HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - No. 2321itk;SOLUTION NO. 2321
RESOLLJTIUN GIVING NOTICE CF PROPOSED "NEXATZ9N TO
CITY CF LODI CF UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN
AND DESKNATFD 'HARRECIN ADDITION " ASW GIVING NOTICE
OF TINE AND PLACE FOR HEARING OF h0ft, #r8 THERETO
BE IT RESCLVtD BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY CF LODI:
1. That, pursuant to the provisions of the knraexaation of
Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939, a petition signed by owners of
all of the land in tha hereinafter described territory, by area
and by assessed value as shown on the last equalized assessmant
roll of the CouiLty of Sari Joaquin, was filed with the Council of
the City of Lodi ou try 18, 1960, requesting annexation of the
hereinafter described territory to said City.
2. Thdt the territory which the petitioners request be
at�ri�xetl to tho City of Lodi and which said City and its Council
propose to annex, is situate in the County of San Joaquin, State
of California, hereby designated "Harrison Addition," and desoribed
as follows:
A portion or the Southwest quarter of Section 2,
'luwriahip 3 North, Range 6 East, Mount Diablo Base and
Meridian, County of Bran Joaquin, State of California,
and quare particularly described -us follows:
Begltning at a point on tha Suuth line of, ttre
Buutnwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 3 North, h4uge
6 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, which point
Is 25 feet west of the Southeast corner of said quarter;
thence westerly along the South line of said Quarter
239.0 feet to the extended West line of the Runnels
property, as shown on map filed in Volume 5, page 290,
Record of Surveys, San Joaquin County Recurds; thance
northerly along said West line and the West lirla of
the Stephen$ property shown on said survey 456.0 feet
to the north line of said Stephens property$ thence easterly
along the North line of said Stephens property, which line
1.
is also a boundary line of the City of Ludi, 239.0 feat
to the West line of Ham Lane (Hutchins Road); thence
southerly along the West line of Ham Lane, which line
is also a City boundary line, 456.0 feet to the point of
beginning; the area thus described containing 25 acres,
more or less.
3. That the County Boundary Co=issioa of San Joaquin County,
California, did in session duly assembled on Monday, April 11, 1960,
consider and approve the proposed annexation boundaries of said
"Harrison Addition," as above described, and as submitted to said
Commission by the proponents of said annexation.
4. That the petitioners further request that tare territory
proposed for annexation take the zoning classification of C-1
Commercial to become effective coincidesat with the effective date
of the aanexat,ion as provided in Section 4.2 of Ordinance No. 469
of the City of Lodi.
5. That Wednesday, July 6, iy,W, dt the tioux Of b p.m., ILI
the Council Chambers in the City Hall in the City of Lodi, County
of San Joaquin, California, is hwreby fixed as the time and place
wird atid where a W person owning real property within the uninhabited
territory above described and proposed to be annexed to the City of
Lodi, and having any objeutioiis to the pruposed annexation, may appear
beforts the Council ei' the City of Lodi and show cause why such unin-
habited territory should not be so annexed to the City of Lodl. The
Protest must be in writing, may be filed at any time before the hour
set for heariA. objections to the proposed annexation, and shall state
the name or names of the owner or owners of property affected and the
description and area of such property, ix4 general terms.
6. The City Clerk of the City of Lodi is hereby autfwrizdd
and directed to cause a copy of this resolution to be published at
least twice, but not oftener than once a week, in the "Lodi News -
Sentinel," a newspaper of general circulation publishad in said City
2.
of Lodi, the city to which it is proposed to annex the aforesaid
territory, said publication to be complete at least twenty days
prior to the date sdt for hearing.
7. In the event there is, upon rite land proposed to be ann((Xed
to said City, a structural improvement owned, being acquired or
leased by a county fire protection district, the City Clerk is
directed to cause written notice of such proposed annexation to
be mailed to the governing body of such district, such notice to
be sent not less than ten days before the first public hearing upon
such proposad annexation.
8. The City Clerk is di:rdct�it to oa4sd writtnAx 4wtl,cv to La
givdrn to such otter persons as nny be legally entitldd trierdto,
in the m=ar required by law.
Dated: May 1d, 1960
'Ft is is Lo cdrtify ttl4t tikes furdgoing ReSolutiun Nu. 2321
was duly and regularly adoptdd by the City Council of the City of
Lodi at tine regular meeting of said City Cuuncil on Wadnesday,
Nty 18, 1960, by thw following vote:
Ays$: Councilmen - Brown, &r Ll.akian, Miteboll, Ull tui
and Culbertson
Noes: cou.tac;:i.lm-un - None
Absent: Councilmen - None
Beatrice Gari aldi
City Clerk
3.