HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - No. 09-12-1921bCity Hall, City of Lodi,
Honday Sept.,12-1921.
As per adjournment taken on September 7th.,1921, the Board of
Trusteasof the City of Lodi met in adjourned regular session at
8 o'clock P.M. and on call of the roll there were present Trustees,
:.iontgomery,Crose,Hale,Eic'-ok. and Rich.
'he minutes of the regular meeting of September 6th. -sere read
and approved. The minutes of the adjourned regular meeting of Sept.
7th. sere corrected to show Trustee Hale as absent and Trustee Rich
present; the clerk having made errors in the roll call of that meet-
ing.
This being the date set by advertisement duly posted and publish-
ed for the reception of sealed proposals for the improvement of
Pleasant Avenue, Elm Street, Stockton Street, and Church Street under
Resolutions of Intention Numbers 33,34,35 and 36 respectively, the
Board proceeded to publicly open and declare the proposals sub-
mitted, viz:- the proposal of the CLARH & H NLRY CONSTRUCTION 00-
MPANY, that being the only bid received; this company proposed to
do the work at the following rates:-
PLEAaANT AVE. ELM ST. STOCi:TON ST. CHURCH ST.
Grading....... X0.0225 40.02 0.02 0.02
Paving........ 55.0.1850.185 XO.185 '0.185
Cone. Curbs... X0.50 §0.50 X0.50 0.50
Cone. Gutters. 40.26 X0.26 X0.26 0.26
This bid being in proper form and accom_oanied by bidders bonds in
sufficient amount, the Board proceeded to accept the same at the
prices bid by the adoption of the following "Resolutions of Award"
by the votes shown:
Resolution of Award No. 183, awarding Clark & Henery Construction
Company the contract for the improvement of PLEASANT A7ENUE;
AYES, Trustees, Hale, Crose, Hickok, Rich, Montgomery
NOES, Trustees, None. Absent, Trustees, None.
Resolution of Award No.184, awarding Clark & Henery Construction
Company the contract for the improvement of= -,I STR ?.T;
AYES, Trustees, Hale, Cross, Hickok, Rich, :.:ontgomery.
NOES, Trustees, None. Absent, Trustees, None.
Resolution of A•.-:ard No. 185, awarding to Clark & Henery Construction
Company the contract for the improvement of STOCKTON STREET;
AYES, Trustees, Hale, Crose, Hickok, Rich, Montgomery.
NOES, Trustees, None. absent, Trustees, None.
resolution of A~:ard No. 186, w.,arding Clark & Henery C)nstruction
Compant the contract for the improvement of CHURCH STREET;
AYES, Trustees, Hale, Cross, Hickok, Rich, Montgomery.
NOES, Trustees, None. Absent, Trustees, None.
The originals of the above resolutions with notations showing the
vote taken on each are in the files of the City Clerk.
In the matter of the proposed improvement of Oak Street, the clerk
reported that he had received assurance that the Southern Pacific Co-
mpany, the only property owner affected, would pave this street by
private contract.
City Engineer Barzellotti having prepared standard specifications
,_ for the laying of pavements having an asphaltic wearing surface, the
same were submitted to the committee on streets for approval.
Ten building permits were granted for buildings at an estimated
cost of .533,650.
The Central California Traction Company having filed formal accept- L/
ance of the franchise granted under Ordinance No.124, Trustee Hale
introduced a resolution finding that the franchise had been accept-
ed.in due time and the same ::as adopted by the following vote:
AYES, Trustees; Hale, Fickok, Rich, Crose, Montgomery.
NOES, Trustees, None ABSENT, Trustees, None.
The Central California Traction Company also filed formal accept-
ance of the franchise granted under Ordinance N0.126 and Trustee Grose
introduced a resolution finding that this franchise had been accepted
in due time. This resolution was thereupon adopted by the following
vote: