HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - No. 3298RESOLUTION NO. 3296
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODI
ADOPTING "SPHERES OF INFLUENCE" FOR FUTURE GROWTH
AND RECOMMENDING THE SAME TO THE LOCAL AGENCY
FORMATION COMMISSION OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Cornmission of San Joaquin
County has asked the six cities of said County to adopt "Spheres of Influence"
for future growth with said "Spheres" to cover fifty years in ten year growth
increments; and
WHEREAS, the Lodi City Planning Commission prepared and on the
28th day of July, 1969 recommended the "Spheres of Influence" to the City
Council for adoption; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the "Spheres of Influence"
as recommended by the Lodi City Planning Commission, now therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lodi that the
"Spheres of Influence" as recommended by the Ladi City Planning Commission
on the 28th day of July, 1969 and on file in the office of the City Clerk of said
City are hereby adopted and recommended to the Local Agency Formation
Commission of San Joaquin County.
Dated: August 20, 1969
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 3298 was passed and
adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in regular meeting
held August 20, 1969 by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen - BROWN, CULBERTSON, HUNNELL,
SCHAFFER and KIRSTEN
Noes: Councilmen - None
Absent: Councilmen - None
August 1, 1969
TO: City co'zdil
F ROY: Planning Director
SUBJECT: Spheres of Influence
The staff has recently given some additional thought to the establish-
ment of Spheres of Influence for the City of Lodi.,
h a asked each city to "...determine the boundaries of the
areas -+ �; the county which in its juagment , bears a relationship to
its 'future planning for a reriod. Said period to cover 5; years
in 5 increments of 10 years each& In determining boundaries, the
following 10 c r i t e r i s are to be used as guides for each area:
1. Provision o, dater transmission rains
2. A_m7le sewerage facilities
3. Adequate police and fire protection
4. haste disposal
5. Parks wid recreation
6. Storm drainage
7. Existing school, postal and judicial districts and
other special districts which give munlci pal type
services
o. Gonna ible street circulation
9. Geographic, economic and social relationships
10. Green belts
Keeping in mind the above criteria the staff has attempted to establish
five probable areas of influence for the period 1970--2020.
Nano .`p'.La.ykiing 00:00a oa " 2 August 1, 1969
As a first step,, certain as:J: mplious ::ad to be male .e ccncerning the
til' ure growth rate, future density per ace aad current population
in the Lodz arca. it was assumed that:
1 � the current population grog. 4: rate for the City of
Lodi is approximately 2% and will remain about the
sanc. for the period 1970-2020
2, the current population darsity per gross acre within the
City of Lodi is approNimatel;;f 7.4 persons and will
revaiz about the same for the period 1970--203
K the current, population for Gine City of Lodi and its
fringe is approximately 32.191.
With the above 9.n rind; the nopuiatior_ and Land area needed for
future e gi owth were projected for the fire' ten year intervals as
follows:
YN«R 1 OPUL ." ION AREA IN ACRES
1970
30,535
40437
1980
':0 xh
5,409
3-990
481?95
6,594
2000
59,479
8,038
2010
7.2505
9;798
2020
88084
11,945
In mapping the projected area tic existing Gity Limits forms the
sphere for 1970; the 1980 need was found to benearly coincident
Ota the most recent capital improvement program service area; the
1990 bounda.—j coincided closely with the present General Plan; the
sphere 1 o r the yeer 2000 is based on the County a s most recent, re-
vision of the Lodi General Ilan and the gems 2010 and 2020 have
been combined into a tingle area wh ch reflects one pattern of
growth that might 411.e PlWe at this fature tire, The two latter
periods were merged into one due to the impossibility of predicting
precise growth area:, for ten year in.ter7ala at such distant dates.
t
Memo -Planning Cormission _ 3 _ August 1, 1969
'f'ra.e area shown on the map for 2020 is 2 possible area of growth with
sufficient acreage in -thin it to take care of the projected population.
However, the Planning Commission nay went to examine two points very
closely
1. Should growth be shown south of Harney Lar -e?
2. Should growth be shown north of the Mokelumne River?
If the anzwer to the above questions is no, the required acreage
should be allotted to the east and vest of Lodi..
In the present scheme growth south of Harney Lane is based on the
assumption that the Hi ;bi-my 3.2 Freeway w i 11 .be located one-quarter
mile south of Harney Lane and that the City w i 1 1 tend to grow out
to the Freeway. Such a scheme still retains a sufficient. greenbelt
between Lodi and Stockton.
Growth north of the Mokelumne River is based on the fact that growth
is already talcing place there and that more people are going to want
to lire "north of the River" in the future.
In summary, the Planning Cosy fission shoa1d detervi.ne the following:
1. Do the proposed spheres take into account the
10 criteria or guides set forth by L.AY.C.?
2. Is the selected population growth rate realistic?
3. Is the future density per gross acre ratio realistic?
4. Is it necessary to show a growth area for both 2010
And 20209 If co, how do tic determine these areas?
g. Is growth north of the Mokelumne River and south of
Barney Lane desirable?
To help in determining 2 realistic growth rate, the following figures
axe given for comparison:
0
memo - ?m---.. ^,-.liss__m AuGuai 1, 1969
1-1/ 2-" ius4ow.- i 2i L
YEAR
TONLATKIN
AREA lj ACRO
1970
32,674
4015
198,0
Y7,918
5tia4
g? o
44, 00S
5,947
200.
51,00
6,902
2011'
5: raq,
8.o?o
2020
611788
91236
3% WOW RYl'E
y ~ri ll
P OMi.f i ION
MEA W ACRES
1970
33457 157
41431
1980.
44:561
6,022
1990
59,880
8493
2000
809482
10:876
2010
?o8;160
0,60
2020
145,357
19:643
i
JLEGEND-
•MR "It
19 8 0 - .0
1990-2014
WEN 2 0 0 0 - 2 1•
-,I
'1�1\
CITY
LIMITS
1969
W-LULNUE
�fl
IDI, CALIFORNIA