HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - July 3, 1996 (49)COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
q<iFoa`'
AGENDA TITLE: Certify a Negative Declaration as adequate environmental documentation for the
Lodi Multi -Modal Station to be located at the southeast corner of Pine and
Sacramento Streets.
MEETING DATE: July 3, 1996
PREPARED BY: Community Development Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council adopt Resolution certifying Negative Declaration as
adequate environmental documentation for the Lodi Multi -Modal Station
to be located at the southeast comer of Pine and Sacramento Streets.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City is proposing the development of a multi -modal
transportation center to combine rail, bus and dial -a -ride service at
a single location. Current plans are to relocate the existing
S.P.R.R. train depot from the current location north of Pine Street
to a new site south of Pine Street. The building would be renovated to provide appropriate facilities and
to meet building code and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. Related facilities would
be constructed such as a train loading platform, bus loading areas, a parking lot, bicycle and pedestrian
facilities. An additional building maybe needed to house other related activities. It is also possible that
the depot could remain at its current location and simply be remodeled and used in a more limited way.
A separate multi -modal facility would then be constructed south of Pine Street.
A Negative Declaration has been prepared and circulated for public review. The document has
determined that there are no significant environmental impacts that can not be mitigated to a less than
significant level. Attached are the significant impacts and the proposed mitigation measures as well as
the Initial Study/Negative Declaration.
FUNDING: None Required
nra`�t�artlam
Community Development Director
Prepared by David Morimoto, Senior Planner
KB/DM/lw
Attachment
APPROVED: _ �t
H. Dixon Flynn -- City M ager
cc9620.DOC 08/26!96
Multi -Modal Transit Station
Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Plan
Impact 4.5 - Moving the historic S.P.R.R. Depot would constitute a significant impact
Mitigation Measure 4.5 - Prepare a historic resources report in compliance with Section 106 of
State Regulation. The document will state the nature of the reasons, rationale, and physical
detail regarding the proposed relocation of the S.P.R.R. Depot and will include an Historic
Property Survey Report (HPSR), case report including a mitigation plan as required under
Federal guidelines, and with the concurrence of the SHPO. This document will be prepared
separately from this environmental document.
Impact 4.6 - Fugitive dust generated by construction and demolition activities would be
substantial and would contribute to ambient PMio Standards. This impact would be significant
and intermittent.
Mitigation Measure - Implementation of a dust abatement program to reduce the contribution of
project construction dust to local PM10 concentrations. The program would be in compliance
with Regulation VIII, Rule 8020 adopted by the SJVUAPCD. The program will include:
1) Watering active sites as appropriate. Increase the frequency of watering when wind
speeds exceed 15 mph. Suspend all excavating and grading operations when wind speeds
as instantaneous gust exceed 25 mph.
2.) Enclose, cover, water twice daily, or apply soil builders to exposed stockpiles of sand,
gravel, and dirt.
3.) Sweep adjacent City streets at the end of day if any visible soil material is carried over to
adjacent thoroughfares.
4.) Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials. Maintain at least six
inches of freeboard between the top of the load and the top of the trailer.
5.) Designate a person or persons to oversee the implementation of a comprehensive dust
control program and to increase watering as necessary.
6.) Maintain and operate construction equipment so as to minimize particulates from exhaust
emissions. During construction, require contractors to operate truck and equipment only
when necessary. Equipment should be kept in good condition and well tuned, to minimize
exhaust emissions.
Impact - Development of a transit station on this site could result in health and safety effects to
workers and/or the general public.
Mitigation Measures - Perform additional studies leading to site cleanup. Potential health and
safety impacts would be mitigated by identifying and then remediating all site hazards. The
Phase I hazardous materials study has been completed and recommends that a Phase II
investigation be performed at the site. Phase II work would include at least the following:
1.) Geophysical analysis to locate underground storage tanks and other buried structures prior
to investigative drilling or other investigative techniques.
2.) Soil sampling and analysis for petroleum hydrocarbons, heavy metals, and volatile
organics.
3.) An asbestos survey of the abandoned depot by a qualified asbestos inspector.
4.) Sampling of paint in the depot to determine the lead content of the paint.
Once these studies are performed, additional measures would follow, depending on whether
the results of the Phase II tests confirm that the project site is contaminated. These measures
may include:
• Preparation of a risk management assessment to quantify potential risks at the project site.
A risk assessment would assess potential human health risks from contaminants of concern
as identified during the site investigation, and would establish health risk-based and
environmental risk-based cleanup goals.
Preparation of site remediation plans. A site remediation plan would (1) specify measures
to be taken to protect workers and the public from exposure to potential site hazards and (2)
certify that the proposed remediation measures, including the disposal of wastes generated,
are protective of human health and are implemented in accordance with federal, state, and
local requirements. Remediation plan(s) would include cleanup plans for soil and
groundwater contamination as well as abatement plans for asbestos and lead paint in the
depot, and for proper disposal of the wall -mounted transformer.
• Preparation of a site constraints analysis to ensure that project development would not
interfere with operation and maintenance of the Unocal pipeline, and that the property is not
in an area affected by border zone development restrictions.
All necessary studies and remediation measures will be conducted before the site is developed
and opened to the public.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-92
A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL
CERTIFYING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION AS ADEQUATE ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENTATION FOR THE LODI MULTI -MODAL STATION
WHEREAS, the City of Lodi, is proposing the development of a multi -modal
transportation center to combine rail, bus and Dial -A -Ride service at a single location; and;
WHEREAS, current plans are to relocate the existing S.P.R.R. train depot from the
current location north of Pine Street to a new site south of Pine Street; and
WHEREAS, it is the recommendation of the Community Development Director
that the City Council certify the filing of a Negative Declaration as adequate environmental
documentation for the Lodi Multi -Modal; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed all documentation and hereby certifies
the Negative Declaration as adequate environmental documentation for the Lodi Multi -
Modal Station.
Dated: July 3, 1996
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 96-92 was passed and adopted by the City
Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held July 3, 1996, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Davenport, Mann, Pennino, Sieglock
and Warner (Mayor)
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
�FER PERRIN
City Clerk
96-92