of the ADA requires that public entities having responsibility for or authority over facilities, streets, roads, sidewalks, and/or other areas meant for public use develop a Transition Plan so that their facilities meet the standards for program accessibility. Program accessibility means that a program, activity, and/or service are accessible when viewed in its entirety. Simply put, a Transition Plan transitions inaccessible facilities into environments that are accessible to and functional for individuals with disabilities. This Transition Plan combines the findings of the facility surveys, public rights-of-way surveys, policy assessments, and program evaluations. Specific policy and program recommendations can be found in Section 2. The specific architectural modifications required to make programs accessible are listed in the City of Lodi—Facility Reports (please see Appendix C). Each facility report contains a complete list of architectural barriers and barrier removal actions. Not all of these barriers must be removed in order to facilitate program access. The first priority is to remove those barriers limiting access to programs. This Transition Plan is divided into two parts: facilities, which include buildings, parks, and their related grounds; and public pedestrian rights-of-way, which include sidewalks and curb ramps in front of City - owned facilities and public schools, as well as downtown parking lots. In compliance with the requirements of the ADA, the City will maintain in working order equipment and features that are required to provide access to individuals with disabilities. Appendix C provides a list of the facilities that the City plans to improve with list of anticipated improvements, timeline, and cost. 3.1 Facilities A. Program Barrier Removal Priorities Each of these criteria is deemed by the City to have equal importance, with no single criteria having priority over another: • Level of use by the public: Does the facilities receive a high level of public use? • Program uniqueness: Some programs are unique to a building, facility, or park and cannot occur at another location. • Geographic distribution: By selecting a range of facilities that are distributed throughout Lodi, the City can ensure maximum access for all residents. • Citizen rights: Facilities where services are provided to exercise citizen rights—voting, right to a trial, access to elected officials, etc. • Citizen responsibilities: Facilities where taxes are paid, permits and licenses are obtained, and services are obtained. • Social need: Facilities that meet social needs such as homeless shelters, health clinics, etc. • Identified complaints: Efforts should focus on identified accessibility complaints. 33 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN B. Prioritizing Access to Programs, Activities, and Services City staff from each department listed the programs, activities, and services provided to the public and locations where the programs are offered. Each program was evaluated using the criteria listed above. C. Priorities for Barrier Removal within Facilities The following guidelines will assist the City to prioritize barriers found in City facilities: 1. Priority One: The highest priority is placed on those barrier removal items that provide accessibility at the main entrance of a facility or improve a path of travel to the portion of the facility where program activities take place. Examples: • Connection to the public right-of-way • Parking and passenger loading • Entrance walks • Entrance ramps • Entrance stairs • Entrance doors 2. Priority Two: A second level priority is placed on those barrier removal items that improve or enhance access to program use areas. Examples: • Transaction counters • Conference and meeting rooms • Public offices • Recreation environments/features • Public restrooms 3. Priority Three: A third level priority is placed on those barrier removal items that improve access to amenities serving program areas. Examples: • Drinking fountains • Public telephones • Vending machines 4. Priority Four: A fourth level of priority is assigned to areas or features that are not required to be modified because there are no public programs located in the facility or a portion of the facility, or because there are other locations that provide access to the program. 34 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN D. Transition Plan for Facilities The Transition Plan for the removal of architectural barriers to program access must contain the following information: • Identification of the barriers to program access • Identification of the specific barrier removal action(s) • Identification of a schedule for barrier removal • Identification of responsibility for ensuring barrier removal The facility reports appended to this document identify the barriers and the specific barrier removal actions. The City will accomplish barrier removals based on two strategies: (1) policy and procedure modifications to remove programmatic barriers; and (2) construction projects to remove architectural barriers. The City of Lodi's ADA/Section 504 Coordinator is responsible for ensuring both programmatic and architectural barrier removal. E. Phasing Schedule for Facilities Barriers in City facilities will be removed systematically, citywide, based on established program priorities. It is the City's intent to address and remove barriers to accessibility in public buildings and parks based on the immediate necessity of programmatic access, degree of complexity, and overall cost. The City of Lodi reserves the right to modify barrier removal priorities to allow flexibility in accommodating community requests, petitions for reasonable modifications from persons with disabilities, changes in City programs, and funding opportunities and constraints. It is the goal of this Transition Plan to facilitate access to the programs, activities, and services provided by the City. Interim measures will be explored and implemented in order to provide programmatic access to the public pending the implementation of physical barrier removal projects. The following tables describe the priorities and schedule for barrier removal in public facilities owned by the City of Lodi. This preliminary schedule represents a 15 -year plan for barrier removal. It is the City's intent to review all barriers during the first year of the implementation of this plan and to address those barriers that can be resolved through programmatic modifications. The City will then revise the following schedule for the removal of the remaining barriers. 35 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Barrier Removal Schedule for City -Owned Facilities Total Estimated Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 ri vi LD N LD Ol City Parks • Blakely Park (Approach & Entrance) • Blakely Park (Toilet Rooms) • Century Meadows Park (Approach & Entrance) • DeBenedetti Park (Approach & Entrance) • Grape Bowl — ADA Parking (Approach & Entrance) • Grape Bowl (Access to Goods & Services) • Kofu Park (Approach & Entrance) • Kofu Park (Access to Goods & Services) • Roget Park (Additional Access) • Zupo Field Park (Approach & Access) • Zupo Field Park (Access to Goods & Services) • Blakely Park (Access to Goods & Services) • Blakely Park (Additional Access) • Chapman Field/Armory Park (Approach & Entrance) • Chapman Field/Armory Park (Access to Goods & Services) • Chapman Field/Armory Park (Toilet Rooms) • Chapman Field/Armory Park (Additional Access) • Emerson Park (Approach & Entrance) • Emerson Park (Toilet Rooms) • Emerson Park (Additional Access) • Hale Park (Approach & Entrance) • Hale Park (Access to Goods & Services) • Hale Park (Toilet Rooms) • Hale Park (Additional Access) • Katzakian Park (Approach & Entrance) • Katzakian Park (Toilet Rooms) • Kofu Park (Additional Access) • Kofu Park (Toilet Rooms) • Legion Park (Approach & Entrance) • Legion Park (Access to Goods & Services) Time Frame L L co co CU CU >- m >- LO I I Lo Cr) City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Total Estimated Cost 0 o 0 -el 0 00 0 Li-i• N V? 0 Lri. m N r i/? City Parks • Legion Park (Toilet Rooms) • Lodi Lake Park (Approach & Entrance) • Lodi Lake Park (Toilet Rooms) • Lodi Lake Park (Access to Goods & Services) • Roget Park (Access to Goods & Services) • Salas Park (Approach & Entrance) • Salas Park (Access to Goods & Services) • Salas Park (Toilet Rooms) • Salas Park (Additional Access) • Softball Complex (Approach & Entrance) • Softball Complex (Access to Goods & Services) • Softball Complex (Toilet Rooms) • Softball Complex (Additional Access) • Zupo Field Park (Toilet Rooms) • Beckman Park (Approach & Entrance) • Beckman Park (Toilet Rooms) • Candy Cane Park (Approach & Access) • Henry Glaves Park (Toilet Rooms) • Peterson Park (Approach & Entrance) • Peterso- Pt�j(Toilet Rooms) • Petersbi )arLlt (A 4 ss to Goods & Services) • Van Buskirk Park (Pc $g to Goods & Services) • Vinewood Park (Approach & Entrance) • Centulreadows (Approach & Entrance) • English Commons (Approach & Entrance) • Vinewood Farl (Toilet Rooms) • Vinewood Park (Additional Agmss) Total Estimated Cost Time Frame i to v >- N L_ (6 N >- 0 .-i City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Total Estimated Cost 0 0 0 0 Ln 0 0 0 vi in Public/City Buildings • Hutchins Street Square — North Entrance (Approach & Entrance) • Hutchins Street Square (Access to Goods & Services) • Hutchins Street Square (Toilet Rooms) • Hutchins Street Square (Additional Access) • Lodi Animal Shelter Facility (Approach & Entrance) • Lodi Parks Administration Office (Approach & Entrance) • Lodi Par ministration Office (Access to Goods & Services) • Lodi Pare Umrfi ration Office (Toilet Rooms) • Lodi Library (Apprq $c Entrance) • Lodi Library (Toilet Rooms) • Murli4il..I Service Center (Approach & Entrance) 0 0 0 0 in Civic Center • Carnegie Forum (Approach & Entrance) • Carnegie Forum (Access to Goods & Services) 4-6 Years Total Estimated Cost Time Frame 1-3 Years 4-6 Years 7-9 Years 10-12 Years Total Estimated Cost 0 0 0 In cr 0 0 0 vi in Public/City Buildings • Hutchins Street Square — North Entrance (Approach & Entrance) • Hutchins Street Square (Access to Goods & Services) • Hutchins Street Square (Toilet Rooms) • Hutchins Street Square (Additional Access) • Lodi Animal Shelter Facility (Approach & Entrance) • Lodi Parks Administration Office (Approach & Entrance) • Lodi Par ministration Office (Access to Goods & Services) • Lodi Pare Umrfi ration Office (Toilet Rooms) • Lodi Library (Apprq $c Entrance) • Lodi Library (Toilet Rooms) • Murli4il..I Service Center (Approach & Entrance) • Lodi Anirrl lhelter (Access to Services) • Lodi Animal Sf� Iter (Toilet Rooms) • Lodi Library (Accel to Goods & Services) • Municipal Service deet rl (Access to Goods & Services) • Municipal Service Cent6r (Toilet Rooms) • Municipal Service Center (Additional Access) Time Frame QJ a) >- m m 4-6 Years co m City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 0 0 o O N 0 0 0 0 1/1 • White Slough (Approach & Entrance) • White Slough (Access to Goods & Services) • White Slough (Toilet Rooms) Total Estimated Cost 7-9 Years sn fD } N r-1 oI O r -I Total Estimated Cost o 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0�' Privately Operated Facilities Owned by the City • CrossFit Gym (Approach & Entrance) • CrossFit Gym (Toilet Rooms) • Mojica's Batting Cages (Approach & Entrance) • Mojica's Batting Cages (Access to Goods & Services) • Mojica's Batting Cages (Toilet Rooms) Total Estimated Cost Time Frame i (U v >- } m I a-1 4-6 Years 7-9 Years fD >- N T--1 I 0 r-1 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 3.2 Pedestrian Rights -of -Way (PROW) A. Overview of the PROW The ADA addresses accessible pedestrian rights-of-way where sidewalks are provided by the City of Lodi. The ADA does not mandate the installation of sidewalks, but does require curb ramps at intersections where existing sidewalks are on both sides of the roadway. Most neighborhoods in the city have sidewalks. Chapter 5, Transportation, in the City's General Plan includes recommendations on pedestrian improvements. The General Plan outlines the City's desire to provide safe and convenient pedestrian connections to and between downtown, other commercial districts, neighborhoods, and major activity centers in the city, as well as to surrounding jurisdictions. B. Surveys of Existing PROW Conditions For the ADA Transition Plan, the City used the existing survey list that included sidewalks and curb ramps associated with the PROW of City -owned facilities. Additionally, the study analyzed the designated accessible parking spaces in City -owned parking lots in the downtown area. C. Pedestrian Rights -of -Way Prioritization Under Title II of the ADA, the City is not necessarily required to construct curb ramps at every point where a sidewalk intersects a curb. Traffic safety considerations may make construction of ramps undesirable at some locations. Alternative routes to buildings that make use of existing curb ramps may be acceptable under the concept of program accessibility in the limited circumstances where individuals with disabilities need only travel a marginally longer route. In addition, the undue financial or administrative burden limitation recognized by Title II may limit the number of curb ramps that the City is required to provide. The City will prioritize PROW projects at the following locations, in the order listed: 1. Government offices and facilities 2. Bus stops and transportation facilities 3. Places of public accommodation such as commercial and business areas 4. Facilities containing employers 5. Other areas such as residential neighborhoods and underdeveloped regions of the city Additional criteria for prioritization may be developed for replacing existing curb ramps. For example: • Repair of hazardous conditions • Distance from a City -operated program or building • Distance from a bus stop • Proximity to a facility serving disabled clients • Level of pedestrian traffic 40 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN • Lack of feasible alternate routes • Distance from non -City -owned public facilities D. Time Period for Pedestrian Rights -of -Way Improvements The City should establish a 15 -year time frame to remove PROW barriers that limit program accessibility. Funding improvements for pedestrian facilities is costly and competitive for state and federal funding sources. Pedestrian improvements are often paired with other roadway improvements, Safe Routes to School projects, and Capital Improvement Projects. The ADA Title II regulations state that if a transition plan will take more than one year to fully implement, it must contain interim steps that will be undertaken to provide program accessibility. Facility Estimated Cost Downtown Parking Lots $90,000 PROW Adjacent to City Facilities and Public Schools $600,000 Total $690,000 E. PROW Construction Details The City of Lodi's standard construction details are available on the City's website: http://www.lodi.gov/public works/std/stdplans.html The plans and specifications are consistent with state and federal accessibility requirements. F. Accessibility During Construction The City ensures that an accessible path of travel is available during construction. Large City Projects: The engineer or architect who designs the project describes the project conditions and includes in the design a construction detour plan for vehicles and pedestrians. Modifications may be requested by the contractor and are reviewed for accessibility before approval by the project engineer. Large Private Projects: City Engineering conditionally approves the project before a building permit is issued and requires that the contractor develop and submit for Engineering approval a detour plan for pedestrians, emergency vehicles, and traffic if necessary. G. Street or Sidewalk Closure for Special Events When there is special event that requires street or sidewalk closure, an encroachment permit is required. The applicant is then responsible to ensure accessibility at the event. The City also has an outdoor display program for downtown merchants. To participate in this program, the vendor must acquire a permit. The permit includes specific instructions for providing pedestrian passway and other clearances related to complying with the ADA in the pedestrian rights-of-way. H. Citizen Request Process See Section 4 for the City's formal grievance procedure. 41 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN I. Street -Related Capital Improvement Projects The City engages in annual maintenance efforts to repair cracked or heaved sidewalks and to address sidewalk improvements based on citizen requests and/or needs at specific locations as budget allows. Street overlay and street reconstruction projects include repair of sidewalks and construction of ADA - compliant curb ramps. Other CIP projects with ADA components are completed every year, and there is a requirement for developers to install ADA -compliant driveways, sidewalks, and curb ramps through conditions of approval. Additionally, the City has an annual concrete maintenance program that focuses on the installation of high priority sidewalks along school routes and in other areas. The program includes methods such as grinding to help mitigate trip hazards, as well as replacing damaged sidewalks. Some recently completed ADA PROW projects are listed below by year of completion. 2013: • Church Street Parking Lot ADA Improvements • HSS South Entrance ADA • Kofu Park ADA Improvements • HSS Pool Chair Lift • City Hall Annex ADA • Mills Avenue Overlay (included 4 ADA ramps) • Multimodal Station Concrete Pavement (3 ramps, crosswalk) • City Hall Parking Lot Reconstruction (4 ADA parking stalls, 2 ADA -compliant driveways, ramp, path of travel improvements) • Softball Complex & Salas Park (12 ADA stalls, 4 ramps, path of travel improvements) • DeBenedetti Park ADA Access Improvement Project (2 ADA stalls, 2 ramps, 2 paths of travel to the bottom of the basin) • Alley Improvement Project — Phase 4 (4 accessible alley approaches/ramps) • 2013-2015 Sidewalk Repair Program (1 ADA alley approach, 1 ramp in 2013) • Ham Lane Overlay (26 ADA ramps, 3 ADA driveways) • Stockton Street Off -Site Improvements (1 ADA ramp, 1 ADA driveway, path of travel improvements) • Kofu Park Parking Lot Improvement (2 ADA stalls, accessible driveway) 2014: • Hutchins Street Square North Entrance ADA, Phase 1 • Cherokee Lane ADA Improvements Phase 1 • Church Street Parking Lot ADA Improvements Phase 2 • Kofu Park ADA Improvements • 2013-2015 Sidewalk Repair Program (6 ramps in 2014) • Sacramento Street — Streetscape Project (13 ADA ramps) • Fire Station 3 Parking Lot Improvements (1 ADA stall, 1 ADA driveway) • ADA Improvements Phase 3 — Church Street Parking Lot (3 ADA stalls, path of travel improvements) • Hutchins Street Square — South Entrance ADA (10 ADA stalls, 2 ramps) • Lodi Lake Park — Youth Area Pathway Improvements (ADA path of travel improvements) • White Slough — Control Building Remodel/Additional Project (2 ADA stalls, ADA bathroom improvements) 2015: 42 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN • 2015 Grapeline Bus Stop Accessibility and Shelter Improvements (10 ADA ramps, 2 ADA alley approaches, path of travel improvements) • Transit Station Restroom (accessible bathrooms, ADA restrooms) • 2015-2017 Sidewalk Repair Program (10 ramps in 2015) 2016: • Lawrence Avenue ADA Parking • 2015-2017 Sidewalk Repair Program (5 ramps in 2016) • Lodi Lake Boat Ramp Replacement (4 ADA stalls, 3 ramps, path of travel improvements) • Alley Improvement Project — Phase 5 (2 ADA alley approaches) • Kofu Park — West Parking Lot ADA Improvements (2 ADA stalls) • 2016 Grapeline Bus Stop Accessibility and Shelter Improvements (16 ramps) • 2016 Cherokee Lane Accessibility Improvements (10 ramps, path of travel improvements) 2017 (in progress): • Grace and Mercy ADA Accessibility Improvements • City Hall/Carnegie Forum ADA Improvements • Public Counter ADA Improvements • Hutchins Street Square North Entrance ADA Improvements (2 ADA stalls, ramp, path of travel improvements) • Lawrence Avenue Accessibility Parking (4 ADA stalls) • 2017 Grapeline Bus Stop Accessibility and Shelter Improvements (16 ramps, path of travel improvements) • 2017 DeBenedetti Park Trail and Parking Lot Improvements (4 ADA stalls, path of travel improvements) • 2017-2019 Sidewalk and Miscellaneous Concrete Repair (5 ramps in 2017) SECTION 4 — ADA POLICY AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE ADA Grievance Procedure If a public entity has 50 or more employees, it is required to designate at least one responsible employee to coordinate ADA compliance. The City of Lodi has designated the Public Works Director as its primary ADA/Section 504 Coordinator. The ADA/Section 504 Coordinator is responsible for coordinating the City's efforts to comply with Title II and for investigating any complaints that the City has violated Title II of the ADA. The ADA/Section 504 Coordinator is also responsible for coordinating the City's efforts to comply with Title 24 and all other applicable state and federal physical and program accessibility requirements. All complaints or grievances submitted to the City of Lodi must be in writing on the designated form and contain specific information about the alleged violation or discrimination, including name; address; telephone number of the complainant; and the location, date, and a complete description of the problem. Anonymous complaints or grievances will not be accepted. Complaints or grievances will be kept confidential to the greatest extent possible, unless ordered released by a court of competent jurisdiction (see California Evidence Code Section 1040). Alternative means of filing complaints or grievances may be accepted at the discretion of the ADA/Section 504 Coordinator. These may be 43 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN submitted by telephone, email (confidentiality cannot be assured), letter, personal interview, or tape recording, upon request. However, all complaints or grievances must include all the required information consistent with the format of the official complaint form. See Appendix E. All complaints must be submitted by the complainant or his/her designee to the ADA/Section 504 Coordinator at the below location or, upon approval of a request to submit via an alternative method, by telephone at (209) 333-6706 (voice) or via online submission at http://www.lodi.gov/accessibility.html. Complaints should be submitted as soon as possible, but no later than 60 calendar days after the date of the alleged violation or discriminatory act. City of Lodi ADA/Section 504 Coordinator PO Box 3006 221 W. Pine Street Lodi, CA 95241 Within 15 calendar days after receipt of the complaint, the ADA/Section 504 Coordinator or Title VI Coordinator (as deemed appropriate) or his/her designee will contact the complainant to discuss the complaint and the possible resolutions. Within 15 calendar days after that discussion, the ADA/Section 504 Coordinator or Title VI Coordinator (as deemed appropriate) or his/her designee will respond in writing, and where appropriate, in an accessible format, such as large print, Braille, or audiotape. The response will explain the position of the City of Lodi and offer options for substantive resolution of the complaint. If the response by the ADA/Section 504 Coordinator or Title VI Coordinator (as deemed appropriate) or his/her designee does not satisfactorily resolve the issue, the complainant and/or their designee may appeal the decision to the City Manager within 15 calendar days after receipt of the coordinator's or his/her designee's response. Within 15 calendar days after receipt of the appeal, the City Manager or his/her designee will meet with the complainant/appellant to discuss the complaint and possible resolutions. Within 15 calendar days after the meeting, the City Manager or his/her designee will respond in writing, and, where appropriate, in a format accessible to the complainant, with a final resolution of the complaint. All written complaints received by the ADA/Section 504 Coordinator or Title VI Coordinator (as deemed appropriate) or his/her designee, appeals to the City Manager or his/her designee, and responses from these two offices will be retained by the City of Lodi for at least three years. If any Title 24 Building Code or ADA complaint or grievance is under the jurisdiction of another public entity, the complainant will be notified that the City of Lodi lacks jurisdiction and will be referred to the appropriate jurisdiction. SECTION 5 - DEFINITIONS The following is a summary of many definitions found in the ADA. Please refer to the Americans with Disabilities Act for the full text of definitions and explanations (http://www.ada.gov/). 44 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 5.1 Auxiliary Aids and Services The term auxiliary aids and services includes: 1. Qualified interpreters or other effective methods of making orally delivered materials available to individuals with hearing impairments; 2. Qualified readers, taped texts, or other effective methods of making visually delivered materials available to individuals with visual impairments; and 3. Acquisition or modification of equipment or devices; and 4. Other similar services and actions as allowed under the ADA. 5.2 Complaint A complaint is a claimed violation of the ADA. 5.3 Disability The term disability means, with respect to an individual: 1. A physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of the major life activities of such individual; 2. A record of such impairment; or 3. Being regarded as having such impairment. 5.4 Discrimination on the Basis of Disability Discrimination on the basis of disability means to: • Limit, segregate, or classify a citizen in a way that may adversely affect opportunities or status because of the person's disability; • Limit, segregate, or classify a participant in a program or activity offered to the public in a way that may adversely affect opportunities or status because of the participant's disability; • Participate in a contract that could subject a qualified citizen with a disability to discrimination; • Use any standards, criteria, or methods of administration that have the effect of discriminating on the basis of disability; • Deny equal benefits because of a disability; • Fail to make reasonable accommodations to known physical or mental limitations of an otherwise qualified individual unless it can be shown that the accommodation would impose an undue burden on the City's operations; • Use selection criteria that exclude otherwise qualified people with disabilities from participating in the programs or activities offered to the public; and 45 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN • Fail to use tests, including eligibility tests, in a manner that ensures that the test results accurately reflect the qualified applicant's skills or aptitude to participate in a program or activity. 5.5 Having a Record of Impairment An individual is disabled if he or she has a history of having an impairment that substantially limits the performance of a major life activity or has been diagnosed, correctly or incorrectly, as having such impairment. 5.6 Physical or Mental Impairments Physical or mental impairments may include, but are not limited to, vision, speech, and hearing impairments; emotional disturbance and mental illness; seizure disorders; mental retardation; orthopedic and neuromotor disabilities; learning disabilities; diabetes; heart disease; nervous conditions; cancer; asthma; Hepatitis B; HIV infection (HIV condition); and drug addiction if the addict has successfully completed or is participating in a rehabilitation program and no longer uses illegal drugs. The following conditions are not physical or mental impairments: transvestitism; illegal drug use; homosexuality or bisexuality; compulsive gambling; kleptomania; pyromania; pedophilia; exhibitionism; voyeurism; pregnancy; height; weight; eye color; hair color; left-handedness; poverty; lack of education; a prison record; and poor judgment or quick temper if not symptoms of a mental or physiological disorder. 5.7 Qualified Individual with a Disability The term qualified individual with a disability means an individual with a disability who, with or without reasonable modification to rules, policies, or practices; the removal of architectural, communication, or transportation barriers; or the provision of auxiliary aids and services, meets the essential eligibility requirements for the receipt of services or the participation in programs or activities provided by the City. 5.8 Reasonable Program Modifications If the individual's disabilities prevent him or her from performing the essential functions of the program or activity, it is necessary to determine whether reasonable program modifications would enable an individual to perform the essential functions of the program or activity. Reasonable program modification is any change in program or activity or in the way things are customarily done that enables an individual with a disability to enjoy equal program opportunities. Accommodation means modifications or adjustments: 1. To a registration or application process to enable an individual with a disability to be considered for the program or activity; 46 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2. To the program or activity environment in which the duties of a position are performed so that a person with a disability can perform the essential functions of the program or activity; and 3. That enables individuals with disabilities to enjoy equally the benefits of the program or activity as other similarly situated individuals without disabilities enjoy. Modification includes making existing facilities and equipment used by individuals readily accessible and usable by individuals with disabilities. Modification applies to: • All decisions and to the application or registration process; • All services provided in connection with the program or activity; and • Known disabilities only. Modification is not required if: • It changes the essential nature of a program or activity of the person with a disability; • It creates a hazardous situation; • Adjustments or modifications requested are primarily for the personal benefit of the individual with a disability; or • It poses an undue burden on the City. 5.9 Regarded as Having a Disability An individual is disabled if she or he is treated or perceived as having an impairment that substantially limits major life activities, although no such impairment exists. 5.10 Substantial Limitations of Major Life Activities An individual is disabled if she or he has a physical or mental impairment that (a) renders her or him unable to perform a major life activity, or (b) substantially limits the condition, manner, or duration under which she or he can perform a particular major life activity in comparison to other people. Major life activities are functions such as caring for oneself, performing manual tasks, walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning, and working. In determining whether physical or mental impairment substantially limits the condition, manner, or duration under which an individual can perform a particular major life activity in comparison to other people, the following factors shall be considered: 1. The nature and severity of the impairment; 2. The duration or expected duration of the impairment; and 3. The permanent or long-term impact (or expected impact) of or resulting from the impairment. 47 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 5.11 Undue Burden The City of Lodi shall not provide an accommodation that imposes an undue burden on the operation of the City's business. The term undue burden means significant difficulty or expense incurred in the provision of accommodation. Undue burden includes, but is not limited to, financial difficulty. Undue burden refers to any modification that would be unduly costly, extensive, substantial, or disruptive, or that would fundamentally alter the nature of operation of the business of the City. Whether a particular accommodation will impose an undue hardship is determined on a case-by-case basis. If a particular modification is determined to cause an undue burden to the City of Lodi, the City will attempt to identify another modification that would not pose such a burden. If cost causes the undue burden, the City must consider whether funding for the modification is available from an outside source. If no such funding is available, the City must give the person with a disability the opportunity to provide the modification or to pay for that portion of the modification that constitutes an undue burden. The following factors are considered in determining whether a program modification would create an undue burden: the nature and cost of the modification; the financial resources of the City available to make the modification; the impact the expense of the accommodation will have on the affected City operation; and the permanence of the alterations affecting the site. SECTION 6— PROGRAM ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES, STANDARDS, AND RESOURCES 6.1 Introduction In order to facilitate access to all City programs and departments, the City will maintain these program accessibility guidelines, standards, and resources. This information is available to all employees and volunteers. The City will add to these guidelines when necessary to address its needs and include information and technological devices that help staff and volunteers communicate with individuals with a variety of disabilities. The City will periodically review the components of this section, as new technologies are developed, to ensure that the best types of modifications are included. This section also contains the accessibility standards of care that govern new construction and alterations to facilities. Both state and federal regulations apply to accessible facilities. Described below are resources for both federal and State of California standards and regulations. 6.2 Federal Accessibility Standards and Regulations US Department of Justice The US Department of Justice provides many free ADA materials, including text of the Americans with Disability Act (ADA). Printed materials may be ordered by calling the ADA Information Line [(800) 514- 0301 (Voice) or (800) 514-0383 (TTY)]. Publications are available in standard print as well as large print, 48 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN audiotape, Braille, and computer disk for people with disabilities. Documents, including the following publications, can also be downloaded from the Department of Justice website (http://www.ada.gov/). • ADA Regulation for Title II: This publication describes Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability by public entities. Title II of the ADA protects qualified individuals with disabilities from discrimination on the basis of disability in the services, programs, or activities of all state and local governments. This rule adopts the general prohibitions of discrimination established under Section 504, as well as the requirements for making programs accessible to individuals with disabilities and for providing equally effective communications. It also sets forth standards for what constitutes discrimination on the basis of mental or physical disability, defines disability and qualified individual with a disability, and establishes a complaint mechanism for resolving allegations of discrimination. • Title II Technical Assistance Manual (1993) and Yearly Supplements: This 56 -page manual explains in lay terms what state and local governments must do to ensure that their services, programs, and activities are provided to the public in a nondiscriminatory manner. Many examples are included for practical guidance. • Accessibility of State and Local Government Websites to People with Disabilities: The 5 -page publication provides guidance on making state and local government websites accessible. • ADA Information for Law Enforcement: This page contains compliance assistance materials to help state and local law enforcement officers understand how to interact with victims, witnesses, suspects, and others who have disabilities. US Access Board Publications The full texts of federal laws and regulations with guidelines for the design of accessible facilities and programs are available from the US Access Board. Single copies of publications are available free and can be downloaded or ordered by completing a form available on the Access Board's website (http://www.access-board.gov/). In addition to regular print, publications are available in large print, on disk or audiocassette, and in Braille. Communications & IT Access to information and communication technology (ICT) is addressed by Access Board standards and guidelines issued under Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act and Section 255 of the Telecommunications Act. • Section 508 Standards: http://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and- standards/communications-and-it/about-the-section-508-standards • Refresh of the Section 508 Standards and the Telecommunications Act Guidelines: http://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/communications-and-it/about-the-ict- refresh • Telecommunications Act Accessibility Guidelines : http://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and- standards/communications-and-it/about-the-telecommunications-act-guidelines 49 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Buildings & Sites Standards issued under the ADA address access to buildings and sites nationwide in new construction and alterations. • 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design: This document contains scoping and technical requirements for accessibility to buildings and facilities by individuals with disabilities under the ADA of 1990. These requirements are to be applied during the design, construction, and alteration of buildings and facilities covered by Titles II and III of the ADA to the extent required by regulations issued by federal agencies, including the US Department of Justice and the US Department of Transportation, under the ADA. This document must be used in conjunction with Title 24 of the California Building Code (see subsection 6.4, State of California Accessibility Standards and Regulations). • 2010 ADA Standards: http://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/buildings-and- sites/about-the-ada-standards Recreation Facilities Access to recreation facilities, including play areas, swimming pools, sports facilities, fishing piers, boating facilities, golf courses, and amusement rides, is addressed in the ADA and Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) standards. New provisions will cover access to trails, picnic and camping sites, and beach access routes. • Recreation Facilities: http://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/recreation- facilities/about-recreation-facilities • Outdoor Developed Areas: http://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/recreation- facilities/outdoor-developed-areas Streets and Sidewalks New guidelines the Access Board is developing will cover access to public rights-of-way, including sidewalks, intersections, street crossings, and on -street parking. The Access Board is also addressing access to shared use paths providing off-road means of transportation and recreation. • Public Rights -of -Way: http://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/streets- sidewalks/public-rights-of-way • Shared Use Paths: http://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/streets- sidewalks/shared-use-paths/about-this-rulemaking 6.3 Publications for Title II: US Department of Justice Title II Technical Assistance Manual 1 Supplement This 56 -page manual explains in lay terms what state and local governments must do to ensure that their services, programs, and activities are provided to the public in a nondiscriminatory manner. (1993) http://www.ada.gov/taman2.html 50 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN The ADA and City Governments: Common Problems The 9 -page document contains a sampling of common problems shared by city governments of all sizes, provides examples of common deficiencies, and explains how these problems affect persons with disabilities. (2000) http://www.ada.gov/comprob.htm ADA Guide for Small Towns This 21 -page guide presents an informal overview of some basic ADA requirements and provides cost- effective tips on how small towns can comply with the ADA. (2000) http://www.ada.gov/comprob.htm Accessibility of State and Local Government Websites to People with Disabilities The 5 -page publication provides guidance on making state and local government websites accessible. (2003) http://www.ada.gov/websites2.htm ADA Checklist for Polling Places This 39 -page checklist is a self-help survey that voting officials can use to determine whether a polling place has basic accessible features needed by most voters with disabilities. (2004) http://www.ada.gov/votingchecklist.htm An ADA Guide for Local Governments: Making Community Emergency Preparedness and Response Programs Accessible to People with Disabilities This 11 -page illustrated publication provides guidance on preparing for and carrying out emergency response programs in a manner that results in the services being accessible to people with disabilities. (2006) http://www.ada.gov/emergencyprep.htm Access for 9-1-1 and Telephone Emergency Services The 10 -page publication explains the requirements for direct, equal access to 9-1-1 for persons who use teletypewriters (TTYs). (1998) http://www.ada.gov/911ta.htm Commonly Asked Questions About the ADA and Law Enforcement This 12 -page publication includes information for law enforcement agencies in a simple question and answer format. (2006) http://www.ada.gov/q&a law.htm Communicating with People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: ADA Guide for Law Enforcement Officers This 8 -panel pocket guide provides basic information for officers about ADA requirements for communicating effectively with people who are deaf or hard of hearing. (2006) http://www.ada.gov/lawenfcomm.htm Model Policy for Law Enforcement on Communicating with People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing This 4 -page document serves as a model for law enforcement agencies when adopting a policy on effective communication with people who are deaf or hard of hearing. Agencies are encouraged to download and adapt the policy to suit their needs. (2006) http://www.ada.gov/lawenfmodpolicy.htm Questions and Answers: The ADA and Hiring Police Officers The 5 -page publication includes information on ADA requirements for interviewing and hiring police officers. (1997) http://www.ada.gov/copsg7a.htm 51 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 6.4 State of California Accessibility Standards and Regulations and Additional Resources Title 24, California Building Code The State of California has adopted a set of design guidelines for accessible facilities, which can be found in the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part II, California Building Code (CBC). The CBC contains general building design and construction requirements relating to fire and life safety, structural safety, and access compliance. CBC provisions establish minimum standards to safeguard life or limb, health, property, and public welfare by regulating and controlling the design, construction, quality of materials, use and occupancy, location, and maintenance of all buildings and structures and certain equipment. Although California has adopted most of the ADAAG requirements, there are some differences. In general, the more restrictive requirement (whether federal or state) should be applied when designing accessible facilities. The complete Title 24 or any of its parts is available for purchase from the International Code Council (ICC), 5360 Workman Mill Road, Whittier, CA 90601; (800) 423-6587, (http://www.iccsafe.org) or at various bookstores that carry technical books. Since the CBC is updated every three years, the City should have an ongoing program of regularly reviewing these changes and updating City policies and procedures related to accessibility to keep them current. Division of the State Architect The Division of the State Architect (DSA) also has information and resources related to accessible or universal design. Publications available for downloading at DSA's website (http://www.dgs.ca.gov/dsa) include: • DSA's 2011 California Access Compliance Reference Manual: The purpose of this book of regulations and statutes is to clarify the obligations for architectural accessibility in California. For further technical assistance, contact DSA's Access Compliance Program at 1102 Q Street, Suite 5100, Sacramento, CA 95811; (916) 445-8100. Resources for Providing Accessible Programs and Facilities • ADA Document Portal: This website includes links to an ADA Collection consisting of more than 7,400 documents on a wide range of topics. The ADA Document Portal is supported by the ten ADA & IT Technical Assistance Centers (https://adata.org/ada-document-portal). • American Alliance of Museums: Accessible exhibit design publications are available for purchase from the alliance's website, including Everyone's Welcome (available in a variety of formats), which addresses museum programs and the ADA; The Accessible Museum, which offers model programs of accessibility for older people and people with disabilities; and What Museum Guides Need to Know to provide access to blind and visually impaired visitors (http://www.aam- us.0rg). • Beneficial Designs: Beneficial Designs works toward universal access through research, design, and education. Beneficial Designs develops assistive and adaptive technology, performs rehabilitation research, contract design, legal consultation, and standards development, and serves as a rehabilitation information resource. Contact Beneficial Designs, Inc., at 2240 52 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Meridian Blvd., Suite C, Minden, NV 89423-8628; (775) 783-8822); (http://www.beneficialdesigns.com/). • California State Parks Accessibility Guidelines: A state outdoor recreation resource (http://www.parks.ca.gov). • Disabilitylnfo.Gov: A one-stop interagency portal for information on federal programs, services, and resources for people with disabilities, their families, employers, service providers, and other community members. • National Center on Accessibility (NCA): The center is a cooperative project between the National Park Service and Indiana University to provide information and technical assistance, primarily on recreation access. An example of NCA's research activities is the National Trails Surface Study. This study is primarily the result of questions that the center has received for many years and continues to receive from organizations, agencies, and individuals who desire to make their trails accessible, are interested in an unobtrusive surface that blends and is friendly to the environment, and provides a quality trail experience for people with and without disabilities. NCA also publishes "What Is an Accessible Trail?," which summarizes the federal guidelines for outdoor developed areas and is available for download from its website. The website also has information on campground accessibility, accessible picnic tables, access to beaches, and inclusion of people with disabilities in aquatic venues (http://www.ncaonline.org/). • National Center on Physical Activity and Disability: The center provides information and resources on physical activity to help people with disabilities find ways to become more active and healthier. The center also has information on how to provide access to fitness centers, schools, recreation facilities, camps, and health and leisure services (http://www.ncpad.org/). • Smithsonian Institution: The Accessibility Program has developed the Smithsonian Guidelines for Accessible Exhibition Design (1996), which are available for download from its website (http://accessible.si.edu). Further information is available from the Smithsonian Accessibility Program at the Arts and Industries Building, Room 1239 MRC 426, Washington, DC 20560; (202) 786-2942. Resources for Assistive Technologies (General) The City should utilize the many disability -related resources available through the Internet. • AbleData: The National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research of the US Department of Education maintains a national web -based service with up-to-date links to assistive technologies and disability -related resources (http://www.abledata.com1). • California Assistive Technology System (CATS): CATS is a statewide project of the California Department of Rehabilitation that promotes access to assistive technologies, related services, and information to enable people with disabilities to be successful, independent, and productive. CATS maintain several directories on its website (http://www.atnet.org) including: o On-site and remote real-time captioning services o American Sign Language (ASL) interpreters 53 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN o Ergonomic office equipment vendors o Augmentative and assistive communications manufacturers and vendors o Organizations that provide low-cost and donated computers for organizations that provide services to people with disabilities o Assistive technology vendors and service providers for the hard of hearing/deaf, learning disabled, mobility/physical/orthopedic, speech/language, and visually impaired/blind Alternative Format Communications Resources to produce standardized publications such as applications and registration forms in Braille, audiotape, large -print text, and accessible electronic media will be assembled. Information regarding Braille services and other accommodations for people with visual disabilities is available by contacting: • American Council of the Blind (ACB): ACB (http://www.acb.org/) is a national organization advocating on behalf of persons who are blind or have low vision. ACB also publishes "A Guide to Making Documents Accessible to People Who Are Blind or Visually Impaired," which is available online, in regular print, large print, or Braille, or on cassette tape. ACB is located at 1155 15th St. NW, Suite 1004, Washington, DC 20005 and may be contacted at (800) 424-8666 or by email at info@acb.org. • National Center on Accessibility: NCA publishes "What Are Alternative Formats? How Do They Apply to Programs and Services?," which is available for downloading from the NCA website (http://www.ncaonline.org/). • National Center for Accessible Media (NCAM): NCAM is a research and development facility dedicated to the issues of media and information technology for people with disabilities in their homes, schools, workplaces, and communities. Developers of Web- and CD -ROM -based multimedia need an authoring tool for making their materials accessible to persons with disabilities. NCAM has developed two such tools, version 1.0 and 2.01 of the Media Access Generator (MAGpie), for creating captions and audio descriptions for rich media. MAGpie is available for download from NCAM's website (http://ncam.wgbh.org). American Sign Language Interpreters A pool of on-call American Sign Language interpreters should be developed. The list of such interpreters should be routinely updated to ensure their availability. Some programs may need to have a pool of interpreters who are available on a 24-hour basis to handle emergency procedures. The required qualifications of these interpreters should be established. Many non -certified interpreters provided by local services may have excellent skills and be qualified to handle most circumstances. However, certain circumstances, such as the provision of emergency medical services, may require interpreters who are approved by the courts and can ensure a level of confidentiality. The City may want to contact each agency in advance of a need for services to determine their rates so that it is prepared to cover the communication expenses, should the need arise. The City should always request RID certified interpreters. Only in the event that certified interpreters are unavailable should non -certified interpreters be relied on. 54 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Individuals who are hard of hearing generally do not use ASL interpreters. The individual requesting an accommodation should be asked what type of accommodation works best for them. Determining what accommodation(s) will be provided is an interactive process. Depending on the situation, accommodating an individual who is hard of hearing may include note writing, use of assistive listening devices, and/or provision of Computer Assisted Real -Time (CART) captioning. Assistive Listening Systems and Devices Systems and devices to amplify sound for persons with hearing disabilities should be available for public meetings and events. Various technologies exist for these devices. Different types of devices are more suitable for different types of hearing disabilities. Devices should be chosen to accommodate the greatest number of individuals. • See the online directory of augmentative and assistive communications manufacturers and vendors available at the California Assistive Technology System website (http://www.atnet.org). • See also the Assistive Listening Systems Technical Bulletins available on the US Access Board's website (http://www.access-board.gov/). Closed Caption Machine To the extent practical, City departments should have access to a device for encoding closed captioning on films and videotapes used for training and other programs. • See the online directory of on-site and remote real-time captioning services available at the California Assistive Technology System website (http://www.atnet.org). Optical Readers Equipment that can translate printed information into an audio format should be available to the City programs. Text Telephone (TTY) City programs should have access to a text telephone or to a telephone transfer service as required by law and offered by public telephone companies. • TDI: TDI's (formerly known as Telecommunications for the Deaf, Inc.) mission is to promote equal access in telecommunications and media for people who are deaf, hard of hearing, late deafened, or deaf blind. TDI's online resources include information about telecommunications access such a TTY, pagers, telephony, VoIP, and more (http://tdiforaccess.org/). • See the Text Telephones Technical Bulletin available on the US Access Board's website (http://www.access-board.gov/). Video Relay Services (VRS) Video Relay Service (VRS) is a form of Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) that enables persons with hearing disabilities who use American Sign Language to communicate with voice telephone users through video equipment, rather than through typed text. Video equipment links the VRS user with a TRS operator—called a communications assistant (CA)—so that the VRS user and the CA can see and communicate with each other in signed conversation. Because the conversation between the VRS user and the CA flows much more quickly than with a text -based TRS call, VRS has become a popular form of TRS (www.fcc.gov/guides/video-relay-services). 55 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN • Hands on Video Relay Service: (877) 467-4877 English or (877) 467-4875 Spanish • Sorenson Video Relay: Using a standard telephone, call the toll-free number at (866)-327-8877. Have the contact information of the deaf or hard -of -hearing individual (i.e., name, videophone number, or IP address) ready. Remain on hold until the call is answered by the next available interpreter. • Sprint VRS Directions: (877) 709-5776 or website (www.sprintvrs.com) Enlarging Printed Materials A copy machine capable of enlarging printed materials should be available for staff. Guide to Disabilities and Disability Etiquette A guide to disabilities and disability etiquette should be assembled and distributed to staff and volunteers. The guide will ensure that staff and volunteers are familiar with a variety of types of disabilities and that they are sensitive to the abilities and needs of people with disabilities in order not to offend or demean them. The guide should be periodically updated to ensure it includes current acceptable language for talking about disabilities. • Disability Etiquette: Interacting with People with Disabilities is available online (http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/access-fairness-etiquette-2009.pdf ). Lending Library of Assistive Technology Equipment The City should establish a "Resources Toolkit" of adaptive aids and resources that will be available for use by staff and volunteers without the means to assemble their own. It is recommended that the City explore local sources of assistive technology. • The US Department of Labor's online resources have guides and information for educators and high schools students, including inclusion materials, educational technology, a comprehensive list including college preparatory materials, transition issues for children with special needs, and more (https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/transitionguide.html; https://www.dol.gov/odep/topics/disability.htm ). • Accessibility Connections Community Map: A Directory of Bay Area Assistive Technology Services is an online service available at http://www.cforat.org/ BARD/. • Accessible Technology Coalition: An interactive website for information on accessible technology resources related to vision, hearing, computer access, workplace, learning, communication, seating and mobility, recreation and leisure, environmental controls, and aging (https://atcoalition.org/). • American Association of People with Disabilities: The association is the largest nonprofit, nonpartisan, cross -disability organization in the United States (http://www.aapd.com/). • American Foundation for the Blind (AFB): The foundation is committed to improving accessibility in all aspects of life—from cell phones to ATMs, on websites and in workplaces. Services include assistance in making products and services accessible to people with visual impairments. AFB offers expert consulting services and accessible media production. AFB provides objective 56 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN product evaluations of adaptive technologies through its assistive technology product database (http://www.afb.org/). Local assistance is available through the California Assistance for the Blind and a directory of services for the blind and visually impaired in California is available on its website (http://www.ccbnet.org/calif.htm).. • Institute for Human Centered Design: This educational nonprofit organization is committed to advancing the role of design in expanding opportunity and enhancing experience for people of all ages and abilities. The institute provides education and consultation to public and private entities about strategies, precedents, and best practices that go beyond legal requirements to design places, things, communication, and policy that integrate solutions to the reality of human diversity (http://www.adaptenv.org/). • The Arc: The Arc (formerly Association for Retarded Citizens of the United States) is the country's largest voluntary organization committed to the welfare of all children and adults with mental retardation and their families. Local information is available from Arc Alameda County, 14700 Doolittle Drive, San Leandro, CA 94577; (510) 357-6619 or by email via the website (www.arcalameda.org) and The Arc San Francisco, 1500 Howard Street, San Francisco, CA 94103; (415) 255-7200 or by email via the website (www.thearcsf.org). • Environmental Health Network (EHN): EHN's focus is on issues of access and developments relating to the health and welfare of the environmentally sensitive and to promote public awareness of environmental sensitivities and causative factors. EHN provides information on environmental and chemical sensitivities at EHN, P.O. Box 1155, Larkspur, CA, 94977-1155; (415) 541-5075 and on its website (http://ehnca.org/) • National Association of the Deaf (NAD): NAD is a national consumer organization representing people who are deaf and hard of hearing. NAD provides information about standards for American Sign Language interpreters and the Captioned Media Program on its website (http://www.nad.org/). • National Federation of the Blind (NFB): NFB is a national organization advocating on behalf of persons who are blind or have low vision. NFB provides online resources for technology for the blind, including a technology resource list, a computer resource list, screen access technology, sources of large -print software for computers, and sources of closed circuit televisions (http://www.nfb.or). • National Organization on Disability: The organization promotes the full and equal participation and contribution of America's 54 million men, women, and children with disabilities in all aspects of life. NOD maintains an online directory of information and links, including transportation -related resources (http://www.nod.org/). • Paralyzed Veterans of America (PVA): PVA is a national advocacy organization representing veterans. PVA's Sports and Recreation Program promotes a range of activities for people with disabilities, with special emphasis on activities that enhance lifetime health and fitness. PVA's website (http://www.pva.org) has information on useful sports publications and a list of contacts. 57 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN • State Council on Developmental Disabilities: This council works to ensure that people with developmental disabilities and their families receive the services and supports they need. The council is an independent state agency established by federal and state law. The council's contact information is: 1507 21st Street, Suite 210, Sacramento, CA 95814-5299; (916) 322- 8481; email scdd@dss.ca.gov or website (http://www.scdd.ca.gov/). • Office of Deaf Access, California Department of Social Services, 744 P Street, MS 6-91, Sacramento, CA 95814; (916) 653-8320; email deaf.access@dss.ca.gov or website (http://www.cdss.ca.gov/Deaf-Access). • Office of Services to the Blind, California Department of Social Services, 744 P Street, MS 6-94, Sacramento, CA 95814; (916) 657-3327; email BlindAccess@dss.ca.gov or website (http://www.cdss.ca.gov/Blind-Services). • United Cerebral Palsy (UCP): UCP's mission is to advance the independence, productivity, and full citizenship of people with cerebral palsy and other disabilities, through their commitment to the principles of independence, inclusion, and self-determination (http://www.ucp.org). • United Spinal Association: The association is a membership organization serving individuals with spinal cord injuries and disorders. Formerly known as the Eastern Paralyzed Veterans Association, the organization expanded its mission to serve people with spinal cord injuries or disorders regardless of their age, gender, or veteran status (http://www.unitedspinal.org). • World Institute on Disability (WID): WID is an international public policy center dedicated to carrying out research on disability issues. WID maintains an online information and resource directory on technology, research, universal design, and ADA (http://www.wid.org/resources/). Resources for Persons with Disabilities in Lodi 4299 Lodi Toastmasters Club Pentecostes Monte Sinai de la Biblia Abierta 643 California Baseball Academy People Assisting Lodi Shelter A T Valdez Foundation Phrabuddhivongsamunee Buddhist Temple A Way Out Inc. Pixie Woods Alpha Delta Chapter of Lodi California of Omega Nu Pleasant Grove Community Church Sorority Police Officers Association of Lodi Anapa Nui Inc. Pregnancy Resource Center of Lodi Animal Friends Connection Humane Society Pro Elite Baseball Club Arthur C. Boehmer and Florence Shubert Boehmer Providence Reformed Church Inc. Scholarship Fund Racers Under the Son North Beth Hallel Messianic Fellowship Radiant Life Church of Lodi Bethel 276 International Order of Jobs Daughters Redeemer Lutheran Church of Lodi Bethel Church of San Francisco Open Bible Reese Parents Club Bethel Gardens Remedy Church of Lodi Beyond Partnership Renew Church of Stockton Big Valley Bible Church Respiratory Works Inc. Big Valley Seniors Softball Club of Lodi -Stockton, Rivergate Mokelumne Owners Association California Rosa de Saron Church Inc. Boosters of Boys/Girls Sports Rotary Club of Lodi 58 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Borchardt PTA Buddhist Church of Lodi Building Blocks Neighborhood Corporation Burson Full Gospel Church California Interscholastic Federation Sac -Joaquin Section California Islamic Center California Wine Education Foundation Calvary Chapel Lodi Inc. Casa de Refugio de la Biblia Abierta Cats of All Colors Inc. Century Assembly Inc. Champion Ministries Chapter 6 Lodi Widowed Persons Association of California Inc. Cherokee Memorial Park Christ Evangelical Lutheran Church of Lodi Christian Women's Renewal Church of Christ Washington Street Church of God Seventh Day of Lodi, California Citizens Church of Open Bible City of Lodi Employees Association Cornerstone Evangelical Free Church of Lodi Corvettes of Lodi Daughters of Isabella Saint Anne's Circle 1332 Delta Fly Fishers Deshmesh Darbar of Lodi and Stockton Dhamarangsey Cambodia Buddhist Wat Duncan Ministries Inc. El Solyo Foundation Elm West Homes Association Emanuel American Lutheran Church of Lodi Emanuel Lutheran Church Lodi Faith Community Church of the Nazarene Feel the Power Impact Ministries First Baptist Church of Lodi, California First Church of Christ Scientist Lodi, California Flora Rebekah Lodge No 162 Independent Order of Odd Fellows FOE Auxiliary, California State French Camp Jail Neighborhood Lighthouse Aglow International Friends of the Lodi Library Incorporated Generations Church of Pleasant Hill San Joaquin County Chapter Thrivent Financial for Lutherans San Joaquin County Historical Society San Joaquin County Zoological Society San Joaquin Dog Training Club San Joaquin Valley Mens Ministry School of Prophets Ministry SFDFA Inc. Share Homes Sigma Nu Iota Kappa Chapter Housing Corporation Solid Rock Fellowship Open Bible Church Solutions Sons in Retirement Tokay Branch 145 Incorporated Sons of California Galt Chapter Sonshine Specialized Camping Ministries Soroptimist International of Lodi Spirit Life Fellowship Sri Aurobindo Association of America Sri Aurobindo Sadhana Peetham St. Anne's Endowment St. John the Baptist Parish St. Paul Lutheran Church St. Peter Lutheran Church of Lodi, California Stockton Chapter No. 266 National Sojourners Stockton Christian Life Foundation Inc Stockton Commandery No. 8 Stockton LLL Stockton Opera Association Inc. Stockton Pupil Personnel Association Inc. Stockton Singles Inc. Stockton YMI Elderly Housing Stonetree Condominiums Owners Association Stress and Grief Relief Inc. Sunny Malhotra Singh Tamarack Springs Mutual Water Company Inc. Temple Baptist Church of Lodi, California Tenrikyo Western Church The American Association of University Women Lodi, California The Bridge of Faith Open Bible Church The Charles and Shirlene Clark Family Foundation The Doves Guidance Program The First United Methodist Church of Lodi, California The Founder Rehabilitation Ranch 59 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Genesis Forum Academy Giving Opportunities to Kids Got Kids Go Foundation Gold Country Irish Red and White Setter Society Golden Trumphets Golden Valley Kennel Club Grace and Mercy Charitable Foundation Grand Chapter of California Order of Eastern Star 150 Lod i Grand Lodge of the Order of Hermann Sons of the State of California Grape Bowl Classic Gratitud Gujarati Community of San Joaquin County Guthrie Consulting Inc. Harvest Worship Center Pentecostal Church of God Northern Calif Hideaway Homeowners Association Hill House Historical Society Inc. Hole in My Heart Ministries Holt Counseling Center Hope Floats Hope for a Better Tomorrow Inc. Hope Initiative Inc. HopeNet Resources International Inc. Hutchins Street Square Foundation Iglesia Biblica El Calvario Iglesia Cristiana Biblia Abierta Iglesia Cristiana Casa de Restauracion Iglesia Cristiana Vino Nuevo Iglesia El Mesias Iglesia Faro de Luz de la Biblia Abierta Inspiring Hope Community Dancers International Ballet Theater Institute Monterey Bay Islamic Cemetery of California Odd Fellows Hall Association of Lodi Open Bible Christian Center Open Bible Church Operation Troop Outreach Order of Hermann Sons of California Group Return Orthodox Church Capital Improvement Fund Outreach Ministries International Pacific Region of Open Bible Standard Churches Pastor of St. Anne's Church The Geweke Foundation The Golden State Institute The Grace Presbyterian Church of Lodi, California The Home Church Bible Baptist of Stockton, California The LG Anderson Family Foundation Inc. The Lodi Police Partners Foundation The Loel Foundation The Maley-Thawley Family Foundation The Michael -David Family Foundation The Pixie 12 Arts Foundation The Rocky Robinson Charity Organization The Spiritual Assembly of the Bahais of Lodi The Vaccarezza-Murdaca Family Foundation The Village Adult Developmental and Community Center The Womans Club of Lodi Thomas Onoyama Memorial Scholarship Fund Thunder Media Ministries Inc. Tienda Place Homeowners Association Tip Your Heart Foundation Tokay AS Tokay Band Boosters Club Inc. Tokay FFA Ag Boosters Tokay High PTSA Tokay Stitch N Quilt Guild Tower Park Yacht Club Tree Lodi Truckers United Fraternity Super Offspring of the Boss Unfettered Ministries Inc. United Congregational Christian Church of Lodi Urban Life Christian Church of Open Bible Valley Rose Court No 158 Valley Waterfowl Valley Womens Community Club Victory Outreach, Lodi Vinewood Community Church Vinewood Parent Club Vista Oaks Charter School Inc. Willow Glen Property Owners Association Woodbridge PTA World Autism and Savant Foundation World of Wonders Science Museum Inc. 60 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Peace4Youth Inc. Appendices Appendix A: ADA Self -Evaluation Survey Appendix 6: Public Comment Appendix C: Facility Report Appendix D: Public Rights -of -Way City Standard Details Appendix E: Grievance Form Wrestling Booster Club of Tokay High Young Ladies Grand Institute 91 Queen of Peace Zion Lutheran Church of Lodi 61 Appendix A: Program Self -Evaluation Survey Appendix A City of Lodi ADA Self -Evaluation Survey Please list your department, division & program: Department: Department Division/Bureau: Division Program (as named on survey notice): Program/Service Cop ri.hted and used with the permission of the Cit and Count of San Francisco, Ma or's Office on Disabilit . Surve Instructions The Self -Evaluation Survey is designed so that you have to answer only those questions that are relevant to your program. It is divided into six sections according to different types of services and activities, as follows: 1. Program Background 11. General Public Contact III. Intensive "Client" Contact IV. Contracting V. Purchasing VI.Staff Training & Technical Assistance Start at Section 1 and continue from there. At the beginning of each section is an explanation of the types of programs that are covered by that section. Please, read each section description carefully to determine whether the questions in that section apply to your program. If your program does not fit the section description, you may skip to the next section. There is a space for comments at the end of every section, as well as at the end of the survey. Please keep in mind that the Survey is not a test. The survey is a tool that is being used to gather baseline data about the accessibility of city benefits and services. We hope to identify best practices as well as areas where improvement is needed. The City and County will use the data gathered to determine where resources and training are needed to improve access across all programs. If you have any questions about the survey, please contact City ADA Coordinator Joseph Wood at x2467. 2 Frequentl Asked Questions My Department has already evaluated the accessibility of our facilities. How does the Self -Evaluation Survey relate to that evaluation? The Self -Evaluation Survey is focused on programmatic and communication access. It does not address architectural issues. Even if your Department has already developed, or is in the process of developing a Transition Plan, you must complete the Self -Evaluation Survey. Is the survey asking about my Department's policies? No. The Survey is an evaluation of City programs, not Departments. While there may be some overlap with your department, the survey asks questions about the policies, procedures and practices of your individual program. In answering the questions, you should limit your responses to the service or cluster of services you oversee. How are you defining "program"? What about "program manager"? For the purposes of the Self -Evaluation: A "program" is a service or cluster of services with a single purpose. Because Departments vary significantly in structure and type of service provided, programs within these Departments also vary. In some cases, smaller clusters of services were grouped together as one because they act as one program when developing and implementing policies, procedures and practices. A "program manager" is the person who is responsible for the program. For the purpose of the Self -Evaluation, a program manager is the responsible individual who is close enough to the day-to-day workings of the program to have a sense of the actual practices, and who has some authority over the program's policies and procedures. How are you defining disability? This survey uses the term disability as it is defined in the Americans with Disability Act: "a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity; a record of such an impairment; or being regarded as having such an impairment.""Physical or mental impairment" includes, but is not limited to: visual, speech and hearing impairments, cerebral palsy, diabetes, mental retardation, emotional illness, HIV disease and drug addiction. Examples of "major life activities" include: caring for one's self, performing manual tasks, walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning and working. don't see a lot of "don't know" answer options. If I don't know the answer to a question, should I research the question or just answer "no"? If you don't immediately know the answer to a question, we prefer that you ask around to find an answer. If you can't get an answer after asking around, you should answer "no." 3 Section I. Pro• ram Back• round Who must complete this section? All programs must complete this section. 1. Name of person completing this survey: Title: Phone: Fax: E-mail: 2. Primary Location of Program: Street Address: City: State: Zip: 3. How many employees work in this program? ❑ 0-10 ❑ 11 —20 ❑ 21 — 50 ❑ over 50 4. What is the approximate total budget for this program? ❑ under $500,000 ❑ $500,000 - $1,000,000 ❑ $1,000,001 - $5,000,000 ❑ over $5,000,000 5. Does your program issue licenses or certifications (e.g., foster home, marriage, dog licenses, etc.)? ID Yes El No 6. In three sentences or less, please describe the contact your program has with the public (e.g., people come into our office for x, y, and z; no one ever comes to our office but we buy information kiosks that are used by the public; we do fieldwork and interact with members of the public in the field; we give grants to organizations that provide x, y and z services to the public; we have clients who must apply for our program and meet certain criteria for continuing to receive service from us; etc.)." 4 Section II. General Public Contact Who must complete this section? Complete this section if your program has any direct contact with the public. This includes programs that lead tours, recruit and hire members of the public, provide information, issue citations or licenses, host meetings, collect fees, provide job training, administer benefits, etc. This does not include programs that provide public service through contracted agencies (see Section IV, below). If your program provides service through contracted agencies or does not have direct contact with the public (e.g., purchasing programs), you may skip this section. A. Population Information 1. Approximately how many members of the public receive service from your program each year? ❑ Under 1000 ❑ 1,000 - 5,000 ❑ 5,001 — 10,000 ❑ Over 10,000 2. Approximately what percentage of these individuals has disabilities? [Note: We understand that your program may not collect this data and do not expect you to do so. However, your best estimate of this percentage will give us a clearer picture of your program. In your estimate, please be sure to consider those people with hidden disabilities (e.g., psychiatric illness) as well as those with visible disabilities (e.g., visual impairment).] ❑ NONE ❑ Under 10% ❑ 10% — 25% ❑ 26% - 50% ❑ over 50% ❑ Have no idea B. General Policies, Procedures & Practices 1. How do you inform members of the public about your program? (Check all that apply.) ❑ Verbal outreach ❑ Brochure ❑ Flyer/notice in community ❑ Advertisement in newspaper, bulletin, etc. ❑ Website ❑ Other, please name: 2. Does your program ever provide transportation for its applicants or participants? ❑ Yes [GO TO 2.1] ❑ No [GO TO 3] 2.1 If yes, what type? ❑ Mini -van ❑ Ramp -taxi ❑ Bus pass or tokens ❑ Other, please name: 5 2.2 Do you provide wheelchair accessible transportation for people who need it? ❑ Yes ❑ No 3. Does your program or service have safety standards (e.g., applicants must be able to care for themselves, participants may not have a history of violent or criminal behavior)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 3.1] ❑ No [GO TO 4] 3.1 If yes, please briefly describe the standards: 3.2 How do you determine whether an individual meets these standards? ❑ Self -identification by individual ❑ Staff observation ❑ Staff interview ❑ Testing ❑ Records check ❑ Other, please name: 4. Does your program have any components or services that are exclusively for people with disabilities (e.g., a housing program designated for persons with disabilities, an alternate employment program, a different application process, special meeting times, etc.)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 4.1] ❑ No [GO TO SECTION C] 4.1 If yes, please list these components or services: 4.2 May people with disabilities also participate in the general program if they so choose? ❑ Yes, always ❑ Yes, under special circumstances ❑ No 4.2a If you answered "Yes, under special circumstances" or "No" please explain: C. Communications 1. Does your program use an automated phone menu system to access staff and/or information on services (i.e., push 1 for... push 2 for...)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 1.1] ❑ No [GO TO 2] 1.1 If yes, does the system offer a simple (1 step) way for a caller to bypass the menu and speak directly with a program representative? 111 Yes El No 6 2. Does your program have a TTY/TDD (text telephone for communicating with people with hearing and/or speech impairments)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 2.1] ❑ No [GO TO 3] 2.1 If yes, do you have a dedicated phone line for the TTY/TTD? ❑ Yes ❑ No 2.2 What is the TTY/TDD number? 2.3 Where is the TTY/TDD number listed? (Check all that apply.) ❑ Brochure or other distributed written material ❑ Public phone directory ❑ Recorded message ❑ Website ❑ Other, please name: 2.4 Does the TTY/TTD have an answering machine that receives calls when a live person is not available (i.e., is your TTY/TTD functional 24 hours a day)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 2.5 Are members of your staff trained in how to use the TTY/TDD? ❑ Yes [GO TO 2.5A] ❑ No [GO TO 3] 2.5a If yes, please briefly describe the training they receive: 2.5b How frequently is this training provided? ❑ At orientation ❑ On request ❑ Semi-annually ❑ Annually ❑ Other, please name: 3. Does your program provide phones for the public to use to make outgoing calls when needed (e.g., to call for transportation or to track down a required document)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 3.1] ❑ No [GO TO 4] 3.1 If yes, is there a TTY/TTD available for making these calls? ❑ Yes ❑ No 4. Is your program staff trained in how to use the California Relay Service? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. Are people with disabilities portrayed in any of the materials used by your program (e.g. written descriptions, pictures, videos etc.)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 5.1] ❑ No [GO TO 6] 5.1 If yes, please describe briefly: 7 6. Does your program notify the public about whether your program office(s) is/are architecturally accessible (e.g., whether or not it is accessible to people in wheelchairs, whether or not there are obstructions that would hinder people who are blind)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 6.1] ❑ No [GO TO 7] 6.1 If yes, please indicate the methods you use to communicate this information: (Check all that apply.) ❑ Verbal outreach ❑ Posted notice outside facility ❑ Brochure ❑ Flyer, notice in community ❑ Advertisement in newspaper, bulletin, etc. ❑ Website ❑ Other, please name: 7. Do you ever provide information to the public through videos, movies or television broadcasts? ❑ Yes [GO TO 7.1] ❑ No [GO TO 8] 7.1 If yes, do these videos, movies, or broadcasts have captioning for individuals with visual impairments (i.e., is the verbal portion of the broadcast transcribed and displayed at the bottom of the screen)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 7.2 Do these videos, movies or broadcasts have an audio narration option for individuals who have visual impairments? ❑ Yes ❑No 8. Does your program include exhibits and/or interpretive displays (e.g., art exhibits, historical displays, information kiosks, etc.)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 8.1] ❑ No [GO TO 9] 8.1 If yes, is information in the exhibit/display provided in a variety of formats? ❑ Written ❑ Audio ❑ Graphic/Pictorial ❑ Other, please name: 9. Does your program use any of the following alternative formats and/or auxiliary aids to make program materials and services accessible to people with disabilities (e.g., to make written materials accessible to people with visual impairments, to make interviews accessible to people who are deaf)? (Check all that apply.) Alternative Formats ❑ Audiotape ❑ Enlarged print ❑ Braille ❑ Computer disk 8 ❑ Website ❑ E-mail ❑ Other, please name: Auxiliary Aids ❑ Sign language interpreters ❑ Assistive listening devices ❑ Real-time captioning ❑ Readers ❑ Call-in/speakerphone capability ❑ Assistants (who perform tasks such as translating for a person with speech impairment) ❑ Other, please name: 9.1 Please briefly describe the procedure someone must follow to request materials in alternative formats and/or auxiliary aids: 9.1a Is this procedure documented in written form? ❑ Yes ❑ No 9.2 Do you notify the public that they may request alternative formats and/or aids if needed? ❑ Yes [GO TO 9.2A] ❑ No [GO TO 9.3] 9.2a How are members of the public notified that they may request alternative formats and/or auxiliary aids if needed? (Check all that apply.) ❑ Verbal explanation at service window ❑ Posted notice program office ❑ Brochure or other distributed written material ❑ Recorded message ❑ Website ❑ Other, please name: 9.3 What is the average length of time that someone must wait for approval of a request? ❑ Less than 1 hour ❑ 1 hour — 24 hours ❑ 25 hours — 72 hours ❑ 73 hours to 1 week ❑ over 1 week 9.4 Please list the firm(s) and/or organization(s) you use to access auxiliary aids (e.g., the firm you use to access ASL interpreters, etc.): 9 10. Does your program hold public meetings, hearings or other events? ❑ Yes [GO TO 10.1] ❑ No [GO TO 11 ] 10.1 If yes, does your program hold public meetings, hearings or other events regularly at specific locations (i.e., at locations other than your program locations listed in Section I)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 10.1A] ❑ No [GO TO 10.2] 10.1a If yes, please list these specific locations: 10.2 Does your program notify the public about whether or not the locations of public meetings, hearings or other events are architecturally accessible? ❑ Yes [GO TO 10.2A] ❑ No [GO TO 10.3] 10.2a If yes, please indicate the methods you use to communicate this information: (Check all that apply.) ❑ Verbal outreach ❑ Written meeting notice ❑ Posted notice outside facility ❑ Advertisement in newspaper, bulletin, etc. ❑ Website ❑ Other, please name: 10.3 Do you use any of the following alternative formats and/or auxiliary aids to make public meetings, hearings or other events accessible to people with disabilities? Alternative Formats ❑ Audiotape ❑ Enlarged print ❑ Braille ❑ Computer disk ❑ Website ❑ E-mail ❑ Other, please name: Auxiliary Aids ❑ Sign language interpreters ❑ Assistive listening devices ❑ Real-time captioning ❑ Readers ❑ Call-in/speakerphone capability ❑ Assistants (who perform tasks such as translating for a person with speech impairment) ❑ Other, please name: 10 10.3a If you answered yes to any of the above, is the procedure for requesting and receiving alternative formats and/or auxiliary aids for public meetings, hearings or other events different from the procedure for requesting these formats and aids for program services? ❑ Yes [GO TO 10.3A1] ❑ No [GO TO 11 ] 10.3a1 If yes, please explain these differences. (Be sure to note any differences in the ways the public is notified, request procedure, length of request approval period, firms used, etc.): 11. How does your program pay for costs incurred from accommodating people with disabilities (e.g., paying for interpreters, alternative formats, individual staff assistance, etc.)? ❑ Fees from participants with disabilities ❑ Fees from all participants ❑ Specific budget line item ❑ Included in general budget ❑ Other, please name: D. Modification of Policies, Procedures & Practices 1. Does your program allow an individual to request a modification of program policies, procedures or practices to accommodate his/her disability (e.g., a waiver of an orientation requirement for someone who cannot attend at the required time due to a disability, a home visit for someone who is homebound and cannot come into the program office, assistance completing a required form for someone with a cognitive impairment, etc.)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 1.1] ❑ No [GO TO 2] 1.1 If yes, please briefly describe the procedure for requesting and providing modifications: 1.1a Is this procedure documented in written form? ❑ Yes ❑ No 1.2 Do you notify the public that they may request such modifications when needed? ❑ Yes [GO TO 1.2A] ❑ No [GO TO 1.3] 1.2a If yes, what does the notice include? ❑ Notice of right to non-discrimination ❑ Notice of right to reasonable modification of policies, procedures and practices ❑ Information on how to request a modification ❑ Phone number to call to request a modification ❑ TTY number to call to request a modification ❑ A form to complete to request a modification ❑ An address at which to make the request in person ❑ Contact information of an advocate or ombudsperson 11 ❑ Other, please name: 1.2b How are members of the public notified they may request modifications if needed)? (Check all that apply.) ❑ Verbal explanation at service window ❑ Posted notice in program office ❑ Brochure or other distributed written material ❑ Recorded message ❑ Website ❑ Other, please name: 1.3 What is the average length of time that someone must wait for approval of a request? ❑ Less than 1 hour ❑ 1 hour — 24 hours ❑ 25 hours — 72 hours ❑ 73 hours to 1 week ❑ over 1 week 1.4 How are staff (including receptionists, service window attendants, client service staff, etc.) informed about how to handle requests for modification? (Check all that apply.) ❑ Word-of-Mouth/Experience ❑ Employee Handbook ❑ Other documented procedure ❑ Training ❑ Other, please name: 1.5 Approximately how frequently does your program receive requests for modification of policies, procedures or practices? ❑ Never ❑ 1 — 10 x per year ❑ 11 — 25 x per year ❑ 25 — 50 x per year ❑ More than 50 x per year 1.6 In the last year, has your program modified a policy, procedure and/or practice for a person with a: (Check all that apply.) ❑ psychiatric disability? ❑ learning or Cognitive disability? ❑ speech impairment? ❑ hearing impairment? ❑ visual impairment? ❑ mobility impairment? ❑ immune disorder (such as HIV, Multiple Chemical Sensitivities, etc.)? 12 1.6a Please give an example of a modification that was made for each "yes" checked: 1.7 Does your program provide alternatives to an individual whose request for modification is denied (e.g., instead of a home visit to fill out an application, you offer a phone interview and mail the application to be signed by the homebound individual)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 1.7A] ❑ No [GO TO 2] 1.7a If yes, please give an example of a situation in which an alternative to a requested modification was provided: 2. Does your program require applicants or participants to wait in line at any time (e.g., at information window, to apply for service, etc.)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 2.1] ❑ No [GO TO 3] 2.1 If yes, are there alternatives available for individuals whose physical or mental disabilities make it unduly difficult to stand or wait for an extended period of time (e.g., a means of holding someone's place in line, staff available to assist people with disabilities, etc.)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 2.1A] ❑ No [GO TO 3] 2.1a If yes, please briefly describe the alternatives: 2.1b Can any staff offer these alternatives or must a request be approved by a designated staff member? ❑ Any staff may offer upon request ❑ Request must be approved by designated staff member ❑ Other, please name: 3. Does your program, and/or the facility in which the program is located, have a policy that restricts animals? ❑ Yes [GO TO 3.1] ❑ No [GO TO SECTION E] 3.1 If yes, may this policy be modified to allow for service or companion animals used by people with disabilities (e.g., the guide dog of a person who is blind, or the cat of a person with post-traumatic stress syndrome)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 3.1A] ❑ No [GO TO SECTION E] 3.1a May any staff modify this policy or must a request be approved by a designated staff member? ❑ Any staff may offer upon request ❑ Request must be approved by designated staff member ❑ Other, please name: 13 E. Grievance Policies & Procedures 1. Does your program have a grievance procedure (i.e., a procedure for resolving complaints by the public alleging noncompliance with the ADA in any of your program's services, activities and/or benefits)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 1.1] ❑ No [GO TO SECTION F] 1.1 If yes, please briefly describe this procedure: 1.1a Is this procedure documented in written form? ❑ Yes ❑ No 1.2 Do you notify the public of the grievance procedure? ❑ Yes [GO TO 1.2A] ❑ No [GO TO 1.3] 1.2a If yes, what does the notice include? (Check all that apply.) ❑ Information about how to file a grievance ❑ Phone number to call to register the grievance ❑ TTY number to call to register the grievance ❑ A form to complete to register the grievance ❑ An address where to register the grievance in person ❑ Contact information to an ombudsperson or advocate ❑ Other, please name: 1.2b How are program applicants or participants notified of the grievance procedure? (Check all that apply.) ❑ Verbal explanation at service window ❑ Posted notice program office ❑ Brochure or other distributed written material ❑ Recorded message ❑ Website ❑ Other, please name: 1.3 Does your program modify the grievance procedure for individuals whose disabilities prevent them from meeting the requirements of the procedure (e.g., providing an alternative to completing a complaint form)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 1.3a] ❑ No [GO TO 1.4] 1.3a If yes, is the procedure for requesting a modification included in the public grievance notice? ❑ Yes ❑ No 1.4 Approximately how frequently is the grievance procedure used? ❑ Never ❑ Once every couple of years ❑ 1 - 10 x per year ❑ 11 - 20 x per year ❑ More than 20 x per year 14 1.5 Do staff members who make decisions on grievances receive training in the requirements of federal and state disability rights laws? ❑ Yes [GO TO 1.5A] ❑ No [GO TO SECTION F] 1.5a If yes, please briefly describe the training provided: 1.5b How frequently is this training provided? ❑ At orientation ❑ Semi-annually ❑ Annually ❑ Bi -annually ❑ Other, please name: F. Emergency Policies, Procedures & Practices 1. Does the building or site that houses your program have emergency evacuation procedures? ❑ Yes [GO TO 1.1] ❑ No [GO TO 2] 1.1 If yes, please briefly describe these procedures: 1.2 Are these procedures documented in written form? ❑ Yes ❑ No 1.3 Do these evacuation procedures include specific provisions for evacuating people with disabilities? ❑ Yes [TO TO 1.3A] ❑ No [GO TO 1.4] 1.3a If yes, please describe these provisions: 1.4 How are members of the public notified of the emergency evacuation procedures? (Check all that apply.) ❑ Verbal explanation ❑ Posted notice program office ❑ Brochure or other distributed written material ❑ Recorded message ❑ Not notified ❑ Other, please name: 2. Is the building where your program is located equipped with visual emergency alarms (e.g., flashing lights) in addition to audio alarms? ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments for Section 11: 15 Section III. Intensive "Client" Contact Who must complete this section? Complete this section if your program has intensive and/or ongoing contact with the public. This includes all programs that have applications and requirements for continued service such as mental health, job training or public benefits programs, etc. This section should be completed in addition to (not instead of) Section II. If your program does not have intensive, ongoing contact with the public, you may skip this section. A. Application Policies, Procedures & Practices 1. Does your program have eligibility requirements (e.g., evidence of particular skills, record of good tenancy, completion of a training program, etc.)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 1.1] ❑ No [GO TO 2] 1.1 If yes, may these eligibility requirements be modified to accommodate individuals whose disabilities prevent them from meeting them? ❑ Yes [GO TO 1.1a] ❑ No [GO TO 2] 1.1a If yes, are members of the public notified before they are enrolled in the program that they may request modifications (i.e., are individuals who aren't already participants in your program notified of your program's modification procedures)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 1.1A1] ❑ No [GO TO 2] 1.1a1 If yes, please briefly describe how these individuals are notified: 2. Where is the application for your program available? (Check all that apply.) ❑ Program office(s) ❑ Community-based organization(s) ❑ Website ❑ Other, please name: 3. How may a member of the public apply to your program? (Check all that apply) ❑ In person at program office ❑ In person at community-based organization ❑ By authorized representative ❑ By mail ❑ By phone ❑ By TTY/TTD ❑ Through website ❑ Through home visit upon request ❑ Other, please name: 16 4. Is a member of your staff available to help those individuals who may require assistance in completing an application? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. Does your program require documentation (e.g. birth certificate, driver's license, medical records, etc.) in order for an individual to participate or receive services? ❑ Yes [GO TO 5.1] ❑ No [GO TO 6] 5.1 If yes, does your staff provide any of the following services to assist an individual in obtaining required documentation? (Check all that apply.) ❑ Make phone calls to request/retrieve documentation ❑ Make photocopies of original documentation ❑ Obtain documentation directly (with signed release) ❑ Other, please name: 5.1a If you answered yes to any of the above, please describe the circumstances under which these services would be provided: 6. Does your program prohibit service to individuals based on their illegal use of drugs? ❑ Yes [GO TO 6.1] ❑ No [GO TO SECTION B] 6.1 How do you determine whether an individual is currently using drugs illegally? ❑ Self -identification by individual ❑ Staff observation ❑ Staff interview ❑ Testing ❑ Records check ❑ Other, please name: B. General Service Policies, Procedures & Practices 1. Does your program have staffed drop-in hours for potential applicants or program participants who may not have an appointment? ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Does your program have a waiting room? ❑ Yes [GO TO 2.1] ❑ No [GO TO 3] 2.1 If yes, how are people who are waiting notified when it is their turn? (Check all that apply.) ❑ Verbal announcement by receptionist/other staff ❑ Loudspeaker announcement ❑ Notice board or other visual display ❑ Individual contact by receptionist/other staff ❑ Other, please name: 17 3. If a participant in your program has a disability that requires a regular (as opposed to one time) modification of a policy, procedure or practice, is this information recorded in his/her file or must he/she make a new request at each visit? ❑ Recorded in file ❑ New request at each visit ❑ Other, please name: 4. Does your program have requirements that a person must meet in order to remain in the program/continue to receive service (e.g. submit forms, attend meetings, complete assignments)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 4.1] ❑ No [GO TO SECTION C] 4.1 If yes, may these requirements be modified to accommodate individuals whose disabilities prevent them from meeting these requirements? ❑ Yes [GO TO 4.1A] ❑ No [GO TO SECTION C] 4.1a If yes, please give one or two examples of recent modifications your program has made: C. Service Termination Policies, Procedures & Practices 1. Does your program have service termination criteria? ❑ Yes [GO TO 1.1] ❑ No [GO TO SECTION IV] 1.1 If yes, please list criteria: 1.2 Does the termination process include an effort to determine whether the cause for termination is related to the participant's disability (e.g., client's failure to call or appear for appointment was result of psychiatric crisis)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 1.2A] ❑ No [GO TO 1.3] 1.2a If yes, please describe this effort: 1.3 Are participants notified that their participation in the program/service is going to be terminated before actual termination? ❑ Yes [GO TO 1.3A] ❑ No [GO TO 1.4] 1.3a If yes, how are participants notified? (Check all that apply.) ❑ In-person at office ❑ Home visit by staff ❑ Mailed letter ❑ Phone call ❑ Other, please name: 18 1.4 Does your program have a process through which someone can appeal a service termination? ❑ Yes [GO TO 1.4A] ❑ No [GO TO SECTION IV] 1.4a If yes, is the appeal process explained in the termination notice? ❑ Yes [GO TO 1.4A1] ❑ No [GO TO SECTION IV] 1.4a1 If yes, what does the notice include? (Check all that apply.) ❑ Phone number to call to register the appeal ❑ TTY number to call to register the appeal ❑ A form to complete to register the appeal ❑ An address at which to register the appeal in person ❑ Contact information to an ombudsperson or advocate Comments for Section 111: 19 Who must complete this section? Complete this section if your program awards and/or monitors contracts to agencies or organizations that provide services to the public. This includes programs that contract work to community-based organizations through an RFP process. If your program does not award and/or monitor contracts, you may skip this section. 1. Does your Request for Proposal/Qualification process include any of the following criteria for evaluating proposals? 1.1 Potential contractor's history of providing service to people with disabilities? I=1 Yes El No 1.2 Training of potential contractor's staff in serving people with disabilities? ❑ Yes ❑ No 1.3 Potential contractor's ability to modify services to accommodate people with disabilities (e.g., ability to provide additional time or assistance to participants with learning disabilities, established relationships with agencies that provide specialized services to people with disabilities, etc.)? ❑ Yes El No 1.4 Potential contractor's ability to provide written materials in alternative formats (e.g., braille, audiotape, large print, floppy disk, email, website, etc.)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 1.5 Potential contractor's experience using auxiliary aids or services (e.g., sign language interpreters, captioning, readers, etc.)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 1.6 Potential contractor's ability to provide transportation to people with disabilities (if appropriate)? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A 1.7 Whether or not a potential contractor has a written grievance procedure (i.e., a procedure for resolving complaints by the public alleging noncompliance with the ADA in any of the contractor's services, activities and/or benefits)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Are your Program Officers/Contract Monitors trained in recognizing programmatic and communication access problems? ❑ Yes [GO TO 2.1] ❑ No [GO TO 3] 2.1 If yes, please briefly described training provided: 20 2.2 How frequently is training provided? ❑ At orientation ❑ Semi-annually ❑ Annually ❑ Bi -annually ❑ Other, please name: 3. In their regular contract monitoring process, do your Program Officers/ Contract Monitors monitor for any of the following criteria? 3.1 Whether contractor notifies the public about how to request modifications or accommodations? ❑ Yes ❑ No 3.1 Whether the contractor has a waiting list? ❑ Yes [GO TO 3.1A] ❑ No [GO TO 3.2] 3.1a If yes, whether an individual can get on the waiting list through means other than standing in line (e.g., with a phone call, mail in form, etc.)? 3.2 Training of contractor's staff in serving people with disabilities? ❑ Yes ❑ No 3.3 Contractor's record of accommodating people with disabilities? ❑ Yes ❑ No 3.4 Contractor's record of providing written materials in alternative formats (e.g., braille, audio tape, large print, floppy disk, email, website, etc.)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 3.5 Contractor's record of using auxiliary aids and services (e.g., sign language interpreters, captioning, readers, etc.)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 3.6 Contractor's record of providing transportation to people with disabilities (when appropriate)? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A 3.7 Whether contractor has a written grievance procedure? ❑ Yes ❑ No 3.8 Whether the contractor has designated staff who are trained in resolving grievances? ❑ Yes ❑ No 21 4. How frequently are programs monitored? ❑ Never ❑ Semi-anually ❑ Annually ❑ Bi-anually ❑ Other, please name: Comments for Section IV: 22 Who must complete this section? Complete this section if you oversee purchasing for your program or other programs. Purchasing includes purchasing of computer systems, equipment, etc. If you do not oversee purchasing for your own or other programs, you may skip this section. 1. Do you purchase computer equipment or applications for use by the public? ❑ Yes [GO TO 1.1] ❑ No [GO TO 2] 1.1 If yes, do you make an effort to research state of the art products that may provide greater accessibility for people with disabilities? ❑ Yes [GO TO 1.1A] ❑ No [GO TO 2] 1.1a If yes, please describe this effort: 1.1b How frequently is the additional cost of accessible equipment or products a bar to purchasing them? ❑ Never ❑ Occasionally ❑ Often 2. Do you purchase large systems or equipment (e.g. new crosswalk signals, voting machines, medical examining tables, kiosk information systems, computer workstations, etc.) for use by the public? ❑ Yes [GO TO 2.1] ❑ No [GO TO SECTION VI] 2.1 If yes, do you make an effort to research state of the art products that may provide greater accessibility for people with disabilities? ❑ Yes [GO TO 2.1A] ❑ No [GO 3] 2.1a If yes, please describe this effort: 2.1b How frequently is the additional cost of accessible equipment or products a bar to purchasing them? ❑ Never ❑ Occasionally ❑ Often 3. Do you ever put equipment or large system purchases out to bid? ❑ Yes [GO TO 3.1] ❑ No [GO TO SECTION VI] 23 3.1 If yes, does your RFP/Q have a standard component about accessibility features (i.e., do you request vendors to show how their equipment may be used by people with disabilities, such as those with mobility impairments, or who are blind)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 3.1A] ❑ No [GO SECTION VI] 3.1a If yes, please describe this standard component: 3.1b How frequently is the additional cost of accessible equipment or products a bar to purchasing them? ❑ Never ❑ Occasionally ❑ Often Comments for Section V: 24 Section VI. Staff Trainin. & Technical Assistance Who must complete this section? All programs must complete this section. Note: In these questions, the term "staff" refers to all full-time employees (including management/supervisory, client/customer service, clerical, etc.) who work for your program. 1. Do members of your staff receive information on any of the following? ❑ Yes (Check all that apply.) ❑ No [GO TO 2] ❑ Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) ❑ Fair Housing Amendments Act ❑ Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act ❑ State Disability Laws 1.1 If yes, does this information provide a general overview of the regulations, specific information on how the regulations relate to the services provided by the program, or both? ❑ General ❑ Specific ❑ Both 1.2 How frequently is training provided? ❑ At orientation ❑ Semi-annually ❑ Annually ❑ Bi -annually ❑ Other, please name: 1.3 Do all members of your staff receive the above training or only staff at specific levels/classifications? ❑ All staff ❑ Management/supervisory staff ❑ Client contact/customer service staff ❑ Clerical/administrative support staff ❑ Other, please name: 2. Do members of your staff receive training in working with people who have: (Check all that apply.) ❑ psychiatric disabilities? ❑ learning or Cognitive disabilities? ❑ speech impairments? ❑ hearing impairments? ❑ visual impairments? ❑ mobility impairments? ❑ immune system disorders (such as HIV, Multiple Chemical Sensitivities, Lupus, etc.)? 25 2.1 If yes, please briefly describe the training provided: 2.2 How frequently is training provided? ❑ At orientation ❑ Semi-annually ❑ Annually ❑ Bi -annually ❑ Other, please name: 2.3 Do all members of your staff receive the above training or only staff at specific levels/classifications? ❑ All staff ❑ Management/supervisory staff ❑ Client contact/customer service staff ❑ Clerical/administrative support staff ❑ Other, please name: 3. Do members of your staff receive training in how to use auxiliary aids and services, (e.g., sign language interpreters, live computer captioning, audio narration devices, etc.)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 3.1] ❑ No [GO TO 4] 3.1 If yes, please briefly describe training provided: 3.2 How frequently is training provided? ❑ At orientation ❑ Semi-annually ❑ Annually ❑ Bi -annually ❑ Other, please name: 3.3 Do all members of your staff receive the above training or only staff at specific levels/classifications ❑ All staff ❑ Management/supervisory staff ❑ Client contact/customer service staff ❑ Clerical/administrative support staff ❑ Other, please name: 4. Does your program have an ADA Coordinator(s) (either dedicated to your program or shared with other programs in your department)? ❑ Yes [TO TO 4.1] ❑ No [GO TO 5] 26 4.1 If yes, please provide the following: Name: Title: Phone: Fax: E-mail: 4.1a For which of the following is this ADA Coordinator responsible? (Check all that apply.) ❑ Architectural access issues ❑ Employment access issues ❑ Communication access issues ❑ Programmatic access issues ❑ Other, please name: 4.2 If you have more than one ADA Coordinator, please provide the following additional information for the second ADA Coordinator: Name: Title: Phone: Fax: E-mail: 4.2a If yes, for which of the following is this ADA Coordinator responsible? (Check all that apply.) ❑ Architectural access issues ❑ Employment access issues ❑ Communication access issues ❑ Programmatic access issues ❑ Other, please name: 5. Would your staff benefit from training and/or technical assistance in providing programmatic and communication access? ❑ Yes [GO TO 5.1] ❑ No [GO TO 6] 5.1 If yes, what kind of training or technical assistance would be helpful? (Check all that are needed/of interest.) ❑ Assistance developing policies and procedures ❑ Training in how to work w/ people with disabilities ❑ Taining in legal requirements ❑ Training in providing accommodations ❑ Resources for alternative formats & auxiliary aids ❑ Other, please name: 27 6. Does your program use the services of contract employees (e.g., security guards, janitors, etc.)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 6.1] ❑ No [GO TO SECTION VII] 6.1 If yes, does your program have a procedure that contract employees are to follow in assisting people with disabilities (e.g., contacting a member of your staff, providing certain accommodations, etc.)? ❑ Yes [GO TO 6.1A] ❑ No [GO TO 6.2] 6.1a If yes, please describe this procedure: 6.2 Does the contract require that employees receive training in interacting with people with disabilities? III Yes El No Comments for Section VI: 28 End of Surve Thank you for completing the ADA Self -Evaluation Survey. We would like to hear from you! Before you submit your survey, please write any comments here: Please send your survey to: ADA Coordinator Office of the City Manager PO Box 3006 Lodi, CA 95241-1910 29 Appendix B: Public Comments to be received Appendix C: Facility Report City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Appendix C: Transition Plan / Facility Report Animal ServicesShelter Facii 1345 W. Kettleman Lane G1 CO - E H 2018-2020 N N N o N O N 2020-2022 I 2020-2022 Cost Estimate 000'05$ O V1 N O O N I O O O O N t/? Barriers Identified Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • 12 of the 15 doors do not have the proper hardware (door handles) • 11 of the 15 doors have threshold problems • 11 of the 15 doors do not have a clear path for approaches • No direct path of travel between the main building and the office • Drainage causes slope problems throughout • No path of travel to or from outside dog pen Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • All doors close in under 5 seconds • All light switches are not complaint Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • Bathroom is not ADA compliant Priority 4 — Additional Access • None City Hall 221 W. Pine Street :cess aisle at north handicap parking stall 7-k'ng space needs to be relocated to .d 1:12 1:48 xceeds 1:48 ;south entrance) exceed 1:12 attitpm of east ramp for south entrance I aces for th ramp handrails exceed 1.5" drails and wall of the ramps exceed 1.5" entrances indicating the location of the ice with International Symbol of Accessibility N City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN m LD Starting November 2017, and ongoing until priority 2 tasks are addressed 2020-2022 Starting November 2017, and ongoing until priority 2 tasks are addressed 0 0 ri VI- 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 ri i/} • Outer door at north entrance closes in less than 5 seconds. Edges of carpet/mat at north entrance are not firmly tacked down Interim -Alternative Methods • Provide temporary signage at inaccessible entrances indicating the location of the nearest accessible entrance (north entrance). • Provide temporary signage indicating elevator as part of accessible route. • During open hours, put up a sign redirecting persons with disabilities to an accessible entrance and contact number of who they can call should they need additional direction/assistance. Multiple directional signs will be provided to get the person to the location desired within the building. Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • No directional signage to accessible route (north entrance) or indicating elevator as part of accessible route. • No signage on the elevator door jambs at any floor identifying floor • No tactile star on both sides of the elevator door jambs at the main entry level • Audible signals in elevator do not announce up or down • Elevator door reopening device does not remain in effect for at least 20 seconds • No required accessible counter space at the public counters for Community Development, Public Works, Administration, or Human Resources Interim -Alternative Methods • Put up temporary directional signage to an accessible route (north entrance) and indicate the elevator as part of an accessible route • Put up a sign with instructions to call for assistance at the LULA elevator; this information will also be available on the City's website. Provide assistance, if requested, in going to second floor and directing the person to desired office. • Consider holding meetings at a different location, such as Carnegie Forum, if interested persons are not able to attend. • To access public counters for Community Development and Public Works, use accessible table space located in the meeting room behind the Community Development public counter, called the Community Development Conference Room can be used. To access Administration or Human Resources offices, one of the following meeting rooms can be used: City Manager Conference Room, City Attorney Conference Room, Human Resources Conference Room. m LD City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN LO I I June 2018 2023-2025 Starting November 2017, and ongoing until priority 2 tasks are addressed 0 0 o Ln ,-I i/)- 0 0 0 LI1 N i/} 0 00 r-1- irl i/} • Provide contact information on City's website for requesting any additional needed accommodations. Priority 3 –Toilet Rooms • None Priority 4 – Additional Access • None Carnegie Forum 305 W. Pine Street Priority 1– Approach and Entrance • Provide signage at inaccessible entrances indicating the location of the nearest accessible entrance • Install sign at accessible entrance with International Symbol of Accessibility Priority 2 – Access to Goods & Services • Provide accessible interior access route within the Council Chambers to the Council and Staff seating areas, as well as to the "media area" • Interior ramp in Council Chambers exceeds 1:12, with no handrail • In -car controls for the LULA elevator are not centered on a side wall • Tactile stars on both jambs of the elevator have been placed on the upper - floor level rather than the main entry level • Install appropriate room identification signage • Width of the door opening going from the front lobby area to the Council Chambers is less than 32" • Insufficient number of wheelchair spaces within the Council Chambers— provide an additional three • Existing wheelchair space is less than the required 60" depth • Information tables at the back of the Council Chamber lobby are not accessible • Speaking podium is not accessible Interim -Alternative Methods • Provide a temporary route within the Council Chambers to the Council and staff seating areas, as well as to the media area, until a permanent route is provided. Signage to be provided. • Put up a sign with instructions to call for assistance at the LULA elevator. • Provide warning in public notices and on the City's website that persons with certain mobility, vision, or other impairments might have difficulty accessing Carnegie Forum, and to contact the City as soon as possible. LO City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN V) Starting November 2017, and ongoing until priority 2 tasks are addressed 2023-2025 N O N M N 0 N O O O O O d O u) 0 O O ,-1'tri N i/} i/} • Provide contact information in public notices so that interested persons can reach out to the City to ask questions or request assistance. • Identify temporary wheel chair spaces within Council Chambers and place "reserved for handicapped" signs on the chairs. • Provide a temporary information table at the back of the Council Chambers lobby that is accessible. • Provide an additional temporary podium/table that is accessible. • Consider holding meetings at a different location if interested persons are not able to attend due to accessibility barriers. Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • Signage on the toilet room doors do not contrast with their background • No Braille signs • Coat hooks on the toilet compartment doors are higher than 48" above the floor • Front of the lavatory counter surface is higher than 34" above the floor • Toilet stall in the women's restroom, which is intended to be accessible, does not meet the minimum requirements for clear space around the water closet • Grab bar in the men's restroom does not extend at least 54" from the rear wall • Flush control in the women's restroom is not on the open side of the water closet • Toilet paper dispensers are located farther than 9" from the front of the water closet • Toilet paper dispensers do not allow continuous paper flow • Toilet compartment doors are not self-closing • Door pulls are not operable with one hand and require tight grasping and twisting of the wrist • Door locks require grasping, pinching, or twisting of the wrist • Compartment in the women's restroom is less than 60" wide Interim -Alternative Methods • Provide signage during meetings and on public notices that before improvements are made, bathrooms may not be fully accessible to those with certain disabilities and that the City should be contacted for additional information and assistance. Priority 4 — Additional Access • Fire alarm system does not have both flashing lights and audible signals City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Fire Station No. 1 210 W. Elm Street ADA Improvements — Completed 2015 Fire Station No. 2 2 5. Cherokee Lane 2018-2023 2018-2023 2018-2023 0 0 0 r1 N 0 0 0 o rl 0 0 0 0 New Construction — Completed 2015 Fire Station No. 3 2141 S. Ham Lane Priority 1— Approach and Access • Paint for the parking stall is not contrasting • Parking stall sign is not meeting the 60" minimum height requirement • Curb ramp exceeds 2% at the base • Flares for the ramp are greater than 8.3% • Main entrance is not accessible • Secondary entrance is not accessible • No signs that designate the nearest accessible route • No sign of accessibility on-site • Front door has a bench that is in the area of clearance and back door has a hose hanging in the area of clearance • Both the front door and the back door have a lip greater than 1/4 inch • Doors are not equipped with operable hardware • Front door has a closer that closes in under 5 seconds • Floor mats in at the back and front doors are not secured to the ground Priority 2— Access to Goods & Services 11 1 1 1 1 11 • Path of travel in the bedroom is not at least 36" wide • All signs present do not meet standards • Pull side for the doors in the bay does not have 18" minimum of the required space • Threshold to the BBQ area is higher than 1/4 inch • All door knobs need to be replaced • No designated seating at the dinner table • Front service counter is higher than 36" • No clearance for space for a parallel approach • Not enough room for a parallel approach Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • None of the bathrooms at Fire Station 3 are accessible LO LD City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2018-2023 0 o o / $ \ / 2 - E k _ @ \ E 0 _ •[ J / e \ E \ E 2 f CO % \ / / \ E U / ) j } � • o ( ° 2 0 ` \ 0 = o ( / % 7 _ / / / 5 \ / ) « i— u o ( o E t co E to \ co o \ } / \ _ \ \ r a u 0 . , / \ \ �� \ -0 op } \ \ } 0 \ / Q \ \ / / ° \ ) / 5 0 k . \ ) 2 \ / \ / / / % v) / ( * '13 { \ E / / .0 / co( — % $ 0 0 2 Lo \ \ E . e « /— s a « s = = . / �� 7 s $ [ 4 4- / 0 \ • a 0 a / = e % 0vt10) 0 % # $ - E5 9= G o t 2 E# a` _§ 3 m=§ E s\\ 2@ B/\ o•- o — 2 ® — _ ° t = / 2 z o — — u = R = o m 2 ® a i. / » m m ® ° o Q — = 7 ®% ° ® % 3 u{»» ®z 4§ § g/ ° 5 5 m cu-0 u o =>= E e° o a o 0 2 3 t \ a 2 a= (g z e a=• ® \\ w E 2 ' _ _ & § _ 0 ® 0_ % ® •_ t { '- _ = u E :\ o o Z / s E v o § 2 E 7 3 ,.- 2°\ / m E°{\ ©° f E E o o \ z La® z=% E 0 2 G ° m-_— CU° 2» o E\®± § \ / / / . / \ .- § ' \ \ } \ \ / \ 4- » 2 \ \ 0/_ 2 2•-@))/ W 2/ 2 2$ o \ 1.2 m» t o g g f f=§« ƒ / s7„ \ J / \ / \ % } ; g \ E ©� 5 E / \ 2 / / / — 0 \ cc z= 2= o e z z= k\ 5 k 2 (CS Z 2 u Z Zƒ 7 k 1-/ 0 0 1- 1-/\$ Additional Access • Drinking fountain (has less than 17" underneath) • Operable with one hand, but requires more than 5 lbs • Spout is higher than 36" • Spout does not meet the minimum 15" from back of wall City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 00 m N 0 (-Ni I co r -i 0 N 2018-2023 2018-2023 0 O 6 Ni in- 0 O 00 c-1 in - O O 0 O (.(1in- • No second fountain • No fire alarms on site Fire Station No. 4 180 N. Lower Sacramento Road Priority 1— Approach and Access • Loading zone needs to be repainted • Fix areas that have greater than 2% • No $250 fine for the accessible parking • No $250 fine for the van -accessible parking • Alternative entrance for the fire station is not accessible but is open to the firefighters only during all hours • Inaccessible entrances do not have signs that direct to the nearest accessible entrance • Accessible entrance does not have sign of accessibility • Front door (accessible entrance) does not have a level landing • Locks require pinching on the door handles • Doors close in under 5 seconds • Carpet at the front door is not secured to the ground • Sidewalk path of travel exceeds more than 9% and there is no level landing that is under 2% Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • No signs designating permanent rooms • Thresholds for the door are higher than a quarter inch • Handle for the sliding door requires tight grasping • Multiple doors require more than 5 lbs of pressure to open • Multiple doors close in under 5 seconds • Mats are not secured to the ground • No open space on the side of the bench; bench seat is less than 17 inches above the floor • Counter is not at least 36" long and is higher than 36" tall Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • No signs that direct to the nearest accessible bathroom from the inaccessible bathrooms • No signs mounted on the latch side of the door • For the bathrooms used by the firefighters, the 18" of space on the latch side of the door is not met • Hardware requires twisting of the wrist • No coat hooks in the bathrooms 00 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2018-2023 Hutchins Street Square 125 5. Hutchins Street N c1 O N 61 c cc) Ltl N O N cn N N O O 0 O O O O O O O u1 • Bottoms of the pipes are higher than 9", but they are not less than 6" from the wall • More than 5 lbs of pressure to operate soap dispenser • Paper towel dispenser is higher than 48" from the ground • Center rim of the toilet is at 19" from the wall • Pprotruding objects under and above the grab bar behind the toilet • Flush control is not on the open side • Toilet paper dispenser is farther than 9" from the rim of the toilet • Toilet paper does not have continuous flow • Thresholds for the showers are too high • Spacing (66"x60") is not met for the showers • No grab bars in the showers • No folding seat in the showers Priority 4 — Additional Access • No water fountains on-site • No public telephones on-site • No fire alarm systems with lights and audible signals Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • North Parking Lot o Shrubs covering "unauthorized vehicle" wordage o Access aisles slopes > 5% o 4 spaces required, only 1 present o No van -accessible parking o No truncated domes, visible crosswalk o Accessible aisle missing "no parking" wordage o Path of travel > 2% o Curb ramp lip @ 1.5" o Ramp near door landing raised, which causes a 5.5% slope o Multiple cracks along sidewalk ■ Cracks range from %" to 1" o Stair uniformity not present, last riser off by %2" o Handrail does not have extension (12") o Level landing near gate exceeds slope maximum Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • Conference/Administration City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN E E x (o E a) a) U v v L O 00 CDV1 L n co Q t O O O O 0,n in 0 s CT) E E X (o E a) a) V x a) L vj O "O O 0 L CU C v O s 00 O O L a) O • co U L L C a) C CD 0- 0 O Q a) 0 (o 4-, ro O 0 a) s U CO4-4 O L a) u a) 0 U O O 0 E O O L O U U ■ L_ L -a 0 • v • 0- bA a)) • O CO CO • � X t10 W c > a) N u N CV V w O• vi M5J-5 •- 0) uE v v 4 L L CO 00 u, • Q C • L 1 O (a - O a - o s u L 0 L L O O O `n 0 • • 0 0 O 0 0 O O Y O v c a) a) 0 CD (o s 4-,v CO4-, VI C 0 V a) 0 4-, ci a) 0 V 4 O O 0 • v ro U 0 N bA =a a) a) a) a) 0_ O O n3 t U 5,5 a) v9 4 00 c C ro L O O 0 00 O 0 co > v a) 0 ro a O y 0 C CI) a 0 0 0 1,5 a) X v E CU 0 Q 0 L 0) a) L L O 0 0 ■ ■ ■ • v E 00 c 0 57.5 O 0 a) ro a) E 0 c N U 0 L a) L 4-+ 0 .(0 00 a5 a) Q a3 U rn E 0 9- tin c 00 c (D X v Q E O U O c a) 0 t OA 0 t N CU N a) v x Q )- 0_ Q O ri O O U L O p 0 ■ .c vii 0 v 0 U U CD U n3 0 s O CO a) .474E .57 c 0 V N 70 a) a) U x v Q O N 00 00 -• C c E M C O g X 03 E (3.)› on W v v ns a) L U V x jig tin O (a v t C c 0 U L 0 (o U u a) CTU 00 C CO 0 C 00 c LE U (o 0 U c v O c v E 00 0 s- 0 O 0 X a) O 0 0- 4-c +-c CU co v t U (o co coY O c Q) O -0 u O a▪ ) O s 0 (o O O 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 a) co a) E a) c O U 0 c a) E a) 0- c c a) ▪ E E v O E • N a v v E U • N E 'C a5 C O ▪ O cu U E [2 N O Y .44 0- .61 a, 0 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN No tactile star Elevator handrail height exceeds maximum requirement Ln L O Q) O • 0 • • ro0) 0 H 0 a) 0 U U CO U Ln 0) v 0) E dA O L O O 0 VI v 0 aJ 0 v O U 0 (0 0) Q) t 0 4-,O 0 C Q (0 L L (0 a U N O -C i U O C Z (}ii • 0 0) O a) 0 a) U U (0 0) CO S 0 C Q) O 0 LQ) CO 0) t 4 -,LE 0- a; Q) O Q) in OA CO N a 2 O CU (0 (n C O US 4- c c co 0 E O O Q' a-' an ro ■ (n • • �-C a✓ a✓ t o0 C t c - Q) O c L C a Q v L O X •� L Q (0 (0 c L c T Q1 = ) Q) a -,cis E CO C Q) N 00 vOi E c ,E - 0 0)- c +, E t 4-' ^ N O (0 Q1 b0 _Q v — (0 a•, b.0 o U v c E c 0 0 •° .� OU Q) U u O C U c (0 c L U O 00 O (a V U- V') • • ■ 0) E Q) 0 0) E E .E E L 0) E 0) O_ a•, O c \ E ow O O a-, m 3 110 0) c Q U L• a(73 a.' C +, N E5- 4-, 0) c 0 m 0 :ast No hall lantern v) 0 Q) c LL 0 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN N N 2020-2022 O O O L11 - LI) 1.4 w ■ Threshold exceeds maximum height ■ Door timing issues in second floor arts room, dance studio, green room ■ Doors pressure exceeding maximum force ■ Several hallway doors with opening widths below 26" ■ Green room door has no closer o Stairs ■ Contrasting striping ■ Riser uniformity issue off by %2" ■ Directional signage not present ■ Stable and firm ground level ■ Rail extension (top/bottom) (essentially 0") ■ Landing issue at the exterior stairs near north main entrance, slope > 2% • Swimming Pool o Deck ■ Slope exceeds 2%, which is maximum ■ Distance of centerline from seat to edge of deck does not meet minimum ■ Rail height does not meet minimum requirement ■ Handrail extension is below 12" ■ Requirements for toilet rooms in "Toilet Room" section of Senior Complex ■ Door pressure 15 Ib and gets stuck on threshold o Locker Rooms/Showers ■ No handheld sprayer with hose present ■ Folding seat inside shower area is missing ■ Roll -in shower area ■ Bench depths all are at 17", fails depth minimum ■ Hook exceeds maximum of 48" inside shower area Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • Conference/Administration o Bathroom signage not present at door/wall (unisex, pictogram, or Braille) o Minimum clearance on accessible route inside room not met o Lavatory heights either exceed maximum or don't meet minimum o Lock hardware missing in toilet stalls o Stall door opening width minimum not met N N City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN � T v _ L C 1 - CD c O CU r6 o C1./' 110 v = 3 a, co 0 m o_ 6 c C ut C r -,E ` 3 ro a) co tU L O O a) '7 E t6 O ° 3 E a v 3 c CO o Q o v o E co O E o c c— a toy CU 0 = ° °; �' v T° Q v v v °�' m v c 0,•• w v E N bA CO t r6 \ E N M cY6 U CO OU 'o ro E E CO al oo v v o, ° E c6 t v o v .E a°i v a, E ° o •x •� O ,� ,n E ° ° U U N L -O U O 'L rXa a, +�+ i6 6A bA v LO a, x x o E o° +, a°i `L° o t E Q `L° E E %n u a ° c v _ 4- v v el 1 > v, +, a, x a, C.J v v a) •E -o o v" s .Q O aXi v v E +� v v c L v v +' N L a, 'X N ° Oin U a, C O U `1 v, X_ a) .� y=. Ucc, OA p cu U s T v C a, X C O X 4! CO C a, c O O Q X O S N 'L Q- E a, coc'i -0 a, L ++ 2i N ut t6 U a, CU QE v 6, ac -a o a, v v c a,� aot - E 4- *' m L O q.0 L ++ {n a, U .� L > L CA > +, °O •• N •CO E X > o L L a, w .N ,Gq •`=' 7 t ,Oi, a1 a, X "' a, '° oo L a, r6 f6 U CO _a cu o ° a v c L t ° — O ria O c0., .'^ O c°., c�i O °- a, c6 r6 Q p a, E ccsa, O a, T0 — a, O ° ° ° E ° L " ° = a E ° u ° o E ° ° L C L U ° E ;° COLCOL.03 -6 ++ +"' rL6 `tte O N L L c6 CO L +••� E L L L L a, Y O a, C cu ° ut of C.0 dA N n V) CO 0 •O L CO n, C C O O N U O O +�+ O vim', a, O L fl- > co ^ O O c6 c6 E ro 'p 0 0 a, O Q a, c6 L 0 O 'O L 0 0 ca O O a, Q O ra a) X c 0 0 a1 a, ° vi H U LL c=, _ •a 2 U=» _ ino H o 0 o m > o= 0 v v O D O m 0 4-, c 0 0 0000000000 Y O O O rn O O O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN I N +, C `- a) a) ° u u a) CO c dA 4J (o = co 0) c +, c E L v E a) v a) v E 0 a) +, O 2 a) O N E • X a) p p } ca •� U a) vi 110 L E E cu xv 0 s o +� x L a) ro fisQ) u E u o 3 o p E E °1 ,_, o C p. v a) so +� +, o c ro +, 0 +, X v o E co L U = v E •E m w— v u v v N o in (0 U +, E _ — +, i a1 = o -co-p o O +, n3 a) 7 +, E +' oA a(-+ ca O L u3 u +, c u E v E v u a) U) a) ° c° L @cu o co cu X o E X •v n3 0 E o f E •E 0_ a ro E ,° a E m E E c ca E c - a E CcLO a 3 u� E E — +, +, E E $ E a�Lo 'a0 u o cXa E +, a) E v v ao (3j ' o s op E o o N o m in 0 u E NE v a u cji N E u L ns v a, ,n L @! C N a) a) a) L U E +, L U O N Q N p ia�• •� VI `� LJ O a) C a) rl p p E 0.0 U i u N N a) X C a) U +, - E VI `J N i U L i V lA invi +, X c c c +-+ a) a) a) 3 co X t p .v� of a1 �) qp +, C C O O (o c 0 a) a s a) o Q a 3 v X v o �a O a v •on +' v X o ns t o c c N t Q Q u o a v -1--) 3 ,� N N 0 v E v v t m E cLo v o �° v v L a) ew +, a a o E a) •4- ca v v u oa '+, +, ro +, v o tin u L L ID iv 'a -a ° a) u t o a) v o N °°° m t° E v u ° t v •0 mu aL) a) .7) v L C Q Q a) 0) '• N C 0 E -° a) a) L L a) O co Q- p @ c a Q c v a —°U `° v V '� ° O O i p p N 7" `L° ro °cn) Q Q `� t `� +' ra L L <') u co c0 L +�., L �O O -6 a) N Lap 0 +, +-, +, co O O O c p 0 vn Q cn _C O = O" 'p co 7 p py N O O O O O L • L 7 N 4_, p>— ro ro p co co •O •O •� n3 .L i) C7 U H H Cr) U D 0 2 Z Z LL O Q o0 v+'i v+'i 2 vi H H H LL c°n a) a) t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O H 00000 0 0 0 o lL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2020-2022 Lodi Public Library 201 W. Locust Street Timeline N 2023-2025 Ln 2023-2025 Municipal Service Center (MSC) N N O O N N I O M N N O O N N Cost Estimate 0 O O O O O O O O O O a--1 O L(1 rl c -I N O N L? V? i/? i/? o Folding seat height in shower room fails minimum height o Depth clearance inside toilet stall not compliant Priority 4 — Additional Access • Conference/Administration o Paper towel dispenser inside kitchen/lavatory area at 55" • Senior Complex o Drinking fountains ■ Height at spout exceeds maximum @ 37" • Fine Arts o Drinking fountains ■ Drinking fountain spout height exceeds maximum • Playground o No accessible ramp leading to the play area from the accessible path/walkway Barriers Identified Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • Front parking has a 3% slope • No $250 signs • Striping is not hatched Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • Staff Room sink is not compliant • No maneuverability in Staff Room • Desks in Staff Room have no clearance underneath Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • Soap dispensers go off at random times • Mirrors are too high • Bathroom doors require more than 10 lbs of force to open • Bathroom doors close in under 5 seconds (average of 3 seconds) • Coat hooks in the (office) bathrooms are too high • Sinks do not have a clear area Priority 4 — Additional Access • Obstructed inside staff kitchen area • No clearance in staff kitchen area City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 13315. Ham Lane Timeline Dec. 2018 2019-2022 N 2020-2022 N 0 N I Cr) r-1 0 N Cost Estimate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Ni M Barriers Identified Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • Parking stall has a slope of 2.2% • No clear path of travel to the joining MSC buildings • Add $250 sign outside of fleet service • Replace "Van Accessible" sign • Ramp to Electric Utility is @ 8.7% • Electric Utility's main entrance is not accessible • No signage • None of the mats throughout the entire facility are secured Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • All have routes but they are not compliant • Route in main offices are @ 29" • Eating area in fleet service is @ 32" • Multiple obstructions • Handrails outside Electric Utility do not extend to the minimum 12" • Main Office -Hallway door @ 28"; warehouse -Closet door @ 28" • Door in the main office leading to the hallway has no maneuvering clearance • List and location of failing switches is in the report Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • No signs to direct to accessible bathroom • Routes are not accessible • Bathroom at warehouse requires twisting of the wrist • Bathroom doors at Fleet Shop, Warehouse, Electric Utility, and Main offices do not meet standards • Fix coat hook at unisex bathroom in the Main Office • Men's Fleet Shop bathroom @ 11" • Pipes in warehouse bathroom are not covered • Repair electric Utility- Bathroom in the men's locker room • Bathrooms at the fleet shop have no closers Priority 4 — Additional Access • The fire alarm systems have no flashing lights. City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Parks & Recreation Field Office 125 N. Stockton Street Parks & Recreation Annex 111 E. Elm Street N • C N E H N N O N 1 O O N 2023-2025 Cost Estimate 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 m Barriers Identified contrasting colors :ceeds 2% an accessible route; ends at wall signage :ting cage and Parks and Rec. annex is not edone for south side entrances for the e are not accessible ire not accessible ;Fit is nog accessible :cessible entrance ible entrance e a slope of 6.5%; 60" moving space not e doors do not meet the requirements Kis hc}i Co pliant secured td ground access but is not compliant :e required width of circulation path p the in warehouse and in main office rdl back door to the warehouse are learancp ace in several locations in the main office and in the warehouse back rooms in storage areas have objects N N City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN co N 2023-2025 2019-2022 2026-2028 2026-2028 0 0 0 0 0 0 o -1 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 o • Lack of clear floor space approaching light switches and other systems, and switches locations above maximum height in several areas in main office, in storage rooms Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • No signage directing to accessible bathrooms in Parks and Rec. Annex • No Braille signs for toilet rooms in Parks and Rec. Annex • Inadequate front approach to pull side of the door in main office (women's) and warehouse (both) • Main building and warehouse have threshold problems, exceed %" • All bathroom door hardware in the main building and warehouse need to be replaced • No coat hook for warehouse bathroom • Warehouse toilet rooms lack clearances for lavatories Priority 4 — Additional Access • Lack of floor clearance for approach to drinking fountain in CrossFit • There is a fire alarm system, but no flashing lights or audible signals Parks & Recreation Annex Leased Space to CrossFit and Mojica's Batting Cages 111 E. Elm Street Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • Direct access to Mojica's batting cage and Parks and Rec. annex is not available • Entrance for Mojica's batting cages is not accessible. • Secondary entrance to CrossFit is not accessible • No signage directing to an accessible entrance • All mats on location are not secured to the ground Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • Entrance to main office provides access but is not compliant • Objects protrude into circulation paths in CrossFit • Room identification signage is noncomplaint at CrossFit and Mojica's • All interior doors in Mojica's are less than required width • No maneuvering and latch side clearance space in several locations throughout the buildings • Door hardware does not comply in Mojica's • Lack of clear floor space approaching light switches and other systems, and switch locations above maximum height in several areas in CrossFit and Mojica's co N • • • • • • • ■ ■ City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2026-2028 2026-2028 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0 U U cO 4-,f0 0) 0 U 03 E 00 f0 a) L a-- 0 4- a) 0 U 3 O C 0 U C to 2 • heater and fans at CrossFit a) L O0) 0) Le) (13 CO 0 Q Q a) > 0) f6 (0 f6 4-, 0 a) 0) a) D o o +-, v 0 to vi 0 v E c 0 J L 00 LL v, ul 0 0 O v 0 -a +, C to C v i O L '— 0 f0 4- 0) 0 a) v E . f0 L o to t 0 L 4_, L CLOu LL 0 C a) ut 4— L 0) 0 -0 -C O 0 3 U CU t11 Cr; CD LL O 0 00 co 0) 0.0 f0 U 00 ro U 0 0) O U 0) 0) a) L 4-,O 0 U f0 O f- ro to a) f0 ro0 0 4 O f0 a) f0 L O 0) 0 0 0 • • • Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms 4.., N co -a co a) v C 0 3 top a) Q O vi dA to ^ to rn ^ ' y' a) --1 ,--I `)tao v E . r1 = )4-c co 4--, 0 O E ._ ° co tO M c co co ,--' C O CU ` J O •v)is U 0 O L 7 D 7 OA U O N to ..a 0) O c (o a) t U S v Ln co a c C (0 0 0 CaCo to E V U L o t--1 CO Ln o `° O 1 L c 0 O U Ln 0 U N O :o v tw ro (0 v ,-' c d- to _ +� _0 — V 4— C (0 a-+ to S 0 s co �--1 a CU — U -C tn C _ 03 O V nC (D E v L v - E to 4-, • i C cn ) v 0 Q 0o Ln . v ° E :ovCa) v L vi co +� O O v fl _0 _0 00.1 O N U � U •5 LE 0) N v, _ _ v >• ' to > v a E v U de v, O �O N a) ` v a30(c) O E L L 3 a) c 0 �O 00 L - Q '=' O C. Q^ N (0 to V _ CU u -0 a) O v, L a) Q1 u U a) CO L C 0 C U r-1 Q on a o o Q ' m 0 (o L v CU 't^ 03 0 s_ to 0 CO to a) C o be s O_ v 0.,.-3(4O co a) CL) �,, N v, v, .E �n ° �, to v, .° 4 s- 0 O U U U a) U s v v, 0 a) - U oz v 0 U U 0 .O :0 7 p m O v :o Q U a) CD Z Z Z Z Y 2 2 LL 2 s> u 2 I 1 FE > +-, • • • • • • • • • • •L • • O d Transit Station ■ 24 S. Sacramento Street a, 0) 1- I Cost Estimate Barriers Identified U4-' -0 N C 00 Q- 4- (0 0 a) 0 O _o L 4-.' 4., Q 0 E tin 2 i a) U 1. E t Vf 0 < E CU Z 0) 0- U O O - CO V) N 4' 0 -, -0 E T 0 (7 O (0 CU 0) 4- t(0 0 +� 0 Lrs 0 f0 2 0 0 L 0 a)L� to b0 Q D 0 a) c V O C ii +--, 0v 0 0 Q bCA VI U (0 O a) O a) c _0 00 co f0 C o 0 E 0) ro L to Q OL C bA Ev ^ to O Q fro VI i W C 4= O L U t0 -0 -0 ut -' (0 C 2 C `^ C v, � O_ 0 Ctl f0 v� r a) C t eq >•• o ra U t6 V Q > o c 3 a) E N v L o o '7, O 0 E +, CU -C UV) U O 0 E L I 0 110 X C 0 CE, _0 Z 'L w to Z CL < 4-, 0 C1- City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 0 co 1 I of -way • Sidewalk narrows more than allowed along accessible routes from the public right-of-way • Protruding objects and head clearance issues along the circulation paths from the public right -of way • Surface conditions along the circulation paths from the public right -of way and from public transportation are in bad repair • Excessive cross slope from accessible parking • Passenger Loading Zone is not marked to discourage parking and is overlapping the vehicular way • Passenger Loading Zone slope exceeds 2% maximum • Passenger Loading Zone lacks sufficient accessible loading for each continuous 100 feet of loading area • No accessible route from the bus stop to an accessible station entrance • Bus boarding area has a different slope than the adjacent roadway • Less than 60% of the public entrances are accessible • Some perpendicular curb ramps do not have a flush transition at the bottom • Corner curb ramps do not have a flush transition at the bottom, and there are changes in the levels • Slopes exceed 2% at exterior landing at Door "A" at front of station building • Slopes exceed 2% at exterior landing at Door "A" at station building platform side • Insufficient pull side maneuvering space at Door "A" • Station entrances lack accessible tactile and visual signage • Informational and directional signage is too small • Station identification signage is not compliant Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • Gaps and gratings along the accessible routes to and between interior public use areas • No accessible route from each accessible station entrance to each Amtrak boarding platform • Train brochures are not within accessible height in the station waiting room • Counter and display case protrude more than 4" into the station waiting room 0 co City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 00 I I f. 3 O Vf O1 c 3 I I • Fire alarm pull station is not within accessible height in the station waiting room • Ticket counter lacks minimum knee clearance height and toe clearance height and depth Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • Women's Restroom • Lacks an accessible privacy lock • Opening force and closing speed of door exceed allowable limits • Hand dryer protrudes farther than allowed • Baby changing station is not accessible due to height and inadequate clear floor space for forward approach • Mirror at lavatory is mounted above allowable height • Soap dispenser is not accessible due to force needed to operate • Water closet compartment lacks minimum width • Flush is not on open side • Rear grab bar lacks adequate clearance • Side grab bar lacks adequate clearance • Seat protector dispenser is not adjacent to clear floor space • Men's Restroom • Lacks an accessible privacy lock • Opening force and closing speed of door exceed allowable limits • Hand dryer protrudes farther than allowed • Mirror at lavatory is mounted above allowable height • Soap dispenser is not accessible due to force needed to operate • Water closet compartment lacks minimum width • Rear grab bar lacks adequate clearance • Side grab bar lacks adequate clearance Priority 4 — Additional Access • Drinking fountain outside of station does not provide a high enough water arc • Payphone on exterior of station is not equipped with volume control or a volume symbol • Payphone is not accessible due to reach height and handset cord length • Audible announcements are not provided in a visual format • Real-time messaging is not provided in both audio and visual formats 00 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 1275 N. Thornton Road Timeline December 2018 December 2019 2020-2022 I Beckman Park 1426 W. Century Blvd. G1 E 2026-2028 I 2023-2025 Cost Estimate O lD M M O Ln- N O O c -I Cost Estimate O O O O ,- I,--Iin- I 0 O 0- in- Barriers Identified Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • Signage - The bottom of the sign is not above 60" • The handrails are not 12" from the edge • Handrails do not extend at least 12" beyond the inside face of the handrail, and there is no curb or barrier that prevents the passage of a 4 -inch diameter sphere • No alternative accessible entrance • Door closer does not close at 5 seconds • Mats are not secured Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • Mounted First Aid box protrudes into the circulation path • Door hardware is not compliant • Doors to men's and women's restroom require more than 5 Ib of force • Men's and women's restroom doors close in under 5 seconds • No clear floor space to approach light switches • No clearance to accessible seating in break room • No back support and bench is too low in men's locker room • Front counter exceeds 36" height; no accessible counter space Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • No toe clearance at women's lavatory ,Im Barriers Identified Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • All parking is along the sidewalk • The sidewalk is stable, but not the grass • The main entrance is not accessible • No alternative entrance • No proper hardware on the doors Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • No goods or services at Beckman Park Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms N 00 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN m 00 Blakely Park 1050 S. Stockton Street Including the Boys and Girls Club and the Enze Pool Facility Timeline Ql i --I O LD .-I 0 N N N O O N 0 N Cost Estimate 0 0 0 O N 0 0 0 O N • There is 6.5" of space • The center of the waterline is 18.5" from the wall Priority 4 — Additional Access • None Barriers Identified Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • No accessible parking for the pool house or baseball fields • No contrasting colors on the striping • Accessible parking areas have slopes greater than 2% in all directions • No $250 sign on-site • No van accessible sign • Path is not 60" wide, and there is no 60 x 60 space along the path of travel • Approaching slope is greater than 5% • No alternative entrance that is open to the public • Inaccessible entrances do not have signs that point to the nearest accessible entrance • No accessible sign at the point of arrival • Front approach has a slope of 2% and greater • Blakely Park Pool House and the Upstart entrances do not have the proper hardware • Doors close in under 5 seconds • The mats are unsecured to the ground Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • No signage designating permanent rooms • No signage designating interior rooms • Door does not open fully to a 90 degree angle • There is not 18" of clear space to open the door • Threshold is higher and steeper than 5% • Doors not equipped with proper hardware • Hardware is lower than 34" • All entrance, office, bathroom, and doors to the basketball court require more than 5 lbs of pressure • Some doors have no closers and other close in under 5 seconds m 00 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN co rn 0 N I iD 0 N 0 0 O Lri N • There is not 36" of clear space in the student room and teen center • Carpet is not secured to the ground • No designated seating at the Boys and Girls Club for wheelchairs • Space requirements are not met • Dimensions are not met under the tables • The benches are not fixed to the wall and there is no space next the benches • The sale service counter is higher than 36" • The accessible countertop at the Boys and Girls Club does not extend the same length as the countertop Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • Entrances to the pool house bathrooms have slopes greater the 3% • Problems with the signage: no Braille, not on latch side, no clear side on latch side of the door, and the sign is higher than 60" • Inside of the bathroom does not have clear maneuvering clearance on a forward approach • Five pounds of pressure is needed to open the door • Doors close in under 5 seconds • Mirrors are higher than 40" from the ground at the pool house bathrooms • Coat hook is at 68" in the Upstart adults bathroom and 72" at the pool house bathrooms • The Upstart bathrooms do not have a clear approach to the lavatory • All bathrooms fail except M1 and W2 • Both bathrooms at the pool house have 8" under the sink • All bathrooms have piping that is 6" or more from the wall at the Boys and Girls Club and the pool house • Bathrooms do not have pipe coverage • The faucets at the pool house need twisting of the wrist to turn on • Soap dispensers too far from the edge of the sink in the kids Upstart bathroom; soap dispenser is too high off the ground in M1 and W1 • Paper towel dispensers at the pool house are higher than 48" and need tight grasping to operate • The rim is 20" away from the wall in the men's bathroom, pool house • All bathrooms do not have grab bars exceeding the minimum 54" long • Women's 2 bathroom and the women's pool house do not meet the requirements for the bar spacing behind the lavatory • The bathroom for the kids Upstart bathroom does not have the flush co City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2020-2022 N 4-, 0) 0 4-+ 0) L o ,n f. CU C L }+ 0 O 00 L v L ro O 0 O 0 V ._0 4- s- an v (0 - v O -0 N O C in Q L O 0 N .0 L al a) 0 L (0 0 c Q 'a 0 4 E — v O .O 00 c } a) a) 0 Q H I- • • • Priority 4 — Additional Access L U (0 O 0 0. CO 0) t 0 CU V CO 0_ L (0 a) V v a) c C 0 La) 4-4 0 H 00 4-, CO i (0 VI 0_ 0) t (0 .(0 C 0 0)) a) s H 0) X a) 0 a) 0) C C C 4 O a) a) S 0 V) 0 C O U • • • Y 0) RS a '- CI C >- .) 00 >cr C N N M 0 0) c 0) E 1- 2023-2025 I Cost Estimate 0 0 0 0 Barriers Identified roach and Entrance r -I 0 a }� O 0_ ro0 u Q co E t ro a) L a U U 0) _0 roC 5) a) L (u.7 O (0 00 C c (o (D a) Q v 1- H Z There is no alternative entrance • • • Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services a) p a) O a) O H 0 Q 0 Z M Z ' Z > > 4J 4J Prioi Century Meadows Park d c 0 00 c �X a) J M M CO 2029-2031 Cost Estimate 0 0 0 u) N Barriers Identified CU U 0 c ro 0 a) a) U O Z r -I Alternative entrance is not accessible a) V C (0 C a) CU N a) U (0 V) a) (0 v C a) 0 a) a) (0 U .ro0 0 a) u0 (a C (5 0 Z (0 0 CU t +-1 a) 4-4 c0 U 0 0 4-+ a) 0A roC 0.0 0 C a) 0) L 4-4roC a) a) V ro v (0 a C (0 (1) C.) (0 4..' O Z .n L • • • • 0 L a a) CU N 05 Priority 2 — Access to Good • Toilet Rooms M C 0 C CL a) C 0 • Additional Acces 4-1 C 0 C Cl- City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Century Park 130 W. Century Blvd. Timeline I I I I I Timeline N N O O N O N N N O o N O N Cost Estimate I I I I Chapman Field/Armory Park 1111. 333 N. Washington Street Cost Estimate O O O O u1 ,i -r, 0 0 O o 0 N Barriers Identified Priority 1—Approach and Entrance • None Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • None Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • None Priority 4 — Additional Access • None Barriers Identified Priority 1—Approach and Entrance • All parking is along the street • No designated accessible parking • Parking east of the field, where rocks are everywhere, can be slippery and unstable • West side of the field cannot be worked upon because the sidewalk is not part of Chapman Field • No flares on the curb ramps, but some could use them • No alternative to the "main" entrance at Chapman field • Gate does not have the proper hardware to access alone Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • There are no signs designating permanent rooms besides for the bathrooms • There is no space inside the concession stand • The floors inside the concession are not slip resistant • All switches do not have a clear space to be accessed • Stadium seating are pre -built and assembled • The great majority of the concession stand does not meet requirements and expectations; concession stand is not in use and it is recommended City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN N 0 N I O N O Ni N 0 N I 0 N 0 N DeBenedetti Park 2150 S. Lower Sacramento Road C - w E H 2020-2022 0 0 0 O 0 N 0 0 m Cost Estimate O 0 that a new one be built. Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • No Braille on the signs • Thresholds in the bathrooms are higher than 1/4 • Doors require more than 5 lbs of pressure to open • Reflection is not clear on the bathroom mirrors • No clearance for the lavatory in the women's restroom • Sink does not meet the 17" minimum requirement • Pipes under the sink do not have proper cover • Sinks require more than 5 lbs of pressure to operate • Soap dispensers are not in operation • Hand dryers require more than 5 lbs of pressure to operate • Toilets are farther than 18" from the wall • Toilets are higher than 19" from the ground • Not a minimum of 12" of grab bar on the closed side of the bathroom • Flusher for the toilets require more than 5 lbs of pressure to operate • Flush control is above the toilet • Toilet paper dispenser is farther than 9" from the rim of the toilet • No continuous flow for the toilet paper • Stall doors are not self-closing • No pulls on both sides of the doors Priority 4— Additional Access 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 • Ground is not stable under the fountain • Space under the water fountain is not meeting the requirements • Operable parts are less than 20" from the wall to the current position • Fountain needs twisting of the wrist to operate • Spout is not at least 15" from back of the wall • No fountain for a standing person • No fire alarms on-site Barriers Identified Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • Entry sidewalk to the south end of the park has a 4.2% slope • Handrails needed at ramps City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN Timeline 2026-2028 I 2026-2028 2026-2028 el el N c E 2026-2028 I I I Cost Estimate 0 0 0 N t/- 1 0 0 0 N i/} 000`01$ Mil Cost Estimate 0 0 �n ri V} Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • None Priority 3 — Toilet Rooms • None Priority 4 — Additional Access • None Emerson Park 11 N. Hutchins Street Barriers Identified Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • No designated accessible parking, all parking is along the street • Sidewalks are not 60" wide • Running slope for the curbs are steeper than 1:12 • Not a level surface on top of curb Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • None signs he bathrooms hrooms tion f pf $pace from under the grab bar to the arance to bn he stall door in the men's ig both sides of the doors English Oaks Commons 2184 Newbury Circle Barriers Identified Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • All parking is along the street Priority 4 — Additional Access • No clearance for a front approac • Only one water fountain on-site, City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN III 41 41 41 N 41 41 41 Timeline 2023-2025 1 2023-2025 1 G1 C E H N O N 0 N 4 4 Cost Estimate OO o 0 N I./T 1 o I t/} 1 Cost Estimate 2 LnN rI t/- • Exterior entrance has a slope of 8.4% at the entrance • Driveway seems to be in use for curb ramp (east side of the park) • Ramp is at 9.1% • Not a level landing at the top of the curb ramp Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • None Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • None Priority 4 — Additional Access • None Glaves Park 2206 Oxford Way Barriers Identified Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • No accessible parking on-site • No events take place at the bottom the park, so no need for a walkway inside the park Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • None -s are not centered 18" from the door V�P 9ytside the maneuvering clearance s 1P, sure to open is t work Priority 4 — Additional Access • None Grape Bowl 221 Lawrence Street Barriers Identified • Path of travel to the bathrooms to the field) ik • Parking stall next to field house has a slope • Northeast side (visitors side) of the Grape Bol Starting from the entrance, there is no direct City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 0 m 2023-2025 I I Timeline 2020-2022 2020-2022 0 0 0 o in I I Cost Estimate 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 (HVO4). To have an accessible path to visitor seating, replicating the path to the home side seating is best suggested (HVO1, HVO7, HVO8, HVO9, HV10). Replicating the path of travel will result in removing seating (HVO5). Suggestion, install new seating on both sides of current seating just like the home side (HVO6, HV10). Path of travel on visitors side is not compliant (PT06, PT08). Ramp is needed on visitors side as is on the home side (HVO3, HV11). • New hardware needed for entrance doors at the field house and for the back doors Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • Visitors side needs wheelchair seating • No clearance surrounding the switches in the concession stand • Office at the concession stand is not ADA accessible because there is no clearance for maneuverability Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • None Priority 4 — Additional Access • None Hale Park 209 E. Locust Street Barriers Identified Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • No sign of International Accessibility and no "Minimum $250 sign" • Sign for van accessibility and $250 sign are needed at parking stall • Slope of curb is steeper than 10% • Cross slope is greater than 2% • Top of curb is not leveled and flares are steeper than 10% • There is not 18" of free space on the pull side of the door • No alternative entrance • There is not 18" of free space on the pull side of the door • No closer on door Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • Route is not a minimum 36" wide • Protrudes more than 4" into the path of travel • No sign for the party room • No designated seating for people in wheelchairs • No clear path of travel to all seating 0 m City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2020-2022 2020-2022 • Timeline N N N N Q1 c-1 O 0 0 O I O t0 N N ,--1 0 0 0 N N N O 0 Cost Estimate OO 1 0 c O M d- 111 in-/) L!1 i- i/) • No floor space and space under the table for someone in a wheelchair Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • Color of the sign does not contrast with the back, there is no Braille, and there is not a sign on the latch side of the door • Door needs more than 5 lbs of pressure to open • Doors have no closer installed • Sinks are at 8" in length • There is not 8" of knee clearance under the sink • Pipes are not covered • Faucet needs more than 5 lbs of pressure to operate Priority 4 — Additional Access • Water fountain is unsanitary and is recommended to be removed • Water fountain needs more than 5 lbs of pressure to operate • No second water fountain for a standing person • No fire alarm system in the Hale Park party room Katzakian Park 2735 W. Turner Road Barriers Identified ivalent, path of travel has a slope of 8.9% inimum Fine $250" signs 77ible" sign 2.1% If curbs and the flares are off • Bathroom doors need more than 5 lbs of pressure to open • Doors close in under 5 seconds • Sinks do not meet the 17" minimum require ent • Pipes under the sink are not covered Priority 4 — Additional Access • Water fountain requires more than 5 lbs of pressure to operate City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN N Timeline Completed 2016 ID ti O N QJ v r., v O. E U Cost Estimate Kofu Park 1145 S. Ham Lane Barriers Identified Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • No designated van accessible parking on-site • The access aisle is 4' wide • If there was an accessible van parking spot, the access aisle would not be wide enough • Parking stall has a 3.0% slope • Access aisle has a slope of 8.7% • Curb ramp near Ham Lane has a slope of 8.6% • Top of curb has a slope of 3.1% • There is sign that routes to the nearest accessible entrance • No sign of accessibility at the accessible entrance Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • Running slope to the bathrooms is greater than 5%, but there are handrails on the side to make it an accessible ramp • Ramp rises higher than 6" with a slope of 11.6% and 12.5%; cross slope for the concession ramp is 2.6% • Landings at the top and bottom of the ramp are not level • Landing is at 2.6% for the walkway to the skate park • Rails do not extend 12" from the end of the ramp • Bottom of the rail does not meet the 12" minimum requirement from the rail • Door to the party room does not have 18" of clearance for a front approach • No clear landing to the concession stand • Hardware for the concession needs to be replaced • The doors to the concession stand and party room require more than 5 lbs of pressure to open • The doors are not self-closing • No clear floor space for the light switch in the concession stand or the party room • 57" for the A/C control panel • No designated spaces for wheelchair seating • Sales service counter is 42" high N City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN m rn 2020-2022 2020-2022 a E I I I I Timeline 0 0 0 N 0 0 o Cost Estimate I I I I Cost Estimate • There is not 48" of clearance inside the concession stand adjacent to the service counter • Soda dispenser in the concession stand fails everything Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • Both bathrooms are not accessible • No sign of accessibility outside the bathrooms • There is not 60" of clear depth to a front side approach to the door • The faucets need twisting of the wrist to operate and require more than 5 lbs of pressure to operate • Dimensions are not met in the bathroom stalls • No grab bars behind the toilet • Flush control in the women's bathroom is not on the open side • No continuous flow for the toilet paper dispenser • There is not 60" of depth to the front approach of the stall door in the women's bathroom • Door is not self-closing • No pull handles on the stall doors • Locks require pinching • Stalls are not 60" wide Priority 4 — Additional Access • Water fountain requires more than 5 lbs of pressure • Spout of the water fountain is 6" from the front of the fountain Lawrence Park 350 N. Washington Street Barriers Identified Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • None Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • None Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • None Priority 4 — Additional Access • None Legion Park 835 5. Hutchins Street Barriers Identified m rn City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2023-2025 2023-2025 2023-2025 I 00 ui r -I sl4 0 0 0 tri N CS Lf1 1--I in I Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • No designated parking to the park; all parking is along the street • Sidewalk is not 60" wide • Running slope for the curb is greater than 1:12 • Top of curb is not leveled • No alternative entrance to the party room • No sign of accessibility outside the room • There is not a level landing out the party room entrance • Lock on the door requires twisting of the wrist • No closer on the door Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • No permanent signage for the party room • Switches do not have a clear floor space • Sink inside the party room does not meet the requirements as if it were used in a bathroom Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • Text does not contrast with the background, and there is no Braille on the signs. The center of the sign is not 9" from the arc of the door, and the sign exceeds the maximum height from the ground to the baseline of the characters. • There is not a minimum of 60" beyond the latch side of the door and is not a level landing outside the doors • Not enough space to maneuver through the privacy wall, into the bathroom • Not enough floor space inside the bathroom • Sink is at 14.5" from the wall to the front • No knee space under the lavatory • No pipe coverage • Faucets need twisting of the wrist to operate • Toilet paper dispenser is farther than 9" from the rim of the toilet • There is not 60" of clear depth when opening the toilet stall door • Stall door is not self-closing • No pull handles on both side of the doors • No locks on the stall doors Priority 4 — Additional Access • None rn City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN rn Timeline 2029-2031 M O N i al N O N Cost Estimate 2 tn ,-i O O O 0- O d - t/? Lodi Lake Park 1101 W. Turner Road Barriers Identified Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • Parking Lots o Accessible parking requirements are not posted throughout the parking lot areas o Accessible routes needed throughout the parking lot areas o Appropriate signage required throughout • Water Park o Water park does not have a level surface for a front approach o Water park does not have proper hardware for entrance • Maintenance Office o Grates are larger than half an inch at the maintenance office o No alternative entrance if needed o No closers on any of the entrance doors • Discovery Center o Has a mat that is not secured to the ground Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • No tactile characters at either the water park or the discovery center • Maintenance office interior doors cannot open fully to a 90 degree angle • Interior doors do not have a clear front approach (locations in report) • Water park interior doors requires more than 5 lbs of pressure to open • Discovery center does not meet the requirements (in report) • Light switches do not have a clear front approach (locations in report) • Water Park o Switches are not compliant o Handrails for the ramp do not extend past the 12" minimum requirement o No tactile characters on room signs o The benches inside the women's bathroom (at the water park) have seats that do not meet the requirements of a minimum of 20" o Front counter at the water park is higher than 36" ■ The portion on top does not extend the same depth ■ Forward approach is not possible • Discovery Center o No tactile characters on room signs rn City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2029-2031 0 0 0 0 00 a) co CU a) w U `) E co Cco O O_ c a) O L .2 E cu oO O O L ao N E c �' c s L O co .E O ac) Eo v C _a co � 0 E O " v E a) .0 L 6 C U 0 v) a) c .� +�.+ C .� C c O C CA C E Cr .� O_ i O E v, f3 c L w E O 0 v O L n +, C c L o ° c v L 0 L E co a) 0) L a1 U a) L Q 0 a OC E 0 i 0 t v) C N E C +, -0 La C0 E cCo c�i O O 0 a) •— C cM +�., s O n co L a) O c O N 0 s i c r`a co C Q X11 co C - E B- . a� o o v c ° v ate) o o c c cc c L E a) •,_, c O Lc (o L to -' a) cu v) cvi LL a) O W O +, +; .E v v co" t E n3 c -a E -a -a E a U 4 v1 c00) c Q 'co v O v v O 'O _c a) at Cr a co 0co 0 u �..� Q v) co +' • • w -0 w 0 co a) a0 •� O L O L C L O O O O 0- S- S- 4-, y., c in c to i, Q O u co Y U 1 _G - C �O Q N a) O C O O E 0 0 CU C C co (13 ca co c� O co '0 Z CC Z Z U N 7 J 0 J J-0 c c d I— 73 X 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M Toilets in both men's and women's restrooms and the maintenance restroom are not accessible a) L co a) E O +-, O 4, i Y o O E U co v, _a o O o L c +-, O C L clic, +� E a) C L E O O ijL E O n3 O E c OL c w vi ai _a -aO ow c(o w c O c co v E E v a)L 2._ E c a)O v +., a v)E4-, a) O L N vv .- C +, v O N O •E E c E c ca _3 s Q Q v) -0 vl 7 E ,v_c 2 w LLD ro 0 c 0 . cu a) a)ID hi +, - c v) v) c 1— 51- The stall doors in both the men's and women's restrooms and the 0) sts s- (0 Q (0 0 00 CU co v v 0 > a) > t t o > c (o O a L 0. 0 O E o =a v E O ai U 0 C v, f° c C N E •7 E O O O 0 O O O O O O O 0 clearance. Water Park L • 0 C d City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2026-2028 Maple Square Park 2 E. Lodi Avenue 0 0 0 cm- d- -,./). d- 112 vO i) O Lc c 0 Q) O p ++ _c v O n n p +-, _C Cn -0 C E 0cu cu c O C } v Q - v 7 O -0'O "a v _a E a° 0 O N _ - L) of •� Q) 7 U •C v v - L Q C U v v Q E L -a no co u L -C 0v i Q) 2 c ro C E E U C O 'n v E 22 E n ra O O m v c ra a) E 0 3 v Q C O 2 0 L CCI 0Q O O VI 0 cu CD N L E v v La u N ra p v rcs a) _a a) E 0 0 0 v c o_0 _0 al v) ca n3 0 c 0 _c 3 v Q) W v 3 L v, E " in c v O O '� E E ro L v U O v C E 0 E a E cu E c Y c v 3 3 c o OC E o CU c v p0 +� O (1) C E "c c cm ro• N U U O p Cl.) t *' _c v *' v E E cn C O n E O L +� 0 r° E E E *' t n +' O O *' L p _C L 0 '0 0 p p u L Q) c v •- O Q Q CU 0 Q O '� O 'C +' L " v v 3 '� v v v v a as _c E m i_ N Cr N i E W C v -C L L v O L p 4--' O In v L L L Q) N v E '^ y0 '^ N `n — N +-' +' `^ -`n to L O 'a v OL M 'n '^ — :^ 'n ++ 'n C Op v _a O C v �, E s _c L C N v co L C v v C O C N a- t i L v tj a-+ CD v v O+ v L v ra 110 -C _C -C C c E c o SZ E C ra L E E a E c E Q v O a to O 'a v i O O 'O ++ v p 7 'n C O v C L 0 0 0 'a v v L 2O _a ra U 2i L -a c •S •c 3 v E h bA 0 •L O v O L 2i U L L C E O -C n +� _C 6 v 'n 'n f6 v L O E '^ -a 7,_c v - v} 2 0 p O N Q C a C ra E 0 0 O Q 2 Op - N a) a) ,c as c a c as t O L u L •- w 0- 0 0 0 op O +, L L +-' Q L Q , Q ++ O ,z, O L L U by O_ +' �� +, O "a C �_ O C �+ v 'moi, co O 'n O L' +.+ +, •'n a, 'n +.' '� 5- L r Q a' C N �- —— a) — v Y v J--' L LO U Y v N C N C v v 2 U a c i, OU 1— E H E' vs vs 7) til t rn E 2_c Z E 2 Z vs H H E 1— E 1— c rn _c O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Priority 4 — Additional Access o Water fountains throughout the site are not accessible o No fire alarm systems on-site that meet the requirements City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN EVALUATION PENDING Timeline I I I 1.1 1111 Timeline 2026-2028 2026-2028 2026-2028 2020-2022 Cost Estimate I I I ILri 4 Cost Estimate N n 0 ,,, n o 0 0 o - 0 ,n i/} Barriers Identified Priority 1— Approach and Entrance Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services Priority 3 — Toilet Rooms Priority 4 — Additional Access Peterson Park W V 1 1 1 199 Evergreen Drive Barriers Identified Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • No parking stalls on-site • At the top of the curb, the level landing is at 3.3% • No main entrance to Peterson Park Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • Grass is slippery when wet • No walkway inside of the park to the fields • Light switches require more than 5 lbs of pressure to operate • No standing space for someone in a wheelchair to use Priority 4 — Additional Access • No sign of accessibility at eitFier I tir{ • No Braille on the signs • Baseline of the signs is higher than 60 • The total length of the lavatory is 15", requirement • Not enough knee space under the lave • There is no baggage or covering on #1 • Faucet requires more than 5Ibs of prle • Hand dryer requires more than 5 lbs c • Rims of the toilets are 15.5" from the • Requires more than 5 lbs of pressure • Door doesn't self -close all the way City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN NOT YET DEVELOPED Timeline rn ,-1 o o o N I I ca E i= I 1 I 2016-2019 Timeline 2020-2022 Cost Estimate O0 I I Cost Estimate I Io Cost Estimate OO t/} • There is a water fountain, but it no longer works Pixley Park 876 E. Vine Street Roget Park 2229 Tienda Drive Barriers Identified Priority 1—Approach and Entrance • None Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • Lack of required clear floor space under outdoor tables • No clear space adjacent to benches with back support Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • None Priority 4 — Additional Access • Drinking fountain requires 10 lbs of pressure to operate Rosegate Park 2801 Ambrosia Street Barriers Identified Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • No parking stalls on-site Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • None Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • None 11 Priority 4 — Additional Access • Water fountains require more than 5 lbs of pressure to operate rSalas Park 2001 S. Stockton Street Barriers Identified Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • Route on the sidewalk is greater than 21 passing • Slope is at 5.4% at the entrance • Running slope is at 8.6% • Landing at the curb is at 3.6%, with flarf City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN O O N N N N O O N N I I O O N N O 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 N in O • There are alternative entrances, but they are not compliant • Inaccessible entrances do not have signage that points to the nearest accessible entrance • No sign that indicates the accessible entrance • Gate to the baseball fields does not have the required approach and maneuvering clearance • Gate at the entrance lacks accessible hardware Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • Running slope to the entrance and to the baseball seating is greater than 5% • Ramp inside the park is 8.4-8.9% and has no rails on the side • All entrances to the baseball seating do not have a clear landing for approach • Threshold for the concession stand is higher than 1/4 inch • Lock is higher than 48" from the ground • Door to the snack shop needs more than 5 lbs of pressure to open • Door to the snack shop does not have a closer • No seating for anyone in a wheelchair • Counters are 40" high from the ground Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • No sign on the latch side of the door • Drain pipes for the sink in the women's restroom are beyond 6" from the wall • Drain pipes for the sinks in both the men's and women's restrooms are not insulated • More than 5 lbs of force is required to activate the faucets in both the men's and women's restrooms • Toilets in both the men's and women's restrooms are lower than 17" from the ground • Side and rear grab bars are not positioned correctly • Toilet flush control requires more than 5 lbs of pressure to flush • Toilet flush controls in both the men's and women's restrooms are located above the toilet, and not on the open side • Toilet paper dispensers in both the men's and women's restrooms extend more than 9" from the rim • Toilet paper dispensers in both the men's and women's restrooms do not have continuous flow O O City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 0 2020-2022 Timeline Completed N 2020-2022 N O N D O N O N Cost Estimate 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 O IO' O Ln 0 Ln 1f r1 N L1. IA • Stall doors in both the men's and women's restrooms are not self-closing • There is not proper hardware for the stall doors in both the men's and women's restrooms • Locks on the stall doors are not accessible Priority 4 — Additional Access • D fountains throughout the facility are not accessible Softball Complex 401 N. Stockton Street Barriers Identified Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • Cross slope is at 2.4% • Slope at the top of the curb is at 2.3% • No alternative entrance • No signage to direct to the nearest accessible entrance • No sign of accessibility at the main entrance • Entrance at the gate does not have the proper hardware out cement on the path of travel ?nt rooms stand are higher than 48" ed seating for people in a wheelchair (1Tilthepark, does not have one accessible 5" froth i • :round not meet the minimum 9" from the latch ed 6inch wall er thJi 40'1 ?red than 5 lbs of pressure to operate sure to operate the flush control an 9" from the rim 0 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2020-2022 Timeline 1 2023-2025 1 1 Timeline LII N 0 m N O N 1 2026-2028 $5,000 Cost Estimate I OO 0 0 Lr N 1 1 Cost Estimate O' N I O 0 cr • No continuous flow in the women's bathroom • There is not 60" of clearance on the pull side of the door • Doors are not self-closing • Doors do not have pulls on both sides of the door Priority 4 — Additional Access • Water fountain requires more than 5 lbs of pressure to operate • Spout does not meet the 15" minimum from the rear of the wall • No second water fountain for one standing person Van Buskirk Park 600 N. Pleasant Street Barriers Identified Priority 1— Approach and Entrance • No parking stalls on-site Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • No accessible path to the seating Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • None Priority 4 — Additional Access • None Vinewood Park 1824 W. Tokay Street Barriers Identified • No accessible bathroom on-site • Route is not accessible • No tactile signage • Not enough clear space on the latch • Sign is higher than 60" • No maneuvering clearance to open ri1 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN m 0 2026-2028 Timeline 0 N lD r-I O N Cost Estimate O O O O O O C i/1 tn. O N i/? • Threshold is more than 1/4 inch • Doors are not equipped with operable hardware • Stall door requires more than 5 lbs of pressure • Not enough room in the restroom • Coat hook is higher than 48" • Not enough knee clearance under the sink in either the men's or women's restroom • Not enough toe clearance under the sink drain in either the men's or women's restroom • No drain pipe insulation • Faucet requires greater than 5 lbs force • Toilets are not accessible in both the men's and women's restrooms • Not enough space in the stalls • Height of the toilet is higher than 19" • Toilet paper dispenser is too close to bar; not enough space between the bar and the wall • No grab bar behind the toilet • Force to flush is greater than 5 lbs • No continuous flow of paper • Stall doors are under 32" wide • No space on the pull side • Door is not self-closing • No pulls on the doors • Latch requires pinching • Component is less than 60" wide in both the men's and women's restrooms • Stall is under 59" deep • Stall does not meet the requirements Priority 4 — Additional Access • Requires more than 5 lbs of force • Fountain is not 15" from the rear • Bottom of the fountain is not at least 27" from the ground Zupo Park 350 N. Washington Street Barriers Identified Priority 1— Approach and Entrance m 0 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN di- 0 rn 2016-2019 O N i l0 i--1 O N O O O O O O O O u'1 O 1n in- m in • No parking on-site; all parking is along the street • Exterior route is all along the street sidewalk • Curb is running at 16.7% • There is an alternative entrance, but it's not compliant; it can be used during the same hours, but not independently • All inaccessible entrances do not have signage that direct to the nearest accessible entrance • Main entrance does not have a sign of accessibility • Main entrance is a gate that is left open when park is in use • Gate does not have the proper hardware Priority 2 — Access to Goods & Services • Path is stable, but there is a lot of cracking • No signs designating permanent rooms besides for the bathroom • Door to the freezer in the concession stand is not at least 32" wide • Front approach to the freezer does not have 18" of space • Threshold to the back door in the concession stand and the inner doorways in the concession stand are higher than 1/4 inch • All doors at Zupo Field need to have their hardware replaced • All doors need 5 lbs or more pounds of pressure to open • Doors do not have closers • Light switches in the concession stand do not have a clear approach • Light switch in the freezer needs to replaced • The overall space of seating is unknown; there are two spaces on the ground for wheelchair seating • There is not a companion seat for each wheelchair space • Counter is higher than 36" • Does not meet the requirements for a forward approach • Inside of the concession stand is not compliant overall Priority 3 —Toilet Rooms • Cross slope at the door way is at 2.4% • No Braille on signs. There is a sign on the latch side of the doors, but it is painted on. Signs are not on the latch side of the door but in front of it. • Bathroom doors do not have operable parts • Requires more than 5 lbs of pressure to open • Mirror is 41" from the ground • Front lavatory is higher than 34" di- 0 City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN I O O O M O r -I • There is 4" of space under the sink • Pipes are farther than 6" from the wall • Pipes are not covered below the lavatory • Requires more than 5 lbs of pressure to operate • Center line of the water is farther than 18" from the side wall • Rim of the toilet is lower than 17" • Grab bar above the toilet does not have the measurements needed • Women's toilet flusher is not on the open side • Toilet paper dispenser is too far from the rim of the toilet • Does not have 60" on the depth side • Doors are not self-closing • No pull bars on the stall doors • Locks on the stall doors are operated with a pinch and twist • Stalls are not 60" wide • Stalls do not meet the dimension requirements Priority 4 — Additional Access • None TOTAL Appendix D: Public Rights -of -Way City Standards Details CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STREET SECTIONS c&s See 2.5' —I Notes 4 & 5. Right—Of—Way (R/W) c&s Face of Curb to Face of Curb (F—F C/L(Symmetrical) 2.5% 1 2.5% R/W See Paving Detail Vertical C,G&S. (Notes 3 & 6) 1-1/2:1 Max slope to ex. ground except © driveways (See Design Stds Sec. 1.500) Cross Section 1 R/W Rolled C,G&S. (Notes 3 & 6) MEM 10' 2% B A 2.5' Top of curb Nominal Face of Curb R/W 6' 2' C C/L 2.5% C 2.5% 8 2' Do not compact Planter area (Typ.) Till thru compacted area prior to planting. 8" C.O.G. © 90% RC (Typ.) 6' 2% 10' WISP Vert. Curb Gutter Planter strip & Sidewalk per Std Plan 121 & 135 (Typ.) Cross Section 2 15' 6" curb 2% B C C B R/W C/L 2.5% 2.5% Vert. Curb Gutter per Std Plan 135 (typical) Do not compact Planter area (Typ.) Till thru compacted area prior to planting. Cross Section 3 varies -i with meander (3' Minimum) 8" C.O.G. © 90% RC (Typ.) f 4' Sidewalk 4' Meandering Sidewalk varies with meander (3' Minimum from face of wall) Sheet 1 of 2 Dr. KT No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. ws 1 2/05 ADDED CROSS SECTION 3 \ate12/00 2/2/05 Date STD PLAN 101, CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Street Sections Street Classification Minor Residential Minor Residential Standard Residential Standard Residential Minor Collector Major Collector Industrial (Local) Secondary Arterial Four—Lane Undivided Minor Arterial Four—Lane Divided Major Arterial Six—Lane Divided Minor Arterial w/ RW frontage wall A Notes: 2. Section Dimension Table (A) (2xC) R/W F—F 50' 34' 50' 30' 55' 39' 55' 35' 60' 44' 68' 52' 66' 52' 80' 64' 94' 78' 118' 102' 108' 78' Structural section to be determined by the City (Design Stds Sec. 1.600) 0.20' AC Type B (AC -1/2" Max. Aggr. Med. Gr.) over 0.30' AB Min: Refer to Construction Specification 6-39 0.67'-92% R.C. Compacted 0. G. Structural Section Cross Structural Min. C&S Section Section 5.5' Rolled 4.0' sidewalk SW w/ 0.5' Vertical curb 5.5' Rolled 4.0' sidewalk SW w/ 0.5' Vertical curb 5.5' Vertical 5.5' Vertical 4.5' Vertical 5.5' Vertical 5.5' Vertical 5.5' Vertical 4.0' meandering SW w/ 0.5' Vertical curb B 1 A 2 A 1 2 1 1 3 Structural section to be determined by the City. (Design Stds Sec. 1.600) 0.50'-95% R.C. Compacted Native Material (Remove & Replace) 0.50'-90% R.C. Compacted 0.0. A A B B B B B B B See City Public Improvement Design Stds. Sec. 1 for general design requirements. Widening at intersections to provide additional lanes may be required. Paving Detail at TOE 3. See Std. Plans 135 and 136 for Vertical and Rolled C,G&S respectively. 4. The area between the R/W and back of sidewalk and between face of walk and back of curb shall be graded to 0.02 per ft. Where wider sidewalk is required (ie. commercial areas, around hydrants, poles etc) sidewalk specifications apply. 5. Private use of the R/W subject to Encroachment Permit requirements and Design Standards Sections 1.400 & 1.500. 6. See Design Stds. Section 1.500 for curb & gutter type criteria. Sheet 2 of 2 Dr. KT Ch. ws `Date 7/08 No. 1 Date 2/05 Revision ADDED MEANDERING WALK Appr. Approved By: Wally Sary(elin City Engine R.C.E. 39895 2/2/05 Date STD PLAN 1O1} °F CITY OF LODI) y = F•oR�' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Special Commercial Driveway 7..5' For continous walk installation Optional on—site sidewalk Modify curb at BOW & add ramp, curb as shown ECR Radius "R" Nominal driveway width Driveway installation without continous walk 0 0 6" Concrete curb A.C. or concrete driveway BCR 3'± radius (tYp•) 6" Curb 4' Ramp Ramp c 0 0 ar 0 0 o' o W U) 1/4" Grooves at 3/4" C—C (typ.) VW Sidewalk r".-10'—.— Transition of 5' sidewalk „s„ 15' 3' 20' 4' 25' 5' 30' 6' 35' 7' \_ See note 2 1" lip See note 3 Concrete driveway Details per Std. Plan 114 Plan 3' Curb height transition Notes: 1. Special Commercial Driveway to be used only where required or specifically approved by the Public Works Director. 2. See Std. Plan 132 for wheelchair ramp details. 3. Provide in—line catch basin if depth of flow in gutter exceeds 3". Gutter Dr. KT No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS ` Date 12/00 Apgroved By: Wally Sar?(elin City Engine R.C.E. 39895 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN CITY OF LSquare—Type Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT and Residential Driveway For Retrofit Cut AC 14" min. unless approved otherwise by City Engineer 15"-- 6" 6" 2" 121„ For Retrofit Cut AC 14" min. 2" Bench Mark monuments will be furnished by the City of Lodi, when required, and shall be installed by the contractor as directed by City Engineer Score Line 5' 2% max Pour as Monolithic Section Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk Section 15" 12 6" Score Line 6" 5' 4" Standard Sidewalk 8" 90% R.C. Concrete Subgrade Compaction O.G. Match Ex Grade Pavement Conform 2% max Residential Driveway Section conform area 1/4" groove approx. 3/4" o.c. (typ.) A 10% or flatter 4" Residential Driveway 8" 90% R.C. Concrete Subgrade Compaction E 0 8% max 8% max Score lines at 5.5' Weakened plane joints See Note 1 Ramp Typical Details Std. Plan 132A, B, & C Notes: 1. Construct weakened plane joints at 11' intervals, at ends of driveway transitions, and at center of driveway. 2. Use impervious membrane cure. Broom finish. 3. Class B concrete per Section 90 of Std. Spec., 1 1/2" max. aggregate. 4. Construct expansion joints at 200' max. 5. All exposed edges shall be rounded to 1/2" radius. Plan 5'min ransition 1" Driveway 5'min Transition If joint is greater than 1/4" wide it shall be filled with petrolastic material. 1/8" Detail Weakened Plane Joint Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/07 MINOR REVISIONS Date 9/08 9/07 Date STD PLAN 112} CITY OF LOD9 rL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Driveway—Type Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk 1" 2 6" 4" For Retrofit Cut AC 14" Unless Approved Otherwise by City Engineer 15" - r 2" 25" 5' 2% Or -4 1Pr 1-1/2" Alternate If joint is greater than 1/4" wide it shall be filled with petrolastic material. 1 /8" Detail Weakened Plane Joint a. Pour as Monolithic Section Curb, Gutter, & Sidewalk Section T 4" Standard Sidewalk 8" 90% R.C. Concrete Subgrade Compaction Weakened plane joints at 11' intervals, See Note 1 Notes: 1. Construct weakened plane joints at 11' interval to match score lines. 2. Use impervious membrane cure. Broom finish. 3. Class B concrete per Section 90 of Std. Spec., 1-1/2" max. aggregate. 4. Construct expansion joints at 200' max. 5. All exposed edges shall be rounded to 1/2" radius. Plan Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS ` Date12/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 113A� __ -,` 25"- _ Flow line 4' 15' ansition Notes: 1. Construct weakened plane joints at 11' interval to match score lines. 2. Use impervious membrane cure. Broom finish. 3. Class B concrete per Section 90 of Std. Spec., 1-1/2" max. aggregate. 4. Construct expansion joints at 200' max. 5. All exposed edges shall be rounded to 1/2" radius. Plan Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS ` Date12/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 113A� CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Curb Return Transition Notes: 1. For Driveway—Type C,G & S See Std. Plan 113A. Dr. KT Ch. WS Date 12/00 No Date Revision Appr. Apgroved B 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 113B i CITY OF LODI) y -f F'oR� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Commercial—Type Gutter & Driveway For Retrofit Cut AC 14" min. 8" Gutter (TYP) Rebar shall be supported in place prior to concrete placement. See note 4 6"x6"—W2.9 WWF centered in slab. (Typical) Pavement Conform— Match Ex Grade 0.G. 2% max 6 1/4" groove approx. 3/4" o.c. (typ.) Score Line Section conform area 1'- \ 8% max 0 e 0 10% °r Batter 6" Sidewalk (Typical) 12" 90% R.C. Concrete Subgrade Compaction (Typ. for Commercial—Type) Construct weakened plane joints at end of transitions and center of driveway. 8% max 5' min -.—Driveway min Driveway width y Transition Transition Limit of wire mesh 6"x6"—W2.9 WWF Plan Notes: 1. Use impervious membrane cure. Broom finish. 2. Class B concrete per Section 90 of Std. Spec., 1-1/2" max. aggregate. 3. All exposed edges shall be rounded to 1/2" radius. 4. #4 rebars may be substituted for mesh when approved by the Engineer. 1 14" AC cut Score lines per sidewalk Std. Plan. 112 Detail Weakened Plane Joint If joint is greater than 1/4" wide it shall be filled with petrolastic material. Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 ADDED FL HEIGHT DIMENSION 2 9/07 MINOR REVISIONS Date 1/00 9/07 Date STD PLAN 114} CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Concrete AIIey Approach / Adjust Width of AIIey R/W to fit No lip in 8" (Typ.) sidewalk score line only B.O.W. Steel trowel (4' with radius less than 6.5') BC See note 1.) EC 6" curb face Warped section Per plan or match adjacent gutter. Commercial Type Gutter Const. weakened plane joint © CL, BC, & EC. Limit of commercial—type gutter 6" 1-1/2" 4 re—bar Variable 5' (4' with radius less than 6.5') • 4.• 3" 0 f — F 2" 6"x6"—W2.9 WWF wire mesh 90% R.C. concrete subgrade compaction 2 #4 Reinforcing Bars Notes: 1. Radius equals distance from face of curb to back of sidewalk or from face of curb to property line if no sidewalk exists. 2. Use impervious membrane cure. Broom finish. 3. Class B concrete per Section 90 of Std. Spec., 1-1/2" max. aggregate. 4. #4 bars 12" 0. C. may be substituted for mesh when approved by the Engineer. 1-•••-1-1/2" 2" Chamfer Detail 6" 12" Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. ws `Date \ 12/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 115} CITY OF LODII J PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Sidewalk Repair Width 1 1/4" score lines Construct weakened plane joints at 11' intervals. 5.5' 11' Plan Varies Varies Width 2% I I-111=11111111111111 1�11�11�11�11�11�11= 11I1I111IITIITITIi1 Planter Strip Sidewalk Detail Notes: 1. Match width with adjacent existing sidewalk. For replacement less than 11' match scoring pattern. 2. Concrete shall be 2500 psi © 28 days. Max. 4" slump. For jobs less than one yard, no static trailer mix, mixer trailer may be used. 3. Construct sidewalk on firm stable subgrade. 4. Light broom finish. 5. Impervious membrane cure. 1" 4" concrete sidewalk If joint is greater than 1/4" wide it shall be filled with petrolastic material. 1/8" Detail Weakened Plane Joint Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS Date 1P/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 117i CITY OF LODI) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Sign Post Installation See Note 5. / J —See Note 9 7'-0" Traffic signs 5,-0" Median signs (See Note 6) Sign Post See Note 8 2" Curb, gutter and sidewalk Alternate R/W, BOW Center of return 8' min., R<30 A/4, R>30 See detail lower right See Note 2 And Note 3 Two Rivets Only Staggered at 90° • \„, f Dirt Location / 1'-9" Alternate location in 4' sidewalk Sign larger than 2' x 2' (use alternate location) Sign Post Location Top Two Holes Above Grade Patch With Non Shrinking Grout For Existing Slabs 12 Gauge Anchor Mate Select punch Style Sleeve 6" R/W 6" Core hole For Existing Slabs. IENt Sidewalk Location Concrete Monolithic pour with Sidewalk Page 1 of 2 Dr. KT No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 9/03 CHANGED 2"95 PIPE TO 2" SQ. 2 2/04 MOVED NOTES TO SECOND PAGE `Date \ 12/00 R.C.E. 39895 2/12/04 Date STD PLAN 119J CITY OF LODI'1 _••::�!�= Sign Post Installation ,9 -_F�- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT \ otes: 1. Concrete For Post Installation May Be Class C Concrete. Posts shall be new 2"x 2" 14 gauge galv. tube set plumb. 3. When Sign Square Footage Is 7.5 Square Feet or More Post Shall Be 2" x 2" 12 Gauge galv. Tube. 4. Posts Shall Be Select Punch Both Ends, 12" from bottom end and no greater than sign height at ton end, on four Sides. 5. Street Name And Traffic Signs Per Std Plan 142, a min. vertical clearance of 9'-6" at locations with street name signs only. R1 O's (one way signs) To Be Located 1.5' from bottom of sign When placed in the median. A Powder Coat (Downtown Green) Is Required For Downtown Locations. 8. Form and edge 12" x 12" concrete apron 4" Thick In Dirt Locations, When Required By Engineer. 9. Min. vertical clearance of 6'-6" at locations with multiple signs. (not including street name signs.) Page 2 of 2 Dr. GWC No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 2/04 ADDITION OF SECOND PAGE `Date Apprgved By: F. Wally Sande! City Engineer R.C.E. 39895 2/12/04 Date STD PLAN CITY OF LSidewalk and Driveway with Planting Strip PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT dotes: Alternate "A" shall be used, except where the driveway slope approaches .3 inches per foot. It may then be necessary to use Alternate "B". 2. When Alternate "9" is used sidewalk shall be removed to nearest score—mark by sawing. When the sidewalk is replaced the existing scoring pattern shall be maintained. 3. Additional compaction is not required where existing curb and gutter, sidewalk, and/or driveway are being removed and replaced. Class B concrete per Section 90 of Std. Specs, 1-1/2" max. aggregate with impervious membrane cure and light broom finish. Page 2 of 2 Dr. K No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 ADDED SCORE LINES 2 2/04 ADDED FILL AREA IN PARKWAY `Date \ 12 /00 3 2/05 REVISED PAGE 1 2/2/05 Date STD PLAIN 121 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Sidewalk and Driveway with Planting Strip 1/4" scoring lines match existing or standard City of Lodi spacing. Fill both sides of driveway with concrete 5.5' Limits of sidewalk removal if Alternate "B" is used where sidewalk exists. A 1 Construct weakened plane joints at 11' intervals Curb and gutter to match existing or as specified on the plans. 3' A Variable width Limits of curb and gutter to be removed Driveway 3 4' Sidewalk 4' Sidewalk 1/4" scoring lines match existing or standard City of Lodi spacing. 8"-90% R.C. Concrete Subgrade Compaction (See note 3) Section A—A Alternate A Detail Alternate Toe Configurations Curb and gutter to match existing or as specified on the plans. 8"-90% R.C. Concrete Subgrade Compaction (See note 3) 1-1/2" I1 1 Detail Weakened Plane 6 If joint is greater than 1/4" wide it shall be filled with petrolastic material. Joint 4' Sidewalk Section A—A Alternate B Page 1 of 2 Dr. K No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 ADDED SCORE LINES 2 2/04 ADDED FILL AREA IN PARKWAY `Date \ 12 /00 3 2/05 ADDED ALT. B SECTION 2/2/05 Date STD PLAIN 121 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FRAME AND COVER ADJUSTMENT EX AC VARIES 3" MIN ON CONE 14" MIN. EX AC VARIES #3 REBAR HOOP 20"0 CENTERED IN CONCRETE RING GRADE— RING MANHOLE & RISER J l FINISHED GRADE I1" AC TO CONFORM TO EX 3/8' MAX AGG SEE NOTE 6" 6. 12" MIN CONCRETE #3 REBAR HOOP CENTERED IN CONCRETE RING FINISHED GRADE 1" AC TO CONFORM TO EX MAX AGG WATER VALVE (MONUMENT BOX SIMILAR) NOTES: 1. THIS DETAIL SHALL BE USED WHERE FRAME AND COVERS ARE BEING ADJUSTED TO GRADE. 2. CLASS B CONCRETE SHALL BE USED. FINISH SHALL BE ROUGH. 3. CONCRETE SHALL BE PLACED AGAINST NEATLY EDGED EXCAVATION. 4. FRAMES SHALL MATCH EX FINISHED GRADE WITHIN 1/8". 5. TACK THE AREA TO BE PAVED, PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF AC. 6. A.C. MAY BE 1/2' MAX. AGG. ONLY WITH PRIOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER. Dr. KT No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS Approved By: Date 12/00 Charlie Swimley City Engineer / Deputy Public Works Director RCE No. 52842 Date STD PLAN 123 °F- CITY OF LODI) 9<F•o�'- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dead—End Barricade R/W 1 4"x 4"x 6' post © max. 12' centers 3" n See Note 3 fi 2"x 10" D.F. const. grade 2-3/8" bolts w/double nuts Sidewalk 10" min. • :a1 Symmetrical about Street Q 3'-0" i r' 2 sack concrete Notes: 1. All posts shall be redwood or plastic. 2. Entire barrier shall be painted white -3 coats. 3. Install one fully reflective red Type N Marker 18"x 18" at centerline. (& 12' right of CE when c—c width is over 60'.) Backing: 0.080 in aluminum 6061T6 alloy. Reflectorization: Wide angle flat top Scotchlite high intensity reflective sheeting. Mount with 5/16 0 bolts w/double nuts. 4. Servicable portions of barricades being removed may be reused at new locations as approved by the Engineer. Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. ws `Date 12/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 128J CIN OF LOD9 � Through—the—Curb PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Cut pipe to match curb face or bevel 1/2" to provide smooth finish. See Note 3 4"x 4" — 2.9 WWF 1 1/2" min. cover on pipe See appropriate d' Drain — See Note 1 Section R/W Detail Minimum Top Elevation is same as top of curb Drop inlet catch basin (See Std Plan 304) or cleonout with solid cover Drain Section Leave annular space open 4" C.I.P. with bet over 4" dia. opening Exist. downspout Extend if req'd. Roof Drain min. 12" max. When req'd extend and connect to roof drain and delete riser. Detail Straight grade Notes: 3" x 4"-26 Ga. Go Iv. downspout pipe I Pipe alternates: 3" x 4" round pipe—Sch 40 PVC, CIP or steel 2. Curb, gutter & sidewalk dimensions to match adjacent construction. 3. For installations in existing sidewalk, saw cut and remove 20" min width of sidewalk and curb. Gutter may be left in place. 6 16" Dia. • 6 Slope,__] 6' Yard Drain Detail Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. ws `Date N. 2/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 129 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Survey Monument Assembly (6") 1/2" pattern letters 1/2" R 9" 7 3/4" 7-1/2" 5 1/4" r 1 /2" Notes: 1. Frame — Approx. wt. 22 lbs. 2. Cover — Approx. wt. 7 lbs. 3. Material — Cast Iron / 1/2" — 2 " 1/16— 1/16"— / / 5" 5-1 /2" 6" 6 1/2" 7" 4" Dr. KT No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 2/04 REVISED FRAME DIMENSION `Dat Date 2/12/04 Date STD PLAN 130 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Street Light Foundation for Future Installation Bond all conduit and anchor bolts with no. 6 cu. 2'-6" 5/8"x8' ground rod (gclv. or copperweld) Tie no. 6 cu. to anchor blots. 13" square level in both directions 3" Install conduit coupling flush with top of sidewalk, cap with recessed pipe plug, and lubricate with graphitized grease. 4 2 1 —1 /2" long galvanized "Allen Head" set screw. Lubricate threads with graphitized grease. Ground rod III—III—III= =111=111=111- 1"x40" 11=111=111=1 11=1 11=111=1 anchor 1111111111111E 11 111111111111 bolts -111-111-111 111-111-1 1 1 '1111 r r-111111- II1=111-ITI= —111-111-11 E1111114 r-111111= El 111 I Il 1 ITT �111I II 3" I I E111I Ell Ell =111= -111E 1 E111 1=111=111=1 11=111=111= 111-111-11 r =111-111E 1 111-111-1 rr- 111-111- 11=111=111=1 11 =1 111-111—ME' 11-111— 3" Sleeve 1-111-1 11=1 1_I-111-111=1 —ITIS l lE 11- =11-111-111- n u t 11=111=111=1 —111-111-1 -111-111—ITI- - 1111- =11=111-1 11=1T1— '1=111-11'-•—A7111-111 Anchor bolt 4 ° ° . I dl' D r. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. ws `ate12/00 9/25/02 Date STD PLAN 131 CITY OF LODI TYPE 1 HANDICAP RAMPS • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT EXPANSION JOINT (TYP) ECR 1/4" GROOVE APPROX. 3/4" O.C. (TYP) TRANSITION SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 6 SEE NOTE 5 CORNER - TYPE 1 NOTES: 1. RAMP SLOPE 1:12 MAXIMUM. 2. TRANSITION SLOPE 1:10 MAXIMUM. 3. SEE STD. PLAN 611& 612 FOR CORNER LAYOUT DIMENSIONS. CURB RETURN RADIUS PER PLANS. CENTER RAMP ON MIDPOINT OF CURB RETURN. SIDEWALK W W W W WW W 11. W W w W W wW PARKWAY -<0 L C&G MWM 1/4" GROOVE APPROX. 3/4" O.C. brvNt4tvNl 1' C9 _q. '' SEE NOTE 6 SEE NOTE 7 SEE NOTE 5 MIDBLOCK - TYPE 1 4. THE CONCRETE FINISH OF THE RAMP SHALL HAVE A TRANSVERSE BROOMED SURFACE TEXTURE ROUGHER THAN THE SURROUNDING SIDEWALK. 5. THE GUTTER PAN ACROSS THE ROUTE OF TRAVEL, FROM THE RAMP TO THE STREET, SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 5%. 6. ALL HANDICAP RAMPS SHALL HAVE NO LIP AND 1/4" DEEP SCORE LINE ACROSS THE RAMP AT GUTTER FLOWLINE. 7. DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE TO BE INSTALLED 6" TO 8" FROM GUTTER FLOW LINE AND EXTEND 36 INCHES MINIMUM IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND THE FULL WIDTH OF THE CURB RAMP. 8. REFER TO CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A88A FOR RAISED TRUNCATED DOME DETAILS. Dr. LP No. Date Revision Appr. cn. ws Date 3/10/05 Approved By: . Wally Sande City Fngineer R.C.E. 39895 3/15/05 Dale STD PLAN 132A% CITY OF LODI TYPE 2 HANDICAP RAMPS •' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1/4" GROOVE APPROX. 3/4" O.C. (TYP) 1' (TYP) —H 6" WIDE RETAINING WALL EXPANSION JOINT (TYP) SIDEWALK IIII, RAMP ^� RAMP `IIII NOTE Q� l NOTE 1 111 C&G Ira SIDEWALK SEE NOTE 7 SEE NOTE 5 EXPANSION JOINT (TYP) SEE NOTE 6 MIDBLOCK - TYPE 2 WEAKENED PLANE JOINT (TYP) 4' R/W 6" WIDE RETAINING WALL NOTES: 1. RAMP SLOPE 1:12 MAXIMUM. 2. TRANSITION SLOPE 1:10 MAXIMUM. 3. CENTER RAMP ON MIDPOINT OF CURB RETURN. CORNER - TYPE 2 4. THE CONCRETE FINISH OF THE RAMP SHALL HAVE A TRANSVERSE BROOMED SURFACE TEXTURE ROUGHER THAN THE SURROUNDING SIDEWALK. 5. THE GUTTER PAN ACROSS THE ROUTE OF TRAVEL, FROM THE RAMP TO THE STREET, SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 5%. 6. ALL HANDICAP RAMPS SHALL HAVE NO LIP AND 1/4" DEEP SCORE LINE ACROSS THE RAMP AT GUTTER FLOWLINE. SEE NOTE 6 SEE NOTE 5 SEE NOTE 7 1/4" GROOVE APPROX. 3/4" O.C. (TYP) 7. DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE TO BE INSTALLED 6" TO 8" FROM GUTTER FLOWLINE AND EXTEND 36 INCHES MINIMUM IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND THE FULL WIDTH OF THE LANDING. 8. REFER TO CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A88A FOR RAISED TRUNCATED DOME DETAILS. Dr. LP No. Date Revision Appr. cn. WS Date 3/10/05 Approved By: Wally Sande City Engineer R.C.E. 39895 3/15/05 Dale STD PLAN 132Bf CITY OF LODI •' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT y >- EXPANSION i< JOINT (TYP) i� Q W ECR SIDEWALK SEE NOTE 2 6" RADIUS (TYP) SEE NOTE 5 SEE NOTE 4 SEE NOTE 7 aw <0 z 1/4" GROOVE APPROX. 3/4" O.C. (TYP) 6" WIDE RETAINING WALL SEE NOTE 6 SEE NOTE 2 n \0! U m NOTES: 1. RAMP SLOPE 1:12 MAXIMUM. 1' (TYP) RAMP SIDEWALK NOTE 1 EXPANSION JOINT (TYP) 2. BACK OF CURB SHALL BE IN LINE WITH BACK OF WALK. 3. THE CONCRETE FINISH OF THE RAMP SHALL HAVE A TRANSVERSE BROOMED SURFACE TEXTURE ROUGHER THAN THE SURROUNDING SIDEWALK. TYPE 3 HANDICAP RAMP S\O I\I PV\ RETAINING WALL LANA 2% M' GRASS NO Fp 4. THE GUTTER PAN ACROSS THE ROUTE OF TRAVEL, FROM THE RAMP TO THE STREET, SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 5%. 5. ALL HANDICAP RAMPS SHALL HAVE NO LIP AND 1/4" DEEP SCORE LINE ACROSS THE RAMP AT GUTTER FLOWLINE. 6. RETAINING WALL AT BACK OF RAMP SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH A 6" RADIUS AT THE CORNER AND MAINTAIN EXISTING BACK OF WALK ELEVATIONS. 7. DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE TO BE INSTALLED 6" TO 8" FROM GUTTER FLOWLINE AND EXTEND 36 INCHES MINIMUM IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND FULL WIDTH OF LANDING. 8. REFER TO CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A88A FOR RAISED TRUNCATED DOME DETAILS. Dr. LP No. Date Revision Appr. cn. WS Date 3/10/05 Approved By: Wally Sande City Engineer R.C.E. 39895 3/15/05 Dale STD PLAN 132C, F CITY OF LODI TYPE 4 •'= � PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT HANDICAP RAMP ( EXPANSION JOINT (TYP) ECR 1/4" GROOVE APPROX. 3/4" O.C. (TYP) TRANSITION - SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 6 SEE NOTE 5 IIIWPARKWAY w C *4* 2* 2 0 so cn LANDING 4' MIN -SEE NOTE 8 6" WIDE RETAINING WALL 4' 1' (TYP) SEE NOTE 7 NOTES: 1. RAMP SLOPE FROM 1:12 MAXIMUM TO 1:15 MINIMUM. 2. TRANSITION SLOPE 1:10 MAXIMUM. 3. CENTER RAMP ON MIDPOINT OF CURB RETURN. SIDEWALK 5% MAX 0 PARKWAYW W W WJ �J w so��P�� LANDING .RETAINING WALL 1 I Np(E 4' MIN .W.W S�M,gx 4. THE CONCRETE FINISH OF THE RAMP SHALL HAVE A TRANSVERSE BROOMED SURFACE TEXTURE ROUGHER THAN THE SURROUNDING SIDEWALK. 5. THE GUTTER PAN ACROSS THE ROUTE OF TRAVEL, FROM THE RAMP TO THE STREET, SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 5%. 6. ALL HANDICAP RAMPS SHALL HAVE NO LIP AND 1/4" DEEP SCORE LINE ACROSS THE RAMP AT GUTTER FLOWLINE. 7. DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE TO BE INSTALLED 6" TO 8" FROM GUTTER FLOWLINE AND EXTEND 36 INCHES MINIMUM IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND THE FULL WIDTH OF THE CURB RAMP. 8. RETAINING WALL AT BACK OF RAMP SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH A 6" RADIUS AT THE CORNER AND MAINTAIN EXISTING BACK OF WALK ELEVATIONS. 9. REFER TO CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A88A FOR RAISED TRUNCATED DOME DETAILS. Dr. LP Ch. WS Date 3/10/05 No. Date Revision Appr. Approved By: 3/15/05 Date STD PLAN "132D� TYPE 5 CITY OF LODI HANDICAP RAMP PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT J EXPANSION JOINT (TYP)- 1/4" GROOVE APPROX. 3/4" O.C. (TYP) TRANSITION SEE NOTE 2 NOTES: 1. RAMP SLOPE 1:12 MAXIMUM. 2. TRANSITION SLOPE 1:10 MAXIMUM. 3. CENTER RAMP ON MIDPOINT OF CURB RETURN. 4. THE CONCRETE FINISH OF THE RAMP SHALL HAVE A TRANSVERSE BROOMED SURFACE TEXTURE ROUGHER THAN THE SURROUNDING SIDEWALK. 5. THE GUTTER PAN ACROSS THE ROUTE OF TRAVEL, FROM THE RAMP TO THE STREET, SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 5%. 6. ALL HANDICAP RAMPS SHALL HAVE NO LIP AND 1/4" DEEP SCORE LINE ACROSS THE RAMP AT GUTTER FLOWLINE. 7. DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE TO BE INSTALLED 6" TO 8" FROM GUTTER FLOWLINE AND EXTEND 36 INCHES MINIMUM IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND THE FULL WIDTH OF THE CURB RAMP. 8. REFER TO CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A88A FOR RAISED TRUNCATED DOME DETAILS. Dr. LP No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS Date 3/10/05 Awed Byi F. Wally Sande City Engineer R.C.E. 39895 3/15/05 Date STD PLAN 132E CITY OF LResidential Street Knuckle PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 00 i 00 00 60 Oft • Axis of symmetry 1 A 3= A 1 + 20°37'32" R/W Radius=65' Curb Radius=57' P.I. of R/W arD Al =Varies Curb Radius=20' Face of Curb 50' Angle point on R/W 0 0 39' 55' D 2=10°18'-46" Curb Radius=100' Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS `Date 1P\00 Approved By/? . Wally Saryq'elin City Engine R.C.E. 39895 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 133J CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Parking Standards _.) SEE NOTE 20 6" CURB (TYP.) SEE NOTES 13&14 E DO NOT ENTER SIGN —E y B 5.0' MIN. ADJACENT TO — PROPERTY LINES COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL OR RESIDENTIAL ZONES E oL) See Note 11 Minimum Parking Lot Standards ** Parking Angle* Parallel See Parking 10 24 14 10 3 Note 3 9 12.7 15 20.5 1.8 17 45° 9.5 13.4 14 20.8 1.8 17 10 14.2 14 21.2 1.8 17 9 10.5 19 21.8 2.2 14 60° 9.5 11 18 22.1 2.2 14 10 11.6 18 22.3 2.2 14 9 9 25 20 2.5 14 90° 9.5 9.5 24 20 2.5 14 10 10 24 20 2.5 14 * Dimensions for other parking angles must be evaluated separately for approval. ** For two-way traffic minimum is 24 feet. 20' MIN. ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL ZONES 10' MIN. ADJACENT TO COMMERCIAL ZONES See Note 3 Do not enter sign Sheet 1 of 2 Dr. KT No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 2/04 REVISION PARKING LOT LAYOUT `Date 12\00 Approved By: . Wally Sande City Engineer R.C.E. 39895 7/7/11 Date STD PLAN 134 CNotes: CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Parking Standards 1. A minimum number of parking spaces required is established by the City of Lodi Ordinance. 2. All parking stalls shall be marked in an acceptable manner. 3. Lots designed for more than four cars must have two-way access. 4. Where two parking angles can be used in a single lot, they shall be located in separate areas of the lot (except as shown on layout.) 5. Any parking layout necessitating a cul-de-sac or similar type of turning facility for reversing direction of travel in order to exit from the area or any parking spaces will generally be discouraged, and it should be approved by the City Staff prior to the incorporation into the plan. 6. Residential parking for more than four cars regardless of zoning designation shall not be designed to require backing out onto any public street Rights -of -Way. 7. Two-way traffic aisles shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. 8. In any non-residential parking condition parking or backing area within a parking lot shall not extend into the public Rights -of -Way, regardless of zoning designation. 9. When a long driveway having only a single ingress is necessary within a development, provisions should be made for the maneuvering of emergency vehicles and the arrangement approved by City Staff prior to its incorporation into the plan. 10. All parking lots shall have an adequate structural section and shall be paved with a minimum of two inches of asphalt concrete. 11. All unusable areas shall be landscaped where practical. 12. Landscaped areas within or adjacent to the parking area shall provide for a minimum of one shade tree for every four parking stalls. Depending on type and size of shade tree, requirements may be modified by the City Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee. 13. Six-inch high concrete curbs shall separate all paved and landscaped areas. 14. Concrete curbing shall be used as wheel stops where possible. The use of bumper blocks is discouraged. 15. Landscaped areas shall be provided between asphalt areas and all building structures, fences and property lines. Hardscaping may be used where pedestrian access is a necessity as determined by the City Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee. 16. Landscaping shall conform to the City of Lodi Landscape Guidelines. 17. End stalls should be protected from the turning movements of other cars with a minimum 5' landscape planter. 18. Handicapped stalls shall be be a min. of 9' wide plus an adjacent 8' min. access zone to accommodate Van accessible parking. If there is more than one stall at least one must meet the Van accessible size. The additional stalls shall be a min. of 9' wide plus an adjacent 5' min. access zone, per title 24, Chapter 2-7102, California Administrative Code. 19. End stalls and stalls adjacent to curbings shall be a minimum of ten feet wide. 20. Dead end 90° parking shall be provided with adequate turning room. 21. Parking requirements for the interior of parking lots on industrial lots surrounded solely by heavy industrially zoned properties may be modified by the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee. Reference: Planning Commission Resolution 77-2, 7/11/77 Sheet 2 of 2 Dr. KT No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 2/04 TEXT ADDITION & REVISION `Date Approved By: 2/12/04 . Wally Sande, City Engineer R.C.E. 39895 2/12/04 Date STD PLAN 134 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Vertical—Type Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk and Residential Driveway For Retrofit Cut AC 14" min. 2" 1-1„ 2 6" Score line 6" 5' 2 6'= 3" (6" when constructing only C&G 6" 2% max #1 /Z4� Top and face of curb For Retrofit Cut AC 14" min. 22- 1 1 /2" 6" Pour as Monolithic Section Curb, Gutter, (Sc Sidewalk Section 7 -- Score line 2% max 4" Standard Sidewalk. 8" 90% R.C. Concrete Subgrade Compaction 0.0. Match Ex Grade Pavement Conform 10% or flatter Bench Mark monuments will be furnished by the City of Lodi, when required, and shall be installed by the contractor as directed by City Engineer—\ Score lines at 5.5' 1 Ramp Typical Details Std. Plan 132A, B, & C 4'-9" 4" Residential Driveway / 8" 90% R.C. Concrete Subgrade Compaction Residential Driveway Section Conform 1/4" groove 1'- approx. 3/4" o.c. (typ.) area 8% max Weakened plane joints See Note 1 Plan E 8% max 5' min Driveway 5' min ransition Transition Notes: Construct weakened plane joints at 11' and at ends of transitions & centerline of driveway. 2. Use impervious membrane cure. Broom finish. 3. Class B concrete per Section 90 of Std. Spec., 1-1/2" max. aggregate. 4. Construct expansion material at 200' max. 5. All exposed edges shall be rounded to 1/2" radius. If joint is greater than 1/4" wide it shall be filled with petrolastic material. 1/8" Detail Weakened Plane Joint Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 9/03 ADDED CURB HEIGHT 2 9/07 MINOR REVISIONS `Date 9/08 9/07 Date STD PLAN 135 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Rolled Curb, Gutter 8c Sidewalk 2' 6" 2' 2' 1' 1 Sidewalk Grade 2% 4'-6" NW - 1" 2 r--21 Score Line Pour as Monolithic Section Curb Return Section 6' 194 °k a a 6" a . c° 8 1" Sidewalk Grade 2% 4'-6" Score Line FOC Sidewalk Section I.— 1 /8" Detail Weakened Plane Joint Notes: 1. Construct weakened plane joints at 11'. 2. Use impervious membrane cure. Broom finish. 3. Class B concrete per Section 90 of Std. Spec., 1-1/2" max. aggregate. 4. Construct expansion joints at 200' max. and at BCR and ECR. 5. All exposed edges shall be rounded to 1/2" radius. 11' 5.5' A 4" Standard Sidewall 8" 90% R.C. Concrete Subgrade Compaction 4" Residential Driveway 8" 90% R.C. Concrete Subgrade Compaction If joint is greater than 1/4" wide it shall be filled with petrolastic material. Weakened plane joints. See Note #1. Score Ines Han Beg.n curb height transition; End of return or SICB. Dr. KT Ch. WS Date 12/00 No Date Revision Appr. Approved By: yA,ctzCc` Wally say5(erin 12/28/00 City Engine el Date R.C.E. 39895 STD PLAN 136 CITY OF LODII J PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT C Tree Well Sprinkler System Installation 12" min. above HP 24" min. Grade Wilkins 720 A Pressure Vacuum Breaker Assembly or approved equal Assembly Wv im 4iI'T Gate valves. i 4 a Unions 1 i _ ISI Il Flow 4" each way Sidewalk Concrete _7 Galt'. steel pipe fittings. Flow _ to RCV To water service PVC main & fittings Vacuum Breaker Rainbird remote control valve—set level & vertical (or approved equal) Pressure Finish Grade Sidewalk To Sprinkler lateral 12" min. 12" min. 24" min. PVC Sch. 40 Male Adapter 2—#14 conductors Control Wires provide 18" min. expansion coils in valve box 1" PVC conduit Notes: PVC Lateral RWS—B w/ RWS sock 12 clear r3 3„ 1 8 I- b 1 I I L-- 1/2" galy. teelI L_— pipe riser & fitting 1/2" PVC lateral 4' Bubbler Riser Remote Control Valve Not to Scale Use Christy N16 w/ 16D30 or Brooks 37T 3" PVC Sch. 80 nipple PVC Sch. 40 90 Ell. Support box on bricks when installed in dirt or turf areas. PVC Sch. 40 Galt'. nipple (length as req'd) To vacuum breaker lateral—PVC main 1 , Use Rainbird, or Irri—trol sprinkler system controller, disconnect switch required. Install controller and disconnect in post mounted, weatherproof cabinet (w/hasp for City padlock). Breaker box must accommodate City Master padlock and must be made of metal. 2. Plastic pipe shall be Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC), Type 1120 or 1220. Class per Table. Threaded pipe shall be Schedule 80 PVC. Fittings shall be molded, medium weight, Schedule 40 PVC. Street crossings, including control wire conduit, shall be steel pipe. 3. Steel pipe shall conform to ASTM A-120 and shall be Schedule 40, galvanized. Fittings shall be 150 lbs., banded pattern, galvanized malleable iron. 4. Control wires shall be installed in 1" conduit. Sheet 1 of 2 Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 2/04 CHANGED NOTATION AND REVISED NOTE 1 Date 12/00 Approved By: 2/12/04 Date R.C.E. 39895 STD PLAN 137 CITY OF LODIJ[ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Tree Well Sprinkler System Installation PVC Pipe Class Table Size Class In turf/planter 1/2" Class 315 PVC 3/4" Class 200 PVC 1"+ Class 160 PVC Mainline (constant pressure) 2"+ Class 200 PVC Under concrete or paving All Schedule 80 Sheet 2 of 2 Dr' KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS `Date ` 12/00 Approved By: IW Wally sa e m 12/28/00 City Engine Date R.C.E. 39395 STD PLAN 137 -F_ CITY OF LODI) `F•=-= PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Grated Tree Well 1 —5/8" Grate is 3/4" thick 17— /2" 37" r3 4 / Tree well grate Class 30 grade iron Mow 12" Ex Sidewalk 1 4" 4" —III—III—I 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11= 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I I ITI—ITI—ITI—ITI—ITI—ITI—ITI—ITI—ITI—ITI—ITI—ITI—ITI—ITI—ITI—ITI—ITI—ITI— II=ITI=ITI=ITI=ITI=ITI=ITI=ITI=ITI=ITI=ITI=ITI=ITI=ITI=ITI=ITI=ITI=ITI=ITI Notes: 1. If the tree is not planted, the opening shall be barricaded. 2. When tree wells are installed in the existing sidewalk, the sidewalk shall be sawed a minimum of 1-1/2" in depth. 3. Place one #4x2' rebar diagonally at each corner. ° Proposed 1idewa4k a a • 4" J 8 4. Reinforcing steel shall not be placed through sidewalk weakened plane joints. D r. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. ws ‘).cite 2/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 138A� -F_ CITY OF LODI) `F•=-= PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Grated Tree Well 1-5/8" Ex Sidewalk 4" 36-1/2" 4" 3/4" Tree well grate Class 30 grade iron iii—iii—iii —iii—iii —ii—ii—i—ii—iii—iii—iii—nf 1=11=11=11=11=11=11=11=11=11=11=11- 1=11=11=11=11= I -III -I l I -III -III -III -III -I I El I I -III -III -III -I Elle I I 1=11=1I1=1T1=11=11=11=11=11=11=11=111=11=1Ell 1=11=11=11= 11-111=111=111=111=1 11=1 l 1=1 l 1=111=111=1 11=111=111=111=111=111=1 11=1 l 1=1 11 Notes: 1 If the tree is not planted, the opening shall be barricaded. 2. When tree wells are installed in the existing sidewalk, the sidewalk shall be sawed a minimum of 1-1/2" in depth. 3. Place one #4x2' rebar diagonally at each corner. 1 8" 12" Proposed aSidevalk• a 4. Reinforcing steel shall not be placed through sidewalk weakened plane joints 4', f Dr' KT No Date Revision Appr. CH. ws `Date N. 2/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 138, CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dead—end Barricade (Fence Type) Wood or Masonry boundary fence ===== ====M ===== ====M ===== ====M ===== ====M 6' high temporary chain link fence per City Std Spec. 6-80.02 "Chain link fence," with top rail galy. or vinyl coated fabric. ii A 12' wide gate C/L when specified Sym. O Per bldg. setback (normally 20') R/W 2x6 min redwood or P.T.D.F. header where existing ground is above new improvements 4' A Sign per Note 1 bolted thru fabric with 2x4 or steel plate backing. II —III —III— III—I II 3 times post O.D., 8" min. Section A—A Notes: Install two fully reflective red Type N Markers, 18"x18". Backing: 0.080" aluminum 6061T6 alloy Reflectorization: high intensity grade Mounting: two 5/16" bolts with double nuts and backing, bend bolts. Serviceable portions of barricades being removed may be reused at new location as approved by the Engineer. Concrete footing D r. KT Ch. wS No Date Revision Appr. Date 12/00 Approved B iy: . wary sa yyre�in 1 2/28/00 City Fngir Date R.C.E. 39895 STD PLAN 139 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Tree/Tree Well Planting and Tree Irrigation (2) Rainbird RWS—B w/socks (See note 7 for number required) Treestake Curb or border 0 • Use RWS in turf areas. Use RWS—B in all other areas. Both w/sock. (See Note 6) Tree — 15 gallon size minimum Curb or border Rootball Set flush At grade RWS—B w/sock \ `1 A \�� ./� Backfill Tree Guard (Arbor Guard #DRAG 9 or approved equal) Rainbrid RWS—B W/sock Set top flush with grade. Drive stake outside rootball Deep root arrier (See Notee 3) Planting pedestal — recompact to 90% to minimize settling '6 See note 1 z Bubbler Installation Native soil 2—Untreated wood stakes (2"0 For 15 gallon tree) (3"-4"0 For Longer tree) Use 4 Rubber ties Set top of rootball 1" above finish grade Mulch with 1" of firbark or approved compost d Use GRO POWER Planting Tabs 12-8-8 following directions See note 2 Sheet 1 of 2 Dr. KT No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 ADDED NOTES 7 THRU 10 2 2/04 REVISED BUBBLER MODEL #'S `Date 8/08 AND TREE STAKE MODEL 3 8/08 ADDED STAKE & TIE NOTE Approved By: elin Wally Sa City Fani R.C.E. 39895 2/12/04 Date STD PLAN 140 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Tree/Tree Well Planting and Irrigation Notes Notes: When soil analysis is required (by City officials prior to job commencement), all backfill soil shall have additional fertilizer and amendments per soil analysis. All backfill to be clean (preferred native, no imported soil) with 10% by volume approved compost, to be placed firmly but uncompacted. Thoroughly soak with water to settle. 2. The entire tree planting area (tree well, island, or strip) shall be free of deleterious materials including concrete and rocks. The pit shall be a minimum of two times wider and only deep enough for the tree to be 1" above grade Scarify Planting Pit And All Four Sides Of Rootball Prior To Planting. 3. Six (6) panels of 24" x 24" Deep Root root barrier (Model #DRUB24, or approved equal) will be required around tree planting area. Place 3 panels at back of curb and 3 panels along edge of sidewalk. 4. Deleted. 5. Remove nursery stake when setting new stakes. 6. Air tubes shall be set immediately next to the root ball. Apply approved pre—emergent herbicide prior to placement of fir bark or mulch. 7. Install three (3) RWS—B air tubes in tree well locations larger than 5' by 5' and install two (2) RWS—B air tubes in planter strip areas or area less then 5' by 5'. Air tubes to be a minimum 18 inches in length. 8. If a discrepancy between this standard and actual on—site conditions occurs, the Contractor is to notify the City Representative immediately, before proceeding with his work, for a decision. The City reserves the right to make deletions, additions, or substitutions in the field as necessary. 9. All trees must meet the standards set forth in ANSI Z60.1 — 1996, (or latest revision) American Standards for Nursery Stock. Particular attention should be paid to section 1.4 container grown specifications. All trees will be inspected for acceptable form and condition by the City Tree Operations Supervisor prior to planting. Contact Tree Operations Supervisor at 333-6740 for tree inspection and approval. Unacceptable trees will be replaced by the contractor. 10. City Tree Operations Supervisor and Public Works Inspector shall be notified at least two working days prior to estimated time of setting—out trees so a mutually acceptable time can be scheduled for final tree placement. All trees shall be placed in approximate locations shown on plans by Contractor prior to arrival of city personnel. Final adjustments of locations shall be made by City personnel. 11. Tree spacing shall be the following minimum spacing distances: Trees: 25'-0" 0.C. min. Trees to Street Lights 10'-0" 0.0. min. Trees to Service Laterals: 5'-0" 0.C. min. Sheet 2 of 2 Dr. KT No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 ADDED NOTES 7 THRU 10 & REVISED NOTES 3 & 4 `Date 9/08 2 3 2/04 9/08 REVISED NOTES 2, 4 & 7 REVISED NOTES 1 & 4 2/12/04 Date STD PLAN 140 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT t Various Crosswalk Layouts Offset Wheelchair ramp Midway point of ramp width 10' 1 Multiple Wheelchair ramps (Because of parkways or inabilities to move catch basins) Midway point of ramp width Standard Wheelchair ramp Notes: All crosswalks are 10 feet wide (measured from outside to outside with 12" stripes). Refer to Public Works Policy Manual for crosswalk ladder design guidelines Midway point of curb return No Wheelchair ramp Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. ws Dat 12/00 Approved By• R.C.E. 39895 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 141J ®�- CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT -_ Fes - Street Name Sign System Plate: 9 6„ 1 i 0.063" Aluminum panel—White engineer grade reflective background with 1/4—inch non reflective black border inset 1/4—inch. 10-1/2"� 24"min.— 36"max. Legend •4" upper case street name 8c 2" block • number with 1-3/4" arrow (all black . 9 6„ 5/8"R (Ty p.) %F000 NUGGET ST. � ,} Maintain Minimum Space Between Signs As Holes Allow A Post Extension May Be Required To Maintain Minimum Height Requirements. All Post Are As Per Std Plan 119 Rain Cap See Note 5 SIGN MOUNTING: Sign Ends To Be Pulled Together And Pop Rivited In Place (Typical Both Ends, Both Directions) All Drive Rivits Shall Be 3/8" Stainless Steel See Std Plan 119 For Height Requirements Notes: 1. Block Numbers Shall Be Rounded To The Nearest Hundred. 2. Block Arrow Shall Point In The Direction Of The Block; Not Across The Street. 3. When Cardinal Direction Is Part Of The Street Name, A 2" Upper Case Initial Shall Follow The Number, (I.E. OON, DOS, 00E, OOW). 4. Legend Shall Be Black And Non—Reflective. 5. Cap Post With Square Rain Cap. Post Top Shall Be 1 1/2" Higher Than Top Of Sign. Dr. KG No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 CHANGED TO S0 POST `Dat Date 2/00 9/25/02 Date STD PLAN 1 42 CITY OF LODI) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Concrete Slab for Basement Access Spanning Detail #4 bars @ 12" (typ.) each way Concrete sidewalk a d Apply grout to level slab as necessary Basement access opening 5' max. Ex. basement wall Section A—A Concrete gutter A Reinforced concrete slab underneath sidewalk TBuilding, otes: 1. All steel reinforcements shall be Grade 40 minimum. 5 • ° ° k—\_) 8" #4 dowels @ 18" max. (Typ. both sides) 3" Compacted soil Install access door per manufacturer's instruction Ex. basement wall Concrete sidewalk Grout and seal joint between slab and building face. 2. All concrete shall have a minimum strength of 2,500 psi @ 28 days. Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS ate2/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 143J CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Parking Lot Planters and Tree Wells Planter Strip Planter Island Parking Stall 4'-04 Min Parking Stall 0'-6" 6'-0" 0'-6" 17'-0" Tree Well Planter Specification 2'-0" ri L0 n 14'-0" Compact 17'-0" Standard 0'-6" 7'-6" Tree 6'-0" 0'-6" 0'-6" 3'-0" 6-0" 0'-6" 0'-6" Poured Curb with Overhang 0'-6" Notes: Minimum Planter Sizes: A minimum 6'-0" by 6'-0" planting area shall be provided for each tree planted in a tree well or planter strip. A minimum 4'-0" by 8'-0" planting area shall be provided for each tree planted in an island planter. Planter dimensions are measured from the interior side of the curb. (See illustration) 2. Tree must be planted behind the curb at a distance no less than one half the minimum planter width or otherwise recommended by the city's arborist. A 2'-0" foot overhang for vehicles into the planter area is allowed as long as it does not overhang planter width or otherwise recommended by the city's arborist. A 2'-0" foot overhang into the planter area is allowed as long as it does not overhang within the required parking lot setback area or pedestrian walkway. 3. Materials: Planters shall contain soil, shrubs and/or living ground cover with 4" of bark mulch. Interlocking pavers and decomposed granite may also be utilized in heavily used areas. Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. wS `Date N. 2/00 9/25/02 Date STD PLAN 145 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1. MOUNTING DETAILS NO MAST ARM STREET NAME SIGN MAST ARM MOUNTING DETAILS 2/3 OF SIGN 7_ 1/3 OF SIGN MOUNTING STRAPS WITH MAST ARM MOUNTING STRAPS O 0 0 HARNEY LN O O O FULLY REFLECTORIZED PER MUTCD (CURRENT VERSION) TABLE 2A-3 COLORS: GREEN BACKGROUND WHITE SERIES "D" LETTERING AND BORDER HIGH INTENSITY 3-M HARDWARE: ALL MOUNTING WILL BE WITH SIGN -FIX HARDWARE. HARNEY LN O O O Dr. DK No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. PJF Date 7/24/14 Approved By: 7/24/14 Charles Swimley City Engineer/Deputy Public Works Director Dale R.C.E. 52842 STD PLAN 146 ,, CITY OF LODI UNIMOUNT MOUNTING HARDWARE PUBLIC WORIsS DEPARTMENT DETAILS o u, TYPICAL VEHICLE SIGNAL MOUNTING TYPICAL PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL MOUNTING NOT TO SCALE Dr. JSB No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. PJF Date 2/04 Approved By: F. Wally Sandelin City Engineer R.C.E. 39895 2/12/04 Date STD PLAN 147 yFt PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON SIGN F DETAIL CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PORTLAND ORANGE HAND AND NUMBER ON BLACK BACKGROUND ARROW AND MAN DIRECTION VARIES. SEE PLANS FOR ARROW DETAILS. 5" TIMER STEADY START CROSSING Watch For Vehicles DON'T START Finish Crossing If Started TIME REMAINING To Finish Crossing DON'T CROSS TO CROSS PUSH BUTTON 7.75" SPECIAL SIGN FOR PED PUSH BUTTONS N.T.S. Dr. DK No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. PJF Date 3/27/17 Approved By: Lyman Chang City Engineer RCE No. 53149 3/28/17 Date STD PLAN 148 J CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Standard Residential Driveway Size and Location NOTE: DRIVEWAY PLANTER A DIMENSIONS: 1. CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSIDERED IN A = 12' MIN, 35' MAX A SIMILAR MANNER FOR THE PURPOSE OF DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS. B <_ 50% LOT FRONTAGE 2. DEVIATION FROM THIS STANDARD PLAN C = 2' MIN REQUIRES CITY ENGINEER APPROVAL. D=5'MIN E=4'MIN E*13'to21' Dr, JP Na Date Revisiorw Appr. Ch. SN \,ate 3/15/17 Pi!? STD PLAN 149 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BENCHMARK BENCHMARK BOC 11" 0 CORE EX SIDEWALK 30" MONUMENT IN EXISTING SIDEWALK BENCHMARK - 18" 3 1/2" 30" BENCHMARK BOC r_ 18 18" f GUTTER PAN MONUMENT IN PARKWAY DETAIL NOTES: 1. BENCHMARK TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY. 2. BENCHMARK IS TO BE SET FLUSH IN WET CONCRETE. Dr- LP Na Date Revision Appr. Appmve By: Ch. SN Date 08/17 Cino y Engineer RCE No 53149 STD PLAN 150 CITY OF LODI Wastewater •••-�• = Service PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Cleanout 4" Plastic threaded cleanout plug with 2" square nut Alternate lateral connection. Use two (only) 45° elbows. (by owner 30" or depth per plans (for deep lots) Support box with bricks. (Two min.) (See Note 7 "CHRISTY"No. F-8 or BES F8 Box (or equal) with concrete, cast iron or fiber cover marked "SEWER". Set box 1/2" to 1" above exist ground or adj. flatwork; flush if in concrete. (See Note 5). \\/\\� min. 8"max. See Location Detail on Page 2 4"cleanout riser Install 4"x4"x4" no Hub 1 Way Cleanout See Note 2 Lateral from house. Conform to City Plumbing Code. (By owner) 24" Install air— tight plug. 4" Service lateral per Std. Plan 203. Notes: 1. Install cleanout on all 4" wastewater services unless otherwise specified. 2. 45° Wye & 45° elbow combination shall be Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) per ASTM D-3034 SDR 35 or Acrylonitrile—Butadiene—Styrene (ABS) per ASTM D-2751, Cast Iron Soil Pipe (ASTM A74, service unit) or Ductile Iron (ASTM A746) or VCP Wye tee ASTM C-425. See Material List Page 2. 3. Backfill shall conform to Std. Plan 501. 4. Maintenance of lateral shall be per City "Wastewater Lateral Maintenance Policy" 5. In commercial driveways. Use "Christy" G-5 box W/G-5C lid or BES equal; in residential driveways replace concrete lid with cast iron lid. 6. When service is installed with water service, terminate even with the water stub. 7. Support box not needed if set in concrete. Related Plans: 203, 506 Sheet 1 of 2 Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 MOVED C.O. LOCATION ` Date 12/00 Apgroved By: Wally Sarelin 9/25/02 City Engine Date R.C.E. 39895 STD PLAN 201 of CITY O LODI") ( Wastewater y -f Service PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Cleanout PUE ww T I PUE w L 1 1 LOCATION DETAILS ww I I P/L 1 wl I 6" min. 24" max. I I I I I I i Cleanouts on services at easements installed 6" to 24" outside the easement. /// 12" min. Alley R/W ww ww PI / / / / / / / / ////// Cleanouts on services at alleys to be installed 6" to 24" outside the alley R/W or 12" within the alley where structures interfere with on—site locations. Easement Service Alley Service -110.- C/L C/L C/L 6" North or West of lot Centerline R/W 2.5' (typ.) 0 ww SWK Cleanouts on services at streets to be installed between the R/W & B.O.W. Material List for STD PLN 201 City Approved 1—Way Cleanouts (a) ,-- R/W R/W O 12" Min. 24" Max. ww SWK Street Service GPK Products Inc. Solvent Weld SCH 40 DWV Mueller Industries, Inc. TY Long Turn (a) or approved equal Sheet 2 of 2 Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 MOVED C.O. LOCATION 2 2/04 REVISED LOT DIMENSION `Date 12/00 2/12/04 Date STD PLAN 201 f CITY OF LODI''1 ••.gym+ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Monitoring Structure Finish grade (Set 2"above FG in Landscape area) Top — See Note 2 'Grout Wall Structure (See Note 2) 30" min. See Notes 5 & 6 Conc. base 6" minimum around pipe Service pipe Section Padlock Loop See Detail A (TYP•) .3 posts eq. spacing or as directed by the Engineer_ Bollard Location Detail CL Str. 3' 4"0 G.I.P. cap, fill w conc. Embed in Conc. Padlock loop (1-1/2" ID) welded to post or #4 rebar loop embedded in conc. Detail A Notes: I Monitoring structures shall be installed on storm and wastewater services when required by the Engineer or as shown on the plans. Normal location is between the back of sidewalk and the R/W. 2. Construction guidelines: Location Wall Top Traffic Area Precast conc. C-478 or 6" per CIP ASTM conc. Frame & Cover per Std Plan 309 Landscape Area Precast RCP pipe or — CP VCP, Expandable Plug 3. For services over 18"0, consult Engineering Division. 4. Monitoring structure to be privately owned and maintained. 5. Where 30" min. depth cannot be maintain, the structure shall be located behind the sidewalk and be installed with padlock loop per Detail A. 6. Posts required when structure is less than 30" and is located in a traffic area. For trench backfill requirements, See Std. Pln 501. Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. ws `Date N. 2/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 2O2} CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Wastewater Service Detail A jr Max. slope 1:1 For taps on existing mains, See Detail A 4" rubber gasketed tee saddle w/WW straps. Remove coupon from pipe. Street 45° long radius bend 45° See Note 7 4" Prefab. tee or Wye—Tee combination Wastewater main 6"WW 22°30' Elbow 4"WW 22°30' 1-1 /4"t Alt. Detail (To be used only w/ approval of Engineer on shallow mains) Water main See Note #6 Section Water main See Note 5 Cleanout per Std Plan 201 4" Service See Note 1 See Note 4 Min. slope 1/8" per 1' Max. slope 1/4" per 1' Provide air tight plug at end of line Notes: 1. Pipe shall be Vitrified Clay Pipe per ASTM C-700 with compression joint per ASTM C-425 or compression coupling per ASTM C-594; Polyvinyl Chloride Pipe per ASTM D-3034 SDR 35; or Ductile Iron Class 50 with Compression Joint and Rubber Ring per ASTM D 1869. 6" and larger services per plans and waste water main standards. 2. Backfill shall conform to Std. Plan 501. 3. Taps on existing mains shall be made by the Contractor per Detail A when shown on the plans or approved by the Engineer. 4. When service is installed with water service, terminate even with the water stub. 5. Where service crosses over WM, 4" min. clearance and special construction are required (See Note 7) 6. Where service crosses under WM with less than 12" clearance, 4" clearance and special construction are required. (See Note 7) 7. Special construction: center length of pipe on water main. Short stick clay pipe not allowed. When service constructed under this condition (See Note 1) Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS `Dat Date 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 203 CITY OF LODI''1 ••.gym+ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Wastewater Interceptor 4" cleanout Flush with surface. See Std Plan 201 — i 6 / See Note 4 L2 — 4" L1 6" rig— Removable Cover 1 C� A1 Cleanout per Std Plan 201 Plan 214 x214 slot 2" REFERENCE LINE (Top of inlet pipe) �L. T 12" Removable cover, See Note 3 Ground or Floor level, See Note 2 { ° Variable • *9e Influent pipe flush with inside cell D 3"i�a� 1 Section A—A 3 #3 Rebars at 12" O.C. both ways all walls and floor. Notes: 1. Precast commercial units are acceptable with prior approval. 2. Waste Interceptor shall not be located in heavy traffic areas. Interceptor shall be installed at ground surface elevation higher than all storm sewer inlet elevations on the property. 3. Removable cover design shall be dictated by strength and location requirements as determined by the installer, but shall be of such a design to provide convenient access to each entire compartment for cleaning. The cover may be sectional, but shall be of solid design, essentially waterproof, installed at K near ground or floor level and kept clear of all obstructions so as to be readily accessible for cleanir and inspection. +. For flows over 165 gpm the capacity of interceptor required for waste shall be individually determined by Public Works Department. 5. Waste Interceptor to be outside any fencing and subject to inspection at all times. Sheet 1 of 2 Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. ws `Date 2/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 204J CITY OF LODI''1 ••.gym+ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Waste Interceptor Peak flow into interceptor (GPM) Inches B D L1 L2 0-67 24 30 36 24 67-112 30 30 48 30 112-165 36 36 60 36 Over 165 GPM, See Note 4 Note: Total rated discharge capacity of all fixtures, equipment or appliances discharging into interceptor in accordance with uniform plumbing code or actual flow rate. Sheet 2 of 2 Dr' KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS `Date N. 2/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 204 CITY OF LODI''1 ••.gym+ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Sand/Oil Trap 1/4" checkered plate cover A 1'-6" min. 6" 5' 2'-0" min. 6 �J • ❖::000000❖.❖.o•$. Cleanout per Std Plan 201 3/8"0 x 4" anchor v� 1::::) 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O V A Use approved Open—Type grate or drill 1 "0 holes at 3" C—C. Cleanout per Std Plan 201 Plan 112 x 112 x14 angles 6" 1'-6" 2'-6" 6" PVC (Schedule 40 or greater) or ABS (SDR 35) See Note 3 111‘0111111 SII 44111111 Pipe and Fittings 4" min. dia. See Note 3 #4 bars at 12" C—C each way. 12" Lection A—A Notes: 1. All exposed steel to be galvanized after fabrication. 2. Precast commercial units are acceptable with prior approval. 3. For petrochemical applications cast iron fittings and piping shall be used. 4. Floor to drain to open grate or drilled plate cover. InfluiHnt Inlet pipe (if req'd) Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. wS `Dat1N. 2/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 205J OF= CITY OF LODI) Manhole •••���� 9F,o� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 48"((I Concentric cone 6" 8" Frame & cover per Std. Plan 309; Adjust to grade per Std Plan 123 Grade Rings 3" min. 18" max. Barrel, See Note 7 Top one half of pipe to be broken out 3 feet min. r_ 12" min. stub Bell end Plug (typ) See Note 4 A 5' 10" See Note 3 Base—See Note 2 Transition coupling Notes: 1. Barrel, cone and grade ring sections shall conform to ASTM C478, latest revision. Manufacturer to be approved by the engineer. 2. Base shall consist of cast—in—place Class B concrete per Sec. 90 Caltrans Std Specification. Prefabricated bases shall conform to Note 1 and be placed on 4" of concrete or 3/4" Class II AB Bedding. 3. Rubber ring waterstop or manhole adapter required for PVC pipe installations. 4. Plugs shall be compression type as approved by the Engineer. 5. Backfill around MH shall be compacted to 95% R.C. min. 6. Drop connection to be used only when shown on the plans or approved by the Engineer. Drop pipe to be one size larger than the incoming pipe. 7. All barrel joints shall be grouted inside and outside or sealed Ram—nek or approved equivalent. For 6" or 8" pipes, dish area in base concrete to allow for camera installation Construct smooth flow channel. Typical all inlets and outlets. Hole 1" larger 0 than incoming pipe. Tee Incoming pipe 8" max Sch. 80 PVC drop pipe, see note 6. Stainless steel 2" bands anchored to wall 24" o.c. two bands min. Smooth 1/4 radius bend Drop Connection Detail For Sanitary Sewer only Dr. Ch KT ws No Date Revision Appr. Date 12/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 301 CITY OF LODI''1 ••.gym+ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ((I Saddle Manhole 48" Manhole per Std Plan 301 Class A concrete Cast—in—place concrete pipe Notes: 1. Make manhole opening in top of pipe before concrete sets and place barrel within following 7 days. 2. Grout all joints. Undisturbed earth Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS `Date 2/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 302J F CITY OF LODI Side Inlet Catch Basin PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Notes: The Side Inlet Catch Basin shall be located with respect to the B.C.R., E.C.R., and P/L as shown below. BCR or ECR 0 Face of curb per appropriate Std Plan. P/L 6" 4' 1. The concrete shall conform to following criteria. A. 2500 P.S.I. at 28 days. B. 1 1/2" maximum aggregate. C. 4" slump at placing site. D. Light broom finish. E. Impervious membrane cure. 2. When catch basin is to be constructed with stub, the stub shall extend beyond the toe of the curb & gutter and plugged with precast plug. 3. Barrel may be constructed with 18" R.C.P. and grouted smooth. 4. Recompact over -excavated areas to 92% R.C. 5. Lateral line must be ductile iron pipe when cover is 2' or less. 6. For trench backfill requirements See Std. Pln 501. 4' Flowline and curb transition (typ.) Catch basin assembly per Std. Plan 307 8" 90% R.C. 4' 4' — Keep bolts loose in order to allow for angle to vary, keeping top of assembly level with S.W. grade & vertical grate plum w/ face of curb See Note 4 —/ See Note 3 Concrete to be placed against neat excavation. See Note 4 6 8" a — 7 3/4" Depression across full width of opening Top of curb (T.C.) 2' min. lateral 8" 90% R.C. See Note 5 Concrete to be placed against neat excavation. Per plan or 36" min. 48" max. Dr. KT Ch. WS `Date 12/00 No. 1 2 3 Date 7/01 2/04 2/05 Revision UPDATE PER FIRST REVISION REVISED SICB OPENING DIM. REVISED TRANSITION DIM. Appr. Approved By: . Wally Sande City Engineer R.C.E. 39895 2/2/05 Darr STD PLAN 303 CIN OF LOD9 � oroP Inet cairn PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Notes: 1. Conc. 2500 psi at 28 days 1 1/2" max. agg. 4" slump at placing site. Light broom finish. Impervious membrane cure. 2. For trench backfill requirements see Std Plan 501. 3. For 24" catch basin, use Std Plan 310 with slotted cover. 4. Alternate construction—use 18" RCP, grout all openings and voids smooth. Cast iron ring and grate. City of Lodi Std Plan 308 or equal If shown on the plan a 2" A.C. apron shall be placed around Drop Inlet Catch Basin. If the size of apron is not indicated on the plan it shall be 4'x4' min. Conc. to be placed against neat excavation �a. 3' min. 4' max. 12� 6" /// //,/, /i/�/A 6" 6" Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. CH. WS `Date N. 2/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 304 F� CITY OF LODI SIDE INLET CATCH BASIN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ASSEMBLY 1" 1-1/8" 23-3/8" 1/2"0 COUNTERSUNK THROUGH HOLE PLAN VIEW FRAME 1/4" LID UNDERSIDE 18-1/4" VERTICAL GRATE BOLTS TO FRAME W/ (2) S.S. BOLTS & NUTS SECTION A -A NON-SKID SQUARE PATTERN OVER ENTIRE TOP OF LID & FRAME 7/8" 0 PICK HOLE PLAN VIEW LID 9 1/4" X 4 3/4" RECESS FOR PLATE 1/8" DEEP (NO SKID PATTERN) NO DUMPING • DRAINS TO RIVER PLATE DETAIL 18" L 1/2" 1/2" 1/4" R-1 /2" SIDE VIEW LID 23-3/8" — 5-7/8" 1_ 3/4" PRE -FABRICATED ALUMINUM PLATE (PROVIDED BY CITY) INSTALLATION SHALL BE AS PER STANDARD PLAN 303 & 314 5-7/8" 1/2"0 HOLE THROUGH 3/4" J ' 9 1/4" 3-7/8" 1 /2" 1-1/4" FRONT VIEW 9" 1-1/4" Dr. KG No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 2/05 NEW STANDARD PLAN `Date 6-04 Approved By: M.\TITLEBLOCKS\Seals&Slgs\Wattyslgr F F. Wally Sandelin City Engineer R.C.E. 39895 2/2/05 Date STD PLAN 307 -�- CITY OF LODI jF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Drop Inlet Catch Basin Assembly 1/8 R A A 1/16" b/1 6" 5/8" Section B—B 17-3/4" 17-1/2" 15-1/2" 17-7/8" 19-3/8" 21-1/2" Section A—A Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. ws `Date 2/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 308J CIN OF LOD9 Manhole Assembly (24") PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Side pick hole 1"x1-1/4" STORM 1-1/2" letters or SANITARY SEWER 1" letters centered 1/8" See Note 1 4" 1/2" 0Q ❑poo° o 00 X0❑0 0 00 00 00 El El 00 STORM 00 u 00 000 00 Oo 00 00 ❑ y<>" o°o ��I °❑cA�❑ 27" -.1411 24" 1-1/4" 32-3/8" Ow - hole 1-1/2" 0 3 holes equally spaced 1-1/8" Notes: 1. Frame—Approx. wt. 140 lbs. 2. Cover—Approx. wt. 136 lbs. 3. Manhole cover shall be marked "STORM" or "SANITARY SEWER" as appropriate. 4. Material—Cast Iron per ASTM A-48 Class 30 5. See Std. Plan 123 for adjustment to grade. Dr. KT No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS Date 12/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 309 CITY OF LODI t.FJi 14/F63 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 24" RISER 41411 J CAST IRON RING AND COVER PER STD PLAN 309 CONCRETE COLLAR AND ADJUST TO GRADE PER STD PLAN 123 R.C.P. ASTM C-76 CL II 14" MIN i91➢in11Wider it�� risrtrt FINISHED A GRADE SEE NOTE 1 — 6" CONCRETE MORTAR NOTES: 1. BACKFILL AROUND RISER SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 92% R.C. 2 CONCRETE: A. 2500 PSI @ 28 DAYS B. 4' SLUMP MAXIMUM. C. CLASS B PER SECTION 90 OF STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 1-1/2" MAX. AGG, 3. FOR DEPTH OVER 60", USE 48" MANHOLE, STANDARD PLAN 301. 4. FOR TRENCH BACKFILL REQUIREMENTS, SEE STANDARD PLAN 501. • — CONCRETE BASE Dr. KT Ch. WS Date 12/00 No: Dale 1 6/17 Revision ADDED CONCRETE COLLAR Appy. Approved By: amp City Engineer RCE No 53149 7 STD PLAN 31 CITY OF LODI''1 ••.gym+ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Construction Catch Basin Filter 3" F •• •• .s. Fabric to extend 3" minimum past bar on front & sides. 40" 8" typ. Front Notes: 1. Will be maintained weekly and/ or after every storm. Fabric #4 Rebar Hold in place using 40 pound rock bags of ultraviolet stable material. (Typical at 2 places) Catch Basin per Std Plan 307 Approx. 87° 12" Side Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS is)at?2/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 313J CITY OF LODI''1 ••.gym+ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Gutter Transition Detail 4Transition 4' Transition 4-1/2" Curb Height Lip of gutter Flowline Top of Curb Left side for 4-1/2" Curb Height 6" Curb Height Opening per Std Plan 307 Lip of gutter Flowline Gutter Transition Detail Right side for 6" Curb Height i 6' r Per Std Plan 307 A 2 Plan View Back of Curb Face of Curb Lip of Gutter Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. CH. ws `Dat Date 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 314 CITY OF LODI') ••.�.�!� = Sand /Oil Trap PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT f Solid Lid per Std Plan 309 Adjust to Grade per Std Plan 123 B.O.W. Construct per Std Plan 301 However use Eccentric Cone rather than Concentric Cone 3>> Oil Trap Removable cop 24" min. Riser w/ Grate Grate per Std Plan 304 adjust to Grade per Std Plan 123 To City Manhole or Catch Basin PVC or ABS Tee Vol. 1 36" min. Dia. varies For 24" size construction shall be per Std Plan 310 for greater than 24" Construction shall be per Std Plan 301 PVC Schedule 40 or greater or ABS (SDR 35). See Note 5 Drainage Area (s.f.) (Excluding Landscaping) Vol. 1 cu, ft d w Vol. 2 Combined all C.B.'S cu.ft. 0 — 20,000 3 6" 12" Drainage Area 4000 20,000 — 40,000 6 8" 16" 40,000 — 100,000 10 10" 20" '100,000 — 220,000 '12 12" 24" dotes: 1. Precast commercial units are acceptable with prior approval. 2. Oil Trap to be outside of fencing and subject to inspection at all times. 3. Larger sizes may be required based on generation of oil and/ or sand (i.e. Bulk oil facilities, Trucking firms) 4. For lower flows Standard Plan 205 can be used with City approval. 5. For petrochemical applications Cast Iron fittings and piping will be used. Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 2/04 ADDED REMOVABLE CAP Date '12/00 Approved By: i . Wally Saryqelin City Engine R.C.E. 39395 2/12/04 Date STD PLAN 315i CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Fire Hydrant Installation BCR, ECR, PL See Note 4 Note: Where main is over 150' from hydrant a second valve shall be installed in-line in the vicinity of the hydrant (15'-30') Refer to water valve installation Standard Plan 402. 4' (10' from edge of driveways) Back of sidewalk or above ground 18" min. from ground utilities See Notes 2 & 3 6 hollow bolts with nut on bottom One break -off riser (20" max.) 1" to 4" B.O.W., 2" to 3" within sidewalk area or pavement. 6"min. 3" to 6" 2' square 6" Hydrant bury 4.-6" max(measured at top of curve) Notes: Refer to Standard Plan 405 for Thrust block requirements Valve/Outlet curb Hydrant Orientation 4' max 0 11. Post-# & location as directed by the Engineer 3' min 0 O Guard Post Location Detail 4" G.I.P. w/concrete fill & mounded above end of pipe. Concrete 18"0x36" deep Guard Post Construction Detail 3' 3' 1. All work and material shall conform to City of Lodi Construction Specifications. 2. Hydrants shall be painted Federal Yellow at the factory and furnished with National Standard Hose Thread outlets and cast iron caps. 3. All Hydrants 1 4-1/2" outlet & 1 2-1/2" outlet; with fusion epoxy coated interior. Clow 850; Clow 950; AVK 24/70; Jones 4040. 4. Locate C/L of hydrant per the following: 1.5' behind walk where F.O.C. to B.O.W. distance is 7.0' or less. 2.5' behind F.O.C. where F.O.C. to B.O.W. distance is greater than 7.0' 5' behind F.O.C. in planters. 5. Install guard posts where hydrants are installed in paved areas accessible to traffic or in planters where hydrant is less than 3' behind the curb or when directed by the City. 6. For trench backfill requirement, See Standard Plan 501. 7. Install blue retroreflective hydrant pavement marker per std. p an 716. See Note #5 Dr. JP No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. LC 1 9/03 ADJUSTED DIMENSION FROM PL 2 2/04 REVISED AVK MODEL NUMBER Approved By: 1/14/14 Date 1/14 3 2/05 ADDED NOTE 7 4 2/08 ADJUSTED GUARD POST DEPTH Charlie Swimley uaic City Engineer / Deputy Public Works Director RCE No. 52842 STD PLAN 401 CITY OF LODI'1 y -f 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Water Valve Installation Flanged Installation Finish Grade Detail B 3' Nominal Operating nut must be located left of the valve, looking down the main from the connection. FLG or FLG x RT Valve (Ty p•) Undisturbed Earth See Note 3 Frame and Cover City of Lodi Standard Plan No. 408, adjust to grade per Std Plan 123 Vi, ei�i ip!ip~ :i�!�!i�����ip!i�! O •>••.•.•,•.•.�, Concrete Pier Block Hot Tap Valve Support Detail C 2" min. clearance between top of riser & bottom of lid. Guide Assembly 8" Dia Tack Weld to Stem Extension Stem Mueller A-26441 8" PVC riser (C900) See Note 4 Extension Stem Detail A See Note 1 Notes: 1. Install extension stem when distance from valve cover to operating nut is greater than 12 feet; 3' max. nominal cover per Detail A. 2. Flanged fittings shall be used where lines are to be extended at a later date or as shown on the improvement plans. Operating nuts on flanged valves must be arranged per Detail B. 3. Concrete blocks may be used for valve and riser support; thrust blocks per Standard Plan 405. For Hot Tap Valve support refer to Detail C. 4. Place Visqueen around valves before placement of concrete supports. 5. For trench backfill, see Standard Plan 501. it. VVVVVV ji��j���iiOj�OjiOii� G�0��Gii�iiOO- \ #3 Rebar hoop 20"0 centered in concrete ring. Concrete ring per Std Plan #123 —95% RC on all surrounding material Wrap Riser Pipe in 30 mil. visqueen to prevent concrete from bonding to riser pipe. Approved Valve Backfill to top of pipe. Set riser on bricks. See Note 2 —1" Clearance from bolts Concrete for valve support to be placed above springline. Sheet 1 of 2 Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS `Date 7/08 5/28/08 Date STD PLAN 402J CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ( Water Valve Installation Materials List All Water Valves & Materials shall be Class 150B with 2" square operating nuts, open left (clockwise to close) and shall conform to AWWA Standard C-504 for Rubber Seated Butterfly Valves and City of Lodi Construction Specs 6-7602. AWWA Approved Valves: Mueller RS and Butterfly M+H/Clow/Kennedy RS and Butterfly American Darling RS Gate valves Waterous RS Gate valve AVK RS Gate valves Sheet 2 of 2 Dr. KT No. Date Revision Ch. WS Date 12/00 Appr. Apgroved By: Wally Sagy(elin City Engine R.C.E. 39895 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 402} CITY OF L1" WATER SERVICE FOR 3/4" OR 1" METER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT W/ RADIO READ Street surface — Sidewalk 36"min. Locate service 12" south or east of lot CL. 712,' Support box with bricks all around on compacted subgrade (90% RC) Trace wire #14 solid & coated (TW, THHN, THWN or MTW) 26" min. 1044 YIIA end Notes: Bulge pipe for slack 1" service See Note 1 I 18" min. Center box over valves. Set box 1/2" to 1" above ex. ground or adjacent sidewalk. //\ 9" min. 12" max. 18" min. 11" face to face 90° Elbow Sch. 80 PVC 12"min. House service by others. Radius per manufacture's requirements (Plastic service only) #4 rebar - 36" lg. w/3-#10 wire ties. See note 2. 1. Maintain 24" clearance between tap and any coupling, fitting or adjacent tap. Plastic services shall be looped approximately 6" vertically or laterally to provide slack in the line. If the service is installed in the same trench as the sanitary service, the water service shall be installed without splices and the trench section shown applies. 2. Backfill shall conform to Std. Plan 501. 3. All fittings shall comply with California No -Lead brass requirements. Trench Section Sheet 1 of 3 Dr. No. Date Revision Ch. 3 10/05 ADDED METER & ERT Appr. 4 7/09 CHANGED CUSTOMER VALVE `Date 5 3/10 REVISED PER AB 1953 REQS. 6 4/11 REVISED ERT MOUNTING. Approved By: F. Wally San in City Enginee R.C.E. 39895 4/12/11 Date STD PLAN 403 r CITY OF L1" WATER SERVICE FOR 3/4" OR 1" METER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MATERIAL LIST Fitting (a.) Size Basic Feature Inlet Connection Outlet Connection Manufacturer's Nos. Saddles 1" For C1 -AC & Ductile Iron Pipe Ductile Iron Double Strap Saddle No Single IPT A.Y. McDonald 4826A Smith Blair 313 Romac 202 Other manufacturers with similar designs o.k. 1 Strap Saddles Saddles 1" For C900 Pipe IPT A.Y. McDonald 4836A Romac 101S Mueller H1349 Corp. Stop 1" PIug Style MIP Comp A.Y. McDonald 74704B-22 CTS Or Approved Equal 2 Service Pipe 1" Tubing C.T.S. PE 3408 CL 160 with Tracer Wire .3 Angle Stop 1" Full Port Angle Ball Valve 1" PE Meter Swivel Nut A.Y. McDonald 74602B-22 CTS Or Approved Equal 4 Meter 3/4" Bronze 9" Long w/ Rubber Washer IPT IPT Badger Model 35 Sensus Model SR II -EB Hersey Model 442 5 Meter 1" Bronze 10 3/4" Long w/ Rubber Washer IPT IPT Badger Model 55 Sensus Model SR II -EB Hersey Model 452 5 Meter Adaptor 3/4" X 1' Bronze Meter Adaptor MIPT FIPT A.Y. McDonald 710J34 Or Approved Equal 6 Angle Stop 1" Full Port Angle Ball Valve 1" FIPT Meter Swivel Nut A.Y. McDonald 74604B With Handle # 6120B Or Approved Equal 7 Customer Pipe 1" PVC Sch. 80 Pipe IPS PVC Sch. 80 per Uniform Plumbing Code 8 Sheet 2 of 3 D r. No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 2 2/05 REVISED PAGE 1 3 10/05 ADDED METER & ERT Date 4 7/09 CHANGED CUSTOMER VALVE 5 3/10 REVISED PER AB 1953 REQ'S. Approved By: F. Wally Sanin City Enginee R.C.E. 39895 10/14/10 Date STD PLAN 4031 CITY OF L1" WATER SERVICE FOR 3/4" OR 1" METER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MATERIALS LIST r Fitting (a) Size Basic Feature Inlet Connection Outlet Connection Manufacturer's Nos. Service Box (b) N/A All lids to read Water N/A N/A Christy FL30 Box 12 (Backyard service easements, rod mounted) 9 Christy FL3OD lid (Backyard service easements, rod mounted) Christy N16 Box (All installs unless otherwise approved) Christy FL16D lid (Grass Areas,Flush Fit Driveways, Sidewalks. rod mounted ERT installs) Christy B16 -61P lid (3/16" steel checker plate, Driveways, Sidewalk, Lid mounted ERT installs) ERT (b) N/A Encoder Receiver N/A N/A ITRON 100W pit ERT w/ 1/2"0 Fiberglass Transmitter Mounting Rod 24" long. Alternate Register E Bracket mount may be used upon approval of Public Works Dept a. Alternative fittings must be approved by the City Engineer. b. The standard installation is a N16 box with a composite (FL16D) lid and a fiberglass mounting rod. All other methods require prior approval and are meant to allow for obstructions or other unforeseen installation conditions. Sheet 3 of 3 D r. No Date Revision Appr. Ch. 3 10/05 ADDED METER & ERT 4 7/09 CHANGED CUSTOMER VALVE Date 5 3/10 REVISED PER AB 1953 REQ'S. 6 4/11 REVISED ERT MOUNTING. Approved By: 4/12/11 F. Wally San in City Engineer Date R.C.E. 39895 STD PLAN 4031 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Water Blow—off Permanent (/N;/\/A Thrust block L --1 ----1 4" Ball valve as approved by the City, (See Material List) with 4" plug cap (greased with pipe lube and hand tightened) Adjust to grade per STD PLAN 123 Common brick continuous for support 4" Galvanized pipe and Flange wrapped in Visqueen Mechanical Joint fitting C900 Pipe or Ductile - Iron Pipe 6" 5 \\\ a g.. -1111 E 1MM 1I 1111-11E1E1E1I-111 11 E' 1lElElElElE' �IPHP1E Notes: 1. No services within 3' of blow -off. Common brick continuous for support Cover -Christy B36D (B36-61 D in traffic areas) For Traffic, Commercial or R/W Installation Box and lid will be H2O Rated. In sidewalk or as noted on plans. - 4" Blow -Off Thrust block Refer to Standard Plan 405 Sheet 1 of 2 Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 REVISED APPROVED BALL VALVE 2 2/05 ADDED PLUG FOR BALL VALVE 12/00 Approved By: Wally Sagy(elin City Engine R.C.E. 39895 2/2/05 Date STD PLAN 4041 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Water Blow—off Permanent Material List Material List for Standard Plan 404 City Approved Ball Valves Flow—Teck's Forged Brass Ball Valve Model S50 Matco—Norca, Inc. Model 752 or Watts Model 75-0211 City Approved Boxes Box Bes C -36W or Christy B-36 or Christy B-17 x 30 Sheet 2 of 2 Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 REVISED APPROVED BALL VALVE 2 2/05 REVISED PAGE 1 Date 2/00 Apgroved By: Wally Sagy(elin City Engine R.C.E. 39895 2/2/05 Date STD PLAN 4041 CITY OF LODIiM = Thrust Block <zFOK'P PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Requirements Plugged Tee No thrusting on cross except where ends are plugged. 45° or 221° Horizontal Bend Minimum Thrust Block Bearing Areas In Square Feet Pipe Sizes 90° 45° 222° Tees off 6" 3 2 2 2 8" 4 3 2 3 10" 6 4 3 4 12" 8 5 3 6 14" 12 7 4 8 Notes: 1. Concrete shall be 2000 PSI minimum at 28 days. 2. Thrust blocks shall be placed against undisturbed earth. 3. All fittings shall be supported in concrete. 4. For fire hydrant thrusting see Std. Plan 401. 5. Don't cover flange bolts with concrete. 6. Mechanically restrained joints as required by the City. See Material List Page 2. 7. Wrap all fittings and flanges with Visqueen. Cross Blow off Fitting Tapped Cap # 4 Reinforcing Bar Vertical Bend Sheet 1 of 2 Dr. KT No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 9/03 ADDED NOTE #7 Date 12/00 Apgroved By: Wally Saryelin 9/25/02 City Engine Date R.C.E. 39895 STD PLAN 405 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Thrust Block Requirements Material List Material List for Standard Plan 405 City Approved Mechanical Restrained Joints Pipe Material Joint Ductile Iron Mega—Lug 1100 C900PVC Mega—Lug 2000 IPS PVC Mega—Lug 2000 PVC Bell and Spicket Mega—Lug 1600 Sheet 2 of 2 Dr. KT No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. ws 1 9/03 ADDED NOTE #7 Date 12/00 Apgroved By: Wally Sa(elin 9/25/02 City Engine Date R.C.E. 39895 STD PLAN 405 CITY OF LODI I DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (3", 4", 6" & 8") WORKS LIDS I I 7 I 1® 5 10" BOX EXTENSIO 1 A 2 4 MIN. 20" MAX. 30" 3" MIN 4 SMITH BLAIR OR DRESSER COUPLING APPROVED VALVE W/HANDWHEEL SUPPORT BOX W/BRICKS ALL AROUND OR SET BOX ON PRECAST SLAB W/ WEEP HOLE. 6" LONG FLG X PE SPOOL FLG ELBOW 3' MIN FLG X RT ELBOW f CL 150 PIPE PER MAIN SPECIFICATIONS INSTALL VALVE PER STD PLAN 402 THRUST BLOCK. REFER TO STD PLAN 405 NOTES: 1. METER (IF REQUIRED) WILL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY CITY. 2. BYPASS MAY BE INSTALLED WITH THE SPECIFIC APPROVAL OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. 3. PLUG ALL OPENINGS IN BOX. 4. BACKFILL SHALL CONFORM TO STD PLAN 501. 5. ALL FITTINGS MUST COMPLY WITH THE LATEST STATE OF CALIFORNIA NO LEAD REQUIREMENTS. SHEET 1 OF 2 Dr. KT No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 2/05 REVISED SPOOL LENGTH'S Approved By: `Date 12/00 Charlie Swimley City Engineer / Deputy Public Works Director RCE No. 52842 Date STD PLAN 406 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE (3", 4", 6" & 8") MATERIALS LIST 1 2 3 5 FLG SPOOL, 24" LONG (2 EA) (C.I., D.I., OR STEEL) FLG X PLAIN END SPOOL. LEAVE 1" GAP AT COUPLING 3" - 29" LONG 4" - 38" LONG ENDS OF SPOOLS 6" - 43" LONG (C.I. OR STEEL) CHRISTY OR BES BOX LID (TRAFFIC) BOX EXTENSION CHRISTY BES 3"+4" B-48 OR C48W B48 -62D 62D85 10" BOX EXTENSION B48 X 10 6" B-52 OR C52W B52 -62D 62D90 10" BOX EXTENSION B52 X 10 FLG SPOOL, LENGTHS AS NEEDED (OPTIONAL) (C.I., D.I., OR STEEL) TEMPORARY BLOWOFF PER STD PLAN 409. 2" FOR 4"-6" SERVICE, 4" FOR 8" AND LARGER SERVICE. ALL FITTINGS SHALL BE CAST OR DUCTILE IRON OR STEEL (AS NOTED) AND SHALL CONFORM TO APPLICABLE AWWA STANDARDS. (SCH. 40, 150 LB. FLG) TRAFFIC LIDS SHALL BE USED IN ALL LOCATION. SHEET 2 OF 2 Dr. KT No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 2/05 REVISED SPOOL LENGTH'S 2 10/08 REVISED SPOOL LENGTH'S Approved By: Date 10/08 Charlie Swimley City Engineer / Deputy Public Works Director RCE No. 52842 Date STD PLAN 406 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Fire Service See Std Plan 409 010* R/W 3' min Pipe per main Valve at water main per specifications Std Plan 402 Plywood Temporary blowoff assembly per Std Plan 409. On—site mains shall be connected per Std Plan 409. See Note 6 4" & Larger Service Notes: 1. If not alarmed a detector check valve w/bypass meter shall be installed at fire—sprinkler system connection only. Installation details shall conform to Fire Dept. and Bldg. Dept. requirements. (See Detail A) 2. On—site fire mains shall be completely isolated from domestic lines. 3. On—site fire mains looped to the City system must be specifically approved by the Public Works Director and must be equipped with double check valve assemblies at each connection. In such cases the services shall be installed per Std. Plan 406 with the Double Check Valve assemblies installed in an appropriately sized box at the property line. 4. Suitable backflow prevention devices will be required for fire systems having auxiliary sources of supply, elevated tanks or chemical additives, or other special conditions. 5. Sufficient valves shall be provided to separate sprinkler, hydrant and domestic systems. Additional main line valves may be required depending on the complexity of the on—site system. 6. Pressure and bacteriological tests per City of Lodi Construction Specifications are required for on—site systems unless waived by the Public Works Director. 7. Systems with booster pumps shall be equipped with a pressure sustaining valve to the approval of the Public Works Director. Sheet 1 of 2 Dr KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 REVISED F.D.C. LOCATION 2 2/04 REVISED TEMP. BLOW OFF VALVE `Dat1N. 2/00 2/12/OL Date STD PLAN 407 J CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Fire Service * Locations of hydrants, Fire Dept. connections & detector checks to be determined by the Fire Marshal. Fire hydrant & valve per Std. Plan 401 See Note 5. r Bldg. sprinkler system P/L Domestic Service per Hans �_ Service lateral T On—site main per Bldg. Dep- & Fire Dept. requirements Fire Dept. pumper connection w/ check valve Detector check valve w/ Fire service See Notes 2-4 6 and 7. Detail A Fire Service Fire service r Detail A size per Plan one size larger than fire service 8" min. w/hydrant or per plan City Main Valve 6" hydrant lateral or second fire service Detail B Combined Fire/Domestic Service 3/4" bypass meter (Note Valving per Note 5 Sheet 2 of 2 Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 REVISED F.D.C. LOCATION `Date N. 2/00 Approved By: J • Wally sa ern 9/25/02 City Fnginc Date R.C.E. 39895 STD PLAN 407 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Water Valve Frame & Cover Notes: 1. Frame — Wt 85 Lbs. 4. Castings shall be dipped in black, bituminous paint. 2. Cover — Wt 40 Lbs. 5. Frame and cover must be H-20 wheel loading rated. A 13 3/4" 12 3/4" 12" Now— A 10" 15 1/2" Section A—A 3. Material — Cast Iron Dr. KT No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. ws � Date 7/08 R.C.E. 39895 5/28/08 Date STD PLAN 408, CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Temporary Water Blow—off and Connection Details Thrust block per Std Plan 405 w/ 1/4" plywood between concrete and flange Frame & cover per Std Plan 408; Adjust to grade per Std Plan 123. 2" Galvanized iron pipe riser w/ end cap (4" riser for 8" and larger mains. (greased with pipe lube Sc hand tight) City Valve From City Plywood m 0 rillm**114 Per Plans No services in this length Temporary Blow—off City valve Remove temporary blowoff and plug saddle attime of meter assembly installation 0 0 0 0 Dimension Provided By City Detail A: Temporary Connection with Meter Assembly Steel plate — 1/8" thick Remove upper bolts only to remove plate Removable Steel Plate 2" riser for temporary blowoff (4" riser for 8" and larger mains) Plug saddle Notes: 1. The Contractor shall not operate any City valves. 24 hours notice is required for operation by City. Flange Water system under Ex. water system construction Detail B: Temporary Connection without Meter Assembly 2. All connections to the existing system shall be made per Details A or B. Upon acceptance of the new system, the Contractor shall remove the riser, plug the saddles and remove the steel plate. Contractor shall also remove the meter assembly and install a flanged spool. Meter assembly shall be returned to the City. 3. Contractor shall supply and install reducers on meter assembly where main is larger than 6". 4. City shall furnish meter assembly upon receipt of deposit. Meter assembly to be installed by Contractor. Sheet 1 of 2 Dr. SN Ch. WS Date 2/02 No 1 2 Date 9/03 2/05 Revision REDRAWN REVISED METER SPOOL ASSEMBLY DIMENSION 2/2/05 Date STD PLAN 409J CITY OF LTemporary Water Blow—off and Connection Details PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Materials List Fittings Legend: O Flanged Reducer (Furnished by the Contractor) ® Meter with Strainer O Check Valve O Butterfly Valve ® Removable Steel Plate. ® Double Strap Malleable Iron Saddle ® Adapter MJ/FLG, Full face flange only. (Furnished by the Contractor) ® Blind Flange ® 6" Flg x Flg spool w/ 2" tapped fitting Sheet 2 of 2 Dr. KT No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 REDRAWN 2 2/05 REVISED PAGE 1 Date R.C.E 39895 2/2/05 Date STD PLAN 409J CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Water & Wastewater Service Modification Ex. 1" water service w/ angle stop Stub to dwelling (tYp.) 10 Ex. 4" Wastewater service Water Service Wastewater Service Notes: 1. This standard plan to be used for modification of existing Water an Wastewater services to lots being split for construction of zero lot The dwellings or where two services are sharing a tap. 2. See Std Plan 403 for water service details. 3. Wastewater materials to be ESVCP ASTM C-700, PVC ASTM D3034 SDR 35 or ABS ASTM D-2751 4. Locate service box and clean—out as close as possible to Property Line. Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS Date 12/00 R.C.E. 39895 12/28/00 Date Sheet 1 of 2 r STD PLAN 410 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Water & Wastewater Service Modification Materials List Legend: ❑1 Mueller H-15364 U—Branch Connection 1" inlet 8" center to center. 3/4" outlet ❑2 Mueller H-14215 Meter Coupling catalog size 5/8"x3/4"x3/4". ❑3 9" Ig. spacer per Std Han 403 ® Mueller H-10890 Coupling. ❑5 3/4" Customer Valve—Stockham 8-216, Mueller 8130, Nibco T -311—Y. © 3/4" Sch. 40 PVC Stub. 7 Christy B-36 box per Std Plan 412 ® 4" Double Wye or 2-4" Wyes in—line. ❑9 4"-90° Elbow (long bend) ▪ Cleanout per Std Plan 201 Sheet 2 of 2 Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS Date N. 2/00 R.C.E. 39895 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 410} CITY OF LODI) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Double Check Valve Assembly et box above grade or at high point to prevent flooding Box or Page 2 Vertical clearance per Table. Page 2 of 2 /\i vault per Table of 2 To customer, pipe, cover, etc. per Bldg. Dept. Requirements Test cocks — see Note 5 Double Check Valve Assembly — see Note 7 Support box w/ bricks all around or on - precast slab w/ weephole. Set on 6" of drain rock bedding. 2'x2'x4" thk. conc. pad (Typ.) Galvanized pipe or cast iron -iser. I rSee Note 8 12"min-30"max 00 Oho 1' ± to service box See Note 11. Underground Installation Flg. connection (2" & larger) or SCR union (1" & 1-1/2") each end See Note 8 See Note 6 & 10 Galy. pipe including elbows (both side Notes: It is the customer's responsibility to have the State Certified Backflow Prevention Tester and report the results to the Public Works Department. 2. Plug all openings in box. 3. Traffic lids shall be used where applicable. 4. Vertical clearance may be increased for OS&Y valves. 5. Offset box over assembly to provide testing clearance per plan. 6. Assembly installed above ground may be enclosed with clearances similar to underground installation. 7. Use FEBCO 850 or approved equal per State Standards. 8. Valve handles may be chained & padlocked for security. 9. This plan for domestic service only. Design for fire service applications to have approval of Public Works Director and Fire Marshal. 10. Install guard posts where device is installed in paved areas accessible to traffic or in planters less than 3' behind the curb or when directed by City. 11. Locate immediately downstream of water service box. Above Ground Installation 2"min ea. end From City service; no connections on this side of assembly; see applicable Std. Plan 40.3, 406, or 407 for details. Flg. connection (2" & larger) or SCR. union (1" (3c 1-1/2") each end Plan assembly tested prior to acceptance and annually by a Sheet 1 of 2 Dr' KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 2/04 REVISED MODEL NUMBER ON NOTE #7 `Date N. 2/00 2/1 2/0L Date STD PLAN 4111 e3 G CITY OF LDouble Check Valve �••���� Assembly PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Materials List Size Vertical Clearance Box or Vault / Lid (See Note 3) min / max (min) 1" 8" 18" Christy B40 or Bes C4OW Box/ Christy B40-61 D or Bes 61 D75 1-1/2" 10" 20" Christy B48 or Bes C48W Box/ Christy B48 -62D or Bes 62D85 2" 10" 20" Christy B48 or Bes C48W Box/ Christy B48 -62D or Bes 62D85 3" 16" 30" 4'x4' Split, hinged lid 4" 20" 36" 4'x4' similar to Forni— Christy B52 or Bes C52W box/ 6" 24" 40" 7'x5' HAL—Lucero Christy or Bes 62D90 30" 48" 7'x5' Assembly Sheet 2 of 2 Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. CH. ws `Date N. 2/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 4111 CITY OF LODI 2" WATER SERVICE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR 1-1/2"OR 21METER W/ RADIO READ LOCATE SERVICE 12" SOUTH OR EAST OF LOT c SIDEWALK. CENTER BOX OVER VALVES. SET BOX 1/2" TO 1" ABOVE EX GROUND. METER READING LID. (SEE ATTACHED MATERIALS LIST) 12" 26" MIN 13"MIN 20"MAX SUPPORT BOX WITH EXTENSION OR BRICKS ALL AROUND ON COMPACTED SUB - GRADE (90%RC) & PLUG OPENINGS W/ BRICK OR MORTAR. MOLDED MALE THREADED ADAPTOR PE RISER OR SCHEDULE 80 PVC OR SCH 40 GIP ANGLE & ELBOW AS REQ'D TO AVOID KINKING PIPE. #4 REBAR 36" LONG SS HOSE CLAMPS W/# 14 SOLID & COATED TW, THNN, THWN OR MTW 4" WW NOTES: 1. MAINTAIN 24" CLEARANCE BETWEEN TAP AND ANY COUPLING, FITTING OR ADJACENT TAP. PLASTIC SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH SLACK IN THE LINE. IF THE SERVICE IS INSTALLED IN THE SAME TRENCH AS SANITARY SERVICE, THE WATER SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHOUT SPLICES AND THE TRENCH SECTION SHOWN APPLIES: W WATER LINE TO BE ABOVE WASTEWATER LINE 18" MIN. (24" AT BOX) 18"MIN CAP END 12" MIN SERVICE BY OTHERS TRENCH SECTION 2. S.S. LINERS REQUIRED ON PE PIPE FITTINGS. 3. BACKFILL SHALL CONFORM TO STD PLAN 501. 4. ALL FITTINGS MUST COMPLY WITH THE LATEST STATE OF CALIFORNIA NO LEAD REQUIREMENTS. SHEET 1 OF 4 Dr. No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 ADDED END CAP 2 2/04 REVISED PAGE 4 Approved By: `Date 3 2/05 REVERSED TRENCH SECTION 4 6/10 REVISED PER AB 1953 REQ'S. Charlie Swimley City Engineer / Deputy Public Works Director RCE No. 52842 Date STD PLAN 412 CITY OF LORI 2" WATER SERVICE FOR tI/2 OR 2 METER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MATERIAL LIST FITTING (A) SIZE BASIC FEATURE INLET CONNECTION OUTLET CONNECTION MANUFACTURERS NOS. SADDLES 1 2" FOR C1 -AC & DUCTILE IRON PIPE DUCTILE IRON DOUBLE STRAP SADDLE NO SINGLE IPT ROCKWELL 313 APAC 102 OTHER MANUFACTURERS WITH SIN DESIGNS O.K. STRAP SADDLES SADDLES 2" FOR C900 PIPE IPT ROMAC 101S MUELLER H1349 WITH 1P THREAD CORP. STOP 2 2" BALL VALVE 2" IPT 2" CTS COMP A.Y. MCDONALD 4704B-22 OR APPROVED EQUAL CORP. STOP 2" BALL VALVE 2" IPT 2" IPT A.Y. MCDONALD 3122B OR APPROVED EQUAL ILAR SHEET 2 OF 4 Dr. No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 ADDED END CAP 2 2/04 REVISED PAGE 4 Approved By: Date 3 2/05 REVISED PAGE 1 4 6/10 REVISED PER AB 1953 REQ'S. Charlie Swi mley City Engineer / Deputy Public Works Director RCE No. 52842 Date STD PLAN 412 CITY OF LORI 2" WATER SERVICE �••`� = FOR 1-1/2 OR 2 METER Fes_ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MATERIAL LIST FITTING (A) SIZE BASIC FEATURE INLET CONNECTION OUTLET CONNECTION MANUFACTURER'S NOS. SERVICE 2" C.T.S. PE 3408 200 PSI SDR9 PIPE ASTM D-2737 3 SCH 80 PVC WITH TRACE WIRE, OR SCH 40 GIP ANGLE 2" BALL VALVE WITH 2" CTS COMP. 2" A.Y. MCDONALD 4602B-22 STOP LOCKWING 2 HOLE METER OR APPROVED EQUAL. 4 FLANGE 2" BALL VALVE WITH 2" FNPT 2" A.Y. MCDONALD 4604B LOCKWING 2 HOLE METER OR APPROVED EQUAL. FLANGE METER 1-1/2" BRONZE 2 HOLE FLG 2 HOLE FLG J129 5 OR 2" 13" LONG FOR BADGER 120 OR 170 1-1/2" SERVICE SENSUS SR -BA 17" LONG FOR 2" SERVICE HERSEY 562 OR 572 W/ RUBBER WASHER COUPLING 1-1/2" FLANGED METER 2 HOLE FLG COMPRESSION ROCKWELL 926 METER 6 OR 2" COUPLING ADAPTER WITHOUT RING COUPLING TO COUPLING MALLEABLE IRON SCH. 80 NIPPLE SPOOL 1-1/2" PVC SCH. 80 2 HOLE FLG PLAIN END 9 1/2" LONG FOR 1 1/2" METER & FLANGE OR 2" & BRONZE FLG. 5 1/2" LONG FOR 2" METER 7 CUSTOMER 2" BALL VALVE WITH 2" FNPT 2" A.Y. MCDONALD 4604B VALVE LOCKWING 2 HOLE METER OR APPROVED EQUAL. FLANGE ALL VALVES MUST HANDLE A.Y. MCDONALD 6120BS HAVE BRASS HANDLE OR APPROVED EQUAL. CUSTOMER 2" PVC SCH. 80 PLAIN END PLAIN END IPS PVC SCHEDULE 80 PER STUB UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE. 9 (SAME SIZE AS SERVICE PIPE) SHEET 3 OF 4 Dr. No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 ADDED END CAP 2 2/04 REVISED PAGE 4 Approved By: Date 3 2/05 REVISED PAGE 1 4 6/10 REVISED PER AB 1953 REQS. Charlie Swi mley City Engineer / Deputy Public Works Director RCE No. 52842 Date STD PLAN 412 .� -- CITY OF LODI 2" WATER SERVICE FOR 1-1 /2 OR 2 METER9 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MATERIAL LIST FITTING (A) SIZE BASIC FEATURE INLET CONNECTION OUTLET CONNECTION MANUFACTURER'S NOS. SERVICE BOX 10 2" ALL LIDS TO READ WATER & HAVE HOLES IN LIDS FOR ERT CHRISTY B36 CHRISTY 36 -R -P001 BO (FLUSH FIT FOOT TRAFFIC, GRASS AREAS, LID MOUNTED ERTS ONLY) CHRISTY FL36D (FOOT TRAFFIC, GRASS AREAS, FLUSH FIT) CHRISTY B36 -61P 1/4" STEEL CHECKER PLATE (DRIVEWAYS, SIDEWALKS, LID MOUNTED ERTS ONLY) CHRISTY B1730 FULL VEHICULAR TRAFFIC BOX CHRISTY B40 BOX CHRISTY B40 -61D LID 1/4" STEEL PLATE (LID MOUNTED ERT'S ONLY) CHRISTY B24X36 FULL VEHICULAR TRAFFIC BOX 90° PJ ELBOW 90° ELBOW 11 2" PJ CTS 2" 2" PJ CTS 2" 2" FORD L44-77 2" MUELLER H-15526 WITH INSERT PVC ERT 12 N/A ENCODER RECEIVER TRANSMITTER N/A N/A ITRON 100W PIT ERT W/ THROUGH THE LID MOUNTING KIT OR z'O FIBERGLASS MOUNTING ROD 24" LONG MAY BE USED UPON APPROVAL OF PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. A. ALTERNATE FITTINGS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. SHEET 4 OF 4 Dr. KT No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 ADDED END CAP 2 2/04 ADDED PVC 90 ELBOW Approved By: t Date 12/00 3 2/05 REVISED PAGE 1 4 6/10 REVISED PER AB 1953 REQ'S. Charlie Swi mley City Engineer / Deputy Public Works Director RCE No. 52842 Date STD PLAN 412 CITY OF LODI) �ty�tr xQ_ =- = PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Reduced Pressure Backflow Device Assembly Galvanized pipe r IIIIIII�I-��� .II-1II-1I To customer, pipe, cover,etc per 3Idg. Dept. requirements R.P. Device Assembly See Note 3 Test cocks See Note 6 /Locate per Note 7 Flg. connection III X (2" & larger) or Thr. union (1 ",1 ��" T_ & 2") each end 12"min, 30"max 1111' — —I l 11 -III= —Concrete Pads r Galvanized Pipe including Elbow Above Ground Installation \totes: It is the customers responsibility to have the assembly tested prior to acceptance and annually by a State Certified Backflow Prevention Tester and report the results to the Public Works Department. 2. Install guard posts where device is installed in paved areas accessible to traffic or in planters less than 3' behind the curb or when directed by City. 3. FEBCO 825Y or approved equal, must be on list of approved Backflow Prevention Assemblies Dept. of Health Services. Valve handles may be chained & padlocked for security. 3. This plan for domestic service only. Design for fire service applications to have approval of Public Works Director and Fire Marshal. o. Provide drainage (with air gap) for pressure relief discharge. 7. Locate assembly immediately down stream of service box. - 1111 I 1 -II-1II-1I I _; _Ili - I— I I-1 11 d From City; no connection on this side of assembly; see applicable Std. Plan 403, 406 or 407 for details 12" min each end T 12" min I■ J-- ■II Test cock side 24" min Obstructions Clearance requirements Plan L T Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS `Dat 12/00 R.C.E. 39895 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 413 jjCITOF LODI'1 .gin+ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Y Dual Water & Wastewater Service Christy B-36 Box ___ (2) Spacer, coupling, customer valve and stub per Std Plan 403 Ford, Mueller or Jones: 1 1/2" to 1" bushing or bell reducer 1"x3/4" "U" branch (2)-3/4" inverted key meter valve w/ lockring 1 1/2" PE Service per Std Plan 412 WW Cleanout, See Std Plan 201 (Typ.) Notes: 1. This Std plan is to be used primarily in residential subdivisions on lot lines opposite the utility joint trench. A utility coordination plan showing service locations is required. 2. See Std Plans 201, 203, 403, and 412 for materials and installation details. Iv a/n w 4" Wastewater Service w/ Cleanout per Std Plan 201 and 203 Trench Section C/L per plans 1 1/2" W 4" WW D r. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS `Date 2/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 414 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Water Main Separation from Sanitary Hazard—New ' Wastewater Line Construction Zone"B" Symmetrical C/L 2 / / , . Water / i �. Line Bottom of pipe CASE 1 New Wastewater Line Parallel Construction 4" Finish Grade ///Z�/"G'f //// / Ne( j6int/a-Kea/ / / / / / / Prohibited Zone „P„ Zone "D" CASE 1 New Wastewater Line Crossing Prohibited Zone P= WASTEWATER LINE CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ZONE A B C D P Requires specific approval of the City Engineer details on plans Pipe: ESVCP, bell & spigot joint only; PVC water pipe; Ductile Iron pipe. (Storm Drain only—Conc. Pipe) Pipe: Ductile Iron or Class 200 PVC water pipe centered over water main. Note the "No Joint" area over water main Pipe: Same as Zone C, no joints allowed Prohibited—No new wastewater line in this area Notes: 1. This Standard Plan shows normal construction requirements/options for reduced separation of existing water mains from new sanitary sewers and storm drains (including mains & laterals). It does not apply to pipes over 24 inches in diameter, to force mains or to services crossing under a water main (see Note 3). See State Dept. of Health Services Standards for other situations and additional alternatives. 2. Plans shall reference this Standard for specific locations and shall note the zone and construction requirement, or provide details on the plans. 3. Sanitary sewer services crossing under water mains shall maintain 4" minimum clearance. 4. All pipe materials and installation shall be per City of Lodi Design Standards and Construction Specifications. Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS `Date 2/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 415A CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Water Main Separation from Sanitary Hazard—New Water Main Construction Bottom of pipe Prohibited Zone „P„ Wastewater Line Zone"B" i 3' C/L Symmetrical CASE 2 New Water Line Parallel Construction Zone "D" (No Joints) 4' 4' WW Line \\\\\\\ No\jcnt\aeo\\\ \\\Zole\'\\\\ CASE 2 New Water Line Crossing Prohibited Zone WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ZONE A B c D P Requires specific approval of the City Engineer with details shown on the plans. Pipe: Ductile Iron pipe; PVC, Class 200. Normal pipe standards apply if wastewater line meets Zone B requirements per Std. Plan 415A. Pipe: Per Zone B Note "no joint" area under Wastewater line. Normal pipe standards apply if wastewater line meets Zone B requirements per Std. Plan 415A. Pipe: Per Zone B No joint allowed. Normal pipe standards apply if wastewater line meets Zone B requirements per Std. Plan 415A. Prohibited — No new watermains in this area. Notes: This Standard Plan shows normal construction requirements/options for reduced separation of new water mains from sanitary sewers (including services, see Note 3) and storm drains (including mains & laterals). It does not apply to pipes over 24 inches in diameter or to force mains. See State Dept. of Health Services Standards for other situations and additional alternatives. 2. Plans shall reference this Standard for specific locations and shall note the zone and construction requirement, or provide details on the plans. 3. Water mains crossing over services shall maintain 4" min. clearance. 4. All pipe materials and installation shall be per City of Lodi Design Standards and Construction Specifications. Dr. KT No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. ws Date 2/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 415, CITY OF L 2" Fire Sprinkler Service PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Establish for use of Copper Tubing Type K or G.I.P. 3/4" Check Valve Meter Coupling Mueller H-10891 3/4" or 5/8" x 3/4" meter 90° 3/4" Copper Tubing Type K on G.I.P. Male Adapter 90° 3/4" Copper Tubing Type K w/ male adapter ea. end 2"x3/4" Tee 90° Elbow 2 1/2" nipple \-2" Union 2 1/2" nipple 2"x3/4" Tee 2" shut—off valve Jones J -1527F with J-129 Flg. (turn so shut—off is to side) 2 1/2" Ig nipple 2" G.I.P. to Main, See Std Plan 403 90° Elbow Extend to req'c 90° Elbow 2 1/2" nipple 2" Check Valve — uL approved w/ synthetic rubber disc (2 1/2" Stockham G-988 w/ bushings) Kennedy 126A Notes: 1. Use Christy B-48 box with traffic lid per Std Plan 403. Center over fittings. 2. City service responsibility is from main to shut—off valve. 3. Meter to be Sensus SR. Support w/ brick. 4. Where Sprinkler system contains chemical additives or other possible contamination exists, Check Valves shown shall be replaced with Double Check Valve Assemblies per Std Plan 411. Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS `Date N. 2/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 416J CITY OF LODI1 J PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WATER SAMPLING STATION Valve Box, Oldcastle Precast (Christy) F08 with FL08D "WATER" Lid, or approved equal. Sampling Station, Eclipse No. 88 -WC, or approved equal Property Line 6" min 14"x14"x5" Class B Concrete Foundation c. J a1 0 d Back of Sidewalk Face of Curb l 6" min 1" Elbow - 1" Galvanized Steel Pipe Support box with bricks • - all around on compacted subgrade (90% RC) Plan View Sampling Station, Eclipse No. 88 -WC 1" Water Service and Trace Wire per Standard Plan 403 Notes: 1. Backfill shall conform to Std. Plan 501. 2. All fittings shall comply with California No -Lead brass requirements. 3. Maintain 24" clearance between tap and any coupling, fitting or adjacent tap. Plastic services shall be looped approximately 6" vertically or laterally to provide slack in the line. Valve Box, Oldcastle Precast (Christy) F08 with FL08D "WATER" Lid, or approved 18" � equal. Center box over valve and set Y2" - 1" above ex. ground or adjacent sidewalk. Radius per manufacture's ' requirements (Plastic service only) #4 rebar - 36" long w/ 3410 wire ties. 18" min. 1" Angle Stop, A.Y. McDonald 74602B-22 CTS or approved equal Section A -A • 1" Water Service and Trace Wire per Standard Plan 403 D • SN Ch. LC No, Dote Revision ApPL Date 9 13. Chorles Swimley Deputy Public Works D.rector R.C.E. 52842 9. I(• l3 Dote STD PLAN 417 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DUAL WATER SERVICE (DUPLEX) TO CUSTOMER t rl 1" WATER SERVICE PER STD PLAN 403 METER AND ERT — TO BE INSTALLED BY CITY 1" WATER — SERVICE PER STD PLAN 403 NOTE: INSTALLATION OF THE METER BOX IN DRIVEWAY IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM CITY ENGINEER. TO CUSTOMER END CAP (IF APPLICABLE) 12" • 111E J 12" 1E 6 — CENTER BOX OVER ASSEMBLY 2 BACK OF SIDEWALK 1 of 2 Dr. JP No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. LC Date 1/27/14 Approved By: 2/24/14 Charlie Swimley City Engineer / Deputy Public Works Director RCE No. 52842 Date STD PLAN 418 CITY OF LORI FOR 2" METER BYPASS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT LARGE WATER SERVICE 2" SADDLE WATER METER SEE STD PLAN 406 FOR MORE INFO INSTALL APPROVED VALVE W/ HANDWHEEL 2" SADDLE 2" GALVANIZED 90° ELBOW METER BOX 2" BALL VALVE (CUSTOMER VALVE LOCKABLE) A.Y. McDONALD 4604B & 6120BS 2" GALVANIZED PIPE SCH 40 (TYP) 2" GALVANIZED 90° ELBOW 2" CORPORATION VALVE Dr. JP No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. LC `Date 3/2/17 Approved By: Lyman Chang City Engineer RCE No. 53149 3/2/17 Date STD PLAN 419 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DUAL WATER SERVICE (DUPLEX) MATERIAL LIST FITTING SIZE BASIC FEATURE INLET CONNECTION OUTLET CONNECTION MANUFACTURER'S NOTE 1 METER COUPLING 2 I U -BRANCHES 3 METER VALVE 1" 1" 1" BRASS W/ NL LISTED STANDARD U -BRANCH 1" MNPT 1" MNPT 3/4" MALE METER THREAD 3/4" MNPT BALL VALVE WITH LOCKWING 1" PE CTS COMPRESSION 1" STRAIGHT THREAD SWIVEL NUT 4 METER SPOOL 1"x9" 1" 1" McDONALD 74619 (3/4"x1 "x2.18") McDONALD 709UFCW (1" x 3/4" x 6.5") McDONALD 76101 MW (1" x 3/4" x 3/4") 1" SCH 80 PVC 5 CUSTOMER VALVE ANGLE STOP 1" FULL PORT ANGLE BALL VALVE 6 SERVICE BOX LID TO READ WATER METER SWIVEL NUT N/A 1" FIPT N/A McDONALD 74604B WITH HANDLE #61206 CHRISTY B36 BOX W/ FL36D FIBRELYTE LID 2 of 2 Dr. JP No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. LC Approved By: 2/24/14 Date 1/23/14 Charlie Swimley City Engineer / Deputy Public Works Director RCE No. 52842 Date STD PLAN 418 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Pipe Bedding & Backfill - Flexible Pipe Trench Section Trench wall (Optional - start slope 6" above top of pipe) Pipe Min. Size "W" 4" 18" 6" 18" 8" 24" 10" 24" 12" 30" 15" 30" Trench Width: "W" per Table Notes: Final backfill & structural section per Std. Plan 506 or Plans / i \ Finish grade I 11111 `00," Bell hole @ joints Trench bottom (Native) (or Foundation if required) Depth of cover "D" (Note 4) Initial Backfill to 6" above pipe Haunching Bedding -4" to 6" Embedment material 1. This Std is for PVC SDR 35 (4" thru 15" dia), C900, & ductile iron pipe (up thru 14" dia) conforming to City Design Standards and Construction Specifications. 2. Class 1 embedment material shall be used unless specified otherwise on the plans. 3. This Std applicable only for stable trench walls where no standing water or groundwater is anticipated. Special details required for unstable soil identified in soils report. For minor occurrences of instability (sand pockets, etc), voids in the embedment zone shall be filled with the specified embedment material to at least two pipe diameters all around the pipe. 4. Minimum depth of cover for mains is 3 ft to finish grade; service laterals per plans. 5. For Water Pipes use native material for backfill. EMBEDMENT MATERIAL CLASS I CLASS II CLASS III CLASS IV CLASS V Description USC Soil Type Class II AB or Clean Sand Coarse Sand & Gravel GW, GP, SW, SP Fine Sand Mixtures GM, GC, SM, SC Silt,Silty Clays MH, ML, CH, CL Organic Soils OL, OH, PT Foundation If required, per special design to be shown on p ans Bedding Haunching Consolidate with vibrator or flat shovel "slicing" (See Note 5) Compact to 85% Min. R.C. Cut-off dam (per Note 5) Compact to 90% Min. R.C. Compact to 90% Min. R.C. in two lifts Initial Backfill Class II AB Compact to 85% Min. R.C. in two lifts Compact to 90% Min. R.C, in two lifts Maximum Depth of Cover "D" (without special design) 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft Special Design Not Permitted Dr. JP No. Date Revision Appr. Approved By: Ch. LC 1 9/03 ADDED C900 PIPE 2 8/13 REMOVE CRUSHED ROCK MATERIAL `Date 8/13 C-K-QU 8/19/13 Charlie Swimley City Engineer / Deputy Public Works Director Date RCE NO. 52842 STD PLAN 5O1Af yoF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Trench Section O F LO D � Pipe Bedding & Backfill - CITY •••���: = Rigid Pipe Legend: D=Nominal pipe inside diameter (in.) Bc=Pipe outside diameter (in.) Bd=Trench width @ top of pipe=Bc+8" min. each side (24" total minimum) Final backfill & structural section CLASS II AB Bedding per Note 4 Notes: CLASS CS Load Factor=2.2 12" CLASS C Load Factor=1.5 Trench wall Optional Initial backfill (Note 3) Bc/8 4" Min. Trench wall Optional _ \ / Initial backfill (Note 3) Bc/6 Bc/8, 4" min. CLASS B Load Factor=1.9 Pipe springline Bedding per note 4. 1. This Standard is for rigid pipes 4" & larger; conforming to City Design Stds and Construction Specifications. Use Trench Class as shown on the plans; if not specified, use appropriate class per pipe material and depth of cover per Std Plan 501C. CLASS D Load Factor=1.1 2. Provide uniform & continuous support of pipe barrel between bell or coupling holes. 3. Initial backfill shall be selected sandy material per Construction Spec. Sect.6-19.02 @ 90% R.C. min. 4. Class B & C bedding material to be Class II AB or sand as specified on the plans. Bedding same as initial backfill See Note 2 (typical all classes) Dr. JP No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. LC 1 6/00 ADDED C900 PIPE 2 8/13 REMOVE CRUSHED ROCK MATERIAL `Date 8/13 Approved By: Charlie Swimley 8/19/13 City Engineer / Deputy Public Works Director Date RCE NO. 52842 STD PLAN 5O 1 B CITY OF LODI1 J PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Pipe Bedding & Backfill— Rigid Pipe Bedding Requirements Pipe Material Class Size (in.) Minimum Trench Class per Std Plan 501 B Depth of Cover (ft.) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Asbestos Cement, AWWA C401 150 4 thru 14 Non—Reinforced Concrete, ASTM C-14 2 12 15 18 21 24 D C B 7Vs// 3 Reinforced Concrete, ASTM C-76 III IV 12 15 18 21 24 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 D C D D C B C B V 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 D Vitrified Clay Pipe, ASTM C700 Extra Strength 4 6 8 10 12 15 D C D KT No Date Revision Ch. WS Appr. I Approved B Date 7/08 F. Wally Sa .elin City Fa9ian- R.C.E. 39895 9/25/02 Date STD PLAN 5O1C, c CITY OF LODI) [ ••:•.;!�. Standard Abbreviations F•oR�'� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Aggregate base American Society for Testing and Materials American Water Works Association Approximately Asbestos cement pipe Asphalt concrete Back of walk Begin curb return Begin curve Begin vertical curve Bench mark monument Blow off Cable Television Cast iron pipe Centerline Center to Center Centimeter Central angle Central California Traction Company City of Lodi Class Cleanout Commercial driveway Compacted Original Ground Concrete Concrete pipe Construct Corrugated metal pipe Cubic feet per second Cubic yards Curb & gutter Curb, gutter & sidewalk Diameter Distance Driveway Drop inlet catch basin Ductile Iron Each Edge of pavement Electric Elevation End curb return End curve End vertical curve Existing Feet per Second Finish grade Fire Hydrant Flowline Fire Service Face of Curb Foot AB ASTM AWWA APPROX ACP AC BOW BCR BC BVC BM BO CATV CIP C/L C—C cm A CCTC COL CL CO COMM DWY COG CONC CP CONST CMP CFS CY C&G CG&S DIA DIST DWY DICB DIP EA EP ELEC ELEV ECR EC EVC EX FPS FG FH FL FS FOC FT Gas Galvanized Gallons per Minute Gas valve Global Positioning System Grade Break Guy pole High point High pressure gas Horizontal Inch Industrial waste Inside diameter Invert Joint use pole Kilometer Length Lineal feet Low proint Low pressure gas Lump sum Manhole Maximum Meter Millimeter Minimum Miscellaneous North, South, East, West Northerly, etc. Original ground Outside Diameter Parking meter Pavement Pedestrian Point of intersection Point of reverse curve Portland Cement Concrete Point on tangent Polyvinylchloride Pothole Power poles Property line Public utility easement Pull box G GALV GPM GV GPS GB GP HP HPG HOR IN. IW ID INV JP Km L LF LP LPG LS MH MAX M mm MIN MISC N,S,E,W N'LY OG OD PM PVMT PED PI PRC POC POT PVC PH PP P/L PUE PB Sheet 1 of 2 Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 6/03 ALL ABBREVIATIONS REVIEWED `Date 2/00 9/25/02 Date STD PLAN 502J 1 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Standard Abbreviations Radius R Rehabilitate REHAB Reinforce,(ed), Ong) REINF Reinforced concrete pipe RCP Relative compaction RC Remote control valve RCV Residential driveway RES DWY Right of way R/W Rubberized Hot Asphalt Concrete RHAC Sheet SHT Side inlet catch basin SICB Sidewalk SWK Southern Pacific Railroad SPRR Specification SPEC Sprinkler head SH Square feet SF Square type SQ TYPE Standard STD Station STA Storm Drain SDMH Storm Drain Manhole SD Street Name Sign SNS Street light conduit SL Subdivision SUBD Survey Monument MON Tangent T Telephone (underground) TEL Telephone pole TP Top of curb TOC Traffic signal conduit TS Tree well TW Typical TYP Underground Service Alert USA Underground Utility Vault UUV Union Pacific Railroad UPRR Vertical curve VC Vitrified clay pipe VCP Wastewater WW Wastewater Manhole WWMH Wastewater service WWS Water W Water service WS Water service box WSB Water valve WV Weakened plane joint WPJ Woodbridge Irrigation Dist WID Yard YD Sheet 2 of 2 Dr. KT No. Date Revision Ch. WS `Date 2/00 1 9/03 ALL ABBREVIATIONS REVIEWED Appr. I Approved B 9/25/02 Date STD PLAN 5O2i CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1 DRAFTING SYMBOLS EXISTING ----(18"SD ----H 4"W H — — — — N2070 /° 0R --E6"WW— 0 PPTP GP JP C X X ((,) 9 X CONSTRUCT 18"SD> 4"W N2070). •RR ID • Y z 6-0 PP TP GP JP F X X X 0 0 O 0.02 - Centerline - Right -of -Way / Property Line - SD, WW or IW (noted) with direction - W or Other Underground Utilities - C,G&S - High Point in Flow Line - Manhole W/ Manhole Number - Rehab Ex Manhole - Riser - WW Cleanout - Point Repair - Side Inlet Catch Basin - Drop Inlet Catch Basin - Fire Hydrant - Water Valve - Blow -off - Reducer - Water Service Shutoff - Cap & Blind Flange - Centerline Survey Monument - City of Lodi Bench Mark - Traffic Signal Head - Pedestrian Head - Electrolier (mast. arm type) - Electrolier (concrete standard) - Utility Pole (type as noted) - Guy Anchor - Sign (type as noted) - Street Name Sign - Fence (type as noted) - Deciduous & other Leafed Trees - Pine, Fir or Cedar Trees - Hedge or Bush - Slope of Pipe Dr. KT No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 7/01 UPDATE PER FIRST REVISION 2 9/03 REVISED SICB SYMBOL Date 11/08 3 11/08 REVISED WW CLEANOUT Approved By: 1 F.�Wally Sandelin Ci y Engineer R.C.E. 39895 /25/02 Date STD PLAN 503 ,, CITY OF LODI'1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ((I Pipe Marker DETAIL A Notes: 1. Posts to be 4"x4" foundation grade Redwood or pressure treated Douglas Fir 2. Posts to be encased in concrete — 8" diameter x 2' deep 3. Posts shall be painted white using 2 coats 4. Use 1/2" block black lettering on both sides of the post in line with the pipe 5. Posts shall state diameter and type of pipe as follows: Examples: 1) 8—INCH 2) 24—INCH 3) 12—INCH WATER WASTE STORM MAIN WATER DRAIN See Detail A Ground Surface 111 111 Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS Date 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 505 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Trench Structural Section Requirements 1 Neat cut per Note —6" Typ. 1b (typ) Ex. A.C. Ex. A.B. A.C. patch per Note 1. Type 1 Patch (Standard, unless Type 2 or 3 is specified) Ex. A.C. "t" -n 4" A.B. per Note ld. Backfill per detail Type 2 Patch Ex. A.C. Ex. A.B. Trench width >12" Trench width >6" A.B. per Note. 1d. Backfill per detail A.C.patch per Note 1. r.-6" Typ. Grind ex. A.C. See Note 2 ("t"=1-1/2"min., 4"max.) A.C. Patch per Note 1. Type 3 Patch Trench width >6" A.B. per Note. 1d. Backfill per detail PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT Backfill: Native material © 90% R.C. except approved select material or A.B. CI. 2 © 95% required for: a.) Type 2 patch b.) Excavation smaller than 3'x3' BACKFILL Ex. surface f 24" max. Pipe bedding per Std Plan 501 1" A.C. per Note 1 c. Compact w/ narrow shoe. Slurry cement backfill per Sec. 6-19.03 of the Construction Specifications. Sand or approved Conduit backfill material O.D.+1" compacted to 90% min. R.C. 1" min. <12" must have "T" cut 3" & Smaller Conduit (Wheel Cut Trench) Pavement replacement per above. Trench Notes: 1. Type 1 Patch: a) Total AC thickness to match existing plus 1", 4" minimum applied in two lifts. b) Drop hammer or other rough cut allowed for initial cut along trench wall. Final AC removal per Sec. 6-15.02 "Removal Method" of the Construction Specification. c) AC replacement per Sec. 6-39.04 "Trench Replacement and Shoulder Paving" of the Construction Specifications. d) AB thickness per Plans. AB may be replaced by additional AC (50% of req'd AB thickness). Toe of gutter -1I L — — — J I— 12"min. Replace A.C. to toe over ex. subgrade if "A" is less than 24" Adjacent to Gutter SPECIAL CASES 2. Type 2 patch optional, except when required by the City. Grind depth "t" shall be adjusted to match existing overlay thickness. 3. Type 3 Patch to be used when shown on the plans or as approved by the Engineer, generally on streets to be overlayed. 4. Controlled density fill (CDF) may be used for backfill with the prior approval of the Engineer. Dr. KT No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 REVISED AB PATTERN Date 12/00 Approved By: Wl F. Wally Sande City Fngineer R.C.E. 39895 9/25/02 Date STD PLAN 506 CITY OF LODIIJ[ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Joint Trenching Details ,) Parkway Water service box 1" Water service 4" Sewer service Water service box ir° 3'-0" C 10' P.U.E. Limit of W&WW service by offsite Contractor. 00 Typical Trench Section No Parkway Sidewalk 1" Water service 4" Sewer service Note: 1. Also See Std Plans 201, 203, 403, & 414. 12" Min. 24" Max. // // R%W th On—site W&WW by plumber See Sheet 507 2 of 2 For Details Limit of W&WW service by offsite Contractor. fl Typical Trench Section Parkway 1 On—site W&WW by plumber See Sheet 507 2 of 2 For Details 1 of 2 Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. ws 1 9/03 ADDED PARKWAY LAYOUT `Date N. 2/00 Approved By: F. Wally9/25/02 City ngineer - Date R.C.E. 39895 STD PLAN 5O7} CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Joint Trenching Details —6" —III—I I (— Street side 2'-10' max. 5'-0" 6 I—III-1 1 Property side 1" Water service See Std Pln 403 4" Wastewater See Std Pln 203 Communications Gas Cable T.V. Primary Electrical Secondary Electrical Trench Section Electric, telephone, and cable T.V. boxes to be set as de— termined by each agency in the 10' P.U.E. 2 of 2 Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. ws 1 9/03 ADDED PARKWAY LAYOUT `Date N. 2/00 Approved By: F. Wally Sandel City Engineer R.C.E. 39895 9/25/02 Date STD PLAN 5O7} CITY OF LStandard Utility Locations PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT In Streets Gutter lip is 15' from C/L with new 50' planter strip section. 6' 12' Varies 6' 12' WW Wastewater SD Storm Dra W Water CD Center Line W Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. CH. WS ` Date N. 2/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 601 CITY OF LODI' [Standard Utility Locations In Easements/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Private Streets 20' 6' 10' 6' 2 0 2' W W Edge of Easement/ Private Street � 2 2' 6' i WW Wastewater SD Storm Drain JT Joint Trench* W Water Center Line * See Std Plan 507 for Details Notes: Private utilities to be located outside of limits shown unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. 0 cn 20' Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS `1 N. 2/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 602 } CITY OF LODI''1 ••.gym+ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Street Name Sign Location 0 0 w 0 J RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL OR COLLECTOR 4 LANE COLLECTOR, ARTERIAL, OR THOROUGHFARE • Place one (1) street • Place two (2) street with a 4 LANE CO • Place two (2) street ARTERIALS, or THO — Street Name Sign 4 LANE COLLECTOR, ARTERIAL, OR THOROUGHFARE r sign at the intersection of two RESIDENTIALS. signs at the intersection of a RESIDENTIAL or COLLECTOR LLECTOR, ARTERIAL, or THOROUGHFARE. signs at the intersection of any two 4 LANE COLLECTORS, ROUGHFARES or any combination thereof. Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. ws `1 N. 2/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 603 } CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Title Block For Private Engineers 41F City of Lodi Title Block See Detail On Sheet 2 of 2 Professional Engineers Stamp Consultant or Firm Logo Additional space may be used as needed to the left of the engineers space. (See Detail On This Sheet) 7g! U C1 674r, 1-o # Standard City of Lodi Drawing Sheet 22"x34" or 24"x36" 4" 1-1/2" Preoarec in the office of: Designed uncer the supervision of: RCE Sheet 1 of 2 Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 9/03 NEW TITLE BLOCK 2 2/04 ADDED SHEET 2 `Date 2/00 2/12/0L Date STD PLAN 604i r CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Title Block For Private Engineers 9 Left blank for city use only According to number of sheets in set. PRINT DATE PLAN SET 1 OF 5 SHEET NO. Cl 004D001-01 DRAWING NO. Notes: Optional sheet numbering for engineering firm, may contain numbers and/or letters Must use city provided number and maintain accending numerical sequence (ie. 01 ,02,03) 1. All work for the City of Lodi shall use this standard. 2. All sheets within a set shall be the same size. 3. City of Lodi shall provide original drawing numbers, And all sets shall be numbered accordinc_ to the number of sheets in the set. 4. City of Lodi will provide title blocks in AutoCAD format upon request. 5. Hans shall also conform to the City of Lodi Public Improvement Design Standards section 5 (Sc appendix A. 6. If plans are to be reduced to a half scale set, 22" x 34" sheets size must be used. Sheet 2 of 2 Dr. GWC No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 2/04 ADDITION OF SHEET 2 Date 2/04 2/12/OL Date STD PLAN 604} CITY OF LODI) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Map Statements (PARCEL MAPS) ENGINEER'S/SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT This map was prepared by me or under my direction and is based upon a field survey in conformance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and Local ordinance at the request of in . I hereby state that this parcel map substantially conforms to the approved or conditionally approved tentative map, if any. All monuments are of the character and occupy the positions indicated and are sufficient to enable the survey to be retraced. Dated this day of 20__ (Engineer) (Surveyor) (License No.) (Registration) (License) expiration date: (PARCEL MAPS) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT'S STATEMENT This map conforms with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and local ordinance. (Pursuant to the authority of Ordinance No. 1302 of the City of Lodi, I accept on behalf of the public for public use the offer of dedication of [all Public Utility easements] [sight—obstruction easement] [landscape easement] [all street rights—of—way] [the (width)—foot widening of right—of—way along Street name] [relinquishment to the City of Lodi all access rights of (Parcel Numbers) to and from (Street name)*(except at the approved access openings)*] all as shown on this Parcel Map.) Gated this day of 20__. Wesley K. Fujitani, R.C.E. 30418 Senior Civil Engineer Registration expiration date: 3-31— [Ex -31—[Ex Officio City Clerk of the City of Lodi] (PARCEL MAP) OWNER'S STATEMENT We, the undersigned, hereby state that we are all the parties having record title interest in the land subdivided and shown on this Parcel Map and we hereby consent to the preparation and filing of this Parcel Map in the office of the County Recorder of San Joaquin County, California. We also offer for dedication to the public for public use [all Public Utility easements] [all street rights—of—way] [ the (width)—foot widening of right—of—way along (Street Name)] [to the City of Lodi lot (No.) [relinquish to the City of Lodi all access rights of (Parcel Numbers) to and from (Street Name) *(except at the approved access openings)*] all as shown on this Parcel Map. Dated this day of 20__. (Print Name/Title) (Print Name/Title) *Use only if applicable* Sheet 1 of 5 Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 FULL STATEMENT REVIEW 2 2/04 REVISED OWNER'S STATEMENT `Date 7/08 3 7/08 REVISED DIRECTOR'S STATEMENT Approved By: F. Wally Sandelin City Engineer R.C.E. 39895 C"C(2/4".— 2/12/04 Date STD PLAN 605i CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Map Statements (FINAL MAP, PARCEL MAP, RECORD OF SURVEY) RECORDER'S STATEMENT Filed this day of , 20__, at _.M. in (Book, Volume) of (Maps & Hats, Parcel Map, Record of Survey) at page , at the request of Fee: $ By: Assessor/Recorder/County Clerk Assistant/Deputy Recorder ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of On before me, (Insert name and title of the officer) personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same in his,her,their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his,her,their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. ceritfy under PENALTY OF PURJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal Signature (Seal) (FINAL MAP) OWNER'S STATEMENT We, the undersigned, hereby state that we are all the parties having record title interest in the lands subdivided and shown on this Final Map of "Tract No. , Subdivisions of San Joaquin County, (Name of Subdivision)", City of Lodi, California, and we hereby consent to the preparation and filing of this Final Map in the office of the County Recorder of San Joaquin County, California. We also offer for dedication to the public for public use [at Public Utility easements] [sight obstruction easement] [landscape easement] [all street rights—of—way] [ the (width)—foot widening of right—of—way along (Street Name)] [to the City of Lodi lot (No.) [relinquish to the City of Lodi all access rights of (Lot Numbers) to and from (Street Name) *(except at the approved access openings)*] all as shown on this Final Map. Dated this day of 20__. (Print Name/Title) *Use only if applicable* (Print Name/Title) Sheet 2 of 5 Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 FULL STATEMENT REVIEW 2 9/05 GENERAL REVISIONS `Date 7/08 3 7/08 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT REVISIONS Approved B F. Wally Sanin City Engineer Date R.C.E. 39895 9/20/05 STD PLAN 605 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Map Statements (FINAL MAP) [ENGINEER'S] [SURVEYOR'S] STATEMENT This map was prepared by me or under my direction and is based upon a field survey in conformance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and local ordinance at the request of (name of person authorizing map) on (date). I hereby state that this final map substantially conforms to the conditionally approved tentative map. I further state that all the monuments shown hereon will be of the character and occupy the positions indicated before said subdivision improvements are accepted by the City of Lodi, and that said monuments will be sufficient to enable this survey to be retraced. Dated this day of 20__ [Engineer] [Surveyor] (License No.) [Registration] [License] expiration date: (FINAL MAPS) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT'S STATEMENT I, Wesley K. Fujitani, hereby state that I am a Senior Civil Engineer for the City of Lodi, California and that I have examined this Final Map of "Tract No. , Subdivisions of San Joaquin County, (Name of Subdivision)", City of Lodi, California and that the subdivision shown hereon is substantially the same as it appeared on the tentative map, and any approved alternations thereof. I further state that this Final Map complies with all the provisions of Title 16 of the Lodi Municipal Code, and any amendments thereto, applicable at the time of approval of the tentative map. Dated this day of 20__ Wesley K. Fujitani, R.C.E. 30418 Senior Civil Engineer Registration expiration date - (FINAL MAPS) CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT His is to state that at its regularly held meeting on the day of 20__, the City Council of the City of Lodi, California approved this Final Map of "Tract No. , Subdivisions of San Joaquin County, (Name of Subdivision)", City of Lodi, California, and accepted on behalf of the public for public use the offer of dedication of [all Public Utility Easements] [sight obstruction easement] [landscape easement] [accepted on behalf of the City the relinquishment to the City of Lodi all access rights of (Lot Numbers) to and from (Street Name) * (except at the approved access openings)*] all as shown on this Final Map and accepted the offer of dedication of [all street rights—of—way] [the (width)—foot widening of right—of—way along Street name][Lot (No.)] to the City of Lodi subject to satisfactory completion of improvements thereon of said street rights—of—way [and lot (No.) in accordance with Title 16 of the Lodi Municipal Code, and any amendments thereto, applicable at the time of approval of the tentative map. Dated this day of 20__ Randy Johl (City Clerk) City Clerk and Clerk of the City Council Sheet 3 of 0 Dr- KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 FULL STATEMENT REVIEW 2 2/04 REVISED FINAL MAP STATEMENT `Date 7/08 3 7/08 REVISED DIRECTOR'S STATEMENT Approved B F. Wally Sanin City Engineer Date R.C.E. 39895 2/12/04 STD PLAN 605 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Map Statements * Notes (Use where applicable) Refer to tentative map application No. 2. Requirements of the Lodi Municipal Code for the dedication of rights—of—way, easements, abandonment of underground tanks and wets, payment of fees and installation of off—site street improvements and utilities have not been met at this time and must be met prior to development or issuance of a building permit or when requested by the City (on Parcels 3 The P.U.E. dedication to the City of Lodi gives the City, owners of public utilities, and owners of cable TV franchises the right to access, construct, maintain, inspect, repair, replace, remove, and operate their facilities in the P.U.E.'S. No buildings or structures shall be constructed nor shall anything be planted within the easement which would interfere with the use or operation of public utilities in the easement. 4. The sight obstruction easement grants the City of Lodi the right to maintain, repair, replace or remove obstructions, both publicly and privately owned, together with the right of access necessary for the maintaining, repairing, replacing or removing said obstructions, in, over, under and across said easement. No buildings or structures shall be constructed and no shrubbery, plantings, mounds or other obstructions over 30 inches high shall be placed within said easement which would interfere with the line of sight at the adjacent intersection. Any poles or trees shall be spaced far enough apart to provide adequate sight and tree limbs shall be at least 7 feet above the ground. 5. Lot except areas covered by buildings or structures shown on the approved building permit plans and subsequent revisions thereto is hereby offered as a public utility easement. "Subsequent revisions" to the plans shall be approved by the affected utilities and any necessary utility relocations wit be made at the expense of the developer/owner. 6. (For Overhead Public Utility Easements) Buildings and structures in comformance with current zoning and building ordinaces are permitted in the (north/south/west/east) feet of the (width)—foot overhead public utility to a maximum height of 23 feet. Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 FULL STATEMENT REVIEW 2 2/04 ADDED NOTE #6 Date 2/00 Apprpved By: F. Wally Sand In City Engineer R.C.E. 39895 2/12/04 Date Sheet 4 of 5 STD PLANIII 605 yF CITY OF LODI') Map Statements fF�s PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT / (FINAL MAPS) CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATION OF ABANDONMENT OF PUBLIC (STREET/ALLEY. UTILITY) EASEMENTS This is to certify that at its regularly held meeting on the day of , 20__, the City Council of the City of Lodi, California, by its approval of this final map of "Tract No. Subdivisions of San Joaquin County, (Subdivision Name), did abandon each and every (Street Right—of—Way/Easement, Public Utility Easement) identified in the (Parcel Map, Final Map, Easement, Deed), filed for record , 20__, (Book/Volume Number Page Number Instrument Number), San Joaquin County Records. Dated this day of 20__. (City Clerk) City Clerk and Clerk of the City Council of the City of Lodi, California (FINAL MAP) *CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION (Do not combine with Owner's Statement) The following real property is dedicated by (name and address of subdivider dedicating the property), for purpose of (name public improvement or construction of public facility): (Legal Description) The City of Lodi shall reconvey the property to the subdivider if the City of Lodi makes a determination pursuant to Government Code Section 66477.5 that the same public purpose for which the property was dedicated does not exist, or the property or any portion thereof, is not needed for public utilities. *Applies only to dedication in fee (See Section 66477.5). Use only if applicable. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR'S CERTIFICATION Abandonment only Abandonment of (Street Right—of—Way/Easement/Public Utility Easement) This map conforms with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and local ordinance. I certify that a (street/alley right—of—way easement public utility easement) accepted by record information as filed on 20__, [(Instrument No. Map(Book/Volume Number, Page Number)] Official Records San Joaquin County, is abandoned by the recordation of this parcel map. Dated this day of 20__. Richard C. Prima, Jr., R.C.E. 28183 Public Works Director Ex—Officio City Clerk of the City of Lodi Sheet 5 of 5 Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 9/03 FULL STATEMENT REVIEW 2 2/04 REMOVED RECORD OF SURVEY Date 2/00 R.C.E. 39895 2/12/04 Date STD PLAN 605 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Rainfall Intensity Tc = Time of Concentration H minutes (See Design Stds §3.200) I = Rainfall Intensity in inches per hour, 2±yr storm I = 5.51*(Tc)^(-0.63) Tc 1 Tc 1 Tc 1 Tc 1 10 1.29 40 0.54 90 0.32 240 0.17 11 1.22 41 0.53 95 0.31 245 0.17 12 1.15 42 0.52 100 0.30 250 0.17 13 1.09 43 0.52 105 0.29 255 0.17 14 1.04 44 0.51 110 0.29 260 0.17 15 1.00 45 0.50 115 0.28 265 0.16 16 0.96 46 0.49 120 0.27 270 0.16 17 0.92 47 0.49 125 0.26 275 0.16 18 0.89 48 0.48 130 0.26 280 0.16 19 0.86 49 0.47 135 0.25 285 0.16 20 0.83 50 0.47 140 0.24 290 0.15 21 0.81 51 0.46 145 0.24 295 0.15 22 0.79 52 0.46 150 0.23 300 0.15 23 0.76 53 0.45 155 0.23 305 0.15 24 0.74 54 0.45 160 0.23 310 0.15 25 0.73 55 0.44 165 0.22 315 0.15 26 0.71 56 0.44 170 0.22 320 0.15 27 0.69 57 0.43 175 0.21 325 0.14 28 0.68 58 0.43 180 0.21 330 0.14 29 0.66 59 0.42 185 0.21 335 0.14 30 0.65 60 0.42 190 0.20 340 0.14 31 0.63 61 0.41 195 0.20 345 0.14 32 0.62 62 0.41 200 0.20 350 0.14 33 0.61 63 0.41 205 0.19 355 0.14 34 0.60 64 0.40 210 0.19 360 0.14 35 0.59 65 0.40 215 0.19 365 0.13 36 0.58 70 0.38 220 0.18 370 0.13 37 0.57 75 0.36 225 0.18 375 0.13 38 0.56 80 0.35 230 0.18 380 0.13 39 0.55 85 0.34 235 0.18 385 0.13 Dr' KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS `Date N. 12/00 Approved By: 12/28/00 Date R.C.E. 39895 STD PLAN 606,,, CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Gutter Hydraulic Capacities Assumptions: Street Cross Slope = 21/2% Manning's "n" = .015 Pavement hike -up at toe of curb = 3/8" DRIVEWAY -TYPE CURB & GUTTER Street Flooding Depth Area from top of curb Q/SA (1/2) (ft) (SF) (ft.) 0.20 0.2 2.1 5.1 0.21 0.3 2.6 5.2 0.22 0.3 3.0 5.6 0.23 0.3 3.5 6.1 0.24 0.3 3.9 6.8 0.25 0.4 4.4 7.7 0.26 0.4 4.8 8.6 0.27 0.5 5.3 9.8 0.28 0.5 5.7 1 1 .1 0.29 0.6 6.2 12.5 0.30 0.7 6.6 14.2 0.31 0.7 7.1 15.9 0.32 0.8 7.5 17.9 0.33 0.9 8.0 20.1 0.34 1 .0 8.4 22.4 0.35 1 .0 8.9 25.0 0.36 1.1 9.3 27.8 0.37 1.2 9.8 31.0 0.38 1 .3 10.2 34.2 0.39 1.4 10.7 37.5 0.40 1.6 1 1 .1 41.2 0.41 1.7 11.6 45.0 0.42 1 .8 12.0 49.3 FLOW EXCEEDS TOP OF CURB Q -Flow in cfs S -Slope in curb and gutter SQUARE -TYPE CURB & GUTTER Street Flooding Depth Area from top of curb Q/S^ (1/2) (ft) (SF) (ft.) 0.20 0.2 3.3 3.6 0.21 0.3 3.7 4.2 0.22 0.3 4.1 5.0 0.23 0.3 4.5 5.8 0.24 0.4 4.9 6.8 0.25 0.4 5.3 8.0 0.26 0.5 5.7 9.3 0.27 0.6 6.1 10.7 0.28 0.6 6.5 12.2 0.29 07 6.9 14.0 0.30 0.8 7.3 15.9 0.31 0.8 7.7 17.9 0.32 0.9 8.1 20.2 0.33 1 .0 8.5 22.7 0.34 1.1 8.9 25.3 0.35 1 .2 9.3 28.1 0.36 1.3 9.7 31.1 0.37 1.4 10.1 34.4 0.38 1 .5 10.5 37.8 0.39 1 .6 10.9 41.5 0.40 1.7 1 1 .3 45.4 0.41 1.8 1 1 .7 49.6 0.42 1.9 12.1 54.0 0.43 2.0 12.5 58.6 0.44 2.2 12.9 63.5 0.45 2.3 13.3 68.6 0.46 2.4 13.7 73.9 0.47 2.6 14.1 79.6 0.48 2.7 14.5 85.4 0.49 2.9 14.9 91.8 0.50 3.0 15.3 98.2 FLOW EXCEEDS TOP OF CURB Dr. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 2/04 REVISED FORMULA `Date 2/00 2/1 2/0L Date STD PLAN 6O8 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Sanitary Sewer Leakage Test Project First Test Date Test Section Station MH to MH Contractor Inspector HYDROSTATIC TEST Allowable leakage shall not exceed 0.6 gallons per hour per inch diameter per 100 feet of pipe. TAPS: Lot # TAPS: Length#._ Water level at start of test AIR TEST Use largest pipe size under pressure and circle below. "Holding Time" represents minimum time for pressure loss from 3.5 psi to 2.5 psi. Pipe Factor Length Allowable loss Size (gph/ft) LF in gallons 4" 0.024 x = 6" 0.036 x = 8" 0.048 x = 10" 0.060 x = 12" 0.072 x = 18" 0.108 x = 24" 0.144 x = 30" 0.180 x = x = 48"MH 0.300 x _ high = Allowable loss: one hour = gal. Pipe Holding time Size in minutes 4" = 2 6" = 3 8" = 4 10" = 5 12" = 6 18" = 9 24" = 11 30" = 14 Gallon Loss: Air Time: Date Time Actual/Allowable Actual/Required Pass Fail Inspector All utilities in and compaction completed: yes no Remarks: Dr. KT No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS 1 04/07 REVISED FACTORS `Dat Date 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 610 CITY OF LR/W Corner Cut—off & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Curb Return Requirements Curb Face NOTES 1. See Std. Plan 612 for curb return layout. 2. Provide corner cut—off for curb return radius required in Table below. T Radius Point Back of walk L LEGEND A = Distance along curb face from curb return to back of walk angle point. B Distance between back of walk and R/W. C Corner cut—off length. D Central angle in degrees. E = B.O.W. dist. from angle pt. to R/W angle pt. L = Length of ramp plus landing. W� R = Curb return radius per Table T = R/W tangent distance in ft. W = Distance from face of curb to back of walk H ft. FORMULAS A = R—W—[ (R—L) / cos(D/2) ] or (R—W) /tan(D/2) — (R—L) /sin(D/2) tan (D/2) C = 2Tcos(D/2) A E = Btan(D/4) L = 10' for R = 20' & 25' 12' for R = 30' (Sc 35' _ (R—W—B)tan(D/2) + R—W—B—[ (R—L—B) / cos(D/2) ] tan (D/2) CURB RETURN RADIUS TABLE Minor Std. Minor Major Industrial Arterial intersection of: Res. Res. Collector Collector (Local) Face—Face Minor Res. 34' 20' — Std. Res. 39' 20' 20' — Minor Col. 44' 20' 20' 25' — Major Col. 52' 20' 20' 25' 30' — Ind. Local 52' — — — 30' 30' — Arterial 64' 25' 25' 30' 30' 35' 35' Other >64' * * SPECIAL DESIGN * * D r. KT No Date Revision Appr. Ch. WS `Dat 12/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 611 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Curb Return Layout Plan Face of curb R/W St. Light R/W angle point staked by surveyor 4 Radius and Delta per plans ECR Toe of Gutter I_xpansion Joint Traffic Signal Pole Wheelchair Ramp per Std. Plan 132a 1/4" Score 1'± for at returns 4 St. Sign Post See Std. Plan 119 F.H. See Note 1 r Crosswalk Per Std. Plan 141 Motes: 1. Curb return to back of walk angle point distance varies. When actual distance is less than 2', curb return shall be placed at back of walk angle point and curb return curve forced to fit. 2. BCR and ECR station per plans (nominal, see note 1) 3. L=10' for R=20' and 25'; 12' for R=30' and 35' Expansion joint Weakened Plane joint BCR Optional SICB location, joints per ECR D r. KT No Date Revision Appr. CH. WS ` Date N. 2/00 12/28/00 Date STD PLAN 612J CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GENERAL NOTES MARKER DETAILS LEGEND NOTES 1. MINIMUM PROJECTED AREA OF REFLECTIVE FACE = 1.00 SQUARE INCH. 2. REFLECTIVE MARKERS NEED NOT BE RECTANGULAR. LEGEND • TYPE A WHITE NON -REFLECTIVE 9 TYPE AY YELLOW NON -REFLECTIVE • TYPE C RED -CLEAR RETROREFLECTIVE TYPE D TWO-WAY YELLOW RETROREFLECTIVE TWO-WAY BLUE RETROREFLECTIVE • TYPE G ONE-WAY CLEAR RETROREFLECTIVE TYPE H ONE-WAY YELLOW RETROREFLECTIVE LINES 4" WHITE gggg 4" YELLOW DIRECTION OF TRAVEL MARKER DETAILS A r0.63" - 0.80" F / 1 REFLECTIVE 4"DIA±0.125" FACE TYPE A & TYPE AY 0.40" - 0.75" r 0.40" - 0.75" 4"±0.125" 4"±0.125" / \ o0000000ir,. t 2" - 4"±0.125" TYPE G & TYPE H 2" - 4"±0.125" TYPE C & TYPE D Dr. JSB No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. PJF 1 2/05 ADDED BLUE REFLECTOR PJF Date 2/04 Appred By: 9 F. Wally Sandelin 2/2/05 C•ty Date R.C.E. 39895 STD PLAN 700 // CITY OF LODI LANE STRIPING TYPICAL DETAIL FOR SPEED PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ZONES 40 MPH OR LESS DETAIL 1 DETAIL 2 CENTER LINES (2 LANE HIGHWAYS) 8.5' I 7' 7' 18.5' 48' a NO PASSING ZONE (ONE DIRECTION) DETAIL 15 T If17 �I 7' If17 yI T lEiEigEiEiEiEiEiEiEPPPPPPPPPPPPPDPNEigiEiglEig DETAIL 16 48' 85 1 7' I 8.5' 1 8.5' I 7' I 8.5 adminunionianigagang 3" I-•.-24'-0-1 24'-0--I 2" LANE LINES (MULTILANE HIGHWAYS) DETAIL 8 7' If 17' 7' r.-17' - 7' DETAIL 9 851 7' r.-1T f17' 7' 8.5' 1 48' 1.1010. Dr. JSB No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. PJF Date 2/04 Apprgved By: /J e. F. Wally Sandelin 2/1 c �' Liigineei R.C.E. 39895 2/04 Date STD PLAN 701 CITY OF LODI LANE STRIPING TYPICAL DETAIL FOR SPEED PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ZONES 45 MPH OR MORE DETAIL 5 12' CENTER LINES (2 LANE HIGHWAYS) DETAIL 6 r_18' DETAIL 18 36' - -- 12' a_ �12'�18 NO PASSING ZONE (ONE DIRECTION) x-12' 36' 8 EigiEiEn ENEMENEDIENEMENEDIENEDIENEDDIEDIEDIENEDIEDIE DETAIL 19 Dr. JSB No. —18' 12' �f-18 ENENENEYFTWWWWWWERM 1 1 3 I-••••— 24' 24' 2" Date Revision Appr. Ch. PJF Date 2/04 LANE LINES (MULTILANE HIGHWAYS) DETAIL 11 1- 12' DETAIL 12 LI Apprgved By: 36' - r 12' 48' 18' 12,-r-18' Li F. Wally Sandelin 2/04 City Engineer Date R.C.E. 39895 STD PLAN 702-1 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TYPICAL DETAIL NO PASSING ZONES NO PASSING ZONE (TWO DIRECTIONS) DETAIL 21 NO PASSING ZONE (TWO DIRECTIONS) DETAIL 22 24' 3" 24' r 2" ® 24' 1 11 24'-1 2 Dr. JSB No. Date Revision Appr. Appr ed By: Ch. PJF Date 2/04 Wally Sandelin City Engineer R.C.E. 39895 2/12/04 Datn STD PLAN 702-2 CITY OF LODI EDGELINE AND MEDIAN LANE STRIPING PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT J l TYPICAL DETAILS LEFT EDGELINES (DIVIDED HIGHWAYS) DETAIL 24 momEgggooppopmemoomm0000� DETAIL 25 - EDGE OF TRAVEL WAY ® EDGE OF TRAVEL WAY 48' 2 2" 2" DETAIL 25A— USE ON FREEWAY RAMPS AND CONNECTORS 2" eeeeeeeeeeeeeee� a � a00000000aaaaaaa�� DETAIL 26 24' 24' 2" EDGE OF TRAVEL WAY 7— EDGE OF TRAVEL WAY DETAIL 27 48' ►1 aJ 000000000000000000000000000000000000000�� 000000000000000000000000000000000000000 ® EDGE OF TRAVEL WAY 48' ►� 2" 2" 3" 2" DETAIL 27B RIGHT EDGELINES WHITE EDGE OF TRAVEL WAY —f RIGHT EDGELINES (EXTENSION THROUGH INTERSECTION) DETAIL 27C 3' DETAIL 28 12' 3' 12' 3' 12' 3'r -o— MEDIAN ISLANDS 2'(MIN.) DETAIL 29 24, 3im" 3" 24' El I 2" 2" Dr. JSB No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. PJF 2/05 REVISED DIMENSION Date 2/04 Apprgved By: Wally Sandelin 2/2/05 " ity Engineer Dat, R.C.E. 39895 STD PLAN 703 f CITY OF LODI )PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANE DETAILS DETAIL 31 DETAIL 32 TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANES igmgm*E*E*E*E*E*E*E*E*E*E*E*E*E*E*E*E*E*E*E*Egmo r 3" go2ogo2ogo 7127 *VS* 36' q*'egM 12' MgM 36' roo.':X01 1444441 10' MIN —1 Mggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggl 24' 24' 96' 24 24 24' 24' A 24' geLioge.gogqogqogeLiogqogqogqogeLiogqogqogeLiogqogqogeLiogqogqogeLiogqogqogeLiogqogeLioge.gogoigogoigogoigogoigogoigogeLiqqoPPgq 0.940°.°0,940,940,940.940.940.940.940.940.940.940.940.940.940,30°.".°40°.".°0°.°0°.°0°.°44.44.44.44.44.44.44.44.0.94.0.944. [3' °0,30°0,30°0 18' —tii—-12' 36' 12' 36' "Eiqe"5iotie"Eio 12 18' Lgi 10' MIN. .3.30°030°030°030°030°030°030°030°030°030°030°030°030°030°030°030°030°030°030°030°030°0°0°.°0°0°0°0°0°.°030"020"03.3.0.303.0.303.00.30°. 021 021 021 021 021 1121 96' 1 3J Dr. JSB No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. PJF 1 2/05 REVISED MIN. LANE DIMENSION Date 2/04 Appr ved By: Aatacith,;_ . Wally Sandelin 2/2/05 ity Engineer Datn R.C.E. 39895 STD PLAN 704 CITY OF LODI LANE DROPS CHANNELIZING LANES PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TYPICAL DETAILS DETAIL 37 El 30' DETAIL 37B El LANE DROP AT EXIT RAMPS REPEAT AT HALF MILE INTERVALS 30' 30' 30' 6' I 3' 1 12' 1 3' 1 6' E 8" WHITE LINE LANE DROP AT INTERSECTION 30' 30' 6' 1 3' 1 1 3' 1 6' THROUGH TRAFFIC DETAIL 38 8" WHITE LINE II L— 24' CI THROUGH TRAFFIC DETAIL 38A 8" WHITE LINE CHANNELIZING LINE Jr -F2" 8" WHITE LINE 6' El DETAIL 38B 3' 6' 3 El 6' 1 —300' 0 SEE DETAIL 38B STD PLAN 705 I6 [-'n- 1:11 SEE DETAIL 38 8" WHITE LINE 2.. L-24, 24.-d 211 Dr. JSB No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. PJF 2/05 REVISED DETAIL REFERENCE Date 2/04 Appr ed By: F. Wally Sandelin /2/05 Clty E ,glneer Date R.C.E. 39895 STD PLAN 705 CITY OF LODI BIKE LANE LINES LANE LINE EXTENSIONS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TYPICAL DETAILS DETAIL 39 6" WHITE LINE BIKE LANE LANES DETAIL 39A 6" WHITE LINE 8' 1 4' 1 8' 1 4' 1 8' 14' 200' LANE LINE EXTENSIONS THROUGH INTERSECTIONS DETAIL 40 DETAIL 40 4" WHITE LINE �I 1' If 6' — 1' If 6' — 1' 6' --•••-I 1' If INTERSECTION TYPE A NON -REFLECTIVE O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4' Dr. JSB No. Date Revision Appr. Apprgved By: Ch. PJF Date 2/04 F. Wally Sandelin City Engineer R.C.E. 39895 ,6a4A-cete,,;_ 2/12/04 Datn STD PLAN 706 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT LANE LINE STRIPING DETAIL 100' 48' 48' 48' 48' 100' NOTES REFER TO STANDARD PLANS FOR APPLICABLE STRIPING DETAILS TYPE G PAVEMENT MARKER Dr. JSB No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. PJF 1 8/13/07 ADDED TYPE G MARKER Date 2/04 Approved By: F. Wally Sandelin 8/13/07 City Engineer Date R.C.E. 39895 STD PLAN 707 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHOOL PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL CENTERLINE OR LEFT EDGELINE STRIPE (SEE NOTE 2) REFER TO STANDARD PLAN 141 FOR CROSSWALK LAYOUTS NOTE 1. CENTER LEGEND IN TRAVEL LANE AT 6' (MAX). 2. FOR MULTIPLE LANES, CENTER THE LEGEND IN TRAVEL LANES EXCLUDING PARKING LANE. 6' (MAX) Dr. JSB No. Date Revision Appr. Apprgved By: Ch. PJF Date 2/04 F. Wally Sandelin City Engineer R.C.E. 39895 ,6a4A-cete,,;_ 2/12/04 Datn STD PLAN 708 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STOP AHEAD PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL LIMIT LINE ADVANCE PLACEMENT DISTANCE* POSTED OR 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED STOP CONDITION 25 MPH SEE NOTE 1 30 MPH 100 FT 35 MPH 150 FT 40 MPH 225 FT 45 MPH 300 FT 50 MPH 375 FT AHEAD 8' 50' STOP 8' *REFERENCE MUTCD GUIDELINES FOR ADVANCE PLACEMENT OF WARNING SIGN TABLE* STOP SIGN (R1) SEE TABLE FOR DISTANCE STOP AHEAD SIGN (W17) NOTES 1. NO SUGGESTED MINIMUM DISTANCES ARE PROVIDED FOR THESE SPEEDS, AS PLACEMENT LOCATION IS DEPENDENT ON SITE CONDITIONS AND OTHER SIGNING TO PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE WARNING FOR THE DRIVER. Dr. JSB No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. PJF Date 2/04 Apprgved By: /Ja.w cw . Wally Sandelin 2/12/04 ity Engineer Datn R.C.E. 39895 STD PLAN 709 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PAVEMENT MARKING DETAILS 16" — 16" ■■u•.■ ■1■!■■■■ LANE WIDTH 1 14' 6` 20' 14' RAILROAD CROSSING SYMBOL A= 70 SQ FT.' 12 INCH GRID 'THE 70 SQ. FT. DOES NOT INCLUDE THE 2'X LANE WIDTH TRANSVERSE LINES - — 3.5' 10' j TYPE I (10) ARROW A= 4SO. FT. 12 INCH GRID 32.5" HAND CAPPED PARKING A=3 SO FT 6 INCH GRID 40"-11 78" 1 BIKE LANE SYMBOL A=7 SQ. FT. 4 INCH GRID 8' TYPE IV (L) ARROW (FOR TYPE IV(R) ARROW USE MIRROR IMAGE) A= 15 SQ. FT, 12 INCH GRID 7.25' .■■■ 1 ..011 I... 111P1F111101 uv■■1111■ [!■■5111■ milt -91•110 ••1u•i111• ■■■u■ilii■ ■u■ ■1111■ 13' TYPE VII (L) ARROW (FOR TYPE VII(R) ARROW USE MIRROR IMAGE) A= 27 SO. FT 12 INCH GRID 21" 60" BIKE LANE ARROW A= 7 SO. FT. 6 INCH GRID ARROWS TO BE INSTALLED 10' FROM BEGINNING OF TURN POCKET Dr. JP No. Date Raviyki A rova4 By: Ch, DK 8/17 REVERSED CYCLIST DIRECTION Date s C1.er` fJiy Engineer RCE No. 53149 STD PLAN 4(7 710-1 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2" BICYCLE LOOP DETECTOR SYMBOL Dr. JP Ch. DK Date Ito, Date 1 INCH GRID Rsvbrlar+ 8/17 REVERSED CYCLIST DIRECTION PAVEMENT MARKING DETAILS Approve B City Engineer RCE No. 53149 STD PLAN 710-2 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PAVEMENT MARKING DETAILS Co) 4" 4'-8" A=17.5 SQ. FT. /a 4" 4'-11 A=19.5 SQ. FT. J .1 4"—m■-] 4'-8" A=16.6 SQ. FT. 1 8" J A=27 SQ FT. 4" 4"� 4'-8" A=16.5 SQ. FT. I 8" A=24 SQ. FT.� 4" ALL PAVEMENT WORD HEIGHTS ARE 8' TALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. Dr. JSB No. Date Revision Appr. Approved By: Ch. PJF 1 8/13/07 ADDED 30 MPH LEGEND Date 2/04 F. Wally Sandelin / 8/13/07 City Engineer Date R.C.E. 39895 STD PLAN CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PAVEMENT MARKING DETAILS 1111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 110111111111111111111 11 1111111 1111111111111111 1111111111111111111 1111111111111111111 111111 I1 I1 1111111111111 111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111 M111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111 r 8" A=22 SQ. FT. 4 J 1 8" `.i �J 8' A=22 SQ. �T. A=24 SQ. FT. 4" 38" )) n Se— 8" A=23 SQ. FT. 1 L 4" A=6 SQ FT. 2" ALL PAVEMENT WORD HEIGHTS ARE 8' TALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. Dr. JSB No. Date Revision Appr. Apprgved By: Ch. PJF Date 2/04 F. Wally Sandelin bity Engineer R.C.E. 39895 2/12/04 Datr. STD PLAN 711-2 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PAVEMENT MARKING DETAILS 8" A=18 SQ, FT. A=21 SQ FT. 1111111111111111 111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111 11'11111111111111 1111111111111111 11111111111111111111 11111111111111111111 111'111111'1111111 1111111111111111 111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111 111'1'111111'111111 8" A=19 SQ. FT. 4" r 8" 32" A=26 SQ. FT. 4" �I i A=5 SQ. FT. 2" — ALL PAVEMENT WORD HEIGHTS ARE 8' TALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8" Dr. JSB No. Date Revision Appr. Apprgved By: Ch. PJF Date 2/04 F. Wally Sandelin City Engineer R.C.E. 39895 2/12/04 Dat, CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PAVEMENT MARKING DETAILS L A=31 SQ FT. 4" ALL PAVEMENT WORD HEIGHTS ARE 8' TALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. Dr. JSB No. Date Revision Appr. Apprgved By: Ch. PJF Date 2/04 F. Wally Sandelin City Engineer R.C.E. 39895 2/12/04 Datn CITY OF LODI ROADSIDE SIGN TYPICAL INSTALLATION PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PUBLIC DEPARTMENT 12' (MIN.) - 30' (MAX.) - /\ 0.1' 5' MIN. 4' MIN. E.T.W. E.T.W.= EDGE OF TRAVEL WAY LOCATION WITH NO CURBING/ AC BERM L Dr. JSB No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. PJF Date N. 2/04 pproxed By: F Wally Sandelin 2/11/04 City Engineer Datn R.C.E. 39895 STD PLAN 712 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT r BIKE LANE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL DETAIL 39 BIKE LANE ARROW — PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24A BIKE LANE SYMBOL, WITH PERSON PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24C SEE NOTE 1 5' 0 _}. 0 12' 10' SEE NOTE 2 CROSSWALK -<1 10' NOTES: 1. CENTER LEGEND IN BIKE LANE. ASSUME 8' MIN PARKING LANE WIDTH IF NO PARKING LANE STRIPED. 2. AT LOCATIONS WITHOUT CROSSWALKS, USE SIMILAR DIMENSIONS AS UNMARKED CROSSWALK. DK Date 1 4107 2 8117 Date RevIslon ADDED NOTES REMOVED "BIKE LANE" Aptx =d By: (at, I - RCE No 53149 7/r7 [HI■ STD PLAN 713 _ F CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STOP PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND DETAIL 21 INSTALL 50 LF OF DETAIL 21 PER CITY STD PLAN 702-2 NOTES: 12" WHITE STOP BAR SEE NOTE 1 5 10' 8' t 8' STOP INSTALL R1 STREET SIGN/POST PER CITY STD PLAN 119 & 612 INSTALL "STOP" LEGEND PER CITY STD PLAN 711-2 1. STOP BAR MAY BE INSTALLED AT ALTERNATE LOCATION AS APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER. Dr. KBG No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. PJF 1 2/05 NEW STANDARD PLAN ` Date 11/04 Approved By: F. Wally Sandelin 2/2/05 City Engineer Date R.C.E. 39895 STD PLAN 714 f CITY OF LORI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STOP PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND DETAIL 22 INSTALL 50 LF OF DETAIL 22 PER CITY STD PLAN 702-2 NOTES: 12" WHITE STOP BAR SEE NOTE 1 5' 10 + l 8' l� 8 • STOP INSTALL R1 STREET SIGN/POST PER CITY STD PLAN 119 & 612 INSTALL "STOP" LEGEND PER CITY STD PLAN 711-2 1. STOP BAR MAY BE INSTALLED AT ALTERNATE LOCATION AS APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER. Dr. KBG No. Date Revision Appr. Approved By: Ch. PJF 1 2/05 NEW STANDARD PLAN `Date 11/04 F. Wally Sandelin City Engineer R.C.E. 39895 2/2/05 Date STD PLAN 715 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FIRE HYDRANT PAVEMENT MARKER LOCATIONS • Om— • 6" 6" • 1 TWO LANE STREET MULTI -LANE STREET ■ J 6" 1 6" • Ow— TWO LANE STREET FOUR LANE STREET WITH AT INTERSECTION TURN LANE AT INTERSECTION 6" • MULTI -LANE STREET WITH TURN LANE LEGEND HYDRANT ■ BLUE RETROREFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKER PER STANDARD PLAN 700 Dr. KBG No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. PJF 1 2/05 NEW STANDARD PLAN � Date 11/04 pproxed By: F Wally Sandelin a 2/2/05 City Engineer Date R.C.E. 39895 CITY OF LODI YIELD PAVEMENT MARKING PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT INSTALL 50 LF OF DETAIL 21 PER CITY STD PLAN 702-2 INSTALL 50 LF OF DETAIL 21 PER CITY STD PLAN 702-2 YIELD MARKINGS LOCATION AT CROSSWALK 10' 4' INSTALL YIELD MARKINGS PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24E YIELD MARKINGS LOCATION WITHOUT CROSSWALK 10' L 4' CROSSWALK PER CITY STD PLAN 141 INSTALL YIELD MARKINGS PER CALTRANS STD PLAN A24E NOTES: 1. YIELD MARKINGS MAY BE INSTALLED AT ALTERNATE LOCATION AS APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER. Dr. DK No. Date Revision Appr. Ch. PJF Date 2/25/15 Approved By: Charlie Swimley City Engineer / Deputy Public Works Director RCE No. 52842 Date STD PLAN 717 Appendix E: Grievance Form Complainant: City of Lodi ADA Complaint / Grievance Form Person Preparing Complaint (if different from Complainant): Relationship to Complainant (if different from Complainant): Street Address & Apt. No.: City: Phone: ( ) E-mail: State: Zip: Please provide a complete description of the specific complaint or grievance: Please specify any location(s) related to the complaint or grievance (if applicable): Please state what you think should be done to resolve the complaint or grievance: Please attach additional pages as needed. ❑ Please do not contact me personally. Signature: Return to: Joseph Wood City of Lodi ADA/Section 504 Coordinator PO Box 3006 221 W. Pine Street Lodi, CA 95241-1910 Date: Upon request, reasonable accommodation will be provided in completing this form, or copies of the form will be provided in alternative formats. Contact the ADA / Section 504 Coordinator at the address listed above, via telephone (209) 333-6700 or via Telecommunication Relay Service (TRS) by dialing 7-1-1, or via e-mail at jwood@lodi.gov. City of Lodi — DRAFT 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN This page intentionally left blank 106 2016 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE AUGUST 2016 DRAFT ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 What Isan Impediment to Fair Housing Choice? 1 Community Participation 1 Impediments Identified 2 Introduction 3 What Is Fair Housing? 3 What Isan Analysisof Impedimentsto Fair Housing Choice (Al)? 3 Purpose of the Analysis of Impediments 4 Organization of the Report 5 Funding Source 5 Community Profile 6 Demographic Data 6 Household Characteristics 15 Special Needs Populations 16 Income 25 Employment 28 Housing Profile 39 Public and Assisted Housing 53 Affordable Units in Lodi 55 Licensed Community Care Facilities 56 Private Sector Practices 58 Real Estate Sales Practices 58 Rental and Property Management 60 Advertisement 61 Mortgage Lending 62 Fair Housing Complaints and Enforcement 75 Housing Outreach 78 Public Policies 80 City Programs 80 Building and Planning Practices 81 Assessment of Fair Housing Practices 89 Lodi Housing Element 89 CITY OF LODI ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Consolidated Plan 90 Lodi Annual Action Plan 90 Lodi Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) 90 Conclusions and Recommendations 91 Economic and Historic Trends 91 Affordable Housing 93 Mortgage Lending 97 Fair Housing Education and Enforcement 99 Government Barriers 100 Comply with Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Obligation 101 Appendix A Community Outreach Summary 103 Stakeholders Meeting, June 25,2015,2:00-4:00 p.m 104 Strengths 104 Sery i ce N eed s 104 Developing New Housing 105 Conditions of Housing/Housing Choice 106 Community Workshop, June 25,2015,6:00-8:00 p.m. 106 Station 1: Housing Programs and Services 107 Station 2: Housing Types 107 Station 3: Fair Housing 108 List of Tables Table 1 Population 2010-2015 6 Table 2 Age Characteristics, 2010 7 Table 3 Race and Ethnicity, 2008 8 Table 4 Household Composition, 2008-2012 16 Table 5 Income Characteristics, 2008-2012 26 Table 6 Labor Force Data 28 Table 7 Major Employers 29 Table 8 Housing Units by Type, Lodi, 2014 39 Table 9 Housing Units by Tenure, 2000 and 2008 40 Table 10 Housing Age 41 Table 11 Median Sales Price 47 Table 12 Rental Listings 48 Table 13 2015 Fair Market Rent (FMR) 48 CITY OF LODI ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Table 14 Affordable Mortgage/Rent Amounts 49 Table 15 Housing Cost Burden 50 Table 16 Income Characteristics for Special Needs Households by Tenure, 2009-2013 51 Table 17 Loan Request Type by Lending Outcome 64 Table 18 Applicant Race by Loan Request Type 64 Table 19 Applicant Ethnicity by Loan Type Request 65 Table 20 Lending Outcome by Race 66 Table 21 Reason for Denial by Race 67 Table 22 Lending Action Outcome by Ethnicity 67 Table 23 Reason for Denial by Ethnicity 68 Table 24 Lending Actions and Characteristics for Lodi Census Tracts 69 Table 25 Reason for Denial by Census Tract 70 Table 26 Fair Housing Claims by Basis 77 Table 27 Fair Housing Claims by Outcome 77 Table 28 Housing Types Permitted by Zone 82 List of Figures Figure 1 Minority Concentration 9 Figure 1.1 Race/Ethnicity Concentrated Areas of Poverty 10 Figure 1.2 Minority Concentration Trends 1990 11 Figure 1.3 Minority Concentration Trends 2000 12 Graph 1 Owner and Renter Occupancy 13 Figure 4 Areas of Low- and Moderate -Income Concentration 27 Figure 5 Transportation and Employment 30 Figure 6 Limited English Proficiency 32 Figure 7 Community Assets 35 Figure 8 Low -Income Households with Severe Housing Problems 46 Figure 9 Housing Choice Voucher Distribution 54 Figure 10 Loan Applications 71 Figure 11 Loan Origination 72 Figure 12 Loan Denial 73 Figure 13 Loan Failure 74 CITY OF LODI iii ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE This page intentionally left blank CITY OF LODI iv ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Asa recipient of fundsfrom the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the City of Lodi is required to conduct an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (Al) and to periodically review that analysis and update it as necessary. This Al isthefirst produced by the City and provides a detailed look into the fair housing environment in Lodi. More specifically, this document includes an analysis of local factors that may impact fair housing choice, the identification of specific impediments to fair housing choice, and a plan to address those impediments. As part of itsongoing responsibilitiesasarecipient of HUD funds, theCity of Lodi must also continuously assure equal access to services and programs it provides or assists in the community. WHAT IS AN IMPEDIMENT TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE? As defined by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development Fair Housing Planning Guide (1996), impediments to fair housing choice are: • Any actions, omissions, or decisions taken because of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religion, sex, disability, marital status, familial status, or any other arbitrary factor which restrict housing choices or theavailability of housing choices; or • Any actions, omissions, or decisions which have the effect of restricting housing choices or the availability of housing choices on the basis of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religion, sex, disability, marital status, familial status, or any other arbitrary factor. To affirmatively further fair housing, a community must work to remove impedimentsto fair housing choice. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION Throughout the preparation of the Al, a number of local agencies and organizations were contacted to obtain feedback on housing discrimination complaints and perceptions. To ensure the report responded to community concerns, the City conducted a stakeholder meeting and community workshop on June 25, 2015, and a survey of several specific groups, including residents, housing professionals, and service providers, was distributed from June to July 2015 to gather information on barriers to affordable housing. The City also held a public hearing in August 2016 to gain additional input. CITY OF LODI 1 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE IMPEDIMENTS IDENTIFIED This analysis has identified the following impediments and actions to address the impediments. The section titled Conclusions and Recommendations of this document includes additional details on the findings of the analysis. Affordable Housing 1. Impediment: Lack of sufficient subsidized and unsubsidized affordable housing supply, particularly for low-income special needs households and persons with disabilities. 2. Impediment: Lack of affordable units suitable for large families, resulting in aconcentration of Hispanic households in adjoining low-income census tracts, and disproportionately impacting Hispanic households and householdswith large families. 3. Impediment: Lack of available rental housing subsidy for lower-income households. 4. Impediment: Lack of new or recently built multifamily units resulting in insufficient suitable housing stock for large families, single -parent households with additional need for housing support, and persons with disabilities with accessibility needs, and disproportionately impacting Hispanicfamily households, single -parent families, and persons with disabilities. Mortgage Lending 5. Impediment: Different origination and denial rates based on neighborhood. 6. Impediment: Lack of knowledge about the requirements of mortgage lenders and the mortgage lending/home purchase process, particularly among lower-income and minority households. Fair Housing Education and Enforcement 7. Impediment: Lack of information on the nature and basis of housing discrimination and the resources available to seek assistance. 8. Impediment: Concentration of lower-income households and minority households in less desirable neighborhoods. Government Barriers 9. Impediment: Growth Management Allocation Ordinance. CITY OF LODI 2 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE INTRODUCTION Lodi is centrally located in Northern California with easy access to major transportation routes that connect the states in the western United States. As the northernmost city in San Joaquin County, Lodi bridges the areas of Northern and Central California—an ideal location for business and for visitors touring this abundant wine -grape -growing region. Lodi is located 90 miles east of San Francisco, 35 miles south of Sacramento, the state's capital, adjacent to State Routes 99, 12, and 88, and easily accessi bl e to Interstate 5 (1-5). The City of Lodi was founded in 1869 and incorporated in 1906. While the city's original economic base was in traditional agriculture, over the last few decades Lodi has become regional and national grower of premium wine grapes and a significant producer of California-based wines. In 1990, the city's population surpassed 50,000, and as of 2015, Lodi has a population of around 63,719. WHAT IS FAIR HOUSING? Equal access to housing is fundamental to each person being able to meet essential needs and to pursuing personal, educational, employment, or other goals. In recognition of equal housing access as a fundamental right, the governments of the United States and the State of California have both established fair housing as a right protected by law. Federal fair housing laws prohibit discrimination in the sale, rental, lease, or negotiation for real property based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, familial status, and disability. The California fair housing laws are built upon the federal laws and add marital status, ancestry, source of income, sexual orientation, and "any arbitrary factor" as protected categories under the laws. Many factors i n the publicand pri vate domai ns i mpede equal access to housing or fair housing choice. To affirmatively promote equal housing opportunity, a community must work to remove or mitigate impediments to fair housing choice. The City of Lodi is dedicated to providing fair housing opportunities to all residents and to ensure compliance with all applicable laws throughout the city. WHAT IS AN ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE (Al)? TheAl isan assessment of how laws, governmental policies, real estate practices, and local conditions affect the location, availability, and accessibility of housing. The analysis of their impact on housing choice can highlight areas where corrective actions might broaden the housing options of persons protected by fair housing laws. The analysis includes examining impediments and barriers to fair housing choice. CITY OF LODI 3 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE An impediment to fair housing choice is any action, omission, or decision which is intended to or has the effect of restricting a person's choice of housing on thebasisof race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, or national origin. Such a limitation to fair housing choice constitutes housing discrimination. This Al defines barriers to housing choice as factors such as income level and housing supply that limit a person's choice of housing. ThisAl adheresto the recommended scopeof analysisand format in the Fair Housing Planning Guide developed by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (H UD). PURPOSE OF THE ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS The purpose of an Al is to review conditions in the jurisdiction that may impact the ability of households to freely choose housing and to be treated without regard to race, ethnicity, religion, gender, national origin, source of income, age, disability, or other protected status. TheAI reviews the general state of fair housing, the enforcement of fair housing law, efforts to promote fair housing, access to credit for the purpose of housing, and general constraints to the availability of afull range of housing types. An Al examines the affordability of housing in the jurisdiction with an emphasis on housing affordable to households with annual incomes classified as low income and less. (Low income is defined as equal to or less than 80 percent of the adjusted area median family income as most recently published by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development.) The document has three major goals: • To provide an overview of the City of Lodi and current conditions as they impact fair housing choice. • To review the City'spoliciesand practicesasthey impact fair housing choice and the provision of housing, specifically affordable housing and housing for special needs households. • To identify impediments to fair housing choice and actions the City will take to remove those impediments or to mitigate the impact those impediments have on fair housing choice. Fulfilling these goals includes the following: • A review of the laws, regulations, and administrative policies, procedures, and practices of the City of Lodi. • An assessment of how those laws affect the location, availability, and accessibility of housing. • An assessment of conditions, both public and private, affecting fair housing choice. CITY OF LODI 4 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT This report is divided into seven sections, including this introduction, asdescribed below. Introduction explains the purpose of the analysis of impediments to fair housing, defines "fair housing," lists the data and funding sources for the report, and describes the public participation process. Community Profile presents demographic information and income characteristics in Lodi, including the number and percentage of persons by age, ethnicity, familial status, disability, and farmworker status. The housing profile includes the number of housing units by type, cost, overcrowding condition, and housing cost burden. Income characteristics include the distribution of low- and moderate -income population by census block group. Private Sector Practices assesses the access to financing for different groups. Predatory and subprime lending issues are discussed. This section also assesses the nature and extent of fair housing complaints and violations. Public Policies analyzes various public policies and actions that may impedefair housing in the city. Assessment of Fair Housing Practices evaluates existing public and private programs, services, practices, and activities that assist in providing fair housing in the city. Conclusions and Recommendations summarizes the findings regarding fair housing issues in Lodi and provides recommendations for furthering fair housing practices. Appendix A: Community Outreach describes the community outreach program and summarizes comments from residents and various agencies on fair housing issues such as discri mi nation, housing impediments, and housing trends. FUNDING SOURCE Preparation of this report was funded with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) administration funds. CITY OF LODI 5 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE COMMUNITY PROFILE Various characteristics may affect the ability of households with similar income levels, in the same housing market, to have a like range of housing choice. This chapter of the Al analyzes the demographic profile, income distribution, housing stock characteristics, and access to public transportation in Lodi. By assessing this information, the housing patterns in Lodi can be determined in relation to race/ethnicity, income, and other characteristics. DEMOGRAPHIC DATA Information in this section is primarily based on the 2008-2012 American Community Survey (ACS), the 2010 US Census, and data from the California Department of Finance. More current data has been provided where readily available. Population According to the California Department of Finance (D OF), as of January 2015, Lodi had a population of 63,719, which represented an increase of 3 percent from 2010. San Joaquin County asawholehad a larger population increase at 5 percent as shown in Table 1. TABLE 1 POPULATION 2010-2015 Jurisdiction 2010 2015 Total Growth (2010-2015) Number Percentage Lodi 62,134 63,719 1,585 3% San Joaquin County 685,306 719,511 34,205 5% Source: 2010 US Census; California Department of Finance 2015 Age Distribution The age characteristics of a community are important factors in evaluating housing needs. Different age groupshavedistinctfamilytypesand sizes and income levels, all of which correspond to different housing needs. Younger adults tend to seek apartments, condominiums, and single-family units that are in proportion to their typically smaller household sizes and more constrained finances. Adults with children may seek larger single-family homes. However, as grown children begin to leave home, older adults and seniors often seek to trade their larger homes for smaller single-family homes and condominiums that are typically easier to maintain and afford. CITY OF LODI 6 3� ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE According to the 2010 US Census and as shown in Table 2, children (age 14 and under) accounted for almost a quarter (23.1 percent) of the total population in Lodi, whilethe15to 19 age group represented 7.4 percent of the total population. The largest age group in Lodi was the 25 to 34 age group (13.8 percent), followed closely by the 45 to 54 age group (13.3 percent) and the 35 to 44 age group (11.9 percent). TABLE 2 AGE CHARACTERISTICS, 201 0 Age Group Lodi San Joaquin County Number Percentage Number Percentage Mit 7.9% mak 7.9% 5 to 9 years 4,721 7.6% 54,810 8.0% 8.2% 15 to 19 years 4,608 7.4% 58,382 8.5% 20 to 24 years 4,180 6.7% 48,451 25 to 34 years 8,530 13.8% 90,815 13.2% to 44 years 7,401 AL 11.9% 45 to 54 years 8,225 13.3% 91,839 13.4% 60 to 64 years 2,887 4.6% 31,048 4.5% 65 to 7411E 3,914 38,530 75 to 84 years 2,840 4.6% 22,709 3.3% 1.5% Total 62,134 100.0% 685,306 100.0% Source: 2010 US Census Race and Ethnicity According to the 2008-2012 ACS, and as shown in Table 3, White and Hispanic populations were the two largest race/ethnic groups in Lodi, representing 54.1 percent and 35.1 percent of the population, respectively. This represents a 2.8 percent increase in the Hispanic population in Lodi from 2008, which was 32.3 percent H ispanic. In San Joaquin County as a whole, the percentage of the population reporting as White was much lower (35.9 percent). Both the county and the city have growing Asian populations, representing 14.0 and 6.9 percent, respectively, of the population. CITY OF LODI 7 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE TABLE 3 RACE AND ETHNICITY, 2008 Race/Origin Lodi San Joaquin County Number Percentage Number Percentage 33,845 54.1% 246,851 35.9% Black or African American alone 931 1.5% 46,941 6.8% American Indian and Alaska Native 283 0.5% 2,939 Asian alone 4,340 6.9% 96,169 14.0% Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander a 0.1% 3,382 Some other race 159 0.3% 1,111 0.2% 22,835 Hispanic Origin 21,987 35.1% 266,808 38.8% Total 2,613 V 100.0% 687,036 100.0% Source: 2008-2012 American Community Survey 5 -year estimates Minority Concentration Data on race and ethnicity was examined at the block group level to determine areas of minority and ethnic concentration (2000 US Decennial Census, Summary File 3). Minority population is defined as the total population less those who responded "White alone" to the US Census. Block group areas where the percentage of total minority population exceeds the group's countywide total percentage are considered to be areas of"minority concentration." Areas that haveaminority population at least two times the countywide total percentage are considered to be areas of "high minority concentration." As shown in Figure 1, Lodi has a large and mostly contiguous area of minority concentration located in the eastern region of the city. Lodi has no high minority concentration areas. However, Lodi does have an area that qualifies as a Race/Ethnicity Concentrated Area of Poverty (R/ECAP). Census tract 45.02, identified in Figure 1.1, has both a minority concentration and a concentration of households who have experienced poverty during the last 12 months, as identified by a combination of the 2010 Census and the 2008-2012 American Community Survey data used by HUD in the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Tool (AFFHT). Further references to data from HUD's AFFHT will source the tool and the date the data was accessed. The R/ECAP isafairly recent designation for census tract 45.02. Figures 1.2 and 1.3 showsthe minority concentration trend starting in 1990 and continuing in the 2000 Census. CITY OF LODI 8 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE FIGURE 1 MINORITY CONCENTRATION Legend F. City Limits Census Track .1=1 Cen Gu s BEock Group Minority Concentration E3 2 41.05 i R■ a ase w Idgr 1 85 EG2 =2.03 ' 961 . 5.01 8G 1 r Y.!' a Yr -- COQ lorGJect kcy 1 Hutchins 9troyt $gUdro - QS Errtwce A JA 2 Kolb Perk orl.ELA Imprnvcsn.nls 3. IN.5oulM W 5hu1gton $t • Lcel Prgy.Ct Pha59 I I 4.719 South W!aShifi r1 52.. HOLKNAirthiCrrity APT wrdow{?opiecsmarx 5. A.DA Rai colt I rnpetovrIn'itta1[S , DoviTTECIFort Perkxlp Lots r e__ii_,I. 14.1 41.02 &hats.Ole Le:l211IM137413_[arur_261d A concentration i9 define d as ■ census block group with a graatcr pars entaee than Uiat crvu p's Qvsral l psrc entice in San Joaquin County' (5,3.7%). FEET Areas of Minority Concentration Michael Biker INTERNATIONAL CITY OF LODI 9 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE FIGURE 1.1 RACE/ETHNICITY CONCENTRATED AREAS OF POVERTY 41.44 42-62. 4210 45.01 4204 4S:02 4101 4302 44.0 s • 4331 Legend rmencovriomto +wanKutlAcis4nde.to Ole; Har.411mank tuck 14...opu DriortrroM MwrytiNUYs,{waYpwi lAirri 44.02 44.04 Not To Scale Race and fftnriIcik}' Calcettt aced Areas or Poverty, 20t0 k1111MirkOir11 CITY OF LODI 10 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE FIGURE 1.2 MINORITY CONCENTRATION TRENDS 1990 4..t 1.03 43.04 4202 42.03 1 % rLi 37.07 xs,ort 45.01 45.02 • 43.07 43.OB 44.02 Lecencl litrnagraprr 1 990 I DN.!k6Moir 'A tiU4 Mon+ll atic rim Amplem,Hon+ilsohle Hi Thin • r..t, u7 tipKl'hwuny v41 ',IAA,. !NIL #SH4 44.04 0 Not To kale Minonty Concentration Trends, 1993 hilichaita doer 1111111i1£T40ili1 CITY OF LODI 11 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE FIGURE 1.3 MINORITY CONCENTRATION TRENDS 2000 41.01 42.02 42,01 1 4120¢ 45,01 4294 4,10 49.02 14.03 03.05 .legend Deme' cs aaoo Dori o rode WrilkY'r#ispank Ei Z.11=4F1-#stl4riC XMM. renelorakri#1cp It 111 �l�snA}iGAelYsnd�.1I14fr v limar►c frs{i .vtu :1 J typun.pitetimpra W�xtw C�«ikPwipOFiph=��: • 45.42 '44.04 . 0 Not To kale Hinorty Conoeraiaiion Trends, 2004 101012101 B& I111kJriTFOMA1 CITY OF LODI 12 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE The 2010 US Census divided census tract 45, as identified in Figure 1.3, into two new census tracts: 45.01 and 45.02. This division did more than divide populations. It allowed a more detailed assessment of the housing conditions, household incomes, and racial and ethnic distributions along the eastern side of Lodi. Over the previous four decades, starting with the 1970 Decennial Census, the population of Lodi grew significantly. During that growth, the city experienced two major changes. One was an increase in rental housing stock, both single-family and multifamily. The second was a major demographic shift that included an influx of minorities, particularly Hispanic populations. Neither of these changes was spread evenly across the city. While new owner -occupied single-family housing stock was added in the north, west, and south sections of the city, the bulk of the added rental housing stock was focused in the eastern section of Lodi, in the area between the railroad tracks and State Route 99. At the same time, the entire city experienced growth in the Hispanic population; however, much of that growth followed the same patterns as the rental housing development, with minority concentrated areas appearing in the eastern section of the city. Graphs 1 through 1.2 show how the housing and population demographics changed between the 1970 US Decennial Census and the 2010 US Decennial Census. 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 GRAPH 1 OWNER AND RENTER OCCUPANCY Owner & Renter Occupancy 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010.01 2010.02 Owner Occupied Renter Occupied Graph 1 details the change in housing stock and tenure from 1970 to 2010. The graph bars for 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000 reflect occupancy before census tract 45 was split. The bars for 2010 are split into the bars for census tracts 45.01 (2010.01) and 45.02 (2010.02). This graph provides the following insight. First, housing stock in the census tracts increased by more than 330 owner -occupied and 610 renter -occupied housing units between 1970 and 2000. The trend toward a higher renter to owner ratio was already clear CITY OF LODI 13 I ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE by 2000. However, when the 2010 US Census split the tracts, it became apparent that the bulk of the renter -occupied growth was in census tract 45.02. GRAPH 1.1 PERSONS IN POVERTY 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 1 Persons in Poverty 1980 1990 2000 2010.01 2010.02 • Persons in Poverty The results of Graph 1.1 echo the changes identified in Graph 1. From 1980 to 2000, there was a dramatic increase in the number of persons identified as living in poverty. However, when census tract 45 was split, it became evident that again the bulk of that increase had happened in the neighborhood that became tract 45.02. 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 i GRAPH 1.2 RACE/ETHNICITY Race/Ethnicity J IN! al 1980 1990 2000 2010.01 2010.02 • White • Black/African American • Native American • Asian/Pacific Islander • Hispanic/Latino CITY OF LODI 14 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Graph 1.2 is critical in understanding the changes in the eastern section of Lodi over the last several decades. In 1980, before census tract 45 was split and during the rapid increase in rental housing stock, the Hispanic population was the most significant minority in the neighborhood, but still only represented 17 percent of the total population. By 2000, the population had grown by almost 3,000 and reflected 36 percent of the total population. When the census tract was split during the 2010 Census, it became apparent that the bulk of that growth had been in the 45.02 census tract neighborhood. In reality, the majority of the population growth in that area across the race/ethnicity spectrum had been in census tract 45.02; however, as seen in Graph 1, the division had split the owner -occupied housing in the north from the renter -occupied housing in the south. The data in these graphs suggests that the rental units in census tract 45.02 had been occupied with predominantly lower-income households and a significant number of minority, particularly Hispanic, families. While the increase in rental stock allowed more lower-income households to find housing in the neighborhoods included in census tract 45.02, the increase in housing stock did not keep pace with the increase in population. The population to housing unit ratio in 1980 was 2.18 for census tract 45. By 2010, it was 3.73 for census tract 45.02. The above graphs and maps suggest that the changes along the eastern portion of the city happened fairly quickly, as the neighborhoods shifted in demographics and housing stock tenure. However, the dramatic nature of the changes did not clearly appear in the data because the neighborhoods facing the most change were geographically tied to neighborhoods that were somewhat change resistant and more demographically stable. Once the geographies were split, the data better aligns with the actual neighborhood compositions and enables the City to better identify the needs of the R/ECAP census tract, as well as measures that can be implemented to respond to housing need and fair housing problems. In addition to the R/ECAP census tract, two other census tracts, 44.03 and 44.04, from the 2010 Census did not exist in previous decennial censuses, making it more difficult to track trends and identify needs through the data. In 2000, the census identified both 44.03 and 44.04 as census tract 44.01. Before 1990, census tract 44.01 was part of the much larger combined census tract 44. The changes in census geography make it easier to identify specific existing population distributions, but make it more difficult to understand the trends and forces that may have led to the minority population, poverty, and rental -occupancy concentrations impacting the eastern section of the city. HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS The type, size, and composition of a household can affect the type of housing and services that are needed. Families typically need single-family homes or large apartments with a sufficient number of bedrooms for children, whereas single -person households, especially those headed by seniors, may desi re smal ler, easier -to -maintain housing units such as condominiums or apartments. CITY OF LODI 15 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Household Composition and Size According to the 2008-2012 ACS, family households accounted for approximately 68.3 percent of all households citywide, while non -family households comprised 31.7 percent of all households. San Joaquin County as a whole had a much higher percentage of family households (74.4 percent) and thus a lower percentage of non -family households (25.6 percent). A summary of Lodi's household characteristics is provided in Table 4. Lodi's average household size was 2.83 persons per household, as compared to the county as a whole at 3.14 persons per household. Both the city and the county have experienced an increase in average household size since 2010, which was 2.76 and 3.07, respectively, based on a California Department of Finance 2010 data source. TABLE 4 HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION, 2008-2012 Household Type Lodi San Joaquin County Number Percentage Number Percentage Total Households 21,881 100.0% 215,563 100 Family households (families) 14,947 68.3% 160,476 74.4% With own children under 18 years 7,725 35.3% 82,431 38.= Married -couple family 10,669 48.8% 111,745 51.8% ith own children under 18 _ Male householder, no wife present, family 1,431 6.5% 15,446 7.2% Female householder, no husband present, family 2,847 13.0% 33,285 15.4% th own children under 18 years Non -family households 6,934 31.7% 55,087 25.6% 65 years and over 2,298 10.5% 16,814 7.8% Average Household Size 2.83 11=111-3.14 Source: 2008-2012 American Community Survey 5 -year estimates SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS Certain groups may have moredifficulty finding housing in Lodi and may requirespecialized services or assistance. Owing to their special circumstances, they are more likely to have extremely low to low incomes. These groups include the elderly, large households, single -parent -headed (female and male) households, persons with disabilities (mental, physical, and developmental), veterans, persons with HIV/AIDS, and homeless persons. CITY OF LODI 16 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Elderly Elderly persons(thoseaged 65 years or older)often have special housing needsfor three mai n reasons: income, health care costs, and physical disabilities. According to the 2008-2012 ACS, approximately 8,377 seniors lived in Lodi, comprising about 13.5 percent of the population. Households led by a senior comprised about 23 percent (5,069) of all city households. Some of the special needs of seniors are limited income for health and other expenses, disabilities, and carrying agreater cost burden due to their limited income. Large Households Large households are defined as having five or more members. These households are usually families with two or more children or extended familieswith family members such asin-lawsor grandparents. Large households are a special needs group because of the limited availability of adequately sized, affordable housing units. In order to afford necessities such as food, clothing, and medical care, very low- and low-income large households may reside in smaller units, resulting in overcrowding. Furthermore, families with children, especially those who are renters, may face discrimination or differential treatment in the housing market. For example, some landlords may charge large households a higher rent or security deposit, limit the number of children in a complex or confine them to a specific location, limit the time children can play outdoors, or choose not to rent to families with children altogether. The 2008-2012 ACS identified 3,146 households in Lodi with five or more persons, representing 32 percent of all households. Of all large households, more than half are renters. Single -Parent Households Single -parent families, particularly female -headed families, often require special consideration and assistance because of their greater need for affordable housing and accessible day care, health care, and other supportive services. Because of their relatively lower income and higher living expenses, female -headed families have more limited opportunities to find affordable, decent, and safe housing. Female -headed families may also bediscriminated against in the rental housing market because some landlords are concerned about the ability of these households to make regular rent payments. Consequently, the landlords may require more stringent credit checks for women, which would be a violation of fair housing law. According to the 2008-2012 ACS, Lodi has 21,894 total households and a subset of 15,030 family householdswith their own children undertheageof 18. Householdsaredefined as" occupied housing units" by the US Census Families and Living Arrangements definitions site (found at https://www.census.gov/hhes/families/about/). Families are defined as" a household in which there is at least 1 person present who is related to the householder by birth, marriage or adoption." According to the ACS data about families, 4,663 or about 31 percent of families in Lodi were headed by single parents with children under the age of 18. This number represents a6percent increase in the number CITY OF LODI 17 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE of single -parent households estimated in 2010, which was 4,404 single -parent family households out of a total 15,261 family households with children under the age of 18 (based on the 2006-2010 ACS). Of thefamilieswith children under theageof 18 in the 2012 estimate, 3,248werefemale-headed family households (21 percent of total family households) and 1,415 family households were male -headed family households (9 percent of total family households). Both male -headed and female -headed single -parent households with children under the age of 18 traditionally face significantly greater challenges regarding housing than two-parent households. Additional analysis of the 2008-2012 ACS data shows that an estimated 13.6 percent of all family households, or about 2,046 families, in Lodi had income below the poverty level in 2012. Of those families that experienced poverty, an estimated 533 or 26.1 percent weremarried-couplefamilieswith children under the age of 18, and an additional 300 or 14.7 percent were male -headed householdswith children under the age of 18, and 828 or 40.4 percent were female -headed households with children under the age of 18. The primary challenge faced by single -parent households is generally housing affordability, followed by housing quality and suitability, and then housing size. Other challenges faced by single -parent households, particularly female -headed households, include the availability of suitable employment, housing and employment stability, reliable child care, access to transportation, and access to supportive services. Figure 2 shows the distribution of single -parent households by census tract in the city. The figure identifies the percentage of households with one or more housing problems in each census tract that are headed by a single parent, either male or female. Note that this not a percentage of all of the households in the census tracts, just the households that have been identified as burdened with one or more of the four housing problems. The four housing problemsareovercrowding (defined as more than one person per room), incomplete plumbing facilities (defined as a lack of plumbing in the bathroom), incomplete or kitchen facilities, and housing cost burden (defined as a monthly housing cost more than 30 percent of gross monthly income). The most common housing problem in Lodi is thehousing cost burden. For single -parent households, thehousing cost burden often becomes severe, which is defined as a monthly housing cost in excess of 50 percent of the household's monthly gross income. CITY OF LODI 18 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE FIGURE 2 SINGLE -PARENT HOUSEHOLDS WITH ONE OF MORE HOUSING PROBLEM • 41.04 Iran Percent 1' ousrhukls 41Ud t �m 4202 't.9Fb 4301 3.13 43127 6.01.6 4244 9.896 4201 10,2% 4305 10.5% 4103 10..57E 4302 15.J% 4203 17.696 4404 1a_1% 11501 20.7'j6 4542 22371, 4�q6 2�,G9F 4403 ]9.6% 'haa■ Ammo, r t Legend Lodi City LJmiis [] C.nsus Traci eowiaary lotreent Moehd.h 1 0- 496 5- 9% 10. 14% 15- 19% 25 - 30% 6 R1 O1 1 • 1 � 1 Nam FIGURE 2 Single Parent Househdds V111th One or Mcre Housing Prodons M'.Iti;ie ,*er. 10N IL CITY OF LODI 19 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Figure 2 indicates that whileevery census tract hassomesingle-parent householdsfacing one or more housing problems, the census tracts with the highest concentration of single -parent -headed households with at least one housing problem are predominantly on the eastern side of the city. This concentration aligns with the distribution of rental properties and lower-cost single-family owner - occupied properties in the city. As detailed earlier in this document, the eastern side of the city has had the highest growth in renter -occupied properties over the last several decades, particularly in census tract 45.02 and south. Because many single -parent households are low income without the resources to purchase homes, they rely heavily on the rental market to provide adequate housing, particularly lower-cost rentals. The Impediments section discusses the impacts that the concentrated rental and lower-cost ownership housing distributions have on the various special needs populations. Disabled Persons Physical, mental, and/or developmental disabilitiesmay prevent aperson from working, restrict one's mobility, or make it difficult to care for oneself. Persons with disabilities frequently have special housing needs, often related to a potentially limited ability to earn a sufficient income, a lack of accessible and affordable housing, and higher health costs associated with a disability. In addition, persons with self-care and mobility limitations may require special housing design features such as wheelchair ramps, grab bars, special bathroom designs, wider doorway openings, and other design featu res. According to the 2000 Census, 22.7 percent of the population age 5 and older (11,789 individuals) who lived in Lodi in 2000 reported adisability.Asage increases, the i nci dence of disability increases. About one-third (32.3 percent) of the population 65 and older reported having a disability. The 2010 Census does not have updated data on disabled persons. For comparison purposes, the 2008-2012 ACS reported that 10.2 percent of the population 5 and older had a disability. However, almost one-half (41.0 percent) of the population 65 years and older reported having at least one disability. This is a significant increase over the 2000 data. The Census also reported householdswith mobility and self-carelimitations. Persons with disabilities often face limited earning potential because of the nature of their disabilities and the reluctance of some employers to hire persons with disabilities. In addition to the chal lenge of finding an affordable unit, persons with disabilities may also face discrimination based on their disability, struggle to find housing that is accessible and safe, and need to live nearer to services. A major challengefacing both the City and its residents with disabilities is the availability of housing stock with accessible features that meet the needs of disabled residents and their families. As reported through the ACS data above, as the population ages, the rate of disability also increases. This means that there will be a constant demand for housing suitable for older residents with a disability. Additionally, as the baby boomer generation ages, the need for senior housing is expected to increase rapidly. With the exception of housing built with public subsidy, it is very difficult to track what housing units have been upgraded or modified. For smaller populations, such as in Lodi, tracking CITY OF LODI 20 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE demographic distributions, such as disabled persons, becomes particularly challenging. TheACSdata is sample data, and the smaller the population, the more unreliable sample data becomes. A single age -restricted development can skew or mask population distributions in cases where the total population is too small to provide a statistically reliable sample. Despite the difficulty in determining accurate population distributions from small samples, the ACS data mentioned above can be mapped to provide some idea of the distribution of the disabled population in Lodi. Figure 3 shows the estimated population distribution for disabled persons in the city. Figure 3.1 shows the placement of medical facilities and age -restricted housing developments for comparison. CITY OF LODI 21 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE FIGURE 3 DISABLED POPULATION DISTRIBUTION, 2008-2012 [whenLegend 113;4.-5 Pe i r.. IH rains 17%61114 ;ogn rAttits doh ry q [JIP N Not To Scare bled 1'�iFwlatiari Michael Beluer CITY OF LODI 22 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE FIGURE 3.1 SENIOR HOUSING AND MEDICAL FACILITIES Legend 1.C+di C4. Limi13 Census Trecl Eioundary Medical Fpciliky Senior Hausing 4.r.. fl..eL/. M5 11 R G- Oa r.- 1 r .140 r b , ns Min FIGURE 3.1 Senior Hoi$ing and modiCd1 Facili1iPS MaOF►ael Baker I O h i L CITY OF LODI 23 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE An analysis of Figure 3 indicates that the disabled population is spread fairly evenly across the city, with the exception that there seem to be slightly fewer persons with disabilities in some of the minority -dense census tracts. Figure 3.1 shows that senior housing tends to be located close to medical facilities. This stands to reason, as financing for senior housing projects, and particularly subsidized projects, rewards development that is located close to amenities such as medical care. This distribution suggests that, while persons with a disability and seniors often fall into the low- and moderate -income categories, sufficient housing is located throughout the city and close to medical care so that there is no significant evidence of disability clusters or a concentrated distribution of persons with disabilities in the census tracts with minority and lower-income household concentrations. However, as will be discussed in more detail later in this document, no new multifamily housing has been developed in Lodi in the last 20 years. This lack of new multifamily housing production poses an impediment to providing suitable housing to persons with disabilities. Older housing stock generally does not meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) base standards, and rehabilitating older housing to improve accessibility can be very expensive and out of reach for lower-income households. The lack of newer multifamily housing stock disproportionately impacts persons with a disability because lower- income and fixed-income households predominantly rely on rental housing for shelter. The absence of multifamily housing stock that meets current ADA standards is an impediment to fair housing choice for persons with a disability and their families. Persons with HIV/AIDS Personswith HIV/AIDSsometimesface bias and misunderstanding about their illness that may affect their access to housing. Due to their disabilities, many persons with HIV/AIDS are lower income in need of housing assistance. The National Commission on AI DS states that up to half of all Americans with AIDS are either homeless or at imminent risk of becoming homeless because of their illness, lack of income or other resources, and having aweak support network. According to the Public Health Services of San Joaquin County, in 2013, 926 persons with HIV were reported as residing in thecounty. However, it is estimated that atotal of 1,169 persons were actually living with H IV. Of the total cases reported: • 35 percent of HIV cases were White persons • 27 and 29 percent of HIV cases were Black and Hispanic persons, respectively • Approximately 80 percent are male and 20 percent are female Homeless Persons Homelessness is the result of several factors—loss of employment, inability to find jobs, need for retraining, cost of housing, chronic health problems, physical disabilities and mental health disability, and drug and alcohol addiction. CITY OF LODI 24 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Individualsorfamiliesthat are homeless have a variety of special needs, including emergency shelter, counseling, job training, transitional housing, and permanent supportive housing, among other needs. According to the most recent count of homeless persons performed by San Joaquin County in 2015, Lodi has approximately 215 sheltered and unsheltered homeless persons. Of these homeless persons, 125 were sheltered and 90 were unsheltered. Two facilitiesin Lodi provide shelter to the homeless. The Salvation Army has 56shelter beds for men and 28 beds for women and children. It has an additional three small units with 3 beds per unit that are for women with children or men with children over the age of 10. Most evenings, the Salvation Army's shelter is able to accommodate all homeless that come to its doors, and they keep no waitlist. If needed, they can expand into an additional room to accommodate more guests. Lodi House has 26 beds for women and children. Additionally, there are a total of 49 transitional housing bedsincluding the Salvation Army (16 persons), Lodi House (three units at approximately 4 persons each), and Central Valley Low -Income Housing Corporation (21 persons). The Salvation Army, Lodi House, and other service organizations provide the following services to homeless individuals and families: • REACH utility assistance • Clothing assistance • Care utility assistance • Community dining hall • Rental assistance • Mental health support group • Emergency food pantry • Leadership training • Transportation assistance • Culinary artstraining • Lodi Memorial Medical Clinic • Drug and alcohol rehabilitation program placement INCOME Household income is the most important factor affecting housing opportunity. It determines a household's ability to balance housing costs with basic necessities. While economic factors that affect a household's housing choices are not fair housing issues per se, the relationship between household income, household type, race/ethnicity, and other factors often createsmisconceptionsand biases that raisefair housing concerns. For example, afair housing concern arises when someone refuses to rent to afamily of a particular race because of a belief that people of that race tend to have lower incomes. The US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) uses specific formul as to determine income for demographic analysis for HUD programs and to evaluate eligibility for HUD -funded projects. A common measure of income used in general economic analysis is the area median household income, based on US Census ACS estimates. HUD prefers to use median family incomes CITY OF LODI 25 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE and produces an adjusted median income metric called the HUD Adjusted Median Family Income (HAMFI). This metric estimates the median family income (typically higher than the median household income) for a family of four in every county in the United States. Additional formulas extrapolate the estimated income for larger and smaller families, and all estimates are updated annually. According to HUD, the 2015 HAM FI for San Joaquin County was $59,600 for a household of four. HUD has defined the following income categories for San Joaquin County, based on the median income for a household of four persons: • Extremely low income: 30 percent and below ($0 to $24,250) • Very low income: 31 to 50 percent of median income ($24,251 to $29,800) • Low income: 51 to 80 percent of median income ($29,801 to $47,400) Table 5 uses the 2008-2012 ACS data to compare the median household income for Lodi at $49,034 with San Joaquin County overall at $53,895, as well as comparing the median family income, which is $60,713 for Lodi and $58,197 for San Joaquin County. The median household and family income data is different from the HAMFI data discussed above and can be fine-tuned to evaluate incomes for smaller geographies and population centers, like Lodi. Also, while the H UD -formulated HAMFI data is only available at the county level and has been provided for San Joaquin County as a whole, the median household and family income data available from theACSismorenuanced and can be used to compare and trend local jurisdictions to their neighboring jurisdictions and parent counties. TABLE 5 INCOME CHARACTERISTICS, 2008-2012 Lodi San Joaquin County Income 49 034 I- $5=5 Median Family Income $60,713 $58,197 Percentage of Families Below Poverty Level Source: 2008-2012 American Community Survey 5 -year estimates Areas of Low- and Moderate -Income Concentration Data on income was examined at the block group level to determine areas of low- and moderate - income concentration (2010 HUD Low and Moderate Income Summary Data). Low- and moderate - income areas are those that have 51 percent or more low- and moderate -income households living within them (see Figure 4). CITY OF LODI 26 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE FIGURE 4 AREAS OF LOW- AND MODERATE -INCOME CONCENTRATION Legend jCity Limits DICerts u& pact C: Arts us Film•:k G rcu p Luke/Moderate lr11UrT1e BItxk uup Be 3 e62 Tract: 41.05 dnnd2e 44satlhnolp• Rd 'Bea L'Mnnp Ito E UNI vralrP BG 2 BC 13G 3 Rf: 7 Y LJ.F Tract: 42.01 Tract:4i Y.Ird BGr1 RG1 1 1 9G Tr doll: 4y .O L.:*■! �.. E.G 2'” 14? Y. `. "Y. 15G 1 • . Dr, A s 4 "`Mad. -43:03 7hc1r43,02 S[t1l.34U! MA.i . BGA Trace 43'05 r —. ■ • BG 3 S h��n..l ICr ESo 1 Traits: 4 .04 mAu}b� %rK Bu+ IN 4i..■' f Traci:43.UL -1)dC14}, I. 2 6G 3 13G} .. FC■+•hyy6ixrTiJl44.QZ 6G 1 A ■ Traci' 1+.62 •.�..�..� ,_. Eu ■i ' H UO'c definition of an ar6,2 of low- and mad wit B -income houAhold concentration Is a block Lwuup aro a Ilial has 61% or more lows and mederalaaneame households within It. 7 10 9.1174 Areas of Lowilvioderale Income 111. T 11�1i19IS L • CITY OF LODI 27 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE There is significant overlap in the maps depicting the minority concentration in the city and the maps depicting the low- and moderate -income concentration. The concentration of H ispanic households in the eastern section of the city coincides with the low-income neighborhoods, meaning that there is a significant concentration of low-income Hispanic households in that area. EMPLOYMENT Labor Force Table 6 provides a summary of the civilian labor force, employment (the number employed), unemployment (the number unemployed), and the unemployment rate for 2012, 2013, and 2014 for Lodi and San Joaquin County. The data are annual averages. When comparing the 2012 data to the 2014 data for Lodi, due to the current economic condition the total number of laborers has declined, and asfollows, the number of employed hasdeclined. On the other hand, the number of unemployed has declined from 3,700 (2012) to 2,900 (2014); however, most telling is that the unemployment rate has decreased dramatically from 11.5 percent in 2012to8.1 percent in 2014 (a d ifference of 3.4percent). This decreased unemployment rate is also the trend in San Joaquin County, with the unemployment rate dropping from 15.2 percent in 2012 to 10.7 percent in 2014. In comparison to Lodi, San Joaquin County had an increase in the number of persons in the workforce from 298,500 to 310,700. TABLE 6 LABOR FORCE DATA Labor Force Lodi San Joaquin County 2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014 Total Labor Force 32,000 28,800 298,500 298,800 Employed 28,100 28,900 25,900 253,200 260,400 277,600 Unemployed 3,700 3,100 2,900 45,300 38,400 33,100 (11.5%) (12.8%) (8.1%) (15.2%) (12.8%) (10.7%) Source: State of California, Economic Development Department, Monthly Labor Force Data for Cities and Census Designated Places, 2012, 2013, June 2014 Note: Data is not seasonally adjusted. Major Employers As shown in Table 7, Lodi's major employers include insurance, food processing, hospitals, canning and waste management services. By comparison, the county's largest employers also include hospitals. Based on the Employment Development Department's labor market information, under the health care industry, the county's largest employers include Dameron Hospital Association, Lodi Memorial Hospital, and San Joaquin General Hospital. The county's largest manufacturers are Pacific Coast Producers (canning) and Leprino Foods Company (cheese processors). The county's largest single retail employer is the Walmart Supercenter. Retail is the second largest industry and is made up of mostly smaller businesses rather than afew large employers. Some of the county's other largest CITY OF LODI 28 5,000-9,900 Canning —11=1— 1,000-4,99. ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE employers include fruit/vegetable growers and shippers called Morada Produce Company and O -G Packing and Cold Storage. Educational employers include the University of the Pacific. Three large social service providers i nclude two correctional facilities and Stockton'sfostercareservices. Lodi has five of the top 25 employers in the county: Blue Shield of California, Lodi Memorial Hospitals, Pacific Coast Producers, and Waste Management. TABLE 7 MAJOR EMPLOYERS Employer Type Number of Employees Blue Shield of California Insurance Lodi Memorial Hospital (800 S. Lower Sacramento Road) Hospital 1,000-4,999 Lodi Memorial Hospital (975 S. Fairmont Avenue) Hospital 1,000-4,999 Pacific Coast Producers Waste Management Garbage Collection 1,000-4,999 Source: State of California, Employment Development Department, America's Labor Market Information System (ALMIS) Employer Database, 2015, 2nd Edition One challenge that faces many low-income households, particularly when they are concentrated in specific areas of a city, is access to the transportation necessary to enable them to find decent and stable employment. A common symptom of socioeconomically impacted neighborhoods is a lack of employment opportunities in the immediate vicinity of the neighborhood. Many low-income residents are faced with often long and potentially expensive commutes to retail or other low-wage employment centers located outside of their neighborhoods. The median commute time for workers in Lodi is 22 minutes, according to towncharts.com; however, 28 percent of Lodi's workforce commutes25minutesor more each way to their jobs. Long commutes and distant employment centers have a disproportionately negative impact on low-income households who frequently have a high housing cost burden aswell asfewer resourcesfor alternative housing and employment opportunities. Towncharts.com also i ndicates that 93 percent of Lodi's commuters drive and 79 percent drive alone. Vehicle costs and other incidental commuting costs resulting from insufficient public transportation options can significantly add to the housing cost burden faced by low-income households. This additional cost burden can further inhibit low-income households from obtaining more suitable housing and can result in households feeling trapped in substandard housing or neighborhoods that do not offer the amenities (such as good schools, grocery stores, parks and open space, and other amenities)that improve quality of life and can help to improveopportunitiesfor low-incomefamilies. Figure 5 shows the access to public transportation, employment, and amenities available to Lodi's residents, and the neighborhoods in the racial, ethnic, and low-income concentrated neighborhoods. Figure 5 overlays the city's public transit system, the Grapevine Bus Line, over a map of the top ten largest employers in Lodi. CITY OF LODI 29 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE FIGURE 5 TRANSPORTATION AND EMPLOYMENT Employers ip Lodi Unified School Disbrt Collage Bakery 9 Pacific. Coast Producers t City of Lodi 9 Blue Shield of California t Walmart 9 Wasle Management t Farmers & Merchant Bank Lodi Memorial I-1ospltal ipTarget Ss.ii :s.Nwa Yitrt 6er.11,1>x0 Weekday Bus Routes D Lodi Transit Station * Baas Stop ▪ Bus Stop with Bench — Bus Route 1 — Bus Route 2 — Bus ROute 3 — Bus Route 4 — Bus Route 5 •-• Flus Route 5 leviaiion 0 Not To Sat TraniponaUars and E rulorrnerc Map Mickrd Baker 1.1.1110011•14.5 L CITY OF LODI 30 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE The Grapevine operates at 30 -minute intervals from the hours of 6:30 a.m. to 7:19 p.m. on weekdays, 7:30 a.m. to 9:22 p.m. on Saturdays, and 8:30 a.m. to 4:22 p.m. on Sundays. The City currently operates the Grapevine bus system and programmed this system to meet the needs of the community. The City can change schedules to accommodate future transit needs whenever necessary. A few of the employers identified in Figure 5, such as the School District, Farmers and Merchants Bank, and Lodi Memorial Hospital, have multiple offices, campuses, and employment locations. This means that while the business or agency may employ a large number of people, the actual places of employment may be scattered across the city. Lodi isapproximately 3.6 milesfrom boundary to boundary east to west, 3.5 milesfrom north to south, and 4.4 miles measured on either diagonal. The city's compact footprint facilitates good overall coverage by the public transportation options available to residents. Most of the identified employers are located within a short walk of transit stops. Additionally, the city's size makes alternative transportation, such as bi cycles or walking, more viable options for people who both live and work in the city. However, a resident living on the eastern side of the city, for whom alternative transportation isnot a reasonable option, may still have to ride two or three different bus lines to get to employment on the western side of Lodi. For families with children or special needs and for single -parent households, complicated commutes pose real challenges in maintaining employment. A late bus can mean the difference between housing and homelessness for families who live paycheck to paycheck. Encouraging a robust public transportation system, as well as multiple means of alternative transportation such as carpooling and bicycle lanes, can help lower-income households maintain stable employment and encourage equal access to the city's public assets and employment centers. While access to transportation to employment centers in Lodi may not be an impediment to housing choice, a more significant concern for the City has to do with the suitability of the city's workforce to qualify for local employment opportunities. Figure 6 shows the geographic distribution of residents with limited English proficiency in Lodi. CITY OF LODI 31 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE FIGURE 6 LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY ti 41.04 42.01 42.03 /S 41 42.04 i 43.Q3 43 42 44 03 X06 Legend Ureal Irrithsh 9ro6dwn[r !Top i k 6ocr+nd igbeim Ns* drdIr} SkiIM11 X Urdu '.: Yirhfr irrLe 1 inp yuy TKilw *denims drn....p Merman O.wgrrro (Aft EM 43.07 '43.03 46,02 44,04 -r Nor lo Scale Limited English Proficiency 1IOUIL CITY OF LODI 32 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE According to Figure 6, produced through H U D'sA FFH T, the highest density of residentswith limited English proficiency overlaps with the RECAP census tract and the adjacent minority concentration areas. Many cities with larger minority concentrated areas and RECAP neighborhoods struggle to develop a workforce that meets the local employment needs. Many service industry, retail, and commercial employment opportunities requi re a base level of English language proficiency,whilethe higher paying manufacturing, industrial, and commercial employment opportunities frequently requirebaseskillsand education that exceed those of thelocal workforce. The result is that employers are forced to import qualified employees from neighboring areas, while the local workforce is relegated to lower -wage and part-time positions or employment located farther from their neighborhood, increasing commute costs. A major challenge facing cities and local jurisdictions like Lodi is developing programs and training opportunities that can help better align the language proficiency, skills, and education of the local workforce with local employment opportunities. Another chal lenge that faces neighborhoods with a significant minority concentration, particularly in neighborhoods with a higher concentration of householdsliving in poverty, is even and fair access to the community assetsvital to providing a suitable quality of life. Theseassetsincludepublicly funded facilities, such as schools, community centers, parks and open space, and public transportation, as well as privately owned assets like grocery stores, pharmacies, medical facilities, and other commercial facilities. Another concern is whether these minority concentrated neighborhoods have access to local employment opportunities or have adequate transportation to employment opportunities in the region. Figure 7 shows the locations of various public and privately operated community assets throughout Lodi. CITY OF LODI 33 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE This page intentionally left blank CITY OF LODI 34 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE FIGURE 7 COMMUNITY ASSETS 0 L FIGLIRE 7 Camm.J9ny M:! 35 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE This page intentionally I eft blank MCITY OF LODI 36 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Figure 7 displays the distribution of community assets across the city. Assets on the map include grocery stores, major retail, pharmacies, fire stations, libraries, hospitals, post offices, police stations, faith -based houses of worship, government buildings, museums, schools, and parks. Often lower- income neighborhoods and neighborhoods with an exceptionally high renter to owner occupancy ratio struggle to maintain access to amenities and public assets. These neighborhoods frequently becom e food deserts, where access to healthy f resh food is m i l es away , and residents are by d efau I t at adisadvantagewhen trying to feed familieson abudget. Thedistribution of publicassetsin Lodi does not reflect these challenges. Lodi's minority concentrated neighborhoods have more access to grocery stores and major retail than some of the city's other neighborhoods, though the city's compact size and the placement of grocery and retail amenities suggest that no neighborhood or area hasa significant lack of access. Additionally, parks, schools, and churches and other places of worship are spread out fairly evenly throughout the city. Lodi's small footprint and growth policies encourage businesses to locate within the city limits, which frequently meansutilizing infill sitesthat are already adjacent to fully built -out neighborhoods. In this case, Lodi's growth policies help ensure that the entire city has access to basic amenities and help to curb the unequal access problems that frequently face minority concentrated and lower- income neighborhoods. Another key amenity that is critical to families with children is the quality of the neighborhood schools. Lodi is served by the Lodi Unified School District, which encompasses 350 square miles and serves the cities of Lodi and North Stockton and the communities of Acampo, Clements, Lockeford, Victor, and Woodbridgein the Central Valley of Northern California. The Lodi Unified School District has 33 elementary schools, 7 middle schools, and 4 high schools, as well as two continuation schools, two community day schools, and other education facilities. Two public charter schools and eight private schools serve children in kindergarten through the twelfth grade in the city. Four of the Lodi Unified School District elementary school sites have preschool programs, many of the private schools also offer preschool programs, and avariety of preschool programsareavailablethrough other private operators throughout the city. Three schools inside the city boundaries rank in the top 30 percent of the best schools in California, according to GreatSchools.org, a school ranking site that uses test scores, demographics, and socioeconomic data to rank public and public charter schools and that identifies the neighborhoods served by individual schools. Another 11 school srank in the middle 40 percent of schools in the state, including one of the city's two charter schools, and six schools rank in the lowest 30 percent of schools in the state, including the other charter school in Lodi. The Lodi Unified School District has been designated a Program Improvement district, due primarily to lower test scores. According to the district's school information, six elementary schools in the Lodi city boundaries are Program Improvement (PI) schools. PI schools are schools that have not met the Adequate Yearly Progress testing goals for two or more years. PI schools are required to provide CITY OF LODI 37 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE afterschool tutoring and educational programming to all students who are eligible for the free or reduced lunch program operated through the district. Two of the three elementary schools located in the minority and low-income concentrated neighborhoods in the eastern region of the city are PI schools. The three PI schools are located around the older city core, and the fourth is in the southern section of the city. All of the public schools in Lodi are below the 20 students per teacher ratio—many are well below, and many of them are showing slow improvement, according to recent test scores. It is also noteworthy that of the three schools that are rated in the top 30 percent of schools in the state, two are on thewestern edge of the older city core and one is located near the newer southwest corner of the city. Parents with children in PI schools may elect to enroll their children in other designated non -PI schools in the district, with enrollment assistance and transportation to and from school provided by the district. Tokay High School, in Lodi, is the designated non -PI high school for the Lodi Unified School District, and Woodbridge Elementary School, just outside of the northwest boundary of Lodi, isoneof two designated non -PI elementary schoolsin the district. If therearemorefamiliesrequesting transfer than resources available, the school district selects the students for transfer based on the lowest test scores and lowest family income. None of the non -PI receiver schools in and near Lodi were rated above a 5 on GreatSchools.org,which puts them in the middle of statewide ratings. The Lodi Unified School District PI school information and the GreatSchools.org information generally agree. The six PI elementary schools all ranked 2, 3, or 4, on a scale of 1 to 10 for GreatSchools.org. A score of 4 is the lowest score a school can receive and still register in the middle 40 percent of schools in California. However, according to GreatSchools.org, there is some overlap between neighborhoods served by different schools, and the district does have programs in place to address both the stud ents attendi ng PI schools and thosewhosefamilies prefer to transfer students to better schools. A significant challenge facing the district is that its boundaries are much larger than the City of Lodi's boundaries. Some of the schools in the more rural areas, as well as many of the schools in Stockton that are part of the district, are also PI schools and rank very low according to GreatSchools.org. This mismatch between the city boundaries and the district boundaries complicates City efforts to directly impact school district policy, as the policy area is so much larger than the city. However, the availability of afterschool programs and the option for students to transfer between schools within the district suggest that the Lodi Unified School District as a whole is struggling to improve student test results and access to quality publiceducation. The minority and low-income concentrated neighborhoods in the eastern region of Lodi have less access to the higher quality schools, as do most of the residents in the central city core and in the southern region where the three neighborhood schools are rated 3, 4, and 5. Of the three non -PI schools in the northern region of the city, two schools rate as 5 and one as 7 on GreatSchools.org. The issues facing Lodi seem to be twofold. First, there is a lack of available multifamily housing suitable for families with school-age children, particularly near the better schools. Second, overall access to CITY OF LODI i 38 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE high quality public education in the Lodi Unified School District is a challenge, as the district works to improve test scores and removed schools from the PI list. HOUSING PROFILE A discussion of fair housing choice must be preceded by an assessment of the housing market in question. This section provides an overview of the characteristics of the local and regional housing markets. A housing unit is defined asa house, an apartment, or a single room occupied asa separate living quarter or, if vacant, intended for occupancy as a separate living quarter. Separate living quarters are those in which the occupants live and eat separately from any other persons in the building and which havedirect accessfrom theoutsideof the building or through acommon hall. The housing stock consists of all housing units located in acommunity. Housing Type The California Department of Finance (DOF) annual esti mates of the number of housing units by type for each jurisdiction is based on reported building and demolition permits. As of 2014, Lodi had atotal of 23,809 housing units. Over half the units in the city were si ngle-fami ly detached units(63.1 percent) and 29.1 percent were multifamily units (see Table 8). TABLE 8 HOUSING UNITS BY TYPE, LODI, 2014 Structure Type Number Percentage Single -Family Detached III 15,018 63.1% 8 Single -Family Attached Multifamily (5 or more units) 1,444 5,062 6.1% 21.3% Total Housing Units 23,809 100.0% Source: California Department of Finance 2014 Housing Tenure H ousing tenure refers to whether a unit is owner -occupied or renter -occupied. The tenure distribution of a community's housing stock influences several aspects of the local housing market. Residential mobility isinfluenced by tenure, with ownership housing evidencing a much lower turnover rate than rental housing. Housing cost burden is generally more prevalent among renters than among owners. Tenure preferences are primarily related to household income, composition, and age of the householder. CITY OF LODI 39 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE According to the 2008-2012 ACS, of Lodi'soccupied housing units, a little more than half of the units were owner -occupied (57.9 percent) and 42.0 percent were renter -occupied (see Table 9). These percentages reflect a change from 2008, when 53.4 percent of housing units were owner -occupied and 46.6 were renter -occupied housing units. Table 9 also presents the vacancy rate in Lodi. Vacancy rate measures the overall housing availability in a community and is often a good indicator of how efficiently for -sale and rental housing units are meeting the current demand for housing. As of 2010, the vacancy rate in the city was 7.1 percent, an increase in the vacancy rate since 2008. TABLE 9 HOUSING UNITS BY TENURE, 2000 AND 2008 Tenure 2008-12 2008 Number Percentage Number Percentage 11,836 51121. 11.680 53.4% Renter -Occupied 8,584 42.0% 10,126 46.6% itsl 20,420 .8% Vacant Units2 1,694 7.1% 1,190 5.2% Total Housing Units 23,792 100.0% 22,924 100.0% Source: 12008-2012 American Community Survey 5 -year estimates; 22010 US Census Overcrowding The US Census Bureau defines overcrowding as occurring when a housing unit is occupied by more than the equivalent of one person per room (excluding bathrooms, kitchens, hallways, and porches), and units with more than 1.50 persons per room are considered severely overcrowded. For example, atypical home might havethree bedrooms, a living room, and adining room, for atotal of five rooms. If more than five people were living in the home, it would be considered by the Census Bureau to be overcrowded. Overcrowding occurs when housing costs are so high relative to income that families have to reside in small units or double up to devote income to other basic needs such as food and medical care. Overcrowding also may result in increased traffic in a neighborhood, deterioration of homes, and a shortage of on-site parking. Maintaining a reasonable level of occupancy and alleviating overcrowding is an important contributor to quality of life. In Lodi, 8 percent of all housing units (owned or rented) were overcrowded and 3 percent of housing units were severely overcrowded, according to the 2008-2012 American Community Survey 5 -year estimates. Not surprisingly, renter -occupied units had a higher rate of overcrowding (14 percent) and severe overcrowding (5 percent) than owner -occupied units. CITY OF LODI 40 1 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Housing Conditions An indication of the quality of the housing stock is its general age. Typically, housing over 30 years old is likely to have rehabilitation needs that may include plumbing, roof repairs, foundation work, and other repairs. Table 10 displays the age of Lodi's housing stock as of 2012. Among these units, the majority of the housing was built between 1980 and 1989 (19.8 percent) and between 1970 and 1979 (16.6 percent). Of the total housing units in Lodi, 40.4 percent of the unitswere less than 30 years old, 31.5 percent were 30 to 50 years old, and 28.0 percent were more than 50 years old. TABLE 10 HOUSING AGE Year Built Number Percentage Mer 1 53 0.2% 2000 to 2009 1,905 8.1% 1990 to 1999 2,893 12.3% 1980 to 1989 4,658 19.8% 1970 3,89 16.6° 1960 to 1969 3,514 14.9% 1 Prior to 1950 3,305 14.0% rota! Units 23,509 Source: 2008-2012 American Community Survey 5 -year estimates Housing age frequently correlates with housing condition. In many cases, the older the general housing stock, the more housing problems and the negative impacts of deferred maintenance are evident. However, this is not a universal truth. In Lodi, some of the oldest residential neighborhoods are located near the city's old downtown, to the west and south. These neighborhoods are generally well maintained, with a high ratio of owner -occupied units. The majority of housing with one of the four housing problems—overcrowding, lack of kitchen facilities, incomplete bathroom plumbing facilities, and high cost burden—are located in the neighborhoods east of the railroad tracks. About half of these units were built after 1970, after building codes and energy efficiency codes started to become more standardized. Most of these units are now renter -occupied units located in the minority and low-income concentrated areas. Renters often face exceptional housing maintenance problems because they do not have the capacity or the authority to make repairs on their units, and they must rely on landlords to address maintenance issues. In an aggressive rental market, where the demand for low-cost housing far outstrips the demand, landlords have little incentive to address costly maintenance issues, as there is high demand for even substandard units. The problem is accentuated in neighborhoods that have minority and low-income concentrations CITY OF LODI 41 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE where there may be language proficiency issues, problems with immigration status, a general distrust of government, high tenant turnover rates, and an aging housing stock that has deferred maintenance. For neighborhoods that have been facing these conditions over multiple decades, the problem can seem so deeply ingrained that it seems insurmountable The analysis of the minority concentration data presented earlier in this document suggests that a significant portion of Lodi's eastern section may be facing these conditions. The three graphs below shows the age of housing stock in the city, while Figure 8 shows the general locations of households in the city with one or more of the four identified housing problems. The 2008-2012 ACS data used for Figure 8 is sample data, with a notable margin of error, so the maps should be considered a general suggestion of the local conditions and not a true housing condition survey. 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 GRAPH 2 OWNER -OCCUPIED HOUSING AGE Owner -Occupied Housing Age 4 42.02 41.04 il. L 43.03 45.01 • Owner -occupied BUILT - 2000 to 2009 • Owner -occupied BUILT - 1980 to 1999 • Owner -occupied BUILT - 1960 to 1979 • Owner -occupied BUILT - 1940 to 1959 • Owner -occupied BUILT - 1939 or earlier CITY OF LODI 42 1 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 GRAPH 2.1 RENTER -OCCUPIED HOUSING AGE Renter -Occupied Housing Age L _ 44.04 43.08 44.03 45.02 60 50 40 30 20 10 Renter -occupied BUILT - 2000 to 2009 Renter -occupied BUILT - 1980 to 1999 Renter -occupied BUILT - 1960 to 1979 Renter -occupied BUILT - 1940 to 1959 Renter -occupied BUILT - 1939 or earlier GRAPH 2.3 OCCUPIED HOUSING AGE Occupied Housing Age 42.01 44.02 43.05 43.02 42.04 43.07 42.03 Occupied BUILT - 2000 to 2009 Occupied BUILT - 1980 to 1999 Occupied BUILT - 1960 to 1979 Occupied BUILT - 1940 to 1959 Occupied BUILT - 1939 or earlier Graph 2 shows the percentage of owner -occupied housing built during the different time periods in Lodi's census tracts where 60 percent or more of the total housing stock is owner -occupied. Graph 2.1 shows the percentage of renter -occupied housing built during the different time periods in the census tracts where 60 percent or more of the total housing stock is renter -occupied. Graph 2.2 shows the remaining census tracts for all housing types combined. These census tracts have smaller renter to owner occupancy ratios, with a more even mix of housing type. CITY OF LODI 43 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE No new housing has been built in Lodi since 2000, according to the 2009-2014 ACS sample data. The lack of new housing stock puts pressure on existing stock to meet any changes in population and can result in higher rents and purchase prices that put suitable housing out of reach for many lower-income households. A further evaluation of the data above shows potential issues with deferred maintenance for some of Lodi's housing stock. In the census tracts where the city's housing stock is more than 60 percent owner -occupied, the bulk of the housing stock was built after 1960. While census tract 45.01 is on the eastern side of the city, the remaining census tracts in Graph 2 are spread across the western section of Lodi. Census tract 45.01 is just north of R/ECAP census tract 45.02, but displays very different demographic and household characteristics, and does not qualify as an R/ECAP or a minority concentration area. Graph 2.1 shows the age of the rental housing stock in census tracts that are more than 60 percent renter - occupied. While the bulk of the rental housing stock was built after 1960, in the R/ECAP census tract of 45.02 as well as the minority concentrated census tracts 44.03 and 44.04, a significant amount of the rental housing stock was built before 1960. Older rental housing stock generally requires a higher maintenance commitment and the frequent tenant turnover in typical apartment housing can result in additional deferred maintenance that can contribute to substandard housing conditions for minority and low-income households that rely on the apartment housing stock for shelter. Substandard housing is sometimes captured in the assessment of the four housing problems recognized by HUD, but it can also appear in forms that are not assessed by HUD. Substandard housing includes units that do not fully meet state health and safety codes or that have violations of state building codes. These violations can include missing or nonoperational smoke detectors, missing or nonoperational carbon monoxide detectors, defective heating, cooling, and ventilation systems, structural deficiencies, surfaces with exposed lead-based paint, pest infestations, and other housing issues. Low-income households are frequently faced with substandard units as their only housing option, particularly when the rental housing market is strong and rents for suitable units are too high to be affordable. Cities may take steps to enforce compliance with the health, safety, and building codes, but many cities rely on residents to report violations. Residents in minority concentrated neighborhoods and in neighborhoods where a significant portion of the population has limited English proficiency are often less likely to contact local government officials to report substandard housing conditions. Some may fear for their immigration status, some may have had negative experiences in the past and do not trust government, and some may fear reprisal from their landlords. Jurisdictions can work with residents to help overcome these fears and ensure that substandard housing is reported and corrected. Graph 2.2 includes the census tracts not identified in Graphs 2 and 2.1. These census tracts have a renter to owner occupancy mix that ranges between 41 and 59 percent, with most close to an even distribution between the two types of tenure. Census tracts 44.02 and 43.05 have predominantly newer housing, while tracts 42.01, 43.02, 42.04, and 42.03 have housing that was generally built before 1979. Housing built prior CITY OF LODI 44 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE to 1979 poses a particular risk to households with children in that lead-based paint was in common usage until 1978. Exposed lead-based paint is common in pre -1978 homes where painted surfaces have deteriorated or have been damaged by water, abrasion, or pets. Exposed lead paint is a risk in households with small children who may ingest paint chips. CITY OF LODI 45 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE FIGURE 8 LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS WITH SEVERE HOUSING PROBLEMS 4103 • 43.07 Lag and Lodi Cily Limds Q Census Tract Boundary % of Ltl Households Wrth Any of 4 Sammy Housing Problems K 17.14% 17.14-41.05% 411.05 - 60.74% 60.74 - 83.9496 t a slaf ,,,.,arc... I. 1 L.. of le 0 025 o.5 Mks FIGURE 8 Lbw -frame Hausehcltls Wilh Severe Housing Prc lefts CITY OF LODI 46 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Figure 8 shows the distribution of low-income households (those making less than 80 percent of AM I) with one or more severe housing problems in Lodi. A housing problem is severe if crowding is more than 1.5 persons per room or the monthly housing cost exceeds 50 percent of monthly gross household income. Between 41 and 61 percent of low-income households on the minority concentrated eastern side of the city are experiencing a severe housing problem. The most common housing problem is cost burden, with overcrowding the second most common problem. Few houses in the city have the incomplete bathroom or kitchen facilitiesthat constitutetheother housing problems. It isworth noting that the three census tracts with the highest percentage of low-income households with one or more severe housing problems are 43.07, 43.05, and 44.02. These are the three tracts from Graph 2.2 with the highest percentage of newer housing units. The combination of newer housing stock with the incidence of severe housing problems among low-income households suggests that these households likely face housing cost burdens that exceed their income capacity. This analysis infers a shortage of suitable newer or rehabilitated lower-cost housing. Housing Costs and Affordability Housing Cost The decline in credit markets, the economic downturn, and related changes in the housing market from the recession have dramatically altered housing prices today. During the recovery from this recession, the trend has been toward steadily increasing prices as demand has increased and supply decreased . Home Purchase Cost The sales prices of homes as well as the cost and availability of mortgage credit have changed significantly over the past four years across the nation. This trend was particularly dramatic in 2009. According to a survey of online real estate sources, the median sales price for homes in Lodi in 2014 was $235,000. This sales price rep resents an increase of 39 percent compared to the 2012 median sales price of $169,000. Table 11 depicts home sale prices over the past three years for Lodi. TABLE 11 MEDIAN SALES PRICE Lodi 2012 2013 2014 Percentage Change All Properties $169,000 $201,500 $235,000 39% Source: realtytrack.corn (2014); www.dgnews.coin, 2012 and 2013 CITY OF LODI 47 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Rental Costs A survey of rentals in Lodi was completed in June 2015and showed that the average monthly rent for apartments ranged from as low as $715 to $1,455. The average monthly rent for a single-family home or duplex ranged from $725 to $2,500. The price ranges and median rents for apartments and single- family homes/duplexesof varying sizes are shown in Table12. TABLE 12 RENTAL LISTINGS Unit Size Median Price Low Price High Price Apartmen 1 Bedroom $778 $715 $930 edro $995 $725 3 Bedrooms $1,150 $1,150 $1,150 Single -Family Homes/Duplexes 2 Bedrooms $750 $725 $1,380 $1,397 $1,295 4 Bedrooms $2,100 $2,100 $2,500 Source: Rental Survey, June 2015 The US Department of Housing and Urban Development publishes annual Fair Market Rents (FM R), which include an estimated utility cost. The figures effective in 2015 for San Joaquin County are shown in Table 13. TABLE 13 2015 FAIR MARKET RENT (FMR) Unit Size 2015 FMR 1 Bedroom Ir $721 2 Bedrooms $946 3 Bedrooms $1,394 4 Bedrooms $1,675 Source: HUD 2015 Fair Market Rent Documentation System Housing Affordability Housing affordability can be calculated by comparing the cost of renting or owning a home with the maximum affordable housing costs to households at different income levels. Taken together, this information can generally indicate the size and type of housing available to each income group and can estimate which households are most susceptible to overcrowding and overpayment. CITY OF LODI 48 $140,474 d ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE In evaluating affordability, the maximum affordable price refers to the maximum amount that could be afforded by households in the upper range of their respective income category. Households in the lower end of each category can afford less in comparison. Table 14 shows the annual income for extremely low-, very low-, and low-income households by household size and the maximum affordable housing payment. Maximum affordable sales prices are based on 10 percent down and a 30 -year fixed-rate mortgage at a 5.25 percent annual interest rate. Maximum affordable rental prices are based on 30 percent of a household's total income, excluding costs of tenant -paid utilities. Per HUD, the 2015 HAM Fl for San Joaquin County was $59,600 for a household of four. TABLE 14 AFFORDABLE MORTGAGE/RENT AMOUNTS 1 Person 2 Persons 3 Persons 4 Persons Extremely Low <30%) Annual Income $12,550 $15,930 $20,090 $24,250 Maximum Sales Price $53,261 $62,341 $81,164 $118,903 Very Low (31%-50%) AMI Monthly Income $1,742 $1,988 $2,238 $2,483 Mine Sales Price $110,487 .1 $125,480 Maximum Monthly Rent $523 $596 $671 $745 Annual Income $33,400 $38,200 $42,950 $47,700 Monthly Income ler $2,783 $3,183 $3,579 $3,975 Maximum Sales Price $158,634 $182,707 $206,780 $230,853 Maximum Monthly Rent $835 $955 $1,074 $1,193 Source: HUD 2015 Income Limits Documentation System; http://www.zillow.com/mortgage-calculator/house-affordability/ Ownership Affordability According to Table 14 above, assuming the buyer is paying 10 percent down, has a 5.25 percent interest rate, and has no other debt payments, a prospective buyer in the extremely low-income category for a four -person household in San Joaquin County could afford a maximum purchase price of $118,903; a prospective buyer in the very low-income category for a four -person household could afford a maximum purchase price of $140,474, and a prospective buyer in the l ow -i ncome category for a four -person household could afford a maximum purchase price of $230,853. When these maximums are compared to the current median sales price of $235,000 (see Table 11), a household earning a low income would not be within reach of affording the median -priced home in Lodi. CITY OF LODI 49 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Rental Affordability As shown in Table 14, a very low-income household of four could afford up to $745 a month for rent. If the same household of four rented a thrcc bedroom single-family home or apartment in Lodi, according to the rental prices listed in Table 12, the household would be paying approximately $1,397 per month for a single-family home or $1,150 for an apartment, indicating that a household earning 30 percent of the area median income (AMI) would need to allocate 56 to 46 percent of their gross income ($2,483) per month to be able to afford the rent for a thrcc bedroom home. This indicates a need for housing affordable to extremely low-, very low-, and low-income households. Housing Cost Burden Federal standards establish that a household is experiencing a housing cost burden if it spends more than 30 percent of its gross income on housing costs, mortgages, rents, and/or other costs associated with housing. Cost burden typically occurs when housing costs increase faster than income. While housing affordability in itself is not a fair housing issue, the question of access to a range of housing choices becomes increasingly relevant to the extent that housing cost burdens are disproportionately impacting the most vulnerable mem bersof a community, particularly those with special needs. The Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data, which was developed by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to assist jurisdictions to write their Consolidated Plans, has special tabulation data based on the 2007-2011 American Community Survey. According to this data (see Table 15), 2,440 owner households and 2,445 renter households were burdened by housing costs. In addition, 1,400 owner -occupied households and 2,310 renter -occupied households experienced aseverehousing cost burden. TABLE 15 HOUSING COST BURDEN Total Total Total Renters Owners Households Severe housing cost burden — Housing cost >50% of income 2,310 1,400 ,710 Housing cost burden — Housing cost >30% of income 2,445 2,440 4,885 % Severe Cost Burden (>30%) of total 50.0% 49.9 100% Source: CHAS, 2007-2011 CITY OF LODI 50 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Housing and Economic Analysis of Special Needs Groups Many ethnic and racial minority, disabled, senior, and large or single -parent households face income challengesthat have adirect impact on the household'sability to obtain safe and stable housing. Table 16 compares the median household income to the household tenure for single -parent households, racial and ethnic minorities, personswith adisability, and seniors to help identify where income gaps are adding to the challenge of obtaining safe and stable housing. TABLE 16 INCOME CHARACTERISTICS FOR SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSEHOLDS BY TENURE, 2009-2013 Single -Parent Households Median Household Income Tenure Rent Tenure Own Male Householder with own children under 18 years $32,292 527 162 Female Householder with own children under 18 years $24,688 1,449 215 Persons with a Disability Median Household Income Tenure Rent Tenure Own b. 1 $26,691 NA NA Female $20,516 NA NA Racial and Ethnic Minorities Median Household Income 1 Tenure Rent Tenure Own Hispanic $35,350 3,734 1,793 White $50,597 8,037 10,141 Black or African American $35,801 204 21 American Indian or Alaska Native $61,739 125 35 Asian $53,152 372 918 Some Other Race $24,500 645 423 Two or More Races $35,365 678 271 Native Hawaiian and other Pacific islander NA 11 0 Seniors Median Household Income Tenure Rent Tenure Own Male Householder 65 years and over living alone $28,090 38 131 Female Householder 65 years and over living alone $23,725 103 324 Householder over 65 (not living alone) $40,750 1,248 3,836 Source: 2009-2013 American Community Survey 5 -year estimates Single -Parent Female -Headed Households with Children Under 18 The table above indicates that there are several groups that face extraordinary economic challenges. Single -parent female -headed households with children under the age of 18 have a median household income comparable to the extremely low-income limits (at or below 30 percent of HAM FI) fora four - person household. They also rely heavily on the rental market for housing with 87 percent of the single -parent female -headed households with children living in rental units. The combination of extremely low incomes with a heavy demand on the rental housing market indicates that this group is at risk of housing discrimination due to a lack of housing choice. CITY OF LODI 51 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Persons with a Disability Another group that is potentially at risk of housing discrimination due to economic challenges is persons with a disability. While the tenure data for persons with a disability is not available from the American Community Survey, the median incomes for disabled persons in Lodi are also comparable to the extremely low-income (at or below 30 percent HAMFI) limits established by HUD. Combined with the fact that many persons with a disability require accessibility accommodations to ensure that they have safe and stable housing, the economic and physical challenges of this group suggests that there is likely an insufficient supply of appropriate and affordable housing. A lack of appropriate inventory puts extremely low-income persons with adisability at risk of housing discrimination due to a lack of housing choice. Hispanic Households in Minority Concentrated Neighborhoods Lodi has a significant Hispanic population. Hispanic households in the city also face economic challenges that can directly impact their ability to obtain safe and stable housing. The median household income for Hispanic householdsiswell below the low-income threshold HUD established for a family of four. The Hispanic population also relies heavily on the rental housing market for shelter in that 68 percent of the population rents their homes. The combination of low incomes and a high demand for rental units puts this population at risk of discrimination due to a lack of housing choice. A common result of an impacted affordable rental market in socioeconomically challenged and minority concentrated neighborhood is a prevalence of substandard housing. Low-income households without adequate accessto a rangeof housing opportunitiescan easily becometrapped in substandard housing operated by landlords who do not have a market-driven incentive to improve the housing stock. The lack of housing opportunities, especially safe housing with access to amenities like good schools and healthy food options, can contri Bute to cycles of poverty that can extend from generation to generation. Senior Households The other group facing potential discrimination in the housing market is seniors. The senior -headed households, and particularly those with a senior living alone, are below the low-income limits set by H UD. While this population tends to be homeowners more than renters, the over -65 population is the fastest growing population in the state. Demand for housing for seniors, who also have the highest disability rates, is expected to continue to increase. Housing that allows seniors to age in place and that can address the needs of seniors with disabilities, while being cognizant of their generally low incomes, is expected to be in increasing demand in the market as this population ages. CITY OF LODI 52 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Special Needs Household Analysis As with the other special needs groups discussed, low incomes combined with a shortage of appropriate housing or heavy reliance on a single housing type indicates that these households probably have insufficient housing choice. A lack of housing choice puts special needs households at risk of discrimination and housing instability because it forces them to seek housing either in socioeconomically impacted neighborhoods, or in substandard housing units, or in conditions where the landlord has little or no incentive to abide by fair housing practices. Special needs groups frequently face additional challenges when they try to seek assistance or support for housing problems. Seniors and persons with adisability frequently are unable to physically and economically maintain their properties and need maintenance assistance. Hispanic households frequently seek housing in lower-cost neighborhoods, resulting in low-income areas of high or moderate ethnic concentration that can have negativeimpactsof quality of life, including access to good schools, access to healthy food, access to quality housing, and access to other resources. Single -parent female -headed households with children face many of the same challenges as Hispanic households. Additionally, housing instability and insecurity has been shown to havedirect negative i mpacts on children through poor school performance and high juvenile crime rates. PUBLIC AND ASSISTED HOUSING To assist low- to moderate -income householdswith their housing costs, the Housing Authority of the County of San Joaquin (HACS.1) operates the Housing Choice Voucher Program (H CVP), the Migrant Program, and public housing in Lodi. The City has limited influence over how the HCVP is managed or how households are placed in the city. However, the City workswith HACSJto improvethequality of public and publicly subsidized housing and to preserve as much of the affordable housing stock as possible. Housing Choice Voucher Program The Housing Choice Voucher Program assists low-income households with housing costs. The program is administered countywide by HACSJ. Specific information on the location of housing choice vouchers is not made available. The Housing Authority administers 4,469 housing choice vouchers throughout the county as of July 2015. Figure 9, based on 2008-2012 ACS data, shows the general distribution of housing choice vouchers acrossthe city. This data isnot precise, and even with housing choice vouchers, rental housing units still tend to experience a high rate of tenant turnover. CITY OF LODI 53 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE FIGURE 9 HOUSING CHOICE VOUCHER DISTRIBUTION 41.04 x.01 42,03 • 45.04 4103 - 43.02 44.03 43.05 13.07• 4 O Legend Deor:-X3pI�kr 21210 .' ?VIM nraK,�-i. DWIDD•1 %No DiDpatoiC ▪ drl, Nun I IKviY. ▪ FL1145J.rirn k ManHspan1: ▪ ,il1WF U# hWt NM##ipilY� 3 Fhpark T! J Potent 'Artp.Tom• irias 091.116 1454 • BIL k 2% ]!L ■ A. • 4% MD4%•5% Mr 534 .614 1Y lj% • AI 14.01 0 Not To Scale Hassid$ Choices Voucher Distribution Michael Baker k111r1k.IItP 111. CITY OF LODI 54 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Lodi does not have a high concentration of housing choice vouchers in any of its census tracts, including the RECAP tract. The highest concentrations of housing choice vouchers in the city are in census tract 42.04 with 2.93 percent of the housing units in the tract using vouchers and census tract 43.08 with 3.29 percent of the housing units in the tract using vouchers. While tract 43.08 does have a significant minority population and is on the minority concentration map, tract 42.04 is mostly white. Census tract 42.04 also has the highest percentage of older housing in the city, with 77 percent of the total housing built before 1959. In addition, the City's one Low -Income Housing Tax Credit project is i n cen su s t r act 42.04. One possibility for the concentration of vouchers in these census tracts could be the condition of the housing in the neighboring minority concentration, low-income concentration, and RECAP neighborhoods. Housing units made affordable through the housing choice voucher program are subject to regular inspections to ensure they are up to HUD's habitability standards. The high cost burden, combined with the housing age, and thelack of newer units on the market can becontributing factors to substandard housing in the RECAP housing tract and in the remaining minority concentration neighborhoods. Because substandard unitswill not passe HUD habitability inspection, these units are not eligible for the housing choice voucher program, which encourages voucher holders into units that do meet the habitability requirements. Migrant Centers HACSJ manages three migrant family farm labor housing developments for the State of California. This housing isavailablefrom thefirstweek of May through the end of October of each year. Childcare centers are provided for farmworkers at the developments. Services from the Employment Development Department, the Social Security Administration, and various education and health care services are also provided on site. During the off-season, one of the developments is made available to the homeless. The developments are also used as evacuation sites, as emergency housing, and to housefamiliesdisplaced by city or county action. Public Housing The City of Lodi does not own or operate any public or assisted housing. HACSJ operates five rent - restricted public housing projects, none of which are located in Lodi. AFFORDABLE UNITS IN NODI There are five affordable housing developments located in Lodi. They are affordable to extremely low-, very low-, and low-income households. • Creekside South Apartments (39 affordable units) — Developed using the Section 236 mortgage subsidy program and Section 8 rental subsidy. The Creekside South Apartments is a project with a Section 8 contract that expires in February 2017. This suggests that the property is at risk of conversion to market -rate housing within the next 10 years. As of July 2015, the property owner CITY OF LODI 55 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE is still operating the project under the Section 8 Program contract restrictions, but could opt to convert the project to market -rate housing. However, according to the owner's representative at Eugene Burger Management Corporation, the ownership does not intend on converting the project to market rate in the next 10 years. • Lodi Hotel (75 senior units) — Lodi Hotel isalow income housing project which accepts Section 8 vouchers. It has 25 one -bedroom units and 50 studio units, for a total of 75 units. The age of the tenants is restricted to 55+ years old. • LOEL Gardens (14 affordable units) — Senior units affordable and restricted to low-income senior households. According to Tracy Williams, LOEL Executive Director, the center plans on continuing to offer affordable housing to seniors for the next 10 years and beyond. • Bethel Gardens (24 affordable units) — The Bethel Gardens Senior Apartments is a nonprofit- and church -owned property that has a subsidized mortgage which has kept the units affordable. The property was constructed in 1971 and is currently in good condition. This mortgage matured in December 2011, but the property owner has indicated that they intend to continueto maintain the affordability for the next 10 years and it is not the mission of the church to operate a for-profit business. The property isnot considered at risk, but the City will continueto encourage the owner to maintain affordability and prepay the H U D 236 mortgage (if feasible) to ensure that tenants are able to receive Enhanced Vouchers. • Harney Lane Migrant Center (94 units) — Houses migrant (seasonal) workers across various industries (winery, cannery, trucks, etc.) from May to October, or longer if needed. According to a phone conversation with the center, the state's Office of Migrant Services (OMS) owns the property and hires a property management company. Recently, OMS hired Roberts Family Development Center, a nonprofit, to manage the property. The San Joaquin Fair Housing Association previously managed the property for approximately 30 years. The State al locates new funds each year in July for thefollowing year. LICENSED COMMUNITY CARE FACILITIES Persons with special needs such as the elderly and those with disabilities must also have access to housing in a community. Residential community care facilities provide a supportive housing environment to persons with special needs in agroup situation. Restrictions that prevent this type of housing represent a fair housing concern since lack of such housing impedes special needs groups from access to adequate housing. According to the State of California Community Care Licensing Division, there are currently 24 residential care facilities located in Lodi that can accommodate up to 656 persons. CITY OF LODI 56 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Thefollowing carefacilitiesarelocated in Lodi: • Adult Day Care provides programs for frail elderly and developmentally disabled and/or mentally disabled adultsin aday care setting. There are currently two facilitiesin the city that can accommodate 75 persons. • Adult Residential Facilities (ARF) are facilities of any capacity that provide 24-hour nonmedical care for adults ages 18 through 59 who are unable to provide for their own daily needs. Adults may be physically handicapped, developmentally disabled, and/or mentally disabled. There are currently eight facilities in the city that can accommodate combined total of 131 persons. • Group homesarefacilitiesof any capacity and provide24-hour nonmedical care and supervision to children in a structured environment. There is currently one facility in the city that can accommodate a total of 6 persons. • Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly (RCFE) provide care, supervision, and assistance with daily living activities to persons 60 years of age and over and persons under 60 with compatible needs. There are currently ninefacilitiesin the city that can accommodate a combined total of 425 persons. • Small Family Homes (SFH) provide 24 -hour -a -day care in the licensee's family residence for six or fewer children who are mentally disabled, developmentally disabled, or physically handicapped and who require special care and supervision as a result of such disabilities. There are currently four facilities in the city that can accommodate a combined total of 19 persons. CITY OF LODI 57 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE PRIVATE SECTOR PRACTICES This section of the Al discusses the City's efforts to determine and eval uate the practi ces of the private sector as they relate to fair housing choice, including the policies and practices of real estate agents, property managers, and mortgage lenders. Mortgagelending patternsarediscussed in the next section titled Mortgage Lending. REAL ESTATE SALES PRACTICES In California, a broker or salesperson must be licensed by the California Bureau of Real Estate (Cal BRE) in order to conduct business in the field of real estate. The Cal BRE also enforces violations of California real estate law. In Lodi, housing discrimination or other fair housing violations related to the sale of real property are reported to the Cal BRE for investigation. The real estate industry in California is highly professionalized. Almost all real estate brokers and salespersons are affiliated with a real estate trade association. The two largest are the California Association of Realtors (CAR), associated with the National Association of Realtors (NAR), and the California Association of Real Estate Brokers (CAREB), associated with the National Association of Real Estate Brokers (NAREB). The use of the term "Realtor" is restricted by NAR as a registered trademark. Members of NAREBarelicensed to use the professional designation "Realtist." NAR has a professional code of conduct that specifically prohibits unequal treatment in professional services or employment practices on the basis of "race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin" (Article 10, NAR Code of Ethics). Both prohibit members from promulgating deed restrictions or covenants based on race. Article 10 oftheNARCodeofEthicsprovidesthat"Realtorsshall not deny equal professional services to any person for reasons of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin. Realtors shall not be a party to any plan or agreement to discriminate against any person or persons on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin." A Realtor pledgesto conduct business in keeping with thespi rit and letter of theCodeof Ethics. Article 10 imposes obligations upon Realtors and is also a firm statement of support for equal opportunity in housing. A Realtor who suspects discrimination is instructed to call the local Board of Realtors. Local Boards of Realtors will accept complaints alleging violations of the Code of Ethics filed by a home seeker who alleges discriminatory treatment in the availability, purchase, or rental of housing. Local Boards of Realtors have a responsibility to enforce the Code of Ethics through professional standards, procedures, and corrective action in cases where a violation of the Code of Ethics is proven to have occurred. CITY OF LODI 58 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE The California Association of Realtors (CAR) has many local associations throughout the state. Lodi is served by the Lodi Association of Realtors. It is the mission of the Lodi Association of Realtors to provide members with education and resources that will enable them to conduct business successfully, to promote and enforce professional and ethical standards, and to strengthen the Realtor image by improving the quality of life in the communities they serve, promoting equal housing opportunity, and protecting and preserving private property rights. CAR offers continuous online courses dealing with fair housing requirements and issues. Part of the license renewal requirements for all sales agents and brokers is continuous education on fair housing laws and regulations. According to the course description, the course wil I provide an overview of the federal fair housing laws and an in-depth discussion of the individual laws and their application to the practice of real estate. The course also provides CAR members with a study of the State of California fair housing laws and regulations. The course emphasizes anti -discriminatory conduct that all Iicensees should practice and concludes by discussing the voluntary affirmative action marketing program and why promoting fair housing laws isapositiveforceatwork in California and throughout the nation. NAREB Realtistsfollow a strict code of ethics stating that "any Realtist shall not discriminate against any person because of Race, Color, Religion, Sex, National Origin, Disability, Familial Status or Sexual Orientation" (Part I, Section 2, NAREB Code of Ethics): • In the sale or rental of real property. • In advertising thesaleor rental of real property. • In the financing of real property. • In the provision of professional services. Part I, Section 2 of the NAREB Code of Ethics continues to state that any "Realtist shall not be instrumental in establishing, reinforcing or extending any agreement or provision that restricts or limits the use or occupancy of real property to any person or group of persons on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability, familial status, or sexual orientation." NAREB's California Chapter offers statewide conferences to educate its members. The most recent conference was held in October 2014: State of Housing in Black California — The Stolen American Dream. NAREB's local chapter called Central Valley Realtist Association serves the Lodi area. CITY OF LODI 59 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE RENTAL AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT The California Apartment Association (CAA) is the country's largest statewide trade association for rental property ow ners and managers. CAA incorporated in 1941 to serve rental property owners and managers throughout California. CAA represents rental housing owners and professionals who together manage more than 1.5 million rental units. CAA has a local association called CAA -Central Valley that services San Joaquin County. CAA supports the spirit and intent of all local, state, and federal fair housing laws for all residents without regard to color, race, religion, sex, marital status, mental or physical disability, age, familial status, sexual orientation, or national origin. Members of the California Apartment Association agree to abide by the following provisions of their Code for Equal Housing Opportunity: • We agree that in the rental, lease, sale, purchase, or exchange of real property, owners and their employees have the responsibility to offer housing accommodations to all persons on an equal basis; • We agree to set and implement fair and reasonable rental housing rules and guidelines and will provide equal and consistent services throughout our resident's tenancy; • We agree that we have no right or responsibility to volunteer information regarding the racial, creed, or ethnic composition of any neighborhood, and we do not engagein any behavior or action that would result in steering; and • We agree not to print, display, or circulate any statement or advertisement that indicates any preference, limitations, or discrimination in the rental or sale of housing. CAA provides members with tenant screening services, application forms, and other types of landlord -tenant forms, which if used by CAA members provide legal proceduresfor processing rental applications and resolving tenant issues. Further, should landlords stay within these guidelines, they will likely avoid committing housingviolations.1 CAA offers a landlord helpline wherelandlordscan call and speak to an attorney about their responsibilities. Lastly, all members receive a fair housing flyer to post on-site at their properties which states that it is illegal to discriminate based on the protected cl asses. When CAA receives complaints about potential fair housing violations, the association provides tenants with information on their rights and then refers them to the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing to file a claim. The Executive Director of CAA's Central Valley branch stated that her experience has been that most tenant complaints are about non -CAA members. For this 1 Conversation with CAA Executive Director, Fresno branch, 2/26/15. CITY OF LODI 60 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE reason, CAA makes additional effortsto try to reach these smaller operations through outreach events and the landlord helpline. Lodi's largest local property management companies include Ahrens Property Management, Lodi Property Management, TKPM Property Management, J&B Rentals, Harvest Property Management, Preferred Property Management, and Liberty Property Management. Of those surveyed, over half are members of CAA. CAA offers a certificate in residential management, which requires a course on fair housing law. In addition, the CAA website provides links to the Fair Housing Institute and Fair Housing Network. Members receive CAA Issue Insight, an online publication that provides in-depth discussion of fair housing or landlord -tenant issues. CAA offers training opportunities across the state and in Modesto. CAA has a landlord helpline open Monday through Friday where landlords can ask questions about landlord -tenant issues and property management. Questions can be submitted online or over the phone. CAA also provides free forms online to its members, such as rental applications and lease agreements. CAA providesfair housing information to renters at outreach events. ADVERTISEMENT In June 2015, a review of rental housing advertisements for units in Lodi was conducted to identify any fair housing impediments. Advertisements were examined for language that explicitly or implicitly indicated that housing would not be made available to persons based on membership in a protected class or that there would be preferences for or bias against persons belonging to a protected class. No advertisements were found that would indicate unfair housing practices. Fifty rental advertisements were surveyed across nine sources including property management companies, newspapers, and other online listings. Thefollowing sources were reviewed: • Ahrens Property Management • Preferred Property Management • Lodi Property Management • Craigslist.org • Ted Katzakian Property Management • Liberty Property Management • JAB Property Management • Harvest Property Management • J&B Rentals CITY OF LODI 61 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE MORTGAGE LENDING Lending practice in the private sector may impact a household's access to housing. A key aspect of fair housing choice is equal access to credit for the purchase or improvement of a home. In the past, financial institutions did not always employ fair lending practices. Credit market distortions and other activities such as redlining prevented some groups from equal access to credit. (Redlining is a now illegal and discontinued practicewhereby bankswould not extend mortgage credit to purchase homes in certain areas. The banks would use maps whereinthese areas were outlifled in red ink.) The passage of the Community Reinvestment Act in 1977 was designed to improve access to credit for all members of the community. This section reviews the lending practices of financial institutions and the access to financing from all households, particularly minority households and those of very low and low incomes. Community Reinvestment Act The Community Reinvestment Act is intended to encourage regulated financial institutions to help meet the credit needs of entire communities, including very low- and low-income persons and neighborhoods. Conventional Versus Government -Backed Financing Conventional financing is market -rate -priced loans provided by private lending institutions such as banks, mortgage companies, and savings and loans. To assist households that may have difficulty in obtaining home mortgage financing in the private market due to income and equity issues, several government agencies offer loan products that have below-market interest rates and are insured (or underwritten) by the agencies. Sources of government -backed financing include loans insured or underwritten by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA -insured), the Department of Veterans Affairs(VA-guaranteed), and the Farm Service Agency or Rural Housing Services (FH S&RHS). Often, these types of loans are offered to the consumer through private lending institutions and make the difference in qualifying or not qualifying for a mortgage. Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Data Analysis The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (H MDA) was enacted by Congress in 1975 and is implemented by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau under Regulation C (12 CFR Section 1003). This regulation provides the public loan data that can be used to assist: • In determining whether financial institutionsare serving the housing needsof their communities; • Public officials in distributing public -sector investments to attract private investment to areas where it is needed; • In identifying possible discrimination lending patterns. CITY OF LODI 62 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Under the HMDA, lenders are required to disclose information on the disposition of home loan applications and on race, national origin, gender, and annual income of loan applicants. Overview The H M DA data set used in this Al reports 2013 lending records for Lodi. To prepare this analysis, census tracts that were fully or partially contained in Lodi were selected for the data set.2 In addition, lending actions within the data set are narrowed to show lending actions only for the purchase of a primary residence to be owner -occupied. All lending actions for home improvement requests, refinancing requests, non -owner -occupied purchases, and loans purchased by investment institutions are removed and not part of this analysis. This data set includes loans that have been originated, denied, or failed. Once an applicant has submitted an application which has been reviewed and accepted by the fi nanci al institution, then three actions result: the loan is originated (loan i s approved and issued), the loan is denied by the lending institution, or the loan offer is not accepted by the applicant. Property Type Most home purchase requests are for homes in structures with one to four units. Ninety-eight (98) percent of all requests are for the purchase of homes in structures with one to four units, with the remainder of requests (2 percent) for the purchase of manufactured housing. Manufactured housing is a "low-cost housing alternative" for low-income families, according to a research paper developed for the US Department of Housing and Urban Development.3 Not only is a manufactured home more affordable, its maintenance and quality are similar to a traditional home; it is higher quality than rental units; and families have more stable communities than are typically associated with rental units. Of the 11 loans for manufactured housing, 27.27 percent originated, as compared to 85.53 percent of traditional structures. The denial rate for manufactured housing in the city is 54.55 percent, compared to 9.96 percent for traditional housing. Home Purchase Lending Because we are interested in analyzing lending patterns, it is important to analyze the outcome of lending requests. As mentioned, mortgage loans are categorized as either conventional or government -backed, making it important to analyze the outcome of lending requests by the type of loan requested. Table 17summarizestheoutcome of loan requests by the type of loan being requested. Of the 543 loans, conventional loans represent the majority of requested loan types (317), followed by FHA -insured (198), VA -guaranteed (26), and FSA -RHS- issued (2). 2 Census tracts i nd u d e 40.01, 41.04, 41.05, 42.01, 42.02, 42.03, 42.04, 43.02, 43.02, 43.05, 43.07, 43.08, 44.02, 44.03, 44.04, 45.01, and 45.02. 3 Is Manufactured Housing a Good Alternative for Low -Income Families? Evidence from the American Housing Survey; ABT Associates, December 2004. CITY OF LODI 63 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE As shown in Table 17, 84.35 percent of loans requested resulted in origination and 16.66 percent failed to originate. Of the loansthat failed to originate, 59 or 10.87 percent did not origi nate because of denial. FSA/RHS loan requests represented the smallest loan type to originate (50.00 percent), followed by FHA -insured (81.31 percent), conventional (86.12 percent), and VA -guaranteed (88.46 percent). FHA - insured loans have the highest denial rate. TABLE 17 LOAN REQUEST TYPE BY LENDING OUTCOME Loan Type Applications Loans Loans Loans Received Originated Failed Denied # % # % #0/0 0/0 Conventional 17 58.38% 273 86.12% 4.10% FHA -Insured 198 36.46% 161 81.31% 11 5.56% 26 13.13% `VA -Guaranteed FSA/RHS 2 0.37% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% Total 543 0% 45 Source: Horne Mortgage Disclosure Act LAR data, 2013 Note: "Loans Failed" includes applications approved by the lender but not accepted by the applicant. Loan Type by Race and Ethnicity Table 18 summarizes loan request types by loan applicant race. As shown, 83.61 percent of loan applicants reported race as White, followed by 5.52 percent as Asian and 2.58 percent American Indian/Alaska Native. A portion of applicants, 7.00 percent, did not provide race information. Of all loan types, conventional loan requests were the most popular request among non-White applicants and White applicants, followed by FHA loan requests. No minorities received FSA/RHSloans. TABLE 18 APPLICANT RACE BY LOAN REQUEST TYPE Applicant Race Total Applications Conventional FHA -Insured # % # % #0/0 VA - Guaranteed FSA/RHS # % # 0/0 American Indian or Alaska Native 14 2.58% , 7 ark of Ail Asian 30 5.52% 25 7.89% 5 2.53% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Black or African American 2 0.37% 1 0.51% 1 3.85% 0 Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander 5 0.92% 3 0.95% 2 1.01% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 454 83.61% 258 81.39% 172 86.87% 22 84.62% 2 100.00% Race not provided/Not Applicable 38 7.00% 24 7.57% 11 5.56% 3 11.54% 0 0.00% 543 100.00% 317 100.00% 198 100.00% 26 100.00% 2 100.00% Source: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act LAR data, 2013 CITY OF LODI 64 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Table 19 summarizes loan request types by loan applicant ethnicity. As shown, more than 17 percent of all loan applicants were Hispanic/Latino, which made the Hispanic/Latino population the second largest group of persons requesting a loan. FHA -insured loan applications were the most common loan type requested among Hispanic/Latino borrowers, while conventional loans were the most common loan type among White borrowers. TABLE 19 APPLICANT ETHNICITY BY LOAN TYPE REQUEST Applicant Ethnicity Total Conventional FHA- VA- FSA/RHS Applications Insured Guaranteed # # # % # % # % # Hispanic/Latino 94 17.31% 36 11.36% 57 28.79% 0 0.0 Not Hispanic/Latino 412 75.87% 256 80.76% 132 66.67% 23 88.46% 1 50.00% Ihnicitynot provide ■ t applicable Total 543 100.00% 317 100.00% 198 100.00% 26 100.00% 2 100.00% Source: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act LAR data, 2013 Lending Outcomes by Race and Ethnicity This section analyzes the outcomes of lending request by race and by ethnicity. The results of this analysis will inform the City of possible fair housing impediments related to the availability of credit to purchase a home. Race Table 20 shows lending actions by race. As shown, 458 (84.35 percent) of all primary residence loan applications in the city resulted in origination. Of the543loan applications, 26 (4.78 percent) failed to originate and 59 (10.86 percent) resulted in denial. The loan origination rate was high for most minority populations: 100.00 percent for American Indian/Alaska Native, Black or African American, and Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, compared to 90.00 percent for Asian and 85.24 percent for White. However, the Race Not Provided category had a rate of 60.53 percent. It is difficult to determine the individuals impacted since no specific raceinformation is specified. CITY OF LODI 65 Denial ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE TABLE 20 LENDING OUTCOME BY RACE Applicant Race Total Applications Origination 0/0 Failure 0/O 0/0 American Indian or Alaska Native AIL 14 2.58% 14 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Asian 30 5.52% 27 90.00% 1 3.33% 2 6.67% Black or African American '°' i 0 0.00°0.00% Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander 5 0.92% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Race not provided 38 7.00% 23 60.53% 4 10.53% 11 28.95% 458 84.3o 0 Source: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act LAR data, 13 Table 21 summarizes, by race, the explanation for each of the 59 denied loans in the city. As shown, the most common form of denial fell under the Other category, which makes analysis difficult. Following the Other category, the table shows that unfavorable debt -to -income ratios, insufficient collateral, and poor credit histories are the next top three reasons loan applications resulted in denial. Of the non-White applicants, only Asians experienced a denial of any kind, compared to other racial categories, which makes comparisons to other non-White infeasible. The reasons for denial of the two Asian applicants were insufficient collateral and other. The two most common reasons of denial for Whiteapplicantswerepoor credit history and insufficient collateral. CITY OF LODI 66 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE TABLE 21 REASON FOR DENIAL BY RACE Debt- Credit Mortgage Other/ ApplicantEmployment Credit Insufficient Unverifiable _ Race History History Collateral Cash Information App. Insurance Not Income me Incomplete Denied Reported American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0 0 Asian 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Black or African 0 0 American 0 Native Hawaiian or other 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 White IMF 0 11 12 Race not provided 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 5 Total 10 0 13 13 1 Source: Horne Mortgage Disclosure Act LAR data, 2013 Ethnicity Table 22 shows lending actions by ethnicity. The share of loan applications that originated for HispanidLatino applicants (85.11 percent) was slightly higher than the origination rate for the overall number of applicants (84.35 percent). Of the 94 Hispanic/Latino loan applicants, 13.83 percent were denied and 1.06 percent failed to originate. Non -Hispanic applicants experienced loan origination at a rate of 86.17 percent, which was approximately 1.5 percent higher than the rate at which HispanidLatino applicants experienced loan origination. TABLE 22 LENDING ACTION OUTCOME BY ETHNICITY Applicant Ethnicity Total Applications # # Origination Failure Denial # % # Hispanic/Latino 1 94 80 85.11% 1 1.06% 13 13.83% Not Hispanic/Latino 412 355 86.17% 21 5.10% 36 8.74% 23 62.16% 4 10.81% 10 27.03% Total 543 458 84.35% 26 4.79% 59 10.87% Source: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act LAR data, 2013 CITY OF LODI 67 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Table 23 summarizes, by ethnicity, the explanation for each of the 59 denied loans in the city. As shown, the Other category had the highest occurrence of denial (23.72 percent), which cannot be analyzed. The next most common reasons for denial were collateral (22.03 percent), credit history (22.03 percent), and debt -to -income ratio (16.94 percent). Of the 13 loan applications denied for H ispan ics, the most common reasons for denial, besi d es the Other category (38.46 percent)weredenial because of debt -to -income ratio (23.07 percent) and collateral (15.38 percent). TABLE 23 REASON FOR DENIAL BY ETHNICITY Debt- Credit Mortgage Other/ ApplicantEmployment Credit Insufficient Unverifiable Race to_ History History Collateral Cash Information App. Insurance Not Income Incomplete Denied Reported Hispaa Latino 3 1 0 5 Not Hispanic/ 4 0 10 11 0 0 6 0 5 Latino Ethnicity not provided IIMP 3 0 2 0 0 0 4 Total 10 0 13 13 1 1 7 0 14 Source: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act LAR data, 2013 Lending Outcomes by Area In addition to analyzing lending outcomes for individual applicant characteristics, it is important to analyze lending patterns by neighborhood characteristics, specifically census tracts. This section analyzes lending outcomes by census tract and compares outcomes in each census tract to race and incomecharacteristicsof each tract. Table 24 shows lending actions and socioeconomic characteristics for Lodi census tracts. HMDA data is available at the census tract level, but not at the block group level. The census tracts presented in Table 24 are those located in Lodi. As shown, the share of non-White households in the city is 25.60 percent. Census tracts with 1 percent more non-White persons than the overall city share are considered concentrated areas. According to Table 24, seven census tracts (43.07, 43.08, 44.02, 44.03, 44.04, 45.01, and 45.02) are concentrated with non-White persons. Those census tracts experienced a loan origination rate of 92.86 percent, 100.00 percent, 76.74 percent, 66.67 percent, 100.00 percent, 80.95 percent, and 58.33 percent, respectively. The overall rate of origination in the city (84.53 percent) is higher than about half of the minority concentrated tracts (44.02, 44.03, 45.01, and 45.02). Two minority concentrated tracts have high origination rates of 92.86 percent and 100.00 percent.. According to HUD's Low/Mod summary data, 25.78 percent of the total census tract populations are low/mod. Low/mod persons are persons that earn 80 percent or less of the area median income, and areas with at least 51 percent low/mod persons are considered CDBG target areas. As shown in CITY OF LODI 68 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Table 24, six census tracts (42.03, 43.08, 44.03, 44.04, 45.01, and 45.02) are considered CDBG target areas. Of the target area census tracts in Lodi, three tracts (44.02, 44.03, and 45.02) correl ate w i th much lower rates of loan origination than the overall rate of origination in the city. Tracts43.08, 44.03, and 44.04, have the greatest share of non -Whites and low/mod persons of all tracts in the city; however, tracts 43.08 and 44.04 have 100.00 percent origination rates, whereas tract 44.03 has a rate of 66.67 percent. Tract 45.02 also has a higher concentration of non -Whites and low/mod persons, as well as a loan origination rate (58.33 percent) much lower than in the city as a whole. TABLE 24 LENDING ACTIONS AND CHARACTERISTICS FOR LODI CENSUS TRACTS Census Tract Total Origination Failure Denial Non -White Low/Mod Applications Population Population 40.01 T 12 75.00% 8.33% 16.67% 25.00% 25.00% 41.04 35 85.71% 5.71% 8.57% 11.43% 5.71% 41.05 61 M83.6 1.64% 14.75% 8.20% 11.48% 42.01 58 84.48% 6.90% 8.62% 31.03% 27.59% 4.00% 4.00% 12.00% 12.00% 16.00% 42.03 19 94.74% 0.00% 5.26% 5.26% 47.37% 21 85.71% 9.52% dim 19.05° 43.02 47 85.11% 4.26% 10.64% 23.40% 29.79% 92.16% 19.61° 43.05 73 83.56% 8.22% 8.22% 16.44% 4.11% 2.86% 28.57% 43.08 16 100.00% 0.00% 6.25% 62.50% 62.50% 6.74% 44.03 15 66.67% 0.00% 33.33% 53.33% 80.00% 45.01 21 80.95% 4.76% 14.29% 42.86% 52.38% Total 543 84.53% 4.79% 10.68% 25.60% 25.78% Source: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act LAR data, 2013; 2015 HUD Low/Mod Data Note: Non -White population includes non-White racial and Hispanic/Latino populations, and excludes any unreported categories. The low/mod population figures come from HUD's 2015 Low/Mod Data, by measuring 80% of the $59,600 AMI, which equals $47,680. Table 25 shows the reasons for denied loan applications by census tract. Because we are interested in exploring lending patterns by census tract, it is important to investigate the reasons why lending requests result in denial. As previously noted, there are ten tracts in the city that are either concentrated with non -Whites or low/mod persons, or both. As shown in the previous table (Table 24), four (40.01, 44.03, 45.01, and 45.02) of the ten tracts have much higher rates of loan denial than the overall rate in the city (10.68 percent). The following summarizes the reasons for loan denial in each of the four tracts: • CITY OF LODI 69 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE • 40.01: Of the 12 loans, 2 resulted in denial. The two reasons for denial were insufficient collateral (the property used to secure the loan has a value too low for securing the loan) and incomplete credit application. • 44.03: Of the 15loan requests, 33.33 percent resulted in denial. The most common reason for denial was insufficient collateral, which isnot surprising in a census tract with an 80.00 percent low/mod population. • 45.01: Of the 21 loan requests, 14.29 percent resulted in denial. The most common reasons for denial were collateral and insufficient cash. • 45:02: Of the 12 loan requests, 33.33 percent resulted in denial. The most common reasons for denial were incomplete credit application, followed by poor credit history and debt -to -income ratio, which isnot surprising in a census tract with a 75.00 percent low/mod population. TABLE 25 REASON FOR DENIAL BY CENSUS TRACT Debt- Mortgage Census Employment Credit Insufficient Unverifiable Credit App Tract History History Cash Information Incomplete I to- Collateral insurance Other Income Denied 40.01 0 0 41.04 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 41.05 0 42.01 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 42.02 0 42.03 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 43.02 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 43.07 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 43.06 3 0 3 6 0 3 9 0 6 0 0 1 44.03 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 45.02 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 14 19 1 4 16 0 19 Source: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act LAR data, 2013 Figures 10 through 13 demonstrate the location of these census tracts and the various rates as seen on a map. CITY OF LODI 70 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE FIGURE 10 LOAN APPLICATIONS r• - :.._.X L. 4E01 42.01 4103 r 43,05 Legend Lalli City Limits FT [+milt* 11at,4, 5c5uriIJary Loan Applications {Uoanlile} 1 6- 15 16-21 !z2-43 44-61 PIL H 5m2.2 m LFS. GwFoa120IQI Sika.{duI Gory ;201 Q. EEnt +.tip. 0hi 0° r -lei Loran Applications Micheel Baker I11TE GNATFONAL CITY OF LODI 71 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE FIGURE 11 LOAN ORIGINATION 41.44 L. 43.05 Legend Lodi City LIIiti1S I -I Ooresus Trac# SOU ndary Loan Origination (Quaniiiel 6-10 11-19 1g-33 34-51 S s�.07 43.003 ; 1 Sw�e Hw]X 77131. U 7 Coma MAI: SA, loan'Vh Om* i#%S!. ilAl Sather up • 1 J 44.02 f j.. u:.L.. Y■ N F.rri Nu 1 a j Loan O iginaflon Michan1 Baker I1TI PPIAL CITY OF LODI 72 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE FIGURE 12 LOAN DENIAL 4104 42.01 42.03 42.04 .15.01 43.03 43.02 43.05 Legend Lodi Coy Limits I -I CEris'' TrArrry Loan Denial (OuaMite) I—I 0% - 596 -996 MI 10% - 149 — 15%-33% 43.07 9., 1.M '(041^,P.U9 C m...*GW1D. $14. Ja•vd. 0:0155 ESR 9� 43-08 44,03 45.02 4-1.04 44.82 .—w A )..5 Loan Deri':.i MlichaeA Balker 114T11.1.1 I* p CITY OF LODI 73 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE FIGURE 13 LOAN FAILURE 41,04 .13.05 Legend C.73 Lodi City Limits I-1 Census Tract So u Maly Loan Failure (Quantile) 1%=4% 5%=8% 9% - 10% 43. 07 4%. cu r r i 44.132 f f E 4r I 1.4MO1.;YY1 4a5 c+e's.e1II1 . Er%Jason Cad :7415:. F.SRIs rtemi 0.5 1.7i I Loan Failure Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL CITY OF LODI 74 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Summary of Lending Data Of the543loan requeststo purchase a mortgagefor a primary residence, lending institutionsapproved financing for 84.35 percent and denied 10.87 percent. VA -guaranteed mortgage requests had the highest rate of loan origination (88.46 percent); however, FHA and conventional mortgage requests closely followed at 81.31 percent and 86.12 percent. As detailed in Table 20, American Indian/Alaska Native, Black or African American, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander applicants experienced a high rate of loan origination (100.00 percent). Asian and White applicants experienced a lower rate at 90.00 percent and 84.35 percent, respectively. Of the census tracts in Lodi, four tracts have large concentrations of non -Whites and low/mod persons aswell as high rates of loan denial. As shown in Table 25, insufficient collateral was the major reason for loan denial in these tracts. The analysis of lending patterns in Lodi does not reveal racial discrimination by lenders during the lending process. However, this analysis does reveal interesting lending patternsin census tracts with high concentrations of non-White persons and low/mod persons. Because rates of denial are higher in thesetracts, possibly creating an impediment to fair housing choicefor personsin these tracts, the City will implement astrategy to increase knowledge of the borrowing process in the tracts identified. FAIR HOUSING COMPLAINTS AND ENFORCEMENT Patterns of complaints and enforcement are useful to assess the nature and level of potentially unfair or discriminatory housing practices in the private sector. Several public and private agencies may receive complaints about unfair housing practices or housing discrimination. At the federal level, the Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FH EO) of the US Department of Housing and Urban Development receives complaints of housing discrimination. FHEO will attempt to resolve matters informally. FH EO may act on those complaints if they represent a violation of federal law and FH EO finds that there is "reasonable cause" to pursue administrative action in federal court. At the state level, the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) has a similar role to FHEO. DFEH also receives, investigates, attempts to settle, and can take administrative action to prosecute violations of the law. FHEO and DFEH have some overlap in jurisdiction and depending on the nature of the case, may refer cases to one another. DFEH is a HUD Fair Housing Assistance Program (FH AP) grantee, meaning that it receives fu ndi ng from HUD to enforce federal fair housing law in the state. CITY OF LODI 75 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity The San Francisco FHEO office provided information on fair housing complaints and cases for the period July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2015. HUD provides FHAP funding annually on a noncompetitive basis to state and local agencies that enforce state fair housing laws which are substantially equivalent to the Fair Housing Act. HUD did not process any complaints in the Lodi over the last three years. Instead, the complaints were referred to DFEH for processing. The FH EO enforces federal fair housing l aw s, w h i l e the DFEH and local agencies enforce both federal and state fair housing laws. The federal Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to discriminate against peoplein thesaleor rental of housing based on race/ethnicity, color, religion, familial status, disability, national origin, and gender. For California agencies, the Fair Employment and Housing Act and the Unruh Civil Rights Act also make it illegal to discriminate based on ancestry, marital status, sexual orientation, source of income, or other arbitrary forms of discrimination. California Department of Fair Employment and Housing The California Department of Fair Employment and Housing provided recordsof housing complaints filed in Lodi for the period July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2015. A total of 16 complaints were recorded in the DFEH report for the past three years. Of those complaints, seven cases were filed in 2012, two in 2013, four in 2014, and three in 2015. The cases filed in 2012 were filed on multiple bases including disability, national origin, religion, and marital status. Of thecasesfiled in 2013, onewason the basis of national origin and one was on the basis of disability. Of the 2014 cases, onewasfiled for national origin, two for disability, and one for family care. In 2015, the final year of the DFEH report, the three cases filed during that year were on the basis of source of income, race, and association with a protected class. No cases were filed on the basis of retaliation, which means the applicant was denied housing based on the fact that they had reported discrimination against the owner. Over the past three years, the most common basis for a complaint isdisability and the second most common is national origin, perhapsindicatingthat in Lodi there may be a need for additional education regarding discrimination against persons with a disability and persons of diverse national origin. The DFEH report shows that 12 cases were closed and four are still open. Of the 12 closed cases, nine were closed through an investigation and finding of insufficient evidence, two werewithdrawn, and one was settled in court. CITY OF LODI 76 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE TABLE 26 FAIR HOUSING CLAIMS BY BASIS Basis of Complaint Number Percentage Disability Race 1 7 44% 1 6% Religion 1 1 6% National Origin 3 19% 1 6% Associated with Protected Class 1 6% IMPIMIllainily care) 2 13% Total 16 100% Source: California Department of Fair Employment and Housing TABLE 27 FAIR HOUSING CLAIMS BY OUTCOME Outcome Number Percentage Conciliated/Settled 1 6% Investigated and insufficient evidence 9 56% Withdrawn after resolution 1 2 13% Open 4 25% Other al o 0% Total 16 100% Source: California Department of Fair Employment and Housing Local Private Sector The San Joaquin Fair Housing Association is a nonprofit agency established in 1983 to serve the citizens of San Joaquin County. The association's services are provided to the community free of chargeand arefunded through theUSDepartment of Housing and Urban Development'sCommunity Development Block Grant (CDBG) program provided by San Joaquin County and the Cities of Stockton, Tracy, Lodi, Manteca, Lathrop, Ripon, and Escalon. The purpose of the San Joaquin Fair Housing Association is to ensure that all members of the community have equal access to safe, affordable housing and to eliminate discrimination in housing. Its office is located in Stockton, but they conduct outreach to all their communities, including Lodi. The San Joaquin Fair Housing Association provides numerous services including: • Information on tenant and landlord rights and responsibilities. • Mediation as an alternative to resolve housing issues for tenants, property management, and owners. This service is free of charge and is provided in an attempt to avoid the costly court system. CITY OF LODI 77 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE • Seminars provided as an educational outreach to the private and publicsectorsofthecommunity. • Training to landlords and tenants. Landlord training includes fair housing laws and basic property management including tenant screening, rental agreements, proper notices, and compliancewith landlord/tenant laws. They also offer training for tenantsincluding how to locate rentals, proper notices to landlords, getting repairs done, and tenant obligations. • Counseling for land lords and tenants. Counselors are avai lable to help both landlords and tenants resolve situations concerning their rental units. Over the last several years, no claims of discrimination have been brought to the San Joaquin Fair Housing Association for processing. Theexecutivedirector cites fear of retaliation as the main reason or individuals decide to handle issues on their own. Despite recent outreach efforts, in which flyers were distributed at businesses in Lodi, no calls or in-person complaints of discrimination have come in to the association's office. The majority of calls instead are related to poor housing conditions. Approximately two workshops per year are offered (in English and Spanish) to residents in which they are provided information on housing discrimination. The executive director also mentioned that with offices being located in Stockton and with limited resources and staff to conduct outreach, Lodi residents may also be less likely to reach out to the organization. HOUSING OUTREACH The City of Lodi provided several opportunities for participation and comment on programs and priorities during the Consolidated Plan and Analysis of Impedimentsto Fair Housing Choice process. Beginning with the Consolidated Plan, on June 11, 2013, staff met with the community as part of a Lodi Improvement Committee meeti ng, in which agroup of six representativesfrom the local business community along Cherokee Lane commented on the need for public improvements along that main thoroughfare that happens to bewithin theCDBG Target Area. On September 10, 2013, staff again met with the community and representatives from the region's service providers as part of a Lodi Improvement Committee's regular monthly meeting. Much of the discussion focused on projects and improvements that could be done along Cherokee Lane. Additionally, on September 29, 2013, staff surveyed participants at the annual Celebration on Central event that serves the low-income and minority communities of Lodi's Eastside. A total of 44 people provided comments, many of which referenced a need for crime prevention or issues with crime and public safety within the neighborhoods. As part of the Consolidated Plan, staff conducted numerous meetings to gather input from residents and stakeholders. On November 7, 12, and 19, 2013, staff conducted a series of community needs assessment presentations and exercises with focused minority populations and the general public. A total of 55 members of the community participated in those exercises. Then, on January 8, 2014, staff conducted a community needs assessment exercise with representatives from local service providers and community-based organizations. A total of nine people attended and participated in that meeting. CITY OF LODI 78 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Similarly, on January 22, 2014, staff conducted a needs assessment workshop with local for-profit and nonprofit developers, the H ou si ng Authority, local real estate and banking professionals, and housing advocates to review and discuss issues related directly to affordable housing. Lastly, on January 30, 2014, staff conducted a follow-up meeting to review and discuss the findings of the community outreach and needs assessment that had been conducted to that date. At the first City Council public hearing to review the Consolidated Plan on April 2, 2014, a total of seven people spoke in support of the various organizations and proposed projects and activities. Letters from one individual and a group of Hispanic residents that took part in the community outreach were addressed and submitted to the City Council. At the second City Council public hearing for approval of the Consolidated Plan on May 7, 2014, a total of four people spoke in support of the various projects and services proposed for 2014-2015, as well as the overall goals and objectives proposed for the 2014-2018 Consolidated Plan period. One letter from the group of Hispanic residents that took part in the community outreach was addressed and submitted to the City Council. No other comments were received during the 30 -day public comment period. After approval of the Consolidated Plan, additional efforts were made to gather updated information and feedback from residents and stakeholders. On June 25, 2015, local organizations, developers, and service providers attended a stakeholders meeting in the Lodi Public Library. Twelve stakeholders attended the meeting. The meeting started with introductions from the group. An overview presentation provided information about the Al update process and requirements. The presentation was followed by a roundtable discussion on the strengths and needs of the community. Comments received were used to updatethegoals and policies of the Housing Element and theAl. See Appendix A for a summary of comments received. Additionally, staff conducted a community workshop in the Lodi Public Library on June25, 2015. Approximately 20 community members attended and provided their comments on the Housing Element and Al update. The workshop included an overview of the Al, and then community members were asked to provide their comments through a series of interactive stations allowing participants to take part in the activities at their own pace. A member of the project team was available at each station to answer questions and guide partici pants through the activities. When surveyed, partici pants said that fair housing assistancewasa high priority servicefor them and their family. Participants also ranked cost and supply as the top barriers to accessing housing. See Appendix A for a summary of additional comments received. In conjunction with the above outreach, staff sent a survey to residents and stakeholders to gather more feedback on the Al. Staff received four responses. When asked about the difficulty of an average family renting or purchasing a safe, decent, affordable unit, participants marked somewhat difficult and very difficult, which were the highest responses compared to the categories of very easy and somewhat easy. Participants said that rental housing was a higher priority to address housing discrimination than for housing to own or obtaining loans. Participants said that discrimination in different rents, fees, or deposits for rentals was most common. Also, they voiced the most concern regarding discrimination that occurs based on race/ethnicity, nationality, and familial/marital status. CITY OF LODI 79 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE PUBLIC POLICIES CITY PROGRAMS The City of Lodi offers multiple programs that encourage fair housing choice or support the City's efforts to remove regulatory barriers to equal housing opportunities. Most of the programs promote affordable housing opportunities for low- to moderate -income households (up to 80 percent or 120 percent of area median income) and preserve the city's existing housing stock. Community Development Block Grant The federal CDBG program provides funds for a variety of community development activities. The program isflexiblein that thefundscan be used for arange of activities. The eligible activities include, but are not limited to, fair housing services, acquisition and/or disposition of real estate or property, public facilities and improvements, job training, rehabilitation and construction (under certain limitations) of housing, and homeownership assistance. From 2001 to 2007, the City used $510,922 in CDBG funds to produce 11 very -low-income units. The City's 2015 CDBG allocation includes funds for the San Joaquin Fair Housing Association to provide fair housing services, such as a housing discrimination and tenant/landlord law hotline, complaint investigation, and outreach and education through publicforums. First -Time Homebuyer Program The City has been awarded $700,000 in state HOME funds for a First -Time Homebuyer Program in 2013-2016 through the California Department of Housing and Community Development. This program provided down payment assistance loans to low-income, first-time homebuyers for the purchase of homes in Lodi. Program eligibility is based on household incomes at or below 80 percent of the area median income(AMI). Section 8 Rental Assistance The Section 8 program is a federal program that provides rental assistance to very low-income households in need of affordable housing. The program offers a voucher that pays the difference between the current fair market rent and what a tenant can afford to pay (e.g., 30 percent of their income). The voucher allows a tenant to choose housing that may cost above the payment standard, but the tenant must pay the extra cost. The program is administered by the Housing Authority of the County of San Joaquin. Acquisition and Rehabilitation Program The City is pursuing a partnership with Habitat for Humanity for an Acquisition and Rehabilitation Program that will allow at least ten vacant and/or foreclosed properties to be purchased and rehabilitated as affordable housing. CITY OF LODI 80 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE BUILDING AND PLANNING PRACTICES Public policies established at the state, regional, and local levels can affect housing development and therefore may have an impact on the range and location of housing choices available to residents. This section discussesthepublicpoliciesenacted by the City of Lodi and their potential impacts on housing development. Zoning and housing -related documents(e.g., housing elements, previous fair housing assessments, and consolidated plans) were reviewed to identify potential impediments to fair housing choice and affordable housing development. Housing Element Law and Compliance As part of evaluating potential impedimentstofair housing choice and housing development, the City of Lodi's draft 2015-2023 Housing Element was reviewed. California housing element law requires that local governments adequately plan to meet the existing and projected housing needs of all economic segments of the community. California housing element law requires each jurisdiction to: • Identify adequate sites which will be made available through appropriate zoning and development standards and with the services and facilities needed to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of types of housing for all income levels in order to meet the city's regional housing needs. • Assist in the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income households. • Address and, where appropriate and legally possible, remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing. • Conserve and improve the condition of the existing affordable housing stock. • Promote housing opportunities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, familial status, or disability. Land Use Policies and Practices The City's existing Development Code regulates the type, location, density, and scale of residential development and exists to protect and promote the health, safety, and general welfare of residents. In addition, the Development Code serves to preserve the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods. Zoning Districts The following is a listing of the residential zoning districts, as well as the commercial districts that permit or conditionally permit residential development in Lodi. CITY OF LODI 81 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE • Low Density Family Residential —RLD • Medium Density Residential —RMD • High Density Residential —RHD Residential land uses are also allowed in the follow ing zoning districts: • Downtown Mixed Use District —DMU • Mixed Use Corridor — MCO • Mixed Use Center—MCE Provisions for a Variety of Housing Permitting different types of housing is essential to providing afull range of housing choice. The City of Lodi has many zoning districts that permit a variety of housing types. Some of the housing types include single-family residential housing, multifamily residential housing, residential accessory dwelling units, mobile homes, duplexes, and family care homes. Table 28 shows the housing types permitted in the various zoning districts in Lodi. No significant barriers were identified for any of the housing types listed below. TABLE 28 HOUSING TYPES PERMITTED BY ZONE Housing Types Permitted RLD RMD RHD DMU MCE MCO Single -Family Dwelling A UP UP X hP Two -Family Dwellings (Duplex) X A A X X A 11ultifamily (3 or more dwelling units) A A Accessory Uses A A A A A A Home Occupations MUP MUP MUP MUP MUP MUP Seasonal Farmworker Housing X A A X X X A 1.11A A Second Dwelling Units A A A X X X s/RV Park X X UP I 1 X X Source: City of Lodi Draft 2015-2023 Housing Element Note: X = not permitted, UP = use permit required, MUP = minor use permit required A = permitted use CITY OF LODI 82 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Licensed Residential Care Facilities The city has 24 licensed residential care facilities: eight adult residential care, nine residential care facilities for the elderly, two adult day care facilities, four residential small care homes for children, and one group home. Residential care facilities are licensed by the State of California to provide permanent living accommodations and 24-hour supervision for persons in need of personal services, supervision, protection, or assistance for sustaining the activities of daily living. Licensed residential care facilities i nclude hospices, nursing homes, convalescent facilities, sanatoriums, and group homes for minors, persons with disabilities, and people in recovery from alcohol or drug addiction. Under state law, the City of Lodi isrequired to permit licensed residential carefacilitiesthat serve six or fewer persons by right in residential districts. Facilities that serve more than six people can be required to have a use permit. The City's Development Code was updated to allow all types of residential care facilities of six of fewer individuals permitted by right in residential zones. Single -Room Occupancy Units Single -room occupancy (SRO) units are generally small and lack separate kitchen or bathroom facilities for every unit. Meals are often provided, and residents stay on a permanent or semi- permanent basis; rent is often accepted on aweekly or monthly basis. SRO units are frequently one of the only sources of housing available to extremely low-income people (in Lodi, a one-person household making $13,950 or less annually qualifies as extremely low income). The Development Code currently treats SROs the same as any group residential use in that projects with six or fewer occupants are allowed by right, and projects with more than six occupants require a conditional use permit. Supportive and Transitional Housing Supportive and transitional housing is geared toward individuals and families who have been homeless and who benefit from supportive services such as job counseling and day care as they get back on their feet and are able to afford their own house or apartment. Residents in supportive and transitional housing typically stay up to a year before moving out. Per state law, supportive and transitional housing must be treated the same as any other residential use in a residential zone. The City Council adopted a Development Code amendment on August 19, 2015, to allow transitional and supportive housing in all zones that allow residential uses. Emergency Shelters Recent state law (Senate Bill 2) mandates that jurisdictions either permit emergency shelters by right in one or more zones or enter into a multi -jurisdictional agreement with neighboring jurisdictions to fund and operate a shelter or shelters to meet their collective homeless needs. The City of Lodi currently meets this new requirement; emergency shelters are allowed by right in the General Commercial (GC) zone. This zone was selected based on access to transit, public facilities, and commercial services. GC sites are all located primarily in downtown Lodi and along Cherokee Lane (a major commercial street with transit access, located adjacent to the eastern residential neighborhoods). Currently, there are five vacant CG sites ranging from 0.24 to 23.06 acres in size that CITY OF LODI 83 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE could accommodate an emergency shelter. Moreover, older motels along Cherokee Lane could be used as emergency shelters if necessary. In sum, available land and existing structures would accommodate the estimated homeless population, approximately 90 unsheltered persons. Second Units The City defines a second unit as"an additional living unit on a lot within a single-family zone." A second unit isa self-contained unit with separate kitchen, living, and sleeping facilities. A second unit can be created by (1) altering a single-family dwelling to establish a separate unit or (2) adding a separateunit onto an existing dwelling. In accordancewith state law, second unitsareallowed without the requirement of a use permit within the RLD, RM D, and RH D zoning districts. The City requires that second units be architecturally compatible with the existing single-family dwelling. They must have separate exterior entrances and be no larger than 640 square feet in floor area or 30 percent of the existing living area of the primary residence, whichever is less. The unit must also have one off-street parking space in addition to the parking required for the existing residence. Farmworker Housing Farmworker or employee housing is property used temporarily or seasonally for the residential use of five or more unrelated personsor families employed to perform agricultural or industrial labor. The accommodations may consist of any living quarters, dwelling, boardinghouse, tent, bunkhouse, mobile home, manufactured home, recreational vehicle, travel trailer, or other housing accommodations maintained in one or more buildings, or one or more sites, and the premises upon which they are situated, including an area set aside for parking of mobile homes or camping of five or more employees by the employer. State law (Sections 17021.5 and 17021.6 of the Health and Safety Code) requires the City to treat employee housing that serves six or fewer persons as a single-family structure and permitted in the same manner as other single-family structures of the same type in the same zone and also to treat employee housing consisting of no more than 12 units or 36 beds as an agricultural use and permitted in the same manner as other agricultural uses in the samezone(Section 17021.6) in zones where agricultural uses are permitted. The Development Code treats permanent housing for farmworkers who live in Lodi year-round the same as other permanent housing (i.e., single-family or multifamily). Seasonal or migrant farmworker housing is currently treated the same as group residential. However, a program of the draft Housing Element proposes to amend the Development Code to comply with the state Employee H ousi ng Act (Health and Safety Code Sections 17021.5 and 17021.6) to treat employee housing for farmworkersor other employees that serves six or fewer persons as a single-family structure and permitted in the same manner as other single-family structures of the same type in the same zone (Section 17021.5). The Development Code will also be amended to treat employee housing consisting of no more than 12 units or 36 beds as an agricultural use and permitted in the same manner as other agricultural uses in the same zone in zones where agricultural uses are permitted (Section 17021.6). CITY OF LODI 84 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Persons with Disabilities Both the federal Fair Housing Act and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act impose an affirmative duty on local governments to make reasonable accommodations (i.e., modifications or exceptions) in their zoning laws and other land use regulations when such accommodations may be necessary to afford disabled persons an equal opportunity to use and enjoy adwelling. The California Government Code requi res local ities to analyze potential and actual constraints and to include programs to accommodate housing for disabled persons. Lodi's Development Code permits certain detached and attached accessory uses and various projections into yards and setbacks. While the Development Code does not specifically indicate that facilitiesfor access by personswith disabilitiesare permitted, accessory usessuch as ram psor liftsfor handicapped accessibility are similar to the specified permitted uses. Ordinance no. 1916 was passed November 4, 2015. It provides a procedure to request reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities seeking fair access to housing under the Federal Fair Housing Act, Americans with Disabilities Act, and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (the Acts) in the application of zoning laws and other land use regulations, policies and procedures. A request for reasonable accommodation may be made by any person with a disability, their representative, or any entity, when the application of azoning law or other land use regulation, policy or practice acts as a barrier to fair housing opportunities. A request for reasonable accommodation may include a modification or exception to the rules, standards and practices for the siting, development and use of housing or housing- related facilitiesthat would eliminateregulatory barriers and providea person with adisability fair access to housing of their choice. Requests for reasonable accommodationsareapproved administratively (without the requirement of a publichearing or other special review) unless the nature of the request triggers a major design review, which is unlikely. Requests for reasonable accommodation shall be reviewed by the Director of Community Development, or designee, with a written determination given no more than 45 calendar days later. The City does not charge a separate fee for such consultation. Reasonable accommodations requests are subject to a building permit. A procedurefor appeals is described in the ordinance. The Development Code does not include any specific programs or provisionsthat specifically obstruct the development of housing or other structuresthat accommodate personswith disabilities. However, there are no special provisions either, which may be a constraining factor on improvements and developments focused to meet the special needs of personswith disabilities. Permit Processing The application process varies dependi ng on thetype of entitlement being requested. A typical single- family development will require a residential allocation, tentative and final tract map, environmental review (negative declaration or environmental impact report), Planning Commission review, City Council review (if a Planning Commission decision is appealed), and construction permits(building, CITY OF LODI 85 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE grading, etc.). From start to finish, the process will typically take 6 to 12 months. A large or complex project, particularly onetriggering state or federal environmental mandates, can take longer. A typical multifamily development will require a residential allocation, environmental review (negative declaration or environmental impact report), Planning Commission review, City Council review (if a Planning Commission decision is appealed), and construction permits(building, grading, etc.). From start to finish, the process for multifamily development approval will also typically take 6 to 12 months. Single-family and multifamily developments are also required to go through the Site Plan and Architecture Approval Committee (SPARC) process. It takes two to four weeks to complete staff review before the development can be submitted to the committee, whereupon the committee takes 21 days to review the project. It should be noted that smaller developments in the city such as one single-family home or two- to four -unit multifamily structures are only required to obtain building permits and are not required to go through the Site Plan and Architectural Approval Committee. Growth Management Allocation Ordinance In 1991, the City adopted a Growth Management Allocation Ordinance (GMAO) to regulate the location, amount, and timing of residential development. Under the ordinance, the maximum number of housing units approved each year by the City reflects a2 percent increasein population. Unused permits roll over to the next year. Theordinanceestablishes a residential density allocation system, with the goal of promoting a mix of housing types. The breakdown by density establishes an upper limit for the number of permits, but does not guarantee that the density quotas for the three categories are attained by the end of a given year. Because in most years demand has been less than the number of available permits, an inventory of available permits has built up. For example, permits for 49 single-family units were pulled from 2013 through April 2015, leaving behind many unused allocated units. Assuming that Lodi's population continues to grow at 1.5 percent annually, the average growth rate from 2000 to 2015, the City will continue to accumulate and not build out at the potential number of allocation units for 2015. More importantly, this means that in total, development permits for approximately 4,923 units will be available to fulfill Lodi's Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), which is 1,931. Of the City's 4,923 total allocation, 3,472 remain for low density, 411 remain for medium density, and 1,040 remain for high density. Taking into account the Housing Element planning period, based on an average number of persons per household of 2.8 and a 1.5 percent growth rate, an estimated 8,817 allocated units will be available for development by the end of the plan period. CITY OF LODI 86 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE The current GM AO excludes commercial and industrial projects; senior housing; on-site replacement of housing in existence as of September 1, 1989; and projects of four units or less. To facilitate the development of affordable units, a program in the City's draft Housing Element will require the City to update the GM AO to exclude affordable housing from units that are required to receive allocations. Overall, the Growth Management Program does not present a substantial constraint to development, but the allocation processaddstimeand cost up front to the development process. Available Vacant Land The extent to which the City of Lodi has available sites for housing affordable to very low- or low- incomehouseholds depends, in part, on zoning standards, particularly the maximum allowed density, minimum parking requirements, building coverage, height, and setback standards. The combination of the City'sflexiblezoning standards, allowancesfor housing on commercial properties, and a history of approving housing, planned development provisions and exceptions and variances indicates that Lodi has land available to accommodate lower-income households. Lodi has both vacant and underutilized sitestoaccommodatethesehouseholds;thesitesareexplained in more detail below. Vacant Infill — This category includes vacant land with zoning designations that permit residential use. The majority of this type of land is located adjacent to existing residential areas or in areas designated for mixed-use development according to the General Plan. Vacant infill sites total 73.8 acres and have the capacity for 1,059 housing units, including 882 units for extremely low-, very -low-, and low-income households. Underutilized —This category includes currently occupied residentially zoned sites capable of being developed at higher densities or with greater intensity than the existing use. All sites have zoning designations that permit residential uses. Underutilized sites total 19.3 acres and could produce as many as 314 units for lower- and moderate -income households. The land inventory analysis in the City's draft 2015-2023 Housing Element indicates that the City is able to accommodate its 2014-2023 RH NA for all income categories. Accessibility of Public Transit Pu bl ic transit plays an important role in analyzing access to housing. Public transit should link lower- income persons, who are often transit -dependent, to major employers where job opportunities may be available. The lack of an integral relationship between public transit, employment opportunities, and affordable housing may impedefair housing choice because personsw ho depend on publictransit will have limited choices regarding places to live. CITY OF LODI 87 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Elderly and disabled personstend to bemoretransit-dependent than other persons. Specifically, many elderly and disabled persons rely on public transit to visit doctors and go to medical appointments, go shopping, or attend activities offered at community facilities. Housing for the elderly and disabled should be located near transit routes, or alternative transit should be made avail able for persons with special needs. This section discusses the accessibility of public transit to major employers, shopping centers, and community and medical facilitiesfrom lower-income areas and from housing for persons with special needs. The City's General Plan includes a Transportation Element that seeks to reduce the reliance on cars and increase the convenience of alternate modes through new connections and improved circulation for transit, bikes, and pedestrians. The City operates its own local GrapeLine transit service, which allows it to closely coordinate land use and transit planning decisions. The following programs that will assist with linking transportation and lower-income households are included in the Transportation Element: • T -P1. Ensure consistency between the timing of new development and the provision of transportation infrastructure needed to serve that development. Regularly monitor traffic volumes on city streets and, prior to issuance of building permits, ensure that there is a funded plan for the developer to provide all necessary transportation improvements at the appropriate phase of development so as to minimize transportation impacts. • T -P2. Review new development proposals for consistency with the Transportation Element and the Capital Improvements Program. Ensure that new projects provide needed facilities to serve developments, and provide all needed facilities and/or contribute a fair share to the City's transportation impact fee. • T -P21. Work cooperatively with the Lodi Unified School District on a "safe routes to schools" program that aims to provide a network of safe, convenient, and comfortable pedestrian routes from residential areas to schools. Improvements may include expanded sidewalks, shade trees, bus stops, and connections to the extended street, bike, and transit network. • T -P35. Require community care facilities and senior housing projects with more than 25 units to provide accessible transportation services for the convenience of residents. CITY OF LODI 88 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING PRACTICES The City of Lodi works directly with the San ,baquin Fair Housing Association, a local fair housing agency based in Stockton that is responsible for receiving, directly handling, and maintaining a working database of fair housing complaints for the City of Lodi. The San Joaquin Fair Housing Association frequently provides training to landlords and tenants regarding fair housing laws. The association also provides educational seminars to the private and public sectors of the community as well as mediation as an alternative to resolve housing issues for tenants, property management, and owners. This service is free of charge to Lodi residents and is provided in an attempt to avoid the costly court system. LODI HOUSING ELEMENT The City of Lodi continues to support the efforts and actions to eliminate affordable housing barriers identified in its Housing Element. The 2015-2023 Housing Element identifies affordable housing barriers and outlinestheCity'splanstoeliminatethesebarriers. Fair and equal housing opportunity remains an important issue in Lodi to ensure that all persons, regardless of their status, have the opportunity to find a suitable home. The Lodi draft Housing Element includes the following policy and program to follow in the ongoing efforts to promote fair and equal housing opportunities. • Policy H -P4.6: Promote fair housing programs and services to residents and property owners in Lodi. Program 4.1: Promote Fair Housing Services. The City shall promote equal housing opportunity for all persons in compliance with state and federal laws by continuing to provide funding for the operation of the City's Affirmative Fair Housing Program. Under the program, the City provides information to the public on state and federal fair laws, provides referrals to county, state, and federal agencies for investigation of fair housing complaints, and providesfinancial support to Stockton/San ,Joaquin Community Housing Resource Board (CH RB), which provides landlord -tenant mediation services. The City will collaborate with CH RB to promote fair housing information and resources at an annual community event. Lodi will promotefair housing activities and resources by providing links through its website to nonprofit, county, state, and federal agencies; providing fair housing information at the Community Development Department public counter; designating a point of contact within the Department to handle fair housing inquiries; and distributing fair housing information at public locations in the city (such as the Lodi Public Library and the LOEL Senior Center). CITY OF LODI 89 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE CONSOLIDATED PLAN Lodi must submit a Consolidated Plan to the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) every five years and is required to update that plan annually. Lodi's 2014-2018 Consolidated Plan is an assessment and analysis of local conditions and issues related to fair housing and other issues: housing, homelessness, community development, and economic development. Using a comprehensive outreach and citizen participation process, the Consolidated Plan describes priority needs facing the community and develops strategies to address those needs, such as prioritizing the particular areas of discrimination that residents experience. LODI ANNUAL ACTION PLAN The Annual Action Plan identifiesthefunding priorities and details the projects proposed to received CDBG funding. The 2015-2016Annual Action Plan includesthefollowing action to reinforcethe City's commitment to removing or reducing barriers to affordable housing over the next several years: • The San .baquin Fair Housing Association provides fair housing services, such as housing discrimination and tenant/landlord law hotline, complaint investigation, and outreach and education through public forums. The City is projecting to assist 2,025 persons and contribute $20,000. LODI CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER) The City contracts with the San Joaquin Fair Housing Association for fair housing services. This local nonprofit agency offers information on fair housing law and tenant -landlord disputes, as well as investigates housing discrimination complaints. Flyers relating to fair housing topicsweredistributed to businesses on the east side of Lodi to increase outreach to low-income residents. Information was available by phone from the agency's Stockton offices five days a week. The City displays fair housing materials at City Hall, and copies of these materials are free to the public. Fair housing information is sent free of charge to those who request it. In addition, the City promotes fair housing awareness in its housing programs and works with housing providers in the city to ensurethefair and equitable treatment of persons and householdsseeking housing in Lodi. CITY OF LODI 90 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The purpose of this analysis is to determine the possible existence of impediments to housing choices based on race, religion, sex, color, national origin, handicap (disability), or familial status and, where identified, to suggest necessary steps to reduce and/or eliminate such impediments. This section describes those impediments and the corresponding actions identified through the analysis. To facilitate reporting of accompl ishments and the association of planned activities with impediments and actions to address, each impediment and action is identified by a number. Actions are labeled according to the impediment they address. Please note that state law requires local jurisdictions in California to assess barriers to affordable housing as part of the General Plan Housing Element. Programs to address impediments to fair housing may be addressed through the implementation of the Housing Element. ECONOMIC AND HISTORIC TRENDS The City of Lodi faces chal lenges si mi lar to other California cities w here demographics, employment, and population trends have changed dramatically over a fairly short period of time. While 40 years may seem significant in a human timeline, for cities and built environments, 40 years is a fairly short period of time. The city's core i nfrastructure, particularly the railroad tracks and the placement of State Route 99, has added to the uneven distribution of lower-cost housing and low-income households. Railroad facilities have commonly been placed in the city proper, and when the railroad was the primary means of long distance overland transportation, this placement was fundamental for commercial vitality. Similarly the placement of State Route 99, which was designed to be a north— south transportation spine down the center of the state, makes sense as it allows easy access to the city without the slowdowns and more impacted transportation patterns of surface streets. However, for the housing built between these two north—south transportation arteries, the division of the railroad tracks and the boundary of the highway create a strip of less -desirable real estate along the eastern side of the city. That strip has become a concentrated pocket of lower-income housing. Less -desirable locations, whether that way by features of nature, or, as in Lodi's case, by features of infrastructure, result in lower land costs. Lower land costs allow for lower-cost housing structures and lower cost -per-unit developments, which begins to address the significant market need for low cost housing. It is doubtful that at any point in Lodi's history, decision makers or the private development market specifically designated the eastern side of the city for lower-cost housing. Nor is it likely that decision makers intentionally aligned the railroad and the highway to create a strip of the city that would asaresult be considered less desirable as a place to livethan the western section of Lodi. CITY OF LODI 91 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE While the lack of intention does not necessarily equal a lack of discrimination, the results are unequivocal. The placement of the north -south transportation arteries created neighborhoods that could not compete in the open land and housing market with the western sections of the city. There have been significant changes in demographics, particularly the large influx of H ispanic households as Lodi has matured. At the same time, the traditional agricultural economy has been replaced with vineyard agriculture, some light manufacturing, and retail and service industry jobs, which are all generally employment sectors with a considerable percentage of lower -paying jobs. These changes have resulted in a significant portion of the population who live on less income, who often have additional language and educational challenges, and who must live in lower-cost housing, even if it is substandard, in order to survive. The physical and demographic designs and changes in the city have created neighborhoods that do not meet the criteria established by H UD as promoting fair housing choice. However, the challenges posed by the decades of demographic and housing market evolution are not simply or easily addressed. The actions available to the City are limited in scope and effectiveness, but the primary challenge will be to encourage private reinvestment in housing stock by the property owners and to encourage the development of new affordable and market -rate housing stock spread throughout the city to help balancetheinequality in supply and demand. CITY OF LODI 92 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE AFFORDABLE HOUSING The provision of affordable housing and the support of existing and new affordable housing are critical to ensuring that all households have access to quality housing. The City of Lodi has produced a diversity of housing types and has adequate land available to meet the projected housing needs of lower-income households. The City is challenged to provide affordable housing in both the ownership and rental sectors of the housing market. The median sales price for a single-family home has continued to rise over the last few years as the housing market recovers from the recession. The median home price in Lodi is now $235,000, which puts homeownership out of range for most low- and moderate -income residents. Low-income households in Lodi would probably still require some assistance to achieve affordable homeownership. Rental housing affordability is particular challengefor householdswith extremely low and very low incomes. Median rents have risen through most of the state, and the average four -person household in the low/mod income categories would have to allocate half of their monthly income to cover the average costs of a thrcc bedroom unit in Lodi. Additional new and the preservation of existing subsidized rental housing is needed to ensure housing affordability. 1. Impediment: Lack of sufficient subsidized and unsubsidized affordable housing supply, particularly for low-income special needs households and persons with disabilities. 1.1 Action: The City of Lodi will continue to pursue available and appropriate state and federal funding sources to support efforts to construct housing meeting the needs of lower- income households. Timeline: ongoing. 1.2 Action: The City of Lodi will continue to offer regulatory relief and incentives, such as expediting the development review process and reducing development impact fees for the development of affordable housing. Timeline: ongoing 1.3 Action: The City of Lodi will continue to ensure the availability of adequate sites for the development of affordable housing. Timeline: ongoing CITY OF LODI 93 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE 1.4 Action: The City of Lodi will continue to allow by right secondary residential units and residential group homes with less than six occupants in residentially zoned areas. Timeline: ongoing 1.5 Action: The City will review each development application and assess the feasibility to partner with nonprofit developers to preserve and increase total rental housing units. Timeline: As development applications are received. 1.6 Action: The City will partner with the Housing Authority to ensure that special needs populations, including single -parent female -headed households with children, persons with disabilities, large families, and seniors, have access to affordable housing options wherever and whenever available. Timeline: ongoing 1.7 Action: The City will track progress made in providing additional access to affordable housing by both the Housing Authority and through any new or rehabilitated affordable housing projects to ensure that special needs populations have the opportunity for improved housing choice. Timeline: Annually. 1.8 Action: The City will continue to work with landlords and property managers to improve conditions of existing affordable (subsidized and unsubsidized) housing stock through enforcement of the Building Code and the Health and Safety Code, and through timely response to complaints of poor housing quality or significant deferred maintenance. Timeline: ongoing 1.9 Action: The City will study thefeasibility of a residential rehabilitation and improvement grant program for low-income, which will allow low-income homeowners with disabilities and landlords to make accessibility improvement to their homes. Timeline: Study program feasibility within one year of adoption. If financial resources are available, develop grant program within three years of adoption. CITY OF LODI 94 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE 2. Impediment: Lack of affordable units suitable for large families, resulting in a concentration of Hispanic households in adjoining low-income census tracts, and disproportionately impacting Hispanic households and households with large families. 2.1 Action: The City will review all submittals for new affordable housing projects, both multifamily and affordable for -sale projects, to identify whether the projects are proposed for neighborhoods that have a high concentration of Hispanic population, and will suggest alternative sites for any affordable projects located in those areas. Timeline: As development applications are received. 2.2 Action: The City will encourage developers, nonprofits, and the Housing Authority to pursue new and rehabilitated affordable housing options, including housing for largefamilies in non -minority concentrated areas. This encouragement may include predevelopment financial assistance, streamlined development processes, property acquisition assistance, or other regulatory relief. Timeline: Ongoing 2.3 Action: The City will require that any affordable housing options located in non -minority concentrated areas of the city be marketed to Hispanic households as well as to other special needshouseholds. Thismarketing will indudematerialsprinted in both Spanish and English, public outreach efforts targeted at both Spanish and English speakers including targeted outreach in minority concentrated neighborhoods, and an evaluation of rental practices to ensure that no discriminatory marketing or application processes are inhibiting qualifying Hispanic households from alternative housing options. Timeline: Ongoing 3. Impediment: Lack of available rental housing subsidy for lower-income households. 3.1 Action: The City will continue to support the San Joaquin County Housing Authority in its administration of the Housing Choice Voucher rental assistance program, which will include distribution of program information at the Community Development public counter, distribution of program information to rental property owners as part of the City's code enforcement activities, annual meetings with representatives of the Housing Authority to discuss actions the City can take to encourage greater participation in the Voucher Program by rental property owners, and creation and mai ntenance of a link to the H ousi ng Authority's website on theCity'swebsite. Timeline: Ongoing CITY OF LODI 95 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE 3.2 Action: The City will look into other waysto support the Housing Authority in preserving and maintaining affordable units, induding potentially providing some funding to help the Housing Authority maintain and add subsidized units in Lodi. For instance, such maintenance could indudeweatherproofing or providing health and safety upgradesto units owned and subsidized by the Housing Authority. Timeline: Currently underway and to be continued annually. 3.3 Action: The City will evaluate the possibility for pursuing HOME Housing Partnerships funding or other state and federal funding, either individually or in partnership with the Housing Authority, to increase the availability and quality of affordable housing units. Timeline: Annually 3.4 Action: The City will consider partnering with nonprofit developers, where possible, to pursue grants and other housing subsidies to construct new or rehabilitate existing units that will be made affordable to low- and moderate -income households. Timeline: Ongoing 3.5 Action: The City will consider programs, incentives, and enforcement options in addressing privately owned substandard rental housing units to encourage reinvestment in the existing rental housing stock so that more existing units may meet HUD's standards and be eligible for Housing Choice Vouchers. Timeline: Annually 4. Impediment: Lack of new or recently built multifamily units resulting in insufficient suitable housing stock for large families, single -parent households with additional need for housing support, and persons with disabilities with accessibility needs, and disproportionately impacting Hispanic family households, single -parent families, and persons with disabilities. 4.1 Action: The City will review the available underutilized and vacant land inventory and consider the viability of rezoning underutilized and vacant properties to make them eligible for multifamily development projects. Timeline: Ongoing CITY OF LODI 96 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE 4.2 Action: The City will consider programs, incentives, and partnering with for-profit and nonprofit developers to facilitate the planning and predevelopment of new market -rate and affordable multifamily housing wherever possible, including underutilized and vacant infill sites. Timeline: Ongoing MORTGAGE LENDING The analysis of home mortgage lending patterns revealed that while the housing market is recovering, the credit markets are still reserved and continue to use tighter criteria in evaluating mortgage eligibility. Themost common reasons fora loan denial area lack of collateral and credit history, which reflects the damage many households suffered to their credit during the recession. Hispanic/Latino applicants experienced the highest rates of loan failurefor all races and ethnicities, not including those who did not report race or ethnicity. The analysis suggested that this was mostly because of insufficient collateral, poor credit history, and an unsustainable debt -to -income ratio. While the lending industry does not havespecificdefinitionsor conditionsthat lead to denialsdueto insufficient collateral, an analysis of the housing market suggests that this denial is probably based on a few specific conditions. First is the lack of sufficient down payment to ensure there is enough equity in the property to cover the mortgage. The increased scrutiny and regulations applied to residential mortgages have put more emphasis on the down payment and have pushed homeownership out of range for households unable to secure sufficient funds for a significant down payment. Second, the recent increasesin housing costsasthehousing market recoversfrom thehousing crisis and the recent recession have driven up the required down -payment costs but have not added enough long-term value for lending institutions to feel confident that the market will continue to grow and by default add equity to properties. Finally, housing market volatility continues to undermine the credit market. Low interest rates reduce the amount of profit that lending institutions can get from the housing market and therefore reinforce stricter lending practices and preference for low-risk loans. The mortgage lending analysis also suggests that those who request mortgage credit to purchase homes in areas that have concentrations of lower-income households and concentrations of minority households are less likely to receive that credit. The analysis suggests that this is related to factors associated with relative income and wealth (credit risk, debt to income, loan to value). Two general strategi es are suggested from the analysis: pre -purchase counsel i ng for homebuyers and the encouragement of lenders to reach out to under -represented populations. CITY OF LODI 97 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE 5. Impediment: Different origination and denial rates based on neighborhood. 5.1 Action: The City of Lodi will periodically monitor Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (NMDA) data and report significant trends in mortgage lending by race, ethnicity, and neighborhood. Timeline: Monitor HMDA on an annual basis and report significant trends to the Planning Commission and City Council. 5.2 Action: The City of Lodi will track fair housing complaints and cases lodged in the city to ensure that lenders are not violating fair housing law with discriminatory lending practices. Timeline: ongoing 5.3 Action: The City of Lodi will support home purchase programs targeted to low/mod households, such as down payment assistance and homeownership mortgage counseling, as long as funding is available. The City may elect to pursue additional funding for down - payment assistance at afuture timeif funding becomes available. Timeline: Beginning July 2016 and reviewed annually. 6. Impediment: Lack of knowledge about the requirements of mortgage lenders and the mortgage lending/home purchase process, particularly among lower-income and minority households. 6.1 Action: The City will offer and support pre -purchase counseling and homebuyer education programs. Timeline: Ongoing 6.2 Action: The City will offer fair housing information to residents, free of charge, to help ensure that both homebuyers and sellers are aware of fair housing law and antidiscrimination requirements. Timeline: Ongoing 6.3 Action: The City of will study the potential benefit to offer and to support home purchase programs targeted to lower-income (low and very low), large family, and minority households. Timeline: Study program feasibility within one-year of adoption. If financial resources are available develop home purchase program within three years of adoption. CITY OF LODI 98 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE FAIR HOUSING EDUCATION AND ENFORCEMENT Promoting fair housing includes both education and enforcement. The City of Lodi will continue to support both education and enforcement efforts. Information from the San ,Joaquin Fair Housing Association regarding the reluctance of residents to make and follow up on fair housing complaints i ndicates that there is need for education regarding fair and equal treatment to persons of different religion, race and ethnicity, age, gender, marital status, presence/absence of children, and household size. This analysis has also indicated that housing discrimination is most prevalent in the rental housing industry. The reported incidence of unfair housing practices in the residential sales market isrelatively low. This can be assumed to be the case because the level of professionalization in thesalesindustry is high and because parties tend to have professional representation. Enforcement efforts will be targeted to rental housing. 7. Impediment: Lack of information on the nature and basis of housing discrimination and the resources available to seek assistance. 7.1 Action: The City of Lodi will monitor the incidence of housing discrimination complaints and report trends annually in conjunction with the CAPER. Timeline: Monitoring will be ongoing with annual reports in conjunction with the CAPER. 7.2 Action: The City of Lodi will include a review of prior year performance regarding affirmatively furthering fair housing in the annual planning for the use of CDBG funds. The City will identify funding support that addresses the removal of impediments or advancing specificfair housing goals. Timeline: Annually. 7.3 Action: The City will work with local agencies to improve the collection and reporting of information on discrimination, particularly based on religion, race and ethnicity, age, gender, marital status, presence/absence of children, and household size. These agencies include the apartment associations as well as the San Joaquin Fair Housing Association and other nonprofit groupsthat regularly comein contact with groups at risk of housing discrimination. Timeline: Ongoing 7.4 Action: The City will conduct fair housing testing at least once every two years to identify the presenceof discrimination. Testing will includeat least five propertieseach time. In afive- year period, at least two typesof discrimination (e.g., race, disability) will be tested. The City CITY OF LODI 99 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE will consider partnering with neighboring jurisdictions to conduct regional testing and will submit a joint Request for Proposals to agencies that have the capacity and experience to complete testing. If ajoint effort is infeasible, the City will consider other ways to ensure that discrimination testing is occurring, either by contracting individually or by participating in capacity building with the San ,baquin Fair Housing Association to ensure that there are no discriminatory marketing practices in the city. Timeline: Conduct fair housing testing at least once every two yearsfollowing adoption. 7.5 Action: The City will continue to work with the San Joaquin Fair Housing Association to improve outreach to residents at risk of discrimination, including marketing, educational efforts, and partnerships with other agencies (schools, utilities, etc.) in the dispersal of fair housing informational materials. Timeline: Ongoing. 8. Impediment: Concentration of lower-income households and minority households in less desirable neighborhoods. 8.1 Action: The City encourages a mixture of household incomes in new developments. As part of the Annual Action Plan, the City will track changes in geographic concentrations for lower-income and minority households. Timeline: Annually. GOVERNMENT BARRIERS The role of local government is critical to providing afull range of housing types and to ensuring the availability of housing suitable for all sectors of the public. The City of Lodi recently adopted a formal policy that describes how a member of the public may request and receive a reasonable accommodation to local regulations. A formal policy is an important commitment to the policy of reasonable accommodation. It also provides the public with a clear road map to reasonable accommodation. Local land use policy should includeprovisionsfor all housing types, including those intended for the homeless. During the last Al cycle, the City of Lodi made the regulatory adjustments needed to define transitional and supportive housing and allow transitional and supportive housing in all residential zones. The City has either made or is currently pursuing all the regulatory amendments necessary to comply with state law regarding multifamily housing, zoning, farmworker housing, emergency housing, residential group homes, and secondary units. The City of Lodi adopted a Growth Management Allocation Ordinance (GMAO) in 1991 to regulate the location, amount, and timing of residential development. Although the GMAO does not present a substantial constraint to development, the allocation process adds time and cost up front to the development process. CITY OF LODI 100 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE 9. Impediment: Growth Management Allocation Ordinance. 9.1 Action: The City will update the Growth Management Allocation Ordinance to exempt housing units affordable to very low- or low-income householdswith long-term affordability restrictions from the allocation. Timeline: Revise Growth Management Allocation Ordinance within a year of adoption of the Draft Housing Element. COMPLY WITH AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING OBLIGATION Action: The City will use mailings to educate people about fair housing and work with the Housing Authority to encourage a diverse applicant pool and good marketing in preparation for when units/vouchers are available. Action: The City will publish online the availability of housing services and programs in the city. Once a year, the City will publish information in Spanish to inform all persons with limited English language proficiency about the availability of housing services and programs in the city. The City also has bilingual staff available daily during business hours to assist. Timeline: Updates to online and bilingual information will be conduction once a year. Bilingual staff available daily during business hours on an ongoing basis. CITY OF LODI 101 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE This page intentionally left blank CITY OF LODI 102 APPENDIX A COMMUNITY OUTREACH SUMMARY CITY OF LODI 103 APPENDIX A COMMUNITY OUTREACH SUMMARY City of Lodi Housing Element and Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice Update Community Engagement Summary STAKEHOLDERS MEETING, JUNE 25, 2015, 2:00-4:00 P.M. Local organizations, developers, and service providers were invited to attend a stakeholders meeting on June 25, 2015, in the Lodi Public Library. Twelve stakeholders attended the meeting. The meeting started with introductions from the group. An overview presentation was presented by the consultant from Michael Baker International with information about the Housing Element, Analysis of Impediments to Fair housing Choice (Al), update process, and federal and state requirements. The presentation wasfollowed by a roundtable discussion on the strengths and needs of the community. Thefollowing comments were received during the stakeholders meeting: STRENGTHS • Emergency shelter services in Lodi include Hope Harbor and Lodi House. • Transitional housing services are limited in Lodi. However, Central Valley Housing provides services to the local area, including Lodi. • The WISH Program provides services in Lodi. SERVICE NEEDS • Need for more transitional housing, as many program participantshavenowheretogoafterthey leave the shelters. • Currently there are 125 people sheltered in emergency/transitional facilities. • There are approximately 91 unsheltered homeless in Lodi. • Lodi is in need of more extremely low-income housing stock. • Nonprofits have seen no increase in grant money for decades to support these kinds of services. • Individuals, not families, are served at the emergency shelter run by the Salvation Army. We need emergency facilities for families. CITY OF LODI 104 APPENDIX A COMMUNITY OUTREACH SUMMARY • Even more support services are needed. • More affordable housing options are needed. • High recidivism rate due to not enough services/transitional housing. That is, participants repeat services instead of being more independent. — Mental health services — Substance/drug abuse • Construction costs are too high to build enough new housing stock. • Tax credits or other government funds are needed to build affordable housing. • Farmworkers are a group in need. Less work means lower incomes, so many are overpaying for housing. • Households"overpaying" isasign that incomes need to increase. • Housing still costs the same, even if someone can't afford to pay, so subsidies are required to makeup thedifferencefor lower-income households. • Small units are difficult to build. • More multifamily units are needed in the community. • In the last 20 years, no new multifamily housing has been built in Lodi. • Build more new single-family market -rate homes and eventually older units will becomeavailablefor rent to low-income households. DEVELOPING NEW HOUSING • More than a few decades ago, federal government funds were used to build or subsidize affordable housing. Now that funding has gone away or been reduced. — Accelerated appreciation — Subsidized rent • Development fees are comparably lower in Lodi than in surrounding jurisdictions. • The County has not lowered its fees, and this impacts development in Lodi. CITY OF LODI 105 APPENDIX A COMMUNITY OUTREACH SUMMARY • Land costs are still high. • No growth policy by City. • Estimated cost to just construct a new unit without accounting for developer profit (including land, fees, materials/labor) would range between $180,000 and $200,000. This amount is too high for developers to be motivated to start new housing development. • County/State/City fees and permits for for-profit business make it difficult to build affordable housing units. CONDITIONS OF HOUSING/HOUSING CHOICE • Low Supply — In the last few years, approximately 660 new single-family developments have been planned, but relatively few have been built. • Lack of newer homes. • Not enough old homes to rent. • Fees are higher than cost to build a house. • State building requirements add cost to house. Low-income households can't afford houses (they need shelter and not all the extras, i.e., LED lights, etc.). • Code enforcement to make sure people are living inhabitableplaces(noslumlords). • Majority of households in Lodi do not have new housing choices, including low-, middle-, and high- income households. • Lack of housing choices. COMMUNITY WORKSHOP, JUNE 25, 2015, 6:00-8:00 P.M. A community workshop was held in the Lodi Public Library on June 25, 2015. Approximately 20 community members attended and provided their comments on the Housing Element and AI update. The workshop started with an overview presentation on the Housing Element and the AI. Then community members were asked to provide their comments at a series of interactive stations allowing participants to participate in the activities at their own pace. A member of the project team was available at each station to answer questions and guide workshop participants through the activities. The following is a summary of the comments received during the community workshop. CITY OF LODI 106 APPENDIX A COMMUNITY OUTREACH SUMMARY STATION 1: HOUSING PROGRAMS AND SERVICES Using sticky dots, workshop participants were asked to identify from a range of housing programs and services that are most important to them. Participants prioritized home maintenance, followed by rental housing assistance and preservation and fair housing assistance. This service is important to me and/or my friends and family: Service Type Agree Disagree Neutral Not applicable Affordable homeownership programs 10 mergency shelters and homeless services 2 Fair housing assistance 11 1 Rental housing assistance and preservation 11 Homeownership education 7 1 Home maintenance and rehabilitation 14 Services for persons with physical or developmental disabilities 9 1 Transitional and supportive housing 8 1 Emergency shelters and homeless services 10 1 Code enforcement 9 Other comments received at Station 1 include the following: • The Lodi City Council needsto adopt an inclusionary ordinance. STATION 2: HOUSING TYPES Participants were asked to identify housing types they would like to see more of in Lodi. As shown below, participants indicated that therewasa need for more workforce housing and condos/apartmentsin Lodi. CITY OF LODI 107 7 APPENDIX A COMMUNITY OUTREACH SUMMARY What housing types do we need more of in the city of Lodi? Total Single-family home W Townhouse 2 Mixed-use building 2 Workforce housing 13 nergy-efficient hom- ADA accessible housing 6 Mobile hom STATION 3: FAIR HOUSING Participants at Station 3 were asked to respond to questions about fair housing in Lodi. When surveyed, participantsvoted that the most common typesof discrimination that they believeoccursinclude(1) refusal to show the apartment/home and (2) different price, rent, fees, or deposit. Participants also voted that the most common barriersto accessing afford abl e adequ ate housing are (1) cost and (2) supply of new housing. Form of Discrimination Form of discrimination Very common, Somewhat important Rare, not important to important to address to address address Refusal to rent/sell mu 4 3 2 Refusal to show 8 4 2 Deception regarding abili price 6 t 2 3 Different price, rent, fees, or deposit 7 2 3 Barriers to Equal Access to Housing Barriers Very common, Somewhat important Rare, not important to important to address to address address 1Coslik ma 13 1 MI Accessibility (seniors and disabled persons) 5 5 11 2 Proper size/type of housing 8 6 CITY OF LODI 108 APPENDIX A COMMUNITY OUTREACH SUMMARY Station 4: Comments Participants had the option to write any additional comments on sticky notes and place them on a poster. Participants were also able to return completed comments cards before leaving. The following are the comments provided: • Affordable housing, even if it is multiple -unit housing, is badly needed in Lodi. We need to build a program to encourage developers to build these homes. • Need most housing for farmworkers and for their families, also housing for the homeless. • My opinion, the state does what it likes. In terms of the families that work in the fields, we need the help from the community, and persons [that are] handicapped [need] fair housing. • I am in agreement with the construction of low-income housing to improve the community. I want too that there is construction of homes for the persons that are on the street. • I want the state to befair with all the persons and families, not only with the ones who have money. I hope! expressed myself well. • I am in agreement that there be houses and apartments in Lodi of low income. • It is very necessary that (they) build low-income houses. In several cities, there are al ready low-income houses, only in Lodi there are not. Why? • I want (them) to build low-cost housing because in Stockton there are and in other places there are houses (low income)and there is no discrimination by race. We don't have differences because we are all the same. • That there are low-cost houses built for farmworkers, and no farmworkers, for people who qualify since in other cities there are (low-income housing), apartments, government housing, where they pay very little. We need for thereto be help. Survey In conjunction with the stakeholders meeting and the community workshop, City staff sent a survey to residents and stakeholders to gather more feedback on the Al. Staff received four responses. When asked about the difficulty an average family has in renting or purchasing a safe, decent, affordable unit, participants marked somewhat difficult and very difficult, which were the highest compared to the categories of very easy and somewhat easy. Participants said that rental housing was a higher priority to address housing discrimination, than for housing to own or obtaining loans. Participants said that discrimination in different rent, fees, or deposit for rentals was most common. Also, they voiced the most concern for discrimination that occurs based on race/ethnicity, nationality, and familial/marital status. CITY OF LODI 109 APPENDIX A COMMUNITY OUTREACH SUMMARY Thefollowing responses were received from survey participants: 1. Currently, I (check all that apply): a. Own my home in Lodi (house, condo, mobile home, or apartment): 0 b. Rent my home in Lodi (house, condo, mobile home, or apartment): 0 c. Represent a housing organization that serves the city: 1 d. Other: • Provide housing services in Lodi • Health care for the homeless providers in San Joaquin County 2. My housing options and choices primarily are limited by: a. Personal reasons/choices: 1 b. High housing costs: 0 c. Availability of financing: 0 d. Distance to work: 0 e. Other: 0 3. Currently, I: a. Commute less than 15 minutes one way: 0 b. Commute 15-30 minutes one way: 1 c. Commute 30-45 minutes one way: 0 d. Commute more than 45 minutes one way: 0 e. Work from home: 0 f. Don't work: 0 Housing Needs 4. For the average person/family, renting safe, decent, and affordable housing in Lodi is: a. Very easy: 0 b. Somewhat easy: 0 c. Somewhat difficult: 2 d. Very difficult: 2 5. For the average person/family, purchasing safe, decent, and affordable housing in Lodi is: a. Very easy: 0 b. Somewhat easy: 0 c. Somewhat difficult: 1 d. Very difficult: 3 CITY OF LODI 110 al APPENDIX A COMMUNITY OUTREACH SUMMARY 6. A number of demographic groups in Lodi face unique housing challenges. Based on your own experience or knowledge, please identify the housing priority for the groups listed below. High Priority Medium Priority Low Priority Not a Housing Need Persons with developmental disabilities 1 1 1 1 Large families (5 or more persons) 3 1 ower income (earning less than $53,050 nnually for a household of 4) Seniors (65 and older) 3 Other: Victims of domestic violence 7. A number of issues limit people's ability to access quality housing. Based on your own experience or knowledge, please identify how the following issues limit access in Lodi. Housing Constraints Severe Moderate Not a Constraint Constraint Constraint gag 1 Availability of public services & facilities 1 2 1 Availability of the proper size/type of housing 2 1 1 Accessibility (seniors and disabled persons) Land use/zoning regulations 4 Processing and permit procedures Development fees 3 1 Fair Housing 8. How common and important it is to address the following areas of housing discrimination in Lodi. Housing Discrimination Very common, Somewhat important Rare, not important important to address to address to address Rental housing Housing for sale 1 2 1 CITY OF LODI 111 APPENDIX A COMMUNITY OUTREACH SUMMARY 9. How common and important it is to address the following areas of housing discrimination in Lodi. Housing Discrimination Very common, Somewhat Rare, not important to important to important to address address address Lce/ethnici 2 Language Gender Familial/marital status 1 3 2 2 3 1 1 1 10. How common and important it is to address the following areas of housing discrimination in Lodi. Form of Discrimination Very common, Somewhat Rare, not important to important to important to address address address tefusaI to rent/sell Refusal to show 1 1 Different price, rent, fees or deposit 3 1 11. Please indicate why housing discrimination might still happen in Lodi (check all that apply): a. Lack of enforcement: 1 b. Lack of reporting : 3 c. Consumers are not aware of rights: 3 d. Sellers/landlords are not aware of the law: 0 e. Other: 0 12. Please indicate which are effective ways to combat housing discrimination in Lodi (check all that apply): a. Enforcement: 2 b. Reporting: 3 c. Education: 4 d. Other: 0 13. Please provide any additional comments you want us to consider during the Housing Element and Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice update process. No comments were received. CITY OF LODI 112 APPENDIX A COMMUNITY OUTREACH SUMMARY Summary Over 30 stakeholders and community members were able to provide their feedback on the Housing Element update and the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (Al) at two workshops in June 2015. Feedback was received via group discussion, sticky notes, comment cards, and interactive exercises. Through this feedback, a few common themes emerged, including thefollowing: • Create More Affordable Housing Options for Low -Income Families, Farmworkers, Transitional Residents, and Seniors. Need for More Transitional Housing. When participants of a program or emergency shelter leave a program/shelter, Lodi does not have enough transitional housing opportunities to support those people while they work on their long-term independence and adjust to new life conditions. Need for More Low -Income Affordable Housing Options. Parti ci pants voi ced that affordable housing opportunities in Lodi are insufficient for demand. Some residents said that new multi- family projects need to be built to help meet the need. Other residents said that new single- family homes need to be built so that the older single-family homes can become available and more affordable to lower-income renters or buyers. — Need for More Farmworker Housing. Participants said that with a slowdown in the farming industry, farmworkers have less work and therefore lower incomes. This makes it especially difficult for them to afford housing. Need for More Senior Housing. With an aging population, more Lodi residents are reaching the age of retirement, which typically results in lower and fixed incomes. Some seniors may also need assistance with daily tasks (driving, cooking, health needs, etc.). Lodi needs less expensive housing for these seniors and housing that provides additional services. • Increase Social Services with Enhanced Government Funds. Representatives from nonprofits said that certain government grant programs have not increased funding levels for years. Despite the greater needs, nonprofit organizations have to serve more people and have the same amount of availablefunds. Social services representativesfelttherewasaneed to increasesupportiveservicesfor homeless, for farmworkers, and for those transitioning out of shelters, rehabilitation, or other programs. • Improve Conditions for Multi -Family Housing Units. No new multi -family complexes have been built in Lodi for over 20 years. As such, existing units are more than 20 years old, and othersare30or more years old. Residents believe that many of the rental units in Lodi are in need of repair. One solution is that they would like code enforcement efforts to continue and even increasewhereneeded to prevent slumlords. CITY OF LODI 113 APPENDIX A COMMUNITY OUTREACH SUMMARY • Reduce Barriers to the Development of New Housing. Experienced developers voiced that building new housing in Lodi, and especially affordable or multi -family housing, is not financially feasible. A reduction in government fccswould help reduce the cost, as well as government assistance/subsidies, like tax credits. Other barriers include the high cost of land in the city and public perception of new development. CITY OF LODI 114 RESOLUTION NO. 2017-231 A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE 2016 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE AND THE 2016 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) TRANSITION PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Lodi is required to conduct an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (Al) as a grant recipient of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program; and WHEREAS, the City has analyzed factors that may impede fair housing choice, and identified a plan to overcome the impediments; and WHEREAS, Fair Housing Choice means each person has equal access to housing regardless of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, familial status, disability, marital status, ancestry, source of income, sexual orientation, and "any arbitrary factor" as protected under other state laws; and WHEREAS, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), adopted in 1990, is a comprehensive piece of federal legislation that prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities and guarantees them the same opportunities as everyone else to participate in civic life; and WHEREAS, the ADA adopts a general prohibition against discrimination as established under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and extends it to cover all activities of State and local governments; and WHEREAS, the City of Lodi's 2016 ADA Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan (2016 ADA Transition Plan) is a two-part plan with the first part identifying and evaluating the City's programs, activities and services for whether they are inconsistent with the requirements of ADA and the second part identifying physical barriers to accessibility and the methods to be used to remove those barriers; and WHEREAS, the 2016 ADA Transition Plan covers a fifteen year period from 2016-2031, and may be periodically updated by the City; and WHEREAS, the public review and comment period for the Al and ADA Transition Plan began November 20, 2017 and ends December 20, 2017; and WHEREAS, a presentation on both documents and an opportunity for public comments and questions was held on December 5, 2017; and WHEREAS, the City of Lodi has held a public hearing with proper notification and at the completion of the mandated public comment period, at the City Council meeting of December 20, 2017, has received comments on the Al and ADA Transition Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lodi City Council does hereby approve: 1.) The 2016 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice; and 2.) The 2016 ADA Transition Plan. Dated: December 20, 2017 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2017-231 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held December 20, 2017, by the following vote: 1) In reference to 2016 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Chandler, Johnson, Kuehne, and Mounce NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Mayor Nakanishi ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None 2) In reference to 2016 Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Chandler, Johnson, Kuehne, and Mounce NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Mayor Nakanishi ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None --)01' 1,� NNIFEIJM. FERRAIOLO City Clerk 2017-231 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice City of Lodi OVERVIEW What is an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice? The Human Rights and Fair Housing Act The Fair Housing Rule and HUD funding Purpose of preparing an Analysis of Impediments (Al) Role of the community • - �.� • ■ - - - • :: =Iit published the Ina •u .o A. Irma ivelyu"rTherin air ousin on Ju6 2015 o aisaoiiity g g y' o familial status (particularly families with children AV.hafitisaftmdollibirinat5Eteltrt0 hair Housing? G,ermI&dlly, it means that the City will take meaningful actions that B. Alit- - • •Artunities" for all within the CitWeteran status C. C8n8itagV8d Annual Performance and Evaluation o sexual orientation, ender Identit /ex ression g r how the Cityis meetingits Wha��1����t����i�It�� yearlyJ►AVtwin-five-year Consolidated Plan SII pg®ple should have fair and equal opportunity to find housing in D. A!'' ,. OPfirOiI t H §itig %61ie6Ebow ti.eo sset meni` r 63 vilifigiit5A ng ailgome in one area. E. Housing Element FAIR HOUSING DEFINED Fair and Equal Opportunity People can not be denied housing based on protected class Protected Classes Federal Race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability, the presence of children, age (over 40), citizenship status, and genetic information State Marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, AIDS/HIV, medical condition, political affiliations, veteran/military status, and status as a victim of assault, stalking, or domestic abuse Thrdi`f'Atlidentifies 9 Impediments. .. that fit in 3 Determines the current state of fairousing, iaentities e n �i �� ri��r�ates a plan to address those g impediments Required of all a e cjes that re granteesf federal HU funds 4 impediments result from a s�oage of ,of stock, ❖3 impediments involve housing discrimination, ❖2 impediments involve the long term impacts of housing policy, C PROr :0 Community workshop & stakeholder meeting were held on June 25, 2015 Community Survey Draft Al was released in November 2017 for public comment �.� Public Comment period closes on December 20, 2017 •.City Council Hearing on December 20, 2017 "Oimitammr's0 W111711, ' , 001 , •,... , WI ( II i 1 i1 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN AGENDA • Legislative authority • Who is protected? • Contents of a plan • Plan funding • ADA improvements in Lodi • Next steps SLATIVE AUTHORI 2. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) - 1990 — Comprehensive requirements to eliminate discrimination — Extends powers of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to apply to all activities of State and local governments — Include local governments that both do and do not receive federal funds Min Who is protected and how? Goal of the ADA Provides people with disabilities access to civic life — Access to programs, services, and activities — Applies to • Physical access to government facilities, programs, and events • Program access - participate in and benefit from • Effective communication to persons with disabilities CONTENTS OF A PLAN • List of physical barriers that limit access to City programs, activities, or services • Methods to be used to remove those barriers and make accessible • Timeline & cost estimates • Name of the official responsible for plan's implementation • Grievance procedure • Self -Evaluation Distributed to every department Thorough review of accessibility Programmatic modifications v. removal of physical barriers Rilli=1,11 BARRIER REMOVAL 1. Communication a. Publicize alternative formats of communication that are available 2. Program Access a. Provide accessible equipment at program facilities 3. Facilities a. Make improvements to City Hall and Carnegie Forum to improve access l'' 1 t • t\ t* ) L� , cc • Timeline 15 years —from 2016 until 2031 —Project prioritizing and phasing • Estimated total cost — $10,311,000 —Costs are rough estimates only and will change according to actual project descriptions TIMELINE & COST ESTI IMPLEMENTATION • Implementation Leadership — ADA Section 504 Coordinator • Each department will have an ADA lead to report progress • Respond to complaints • Coordinates department efforts • Provides resources and information • Programs ADA barrier removal budget GREIVANCE PROCEDURE • Section 504 Coordinator Charlie Swimley Public Works Director 221 West Pine Street Lodi, CA 95241 cswimley@lodi.gov 209-333-6707 ext. 6709 • Grievance forms available to the public • Established procedure to address grievances TRANSITION PLAN FUNDING • Possible sources of funding: • General Fund • CDBG • Transportation Development Act • Measure K • Other State and Federal Grants (as available) • Recent ADA improvement projects • Hutchins Street Square • City Hall Annex • Kofu Park • Ham Lane Overlay (26 ADA ramps, 3 ADA driveways) • Sidewalk Repair program • Grapeline Bus Stop Analysis of Impediments and ADA Transition Plan • November 20t" to December 20t" — 30 day public comment review period — Public comments will be included with the final plan • December 20t" — City Council hearing to review and approve ADA and Al • Submit approved plans to federal agencies CITY OF LODI LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISING INSTRUCTIONS SUBJECT: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR DISCUSSION OF THE 2016 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE (AI) AND THE 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN PUBLISH (DATES): November 18, 2017 ACCT#: 20104930 TEAR SHEETS WANTED: 1 EXTRA (ONLY) DELIVER TO: Community Development Dept. AFFIDAVIT & BILL TO: Community Development - CDBG City of Lodi 221 W. Pine Street Lodi, CA 95241 DATE: Novernber 15, 2017 ORDERED BY: Patrice Clemons TITLE: CDBG Coordinator LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR DISCUSSION OF THE 2016 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE (AI) AND THE 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, December 20, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the Lodi City Council Chambers, 305 West Pine Street, Lodi, CA 95240 in order to consider the 2016 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) and the 2016 ADA Transition Plan. As a recipient of funds from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the City of Lodi is required to conduct an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) and to periodically review that analysis and update it as necessary. The AI includes an analysis of local factors that may impact fair housing choice, the identification of specific impediments to fair housing choice, and a plan to address those impediments. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) states that a public entity must reasonably modify its policies, practices, or procedures to avoid discrimination against people with disabilities. To meet ADA requirements the City has prepared an ADA Transition Plan to partially fulfill the requirements set forth in Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The ADA Transition Plan identifies policies, programs, and physical barriers to accessibility and to develop barrier removal solutions that will facilitate the opportunity of access to all individuals. Planning documents will be made available to the public for at least 30 days before adoption by the City Council. The documents are released on November 20, 2017 for public review and comment. The purpose of this public hearing will be to give citizens an opportunity to comment on both the AI and ADA Transition Plan. If you are unable to attend the public hearing, you may direct written comments to the City Clerk, City of Lodi, PO Box 3006, Lodi, CA 95241, or you may telephone (209) 333-6711. In addition, information is available for review at Lodi City Hall (221 West Pine Street) between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. every other Friday. For a complete office hours schedule please see the City of Lodi website: http://www.lodi.gov/index.lhtm Notice of Non -Discrimination on the Basis of Disability and Reasonable Accommodation The City promotes fair housing and makes all its programs available to low- and moderate -income families regardless of age, race, color, religion, sex, national origin, sexual preference, marital status or handicap. The City of Lodi does not discriminate in admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its federally assisted programs and activities on the basis of disability. Reasonable accommodations will be made available to the disabled, upon request. Translators/Translation services are also available upon request. Any questions, concerns or requests related to these Notices should be directed to the following person: Patrice Clemons, (209) 333-6800 x3404 CDBG Coordinator Patrice Clemons Dated: November 15, 2017 DECLARATION OF POSTING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR DISCUSSION OF 2016 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE AND 2016 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT TRANSITION PLAN On Thursday, December 7, 2017, in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, a Notice of Public Hearing for discussion of 2016 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice and 2016 Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan (attached and marked as Exhibit A) was posted at the following locations: Lodi City Clerk's Office Lodi City Hall Lobby Lodi Carnegie Forum WorkNet Office I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on December 7, 2017, at Lodi, California. 1'1 .•4. PAMELA M. FARRIS ELIZABETH BURGOS DEPUTY CITY CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK ORDERED BY: JENNIFER M. FERRAIOLO CITY CLERK N:\Administration\CLERK\Public Hearings \AFFADAVITS\DECPOSTCDD2.doc EXHIBIT A LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR DISCUSSION OF THE 2016 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE (AI) AND THE 2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, December 20, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the Lodi City Council Chambers, 305 West Pine Street, Lodi, CA 95240 in order to consider the 2016 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) and the 2016 ADA Transition Plan. As a recipient of funds from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the City of Lodi is required to conduct an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) and to periodically review that analysis and update it as necessary. The AI includes an analysis of local factors that may impact fair housing choice, the identification of specific impediments to fair housing choice, and a plan to address those impediments. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) states that a public entity must reasonably modify its policies, practices, or procedures to avoid discrimination against people with disabilities. To meet ADA requirements the City has prepared an ADA Transition Plan to partially fulfill the requirements set forth in Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The ADA Transition Plan identifies policies, programs, and physical barriers to accessibility and to develop barrier removal solutions that will facilitate the opportunity of access to all individuals. Planning documents will be made available to the public for at least 30 days before adoption by the City Council. The documents are released on November 20, 2017 for public review and comment. The purpose of this public hearing will be to give citizens an opportunity to comment on both the AI and ADA Transition Plan. If you are unable to attend the public hearing, you may direct written comments to the City Clerk, City of Lodi, PO Box 3006, Lodi, CA 95241, or you may telephone (209) 333-6711. In addition, information is available for review at Lodi City Hall (221 West Pine Street) between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. every other Friday. For a complete office hours schedule please see the City of Lodi website: http://www.Iodi.gov/index.htnn Notice of Non -Discrimination on the Basis of Disability and Reasonable Accommodation The City promotes fair housing and makes all its programs available to low- and moderate -income families regardless of age, race, color, religion, sex, national origin, sexual preference, marital status or handicap. The City of Lodi does not discriminate in admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its federally assisted programs and activities on the basis of disability. Reasonable accommodations will be made available to the disabled, upon request. Translators/Translation services are also available upon request. Any questions, concerns or requests related to these Notices should be directed to the following person: Patrice Clemons, (209) 333-6800 x3404 CDBG Coordinator Patrice Clemons Dated: November 15, 2017 AVISO LEGAL AVISO DE AUDIENCIA PUBLICA PARA LA DISCUSION DEL ANALISIS DE IMPEDIMIENTOS PARA LA ELECCION DE LA VIVIENDA JUSTA (AI) Y EL PLAN DE TRANSICION ADA 2016 POR LA PRESENTE SE NOTIFICA que se celebrara una audiencia publica el miercoles 20 de diciembre de 2017 a las 7:00 p.m. o tan pronto como sea posible, en las Carnal -as del Concejo Municipal de Lodi, 305 West Pine Street, Lodi, CA 95240 para considerar el Analisis de Impedimentos 2016 a la Election de Vivienda Justa (AI) y el Plan de Transicion ADA 2016. Como receptor de fondos del Departamento de Vivienda y Desarrollo Urbano (HUD) de los EE. UU., Se requiere que la Ciudad de Lodi realice un Analisis de Impedimentos a la Election de Vivienda Justa (AI) y que revise periodicamente dicho analisis y lo actualice segun sea necesario. La IA incluye un analisis de los factores locales que pueden afectar la election de vivienda justa, la identification de impedimentos especificos para la election de vivienda justa, y un plan para abordar esos impedimentos. La Ley de Estadounidenses con Discapacidades (ADA) establece que una entidad publica debe modificar razonablemente sus politicas, practicas o procedimientos para evitar la discrimination contra las personas con discapacidad. Para cumplir con los requisitos de ADA, la Ciudad ha preparado un Plan de transicion ADA para cumplir parcialmente con los requisitos establecidos en el Titulo II de la Ley de Estadounidenses con Discapacidades. El Plan de transicion de ADA identifica politicas, programas y barreras fisicas para la accesibilidad y para desarrollar soluciones de elimination de barreras que facilitaran la oportunidad de acceso a todas las personas. Los documentos de planificacion se pondran a disposicion del publico por al menos 30 dias antes de ser adoptados por el Concejo Municipal. Los documentos se lanzan el 20 de noviembre de 2017 para revision publica y comentarios. El objetivo de esta audiencia publica sera brindarles a los ciudadanos la oportunidad de hacer comentarios sobre el Plan de Transicion de AI y ADA. Si no puede asistir a la audiencia publica, puede dirigir los comentarios por escrito al Secretario Municipal, la Ciudad de Lodi, PO Box 3006, Lodi, CA 95241, o puede llamar al (209) 333-6711. Ademas, la information esta disponible para revision en el Ayuntamiento de Lodi (221 West Pine Street) entre las 7:30 a.m. y 5:30 p.m. De lunes a jueves y de 8:00 a.m. y 5:00 p.m. sada dos viernes. Para obtener un horario completo de horarios de oficina, visite el sitio web de la Ciudad de Lodi: http://wvvw.lodi.gov/index.htm Aviso de no discrimination sobre la base de la discapacidad y el alojamiento razonable La Ciudad promueve la vivienda justa y pone a disposicion todos sus programas para familias de ingresos bajos y moderados, independientemente de su edad, raza, color, religion, sexo, origen nacional, preferencia sexual, estado civil o discapacidad. La Ciudad de Lodi no discrimina en la admision o el acceso a, o el tratamiento o el empleo en, sus programas y actividades con asistencia federal sobre la base de la discapacidad. Acomodaciones razonables estaran disponibles para los discapacitados, previa solicitud. Traductores / servicios de traduccion tambien estan disponibles bajo peticion. Cualquier pregunta, inquietud,o solicitud relacionada con estos Avisos debe dirigirse a la siguiente persona: Patrice Clemons, (209) 333-6800 x3404 Coordinador de CDBG Patrice Clemons Fechada: 15 de noviembre de 2017