HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - No. 2518RESOLUTION NO. 2518
RESOLUTION QIVING NOTICE CF FROPO$ZD ANNEXATION TO
THE CITY OF LODI OF UNINHABITED TERRITORY litJLItItSt.0
HEREIN AND DESIGNATED "NORTH LOMA. DRIVE ADDITION"
AND GIVING NOTICE OF TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING
OF PROTESTS THERETO
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODI:
1_ That, pursuant to the provisions of the Annexation of
Uninhab.ttad Territory Act of 1939, a petition signed by owners
of not less than one-fourth of the land in the hereinafter des-
cribed territory, by area and by assessed va1ua as shown on the
last equalized assessment roll of the County of San Joaquin,
was filed with the Counoil of the City of Lodi on March 7, 1962,
requesting annexation of the hereinafter described territory to
said City.
2. That tree territory wia. h the petitioiL vs request ba
annexed tc) the City of Lodi and which said City and its Council
propose to annex, is situate in the County of San Joaquin, State
of California, hereby designated "North Loma Drive Addition,"
and described as follows:
A portion of the iwurtriwast 4uartsr of Section ,
Township 3 North, Range 6 East, Mount Diablo Base and
Meridian, San Joaquin County, California, and more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 25, crt4zrrd
Tract, as filed for record on August 8, 1916 in Volume
8, page 62, San Joaquin County Records; thence Southerly
757.34 feet along the East lines of Lots 25, 28, 33 and
36, Gerard Tract, this line also a boundary line of the
City of Lodi, to the North line of Lockeford Street (formerly
Lockaford Avenue); thence Westerly along the North line of
1_
Lock®ford Street, also a City Limit Line, 442.8 feet to the
centerline of Loma Drive (also formerly Lockeford Avenue);
thence Northerly along the centerline of Lorne Drive, also a
City Limit Line, 757.34 feet to the extended North line of
Lot 25, Gerard Tract; thence Easterly along the north line
of said Lot 25, 41+2.8 feet to the point of beginning; the
area thus described containing 7.7 acres more or less.
3. That the County Boundary Commission of San Juaquin County,
California, did in session duly assembled on Tuesday, January 9,
1962, consider and approve the proposed annexation boundaries of
said "North Loma Drive Addition," as above described, and as sub-
mitted to said Commission by the proponents of said annexation.
4. That Tuesday, April 17, 1962, at the hour of 8 p.m.., in
the Cou.noi1 Chambers in the City Hall in the City of Lodi, County
of San Joaquin, California, is hereby fixed as this time and place
when and where any person owning real property within the uninhabited
territory above described and proposed to be annexed to the City
of Lodi, and having any objections to the proposed annexation,
may appear bafore the CoUna of the City of Lodi and show cause
Why such uninhabited territory should not be so annexed to the
City Of Lodi. The protest must be in writing, may be filed at
any time before the hour set for hearing objections to the proposed
annexation, and shall state the name or names of the owner or
owners of property affected and the description and area of such
property, in general terns.
5. The City Cierk of txae city or Lodi is hereby auttiurized
and directed to cause a copy of this resolution to be published
at least twice, but not oftener than once a week, in the Lodi News-
Sentinel, a newspaper of general circulation published in said
city of Lodi, the city to which it is proposed to annex the aforesaid
territory, and also in the Stockton Record, a newspaper of general
circulation published outside the City of Lodi but in the County
of Ban Joaquipi, California, the county in which is located the
territory proposed to be annexed to the City of Lodi, said publi-
cation to be complete at least twenty days prior to the date set
for hearing.
6. The said City Clerk is further authorized and directed
to o*tne written notice of such proposed annexation to be mailed
to each person to warm land within the territory proposed to be
annexed was assessed in the last equalized county assessment roll
available on the date the above said proceedings were initiated,
at the addresses shown on said assessment roll or known to said
Clerk, and to any person who has filed his name and address and
the designation of the lands in which he has an interest, either
legal or equitable, with said Clerk, such noticu to be given not
less than twenty days before the first public hearing on the pro -
Posed annexation.
7. In the event. there is, upon thu idnd proposed tc) be
arumxect to said City, a structural improvement owned, being aectuired
or leased by a county fire protection district, the City Clerk is
directed to cause written notice of such proposud annexation to
be mailed to the governing body of such district, such notice to
be sent not less than ten uays before the first public hearing
upon such proposed annexation.
8. The City Clerk Is dlructed to cause written notice to be
given to such other persons as may be legally entitled thereto, in
the manner required by law.
ADOPTED THIS 7111 DAY OF MARC}1, 1962, by the roiiowing vote:
AYES:
NoEst
Councilmen ' BROWN, KATZAKIMN, MITCHELL, ULLMA"
and CEJLBERTSON
Councilmen - NONE
ABSENT: Councilmen - NONE
3.
Ai'RICEto
City Clerk