Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - January 5, 2000 E-12CITY OF LODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION AGENDA TITLE: Resolution to Support the Passage of Proposition 12, the Safe Neighborhood, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Act of 2000 MEETING DATE: January 5, 2000 PREPARED BY: Parks and Recreation Director RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council support the passage of Proposition 12. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Proposition 12 (bill AB 18) will provide to the City of Lodi roughly $500,000 for the acquisition, development, rehabilitation, and restoration of real property for park purposes in it's Per Capita I and Per Capita II programs. In addition, funds will be made available for competitive grants (Robert-Z'berg-Harris program) that can be used for infrequent refurbishing or innovative recreation programs that meet otherwise unmet needs. Governor Gray Davis signed bill AB 18 in September. Citizens will vote on the proposition March 7, 2000 ballot, which needs only a simple majority to pass. Please see the attached for more information. I remind you that our list of deferred maintenance and general projects is long. This proposition could be a major boost to getting these projects completed. Your support and endorsement would be appreciated. FUNDING: None. (J� Ron Williamson Parks and Recreation Director RWfsb Attachment cc: City Attorney APPROVED: H. Dixon Flyn�i City Manager 12/22/99 FACT SHEET CALIFORNIA PARK & prop 12: The March 2000 park bond' RECREATION SOCIETY Gov. Gray Davis signed Proposition 12 (bill AB 18) on September 21 in Los Angeles. Citizens 7971 Freeport Blvd will vote AB 18, the 'Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal Sacramento, CA Protection Bond,' on-th-e-Wrch 2000a o . requires a situp e—majority to pass (Le., 50% 95832-9701 + 1). This $2.1 billion bond act, the ]a est park bond in U.S. history, includes the following: 9161665-2777 FAX 9161665-9149 Per capita I program $338 million' WVVW cpr5,Q Provides funds to local jurisdictions for the acquisition, development, rehabilitation of restoration of real property for park purposes -60% of the funds are allocated to cities and districts; with a minimum allocation of $30,000.40% is allocated to counties and regional districts. The minimum to regional districts and counties will be $150,000. cidesldistricts: $6.29 per capita counties: $4.00 per capita Contact: Per capita II program $50 million Jane H. Adams, citiesldistrids: $2,70 per capita' Executive Director Roberti-Z'berg-Harris program $200 million 9161665-2777 A -Z -H funds (1) rehabilitation or refurbishing performed annually or infrequently; excludes lane@cprs.org capital improvements and other routine maintenance work; special major maintenance projects include energy efficiency for lands and facilities (i.e., irrigation systems, replace- ment or repair of indoor facility or resurfacing parking lots. (2) innovative recreation programs that respond to unique and otherwise unmet recreation needs of special urban populations; can fund transportation to facilitate access to programs and facilities. R -Z -H requires a match of 30% of project costs. Funds are distributed on following formula: 69% block grants for urbanized areas 60% cities and districts $3.33' per capita 40% counties and regional districts $1.75 per capita 140/6 block grants to heavily urbanized areas 60% large cities $1.86 per capita 40°x6 large counties and regional districts $ .49 per capita 17% competitive grants $33,490,000 88% non -urbanized jurisdictions 12% urbanized, not including heavily urbanized Other funding programs local agencies may compete for funds: CPRS provides RipariaNriverfaquatio habitat $10 million Trails, nonmotorized $10 million the leadership %� Low incometat risk youth $100 million Urban/cultural centers/ $71.5 million Regional youth soccer facilities $15 million zoos/wildlife education to the Playground replacement $7 million CA Heritage Fund $10 million advance Urban forestation proj. $10 million Local Conservation Corps $12.5 million State parks administered by local agencies $20 million positive impact The full text of Prop 12 is available on the CPRS website legislative page and value of (www.cprs.orgllegislative). Search for the text of AB 18. 9199 the profession 1 Proposition number tentative, to be confirmed by November 11, 1999 on society ' State Department of Parks & Recreation will administer, less than 1.5% of total allocation is for grant administration. ' Provides funds to cities and districts with populations of 200,000 or less within urbanized counties with a population greater than 200,000 'The allocations given here are estimates developed by the Department of Parks & Recreation upporters H'M N Funding Allbcatiqns..Cont I- HO1)[)e.-:-Teyt, Supporters His 1+5 ry. U Funding Allocations Aa *666 M: • Funding AMocations by Agencyt • Funding Allocations Detailed List • Per Capita and Related Funding If passed, the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, And Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 would fund a number of local assistance grants that would be administered by the California Department of Parks and Recreation. http://www.safeparks.org/funding.htrW 1114/99 12 DECEMBER 1999 • Job Line... and news from CPRS CPRS PUBLISHES PROPOSITION 12 TALKING POINTS Use these talking points to help educate voters about the key issues These "talking points" cover key concepts to use when educating voters about Proposi- tion 12. It is important to make your presen- tation as specific as possible regarding poten- tial projects should Prop 12 be approved March 7, 2000. Additional information is available at www.safeparks.org or www.cprs.org. How will Prop 12 benefit my community? Throughout California, neighborhood parks have deteriorated and, in that process, have become unsafe and unusable for chil- dren, adults, and families. Proposition 12 tack- les these problems head on by providing sub- stantial grants to local park and recreation agencies (cities, counties, and special dis- tricts) for renovating existing playgrounds and facilities, replacing inefficient lighting systems, and/or rehabilitating buildings and grounds. Prop 12 provides funding through: • Per capita grants, $388 million; • Roberti-Z'berg-Harris grants to urban areas; $200 million; • Grants to low income neighborhoods, $100 million; Playground safety improvements, $7 million; and • Playground safety in state parks, $1 million. Do all areas of the state benefit from Prop 12? Prop 12 calls for a per capita funding pro- gram of $388 million be distributed to local agencies (cities, counties, and special dis- tricts) and $200 million for grants to local agencies in highly urbanized areas (Roberti- Z'berg-Harris program). In addition, the Coastal Conservancy, Wildlife Conservation Board, and various other conservancies (from Tahoe to the Coachella Valley) will re- ceive funds. How do 1 determine what my agency will receive from the per capita program and Roberti-Z'berg Harris grant program? It is anticipated the per capita allocation will be based upon 2000 population data pre- pared by the Department of Finance. The State Department of Parks and Recreation (who will administer the per capita and the Roberti-Z'berg-Harris programs) website, http://www.cal-parks.ca.gov, contains fur- ther information. Who supports Prop 12? A wide variety of state and local civic or- ganizations are supporting the passage of Prop 12 as they recognize the value of clean air, clean water, and safe parks to all Califor- nians. They include: • League of Women Voters of California; • American Assn. of Retired Persons; • Congress of California Seniors; • California Taxpayers' Association; • California Organization of Police and Sheriffs; • National Audubon Society; • Coalition for Clean Air; • California League of Cities; and • California Park & Recreation Society. Does the business community support Prop 12? Yes, in fact the California State Chamber of Commerce has endorsed Proposition 12 as it recognizes the value of clean water, clean air, and safe parks to business retention and development in local communities. In addition the California Manufacturers Association and the California Taxpayers' Association has en- dorsed Prop 12. The California Environmen- tal Dialogue, made up of the state's leading businesses and conservation groups has pre- pared "Land Conservation in California," pointing out the need for protection of our natural environment. You can see their publi- cation at http://www.pel.org. Cal -Tax states, "Cal -Tax endorses Proposi- tion 12 because it is fiscally responsible, it does not raise taxes, and it pays for projects that are important for all Californians." How soon will my community get the funds to Improve our parks? If voters approve Prop 12 on March 7, the Legislature can begin to appropriate funds in the 2000/01 budget. State agencies must ap- prove all fund distributions, but there is no reason why funds cannot be ready for distri- bution in late summer 2000 if the Legislature budgets the funds in the 2000/01 budget year. The State does not have to wait until bonds are sold, since a loan can be taken from the state Pooled Money Investment Account, which will be repaid once the bonds are sold. Who decides how the funds will be used locally? The text of Prop 12 provides the final word on how funds will be spent. Some funds will be distributed on a per capita bases, while others are competitively distributed. Still oth- ers are specifically mentioned in the text of the proposition. Virtually all funds must first be appropriated to the state agency in charge of distributing the funds. State agencies will either use existing distribution guidelines or it will create new ones. The per capita and Roberti-Z'berg-Harris funds can be spent on a wide variety of pur- poses. Local agencies will prepare an appli- cation, explaining how the funds will be spent If voters approve I " "T,.. Prop 12 on March£. s.x Legislature the c 9 !- ii a & num begin to appropr1 WA ate funds in the ' 2000/01 budget in compliance with the provisions of Prop 12. If the application meets the requirements of the law and the regulations, funs will be dis- tributed as soon as the Legislature appropri- ates the funds. Competitive funds (trails, historic preser- vation, etc) will be distributed by the appro- priate state agency based upon applications. There will probably be more than one appli- cation period, so that all the funds are not spent in the first application cycle. Each state agency must adopt regulations or guidelines, and the Legislature must appropriate the money before applications can be received. How will be bonds be paid? How long will it take to pay them off? Steve Kroes, vice president of the Califor- nia Taxpayers' Association, a nonpartisan nonprofit organization dedicated to protect- ing taxpayers from unnecessary taxes, states that "payments on the bonds will be made over 20-25 years from existing revenues in the state general fund. The passage of the bonds commits the Legislature to make these bond payments one of their highest budget priori- ties as they allocate funds." Will my taxes Increase if Prop 12 Is ap- proved? According to a November 1999 memoran- dum from Cal -Tax, "State general obligation bonds like Proposition 12 do not cause a tax increase ... Proposition 12 will require about $140 million a year in debt payments — this is about 0.2 percent of next year's projected general fund budget. This small fraction is a reasonable amount to pay for investing in im- portant facilities that will benefit future gen- erations." Where can 1 get more information about Prop 12? Proposition 12's official website is http:// www.safeparks.org or the website of the Cali- fornia Park & Recreation Society, http:// www.cprs.org. Sent, By: CA PARK 9 RECREATION SOCIETY; 9166659149 ; Nov -23.99 12:19; Page 718 PROPOSITION 12 $2.9 Billion Safe I leighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air and Coetal Protection Bond Act of 2000 L Department of Parks and Rreation (DPR) 5544,730,000 o State Parks Projects S502.750,000 S502.750,000* Cultural Resource Stewar Na"dr. ip Projects 18,000,000 o Volunteer Facility Projects 4,000,000 U. Grants to Local Agencies for ban Parks, Trails and Recreation Facilities S846.$00,000 4 Per Capita Grants to cities, counties d part districts 5388,000,000 * Robert-Z'Betg-Harris Urban Open S isce Crant Prograta 200,000,000 * State Park facilities administered by xat agencies 20,000,000 * Park improvements for low income i id at -risk youth 10010001000 O Playground safety projects 7,000,000 * California Heritage Fund 10,000,000 4 Urban Creeks Restoration, lake ace 10,000,000 O Non-motorimd trail projects 10,000,000 9 Zoos, museums, aquariums and wild fe 71,500,000 4 Regional youth soccer Prtcilities - pri 'ty for projects 15,000,000 serving disadvantaged youth III. Resources Agency 545,850,000 # Los Angeles San Gabriel Rivers $25,000,000 O Kern River, Santa Clarim, county pr ects 13,600,000 4 Sierra-Nevada-Caseade Mountain R ion 6,250,000 IV. California Conservation rps S15,000,000 4 Grants for local Conservation Corps $12,500,000 O State Conservation Corps 2,500,000 V. Wildlife Conservation Boa + Natural Community Conservation P erships (NCCP) S100,000,000 + Wetlands 10,000,000 8 Riparian and watershed lands 10,000,000 4'litreatetted and endangered species 43,000,000 • Ancient redwoods and oak woodlan 13.000,000 O Salton Sea 5,000,000 O Wildlife Conservation Partnership jcets 82.500,000 VI. Department of Fish & Gat te S12.000,000 O Waterfowl habitat projects 55,000,000 4 Wildlife area improvement projects 5,000,000 4 Non-native vegetation removal 2,000,000 VII. State Coastal Conservan 5220.400,000 O Coastal areas, watersheds, wetlands 5145,400,000 San Francisco Bay Area projects 25.000,000 4 Santa Monica Bay projects 25,000.000 4 Central Coast 25,000,000 VIII. Conservancies S135,000.000 4 Tahoe Conservancy 550,000,000 4 Santa Monica Mountains Conservan y 35,000.000 4 San Francisco Say Area Conservanc 30,000,000 rr Coachella Valley Mountains Const ancy 5.000,000 IX Agricultural Land and Ur a Forestry Projects 535,000,ON4 Proposition 12 — the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 SupportForm I/We support Proposition 12, the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000, which will be on the March 7, 2000 ballot. If approved, this act will authorize $2.1 billion in bonds to improve California's state and local parks, our water, air, and coast. You may add my/our name to the Proposition 12 literature and website www.Weparks.orQ. Organization Name Authorized Signature Mailing Address City, State, Zip. Phone E-mail Printed Name Fax Please FAX completed form to CPRS Headquarters at 916/665-9149 RESOLUTION NO. 2000-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL IN SUPPORT OF SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 (PROPOSITION 12) WHEREAS, California's state, regional, and local parks serve as recreational, social, and cultural centers for California's communities, providing important venues for youth enrichment and safety; community identity, protection of natural and historic sites, parkland and open space; and WHEREAS, the State's commitment to state, regional, and local parks has dwindled over the last decade thereby California and its communities have not kept pace with the needed funding for rehabilitation, development, and acquisition; and WHEREAS, during this same period of diminished funding for state, regional and local parks, California's citizens have increased their visits to state and local parks; and WHEREAS, California is known for its incredible natural resources of open space, mountains, rivers, coastline, and forests that positively impact the state and local economy; and WHEREAS, California is largely an urban state where it is projected the State's population will continue to grow by 18 million by 2020; thereby placing more pressure on existing parkland and facilities; and WHEREAS, California's economy is dependent upon maintaining a high quality of life that includes attractive and safe public park and recreation facilities and services; and WHEREAS, the last statewide park bond was passed in 1988; and WHEREAS, Proposition 12, the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000, provides $2.1 billion for state and local park projects to preserve our natural heritage and allow urban areas to expand much needed recreation facilities that serve children, youth, seniors, and families. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lodi supports the passage of Proposition 12, the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000, and encourages California voters to approve this bond act on March 7, 2000. Dated: January 5, 2000 -------------------- -------------------- I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2000-03 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held January 5, 2000 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Hitchcock, Land, Pennino and Mann (Mayor) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Nakanishi ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None ALICE M. REIMCHE City Clerk 2000-03