Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - No. 2016-24RESOLUTION NO. 2016-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING DOCUMENTS AND OFFICIAL ACTIONS RELATING TO THE REFINANCING OF AN OUTSTANDING INSTALLMENT PAYMENT OBLIGATION OF THE CITY OF LODI RELATING TO ITS WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF REFUNDING WASTEWATER REVENUE BONDS BY THE LODI PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the City of Lodi (the "City") owns and operates facilities and property for the collection, treatment and disposal of wastewater within the service area of the City (the "System"); and WHEREAS, the City previously entered into an Installment Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2007 (the "2007 Installment Purchase Agreement") with the Lodi Public Improvement Corporation (the "Corporation"), pursuant to which the City agreed to make certain installment payments in the aggregate principal amount of $30,320,000 (the "2007 Installment Payments"), and caused execution and delivery of Wastewater System Revenue Certificates of Participation, 2007 Series A (the "2007 Certificates"), pursuant to a Trust Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2007 (the "2007 Trust Agreement"), between the Corporation and MUFG Union Bank, N.A., as successor trustee (the "2007 Trustee"), all for the purpose of (i) financing the costs of certain improvements to the System (the "2007 Improvements") and (ii) refinancing, on a current basis, all outstanding installment payments under an Installment Sale Agreement, dated as of December 1, 1991, with the Corporation, and certain outstanding Certificates of Participation (1991 Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Refunding Project) (the "1991 Certificates"); and WHEREAS, the 1991 Certificates were executed and delivered to (i) finance certain capital improvements to the System (the "1991 Improvements") and (ii) prepay, on an advance basis, certain certificates of participation that were executed and delivered to finance the expansion of the City's White Slough Water Pollution Control Facility; and WHEREAS, under current economic conditions, it is possible for the City to refinance on a tax-exempt basis the portion of the 2007 Installment Payments attributable to the financing of the 2007 Improvements and the 1991 Improvements (the "Refinanced 2007 Installment Payments") for the purpose of achieving savings for the benefit of the customers of the System, and to cause an advance prepayment of the related 2007 Certificates (the "Refunded 2007 Certificates of Participation"); and WHEREAS, in order to provide funds to refinance the Refinanced 2007 Installment Payments and cause an advance prepayment of the Refunded 2007 Certificates, the City wishes to ask the Lodi Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") to issue its 2016 Refunding Wastewater Revenue Bonds (the "Bonds") under the provisions of Article 4 of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 6584 of said Code (the "Bond Law"); and WHEREAS, in order to provide revenues which are sufficient to pay debt service on the Bonds, the City proposes to enter into an Installment Purchase Agreement with the Authority; and WHEREAS, the obligations of the City under the proposed Installment Purchase Agreement will be secured by a pledge of and lien on the net revenues of the System, on a parity with a pledge of and lien on the net revenues securing a 2004 installment payment obligation, the continuing obligation to pay the portion of the 2007 Installment Payments that is not being refunded and a 2012 installment payment obligation; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes at this time to take action approving such financing transactions and all related documents and actions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lodi as follows: Section 1. Approval of Refinancing Plan; Authorization of Bonds. The City Council hereby approves the refinancing plan described in the recitals of this Resolution. To that end, the City Council hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority under the Bond Law in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $21,000,000. Section 2. Approval of Installment Purchase Agreement. The City Council hereby approves the Installment Purchase Agreement between the Authority and the City. The Installment Purchase Agreement is hereby approved in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk together with any changes therein or additions thereto deemed advisable by the City Manager, the Deputy City Manager/Internal Services Director or the City Attorney (each, an "Authorized Officer"). An Authorized Officer is hereby authorized and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the City to execute, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to attest, the final form of the Installment Purchase Agreement, and such execution shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of the final form thereof. Section 3. Approval of Escrow Deposit and Agreement. The City Council hereby approves an Escrow Deposit and Trust Agreement between the City and the 2007 Trustee, as escrow bank, providing for the deposit, investment and application of funds to refinance the Refinanced 2007 Installment Payments and defease and prepay the Refunded 2007 Certificates. The Escrow Deposit and Trust Agreement is hereby approved in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, together with any changes therein or additions thereto deemed advisable by an Authorized Officer. An Authorized Officer is hereby authorized and directed for and in the name and on behalf of the City to execute, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to attest, the final form of the Escrow Deposit and Trust Agreement, and such execution shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of the final form thereof. Section 4. Sale of Bonds; Approval of Bond Purchase Agreement. The City Council hereby approves the negotiated sale of the Bonds by the Authority to JP Morgan Securities LLC (the "Underwriter"). The Bonds shall be sold pursuant to the terms and provisions of a Bond Purchase Agreement among the Authority, the City and the Underwriter in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk together with any changes therein or additions thereto deemed advisable by an Authorized Officer. The Refunding Bonds shall be sold at such price and shall bear interest at such rates as shall produce a minimum net present value savings to the City of at least 5% of the principal component of the Refinanced 2007 Installment Payments, as such savings shall be verified and conclusively determined by the City's financial advisor (the "Minimum Savings Requirement"). The Underwriter's discount shall not exceed 1.0%. The final form of the Bond Purchase Agreement shall be executed in the name and on behalf of the City by an Authorized Officer. Section 5. Official Statement; Continuing Disclosure Certificate. The City Council hereby approves and deems nearly final within the meaning of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Preliminary Official Statement describing the Bonds in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B, together with such modifications thereof as may be approved by an Authorized Officer. An Authorized Officer is hereby authorized and directed to (a) execute and deliver to the purchaser of the Bonds a certificate deeming the Preliminary Official -2- Statement to be nearly final as of its date within the meaning of such Rule, (b) approve any changes in or additions to cause the Official Statement to be put in final form, and (c) execute the final Official Statement for and in the name and on behalf of the City. The City Council hereby authorizes the distribution of the Preliminary Official Statement and the Final Official Statement by the Underwriter. The City Council hereby approves execution by an Authorized Officer of a Continuing Disclosure Certificate in substantially the form attached as an appendix to the Preliminary Official Statement. Section 6. Official Actions. The Mayor, the City Manager, the Deputy City Manager/Internal Services Director, the City Clerk, the City Attorney and all other officers of the City are each authorized and directed in the name and on behalf of the City to make any and all assignments, certificates, requisitions, agreements, notices, consents, instruments of conveyance, warrants and other documents, which they or any of them might deem necessary or appropriate in order to consummate any of the transactions contemplated by the agreements and documents approved under this Resolution, including any documentation relating to municipal bond insurance if an Authorized Officer concludes, after consultation with the City's bond counsel, the City's financial advisor and the Underwriter, that it would be cost-effective to purchase such insurance. Whenever in this Resolution any officer of the City is authorized to execute or countersign any document or take any action, such execution, countersigning or action may be taken on behalf of such officer by any person designated by such officer to act on his or her behalf in case such officer is absent or unavailable. Section 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption. Dated: February 17, 2016 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2016-24 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular/special joint meeting held February 17, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Kuehne, Mounce, Nakanishi, and Mayor Chandler NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Johnson ABSTAIN COUNCIL MEMBERS — None 1k .2/7-1)--4-e;c7 PAMELA M. FARRIS Deputy City Clerk 2016-24 -3- EXHIBIT A FORM OF ESCROW DEPOSIT AND TRUST AGREEMENT Jones Hall Draft 2-11-2016 ESCROW DEPOSIT AND TRUST AGREEMENT Relating to $30,320,000 Wastewater System Revenue Certificates of Participation, 2007 Series A This ESCROW DEPOSIT AND TRUST AGREEMENT (this "Agreement"), dated as of March 1, 2016, is between the CITY OF LODI, a general law city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (the "City"), and THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., a national banking association organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America, acting as escrow agent for the 2007 Certificates described below (the "Escrow Agent") and as trustee (the "2007 Trustee") for the 2007 Certificates. BACKGROUND: 1. The City previously entered into an Installment Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2007 (the "2007 Installment Purchase Agreement") with the Lodi Public Improvement Corporation (the "Corporation"), pursuant to which the City agreed to make certain installment payments in the aggregate principal amount of $30,320,000 (the "2007 Installment Payments") and caused execution and delivery of Wastewater System Revenue Certificates of Participation, 2007 Series A (the "2007 Certificates"), pursuant to a Trust Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2007 (the "2007 Trust Agreement"), between the Corporation and the 2007 Trustee, all for the purpose of (i) financing the costs of certain improvements to the City's wastewater (the "2007 Project") and (ii) refinancing, on a current basis, all outstanding installment payments under an Installment Sale Agreement, dated as of December 1, 1991, with the Corporation, and certain outstanding Certificates of Participation (1991 Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Refunding Project) (the "1991 Certificates"). The 1991 Certificates were executed and delivered to (i) finance certain capital improvements to the System (the "1991 Improvements") and (ii) prepay, on an advance basis, certain certificates of participation that were executed and delivered to finance the expansion of the City's White Slough Water Pollution Control Facility (the "White Slough Certificates"). 2. In order to take advantage of prevailing bond market conditions, the City wishes to refinance a portion of the 2007 Certificates, specifically the portion of the 2007 Installment Payments and the 2007 Certificates, respectively, that are attributable to the financing of the 2007 Project and the 1991 Improvements. The City is not refinancing the portion of the 2007 Installment Payments and the 2007 Certificates that are attributable to the White Slough Certificates. 3. For the purpose of refinancing all of the outstanding 2007 Certificates specified on Attachment 1 hereto (the "Refunded 2007 Certificates") and the related 2007 Installment Payments (the "Refinanced 2007 Installment Payments"), the City has proposed to sell the 2007 Project to the Lodi Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") and the Authority will sell the 2007 Project back to the City (subject to the continuing obligation of the City under the 2007 Installment Purchase Agreement). 4. In order to refinance the Refinanced 2007 Installment Payments, the Authority proposes to issue and sell its Lodi Public Financing Authority 2016 Refunding Wastewater Revenue Bonds (the "Refunding Bonds"), pursuant to an Indenture of Trust, dated as of March 1, 2016 (the "Refunding Bonds Indenture"), 5. The City wishes to appoint the Escrow Agent for the purpose of establishing an irrevocable escrow fund to be funded, invested, held and administered for the purpose of providing for the payment in full of the Refinanced 2007 Installment Payments and the payment in full of the principal and interest and premium (if any) with respect to the outstanding Refunded 2007 Certificates, and to provide certain directions to the 2007 Trustee with respect to the Refunded 2007 Certificates. 6. As a result of the deposit and investment of funds in accordance with this Agreement, the Refinanced 2007 Installment Payments will be deemed paid and prepaid under Section 7.1 and Section 9.1 of the 2007 Installment Purchase Agreement, and the Refunded 2007 Certificates will be discharged and defeased in accordance with the provisions of Section 9.01 of the 2007 Trust Agreement and prepaid in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.04 of the 2007 Trust Agreement. AGREEMENT: In consideration of the premises and the material covenants contained herein, the City and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Escrow Bank and 2007 Trustee, hereby agree as follows: SECTION 1. Appointment of Escrow Agent; Establishment of Escrow Fund. The City hereby appoints the Escrow Agent to act as escrow agent for purposes of administering the funds required to defease and prepay the Refunded 2007 Certificates in accordance with the 2007 Trust Agreement. The Escrow Agent is directed to establish an escrow fund (the "Escrow Fund") to be held by the Escrow Agent in trust as an irrevocable escrow securing the payment of the Refinanced 2007 Installment Payments and the Refunded 2007 Certificates as set forth below. All cash and securities in the Escrow Fund are hereby irrevocably pledged as a special fund for the payment of the Refinanced 2007 Installment Payments in accordance with the 2007 Installment Purchase Agreement and the payment of the principal of and interest and premium (if any) with respect to the Refunded 2007 Certificates in accordance with the 2007 Trust Agreement. If at any time the Escrow Agent receives actual knowledge that the cash and securities in the Escrow Fund will not be sufficient to make any payment required by Section 4 in respect of the Refunded 2007 Certificates, the Escrow Agent shall notify the City of such fact and the City shall immediately cure such deficiency from any source of legally available funds. The Escrow Agent has no liability for any such insufficiency. SECTION 2. Deposit and Investment of Amounts in Escrow Fund. On March 10, 2016 (the "Closing Date"), the Authority, pursuant to the Refunding Bonds Indenture, will cause to be transferred to the Escrow Agent for deposit into the Escrow Fund the 2 amount of $ in immediately available funds, to be derived from the proceeds of the Refunding Bonds. In addition, the City hereby directs the 2007 Trustee to transfer to the Escrow Agent for deposit into the Escrow Fund the amount of $ , to be derived from moneys related to the Refunded 2007 Certificates that are available as a result of the defeasance of the Refunded 2007 Certificates. On the Closing Date, the Escrow Agent shall invest $ of the amounts deposited in the Escrow Fund in the federal securities listed on Exhibit A; the federal securities listed on Exhibit A are "Defeasance Securities" as defined in the 2007 Trust Agreement. The Escrow Agent shall hold the remaining $ in cash, uninvested. SECTION 3. Application of Amounts in Escrow Fund. The Escrow Agent is hereby instructed to withdraw from the Escrow Fund and transfer to the 2007 Trustee an amount required to pay the principal of and interest and prepayment premium (if any) on the Refunded 2007 Certificates, in accordance with the schedule attached as Exhibit B hereto, which payment shall also constitute payment of the Refinanced 2007 Installment Payments. Following the payment and prepayment of the Refinanced 2007 Installment Payments and the Refunded 2007 Certificates in full, the Escrow Bank shall transfer any amounts remaining on deposit in the Escrow Fund to MUFG Union Bank, N.A., as trustee for the Refunding Bonds, for deposit in the Bond Fund established under the Refunding Bonds Indenture, to be applied to pay interest next coming due and payable on the Refunding Bonds. SECTION 4. Irrevocable Election to Prepay Refunded 2007 Certificates; Defeasance Notice. The City has irrevocably elected to pay and prepay all of the unpaid Refinanced 2007 Installment Payments and all of the outstanding Refunded 2007 Certificates on the date set forth in Exhibit B, in accordance with the provisions of the 2007 Trust Agreement. The City hereby directs the 2007 Trustee to give notice of the prepayment of the Refunded 2007 Certificates in accordance with the requirements of the 2007 Trust Agreement, at the expense of the City, using the form set forth in Exhibit C. The City further hereby directs the 2007 Trustee to file on the Closing Date the notice attached as Exhibit D on the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board's EMMA system. SECTION 5. Compensation to Escrow Agent. The City shall pay the Escrow Agent full compensation for its services under this Agreement, including out-of-pocket costs such as publication costs, prepayment expenses, legal fees and other costs and expenses relating hereto and, in addition, all fees, costs and expenses relating to the purchase, substitution or withdrawal of any securities after the date hereof. Under no circumstances shall amounts deposited in or credited to the Escrow Fund be deemed to be available for said purposes. The Escrow Agent has no lien upon or right of set off against the cash and securities at any time on deposit in the Escrow Fund. SECTION 6. Immunities and Liability of Escrow Bank. The Escrow Bank undertakes to perform only such duties as are expressly set forth in this Agreement and 3 no implied duties, covenants or obligations shall be read into this Agreement against the Escrow Bank. The Escrow Bank shall not have any liability hereunder except to the extent of its negligence or willful misconduct. In no event shall the Escrow Bank be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages. The Escrow Bank shall not be liable for any loss from any investment made by it in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The Escrow Bank may consult with legal counsel of its own choice and the Escrow Bank shall not be liable for any action taken or not taken by it in good faith in reliance upon the opinion or advice of such counsel. The Escrow Bank shall not be liable for the recitals or representations contained in this Agreement and shall not be responsible for the validity of this Agreement, the sufficiency of the Escrow Fund or the moneys and securities to pay the principal, interest and prepayment premium with respect to the Refunded 2007 Certificates. Whenever in the administration of this Agreement the Escrow Bank deems it necessary or desirable that a matter be proved or established prior to taking or not taking any action, such matter may be deemed to be conclusively proved and established by a certificate of an authorized representative of the City and shall be full protection for any action taken or not taken by the Escrow Bank in good faith reliance thereon. The Escrow Bank may conclusively rely as to the truth and accuracy of the statements and correctness of any opinions or calculations provided to it in connection with this Agreement and shall be protected in acting, or refraining from acting, upon any notice, instruction, request, certificate, document, opinion or other writing furnished to the Escrow Bank in connection with this Agreement and believed by the Escrow Bank to be signed by the proper party, and it need not investigate any fact or matter stated therein. None of the provisions of this Agreement shall require the Escrow Bank to expend or risk its own funds or otherwise to incur any liability, financial or otherwise, in the performance of any of its duties hereunder. The Escrow Bank may execute any of the trusts or powers hereunder or perform any duties hereunder either directly or by or through agents, attorneys, custodians or nominees appointed with due care. The Escrow Bank may at any time resign by giving 30 days written notice of resignation to the City. Upon receiving such notice of resignation, the City shall promptly appoint a successor and, upon the acceptance by the successor of such appointment, release the resigning Escrow Bank from its obligations hereunder by written instrument, a copy of which instrument shall be delivered to the resigning Escrow Bank and the successor. If no successor shall have been so appointed and have accepted appointment within 30 days after the giving of such notice of resignation, the resigning Escrow Bank may petition any court of competent jurisdiction for the appointment of a successor. Any bank, corporation or association into which the Escrow Bank may be merged or converted or with which it may be consolidated, or any bank, corporation or association resulting from any merger, conversion or consolidation to which the Escrow Bank shall be a party, or any bank, corporation or association succeeding to all or substantially all of the corporate trust business of the Escrow Bank shall be the successor of the Escrow Bank hereunder without the execution or filing of any paper with any party hereto or any further act on the part of any of the parties hereto except on the part of any of the parties hereto where an instrument of transfer or assignment is 4 required by law to effect such succession, anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding. The City shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Escrow Bank and its officers, directors, employees, representatives and agents, from and against and reimburse the Escrow Bank for any and all claims, obligations, liabilities, losses, damages, actions, suits, judgments, reasonable costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' and agents' fees and expenses) of whatever kind or nature regardless of their merit, demanded, asserted or claimed against the Escrow Bank directly or indirectly relating to, or arising from, claims against the Escrow Bank by reason of its participation in the transactions contemplated hereby except to the extent caused by the Escrow Bank's negligence or willful misconduct. The provisions of the foregoing sentence shall survive the termination of this Agreement or the earlier resignation or removal of the Escrow Bank. The Escrow Bank agrees to accept and act upon instructions or directions pursuant to this Agreement sent by unsecured e-mail (provided, that for purposes of this Agreement, an e-mail does not constitute a notice, request or other communication hereunder but rather the portable document format or similar attachment attached to such e-mail shall constitute a notice, request or other communication hereunder), facsimile transmission or other similar unsecured electronic methods, provided, however, that, the Escrow Bank shall have received an incumbency certificate listing persons designated to give such instructions or directions and containing specimen signatures of such designated persons, which such incumbency certificate shall be amended and replaced whenever a person is to be added or deleted from the listing. If the City elects to give the Escrow Bank e-mail or facsimile instructions (or instructions by a similar electronic method) and the Escrow Bank in its discretion elects to act upon such instructions, the Escrow Bank's understanding of such instructions shall be deemed controlling. The Escrow Bank shall not be liable for any losses, costs or expenses arising directly or indirectly from the Escrow Bank's reliance upon and compliance with such instructions notwithstanding such instructions conflict or are inconsistent with a subsequent written instruction. The City agrees to assume all risks arising out of the use of such electronic methods to submit instructions and directions to the Escrow Bank, including without limitation the risk of the Escrow Bank acting on unauthorized instructions, and the risk of interception and misuse by third parties. SECTION 7. Termination of Agreement. Upon payment in full of the principal of and interest and prepayment premium on the Refunded 2007 Certificates and all fees, expense and charges of the Escrow Bank as described above, this Agreement shall terminate and the Escrow Bank shall be discharged from any further obligation or responsibility hereunder. SECTION 8. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. 5 SECTION 9. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., as Escrow Agent and as 2007 Trustee By Authorized Officer CITY OF LODI By: City Manager 6 ATTACHMENT 1 REFUNDED 2007 CERTIFICATES I— Maturity Date Outstanding Principal Interest Rate Principal Amount Refunded CUSIP No. _ 1 EXHIBIT A ESCROW SECURITIES First Type of Purchase Maturity Int Pmt Par Purchase Security Date Date _ Date Amount Rate Price A-1 EXHIBIT B ESCROW REQUIREMENTS Interest Prepaid Principal Prepayment Total Payment Date Payment Principal Redeemed Premium Payment B-1 EXHIBIT C FORM OF NOTICE OF PREPAYMENT $30,320,000 Wastewater System Revenue Certificates of Participation, 2007 Series A NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, by the City of Lodi (the "City") that certain maturities of the captioned certificates of participation (the "Refunded 2007 Certificates") have been defeased and discharged under and within the meaning of the Trust Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2007, relating to the Refunded 2007 Certificates (the "2007 Trust Agreement"), and that the City has irrevocably elected to prepay the outstanding Refunded 2007 Certificates on October 1, 2017, at a prepayment price equal to the par amount thereof together with accrued interest thereon to the prepayment date, without premium. The maturity of the captioned certificates of participation will remain outstanding. The Refunded 2007 Certificates consist of the following: Maturity Date October 1 Principal Amount Interest Rate CUSIP Funds for the payment of the Refunded 2007 Certificates have been deposited with The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as escrow bank, and the sufficiency of the funds and investments for the purpose of paying the principal of and interest on the Refunded 2007 Certificates has been verified by The Arbitrage Group, certified public accountants. Additional information regarding the foregoing actions may be obtained from contacting The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., [address to come] or by fax at [fax number to come]. Payment of interest on the Refunded 2007 Certificates shall be made by check or, at the option of any owner of at least $1,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Refunded 2007 Certificates, by wire transfer to a bank account in the United States of America. The principal and premium (if any) payable will be payable by check upon C-1 surrender of the Refunded 2007 Certificates at the Principal Office of The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., [address to come] or by fax at [fax number to come]. Dated: March _, 2016 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A. C-2 EXHIBIT D FORM OF NOTICE OF DEFEASANCE $30,320,000 Wastewater System Revenue Certificates of Participation, 2007 Series A NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, by the City of Lodi (the "City") that certain maturities of the captioned certificates of participation (the "Refunded 2007 Certificates") have been defeased and discharged under and within the meaning of the Trust Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2007, relating to the Refunded 2007 Certificates (the "2007 Trust Agreement"). Funds for the payment of the Refunded 2007 Certificates have been deposited with The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as escrow bank, and the sufficiency of the funds and investments for the purpose of paying the principal of and interest on the Refunded 2007 Certificates has been verified by The Arbitrage Group, certified public accountants. As a consequence of the foregoing actions and in accordance with the 2007 Trust Agreement, all obligations of The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.,, as trustee for the Refunded 2007 Certificates, the Lodi Public Improvement Corporation and the City with respect to the Refunded 2007 Certificates has ceased and terminated, except the obligation to use moneys set aside in escrow as described above and, if necessary, from other legally available funds of the City. The outstanding Refunded 2007 Certificates consist of the following: Maturity Date Principal Interest October 1 Amount Rate CUSIP The City has irrevocably elected to prepay all of the outstanding Refunded 2007 Certificates on October 1, 2017, at a prepayment price equal to the par amount thereof together with accrued interest thereon to the prepayment date, without premium. D-1 Additional information regarding the foregoing actions may be obtained from contacting The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., [address to come] or by fax at [fax number to come]. Dated: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A. D-2 EXHIBIT B FORM OF PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT o= a. U � o ani 0 cd 0 0 o 0 y 0 o O v 0 o a 1 o o g o 0 U O ULn Ln E H� ro E E U o O •- •- a o, 0 cn o o y 3 o o � � ami o 0 U 0 O 5 .0 U U bo 0 0 'C U >~ 0 O • U 0 .mow° 3 0 0 .5 CJ 0' T.3 b i o Y y N v E :� yd U 0 • `6,au au 0 O c E - az PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED FEBRUARY -, 2016 NEW ISSUE - FULL BOOK -ENTRY RATINGS: Fitch: " " Standard & Poor's: " " See "Ratings". In the opinion of Jones Hall, A Professional Law Corporation, San Francisco, California, Bond Counsel, subject, however to certain qualifications described herein, under existing law, the interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes and such interest is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations, although for the purpose of computing the alternative minimum tax imposed on certain corporations, such interest is taken into account in determining certain income and earnings. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, such interest is exempt from California personal income taxes, See "TAX MATTERS." LODI PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 2016 REFUNDING WASTEWATER REVENUE BONDS, SERIES A Dated: Date of Delivery Due: October 1, as shown on inside cover Authority for Issuance. The 2016 Refunding Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series A (the "2016 Bonds") are being issued by the City of Lodi Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") under a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Authority on February 2016, and an Indenture of Trust dated as of March 1, 2016 (the "Indenture") by and between the Authority and Union Bank, N.A., as trustee for the 2016 Bonds (the "Trustee"). See "THE 2016 BONDS - Authority for Issuance." Use of Proceeds. The proceeds of the 2016 Bonds will be used to (i) refinance $ principal amount of City of Lodi (the "City") Wastewater System Revenue Certificates of Participation, 2007 Series A (such amount refinanced constituting the "Refunded Certificates") and the corresponding portion of the related installment payment obligation of the City; and (ii) pay the costs of issuing the 2016 Bonds. See "THE REFINANCING PLAN." Security for the 2016 Bonds. Under the Indenture, the 2016 Bonds will be payable solely from and secured by Authority Revenues and certain funds and accounts held under the Indenture. Authority Revenues consist primarily of installment payments ("2016 Installment Payments") to be made by the City pursuant to an Installment Purchase Agreement dated as of March 1, 2016 (the "2016 Installment Purchase Agreement"). The obligation of the City to make the 2016 Installment Payments is a special obligation of the City that is secured by a pledge of, and payable solely from, System Net Revenues relating to the City's wastewater collection and treatment system (the "System"). The general fund of the City is not liable for, and neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the City is pledged to, the payment of the 2016 Installment Payments. The pledge of System Net Revenues to the 2016 Installment Payments is on a parity with the pledge of System Net Revenues to certain other outstanding obligations, which will be outstanding in the principal amount of $ following defeasance of the Refunded Certificates with proceeds of the 2016 Bonds (the "Existing Parity Obligations"). See "SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE 2016 BONDS - Outstanding Parity Obligations". The City is also authorized under the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement to incur other obligations payable from System Net Revenues on a parity with the 2016 Installment Payments and the Existing Parity Obligations. See "SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE 2016 BONDS" and "THE SYSTEM." Bond Terms; Book -Entry Only. The 2016 Bonds will bear interest at the rates shown on the inside cover page, payable semiannually on April 1 and October 1 of each year, commencing on October 1, 2016, and will be issued in fully -registered form without coupons in integral multiples of $5,000. The 2016 Bonds will be issued in book -entry only form, initially registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York ("DTC"). Purchasers of the 2016 Bonds will not receive certificates representing their interests in the 2016 Bonds. Payments of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the 2016 Bonds will be made to DTC, which is obligated in turn to remit such principal, premium, if any, and interest to its DTC Participants for subsequent disbursement to the beneficial owners of the 2016 Bonds. See "THE 2016 BONDS - General Provisions." Redemption. The 2016 Bonds are subject to redemption prior to maturity. See "THE 2016 BONDS - Redemption." NEITHER THE 2016 BONDS, NOR THE OBLIGATION OF THE AUTHORITY TO PAY PRINCIPAL OF OR INTEREST ON THE 2016 BONDS, CONSTITUTES A DEBT OR A LIABILITY OF THE AUTHORITY, THE CITY, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR ANY OF ITS POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS WITHIN THE MEANING OF ANY CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATION ON INDEBTEDNESS, OR A PLEDGE OF THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT OF THE CITY. THE 2016 BONDS ARE SECURED SOLELY BY THE PLEDGE OF AUTHORITY REVENUES AND CERTAIN FUNDS HELD UNDER THE INDENTURE. THE 2016 BONDS ARE NOT SECURED BY A PLEDGE OF THE TAXING POWER OF THE CITY. THE AUTHORITY HAS NO TAXING POWER. THIS COVER PAGE CONTAINS CERTAIN INFORMATION FOR QUICK REFERENCE ONLY. IT IS NOT A SUMMARY OF THIS ISSUE OF 2016 BONDS. INVESTORS MUST READ THE ENTIRE OFFICIAL STATEMENT TO OBTAIN INFORMATION ESSENTIAL TO THE MAKING OF AN INFORMED INVESTMENT DECISION WITH RESPECT TO THE PURCHASE OF THE 2016 BONDS. The 2016 Bonds are offered when, as and if issued and received by the Underwriters and subject to the approval as to their legality by Jones Hall, A Professional Law Corporation, San Francisco, California, Bond Counsel. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the City and the Authority by the City Attorney, and for the Underwriters by Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation, Sacramento, Califomia. It is anticipated that the 2016 Bonds will be delivered in book -entry form through the facilities of DTC on or about March , 2016. J.P. Morgan The date of this Official Statement is: February 2016. Preliminary; subject to change. MATURITY SCHEDULE (Base CUSIPt: ) Maturity Date Principal Interest Price or (October 1) Amount Rate Yield CUSIP1 t CUSIP® is a registered trademark of the American Bankers Association. CUSIP Global Services (CGS) is managed on behalf of the American Bankers Association by S&P Capital IQ. Copyright© 2016 CUSIP Global Services. All rights reserved. CUSIP® data herein is provided by CUSIP Global Services. This data is not intended to create a database and does not serve in any way as a substitute for the CGS database. CUSIP® numbers are provided for convenience of reference only. None of the City, the Underwriter or their agents or counsel assume responsibility for the accuracy of such numbers. LODI PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CITY OF LODI AUTHORITY BOARD/CITY COUNCIL Mark Chandler, Mayor/Chair Doug Kuehne, Mayor Pro Tem/Vice-Chair Bob Johnson, Councilmember/ Member JoAnne Mounce, Councilmember/Member Alan Nakanishi, Councilmember/Member AUTHORITY/CITY OFFICIALS Stephen Schwabauer, City Manager/Executive Director Jordan Ayers, Deputy City Manager/Treasurer Jennifer M. Ferraiolo, City Clerk/Secretary Janice D. Magdich, City Attorney/Authority Counsel BOND COUNSEL Jones Hall, A Professional Law Corporation San Francisco, California FINANCIAL ADVISOR Lamont Financial Services Corporation Los Angeles, California TRUSTEE Union Bank, N.A. San Francisco, California ESCROW BANK The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. San Francisco, California VERIFICATION AGENT The Arbitrage Group, Inc. Houston, Texas No dealer, broker, salesperson or other person has been authorized by the Authority, the City or the Underwriters to give any information or to make any representations in connection with the offer or sale of the 2016 Bonds other than those contained herein; and, if given or made, such other information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the Authority, the City or the Underwriters. This Official Statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of the 2016 Bonds by a person in any jurisdiction in which it is unlawful for such person to make such an offer, solicitation or sale. This Official Statement is not to be construed as a contract with the purchasers or owners of the 2016 Bonds. Statements contained in this Official Statement that involve estimates, forecasts or matters of opinion, whether or not expressly so described herein, are intended solely as such and are not to be construed as representations of fact. The information set forth herein has been obtained from the Authority and the City and from other sources that the Authority and the City believe to be reliable. The information and expression of opinion herein are subject to change without notice and neither delivery of the Official Statement nor any sale made hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the City or the Authority or any other parties described herein since the date hereof. All summaries of the Resolution or other documents are made subject to the provisions of such documents and do not purport to be complete statements of any or all of such provisions. Reference is hereby made to such documents on file with the City for further information in connection therewith. The Underwriters have provided the following sentence for inclusion in this Official Statement: The Underwriters have reviewed the information in this Official Statement in accordance with, and as a part of, their responsibilities to investors under the federal securities laws as applied to the facts and circumstances of this transaction, but the Underwriters do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information. In connection with the offering of the 2016 Bonds, the Underwriters may overallot or effect transactions that stabilize or maintain the market price of such Bonds at a level above that which might otherwise prevail in the open market. Such stabilizing, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time. The Underwriters may offer and sell the 2016 Bonds to certain dealers and dealer banks and banks acting as agents at prices lower than the public offering prices stated on the cover page hereof and said public offering prices may be changed from time to time by the Underwriters. The 2016 Bonds have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in reliance upon an exemption contained in such act. The 2016 Bonds have not been registered or qualified under the securities laws of any state. Certain statements included or incorporated by reference in this Official Statement constitute "forward-looking statements." Such statements are generally identifiable by the terminology used such as "plan," "expect," "estimate," "budget" or other similar words. Such forward-looking statements include but are not limited to certain statements contained in the information in "THE SYSTEM" in this Official Statement. The achievement of certain results or other expectations contained in such forward-looking statements involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements described to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Neither the Authority nor the City plans to issue any updates or revisions to those forward-looking statements if or when its expectations or events, conditions or circumstances on which such statements are based occur. The City maintains a website. However, the information presented therein is not part of this Official Statement and should not be relied upon in making an investment decision with respect to the 2016 Bonds. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 Rate Covenant 2 Continuing Disclosure 3 Other Matters 3 THE REFINANCING PLAN 3 Estimated Sources and Uses of Funds 5 THE 2016 BONDS 5 Authority for Issuance 5 General Provisions 5 Transfer, Registration and Exchange 6 Redemption 6 Book -Entry Only System 7 SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE 2016 BONDS 9 Pledge of Authority Revenues 9 2016 Installment Payments 10 Defined Terms 11 Pledge of System Net Revenues 12 Rate Covenant 12 Application of System Revenues 12 Outstanding Parity Obligations 13 Additional Parity Debt 14 Subordinate Obligations 15 Rate Stabilization Fund 15 THE SYSTEM 16 General 16 Governance and Management 16 Employees 17 Retirement Programs 17 Insurance 18 System Facilities 18 Environmental Compliance 20 Service Area and Customers 21 Wastewater Rates and Charges 23 Planned Capital Improvements 27 Financial Statements 28 Disposal of Recycled Water 28 Historical Operating Results 30 i Projected Operating Results and Debt Service Coverage THE AUTHORITY RISK FACTORS Rate Covenant Not a Guarantee Statutory and Regulatory Impact Permit Renewal Earthquake, Flood or Other Natural Disasters Projected Operating Results No Reserve Account Limited Recourse on Default Certain Limitations on the Ability of the City to Impose Taxes, Fees and Charges Effect of Bankruptcy Loss of Tax Exemption Secondary Market TAX MATTERS LITIGATION APPROVAL OF LEGALITY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS RATINGS CONTINUING DISCLOSURE FINANCIAL ADVISOR UNDERWRITING VERIFICATION OF MATHEMATICAL COMPUTATIONS EXECUTION AND DELIVERY APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D APPENDIX E APPENDIX F — 31 32 33 33 33 33 34 34 35 35 35 37 38 38 38 39 40 40 40 41 41 42 42 43 — CERTAIN ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION CONCERNING THE CITY OF LODI A-1 — AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE CITY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 B-1 — SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL LEGAL DOCUMENTS C-1 — FORM OF OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL D-1 — FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT E-1 DTC AND THE BOOK -ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM F-1 ii OFFICIAL STATEMENT $ LODI PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 2016 REFUNDING WASTEWATER REVENUE BONDS, SERIES A INTRODUCTION This introduction is not a summary of this Official Statement. It is only a brief description of and guide to, and is qualified by, more complete and detailed information contained in the entire Official Statement, including the cover page and appendices, and the documents summarized or described in this Official Statement. A full review should be made of the entire Official Statement. The offering to potential investors is made only by means of the entire Official Statement. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Official Statement have the meanings set forth in the Indenture (as defined below). See "APPENDIX C - Summary of Principal Legal Documents." Authority for Issuance. The Lodi Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") is issuing its 2016 Refunding Wastewater Revenue Bonds (the "2016 Bonds") under the following legal authority: (i) Articles 10 and 11 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 6584 (the "Bond Law"), (ii) a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors (the "Board") of the Authority on February 17, 2016 (the "Authority Resolution"), and a resolution adopted by the City Council (the "City Council") of the City of Lodi (the "City") on February 17, 2016 (the "City Resolution"), and (iii) an Indenture of Trust (the "Indenture"), dated as of March 1, 2016, by and between the Authority and Union Bank, N.A., as trustee (the "Trustee"). Form of Bonds; Book -Entry Only. The 2016 Bonds will be issued in fully registered form, registered in the name of The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York ("DTC"), or its nominee, which will act as securities depository for the 2016 Bonds. Purchasers of the 2016 Bonds will not receive certificates representing the 2016 Bonds that are purchased. See "THE 2016 BONDS - Book -Entry Only System" and "APPENDIX F - DTC AND THE BOOK -ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM." Purpose of the 2016 Bonds. The 2016 Bonds are being issued to provide funds to (i) refinance $21,415,000* principal amount of the City's Wastewater System Revenue Certificates of Participation, 2007 Series A (such amount being refinanced constituting the "Refunded Certificates") and a related installment payment obligation of the City; and (ii) pay the costs of issuing the 2016 Bonds. Security for the 2016 Bonds. Under the Indenture, the 2016 Bonds will be payable solely from and secured by Authority Revenues and certain funds and accounts held under the Indenture. Authority Revenues consist primarily of installment payments ("Installment Payments") to be made by the City pursuant to an Installment Purchase Agreement dated as of March 1, 2016 (the "2016 Installment Purchase Agreement"). The obligation of the City to make the 2016 Installment * Preliminary; subject to change. Payments is a special obligation of the City that is secured by a pledge of and payable solely from System Net Revenues. The general fund of the City is not liable for, and neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the City is pledged to, the payment of the 2016 Installment Payments. The obligation of the City to make the 2016 Installment Payments does not constitute a debt of the City or of the State of California or of any political subdivision thereof in contravention of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation or restriction. Existing Parity Obligations. The City's pledge of System Net Revenues to the 2016 Installment Payments is on a parity with the City's pledge of System Net Revenues to certain outstanding obligations (the 2004 Installment Payments, the 2007 Installment Payments and the 2012 Installment Payments, as defined below), which are outstanding in the aggregate principal amount of $ as of March 1, 2016 (the "Existing Parity Obligations"). See "THE FINANCING PLAN" and "SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE 2016 BONDS - Outstanding Parity Obligations". Additional Parity Obligations. The City may incur additional obligations payable from and secured by the System Net Revenues on parity with the 2016 Installment Payments and the Existing Parity Obligations. See "SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE 2016 BONDS - Additional Parity Debt". Parity Debt. The Existing Parity Obligations, the 2016 Installment Payments and any future Parity Obligations are referred to as Parity Debt in this Official Statement. No Reserve Account. No debt service reserve account has been established with respect to the 2016 Bonds. Rate Covenant The City covenants in the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement that it will, to the maximum extent permitted by law, fix, prescribe and collect rates, fees and charges and manage the operation of the City's wastewater collection and treatment system (the "System") for each Fiscal Year so as to yield System Net Revenues during such Fiscal Year equal to at least 110% of the Annual Debt Service on all Parity Debt in such Fiscal Year; provided, an adjustment will be made to the amount of System Net Revenues for amounts deposited into or withdrawn from the Rate Stabilization Fund; provided that, for purposes of such calculation, the amount of System Net Revenues before any credits for transfers from the Rate Stabilization Fund to the System Revenue Fund may not be less than 100% of Annual Debt Service for such Fiscal Year. See "SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE 2016 BONDS— Rate Covenant". NEITHER THE 2016 BONDS NOR THE OBLIGATION OF THE AUTHORITY TO PAY PRINCIPAL OF OR INTEREST ON THE 2016 BONDS CONSTITUTES A DEBT OR A LIABILITY OF THE AUTHORITY, THE CITY, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OR ANY OF ITS POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS WITHIN THE MEANING OF ANY CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATION ON INDEBTEDNESS, OR A PLEDGE OF THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT OF THE CITY. THE 2016 BONDS ARE SECURED SOLELY BY THE PLEDGE OF AUTHORITY REVENUES AND CERTAIN FUNDS HELD UNDER THE INDENTURE. THE 2016 BONDS ARE NOT SECURED BY A PLEDGE OF THE TAXING POWER OF THE CITY. THE AUTHORITY HAS NO TAXING POWER. 2 Continuing Disclosure The City has covenanted for the benefit of the Owners and beneficial owners of the 2016 Bonds to provide certain financial information and operating data relating to the City and the System annually, and to provide notices of the occurrence of certain enumerated events. See "CONTINUING DISCLOSURE". Other Matters The summaries of and references to documents, statutes, reports and other instruments referred to in this Official Statement do not purport to be complete, comprehensive or definitive, and each such summary and reference is qualified in its entirety by reference to each document, statute, report or instrument. The capitalization of any word not conventionally capitalized or otherwise defined in this Official Statement indicates that such word is defined in a particular agreement or other document and, as used in this Official Statement, has the meaning given it in such agreement or document. See "APPENDIX C - SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL LEGAL DOCUMENTS". THE REFINANCING PLAN The 2016 Bonds are being issued to provide funds to (i) refinance the Refunded Certificates and the corresponding portion of the related installment payment obligation of the City, and (ii) pay the costs of issuing the 2016 Bonds. The Refunded Certificates were executed and delivered for the purpose of (i) financing certain additions, betterments, extensions, replacements and improvements to the System (ii) funding a debt service reserve account for the Refunded Certificates and (iii) paying the costs of execution and delivery of the Refunded Certificates. The Refunded Certificates are expected to consist of the amounts set forth in the following table. The specific maturities and amounts will be determined by the District at the time of sale of the 2016 Bonds. 3 Wastewater System Revenue Certificates of Participation, 2007 Series A Outstanding Maturity Date Principal Refunding (October 1) Amount Amount* CUSIP Numberf 2018 $185,000 $135,000 540279BG0 2019 185,000 135,000 540279BH8 2020 200,000 145,000 540279BJ4 2021 215,000 155,000 540279BK1 2022 230,000 170,000 540279BL9 2023 240,000 175,000 540279BM7 2024 630,000 465,000 540279BN5 2025 2,835,000 2,100,000 540279BP0 2026 2,980,000 2,205,000 540279BQ8 2032 10,150,000 7,505,000 540279BR6 2037 11,120,000 8,225,000 540279BS4 Total $28,970,000 $21,415,000 Upon the execution and delivery of the Bonds, a portion of the proceeds and available moneys from the Refunded Certificates shall be applied to the purchase of certain direct obligations of the United States of America, which, along with uninvested cash and earnings on the obligations, will satisfy the City's payment obligations with respect to the Refunded Certificates until their payment or prepayment dates. These direct obligations and uninvested cash shall be deposited in an escrow account held by The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as escrow agent for the Refunded Certificates (the "Escrow Agent") under an escrow agreement (the "Escrow Agreement"). The obligations of the United States of America so deposited with the Escrow Agent into the escrow account for the Refunded Certificates will bear interest at such rates and will be scheduled to mature at such times and in such amounts that, when paid in accordance with their terms, together with any other funds held by the Escrow Agent under the Escrow Agreement, will be sufficient to make full and timely payment of the principal of and interest evidenced and represented by the Refunded Certificates prior to October 1, 2017 and to pay the prepayment price of the outstanding Refunded Certificates on such date. For information on mathematical verification for the sufficiency of scheduled payments with respect to such obligations of the United States of America and other funds held by the Escrow Agent to make such payments with respect to the Refunded Certificates, see "VERIFICATION OF MATHEMATICAL COMPUTATIONS." Upon such irrevocable deposit with the Escrow Agent and the receipt by the Escrow Agent of irrevocable escrow instructions from the City under the Escrow Agreement, the Refunded Certificates will be defeased and the owners of the Refunded Certificates will no longer be entitled to the benefits of the legal documents under which they were executed and delivered. I- CUSIP® is a registered trademark of the American Bankers Association. CUSIP Global Services (CGS) is managed on behalf of the American Bankers Association by S&P Capital IQ. Copyright© 2016 CUSIP Global Services. All rights reserved. CUSIP® data herein is provided by CUSIP Global Services. This data is not intended to create a database and does not serve in any way as a substitute for the CGS database. CUSIP® numbers are provided for convenience of reference only. None of the City, the Underwriters or their agents or counsel assume responsibility for the accuracy of such numbers. 4 The amounts held and invested by the Escrow Agent in the Escrow Fund are pledged solely to the payment of the Refunded Certificates. Neither the funds deposited in the Escrow Fund nor the interest on the invested funds will be available for the payment of debt service on the 2016 Bonds. Estimated Sources and Uses of Funds The estimated sources and uses of funds relating to the 2016 Bonds are as follows: Sources: Principal Amount Plus Original Issue Premium Less Underwriters' Discount Plus Available Money Relating to the Refunded Certificates Total Sources Uses: Escrow Fund Costs of Issuance (1) Total Uses (I) Represents funds to be used to pay Costs of Issuance, which include legal fees, printing costs, rating agency fees and other miscellaneous expenses. THE 2016 BONDS Authority for Issuance The 2016 Bonds are being issued under the Bond Law, the Authority Resolution (which was adopted by the Board of Directors of the Authority on February 17, 2016), the City Resolution (which was adopted by the City Council on February 17, 2016), and the Indenture. General Provisions Bond Terms. The 2016 Bonds will be dated their date of delivery and issued in fully registered form without coupons in integral multiples of $5,000. The 2016 Bonds will mature in the amounts and on the dates, and bear interest at the annual rates, set forth on the inside cover page of this Official Statement. Payments of Principal and Interest. Interest on the 2016 Bonds will be payable on April 1 and October 1 in each year, beginning October 1, 2016 (each an "Interest Payment Date"). Principal on the 2016 Bonds will be payable on October 1 in the amounts and in the years set forth on the inside front cover of this Official Statement. While the 2016 Bonds are subject to the book -entry system, the principal, interest and any prepayment premium with respect to the 2016 Bonds will be paid by the Trustee to DTC for subsequent disbursement to beneficial owners of the 2016 Bonds. See APPENDIX F — "DTC AND THE BOOK -ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM." Interest on the 2016 Bonds is payable from the Interest Payment Date next preceding the date of authentication thereof unless: 5 a Bond is authenticated on or before an Interest Payment Date and after the close of business on the preceding Record Date, in which event it will bear interest from such Interest Payment Date, • a Bond is authenticated on or before the first Record Date, in which event interest thereon will be payable from the Closing Date, or interest on any 2016 Bond is in default as of the date of authentication thereof, in which event interest thereon will be payable from the date to which interest has been paid in full, payable on each Interest Payment Date. Principal and premium, if any, with respect to each 2016 Bond is payable upon surrender of such Bond at the Office of the Trustee in San Francisco, California, upon maturity or the earlier redemption thereof. The principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the 2016 Bonds will be payable in lawful money of the United States of America. Interest with respect to the 2016 Bonds will be computed on the basis of a 360 day year composed of twelve 30 -day months. Transfer, Registration and Exchange See "APPENDIX C - Summary of Principal Legal Documents" for a description of the provisions of the Indenture relating to the transfer, registration and exchange of the 2016 Bonds. Redemption Optional Redemption. The Bonds maturing on or before October 1, 2026, are not subject to optional redemption prior to their respective stated maturity dates. The Bonds maturing on or after October 1, 2027, are subject to redemption in whole, or in part at the Written Request of the Authority among maturities on such basis as the Authority may designate and within a maturity as set forth in the Indenture, at the option of the Authority, on any date on or after October 1, 2026, from any available source of funds, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed, plus accrued interest to the date of redemption, without premium. Mandatory Sinking Fund Redemption. The Term Bonds are subject to mandatory redemption in part by lot, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof to be redeemed, without premium, in the aggregate respective principal amounts and on October 1 in the respective years as set forth in the following tables; provided, however, that if some but not all of the Term Bonds have been redeemed pursuant to the optional redemption provisions of the Indenture, the total amount of all future sinking fund payments shall be reduced by the aggregate principal amount of the Term Bonds so redeemed, to be allocated among such sinking fund payments on a pro rata basis in integral multiples of $5,000 (as set forth in a schedule provided by the Authority to the Trustee). 6 Bonds Maturing October 1, Sinking Fund Redemption Date (October 1) Selection of Bonds for Redemption Principal Amount To Be Redeemed Whenever provision is made in this Indenture for the redemption of less than all of the Bonds of a single maturity, the Trustee shall select the Bonds of that maturity to be redeemed by lot in any manner which the Trustee in its sole discretion deems appropriate. For purposes of such selection, the Trustee shall treat each Bond as consisting of separate $5,000 portions and each such portion shall be subject to redemption as if such portion were a separate Bond. Notice of Redemption; Rescission The Trustee shall mail notice of redemption of the Bonds by first class mail, postage prepaid, not less than 30 nor more than 60 days before any redemption date, to the respective Owners of any Bonds designated for redemption at their addresses appearing on the Registration Books and to one or more Securities Depositories and to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. Each notice of redemption shall state the date of the notice, the redemption date, the place or places of redemption, whether less than all of the Bonds (or all Bonds of a single maturity) are to be redeemed, the CUSIP numbers and (in the event that not all Bonds within a maturity are called for redemption) Bond numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the maturity or maturities of the Bonds to be redeemed, and in the case of Bonds to be redeemed in part only, the respective portions of the principal amount thereof to be redeemed. Each such notice shall also state that on the redemption date there will become due and payable on each of said Bonds the redemption price thereof, and that from and after such redemption date interest thereon shall cease to accrue, and shall require that such Bonds be then surrendered. Neither the failure to receive any notice nor any defect therein shall affect the sufficiency of the proceedings for such redemption or the cessation of accrual of interest from and after the redemption date. Notice of redemption of Bonds shall be given by the Trustee, at the expense of the Authority, for and on behalf of the Authority. The Authority has the right to rescind any notice of the optional redemption of Bonds by written notice to the Trustee on or prior to the date fixed for redemption. Any notice of redemption shall be cancelled and annulled if for any reason funds will not be or are not available on the date fixed for redemption for the payment in full of the Bonds then called for redemption, and such cancellation shall not constitute an Event of Default. The Authority and the Trustee have no liability to the Bond Owners or any other party related to or arising from such rescission of redemption. The Trustee shall mail notice of such rescission of redemption in the same manner as the original notice of redemption was sent under this Section. 7 Effect of Redemption Notice of redemption having been duly given as aforesaid, and moneys for payment of the redemption price of, together with interest accrued to the date fixed for redemption on, including any applicable premium, the Bonds (or portions thereof) so called for redemption being held by the Trustee, on the redemption date designated in such notice, the Bonds (or portions thereof) so called for redemption shall become due and payable, interest on the Bonds so called for redemption shall cease to accrue, said Bonds (or portions thereof) shall cease to be entitled to any benefit or security under this Indenture, and the Owners of said Bonds shall have no rights in respect thereof except to receive payment of the redemption price thereof. Book -Entry Only System The 2016 Bonds will be issued as fully registered bonds in book -entry only form, registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of DTC, and will be available to ultimate purchasers in the integral multiples of $5,000, under the book -entry system maintained by DTC. While the 2016 Bonds are subject to the book -entry system, the principal, interest and any prepayment premium with respect to a Bond will be paid by the Trustee to DTC, which in turn is obligated to remit such payment to its DTC Participants for subsequent disbursement to Beneficial Owners of the 2016 Bonds. Purchasers of the 2016 Bonds will not receive certificates representing their interests therein, which will be held at DTC. See "APPENDIX F - DTC AND THE BOOK -ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM" for further information regarding DTC and the book -entry system. 8 DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE The table below shows annual debt service payments on the 2016 Bonds and Existing Parity Obligations, assuming no optional redemption. Existing Parity Existing Parity Year Ending Obligations Obligations 2016 Bonds 2016 Bonds Total October 1 Principal* Interest* Principal Interest Debt Service 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 Total * Does not reflect refunding of the Refunded Certificates. SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR THE 2016 BONDS The principal of and interest on the 2016 Bonds are not a debt of the Authority (except to the limited extent described in this Official Statement) or the City, nor a legal or equitable pledge, charge, lien or encumbrance, upon any of their respective property, or upon any of their income, receipts, or revenues except the Revenues and other amounts pledged under the Indenture. This section provides summaries of the security for the 2016 Bonds and certain provisions of the Indenture and the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement. See "APPENDIX C - Summary of Principal Legal Documents" for a more complete summary of the Indenture and the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this section have the meanings given in APPENDIX C. Pledge of Authority Revenues The 2016 Bonds are payable from and secured by a pledge of Authority Revenues and certain funds and accounts established and held by the Trustee under the Indenture. Authority Revenues, as defined in the Indenture, mean (a) all of the 2016 Installment Payments, and (b) all interest, profits or other income derived from the investment of amounts in any fund or account established under the Indenture. 9 THE 2016 BONDS ARE SPECIAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE AUTHORITY PAYABLE SOLELY FROM AND SECURED BY A PLEDGE OF REVENUES AND CERTAIN FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS HELD UNDER THE INDENTURE. THE AUTHORITY HAS NO TAXING POWER. THE OBLIGATION OF THE CITY TO MAKE 2016 INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS IS PAYABLE SOLELY FROM SYSTEM NET REVENUES. NEITHER THE 2016 BONDS NOR THE OBLIGATION OF THE CITY TO MAKE 2016 INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS CONSTITUTES AN INDEBTEDNESS OF THE CITY, THE COUNTY, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (THE "STATE") OR ANY OF ITS POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS (INCLUDING ANY MEMBER OF THE AUTHORITY) IN CONTRAVENTION OF ANY CONSTITUTIONAL OR STATUTORY DEBT LIMITATIONS. 2016 Installment Payments The 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement provides that the City's obligation to make the 2016 Installment Payments from System Net Revenues and to perform and observe the other agreements contained therein are absolute and unconditional and are not subject to any defense or any right of set-off, counterclaim or recoupment arising out of any breach by the Authority or the Trustee of any obligation to the City or otherwise with respect to the System, or out of indebtedness or liability at any time owing to the City by the Authority or the Trustee. Until all of the 2016 Installment Payments, all of the Additional Payments and all other amounts coming due and payable under the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement are fully paid or prepaid, the City (a) will not suspend or discontinue payment of any 2016 Installment Payments, Additional Payments or such other amounts, (b) will perform and observe all other agreements contained in the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement, and (c) will not terminate the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement for any cause, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the occurrence of any acts or circumstances that may constitute failure of consideration, eviction or constructive eviction, destruction of or damage to the System, sale of the System, the taking by eminent domain of title to or temporary use of any component of the System, commercial frustration of purpose, any change in the tax or law other laws of the United States of America or the State of California or any political subdivision of either thereof or any failure of the Authority or the Trustee to perform and observe any agreement, whether express or implied, or any duty, liability or obligation arising out of or connected with the Indenture or the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the Indenture, the Authority transfers, assigns and sets over to the Trustee all of the 2016 Installment Payments and any and all rights, title, interest and privileges it has in, to and under the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement (other than its rights to expenses and indemnification), including without limitation, the right to collect and receive directly all of the 2016 Installment Payments and the right to enforce the provisions of the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement. The City consents to such assignment in the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement and agrees to make payments of the 2016 Installment Payments directly to the Trustee. Under the Indenture, The Trustee is also entitled to and shall, subject to the provisions of the Indenture, take all steps, actions and proceedings which the Trustee determines to be reasonably necessary in its judgment to enforce, either jointly with the Authority or separately, all of the rights of the Authority and all of the obligations of the City under the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement. The Trustee is entitled to indemnification and expenses before taking such action as provided in the Indenture. The Indenture provides that all of the 2016 Installment Payments received by the Trustee shall be deposited immediately in the Bond Fund. All of the 2016 Installment Payments are to be 10 held in trust by the Trustee for the benefit of the Owners of the 2016 Bonds and shall be disbursed and applied only as provided in the Indenture. Defined Terms For the purposes of the Indenture and the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement, the following terms are given the following meanings: "System Net Revenues" means, for any period, System Revenues less Operation and Maintenance Costs for such period; provided that certain adjustments in the amount of System Net Revenues for a Fiscal Year may be made in connection with amounts deposited in and transferred from the Rate Stabilization Fund. "System Revenues " is defined under the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement as all gross income and revenue received or receivable by the City from the ownership or operation of the System, determined in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, including all fees (including connection fees), rates, charges and all amounts paid under any contracts received by or owed to the City in connection with the operation of the System and all proceeds of insurance relating to the System and investment income allocable to the System and all other income and revenue howsoever derived by the City from the ownership or operation of the System or arising from the System. System Revenues for any Fiscal Year shall include, for the purposes permitted by the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement, amounts transferred to the System Revenue Fund from the Rate Stabilization Fund during such Fiscal Year. System Revenues does not include the payments received by the City pursuant to the NCPA Lease described herein in "THE SYSTEM - Disposal of Recycled Water." "Operation and Maintenance Costs" means the reasonable and necessary costs paid or incurred by the City for maintaining and operating the System, determined in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, including all reasonable expenses of management and repair and all other expenses necessary to maintain and preserve the System in good repair and working order, including all other reasonable and necessary costs of the City or charges required to be paid by it to comply with the terms of the Indenture or of any Supplemental Agreement or resolution authorizing the execution of any Parity Obligations, such as compensation, reimbursement and indemnification of the Trustee and the Corporation, fees and expenses of Independent Certified Public Accountants and deposits to the Rebate Fund; but excluding in all cases (i) payment of Parity Debt and Subordinate Obligations, (ii) costs of capital additions, replacements, betterments, extensions or improvements which under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles are chargeable to a capital account, (iii) depreciation, replacement and obsolescence charges or reserves therefor and amortization of intangibles, (iv) City Administrative Costs (as defined in the Indenture (the "City Administrative Expenses")), and (v) transfers from the System Revenue Fund to other funds or accounts of the City. For definitions of additional terms used in the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement and the Indenture, see "APPENDIX C – SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL LEGAL DOCUMENTS— CERTAIN DEFINITIONS". 11 Pledge of System Net Revenues Pursuant to the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement, all System Net Revenues and all amounts on deposit in the System Revenue Fund are irrevocably pledged to the payment of the 2016 Installment Payments, as provided in the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement. The 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement provides that such pledge, together with the pledge of System Net Revenues and amounts in the System Revenue Fund securing all other Parity Debt shall, subject to application as permitted in the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement, constitute a first lien on System Net Revenues and amounts on deposit in the System Revenue Fund. The obligation of the City to make the 2016 Installment Payments is a special obligation of the City payable solely from the System Net Revenues, and does not constitute a debt of the City or of the State of California or of any political subdivision thereof in contravention of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation or restriction. See "Outstanding Parity Obligations" and "Additional Parity Debt" below. Rate Covenant The 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement provides that the City will, at all times until all 2016 Installment Payments have been fully paid or provision has been made therefor in accordance with the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement, fix, prescribe and collect rates, fees and charges and manage the operation of the System for each Fiscal Year so as to yield System Revenues at least sufficient, after making reasonable allowances for contingencies and errors in the estimates, to pay the following amounts during such Fiscal Year: (i) All current Operation and Maintenance Costs. (ii) The 2016 Installment Payments and all other Parity Obligation Payments and all payments on Subordinate Obligations as they become due and payable. (iii) All payments required for compliance with the terms of the Indenture and the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement. (iv) All payments to meet any other obligations of the City which are charges, liens or encumbrances upon, or payable from, the System Revenues. In addition, the City covenants that it will, to the maximum extent permitted by law, fix, prescribe and collect rates, fees and charges and manage the operation of the System for each Fiscal Year so as to yield System Net Revenues during such Fiscal Year equal to at least 110% of the Annual Debt Service in such Fiscal Year; provided an adjustment may be made to the amount of System Net Revenues for amounts deposited into or withdrawn from the Rate Stabilization Fund; provided that, for purposes of such calculation, the amount of System Net Revenues before any credits for transfers from the Rate Stabilization Fund to the System Revenue Fund may not be less than 100% of Annual Debt Service for such Fiscal Year. Application of System Revenues The City agrees and covenants in the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement that all System Revenues it receives (except for net proceeds of any casualty insurance or condemnation award) will 12 be deposited when and as received in the System Revenue Fund, which the City has established and which the City agrees to maintain separate and apart from other moneys of the City until all Installment Payments have been fully paid or provision has been made therefor in accordance with the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement. Moneys in the System Revenue Fund shall be used and applied only as provided in the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement. The 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement provides that the City is to pay all Operation and Maintenance Costs (including amounts reasonably required to be set aside in contingency reserves for Operation and Maintenance Costs the payment of which is not then immediately required) from the System Revenue Fund as they become due and payable and all remaining money in the System Revenue Fund shall be set aside and deposited by the City at the following times in the following order of priority: Installment Payments. Not later than each Installment Payment Date, the City is required to, from the moneys in the System Revenue Fund, transfer to the Trustee the 2016 Installment Payment due and payable on that Installment Payment Date. The City will also, from the moneys in the System Revenue Fund, transfer when due to the applicable trustee for deposit in the respective payment fund, without preference or priority, and in the event of any insufficiency of such moneys ratably without any discrimination or preference, any Parity Obligation Payments in accordance with the provisions of the applicable Parity Obligation. Reserve Account. On or before the first Business Day of each month, the City shall, from the remaining moneys in the System Revenue Fund, without preference or priority, and in the event of any insufficiency of such moneys ratably without any discrimination or preference, transfer to the applicable trustee for such debt service reserve funds, if any, as may have been established in connection with Parity Obligations that sum, if any, necessary to restore such debt service reserve funds for Parity Obligations to an amount equal to the amount required to be maintained therein (including to reimburse the provider for a draw on a reserve account credit instrument). Amounts on deposit on the Reserve Account are not available for payment of debt service on the 2016 Bonds. Surplus. Moneys on deposit in the System Revenue Fund not necessary to make any of the payments required above in a Fiscal Year, may be expended by the City at any time for any purpose permitted by law, including but not limited to payments with respect to Subordinate Obligations and deposits to the Rate Stabilization Fund. Outstanding Parity Obligations The City has the following outstanding obligations that are payable from System Net Revenues on a parity with the 2016 Installment Payments (referred to as the "Existing Parity Obligations" in this Official Statement): 2004 Certificates. On May 12, 2004, the City caused execution and delivery of the $27,360,000 initial principal amount Wastewater System Revenue Certificates of Participation, 2004 Series A (the "2004 Certificates"). The 2004 Certificates are secured by and payable from installment payments (the "2004 Installment Payments") payable by the City under an Installment Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2004 (the "2004 Installment Purchase Agreement ") between the City and the Lodi Public Improvement Corporation (the "Corporation"). As of February 1, 2016, the outstanding principal obligation under the 2004 Installment Purchase Agreement was $2,070,000. 13 2007 Certificates. On November 16, 2007, the City caused execution and delivery of the $30,320,000 initial principal amount Wastewater System Revenue Certificates of Participation, 2007 Series A (the "2007 Certificates"). The 2007 Certificates are secured by and payable from installment payments (the "2007 Installment Payments") payable by the City under an Installment Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2007 (the "2007 Installment Purchase Agreement ") between the City and the Corporation. Upon issuance of the 2016 Bonds and the refunding of the Refunded Obligations, $ * of the 2007 Certificates will remain outstanding. 2012 Revenue Bonds. On September 5, 2012, the City caused execution and delivery of the $17,105,000 Lodi Public Financing Authority 2012 Refunding Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series A (the "2012 Bonds"). The 2012 Bonds are secured by and payable from installment payments (the "2012 Installment Payments") payable by the City under an Installment Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 5, 2012 (the "2012 Installment Purchase Agreement ") between the City and the Authority. As of February 1, 2016, the outstanding principal obligation under the 2012 Installment Purchase Agreement was $ Additional Parity Debt In addition to the Existing Parity Obligations, the City is permitted under the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement to incur obligations secured by a pledge of System Net Revenues on a parity with the 2016 Installment Payments and the Existing Parity Obligations, subject to satisfaction of the following conditions. The 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement refers to the 2016 Installment Payments and any Parity Obligations as "Parity Debt". (a) The City must be in compliance with its obligations under the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement. (b) Any debt service reserve fund established for such Parity Debt shall satisfy the following criteria: (i) such debt service reserve fund shall be held by an independent trustee (who may be other than the Trustee); (ii) the required amount of such debt service reserve fund shall not exceed the lesser of the maximum annual debt service of such Parity Debt (calculated on the basis of a year ending on the principal payment date of such Parity Debt) or the maximum amount permitted under the Code, provided that, if such Parity Debt is a loan from a governmental agency, then a debt service reserve fund shall be established in the amount, if any, required or permitted by such governmental agency; and (iii) the City shall not be required to replenish withdrawals from such debt service reserve fund in greater than monthly installments equal to 1/12 of the aggregate amount needed to restore the debt service reserve fund to the required level. (c) The System Net Revenues for the last completed Fiscal Year or any 12 consecutive months within the last 18 months preceding the date of entry into or incurrence of the Parity Debt, as shown by a Certificate of the City on file with the Trustee, plus an allowance for increased System Net Revenues arising from any increase in the rates, fees and charges of the System which was duly adopted by the City Council of the City prior to the date of the entry into or incurrence of the Parity Debt but which, during all or any part of such 12 month period, was not in effect, in an amount equal to the amount by which the System Net Revenues would have been increased if the increase in rates, fees and charges had been in effect during the whole of * Preliminary; subject to change. 14 such 12 month period, as shown by a Certificate of the City on file with the Trustee, must have produced a sum equal to at least 110% of the Maximum Annual Debt Service as calculated after the entry into or incurrence of the Parity Debt; provided, that in the event that all or a portion of such Parity Debt is to be issued for the purpose of refunding and retiring any Parity Debt then outstanding, interest and principal payments on the Parity Debt to be so refunded and retired from the proceeds of such Parity Debt being issued shall be excluded from the foregoing computation of Maximum Annual Debt Service; provided further, that the City may at any time enter into or incur Parity Debt without compliance with the foregoing conditions if the Annual Debt Service for each Fiscal Year during which such Parity Debt is outstanding will not be increased by reason of the entry into or incurrence of such Parity Debt; and provided further, an adjustment shall be made in the amount of System Net Revenues as described in "Rate Stabilization Fund" below. The Projected Operating Results contained in Table 10 do not currently contemplate the issuance of Additional Parity Obligations during the Projection period. Subordinate Obligations The 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement permits the City to incur obligations payable from System Net Revenues on a subordinate basis to the 2016 Installment Payments, the Existing Parity Obligations and any future Parity Debt. Rate Stabilization Fund Pursuant to the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement, a Rate Stabilization Fund is to be held and maintained by the City until all Installment Payments have been fully paid or provision has been made therefor in accordance with the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement. The City may, during or within 210 days after a Fiscal Year, transfer surplus System Net Revenues attributable to such Fiscal Year on the basis of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (the "GAAP Receipt Fiscal Year") from the System Revenue Fund to the Rate Stabilization Fund. The City may at any time transfer moneys from the Rate Stabilization Fund to the System Revenue Fund. System Net Revenues deposited into the Rate Stabilization Fund will not be taken into account as System Net Revenues for the GAAP Receipt Fiscal Year for purposes of the calculations required by the covenants in the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement relating to rate coverage and additional Parity Obligations. Amounts withdrawn from the Rate Stabilization Fund and deposited into the System Revenue Fund, may be taken into account as System Revenues for purposes of the calculations required by such covenants for the Fiscal Year in which such deposit is made; provided that, for purposes of the calculation described in the last paragraph under "Rate Covenant" above, the amount of System Net Revenues before any credits for transfers from the Rate Stabilization Fund to the System Revenue Fund may not be less than 100% of Annual Debt Service for such Fiscal Year. As of June 30, 2015, the Rate Stabilization Fund contained $500,000. The Projected Operating Results contained in Table 10 hereof do not contemplate the use of moneys in the Rate Stabilization Fund. 15 THE SYSTEM General The City of Lodi is located in the County of San Joaquin (the "County") between Stockton and Sacramento, and adjacent to U.S. Highway 99, approximately 90 miles east of San Francisco. The City was incorporated as a General Law City on December 6, 1906. The City operates under a City Council -Manager form of government and provides the following services: public safety (police, fire and graffiti abatement), public utilities services (electric, water and sewer), transportation services (streets, flood control and transit), leisure, cultural and social services (parks and recreation, library, and community center), and general government services (management, human resources administration, financial administration, building maintenance and equipment maintenance). Since 1923, the City has been providing wastewater collection and treatment services to the community. As of January 1, 2016, the City had an estimated population of 63,791 within an area of approximately 13.98 square miles. See "APPENDIX A — CERTAIN ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION CONCERNING THE CITY OF LODI." Governance and Management The System is operated as a separate enterprise activity within the City government. This structure is essentially the same as for its water and electric utility enterprises. Functionally, the System is operated jointly with the water utility by the Water/Wastewater Division within the Department of Public Works. This arrangement is designed by the City to provide for improved efficiency in cross training and utilization of staff and in the purchase and use of equipment and facilities. The City is governed by a five -member City Council comprised of members elected at large. Each council member is elected for four years with staggered terms. The current City Council members and the expiration dates of their terms are set forth below. Council Member Title Expiration of Term Mark Chandler Mayor December 5, 2018 Doug Kuehne Mayor Pro Tempore December 5, 2018 JoAnne Mounce Council Member December 7, 2016 Alan Nakanishi Council Member December 5, 2018 Bob Johnson Council Member December 7, 2016 Following are biographies of certain City staff. STEPHEN SCHWABAUER, City Manager, was appointed to the position by the City Council on June 5, 2014 after serving five -months as the Interim Manager. He had been Lodi's City Attorney from 2004 to 2014, and Deputy City Attorney from 2000 to 2004. During his tenure as City 16 Attorney, Steve negotiated the resolution of a multimillion dollar groundwater contamination action and associated financing scheme. Steve also led labor negotiations for much of his tenure as City Attorney and developed significant experience with budget operations and employee relations. Steve earned his Bachelor of Arts degree from U. C. Davis in 1990 and his law degree from U. C. Berkeley in 1994. JORDAN AYERS, Deputy City Manager/Internal Services Director, has been the City's Deputy City Manager/Internal Services Director since December 15, 2008. As Lodi's administrative second -in -command, Ayers oversees the City's Finance, Budget and Treasury, Information Systems and Human Resources functions. Ayers came to the City after a 26 -year career with Sacramento County. He was Deputy Director for Administrative and Business Services within Sacramento County's General Services department before being hired by the City. Ayers began his professional career with Sacramento County following his graduation from California State University, Sacramento, in 1982 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration. CHARLES E. SWIMLEY, JR., Interim Public Works Director, began his tenure with the City in 2001 as Senior Civil Engineer, was promoted to Water Services Manager in 2006 then Deputy Director of Utilities in 2010 where he oversaw wastewater collection and treatment, water production and distribution and street maintenance. In 2012, Swimley was promoted to City Engineer until his appointment to Interim Public Works Director in December 2015. Mr. Swimley, a registered civil engineer since 1994, earned his Bachelor of Science degree from California State University, Sacramento. Employees For Fiscal Year 2015-16, the City has 57 full-time equivalent employee positions budgeted for the System and the City's water system. Employees of the System and the City's water system are primarily represented by the Maintenance and Operators Bargaining Unit, whose Memorandum of Understanding is set to expire on December 31, 2017. The City has never experienced a labor strike. Retirement Programs Certain Retirement Benefits. Salaries and benefits costs of the System include funding of retirement benefits for employees assigned to the System who, as City employees, participate in the California Public Employees Retirement System ("PERS"). (City employees assigned to the System constitute approximately 8.4% of all City employees.) Retirement payments paid from System Revenues, with respect to employees assigned to the System, were approximately $481,500 Fiscal Year 2012-13, approximately $498,400 in Fiscal Year 2013-14, and approximately $508,800 in Fiscal Year 2014-15. The City estimates that the required contribution for Fiscal Year 2015/16 will be approximately $649,100. In addition, the PERS contribution payable from the Wastewater Fund is projected to continue to increase. The table below shows the actual required rate of PERS contributions from 2016-17 and the projected future rates for the following five years, as currently calculated by PERS. Each one percent (1%) increase in the contribution rate equates to approximately a $32,500 increase in PERS cost for the system at current salary rates. 2016-17 2017-18* 2018-19* 17 2019-20* 2020-21* 2021-22* 21.797% 23.7% 25.6% 27.4% 27.7% 28.3% *Projected For a variety of reasons, including investment losses, the City has experienced significant unfunded liabilities, and retirement costs payable with respect to all City employees, including those assigned to the System, has increased in recent years. As show above, required contributions from the City are expected to continue to increase. See APPENDIX B — "AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE CITY FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015" — Note 9 to the Basic Financial Statements" for a discussion of retirement liabilities payable by the City. In addition to required contributions for retirement benefits for employees, the City pays certain post -employment health care and other non -pension ("OPEB") benefits for such employees. The City's OPEB related payments were approximately $700,000 in Fiscal Year 2014-15 and are projected to be approximately $715,000 in Fiscal Year 2016-17. Approximately 8.4 percent of City employees are assigned to the System and the City estimates that a similar ratio of OPEB costs is attributable to System employees. The City generally contributes the minimum amount required under State law to most retired employees. However, a limited number of employees hired prior to 1995 may be eligible for additional OPEB benefits. See APPENDIX B "AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE CITY FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2011" — Note 10 to the Basic Financial Statements" for a discussion of OPEB liabilities payable by the City, as well as the City's current unfunded OPEB liability. Payments to PERS and payments with respect to OPEB benefits constitute Operation and Maintenance Costs of the System. The City has completed negotiations with the labor groups which represent City employees assigned to the System for 2015 through 2017. Key elements in the new contracts, which generally end on December 31, 2017, include employees paying the full share of the employee share of retirement starting January 1, 2014, capping City medical cost exposure at the January 2014 levels, establishing a second tier retirement system for all new hires and establishing 3%, 2% and 2% cost - of -living adjustments in January of 2015, 2016 and 2017 respectively. Insurance The City's boiler and machinery operations (including those parts of the System) are insured by Hartford Steam Boiler for up to $21,250,000 in coverage. The City, including the System, is self- insured for general liability losses for up to $500,000 and has pooled excess coverage through the California Joint Powers Risk Management Authority for up to $40 million per occurrence. The City is self-insured for workers' compensation losses for up to $250,000 and has excess coverage through the Local Agency Workers' Compensation Excess Authority for statutory coverage. System Facilities The System consists of 186.5 miles of wastewater mains, seven pump stations and one wastewater treatment plant, the White Slough Water Pollution Control Facility (the "White Slough Facility"). White Slough Facility. The White Slough Facility operates pursuant to a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permit, governing the City's surface water discharges, and a Waste Discharge Requirement ("WDR"). Each governs the City's reuse activities 18 administered by the State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region (the "RWQCB"). Both permits were adopted by the RWQCB in October 2013. The current NPDES permit will expire in November 2018. The WDR does not have an expiration date. See "Environmental Compliance" below. The White Slough Facility is located in a primarily agricultural area adjacent to Interstate 5, approximately 6.5 miles southwest of the City. The White Slough Facility was originally constructed in 1966 to replace an older wastewater treatment plant located in the City. The White Slough Facility assists the City in maintaining water quality standards required for the protection of the environmentally sensitive Sacramento -San Joaquin Delta. Through the years, the White Slough Facility has been expanded and improved to meet increasingly stringent environmental protection standards. In 1992, the City expanded the White Slough Facility to a capacity of 8.5 million gallons per day ("MGD"). However, the Waste Discharge Requirements ("WDRs") issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (the "RWQCB") established an interim limit the average dry weather flow from the White Slough Facility of 7.0 MGD to limit potential water quality impacts in Dredger Cut, a waterway connecting to White Slough. After the establishment of the interim limit, improvements financed with proceeds of the 2007 Certificates restored the treatment capacity to the full 8.5 MGD. The average current daily demand on the White Slough Facility is approximately 5.0 MGD. The 8.5 MGD flow capacity is expected to be sufficient to accommodate the City's growth projections past 2035. The White Slough Facility consists of an activated sludge treatment system and a lagoon and storage pond system, having approximately 100 million gallons of capacity. Preliminary treatment of the domestic wastewater is accomplished by comminutors, detritors and five rectangular clarifiers. Secondary treatment facilities consist of six activated sludge aeration basins with a fine bubble aeration system and anoxic zones for denitrification; and three circular secondary clarifiers. The aeration system is driven by four centrifugal blowers. The municipal wastewater is treated to Title 22 tertiary standards using cloth filtration and ultraviolet light pathogen deactivation (uv disinfection) prior to surface water discharge. A 2.5 MW emergency generator is available in case of power interruptions. In addition to domestic wastewater treatment, the White Slough Facility also disposes of industrial wastewater produced primarily by Pacific Coast Producers, a local cannery. See "Service Area and Customers" below. During summer months (i.e., generally during the period from May 1 through September 1), treated domestic wastewater and industrial wastewater, are blended together and used for irrigation of an adjacent 790 acres of City -owned agricultural land. Class B biosolids are dewatered and seasonally applied to approximately 300 acres of feed and fodder crops. Recycled irrigation water and biosolids applications are performed under direction of a certified agronomist, and are to be applied at agronomic rates. During the remainder of the year, treated domestic wastewater is discharged to Dredger Cut in the Sacramento -San Joaquin Delta, and industrial wastewater is stored in four ponds located directly north of the main treatment plant site. These ponds have a total surface area of about 40 acres. Tertiary treated domestic wastewater is also used by the adjacent Northern California Power Agency power generation facilities for various purposes, including, but not limited to, cooling. Tertiary treated domestic wastewater is also used to supply nearby ponds that are used by the Mosquito Abatement District to raise mosquito fish. Sludge is thickened and then digested in four anaerobic digestors, dewatered using two rotary fan presses and then in a covered concrete lined 19 facility for eventual use on City -owned agricultural land. Methane gas from the anaerobic digestion process is used for building and digester heating. Excess methane is flared off at the plant site. Collection System. The existing collection system, not including the outfall to the treatment plant, consists of approximately 187.1 miles of 4" to 42" sewers constructed of clay, concrete, and PVC plastic materials. Included in this system are six lift stations which serve outlying portions of the City and one industrial waste pumping station. The collection system currently serves over 23,000 customers (most of which are residential), 1,400 acres of commercial/industrial development, and 250 acres of schools. Over 50% of the sewers are 6" in diameter. The following contains certain information relating to the City's sewer lines. Table 1 City of Lodi Wastewater System Tabulation of Existing Sewers As of July 1, 2015 Sewer Size Sewer Size (inches) Total Feet (inches) Total Feet 42 30,662 14 6,956 30 9,715 12 46,782 24 18,795 10 75,114 21 14,749 8 203,097 18 31,976 6 530,066 16 7,642 4 4,572 15 22,039 Source: City of Lodi The domestic wastewater collection system conveys all domestic and commercial flows and limited industrial flows. The industrial wastewater system conveys fruit processing water and minor amounts of cooling and process water contributed by certain industries. The wastewater collection system serves all of the developed property within the City limits. The age of the collection system ranges from new to around 100 years old. For nearly thirty years the City has implemented a regular cleaning schedule and performed localized repairs and replacements. Approximately eleven years ago, the City implemented a capital rehabilitation program that expends approximately $1 million per year on sewer lining, spot repairs, and pipe replacements. Since the inception of this program, over $16 million has been invested in the collection system. The pipelines to be replaced are identified through the regular maintenance program for these facilities performed by City crews. This program includes the systematic hydrocleaning, rodding, smoke testing and video inspection of mains throughout the City. Environmental Compliance In 2001, the City adopted the City of Lodi Wastewater Master Plan (the "Master Plan"). The Master Plan provided the City with a strategy for reliably meeting future discharge and capacity requirements to meet the City's needs. Over the past fifteen years, the City has invested approximately $50 million dollars toward major treatment plant upgrades that include tertiary 20 treatment using cloth filtration and ultra violet disinfection, aeration basin upgrades that include anoxic zones for denitrification, solids handling infrastructure that includes an additional digester, sludge lagoon and biosolids dewatering facility and headworks improvements. The City recognizes the importance of operating and maintaining current and reliable treatment facilities in order to assure environmental compliance with State requirements. Due to exceptional water quality performance during the term of the 2007 NPDES Permit, the 2013 Permit reflected significantly reduced discharge limits for Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS) electrical conductivity (EC), ammonia, nitrate, PH nitrite, and other requirements associated with delta Total Maximum Daily Loads ("TMDLs"). The 2013 WDR includes a number of groundwater protection requirements for a range of constituents including chloride, iron, boron, lead, mercury, manganese, sodium nitrogen, and ammonia. Operations currently comply with these requirements. The City's pretreatment program complies with the pretreatment requirements contained in the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. In general, although the City has experienced a handful of non -material instances of noncompliance, the White Slough Facility has complied with all discharge requirements contained in the 2013 Permit. The 2013 Permit expires in November 2018. Discussions with RWQCB staff will commence with the City submitting a Report of Waste Discharge in November 2017. During the approval process of a new NPDES permit, the White Slough Facility may continue to operate under the requirements of the 2013 Permits until new permits are adopted by the RWQCB. The City expects the new permit conditions will require continued monitoring activities as in the 2013 Permits. While the City does not anticipate the discharge limits and other requirements for the White Slough Facility as set forth in the 2013 Permits will be significantly different in the new NPDES and WDR permits when they are issued, the City has not yet received draft permit conditions. There can be no assurances that the new permit, when issued, will not impose significant new and potentially more stringent conditions and requirements on the operations of the White Slough Facility, which could result in significant increases in capital and/or operating costs. See "RISK FACTORS — Permit Renewal" herein. Service Area and Customers The City provides wastewater collection and treatment to substantially all of the population of the City. The City does not provide wastewater service outside the City limits, except for wineries and other public wastewater service districts pursuant to contracts with the City. 21 The table below shows the number of connections of the System by user type and service charge revenues by class of user. Table 2 City of Lodi Wastewater System Number of Connections by User Type as of June 30 and Percentage of Fiscal Year 2014-15 Service Charge Revenue by User Type User Type Residential Commercial/Industrial Total All Users Source: City of Lodi 2011 2012 2013 2014 21,956 21,864 21,959 22,076 1,785 1,819 1,851 1,851 23,741 23,683 23,810 23,927 2015 21,920 1,876 23,796 % of FY14-15 Service Charge Revenue 92% 8% 100.0% The table below shows the 10 largest users of the System based on service charge revenues for the Fiscal Year 2014-15. Table 3 City of Lodi Wastewater System Largest Users by Service Charge Revenues Fiscal Year 2014-15 (unaudited) User ConAgra Foods General Mills(') Lodi Unified School District Miller Packing Blue Shield of California Archer Daniels Midland Pacific Coast Producers Covenant Care Vienna Convalescent Hospital Del Castillo Foods Total Top 10 Users Total System Type of Business Specialty bakery, frozen dough Cereals, bread mixes, snack foods K-12, adult education Hot dog producer Health Insurance Agricultural Processor Private label fruit canning Rehabilitation/Nursing Center Rehabilitation/Nursing Center Tortilla producer Service Charge Revenue $ 474,855 332,022 95,931 39,311 39,119 35,804 32,856 21,397 21,140 20,580 $ 1,113,015 $14,714,123 Percentage of Total Annual Service Charge Revenue 3.22% 2.25 .65 .26 .26 .24 .22 .14 .14 .13 7.51% 100.00% (1) General Mills closed all operations in December of 2015 and has the property listed for sale. At this time, future wastewater demand and revenue from the site is unknown. The City does not believe that the closure will have a material effect on the System's financial condition. Source: Lodi Public Works Department. 22 Wastewater Rates and Charges The City has the power to establish rates and charges as needed to operate the System. The rates and charges are established by the City Council and are not subject to review or approval by any other agency. The City principally relies on service charges and connection fees. The City is required to comply with the provisions of Proposition 218 (including public notice and hearing requirements) in connection with the establishment of rates, and it believes it has done so with all rate increases to date. Service Charges. The City Council approved multi-year charges and rate increases for domestic system residential, commercial and industrial wastewater service in May, 2014 through December of 2018 based on a maximum increase in the Engineering News Record, but has from time to time imposed lower increases than were approved, depending on the then -current needs of the System. Set forth below is a table showing the rates effective July 1 in Fiscal Years 2012-13 through 2014-15. The Projected Operating Results contained herein contemplate that rates will increase approximately 3% each year for Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2017-18. Rate increases beyond Fiscal Year 2017-18 would be subject to approval by the City Council and compliance with Proposition 218 requirements. 23 Table 4 City of Lodi Wastewater System Schedule of Wastewater Service Charges For Residential Users (per month): 1 Bedroom 2 Bedrooms 3 Bedrooms 4 Bedrooms 5 Bedrooms 6 Bedrooms 7 Bedrooms Usage -Based Rates (per month): Service Charge (per month for 3/4 inch meter) Usage Charge (per CCF) For Commercial/Industrial Users: Moderate Strength (annual per Sewage Service Unit (SSU)) High Strength: Flow (annual per MG) BOD (annual per 1,000 lbs.) SS (annual per 1,000 lbs.) Grease Interceptor/Septic Holding Tank Waste within City Limits (per 1,000 gal.) Septic Holding Tank Waste outside City Limits (per 1,000 gal.) Disposal to Storm Drain System (per MG) Disposal to Industrial System Flow (per MG, annual basis) BOD (per 1,000 lbs., annual basis) Winery Waste (per 1,000 gallons) Service Charge (effective July 1, 2012) $25.20 33.60 42.00 50.40 58.80 67.20 75.60 Service Charge (effective July 1, 2013) $25.83 34.44 43.05 51.66 60.27 68.88 77.49 22.95 23.52 2.61 2.68 Service Charge (effective July 1, 2012) Service Charge (effective July 1, 2013) $403.20 $413.28 3,402.35 561.47 351.07 3,487.41 575.51 359.85 Service Charge (effective July 1, 2014) $26.48 35.30 44.13 52.95 61.78 70.60 79.43 24.11 2.75 Service Charge (effective July 1, 2014) $423.61 3,574.60 589.90 368,85 Service Charge (effective July 1, 2015) $27.22 36.29 45.36 54.43 63.51 72.58 81.65 24.78 2.82 Service Charge (effective July 1, 2015) $435.47 3,674.68 606.41 379.17 297.29 304.72 312.34 321.08 631.11 646,89 312.28 320.09 7,553.00 159.00 301.04 7,553.00 159.00 301.04 663.06 681.63 328.09 337.28 7,553.00 159.00 301.04 7,553.00 159.00 301.00 There are separate charges applicable to the industrial system, which primarily apply to Pacific Coast Producers, the largest individually -monitored system user. No new users have been connected to the industrial system, except the Michael David Winery, in several years and no new users are anticipated. The tables above include usage -based rates which are applicable to those customers which have water meters and which are used to determine the monthly wastewater service and usage charge. The City Council adopted usage based wastewater rates in 2010 that are annually calculated based upon the water usage during the prior winter months of December, January and February. In July of each year, a new standard monthly charge is calculated based upon the winter usage and 24 billed for the next 12 months. The Water Meter Program policy approved in 2009 established a process to transition single family residential customers from flat water and wastewater rates to usage -based water and wastewater rates. As of July 1, 2015, approximately 7,300 customers of the System were being charged usage -based rates. By July 1, 2016, an additional 1,300 customers will be charged usage -based rates. The City expects that all single family residential customers will be transitioned to usage -based water and wastewater rates by January 2020. Prior to converting any customer to usage -based rates, the City provides the customer with actual water and wastewater usage data and information regarding how the customer's bills may be affected with the change in billing. The new usage -based wastewater rate structure for single family customers includes a fixed service charge based on the size of the water meter, and a single -tier usage rate structure. Usage - based rates are expected to be revenue neutral, in the aggregate, with the prior rate structure. The City reviews its rate model frequently with actual results to gauge whether the transition to metered rates is in fact performing on a revenue neutral basis. This evaluation is all the more important in light of recent water conservation mandates placed on the City by the State. Because of the current drought in the State, Lodi has been ordered to cut its water use by 32% from 2013 usage levels. While the majority of that conservation is coming from reductions in water used for irrigation, which is excluded from Lodi's wastewater rate base as referenced above, some portion of the conservation is coming in reduced winter water usage. However, the rate model adopted in 2013 assumed that average metered consumption rate would be 9.3 ccf per month per single family residential account. That prediction was then used to set the metered rate for wastewater services to equal the revenue from the per -bedroom rate that has historically been used by the City to charge for wastewater services. Actual winter month usage since 2012 has annually averaged 10.4 ccf and the November and December 2015 average usage was 12.2 ccf and 8.5 ccf respectively (for a two month average of 10.3 ccf) after the conservation mandate was effective. As such the City believes that the current rate model appears to have adequate room to absorb current and reasonably anticipated future conservation mandates. If necessary, the City System's capital program could be temporarily modified to further absorb reductions in revenue due to conservation mandates until adequate rate adjustments are implemented. Historical Rates. The following table shows rate increases approved by the City Council as well as increases actually implemented. Table 5 Approved and Implemented Service Charge Rate Adjustments Year Approved Implemented 2009-10 25% 25% 2010-11 20% 12% 2011-12 10% 5% 2012-13 5% 3% 2013-14 2.8%(1) 2.5% 2014-15 2.6%(1) 2.5% 2015-16 3% 2.8% (1) ENR Index cap. 25 Capacity/Connection Fees. Capacity/connection fees are one-time only connection charges based on estimated annual usage (the City reviews large industrial users after connection to determine actual usage and, in some cases, adjusts the connection fee to reflect actual usage). Capacity/connection fees are collected at the time a building permit is granted. The current capacity/connection fees are identified in the following table: Table 6 Capacity/Connection Fees (as of July 1, 2015) Description Fees') High Strength Users Flow (per million gallons (MG), annual basis) $47,753 BOD (per 1,000 lbs., annual basis) 12,368 SS (per 1,000 lbs., annual basis) 6,614 -0) Includes 2% public art fee. Subject to annual adjustment on July 1 based on the past annual change in the Engineering News Record 20 Cities Construction Index. Source: City of Lodi. New residential development in the City is subject to a growth control ordinance that limits new residential development based on an increase in population of 2% per year. However, as a practical matter, the City's growth control ordinance has had little effect on Lodi's growth in recent years because unused growth allocations are carried over from prior years resulting in a substantial surplus. Nonetheless, capacity connections fees have not historically constituted a significant portion of System Revenues. In Fiscal Year 2015-16, the City estimates that connection fees will constitute approximately 1% of System Revenues. Collections. The City bills for water, wastewater, solid waste and electricity on the same bill. If a bill is unpaid, the City will terminate electric service to a customer within 46 days of initial billing after 48 hours notice. The annual delinquency rate has been less than 1% for the bulk of the preceding 10 fiscal years. The actual delinquency rate for Fiscal Year 2014-15 was 0.3%. Comparison of Monthly Wastewater Service Charges of Selected Agencies. A comparison of wastewater service charges of selected agencies located in San Joaquin County for an average single-family home is set forth below. 26 Table 7 Comparison of Monthly Wastewater Service Charges (as of July 1, 2015(1)) Agency Service Charge (2) City of Tracy City of Stockton City of Galt City of Manteca City of Lodi Average $35.20 41.40 46.85 43.30 50.16 43.38 (1) Rates shown are as of July 1, 2015. (2) For all agencies other than the City, based upon flat monthly rate charged to all single family residential customers. Rate for City reflects a fixed monthly service charge plus usage charge for median volume user. Source: City of Lodi. Planned Capital Improvements In April 2012, the City completed the final portion of significant capital improvements at the White Slough Treatment Facility that were financed with the proceeds of the 2007 Certificates. The City has programmed several large capital improvement projects over the next three years that include the investigation and repair of several concrete process tanks and channels that have corroded due to exposure to hydrogen sulfide gas, relocating/upgrading the south electric room, construction of coarse screening and septage receiving facilities, and various electrical upgrades to address arc flash potential. These projects are programmed through Fiscal Year 2017-18 and total approximately $13 million through that period. Funding for these projects is projected to be available under the City's current rate model through current and future rate increases (capped at 3% per year) and impact fees. There is one remaining phase of the original pipe lining and replacement program that was initiated in the early 2000's. This phase is being deferred to accommodate funding needed for the 2017-18 facility improvements to the White Slough Treatment Facility as noted above and will be completed upon completion of the White Slough improvements. Future pipeline and replacement projects in other areas of the city will be programmed as necessary based on pipeline condition assessments. In October 2015, the City was conditionally awarded a Proposition 84, Delta, San Joaquin River, and Sacramento River Water Quality Program Grant by the California Department of Water Resources ("DWR"), to receive $4,600,000. The grant is only offered to agencies located within the Sacramento San Joaquin Delta Area. Upon final approval by DWR (expected by July 2016), the grant will fund up to 75 percent of the total proposed costs (approximately $6.1 million) for environmental, design, and construction components of the project. (The Projected Operating Results assume that this grant is finally approved and funded.) The City will be responsible for the remaining 25 percent match (approximately $1.5 million) which is programmed into the City's Projected Operating Results over three fiscal years beginning Fiscal Year 2016-17. The City is eligible to receive credit for pre -project 27 costs that were incurred after November 2008 toward the 25 percent match. The costs eligible for credit are estimated to be between $300,000 and $400,000. To be conservative, this credit is not currently accounted for in the Projected Operating Results. The proposed recycled water storage facilities, located at the White Slough Treatment Facility, are intended to reduce or eliminate the City's need to seasonally discharge wastewater to the Delta and to recharge recycled Title 22 effluent into a critically over drafted groundwater basin. The recycled and groundwater recharge components of the project operation will even further benefit the City's already demonstrated groundwater sustainability. Other capital maintenance improvements at White Slough and the 7 lift stations are included in the financial plan for the replacement and maintenance of equipment as it ages. Much of this capital maintenance activity is planned and scheduled through a computer-based asset management and maintenance program. In addition to the $1 million annual allocation for pipe lining and replacement, the annual planned expenditures are expected to be approximately $5.4 million in Fiscal Year 20-15-16, approximately $7.2 million in Fiscal Year 2016-17, and approximately $13.5 million in Fiscal Year 2017-18 and then are expected to decline significantly in Fiscal Years 2018-19 and 2019-20. Financial Statements The audited Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the City as of June 30, 2015 is included in Appendix B to this Official Statement. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report includes all funds and accounts of the City, including the City's General Fund. The 2016 Installment Payments are special obligations of the City payable solely from the System Net Revenues, and are not payable from the City's General Fund. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report has been audited by Macias, Gini & Company LLP, Sacramento, California, independent accountants (the "Independent Accountants") as stated in their report appearing in Appendix B. No review or investigation with respect to subsequent events has been undertaken in connection with such General Purpose Financial Statements by the Independent Accountants and the Independent Accountants have not been asked to consent to the City including the General Purpose Financial Statements in this Official Statement. Disposal of Recycled Water As described below, the City receives certain payments relating to recycled water which do not constitute System Revenues. The City is a party to a Second Amended and Restated Ground Lease, dated April 29, 2013, with the Northern California Power Agency ("NCPA"). The City owns certain real property adjacent to the White Slough Facility that it purchased prior to 1990. Under the NCPA Ground Lease, the City leases that real property (the "NCPA-Leased Property") to NCPA, and NCPA uses the NCPA-Leased Property for operation of a gas turbine power generation plant and ancillary uses. The term of the NCPA Ground Lease commenced on January 1, 1993 and continues for 50 years; NCPA has a right to extend the lease for another 50 years. In Fiscal Year 2014-15, the City received approximately $1,025,000 of rent from NCPA under the NCPA Ground Lease. 28 Pursuant to the NCPA Ground Lease, the City supplies NCPA with recycled water and NCPA agrees to dispose of the recycled water by generating electricity or to irrigating landscaping associated with its generating facilities. NCPA does not pay for the recycled water. The payments received by the City from NCPA under the agreement does not exceed the fair rental value for the NCPA-Leased Property (which is not an asset of the System), and the recycled water provided to NCPA does not have any value (the transfer of recycled water to NCPA avoids the cost of alternative disposal methods). Consequently, the City deposits the payments it receives from NCPA under the NCPA Recycled Water Agreement and the NCPA Ground Lease in its general fund rather than the System Revenue Fund, as it would be required to do if the payments received from NCPA were System Revenues. No claim has been filed or threatened alleging that all or a portion of the payments received by the City from NCPA and deposited into the City's general fund are System Revenues. Although the City believes that the payments received from NCPA may legally be deposited into its general fund, it cannot predict the outcome of any litigation of the issue. If a court were to conclude that all or a portion of the payments received by the City from NCPA were System Revenues, then the City would be obligated to deposit future such payments into the System Revenue Fund rather than the City's general fund, and, because the statute of limitations applicable to any such claim would be three years, the City could be obligated to reimburse the System Revenue Fund for any such payments for the preceding three years. The obligation to deposit all or a portion of the NCPA payments into the System Revenue Fund would obviously benefit the System. However, if the City were unable to reimburse the System Revenue Fund, the City could be obligated to rebate to System customers an amount equal to three years' of rates and charges attributable to the payments from NCPA that were held to be System Revenues. The City believes that any such obligation to reimburse System customers would not adversely impact its ability to make the Installment Payments when due. See "RISK FACTORS - Certain Limitations on the Ability of the City to Impose Taxes, Fees and Charges." 29 Historical Operating Results The following table sets forth historical revenues, expenses and debt service coverage of the System, based on the City's audited financial statements for Fiscal Years 2010-11 through 2014-15. The coverage ratios have been computed in accordance with the requirements of the Existing Parity Obligations, including the definitions of System Net Revenues and Operation and Maintenance Costs. Table 8 City of Lodi Wastewater System Historical Operating Results and Debt Service Coverage Fiscal Years 2010-11 through 2014-15 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Operating Revenues Charges for Services $ 13,089,679 $ 13,280,216 $ 13,747,216 $ 14,305,093 $ 14,714,123 Non -Operating Revenues Interest Income 220,600 216,108 301,347 427,308 356,590 Rent Other 3.198.I94 290.819 256.868 453,798 774.007 Total System Revenues $16,508,474 $13,787,143 $14,305,431 $15,186,199 $15,844,720 Operating Expenses Personnel services $3,257,618 $3,130,012 $3,089,930 $3,215,190 $3,116,493 Supplies, Materials and services 1,955,464 2,818,041 1,900,710 2,145,745 2,541,909 Utilities 758,934 710.622 683 508 642.508 676,838 Total Operating Expenses $5,972,016 $6.658.675 $5.674,148 $6.003.443 $6,335,240 System Net Revenues $10,536,458 $7,128,468 $8,631,283 $9,182,756 $9,509,480 Parity Debt Service 2003 Installment Payments $381,393 $379,170 $381,122 $3,280,111(0 2004 Installment Payments 2,147,600 2,139,350 1,705,213 98,321 98,326 2007 Installment Payments 1,588,750 1,599,050 1,598,950 1,603,550 1,602,850 2012 Installment Payments 1,921,700 1,970,350 Total Parity Debt Service $4,117,743 $4,117,570 $4,059,804 $6,903,682 $3,671,526 Debt Service Coverage 2.56 1.73 2.13 1.33 2.59 Non -Operating Expenses Transfers (In)/Out $1,451.480 (778.092) 1.451.480 1,318.000 1.068 000 Total Non -Operating Expenses 1,451,480 (778,092) 1,451,480 1,318,000 1,068,000 Net Cashflow Before Capital Expenditures $ 4,967,234 $ 3,788,990 $ 3,119,999 $ 961,072 $ 4,769,954 (1) Reflects optional prepayment of 2003 Installment Payments from available funds. Without pre -payment, debt service coverage would have been 2.33 in Fiscal Year 2013-14. Source: City of Lodi Financial Report System Reserves. The Wastewater Fund cash balance at June 30, 2015 was approximately $13.8 million. The Operating fund cash balance was approximately $5.6 million and significantly exceeded the reserve policy goal of 25% of operating expenses, which was established by the City Council. The $13.8 million noted above also includes the Rate Stabilization Fund reserve of $500,000, $0 8 million set aside for capital improvements through the City Impact Mitigation Fee program and an additional 30 $6.9 million designated for infrastructure replacement, but which could also be used for operations or debt service. The following table shows historical funding levels for certain System reserves. Table 9 Historical Reserve Balances (in millions) Fund 2012 2013 2014 2015 Operating $6.1 $6.5 $4.3 $5.6 Rate Stabilization 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Impact Mitigation 1.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 Capital 5.4 6.8 8.7 6.9 Total $13.4 $14.4 $14.2 $13.8 25% Operating Reserve Goal $1.7 $1.6 $1.6 $1.5 Projected Operating Results and Debt Service Coverage The City's estimated projected operating results for the System for the Fiscal Years ending June 30, 2016 through 2020 are set forth below, reflecting certain significant assumptions concerning future events and circumstances. The financial forecast represents the City's estimate of projected financial results based upon its judgment of the probable occurrence of future events. The assumptions set forth in part in the footnotes to the chart set forth below are material in the development of the City's financial projections, and variations in the assumptions may produce substantially different financial results. Actual operating results achieved during the projection period may vary from those presented in the forecast and such variations may be material. The following table also sets forth debt service coverage ratios with respect to the 2016 Bonds and the Existing Parity Obligations. Such coverage ratios have been computed in accordance with the requirements of the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement. 31 Table 10 City of Lodi Wastewater System Projected Operating Results and Debt Service Coverage Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2019-20 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Operating Revenues Charges for Services (1) $15,006,000 $15,486,000 $15,981,000 $16,332,000 $16,691,000 Non -Operating Revenues Interest Income(2) 59,000 106,000 115,000 59,000 109,000 Other(3) 609,300 627.900 646.600 666,400 686.300 Total System Revenues $15,674,300 $16,219,900 $16,742,600 $17,057,400 $17,486,300 Operating Expenses(4) Personnel services $3,195,590 $3,305,000 $3,417,000 $3,533,000 $3,653,000 Supplies, Materials and services 1,849,125 1,930,000 2,014,200 2,101,400 2,195,600 Utilities 662,200 691,000 721.000 753.000 786.000 Other (5) $741,110 $758,900 $778,100 $797,300 $817,600 Total Operating Expenses 6,448,025 6.681.900 6.930,300 7,184 700 7,452,200 System Net Revenues $9,226,275 $9,535,000 $9,812,300 $9,872,700 $10,034,100 Parity Debt Service 2004 Installment Payments $98,325 $98,325 $98,325 $98,325 $98,325 2007 Installment Payments 1,606,850 1,605,550 1,613,850 1,616,650 1,609,250 2012 Installment Payments 1.981.800 1.947,100 1.949.300 1.949,100 1.951.400 Total Parity Debt Service) $3,686,975 $3,650,975 $3,661,475 $3,664,075 $3,658,975 Debt Service Coverage 2.50 2.61 2.68 2.69 2.74 Non -Operating Expenses Transfers (In)/Out 1.068.000 1.068,000 1.068.000 1.068,000 1.068 000 Total Non -Operating Expenses $1,068,000 $1,068,000 $1,068,000 $1,068,000 $1,068,000 Net Cashflow Before Capital Expenditures 4,471,300 4,816,025 5,082,825 5,140,625 5,307,125 (1) Charges for services projected to increase annually by 3% for Fiscal Year 2016-17 and thereafter to increase annually by 3% subject to Council approval. Rates after Fiscal Y ear 2018-19 and beyond are subject to Council approval as well as a new Proposition 218 process. (2) Annual interest earnings projected at 1% times the projected average annual fund balance. (3) Includes Sewer Tap Fees and Septic Dumping Charges. Sewer Tap Fees and Septic Dumping Charges projected at 3% annual growth rate estimate. Projections do not include any Connection Fees during the projection period. (4) Excludes depreciation. Projected to increase annually at varying rates: personnel costs at 3.4%, utility costs at 4.5%, supplies and other at 4.5%, with variations for regulatory studies, etc. (5) Includes equipment, rebates, special payments/fees. (6) Does not reflect refunding of the Refunded Certificates. Source: Adopted City Budget estimates for Fiscal Year 2015-16. City of Lodi provided revenue and expense projections for Fiscal Year 2016-17 through Fiscal Year 2019-20. THE AUTHORITY The Authority was created in July 2010 by a joint exercise of powers agreement, which was entered into between the City and Industrial Development Authority of the City of Lodi ("IDA"), pursuant to the provisions of the Act. Under the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, the Authority is a public entity, separate from the City and the IDA. The debts, liabilities and obligations of the 32 Authority are not debts, liabilities and obligations of either the City or the IDA. The Authority is administered by a governing board consisting of the members of the Lodi City Council. RISK FACTORS The following factors, which represent certain risk factors, should be considered along with all other information in this Official Statement by potential investors in evaluating the 2016 Bonds. The following is not intended to be an exhaustive list and there can be no assurance made that other risk factors do not currently exist or will not become evident at any future time. Rate Covenant Not a Guarantee The ability of the City to make the 2016 Installment Payments and thereby pay the principal of and interest on the 2016 Bonds depends on the ability of the City to generate System Net Revenues in the levels required by the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement. Although, as more particularly described herein, the City expects that sufficient revenues will be generated through the imposition and collection of impact fees, service fees and other System Revenues described herein, there is no assurance that such imposition of impact fees, service fees, or other System Revenues will result in the generation of System Net Revenues in the amounts required by the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement. As a result, the City's covenant does not constitute a guarantee that sufficient System Net Revenues will be available to make debt service payments on the 2016 Bonds. Statutory and Regulatory Impact Laws and regulations governing treatment and disposal of wastewater are enacted and promulgated by government agencies on the federal, state and local levels. Compliance with these laws and regulations may be extremely costly, and, as more stringent standards are developed to protect the environment, these costs will likely increase. See "THE SYSTEM - Environmental Compliance." Claims against the City for violations of regulations with respect to its facilities and services could be significant. Such claims are payable from assets of the System or from other legally available sources. Although the City has covenanted in the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement to fix, prescribe and collect rates, fees and charges during each Fiscal Year at specified levels, no assurance can be given that the cost of compliance with such laws and regulations will not materially adversely affect the ability of the City to generate System Net Revenues in the amounts required by the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement and to pay the 2016 Installment Payments. Certain potential increasing regulatory standards could materially increase the cost to the City of providing sewer services. Permit Renewal The City's current NPDES Permit expires in 2018. While the City does not anticipate that the discharge limits and other requirements for the White Slough Facility as set forth in the current 2013 Permits will be significantly different in the new NPDES and WDR permits when they are issued, there can be no assurances that significant new and potentially more stringent conditions and requirements on the operations of the White Slough Facility will not be imposed in connection with 33 such renewal. More stringent conditions could result in significant increases in capital and/or operating costs. Earthquake, Flood or Other Natural Disasters The occurrence of an earthquake, flood or other natural disaster which resulted in the temporary or permanent closure of major components of the System or resulted in significantly increased costs could materially adversely affect the ability of the City to operate the System or to generate System Net Revenues at the levels required by the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement . Flood. Based on flood risk evaluations prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for the City and San Joaquin County, effective October 19, 2009, flood hazards are a constraint to development only in two areas of the City: the area immediately adjacent to the Mokelumne River along the City's northern boundary, and the area around the White Slough Facility. These areas lie within Zone AE, meaning that they are subject to a 1% annual (100 -year) flood. Flooding depths in this area are generally greater than three feet. Most of the City lies within Zone X, which describes lands subject to the 0.2% annual (500 -year) flood zone or that lie within the 100 -year flood zone, but with flooding depths less than one foot. As describe above, the property on which the White Slough Facility sits within a 100 -year flood zone. However, the White Slough Facility itself is constructed at or above the estimated flood elevation. Projected Operating Results The Projected Operating Results included herein are based on certain assumptions and forecasts. Any forecast is subject to uncertainties. There will usually be differences between actual and forecast results because not all events and circumstances occur as expected, and those differences may be material. Accordingly, the Projected Operating Results are not necessarily indicative of future performance, and the City does not assume any responsibility for the failure to meet such projections. In addition, certain assumptions with respect to future business and financing decisions of the City are subject to change. No representation is made or intended, nor should any representation be inferred, with respect to the likely existence of any particular future set of facts or circumstances, and prospective purchasers of the 2016 Bonds are cautioned not to place undue reliance upon the Projected Operating Results. If actual results are less favorable than the results projected or if the assumptions used in preparing such projections prove to be incorrect, the amount of System Net Revenues may be materially less than expected and consequently, the ability of the City to make timely payment of the principal of and interest on the 2016 Bonds may be materially adversely affected. Neither the City's independent auditors, nor any other independent accountants have compiled, examined or performed any procedures with respect to the Projected Operating Results, nor have they expressed any opinion or any form of assurance on such information or its achievability, and assume no responsibility for, and disclaim any association with, Projected Operating Results, nor have they expressed any opinion or any form of assurance on such information or its achievability, and assume no responsibility for, and disclaim any association with, Projected Operating Results. 34 No Reserve Account No debt service reserve account has been established with respect to the Bonds. Limited Recourse on Default Failure by the City to make the 2016 Installment Payments, when due, constitutes an event of default under the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement and the Authority is permitted to pursue remedies at law or in equity to enforce the City's obligation to make the 2016 Installment Payments. Although the Trustee, as assignee of the Authority, has the right to accelerate the total unpaid principal component of the 2016 Installment Payments, there is no assurance that the City will have sufficient System Net Revenues to pay the principal component of the 2016 Installment Payments upon acceleration. See also "Certain Limitations on the Ability of the City to Impose Taxes, Fees and Charges" below. Certain Limitations on the Ability of the City to Impose Taxes, Fees and Charges On November 5, 1996, the voters of the State approved Proposition 218, a constitutional initiative, entitled the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act" ("Proposition 218"). Proposition 218 added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution and contains a number of interrelated provisions affecting the ability of local governments, including the City, to levy and collect both existing and future taxes, assessments, fees and charges. Section 3 of Article XIIIC expressly extends the initiative power to give voters the power to reduce or repeal local taxes, assessments, fees and charges, regardless of the date such taxes, assessments, fees or charges were imposed. Section 3 expands the initiative power to include reducing or repealing assessments, fees and charges, which had previously been considered administrative rather than legislative matters and therefore beyond the initiative power. This extension of the initiative power is not limited by the terms of Article XIIIC to fees imposed after November 6, 1996, the effective date of Proposition 218, and absent other legal authority could result in the reduction in any existing taxes, assessments or fees and charges imposed prior to November 6, 1996. "Fees" and "charges" are not expressly defined in Article XIIIC or in SB 919, the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act enacted in 1997 to prescribe specific procedures and parameters for local jurisdictions in complying with Article XIIIC and Article XIIID ("SB 919"). However, on July 24, 2006, the California Supreme Court ruled in Bighorn -Desert View Water Agency v. Virjil (Kelley) (the "Bighorn Decision") that charges for ongoing water delivery are property related fees and charges within the meaning of Article XIIID and are also fees or charges within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIIIC. The California Supreme Court held that such water service charges may, therefore, be reduced or repealed through a local voter initiative pursuant to Section 3 of Article XIIIC. In the Bighorn Decision, the Supreme Court did state that nothing in Section 3 of Article XIIIC authorizes initiative measures that impose voter -approval requirements for future increases in fees or charges for water delivery. The Supreme Court stated that water providers may determine rates and charges upon proper action of the governing body and that the governing body may increase a charge which was not affected by a prior initiative or impose an entirely new charge. 35 The Supreme Court further stated in the Bighorn Decision that it was not holding that the initiative power is free of all limitations and was not determining whether the initiative power is subject to the statutory provision requiring that water service charges be set at a level that will pay debt service on bonded debt and operating expenses. Such initiative power could be subject to the limitations imposed on the impairment of contracts under the contract clause of the United States Constitution. Additionally, SB 919 provides that the initiative power provided for in Proposition 218 "shall not be construed to mean that any owner or beneficial owner of a municipal security, purchased before or after (the effective date of Proposition 218) assumes the risk of, or in any way consents to, any action by initiative measure that constitutes an impairment of contractual rights" protected by the United States Constitution. However, no assurance can be given that the voters within the service area of the City will not, in the future, approve an initiative which reduces or repeals local taxes, assessments, fees or charges. Article XIIID defines a "fee" or "charge" as any levy other than an ad valorem tax, special tax, or assessment imposed upon a parcel or upon a person as an incident of property ownership, including a user fee or charge for a property -related service. A "property -related service" is defined as "a public service having a direct relationship to a property ownership." In the Bighorn Decision, the California Supreme Court held that a public water agency's charges for ongoing water delivery are fees and charges within the meaning of Article XIIID. Article XIIID requires that any agency imposing or increasing any property -related fee or charge must provide written notice thereof to the record owner of each identified parcel upon which such fee or charge is to be imposed and must conduct a public hearing with respect thereto. The proposed fee or charge may not be imposed or increased if a majority of owners of the identified parcels file written protests against it. As a result, the local government's ability to increase such fee or charge may be limited by a majority protest. The City believes that it has complied with the applicable notice and protest procedures of Article XIIID for all increases in its rates and charges approved since the effective date of Article XIIID, and that the Bighorn decision will not require any changes in the procedures it has utilized. There has not been nor is there any pending challenge to any of the City's fees and charges approved since the effective date of Proposition 218. In addition, Article XIIID also includes a number of limitations applicable to existing fees and charges including provisions to the effect that (i) revenues derived from the fee or charge shall not exceed the funds required to provide the property -related service; (ii) such revenues shall not be used for any purpose other than that for which the fee or charge was imposed; (iii) the amount of a fee or charge imposed upon any parcel or person as an incident of property ownership shall not exceed the proportional cost of the service attributable to the parcel; and (iv) no such fee or charge may be imposed for a service unless that service is actually used by, or immediately available to, the owner of the property in question. Property -related fees or charges based on potential or future use of a service are not permitted. On November 2, 2010, voters in the State approved Proposition 26. Proposition 26 amends Article XIIIC of the State Constitution by expanding the definition of "tax" to include "any levy, charge, or exaction of any kind imposed by a local government" except the following: (1) a charge imposed for a specific benefit conferred or privilege granted directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of conferring the benefit or granting the privilege; (2) a charge imposed for a specific government service or product provided directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of providing the service or product; (3) a charge 36 imposed for the reasonable regulatory costs to a local government for issuing licenses and permits, for performing investigations, inspections, and audits, for enforcing agricultural marketing orders, and for the administrative enforcement and adjudication thereof; (4) a charge imposed for entrance to or use of local government property, or the purchase, rental, or lease of local government property; (5) a fine, penalty, or other monetary charge imposed by the judicial branch of government or a local government, as a result of a violation of law; (6) a charge imposed as a condition of property development; and (7) assessments and property -related fees imposed in accordance with the provisions of Article XIIID Proposition 26 provides that the local government bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that a levy, charge, or other exaction is not a tax, that the amount is no more than necessary to cover the reasonable costs of the governmental activity, and that the manner in which those costs are allocated to a payor bears a fair or reasonable relationship to the payor's burdens on, or benefits received from, the governmental activity. As of the date of this Official Statement, the City is unaware of any fees relating to the Sewer System that would have to be reduced or eliminated because of Proposition 26. Articles XIIIA, XIIIB, XIIIC and XIIID were adopted as measures that qualified for the ballot pursuant to California's initiative process. From time to time other initiatives could be proposed and adopted affecting the City's revenues or ability to increase revenues. The City covenants in the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement that it will, to the maximum extent permitted by law, fix, prescribe and collect rates, fees and charges and manage the operation of the System for each Fiscal Year so as to yield System Net Revenues during such Fiscal Year equal to at least 110% of the Annual Debt Service on all Parity Debt in such Fiscal Year; provided, an adjustment will be made to the amount of System Net Revenues for amounts deposited into or withdrawn from the Rate Stabilization Fund; provided that, for purposes of such calculation, the amount of System Net Revenues before any credits for transfers from the Rate Stabilization Fund to the System Revenue Fund may not be less than 100% of Annual Debt Service for such Fiscal Year. In the event that proposed increased service charges cannot be imposed as a result of a majority protest, such circumstances may adversely effect the ability of the System to generate revenues in the amounts required by the Installment Purchase Agreement , and to make 2016 Payments representing principal and interest with respect to the 2016 Bonds. See "THE SYSTEM - Sale of Recycled Water" for a description of the application of revenues from sale of recycled water by the City to NCPA. Effect of Bankruptcy In addition to the limitations on remedies contained in the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement and the Indenture, the rights and obligations under the Bonds, the Lease and the Indenture may be subject to the following: the United States Bankruptcy Code and applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, or similar laws relating to or affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights generally, now or hereafter in effect; usual equity principles which may limit the specific enforcement under State law of certain remedies; the exercise by the United States of America of the powers delegated to it by the Federal Constitution; and the reasonable and necessary exercise, in certain exceptional situations, of the police power inherent in the sovereignty of the State of California and its governmental bodies in the interest of serving a significant and legitimate public purpose. 37 Bankruptcy proceedings, or the exercise of powers by the federal or state government, if initiated, could subject the Owners of the 2016 Bonds to judicial discretion and interpretation of their rights in bankruptcy or otherwise, and consequently may entail risks of delay, limitation or modification of their rights. The opinion of Bond Counsel notes that the rights of the owners of the 2016 Bonds and the enforceability of the 2016 Bonds and the Indenture are limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and other similar laws affecting creditors' rights generally, and by equitable principles, whether considered at law or in equity. Loss of Tax Exemption The City has covenanted in the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement, and the Authority has covenanted in the Indenture, that each will not take any action, or fail to take any action, if any such action or failure to take action would adversely affect the exclusion from gross income of interest or the 2016 Bonds under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. In the event either the City or the Authority fails to comply with the foregoing tax covenant, interest or the 2016 Bonds may be includable in the gross income of the Owners thereof for federal tax purposes retroactive to the date of issuance of the Bonds. See "TAX MATTERS". Secondary Market There can be no guarantee that there will be a secondary market for the 2016 Bonds or, if a secondary market exists, that any 2016 Bonds can be sold for any particular price. Prices of bond issues for which a market is being made will depend upon then -prevailing circumstances. Such prices could be substantially different from the original purchase price. No assurance can be given that the market price for the 2016 Bonds will not be affected by the introduction or enactment of any future legislation (including without limitation amendments to the Internal Revenue Code), or changes in interpretation of the Internal Revenue Code, or any action of the Internal Revenue Service, including but not limited to the publication of proposed or final regulations, the issuance of rulings, the selection of the 2016 Bonds for audit examination, or the course or result of any Internal Revenue Service audit or examination of the 2016 Bonds or obligations that present similar tax issues as the 2016 Bonds. TAX MATTERS In the opinion of Jones Hall, A Professional Law Corporation, San Francisco, California, Bond Counsel, subject, however to the qualifications set forth below, under existing law, the interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes and such interest is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations, provided, however, that, for the purpose of computing the alternative minimum tax imposed on corporations (as defined for federal income tax purposes), such interest is taken into account in determining certain income and earnings. The opinions set forth in the preceding paragraph are subject to the condition that the Authority and the City comply with all requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Tax Code") that must be satisfied subsequent to the issuance of the Bonds. The Authority and the City have covenanted to comply with each such requirement. Failure to comply with certain of such requirements may cause the inclusion of such interest in gross income for federal income tax purposes to be retroactive to the date of issuance of the Bonds. 38 If the initial offering price to the public (excluding bond houses and brokers) at which a Bond is sold is less than the amount payable at maturity thereof, then such difference constitutes "original issue discount" for purposes of federal income taxes and State of California personal income taxes. If the initial offering price to the public (excluding bond houses and brokers) at which a Bond is sold is greater than the amount payable at maturity thereof, then such difference constitutes "original issue premium" for purposes of federal income taxes and State of California personal income taxes. De minimis original issue discount and original issue premium is disregarded. Under the Tax Code, original issue discount is treated as interest excluded from federal gross income and exempt from State of California personal income taxes to the extent properly allocable to each owner thereof subject to the limitations described in the first paragraph of this section. The original issue discount accrues over the term to maturity of the Bond on the basis of a constant interest rate compounded on each interest or principal payment date (with straight-line interpolations between compounding dates). The amount of original issue discount accruing during each period is added to the adjusted basis of such Bonds to determine taxable gain upon disposition (including sale, redemption, or payment on maturity) of such Bond. The Tax Code contains certain provisions relating to the accrual of original issue discount in the case of purchasers of the Bonds who purchase the Bonds after the initial offering of a substantial amount of such maturity. Owners of such Bonds should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the tax consequences of ownership of Bonds with original issue discount, including the treatment of purchasers who do not purchase in the original offering, the allowance of a deduction for any loss on a sale or other disposition, and the treatment of accrued original issue discount on such Bonds under federal individual and corporate alternative minimum taxes. Under the Tax Code, original issue premium is amortized on an annual basis over the term of the Bond (said term being the shorter of the Bond's maturity date or its call date). The amount of original issue premium amortized each year reduces the adjusted basis of the owner of the Bond for purposes of determining taxable gain or loss upon disposition. The amount of original issue premium on a Bond is amortized each year over the term to maturity of the Bond on the basis of a constant interest rate compounded on each interest or principal payment date (with straight-line interpolations between compounding dates). Amortized Bond premium is not deductible for federal income tax purposes. Owners of premium Bonds, including purchasers who do not purchase in the original offering, should consult their own tax advisors with respect to State of California personal income tax and federal income tax consequences of owning such Bonds. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Bonds is exempt from California personal income taxes. Owners of the Bonds should also be aware that the ownership or disposition of, or the accrual or receipt of interest on, the Bonds may have federal or state tax consequences other than as described above. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any federal or state tax consequences arising with respect to the Bonds other than as expressly described above. LITIGATION Litigation Concerning the 2016 Bonds. To the knowledge of the City, there is no controversy or litigation of any nature now pending or threatened restraining or enjoining the execution and delivery of the 2016 Bonds, the Indenture, the 2016 Installment Purchase Agreement or in any way 39 contesting or affecting the validity of the 2016 Bonds or any proceedings of the City or the Authority taken with respect to the execution and delivery thereof. Prior Environmental Litigation Involving the City. The City of Lodi initiated litigation in 2000 to address PCE and TCE contamination that threatened the City's water supply. The litigation exposed the City to several economic risks associated with: 1) the costs of the litigation; 2) the financing of the litigation; and 3) the City's wastewater system because the PCE had been discharged by private parties to, and may have leaked from the City's wastewater collection system. The City has now fully resolved the environmental clean-up litigation, and all of the associated litigation that arose out of the economic risks referenced above. In exchange for money to fund the clean-up, the settlements require the City to perform the clean-up. The City's contract engineer estimates that its total clean-up cost is approximately $18.6 million as of June 30, 2015. The City has a total of $14.8 million in settlement and other rate funds set aside to meet this cost. Given that the cost is over a 30 year operations and maintenance horizon, the City believes it has all the savings it needs to meet this liability. The City does not expect that any other funds from the System will be used for the costs relating to the clean-up. APPROVAL OF LEGALITY The 2016 Bonds are offered when, as and if issued and received by the Underwriter and subject to the approval as to their legality by Jones Hall, A Professional Law Corporation, San Francisco, California, Bond Counsel. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the City and the Authority by the City Attorney, and for the Underwriters by Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation, Sacramento, California. Payment of the fees and expenses of Bond Counsel and Underwriters' Counsel is contingent upon execution and delivery of the 2016 Bonds. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Macias, Gini & O'Connell, Certified Public Accountants (the "Auditor"), audited the financial statements of the City for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2015. The Auditor's examination was made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Governmental Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. See "APPENDIX B — Audited Financial Statements of the City for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015." The City has not requested nor did the City obtain permission from the Auditor to include the audited financial statements as an appendix to this Official Statement. Accordingly, the Auditor has not performed any post -audit review of the financial condition or operations of the City. RATINGS Standard & Poor's and Fitch are expected to assign the 2016 Bonds the long-term ratings of "" and "_," respectively. The ratings reflect only the respective views of the rating agencies, and any explanation of the significance of such ratings may be obtained only from such rating agencies as follows: Standard & Poor's, 55 Water Street, 38th Floor, New York, New York 10041; and Fitch Ratings, One State Street Plaza, New York, New York 10004. There is no assurance that the ratings will remain in effect 40 for any given period of time or that they will not be revised downward or withdrawn entirely by such rating agencies, or either of them, if, in their respective judgments, circumstances so warrant. The City undertakes no responsibility to oppose any such revisions or withdrawal. Any downward revision or withdrawal of any rating may have an adverse effect on the market price of the 2016 Bonds. CONTINUING DISCLOSURE The City will covenant for the benefit of owners of the 2016 Bonds to provide certain financial information and operating data relating to the City by not later than 9 months after the end of each fiscal year of the City (currently June 30th), commencing with the report for the 2015-16 Fiscal Year (the "Annual Report"), and to provide notices of the occurrence of certain enumerated events. Such reports are required to be filed with the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board through its Electronic Municipal Market Access system ("EMMA"). The specific nature of the information to be contained in the Annual Report or the notices of enumerated events is described in "APPENDIX D— Form of Continuing Disclosure Agreement," attached to this Official Statement. These covenants have been made in order to assist the underwriters of the 2016 Bonds in complying with Securities Exchange Commission Rule 15c2 12(b)(5). The City has entered into a number of continuing disclosure undertakings in connection with City obligations, including obligations payable from the City's General Fund, as well as obligations payable from the revenues relating to the City's electric, wastewater and water utilities. During the past five years, the City has prepared continuing disclosure reports pursuant to these undertakings and transmitted such reports to its dissemination agent in December or January following City Council receipt of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. However, in certain years the reports were filed on EMMA after the date required, and frequently certain of the reports were not filed so as to be linked on EMMA with all of the CUSIP numbers for the respective City obligations. The City corrected the filings on EMMA (so that the appropriate reports are "linked" on EMMA to the City obligations to which they relate). The City also will confirm that the dissemination agent files timely reports in the future. In addition, on several occasions the City failed to make "material event" filings with respect to changes in the ratings of bond insurers of City obligations, as well as upgrades of the underlying ratings of certain obligations. Current ratings of the City's obligations are available on EMMA. The City filed a self-report under the Securities and Exchange Commission's Municipalities Continuing Disclosure Cooperation ("MCDC") initiative regarding statements made in certain of the City's previous official statements concerning the City's compliance with its continuing disclosure requirements. FINANCIAL ADVISOR Lamont Financial Services Corp. (the "Financial Advisor") has assisted the City with various matters relating to the planning, structuring and delivery of the 2016 Bonds. The Financial Advisor is a financial advisory firm and is not engaged in the business of underwriting or distributing municipal securities or other public securities. The Financial Advisor assumes no responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fairness of this Official Statement. The Financial Advisor will receive compensation from the City contingent upon the sale and delivery of the 2016 Bonds. 41 UNDERWRITING The Underwriter has agreed, subject to certain conditions, to purchase the 2016 Bonds at a price of $ (consisting of the aggregate principal amount of the Series 2016 Bonds less an Underwriters' discount of $ and plus net original issue premium of $ ). The Purchase Contract for the 2016 Bonds provides that the Underwriters will purchase all the 2016 Bonds, if any are purchased. The 2016 Bonds may be offered and sold by the Underwriters to certain dealers and others at prices lower than the public offering price stated on the inside cover page of this Official Statement, and such public offering price may be changed, from time to time, by the Underwriters. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC ("JPMS") provided the information contained in this paragraph for inclusion in this Official Statement and the City does not take any responsibility for or make any representation as to its accuracy or completeness. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC ("JPMS"), the Underwriter of the 2016 Bonds, has entered into negotiated dealer agreements (each, a "Dealer Agreement") with each of Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. ("CS&Co.") and LPL Financial LLC ("LPL") for the retail distribution of certain securities offerings at the original issue prices. Pursuant to each Dealer Agreement, each of CS&Co. and LPL may purchase 2016 Bonds from JPMS at the original issue price less a negotiated portion of the selling concession applicable to any 2016 Bonds that such firm sells. VERIFICATION OF MATHEMATICAL COMPUTATIONS Upon delivery of the 2016 Bonds, The Arbitrage Group, Inc. Houston, Texas, independent certified public accountants, will deliver a report stating that the firm has verified the mathematical accuracy of certain computations relating to the adequacy of the amounts deposited pursuant to the Escrow Agreement to pay the applicable redemption price of and accrued interest on, the Refunded Certificates on their respective payment and redemption dates. 42 EXECUTION AND DELIVERY The execution and delivery of this Official Statement have been authorized by the Board of Directors of the Authority and the City Council of the City. LODI PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY By: Executive Director CITY OF LODI By: City Manager 43 APPENDIX A CERTAIN ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION CONCERNING THE CITY OF LODI The City of Lodi is located in the County of San Joaquin (the "County") between Stockton and Sacramento, and adjacent to U.S. Highway 99, approximately 90 miles east of San Francisco. The City was incorporated as a General Law City on December 6, 1906. The City operates under a City Council -Manager form of government and provides the following services: public safety (police, fire and graffiti abatement), public utilities services (electric, water and sewer), transportation services (streets, flood control and transit), leisure, cultural and social services (parks and recreation, library, and community center), and general government services (management, human resources administration, financial administration, building maintenance and equipment maintenance). 2006. Population. The following chart indicates the growth in the population of the City since CITY OF LODI POPULATION For Fiscal Years 2006 through 2015 Fiscal Year Population 2006 62,817 2007 63,395 2008 63,362 2009 63,313 2010 62,134 2011 62,346 2012 62,886 2013 63,239 2014 63,496 2015 63,719 Source: State of California, Department of Finance. A-1 Employment. The following table contains certain information concerning employment in the City and State. CITY OF LODI EMPLOYMENT, UNEMPLOYMENT AND LABOR FORCE Averages for each of the Calendar Years 2010-2014 Employment Unemployment Civilian Labor Force Unemployment Rate State Unemployment Rate 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 27,600 24,300 4,200 4,400 31,800 28,700 13.2 15.3 12.2 11.7 Source: State of California, Employment Development Department. 24,900 25,500 3,900 3,400 28,800 28,800 13.6 11.7 10.4 8.9 25,900 2,900 28,800 10.0 7.5 Major Employers. There are several manufacturing plants in the community producing a wide variety of products: cereals, food mixes, wines, rubber products, steel framing and industrial shelving, foundry items, recreational vehicle components, electronic substrates, and plastic piping and injection molded products. In addition, Lodi has a number of small businesses located within the City. The main businesses in Lodi, however, are food processes and plastics. The largest employers in Lodi as of June 30, 2015 are as follows: Employer Lodi Unified School District Lodi Memorial Hospital Pacific Coast Producers Blue Shield ConAgra General Mills* City of Lodi Walmart Farmers & Merchants Bank Target Source: City of Lodi. CITY OF LODI LARGEST EMPLOYERS Business Education Health Care Can Manufacture and Cannery Health Care Specialty Bakery Cereals and Food Mixes Government General Merchant Banking General Merchant * General Mills closed all operations in Lodi in December of 2015. 2 Number of Employees 3,090 1,386 2,800 780 485 280 391 190 192 177 Building Permit Activity. The following table shows the value of building permits issued in the City between 2008 and 2015. Residential Valuation Single Family Multifamily TOTAL CITY OF LODI BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION for Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2011 through 2015 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 $1,204,695 $1,526,810 $4,402,870 $5,587,759 $10,483,842 0 0 0 0 0 $1,204,695 $1,526,810 $4,402,870 $5,587,759 $10,483,842 New Dwelling Units Single Family 8 6 Multiple Family 0 0 TOTAL 8 6 Source: City of Lodi. 17 21 0 0 17 21 37 0 37 Taxable Sales. The following table indicates taxable transactions in the City by type of business during the calendar years 2010 through 2014. CITY OF LODI TAXABLE TRANSACTIONS BY TYPE OF BUSINESS for Calendar Years 2010 through 2014 (in Thousands of Dollars) Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers Home Furn. & Appliances Bldg. Mat. & Garden Equip. & Supplies Food & Beverage Stores Service Stations Apparel Stores General Merchandise Food Services & Drinking Places Other Retail Stores Retail and Food Services Total All Other Outlets 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014(1) $ 76,930 $ 75,817 13,634 13,496 54,603 59,608 43,928 44,148 87,959 104,588 19,441 20,055 110,821 147,812 75,517 79,322 48.978 50,111 $531,811 $594,957 213,405 172,204 TOTAL ALL OUTLETS $ 745,216 $ 767,162 (1) First, Second and Third Quarter of 2014 Source: California State Board of Equalization. 3 $ 90,980 12,645 67,512 45,769 103,454 21,495 187,708 85,677 50,300 $665,538 140,223 $ 97,091 $ 87,268 14,057 13,243 81,299 63,216 47,400 35,322 104,893 82,760 23,016 16,656 192,894 132,239 91,752 73,915 48,896 36,346 $701,339 $540,968 169,983 130,561 $ 805,762 $ 871,322 $ 671,528 Community Facilities. The City has a central library, one community center, 26 parks and five specific use facilities, covering 263 developed areas and 110 undeveloped areas, and 16 playgrounds. Lodi Lake Park is connected to the Mokelumne River and features boating, fishing, beach swimming, boat rentals, nature walks, group picnic sites, an RV park and the Discovery Nature Center. Micke Grove Park is located between Lodi and Stockton. The park is home to a Japanese garden, the San Joaquin Historical Museum, rides, picnic areas, and a five -acre zoo featuring mammals, birds, reptiles and vertebrates. Community recreation programs cover a wide range of interests and activities including youth and adult sports and special interest classes, youth -at -risk programs, aquatics, special events, camps/clinics and tournaments. Lodi Health, a subsidiary of Adventist Health operates a 270 -bed, non-profit, independent, acute-care hospital to the residents of Lodi. Its mission is to provide quality medical care, education and support services to the community. Two hospital campuses and six satellite clinics are used to provide a variety of inpatient, outpatient, urgent, emergency and primary care services. Education. The Lodi Unified School District provides K-12 and special education programs. The area also is served by several private and parochial schools. The University of the Pacific, San Joaquin Delta Community College, California State University-Stanislaus/Turlock/Stockton Center, and the University of San Francisco satellite center are all within a 20 -minute drive of Lodi. The University of California -Davis, California State University -Sacramento and the University of Southern California satellite center are within an hour's drive from Lodi. Transportation. Lodi is served by Interstate highway 5 and State highways 12 and 99 and is located on the main line of the Union Pacific Railroad. Lodi has Amtrak passenger rail service and local, regional and national bus service. A deep -water seaport and airport with commercial passenger travel are located approximately 15 miles south. 4 APPENDIX B AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE CITY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 CITY OF LODI, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Year Ended June 30, 2015 BOB JOHNSON, MAYOR MARK CHANDLER, MAYOR PRO TEM DOUG KUEHNE, COUNCILMEMBER JOANNE MOUNCE, COUNCILMEMBER ALAN NAKANISHI, COUNCILMEMBER STEVE SCHWABAUER, CITY MANAGER Prepared by the Financial Services Division Ruby Paiste, Financial Services Manager Derrick Cotten, Supervising Accountant CITY OF LODI COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY SECTION Table of Contents Letter of Transmittal v Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting xiii Organization Chart of the City of Lodi xiv Directory of Officials and Advisory Bodies xv FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor's Report 1 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 3 BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Government -wide Financial Statements: Statement of Net Position 17 Statement of Activities 18 Fund Financial Statements: 19 Balance Sheet—Governmental Funds 21 Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net Position 22 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances — Governmental Funds 23 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities 24 Statement of Net Position — Proprietary Funds 25 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position — Proprietary Funds 26 Statement of Cash Flows — Proprietary Funds 27 Statement of Fiduciary Net Position — Fiduciary Funds 29 Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position - Fiduciary Funds 30 Notes to Basic Financial Statements 32 REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios - Miscellaneous Plan 82 Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios - Safety Plan 83 Schedule of Contributions 84 Schedule of Funding Progress — OPEB Plan 85 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget and Actual — General Fund 86 Note to the Required Supplementary Information 87 COMBINING AND INDIVIDUAL FUND STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES Combining Balance Sheet — Nonmajor Governmental Funds 90 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances — Nonmajor Governmental Funds 91 Nonmajor Governmental Funds - Special Revenue Funds 92 Combining Balance Sheet —Nonmajor Governmental Funds — Special Revenue Funds 94 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances — Nonmajor Governmental Funds — Special Revenue Funds 95 Schedules of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget and Actual — Nonmajor Governmental Funds — Special Revenue Funds 96 Nonmajor Governmental Funds - Capital Project Funds 102 Combining Balance Sheet — Nonmajor Governmental Funds — Capital Project Funds 103 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances — Nonmajor Governmental Funds — Capital Project Funds 104 Internal Service Funds 106 Combining Statement of Net Position - Internal Service Funds 107 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Position — Internal Service Funds 108 Combining Statement of Cash Flows - Internal Service Funds 109 Combining Statement of Fiduciary Net Position - Private -Purpose Trust Funds 110 Combining Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position - Private -Purpose Trust Funds 111 Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities - Agency Fund 112 STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED) Government -wide information: 114 Net Position by Component - Last Ten Fiscal Years 115 Changes in Net Position - Last Ten Fiscal Years 116 Fund information: Fund Balances, Governmental Funds - Last Ten Fiscal Years 118 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds - Last Ten Fiscal Years 119 Tax Revenues by Source, Governmental Funds - Last Ten Fiscal Years 121 Assessed Value and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property - Last Ten Fiscal Years 122 Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates - Last Ten Fiscal Years 123 Principal Property Taxpayers -Current Year and Nine Years Ago 124 Property Tax Levies and Collections - Last Ten Fiscal Years 125 Electricity Sold by Type of Customer - Last Ten Fiscal Years 126 Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type - Last Ten Fiscal Years 127 Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding- Last Ten Fiscal Years 128 Legal Debt Margin Information - Last Ten Fiscal Years 129 Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt 130 Pledged -Revenue Coverage - Last Ten Fiscal Years 131 Demographic and Economic Statistics - Last Ten Fiscal Years 134 Principal Employers - Current Year and Nine Years Ago 135 Full -Time Equivalent City Government Employees By Department - Last Ten Fiscal Years 136 Operating Indicators by Function/Program/Department - Last Ten Fiscal Years 137 Capital Asset Statistics by Function/Program/Department - Last Ten Fiscal Years 139 SINGLE AUDIT REPORTS Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 142 CITY OF LODI COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS - continued Notes to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 144 Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards 145 Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance for the Major Federal Program and on Internal Control over Compliance Required by OMB Circular A-133 147 Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs 149 Schedule of Prior Year Findings and Questioned Costs 151 CONTINUING DISCLOSURES (UNAUDITED) Annual Report for Electric Utility 154 Annual Report for Wastewater Utility 161 Annual Report for the Lodi Public Improvement Corporation and the Lodi Public Financing Authority 168 Annual Report for Water Utility 171 (This page intentionally left blank.) CITY COUNCIL BOB JOHNSON, Mayor MARK CHANDLER, Mayor Pro Tempore C0UNCILMEMBERS: DOUG KUEHNE JOANNE MOUNCE ALAN NAKANISHI February 3, 2016 STEVE SCHWABAUER CITY OF LODI City Manager CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET P.O. BOX 3006 LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910 (209) 333-6706 FAX (209) 333-6795 To the Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council and the City Manager of the City of Lodi: JENNIFER FERRAIOLO City Clerk JANICE MAGDICH City Attorney The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the year ended June 30, 2015, is hereby submitted. This report is provided to present the financial position, changes in financial position, and where applicable, cash flows of the City of Lodi (City) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2015, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The report conforms to the highest standards of financial reporting as established by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), for reporting by State and local governments. The responsibility for the accuracy, fairness and completeness of the report rests with the City. This report consists of management's representations concerning the finances of the City. Consequently, management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of all the information presented in this report. To provide a reasonable basis for making these representations, management of the City has established a comprehensive internal control framework that is designed to protect the City's assets from loss, theft, or misuse and to compile sufficient reliable information for the preparation of the City's financial statements in conformity with GAAP. We believe that the information is accurate in all material respects, and that it is presented in a manner designed to fairly present the financial position and changes in financial position of the City. In addition, we believe that all disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain a full understanding of the City's financial activities have been included. This letter of transmittal is designed to complement the Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) and should be read in conjunction with it. The MD&A can be found immediately following the independent auditor's report. THE REPORTING ENTITY AND SERVICES PROVIDED The funds included in the CAFR are those deemed dependent upon the City and controlled by the City Council and reflect the City's financial reporting entity in accordance with GASB Statement No.14, as amended by GASB Statement No. 61. The City was incorporated December 6, 1906, as a municipal corporation under the general laws of the State of California. The City operates under a Council -Manager form of government. Under the Council -Manager form of government, policy making and legislative authority are entrusted to the City Council. The City Council consists of five members elected at -large by its voters for four-year terms, with no term limits. Elections are held v in November of even -numbered years. Each year the Mayor and Mayor Pro -Tempore are chosen by the members of the City Council. The Mayor presides at Council meetings and acts as the ceremonial head of the City, the Mayor Pro Tempore serves as Mayor in his or her absence. The City Manager is responsible for carrying out the policies and ordinances of the City Council, for appointing department heads, and overseeing the operations of the City. The City Manager, City Attorney and the City Clerk are appointed by the City Council. The City provides a wide range of municipal services including public safety (police, fire and graffiti abatement), public utilities services (electric, water and wastewater), transportation services (streets, flood control and transit) leisure, cultural and social services (parks and recreation, library and community center), and general government services (management, community development, human resources administration, financial administration, building maintenance and equipment maintenance). Several municipal services are provided through other government agencies, private companies or public utility companies, including: Number of Facilities Elementary and Secondary Schools 18 Sanitation (solid waste) and Cable Television 3 Ambulance 1 Gas and Telephone 2 ECONOMIC CONDITION AND OUTLOOK The City is located in the San Joaquin Valley between Stockton, 10 miles to the south, and Sacramento, 35 miles to the north, and adjacent to U.S. Highway 99. The City population is 63,719 and is contained in an area of 13.98 square miles. The City has grown steadily since incorporation in 1906. The City's growth is provided for in both the General Plan and the City's growth control ordinance that allows an increase in population of 2% per year until the growth limits are reached. The City is built on a strong and broad based local economy. The City is known for its Zinfandel wine. It is an authentic dynamic wine region with over 80 wineries within 10 miles of downtown. The employment base is diversified with food processing, packaging, plastic and service industries. In addition, the City has a wide range of small, financially sound businesses that add to the economic strength of the City. These companies range in size from 10 to 150 employees and produce a wide variety of products, services and commodities. Over the past several years, there has been an increase in industrial and residential development that has been unprecedented since the early 1980s. This new development combined with the growing strength of the wine/grape industry is a positive indicator for the City. The City's focus on economic development has encouraged numerous big industries to move to the City that collectively created hundreds of new jobs. vi Economic Development The City continues to be committed to promoting economic development (business retention and attraction) and expanding the tax base to fund City services rather than increase taxes to pay for these services. The City has provided for additional retail sales and commercial activity with approval of new retail developments adjacent to Highway 99 and Harney Lane in the southeast corner of the City, and with a large retail development in the southwest corner of the City. The City is also committed to an Enterprise Zone with San Joaquin County. MAJOR GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTS To assist the citizens of the City in understanding where the City intends to allocate available resources, the City Council, the City Manager and Department Heads established in 2004 a hierarchy of major aspirational goals, objectives and major projects that support and re -enforce the City's mission statement. Council then set project specific goals at a series of workshops in 2015. 1). Aspirational Goals Four major City goals were established as policy direction and focal points for the efforts of City staff. These goals include: Ensure a High Quality of Life and a Safe Environment for Citizens Ensure Efficient and Productive City Organization Ensure Public Trust, and Ensure the Development of the Lodi Economy for a Fiscally Sound City Organization City Council, the City Manager and Department Heads established nineteen major City objectives: Maintain City's Sense of Community Provide for a Balanced Community Enhance Access through Implementation of Information Systems Strategic Plan Promote Urban Forestry Attract, Retain and Invest in a Quality City Work Force Encourage Public Arts, Cultural and Recreational Opportunities Provide Appropriate and Sufficient City Facilities Develop Short and Long Range Operational Plans Develop Effective Records Management Program Promote Commercial/Industrial Base 2). Project Specific Goals Provide Employee Training and Education Evaluate Telecommunications Opportunities Provide Resources to Maintain City's Infrastructure Promote Public Relations and Marketing Efforts Ensure Open and Accessible Public Meetings Pursue Efforts to be Entrepreneurial Improve Customer Service Continue to use Partnerships to Advance City's Objectives Provide a Balanced Budget and Adhere to Adopted Policies Projects represent the foundation of the planning statements for the City. These projects are designed to accomplish specific objectives and become the focus for organization -wide effort. Council set the following priorities and categories in 2015: Economic development for "shovel ready" land Economic development and incentive program to focus on underutilized parcels Public Safety, Gang Reduction Intervention Program, training and increase in staffing vii Fiscal sustainability, asset preservation, CALPERS and Other Post -Employment Benefits East side rehabilitation, incentive programs and infrastructure Additional priorities that did not fit into the above categories include 1) addressing homelessness issues, 2) providing downtown Wi-Fi and music and 3) beautification of highway overpasses. As discussed above, economic revitalization continued to be an active focal point of the City in 2014-15. The following projects are underway and will see significant progress or be completed in 2014 or 2015. Fire Station #2 The City awarded a $4.2 million construction contract in August 2014 for building a replacement for the existing Fire Station #2. Construction is substantially complete and the new building will be occupied in January 2016. Lodi Shopping Center The Lodi Shopping Center development in the southwestern corner of the City has cleared all legal hurdles and is currently under construction. Anchored by a WalMart supercenter, the site will encompass 12 building pads and approximately 340,000 square feet of retail space. Construction began on the main building and a number of smaller pads in 2015. Reynolds Ranch Reynolds Ranch is a planned development on the south eastern edge of the city that will eventually incorporate residential and commercial development. Development continues with additional retail space completed in 2014 and 2015. Construction continues on a number of pads and tenants should be in place in 2016. Build -out of the commercial space will occur over the next 10 years. Residential Development The City has five residential development projects that have been approved and total about 1,100 dwelling units. Dwelling units are fairly evenly divided among low, medium and high density units. Sales in one of the five projects are ongoing in 2015. Construction is expected in two of the remaining four projects in the coming year. Water Meters and Water Infrastructure Under state law, all residential housing must be billed for water usage on a metered basis by 2025. The City has embarked on a program to install meters on approximately 14,000 parcels over an eight year period. A portion of this project will also include moving mains and service connections from alleys and rear yards to streets and front yards. Additionally, the City will be appropriately sizing water mains as part of this project. Construction began during FY 2009-10 and will continue through FY 2017-18. To date, approximately 10,900 meters have been installed. Estimated cost for the complete program is $42.5 million. FINANCIAL INFORMATION, MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL A detailed understanding of the financial position and change in financial position of the City is provided in the following sections of this report. The following is a brief description of the City's financial condition, management practices and control techniques. viii Basis of Accounting Basis of accounting refers to the policy as to when revenues, expenditures or expenses are recognized in the financial accounts and reported in the financial statements. The City's accounting records for general government operations are maintained on a modified accrual basis. Revenues are recorded when available and measurable. Expenditures are recorded when the services or goods are received and the liability incurred. For proprietary fund types, the City uses the accrual basis of accounting. As such, the measurement focus is on operating income in addition to financial position and changes in financial position. Revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recognized as the liability is incurred. We believe that the City's internal accounting controls adequately safeguard assets and provide reasonable assurance of proper recording of financial transactions. Accounting System and Budgetary Control In developing the City's accounting system, consideration is given to the adequacy of the internal controls. The objective of the City's internal accounting controls is to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition; and to ensure that transactions are properly recorded to permit the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that the cost of the controls should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived and that estimates and judgments are required to be made by management in evaluating these costs and benefits. In addition, the City maintains budgetary controls. The objective of these controls is to ensure compliance with legal provisions embodied in the annual appropriated budget approved by the City Council. The City Manager is responsible for the preparation of the budget and its implementation after adoption. The City Council has the authority to amend the budget at any time during the year. The City Manager has the authority to make adjustments to the budget as long as those changes will not have a significant policy impact nor affect budgeted year-end fund balances. During fiscal year 2014-15, the City Council and City Manager made several supplemental appropriations for operating budgets and capital projects. Fund Balance It is the City's goal to target and maintain an unassigned fund balance in the General Fund of at least 16% of revenues and working capital balances in the Water and Wastewater enterprise funds, and at least 25% of operating expenses. Based on a reserve policy adopted in March 2014, the target for the Electric enterprise fund working capital is $23.7 million for fiscal year 2014-15. The goals allow for variations from year-to-year to account for economic and fiscal changes. The General Fund maintained an unassigned fund balance of $12,107,040 or 28.65%, of revenues at the end of fiscal year 2014-15. Cash Management The City has written investment policies that address a wide range of investments. These policies describe the City's investment objectives, investment authority, allowable investment vehicles, maturity terms and eligible financial institutions. They also describe the City's capital preservation and cash management objectives. As provided in the policy, investments are intended to be held until maturity and investment terms are to be consistent with the City's cash flow needs. Investment reports are issued quarterly to the City Manager and City Council to provide detailed information regarding the City's investments and compliance with City policy and state law. An important objective of the City's investment policy is to achieve a reasonable rate of return on public funds while minimizing risks and preserving capital. In evaluating the performance of the City's investment portfolio, investments are expected to yield a rate of return that regularly meets or exceeds an average rate of return on a three- month U.S. Treasury Bill. ix Appropriation Limitation Article XIII B of the Constitution of the State of California (Proposition 4) provides for the limitation of expenditures by state and local governments. Under the provisions of this article, City appropriations funded through tax sources may not exceed Fiscal Year 1979 appropriation levels except as adjusted for increases in population and the growth in the California per capita income or non-residential assessed valuation due to new construction within the City. Excluded from the limitation are appropriations funded through charges for services, fines and forfeitures, grants, transfers of service responsibilities between government agencies and indebtedness incurred prior to Fiscal Year 1979. Pursuant to subsequent legislation adopted after Article XIII B, the City is required to annually establish and adopt its appropriations limit by resolution. For 2014-15, the City's appropriations subject to limit were $34,129,895 and the appropriation limit was $86,477,897, leaving appropriations at $52,348,002 below the limit. Debt Administration At June 30, 2015, the City had outstanding Certificates of Participation and Revenue Bonds of $169,717,617. These liabilities are discussed in Note 8 of the Basic Financial Statements and summarized below. In 1999, the Electric Utility issued $43.96 million Certificates of Participation to finance the costs of certain improvements to the distribution and transmission facilities of the City's electric system. These bonds were refunded by the issuance of the 2002 Electric Systems Revenue Certificates of Participation. The 2002 bonds were refunded with the 2008 Electric Systems Revenue Certificates of Participation thereby eliminating a variable rate obligation. In 2004, the City issued $27,360,000 in Wastewater Certificates of Participation (2004A) to finance the costs of improvements to the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal system. These bonds were partially refunded with the 2012 Refunding Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series A. In 2007, the City issued $30,320,000 in Wastewater Certificates of Participation (2007A) to finance Phase 111 of the wastewater improvements and to refund the 1991 Certificates of Participation. On July 24, 2008, the City issued the $60,685,000 2008 Electric System Revenue Certificates of Participation to provide funds to currently refund the outstanding $46,760,000 principal amount of the Electric System Revenue Certificates of Participation 2002 Series A Variable Rates Certificates (the "Refunded 2002 Certificates"); and to pay certain costs relating to the termination of a swap agreement relating to the Refunded 2002 Certificates. On October 1, 2010, the City issued $9,015,000 Water Revenue Certificates of Participation, 2010 Series A and $29,650,000 Water Revenue Bonds, 2010 Series B (Federally taxable - Build America Bonds) to finance the construction of the Surface Water Treatment Facility which is designed to pump water from the Mokelumne River, treat and deliver it to the City's water distribution system. On September 1, 2012, the City issued $19,080,000 Refunding Lease Revenue Bonds (2012 LRB) to prepay and cause the immediate defeasance of the outstanding $21,025,000 Certificates of Participation (2002 COP). The 2002 COP were issued in January 2002 to provide funds to finance the costs of constructing, furnishing and equipping a new police building and jail for the City, to finance portions of certain other projects and to refund the outstanding 1995 and 1996 Certificates of Participation. The City also issued the $17,105,000 2012 Refunding Wastewater Revenue Bonds (2012 Bonds) in September 2012 to advance refund the $17,115,000 principal amount of the 2004 Wastewater Revenue Certificates of Participation (2004 COP). The 2004 COP were issued to provide funds to finance the costs of certain improvements to the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal system of the City. The City's debt management policy includes a commitment to monitor all forms of debt annually during the preparation of the City's Financial Plan and Budget to ensure compliance. Also, the City will generally conduct financing on a competitive basis, will seek an investment grade rating on any direct debt and will obtain credit enhancements such as letters of credit or insurance when necessary for marketing purposes, availability and cost effectiveness. Interim Financial Reporting Monthly financial reports are prepared to present the City's financial condition and changes in financial position. These executive reports are organized using the "pyramid" approach. As such, the highest level of summary data is presented first, followed by progressively greater levels of detail. The reports provide current period and year to date revenues, expenditures and encumbrances for all activities and funds, including year- to - date estimates and variances. The reports are available to all departments. Single Audit The City is subject to financial and compliance reporting required by the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular A-133, which is a requirement of all local and state governments receiving and expending in excess of $500,000 of federal financial awards annually. As part of the Single Audit, tests are made to determine the adequacy of internal controls, including that portion related to federal financial awards, as well as to determine that the City has complied with certain applicable laws and regulations governing federal funds. The Single Audit report is published as part of the annual financial statements for easy reference. Competitive Bidding Policy All required purchases for materials, equipment and services during 2014-15 were made pursuant to competitive bidding procedures as established under the City's purchasing ordinance. Contracts for construction projects were awarded pursuant to competitive bidding procedures established by the State of California for projects in excess of $5,000. Risk Management The City is self-insured for dental care, workers' compensation, general liability and unemployment insurance. General liability and workers' compensation are administered by outside agencies. The City administers unemployment insurance. Self-insurance transactions are accounted for under the Insurance Funds. At June 30, 2015, the Insurance Fund had a net position of $4,053,434. INDEPENDENT AUDIT The City Council requires an annual audit of the records and accounts of the City by an independent certified public accountant. To ensure proper internal control, periodically the City conducts a request for proposal (RFP) process for auditing services. The accounting firm of Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP was selected to perform this audit. The independent auditor's report precedes the basic financial statements and concludes that the City's basic financial statements are presented fairly, in all material respects, in accordance with GAAP. xi CERTIFICATES OF ACHIEVEMENT The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the year ended June 30, 2014. These Certificates of Achievement are prestigious national and state awards recognizing conformance with the highest standards for preparation of state and local govemment financial reports. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a governmental unit must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized CAFR, whose contents conform to program standards. The CAFR must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. The City has received a Certificate of Achievement for the last twenty-two consecutive years. We believe our current report continues to conform to the Certificate of Achievement program requirements and we are submitting it to GFOA this year. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS As always the professionalism, dedication and efficiency of the Financial Services Division Accounting staff made it possible for the timely preparation of this report and are to be commended. I would also like to personally thank Ruby Paiste, Financial Services Manager, Derrick Cotten, Supervising Accountant, Tyson Mordhorst, Senior Programmer Analyst and Nancy Spinelli, Finance Technician. Their work in preparing this year's CAFR is greatly appreciated. I would also like to thank you for your continued interest and support in planning and conducting the financial operations of the City in a responsible and progressive manner. Respectfully submitted, Jordan Ayers Deputy City Manager/Internal Services Director xii r . i r Government Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presented to City of Lodi California For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014 Executive Director/CE0 ■ L!' City of Lodi Citizens City Council Library Board Library City Attorney City Manager City Clerk Parks, Rec. & Cultural Services Community Development Electric Utility Boards and Commissions Deputy City Manager/Internal Services Director Public Works Fire Police Budget/ Treasury Division XIV Financial Services Division Human Resources Division Information Systems Division FY 2014-2015 DIRECTORY OF OFFICIALS AND ADVISORY BODIES CITY COUNCIL Bob Johnson Mark Chandler Doug Kuehne JoAnne Mounce Alan Nakanishi ADVISORY BODIES Planning Commission Library Board Recreation Commission Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee PRINCIPAL ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS Steve Schwabauer Jordan Ayers Janice Magdich Jennifer Ferraiolo Dean Gualco Larry Rooney Jeff Hood Wally Sandelin Elizabeth Kirkley Steve Schwabauer Tod Patterson xv Mayor Mayor Pro Tempore Council Member Council Member Council Member Lodi Improvement Committee Lodi Arts Commission Youth Commission Lodi Senior Citizens' Commission City Manager Deputy City Manager City Attorney City Clerk Library Services Director Fire Chief Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director Public Works Director Electric Utility Director Community Development Director Interim Police Chief FINANCIAL SECTION The Financial Section is comprised of the Independent Auditors' Report, Management Discussion and Analysis, Basic Financial Statements, including the notes, required Supplementary Information, and Supplementary Information which includes Combining and Individual Fund Statements and Schedules. Certified Public Accountants Independent Auditor's Report The Honorable Members of City Council City of Lodi, California Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Lodi, California (City), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2015, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditor's Responsibility Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. Opinions In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City, as of June 30, 2015, and the respective changes in financial position, and, where applicable, cash flows thereof for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Emphasis of Matter As described in Note 1 to the basic financial statements, effective July 1, 2014, the City implemented Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions — an amendment of GASB Statement No. 27 and GASB Statement No. 71, Pension Transition for Contributions Made Subsequent to the Measurement Date — an amendment of GASB Statement No. 68. Our opinions are not modified with respect to this matter. Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP 3000 S Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95816 Sacramento Walnut Creek Oakland San Francisco Los Angeles Century City Newport Beach San Diego www.mgocpa.com Other Matters Required Supplementary Information Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management's discussion and analysis, the schedules of changes in net pension liability and related ratios, the schedule of pension contributions, the schedule of funding progress for the OPEB plan, and the schedule of revenues, expenditures and change in fund balance — budget and actual — for the General Fund as listed in the table of contents be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Other Information Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements. The accompanying introductory section, combining and individual fund statements and schedules, statistical section, schedule of expenditures of federal awards, as required by Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non -Profit Organizations, and the continuing disclosures section are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. The combining and individual fund statements and schedules and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards are the responsibility of management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the combining and individual fund statements and schedules and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards are fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole. The introductory, statistical, and continuing disclosures sections have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them. Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated February 3, 2016 on our consideration of the City's intemal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City's internal control over financial reporting and compliance. aciaS 11i c 'C l Sacramento, California February 3, 2016 2 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS This section of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report is presented as discussion and analysis of the financial performance of the City of Lodi (City) for the year ended June 30, 2015. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS • The assets and the deferred outflows of resources of the City exceeded its liabilities and the deferred inflows of resources at the close of the fiscal year by $171,425,284 (net position). Of this amount, $73,254,063 is unrestricted deficit. • The City's total net position decreased by $12,863,903 in fiscal year 2015. • As of June 30, 2015, the City's governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $24,436,361, an increase of $3,293,392 in comparison with the prior year. Of this amount, $12,107,040 is available for spending at the City's discretion (unassigned fund balance). • At the close of the fiscal year, fund balance for the general fund was $12,478,553, of which $12,107,040 is unassigned or 28.65% of total general fund revenues of $42,254,075. • The City's total long-term liabilities decreased by $9,528,619 (4.45%) during the current fiscal year. OVERVIEW OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS This discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the City's basic financial statements. The City's basic financial statements are comprised of three components: (1) Government -wide financial statements, (2) Fund financial statements, and (3) Notes to the Basic Financial Statements. This report also includes other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements. Government -wide Financial Statements The government -wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the City's finances, in a manner similar to a private -sector business. The statement of net position presents information on all of the City's assets, deferred outflows of resources, and liabilities, with the difference reported as net position. Over time, increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of whether or not the financial position of the City is improving or deteriorating. The statement of activities presents information showing how the City's net position changed during the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net position are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods, such as revenues pertaining to uncollected taxes and expenses pertaining to earned but unused vacation and sick leave. 3 Both of the government -wide financial statements distinguish functions of the City that are principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues (governmental activities) from other functions that are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through users fees and charges (business -type activities). The governmental activities of the City include general government, public protection, public works, community development, library, parks and recreation. The business -type activities of the City include electric operations, wastewater operations, water operations and public transit operations. Fund Financial Statements The fund financial statements are designed to report information about groupings of related accounts, which are used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The City, like other state and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance -related legal requirements. All of the funds of the City can be divided into the following three categories: Governmental funds, Proprietary funds, and Fiduciary funds. Governmental Funds. Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. Most of the City's basic services are reported in governmental funds. These statements, however, focus on (1) how cash and other financial assets can readily be converted to available resources and (2) the balances left at year-end that are available for spending. Such information may be useful in determining financial resources available in the near future to finance City programs. Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government -wide financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. By doing so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the government's near-term financing decisions. Both the governmental funds balance sheet and the governmental funds statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities. The City maintains several individual governmental funds organized according to their type (special revenue, capital projects and debt service). Information is presented separately in the governmental funds balance sheet and in the governmental funds statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances for the general fund which is considered to be a major fund. Data from the remaining governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation. Individual fund data for each of the non -major governmental funds is provided in the form of combining statements elsewhere in this report. The City adopts an annual budget for its general fund and special revenue funds. Budgetary comparison statements and schedules have been provided for the general fund and the special revenue funds to demonstrate compliance with this budget. Proprietary Funds. Proprietary funds are generally used to account for services for which the City charges customers, either outside customers, or internal units or departments of the City. Proprietary funds provide the same type of information as shown in the government -wide financial statements, only in more detail. The City maintains the following two types of proprietary funds: • Enterprise funds are used to report the same functions presented as business -type activities in the government -wide financial statements. The City uses enterprise funds to account for the operations of the Electric, Wastewater, Water, all of which are considered to be major funds and the Transit system, which is considered to be a non -major proprietary fund. 4 • Internal Service funds are used to report activities that account for various employee benefits, self-insurance, and fleet activities of the City. Because these activities predominantly benefit governmental rather than business -type functions, they have been included within the governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. Fiduciary funds. Fiduciary funds are used to account for resources held for the benefit of parties outside the City. The activities of the Industrial Way -Beckman special assessment and various landscape and lighting districts are accounted for and reported under the fiduciary funds. The activities of the Private -Purpose Trust and the Hutchins Street Square Bequest are also accounted for under the fiduciary funds. Since the resources of these funds are not available to support the City's own programs, they are not reflected in the government -wide financial statements. The accounting used for fiduciary funds is much like that used for proprietary funds. Notes to the Basic Financial Statements The notes to the basic financial statements provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the data provided in the government -wide and fund financial statements. Required Supplementary Information In addition to the basic financial statements and accompanying notes, this report presents certain required supplementary information concerning changes in net pension liability and related ratios for the City's Miscellaneous and Safety pension plans, the City's progress in funding its obligation to provide other postemployment benefits (OPEB) to its employees, and schedules comparing budget to actual amounts in the General Fund. Combining Statements The combining statements in connection with non -major governmental funds and fiduciary funds are presented immediately following the required supplementary information on pensions. 5 GOVERNMENT -WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS As noted earlier, net position may serve over time as a useful indicator of a government's financial position. The City's assets and deferred outflows of resources exceeded liabilities and deferred inflows of resources by $171,425,284 at the close of the current fiscal year. Assets: Current and other assets Capital assets Total assets Deferred outflows of resources Liabilities: Net OPEB obligation Net pension liability Long-term liabilities Other liabilities Total liabilities Governmental Activities 2015 City of Lodi's Net Position Business -type Activities 2014 2015 $ 44,957,568 39,219,664 125,703.452 125,248.452 170, 661, 020 82,429,647 238,569,011 164,468,116 320,998,658 6,317,566 462,397 5,343,727 74,791,178 34,313,177 6,505,235 4,767,274 35,661,889 4,679,095 120,953,317 45,108,258 Deferred inflows of resources 12,226,800 Net position: Net investment in capital assets Restricted Unrestricted Total net position 105,943,664 12,001,224 (74,146,419) 105,461,769 11,808,701 2,551,785 $ 43,798,469 119,822,255 8,240,201 16,870,603 170,074,211 10.723.874 197,668,688 Total 2014 2015 86,449,184 $ 127,387,215 234,608, 951 364, 272, 463 2014 125,668,848 359,857,403 321,058,135 491,659,678 485,526,251 7,371,560 178,254,118 10,781,887 189,036,005 14,557,767 7,833,957 5,343,727 91,661,781 204,387,388 17,229,109 4,767,274 213,916,007 15,460,982 318,622,005 234,144,263 3,943,356 16.170.156 119,924,203 6,810,256 892.356 127,626,815 116,156,098 225,867,867 6,702,976 18,811,480 16,534,616 (73,254,063) 221,617,867 18,511,677 19,086,401 139,393,690 $ 171,425,284 259,215,945 Assets. The City's total assets increased by $6,133,427. The increase is primarily due to the following: Governmental activities. Total assets for the governmental activities had an increase of $6,192,904 or 3.77% resulting largely from an increase in cash and investments due to increases in property tax revenue, $495,193; sales tax, $513,673; State mandated reimbursements from claims 6 submitted in prior years including interest, $958,106; and transfers from the Electric, Wastewater, Water Enterprise Funds and the Internal Service Fund for various capital projects, $3,600,000. Other insignificant activities make up the difference. Business -type activities. Total assets for the business -type activities had a decrease of $59,477. Current and other assets decreased by $4,019,537 primarily due to decreases in cash and investments and restricted assets as a result of payments for debt service and an increase in contributions to the Capital Outlay Fund for various projects, $3,550,000; offset by the increase in Greenhouse gas allowance compared to prior year of $1,869,672 and the increase in charges for services revenue due to increased rates in Wastewater Fund of $409,030 and in the Electric Fund by $544,512, due to the overall increase in usage by customers. Capital assets increased by $3,960,060 primarily from the purchase of thirteen buses in the Transit Fund, $2,585,873, increase in construction in progress, $10,449,092; offset by depreciation of buildings and improvements, machinery and equipment, and vehicles. Other insignificant activities contributed to the difference. Deferred outflows of resources. The increase in deferred outflows of resources of $ 6,723,810 is primarily due to the recording of the current pension contributions made after the measurement date of June 30, 2014 of the CaIPERS valuation report. Liabilities. The City's total liabilities increased by $84,477,742 or 36.08%. The increase is primarily due to the following: Governmental activities. Total liabilities for the governmental activities had a significant increase of $75,845,059 or 168.14%, primarily from pension related liability. Business -type activities. Total liabilities for the business -type activities increased by $8,632,683 or 4.57%. The increase is primarily attributable to the pension related liability. Other insignificant activities offset the difference. Deferred inflows of resources. The increase in deferred inflows of resources of $16,170,156 represents the plan earnings of both Miscellaneous and Safety Plans in excess of projected in the CaIPERS actuarial report. Net position. The City's overall financial position has increased during the fiscal year. The net position has increased by $12,863,903, excluding the restatement of $100,654,564, or 4.96%. The largest portion ($225,867,867) of the City's net position reflects its investment in capital assets net of any associated depreciation (e.g., land, buildings and improvements, machinery and equipment); less any related debt used to acquire those assets that is still outstanding. The City uses these capital assets to provide services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. Although the City's investment in its capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that the resources needed to repay this debt must be provided from other sources, since the capital assets themselves cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities. An additional portion of the City's net position, $18,811,480 (10.97%) represents resources that are subject to external restrictions on how they may be used. The remaining balance of unrestricted net position amounts to a deficit of $73,254,063. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City is able to report positive balances in two categories of net position for the City as a whole. Unrestricted net position is negative for the governmental -type activities. 7 Revenues Program revenues: Charges for services Operating grants and contributions Capital grants and contributions General revenues: Property taxes Other taxes Grants and contributions not restricted to specific programs Rent Other Total revenues Expenses General government Public protection Public works Community development Library Parks and recreation Interest on long-term debt Electric Wastewater Water Transit Total expenses Changes in net position before transfers Transfers Changes in net position Net position at beginning of year, as previously reported Adjustment related to pensions Adjustment for OPEB and deferred costs Net position at beginning of year, as restated Net position at end of year Analysis of Changes in Net Position City of Lodi's Change in Net Position Govemmental Activities 2015 Business -type Activities 2014 2015 2014 $ 6,193,492 5,692,708 3,369,054 2,685,911 3,130,921 5,359,070 13,502,085 12, 758, 079 11,128,660 10,960,317 10,650,893 10,138,096 1,941,477 1,905,709 750,606 730,690 50.667.188 50,230,580 9,108,789 9,580,379 27,426,291 27, 883,875 10,281,419 10,644,153 1,164,964 1,174,428 1,324,130 1,282,257 3,115,763 3,163,506 817,918 824,517 53,239,274 (2,572,086) 7,513,614 4,941,528 119,822,255 (80,965,314) 38.856,941 $ 43.798.469 54,553,115 (4,322,535) 4,792,000 469,465 120,585,956 (1,233,166) 119.352,790 119,822,255 92,904,205 5,185,575 5,283,584 4,200 3,376,133 91,956,874 $ 4,431,258 2,846,263 4,200 3,126,882 106, 753,697 102, 365,477 64,366,530 61,974,538 12,911,955 12,526,711 9,905,544 11,013,911 4,133,679 3,833,786 91,317,708 89,348,946 15,435,989 13,016,531 (7,513,614) (4,792,000) 7,922,375 139,393,690 (19,689,250) 8,224,531 134,435,142 (3,265,983) 119,704,440 131,169,159 Total 2015 99,097,697 8,554,629 8,414,505 13,502,085 11,128,660 10,650,893 1,945,677 4,126,739 2014 97,649,582 7,117,169 8,205,333 12,758,079 10,960,317 10,138,096 1,909,909 3,857,572 157, 420, 885 152,596,057 9,108,789 27,426,291 10,281,419 1,164,964 1,324,130 3,115,763 817,918 64,366,530 12,911,955 9,905,544 4,133,679 9,580,379 27,883,875 10,644,153 1,174,428 1,282,257 3,163,506 824,517 61,974,538 12,526,711 11,013,911 3,833,786 144, 556, 982 143,902,061 12,863,903 12,863,903 8,693,996 8,693,996 259,215,945 255,021,098 (100,654,564) (4,499,149) 158,561,381 250,521,949 127.626,815 139,393,690 $ 171,425,284 259,215,945 Governmental activities Net position for the governmental activities increased by $4.941,528 in the current fiscal year, which is an increase of $4,472,063 from last year's increase of $469,465. The key factors impacting this increase are: 8 Revenues increased $436,608 from the prior fiscal year. Key elements of this increase are. • Charges for services increased by 8.8%, a net amount of $500,784 from the prior fiscal year, mainly from the increase revenue from engineering inspection fees and engineering fees of $415,705. • Operating grants and contributions increased by $683,143 or 25.43% compared to the prior year from the increase in the State mandated reimbursements of $958,106 offset by the decrease in Police Hiring grant of $194,984 and decrease of CaIGRIP funding of $177,776. • Capital grants and contributions decreased by $2,228,149 or 41.58% from the prior fiscal year. The decrease in capital contributions was mainly attributable to federal funds used for the Harney Lane Grade Separation project and the Sacramento Street Pedestrian Beautification project totaling $1,761,762, decrease gas tax allocation of $167,740 and decrease in CDBG allocation of $307,992. • Property taxes increased by $744,006 or 5.83% compared to prior year. The economy continues to show evidence of positive movement particularly in the housing market. Rising home prices coupled with record lows in mortgage rates are helping the process to generate sales, resulting in an increase in property tax revenues in the current year. • Grants and contributions not restricted to specific programs increased by $512,797 or 5.06% basically from sales tax revenues which increased by $513,673. The overall increase in sales tax is attributed to a general increase in consumer spending and steady increase in auto sales spurred by low interest rates, easy credit and manufacturer's incentives. Expenses for governmental functions totaled $53,239,274, a decrease of $1,313,841 from the prior fiscal year. The key elements of this decrease are: • General government — the decrease in general government of $471,590 is primarily due to decrease in salaries and benefits due to vacancies and the effect of the Council approved one-time payment given to employees and the increase in the cap for medical premiums in the prior year. Other insignificant increases offset the difference. • Public protection — a decrease of $457,584 in public protection is primarily due to vacancies and the one-time payment given to employees and the increase in the cap for medical premiums in the prior year. Other insignificant increases offset the difference. • Public works — the decrease of $362,734 is primarily due to vacancies and the one-time payment given to employees and the increase for medical premiums in the prior year. Other insignificant increases offset the difference. Transfers increased by $2,771,614, primarily due to contributions from the enterprise funds for various capital projects. Business -type activities Business -type activities increased the City's net position by $7,922,375 in the current year, which is a decrease of $302,156 from last year's increase of $8,224,531. The key elements of this decrease are: • Transfers to the governmental activities for various capital projects increased by $2,771,614 in comparison to the prior year. • Charges for services in the Electric fund increased by $544,512 primarily from sales due to growth and increased usage by commercial customers. • Increase in the Greenhouse gas allowance (GHG) of $1,869,672 in the Electric fund related to Assembly Bill 32: Global Warming Act, which set the 2020 greenhouse gas emissions reduction into law and also adopted a regulation that established a system of market-based declining annual aggregate emission limits for sources or categories of sources that emit greenhouse gases. In 2011, the California Air Resources Board (ARB) adopted the cap -and -trade regulation. This program covers major sources of GHG emissions in the State such as refineries, power plants, industrial facilities, and transportation fuels. The cap -and -trade program includes an enforceable emissions cap that will decline over time. The State distributes allowances which are tradable permits, equal to emissions allowed under the cap. 9 • Capital contributions increased by $2,437,321, primarily from federal funds received for the purchase of buses for the Transit Fund. • Increase in depreciation expense of $1,146,358 as the result of adding $5,416,421 in capital assets. • Bulk power cost increased by $1,209,397 compared to the prior year is primarily attributed to increasing transmission access charges per MWH charged by NCPA. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE CITY'S FUNDS Governmental Funds The focus of the City's governmental funds is to provide information on near-term inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing the City's financing requirements. In particular, unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a government's net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year. Types of governmental funds reported by the City include the General Fund, special revenue funds, debt service fund and capital projects funds. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City's governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $24,436,361. This represents an increase of $3,293,392, an increase of $2,162,924 in comparison to the prior year increase of $1,130,468 resulting from the increase in total revenues and increase in transfers in, offset by the increase in capital outlay. The General Fund is the chief operating fund of the City. At the end of the current fiscal year, unassigned fund balance of the General Fund was $12,107,040 while total fund balance was $12,478,553. As a measure of the General Fund's liquidity, it may be useful to compare both unassigned fund balance and total fund balance to total fund expenditures. Unassigned fund balance and total fund balance represent 33.56% and 34.59% of total General Fund expenditures, respectively. The fund balance of the General Fund increased by $3,004,793 during the current fiscal year, an increase of $1,496,245 from last year's increase of $1,508,548. Key factors in this growth are as follows: • Total revenues increased by $2,653,051, primarily from the increase in sales tax of $513,673; increase in property tax of $495,193, increase in property tax in -lieu of $244,564, increase in State mandated reimbursements of $958,106; increase in engineering and inspection fees, $415,705; and, increase in transient occupancy tax of $72,636. Other insignificant increases and decreases offset the difference. • Total expenditures increased by $297,571, primarily from increase in public works for professional services related to construction testing and inspection services for various city projects. Salaries and wages also decreased by $747,481 and offset by the increase of overtime by $ 446,372 due to vacancies. Other insignificant increases and decreases offset the difference. Proprietary Funds The City's proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in the government -wide financial statements, but in more detail. Unrestricted net position at the end of the year for the Wastewater Fund was $5,698,680, Water Fund was $2,087,340 and for the Transit Fund, $3,489,661. The Electric Fund unrestricted net position was ($10,383,325) and the Internal Services Funds unrestricted net position was ($615,623). 10 Other factors concerning the finances of these funds are discussed in the City's business -type activities. GENERAL FUND BUDGETARY HIGHLIGHTS Differences between the original budget and the final budget in the General Fund were a net increase in appropriations of $99,422. The increase in appropriations can be briefly summarized as follows: • $61,923 increase in general government • $301,499 decrease in public protection • $128,511 increase in public works • $11,643 increase in library Significant differences between the final budget and the actual revenues and expenditures can be briefly summarized as follows: • Taxes — a favorable variance of $467,835 was due to positive variances in property tax ($57,041), real property transfer tax ($29,493), transient occupancy tax ($116,419), in -lieu of vehicle license fees ($122,721), cable TV franchise fees ($59,537), electric, gas and industrial waste franchise ($106,235), card room tax ($23,217), offset by a negative variance in business license tax ($46,828). • Intergovernmental revenues — a favorable variance of $1,359,792 was mainly due to a positive variance in sales tax ($366,733), State mandated reimbursements ($962,932), and in Prop. 172 ($31,865). • For expenditures, a favorable variance between the final budget and actual expenditures of $948,082 was due to savings from vacancies and the continued overall effort to reduce spending and costs. 11 CAPITAL ASSETS AND DEBT ADMINISTRATION Capital assets The City's investment in capital assets for its governmental and business -type activities as of June 30, 2015, amounts to $364,272,463 (net of accumulated depreciation). This investment in capital assets includes land, buildings and improvements, machinery and equipment, vehicles, infrastructure, works of art, and construction in progress. The total increase in the City's investment in capital assets for the current fiscal year was $4,415,060, a 1.23% increase (a 0.36% increase in governmental activities and 1.69% increase in business -type activities) as shown in the table below. Changes in Capital Assets, Net of Depreciation Governmental Activities Business -type Activities Total 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 Land $ 24,947,834 $ 24,933,134 $ 5,535,718 $ 5,535,718 $ 30,483,552 $ 30,468,852 Construction in Progress 12,124,679 4,407,042 14,478,947 4,029,855 26,603,626 8,436,897 Buildings and Improvements 36,344,383 38,288,041 29,340,217 31,130,846 65,684,600 69,418,887 Machinery and Equipment 549,226 726,413 184,431,755 191,198,079 184,980,981 191,924,492 Vehicles 1,758,667 1,318,240 4,782,374 2,714,453 6,541,041 4,032,693 Infrastructure 49,673,756 55,270,675 49,673,756 55,270,675 Work of Art 304,907 304,907 304,907 304,907 Total $ 125,703,452 $ 125,248,452 $ 238,569,011 $ 234,608,951 $ 364,272,463 $ 359,857,403 An increase in construction in progress compared to prior year was primarily from the ongoing improvements for Fire Station # 2 and Fire Station #3, City Hall Annex improvements, the Harney Lane Grade separation project, White Slough Plant improvements, and the Water Meter Programs - Phases #4 and #5. The increase in vehicles resulted from the purchase of thirteen buses. Additional information on the City's capital assets can be found in Note 6 on pages 49-51 of this report. 12 Long-term debt At the end of the current fiscal year, the City had total bonded debt outstanding of $169,717,613. Of this amount, $19,950,250 is the outstanding balance of the bonds issued to fund the new public safety building, refinancing of the performing arts center and the downtown and Cherokee Lane improvements. The total of $149,767,363 from the business -type activities consists of $35,907,504 for the Water Fund; $47,556,412 for the Wastewater Fund; and $66,303,447 for the Electric Fund. City of Lodi's Outstanding Debt Governmental Business -type Activities Activities Certificates of Participation and Revenue Bonds $ 19,950,250 The City's total bonded debt decreased by $7,583,005 during the current fiscal year. Total 149, 767, 367 169, 717, 617 Bond Rating In December 2015, Moody's Rating Services maintained its A2 rating with a stable outlook on outstanding electric utility debt instruments given management's focus on improving financial performance and no plans to issue additional debt in the near future. In September 2015, Standard & Poor's Rating Services raised its long-term rating to A+ from A on the outstanding public improvement bonds with a stable outlook. Additional information on the City's long-term debt can be found in Note 8 on pages 52-58 of this report. ECONOMIC FACTORS AND NEXT YEAR'S BUDGET The City continues to see a number of positive economic indicators and is slowly returning to revenue levels seen before the Great Recession. General Fund revenues including transfers from other funds are projected to increase for the first time to exceed the historic high of $45.5 million in 2007/08 to a conservatively projected $46,708,260 in 2015/16, representing a 7.2 percent growth in revenues. This past year has seen the continued growth for Costco and Home Depot stores. Moreover, plans are now on file for construction of several businesses and additional retailers are moving forward with plans to complete other sections of the development at Reynolds Ranch. Additionally, the Lodi Shopping Center is moving forward and is under construction. The General Fund continues to be of the greatest focus. It funds all of the core municipal services including police, fire, administration, economic development, transfers to the parks and library funds and other essential public services. The General Fund houses the large majority of City employees. The City has reduced its workforce by 17% over the past ten years, from 470 full-time budgeted employees in 2004/05 to 391 full-time budgeted employees in 2015/16. The City will add a net of 8 positions this year to address capital maintenance needs, succession planning and operational efficiencies in various departments. 13 The City will continue its capital efforts in the coming year. Significant projects expected to be undertaken during the year include various electrical system maintenance projects, water meter and water system maintenance projects, PCE/TCE remediation projects, various wastewater system maintenance projects, street maintenance and replacing boating facilities at Lodi Lake Park under a State Division of Boating and Waterways Local Assistance grant. The City began a phased financial systems implementation and activated the financials, human resources and payroll during the fiscal year 2014/15. Utility billing, business license and animal license and fleet maintenance management modules will be brought live during the budget year. Additionally, the City is expecting to complete construction of Fire Station #2 and refurbish the City Hall Annex to house Parks Administration, Fire Administration and the City's computer systems. Balancing the 2015/16 budget involves balancing several critical issues: employee costs and retirement contributions; capital programs; and cost increases beyond the City's control that were either imposed by external entities or negotiated by the City with its bargaining groups. Employee costs and retirement contributions — Prior to the economic downturn, Lodi and its employees aggressively moved to manage employment costs. Positions not deemed vital to City operations were held vacant, and other departmental expenses were closely monitored. Importantly, as the economy plummeted, in March 2009, City employees made a number of temporary salary and benefit concessions to reduce salary costs, including salary reductions, furloughs, and waiving of the City's deferred compensation match. These concessions alone were valued at over $2.3 million for FY 2009-10, $2.7 million for FY 2010-11, and $3.0 million for FY 2011-12. Consequently, the City largely avoided employee layoffs and drastic service cuts so common in other cities. In 2013, the majority of employees agreed to a historic restructuring of their salary and benefits, permanently reducing employee expenses. Employees agreed to paying their full seven or nine percent retirement contribution and capping the City's medical costs. The effect of these agreements was to reduce employment costs seven to nine percent below the 2007/08 levels. For 2014/15, the City negotiated an additional one-year agreement with all of its bargaining units (except IBEW). For the first time since 2007/08, the City returned a portion of the concessions agreed to by employees, issuing a one-time payment of $2,300 per employee to all employees, and increasing the medical cap to January 2014 rates. In addition, the City increased safety uniform allowances by 1 percent on a one-year non- PERSable basis. The one-time dollars were paid for from amounts over the City's General Fund reserve targets at the close of the 2012/13 budget year. The ongoing health costs were funded through the budget. Looking forward to 2015/16 and beyond, the City has reached an agreement with The agreements reached generally call for 3 percent raises in year one and 2 percent raises in years two and three. Capital programs — The City continues to utilize one-time funds for capital maintenance, rather than ongoing operations. In prior years, the City assessed its physical plant and is using one-time funds generated by the Lodi Energy Center, to address deferred maintenance projects on its buildings. Scheduled to be completed this year are Fire Station #2, City Hall Annex remodel, financial system implementation and various roof, parking lot and facility maintenance projects totaling about $1.6 million. The 2015/16 budget also includes $767,000 in unallocated one-time revenues that could be put toward additional capital projects. Imposed costs — While revenues have increased by over $3.1 million, the cost of retirement and insurance continue to rise. In the last few years, CaIPERS has revised a number of its actuarial assumptions and policies. Rates for Miscellaneous plan employees rose 1.9 percent while Safety plan rates increased 2.9 percent. Total additional cost to the City is about $600,000. In December of 2014, CaIPERS released its long awaited five-year rate projections resulting from its major policy shift regarding the time frame within which it recovers market losses. In years past, CaIPERS recovered these losses over a 30 -year rolling period. In 2013, CaIPERS reduced 14 that time frame. The increase is phased in on a bell curve over five years, levels out for 20 years and decreasing for the last five. The bell curve structure means Lodi will see its greatest impact in the 2019/20 budget year. Projected contribution rates ranges from 19.994% to 27.7% for the Miscellaneous group, and 40.87% to 54.59% for the Safety group, in the next five years. A second cost increase that is a cause of concern is rapidly increasing health care costs. While the City has negotiated a medical insurance cap with its bargaining units, costs are expected to increase and impact the net pay of the workforce. Staff is evaluating the impact of the Affordable Care Act and believes that prudent management of part-time hours will allow the City to avoid an economic impact. A third cost increase that is a cause of concern is worker's compensation. The City is self-funded for worker's compensation costs. There has been a moderation in the cost and severity of claims and the City has funded its actuarial liability at slightly more than the 90% percent confidence level. Staff continues to manage the program and provide education to employees to minimize injuries and work time losses. Economic Development During the Great Recession, the City has fared better than the surrounding area, as a whole. While not immune to the foreclosure crisis, the City housing stock has seen fewer foreclosures and has maintained housing values better than the surrounding communities. The City's unemployment rate continues to track roughly 1 percent lower than that of San Joaquin County. The City's diversified economic base continues to help the City maintain its revenue base. Although agriculture is an important part of the City's past, present and future by providing residents with employment on farms and in processing plants, even more jobs can be found in food and plastics manufacturing and in health-related businesses. Lodi Health Hospital, Blue Shield and ConAgra have the highest year-round employment in the City, and large national and international manufacturers such as CertainTeed find the City an attractive base for their West Coast operations. The City was disappointed with the announcement that the General Mills plant would be closing by the end of 2016. City staff, is in discussions with General Mills staff regarding the marketing and re -use of the site as General Mills closes the plant. While a major employer, staff is optimistic that a suitable replacement will be found timely and not significantly impact City operations. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION This financial report is designed to provide citizens, taxpayers, customers, investors and creditors with a general overview of the City's finances and to demonstrate the City' accountability for the money it receives. If you have any questions about this report or need additional information, contact the Financial Services Division of the City of Lodi at 310 W. Elm Street, Lodi, California, 95240. 15 BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Government -wide Financial Statements provide a broad overview of the City's financial position and operating results. Information is grouped by governmental activities or business -type activities. The Fund Financial Statements report information about the City's Governmental Funds, Proprietary Funds, and the Fiduciary Funds. The notes have an integral role in disclosing information essential to the fair presentation of the Basic Financial Statements. GOVERNMENT -WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ASSETS Cash and investments Accounts receivable, net Property tax receivable Interest receivable Internal balances Due from other governmental agencies Restricted assets Loans receivable Advance receivable Inventory Other assets Capital assets, net: Nondepreciable Depreciable, net TOTAL ASSETS DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unamortized losses on defeasance Related to pensions TOTAL DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES LIABILITIES Accounts payable and accrued liabilities Accrued salaries and wages Accrued interest Unearned revenue Net OPEB obligation Net pension liability Long-term liabilities: Due within one year Due in more than one year TOTAL LIABILITIES CITY OF LODI STATEMENT OF NET POSITION June 30, 2015 Governmental Business -type Activities Activities Total 41,348,139 27,531,358 $ 68,879,497 4,606,072 8,815,777 13,421, 849 7,752 7,752 25,857 24,685 50,542 (1,550,454) 1,550,454 348,979 2,287,366 2,636,345 31,717,302 31,717,302 88,698 88,698 6,956,797 6,956,797 171,223 3,119, 361 3,290,584 337,849 337,849 37,377,420 88,326,032 170,661, 020 20,014,665 57,392,085 218,554,346 306,880,378 320, 998, 658 491, 659, 678 435,462 6,874,417 7,309,879 5.882.104 1,365,784 7.247.888 6.317.566 5,549,654 542,673 211,203 201,705 5,343,727 74, 791,178 2,439,237 31, 873, 940 120,953,317 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Related to pensions 12.226.800 8,240,201 14, 557,767 7,619,627 2,328,909 775,338 16,870,603 13,169,281 542,673 2,540,112 977,043 5,343,727 91,661,781 8,346,744 10,785,981 161, 727, 467 193,601,407 197.668.688 318,622,005 3.943 356 16.170,156 NET POSITION Net investment in capital assets 105,943,664 119,924,203 225,867,867 Restricted for: Road -related projects 3,207,124 3,207,124 Capital projects 6,841,989 6,841,989 Debt service 6,810,256 6,810,256 Public safety 249,258 249,258 Community development 1,474,880 1,474,880 Parks, recreation and community services 227,973 227,973 Unrestricted f 74 146.4197 832.356 (73,254,063) TOTAL NET POSITION $ 43.798.169 127.525.615 $ 171,425,284 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 17 CITY OF LODI STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES Year ended June 30, 2015 Net (Expense) Revenue and Program Revenues Changes in Net Position Operating Capital Charges for Grants and Grants and Governmental Business -type FunctionslPrograms Expenses Services Contributions Contributions Activities Activities Total PRIMARY GOVERNMENT: Govemmental activities: General govemment 3 9,108,789 1,971,045 1,012,932 (6,124,812) $ (6,124,812) Public protection 27,426,291 608,602 1222,232 41,451 (25,554,006) (25,554,006) Public works 10,281,419 832,391 1,114,220 2,863,540 (5,471,268) (5,471,268) Community development 1,164,964 1,377,715 212,751 212,751 Library 1,324,130 43,456 19,670 (1,261,004) (1,261,004) Parks and reorealion 3,115,763 1,360,283 225,930 (1,529,550) (1,529,550) Interest on long-term debt 617,918 (817,918) (817,918) Total govemmental activities 53,239,274 6,193,492 3,369,054 3,130,921 (40,545,807) (40,545,807) Business -type activities: Electric 64,366,530 65,237,320 2,557,326 417,669 3,845,785 3,845,785 Wastewater 12,911,955 14,714,123 372,044 2,174,212 2,174,212 Water 9,905,544 12,722,619 613,715 493,748 3,924,538 3,924,538 Transit 4,133,679 230,143 2,014,534 4,000,123 2,111,121 2,111,121 Total business -type activities 91,317,708 92,904,205 5,185,575 5,283,584 12,055 656 12,055,656 Total primary govemment $ 144,556,982 99,097,697 8,554,629 8,414,505 (40,545,807) 12,055,656 (28,490,151) The notes to the F tial statements are an integral part of this statement General revenues: Taxes: Property taxes 13,502,085 13,502,085 Franchise taxes 8,975,852 8,975,852 Business license tax 1,466,369 1,486,389 Transient occupancy tax 666,419 666,419 Grants and contributions not restricted to specific programs 10,650,893 10,650,893 Investment eamings 145,159 631,546 776,705 Rent 1,941,477 4,200 1,945,677 Other 605,447 2,744,587 3,350,034 Transfers 7,513,614 (7,513,614) Total general revenues and transfers 45,487,335 (4,133,281) 41,354,054 Changes in net position 4,941,528 7,922,375 12,863,903 Net position, beginning of year, as previously reported Change in accounting principles Net position, beginning of year, as restated Net position, end of year 18 119,822,255 139,393,690 259,215,945 (80,965,314) (19,689,250) (100,654,564) 38, 856, 941 119, 704,440 158, 561, 381 $ 43,798,469 127,626,815 $ 171,425,284 FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Governmental Fund Types Governmental funds consist of the General Fund, special revenue funds, debt service fund and capital projects funds. Major Governmental Fund: General Fund This fund is maintained to account for all financial resources that are not restricted as to their use. This includes property and sales taxes, business tax receipts, franchise taxes and various subventions such as Motor Vehicle In - Lieu fees received from the State of California. With the exception of grant programs, General Fund resources can be utilized for any legitimate governmental purpose. Proprietary Fund Types Proprietary funds consist of the enterprise funds and the internal service funds. Major Enterprise Funds include: Electric Fund The City established this fund in order to account for the provision of electric services to the residents of the City. All activities necessary to provide such services are accounted for in this fund, including but not limited to, source of supply, overhead, systems maintenance, customer service, engineering, administration, capital improvements maintenance and debt service. 19 Sewer Fund This fund was established by the City in order to account for the provision of waste water collection and treatment services to the residents of the City. All activities necessary to provide such services are accounted for in this fund, including, but not limited to, administration, operations, maintenance, improvements and debt service. Water Fund This fund was established by the City in order to account for the provision of water to the residents of the City as well as some customers in the County. All activities to provide such services are accounted for in this fund, including, but not limited to administration, operations, distribution, maintenance, capital improvements and debt service. Nonmajor Enterprise Fund: Transit Fund This fund is used to account for the operations of the Dial -A -Ride and the Grapeline bus system. Fiduciary Fund Types Private -purpose Trust Funds These funds are used to account for assets held by the Library Board as trustee of the Lodi Public Library and for assets held by the City in accordance with the trust agreement on behalf of the Hutchins Street Square. Agency Fund This fund was established to account for special assessments collected on the property tax roll by the City on behalf of the property owners within the Industrial Way Beckman Districts and the Downtown and Cherokee Lane Districts and various landscape and lighting districts around the City. 20 CITY OF LODI BALANCE SHEET GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS June 30, 2015 Other Total General Governmental Governmental Fund Funds Funds ASSETS Cash and investments $ 12,542,808 14,664,209 $ 27,207,017 Receivables: Accounts, net 3,890,758 715,314 4,606,072 Property taxes 7,752 7,752 Interest 9.340 7,595 16,935 Due from other funds 93,114 93,114 Due from other governmental agencies 348,979 348,979 Inventory 1,291 1,291 Total assets $ 16.450.658 15,830,502 $ 32,281,160 LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES, AND FUND BALANCES Liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ 3,373,901 2,038,245 $ 5,412,146 Accrued salaries and wages 542,673 542,673 Due to other funds 93,114 93,114 Advances from other funds 1,550,454 1,550,454 Unearned revenue 55.531 146,174 201.705 Total liabilities 3,972,105 3.827.987 7.800.092 Deferred inflows of resources: Unavailable revenue 44.707 44,707 Fund balances: Nonspendable Inventory 1,291 1,291 Restricted Road -related projects 3,207,124 3,207,124 Capital projects 6,797,282 6,797,282 Public safety 249,258 249,258 Community development 1,474,880 1,474,880 Parks, recreation and community services 227.973 227,973 Committed Video- related capital projects 345,294 345,294 Assigned Encumbrances - supplies, materials and services 26,219 26,219 Unassigned 12,107,040 12.107.040 Total fund balances 12,478,553 11,957,808 24.436.361 Total liabilities. deferred inflows of resources. and fund balances $ 16.450.658 15,830,502 $ 32,281,160 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 21 CITY OF LODI RECONCILIATION OF THE BALANCE SHEET OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF NET POSITION June 30, 2015 Fund balances - total governmental funds Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net position are different because: Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and, therefore, are not reported in the funds Nondepreciable capital assets Depreciable capital assets, net Deferred outflows of resources related to pensions are not reported in governmental funds. Deferred inflows of resources related to pensions are not reported in governmental funds. Long-term liabilities are not due and payable in the current period and therefore are not reported in the governmental funds as follows: Compensated absences Long-term debt Issuance premium (to be amortized as interest expense) Unamortized losses on defeasance (to be amortized as interest expense) Accrued interest Net pension liability Other long-term assets are not available to pay for current period expenditures and, therefore, are deferred in the funds Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of general liability insurance, workers' compensation insurance, health benefits insurance, other insurance, employee benefits and the cost of operating and maintaining the City's fleet to individual funds. The assets and liabilities of the internal service funds are included in governmental activities in the statement of net position $ 24,436,361 37,377,420 88,298,534 5,807,745 (12,010,250) (5,732,206) (19, 325, 000) (870,250) 435,462 (211,203) (73,864,726) 44,707 (588,125) Net position of governmental activities $ 43,798,469 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 22 CITY OF LODI STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Year ended June 30, 2015 Other Total General Governmental Governmental Fund Funds Funds Revenues: Taxes $ 24,630,745 $ 24,630,745 Licenses and permits 87,908 879,225 967,133 Intergovernmental revenues 12,642,107 4,914,450 17,556,557 Charges for services 1,482,448 2,345,002 3,827,450 Fines, forfeits and penalties 1,573,071 1,573,071 Investment and rental income 1,546,845 481,971 2,028,816 Miscellaneous revenue 290,951 529,286 820.237 Total revenues 42,254,075 9,149,934 51,404,009 Expenditures: Current: General government 6,490,907 2,660,048 9,150,955 Public protection 26,388,172 257,888 26,646,060 Public works 1,882,250 2,625,771 4,508,021 Community development 1,226,307 1,226,307 Library 1,311,367 1,311,367 Parks and recreation 2,145,084 2,145,084 Capital outlay 9,841,625 9,841,625 Debt service: Interest and fiscal charges 844.812 844,812 Total expenditures 36,072,696 19,601,535 55.674.231 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures 6,181,379 Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) 3,952,000 (7.128.586) (3,176, 586) (10.451.601) (4.270.222) 11,647,376 (907.176) 15,599,376 (8,035,762) 10.740.200 7.563.614 Changes in fund balances 3,004,793 288,599 3,293,392 Fund balances, beginning of year 9.473.760 11.669.209 21.142.969 Fund balances, end of year $ 12,478,553 11,957,808 $ 24,436,361 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 23 CITY OF LODI RECONCILIATION OF THE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES Year ended June 30, 2015 Net change in fund balances - total governmental funds Amounts reported for governmental activities are different because: Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense. Capital outlays and depreciation expense are as follows: Capitalized capital outlays Depreciation expense Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of general liability insurance, workers' compensation insurance, health benefits insurance, other insurance, employee benefits and the cost of operating and maintaining the City's fleet to individual funds. The net revenue of the internal service funds are reported with governmental activities. $ 3,293,392 8,996,052 (8,539,608) 784,312 Other expenses in the statement of activities that do not use current financial resources are not reported as expenditures in the governmental funds. Change in compensated absences 563,640 Amortization of loss on defeasance (26,935) Amortization of bond premium 53,830 Change in net pension liability and related amounts (183,155) Change in net position of governmental activities $ 4.941,528 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 24 ASSETS Current assets: Cash and investments Restricted cash and investments Restricted assets with fiscal agents Receivables: Accounts, net Interest Due From other governmental agencies Advance receivable Loans receivable Inventory Other assets Total current assets Noncurrent assets: Restricted assets with fiscal agents Advances to other funds Capital assets, net: Nondepreciable Depreciable, net Total capital assets Total noncurrent assets TOTAL ASSETS CITY OF LODI STATEMENT OF NET POSITION PROPRIETARY FUNDS June 30, 2015 Business -type Activities -Enterprise Funds Electric Nonmajor Fund Wastewater Water Tranfll Total. 6,383,017 13,853,935 6,755,522 538,684 $ 27,531,358 $ 14,832,904 14,632,904 12,230,110 108,982 2,375,456 14,714,548 4,884,633 3,959 6,956,797 88,698 2,755,191 1,010,587 8,816 92,370 33,302,405151171.4.......90 . 2,169,850 376,429 763,785 8,772,041 39,367,685 '81.525.096 40,131,470 90.290.029 40,131,470 92 844,3E18 73,433, 875 107,915,998 844,542 2,076,015 8,815,777 11,567 343 24,685 362,028 1,925,338 2,287,366 6,956,797 88,698 271,800 3,119,361 337,849 337,849 25,791,668 4.540.580 78,709,343 1,750,403 8,920,552 1,558,287 01,629,524 16,031.149 2,169,850 2,126,832 20,014,665 218,554,346 90,550,076 17,589,436 238,569,011 92,300,479 17,589,436 242,865,693 116,062,147 22,130,016 321,575,036 Governmental Activities - Internal Service Funds 14,141,122 6,922 169,932 14,319,976 27,498 27,498 27,498 14,347,474 DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unamortized losses on defeasance 5,128,145 1,746,272 6,674,417 Related to pensions 784,603 498,007 46,096 37,078 1,365,784 74,359 TOTAL DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES 5,912,748 2,244,279 _ _ 46,096 37,078 8,240,201 74,359 LIABILITIES Current liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 3,309,528 1,037,742 2,899,265 373,092 7,619,627 137,508 Accrued interest 1,615,256 538,769 174,884 2,328,909 Unearned revenue 660,104 115,234 775,336 Self-insurance liability 634,932 Accrued compensated absences 286,385 185,493 33,237 22,454 527,569 31,195 Certificates of participation and revenue bonds payable 5,219,909 1,709,566 889,700 7,819,175 Total current liabilities 10,431,078 3471.570 4,657,190 510,780 19,070,618 823.535 Noneuf!!nI IIabirbes: Advances from other funds 576,378 576,378 Self-insurance liability 7,670,955 Accrued compensated absences 542,777 588,524 55,868 1,187,169 48,639 Certificates of participation and revenue bonds payable 61,083,539 45,846,848 35,017,805 141,948,192 Net pension liability 9,512,447 6,314,686 620,694 422,576 16,870,603 926,452 Net OPEB obligation 5,343,727 Pollution remediation obligation 18,592,106 13,592,106 Total noncurrent liabilities 71.715,141 _ 52.750.256 54230.005 478,444 179,171,418 13,989.773 TOTAL LIABILITIES 82,146.219 56.221.828 55.867.795 985.224 198245.068 14,793,408 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Related to pensions NET POSITION Nei im VCStree n! in capital assets Restricted: Debt service Unrestricted TOTAL NET POSITION The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement $ 2.223 452 1.426.050 145,081 (1,449,979) 46,766,719 57,018,027 6,810,256 (10,383,325) 5,698,680 2,087,340 (5,023,048) 52,465,399 59,105,367 84.773 17,569,436 3,489,661 21,079,097 $ 3.943.358 216.550 119,924,203 27,498 6,810,256 892,356 (615,623) 127,626,815 $ (588,125) OPERATING REVENUES Charges for services CITY OF LODI STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN NET POSITION PROPRIETARY FUNDS Year ended June 30, 2015 Business -type Activities - Enterprise Funds Electric Nonmajor Fund Wastewater Water Transit Total Governmental Activities - Internal Service Funds $ 65.237.320 14.714,123 12.722.619 230,143 $ 92,904,205 $ 12.010,929 OPERATING EXPENSES Personnel services 6,194,068 3,116,493 2,316,305 312,406 11,939,272 1,039,685 Supplies, materials and services 12,282,288 2,541,904 2,139,013 2,600,659 19,563,864 7,906,220 Utilities 38,568,622 676,838 579,774 74,844 39,900,078 17,843 Depreciation 2,658,929 4,217,932 2,752,367 1,145,770 10,774,998 1,444 Claims 2.352.814 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 59,703,907 10.553.167 7.787.459 4.133.679 82.178,212 11.318.006 OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES) Investment income Interest expense Operating grants Greenhouse gas allowance Loss on disposal of capital assets Other revenues TOTAL NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES) INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS Capital contributions Transfers out Net capital contributions and transfers 5.533.413 4.160,956 135,397 (3,532,168) 234,550 2,322,776 (1,130,455) 1,360,933 356,590 (2,358,788) 590,013 (606,967) (1,412,185) 4.924.446 2.748.771 4.935.160 (3.903,536) 130,616 (2,118,085) 613,715 8,943 2,014,534 483,708 314,133 (890,046) 2,337,610 4,045,114 (1.565.926) 10.725,993 692,923 631,546 (8,009,041) 2,862,799 2,322,776 (1,130,455) 2,748,787 58,750 82.639 (573,586) 141.389 10.152 405 834.312 417,669 372,044 493,748 4,000,123 5,283,584 (3.823858) (1,894,378) (1,795,378) (7.513.614) (50,000) (3.406.189) (1,522,334) (1,301.630) 4,000,123 (2.230.030) (50,000) Changes in net position 1.518,257 1.226 437 2.743.484 2.434.197 7.922,375 784.312 NET ASSETS - BEGINNING OF YEAR, as previously reported 4,560,430 58,608,905 57,086,278 19,138,077 139,393,690 (291,199) Change in accounting principles (11.101.735) (7,369,943) (724.395) (493,177) (19.689.250) (1,081,238) NET POSITION - BEGINNING OF YEAR, restated NET POSITION - END OF YEAR The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement (6.541,305) 51.238.962 56.361,883 18,644,900 119,704,440 (1.372.437) $ (5.023.048) 52,465,399 59.105.367 21,079,097 $ 127,626,815 $ (588.125) 26 CITY OF LODI STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS PROPRIETARY FUNDS Year ended June 30, 2015 Governmental Business -type Activities - Enterprise Funds Activities- Nonmajor Fund Internal Service Electric Wastewater Water Transit Total Funds Cash flows from operating activities: Receipts from customers and users $ 67,309,118 15,307,357 12,403,707 544,276 $ 95,564,458 $ 82,739 Receipts from interfund services provided 257,410 257,410 12,010,929 Cash paid to suppliers for goods & services (50,941,764) (1,785,280) (2,525,891) (2,441,667) (57,694,602) (10,463,138) Payments to employees (6,398,576) (3,273,694) (2,309,985) (327,968) (12,310,223) (1,067,650) Payments for interfund services provided (3.799) (602.252) (555,248) (60,469) (1,221,768) Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 10.222.389 9,646.131 7.012.583 (2,285,828) 24,595,275 562.880 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Operating grants 234,550 613,715 1,195,418 2,043,683 Loaned to other funds (576,378) (576,378) Loaned from other funds 576,378 576,378 Repaid from other funds 128,571 128,571 Received -greenhouse gas allowance 2,322,776 2,322,776 Transfers out (3,823,858) (1,894,378) (1,795,378) (7,513,614) Net cash provided by (used) in noncapital financing activities (690,154) (1,765,807) (1,758,041) 1.195.418 (3,018,584) Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Fees received for water meter installations 56,050 56,050 Acquisition and construction of capital assets (867,535) (4,945,098) (5,617,689) (3,576,060) (15,006,382) Fees received from developers 163,985 183,994 20,301 368,280 Capital grants received 3,455,944 3,455,944 Principal payments on debt (4,960,000) (1,500,000) (850,000) (7,310,000) Interest payments on debt (3,358,233) (2,171,525) (2,119,856) (7,649,614) Net cash used in capital and related financing activities (9,021,783) (8,432,629) (8,511,194) (120.116) (26,085,722) Cash flows from investing activities: Interest on investments 108.068 176.903 104,238 9.051 398.260 Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 618,520 (375,402) (3,152,414) (1,201,475) (4,110,771) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 17,994,607 14,338,319 27,116,296 1,740,359 61,189,581 Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 18,613,127 13,962,917 23,963,882 538,884 $ 57,078,810 $ (continued) 27 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement (50,000) (50,000) 53 319 566,199 13,574,923 14,141,122 CITY OF LODI STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS - continued PROPRIETARY FUNDS Year ended June 30, 2015 Business -type Activities - Enterprise Funds Electric Nonmajor Fund Wastewater Water Transit Total Govemmental Activities - Internal Service Funds Reconciliation to the statement of net position: Cash and investments $ 6,383,017 13,853,935 6,755,522 538,884 $ 27,531,358 $ 14,141,122 Restricted cash and investments 14,832,904 14,832,904 Restricted assets with fiscal agents - current 12,230,110 108,982 2,375,456 14,714,548 Total cash and cash equivalents $ 18,613,127 13,962,917 23,963,882 538.884 $ 57,078,810 $ 14.141.122 Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Operating Income (loss) $ 5,533,413 4,160,956 4,935,160 (3,903,536) $ 10,725,993 $ 692,923 Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation 2,658,929 4,217,932 2,752,367 1,145,770 10,774,998 1,444 Other revenues 1,360,933 590,013 483,708 314,133 2,748,787 82,639 Change in assets and liabilities: Increase in loans receivable (54,631) (54,631) Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable 1,712,963 (4,361) 50,165 1,758,767 Increase in advance receivables (744,688) (744,688) Decrease (increase) in due from other govemmental agencies 7,150 (306,858) (299,708) Decrease (increase) in inventory 267,074 (68,270) 92,259 291,063 (31,146) Decrease (increase) in other assets 432 (337,813) (337,381) 100 Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities (307,096) 899,480 66,245 173,367 831,996 (15,696) Increase (decrease) in compensated absences (54,069) (80,187) 11,036 (6,656) (129,876) (15,370) Decrease in net pension liability and related amounts (150,439) (77,014) (4,716) (8,906) (241,075) (12,595) Decrease in uneamed revenue (208,114) (208,114) Decrease in self-insurance liability (715,872) Decrease in pollution remediation obligation (520,856) (520,856) Increase in net OPEB obligation 576.453 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ 10 222.389 9.646.131 7,012,583 (2.285.828) $ 24.595.275 $ 562,880 Noncash Investing, Capital and Financing Activities Capital asset contributions Book value of disposed capital assets Amortization of issuance premium 253,684 188,050 417,397 1,130,455 24,908 174,567 19,700 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement 28 859,131 1,130,455 219,175 CITY OF LODI STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET POSITION FIDUCIARY FUNDS June 30, 2015 Private -Purpose Trust Funds Agency Fund ASSETS Cash and investments $ 238,905 $ 428,973 Receivables: Interest 277 TOTAL ASSETS 238,905 429,250 LIABILITIES Agency obligations 429.250 NET POSITION - EXPENDABLE The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 29 $ 238.905 $ CITY OF LODI STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FIDUCIARY NET POSITION FIDUCIARY FUNDS Year ended June 30, 2015 ADDITIONS Investment and rental income DEDUCTIONS Current Library Private -Purpose Trust Funds $ 6 33.812 CHANGE IN NET POSITION (33,806) NET POSITION, BEGINNING OF YEAR 272,711 NET POSITION, END OF YEAR $ 238,905 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 30 NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements June 30, 2015 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (a) The Financial Reporting Entity The City of Lodi (City) was incorporated on December 6, 1906, as a municipal corporation under the General Laws of the State of California. The City operates under a Council -Manager form of government and provides the following services: general government, public works, community development, public protection (police and fire), public utilities, library, parks and recreation. The accounting policies of the City conform to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) as applicable to governments in the United States of America. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is the accepted standard setting body for governmental accounting and financial reporting principles. An elected five -member council governs the City of Lodi. As required by GAAP, these financial statements present the City and its component units, entities for which the City is considered to be financially accountable. The component units, although legally separate entities, are, in substance, part of the City's operations and therefore, their activities are blended with data of the City. Blended Component Units The blended component units of the City are as follows: The Lodi Public Improvement Corporation (LPIC) was formed on April 26, 1988, for the purpose of rendering financial assistance to the City in the issuance of the 1988 Certificates of Participation (refunded by the issuance of the 1991 Certificates of Participation) to finance the expansion of the City's White Slough Pollution Control Facility. Since then, several Certificates of Participation were issued to finance various major projects (See Note 8). The City Council constitutes the Board of Directors of LPIC. The funds of LPIC have been included in the Enterprise (Electric and Wastewater) Funds and in the other governmental funds in the accompanying basic financial statements. The Lodi Financing Corporation (LFC) was formed on October 12, 1999, for the purpose of assisting the City with the financing of the costs of its environmental abatement program and enhancing the water supply of the City for the use, benefit and enjoyment of the citizens served by the City. The City Council is the Board of Directors of LFC. The funds of LFC are included in the Water Fund in the accompanying basic financial statements. The Lodi Public Financing Authority (LPFA) was created by a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement between the City and the Industrial Development Authority (IDA) on July 21, 2010, for the purpose of assisting the City in the financings of public capital improvements. The 2010 Water Revenue Certificates of Participation Series A and B were issued in October 2010 to provide funds for a new water treatment facility. On September 1, 2012, the $19,080,000 Refunding Lease Revenue Bonds (2012 LRB) was issued to prepay and cause the immediate defeasance of the outstanding $21,025,000 Certificates of Participation (2002 COP). The 2002 COP were issued in January 2002 to provide funds to finance the costs of constructing, furnishing and equipping a new police building and jail for the City, to finance portions of certain other projects 32 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 and to refund the outstanding 1995 and 1996 Certificates of Participation. The $17,105,000 2012 Refunding Wastewater Revenue Bonds (2012 Bonds) was also issued in September 2012 to advance refund the $17,115,000 principal amount of the 2004 Wastewater Revenue Certificates of Participation (2004 COP). The 2004 COP were issued to provide funds to finance the costs of certain improvements to the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal system of the City. The City Council constitutes the Board of Directors of LPFA. The funds of LPFA have been included in the Enterprise (Water) Fund in the accompanying basic financial statements. (b) Government -Wide and Fund Financial Statements The government -wide financial statements (i.e., the statement of net position and the statement of activities) report information on all of the non - fiduciary activities of the primary government and its component units. For the most part the effect of interfund activity has been removed from these statements. Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues, are reported separately from business -type activities that rely, to a significant extent, on fees and charges for support. The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function are offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function or segment. Program revenues include (1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use, or directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function or segment and (2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirements of a particular function. Taxes and other items not properly included among program revenues are reported instead as general revenues. Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds, even though the latter are excluded from the government -wide financial statements. Major individual governmental funds and major individual enterprise funds are reported as separate columns in the fund financial statements. (c) Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statement Presentation The government -wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and accrual basis of accounting, as are the proprietary fund and private -purpose trust fund financial statements. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as revenues in the year for which they are levied. Grant and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements have been met. Agency funds use the accrual basis of accounting, but they do not have a measurement focus. Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they 33 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 are collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. The City considers property tax revenues to be available if they are collected within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal year. All other revenues are considered to be available if they are generally collected within 120 days of the end of the current fiscal period. Expenditures generally are recorded when a liability is incurred, as under accrual accounting. However, debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures related to vacation, sick leave, claims and judgments, are recorded only when payment is due. Property taxes, other local taxes, licenses, intergovernmental revenues, and interest associated with the current fiscal period are all considered susceptible to accrual and so have been recognized as revenues of the current fiscal period. All other revenues are considered to be measurable and available when the City receives cash. The City reports the following major governmental fund: The General Fund is the City's primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resources of the City except those required to be accounted for in another fund. The City reports the following major proprietary (enterprise) funds: The Electric Fund accounts for the provision of electric services to the residents of the City. All activities necessary to provide such services are accounted for in this fund, including but not limited to, source of supply, overhead, systems maintenance, customer service, engineering, administration, capital improvements, and maintenance and debt service. The Wastewater Fund accounts for the provision of wastewater collection and treatment services to the residents of the City. All activities necessary to provide such services are accounted for in this fund, including, but not limited to, administration, operations, maintenance, improvements and debt service. The Water Fund accounts for the provision of water to the residents of the City as well as some customers in the San Joaquin County (County). All activities to provide such services are accounted for in this fund, including, but not limited to administration, operations, distribution, maintenance, capital improvements and debt service. Additionally, the City reports the following fund types: The Internal Service Funds account for the City's claims, benefits and fleet services. The Fiduciary Funds account for assets held in trust for other agencies. 34 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 Private -Purpose Trust Funds are used to account for trust agreements under which the principal and income benefit individuals, private organizations or other governments. They were established to account for assets held and invested by the Library Board as trustee; and to account for assets held by the City in accordance with a trust agreement on behalf of the Hutchins Square. These funds can only be spent in accordance with the trust agreements. Agency Funds account for assets held by the City as a trustee or as an agent for individuals, private organizations, related organizations and/or other governmental units. This fund was established to account for special assessments collected on the property tax roll by the City on behalf of the property owners within the Industrial Way/Beckman Districts, the Downtown/Cherokee Lane Districts and various landscape and lighting districts around the City. The effect of interfund activity has been eliminated from the government -wide financial statements. Exceptions to this rule are charges to other City departments from the Electric, Wastewater, Water and Transit Funds. These charges have not been eliminated because elimination would distort the direct costs and program revenues reported in the statement of activities. Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services in connection with the fund's principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the City's enterprise funds and internal service funds are charges for customer services including: electric, wastewater, water and public transportation fees. Operating expenses for enterprise funds and internal service funds include the cost of services, administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses. (d) Cash and Investments The City maintains a cash and investment pool that is available for all funds of the City for the purpose of increasing interest earnings through investment activities. Investments are generally stated at fair value with the exception of guaranteed investment contracts, which are stated at cost. Income earned or losses arising from the investment of pooled cash are allocated to various funds based on month-end cash balances in accordance with California Government Code Section 53647. Changes in fair value of investments are recognized as a component of investment income. (e) Restricted Cash and Investments The City accounts for certain settlement payments for environmental remediation as restricted with the understanding that these funds will be used exclusively for environmental clean up, investigation or remediation expenses incurred by the City in the specified areas and that they will not be used for the payment of legal or technical fees. These funds are accounted for in the Water Fund. 35 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 (f) Restricted Assets with Fiscal Agents Restricted assets represent the proceeds from debt and other cash and investments held by fiscal agents by agreement that meet the definition of cash and cash equivalents, with the exception of a $2,169,850 guaranteed investment contract held in the Wastewater Fund which is a long- term investment. In the Electric Fund, restricted assets represent the proceeds of the 2002D and the 2008 Certificates of Participation restricted for debt service. In the Wastewater Fund, the restricted assets represent the proceeds of the 2004A and the 2007A Certificates of Participation issued for improvements to the City's wastewater collection, treatment and disposal system. In the Water Fund, restricted assets represent the proceeds of the 2010A and 2010E Revenue Bonds issued for the purpose of providing funds to pay the cost of a new Water Treatment Facility. (g) Property Taxes County is responsible for assessing, collecting and distributing property taxes in accordance with enabling legislation. Revenue received is based on an allocation factor calculated by the County under the provisions of Proposition 13, plus a percentage of the increase in market value in specific areas. The City's property tax lien is based on the assessed value listed as of the prior January 1st for all real and personal property located in the City. Property sold after the assessment date (January 1st) is reassessed and the amount of property tax assessed is prorated. The assessed value at January 1, 2015, upon which the 2014-15 levy was based, was $5,418,050,000. Secured property taxes are levied on October 1 and are due in two installments on November 1 and February 1. The tax becomes delinquent after December 10 and April 10, respectively. Unsecured property tax is levied on July 1, due on July 31 and becomes delinquent after August 31. Property taxes levied for the year ended June 30, 2015, are recorded as receivables, net of estimated uncollectible amounts. Property taxes paid to the City by the County within 60 days of the fiscal year end are considered "available" and are, therefore, recognized as revenue in governmental funds. In 1993, the City made an agreement with the San Joaquin County to participate in the Teeter Plan. The Teeter plan is an alternative method of apportioning property tax money. The City receives 95% of the property taxes in advance from the County and the 5% remaining after reconciling the City's balance at June 30. As part of the agreement, the County keeps the penalties and interest on the delinquent taxes. (h) Due From/Due To Other Funds, Advances To/Advances From Other Funds, and Internal Balances During the course of operations, numerous transactions occur between individual funds for goods provided or services rendered. In the fund financial statements, these receivables and payables are classified as "due from other funds" or "due to other funds." Long-term interfund loans 36 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 receivable are reported as "advances to other funds." The corresponding long-term interfund loans payable are reported as "advances from other funds." In the government -wide financial statements, these receivables and payables are eliminated within the governmental activities and business -type activities columns. Receivables and payables between the governmental activities and the business -type activities are classified as internal balances. (i) Transfers In the fund financial statements, interfund transfers are recorded as transfers in (out) except for transactions that are described below: Charges for services are recorded as revenues of the performing fund and expenditures/expenses of the requesting fund. Unbilled costs are recognized as an asset of the performing fund at the end of fiscal year. Reimbursements for expenditures/expenses, initially made by one fund that is properly applicable to another fund, are recorded as expenditures/expenses in the reimbursing fund and as a reduction of expenditures/expenses in the fund that is reimbursed. Reimbursements are eliminated for purposes of government -wide reporting. (j) Long-term Obligations In the government -wide financial statements and in the proprietary fund financial statements, long-term debt and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicable governmental activities, business -type activities, or proprietary fund statement of net position. Bond premiums are deferred and amortized over the life of the bonds. Bonds payable are reported net of the applicable bond premium. Losses occurring from advance refunding are reported as deferred outflows of resources and amortized as an expense for both governmental and business -type activities. (k) Loans Receivable Loans receivable reported in the HOME Program and Community Development Block Grants Special Revenue Fund represent funds loaned to first-time homebuyers. Loans receivable in the Electric Enterprise Fund represent loans to eligible industrial and commercial customers participating in the Lodi Energy Efficiency Financing Pilot Project. In December 2009, the City entered into a contractual relationship with the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to administer a First-time Homebuyers Program. The loan program is intended to provide deferred down -payment assistance to first-time homebuyers who are at or below 80% of the median income, for the purchase of homes within Lodi. The loan bears 2% interest and is due and payable 30 years from close of escrow, upon transfer of the property or when the home is no longer owner -occupied, whichever comes first. 37 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 In October 2010, the City established a loan fund in its public benefits program from which G2 electric utility rate commercial and industrial customers may borrow money to implement energy conservation projects in their facilities. The loan is at zero interest rate payable in two years capped at $50,000 per customer. As of June 30, 2015, a total of twenty-one loans to industrial and commercial customers have been approved. (I) Advance Receivable Advance receivable reported in the Electric Enterprise Fund represents the City's portion of the Northern California Power Agency's (NCPA) General Operating Reserve that is refundable upon demand by the City (See Note 12). (m) Inventory Other governmental funds inventories are recorded at cost and are recognized as expenditures when consumed rather than when purchased. For the proprietary fund types, inventories are recorded at cost using the weighted average cost method, which approximates market, and expense is recognized when inventories are consumed in operations. (n) Deferred Outflows and Inflows of Resources Unamortized Losses on Defeasance Deferred outflows of resources reported in the Electric Enterprise Fund and business -type activities include refunding loss incurred in connection with the issuance of the 2008 Certificates of Participation Series A amortized over 24 years. The deferred outflows of resources reported in the Wastewater Enterprise Fund and business -type activities include refunding loss incurred on the issuance of the 2007A Certificates of Participation amortized over 20 years and the 2012 Refunding Revenue Bonds amortized over 11 years. Deferred outflows of resources reported in the governmental activities represent refunding loss incurred with the issuance of the 2012 Refunding Lease Revenue Bonds. Related to Pensions Pension contributions made in the current year are reported as deferred outflows of resources per GASB Statement No. 71 as the CaIPERS' valuation measurement date is June 30, 2014. Those contributions will be expensed in fiscal year 2015-16. Plan earnings in excess of earnings projected in the CaIPERS actuarial report are reported as deferred inflows of resources. Unavailable Revenue The unavailable revenue in the other governmental funds is related to the HCD's First-time Homebuyers Program. 38 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 (o) Capital Assets Capital assets, which include land, buildings and improvements, machinery and equipment, vehicles, infrastructure (e.g., streets, streetlights, traffic signals, sidewalks, and bridges), and electric lines, wastewater lines and storm drains are reported in the applicable governmental or business -type activities columns in the government -wide financial statements and in the proprietary funds financial statements. Capital assets are defined by the City as assets with individual cost of $3,000 or more and have an estimated useful life in excess of two years. Such assets are recorded at historical cost. Donated capital assets are recorded at estimated fair market value at the date of donation. Capital outlay is recorded as expenditures in the General and other governmental funds and as assets in the government -wide financial statements to the extent the City's capitalization threshold is met. The cost of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend asset useful lives are not capitalized. As required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 34, beginning July 1, 2002, the City has capitalized infrastructure, primarily its network of streets, as part of the capital assets shown in the governmental activities column on the government -wide statement of net position. This capitalization included infrastructure that could be identified and has been acquired since July 1, 1980. Depreciation of capital assets is provided on the straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: Years Buildings and improvements 3 - 40 Machinery and equipment 2 - 40 Vehicles 5 - 15 Infrastructure 10 - 50 (p) Compensated Absences/Vacation and Sick Leave The City accrues for compensated absences, in the government -wide financial statements and the proprietary funds financial statements, to pay its employees for the unused vacation, compensatory time, and miscellaneous leave. The City is not obligated to pay for unused sick leave if employees terminate prior to retirement. 39 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 (q) Pensions For purposes of measuring the net pension liability, deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions, and pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the Miscellaneous and Safety Plans (Plans) and additions to/deductions from the Plans' fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by the CaIPERS Financial Office. For this purpose, benefit payments (including refunds of employee contributions) are recognized when currently due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported at fair value. GASB Statement No. 68 requires that the reported results must pertain to liability and asset information within certain defined timeframes. For this report, the following timeframes are used: Valuation Date: Measurement Date: Measurement Period: (r) Self -Insurance June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014 The City is self-insured for general liability, workers' compensation, dental benefits, unemployment and long-term disability. Various City funds are charged premiums for the City's self-insurance liability, which is accounted for in an internal service fund. The accrued liability for estimated self-insured claims represents an estimate of the eventual loss on claims arising prior to year-end including claims incurred but not reported. (s) Net Position In the government -wide and proprietary funds financial statements, net position is reported in one of three categories: Net Investment in Capital Assets — This category consists of capital assets net of accumulated depreciation and reduced by deferred outflows of resources and outstanding debt that is attributed to the acquisition, construction, or improvement of the assets. Restricted Net Position — Assets restricted by external creditors, grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments reduced by liabilities related to those assets. Unrestricted Net Position — This category consists of all net position that does not meet the definition of net investment in capital assets or restricted net position. 40 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 (t) Fund Balance Fund balances presented in the governmental fund financial statements represent the difference between assets, liabilities and deferred inflows of resources. GASB Statement No. 54, Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions, establishes the criteria for classifying fund balances into specifically defined classifications and clarifies definitions for governmental funds. GASB Statement No. 54 requires that the fund balances be classified in categories based upon the type of restrictions imposed on the use of funds. The City evaluated each of its funds at June 30, 2015 and classified fund balances into the following five categories: Nonspendable — Amounts that cannot be spent because they are (1) not in spendable form, such as prepaid items, inventories and long-term receivables for which the payment of proceeds are not restricted or committed with respect to the nature of the specific expenditures of that fund or (2) legally or contractually required to remain intact. Restricted — Amounts that are restricted by external parties such as creditors or imposed by grants, laws or regulations of other governments or imposed by law through constitutional provisions or enabling legislation. The City has legislative restrictions on amounts collected and reported in the City's various governmental funds. Committed — Amounts that can only be used for specific purposes pursuant to constraints imposed by a formal action by the City's "highest level of decision-making authority", which the City considers to be an ordinance passed by the Lodi City Council. Assigned — Amounts that have been allocated by action of the Lodi City Council in which the City's intent is to use the funds for a specific purpose. Once assigned, funds may only be released by resolution of the City Council. Unassigned — Amounts that constitute the residual balances that have no restrictions placed upon them and are reported in the General Fund. For other governmental funds, as restrictions exceed available resources only deficit amounts are reported in the unassigned category. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the City's policy to use restricted resources first, and then unrestricted resources as they are needed. The City does not have a policy on the order of spending unrestricted amounts when an expenditure is incurred for which amounts in any of the unrestricted fund balance classifications could be used. Therefore, by default under GASB Statement No. 54, the City uses committed resources first, then assigned resources and unassigned resources last as they are needed. It is the City's policy to maintain an unassigned fund balance in the General Fund of at least 16% of revenues and working capital balances in the Water and Wastewater enterprise funds of at least 25% of operating expenses and the target for the Electric Enterprise Fund working capital is 41 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 $23.7 million. The policy allows for variations from year-to-year to account for economic and fiscal changes. The City Council also adopted a policy to establish the following reserves: Catastrophic reserve - To maintain the ability of the City to meet operational costs during times of declared emergency or major catastrophe, the City shall designate General Fund balance of a minimum of 8% of annual General Fund revenues. This reserve may only be drawn upon pursuant to an emergency as declared under the Municipal Code. Economic reserve - To maintain the City's economic viability and to meet seasonal cashflow shortfalls, the City shall designate General Fund economic reserve balance of a minimum of 8% of annual General Fund revenues. Funding the economic reserve will begin in the fiscal year following full funding of the catastrophic reserve. Funding may only be disbursed upon a resolution of the City Council. Once fully funded, if these reserves fall below 5% of annual revenues, the City Manager shall prepare a plan within three months of approval of the City's Financial Statements. This plan will restore the 5% within 12 months and the 8% within 24 months. (u) Statement of Cash Flows A statement of cash flows is presented for proprietary fund types. For purposes of reporting cash flows, the City considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased and investments maintained in the pool to be cash equivalents. (v) Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. (w) Implementation of New Governmental Accounting Standards During the year ended June 30, 2015, the City implemented GASB Statement No. 68 — Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions — An Amendment of GASB Statement No. 27 and GASB Statement No. 71 — Pension Transition for Contributions Made Subsequent to the Measurement Date — an amendment of GASB Statement No. 68 (collectively, the Statements). The primary objective of the Statements is to improve accounting and financial reporting by state and local governments for pensions by establishing standards for measuring and recognizing liabilities, deferred outflows of resources, deferred inflows of resources, and expenses. It requires employers to report a net pension liability for the difference between the present value of projected pension benefits for past service and restricted resources held in trust for the payment of benefits. The Statements identify the methods and assumptions that should be used to project benefit payments, discount projected benefit payments to their actuarial present value, and attribute that present value to periods of employee service. 42 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 The net pension liability offset by the related deferred outflows of resources as of June 30, 2014 reduced the City's beginning net position of its governmental activities, business -type activities, Electric Fund, Wastewater Fund, Water Fund, Transit Fund, and internal service funds by $80,965,314, $19,689,250, $11,101,735, $7,369,943, $724,395, $493,177, and $1,081,238, respectively. (x) Future Implementation of New Governmental Accounting Standards The City is currently analyzing its accounting practices to determine the potential impact on the financial statements for the following GASB Statements: In February 2015, GASB issued Statement No. 72, Fair Value Measurement and Application. This statement addresses accounting and financial reporting issues related to fair value measurements. The requirements of this statement are effective for the City's year ending June 30, 2016. In June 2015, GASB issued Statement No. 73, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions and Related Assets That Are Not within the Scope of GASB Statement No. 68, and Amendments to Certain Provisions of GASB Statements No. 67 and No. 68. This statement establishes requirements for those pensions and pension plans that are not administrated through a trust meeting specified criteria and thus are not covered by Statement Nos. 67 and 68. The requirements of this statement are effective for the City's year ending June 30, 2016. In June 2015, GASB issued Statement No. 75, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions. This statement addresses reporting by governments that provide other postemployment benefits (OPEB) to their employees and for governments that finance OPEB for employees of other governments. The requirements of this statement are effective for the City's year ending June 30, 2018. In June 2015, GASB issued Statement No. 76, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for State and Local Governments. This statement reduces the hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles to two categories of authoritative GAAP and addresses the use of authoritative and nonauthoritative literature in the event that the accounting treatment for a transaction or other event is not specific with a source of authoritative GAAP. The requirements of this statement are effective for the City's year ending June 30, 2016. In August 2015, GASB issued Statement No. 77, Tax Abatement Disclosures. This statement requires governments that enter into tax abatement agreements to disclose certain information about the agreements. The requirements of this statement are effective for the City's year ending June 30, 2017. In December 2015, the GASB issued Statement No. 79, Certain External Investment Pools and Pool Participants. This statement establishes criteria for an external investment pool to qualify for making the election to measure all investments at amortized cost for financial reporting purposes. Pool participants should also measure their investments at amortized cost if the external pool meets these criteria. If an external investment pool does not meet the criteria, then the pool should apply the provisions in paragraph 16 of Statement No. 31, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Certain Investments and for External Investment Pools. Pool participants should measure their investments in that pool at external investment pools that measure all of their investments at amortized cost and for governments that participate in those pools. The 43 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 requirements of this statement are effective for the City's year ending June 30, 2017. (2) CASH AND INVESTMENTS Cash and investments as of June 30, 2015 are classified in the accompanying financial statements as follows: Government -wide statement of net position Cash and investments $ 68,879,497 Restricted assets 31,717,302 Fiduciary funds cash and investments: Private -purpose trust funds 238,905 Agency fund 428,973 Total cash and investments $ 101,264,677 Cash and investments as of June 30, 2015 consist of the following: Cash on hand Deposits with financial institutions Investments Total cash and investments (a) Authorized Investments 3,071 8,583,383 92.678.223 101,264,677 The City has adopted an investment policy pursuant to Government Code Section 53601 which authorizes the City to invest in obligations of the U.S. Treasury, U.S Government agency securities and instruments, bankers' acceptances, certificates of deposit, negotiable certificates of deposit, commercial paper, State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), Investment Trust of California (CALTRUST),Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS), mutual funds that invest in eligible securities, supranationals and medium term notes as permitted by the Government Code. The City is not authorized to enter into reverse repurchase agreements. The City selects its investments based on safety, liquidity and yield. 44 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 The following table identifies the permitted investment types authorized per the City's investment policy. The table also identifies certain provisions that address interest rate risk and concentration of credit risk. Maximum Maximum % of Maximum Investment Permitted Investments/Deposits Maturity Portfolio in One issuer U.S. Treasury Obligations 5 years 100% U.S. Agency Securities 5 years 100% Banker's Acceptances 180 days 40% 25% Certificates of Deposit 5 years 100% Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 5 years 30% Commercial Paper 270 days 40% California State Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Indefinite 100% $50m per account Passbook Deposits Indefinite 100% Money Market Mutual Funds Indefinite 20% Guaranteed Investment Contracts (GICs) 5 years 100% Medium term Notes 5 years 30% Investment Trust of California (CALTRUST) Indefinite 100% Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) 5 years 30% Supranational Obligations 5 years 30% (b) Investments Authorized by Debt Agreements Investments of debt proceeds held by bond trustee are governed by the provisions of the debt agreements as to the extent that they are permissible investments of funds of the City. (c) Interest Rate Risk Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates will adversely affect the fair value of an investment. Generally, the longer the maturity of an investment, the greater the sensitivity its fair value is to changes in market interest rates. Information about the sensitivity of the fair values of the City's investments to market interest rate fluctuations is provided by the following table that shows the maturity date of each investment: 45 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 Investment as of June 30, 2015 Maturity Maturity Less than One Year One to Five Years Total LAIF $ 31,944,790 $ 31,944,790 CALTRUST 43,615,455 43,615,455 Money Market Mutual Funds 123,254 123,254 Held by bond trustee: Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 1,010,755 3,539,300 4,550,055 U.S. Agency Securities 631,224 631,224 LAIF 1,737,159 1,737,159 Money Market Mutual Funds 7,796,111 7,796,111 Guaranteed investment contracts (GICs) 2,169,850 2,169,850 Total investments subject to interest rate risk $ 42.612,069 49,955,829 92,567,898 Equities and options 110.325 Total investments $ 92,678,223 Investments in equities are shares of stock received by the Library as an endowment from a private citizen. (d) Credit Risk Generally, credit risk is the risk that an issuer of an investment will not fulfill its obligation to the holder of the investment. This is measured by the assignment of a rating by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. The money market mutual funds are registered under the Federal Investment Company Act of 1940, whose shares are registered under the Federal Securities Act of 1933, and have a rating by S&P of "AAA -m." The GICs and LAIF do not have a rating provided by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. The CALTRUST Short term fund is rated "AA/S1+" by S&P while the CALTRUST Medium term fund is rated "A or better." The negotiable certificates of deposit are all rated AAA. In accordance with the City's investment policy in selecting authorized investments, consideration must be given to credit ratings and collateralization of applicable instruments, however, the City does not have a minimum credit rating limitations policy. 46 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 (e) Concentration of Credit Risk The investment policy of the City contains certain limitations on the amount that can be invested in any one issuer beyond that stipulated by the California Government Code. Investments in LAIF, CALTRUST, and money market mutual funds are not subject to the concentration of credit risk disclosure. There are no investments with any one issuer greater than 5% of total investments. (f) Custodial Credit Risk Custodial credit risk for deposits is the risk that, in the event of the failure of a depository financial institution, a government will not be able to recover collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The California Government Code and the City's investment policy do not contain legal or policy requirements that would limit the exposure to custodial risk for deposits, other than the following provision for deposits: The California Government Code requires that a financial institution secure deposits made by state or local governmental units by pledging securities in an undivided collateral pool held by a depository regulated under state law. The market value of the pledged securities in the collateral pool must equal at least 110% of the total amount deposited by the public agencies. California law also allows financial institutions to secure City deposits by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes having a value of 150% of the secured deposits. $9,652,164 of the City's deposits with financial institutions, which exceeded federal depository insurance limits, was collateralized in this fashion. The custodial credit risk for investments is the risk that, in the event of the failure of the counterparty (e.g., broker-dealer) to a transaction, a government will not be able to recover the value of the investment or collateral securities that are in the possession of another party. The California Government Code and the City's investment policy do not contain legal or policy requirements that would limit the exposure to custodial credit risk for investments. With respect to investments, custodial credit risk generally applies only to direct investments in marketable securities. Custodial credit risk does not apply to a local government's indirect investment in securities through the use of mutual funds or government investment pools such as LAIF. (g) Investments in Investment Pools The City is a voluntary participant in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) that is regulated by the California Government Code under the oversight of the Treasurer of the State of California. The fair value of the City's investment in this pool is reported in the accompanying financial statements at amounts based upon the City's pro -rata share of the fair value provided by LAIF for the entire LAIF portfolio (in relation to the amortized cost of that portfolio). The balance available for withdrawal is based on the accounting records maintained by LAIF, which are recorded on an amortized cost basis. The total amount invested by all public agencies in LAIF at June 30, 2015 was $21.5 billion. LAIF is part of the California Pooled Investment Account (PMIA), which at June 30, 2015 had a balance of $69.6 billion. Of this amount, 2.08% was invested in medium-term and short-term structured notes and asset-backed securities. PMIA is not SEC -registered, but is required to invest according to California State Code. The average maturity of PMIA investments was 239 days as of June 30, 2015. 47 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 The Local Investment Advisory Board has oversight responsibility for LAIF. The Board consists of five members as designated by state statute. The value of the pool of shares in LAIF, which may be withdrawn, is determined on an amortized cost basis, which is different than the fair value of the City's portion of the pool. Withdrawals from LAIF are done on a dollar for dollar basis. In accordance with GASB Statement 31, investments are marked to fair value annually and an adjustment is made to each fund accordingly. However, actual daily activity is done on a dollar to dollar basis and only a withdrawal from the pool size that jeopardizes pool participants would cause the withdrawal to be done at market value. The City is also a participant in the Investment Trust of California Joint Powers Authority Pool (CALTRUST). At June 30, 2015, the City's investment in CALTRUST is $43.6 million. CALTRUST is an innovative partnership between the CSAC Finance Corporation and the League of California Cities to provide a convenient method for local agencies to pool their assets for investment. The weighted average to maturity of CALTRUST investments was as follows: CALTRUST Short Term, 16 months and CALTRUST Medium, 24 months. The Board of Trustees, which is made up of experienced local treasurers and Investment Officers has oversight responsibility for CALTRUST. The value of the pool shares in CALTRUST, which may be withdrawn, is determined on a fair value basis, which may be different than the amortized cost of the City's portion of the pool. The total amount invested in CALTRUST by California public agencies, as of June 30, 2015 was divided among the following asset classes: CALTRUST Short term was $989 million and CALTRUST Medium Term was $790 million. (3) ALLOWANCE FOR UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS Receivables of the General Fund, Electric, Wastewater and Water funds are reported net of uncollectible amounts. Total allowance provided for uncollectible amounts related to receivables of the current period are as follows: Uncollectibles related to late charges and services Uncollectibles related to electric sales and services Uncollectibles related to wastewater services Uncollectibles related to water sales and services Total uncollectibles of the current fiscal year 48 4,090 178,970 47,980 75.800 306,840 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 (4) INTERFUND RECEIVABLES/PAYABLES Interfund receivables and payables at June 30, 2015 are as follows: Due from Due to Amount Other governmental Other governmental $ 93.114 "Due to" and "due from" balances are recorded primarily when funds overdraw their share of pooled cash or when there are short-term loans between funds. The $93,114 represents cash deficits in other governmental funds. Advances from Advances to Amount Wastewater Other governmental $ 376,429 Water Electric 576,378 Water Other governmental 1.174.025 $ 2,126,832 The $376,429 advance from the Wastewater Fund was used for the Impact Mitigation Fees update, $55,000; and $321,429 was used for the Grape Bowl Improvements - Phase 3. The advances from the Water Fund were used for the City Hall Annex Phase 2, $576,378; and for the construction of Fire Station #4, $1,174,025. (5) TRANSFERS Transfers for the year ended June 30, 2015, are summarized as follows: Transfers in Other Transfers out: General Governmental Total General $ 7,128,586 $ 7,128,586 Other governmental 907,176 907,176 Electric 2,104,000 1,719,858 3,823,858 Wastewater 1,068,000 826,378 1,894,378 Water 780,000 1,015,378 1,795,378 Internal service 50,000 50,000 Total $ 3,952,000 11,647,376 $ 15,599,376 49 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 During the year, various interfund transfers were made to finance expenditures, subsidize operating losses and service debt. Transfers out of $2,104,000 from the Electric Fund, $1,068,000 from the Wastewater Fund, and $780,000 from the Water Fund represent the cost of services reimbursement to the General Fund. The transfer of $7,128,586 from the General Fund to other governmental represents transfer of $509,403 to the Debt Service Fund for the interest required to pay the 2012 Refunding Lease Revenue Bonds; $3,583,243 to Parks, Recreation and Community Services for operating costs; $126,160 to Community Development for operating costs; $806,780 to the Vehicle and Equipment Fund for vehicle replacements and computer replacements; and $1,511,200 to the Capital Outlay Reserve Fund for various capital projects; and $591,800 to the Streets Fund for various streets projects. The transfer out of $907,176 from other governmental to other governmental includes $335,410 transferred from Parks, Recreation and Community Services to the Debt Service Fund for the interest required to pay the 2012 Refunding Lease Revenue Bonds, transfer of $150,500 from Parks, Recreation and Community Services to Parks Capital Fund for park -related capital projects, transfer of $189,000 from Streets and $125,300 transfer from Vehicle and Equipment Fund to Capital Outlay Reserve for various capital projects, and transfer of $2,510 from the Community Development, $31,866 from Public Safety and $72,590 from the Parks, Recreation and Community Services to the Vehicle and Equipment Fund for fleet replacement. The transfer out from the Electric Fund of $1,719,858, transfer out from Wastewater Fund for $826,378, Water Fund for $1,015,378, and $50,000 from the Insurance Fund, to other governmental represent transfers to the Capital Outlay Reserve Fund for various capital projects. 50 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 (6) CAPITAL ASSETS Capital assets activity of the primary government for the year -ended June 30, 2015, was as follows: Balance Balance Governmental activities June 30, 2014 Increases Decreases June 30, 2015 Capital assets, not being depreciated: Land $ 24,933,134 14,700 $ 24,947,834 Work of Art 304,907 304,907 Construction in progress 4.407,042 7,955,423 (237,786) 12,124,679 Total capital assets, not being depreciated 29,645,083 7,970,123 (237,786) 37,377,420 Capital assets, being depreciated: Buildings and improvements 68,538,889 68,538,889 Machinery and equipment 11,335,038 329,853 (58,053) 11,606,838 Vehicles 10,346,394 696,076 11,042,470 Infrastructure 140,164,672 237,786 140,402,458 Total capital assets, being depreciated 230,384,993 1.263.715 (58.053) 231,590,655 Less accumulated depreciation for: Buildings and improvements 30,250,848 1,943,658 32,194,506 Machinery and equipment 10,608,625 507,040 (58,053) 11,057,612 Vehicles 9,028,154 255,649 9,283,803 Infrastructure 84,893,997 5,834,705 90,728.702 Total accumulated depreciation 134,781,624 8,541,052 (58,053) 143,264,623 Total capital assets, being depreciated, net 95,603,369 (7,277,337) 88,326,032 Governmental activities capital assets, net $ 125,248,452 692,786 (237,786) $ 125,703,452 51 Business -type activities Capital assets, not being depreciated. CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 Balance Balance June 30. 2014 Increases Decreases June 30, 2015 Land $ 5,535,718 Construction in progress 4,029,855 Total capital assets, not being depreciated 9,565,573 10,449,092 $ 5,535,718 14,478,947 10,449,092 20,014,665 Capital assets, being depreciated: Buildings and improvements 47,395,387 47,395,387 Machinery and equipment 265,429,564 2,353,163 (1,972,823) 265,809,904 Vehicles 9,773,724 3,063,258 (1.600.595) 11.236,387 Total capital assets, being depreciated 322,598,675 5,416,421 (3,573,418) 324,441,678 Less accumulated depreciation for: Buildings and improvements 16,264,541 1,790,629 18,055,170 Machinery and equipment 74,231,485 7,989,032 (842,368) 81,378,149 Vehicles 7,059,271 995.337 (1,600,595) 6,454,013 Total accumulated depreciation 97,555,297 10.774,998 (2,442,963) 105,887,332 Total capital assets, being depreciated, net 225,043,378 (5,358,577) (1,130,455) 218,554,346 Business -type activities capital assets, net $ 234,608,951 5.090,515 (1,130,455)_ $ 238,569,011 52 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 Depreciation expense was charged to function/programs of the primary government as follows: Governmental activities: General government $ 524,974 Public protection 898,317 Public works 5,942,856 Community development 4,515 Library 72,651 Parks and recreation 1,096,295 Internal service funds 1,444 Total depreciation expense - governmental activities $ 8,541.052 Business -type activities: Electric $ 2,658,929 Wastewater 4,217,932 Water 2,752,367 Transit 1,145,770 Total depreciation expense - business -type activities $ 10.774.998 (7) OPERATING LEASES The City is obligated under an operating lease for the use of facilities. Total costs for such lease was $21,000 for the year ended June 30, 2015. Future minimum lease payments required by this lease agreement that has a remaining noncancellable lease term of one year or more as of June 30, 2015, are as follows: Years Ending 2016 $ 21,000 Total minimum lease payments required under operating leases $ 21,000 53 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 (8) LONG-TERM LIABILITIES The following is a summary of long-term liability transactions of the City for the year ended June 30, 2015. Interest Rates Amounts Due Within June 30, 2014 Additions Reductions June 30, 2015 One Year Governmental activities: Compensated absences $ 6,391,050 1.490.475 (2.069.485) $ 5,812,040 $ 1,490,475 2012 Lease Revenue Bonds 2.0-5.0% 19,080,000 19,080,000 260,000 Issuance premium 924,080 (53.830) 870,250 53.830 Total 20,004,080 (53.830) 19,950,250 313.830 Note payable 6.0% 245.000 _ 245.000 Self-insurance liability 9.021.759 634.932 (1,350,804) 8.305.887 634.932 Governmental activities long-term liabilities $ 35,661,889 2,125,407 (3,474,119) $ 34,313,177 $ 2.439.237 54 Business -type activities: Compensated absences Pollution remediation obligation Certificates of Participation and Revenue Bonds: 2010 Water Revenue Bonds A & B Issuance premium Total 2008 Certificates of Participation A Issuance premium Total 2002 Certificates of Participation D CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 Interest Rates 2.50-6.637% 3.8-5.05% Amounts Due Within June 30. 2014 Additions Reductions June 30, 2015 One Year $ 1,844,614 19,112,962 36,265,000 512,205 527.570 (657,446) 1,714,738 $ 527.569 (520.856) 18,592,106 (850,000) (19.700) 36.777,205 (869.700) 60,685,000 448.356 61.133.356 1.54-5.25% 10.155.000 2004 Certificates of Participation A 2.0-5.5% 2007 Certificates of Participation A Issuance premium Total 2012 Wastewater Revenue Bonds A Issuance premium Total Total Certificates of Participation and Revenue Bonds Business -type activities long-term liabilities 4.0-5.0% 2.0-5.0% (24.908) 35,415,000 492.505 870,000 19.700 35.907.505 889.700 60,685,000 423.448 (24.908) 61.108.448 (4.960.000) 24,909 24,909 5,195,000 5,195.000 2.070.000 2.070.000 29,605,000 192.582 (145,000) (8,254) 29,797,582 (153,254) 15,825,000 1.538,399 17,363.399 157,296,542 $ 178,254,118 527.570 (1,355,000) (166,313) (1.521.313) (7.529.175) 29,460,000 184.328 155,000 8.253 29.644.328 163.253 14,470,000 1.372,086 15,842,086 149,767,367 1,380,000 166,313 1.546.313 7 819.175 (8,707,477) $ 170,074,211 $ 8,346,744 Internal service funds predominantly serve the governmental funds. Accordingly, long-term liabilities for them are included as part of the above totals for governmental activities. At year-end, internal service funds self-insurance liability for $8,305,887 was included in the above amounts. Also, for the governmental activities, compensated absences are generally liquidated by the General Fund and the internal service funds. 55 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 Long-term debt payable at June 30, 2015, comprised of the following individual issues: Note Payable The City issued a $245,000 promissory note to James E. Dean and Carol Dean, as trustees of the James E. Dean Family Trust, for the purchase of 307 W. Elm Street property, which is the site of the Public Safety Building. Interest is payable quarterly and principal is due on April 1, 2017. Annual debt service requirements to maturity of the note payable are as follows: Year Ending Governmental Activities June 30, Principal Interest 2016 $ $ 14,700 2017 245,000 11.025 Total $ 245,000 $ 25,725 Certificates of Participation and Revenue Bonds $27,360,000 Certificates of Participation (2004A COP) were issued on May 12, 2004 to provide funds to finance the costs of certain improvements to the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal system of the City. Principal is payable annually on October 1 in amounts from $170,000 to $2,070,000 with final payment due October 1, 2024. The City has pledged future wastewater revenues, net of specified operating expenses, to repay these certificates. The total principal and interest remaining to be paid on the certificates is $2,954,925. Interest paid for the current year and total net revenues were $98,325 and $9,509,480, respectively. $30,320,000 Certificates of Participation (2007A COP) were issued on November 16, 2007 to provide funds to finance the costs of certain improvements to the wastewater collection, treatment and disposal system of the City and to provide resources for the repayment of the 1991 Certificates of Participation (Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion Refunding Project). Principal is payable annually on October 1 in amounts ranging from $105,000 to $2,980,000 with final payment due October 1, 2037. The City has pledged future wastewater revenues, net of specified operating expenses, to repay these certificates. The total principal and interest remaining to be paid on the certificates is $52,429,588. Principal and interest paid for the current year and total net revenues were $1,602,850 and $9,509,480, respectively. 56 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 $22,740,000 Revenue Certificates of Participation Series D (2002 COP) were issued to buy out the energy purchase agreement with Calpine. In February 2001, the City entered into an energy purchase agreement (the Original Agreement) with Calpine Energy Services L.P. (Calpine) to purchase 25 MW of energy at $65/mwh for a ten-year period beginning January 1, 2002. Since the execution of the Original Agreement, actions of the State in connection with the energy market conditions, including the initiation of conservation programs, and other factors, have resulted in lower electric Toad requirements and reduced energy costs throughout the State. As a result, the City's need for the energy purchased under the Original Agreement to serve its load has been reduced. The Original Agreement was amended on September 4, 2002, and was divided into three parts. The City sold its interests in the energy purchased under the Original Agreement to Calpine and nets the payments due from the City with respect to its purchase of such energy against the payments due from Calpine with respect to its purchase of the City's rights to such energy. Principal is payable annually on July 1 in amounts ranging from $110,000 to $5,195,000 with final payment due July 1, 2015. The City has pledged future electric revenues, net of specified operating expenses, to repay these certificates. The total principal and interest remaining to be paid on the certificates is $5,331,368. Principal and interest paid for the current year and total net revenues were $5,360,458 and $15,016,570. The City issued $60,685,000 Certificates of Participation (2008A COP) on July 24, 2008 to allow the City to prepay and cause the immediate defeasance of the outstanding $46,760,000 Certificates of Participation (Electric System Revenue Certificates of Participation 2002 Series A Variable Rate Certificates) and to pay $8,979,000 for the termination of a swap agreement related to the refunded 2002 certificates. Principal is payable annually on July 1 in amounts ranging from $2,390,000 to $5,090,000 beginning in 2016 with final payment due in 2032. The City has pledged future electric revenues, net of specified operating expenses, to repay these certificates. The total principal and interest remaining to be paid on the certificates is $90,900,400. Interest paid for the current year and total net revenues were $2,957,775 and $15,016,570, respectively. On October 1, 2010, the City issued $9,015,000 Water Revenue Bonds, 2010 Series A and $29,650,000 Water Revenue Bonds, 2010 Series B (Federally taxable - Build America Bonds) (2010 Bonds) to finance the construction of the Surface Water Treatment Facility which is designed to pump water from the Mokelumne River, treat and deliver it to the City's water distribution system. Principal is payable annually on June 1 in amounts ranging from $775,000 to $2,210,000 with final payment due June 1, 2040. The City has pledged future water revenues, net of operation and maintenance costs, to repay these certificates. The total principal and interest remaining to be paid on the certificates is $69,267,196. Principal and interest paid for the current year and total net revenues were $2,356,141 and $7,554,798, respectively. The City issued $19,080,000 Refunding Lease Revenue Bonds (2012 LRB) on September 1, 2012 to allow the City to prepay and cause the immediate defeasance of the outstanding $21,025,000 Certificates of Participation (2002 COP). The 2002 COP were issued in January 2002 to provide funds to finance the costs of constructing, furnishing and equipping a new police building and jail for the City, to finance portions of certain other projects and to refund the outstanding 1995 and 1996 Certificates of Participation. As of June 30, 2015, there are no outstanding balances of these refunded Certificates. The 1995 Certificates of Participation (1995 COP) were sold in October 1995 to finance the City Downtown Revitalization and the Cherokee Lane Beautification projects. The 1996 Certificates of Participation (1996 COP) were sold in August 1996 to finance the construction of the Hutchins Square Conference and Performing Arts Center. The total principal and interest remaining to be 57 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 paid on the 2012 LRB is $27,455,956. Principal is payable annually on October 1 in amounts ranging from $260,000 to $1,605,000 beginning in 2016 with final payment due in 2031. Interest paid for the current year was $844,812. The City issued $17,105,000 2012 Refunding Wastewater Revenue Bonds (2012 Bonds) to advance refund the $17,115,000 principal amount of the 2004 Wastewater Revenue Certificates of Participation. The City pledged future wastewater revenues, net of specified operating expenses, to repay these certificates. The total principal and interest remaining to be paid on the 2012 Bonds is $17,513,950. Principal is payable annually on October 1 in amounts ranging from $1,280,000 to $1,885,000 beginning in 2013 with final payment due in 2023. Principal and interest paid for the current year and total net revenues were $1,970,350 and $9,509,480 respectively. At June 30, 2015, the remaining balance of the refunded debt is $0. The various indentures contain significant limitations and restrictions on annual debt service requirements, maintenance of and flow of moneys through various restricted accounts and minimum revenue bond coverage. The City is in compliance with all such significant limitations and restrictions. Annual debt service requirements to maturity for certificates of participation and bonds are as follows: Year Ending Governmental Activities __.. Business-_ype Activities June 30. Principal Interest Principal Interest 2016 $ 260,000 $ 840,913 $ 7,600,000 $ 7,324,025 2017 830,000 824,563 4,880,000 6,969,356 2018 860,000 794,912 5,110,000 6,767,006 2019 900,000 755,212 5,310,000 6,540,606 2020 930,000 721,087 5,535,000 6,304,106 2021-2025 5,345,000 2,903,717 32,040,000 27,359,983 2026-2030 6,810,000 1,404,480 37,270,000 18,407,003 2031-2035 3,145,000 131,072 32,370,000 8,810,488 2036-2040 17,180,000 2,619,854 Total $ 19.080,000 $ 8,375,956 $ 147.295.000 $ 91,102,427 Industrial Development Bonds The City of Lodi has lent its name to the City of Lodi Industrial Development Authority for the purpose of issuing the following industrial development bonds: Minton Corporation $5,000,000; Dart Corporation $8,000,000; Wallace Computer Services $3,000,000; and Luster -Cal Nameplate Corporation $3,000,000. These bonds are special obligation bonds only, payable solely out of the bond revenues or other sources of 58 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 the above companies and are not a pledge of the general credit of the City. The City is not obligated for the redemption or administration of these industrial development bonds. Woodbridge Irrigation District Bonds On October 8, 2003, the City lent its name to the Woodbridge Irrigation District (the "District") in the procurement of $11.745 million 2003 Revenue Certificates of Participation, to provide funds to finance the costs of construction of a new diversion dam on the Mokelumne River and related facilities of the water district. A significant portion of the District's sources of payment for the 2003 Certificates are expected to be derived from amounts to be received by the District from the City of Lodi pursuant to an Agreement for the purchase of water from the District by the City of Lodi, dated May 13, 2003 (the "Lodi Water Sales Agreement"). Under the agreement, the City will purchase 6,000 acre feet of water per annum from the District for 40 years. (9) PENSION PLAN Plan Descriptions All qualified permanent and probationary employees are eligible to participate in the City's separate Miscellaneous and Safety Plans (Plans), agent multiple -employer defined benefit pension plans administered by the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CaIPERS), which acts as a common investment and administrative agent for its participating member employers. Benefit provisions under the Plans are established by State statute and City resolution. CaIPERS issues publicly available reports that include a full description of the pension plans regarding benefit provisions, assumptions and membership information that can be found on the CaIPERS website. Benefits Provided CaIPERS provides service retirement and disability benefits, annual cost of living adjustments and death benefits to plan members, who must be public employees and beneficiaries. Benefits are based on years of credited service, equal to one year of full time employment. Members with five years of total service are eligible to retire at age 50 with statutorily reduced benefits. All members are eligible for non -duty disability benefits after 10 years of service. The death benefit is one of the following: the Basic Death Benefit, the 1957 Survivor Benefit, or the Optional Settlement 2W Death Benefit. The cost of living adjustments for each plan are applied as specified by the Public Employees' Retirement Law. 59 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 The Plans' provisions and benefits in effect at June 30, 2015, are summarized as follows: Hire date Benefit formula Benefit vesting schedule Benefit payments Retirement age Monthly benefits, as a % of eligible compensation Required employee contribution rates Required employer contribution rates Hire date Benefit formula Benefit vesting schedule Benefit payments Retirement age Monthly benefits, as a % of eligible compensation Required employee contribution rates Required employer contribution rates Miscellaneous Plan Prior to January 1. 2013 2% @ 55 5 years of service monthly for life 50-55 2%-2.418% 7% 19.994% Safety Plan On or after January 1. 2013 2% @ 62 5 years service monthly for life 52-67 1% to 2.5% 6.75% 19.994% Prior to December 22, 2012 to December 22. 2012 December 31, 2012 3% @ 55 5 years of service monthly for life 50-55 2.4% to 3% 3% @ 50 5 years of service monthly for life 50 3% 9% 40.87% 60 9% 40.87% On or after January 1. 2013 2.7% @ 57 5 years of service monthly for life 50-57 2% to 2.7% 11.25% 40.87% CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 Employees Covered At June 30, 2013, the most recent actuarial valuation available, the following employees were covered by the benefits of the City's Plans' Miscellaneous Plan Safety Plan Inactive employees or beneficiaries currently receiving benefits 355 158 Inactive employees entitled to but not yet receiving benefits 134 16 Active employees 256 118 Total 745 292 Contributions For the year ended June 30, 2015, the City's actuarially determined contributions were as follows: Miscellaneous Plan Safety Plan Inactive employees or beneficiaries currently receiving benefits 355 158 Inactive employees entitled to but not yet receiving benefits 134 16 Active employees 256 118 Total 745 292 Section 20814(c) of the California Public Employees' Retirement Law requires that the employer contribution rates for all public employers be determined on an annual basis by the actuary and shall be effective on the July 1 following notice of a change in the rate. Funding contributions for both Plans are determined annually on an actuarial basis as of June 30 by CaIPERS. The actuarially determined rate is the estimated amount necessary to finance the costs of benefits earned by employees during the year, with an additional amount to finance any unfunded accrued liability. The City is required to contribute the difference between the actuarially determined rate and the contribution rate of employees. Net Pension Liability The City's net pension liability for each Plan is measured as the total pension liability, less the pension plan's fiduciary net position. The net pension liability of each of the Plans is measured as of June 30, 2014, using an annual actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2013 rolled forward to June 30, 2014 using standard update procedures. 61 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 Actuarial Assumptions The total pension liabilities in the June 30, 2013 actuarial valuations were determined using the following actuarial assumptions. Valuation Date Measurement Date Actuarial Cost Method Actuarial Assumptions: Discount Rate Inflation Investment Rate of Return Mortality Miscellaneous Plan Safety Plan June 30, 2013 June 30, 2013 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2014 Entry -Age Normal Cost Method 7.5% 7.5% 2.75% 2.75% 7.5% (1) 7.5% (1) Based on rates of CaIPERS Experience Study (1) Net of pension plan investment expenses, including inflation The underlying mortality assumptions and all other actuarial assumptions used in the June 30, 2013 valuation were based on the results of a January 2014 actuarial experience study for the period 1997 to 2011. Further details of the Experience Study can found on the CaIPERS website. Discount Rate The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 7.50% for each Plan. To determine whether the municipal bond rate should be used in the calculation of a discount rate for each plan, CaIPERS stress tested plans that would most likely result in a discount rate that would be different from the actuarially assumed discount rate. Based on the testing, none of the tested plans run out of assets. Therefore, the current 7.50 percent discount rate is adequate and the use of the municipal bond rate calculation is not necessary. The long term expected discount rate of 7.50 percent will be applied to all plans in the Public Employees Retirement Fund (PERF). The stress test results are presented in a detailed report that can be obtained from the CaIPERS website. According to GASB Statement No. 68, the Tong -term discount rate should be determined without reduction for pension plan administrative expense. The 7.50 percent investment return assumption used in this accounting valuation is net of administrative expenses. Administrative expenses are assumed to be 15 basis points. An investment return excluding administrative expenses would have been 7.65 percent. Using this lower discount rate has resulted in a slightly higher total pension liability and net pension liability. This difference was deemed immaterial by the City. 62 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 CaIPERS is scheduled to review all actuarial assumptions as part of its regular Asset Liability Management review cycle that is scheduled to be completed in February 2018. Any changes to the discount rate will require Board action and proper stakeholder outreach. For these reasons, CaIPERS expects to continue using a discount rate net of administrative expenses for GASB 67 and 68 calculations through at least the 2017-18 fiscal year. The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a building-block method in which best -estimate ranges of expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of pension plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class. In determining the long-term expected rate of return, CaIPERS took into account both short-term and long-term market return expectations as well as the expected pension fund cash flows. Using historical returns of all the funds' asset classes, expected compound returns were calculated over the short- term (first 10 years) and the long-term (11-60 years) using a building-block approach. Using the expected nominal returns for both short-term and long- term, the present value of benefits was calculated for each fund. The expected rate of return was set by calculating the single equivalent expected return that arrived at the same present value of benefits for cash flows as the one calculated using both short-term and long-term returns. The expected rate of return was then set equivalent to the single equivalent rate calculated above and rounded down to the nearest one quarter of one percent. The table below reflects the long-term expected real rate of return by asset class. The rate of return was calculated using the capital market assumptions applied to determine the discount rate and asset allocation. These rates of return are net of administrative expenses. Asset Class Global Equity Global Fixed Income Inflation Sensitive Private Equity Real Estate Infrastructure and Forestland Liquidity An expected inflation of 2.5 percent used for this period. An expected inflation of 3.0 percent used for this period. New Strategic Allocation 47.0% 19.0 6.0 12.0 11.0 3.0 2.0 63 Real Return Years 1-10(1) 5.25% 0.99 0.45 6.83 4.50 4.50 (0.55) Real Return Years 11+ (2) 5.71% 2.43 3.36 6.95 5.13 5.09 (1.05) CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 Changes in the Net Pension Liability The changes in the Net Pension Liability for each Plan follows' Miscellaneous Plan: Balance at June 30, 2013 (1) Changes in the year: Service cost Interest on the total pension liability Contribution - employer Contribution - employee Net investment income (2) Benefit payments, including refunds of employee contributions Net changes during measurement period Balance at June 30, 2014 Safety Plan: Balance at June 30, 2013 (1) Changes in the year: Service cost Interest on the total pension liability Contribution - employer Contribution - employee Net investment income (2) Benefit payments, including refunds of employee contributions Net changes during measurement period Balance at June 30, 2014 Increase (Decrease) Total Pension Liability $ 158,694,446 2,478,901 11,705,179 (7.729,680) Plan Fiduciary Net Position $ 111.971.008 2,694,850 1,237,916 19,249,151 (7,729,680) Net Pension Liability _ $ 46,723,438 2,478,901 11,705,179 (2,694,850) (1,237, 916) (19,249,151) 6,454,400 15,452,237 (8,997,837 $ 165,148,846 $ 127,423,245 $ 37,725,601 Increase (Decrease) Total Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Liability Position $ 154.077.401 $ 93.345.381 3,048,048 11,390, 793 4,106, 044 1,058,376 16,070,261 (7,448,361) (7,448,361) Net Pension Liability $ 60.732.020 3,048,048 11,390,793 (4,106, 044) (1,058, 376) (16,070,261) 6,990,480 13,786,320 (6,795,840) 161,067,881 $ 107,131,701 $ 53,936,180 (1) The fiduciary net position includes receivables for employee service buybacks, deficiency reserves, fiduciary self insurance and OPEB expense. (2) Net of administrative expenses. 64 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 Sensitivity of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate The following presents the net pension liability of the City for each Plan, calculated using the discount rate for each Plan, as well as what the City's net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1 -percentage point lower or 1 -percentage point higher than the current rate: 1% Decrease Net Pension Liability Current Discount Rate Net Pension Liability 1% Increase Net Pension Liability Miscellaneous Plan 6.50% $58,879,248 7.50% $37,725,601 8.50% $20,138,259 Safety Plan 6.50% $75,439,730 7.50% $53,936,180 8.50% $36,195,422 Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position Detailed information about each pension plan's fiduciary net position is available in the separately issued CaIPERS financial reports Pension Expenses and Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions For the year ended June 30, 2015, the City recognized pension expense of $2,515,043 and $4,662,330 for the Miscellaneous and Safety Plans, respectively. At June 30, 2015, the City reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources: Miscellaneous Plan Safety Plan Deferred Deferred Deferred Deferred Outflows of Inflows of Outflows of Inflows of Resources Resources Resources Resources Pension contributions subsequent to measurement date $ 3,252,760 $ $ 3,995,128 $ Net differences between projected and actual earnings on plan investmetns 8.818, 030 7,352,126 Total $ 3,252,760 $ 8,818,030 $ 3.995.128 $ 7,352,126 65 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 The $3,252,760 and $3,995,128 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ending June 30, 2016. Other amounts reported as deferred inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized as pension expense as follows: Year Ending Miscellaneous Safety June 30 Plan Plan 2016 $ 2,204,507 $ 1,838,032 2017 2,204, 507 1,838,032 2018 2,204, 507 1,838,032 2019 2.204.509 1,838,030 Total $ 8,818,030 $ 7,352,126 (10) POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS (a) Plan Description The City sponsors a single -employer defined -benefit postemployment healthcare plan (Retiree Health Plan) to provide medical insurance benefits to eligible retired employees and their spouses. The Plan does not issue a publicly available financial report. Medical coverage is provided through CaIPERS healthcare program. Employees who retire from the City and receive a CaIPERS pension are eligible for postemployment medical benefits. The City contributes the minimum amount provided under Government Code Section 22825 of the Public Employees Medical and Hospital Care Act. In general, retirees must contribute any premium amounts in excess of the City contribution. However, as described below, a closed group of active employees and retirees receive additional postemployment benefits. Employees hired prior to the dates shown in the following table are allowed to convert their accumulated sick leave into postemployment medical benefits at retirement as long as they have ten or more years of service with the City. Group Hired prior to: Executive Management July 1, 1994 Mid -Management July 1, 1994 Fire Mid -Management December 6, 1995 Police Mid -Management July 1, 1994 General Services July 1, 1995 IBEW July 1, 1995 66 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 Maintenance and Operators July 1, 1995 Dispatchers July 9, 1994 Police October 10, 1994 Fire December 6, 1995 The most widely elected options are the "Bank" option and the "Conversion" option. Under the "Bank" option, accumulated sick leave amounts are translated by specified formulas into a bank amount that is then used to pay postemployment healthcare premiums until the "Bank" is exhausted. Under the "Conversion" option, the accumulated sick leave hours are converted by specified formulas into a period of time during which the retiree will receive postemployment benefits. The number of hours is multiplied by 50% and converted to days. The City pays one month's premium for employee and dependents for each day after conversion. For each year of employment in excess of ten years, 2.5% is added to the 50% before conversion. The amount of premium paid will be the same as the premium paid by the City at the time of retirement. In the event that the premium increases, the retiree pays the difference. The City also allows a surviving dependent of a retiree to enroll in the Sick Leave Conversion program to purchase medical insurance at the employee only premium for the same period as if the retiree was still alive. Retirees are allowed to enroll in any of the available CaIPERS medical plans. The CaIPERS minimum amount will continue for the life of the retiree and surviving spouse. The "Conversion" benefit will continue until the end of a period that is based on accumulated sick leave at retirement. (b) Funding Policy Contribution requirements of the Retiree Health Plan are based on pay-as-you-go financing. For fiscal year 2014-15, the City contributed $699,748, or 54.83%, of the actuarially required contributions. (c) Annual OPEB Cost and Net OPEB Obligation The City's annual other postemployment benefits (OPEB) cost is calculated based on the annual required contribution (ARC), an amount actuarially determined in accordance with the parameters of GASB Statement No. 45. The ARC represents a level of funding that, if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal cost each year and to amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities (or funding excess) over a period not to exceed thirty years. 67 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 The following table shows the components of the City's annual OPEB cost for the year, the amount actually contributed to the plan, and changes in the City's net OPEB obligation: Annual required contribution Interest on net OPEB obligation Adjustment to annual required contribution Annual OPEB cost (expense) Contributions made Increase in net OPEB obligation Net OPEB obligation - beginning of year Net OPEB obligation - end of year $ 1,315,853 190,691 (230,343) 1,276,201 (699.748) 576,453 4,767,274 $ 5,343,727 The City's annual OPEB cost, the percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed to the plan, and the net OPEB obligation, are as follows: Percentage of Net Year Annual Annual OPEB OPEB ended OPEB Cost Cost Contributed Obligation 06/30/2013 $ 1,283,605 51.08% $ 4,249,526 06/30/2014 1,223,236 57.67% 4,767,274 06/30/2015 1,276,201 54.83% 5,343,727 68 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 (d) Funding Status and Funding Progress As of January 1, 2014, the most recent actuarial valuation date, the funded status of the Retiree Health Plan was as follows: Actuarial accrued liability (AAL) Actuarial value of plan assets Unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) $ 16,879,493 $ 16,879,493 Funded ratio (actuarial value of plan assets/AAL) 0% Annual covered payroll (active plan members) $ 5,697,043 UAAL as percentage of annual covered payroll 296% The schedule of funding progress, presented as RSI following the notes to the basic financial statements, presents multi-year trend information about whether the actuarial value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liability of benefits. (e) Actuarial Methods and Assumptions Actuarial valuations of an ongoing plan involve estimates of the value of reported amounts and assumptions about the probability of occurrence of events far into the future. Examples include assumptions about future employment, mortality, and the healthcare cost trend. Amounts determined regarding the funded status of the plan and the annual required contribution of the employer are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared with past expectations and new estimates are made about the future. Projections of benefits for financial purposes are based on the substantive plan (the plan as understood by the employer and plan members) and include types of benefits provided at the time of each valuation and the historical pattern of sharing benefit costs between the employer and the plan members to that point. The actuarial methods and the assumptions used include techniques that are designed to reduce short-term volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value of assets, consistent with the long-term perspective of the calculations. In the January 1, 2014 actuarial valuation, the entry age normal cost method was used. The actuarial assumptions included a 4% discount rate to calculate the present value of future benefit payments; a 2.75% inflation rate; an annual healthcare cost trend rate of 7.5% for calendar year 2015, increasing to 8.5% for calendar year 2015, then gradually decreasing to 4.5% for calendar year 2021 and beyond; the CaIPERS minimum benefit will increase 4% per year; a 3.00% annual rate of increase in payroll; assumed that 100% of future eligible retirees will elect to maintain their enrollment in a CaIPERS medical plan and qualify for the City's minimum contribution; 75% of future retirees will enroll a spouse; and also assumed that 100% of General Services, Maintenance and Operators and Dispatchers will elect the conversion option and 50% of Executive Management, Mid Management and Police will elect the option. The conversion option is not available to IBEW and Fire retirees. The unfunded 69 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 actuarial accrued liability is amortized as a level percentage of expected payroll over a closed thirty year period. As of June 30, 2015, the remaining amortization period is 24 years. (11) CLAIMS AND BENEFITS The City is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts; theft of, damage to and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; injuries to employees; and natural disasters. The City is self-insured as discussed in the following paragraphs for which liabilities are recorded in the Internal Service Fund -Insurance Fund. The City is self-insured for general liability up to the first $500,000 per occurrence with claims from $500,000 to $40,000,000 per occurrence and in the aggregate insured through the California Joint Powers Risk Management Authority. The City has not had any settlements that exceeded its general liability insurance coverage (See Note 13). The City is self-insured for workers' compensation up to the first $250,000 per claim. Any claims of $250,000 up to California statutory limits are covered under a purchased policy through the membership with the Local Agency Workers' Compensation Excess Joint Powers Authority with coverage up to $300,000,000 in the current year. The City has not had any settlements that exceeded its workers' compensation insurance coverage (See Note 13). The City is fully self-insured for dental and unemployment for its employees. General liability and workers' compensation claims are administered by an outside agency and all other claims are administered by the City. The City has accrued a liability of $8,305,887 at June 30, 2015, for all self-insured claims in the Internal Service Fund -Insurance Funds that includes an amount for incurred but not reported claims. The liability amount is based on the requirements of GASB Statement No. 62, which requires that a liability for claims be reported if information prior to the issuance of the financial statements indicates that it is probable that a liability has been incurred at the date of the financial statements and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. In the opinion of the City, the amounts accrued are adequate to cover claims incurred but not reported in addition to known claims. Changes in the self-insurance liability for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows: Beginning FY 13-14 $ 9,117,062 FY 14-15 9,021,759 Current -Year Claims and Changes in Estimates $ 1,050,613 634,932 70 Claim Payments Ending $ (1,145,916) $ 9,021,759 (1,350,804) 8,305,887 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 (12) PARTICIPATION IN JOINT VENTURES Northern California Power Agency The City, along with thirteen other public agencies, is a member of the Northern California Power Agency (NCPA) that was formed in 1968 as a joint powers agency. Its membership consists of eleven cities with publicly owned electric utility distribution systems, one irrigation district, one public utility district, one port authority and three other associate member entities. NCPA is generally empowered to purchase, generate, transmit, distribute and sell electrical energy. Members participate in the projects of NCPA on an elective basis. A commission comprising of one representative from each member organization governs NCPA. The commission is responsible for the general management of the affairs, property and business of NCPA. Under the direction of the general manager, the staff of NCPA is responsible for providing various administrative, operating and planning services for NCPA and its associated power corporations. Project Financing and Construction NCPA's project construction and development programs have been individually financed by project revenue bonds collateralized by NCPA's assignment of all payments, revenues and proceeds associated with its interest in each project. Each Project Participant has agreed to pay its proportionate share of debt service and other costs of the related project, notwithstanding the suspension, interruption, interference, reduction or curtailment of output from the project for any reason. Certain of the revenue bonds are additionally supported by municipal bond insurance credit enhancements. Increase in Non -defaulting Project Participant's Original Project Entitlement Percentage Upon the failure of any Project Participant to make any payment, which failure constitutes a default under the Member Agreement for the projects, and except as sales and transfers are made pursuant thereto, the Member Agreements provide that Project Entitlement for each non - defaulting Project Participant shall be automatically increased for the remaining term of the Member Agreement; pro rata with those of the non - defaulting Project Participant thereunder; provided, however, that the sum of such increase for any non -defaulting Project Participant shall not exceed, without written consent of such non -defaulting Project Participant, an accumulated maximum of 25% of the non -defaulting Project Participant's original Project Entitlement Percentage Share. General Operating Reserve with NCPA Members of NCPA established a general operating reserve in 1992 for the purposes of providing a vehicle to fund reasonably foreseeable contingent liabilities. It was set up primarily to provide the following advantages: minimizes the number and dollar amount of reserve that might otherwise be funded separately in connection with NCPA's individually financed operating plants, projects and programs; provides each member with flexibility and unilateral control over the determination of what they will fund, how they will fund it and what expenditures from the reserve will be made on their individual behalf. It provides funding for contingent liabilities that are not budgeted but that may require significant future expenditures. The reserve is segregated by participant and is refundable on demand by the participant. 71 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 As of June 30, 2015, the City's balance in the NCPA General Operating Reserve, which has been credited with annual interest earnings and settlements, is $6,956,797. Project Participation The NCPA members and their percentage share at June 30, 2015, which is the most recent available data, are as follows: NCPA MEMBERS Hydro Combustion Multiple Lodi Geothermal Electric Turbine Capital Transmission Energy Project Project Project #1 Facilities Project Center Alameda 16.8825% 10.00% 21.820% 19.00% 30.7802% Bay Area Rapid Transit 6.6000% Biggs 0.2270 0.197 0.3446 0.2679 Gridley 0.3360 0.350 0.6248 1.9643 Healdsburg 3.6740 1.66 5.833 6.6947 1.6428 Lodi 10.2800 10.37 13.393 39.50 20.6077 9.5000 Lompoc 3.6810 2.30 5.833 5.00 6.7101 2.0357 Palo Alto 22.92 Plumas-Sierra Rural Electric Coop 0.7010 1.69 1.817 1.3112 0.7857 Roseville 7.8830 12.00 36.50 13.0846 Santa Clara 44.3905 37.02 41.667 25.7500 Ukiah 5.6145 2.04 9.090 10.2315 1.7857 OTHER PARTICIPANTS Azusa 2.7857 California Department of Water Resources 33.5000 Modesto Irrigation District 10.7143 Power & Water Resources Pooling Agency 2.6679 Turlock Irrigation District 6.3305 9.6106 72 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 Bulk power purchased by the City through NCPA amounted to $38,512,404 during the year ended June 30, 2015 and is reflected in utilities expense in the Electric Enterprise Fund. NCPA Geothermal Project A purchase power agreement with NCPA obligates the City for a 10.28% share of the operating costs and debt service of two of NCPA's 110 - megawatt (MW) steam powered plants, Project Number 2 and Project Number 3. Outstanding long-term debt related to this project was approximately $38 million at June 30, 2015. In addition to federal geothermal leasehold, steam wells, gathering system and related facilities, the project consists of two electric generating stations (Plant 1 and Plant 2). Each plant has two 55MW turbine generator units utilizing low temperature geothermal steam; associated electrical, mechanical and control facilities; a heat dissipation system; a steam gathering system; a transmission tapline; and, other related facilities. Geothermal steam for the project is derived from the geothermal property, which includes wellpads, access roads, steam wells and reinjection wells. Calaveras Hydroelectric Project NCPA contracted to finance, manage, construct and operate Hydroelectric Project Number One for the licensed owner, Calaveras County Water District. In exchange, NCPA has the right to the electric output of the project for 50 years from February 1982. NCPA has also the option to purchase power from the project in excess of the District's requirements for the subsequent 50 years, subject to regulatory approval. Under a power purchase agreement the City is obligated to pay 10.37% of the debt service and operating costs. At June 30, 2015, approximately $383 million in long-term debt used to finance this project was outstanding. NCPA Combustion Turbine Proiect #1 The project consists of five combustion turbine units; each nominally rated at 25 MW. Two such units are located in Roseville, two in Alameda and one in Lodi. The project provides capacity during peak Toad periods and emergency capacity reserves. Excess capacity and energy from the project are also sold to other entities from time to time. Under the NCPA power agreement, the City is obligated to pay 13.393% of the debt service and operating costs. At June 30, 2015, there was no outstanding long-term debt related to this project. Capital Facilities Proiect The Project consists of one 49.9 MW natural gas-fired steam injected combustion turbine generator unit located in Lodi, California. Wastewater is reclaimed from the City of Lodi's White Slough water pollution control facility, processed to eliminate contaminants, and used in the turbine to produce steam for power enhancement and emissions control. 73 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 Under a power purchase agreement, the City is obligated to pay 39.5% of the debt service and operating costs. At June 30, 2015, approximately $45 million in Tong -term debt was outstanding. Transmission Project The project was undertaken to meet certain obligations of NCPA under the NCPA/PG & E Interconnection Agreement. The project includes an ownership interest in PG & E's 230kv Castle Rock to Lakeville Substation Transmission Line in Sonoma County, additional firm transmission rights in that Transmission Line, and a central scheduling and dispatch facility in service at the NCPA headquarters in Roseville, California. Under a power purchase agreement, the City is obligated to pay 20.6077% of the debt service and operating costs. At June 30, 2015, there was no outstanding long-term debt related to this project. Lodi Energy Center The Lodi Energy Center project is a 280 MW base load, combined cycle, natural gas-fired, combustion turbine generating station (one gas turbine and one steam turbine) built in Lodi on city property. Under a power purchase agreement, the City is obligated to pay 17.03% of the debt service and 9.5% of operating costs. At June 30, 2015, approximately $370 million in long-term debt was outstanding. The following are the most recent available audited condensed financial statements of NCPA: Condensed Statement of Net Position June 30, 2015 (in thousands) Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources and Net Assets and Deferred Outflows of Resources Position Current assets Restricted assets Electric plant, net Other assets Total assets Deferred outflows of resources Total assets and deferred outflows of resources 81,501 Long-term debt, net $ 816,936 204,769 Current liabilities 93,224 618,708 Non-current liabilities 199,980 249.659 Deferred inflows of resources 81,930 1,154,637 Net position 29.991 Total liabilities, deferred inflows of resources 67.424 and net position $ 1.222.061 1222061 74 Sales for resale CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 Condensed Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position Year ended June 30, 2015 (in thousands) $ 423,887 Operating expenses Other expenses Future recoverable costs Net revenues before refunds Refunds to participants Decrease in net position Net position, beginning of year Net position, end of year $ (378,672) (38,260) (2,292) 4,663 (6.905) (2,242) 32,233 29,991 Combined Statement of Cash Flow Year ended June 30, 2015 (in thousands) Net cash from operating activities $ Net from investing activities Net cash from capital and related financing activities Net cash from noncapital and related financing activities 61,496 (11,747) (74,875) (1,846) Decrease in cash and cash equivalents (26,972) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 130.151 Cash and cash equivalents end of year $ 103,179 At June 30, 2015, NCPA's total net outstanding long-term debt was $835,340,000 at an average interest rate of 5%. The current portion of long- term debt at June 30, 2015, was $35,615,000. Complete financial information for NCPA may be obtained at the following administration office Northern California Power Agency 180 Cirby Way Roseville, CA 95678 Transmission Agency of Northern California The Transmission Agency of Northern California (TANG) was organized under the California Government Code pursuant to a joint powers agreement entered into by fifteen Northern California utilities including the City of Lodi. The purpose of TANC is to provide electric transmission or other facilities for the use of its members through its authority to acquire, construct, finance, operate and maintain facilities for electric power transmission. The joint powers agreement provides that the costs of TANC's activities can be financed or recovered through assessment of its members or user charges through transmission contracts with its members. Each TANC member has agreed to pay a pro rata share of the 75 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 costs to operate TANC and has the right to participate in future project agreements. The joint powers agreement remains in effect until debt obligations and interest thereon have been paid, unless otherwise extended by the members. Increase in Non -defaulting Project Participant's Original Project Entitlement Percentage Upon the failure of any Project Participant to make any payment, which failure constitutes a default under the Member Agreement for the projects, and except as sales and transfers are made pursuant thereto, the Member Agreements provide that Project Entitlement for each non - defaulting Project Participant shall be automatically increased for the remaining term of the Member Agreement; pro rata with those of the non - defaulting Project Participant thereunder; provided, however, that the sum of such increase for any non -defaulting Project Participant shall not exceed, without written consent of such non -defaulting Project Participant, an accumulated maximum of 25% of the non -defaulting Project Participant's original Project Entitlement Percentage Share. California -Oregon Transmission Project The project is a 340 -mile long, 500 -kilovolt alternating current transmission project between Southern Oregon and Central California. The project is operated in coordination with the Pacific AC Intertie as a part of the California -Oregon Intertie (COI) within the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) region. The WECC approved rating of the COI is 4,800 MW. TANC, Western Area Power Authority (WAPA), and five other parties have agreed to an Interim Participation Agreement (IPA) under which each project participant is granted a percentage entitlement in project transfer capability and is required to pay a percentage of the costs. Pursuant to the IPA and a subsequent agreement with WAPA, and the purchase of entitlement, rights and title, and interest in the City of Vernon's share of the project transmission assets, TANC is entitled to use approximately 1,362 MW, and is obligated to pay an average of approximately 80 percent of the operating costs associated with the project. Under the TANC joint powers agreement, the City is obligated to pay 1.89% of its debt service and operating costs. At June 30, 2015, approximately $284 million in long-term debt was outstanding of which $32 million is considered current. Effective July 1, 2015, the City terminated its interest in the California -Oregon Transmission Project to other TANC members. As a result, the City will not incur any costs after this date related to this Project. Complete financial information for TANC may be obtained at the following administration office: Transmission Agency of Northern California 3100 Zinfandel Drive, Suite 600 Sacramento, CA 95670 76 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 (13) MEMBERSHIP IN INSURANCE POOLS California Joint Powers Risk Management Authority The City is a member, along with 16 other individual cities and 4 joint powers authorities, of California Joint Powers Risk Management Authority (CJPRMA) organized under a Joint Powers Agreement pursuant to the California Government Code for the purpose of sharing the risk of catastrophic general liability, automobile liability and public officials' errors and omissions losses. CJPRMA has a twenty-one member Board of Directors, including a director from the City of Lodi. The Board members elect officers of CJPRMA every two years. The ultimate cost of the program to the City depends on the catastrophic losses of all members, as well as the City's own loss experience and will be determined through an actuarial analysis of loss history during the ten-year period preceding the three years prior to the end of the current program year. The City periodically pays deposits to the CJPRMA. These deposits are recorded as expenses in the year paid, as they are a reasonable estimate of the actual cost of the program. During the year ended June 30, 2015, premiums of $93,834 were paid to CJPRMA for the liability program. The participants at June 30, 2015, are as follows: Alameda, Chico, Fairfield, Fremont, Livermore, Lodi, Northern California Cities Self Insurance Fund, Petaluma, Redding, Redwood Empire Municipal Insurance Fund, Richmond, Roseville, San Leandro, San Rafael, Santa Rosa, Small Cities Organized Risk Effort, Stockton, Sunnyvale, Vacaville, Vallejo, and Yolo County Public Agencies Risk Management Insurance Authority. Complete financial information for CJPRMA may be obtained at the following administration office: California Joint Powers Risk Management Authority 3252 Constitution Dr. Livermore, CA 94551 Local Agency Workers' Compensation Excess Joint Powers Authority The City, along with thirty-three other public agencies, is a member of the Local Agency Workers' Compensation Excess Joint Powers Authority (LAWCX), which was formed July 1992, for the purpose of sharing the risk of workers' compensation losses. LAWCX offers $150,000, $250,000, $350,000, $500,000 and $1 million self-insured retentions (SIR) or a member can attach directly to the purchased excess insurance. LAWCX covers the layer above the member SIR up to $5 million. The City of Lodi's self-insured retention is $250,000. LAWCX participates in the California State Association of Counties Excess Insurance Authority (CSAC-EIA) to obtain coverage up to statutory limits. The City paid $353,997 in premiums to LAWCX during the year ended June 30, 2015. The participants at June 30, 2015, are as follows: City of Alameda, Association of Bay Area Governments Shared Risk Pool (ABAG SHARP), Bay Cities Joint Powers Insurance Authority (BCJPIA), City of Benicia, Central Contra Costa County Transit Agency (CCCTA), California Housing 77 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 Workers' Compensation Authority (CHWCA), Central San Joaquin Valley Risk Management Authority (CSJVRMA), City of Clovis, City of Coronado, City of Encinitas, Fire Agencies Self Insurance System (FASIS), City of Gilroy, City of Livermore, City of Lodi, Town of Los Gatos, City of Merced, Monterey County Local Agencies Insurance Authority (MCLAIA), City of Morgan Hill, City of Newark, City of Placentia, City of Pleasanton, Public Agency Risk Sharing Authority of California (PARSAC), City of Roseville, Public Entity Risk Management Authority (PERMA), City of San Leandro, City of Santa Maria, City of Santee, Small Cities Organized Risk Effort (SCORE), City of South Lake Tahoe, City of Suisun City, City of Vacaville, City of Vallejo, Vector Control Joint Powers Agency (VCJPA) and City of Vista. Complete financial information for LAWCX may be obtained at the following administration office: Local Agency Workers' Compensation Excess Joint Powers Authority 1750 Creekside Oaks Drive, Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95833 California Transit Insurance Pool The City, along with thirty-three other public agencies is a member of the California Transit Insurance Pool (CaITIP), a joint powers insurance authority which was formed for the purpose of sharing the risk of property damage, bodily injury, personal injury and public officials errors and omissions losses for public transit systems. Liability protection coverage is provided under two programs: Program I applies to members who choose to utilize CaITIP's claims administrator services. Program II applies to members with self-insured retentions who choose to provide their own claims administrator services. CaITIP purchases excess insurance over its $1,000,000 retention up to $20 million per occurrence. Each member is provided with $4 million in excess of the pooled retention for a total of $5 million in coverage and has the option to choose one or both of two additional layers for the full $20 million. CaITIP also provides physical damage coverage to its members. This coverage program is optional for all members and offers damage or loss protection for transit, staff and maintenance vehicles to transit operators. CaITIP self -insures up to $100,000, under which members have the option of five levels of deductible ranging from $500 to $10,000 per vehicle. Claims are administered by the CaITIP's adjuster. The City paid $77,447 in premiums to CaITIP during the year ended June 30, 2015. There have been no reductions in insurance coverage from the prior year and there were no insurance settlements in excess of insurance coverage in any of the last three years. 78 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 City of Lodi Transit System Self - Insured Limit Physical Program Retention (In millions) Damage 1 Prefunded 20 Yes Complete financial information for CalTip may be obtained at the following administration office: California Transit Insurance Pool 1750 Creekside Oaks Drive, Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95833 (14) DEFICIT IN FUND EQUITY Internal Service Funds — Fleet Services Fund— A deficit in fund equity in the amount of $928,620 at June 30, 2015, is attributed to the net pension obligation set up in accordance with the requirements of GASB Statement No. 68. Net pension obligation as of June 30, 2015, was $926,452. Internal Service Funds - Benefits Fund — A deficit in fund equity in the amount of $3,712,939 at June 30, 2015, is attributed to the net OPEB obligation set up in accordance with the requirements of GASB Statement No. 45. Net OPEB obligation as of June 30, 2015, was $5,343,727. The City will continue to address annual funding to eliminate the deficit during the budget process. Electric Enterprise Fund — A deficit in fund equity in the amount of $5,023,048 at June 30, 2015, is attributed to the net pension obligation set up in accordance with the requirements of GASB No. 68. Net pension obligation as of June 30, 2015, was $9,512,447. (15) POLLUTION REMEDIATION OBLIGATION The City relies on groundwater for its drinking water and in the late 1980's, PCE and TCE pollution was discovered in several municipal water supply wells. Investigations conducted by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) in the early 1990's under the Well Investigation program revealed numerous areas where TCE was discharged, or where PCE from dry cleaning operations was discharged to the sewer system. In 1997, the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) and the City entered into a cooperative agreement whereby the City assumed a lead role in the cleanup and agreed to pursue legal action against potentially responsible parties (PRPs). The City's estimate of the pollution remediation obligation was $70 million. The City has settled with all the involved parties. The City received a draft cleanup and abatement order to investigate the discharges of waste, clean up the waste and abate the effects of the discharges of waste in conformance with the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) Resolution No. 92-49 Policies and Procedures 79 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 for Investigation and Cleanup and Abatement of Discharges Under the Water Code Section 13304 and with the RWQCB's Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River. The City then engaged the services of Treadwell and Rollo to advise the City on courses of action in the preparation of feasibility studies, remedial design, and remedial action plan to comply with the technical and reporting requirements of the SWRCB. The City's estimated total pollution remediation obligation as of June 30, 2015, is $18,592,106. This amount is an estimate and subject to changes resulting from price increases or reductions, technology, or changes in applicable laws or regulations. (16) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Litigation and claims — The City has fully resolved all the litigation arising out of its groundwater contamination. Settlement and rate revenues have amassed a $16 million dollar reserve which is expected to cover all costs through the next 10 years. Costs thereafter can be effectively managed with new rate revenues. As such, the City Attorney does not anticipate a material effect on the City's financial condition. The City owns a 1,000 acre wastewater treatment facility known as "White Slough" approximately 5 miles west of the contiguous city limit. Neighboring farming and dairy operations are in litigation over elevated nitrate levels in the area. Efforts to join the City in the litigation have been so far unsuccessful but are expected to continue. It is too early at this stage to estimate liability or damages if the City is joined in the action. However, the City Attorney does not currently expect the matter to have a material effect on the City's financial condition. All other actions against the City are under $75,000 or have no arguable cost and will therefore not have a material financial effect on the City. Water Purchase Agreement with Woodbridge Irrigation District — The City obtains its municipal water supply from wells located within the City, extracting water from the underground aquifer, which is replenished in part by flows of the Mokelumne River. To avoid being wholly dependent upon wells and the possible impacts of eventual overdraft of the groundwater supply, the City made a commitment in 2003 to purchase surface water supply from Woodbridge Irrigation District for 40 years beginning in 2003. The agreement provides for the purchase of 6,000 acre feet per year and the City pays the District $1.2 million annually. Effective January 1, 2010, the amount payable to the District shall be increased by two percent (2%) per year or by the change in the Consumer Price Index whichever is higher but shall not exceed five percent (5%). Arbitrage Earnings Rebate Liability — Arbitrage earnings are defined as income earned on the unexpended tax-exempt certificate proceeds in excess of that which would have been earned had the moneys been invested in securities with a yield of the effective rate of the certificates. Currently, arbitrage earnings must be rebated to the United States Treasury every five years. There is no cumulative arbitrage liability as of June 30, 2015, for any of the City's outstanding Certificates of Participation and Revenue Bonds. 80 CITY OF LODI Notes to Basic Financial Statements (continued) June 30, 2015 Construction and Other Significant Commitments — Commitments are existing arrangements to enter into future transactions or events, such construction contracts for ongoing projects and long-term contractual obligations with suppliers for future purchases at specified prices and sometimes specified quantities. Significant commitments as of June 30, 2015 are as follows: General Fund $ 26,219 Other governmental funds 3.527.744 Total $ 3,553,963 (17) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS In August 2015, the City obtained a loan in the amount of $1.5 million to finance the Electric Enterprise Fund's LED Street Light Retrofit project. Annual principal and interest payment is approximately $235,000 with final payment due December 1, 2022. The City has pledged future revenues from Greenhouse Gas Free Allowance proceeds, to repay the loan. In September 2015, the City obtained a loan in the amount of $468,000 to finance the purchase of a fire engine. Annual principal and interest payment is $99,172 with final payment due on December 1, 2020. The annual payments will be paid from Fire department appropriations. 81 REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION CITY OF LODI REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN NET PENSION LIABILITY AND RELATED RATIOS MISCELLANEOUS PLAN Measurement Period 2013-14 (1) Total Pension Liability Service Cost $ 2,478,901 Interest 11,705,179 Benefit Payments, Including Refunds of Employee Contributions (7,729.680) Net Change in Total Pension Liability 6,454,400 Total Pension Liability - Beginning 158.694.446 Total Pension Liability - Ending (a) 165.148.846 Plan Fiduciary Net Position Contributions - Employer 2,694,850 Contributions - Employee 1,237,916 Net Investment Income (2) 19,249,151 Benefit Payments, Including Refunds of Employee Contributions (7,729,680) Other Changes in Fiduciary Net Position Net Change in Fiduciary Net Position 15,452,237 Plan Fiduciary Net Position - Beginning 111,971,008 Plan Fiduciary Net Position - Ending (b) 127,423,245 Plan Net Pension Liability/(Asset) - Ending (a) - (b) $ 37,725,601 Plan Fiduciary Net Position as a Percentage of the Total Pension Liability 77.16% Covered -Employee Payroll $ 16,669,363 Plan Net Pension Liability/(Asset) as a Percentage of Covered -Employee Payroll 226.32% (1) Historical information is required only for measurement periods for which GASB 68 is applicable. (2) Net of administrative expenses. Notes to Schedule: Benefit Changes: The figures above do not include any liability impact that may have resulted from plan changes which occurred after June 30, 2013. This applies for voluntary benefit changes as well as any offers to Two Years Additional Service Credits (a.k.a. Golden Handshakes). Changes of Assumptions: There were no changes in assumptions. 82 CITY OF LODI REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN NET PENSION LIABILITY AND RELATED RATIOS SAFETY PLAN Measurement Period 2013-14 (1) Total Pension Liability Service Cost $ 3,048,048 Interest 11,390,793 Benefit Payments, Including Refunds of Employee Contributions (7,448,361) Net Change in Total Pension Liability 6,990,480 Total Pension Liability - Beginning 154.077.401 Total Pension Liability - Ending (a) 161.067.881 Plan Fiduciary Net Position Contributions - Employer Contributions - Employee Net Investment Income (2) Benefit Payments, Including Refunds of Employee Contributions Other Changes in Fiduciary Net Position Net Change in Fiduciary Net Position Plan Fiduciary Net Position - Beginning Plan Fiduciary Net Position - Ending (b) Plan Net Pension Liability/(Asset) - Ending (a) - (b) 4,106,044 1,058,376 16,070,261 (7,448,361) 13,786,320 93,345.381 107,131, 701 $ 53,936,180 Plan Fiduciary Net Position as a Percentage of the Total Pension Liability 66.51% Covered -Employee Payroll $ 11,194,123 Plan Net Pension Liability/(Asset) as a Percentage of Covered -Employee Payroll 481.83% (1) Historical information is required only for measurement periods for which GASB 68 is applicable. (2) Net of administrative expenses. Notes to Schedule: Benefit Changes: The figures above do not include any liability impact that may have resulted from plan changes which occurred after June 30, 2013. This applies for voluntary benefit changes as well as any offers to Two Years Additional Service Credits (a.k.a. Golden Handshakes). Changes of Assumptions: There were no changes in assumptions. 83 CITY OF LODI REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SCHEDULE OF CONTRIBUTIONS 2013-14 2014-15 Miscellaneous Plan: Actuarially Determined Contributions $ 2,694,850 $ 3,252,760 Contributions in Relation to the Actuarially Determined Contributions (2,694,850) (3,252,760) Contribution Deficiency $ - $ - Covered -Employee Payroll $ 16,669,363 $ 15,904,486 Contributions as a Percentage of Covered -Employee Payroll 16.17% 20.45% Safety Plan: Actuarially Determined Contributions $ 4,106,044 $ 3,995,128 Contributions in Relation to the Actuarially Determined Contributions (4.106.044) (3.995,128) Contribution Deficiency $ $ - Covered -Employee Payroll Contributions as a Percentage of Covered -Employee Payroll Notes to Schedule: $ 11,194,123 $ 11,569,013 36.68% 34.53% The actuarial methods and assumptions used to set the actuarially determined contributions for Fiscal Year 2013- 14 were from the June 30, 2011 public agency valuations. Actuarial Cost Method Entry Age Normal Amortization Method/Period For details, see June 30, 2011 Funding Valuation Report Asset Valuation Method Actuarial Value of Assets. For details, see June 30, 2011 Funding Valuation Report. Inflation 2.75% Salary Increases Varies by Entry Age and Service Payroll Growth 3 00% Investment Rate of Return 7.50% Net of Pension Plan Investment and Administrative Expenses; includes Inflation. Retirement Age The probabilities of Retirement are based on the 2010 CaIPERS Experience Study for the period from 1997 to 2007. Mortality The probabilities of mortality are based on the 2010 CaIPERS Experience Study for the period from 1997 to 2007. Pre -retirement and Post-retirement mortality rates include 5 years of projected mortality improvement using Scale AA published by the Society of Actuaries. 84 City of Lodi Required Supplementary Information Schedule of Funding Progress — OPEB Plan June 30, 2015 (in thousands of dollars) Entry Age Actuarial Normal Annual UAAL As a Actuarial Value Accrued Unfunded Funded Covered Percentage of Valuation of Assets Liability Liability Ratio Payroll Covered Payroll Date (A) (B) [(B) - (A)] [(A) / (B)] (C) {[(B) — (A)]/(C)} 1/1/10 $ 0 $ 17,710 $ 17,710 0% $ 9,410 188% 1/1/12 0 17,011 17,011 0% 7,305 233% 1/1/14 0 16,879 16,879 0% 5,697 296% 85 CITY OF LODI SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL GENERAL FUND Year ended June 30, 2015 Budget Variance with Original Final Actual Final Budget REVENUES Taxes $ 23,912,910 24,162,910 24,630,745 $ 467,835 Licenses and permits 80,800 80,800 87,908 7,108 Intergovernmental revenues 11,214,240 11,282,315 12,642,107 1,359,792 Charges for services 1,217,410 1,317,410 1,482,448 165,038 Fines, forfeits and penalties 1,478,400 1,478,400 1,573,071 94,671 Investment and rental income 1,533,100 1,533,100 1,546,845 13,745 Miscellaneous revenue 220.800 220.800 290.951 70.151 Total revenues 39.657,660 40.075 735 42.254.075 2.178.340 EXPENDITURES Current: General govemment: City Manager 902,700 914,008 883,079 30,929 City Clerk and Council 626,320 615,520 522,168 93,352 City Attorney 490,810 497,325 396,514 100,811 Human Resources 419,590 456,700 437,832 18,868 Information Systems 1,017,670 968,940 884,000 84,940 Financial Services 1,647,090 1,664,670 1,613,592 51,078 Budget and Treasury 283,360 283,500 271.153 12,347 Non Departmental 1,456,090 1,504,890 1,482,569 22,321 Total general govemment 6,843,630 6,905,553 6,490,907 414,646 Public protection: Police 17,130,800 16, 638,578 16,477,012 161,566 Fire 9,867.280 10.058.003 9,911,160 146,843 Total public protection 26,996.080 26.696.581 26.388.172 308,409 Public Works 1,936.540 2 065 051 1 882.250 182.801 Library Total expenditures EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES 1.341,950 1.353.593 1.311 367 42.226 37.120,200 37.020.778 36.072.696 948.082 2.537.460 3.054.957 6.181.379 3,126,422 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Transfers in 3,940,357 3,952,000 3,952,000 Transfers out (6,314,877) (7,131,623) (7,128,586) 3,037 Total other financing sources (uses) (2,374,520) (3,179,623) (3,176,586) 3,037 CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE 162,940 (124,666) 3,004,793 3,129,459 FUND BALANCE , beginning of year 7,641,322 7,641,322 9,473,760 1,832,438 FUND BALANCE, end of year $ 7.804.262 7.516.656 12,478,553 $ 4,961,897 The note to the required supplementary information is an integral part of this schedule. 86 CITY OF LODI Note to the Required Supplementary Information June 30, 2015 Budgetary Data The City adopts an annual budget for the general and special revenue funds. These budgets are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. As part of the City's internal controls, the City maintains budgetary controls. The objective of these budgetary controls is to ensure compliance with the legal provisions embodied in the annual appropriated budget approved by the City Council. The accompanying financial statements present budget and actual data only of funds for which an annual budget was adopted. The budgets for capital projects are primarily "long-term" budgets that emphasize the major programs and capital project plans extending over a number of years. Due to the long-term nature of these projects, "annual" budget and actual comparisons are not considered meaningful. Formal budgetary integration is not employed for debt service funds since effective budgetary control is alternatively achieved through the bond indenture provisions. Accordingly, no budgetary information is included in the accompanying basic financial statements for capital projects and debt service funds. The City Council follows the following procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in the accompanying basic financial statements: Original Budget On or prior to the first regular Council meeting in June of each year, the City Manager submits to the City Council a proposed Financial Plan and Budget for the fiscal year commencing July 1. The budget includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing them. Budgeted revenues are adopted by the City Council at the time the budget is approved. Budgeted revenues are modified when the tax base changes, when fees are modified or when new revenue sources are identified. Public hearings are conducted during meetings of the City Council to obtain citizens' comments. Prior to July 1, the budget is legally enacted through passage of a resolution. Final Budget The final budgetary data presented in the basic financial statements reflects the following changes to the original budget: ■ Budgeted expenditures represent original appropriations adjusted by budget transfers and appropriation amendments. The legal level of budgetary control (that is, the level at which expenditures can not legally exceed the appropriated 87 amount) is at the department level. The operating budget is prepared and controlled at the department level (e.g., city clerk, city manager, etc.) for the General Fund. Special revenue fund expenditures, including transfers out, are approved by Council at the fund level. • The City Manager may transfer appropriations from one activity to another within a department without approval from the City Council. All other appropriation adjustments during the year, whether transfers, increases or decreases, require City Council approval. COMBINING AND INDIVIDUAL FUND STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Nonmajor Governmental Funds include. Special Revenue Funds account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are restricted by law or administrative action to expenditures for specified purposes, other than those for major capital projects; Debt Service Fund account for the accumulation of resources for the repayment of principal and interest on general long-term debt; Capital Project Funds account for the financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities, other than those financed by proprietary funds. CITY OF LODI COMBINING BALANCE SHEET NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS June 30, 2015 Special Capital Revenue Projects Total ASSETS Cash and investments $ 4,590,818 10,073,391 $ 14,664,209 Receivables: Accounts, net 660,894 54,420 715,314 Interest 2,510 5,085 7,595 Due from other funds 93,114 93,114 Due from other governmental agencies 348,979 348,979 Inventory 1,291 1,291 Total assets $ 5,697,606 10,132,896 $ 15,830,502 LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES, AND FUND BALANCES Liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ 253,085 1,785,160 $ 2,038,245 Due to other funds 93.114 93,114 Advances from other funds 1,550,454 1.550.454 Unearned revenue 146,174 146,174 Total liabilities 492.373 3.335.614 3.827.987 Deferred Inflows of Resources: Unavailable revenue 44.707 44.707 Fund Balances: Nonspendable: Inventory 1,291 1,291 Restricted for: Road -related projects 3,207,124 3,207,124 Capital projects 6,797,282 6,797,282 Public safety 249,258 249,258 Community development 1,474,880 1,474,880 Parks, recreation and community services 227,973 227,973 Total fund balances 5.160.526 6.797.282 11,957,808 Total liabilities, deferred inflows of resources, and fund balances 90 $ 5,697,606 10,132,896 $ 15.830.502 CITY OF LODI COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Year ended June 30, 2015 Special Debt Capital Revenue Service Proiects Total Revenues: Licenses and permits $ 879,225 $ 879,225 Intergovernmental revenues 4,914,450 4,914,450 Charges for services 2,282,934 62,068 2,345,002 Investment and rental income 446,806 35,165 481,971 Miscellaneous revenue 301.617 227.669 529.286 Total revenues 8.825.032 324.902 9,149,934 Expenditures: Current: General government Public protection Public works Community development Parks and recreation Capital outlay Debt service: Interest and fiscal charges Total expenditures Deficiency of revenues under expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) 2,660,048 257,888 2,625,771 1,226,307 2,145,084 3,540,613 6,301,012 2,660,048 257,888 2,625,771 1,226,307 2,145, 084 9,841,625 844,812 844.812 12,455,711 844,812 (3.630.679) (844.812) 4,301,203 (781,876) 844,812 3.519.327 844.812 6.301.012 19.601.535 (5,976,110) (10,451,601) 6,501,361 (125.300) 11,647,376 (907,176) 6.376,061 10,740,200 Changes in fund balances (111,352) 399,951 288,599 Fund balances, beginning of year 5,271,878 6.397.331 11,669.209 Fund balances, end of year $ 5,160,526 6,797,282 $ 11.957,808 91 NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Parks, Recreation and Community Services This fund was established to account for the revenues and expenditures related to the activities of the Hutchins Street Square and Performing Arts Theater and the wide -range of parks and recreation activities and programs offered to the public Public Safety This fund was established to account for the revenues and expenditures related to the City's share of property forfeited by persons convicted of possession and selling illegal drugs and the State of California auto theft prosecution monies along with State and Federal grants related to public safety operations. Community Development This fund was established to account for development planning and project review services including land use entitlements, permit processing and review/inspection of public improvements to ensure orderly physical growth and development of the City. Streets Fund This fund was established to account for the following Gas Tax To account for revenues and expenditures apportioned to the City under the Streets and Highway Code. Portions of the tax rate levied by the State of California on all gasoline purchases are allocated to cities throughout the State on a population basis. These funds are restricted for expenditure by the State of California for street related purposes only. Development Impact Mitigation Fees To account for impact fees charged to provide for the building of various storm drains and street improvements needed to serve new development. The fees are calculated on a per acre basis and are collected at subdivision final map approval or with building permit stage effective November 4, 1991. Measure K Sales Tax To account for revenues and expenditures apportioned to the City for sales tax collections under Measure K. Expenditures for administration, maintenance and construction must be for street -related projects. 92 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) To account for revenues from the federal highway administration for programs including surface transportation program (STP) for streets and roads, congestion mitigation and air quality program (CMAQ) and hazard elimination safety (HES) for street lighting projects. Transportation This fund was established to account for the receipt of moneys from the State of California apportioned to the City for transportation purposes. The State has designated 1/4% of the 6% sales tax levied statewide for local transportation purposes. Funding for this program was provided during the 1971 legislative session with the enactment of the Transportation Development Act, which extended the 6% sales tax to include purchases of gasoline. Revenues allocated to the City of Lodi under this program are divided into two categories: Article 8 funds, which are restricted for the improvement and maintenance of street systems; and Article 4 funds, which are restricted for public transit systems. HOME Program and Community Development Block Grants This fund was established to account for the City's HOME Program that provides adequate and affordable housing for low and very low-income residents, and Community Development Block Grants provided to the City principally for low and moderate income residents to develop a suitable living environment and expand economic opportunities. 93 CITY OF LODI COMBINING BALANCE SHEET NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS - SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS June 30, 2015 Parks, HOME Program and Recreation and Community Community Public Community Development Services Safety :LeLpL_ent_Streets Transportation Block Grants Total ASSETS Cash and Investments $ 230,683 280,994 1,501,484 2,577,657 $ 4,590,818 Receivables: Accounts, net 47,023 1,927 3,247 564,586 44,111 660,894 Interest 144 230 950 1,166 20 2,510 Due from other funds 93,114 93,114 Due from other govemmental agencies 81,538 47,067 220,374 348,979 Inventory 1,291 1,291 TOTAL ASSETS $ 279,141 364,689 1,505,681 3,283,590 44.111 220,394 $ 5,697,606 LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES, AND FUND BALANCES LIABILITIES Accounts payable and other liabilities $ 49,877 259 30,801 91,278 19 80,851 $ 253,085 Due to other funds 29,519 63,595 93,114 Uneamd revenue 115,172 31,002 146,174 TOTAL LIABILITIES 49,877 115,431 30,801 91.278 29,538 175,448 492.373 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Unavailable revenue 44,707 44,707 FUND BALANCES Nonspendable Inventory 1,291 1,291 Restricted for: Road -related projects 3,192,312 14,573 239 3,207,124 Public safety 249,258 249,258 Community development 1,474,8$0 1,474,880 Parks, recreation and community services 227,973 227,973 TOTAL FUND BALANCES 229,264 249,258 14 74.880 3,192,312 14.573 239 5,160,526 TOTAL LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES, AND FUND BALANCES $ 279.141 364,689 1.505.681 3.283.590 44,111 220,394 $ 5.697.606 94 REVENUES Licenses and permits Intergovernmental revenues Charges for services Investment and rental income Miscellaneous revenue Total revenues EXPENDITURES Current General government Public protection Public works Community development Parks and recreation Capital outlay Total expenditures EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES CITY OF LODI COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS - SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Year ended June 30, 2015 Parks, Recreation and Community Public Community Services Safety Development Streets HOME Program and Community Development Transportation Block Grants Total $ 879,225 $ 879,225 263,620 4,121,950 43,991 484,889 4,914,450 1,662,690 498,490 121,754 2,282, 934 431,250 1,590 6,825 7.141 446,806 10,498 2,589 84,954 203,576 301,617 2,104,438 267,799 1,469,494 4,454,421 43.991 484.889 8,825,032 2,660,048 2,145,084 4.805.132 2,660,048 257,888 257,888 2,141,013 484,758 2,625,771 1,226, 307 1,226,307 2,145,084 3,511,195 29,418 3,540,613 257,888 1226.307 5,652,208 29 418 484 758 12,455,711 (2.700.694) 9 911 243,187 (1,197.787) 14.573 131 (3,630,679) OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Transfers in 3,583,243 126,160 591,800 4,301,203 Transfers out (558,500) (31,866) (2,510) (189,000) (781,876) Total other financing sources (uses) 3,024,743 (31,866) 123,650 402,800 3,519,327 CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES 324,049 (21,955) 366,837 (794,987) 14,573 131 (111,352) FUND BALANCES (DEFICIT), beginning of year (94 785) 271.213 1 108.043 3.987.299 108 5.271.878 FUND BALANCES , end of year $ 229.264 249.256 1474.880 3.192.312 14.573 239 $ 5.160.526 95 CITY OF LODI SCHEDULE OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BUDGET AND ACTUAL NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS - SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Year ended June 30, 2015 PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES FINAL BUDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE REVENUES Charges for services $ 1,860,360 1,662,690 $ (197,670) Investment and rental income 430,000 431,250 1,250 Miscellaneous revenue 47,500 10,498 (37,002) Total Revenue 2337,860 2,104,438 (233,422) EXPENDITURES Current General government Parks and recreation Total Expenditures DEFICIENCY OF REVENUES UNDER EXPENDITURES OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE 3,046,630 2.213.710 5.260.340 (2.922.480) 2,660,048 386,582 2.145.084 68,626 4.805.132 455,208 (2.700.694) 221.786 3,583,243 3,583,243 (558.500) (558,500) 3.024.743 3.024.743 102,263 324,049 221,786 FUND DEFICIT, BEGINNING OF YEAR (94.785) (94.785) FUND BALANCE, END OF YEAR $ 7,478 229,264 $ 221,786 96 CITY OF LODI SCHEDULE OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BUDGET AND ACTUAL NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS - SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Year ended June 30, 2015 PUBLIC SAFETY FINAL BUDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE REVENUES Intergovernmental revenues $ 695,966 263,620 $ (432,346) Investment and rental income 770 1,590 820 Miscellaneous revenue 2.589 2,589 Total Revenue 696,736 267.799 (428,937) EXPENDITURES Current Public protection EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES OTHER FINANCING USES Transfers out CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FUND BALANCE, BEGINNING OF YEAR FUND BALANCE, END OF YEAR 97 691,434 5.302 257,888 433,546 9,911 4,609 (31.866) (31,866) (26,564) (21,955) 4,609 271.213 271.213 $ 244,649 249,258 $ 4,609 CITY OF LODI SCHEDULE OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BUDGET AND ACTUAL NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS - SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Year ended June 30, 2015 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINAL BUDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE REVENUES Licenses and permits $ 628,040 879,225 $ 251,185 Charges for services 359,000 498,490 139,490 Investment and rental income 3,400 6,825 3,425 Miscellaneous revenue 120,460 84,954 (35.506) Total Revenue 1,110,900 1,469,494 358,594 EXPENDITURES Current Community development EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FUND BALANCE, BEGINNING OF YEAR FUND BALANCE, END OF YEAR 98 1,262.090 (151.190) 1.226.307 35.703 243.187 394.377 126,160 126,160 (2.510) (2,510) 123,650 123,650 (27,540) 366,837 394.377 1,108,043 1,108,043 1,080,503 1,474,880 $ 394,377 CITY OF LODI SCHEDULE OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BUDGET AND ACTUAL NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS - SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Year ended June 30, 2015 REVENUES Intergovernmental revenues Charges for services Investment and rental income Miscellaneous revenue Total Revenue EXPENDITURES Current Public works Capital outlay Total Expenditures DEFICIENCY OF REVENUES UNDER EXPENDITURES OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FUND BALANCE, BEGINNING OF YEAR FUND BALANCE, END OF YEAR 99 $ STREETS FINAL BUDGET Actual 4,509,993 289,490 14,140 30,000 4,121,950 $ 121,754 7,141 203,576 4,843,623 4,454,421 2,128,207 4,113,825 6.242.032 (1,398,409) 591,800 (189,000) 402,800 (995,609) 3,987,299 $ 2.991.690 2,141,013 3,511,195 5.652.208 (1,197,787) 591,800 (189,000) 402,800 (794,987) 3,987,299 Variance with Final Budget (388,043) (167,736) (6,999) 173,576 (389,202) (12,806) 602,630 589,824 200,622 200,622 3,192,312 $ 200.622 CITY OF LODI SCHEDULE OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BUDGET AND ACTUAL NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS - SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Year ended June 30, 2015 TRANSPORTATION FINAL BUDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE REVENUES Intergovernmental revenues $ 43,991 43,991 $ EXPENDITURES Capital outlay 43,991 29,418 14,573 CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE 14,573 14,573 FUND BALANCE, BEGINNING OF YEAR FUND BALANCE, END OF YEAR $ 14,573 $ 14,573 100 CITY OF LODI SCHEDULE OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BUDGET AND ACTUAL NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS - SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Year ended June 30, 2015 REVENUES Intergovernmental revenues EXPENDITURES Current Public works CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FUND BALANCE, BEGINNING OF YEAR HOME PROGRAM and COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS FINAL BUDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE $ 916,415 484,889 $ (431,526) 916,415 484,758 431,657 131 131 108 FUND BALANCE, END OF YEAR $ 239 $ 131 101 NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS Vehicle and Equipment This fund was established to account for the financing and replacement of vehicles and equipment for all funds of the City with the exception of the Enterprise Funds. Financing is primarily provided through transfers from other funds, interest earnings and sales of surplus property. Library This fund is used to account for the acquisition, construction and installation of capital facilities for the Library. Hutchins Street Square When the old Lodi High School burned down, the City purchased the property and renamed it Hutchins Street Square. The Old Lodi High Site Foundation was established which organizes events to raise money for the capital restoration of Hutchins Street Square. Capital Outlay Reserve This fund was established to account for the entire City's construction projects and capital purchases in excess of $10,000 with the exception of those funded through Enterprise Funds. Financing is provided primarily through transfers from other funds and from State and Federal grants. Parks Capital This fund was established to account for the acquisition, construction and installation of capital facilities for the various city parks. 102 ASSETS Cash and investments Receivables: Accounts, net Interest TOTAL ASSETS CITY OF LODI COMBINING BALANCE SHEET NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS - CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS June 30, 2015 Capital Vehicle and Hutchins Outlay Parks Equipment Street Square Reserve Capital $ 2,033,605 Total 3,276 6,803,352 1,233,158 $ 10,073,391 1,803 52,617 54,420 $ 2,035,408 4,305 780 5,085 3,276 6,860,274 1,233,938 $ 10,132,896 LIABILITIES Accounts payable and other liabilities $ 101,918 1,669,842 13,400 $ 1,785,160 Advances from other funds 1.229.025 321,429 1.550.454 TOTAL LIABILITIES 101,918 2,898,867 334,829 3,335,614 FUND BALANCES Restricted for: Capital projects 1,933,490 3,276 3,961,407 899,109 6,797,282 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES $ 2,035,408 3,276 6,860,274 1,233,938 $ 10,132,896 103 REVENUES Charges for services Investment and rental income Miscellaneous revenue Total revenues EXPENDITURES Capital outlay CITY OF LODI COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS - CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS Year ended June 30, 2015 Vehicle and Equipment Library Hutchins Capital Street Outlay Parks Sauare Reserve Capital 58,068 4,000 $ 5 29,936 5,224 30,383 1,090 196,196 30,383 1,095 88,004 205,420 699.410 28.890 5,489.371 83.341 EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUE OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (669.027) (28.890) 1,095 (5.401.367) 122.079 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FUND BALANCES , BEGINNING OF YEAR FUND BALANCES, END OF YEAR 913,747 (125.3001 788.447 Total 62,068 35,165 227,669 324,902 6,301.012 (5.976.110) 5,425,514 162,100 6,501,361 (125.300) 5.425, 514 162,100 6376.061 119,420 (28,890) 1,095 24,147 284,179 399,951 1.814.070 28.890 2.181 3,937.260 614,930 6.397.331 $ 1,933,490 3.276 3.961.407 899,109 $ 6.797,282 (This page intentionally left blank.) INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Internal Service Funds are maintained to account for the internal transfer of services between operating units of the City and to achieve a level of operating efficiency that may not be available if the same activities were performed by multiple organizations. Fleet Services This fund is used to account for the operation, maintenance and timely replacement of the City's fleet of vehicles which serve the transportation needs of all city departments. Benefits This fund is used to account for the following employee benefits: Dental Employee assistance program Chiropractic Employee recognition program Life/accidental insurance Unemployment insurance Medical Flexible spending program Vision Long Term Disability Insurance This fund is used to account for the following insurances: General Liability Workers' Compensation Other Insurance 106 CITY OF LODI COMBINING STATEMENT OF FUND NET POSITION INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS June 30, 2015 Fleet Services Benefits Insurance Total ASSETS Current assets: Cash and investments $ 76,483 1,681,977 12,382,662 $ 14,141,122 Receivables: Interest 49 1,064 7,809 8,922 Inventory 169,932 169,932 Noncurrent assets: Capital assets (net) 27,498 27,498 Total assets 273,962 1,683,041 12,390,471 14,347,474 DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES Related to pensions 74.359 74.359 LIABILITIES Current liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 54,105 52,253 31,150 137,508 Self-insurance liability 634,932 634,932 Accrued compensated absences 31,195 31,195 Noncurrent liabilities: Net pension liability 926,452 926,452 Self-insurance liability 7,670,955 7,670,955 Accrued compensated absences 48,639 48,639 Net OPEB obligation 5.343,727 5,343,727 Total liabilities 1,060,391 5,395,980 8,337,037 14,793,408 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Related to pensions NET POSITION Net investment in capital assets Unrestricted (deficit) Total net position 216,550 216,550 27,498 27,498 (956,118) (3,712,939) 4,053,434 (615,623) $ (928,620) (3,712,939) 4,053,434 $ (588,125) 107 CITY OF LODI COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN FUND NET POSITION INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Year ended June 30, 2015 Fleet Services Benefits Insurance Total OPERATING REVENUES Charges forservices $ 1.636.786 7.763.238 2,610,905 $ 12,010,929 OPERATING EXPENSES Personnel services 672,956 229,630 137,099 1,039,685 Supplies, materials and services 855,697 6,013,643 1,036,880 7,906,220 Utilities 17,194 649 17,843 Depreciation 1,444 1,444 Claims 17,280 1,700,602 634,932 2,352,814 1,564,571 7 943.875 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 1.809.560 11.318, 006 OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) 72,215 (180.637) 801,345 692.923 NONOPERATING REVENUES Investment income Other revenues TOTAL NONOPERATING REVENUES LOSS (INCOME) BEFORE TRANSFERS 196 2 294 2.490 6,568 51,986 58,750 29.397 50,948 82,639 35.965 102,934 141,389 74,705 (144,672) 904,279 834,312 Transfers out (50,000) (50.000) Changes in net position 74:705 (144.672) 854.279 784,312 NET ASSETS - BEGINNING OF YEAR, as previously reported 77,913 (3,568,267) 3,199,155 (291,199) Change in accounting principles (1,081,238) (1.081.238) NET POSITION - BEGINNING OF YEAR, as restated (1.003.325) (3.568.267) 3.199.155 (1,372,437) NET POSITION - END OF YEAR $ (928,620) (3,712,939) 4,053.434 $ (588,125) 108 CITY OF LODI COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Year ended June 30, 2015 Cash flows from operating activities: Receipts from customers and users Receipts from interfund services provided Cash paid to suppliers for goods and services Payments to employees Net cash provided by operating activities Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Transfers out Cash flows from investing activities: Interest on investments Net increase in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities Operating Income (loss) $ Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation Other revenues Change in assets and liabilities: Increase in inventory Decrease in other assets Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities Decrease in compensated absences Decrease in self-insurance liability Increase in net OPEB obligation Decrease in net pension liability and related amounts Net cash provided by operating activities $ 109 Fleet Services $ 2,394 1,636,786 (934,295) (700,921) 3,964 147 4,111 72,372 76,483 72,215 1,444 2,294 (31,146) 100 (12,978) (15,370) (12,595) Benefits 29,397 7,763,238 (7,136,209) (229,630) 426,796 5.828 432,624 1,249,353 1.681.977 (180,637) 29,397 1,583 576,453 Insurance Total 50,948 $ 82,739 2,610,905 12,010,929 (2,392,634) (10,463,138) (137,099) (1,067,650) 132,120 562,880 (50, 000) 47.344 129,464 (50, 000) 53.319 566,199 12.253.198 13, 574, 923 12.382.662 $ 14,141,122 801,345 $ 692,923 50,948 (4,301) (715,872) 1,444 82,639 (31,146) 100 (15,696) (15,370) (715,872) 576,453 (12, 595) 3,964 426,796 132,120 $ 562,880 FIDUCIARY FUNDS Private -purpose Trust Funds These funds are used to account for trust agreements under which the principal and income benefit individuals, private organizations or other governments. Agency Fund This fund was established to account for special assessments collected on the property tax roll by the City on behalf of the property owners within the Industrial Way Beckman Districts and the Downtown and Cherokee Lane Districts. ASSETS Cash and Investments CITY OF LODI COMBINING STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET POSITION PRIVATE -PURPOSE TRUST FUNDS June 30, 2015 Library Hutchins Street Square Bequest Total $ 237.383 1.522 $ 238.905 NET POSITION -EXPENDABLE $ 237.383 1,522 $ 238,905 110 CITY OF LODI COMBINING STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FIDUCIARY NET POSITION PRIVATE -PURPOSE TRUST FUNDS Year ended June 30, 2015 Library Hutchins Street Square Bequest Total ADDITIONS Investment income and donations $ 6 $ 6 DEDUCTIONS Current Library 33.812 33.812 CHANGES IN NET POSITION NET POSITION, BEGINNING OF YEAR NET POSITION, END OF YEAR (33,812) 271,195 6 1.516 (33,806) 272.711 237.383 1.522 $ 238,905 111 CITY OF LODI STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES AGENCY FUND Year ended June 30, 2015 Special Assessments Balance Balance July 1, 2014 Additions Deductions June 30, 2015 ASSETS Cash and investments $ 425,592 35,437 32,056 $ 428,973 Interest receivable 113 277 113 277 TOTAL ASSETS $ 425,705 35,714 32,169 $ 429,250 LIABILITIES Agency obligations $ 425,705 112 3,545 $ 429,250 (This page intentionally left blank.) STATISTICAL SECTION UNAUDITED STATISTICAL SECTION The Statistical Section provides detailed information as a framework for understanding the information in the financial statements, notes and required supplementary information. This section presents additional data and analysis that may provide the reader with valuable insight regarding the demographics and the overall health of the City. Contents Pages Financial Trends These schedules contain trend information to help the reader understand how the City's financial performance and well-being has changed over time. Revenue Capacity These schedules contain information to help the reader assess the factors affecting the City's most significant local revenue source, the property tax. Debt Capacity These schedules present information to help the reader assess the affordability of the City's current levels of outstanding debt and the City's ability to issue additional debt in the future. Demographic and Economic Information These schedules offer demographic and economic indicators to help the reader understand the environment within which the City's financial activities take place and to help make comparisons over time and with other governments. Operating Information These schedules contain information about the City's operations and resources to help the reader understand how the City's financial information relates to the services the city provides and the activities it performs. Sources Unless otherwise noted, the information in these schedules are derived from the comprehensive annual financial report for the current year. 114 115-120 121-126 127-133 134-136 137-141 CITY OF LODI NET POSITION BY COMPONENT LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Dollar amounts in thousands) Fiscal Year 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Govemmental activities: Net investment in capital assets $ 105,944 $ 105,462 $ 106,828 $ 107,587 $ 114,165 $ 113,308 $ 115,036 $ 107,874 $ 110,815 $ 111,572 Restricted 12,001 11,809 12,601 16,176 14,894 13,233 13,492 15,043 15,044 14,526 Unrestricted (74,146) 2,551 1,157 (3,606) (5,148) (6,110) (3,462) (4,162) (3,968) (8,838) Total governmental activities net position $ 43,799 $ 119,822 $ 120,586 $ 120,157 $ 123,911 $ 120,431 $ 125,066 $ 118,755 $ 121,891 $ 117,260 Business -type activities: Net investment in capital assets $ 119,924 $ 116,156 $ 113,008 $ 109,582 $ 104,858 $ 100,233 $ 95,533 $ 98,109 $ 97,961 $ 77,494 Restricted 6,810 6,703 6,600 6,533 5,303 8,657 8,711 10,969 Unrestricted 892 16,535 14,827 (34,563) (34,129) (28,591) (35,448) 26,460 6,417 1,880 Total business -type activities net position $ 127,626 $ 139,394 $ 134,435 $ 81,552 $ 76,032 $ 71,642 $ 60,085 $ 133,226 $ 113,089 $ 90,343 Primary government: Net investment in capital assets $ 225,868 $ 221,618 $ 219,836 $ 217,169 $ 219,023 $ 213,541 $ 210,569 $ 205,983 $ 208,776 $ 189,066 Restricted 18,811 18,512 19,201 22,709 20,197 13,233 13,492 23,700 23,755 25,495 Unrestricted (73,254) 19,086 15,984 (38,169) (39,277) (34,701) (38,910) 22,298 2,449 (6,958) Total primary government net position $ 171,425 $ 259,216 $ 255,021 $ 201,709 $ 199,943 $ 192,073 $ 185,151 $ 251,981 $ 234,980 $ 207,603 Source: City of Lodi Financial Services Division 115 CITY OF LODI CHANGES IN NET POSITION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Dollar amounts in thousands) Fiscal Year 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Expenses Governmental activities: General government 5 9,109 5 9,580 6 8,943 $ 9,381 $ 8,262 $ 8,749 $ 9,451 5 8,307 $ 7,853 5 9,746 Public protection 27,426 27,884 25,930 25,432 25,113 27,186 27,110 25,531 23,328 22,105 Public works 10,281 10,644 10,546 10,248 9,305 10,462 10,464 12,224 10,599 13,229 Community development 1,165 1,174 1,050 1,003 973 1,114 1,323 2,027 2,130 2,290 Library 1,324 1,282 1,342 1,381 1,355 1,440 1,495 1,696 1,630 1,485 Parks and recreation 3,116 3,164 2,933 2,913 5,778 5,077 4,609 4,414 4,172 4,114 Interest and fiscal charges 818 825 416 1,033 1,075 1,105 1.134 1,166 1,201 1,234 Total governmental activities expenses 5328 54,553 61,160 51,391 51,861 55,133 55,566 55,365 50,913 54.203 Business -type activities: Electric 64,367 61,974 61,106 62,599 63,399 64,364 73,358 65,201 67,534 63,780 Wastewater 12,912 12,527 13,423 17,441 11,687 11,289 10,940 12,227 9,271 8,574 Water 9,905 11,014 (34,877) 7,953 8,168 6,148 9,604 9,920 9,875 8,256 Transit 4,134 3,834 4.141 4.256 4,132 4,785 4.832 3.908 3,577 3,643 Total business -type activities expenses 91,318 89,349 4L793 92.245 87.405 86.580 98 734 91,256 90257 84.253 Total primary government expenses 5 144,557 5 143,002 5 94,953 $ 143,840 5 139,267 3 141.719 $ 154 320 9 146,621 5 141,170 5 138,456 Program Revenues Governmental activities: Charges for services: General government S 1,971 S 1,955 5 2,337 5 1,718 5 1,793 5 2,184 $ 1,631 $ 1,544 S 1,280 5 1,232 Public protection 609 582 538 500 643 714 844 837 582 563 Public works 832 415 224 166 356 326 358 755 295 320 Community development 1,378 1,219 1,458 993 1,601 786 749 1,085 1,174 1,630 Library 43 43 44 43 47 48 44 53 53 54 Parks and recreation 1,360 1,479 1,404 1,241 1,245 1,269 1,158 851 1,007 918 Operating grants and contributions 3,369 2,686 2,341 2,300 2,236 1,927 1,951 2,305 2,589 2,587 Capital grants and contributions 3,131 5,354 4,216 5.025 6.737 5,122 10,822 4,717 6,975 14,631 Total governmental activities program revenues 12,693 13,739 12,562 11,988 14,658 12.376 17.557 12.147 13.955 21.935 Business -type activities: Charges for services: Electric 65,237 64,693 63,230 64,251 62,167 69,664 74,000 69,284 65,809 59,112 Wastewater 14,714 14,305 13,747 13,280 13,090 11,513 9,276 9,091 8,524 8,927 Water 12,723 12,756 12,441 12,083 11,940 11,716 11,787 11,350 10,040 8,343 Transit 230 203 185 186 195 217 251 278 401 386 Operating grants and contributions 5,186 4,431 5,178 4,214 3,983 3,449 3,653 3,381 2,621 3,377 Capital grants and contributions 5,284 2,846 4,715 3,206 5,150 1,408 5,774 5,064 19,984 11,146 Total business -type activities program revenues 103.374 99,234 99.496 67220 96,525 97,957 104,741 101,440 107,379 91,291 Total primary government program revenues S 116,067 5 112,972 -T 112,055 9 109.205 5 111,183 5 110,343 5 122,298 S 111595 5 121.334 $ 113.225 Net (Expense)/Revenue Govemmental activities Business -type activities Total primary govemment net expense $ (40,546) $ (40,815) $ (38,598) $ (39,405) $ (37,203) $ (42,757) $ (38,029) $ (43,218) $ (36,958) $ (32,268) 12,056 9,885 55,703 4,971 9,119 11,381 6,007 10,192 17,122 7,038 $ (28,490) $ (30,930) $ 17,105 $ (34,434) $ (28,084) $ (31,376) $ (32,022) $ (33,026) $ (19,836) $ (25,230) (Continued) 116 CITY OF LODI CHANGES IN NET POSITION (Continued) LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Dollar amounts in thousands) Fiscal Year 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2006 2007 2006 General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Position: Governmental activities: Taxes: Property 5 13,502 S 12,758 5 12,218 $ 12,103 5 12,698 5 12,836 $ 13,564 5 13,838 5 9,524 $ 8,031 Franchise taxes 8,976 8,838 8,735 8,712 8,692 8,658 8,357 9,338 9,609 8,721 Business license tax 1,486 1,528 1,524 1,628 1,246 1,242 1,190 1,140 1,082 973 Transient occupancy tax 666 594 546 486 426 382 405 396 380 368 Grants and contributions not restricted to specific programs 10,651 10,138 9,382 9,277 8,954 7,064 8,249 9,593 14,772 14,215 Investment earnings 145 203 44 132 133 155 467 1,008 874 328 Rent 1,942 1,906 1,370 Other 605 528 610 2,052 1,556 1,917 2,382 1,077 621 1,012 Special item -gain on sale of parkland 321 Transfers 7,514 4,792 5,682 1.261 6 657 5,868 5,368 3,693 4,727 4523 Total governmental activities 45,487 41285 40,111 35651 40.683 38.122 39.982 40.083 41,589 38,571 Business -type activities: Investment eamings 632 757 497 566 575 731 1,385 2,028 2,380 2,008 Litigation- environmental lawsuits proceeds 1,107 300 2,010 8,892 6,222 6,700 Rent 4 4 Other 2,745 2,370 1,258 1,244 1,353 923 1,891 2,717 1,749 2,056 Special item -swap termination (8,979) Transfers (7,514) (4,792) (5.682) (1,261) (5.851) (5,868) (5,368) (3,693) (4,727) (4,923) Total business -type activities (4,133) (1,661) (2,620) 549 (4.729) (3,914) (9,061) 9.944 5,624 5,841 Total primary government 5 41,354 5 39,624 S 37,291 5 36,200 5 35.954 5 34.208 5 30,921 5 0,027 5 47.213 5 44,417 Change in Net Position Govemmental activities Business -type activities Total primary government Source: City of Lodi Financial Services Division $ 4,941 $ 470 $ 1,513 $ (3,754) $ 3,480 $ (4,635) $ 1,953 $ (3,135) $ 4,631 $ 6,303 7,923 8,224 52683 5,520 4,390 7.467 (3.354) 20,136 22,746 1209 $ 12,864 5 8,694 5 54,396 5 1,765 5 7,670 S 2,632 9 (1,101) 5 17,001 S 27,377 S 19382 117 CITY OF LODI FUND BALANCES, GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Dollar amounts in thousands) Fiscal Year 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 General Fund Reserved $ $ $ $ $ $ 389 $ 383 $ 1,150 $ 1,144 $ 1,321 Unreserved 3,896 3,383 4,159 5.175 3,048 Nonspendable 10 9 6 357 Committed 345 301 277 Assigned 26 29 65 50 136 Unassigned 12.107 9,134 7.614 6.233 5 654 Total General Fund $ 12 478 5 9,474 $ 7.965 $ 6.289 5 6.147 $ 4.285 $ 3 766 $ 5.309 5 6 319 $ 4.369 All other govemmental funds Reserved $ 5 $ $ $ $ 7,801 $ 1,487 $ 1,932 $ 1,874 $ 1,138 Unreserved, reported in: Special revenue funds 963 6,540 7,433 6,651 6,271 Capital projects funds 3,649 5,217 5,504 6,200 5,663 Nonspendable 1 4 3 1 Restricted 11,957 11.764 12,556 15,017 13,786 Unassigned (991 (512) (8631 (846) Total all other governmental funds 5 11 958 $ 11.669 $ 12.047 5 14,155 $ 12 940 $ 12.413 $ 13.244 $ 14.869 $ 14.725 $ 13,072 5 24.436 5 21.143 $ 20.012 5 20 444 5 19.087 $ 16 698 $ 17.010 5 20.178 $ 21.044 $ 17,441 Implemented GASB 54 during the 2011 fiscal year changing the presentation of fund balance Source: City of Lodi Financial Services Division 118 CITY OF LODI CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Dollar amounts in thousands) Fiscal Year 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Revenues: Taxes $ 24,631 5 23,719 5 23,022 5 22,928 $ 23,061 $ 23,118 $ 23,516 $ 24,712 5 20,594 $ 18,094 Licenses and permits 967 852 921 686 954 520 431 683 717 1,020 Intergovernmental revenues 17,557 17,392 14,625 15,289 16,865 12,579 13,229 14,980 19,892 25,491 Charges for services 3,827 3,558 3,880 3,427 3,946 4,116 3,329 4,757 4,696 3,848 Fines and forfeitures 1,573 1,557 1,632 1,357 1,407 1,444 1,416 1,321 1,245 1,173 Investment and rental income 2,029 2,025 1,389 1,264 817 923 922 1,312 998 707 Contributions and donations 282 1,003 689 Miscellaneous revenue 538 1.078 813 799 1,093 1,762 822 304 653 Total revenues 51 404 50.106 46.547 45.764 48.538 43 793 44.605 48,587 48.446 50,986 Expenditures: Current: General government 9,151 9,019 8,522 8,820 7,667 7,666 8,431 9,545 8,893 8,345 Public protection 26,646 27,093 26,282 25,249 24,489 24,466 24,716 23,979 22,211 20,863 Public works 4,508 4,393 4,532 4,174 3,715 4,383 4,657 5,842 5,587 7,827 Community development 1,226 1,192 1,111 1,037 969 1,013 1,341 2,006 2,062 1,847 Library 1,311 1,268 1,411 1,381 1,357 1,322 1,500 1,673 1,588 1,468 Parks and recreation 2,145 2,299 2,370 2,254 4,127 4,180 3,776 3,826 3,598 3,440 Capital outlay 9,842 7,652 6,271 2,961 9,377 5,108 6,791 4,207 3,526 7,232 Debt service: Interest and fiscal charges 845 851 483 1,039 1,081 1,110 1,139 1,170 1,205 1,238 Principal payments 245 630 752 725 789 898 900 892 Advance refunding escrow 1,689 Total expenditures 55,674 53.767 52.916 47.545 53.534 49.973 53,140 53.146 49,570 53,152 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over(under) expenditures (4,270) (3.661) (6,369) (1,781) (4,996) (6.180) (8,535) (4.559) (1,124) (2,166) (Continued) 119 CITY OF LODI CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS (continued) LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Dollar amounts in thousands) Fiscal Year 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in 15,599 11,596 12,546 14,486 11,881 11,173 10,609 7,058 8,863 9,142 Transfers out (8,036) (6,804) (6,864) (11,348) (5,224) (5,305) (5,242) (3,365) (4,136) (4,219) Proceeds from sale of land 98 Refunding bonds issued 20,103 Payment to refunded bond escrow agent (19.848) Total other financing sources (uses) 7.563 4.792 5.937 3,138 6.755 5 868 5.367 3,693 4.727 4.923 Special item- sale of parkland 630 Net change in fund balances 3,293 1,131 (432) 1,357 2,389 (312) (3,168) (866) 3,603 2,757 Fund balances, beginning of year 21 143 20.012 20,444 19.087 16.858 17.010 20.178 21,044 17,441 14,684 Fund balances, end of year 0 24.436 3 21.143 3 20,012 $ 20.444 $ 19,087 5 16,698 5 17,010 $ 20.176 $ 21.044 $ 17.441 Debt service as a percentage of noncapital expenditures Source: City of Lodi Finance Services Division 1.9% 1.9% 5.5% 3.9% 4.3% 4.3% 4.3% 4.4% 4.8% 4.9% 120 City of Lodi TAX REVENUES BY SOURCE, GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Dollar amounts in thousands) Property Sales and Use Transient Occupancy Franchise Documentary Transfer Motor Vehicle in Lieu Public Protection Business License In Lieu Franchise Totals Fiscal Year % Change 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2006 to $ 8,810 $ 8,314 $ 7,955 $ 7,861 $ 8,285 $ 8,342 $ 8,887 10,625 10,111 9,350 9,246 8,663 6,873 8,028 666 594 545 486 426 382 405 1,942 1,862 1,758 1,734 1,715 1,681 1,415 159 155 120 91 95 117 114 4,533 4,289 4,143 4,151 4,317 4,377 4,784 362 341 325 295 250 267 296 1,133 1,220 1,187 1,182 958 962 1,038 7.033 6.977 6.977 6.977 6.977 6.977 6.942 2015 $ 9,210 $ 9,289 $ 7,676 15% 9,296 10,137 9,812 8% 396 380 368 81% 976 929 890 118% 125 235 355 -55% 4,797 4,635 4,402 3% 338 390 310 17% 1,140 1,082 973 16% 8.362 8.680 7.831 -10% $ 35,263 $ 33,863 $ 32,360 $ 32,023 $ 31,686 $ 29,978 $ 31,909 $ 34,640 $ 35,757 $ 32,617 Note: General governmental tax revenues are included in taxes, licenses and permits, intergovernmental revenues and miscellaneous revenues. Source: City of Lodi Financial Services Division 121 8% CITY OF LODI ASSESSED VALUE AND ESTIMATED ACTUAL VALUE OF TAXABLE PROPERTY LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Dollar amounts in thousands) Fiscal Year 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Secured roll $ 5,156,704 $ 4,895,091 $ 4,737,807 $ 4,738,823 $ 4,907,588 $ 4,986,693 $ 5,156,706 $ 5,069,788 $ 4,799,141 $ 4,254,184 Utility roll 3,490 3,490 2,382 2,382 2,423 2,423 2,031 2,035 2,773 3,654 Unsecured roll 257,856 230.827 233.398 226.651 270.600 270.315 263.648 258.687 242.082 216.065 Gross assessed value 5,418,050 5,129,408 4,973,587 4,967,856 5,180,611 5,259,431 5,422,385 5,330,510 5,043,996 4,473,903 Less exemptions (1) 326,833 324,439 327.783 314.448 321.138 332.701 265.154 243.259 229.049 220.590 Net assessed value 5,091,217 4,804,969 4,645,804 4,653,408 4,859,473 4,926,730 5,157,231 5.087.251 4.814.947 4.253.313 Land 1,469,347 1,364,401 1,227,969 1,264,884 1,322,830 1,345,815 1,562,729 1,537,554 1,431,203 1,226,293 Improvements 3,610,391 3,443,266 3,445,328 3,401,792 3,534,778 3,600,824 3,577,741 3,503,186 3,327,453 2,989,575 Personal property 338,312 321.741 300.290 301.180 323.003 312.792 281.915 289.770 285.340 258,035 Gross assessed value 5,418,050 5,129,408 4,973,587 4,967,856 5,180,611 5,259,431 5,422,385 5,330,510 5,043,996 4,473,903 Less exemptions (1) 326,833 324,439 327,783 314,448 321,138 332.701 265.154 243.259 229.049 220.590 Net assessed value $ 5,091,217 $ 4,804,969 $ 4,645,804 $ 4,653,408 $ 4,859,473 $ 4,926,730 $ 5,157,231 $ 5,087,251 $ 4,814,947 $ 4.253.313 Total Direct Tax Rate 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% (1) All exemptions (secured, utility, and unsecured rolls) are homeowners - $61,499 and other - $265,384 =$326,833 1.00% 1.00% Note: In 1978, the voters of the State of California passed Proposition 13 which limtted property taxes to a total maximum rate of 1% based upon the assessed value of the property being taxed. Each year, the assessed value of property may be increased by an "inflation factor" (limited to a maximum increase of 2%) With few exceptions, property is only assessed at the time that it is sold to a new owner. At that point, the property being sold is reassessed at the purchase price. The assessed valuation data shown above represents the only data currently available with respect to the the actual market value of taxable property and is subject to the limitations described above. Source: San Joaquin County Auditor -Controller's Office 122 1.00% 1.00% CITY OF LODI DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING PROPERTY TAX RATES LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Rate per $100 of assessed value) Basic Fiscal Countywide Year Levy School All Other Total 2015 1.0000 0.0658 0.0000 1.0658 2014 1.0000 0.0574 0.0000 1.0574 2013 1.0000 0.0646 0.0000 1.0646 2012 1.0000 0.0658 0.0000 1.0658 2011 1.0000 0.0626 0.0000 1.0626 2010 1.0000 0.0575 0.0000 1.0575 2009 1.0000 0.0517 0.0000 1.0517 2008 1.0000 0.0478 0.0000 1.0478 2007 1.0000 0.0478 0.0000 1.0478 2006 1.0000 0.0570 0.0000 1.0570 Source: San Joaquin County Tax Collector 123 CITY OF LODI PRINCIPAL PROPERTY TAXPAYERS CURRENT YEAR AND NINE YEARS AGO (Dollar amounts in thousands) Fiscal Year 2015 2006 Percent of Percent of Total City Total City Taxable Taxable Taxable Taxable Assessed Assessed Assessed Assessed Taxpayer Value Rank Value Value Rank Value Lodi Memorial Hospital Assn $ 149,117 1 3.083 % $ % Pacific Coast Producers 104,939 2 2.170 43,068 2 1.068 General Mills 86,831 3 1.795 152,102 1 3.771 California Physicians Service Corp 57,476 4 1.188 Cottage Bakery Inc 41,022 5 0.848 25,341 4 0.628 Westcore Vine LP 26,417 6 0.546 Costco 19,793 7 0.409 Archer Daniels Midland Co Corp 18,405 8 0.381 Dart Container Corp 16,638 9 0.344 17,625 8 0.437 North American Specialty Products LLC 15,723 10 0.325 Pacific Coast Producers Corp. 34,267 3 0.850 Kristmont West 21,961 5 0.544 Parinehs Exchange 2004 LLC 19,539 6 0.484 Certainteed Corp 18,842 7 0.467 Fountains At Lodi LLC 13,031 9 0.323 Panattoni, Carl D ETAL 12.984 10 0.322 Principal Secured Property Valuation 536,361 11.089 358,760 8.894 Other Secured Taxpayers 4,620,343 95.520 3,895,424 96.575 Exemptions relative to secured tax roll 319.672 6.609 220.590 5.469 Total Secured Property Valuation $ 4.837.032 100.000 % $ 4,033,594 100.000 % Source: San Joaquin County Assessor's Office 124 CITY OF LODI PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Dollar amounts in thousands) Taxes Collected Within the Total Collections Fiscal Year of the Levy to Date Levied for Percent Percent Fiscal the Fiscal of of Year Year Amount Levy (1) Amount Levy 2015 $ 8,742 $ 8,742 100.0% $ 8,742 100.0% 2014 8,353 8,353 100.0% 8,353 100.0% 2013 7,865 7,865 100.0% 7,865 100.0% 2012 7,754 7,754 100.0% 7,754 100.0% 2011 8,143 8,143 100.0% 8,143 100.0% 2010 8,291 8,291 100.0% 8,291 100.0% 2009 7,966 7,966 100.0% 7,966 100.0% 2008 8,167 8,167 100.0% 8,167 100.0% 2007 8,170 8,170 100.0% 8,170 100.0% 2006 7,815 7,815 100.0% 7,815 100.0% 1) Per agreement with San Joaquin County, the County provides the City of Lodi with 100% of the amount owed to the City for secured properties, regardless of collection status. In exchange, the County is entitled to 100% of revenues collected for interest and penalties. This agreement is commonly referred to as the Teeter Plan. Source: San Joaquin County Auditor/Controller's Office 125 CITY OF LODI ELECTRICITY SOLD BY TYPE OF CUSTOMER LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Type of Customer Billed Accounts 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 City Accounts 212 207 204 195 197 189 189 187 186 184 Contract Large Industrial 5 5 6 Contract Medium Industrial 1 1 2 Contract Small Industrial 1 0 1 Domestic Residential 22,393 22,623 22,541 22,361 22,360 22,525 22,506 22,510 22,938 22,860 Domestic Mobile Home Park 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Dusk to Dawn 88 89 88 92 89 89 92 92 95 95 Large Commercial 337 339 344 336 350 357 377 380 375 359 Large Industrial 41 39 40 38 40 39 37 32 33 33 Medium Industrial 12 11 11 9 9 9 8 8 10 13 Residental Low Income 2,798 2,788 2,582 2,531 2,258 2,193 1,847 1,943 2,003 1,910 Small Commerical 3,332 3,367 3,358 3,340 3,324 3,280 3,249 3,199 3,241 3,279 Small Industrial 7 8 9 11 11 10 10 9 9 9 Total 29.233 29,484 29,190 28,926 28,651 28,704 28,328 28,380 28,909 28.764 Source: City of Lodi Financial Services Division 126 CITY OF LODI RATIOS OF OUTSTANDING DEBT BY TYPE LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per capita) Governmental Activities Business -type Activities Total Certificates of Total Total Fiscal Lease Revenue Loan Notes Governmental Participation and Notes Business -type Primary Percent of Personal Per Year Bonds Payable Payable Activities Revenue Bonds Payable Activities Government Income (1) Capita (1) 2015 $ 19,950 $ 245 $ 20,195 $ 149,767 $ $ 149,767 $ 169,962 7.67 % $ 2,667 2014 20,004 245 20,249 157,297 157,297 177,546 9.10 2,821 2013 20,058 245 20,303 167,743 167,743 188,046 9.74 2,993 2012 21,025 245 21,270 173,241 173,241 194,511 10.34 3,096 2011 21,655 245 21,900 178,827 178,827 200,727 10.67 3,213 2010 22,265 245 22,510 144,165 1,409 145,574 168,084 8.49 2,645 2009 22,855 245 23,100 148,529 1,585 150,114 173,214 8.81 2,736 2008 23,420 94 245 23,759 140,640 1,755 142,395 166,154 8.99 2,622 2007 23,975 187 245 24,407 122,128 1,918 124,046 148,453 8.15 2,342 2006 24,510 279 245 25,034 125,863 2,077 127,940 152,974 8.93 2,435 Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in Note 8 of these financial statements. (1) See uemograpnlc and Economic Statistics table tor personal income and population Source: City of Lodi Financial Services Division 127 CITY OF LODI RATIOS OF GENERAL BONDED DEBT OUTSTANDING LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per capita) Fiscal Year 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Lease Revenue Bonds $ 19,950 20,004 20,058 21,025 21,655 22,265 22,855 23,420 23,975 24,510 Less Amounts Available for Debt Service 10 1,692 1,692 1,692 1,692 1,692 1,692 1,692 Net $ 19,950 20,004 20,048 19,333 19,963 20,573 21,163 21,728 22,283 22,818 Percent of Assessed Value (1) of Property 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 Per Capita $ 313.09 314.28 318.58 307.73 319.55 323.73 334.26 342.92 351.49 363.25 General bonded debt is debt payable with governmental fund resources and general obligation bonds recorded in enterprise funds (of which, the City has none). (1) Assessed value has been used because the actual value of taxable property is not readily available in the State of Califomia. Source: City of Lodi Financial Services Division 128 CITY OF LODI LEGAL DEBT MARGIN INFORMATION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Dollar amounts in thousands) FISCAL YEAR 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Assessed valuation (1) $ 5,152,666 $ 4,867,731 $ 4,709,916 $ 4,718,766 $ 4,926,130 $ 4,995,362 $ 5,227,580 $ 5,159,269 $ 4,887,074 $ 4,325,000 Conversion percentage 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% Adjusted assessed valuation 1,288,167 1,216,933 1,177,479 1,179,692 1,231,533 1,248,841 1,306,895 1,289,817 1,221,769 1,081,250 Debt limit percentage 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% Debt Lim it 193,225 182,540 176,622 176,954 184,730 187,326 196,034 193,473 183,265 162,188 Total net debt applicable to limit 19,950 20,004 20,048 19,333 19,963 20,573 21,163 21,728 22,283 22,818 Legal debt margin $ 173,275 $ 162,536 $ 156,574 $ 157,621 $ 164,767 $ 166,753 $ 174,871 $ 171,745 $ 160,982 $ 139,370.. Total net debt applicable to the limit as a percent of debt limit 10 3% 11.0% 11 4% 10 9% 10 8% 11 0% 10.8% 11.2% 12 2% 14.1% The Government Code of the State of Califomia provides for a legal debt limit of 15% of gross assessed valuation However, this provision was enacted when assessed valuation was based upon 25% of market value Effective with the 1982 fiscal year, each parcel is now assessed at 100% of market value (as of the most recent change in ownership for that parcel). The computation shown above reflect a conversion of assessed valuation data for each fiscal year from the current full valuation perspective to the 25% level that was in effect at the time the legal debt margin was enacted by the State of Califomia for local governments located within the state (1) Reflects City assessed valuation with other exemptions of 5265,384 deducted for 2015. Source: San Joaquin County Auditor -Controller's Office 129 CITY OF LODI DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES DEBT June 30, 2015 OVERLAPPING DEBT: San Joaquin Community College District Lodi Unified School District San Joaquin County Certificates of Participation Lodi Unified School District Certificates of Participation SUBTOTAL OVERLAPPING DEBT DIRECT DEBT: City of Lodi Lease Revenue Bonds City of Lodi - Note payable SUBTOTAL DIRECT DEBT TOTAL DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING DEBT(2) Total Debt $ 153,118,000 89,335,000 152,425,000 36,665,000 19,950,250 245,000 2014-15 Gross Assessed Valuation $ 5,418,050,000 2014-15 Population 63,719 DEBT RATIOS Total Gross Debt $ 95,622,160 $ Percentage City's Share Applicable (1) of Debt 8.865 % $ 13,573,911 37.209 33,240,660 9.821 14,969,659 37.209 13,642,680 100.00 100.00 75,426,910 19,950,250 245,000 20,195,250 95,622,160 Per Capita Value 1,501 1.76% (1) Percent of overlapping agency's assessed valuation located within the boundaries of the City. (2) Excludes tax and revenue anticipation notes, enterprise revenue, mortgage revenue and tax allocation bonds and non -bonded capital lease obligations. SOURCE: California Municipal Statistics, San Francisco, CA San Joaquin County Auditors -Controller Office State of California, Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit 130 CITY OF LODI PLEDGED -REVENUE COVERAGE LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Dollars amounts in thousands) Less: Adjusted Adjusted Net Fiscal Annual Operating Available Debt Service Year Revenues (1) Expenses (2) Revenue Principal Interest Total Coverage Electric Revenue Certificates of Participation 2015 $ 67,132 $ 52,116 $ 15,016 $ 4,960 $ 3,358 $ 8,318 1.81 2014 67,144 50,349 16,795 4,750 3,606 8,356 2.01 2013 63,974 51,209 12,765 4,575 3,839 8,414 1.52 2012 65,220 50,164 15,056 3,270 4,021 7,291 2.07 2011 63,307 48,397 14,910 3,080 4,152 7,232 2.06 2010 70,288 49,949 20,339 2,920 4,274 7,194 2.83 2009 75,195 58,370 16,825 5,240 4,720 9,960 1.69 2008 74,923 54,437 20,486 2,305 3,961 6,266 3.27 2007 67,865 52,984 14,881 2,350 3,977 6,327 2.35 2006 61,066 51,131 9,935 - 3,613 3,613 2.75 Source: City of Lodi Financial Services Division 131 CITY OF LODI PLEDGED -REVENUE COVERAGE (continued) LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Dollars amounts in thousands) Less: Adjusted Adjusted Net Fiscal Annual Operating Available Debt Service Year Revenues (1) Expenses (2) Revenue Principal Interest Total Coverage Wastewater Certificates of Participation and Revenue Bonds 2015 $ 15,845 $ 6,335 $ 9,510 $ 1,500 $ 2,172 $ 3,672 2.59 2014 15,186 6,003 9,183 4,610 2,294 6,904 1.33 2013 14,305 5,674 8,631 1,500 2,560 4,060 2.13 2012 13,787 6,659 7,128 1,430 2,688 4,118 1.73 2011 16,508 5,972 10,536 1,370 2,748 4,118 2.56 2010 12,284 6,180 6,104 1,320 2,832 4,152 1.47 2009 10,764 5,921 4,843 1,270 2,882 4,152 1.17 2008 10,530 6,189 4,341 1,355 2,334 3,689 1.18 2007 9,881 5,287 4,594 1,315 2,017 3,332 1.38 2006 9,865 4,886 4,979 1,275 2,056 3,331 1.49 Source: City of Lodi Financial Services Division 132 CITY OF LODI PLEDGED -REVENUE COVERAGE (continued) LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS (Dollars amounts in thousands) Less: Adjusted Adjusted Net Fiscal Annual Operating Available Debt Service Year Revenues (1) Expenses (2) Revenue Principal Interest (3) Total Coverage Water Revenue Bonds 2015 $ 13,370 $ 5,815 $ 7,555 $ 850 $ 1,506 $ 2,356 3.21 2014 14,166 6,835 7,331 825 1,530 2,355 3.11 2013 13,367 6,899 6,468 800 1,535 2,335 2.77 2012 13,275 5,392 7,883 775 1,530 2,305 3.42 2011 14,051 5,662 8,389 1,409 874 2,283 3.67 Includes all nongeneral obligation long-term debt backed by pledged revenues. Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in Note 8 of these financial statements. (1) Total operating revenues including investment earnings, operating grants, capital contributions and other revenue. (2) Total operating expenses including cost of services paid to the General Fund and excluding in -lieu fees, depreciation and amortization. (3) Net of Build America Bonds interest subsidy. Source: City of Lodi Financial Services Division 133 CITY OF LODI DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC STATISTICS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Population Fiscal Square City Percent Year Miles Population Change 2015 13.98 63,719 0.4% 2014 13.98 63,651 0.2% 2013 13.92 62,930 0.2% 2012 13.92 62,825 0.8% 2011 13.92 62,473 0.6% 2010 13.92 63,549 0.6% 2009 13.92 63,313 -0.1% 2008 13.92 63,362 -0.1% 2007 13.17 63,395 0.9% 2006 12.81 62,817 0.6% San Joaquin County Population 719,511 710,731 698,414 695,750 690,899 694,293 689,480 685,600 679,687 668,265 Population Percent of County 8.9% 9.0% 9.0% 9.0% 9.0% 9.2% 9.2% 9.2% 9.3% 9.4% Rank in Size of California Cities 138 135 137 136 135 136 135 133 129 131 Personal Per Income Capita (millions of Personal dollars) Income $ 2,215 34,755 2,102 33,024 1,952 31,013 1,931 30,732 1,882 30,132 1,980 31,166 1.967 31,071 1.849 29,178 1.822 28,743 1.713 27,272 Personal income is the income received by all persons from all sources. Personal income is the sum of net earnings by place of residence, rental income of persons, personal dividend income, personal interest income, and personal current transfer receipts. Unemployment Rate 7.8% 8.8% 9.0% 11.3% 13.4% 13.3% 12.2% 7.1% 6.1% 5.5% Per capita personal income is calculated as the personal income of residents of a given area divided by the resident population of the area. In computing per capita personal income, Bureau of Economic analysis uses the Census Bureau's annual midyear population estimates. Source: State of California, Department of Finance, Demographic Reseach Unit and Department of Labor. 134 CITY OF LODI PRINCIPAL EMPLOYERS CURRENT YEAR AND NINE YEARS AGO Current Nine Years Ago Percent Percent of Total City of Total City Employer Employees Rank Employment Employees Rank Employment Lodi Unified School District 3,090 1 11.83 % 2,400 1 9.19 % Lodi Memorial Hospital 1,386 2 5.31 900 2 3.44 Pacific Coast Producers 2,800 3 10.72 500 4 1.91 Blue Shield 780 4 2.99 550 3 2.11 ConAgra 485 5 1.86 General Mills 280 6 1.07 425 6 1.63 City of Lodi 391 7 1.50 429 5 1.64 Walmart 190 8 0.73 317 7 1.21 Farriers & Merchants Bank 192 9 0.73 314 8 1.20 Target 177 10 0 68 186 10 0.71 Valley Industries 295 9 1.13 Total 9.771 37.41 6,316 24 18 135 CITY OF LODI FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT CITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES BY DEPARTMENT LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Fiscal Year 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011* 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Department: Administration 10 10 10 12 13 31 32 19 35 33 Community Development 11 9 9 9 13 13 13 14 18 17 Electric 48 43 40 40 41 51 50 48 64 65 Financial Services 24 26 39 30 28 Fire 53 53 53 54 64 64 64 64 64 61 Internal Services 31 31 31 29 35 Library 10 10 11 12 14 14 14 14 16 14 Parks and Recreation 31 31 30 34 31 Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services 26 27 27 29 37 Police 102 104 104 103 125 125 125 125 116 117 Public Works 100 95 92 93 98 102 102 107 114 99 Total 391 382 377 381 440 455 457 460 491 465 Community Center, Human Resources and Information Systems were previously included in Administration. Budget, Financial Services, Human Resources and Information Services are now Internal Services. Community Center, Parks & Recreation are now Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services. Source: City of Lodi Budget Document 136 • CITY OF LODI OPERATING INDICATORS BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM/DEPARTMENT LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Flsd Yaw. 2075 2014 2013 2012 2011 0070 2003 2006 2907 '2006 General government: Building permits issued 2,404 1,791 1,578 1,461 2,022 1.709 1,754 1551 2317 2,699 Business tax certificates: Retail sales and service 2,281 2,633 2,526 2,485 2530 2,406 2A96 2,442 2632 2.565 Manufacturers and processors 23 85 78 77 76 85 82 78 78 125 Professions 323 362 362 364 371 373 380 398 404 322 Miscellaneous contractors, peddlers, delivery vehicles, etc 1256 1,595 1,456 1,362 1,357 1.312 1,411 1,063 1.127 533 Utility billing/customer service: Number of customers 25,912 25,733 23,927 23,761 23,575 25,573 25,555 25,555 25,712 25,655 Energy sales (KWH) 438,780,911 437,294,133 435,822,465 435,655,731 421,130,329 434,200,987 452,075,554 450,407,709 456,740,745 459,637,092 Peak demand (MW) 134 126 122 116 116 120 134 134 144 127 Public safety: Police: Major reported crimes 2,268 2,519 2,643 3,573 2,885 2,377 2,454 2,993 3,096 3,234 Total arrests 3,690 3,656 3,825 4,350 4,410 4,238 4,646 5,590 5,463 5,162 Dispatched calls for service 35,992 35,281 50,124 46,756 52,061 51,870 56,391 55,911 53,656 55,937 Fire Intclkot sttuctuee Ore calls 32 33 67 57 56 47 69 88 79 66 Nan•Hrutbual Bre Rags 143 1,923 209 163 121 123 123 160 163 156 Hazardous materials calls 65 53 58 41 69 70 70 35 27 26 Emergency medical calls 3,416 3,848 3,682 3,620 3,752 3,494 3,364 3,420 3,213 2.912 Total emergency calls 3,666 4,144 5,823 5,620 5,753 5,385 5,392 5,346 5,000 4,447 Total number of units dispatched 5,727 7,845 7,954 7,855 7,835 7,390 7,038 7,841 7,005 6.055 Public works: Mibi Of eh4ets 'mewed 6 6 6 6 6 3 :6. 5 4 33 Fleet job orders completed 2,500 2,004 1.603 1,953 2.810 3,303 3,921 3.520 6,938 5,608 Trees planted 135 131 131 06 130 95 Water utility: New connections 86 8 7 6- 17 17 35 110 266 Water main breaks 16 14 14 10 6 6 4 4 10 6 Wastewater utility: Average daily treatment (million gal/day) 4.6MG 5.0MG 5.10MG 6.5MG 6.5MG 6.5MG 6.5MG 6.5MG 6.9MG 6.7MG Library: Registered borrowers 58,824 55,835 51,594 47,147 43,927 39,199 53,530 48,969 44,556 52,779 Circulation of library materials 197,673 225,476 215,293 217,742 248,250 251,967 219,711 280,466 273,270 281,216 Reference, research and informational questions answered 13,189 16,750 16,270 14,463 16,234 16,501 15,379 19,257 18,854 17,342 Annual Ottanaanw a1 16ranea 209,929 224,762 222,148 210,279 207,123 n/a 296,793 268,070 267,986 Number of programs offered 432 284 407 432 388 344 316 348 339 320 Annual attendance at programs 12,888 10,824 14,443 12,993 13,133 10,676 8,765 11,242 10,700 10,872 Public access computer usage 41,180 47,126 45,871 47,426 58,990 52,124 36,368 38,999 35,260 29,896 (Continued) 137 Community center: Community center bookings Instructional classes Registered students Yearly attendance Parks and recreation: After school program registration (number of participant/sites) Adult sports Program/Participation Programs offered Partnerships Tournaments Youth/Teen sports Program attendance Programs offered Aquatics Program attendance Number of programs Sauce: Cky of Lodi CITY OF LODI OPERATING INDICATORS BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM/DEPARTMENT - (continued) LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Fiscal Your 2015 2014 1011 2012 2211 2010 2009 2000 2007 2005 794 769 716 698 925 789 475 494 302 220 500 553 580 307 536 583 507 530 478 509 2,586 3,269 2,819 3,713 3,438 3,525 3,316 5,550 3,548 4,369 13,925 13,925 13,925 13,925 14,217 13,355 14,050 14,410 14,429 15,369 315140/19 254,096/20 1,715(20 3,232/20 1,920/4 1,920/4 1,920/4 3,014/4 145,000/12 135,000/12 15285 2.082 2246 2,420 2.528 2,528 2.284 28,000 36.000 36.000 18 17 16 15 16 16 13 11 11 11 2 2 2 3 5 5 13 3 5 10 5 5 12 7 7 10 10 20 20 3,621 3,6723,643 3,889 4,251 4,251 215,000 195,000 200,000 200,000 18 16 19 24 16 16 24 14 14 20 28,009 27,731 23,414 34,366 32,566 32,566 2,433 50,000 15 13 13 25 13 13 8 3 138 59,0008 59,000 6 CITY OF LODI CAPITAL ASSET STATISTICS BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM/DEPARTMENT LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Fiscal Year 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 General govemment: Total square miles 13 92 13.92 13 92 13.92 13 92 13.92 13 92 13.92 13 17 12.81 Public safety: Police: Facilities: Stations 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 , Animal control facility 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Police training facility (pistol range) 1 1 1 1 1 1 Vehicles: Marked patrol cars 23 23 23 23 23 23 25 25 25 28 Motorcycles and scooters 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 Animal control vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Other automobiles 37 37 37 37 37 37 38 40 41 41 Fire: Facilities: Fire stations 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Vehicles: Fire engines 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 6 6 5 Trucks/Trailers 6 6 6 5 5 6 6 9 8 7 Other automobiles 11 11 11 9 8 10 12 7 10 11 Public works: Miles of streets 202 202 202 202 202 202 202 200 184 198 Miles of alley ways 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 Traffic signals 67 67 67 67 67 62 62 64 66 64 Street lights 7,270 7,270 7,270 7,270 7,270 7,270 7,270 7,270 7,270 7,203 (Continued) 139 CITY OF LODI CAPITAL ASSET STATISTICS BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM/DEPARTMENT - (continued) LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Fiscal Year 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Parks and recreation: Parks and squares 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 23 23 23 Park acreage 361 361 361 373 373 373 371 275 275 275 Boating facilities - launch lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Senior center 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Community Centers 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Swimming pools 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 Baseball/softball diamonds 20 20 20 24 24 24 24 26 26 26 Tennis courts 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 Skateboard park 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Playgrounds 20 20 20 22 25 25 25 22 22 22 Ballpark 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 26 26 26 Soccer Field 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 Football Field 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 Handball/BasketballNolleyball Courts/Bocce Courts 12 12 12 10 10 10 10 8 8 8 Horseshoe Pits 8 8 8 8 6 6 6 7 10 10 Library: Central library 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total items in collection 119,554 148.287 149,243 135 113 134,804 130,530 135,197 142,885 142.098 134,129 Integrated library system 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Microfilm readers 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Microfilm readers/printers 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Self check out machines 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 1 1 Electric utility: Overhead lines 12kv (miles) 117 117 133 133 133 130 130 130 129 129 Overhead lines 60kv (miles) 14 14 14 14 13 13 13 13 13 13 Underground lines (miles) 118 115 159 159 157 155 154 153 151 151 (Continued) 140 CITY OF LODI CAPITAL ASSET STATISTICS BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM/DEPARTMENT - (continued) LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Fiscal Year 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Water utility: Water main lines 236 236 236 236 236 237 233 233 238 235 Water storage capacity (gallons) 4,100,000 4,100,000 4,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 Water wells 28 28 28 27 27 26 26 26 26 26 Water reservoirs 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Wastewater utility: Wastewater main lines (miles) 196 196 196 196 196 191 194 194 189 182 Treatment capacity 8 5 MG 8 5 MG 8 5 MG 8 5 MG 8.5 MG 8 5 MG 8 5 MG 8 5 MG 8 5 MG 8.5 MG Wastewater treatment plant 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Stormwater utility: Stormwater main drain lines (miles) 124 124 124 124 124 124 161 119 161 115 Stormwater pump stations 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 13 Central parking district: Parking structure 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Parking spaces 2,450 2,450 2,453 2,453 2,453 2,453 2,453 2,453 2,453 2,453 Parking lots 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Source: City of Lodi Departments 141 SINGLE AUDIT REPORTS CITY OF LODI SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 Federal Grantor Pass-through Grantor or Direct CFDA Grant/Project Federal Federal Program Title Number Number Expenditures U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Direct: Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants 14.218 B -13 -MC -06-0038 $ 263,095 Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants 14.218 B -14 -MC -06-0038 221,663 Total Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants 484,758 U.S. Department of Justice Direct: Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program 16.738 2013 -DJ -BX -0877 9,846 U.S. Department of Transportation Direct: Federal Transit Formula Grants 20.507 CA -95-X169 130,542 Federal Transit Formula Grants 20.507 CA -95-X207 1,442,302 Federal Transit Formula Grants 20.507 CA -90-Z171 332,800 Federal Transit Formula Grants 20.507 CA -90-Z281 678,769 Federal Transit Formula Grants 20.507 CA -90-Z293 913,769 Total Federal Transit - Formula Grants 3,498,182 See accompanying notes to the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. 142 CITY OF LODI SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS (Continued) FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 Federal Grantor Pass-through Grantor or Direct CFDA Grant/Project Federal Federal Program Title Number Number Expenditures U.S. Department of Transportation (Continued) Passed through California Department of Transportation: Highway Planning and Construction 20.205 STPL-5154(040) $ 230,890 Highway Planning and Construction 20.205 RPSTPLE-5154(044) 43,358 Total Highway Planning and Construction 274.248 Passed through California Office of Traffic Safety State and Community Highway Safety 20.600 PT1462 Passed through University of California, Berkeley: State and Community Highway Safety 20.600 SC14230 26,531 14.602 Total State and Community Highway Safety 41,133 Passed through California Office of Traffic Safety Minimum Penalties for Repeat Offenders for Driving While Intoxicated 20.608 PT1557 Passed through City of Stockton: Minimum Penalties for Repeat Offenders for Driving While Intoxicated 20.608 AL1160 112,533 16,473 Total Minimum Penalties for Repeat Offenders for Driving While Intoxicated 129,006 Total U.S. Department of Transportation 3,942,569 Total Expenditures of Federal Awards $ 4,437,173 See accompanying notes to the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. 143 CITY OF LODI NOTES TO THE SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 NOTE 1— GENERAL The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for the year ended June 30, 2015, presents the activity of all federal award programs of the City of Lodi, California (City). The City reporting entity is defined in Note 1 of the City's basic financial statements. All federal awards received directly from federal agencies, as well as federal awards passed through other government agencies, are included in the SEFA. NOTE 2 — BASIS OF ACCOUNTING The accompanying SEFA is presented using the modified accrual basis of accounting for grants accounted for in governmental fund types and the full accrual basis of accounting for grants accounted for in proprietary fund types, as described in Note 1 of the City's basic financial statements. NOTE 3 — CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE (CFDA) The CFDA numbers included in the accompanying SEFA were determined based on the program name, review of grant contract information and Office of Management and Budget's Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance. NOTE 4 — SUBRECIPIENTS Of the federal expenditures presented in the SEFA, the City provided federal awards to subrecipients as follows: Federal Program Title Community Development Block Grants/ Entitlement Grants Federal CFDA Number 144 Amount Provided to Subrecipients 14.218 $192,737 Certified Public Accountants Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards The Honorable Members of City Council City of Lodi, California We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Lodi, California (City), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2015, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated February 3, 2016. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City's internal control over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control over financial reporting was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies and therefore, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may exist that were not identified. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be material weaknesses. We did identify a certain deficiency in internal control, described in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs as item 2015-001 that we consider to be a significant deficiency. Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP 3000 5 Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95816 145 Sacramento Walnut Creek Oakland San Francisco Los Angeles Century City Newport Beach San Diego www.mgocpa.com City's Response to Finding The City's response to the fmding identified in our audit is described in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs. The City's response was not subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, accordingly, we express no opinion on it. Purpose of the Report The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity's internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose. az•i..ts Oceititeit 0). Sacramento, California February 3, 2016 146 Certified Public Accountants Independent Auditor's Report on Compliance for the Major Federal Program and on Internal Control Over Compliance Required by OMB Circular A-133 The Honorable Members of City Council City of Lodi, California Report on Compliance for the Major Federal Program We have audited the City of Lodi's (City) compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on the City's major federal program for the year ended June 30, 2015. The City's major federal program is identified in the summary of auditor's results section of the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. Management's Responsibility Management is responsible for compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants applicable to its federal programs. Auditor's Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance for the City's major federal program based on our audit of the types of compliance requirements referred to above. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non -Profit Organizations. Those standards and OMB Circular A-133 require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the City's compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion on compliance for the major federal program. However, our audit does not provide a legal determination of the City's compliance. Opinion on Major Federal Program In our opinion, the City complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on its major federal program for the year ended June 30, 2015. Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP 3000 5 Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95816 147 Sacramento Walnut Creek Oakland San Francisco Los Angeles Century City Newport Beach San Diego www.mgocpa.com Report on Internal Control over Compliance Management of the City is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above. In planning and performing our audit of compliance, we considered the City's internal control over compliance with the types of requirements that could have a direct and material effect on the major federal program to determine the auditing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing an opinion on compliance for the major federal program and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control over compliance. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of OMB Circular A-133. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. Sacramento, California February 3, 2016 OcoNtel LLQ 148 CITY OF LODI SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 Section I — Summary of Auditor's Results Financial Statements: Type of auditor's report issued: Internal control over financial reporting: Unmodified • Material weaknesses identified? No • Significant deficiencies identified that are not considered to be material weaknesses? Yes Noncompliance material to financial statements noted? No Federal Awards: Internal control over major federal programs: • Material weaknesses identified? No • Significant deficiencies identified that are not considered to be material weaknesses? None reported Type of auditor's report issued on compliance for major federal programs: Unmodified Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be reported in accordance with Section 510(a) of Circular A-133? Identification of major federal programs: Federal Program Title Federal Transit — Formula Grants No CFDA No. 20.507 Dollar threshold used to distinguish between Type A and Type B programs: $300,000 Auditee qualified as low-risk auditee? Yes 149 CITY OF LODI SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (Continued) FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 Section II — Financial Statement Findings Reference Number: 2015-001 Criteria: Under generally accepted accounting principles, internal service funds are expressly designed to function as cost -reimbursement devices. That is, an internal service fund is simply a means of accumulating costs related to a given activity on an accrual basis so that the costs can subsequently be allocated to the benefitting funds in the form of fees and charges. Condition: The City is not charging City funds their share of the City's Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB) costs accumulating in its Benefits Internal Service Fund. Context: The Benefits Internal Service Fund's deficit net position balances were $1,078,724, $1,930,874, $2,934,664, $3,621,665, $3,203,516, $3,568,267, and $3,712,939 as of June 30, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015, respectively. Effect: This condition resulted in an increase of $144,672 in the deficit net position of the Benefits Internal Service Fund during the year ended June 30, 2015. Cause: The City is only charging City funds their share of the City's OPEB costs that it has chosen to pay under a pay-as-you-go basis. Recommendation: Under generally accepted accounting principles, the City should either charge City funds their share of the OPEB costs incurred in its Benefits Internal Service Fund as opposed to limiting the charges to those costs actually paid, or report the OPEB liability in other City funds like is done for the net pension liability. Management Response and Corrective Action: The City's practice of reflecting the total liability and expense of the OPEB program in the Benefits Internal Service Fund enhances transparency in reporting by showing the impact of this reporting requirement in one location. The deficit net position will continue until the City fully funds the actuarially calculated liability and expense that it is required to record. Staff will bring forward the deficit amount each budget cycle for City Council consideration_ Section III — Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs None 150 CITY OF LODI SCHEDULE OF PRIOR YEAR FINDINGS AND QUESTONED COSTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 Financial Statement Findings Reference Number: 2014-001 Criteria: Under generally accepted accounting principles, internal service funds are expressly designed to function as cost -reimbursement devices. That is, an intemal service fund is simply a means of accumulating costs related to a given activity on an accrual basis so that the costs can subsequently be allocated to the benefitting funds in the form of fees and charges. Condition: The City is not charging City funds their share of the City's Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB) costs accumulating in its Benefits Internal Service Fund. Context: The Benefits Internal Service Fund's deficit net position balances were $1,078,724, $1,930,874, $2,934,664, $3,621,665, $3,203,516, and $3,568,267 as of June 30, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014, respectively. Effect: This condition resulted in an increase of $364,751 in the deficit net position of the Benefits Internal Service Fund during the year ended June 30, 2014. Cause: The City is only charging City funds their share of the City's OPEB costs that it has chosen to pay under a pay-as-you-go basis. Recommendation: Under generally accepted accounting principles, the City needs to charge City funds their share of the OPEB costs incurred in its Benefits Internal Service Fund as opposed to limiting the charges to those costs actually paid. Management Response and Corrective Action: The City's practice of reflecting the total liability and expense of the OPEB program in the Benefits Internal Service Fund enhances transparency in reporting by showing the impact of this reporting requirement in one location. The deficit net position will continue until the City fully funds the actuarially calculated liability and expense that it is required to record. Staff will bring forward the deficit amount each budget cycle for City Council consideration. Status: During the year ended June 30, 2015, the Benefits Internal Service Fund's deficit net position increased by $144,672, therefore this recommendation continues as finding 2015-001. 151 CITY OF LODI SCHEDULE OF PRIOR YEAR FINDINGS AND QUESTONED COSTS (Continued) FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 Reference Number: 2014-002 Criteria: Under generally accepted accounting principles, costs directly related to the acquisition or construction of capital assets, should be capitalized and not expensed. The City defines capital assets as assets with an initial individual cost of more than $3,000 and an estimated useful life in excess of two years. Condition: Transactions relating to the City's water meter capital asset project were expensed. Cause: The condition is a result of the timing of the City's year-end close process. The City runs a capital report identifying the City's capital asset activity and reconciles the activity to general ledger activity to ensure all costs were captured. However, costs relating to a capital project were accrued and reported in the general ledger subsequent to the previously mentioned reconciliation, thus project costs were improperly reported as an expense and not capitalized. Effect: As a result of this condition, a significant audit adjustment for the Water Fund debiting "capital assets" on the Statement of Net Position and crediting "services and supplies" expense on the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position for $1,499,302 was recorded. Recommendation: The City should improve its year-end procedures for identifying capital projects to ensure proper financial reporting. Management Response and Corrective Action: The City is currently transitioning to a new financial system which includes capital assets and project management modules. These two modules will not only streamline the year-end capitalization process, it will also ensure proper financial reporting of the City's capital assets. Status: No transactions that should have been capitalized were determined to have been expensed during the year, therefore we consider this recommendation implemented. 152 CONTINUING DISCLOSURES UNAUDITED CONTINUING DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CITY OF LODI, THE LODI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION AND THE LODI PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Fiscal Year 2012-13 The City of Lodi has executed Continuing Disclosure Certificates associated with the various debt issues outstanding by the Electric Utility, Wastewater Utility and the Lodi Public Improvement Corporation. These Certificates were executed to satisfy provisions of Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2 -12(b) (5). The material provided herein applies to the various debt issues as noted. Data for each utility is shown separately. This Bond Disclosure Section included within the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) provides the information required by the Continuing Disclosure Certificates. The CAFR, in turn, will be filed with the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. The CAFR may also be found on the City's website at www.lodi.00v. ANNUAL REPORT FOR ELECTRIC UTILITY The Lodi Electric Utility has Continuing Disclosure requirements associated with its 2008 Series A Certificates of Participation, and 2002 Taxable Series D Certificates of Participation. The annual report includes, by reference, the audited financial statement of the City of Lodi (including the Electric Utility). The annual report also contains the following five (5) tables as required in the Certificates: 1. A table setting forth the City's power supply resources for the most recently completed fiscal year. 2. A table showing the average number of customers, sales, revenues and demand for the past five fiscal years. 3. A table showing the outstanding debt of joint powers agencies in which Lodi participates and the City of Lodi share of that debt for the most recent fiscal year. 4. A table showing a summary of Operating Results for the past five fiscal years. 5. A table showing Lodi Electric Utility Department Rate Changes since November 1996 (applicable only to the 2002 Series C and D issues). Reporting of Significant Events The Certificates identify eleven (11) specific events that require special reporting. As of June 30, 2015, none of the specified events have occurred. Further, there is no knowledge on the part of the City Council, officers or employees of the City of any impending Significant Event that would require disclosure under the provisions of the Certificates. 154 Table 1 A table setting forth the City's power supply resources. Source CITY OF LODI ELECTRIC UTILITY DEPARTMENT POWER SUPPLY RESOURCES Capacity Available (MW)(10) Actual Energy % of Total (MWh) Enerav Purchased Power(2: Western 8.00 9,824 2.15% NCPA Geothermal Project 12.91 87,319 19.09 Hydroelectric Project 26.20 17,217 3.76 Combustion Turbine Project No. 1 9.98 439 0.10 Capital Facilities, Unit One 19.71 1,442 0.32 Lodi Energy Center 28.75 158,527 34.65 Contracts and Exchanges(3) 45.00 182,686 39.93 Total 150.55 457.454(4) 100.00% Total Capacity and Energy Sold at Wholesale City System Requirement for Retail Load (1) Source: NCPA. Non -coincident capacity. (2) Entitlements, firm allocations and contract amounts. (3) Includes participation in NCPA/Seattle City Light exchange. (4) Includes supply from exchanges and line losses. N/A 3,326 134.01 454,128 Table 2 A table showing the average number of customers, sales, revenues and demand for the past five fiscal years. Number of Customers: Residential Commercial Industrial Other Total Customers Kilowatt -Hour (kWh) Sales: Residential Commercial Industrial Other Total kWh sales Revenues from Sale of Energy: Residential Commercial Industrial Other Total Revenues from Sale of Energy: P k Demand (MW) ea Excludes revenues from California Energy Commission Tax. Sources: City of Lodi, audited annual financial statements and Customer Information System reports. CITY OF LODI ELECTRIC UTILITY DEPARTMENT CUSTOMER SALES, REVENUE AND DEMAND 2011 22,251 2,865 39 229 25,384 144,256,683 137,584,723 128,072,575 11,216,348 421,130,329 $ 24,513,202 $ 21,870,624 13,914,539 1,868,985 $ 62,167,350 $ 123.9 Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2012 22,244 2,834 37 235 25,350 149,814,375 138,735,487 135,620,441 11,485,428 435,655,731 25,606,368 $ 21,814,073 14,876,828 1,954,099 64,251,368 $ 116.0 156 2013 22,369 2,902 39 246 25,556 151,814,834 140,733,500 131,473,405 11,800,726 435,822,465 25,377,978 $ 21,816,149 14,173,951 1,861,567 63,229,645 $ 123.3 2014 22,547 2,898 38 250 25,733 148, 762, 783 146,176,148 130,333,102 12,022,160 437,294,193 25,270,075 $ 23,127,603 14,381,296 1,913,833 2015 22,355 3,264 40 253 25,912 148,950,428 149,380,413 128,814,673 11,635,397 438,780,911 25,165,194 23,780,354 14,418,921 1,871,470 64,692,808 $ 65,235,939 128.7 134.0 Table 3 A table showing the outstanding debt of joint powers agencies in which Lodi participates. CITY OF LODI ELECTRIC UTILITY DEPARTMENT OUTSTANDING DEBT OF JOINT POWERS AGENCIES (Dollar Amounts in Millions) Lodi's Share of Outstanding Lodi's Outstanding Debt(') Participation(2) Debt NCPA Geothermal Project Three $ 38.0 10.28% $ 3.9 Hydroelectric Project 383.0 10.37 39.7 Capital Facilities Project Unit One 44.6 39.50 17.6 Lodi Energy Center Project 241.0 17.03 41.0 TANC COTP 284.0 1.92(3) 5.5 TOTAL* $ 990.6 10.87% $ 107.7 * Columns may not add to totals due to independent rounding. (1) Source: NCPA Financial Statements. (2) Participation obligation is subject to increase upon default of another project participant. Such increase shall not exceed, without the written Consent of a non -defaulting participant, an accumulated maximum of 25% of such non -defaulting participant's original participation. Lodi's actual payment obligation differs slightly from this percentage due to varying shares of certain series of TANC bonds relating to each TANC member -participant's taxable portion and each TANC member -participant's participation or non -participation in acquisition of assets from Vernon. Effective July 1, 2014, Lodi has entered into a layoff of its COTP interest which will effectively reduce Lodi's share of outstanding debt to $0. Lodi remains contractually obligated for its share. (3) Source: Northern California Power Agency - 157 Table 4 A table showing a summary of operating results for the past five fiscal years. CITY OF LODI ELECTRIC SYSTEM SUMMARY OF OPERATING RESULTS (1) Ending Fiscal Year June 30 (Dollars in 000s) Actual 2011 Actual 2012 Actual 2013 Actual 2014 Actual 2015 Operating Revenues Rate Revenue $ 59,676 $ 61,658 $ 61,888 $ 61.837 $ 63,370 ECA Revenue 2,491 2,593 1,341 2,856 1,867 Other Revenue 1,140 969 745 2,451 1,895 Total Operating Revenue 63,307 65.220 63,974 67,144 67,132 Operating Expenses Purchased Power 35,282 39,416 39,191 37,303 38,512 Non -Power Costs (2) 13,115 10,748 12,018 13.046 13,604 Total Operating Expenses 48,397 50,164 51,209 50.349 52,116 Net Revenue Available for Debt Service 14,910 15,056 12.765 16.795 15,016 Parity Debt Service 2002 C & D, 2008 A Bonds 7,232 7,291 8,414 8.356 8.318 Total Net Debt Service 7,232 7,291 8,414 8.356 8,318 Debt Service Coverage 2.06 2.07 1.52 2.01 1.81 Remaining Revenue Available for Other Purposes 7,678 7,765 4,351 8,439 6,698 Non -Operating Revenue/Expenses Greenhouse gas allowance 2,018 453 2,323 In -Lieu Transfer to General Fund (6.977) (6.977) (6,977) (6.977) (7.033) Net Cash Flow Before Capital Expenditures 701 788 (608) 1.915 _ 1.988 Beginning Operating Reserve 25 899 28,455 30,384 31,082 33,850 Changes in GOR 1.854 1,141 1,306 942 745 Net Deposit/Withdrawal from Reserves 701 788 (608) 1,915 1,988 Ending Operating Reserve $ 28,454 $ 30,384 $ 31,082 $ 33,939 $ 36,583 Source: City of Lodi (1) As defined in the Installment Purchase Contract, this may or may not be on the same basis as Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. (2) Non -power costs include cost of services provided by other departments and does not include depreciation and amortization expense. 158 Table 5 A table showing Lodi Electric Utility Department Rate Changes since November 1996. CITY OF LODI ELECTRIC UTILITY DEPARTMENT RATE CHANGES Effective Date Percent Change September 2015 Extended Economic Development Rates January 2015 Average 5% increase across all rate classes July 2013 Established Electric Vehicle and Industrial Equipment Charging Rates April 2009 Established Economic Development Rates updated July 2013 December 2007 Established Solar Initiative Surcharge of $0.00125 per kilowatt-hour August 2007 Implemented monthly Energy Cost Adjustment December 2005 Average 17% increase across all rate classes December 2002 4.5% average rate increase August 2001 Increased MCA for all but contract customers: 10% to 12% rate change June 2001 Implemented MCA for residential and small commercial: 8% to 10% rate change December 1998 5.00% rate decrease for small commercial/industrial customers May 1998 2.50% general rate increase to fund public benefit programs September 1997 4.5 to 5.5 cents per kilowatt-hour, non -demand, non -time -use, contract rate available for new large commercial/industrial loads December 1996 10% to 40% economic development discount on new small to medium commercial/industrial electric loads 159 November 1996 Economic Stimulus Rate Credit increased to 1.262 cents per kilowatt-hour from 0.4 cents per kilowatt-hour for largest primary service customers (estimated 19% reduction) Source: City of Lodi. ANNUAL REPORT FOR WASTEWATER UTILITY The Lodi Wastewater Utility has Continuing Disclosure requirements associated with its 2004 Series A Certificates of Participation, 2007 Series A Certificates of Participation and the 2012 Refunding Wastewater Revenue Bonds. The annual report includes, by reference, the audited financial statement of the City of Lodi (including the Wastewater Utility). The annual report also contains the following five (5) tables as required in the Certificates: 1. A table setting forth the City's number of connections by user type for the past five fiscal years. 2. A table showing the proportion of service charge revenue by class of user for the most recent fiscal year (applicable only to the 2004 Series A issue). 3. A table showing the largest users by service charge revenues for the most recent fiscal year. 4. A table showing a schedule of service charges. 5. A table showing a summary of historic operating results and debt service coverage for the past five fiscal years. Additionally, the Certificate for the 2007 Series A issue requires a description of any additional indebtedness incurred during the prior fiscal year which is payable from the system net revenues on a parity with the installment payments. Reporting of Significant Events The Certificates identify eleven (11) specific events that require special reporting. As of June 30, 2015, none of the specified events have occurred. Further, there is no knowledge on the part of the City Council, officers or employees of the City of any impending Significant Event that would require disclosure under the provisions of the Certificates. 161 Table 1 A table setting forth the City's number of connections by user type for the past five fiscal years. City of Lodi Wastewater System Number of Connections by User Type as of June 30 and Percentage of Fiscal Year 2014-15 Service Charge Revenue by User Type % of FY 14/15 Service Charge User Type 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Revenue Residential 21,956 21,864 21,959 22,076 21,920 77% Commercial/Industrial 1,785 1,819 1,851 1,851 1.876 23% Total All Users 23,741 23,683 23,810 23,927 23,796 100% Source: City of Lodi Table 2 A table showing the proportion of service charge revenue by class of user for the most recent fiscal year. City of Lodi Wastewater System Proportion of Service Charge Revenues by Class of User Fiscal Year 2014-15 Percentage of Total Annual Service User Type Charge Revenue Single Family Residential 60% Multiple Family Residential 17% Commercial/Industrial 23% Total 100% Source: City of Lodi Table 3 A table showing the largest users by service charge revenue for the most recent fiscal year. User ConAgra Foods General Mills Lodi Unified School District Miller Packing Company Blue shield of California Archer Daniels Midland Pacific Coast Producers Covenant Care Vienna Convalescent Hospital Del Castillo Foods Total top ten users Total System City of Lodi Wastewater System Largest Users by Service Charge Revenues Fiscal Year 2014-15 Type of Business Specialty bakery, frozen dough $ Cereals, bread mixes, snack foods K-12, adult education Hot dog producer Health Insurance Agricultural processor Private label fruit canning Rehabilitation/Nursing Center Rehabilitation/Nursing Center Tortilla producer Service Charge Revenue 474,855 332,022 95,931 39,311 39,119 35,804 32,856 21,397 21,140 20.580 Percentage of Total Annual Service Charge Revenue 3.23% 2.26 .65 .27 .27 .24 .22 .14 .14 .14 1,113,015 7.56% 14,714,123 100.00% Table 4 A table showing the schedule of service charges For Residential Users (per month): 1 Bedroom 2 Bedrooms 3 Bedrooms 4 Bedrooms 5 Bedrooms 6 Bedrooms 7 Bedrooms For Commercial/Industrial Users: Moderate Strength (annual per Sewage Service Unit (SSU) High Strength: Flow (annual per MG) BOD (annual per 1,000 lbs.) SS (annual per 1,000 lbs.) Grease Interceptor/Septic Holding Tank Waste within City Limits (per 1,000 gal.) Septic Holding Tank Waste Outside City Limits (per 1,000 gal.) Disposal to Storm Drain System (per MG) Disposal to Industrial System: Flow (per MG, annual basis) BOD (per 1,000 lbs., annual basis) Winery Waste (per 1,000 gallons) City of Lodi Wastewater System Schedule of Wastewater Service Charges Service Service Charge Service Charge Charge (effective July (effective July (effective July 1, 2011) 1, 2012 1, 2013) 165 $24.47 32.62 40.78 48.93 57.09 65.24 73.40 $391.44 3,303.25 545.12 340.84 288.63 612.73 303.18 2,609.28 23.92 292.27 $25.20 33.60 42.00 50.40 58.80 67.20 75.60 $403.20 3,402.35 561.47 351.07 297.29 631.11 312.28 2,687.56 24.64 301.01 $25.83 34.44 43.05 51.66 60.27 68.88 77.49 $413.28 3,487.41 575.51 359.85 304.72 646.89 320.09 301.04 Service Charge (effective July 1, 2014) $26.48 35.30 44.13 52.95 61.78 70.60 79.43 $423.61 3,574.60 589.90 368.85 312.34 663.06 328.09 Table 5 A table showing historic operating results and debt service coverage for the past five fiscal years. City of Lodi Wastewater System Historical Operating Results and Debt Service Coverage Fiscal Years 2010-11 through 2014-15 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Operating Revenues Charges for Services $13,089,679 $13,280,216 $13,747,216 $14,305,093 $14,714,123 Non -Operating Revenues Interest Income 220,600 216,108 301,347 427,308 356,590 Rent Other 3,198.194 290,819 256,868 453.798 774,007 Total System Revenues 16,508,473 13,787,143 14,305,431 15,186,199 15,844,720 Operating Expenses Personnel services 3,257,618 3,130,012 3.089,930 3,215,190 3,116,493 Supplies, Materials and services 1,955,464 2,818,041 1,900,710 2,145,745 2,541,909 Utilities 758,934 710.622 683.508 642,508 676.838 Total Operating Expenses 5,972,016 6.658.675 5.674.148 6,003,443 6.335.240 System Net Revenues 10,536,457 7,128,468 8,631,283 9,182,756 9,509,480 Parity Debt Service 2003 Installment Payments 381,393 379,170 381,122 3,280,111 2004 Installment Payments 2,147,600 2,139,350 1,705,213 98,321 98,325 2007 Installment Payments 1,588,750 1,599,050 1,598,950 1,603,550 1,602,850 2012 Installment Payments 374,519 1.921.700 1 970.350 Total Parity Debt Service 4,117,743 4,117,570 4,059,804 6,903,682 3,671,525 Debt Service Coverage 2.56 1.73 2.13 1.33 2.59 Non -Operating Expenses Transfers (In)/Out 1,451,480 _ , (778,092) 1.451;480 1,318,000 1,068,000 Total Non -Operating Expenses 1,451,480 (778,092) 1,451,480 1,318,000 1,068,000 Net Cashflow Before Capital Expenditures $4,967,234 $3,788,990 $3,119,999 $961,072 $4,769,955 Source: Financial Services Division 166 Additional Indebtedness The Wastewater Utility did not incur any additional indebtedness during the 2014-15 fiscal year which is payable from the system net revenues on a parity with the installment payments. 167 ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE LODI PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION AND THE LODI PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY The Lodi Public Improvement Corporation and the Lodi Public Financing Authority have Continuing Disclosure requirements associated with its 2012 Refunding Lease Revenue Bonds. The annual report includes, by reference, the audited financial statement of the City of Lodi. The annual report also contains the following five (5) tables as required in the Certificates: 1. A table setting forth the approved budget and actual results for the most recent fiscal year. 2. A table showing the comparative statements of revenue, expenditures and changes in fund balance for the general fund for the past five fiscal years. 3. A table showing the assessed valuations for the last five fiscal years. 4. A table showing the secured property tax collections for the past ten fiscal years. 5. A table showing the ten largest locally secured taxpayers for the last fiscal year. 6. A table showing the Employee -paid and City -paid employee portion of the retirement plan. Reporting of Significant Events The Certificates identify eleven (11) specific events that require special reporting. As of June 30, 2015, none of the specified events have occurred. Further, there is no knowledge on the part of the City Council, officers or employees of the City of any impending Significant Event that would require disclosure under the provisions of the Certificates. Table 1 A table setting forth the approved budget and actual results for the most recent fiscal year. Please refer to the Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget and Actual on page 86 of this Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. 168 Table 2 A table showing the comparative statements of revenue, expenditures and changes in fund balance for the general fund for the past five fiscal years. STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES GENERAL FUND LAST FIVE YEARS 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Revenues: Taxes $ 23,061,164 22,928,438 23,022,370 23,718,396 24,630,745 Licenses and permits 83,395 79,745 62,582 83,420 87,908 Intergovernmental revenues 10,032,523 10,449,364 10,531,871 11,319,708 12,642,107 Charges for services 1,035,220 682,156 1,105,178 1,025,851 1,482,448 Fines, forfeits and penalties 1,404,307 1,355,101 1,628,870 1,552,531 1,573,071 Investment and rental income 455,923 807,270 979,100 1,548,787 1,546,845 Miscellaneous revenue 480,028 286.125 393,299 352.331 290.951 Total revenues 36.552,560 36,588,199 37.723.270 39.601.024 42.254.075 Expenditures: Current: General government 6,478,159 6,007,327 5,943,192 6,482,226 6,490,907 Public protection 24,091,472 24,923,155 25,920,654 26,470,110 26,388,172 Public works 1,421,238 1,112,569 1,555,833 1,554,939 1,882,250 Library 1,357,473 1,380,972 1,410,657 1,267,850 1,311,367 Parks and recreation 2,191,102 Debt service: Interest and fiscal charges 6,427 Principal payments 141.576 Total expenditures 35,687,447 33,424,023 34,830,336 35.775.125 36.072.696 Excess of revenues over expenditures 865.113 3,164,176 2,892,934 3.825.899 6.181.379 Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in 5,379,186 5,370,230 5,367,990 3,952,000 3,952,000 Transfers out (4,383,110) (8,391,858) (6.584.665) (6.269,351) (7,128,586) Total other financing sources (uses) 996,076 (3.021.628) (1,216,675) (2.317.351) (3,176,586) Net change in fund balances 1,861,189 142,548 1,676,259 1,508,548 3,004,793 Fund balances, beginning of year 4.285.216 6.146.405 6,288,953 7,965,212 9,473,760 Fund balances, end of year $ 6,146,405 6.288.953 7,965,212 9,473,760 12,478,553 169 Table 3 A table showing the assessed valuations for the last five fiscal years. Please refer to the table shown in the Statistical Section on page 115. Table 4 A table showing the secured property tax collections for the past ten fiscal years. Please refer to the table shown in the Statistical Section on page 118. Table 5 A table showing the ten largest locally secured taxpayers for the last fiscal year. Please refer to the table shown in the Statistical Section on page 117. Table 6 A table showing the Employee -paid and City -paid employee portion of the retirement plan. Pension Contributions As of Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015 Bargaining Units Employee Paid* Council appointees 7.0% Executive management 7.0 Confidential mid -management 7.0 Confidential 7.0 Fire mid -management 9.0 Fire 9.0 Mid -management 7.0 General services 7.0 Maintenance and operators 7.0 I BEW 7.0 Police mid -management 9.0 Police 9.0 Dispatchers 7.0 *PEPRA Miscellaneous Employees *PEPRA Safety Employees City Paid Total Employee Share % 7.0% 7.0 7.0 7.0 9.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 9.0 9.0 7.0 6.75 6.75 11.25 11.25 170 ANNUAL REPORT FOR WATER UTILITY The Lodi Water Utility has Continuing Disclosure requirements associated with its 2010 Series A and B Certificates of Participation. The annual report includes, by reference, the audited financial statement of the City of Lodi (including the Water Utility). The annual report also contains the following four (4) tables as required in the Certificates: 1. A table setting forth the City's number of accounts and revenues by user type for the past five fiscal years. 2. A table showing the largest users by service charge revenues for the most recent fiscal year. 3. A table showing a schedule of selected rates effective January 1, 2015. 4. A table showing a summary of historic operating results and debt service coverage for the past five fiscal years. Additionally, the Certificate for the 2010 Series A issue requires a description of any additional indebtedness incurred during the prior fiscal year which is payable from the system net revenues on a parity with the installment payments. Reporting of Significant Events The Certificates identify eleven (11) specific events that require special reporting. As of June 30, 2015, none of the specified events have occurred. Further, there is no knowledge on the part of the City Council, officers or employees of the City of any impending Significant Event that would require disclosure under the provisions of the Certificates. 171 Table 1 A table showing number of accounts and revenues by user type. CITY OF LODI WATER SYSTEM Number of Accounts and Revenues by User Type Commercial/Industrial/ Municipal Residential Year Ending Number of Number of December 31 Accounts Revenue Accounts _ Revenue 2007 1,445 $ 2,043,731 21,533 $ 8,715,928 2008 1,470 2,184,496 21,449 9,429,594 2009 1,382 2,188,486 21,577 9,600,129 2010 1,383 2,097,001 21,622 9,604,412 2011 1,396 2,169,967 21,593 9,706,537 2012 1,432 2,329,957 23,399 8,411,315 2013 1,415 2,436,777 21,717 10,353,374 2014 1,435 2,534,741 21,722 10,359,235 Source: City of Lodi Table 2 A table showing the largest users by service charge revenue for the most recent fiscal year. User Lodi Unified School District City of Lodi Pacific Coast Producers General Mills ConAgra Foods Lodi Memorial Hospital Lodi Grape Festival Temple Baptist Church Wine & Roses Blue Shield of California Subtotal Top Ten Users TOTAL SYSTEM City of Lodi Water System Largest Users by Service Charge Revenues Fiscal Year 2014-15 Type of Business K-12, adult education Government Private label fruit canning Cereals, bread mixes, snack foods Specialty bakery, frozen dough Health care Festival Grounds Church Hotel and restaurant Health insurance Service Charge Revenue 303,546 280,366 142,558 81,600 64,539 54,230 20,728 17,848 13,623 12,815 Percentage of Total Annual Service Charge Revenue 2.39% 2.20 1.12 0.64 0.51 0.43 0.16 0.14 0.11 0.10 991,853 7.80% 12,722,619 100.00% Table 3 A table showing selected rates effective January 1, 2015. CITY OF LODI WATER SYSTEM Selected Rates Effective January 1, 2015 Percent Increase Current Flat Rates ($/month) Single Family Residential Unit ($/month) 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom Metered Water Rates Service Charge ($/month) Single Family Residential Up to 3/4" Meter Multi -Family and Non -Residential 1" Meter 1 1/2" Meter 2" Meter Water Usage rates ($/CCF) Single Family Residential Tier 1 - 0 to 10 CCF/month Tier 2 - 11 to 50 CCF/month Tier 3 - Over 50CCF/month Multi -Family and Non -Residential All Water Usage Source: City of Lodi. 174 $31.26 $37.55 $45.00 $22.58 $35.91 $63.66 $93.26 $0.96 $1.32 $1.68 1.08 Table 4 A table showing historic operating results and debt service coverage for the past five fiscal years. CITY OF LODI WATER SYSTEM Historical Operating results and Debt Service Coverage Fiscal Years 2010-11 through 2014-15 Gross Revenues Water Sales (1) Investment Earnings Water Impact Mitigation Fees Meter Retrofit Installation Charges Other Revenues (2) Total Gross Revenues Operating and Maintenance Expenses Personnel Services (3) Supplies, Materials and Services (3) New Treatment Plant Operations (net) Utilities Administrative Overhead Total 0 & M Expenses Net Revenue Available for Debt Service Debt Service 1991 California DWR SRF loan (4) 2010 Bonds (5) 2010-11 11,940,022 83,374 14,803 1,653,399 359,979 14.051.577 1,359,227 2,590,222 652,296 1,060,122 5,661,865 8,389,712 1,433,395 849.968 Total Net Debt Service 2,283,363 Debt Service Coverage (6) Debt Service Coverage Debt Service Coverage (excluding impact mitigation fees) Net Remaining Revenues Available for Capital Capital Improvement Projects Meter Retrofit Program (7) 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 12,083, 226 12,441, 039 12, 756, 076 12, 722,619 119,526 67,892 118,799 87,211 111,429 2,529 60,000 20,299 675,815 585,965 405,677 56,052 285,093 269,335 825,314 483.710 13,275,089 13,366,850 14,165,866 13,369,891 1,856,131 2,272,568 2,392,611 2,316,305 1,781,622 2,882,547 3,014,227 2,139,014 693,657 683,635 648,233 579,774 1,060,120 1,060,120 780.000 780,000 5,391,530 6,898,870 6,835,071 5,815,093 7,883,559 6,467,980 7,330,795 7,554,798 2,304,811 2,335,360 2,355,230 2,356,141 _ 2,304,811 2,335,360 2,355,230 2,356,141 3.67 3.42 2.77 3.11 3.21 3.67 6,106, 349 919,555 175 3.37 2.77 3.09 3.20 5,578,748 4,132,620 4,975,565 5,198,657 6,325,558 6,536,687 6,891,350 4,841,932 Other Water System Improvements (8) Total Capital Improvement Projects Net Change in Reserve Water Enterprise Fund (9) Beginning Cash Balance Ending Cash Balance (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) 3,666,202 540,832 1,144,363 4.585.757 6,866,390 1,520,592 14,120,605 12,807,412 (1,287,639) 12,807,412 12,465,350 380.675 267.902 7,681,050 7,272,025 (3,548,520) (2,296,460) 12,465,350 9,044,659 9,044,659 7,027,567 5,109,834 88,823 7,027,567 6,755,522 Water sales reflect Council -adopted rate increases effective January 1, 2015. Includes rent, sales of City property, discounts, water reimbursements, and damage to property, water tap fees, DBCP reimbursements, and other miscellaneous revenues. DBCP reimbursements are expected to decline beginning in Fiscal Year 2012-13 as new plant becomes operational and groundwater draws diminish. PCE/TCE litigation revenues are excluded from Fiscal year 2005-06 through 2009- 10. Fiscal year 2009-10 reflects one-time adjustments from prior years. PCE/TCE litigation expenses are excluded from Fiscal Year 2006-07 through Fiscal year 2010-11. Debt service on 1991 Loan was paid off in full on October 1, 2010. Reflects total debt service for the 2010 Water Revenue Bonds net of the 35% interest rate subsidy for the Series 2010B bonds. Coverage calculated based on Net Revenues divided by net Debt Service and Net Revenues Tess mitigation fees divided by Net Debt Service. Annual capital costs of transition to water meters. Program expected to be completed in Fiscal Year 2017-18. Excludes costs of the Project to be funded from proceeds of the Series 2010 Bonds. Water Enterprise Fund balance includes both operating and capital reserves and is presented on a cash basis. Cash position is expected to increase substantially upon completion of the water meter installation program. Source: City of Lodi 176 .7s APPENDIX C SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL LEGAL DOCUMENTS Refer to Indenture of Trust and Installment Purchase Agreement, attached as Exhibits A and B, respectively, to the draft Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Lodi Public Financing Authority Authorizing the Issuance and Sale of Refunding Wastewater Revenue Bonds to Refinance an Installment Payment Obligation of the City of Lodi, and Approving Related Documents and Official Action C-1 APPENDIX D FORM OF OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL D-1 1-29-16 Jones Hall Draft March , 2016 Lodi Public Financing Authority 221 West Pine Street Lodi, CA 95240 OPINION: $ Lodi Public Financing Authority 2016 Refunding Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series A Members of the Board of Directors of the Authority: We have acted as bond counsel to the Lodi Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") in connection with the issuance by the Authority of the captioned bonds dated the date hereof (the "Bonds"). In such capacity, we have examined such law and such certified proceedings, certifications and other documents as we have deemed necessary to render this opinion. The Bonds are issued pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Bond Law"), the Indenture of Trust, dated as of March 1, 2016 (the "Indenture"), by and between the Authority and Union Bank, N.A., as trustee (the "Trustee "), and a resolution (the "Resolution') of the Board of Directors of the Authority adopted February , 2016. Under the Indenture, the Authority has pledged certain revenues (the "Revenues") for the payment of principal, premium (if any), and interest on the Bonds when due, including installment payments made by the City of Lodi (the "City") under an Installment Purchase Agreement dated as of March 1, 2016 (the "Installment Purchase Agreement") between the Authority and the City. Regarding questions of fact material to our opinion, we have relied on representations of the Authority contained in the Indenture and the City contained in the Installment Purchase Agreement, and in the certified proceedings and other certifications of public officials furnished to us, without undertaking to verify the same by independent investigation. Based on the foregoing, we are of the opinion that, under existing law: 1. The Authority is a duly created and validly existing joint exercise of powers authority with the power to adopt the Resolution, enter into the Indenture and perform the agreements on its part contained therein, and issue the Bonds. Lodi Public Financing Authority March , 2016 Page 2 2. The City is a duly created and validly existing general law city with the power to enter into the Installment Purchase Agreement and perform the agreements on its part contained therein. 3. The Indenture has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Authority, and constitutes a valid and binding obligation of the Authority, enforceable against the Authority. 4. The Installment Purchase Agreement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Authority and the City, and constitutes a valid and binding obligation of the Authority and the City, enforceable against the Authority and the City. 5. The Indenture creates a valid lien on the Revenues and other funds pledged by the Indenture for the security of the Bonds, on a parity with other bonds (if any) issued or to be issued under the Indenture. 6. The Bonds have been duly authorized and executed by the Authority, and are valid and binding limited obligations of the Authority, payable solely from the Revenues and other funds provided therefor in the Indenture. 7. Interest on the Bonds is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes and is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations; it should be noted, however, that for the purpose of computing the alternative minimum tax imposed on corporations (as defined for federal income tax purposes), such interest is taken into account in determining certain income and earnings. The opinions set forth in the preceding sentence are subject to the condition that the Authority and the City comply with all requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that must be satisfied subsequent to the delivery of the Bonds in order that such interest be, or continue to be, excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes. The Authority and the City have covenanted to comply with each such requirement. Failure to comply with certain of such requirements may cause the inclusion of interest on the Bonds in gross income for federal income tax purposes to be retroactive to the date of issuance of the Bonds. We express no opinion regarding other federal tax consequences arising with respect to the Bonds. 8. Interest on the Bonds is exempt from personal income taxation imposed by the State of California. The rights of the owners of the Bonds and the enforceability of the Bonds and the Indenture are limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and other similar laws affecting creditors' rights generally, and by equitable principles, whether considered at law or in equity. This opinion is given as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to revise or supplement this opinion to reflect any facts or circumstances that may hereafter come to our Lodi Public Financing Authority March , 2016 Page 3 attention, or any changes in law that may hereafter occur. Our engagement with respect to this matter has terminated as of the date hereof. Respectfully submitted, A Professional Law Corporation APPENDIX E FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT 2-8-16 Jones Hall Draft CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE LODI PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 2016 REFUNDING WASTEWATER REVENUE BONDS, SERIES A This CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE (this "Disclosure Certificate") is executed and delivered by the CITY OF LODI (the "City") in connection with the execution and delivery of the bonds captioned above (the "Bonds"). The Bonds are being executed and delivered pursuant to an Indenture of Trust, dated as of March 1, 2016 (the "Indenture"), by and between the City and MUFG Union Bank, N.A., as trustee. The City covenants and agrees as follows: Section 1. Purpose of the Disclosure Certificate. This Disclosure Certificate is being executed and delivered by the City for the benefit of the holders and beneficial owners of the Bonds and in order to assist the Participating Underwriter in complying with S.E.C. Rule 15c2 - 12(b)(5). Section 2. Definitions. In addition to the definitions set forth above and in the Indenture, which apply to any capitalized term used in this Disclosure Certificate unless otherwise defined in this Section 2, the following capitalized terms shall have the following meanings: "Annual Report" means any Annual Report provided by the City pursuant to, and as described in, Sections 3 and 4 of this Disclosure Certificate. "Annual Report Date" means the date that is 9 months after the end of the City's fiscal year (currently March 31 based on the City's fiscal year end of June 30). "Dissemination Agent" means the City, or any successor Dissemination Agent designated in writing by the City and which has filed with the City a written acceptance of such designation. "Listed Events" means any of the events listed in Section 5(a) of this Disclosure Certificate. "MSRB" means the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, which has been designated by the Securities and Exchange Commission as the sole repository of disclosure information for purposes of the Rule, or any other repository of disclosure information that may be designated by the Securities and Exchange Commission as such for purposes of the Rule in the future. "Official Statement' means the final official statement executed by the City in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. "Participating Underwriter" means J.P. Morgan, the original underwriter of the Bonds required to comply with the Rule in connection with offering of the Bonds. "Rule" means Rule 15c2 -12(b)(5) adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as it may be amended from time to time. Section 3. Provision of Annual Reports. (a) The City shall, or shall cause the Dissemination Agent to, not later than the Annual Report Date, commencing March 31, 2017, with the report for the 2015-16 fiscal year, provide to the MSRB, in an electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB, an Annual Report that is consistent with the requirements of Section 4 of this Disclosure Certificate. Not later than 15 Business Days prior to the Annual Report Date, the City shall provide the Annual Report to the Dissemination Agent (if other than the City). If by 15 Business Days prior to the Annual Report Date the Dissemination Agent (if other than the City) has not received a copy of the Annual Report, the Dissemination Agent shall contact the City to determine if the City is in compliance with the previous sentence. The Annual Report may be submitted as a single document or as separate documents comprising a package, and may include by reference other information as provided in Section 4 of this Disclosure Certificate; provided that the audited financial statements of the City may be submitted separately from the balance of the Annual Report, and later than the Annual Report Date, if not available by that date. If the City's fiscal year changes, it shall give notice of such change in the same manner as for a Listed Event under Section 5(c). The City shall provide a written certification with each Annual Report furnished to the Dissemination Agent to the effect that such Annual Report constitutes the Annual Report required to be furnished by the City hereunder. (b) If the City does not provide (or cause the Dissemination Agent to provide) an Annual Report by the Annual Report Date, the City shall provide (or cause the Dissemination Agent to provide) to the MSRB, in an electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB, a notice in substantially the form attached as Exhibit A. (c) With respect to each Annual Report, the Dissemination Agent shall: (i) determine each year prior to the Annual Report Date the then -applicable rules and electronic format prescribed by the MSRB for the filing of annual continuing disclosure reports; and (ii) if the Dissemination Agent is other than the City, file a report with the City certifying that the Annual Report has been provided pursuant to this Disclosure Certificate, and stating the date it was provided. Section 4. Content of Annual Reports. The City's Annual Report shall contain or incorporate by reference the following: (a) The City's audited financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as promulgated to apply to governmental entities from time to time by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. If the City's audited financial statements are not available by the Annual Report Date, the Annual Report shall contain unaudited financial statements in a format similar to the financial statements contained in the final Official Statement, and the audited financial statements shall be filed in the same manner as the Annual Report when they become available. (b) Unless otherwise provided in the audited financial statements filed on or before the Annual Report Date, the following financial information and operating data: (1) October 1. Principal amount of Bonds outstanding as of the immediately preceding (ii) A description of any Parity Debt incurred by the City in the most recently - completed fiscal year. (iii) Information for the most recently -completed fiscal year in the form of Table 2 (Number of Connections by User Type). (iv) Information for the most recently -completed fiscal year in the form of Table 3 (Largest Users by Service Charge Revenues). (v) Information for the most recently -completed fiscal year in the form of Table 4 (Schedule of Wastewater Service Charges). (vi) Information for the most recently -completed fiscal year in the form of Table 7 (Historical Operating Results and Debt Service Coverage). (vii) Information for the most recently -completed fiscal year in the form of Table 9 (Historical Reserve Balances). (c) In addition to any of the information expressly required to be provided under this Disclosure Certificate, the City shall provide such further material information, if any, as may be necessary to make the specifically required statements, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading. (d) Any or all of the items listed above may be included by specific reference to other documents, including official statements of debt issues of the City or related public entities, which are available to the public on the MSRB's Internet web site or filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The City shall clearly identify each such other document so included by reference. Section 5. Reporting of Significant Events. (a) The City shall give, or cause to be given, notice of the occurrence of any of the following Listed Events with respect to the Bonds: (1) Principal and interest payment delinquencies. (2) Non-payment related defaults, if material. (3) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties. (4) Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties. (5) Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform. (6) Adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701-TEB) or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the security, or other material events affecting the tax status of the security. (7) Modifications to rights of security holders, if material. (8) Bond calls, if material, and tender offers. (9) Defeasances. (10) Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the securities, if material. (11) Rating changes. (12) Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the City or other obligated person. (13) The consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving the City or an obligated person, or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the City or an obligated person (other than in the ordinary course of business), the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action, or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material. (14) Appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if material. (b) Whenever the City obtains knowledge of the occurrence of a Listed Event, the City shall, or shall cause the Dissemination Agent (if not the City) to, file a notice of such occurrence with the MSRB, in an electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB, in a timely manner not in excess of 10 business days after the occurrence of the Listed Event. Notwithstanding the foregoing, notice of Listed Events described in subsections (a)(8) and (9) above need not be given under this subsection any earlier than the notice (if any) of the underlying event is given to holders of affected Bonds under the Indenture. (c) The City acknowledges that the events described in subparagraphs (a)(2), (a)(7), (a)(8) (if the event is a bond call), (a)(10), (a)(13), and (a)(14) of this Section 5 contain the qualifier "if material" and that subparagraph (a)(6) also contains the qualifier "material" with respect to certain notices, determinations or other events affecting the tax status of the Bonds. The City shall cause a notice to be filed as set forth in paragraph (b) above with respect to any such event only to the extent that it determines the event's occurrence is material for purposes of U.S. federal securities law. Whenever the City obtains knowledge of the occurrence of any of these Listed Events, the City will as soon as possible determine if such event would be material under applicable federal securities law. If such event is determined to be material, the City will cause a notice to be filed as set forth in paragraph (b) above. (d) For purposes of this Disclosure Certificate, any event described in paragraph (a)(12) above is considered to occur when any of the following occur: the appointment of a receiver, fiscal agent, or similar officer for the City in a proceeding under the United States Bankruptcy Code or in any other proceeding under state or federal law in which a court or governmental authority has assumed jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the City, or if such jurisdiction has been assumed by leaving the existing governing body and officials or officers in possession but subject to the supervision and orders of a court or governmental authority, or the entry of an order confirming a plan of reorganization, arrangement, or liquidation by a court or governmental authority having supervision or jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the City. Section 6. Identifying information for Filings with the MSRB. All documents provided to the MSRB under the Disclosure Certificate shall be accompanied by identifying information as prescribed by the MSRB. Section 7. Termination of Reporting Obligation. The City's obligations under this Disclosure Certificate shall terminate upon the legal defeasance, prior redemption or payment in full of all of the Bonds. If such termination occurs prior to the final maturity of the Bonds, the City shall give notice of such termination in the same manner as for a Listed Event under Section 5(c). Section 8. Dissemination Agent. The City may, from time to time, appoint or engage a Dissemination Agent to assist it in carrying out its obligations under this Disclosure Certificate, and may discharge any Dissemination Agent, with or without appointing a successor Dissemination Agent. The initial Dissemination Agent shall be the City. Any Dissemination Agent may resign by providing 30 days' written notice to the City. Section 9. Amendment; Waiver. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Disclosure Certificate, the City may amend this Disclosure Certificate, and any provision of this Disclosure Certificate may be waived, provided that the following conditions are satisfied: (a) if the amendment or waiver relates to the provisions of Sections 3(a), 4 or 5(a), it may only be made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in legal requirements, change in law, or change in the identity, nature, or status of an obligated person with respect to the Bonds, or type of business conducted; (b) the undertakings herein, as proposed to be amended or waived, would, in the opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel, have complied with the requirements of the Rule at the time of the primary offering of the Bonds, after taking into account any amendments or interpretations of the Rule, as well as any change in circumstances; and (c) the proposed amendment or waiver either (i) is approved by holders of the Bonds in the manner provided in the Indenture for amendments to the Indenture with the consent of holders, or (ii) does not, in the opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel, materially impair the interests of the holders or beneficial owners of the Bonds. If the annual financial information or operating data to be provided in the Annual Report is amended pursuant to the provisions hereof, the first Annual Report filed pursuant hereto containing the amended operating data or financial information shall explain, in narrative form, the reasons for the amendment and the impact of the change in the type of operating data or financial information being provided. If an amendment is made to this Disclosure Certificate modifying the accounting principles to be followed in preparing financial statements, the Annual Report for the year in which the change is made shall present a comparison between the financial statements or information prepared on the basis of the new accounting principles and those prepared on the basis of the former accounting principles. The comparison shall include a qualitative discussion of the differences in the accounting principles and the impact of the change in the accounting principles on the presentation of the financial information, in order to provide information to investors to enable them to evaluate the ability of the City to meet its obligations. To the extent reasonably feasible, the comparison shall be quantitative. A notice of any amendment made pursuant to this Section 9 shall be filed in the same manner as for a Listed Event under Section 5(c). Section 10. Additional information. Nothing in this Disclosure Certificate shall be deemed to prevent the City from disseminating any other information, using the means of dissemination set forth in this Disclosure Certificate or any other means of communication, or including any other information in any Annual Report or notice of occurrence of a Listed Event, in addition to that which is required by this Disclosure Certificate. If the City chooses to include any information in any Annual Report or notice of occurrence of a Listed Event in addition to that which is specifically required by this Disclosure Certificate, the City shall have no obligation under this Disclosure Certificate to update such information or include it in any future Annual Report or notice of occurrence of a Listed Event. Section 11. Default. If the City fails to comply with any provision of this Disclosure Certificate, the Participating Underwriter or any holder or beneficial owner of the Bonds may take such actions as may be necessary and appropriate, including seeking mandate or specific performance by court order, to cause the City to comply with its obligations under this Disclosure Certificate. A default under this Disclosure Certificate shall not be deemed an Event of Default under the Indenture, and the sole remedy under this Disclosure Certificate in the event of any failure of the City to comply with this Disclosure Certificate shall be an action to compel performance. Section 12. Duties, Immunities and Liabilities of Dissemination Agent. (a) The Dissemination Agent shall have only such duties as are specifically set forth in this Disclosure Certificate, and the City agrees to indemnify and save the Dissemination Agent, its officers, directors, employees and agents, harmless against any loss, expense and liabilities which they may incur arising out of or in the exercise or performance of its powers and duties hereunder, including the costs and expenses (including attorneys fees) of defending against any claim of liability, but excluding liabilities due to the Dissemination Agent's negligence or willful misconduct. The Dissemination Agent shall have no duty or obligation to review any information provided to it by the City hereunder, and shall not be deemed to be acting in any fiduciary capacity for the City, the Bond holders or any other party. The obligations of the City under this Section shall survive resignation or removal of the Dissemination Agent and payment of the Bonds. (b) The Dissemination Agent shall be paid compensation by the City for its services provided hereunder in accordance with its schedule of fees as amended from time to time, and shall be reimbursed for all expenses, legal fees and advances made or incurred by the Dissemination Agent in the performance of its duties hereunder. Section 13. Beneficiaries. This Disclosure Certificate shall inure solely to the benefit of the City, the Dissemination Agent, the Participating Underwriter and the holders and beneficial owners from time to time of the Bonds, and shall create no rights in any other person or entity. Section 14. Counterparts. This Disclosure Certificate may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be regarded as an original, and all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. Date: March , 2016 CITY OF LODI By: Name: Title: EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF FAILURE TO FILE ANNUAL REPORT Name of Issuer: Lodi Public Financing Authority Name of Issue: Lodi Public Financing Authority 2016 Refunding Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series A Date of Issuance March _ , 2016 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City has not provided an Annual Report with respect to the above-named Bonds as required by the Continuing Disclosure Certificate dated March , 2016. The City anticipates that the Annual Report will be filed by Dated: DISSEMINATION AGENT By: Its: APPENDIX F DTC AND THE BOOK -ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM The information in this Appendix C regarding DTC and its book -entry system has been obtained from DTC's website, for use in securities offering documents, and the City takes no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness thereof or for the absence of material changes in such information after the date hereof. The Depository Trust Company ("DTC"), New York, New York, acts as securities depository for the 2016 Bonds. The 2016 Bonds were issued as fully—registered securities registered in the name of Cede & Co. (DTC's partnership nominee) or such other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. One fully -registered bond certificate was issued for each maturity of each series of the 2016 Bonds, each in the aggregate principal amount of such maturity, and will be deposited with DTC. DTC, the world's largest securities depository, is a limited -purpose trust company organized under the New York Banking Law, a "banking organization" within the meaning of the New York Banking Law, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a "clearing corporation" within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code, and a "clearing agency" registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. DTC holds and provides asset servicing for over 3.5 million issues of U.S. and non -U.S. equity issues, corporate and municipal debt issues, and money market instruments (from over 100 countries) that DTC's participants ("Direct Participants") deposit with DTC. DTC also facilitates the post -trade settlement among Direct Participants of sales and other securities transactions in deposited securities, through electronic computerized book - entry transfers and pledges between Direct Participants' accounts. This eliminates the need for physical movement of securities certificates. Direct Participants include both U.S. and non -U.S. securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations, and certain other organizations. DTC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation ("DTCC"). DTCC is the holding company for DTC, National Securities Clearing Corporation and Fixed Income Clearing Corporation, all of which are registered clearing agencies. DTCC is owned by the users of its regulated subsidiaries. Access to the DTC system is also available to others such as both U.S. and non -U.S. securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, and clearing corporations that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Direct Participant, either directly or indirectly ("Indirect Participants"). DTC has a Standard & Poor's rating of AA+. The DTC Rules applicable to Participants are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. More information about DTC can be found at www.dtcc.com. Purchases of the 2016 Bonds under the DTC system must be made by or through Direct Participants, which will receive a credit for the 2016 Bonds on DTC's records. The ownership interest of each actual purchaser of each 2016 Bond ("Beneficial Owner") is in turn to be recorded on the Direct and Indirect Participants' records. Beneficial Owners will not receive written confirmation from DTC of their purchase. Beneficial Owners are, however, expected to receive written confirmations providing details of the transaction, as well as periodic statements of their holdings, from the Direct or Indirect Participant through which the Beneficial Owner entered into the transaction. Transfers of ownership interests in the 2016 Bonds are to be accomplished by entries made on the books of Direct and Indirect Participants acting on behalf of Beneficial Owners. Beneficial Owners will not receive certificates representing their ownership interests in the 2016 Bonds, except in the event that use of the book -entry system for the 2016 Bonds is discontinued. F-1 To facilitate subsequent transfers, all 2016 Bonds deposited by Direct Participants with DTC are registered in the name of DTC's partnership nominee, Cede & Co. or such other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. The deposit of 2016 Bonds with DTC and their registration in the name of Cede & Co. or such other DTC nominee do not affect any change in beneficial ownership. DTC has no knowledge of the actual Beneficial Owners of the 2016 Bonds; DTC's records reflect only the identity of the Direct Participants to whose accounts such 2016 Bonds are credited, which may or may not be the Beneficial Owners. The Direct and Indirect Participants will remain responsible for keeping account of their holdings on behalf of their customers. Conveyance of notices and other communications by DTC to Direct Participants, by Direct Participants to Indirect Participants, and by Direct Participants and Indirect Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Beneficial Owners of 2016 Bonds may wish to take certain steps to augment the transmission to them of notices of significant events with respect to the 2016 Bonds, such as redemptions, tenders, defaults and proposed amendments to the 2016 Bond documents. For example, Beneficial Owners of 2016 Bonds may wish to ascertain that the nominee holding the 2016 Bonds for their benefit has agreed to obtain and transmit notices to Beneficial Owners. In the alternative, Beneficial Owners may wish to provide their names and addresses to the registrar and request that copies of the notices be provided directly to them. While the 2016 Bonds are in the book -entry -only system, redemption notices will be sent to DTC. If less than all of the 2016 Bonds of a maturity are being redeemed, DTC's practice is to determine by lot the amount of the interest of each Direct Participant in such issue to be redeemed. Neither DTC nor Cede & Co. (nor any other DTC nominee) will consent or vote with respect to the 2016 Bonds unless authorized by a Direct Participant in accordance with DTC's MMI Procedures. Under its usual procedures, DTC mails an Omnibus Proxy to the City as soon as possible after the record date. The Omnibus Proxy assigns Cede & Co.'s consenting or voting rights to those Direct Participants to whose accounts the 2016 Bonds are credited on the record date (identified in a listing attached to the Omnibus Proxy). Principal and interest payments on the 2016 Bonds will be made to Cede & Co., or such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. DTC's practice is to credit Direct Participants' accounts upon DTC's receipt of funds and corresponding detail information from the City or the Trustee on the payable date in accordance with their respective holdings shown on DTC's records. Payments by Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by standing instructions and customary practices, as is the case with securities held for the accounts of customers in bearer form or registered in "street name," and will be the responsibility of such Participant and not of DTC, the Trustee or the City, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Payment of principal and interest payments to Cede & Co. (or such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC) is the responsibility of the City or the Trustee, disbursement of such payments to Direct Participants will be the responsibility of DTC, and disbursement of such payments to the Beneficial Owners will be the responsibility of Direct and Indirect Participants. DTC may discontinue providing its services as depository with respect to the 2016 Bonds at any time by giving reasonable notice to the City or the Trustee. Under such circumstances, in the event that a successor depository is not obtained, certificates representing the 2016 Bonds are required to be printed and delivered. F-2 The City may decide to discontinue use of the system of book -entry -only transfers through DTC (or a successor securities depository). In that event, certificates representing the 2016 Bonds will be printed and delivered to DTC. F-3