HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - December 18, 1996 (76)CITY OF LODI
-04
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
AGENDA TITLE: Authorize City Manager to sign Agreement with the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air
Pollution Control District for Installation of Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Station.
MEETING DATE: December 18, 1996
PREPARED BY: Assistant to the City Manager
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That City Council authorize the City Manager to sign the attached
agreement with the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control
District for installation of a Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Station.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On April 10, 1996, City Council authorized the City Manager to submit
a grant application to the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution
Control District for the purchase of a CNG fueling station and an
electric bus. The electric bus application was denied. However, the
City of Lodi succeeded in its application for the CNG fueling station, and has been awarded $96,800.
The District requires the City to enter into an agreement (attached) to perform all activities and work
necessary to install the station.
The actual conversion of the buses to CNG fuel use will be financed through a $95,000 Petroleum
Violation Escrow Account grant which is coordinated by the California Energy Commission. The Assistant
to the City Manager is currently researching CNG conversion systems which will operate on five new 22
passenger Startrans buses recently purchased for the GrapeLine transit system. A system is available.
All capital costs associated with this project will be bome by outside granting agencies. There will be
some costs associated with training City mechanics to maintain these conversion systems, but these
should be more than offset by reduced maintenance costs. CNG vehicles require fewer oil changes and
experience less engine component wear. Gasoline is ridiculously cheap for the City of Lodi at the present
time ($0.8813 per gallon). Nevertheless, CNG remains less expensive and may be obtained for $0.66 or
less per gallon equivalent. The net fiscal effect will be very beneficial for GrapeLine.
Other project benefits include - significantly reduced emissions, less dependence on foreign oil imports,
less need for use of underground storage tanks and encouragement of other agencies to convert to CNG.
FUNDING: All funding for the fuel station will be derived from a San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution
Control District "REMOVE" grant ($96,800).
All funding for CNG conversion �w II be derived from a Petroleum Violation Escrow Account
grant ($95,000). _ /> /
J.
to the City Manager
APPROVED:
H. Dixon hynn -- City M nager
Natural Gas as a Vehicle Fuel
CADDET Energy Efficient Analysis Report No.5
Natural Gas as a Vehicle Fuel
Home Contents jList of Analysis Renortsl
Vehicles using compressed natural gas (NGVs) benefit from lower running costs and
reduced emissions. Surprisingly its use is only prevalent in a few countries, despite recent
technological advances that have made installation easier, such as the development of lightweight
on -vehicle storage cylinders.
Given a favourable economic and technical climate, the success of NGVs depends on government support
at both local and national level. Based on field experience, this CADDET analysis report assesses the
benefits and costs of introducing NGVs and tries to overcome uncertainties associated with the fuel's
promotion and ignorance of its potential.
Although dedicated natural gas engines are now available, much of the present industry is concerned with
retrofit engine and vehicle conversion, often with the petrol fuel system retained as a back-up. The report
deals in some detail with the technical aspects of vehicle conversion including dual -fuel operation for
diesel engines. The limitations imposed by the cost and weight of on -board fuel storage are examined, as
are questions of refuelling facilities, maintenance and safety.
Considerable attention is paid to the advantages of natural gas over other hydrocarbon vehicle fuels in
terms of emissions levels. Various engine control strategies are considered and emissions test results given.
IME Last modified 8 February 1996.
Page 1 of I
07/12/96 3:24:43 AM
Compressed natural gas alternative fuel , _gr...
Compressed natural gas alternative fuel programme in
Efficiency I Florida
Location : Sunrise, Florida;
United States of America
• Organisations
• Documents
Project Description
General Description
Page 1 of 3
The Compressed Natural Gas Alternative Fuel Programme was reintroduced in Sunrise, Florida, as a long-term project after a
brief but successful trial programme. It created the necessary infrastructure to support the use of vehicles operating on
compressed natural gas (CNG) and other alternative fuels. CNG is less expensive and cleaner burning than gasoline, which
allows the City of Sunrise to save money while helping to preserve Florida's fragile environment. The programme was made
possible through substantial financial commitment from both city and state agencies.
This project has received a "Best in Category" Award from the U.S. Department of Energy's National Awards Programme for
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy in 1995.
Technical Data
From 1991 to 1994, several public natural gas refueling facilities have been built and more and more cars have been converted
to run on CNG, as a result of the programme.
In 1991, a public natural gas refuelling station was opened in Sunrise - the fust in the southeastern United States - with a USD
233,000 State of Florida Energy Grant. At that time, Sunrise had only two city vehicles and two private vehicles that ran on
natural gas. That wasn't the case for long, however. The Energy Grants, along with matching city funds, also provided funds to
begin converting vehicles and purchase factory- dedicated vehicles that operate on CNG. To realize the greatest fuel savings
and environmental benefits, the programme targeted city vehicles that used the most fuel - the Police Department. Initially, a
single police car was converted to run on both gasoline and natural gas. The car was monitored over a test period, and the
results were positive. Between August 1992 and January 1993, 26 police vehicles were similarly converted.
A second refuelling station opened in March 1993. In an effort to further encourage and develop the use of alternative -fuel
vehicles, a second State of Florida grant for USD 250,000 was awarded in August 1993. Again with matching city funds, 35
natural gas vehicles were added to the city's fleet, along with two time -fill stations, which allow refuelling during off -hours. The
city continued to convert cars to run on CNG, and expanded its efforts to other vehicle types including five 22 -passenger buses.
In 1994, the U.S. Postal Service selected Sunrise as one of the first towns to receive natural gas -powered postal vehicles.
Twenty- eight of these vehicles were put into service in September. Also in 1994, a third state grant was warded for USD
200,640. These funds enabled the city to purchase additional natural -gas -powered vehicles, including a school bus, and to build
a mobile refuelling facility.
Currently, about 130 alternative -fuel vehicles are in operation in Sunrise as a result of the programme;
94 of these belong to city fleets.
Energy Data
Programme officials estimate that more than 2.8 million liters (750,000 gallons) of gasoline will be conserved over the next
decade due to the use of alternative -fuel vehicles.
Environmental Data
Harmful emissions have been lowered as a result of operating the alternative -fuel vehicles. In one emissions comparison, a
factory -dedicated natural gas vehicle reduced hydrocarbon emissions by nearly 350%, carbon monoxide by about 200/0, and
nitrogen oxides by 150% compared to a conventional gasoline -operated vehicle.
Economic Data
07/12/96 3:51:27 AM
Compressed natural gas alternative fuel ,_ _ gr... Page 2 of 3
Since the programme began, the city has saved an estimated USD 50,000 in fuel costs, based on costs of USD 0.11 per liter of
CNG (USD 0.43 per gallon equivalent) and USD 0.21 per liter of gasoline (USD 0.80 per gallon). There are other economic
benefits as well. The programme resulted in the creation of several jobs (totalling about 2000 labor -hours each year) to convert
the vehicles and operate the refuelling stations.
KEYWORDS CNG, grants, funds, encouragement, emissions
Project Details
Project Number
: US -95-554
Project Type
: Result
Start date
January 01, 91
End date
: December 01, 94
Country
United States of America
CADDET Brochure
Primary Sector
4X TRANSPORT: General
Primary Technology
CO1 Fossil Fuels
Secondary Sectors
Secondary Technologies
Organisation(s) and Contacts)
Organisation: City of Sunrise Gas Department
Abbreviation:
Role: Host Organisation
Address 4747 Nob Hill Road, Suite 5
Sunrise, Florida
33351
US
Tel
Fax
Contact Zehender, H.
Title Mr.
Department
Tel 01-305-572-2294
Fax
Organisation: State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs
Abbreviation:
Role: Subsidising Organisation
Address 2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahasee, Florida
32399-2100
US
Tel
Fax
Contact Fleming, S.
Title Ms.
Department Florida Energy Office
Tel 01-904-488-8466
Fax
Organisation: CADDET US National Team
Abbreviation:
Role: Information Organisation
Address Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Energy Division
Oak Ridge,TN
37831-6070
US
Tel +1-423-576-8152
Fax +1-423-576-7572
Contact : Shaver, Julia A.
Title Ms
Department
Tel
07/12/96 3:51:27 AM
Compressed natural gas system for trans. uses
Compressed natural gas system for transit buses
Location : Hamilton, Ontario; Canada
• Organisations
• Documents
Project Description
General Description
Page 1 of 2
Hamilton Street Railway (HSR) Company of Hamilton, Ontario (Canada) has used compressed natural gas (CNG) as a fuel for
transit buses. Late in 1985, a typical diesel bus engine was selected as the prototype and retrofitted with suitable parts for
natural gas operation. Following a test period, an additional five buses were converted to CNG: three in 1986 and two in 1987.
A CNG refuelling facility was also installed to supply all buses. The six buses, operating in daily service, use a spark -ignited
4 -stroke Iveco engine converted to use natural gas fuel.
Technical Data
The CNG engine was based on the conversion of a 4 -stroke, 6 cylinder, 9.6 litres diesel engine. A CNG compatible spark
ignition system was installed with an interfacing of the gas let -down and mixing system (the gas "carburation system"). The
conversion to CNG buses also involved replacing the diesel fuel tank with fibre -wound aluminum tanks. A total of 215 cubic
metres storage capacity, separated in seven cylinders, was installed to give the equivalent of 200 litres of diesel (approximately
300 km of range).
The drivers were enthusiastic about the performance of the CNG buses, and no adverse comments were received from the
public.
Energy Data
CNG consumption: 74.3 cubic metres/100 km.
Economic Data
Natural gas was chosen because of the large supplies available in Canada. This choice was also based on the anticipation that
the price of Canadian gas would not increase at the same rate as that of diesel. The decision to use CNG was in addition due in
part to the substancial financial incentives available from the federal and Ontario governments. There was no federal or sales tax
on CNG, but such taxes were levied on diesel. For the period covering from November 1989 to March 1990, the equivalent
diesel bus in HSR service cost CAD 0.22 per kilometer for fuel at CAD 0.38 per litre. The CNG fleet cost CAD 0.09 per
kilometer at an average gas price of CAD 0.125 per cubic meter (CNG consumption: 74.3 cubic meters/100km). More recently,
fuel costs continue to favour natural gas;
for instance, in 1991 diesel fuel cost CAD 0.25 per km compared to CAD 0.11 for the natural gas (including compression
electricity costs).
Environmental Data
The interior noise level, and the particulate emissions, odour level and carbon monoxide from the exhaust, were all lower than
from current technology diesel buses.
KEYWORDS :HSR CNG
Project Details
Project Number
CA -92-009
Project Type
Result
Start date
November 01, 89
End date
December 01, 91
Country
Canada
CADDET Brochure
Primary Sector
4X TRANSPORT: General
07/12/96 3:44:43 AM
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
sivuAPC0
1999 Tuolumne
suite 200
Fresno, CA!
93721.
(209)497-1000 .
Agreement No. 96-053
AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this day of
, 1996, by and between the SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT, a unified air pollution control district formed
pursuant to California Health and Safety Code section 40150 et seq. (District), and
the CITY OF LODI (Contractor).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the California Clean Air Act (CCAA) requires local air
pollution control districts to reduce emissions from motor vehicles;
WHEREAS, AB 2766, codified in California Health and Safety Code
section 44223, authorizes districts to impose a fee of up to Four Dollars ($4) upon
certain registered motor vehicles within the district, and the governing board of the
District has imposed said fee;
WHEREAS, said legislation requires District to use said funds for
activities related to reduce air pollution from motor vehicles and for related planning,
monitoring, enforcement, and technical studies necessary for the implementation of
the California Clean Air Act of 1988; and
WHEREAS, District appointed a motor vehicle evaluation committee for
vehicle emissions reduction projects to review proposals for eligible projects for the
purpose of making funding recommendations to the Governing Board of the District;
and
WHEREAS, on September 18, 1996, after holding public hearing and
considering the recommendations of the evaluation committee, District approved for
funding those projects deemed to be most suitable for vehicle license fee funding and
best meeting the goals of Health and Safety Code sections 44220 through 44247;
WHEREAS, Contractor has proposed a project that meets the eligibility
criteria of District that has been approved by District for funding; and
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SJVUAPM :
1999 Tuolumne
Suite 200'
Fresno, CA
93721
(209)497 4000
WHEREAS, Contractor represents that it is willing and able to perform
the activities set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on their mutual promises, covenants, and
conditions, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1. PROJECT
Contractor shall perform all activities and work necessary to install a
CNG fueling station, as set forth in the proposal which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit A. Contractor agrees to furnish all labor, materials,
equipment, licenses, permits, fees, and other incidentals necessary to perform and
complete, per schedule, in a professional manner, the services described herein.
Contractor represents that Contractor has the expertise necessary to adequately
perform the project specified in Exhibit A.
In the event of any conflict between or among the terms and conditions
of this Agreement, the exhibits incorporated herein, and the documents referred to
and incorporated herein, such conflict shall be resolved by giving precedence in the
following order of priority:
1. To the text of this Agreement
2. Exhibit A to this Agreement
3. To the Motor Vehicle Emissions Reduction Projects
Request for Proposals (RFP) prepared by District and dated February 5, 1996.
2. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE/TIMETABLE
Contractor shall commence performance of work and produce all work
product in accordance with the work schedule and deadlines for performance
identified in Exhibit A, pages 7 and 8, of this Agreement, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein, unless this Agreement is terminated sooner as provided for
elsewhere in this Agreement.
If requested by District, Contractor shall submit regular progress reports,
at intervals determined by District, detailing the work performed during the current
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
........ ......... . .
1999' Tuolumne
siikei20o' .'
Fresno CA
.937i
(209):497-16M:1
reporting period; work planned for the next reporting period; problems identified,
solved, and/or unresolved; and the percentage of each task completed. Contractor
shall provide District with a comprehensive final written report prior to the end of the
contract term. Said final report shall document the work performed under this
Agreement.
IQ
COMPENSATION
The total obligation of District under this Agreement shall not exceed
Ninety Six Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars ($96,800).
Contractor shall obtain through other sources sufficient additional
monies to fund the total cost of the project as outlined in Exhibit A, pages 1, 8 and 9.
Satisfactory written evidence of such funding commitments shall be provided to
District prior to the release by District of any funds under this Agreement. In the
event funding from other sources for the total cost of the project as outlined in Exhibit
A, pages 1, 8 and 9, is not received by Contractor, District reserves the right to
terminate or re -negotiate this Agreement. In that event, if requested by District,
Contractor shall return any District funds advanced.
A. Payments: Advance payments shall not be permitted.
Payments will be permitted only at which time equivalent services have been
satisfactorily rendered. District shall reimburse Contractor quarterly, in arrears, after
receipt and verification of a properly support financial claim. Claims and all
supporting documentation shall be submitted to San Joaquin Valley Unified Air
Pollution Control District, Planning Department, Attention: John Villeneuve or Jeff
Findley.
Payment shall be made to Contractor by District upon submission
and evaluation of Contractor's invoice or claim that shall set forth the work completed
pursuant to this Agreement.
District will issue payment to Contractor within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of proper documentation and verification that Contractor has
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SiWAPM.....
.::199.9: Tuol urn ne:
............. ............. .
20�
Fresno CA
93721
(209) 497 1000:
satisfactorily completed the work for which compensation is sought.
The amount to be paid to Contractor under this Agreement includes
all sales and use taxes incurred pursuant to this Agreement, if any, including any
such taxes due on equipment purchased by Contractor. Contractor shall not receive
additional compensation for reimbursement of such taxes and shall not decrease
work to compensate therefore.
Concurrently with the submission of any claim for payment,
Contractor shall certify (through copies of invoices issued, checks, receipts, and the
like) that complete payment has been made to any and all subcontractors as
provided.
B. Surplus Funds: Any compensation which is not expended by
Contractor pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement by the project
completion date shall automatically revert to District. Only expenditures incurred by
Contractor in the direct performance of this Agreement will be reimbursed by District.
Allowable expenditures under this Agreement are specifically established and
included in Exhibit A, pages 8 and 9, attached hereto and incorporated herein.
C. Close-out Period: All final claims shall be submitted by
Contractor within sixty (60) days following the final month of activities for which
payment is claimed. No action will be taken by District on claims submitted beyond
the 60 -day close-out period.
4. NON -ALLOCATION OF FUNDS
The terms of this Agreement and the services to be provided thereunder
are contingent on the approval of funds by the appropriating government agency.
Should sufficient funds not be allocated, the services provided may be modified or
this Agreement terminated at any time by giving Contractor thirty (30) days' prior
written notice.
5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
In performance of the work, duties, and obligations assumed by
In
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
sivUAPCD
1999 Tuolumne
. ............... .......
SWA46200
Fresno;, `cA
93721 .
(209):467400.0
Contractor under this Agreement, it is mutually understood and agreed that
Contractor, including any and all of Contractor's officers, agents, and employees, will
at all times be acting and performing as an independent contractor and shall act in an
independent capacity and not as an officer, agent, servant, employee, joint venturer,
partner, or associate of District. Furthermore, District shall have no right to control or
supervise or direct the manner or method by which Contractor shall perform its work
and function. However, District shall retain the right to administer this Agreement so
as to verify that Contractor is performing its obligations in accordance with the terms
and conditions thereof. Contractor and District shall comply with all applicable
provisions of law and the rules and regulations, if any, of governmental authorities
having jurisdiction over matters the subject thereof.
Because of its status as an independent contractor, Contractor shall
have absolutely no right to employment rights and benefits available to District
employees. Contractor shall be solely liable and responsible for providing to, or on
behalf of, itself all legally required employee benefits. In addition, Contractor shall be
solely responsible and save District harmless from all matters relating to payment of
Contractor's employees, including compliance with social security, withholding, and
all other regulations governing such matters. It is acknowledged that during the term
of this Agreement, Contractor may be providing services to others unrelated to District
or to this Agreement.
6. TERMINATION
A. Breach of Agreement: District may immediately suspend or
terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, where in the determination of District
there is:
1. An illegal or improper use of funds;
2. A failure to comply with any term of this Agreement;
3. A substantially incorrect or incomplete report submitted to District; or
4. Improperly performed services.
111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SJVUAPCm ::;:
................. .....:
1999 Tuol.umne:::
Suite 200.;:::
93721
(209)'497710M.:
In no event shall any payment by District constitute a waiver by District
of any breach of this Agreement or any default which may then exist on the part of
Contractor. Neither shall such payment impair or prejudice any remedy available to
District with respect to the breach or default. District shall have the right to demand of
Contractor the repayment to District of any funds disbursed to Contractor under this
Agreement which in the judgment of District were not expended in accordance with
the terms of this Agreement. Contractor shall promptly refund any such funds upon
demand.
In addition to immediate suspension or termination, District may impose
any other remedies available at law, in equity, or otherwise specified in this
Agreement.
B. Without Cause: Either party may terminate this Agreement at
any time upon giving the other party at least thirty (30) days' advance written notice of
intention to terminate. In such case, Contractor shall, subject to paragraph 3, be paid
the reasonable value of all services satisfactorily rendered and actual, reasonable
costs incurred up to the time of the termination. Upon such termination, all the work
produced by Contractor shall be promptly delivered to District.
7. MODIFICATION
Any matters of this Agreement may be modified from time to time by the
written consent of all the parties without in any way affecting the remainder.
8. NON -ASSIGNMENT
Neither party shall assign, transfer, or subcontract this Agreement, nor
their rights or duties under this Agreement, without the prior express, written consent
of the other party.
9. INDEMNIFICATION
Contractor agrees to indemnify, save, hold harmless, and at District's
request, defend District, its boards, committees, representatives, officers, agents, and
employees from and against any and all costs and expenses (including reasonable
RI
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SJVGAPCD':'.
1999 Tuolumne'
Suite 200
Fresno; CA
93721
.(209) 497-1000
attorneys' fees and litigation costs), damages, liabilities, claims, and losses (whether
in contract, tort, or strict liability, including, but not limited to, personal injury, death,
and property damage) occurring or resulting to District which arises from any
negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of Contractor, its officers, agents,
subcontractors, or employees in their performance of this Agreement.
10. INSURANCE
A. Without limiting District's right to obtain indemnification from
Contractor or any third parties, Contractor, at its sole expense, shall maintain in full
force and effect the following insurance policies throughout the term of this
Agreement:
1) Commercial general liability insurance with
minimum limits of coverage in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per
occurrence;
2) Commercial automobile liability insurance which
covers bodily injury and property damage with a combined single limit with minimum
limits of coverage in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence;
3) Workers' compensation insurance in accordance
with California law.
B. Such insurance policies shall name District, its officers, agents,
employees, individually and collectively, as additional insured (except workers'
compensation insurance), but only insofar as the operations under this Agreement
are concerned. Such coverage for additional insured shall apply as primary
insurance, and any other insurance maintained by District, its officers, agents, and
employees, shall be excess only and not contributing with insurance provided under
Contractor's policies herein. This insurance shall not be canceled or changed without
a minimum of thirty (30) days' advance, written notice given to District.
C. Prior to the commencement of performing its obligations under
this Agreement, Contractor shall provide certifications of insurance on the foregoing
rA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
sivuAPCD :.
1999 Tuolumne':
Suite 200
Fresno.CA
93721
(209) 497;?000
policies, as required herein, to District, stating that such insurance coverages have
been obtained and are in full force; that District, its officers, agents, and employees
will not be responsible for any premiums on the policies; that such insurance names
District, its officers, agents, and employees, individually and collectively, as additional
insured (except workers' compensation insurance), but only insofar as the operations
under this Agreement are concerned; that such coverage for additional insured shall
apply as primary insurance and any other insurance maintained by District, its
officers, agents, and employees, shall be excess only and not contributing with
insurance provided under Contractor's policies herein. This insurance shall not be
canceled or changed without a minimum of thirty (30) days' advance, written notice
given to District.
D. In the event Contractor fails to keep in effect at all times
insurance coverage as herein provide, District may, in addition to other remedies it
may have, suspend or terminate this Agreement upon the occurrence of such event.
E. If Contractor is a government entity, then it may self -insure such
of those risks identified in paragraphs 10.A.1 -10.A.3 of this Agreement, provided,
however, that:
1) District, its officers, agents, and employees,
individually and collectively, shall be named as additional insured (except for workers'
compensation insurance) on Contractor's self-insurance plans, but only insofar as the
operations under this Agreement are concerned;
2) Such self-insurance plans shall be reasonably
satisfactory to District; and
3) All those provisions identified in subparagraph 10.0
of this Agreement concerning the relationship of Contractor's primary and District's
excess insurance to each other, the requirement of Contractor delivering a certificate
of insurance or other suitable evidence to District, and the cancellationlchange of
insurance requirements shall apply to such self-insurance plans.
1
21
3
4
5
6I
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SJVUAPCD..
1999 Tuolumne
Suite200'.[::
Fresno, CA'.
93721
(209) 497-1000:.
11. AUDITS AND INSPECTIONS
Contractor shall at any time during regular business hours, and as often
as District may deem necessary, make available to District for examination all of its
records and data with respect to the matters covered in this Agreement. Contractor
shall, and upon request by District, permit District to audit and inspect all of such
records and data necessary to ensure Contractor's compliance with the terms of this
Agreement.
Contractor shall be subject to an audit by District or its authorized
representative to determine if the revenues received by Contractor were spent for the
reduction of pollution as provided in AB 2766 and to determine whether said funds
were utilized as provided by law and this Agreement. If, after audit District makes a
determination that funds provided Contractor pursuant to this Agreement were not
spent in conformance with this Agreement or AB 2766 or any other applicable
provisions of law, Contractor agrees to immediately reimburse District all funds
determined to have been expended not in conformance with said provisions.
Contractor shall retain all records and data for activities performed
under this Agreement for at least three (3) years from the date of final payment under
this Agreement or until all state and federal audits are completed for that fiscal year,
whichever is later.
Because this Agreement exceeds Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000),
Contractor shall be subject to the examination and audit of the auditor general for a
period of three (3) years after final payment under contract (Government Code §
10532).
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SJVUAPCD s
i 444 Tuotumrte
Suite 200
Fresno, CA':
93721
(209):497-1000.
112. NOTICES
The persons and their addresses having authority to give and receive
notices under this Agreement are as follows:
CONTRACTOR DISTRICT
Jerry Glenn, Assistant City Manager David L. Crow, Executive
221 West Pine Street Director/APCO
Lodi, CA 95240 1999 Tuolumne, Ste. 200
Fresno, CA 93721
Any and all notices between District and Contractor provided for or
permitted under this Agreement or by law shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly
served when personally delivered to one of the parties, or in lieu of such personal
service, when deposited in the United States mail, postage prepared, addressed to
such party.
13. POLITICAL ACTIVITY PROHIBITED
None of the funds, materials, property, or services provided under this
Agreement shall be used for any political activity, or to further the election or defeat of
any candidate for public office contrary to federal or state laws, statutes, regulations,
rules, or guidelines.
14. LOBBYING PROHIBITED
None of the funds provided under this Agreement shall be used for
publicity, lobbying, or propaganda purposes designed to support or defeat legislation
before the Congress of the United States of America or the Legislature of the State of
California.
15. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
No officer, employee, or agent of District who exercises any function or
responsibility for planning and carrying out the services provided under this
Agreement shall have any direct or indirect personal financial interest in this
Agreement. Contractor shall comply with all federal and state conflict of interest laws,
statutes, and regulations, which shall be applicable to all parties and beneficiaries
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SJvuAPCD
f999 Tuolumne
ISuite 20.0; I
Fresno, CA
93721
(209) 497-4000
under this Agreement and any officer, agent, or employee of District.
16. GOVERNING LAW
This Agreement shall be governed in all respects by the laws of the
State of California. Venue for any action arising out of this Agreement shall only be in
Fresno County, California.
17. BINDING ON SUCCESSORS
This Agreement, including all covenants and conditions contained
herein, shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, including their
respective successors -in -interest, assigns, and legal representatives.
18. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE
It is understood that for Contractor's performance under this Agreement,
time is of the essence. The parties reasonably anticipate that Contractor will, to the
reasonable satisfaction of District, complete all activities provided herein within the
time schedule outlined in the attachments to this Agreement, provided that Contractor
is not caused unreasonable delay in such performance.
19. DATA OWNERSHIP
Upon termination or expiration of this Agreement, all data which is
received, collected, produced, or developed by Contractor under this Agreement shall
become the exclusive property of District, provided, however, Contractor shall be
allowed to retain a copy of any non -confidential data received, collected, produced, or
developed by Contractor under this Agreement subject to District's exclusive
ownership rights stated herein. Accordingly, Contractor shall, if requested, surrender
to District all such data which is in its possession (including its subcontractors or
agents), without any reservation of right or title, not otherwise enumerated herein.
District shall have the right at reasonable times during the term of this
Agreement to inspect and reproduce any data received, collected, produced, or
developed by Contractor under this Agreement. No reports, professional papers,
information, inventions, improvements, discoveries, or data obtained, prepared,
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 j
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SJvuAPcD
1999.Tuolumne:
Suite 200
Fresno, ,CA:
::: 937211::
(209) 497=1000::
assembled, or developed by Contractor, pursuant to this Agreement, shall be
released or made available (except to District) without prior, express written approval
of District while this Agreement is in force.
20. NO THIRD -PARTY BENEFICIARIES
Notwithstanding anything else stated to the contrary herein, it is
understood that Contractor's services and activities under this Agreement are being
rendered only for the benefit of District, and no other person, firm, corporation, or
entity shall be deemed an intended third -party beneficiary of this Agreement.
21. SEVERABILITY
In the event that any one or more of the provisions contained in this
Agreement shall for any reason be held to be unenforceable in any respect by a court
of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect any other provisions of this
Agreement, and the Agreement shall then be construed as if such unenforceable
provisions are not a part hereof.
22. SPECIAL CONDITIONS
The entire proposed project must be completed within one (1) year of
contract execution.
23. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between Contractor
and District with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all previous
negotiations, proposals, commitments, writings, advertisements, publications, and
understandings of any nature whatsoever unless expressly included in this
Agreement.
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
OUAPCO
1999 Tuolumne:
Suite 200
Fresno, CA
93721
.(209) 49:7-1000
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement
to be executed as of the day and year first hereinabove written.
CONTRACTOR DISTRICT
City of Lodi San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution
Control District
By
Jerry Glenn, Assistant City
Manager
Tax I.D. No.
By
Charles Harness, Chair
Governing Board
Recommended for approval: Approved as to legal form:
San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution - San JoqOn Valley Unified Air Pollution
Control District Cort of district
David L. Crow
Executive Director/APCO
Approved as to accounting form:
San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution
Control District
Roger W. McCoy
Director of Administrative Services
PMJ/tm
96-053.dmv
Philip M. Jay ' ` / /
District Counsel l/
For accounting use only:
Program:
Accounting No.:
13
OMPRESSED NATU34L GnS COM 'SSOP STATION
EXHIBIT SUMMARY SHEET (Cover)
(This is a summary only. You must also supply the detailed information as requested in the RFP.)
Applicant (include other participating entities): City Of Lodi, California
Contact Person: Jerry Glenn, Assistant City Manager
Address: 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, CA 95240
Phone#: 209/333-6800 x607
FAX # (optional): 209/333-5807
Total Project Budget: REMOVE Funds
Matching Funds Total Project Costs
Materials S a R n n n
S 0 S 8 s. n n n
Personnel $ 0
S 9, 35 0 S a-IG n
Other $ 81800
S i tia , 500 S 17P .'4Q0
TOTAL S 96,800
g 170'0-f� S2.75,590
Type of Project: (check one)
Technology Based
Public Education
Trip Reduction
_ Research
_ Plan Development
X Transportation Control Measure (TCM)
Identify TCM (see Attachment 3): 1=at
Lou Emission Vehicle Program
Implementation Area for Project: City of
Lodi, CA
Altemate
Cost Effectiveness:
As Pressed Funding Level
A. Useful Life of Project (years)
1'.'-15 16-2.0
B. Total Emissions Reduced (tons of NOx, ROG,
CO, PM -10) 72 55
C. Cost Effectiveness (Cost divided by item
B) 3,828-47 5,O11.81
Other Performance Measures:
A Audience Reached: R`sidents of
and visitors to th3 City of Lodi, CA
B. Other.
Brief Project Description:
This -project will provide
a Comrssse? natural Gas (CNG)
Compressor Station for the
City of Lodi to provide fuel for
seven CNG -powered transit
buses that will be purchased using,
PVEA funds.
EXHI°IT A
N
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL CONTENTS CHECKLIST
Applicant: City of Lodi, California - ComAressed Natural nas r'om rPGaor
Station
Please complete and attach this checklist with your application.
MExhibit Summary Sheet (Cover) - page 1
11711 Request for Proposal Contents Checklist (Second Page) - page 7
Authorization Letter/Resolution (Third Page) - page -4_
X® Project Description - page 4
Project Organization/Background - page 5
Emission Benefits/Cost Effectiveness - page
Work Statement - page 7
Funding Request/Cost Breakdown - page 8
Schedule of Deliverables/Self-Monitoring Program - page 9
Local TPA Review (when applicable) - page N/A
MAll Pages Numbered
El20 Copies of Proposal
2
•• .- .1- .1.e1 I' l l t, L,.ui itU 7141 01)0JJ 74f r'. U1
CITY COUNCIL
DAVID P. WARNER, Mayor
PHILLIP A. PENNINO
Mayor Pro Tempore
RAY G. DAVENPORT
STEPHEN J. MANN
JACK A. S►EGLOCK
April 11, 1996
CITY OF LODI
CITY HALL, 221 Vic ST P!?►E STREET
P.O. BOX 3005
LODI. CALIFORNIA 95241-1910
(209) 333-0700
FAX (209) 333-6807
San Joaquin Valley unified Air Pollution Control District
1999 Tuolumne Street, Suite 200
Fresno, CA 93721
ATTN. John Villeneuve or Jeff Findley
RE: REMOVE :application
Dear Sirs:
H. DIXON FLYNN
City Manager
JENNIFER M. PERRIN
City Clerk
RANOALL A. HAYS
City Attorney
Please find attached the City of Lodi's response to the 1995-96 REMOVE Program Request for
Proposals. This program is essentially comprised of the purchase and installation of two distinct
pieces of equipment - a CNG compressor station and an electric bus. As this `Response will
demonstrate, we have researched this program and feel supplying City transit vehicles with-CYG and
operating an electric bus will produce many benefits for this community. We are eagef-to implement
this proposal and look forward to developing a model program for our City.
On Wednesday April 10, 1996, the Lodi City Council was informed of the avadabUitylof REMOVE
Program funding, the potential to use REMOVE to obtain a CNG compressor station and electric
bus, and costs associated Nvith these purchases. C; -y Council unanimously approved pFeparation and
submission of this application. Staff time contributed by the City for coordinating thel-purchase and
installation of this equipment is valued at close to $19,000. The City will be responsible for
obtaining physical space to locate this equipment which also represents a contribution on our part.
We expect this narrative will satisfy all requirements your offltce may have for this particular grant. If
you have further questions, the contact person for this project is: VIr. Jerry Glenn, Assistant City
Manager, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, CA 95240. (209) 333-6800 ext. 607. Thank 'you -
Signed ,
H. Dixon Flynn
City Manager
City of Lodi
04111B3 C:kKJEVVORKkTRANSITI.REMOVE1.00C
eery Glenn, Assistant City Manger
Public Works - Transit Division '
City of Lodi
TOTAL P.01
City of Lola
CNG Compressor Station Proposal
CITY OF LODI
COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS
COMPRESSOR STATION PROPOSAL
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Lodi has two intra -city transit services: one is the GrapeLine, the other is a Dial -A -
Ride service. These two services are the main sources of public transportation to the residents of
Lodi, population 55,000. The GrapeLine System, which has been in existence since November
1994, has four buses, plus one spare, used for four routes in the City of Lodi. The current buses
carry up to eleven passengers, including two wheelchair occupants. The GrapeLine provides
transportation to residents and visitors throughout the city, and also drops commuters off at Park
and Ride commuter locations, and at San Joaquin County interjurisdictional stations. The Dial -A -
Ride service, in existence since 1978, has a fleet of 10 vehicles: four station wagons, two sedans,
and four eleven -passenger buses (the same as the GrapeLine buses).
Due to the constant use of the buses, they often need service, and for the GrapeLine the substitute
bus is used as much as the regular buses. Also, because they are powered by gasoline, they emit
air pollutants into the City of Lodi's atmosphere. As a result, the City of Lodi's Public Works
Department, with the use of Petroleum Violation Escrow Account (PVEA) funds, intends to
purchase three Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) -powered buses in 1996 and four in 1997; four of
these buses will be used for the GrapeLine, and three will be used for the Dial -A -Ride service.
The CNG buses will help the City of Lodi to reach its goal of reducing air pollution in the city.
However, currently there is no CNG compressor station located in Lodi, and in order to use the
CNG -powered buses, the City of Lodi is requesting funds from the REMOVE program to
purchase a CNG Compressor Station.
By providing CNG -powered buses to the community, Lodi will play a leadership role in the
promotion of air pollution reduction, serving as an example to the community. The use of these
buses will displace gasoline energy consumption equivalent to 4.33 billion BTU's per year.
Another advantage is that a high-profile bus fleet operating on an alternative fuel source sets a
great example for other agencies, businesses and residents in this community, who may be
interested in using alternative fuel in their vehicles. City staff are often contacted for information
on a wide range of subjects; through the process of purchasing the CNG vehicles and the CNG
Compressor Station, and putting them to use, City staff will become well educated on the subject
and will be able to convey the benefits of alternative fuel use to the community. Lessons will be
learned regarding the most efficient ways to develop and implement such a project; City staff will
then also be able to provide direction on pitfalls to avoid, thus making the process easier for other
entities to follow.
The CNG Compressor Station will have two fill posts consisting of four hoses each, for a total of
8 fill stations. It is a slow fill process, taking 10 hours to fill each bus. Please see the Appendix I
for design examples of the Compressor Station and fill posts.
4
City of Lodi
CNC Compressor Station Proposal
The goal of this project proposed here is to build a CNG slow -fill fuel station that will provide
CNG fuel to seven CNG -powered buses. This goal will allow the City of Lodi to accomplish the
following objectives:
• Cost Efficiency: The cost of gasoline is $1.35 per gallon; the cost of CNG is $ .32 per gallon,
representing an enormous cost savings for the operation of the bus fleet
• Reduction of Air Pollution Emissions from motor vehicles by replacing gasoline -powered
buses with CNG -powered buses for the City of Lodi's GrapeLine and Dial -A -Ride Transit
Systems.
PROJECT ORGANIZATIONBACKGROUND
The City of Lodi Transit Division as part of the City of Lodi's Public Works Department will be
the lead agency on this project. Public Works is the department primarily responsible for purchase
and implementation of all equipment obtained with requested grant funds. Public Works, while
not having direct prior experience with CNG buses, does have a shop facility comprised of six
bays that has provided ongoing maintenance for a variety of compressors in Lodi. Organization
charts of the Public Works, Street, and Building & Maintenance divisions are located in the
Appendix 11. Public Works is committed to fulfilling SJWAPCD and Evaluation Committee
goals through the construction of a CNG Compressor Station for CNG -powered buses.
Sub -contractors will be identified through a bidding process. Sub -contractors are expected to
have experience with designing and building CNG Compressor Stations that can fuel at least
seven vehicles at a time.
EMISSION BENEFITS/COST EFFECTIVENESS
GrapeLine Calculations: Based on operation of four buses, six days per week (312 days per
year), making 61 trips per day each for a fleet total of 244 trips per day.
Dial -A -Ride Calculations: Based on operation of three buses, seven days per week (365 days
per year), making 30 trips per day each for a fleet total of 90 trips per day. Please see Appendix
III for the calculations and assumptions necessary to derive and support these estimates.
Estimated Emission Reductions
GrapeLine:
• HC and CO remain stable between diesel and alternate fuel.
• NOx:
a reduction of 5,888 grams of NOx per day.
=z> a reduction of 1,837,056 grams of NOx per year.
• PM -10:
=> a reduction of 25.6 grams of PM -10 per day.
=:> a reduction of 7,987 grams of PM -10 per year.
Dial -A -Ride:
• HC and CO remain stable between diesel and alternate fuel.
• NOx:
=> a reduction of 2,208 grams of NOx per day.
=::> a reduction of 805,920 grams of NOx per year.
• PM -10:
City of Lola
CNG Compressor Stadon Proposal
=> a reduction of 9.6 grams of PM -10 per day.
=:> a reduction of 3,504 grams of PM -10 per year.
Vehicle Miles Traveled (J/M7) Reductions
GrapeLine (four buses):
• 40 VMT reductions per bus trip
• 2,440 VMT reductions per bus per day
• 9,760 VMT reductions per day for GrapeLine fleet
• 3,045,120 VMT reductions per year for GrapeLine fleet
Each GrapeLine bus travels approximately 160 miles per day:
• 640 miles per day traveled by four GrapeLine buses
a 199,680 miles traveled per year by four GrapeLine buses
Dial -A -Ride (three buses):
40 VMT reductions per bus trip
• 1,200 VMT reductions per bus per day
• 3,600 VMT reductions per day for Dial -A -Ride buses
• 1,314,000 VMT reductions per year for Dial -A -Ride buses
Each Dial -A -Ride bus travels approximately 80 miles per day:
• 240 miles per day traveled by three Dial -A -Ride buses;
• 87,600 miles traveled per year by three Dial -A -Ride buses
Vehicle Trip Reductions
GrapeLine (four buses):
• 610 trips per day eliminated per bus
• 2,440 trips eliminated per day by the GrapeLine fleet
• 761,280 trips eliminated per year by the GrapeLine fleet
Dial -A -Ride (three buses):
• 300 trips per day eliminated per bus
• 900 trips eliminated per day by the Dial -A -Ride fleet
• 328,500 trips eliminated per year by the Dial -A -Ride fleet
Persons Served
GrapeLine:
• 4,880 persons potentially will be served daily by the GrapeLine
• 1,522,560 persons potentially will be served by the GrapeLine per year
Dial -A -Ride:
• 1,800 persons potentially served daily by Dial -A -Ride
• 657,000 persons potentially will be served by Dial -A -Ride per year
1.1
Cary of Lodi
CNG Compressor Station Proposal
Cost Effectiveness
The cost for gasoline is $1.35 per gallon; the cost for CNG is $ .32 per gallon, which is a cost
savings of $1.03 per gallon.
GrapeLine:
• cost savings of $120 per day for the GrapeLine fleet
• annual cost savings of $37,440 for GrapeLine
Dial -A -Ride:
• cost savings of $90 per day for the Dial -A -Ride buses
• annual cost savings of $32,850 for Dial -A -Ride
Total yearly cost savings for both will be $70,290.
Air Quality Benefits
GrapeLine:
• 12,712.4 grams reduction of ROG auto emissions per day; 3,966,268.8 per year
• 9,564.8 grams reduction of NOx auto emissions per day; 2,984,217.6 per year
• PM -10: Auto trip end emission factor is not available for PM -10, therefore calculations
cannot be made.
• 124,976.8 grams reduction of CO auto emissions per day; 38,992,761.6 per year
Dial -A -Ride:
• 4,689 grams reduction of ROG auto emissions per day; 1,711,485 per year
• 3,528 grams reduction of NOx auto emissions per day; 1,189,170 per year
• PM -10: Auto trip end emission factor is not available for PM -10, therefore calculations
cannot be made.
• 46,098 grams reduction of CO auto emissions per day; 16,825,770 per year
WORK STATEMENT
Timeline
November 15, 1996 Transportation Coordinator begins preliminary research on CNG
manufacturers
December 1 Transportation Coordinator begins preparation of documents:
■ Request for Information (RFI)
■ Request for Qualifications (RFQ)
■ Request for Proposals (RFP)
January 3, 1997 Transportation Coordinator sends out RFI
February 14 RFI due
Feb. 14 -March 14 Transportation Coordinator reviews RFI's received, prepares the
RFQ/RFP
7
City ofLolfi
CNG Compressor Station Proposal
March 14 Release RFQ/RFP, to be due mid-April
March 17 - 31 Selection & Review Committee members are chosen by the City
Manager and Public Works Director
April 1 Selection & Review Committee is convened
April 16 RFQ(RFP's due
April 16 - May 2 Selection & Review Committee reviews RFP's
May 3 Sub -contractor is chosen
May 31 Contracts executed between sub -contractors and City; to be
approved by City Council, executed by City Attorney, Public
Works Director
July 31 Delivery of CNG Compressor Station equipment. Construction of
concrete pad for Compressor and islands for fill posts will begin.
September 1 Training of City personnel by sub -contractor regarding use of
system
September 4, 1997 CNG Compressor Station in place and ready for use
FUNDING REQUEST/COST BREAKDOWN
The City of Lodi's Public Works Department, Transit Division, proposes to purchase a CNG
Compressor Station to provide slow -fill fueling for seven CNG -powered buses for the intra -city
GrapeLine Transit System and Dial -A -Ride Service.
REMOVE Funds. The City of Lodi request 596,800 from the REMOVE Program for the cost of
the CNG Fuel Station. This amount includes the following:
• $58,000 for purchase of one CNG Compressor Station that will include two compressor
engines (one will be for back up use only) and fill posts. Please see Appendix IV for an
itemized list of equipment that make up a typical Station.
$20,000 for the installation of the CNG Compressor Station and fill posts
$10,000 for an underground gas line and fuel hose installation
• $ 8,800 for administrative costs.
Matching Funds. There are $94,500 in matching monetary funds available to Public Works from
the Petroleum Violation Escrow Account (PVEA). Please see Appendix V for the PVEA award
letter as proof of availability. These funds will be used to pay for the differential cost between
gasoline- and CNG -powered buses.
City of Lodi
CNG Compressor Station Proposat
Lodi's Public Works Department and other city departments will also provide staff time as an in-
kind contribution to this project. Following is a breakdown of this contribution:
Hours Devoted Cost
Public Works to CNG Station Participation
Tasks for these positions will include development of documents (RFI, RFQ, RFP); creation and
convening of Selection and Review Committee, administrative duties pertaining to this project,
and oversight of Fuel Station construction.
Transportation Coordinator
80
$1,540
Public Works Director
20
$ 790
Administrative Assistant
20
$ 430
Building & Equipment
Maintenance Supervisor
80
$2,300
Transit Field Supervisor
20
$ 200
$5,260
Hours Devoted Cost
Other Departments to CNG Station Participation
Tasks for these positions include executing contracts, purchasing equipment for the Fuel Station,
administrative duties pertaining to this project, and oversight of contracts.
Finance - Purchasing Division 80 $1,250
Assistant to the City Manager 40 $1,000
City Attorney 40 $1,540
City Council 5 $ 250
City Clerk 2 $ 50
$4,090
Estimated Cost Participation of Land used for the CNG Compressor Station: Based on an
estimate of $15 per square foot, and an estimated 15,000 square feet to be used for the Station,
the estimated amount is $75,000.
Total Matching Funds: $178,850
SCHEDULE OF DELIVERABLES/
SELF-MONITORING PROGRAM
The schedule of deliverables and work products and their anticipated dates of delivery are listed
above in the Work Statement Timeline. Accomplishment of these deliverables will be measured
based on whether the task deadlines set in the timeline are met. The following project objectives
will be measured: 1) Cost Efficiency will be measured based on cost savings of gasoline vs. CNG -
powered buses; and 2) Reduction of air pollution emissions will be measured based on comparing
pre -CNG (all buses powered by gasoline) emissions readings to post -CNG readings (seven buses
powered by CNG). All results will be reported to the SJVUAPCD on a quarterly basis.
E
Compressed Natural Gas
Compressor Station
Appendices
Appendix I:
Compressor Station Design..............................................................................I-1
FillPost Design............................................................................................I-2
Appendix II:
Public Works Administration Organization Chart ....................................................II -1
Street Division Organization Chart.....................................................................II-2
Building & Equipment Maintenance Division Organization Chart.................................II-3
Appendix III:
Emission Benefits/Cost Effectiveness ......................................................... III- 1 - III -4
Appendix IV:
CNG Compressor Station Equipment List ................................................... IV- 1 - IV -3
Appendix V:
PVEAAward Letter...............................................................................V-1 - V-2
Appendices List
APPENDIX I
VENT POST
I
10' ABOVE GROUND LEVEL
REVISIONS
t
BREAKAWAY TOWER
FILL HOSE —�
Thls drorin6 Is the property of
MARCUM CNC SYSTEMS. INC.
702 W. 461h Are. 0- Colorado 60216
and Is nal to be ropfoJused or u .4
to IurnteA any Inlormollon Isr mo4lnp
.1 dro.ln6s or opparalus e.eepl
.Mrs provldod for by ogrsomenl with
sold eompony
702 W. 461h Ara. Don— Colorado 60216
PHONE NUMBER: (303) 293-0055
FAX NUMBER: (303) 293-0006
rp t CAl I
RETRACTOR
MASTER SHUTOFF VALVE
MARCU ► i
DR.N+N
CNG SYSTEMS INC.
TWO—POSITION FILL
POST ASSEMBLY
I
IOC
8 95145
Ulm. lal
APPENDIX II
PUBLIC WORKS
ADMINISTRATION
ORGANIZATION
APRIL 1996
PUBLIC WORKS
DIRECTOR
J.RONSKO
DEPARTMENT
LSE
CARYCRU EY �_�-� AOSSBISTANT E
AOWNISTRATIVE
CLERK II
P. pARRIS
E I NO I I MAINTENANCE DIN S ON I I DIVISION
STREET
TOTAL AUTHORIZED FULL-TIME
--------------DEPARTMENT POSITIONS
p�nalm�
86
----------------
WATERMASTEWATER
DIVISION
i
C
STREET
DIVISION
ORGANIZATION
411196-9127196
STREET 6 ALLEY MAINTENANCE,
STREET CLEANING L LANDSCAPING
NOTES
'A44jste Ae&~ supan{som to NI mtkioad.
-sidpar
DMalon receMs electrical and lnUmmeAUtlan makdenaroe support from the
Electric Utility Dept, for traffic signsle and storm pumping strilons.
STREET SUPERVISOR
D BENDER
O. BRAOTLEY
STREET CLEANING
MAINTENANCE
GRAFFITI
SUPERVISING
ST. MWIII
SWEEPER OPER,
ADMIN. CLERK
ST. MW 111
1.1+d�C
a o„wo
r Not
1,kv q
4mwil
ADMINSTRATWE
r mua
H
CLERK II
MWB
I 1/E
NOTES
'A44jste Ae&~ supan{som to NI mtkioad.
-sidpar
DMalon receMs electrical and lnUmmeAUtlan makdenaroe support from the
Electric Utility Dept, for traffic signsle and storm pumping strilons.
S TREET• TRAFFIC CONTROL A
STORM GRAIN MAINTENANCE
STREETSUPERINTENOENT
M WATSON
O. BRAOTLEY
MAINTENANCE
GRAFFITI
SUPERVISING
ST. MWIII
H
ADMIN. CLERK
ST.M..;
a o„wo
1 b6W
r
1,kv q
_
MW I'
ADMINSTRATWE
r lair
H
CLERK II
It srN
CWIStON INSt1MNCE CLAIMS
-
----------------
_j
11
I
ADMINSTRATIVE
r
CLERK II (pafl lune)
amA,
S TREET• TRAFFIC CONTROL A
STORM GRAIN MAINTENANCE
MWII
i .rut
61REET, TREE, STORM DRAIN
L SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE
STREET SUPERVISOR
T. EVAN
TRAFFIC - - _ - STREET. STORM CRAW
I MAINTENANCE SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE
S'At1 ST. M4V 111
ST. M-11
c, uc1 r alalax
Mw0•.
r gyp' MW 11 MWII
c B41J�S rlrc7
LABORER
[twat Mw 1 MWI'
o uwo J A aVQ
IpE���Iri3�.
Legend
--------------- e� /
' rart-rare , YCrdFri6tal
j erlcone I p:;�� TAW,
..0 1:12.1...4
w
D
t
STREET SUPERVISOR
M WATSON
MAINTENANCE
GRAFFITI
MAINTENANCE
ST. MWIII
' 1A00RER
ST.M..;
r 111
1 b6W
r
1,kv q
_
MW I'
WWII
r lair
1.M'RM
MWII
i .rut
61REET, TREE, STORM DRAIN
L SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE
STREET SUPERVISOR
T. EVAN
TRAFFIC - - _ - STREET. STORM CRAW
I MAINTENANCE SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE
S'At1 ST. M4V 111
ST. M-11
c, uc1 r alalax
Mw0•.
r gyp' MW 11 MWII
c B41J�S rlrc7
LABORER
[twat Mw 1 MWI'
o uwo J A aVQ
IpE���Iri3�.
Legend
--------------- e� /
' rart-rare , YCrdFri6tal
j erlcone I p:;�� TAW,
..0 1:12.1...4
w
D
t
nfM1 �V0���70 10.7-� rRt.Y't �.l I t l!r 6VJ
I BLDG. & EQUIP.
MAINTENANCE
DIVISION
ORGANIZATION
APRIL 1996
BUILDING
MAINTENANCE
SENIOR BLDG.
MAINT. WORKER
T. ELHARD
BUILDING
SERVICE WORKER
J.MUNOZ
IU
BLDG. & EQUIP. MAINTENANCE
SUPERINTENDENT
D.CALLAHAN
EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
EQUIP. NLAINT.
SUPERVISOR
O. COULTER
I: ADMINISTRATIVE
CLERK
N. LAGORIO
LEAD EQUIPMENT
MECHANIC
VACANT
HEAVY EQUIP.
MECHANIC i
VACANT
HEAVY EQUIP.
MECHANIC
R.OHLHAUSER
WELDER -
MECHANIC
K..GRUSZIE I
HEAVY EQUIPMENT
MECHANIC -CONTRACT
D. JENKINS
HEAVY EQUIP.
MECHANIC
R_LANEY
HEAVY EQUIP.
MECHANIC
J. WALKER
71�i77tlj77.1 / Y. 17b
EQUIPMENT SERVICE
WORKER -CONTRACT
0. WATT
INSURANCE
CLAIMS
TOTAL P.06
II -3
APPENDIX III
Cay Of L_&
CNG Compressor Station Proposal
APPENDIX III
EMISSION BENEFITS/COST EFFECTIVENESS
GrapeLine Calculations: Based on operation of four buses, six days per week (312 days per
year), making 61 trips per day each for a fleet total of 244 trips per day.
Dial -A -Ride Calculations: Based on operation of three buses, seven days per week (365 days
per year), making 30 trips per day each for a fleet total 90 trips per day.
Estimated Emission Reductions
Based on the methodologies used in Table 1, Bus Emissions Factors, the following results were
derived. The numbers are a result of the difference between diesel fuel and alternate fuels (such as
CNG). Lodi's buses are currently gasoline -powered, not diesel; however, as gasoline factors are
similar to diesel, the resulting figures for comparing diesel to CNG can also be used for comparing
gasoline to CNG:
GrapeLine:
• HC and CO remain stable between diesel and alternate fuel.
• NOx: For diesel buses made between 1991-95, there is a reduction of 9.2 grams/mile from
diesel to CNG:
9.2 grams/mile reduction of NOx X 160 miles traveled (per bus per day) X 4 buses = a
reduction of 5,888 grams of NOx per day.
5,888 grams X 312 = a reduction of 1,837,056 grams of NOx per year.
• PM -10: For diesel buses made between 1994-95, there is a reduction of .04 grams from diesel
to CNG:
=> .04 grams/mile reduction of PM -10 X 160 miles traveled X 4 = a reduction of 25.6
grams of PM -10 per day.
=> 25.6 grams X 312 = a reduction of 7,987 grams of PM -10 per year.
Dial -A -Ride:
• HC and CO remain stable between diesel and alternate fuel.
• NOx: For diesel buses made between 1991-95, there is a reduction of 9.2 grams/mile from
diesel to CNG:
=:> 9.2 grams/mile reduction of NOx X 80 miles traveled (per bus per day) X 3 buses = a
reduction of 2,208 grams of NOx per day.
=> 2,208 grams X 365 = a reduction of 805,920 grams of NOx per year.
• PM -10: For diesel buses made between 1994-95, there is a reduction of .04 grams from diesel
to CNG:
=> .04 grams/mile reduction of PM -10 X 80 miles traveled X 3 = a reduction of 9.6
grams of PM -10 per day.
=> 9.6 grams X 365 = a reduction of 3,504 grams of PM -10 per year.
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VH7) Reductions
The GrapeLine and Dial -A -Ride systems provides transportation to individuals who would either
not make the trip or would use a car. The CNG buses to be purchased will have space for twenty
Cary ojLodi
CNG Compressor Station Proposal
passengers, including two wheelchair passengers. Assuming only half (10) would use cars to drive
an average of four miles:
GrapeLine:
• 10 passengers X 4 mile average trips = 40 VMT reductions per bus trip
• Each bus will make approximately 61 trips per day. 40 X 61 = 2,440 VMT reductions per
bus per day
• 2,440 X 4 GrapeLine buses = 9,760 VMT reductions per day for GrapeLine fleet
• 9,760 X 312 (operating days per year) = 3,045,120 VMT reductions per year for
GrapeLine fleet
Each GrapeLine bus travels approximately 160 miles per day:
• 160 X 4 buses = 640 miles per day traveled by GrapeLine buses;
• 640 X 312 (operating days per year) = 199,680 miles traveled per year by GrapeLine buses
Dial -A -Ride:
• 10 passengers X 4 mile average trips = 40 VMT reductions per bus trip
Each bus will make approximately 30 trips per day. 40 X 30 = 1,200 VMT reductions per
bus per day
• 1,200 X 3 Dial -A -Ride buses = 3,600 Vi'VIT reductions per day for Dial -A -Ride buses
• 3,600 X 365 (operating days per year) = 1,314,000 VMT reductions per year for Dial -A -
Ride buses
Each Dial -A -Ride bus travels approximately 80 miles per day:
• 80 X 3 buses = 240 miles per day traveled by Dial -A -Ride buses;
• 240 X 365 (operating days per year) = 87,600 miles traveled per year by Dial -A -Ride buses
Vehicle Trip Reductions
Each CNG bus will have space for 20 passengers including two wheelchair passengers. Assuming
only half (10) of these passengers would use cars to drive an average of four miles:
GrapeLine:
GrapeLine's four buses make 61 trips per day each, or 244 trips total per day by the fleet.
• 61 trips X 10 passengers= 610 trips per day eliminated per bus
• 610 X 4 = 2,440 trips eliminated per day by the GrapeLine fleet
• 2,440 X 312 = 761,280 trips eliminated per year by the GrapeLine fleet
Dial -A -Ride:
Dial -A -Ride's three buses make 30 trips per day each, or 90 trips total per day by the fleet.
• 30 trips X 10 passengers = 300 trips per day eliminated per bus
• 300 X 3 = 900 trips eliminated per day by the Dial -A -Ride fleet
• 900 X 365 = 328,500 trips eliminated per year by the Dial -A -Ride fleet
Persons Served
GrapeLine:
City of Lodi
CNG Compressor Station Proposal
As the GrapeLine's four buses currently make a total of 244 trips per day (61 trips each), and the
CNG buses to be purchased will be able to carry 20 passengers for each trip, a total of 4,880 (20
X 244) persons potentially will be served daily by the GrapeLine. Based on 312 days of operation
per year, a total of 1,522,560 persons potentially will be served by the GrapeLine per year.
Dial -A -Ride:
As Dial -A -Ride's buses make a total of 30 trips per day each, and based on the purchase of three
20 -passenger CNG buses for this system, a total of 90 trips per day will be made by the CNG
buses. This will total 1,800 (20 X 90) persons potentially served daily by Dial -A -Ride. Based on
365 days of operation per year, a total of 657,000 persons potentially will be served by Dial -A -
Ride per year.
Cost Effectiveness
The cost for gasoline is $1.35 per gallon; the cost for CNG is $ .32 per gallon, which is a cost
savings of $1.03 per gallon. The bus tanks (either CNG or gasoline) hold 35 gallons of fuel, and
are filled each day, for a cost savings of about $30 per day per bus. For GrapeLine's four buses,
that will be a cost savings of $120 per day for the GrapeLine fleet. For a year's use, that will be
$120 multiplied by 312 days of operation per year, for an annual cost savings of $37,440 for
GrapeLine. For Dial -A -Ride's three buses, there will be a cost savings of $90 per day for the Dial -
A -Ride buses. For a year's use, that will be $90 multiplied by 365 days of operation per year, for
an annual cost savings of $32,850 for Dial -A -Ride. Total yearly cost savings for both will be
$70,290.
Air Quality Benefits
As this project qualifies as a Project Type 4, Transportation Management Organizations/
Associations (TMOs/TMAs), the following is a quantitative analysis of this project based on
Project Type 4 emission reduction calculations. Average auto emission factors (auto trip end
emission factor and `TMT emission factor) are from Table 3.
GrapeLine:
• For ROG emissions: (for project life of 11-15 Years)
(2,440 auto trips removed per day) X (3.65) = 8,906
(2,440) X (average commute trip length: 4 miles) X (39) = 3,806.4
= 12,712.4 grams reduction of ROG auto emissions per day;
3,966,268.8 grams per year
• For NOx emissions: (for project life of 11-15 Years)
(2,440) X (1.84) = 4,489.6
(2,440) X (4 miles) X (.52) = 5,075.2
= 9,564.8 grams reduction of NOx auto emissions per day;
City ojLo- i
CNC Compressor Station Proposal
2,984,217.6 grams per year
• For PM -10 emissions: (for project life of 11-15 Years)
Auto trip end emission factor is not available for PM -10, therefore calculations cannot be made.
• For CO emissions: (for project life of 11-15 Years)
(2,440) X (38.3) = 93,452
(2,440) X (4 miles) X (3.23) =31,524.8
= 124,976.8 grams reduction of CO auto emissions per day;
38,992,761.6 grams per year
Dial -A -Ride:
• For ROG emissions: (for project life of 11-15 Years)
(900 auto trips removed per day) X (3.65) = 3,285
(900) X (average commute trip length: 4 miles) X (.39) = 1,404
= 4,689 grams reduction of ROG auto emissions per day;
1,711,485 grams per year
• For NOx emissions: (for project life of 11-15 Years)
(900) X (1.84) = 1,656
+
(900) X (4 miles) X (.52) = 1,872
= 3,528 grams reduction of NOx auto emissions per day;
1,189,170 grams per year
• For PM -10 emissions: (for project life of 11-15 Years)
Auto trip end emission factor is not available for PM -10, therefore calculations cannot be made.
• For CO emissions: (for project life of 11-15 Years)
(900) X (38.3) = 34,470
(900) X (4 miles) X (3.23) =11,628
= 46,098 grams reduction of CO auto emissions per day;
16,825,770 per year
III -4
APPENDIX IV
Marcam F�al Splem. Inc.
i lo2 W. AgwAvc. $ a Zo A
V1-� • Denver, do' kirado W210.
Phone. f :129&gM 6 ^
Fax is m ]%-9F,.64
Post -ft" brand tax transm+tial memo nN eR a•g• •
DGPL
`iO`r�j l0 ou 71 TZ5, fir s
i�
EQUIPMENT QUOTATION
W2011
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
BUS FLEET
January 21 1996
A Subsidiary d! A1„cum NuurQ Ga, Scn6x3 lir.
TO *d SEETZ£80rST6 01 IQ0-1 -,0 AlIO wM=l 99:zT 9661-OT-Ndb
nr_,
i
Marcum. Fuel Systems Inc. proposes to supply the following quality NGV equipment
consisting of the following components:
i
One (1
Ingersoll Rand Model 20H40NG CNG Compressor, rated for 57 c1m at 20
prig, suction and 4500 psig discharge pressure. The compressor has :air
cooled, lubricated cylinders and is a four stage, single -acting type. The
compressor. also has air cooled intercoolers, aitercoolers and moisture
separators for the second, third, and fourth stage coolers.
One (1)i
Pressut a gauge and a pressure relief valve for each stage of compression
rr ouhted on the compressor.
One (1)!i:Crankcase
pressure gauge, rxankcase pressure relief valve, and
crankcase bleed mounted on the compressor. '
One (1 ):
Thermostaticalty controlled, 120 volt, crankcase heater for the
. aornpressar:
One (1)
Crankcase oil level switch for the compressor. 120 volt. ;
One (1)i-
Totally enclosed explosion proof (TEXP) electric motor, 40 HP, 480 volt, 3
phasie, 60 cycles with 1.15 service factor.
One (1);
V43eft drive with beltguard.
One (1)
Inlet pulsation Mottle with baffles.
One (1)
Inlet pressure gauge mounted on the compressor.
One (1)
Set of pressure gauges, locally mounted.
One (1)
Suction filter, sized for 60 c fm flow rate.
Cti
.
A Subsidiary d! A1„cum NuurQ Ga, Scn6x3 lir.
TO *d SEETZ£80rST6 01 IQ0-1 -,0 AlIO wM=l 99:zT 9661-OT-Ndb
nr_,
Ma =rn Fuel Systems Inc-
Quote * 96-209 i.
i
Orae Discharge coalescing filter, sized for W cfm flow rate.
I
One (1 j Discharge attack valve.
Page 2
One (1) Shiutoff valve to isdate the compressor. it wttl be 114" NPT quarter tum
shut off type.
One (1) Hightlow suction gas pressure switch.
One (1 High discharge gas pressure switch
i.
One (1 # Electrical control panel. The control panel which utilizes relay logic will
have the following shutdowns:
High/low suction gas pressure.
Final discharge pas pressure.
Compressor oil level.
Motor overloads for the motor.
The control panel will have one Hand -off -Auto switch, one size 3 motor
starter, one hourmeter, one start pushbutton, one reset pushbutton, and
one enxwgency stop „mushroom type" pushbutton. The- control panel will
haue a window to view the indicating lights for fault matfurx1ion for high
suction gas pressure, low suction gas pressure, high gas temperature
(opional), and low oil level. There are also green indicating lights .for
solenoid valve open and pressure demand to indicate the compressor, is
running and compressing gas. The size 3 NEMA rated starter &Fem the,
flexibility to operate with either 230 or Oso voltage. The control panel will
also i have a transformer to - reduce the incoming voltage to 110 volts for
contiol voltage.
Back pressure regulator
Natural gas recovery system with 60 gallon ASME recapture tank rated
for 150 psig. working pressure. The system wl'll have a regulator capable
Of reducing the tarrlc pressure from 150 prig to 1 prig above the inlet gas
pressure. The Compressor will have a bkw down solenoid valve, dragon
valve, and check valves for the second, third,- and fourth stage moisture
Separators. Also the natural gas recovery system will have a pressure
gauge indicating
N-2
ZoId S?ETMOTST6 6i IQ01 d0 AiIo WUH 99:2!T 966T -OT -8c"
a.
b.
i
c
d.
i
High/low suction gas pressure.
Final discharge pas pressure.
Compressor oil level.
Motor overloads for the motor.
The control panel will have one Hand -off -Auto switch, one size 3 motor
starter, one hourmeter, one start pushbutton, one reset pushbutton, and
one enxwgency stop „mushroom type" pushbutton. The- control panel will
haue a window to view the indicating lights for fault matfurx1ion for high
suction gas pressure, low suction gas pressure, high gas temperature
(opional), and low oil level. There are also green indicating lights .for
solenoid valve open and pressure demand to indicate the compressor, is
running and compressing gas. The size 3 NEMA rated starter &Fem the,
flexibility to operate with either 230 or Oso voltage. The control panel will
also i have a transformer to - reduce the incoming voltage to 110 volts for
contiol voltage.
Back pressure regulator
Natural gas recovery system with 60 gallon ASME recapture tank rated
for 150 psig. working pressure. The system wl'll have a regulator capable
Of reducing the tarrlc pressure from 150 prig to 1 prig above the inlet gas
pressure. The Compressor will have a bkw down solenoid valve, dragon
valve, and check valves for the second, third,- and fourth stage moisture
Separators. Also the natural gas recovery system will have a pressure
gauge indicating
N-2
ZoId S?ETMOTST6 6i IQ01 d0 AiIo WUH 99:2!T 966T -OT -8c"
ey`r
Magcum Fuel Systems Inc.
Quote 96-2011.
Page 3
the . regulator setting, a pressure gauge indicating tank pressure,
condensate drain valve, and a pressure relief valve.
One (1) Emergency. shutdown (ESD) system designed to shut off the flow of gas
from the compressor to the fill post assembly. The shut off valve will: be
incorporated into the package. The relays required for the ESD system
will be installed on the compressor control panel. This will allow the ESD
system to shut off the compressor motor and inlet' solenoid valve
incorporated into the compressor package. One ESO switch will be
installed on the compressor control panel. The remote ESO switch shall
be ;installed by the customer in a non -hazardous area. The remote ESD
switch will be shipped loose.
One (1) Hi -.Flo Dome Load for slow fill and one reference tube mounted on an
aluminum back panel. The panel is designed for 4,000 psig MAWP and a
maximum fow rate of 600 cfm. The dome load valve will have a reference
tube to allow for temperature compensated NGV fueling. There will be
two :pressure gauges, one for reference pressuro and one for vehide
i pressure
One (1) Steel skid with all previously listed components, mounted, piped, and
wa*d. The. skid will be wired to a Class 1, Group D, Division 2 electrical
classficatiom All electrical components designed for non hazardous
areas shall be Installed at least 15 feet from all NGV equipment and - 20
feet from the dispenser_ The skid will be painted with a primer coat and a
top; coat of dark green enamel.
Three (3) Marcum's Double Position Fill Post Assembly which can be utilized for
either fast fiiil or time fill refueling. Each flit post assembly comes standard
with two retractors, two break -away towers, two 18' siaMese conductive
!loses for NGV fueling and venting, two Whitey three-way fill/Vent valve,
two NGV -1 fuel disconnect, and one aluminum casting molded to store
the; refueling disconnects when they are not being used. The fill post
assembly is -designed for a maximum operating pressure of 3600 psig.
Each siamese hose will have a pressure rating of WM psig and wilt .be
connected to the -ftee-way valve via 114" NPT fittings.
One (1) Stasi up and training services of the listed equipment The services
quoted are for 3 days which alkma one day travel time. For services
required beyond the three days quoted, our rates will be billed per our
servkxmian's rate sheet. The start up should require one to two days.
£0'd SZ£TZ£801S16 01 Ia01 d0 Al IJ W021d GS:ZT 9661-01-8dd
N-3
APPENDIC V
ST'a E OF C-LIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
CHARLES R. IMBRECHT
Chairman
December 15, 1995
The Honorable Michael Machado
Member, State Assembly
State Capitol, Room 5150
Sacramento, CA 95814
Dear Assemblyman Machado:
PETE WILSON. Go. mor
•�a
This is to congratulate you for successfully obtaining an appropriation of $95,000 through the
California Energy Commission (Commission) from AB 1671 (Katz, Chapter 980), for the
City of Lodi. This appropriation was made from the Petroleum Violation Escrow Account
(PVEA) for the purpose of Conversion of buses to CNG.
As you may be aware, AB 1671 is not "operative" until the passage of AB 285 (Hauser),
which appropriates funds in a geothermal account for a project in Lake County. However,
we are proceeding with the implementation of AB 1671 in anticipation of the imminent
passage of AB 285.
PVEA funds are the result of legal settlements arising from oil price fixing in the 1970s.
These funds are administered by the federal Department of Energy (DOE), subject to two
general criteria. One, the project must be restitutionary in nature (repaying the people who
were overcharged) and two, the project must realize identifiable energy savings. Because of
legal and federal constraints on PVEA funds, each proposed project must be approved by
DOE. In addition, state law requires that a contract be executed between the Commission
and the City of Lodi (the project proponent) before funds can be released.
The Commission has extensive expertise in._negotiating with DOE for PVEA approvals.
However, because of the specialized nature of the above appropriation, we will need the
assistance of the City of Lodi in drafting the justification for PVEA funding. Commission
staff have already contacted the City of Lodi in order to expedite the approval process. This
letter, which has been copied and sent to Mr. Kirk J. Evans, Assistant to the City Manager,
City of Lodi, includes the complete schedule and staff contacts for the appropriation process.
1516 Ninth Street, Sacramento, California 95814-5512
(916) 654-5000
FAX: (916) 654.4420
V-1
/,-
The Honorable Michael Machado
Page 2
Susan Aronhalt, of the Commission's Grants and Loans Office, will be coordinating the
submittal of the state plans to DOE. If there are any questions regarding the approval
process or preparing the project proposal, please call her at (916) 654-4202. If you have any
other questions about energy policies or programs, please call me at (916) 654-5000.
Sincerely,
�:a *
CHARLES R. IMBRECHT
Chairman
cc: Mr. Kirk J. Evans, Assistant to the City Manager (with Enclosures)
City of Lodi
City Hall, 221 West Pine Street
P.O. Box 3006
Lodi, CA 95241-1910
V-2