Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - No. 83-89RESOLUTION NO. 83-89 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CITY OF LODI'S 1983-1984 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIM FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND (LTF) AND STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE (STA) RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lodi does hereby approve the City of Lodi's 1983-84 Transportation Development Act Claim for Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit Assistance (STA), a copy of which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit A, and thereby made a part hereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lodi does hereby direct the City Manager to execute the subject document on behalf of the City. Dated: August 17, 1983 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 83-89 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held August 17, 1983 by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Reid, Snider, Murphy, Pinkerton & Olson (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None } cAlice M. ReimcLhehe City Clerk 51MET-111 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND TO: San Joaquin County Council of Governments 1860 East Hazelton Avenue Stockton, CA 95205 FROM: Applicant: City of Lodi Address: P.O. Box 320, Lodi, CA 95241 (City, Zip Contact Person: ,lack L. Ronsko Phone: 334-5634 The City of Lodi hereby requests, in accordance witF-C apter 1400, Statutes,1971--a—nU applicable rules and regulations, that its annual transportation claim be approved in the amount of $ 491 ,974 for fiscal year 1983-84 to be . drawn from the local.transportation fund. 1 When approved., please transmit this claim to the County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to this applicant is subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan. The claimant certifies that this -Local Transportation Fund claim and the financial information contained therein, is reasonable and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634 and 6734. APPROVED: San Joaquin County Council of Governments By PETER D--VE-RDOORM Title Executive Director Date 19 - 5 - App ant C i t of Lo By Title C i y Manager Date 8/17 19' 83 k ( STA STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE CLAIM TO: San Joaquin County Council of Governments 1860 East Hazelton Avenue Stockton, CA 95205 FROM: Applicant:. City of Lodi Address (City, Zip) : P.O. Box 320, Lodi, CA 95241 Contact Person, Phone: ,ferry Glenn This claimant, qualified pursuant to Section 99203 and 99315 of the Public Utilities Code, hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes of 1971 as amended, and applicable -rules and regula- tions, that an allocation be made in the amount of $ 78,149 for fiscal year 1983-84 to be drawn from the State Transit Assistance trust fund of San Joaquin County for the following purposes and in the following respective amounts: Purposes Amounts Dial -a -ride$ 78,149 Allocation instruction and payment by the County Auditor to this claimant are subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved claim. -The claimant certifies that this Local Transportation Fund Claim and the financial information contained herein, is reasonable and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant -to CAC Section 6034 and 6734. APPROVED: San Joaquin County Council of Governments By Title Date cutive Direc 19 App l i s nt C i t %f o i By ^► � � Title City Manager Date 19 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT APPORTIO�'riENTS I. Local Transportation Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment (83-84) $ 476,064 B. Pedestrian/Bicycle Apportionment 9,918 C. Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment 5,992 D. Unexpended Carryover 1 196 132 Total Available for 1983-84 Claim S 1,688,106 II. State Transit Assistance Fund Available Apportionment - A. Area Apportionment (83-84) $ 76,943 B. Special Transit Apportionment (83-84) 1,206 C. Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment -- D. Unexpended Carryover 8,282 Total Available for 1983-84 Claire $ 86,431 - 7 - Ir TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT.ACT ALLOCATIONS Claim Purpose I. Public Transportation Article 4 (99260) - Operator Article 8 (99400(c)) - Contractor II_ Pedestrian and Bicycle Article 3 (99234) Article 8 (99400(a)) III. Roads and Streets Article 8 (99400(a)) IV. Other Article 8 (99400(b)) Total Claimed Total Available Apportionment Total Claimed Unclaimed Apportionment (1983-84) I. LTF I I - STA' 9.918 1,612,669 1 688.106 1,688,106 1,688,106 0 86.431 86,431 86,431,'..., 0 *This will automatically be classified as Article 6.5 (99313.3) for purposes of the Act. - 9 - Please Check One: � � XX Article 4 Operator E. Article 8 Contractor FINANCIAL INFOR::IATION 1982-83 1983-84 I. OPERATING REVENUE P'Actual/1;stimate® Budget 401 Passenger Fares 30,518 30,400 402 Special Transit Fares 403 School Bus Service Revenues 404 Freight Tariffs 405 Charter Service Revenues (Woodbridge) .1,892 3,850 406 Auxilliary Transportation Revenues 407 Non -Transportation Revenues Interest 408 Taxes Levied Directly by Transit System (Specify) 409 Local Cash Grants and Reimbursements (Specify) Local Transportation Fund (LTF) 44 U0o 65,519 410 Local Special Fare Assistance 411 State Cash Grants and Reimbursements -- (Specify) State Transit Assist. Fund (STA)' 109,465 86,431 412 State Special Fare Assistance 413 Federal Cash Grants & Reimbursements (Specify) UMTA Grants 430 Contributed Services 440 (Specify) TOTAL 185,875 186,200. II. CAPITAL REVENUE 464 Federal Capital Grants & Subsidies (Specify) State Capital Grants & Subventions (Specify) State Transit Assist. Funds (STA) Local Capital Provisions (Specify) Local Transportation Fund (LTF) Non -Governmental Donations TOTAL - 9 - III. OPERATING EXPENSES 501 Labor Operators Salaries/Wages Other Salaries/Wages 502 Fringe Benefits 503 Services 504 Materials/Supplies Fuels/Lubricants Tires/Tubes Other 505 Utilities 506 Casualty/Liability Costs 507 Taxes 508 Purchased Transportation Service 509 Miscellaneous Expenses 510 Expense Transfers 511 Interest Expense 512 Leases and Rentals 513 Depreciation/Amortization — Operator Funds Grant Funds IV. CAPITAL EXPENSES Debt Service Land/Property Acquistion Vehicles Construction Other TOTAL TOTAL - 10 1982-83 1983-84 Actual/Estimates Budget 360 1,000 _ 185 500 739 6,000 6,000 1702309 177,700 1.000 177,593 186,200 OPERATIONAL INF O:�,fATION* Actual Actual Proposed FY 1981-82 FY 1982-83 FY 1983-84 1. Patronage a. Total Passengers 56,386 59.050 b. Revenue Passengers _ _ 787 950 c. Youth Passengers d. Elderly Passengers s Handicapped 55,599 58,100 e. Handicapped Passengers - 2. Vehicle Miles a. Total Vehicle Miles 97,529 102,405 b. Revenue Vehicle Miles 97,529 102,405 3. R2venue Vehicle Hours Unknown 10,000 4. Revenue Vehicle Fuel Consumption a. Diesel 68,542 7,197 b. Gasoline c. Liquid natural Compressed -- Gas 5. Fare Structure a. Base 2.00 2.00 b. Zone c. Youth d. Senior 0.50 0.50 e. Handicapped 0.50 0.5n f. Monthly Pass g. Other h. Average Fare _ 0.53 0.53 J *Attach additional pages as necessary :,Vo alter or complete description THREE YEAR FISCAL PLAN Operating Expenses $ 1984'-85 Capital Revenue Sources: LTF STA Federal Other 1985-86 $ 1986-87 $ 186,200 $ 195,510 $ 205,285 Operating Sources: Revenues LTF STA Federal Fares General Fund Other $ 61,950 $ 69,510 $ 88,285 90,000 90,000 79,000 34,250 36,000 38,000 Total $ 186 200 $ 195,510 $ 205,285 Capital Expenses $ $ $ 11,000 Capital Revenue Sources: LTF STA Federal Other $ $ 11,000 Total $ $ $ 11,000 _ t1LL-LULC -fr FLEET INVENTORY sake & Model Production Year # of Veh. -Fuel Tie Seat Sliqcial, Capacity AC '--t Features i_EP �rTC Other Chevrolet Station Wagon 1982 6 diesel 6 X I TOTAL XXXXXXxxxxx 6 36 6 Vehicles to be Purchased in FY 86-87 Station wagon 1 6 X AC = Air Conditioned EP = Environmental Package WC = Wheel Chair Lift - 13 - Article 4. Operator TDA Requirements 1. Fare Ratio Requirement A. For an operator serving a non -urbanized area and providing exclusive service to the elderly and handicapped, the ratio of fare revenues to operating cost (minus depreciation) must equal at least 10%, or the ratio the operator achieved in FY 1978/79, whichever is greater. B. For an operator serving an urbanized area, the ratio of fare revenues to operating cost (minus depreciation) must equal at least 20%, or the ratio the operator achieved in FY 1978/79, whichever is greater. i. What is this system's required farebox recovery ratio? 10% ii. Does the attached budget demonstrate that the system will meet its required farebox recovery ratio? Yes iii. Has the system utilized its grace year? no iv. Has this system been in non-compliance with its required farebox recovery ratio? nn _ — .If yes, identify the year or years: 2.. - Local Support Ratio - Same as above A. For an operator serving a non -urbanized area, and/or pro- viding exclusive service to the elderly and handicapped, the ratio of fare revenue plus local support (local taxes, general fund, etc. 6611.3) to operating cost, (minus de-. preciation) must equal at least 10%, or the ratio the operator achieved in FY 1978/79, whichever is greater. B. For an operator serving an urbanized area, the ratio of fare revenues plus local support to operating cost must equal at least 20%, or the ratio the operator achieved in FY 1978/79, whichever is greater. 1 11 i'. What is this system's required local support ratio? "lo ii. Does the attached budget demonstrate that the system will meet this required local support ratio? - 14 iii. Has this system utilized its grace year? iv. Has this system been in non-compliance with its requir.ed.local support ratio? _ If yes, Identify the year or years: 3. Extension of Service An extension or new service is exempt from the required farebox and local support ratios if: A. The extension of service has been in operation for less than two years at the end of the fiscal year. B. The claimant's operating; cost for the fiscal year, after excluding the operating cost of the extension of service, exceeds its operating cost for the prior fiscal year. C. The claimant submits a report on the extension of service to COG. (For details of the report, see 6633.8(c)). i.. -Is this a new service? ii. Is there an extension of service being claimed? -- If so, please identify the extension of service: 4. Fifteen Percent Expenditure Increase If any of the line items on the attached budget exceed by more than 15% the expenditure for that same item in the previous year's budget, then an explanation for that increase must be attached. See attached. 5. Narrative Description Describe any changes in service characteristics from the previous fiscal year. Please attach an additional page if necessary- - 15 - C Article 8 Contractor TDA Requirements For contracted transportation service providers, the San Joaquin County Council of Governments' Executive Board has waived the farebox and local support ratios as it is empo..ered to do and established a two-step process: 1. Match Requirement To receive the same amount of TDA funds (LTF and STA combined). that a service received in the previous year, no more than 90% of the operating funds (minis depreciation) in the budget may be.TDA derived. The ten percent or more matching funds may come from any other source available to the community as long as it is not TDA. 2. Operating Cost Per Passenger Objective To receive an amount of TDA funds (LTF and STA combined) in excess of what was claimed the previous fiscal year, the claim- ant must establish a specific service objective for the fiscal year of the claim. This specific objective would be the operating cost per passenger for the fiscal year of the claim. The objective should be a realistic one based on current and past system performance, but should be low enough to represent an "improvement" when warranted. The Transportation Planning Policy Committee will adopt the operating cost per passenger figure that a claimant must meet in the fiscal year of the claim. If the system failed to meet is operating cost per passenger objective in the fiscal year prior to the claim, then it would only be eligible to file a cliam for the level of TDA funding received in that fiscal year. If a system wishes to be eligible for increased TDA funding in a future fiscal year, then it should identify an operating cost per passenger objective. i. What was the level of TDA funding received in the previous fiscal year for this system (LTF and STA) $ ii. Does the attached budget information demonstrate at least a 10`/o match of non -TDA funds? iii. Is this claim requesting more TAA funds then were received in the previous fiscal year? If yes, how much more? $ iv. What was last year's Operating Cost per Passenger Objective? What was the actual Operating Cost per Passenger? Opera,ing Cost (minus depreciation) $ Total Passengers . Operating Cost per Passenger $_` v. What is the Operating Cost per Passenger Objective for this claim? Budgeted Operating Cost (minus depreciation) $ Estimated Total Passengers Operating Cost per Passenger _ 3. Fifteen Percent Expenditure Increase If any of the line items on:the attached budget exceed by more than 15% the expenditure for that same item in the previous year's budget, then an explanation for that increase must be attached. 4. Narrative Description Describe any changes in service characteristics from the previous fiscal year. Please attach an additional page if necessary. - 17 - f If - PART PART II - PEDESTRIAN? AND BICYCLE PROJECTS :LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND Project Limits LTF Cost To taros t PART III- ROAD AND STREET PROJECTS /lease provide the requested information for each project being identified `'for Transportation Development Act funding. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND LTF Cost Project Title and Description _ _ Project Limits Total Cost Ham Lane (R/W construction) Ham .Lane Median Stockton Street R/W Acquisition Utility Relocation Hutchins Street I Hutchins Street Median Turner Road Downtown Improvement'District Pine -School Signal Modification, Sacramento Street CGS, Inspection and other miscellaneous related work. Railroad Grade Crossingg Approach Improvements (SPR .) Ham Lane $ 6,000 Tokay Street 12,000 Lodi Avenue, •14,000 Pine Street 22,000 Elm Street 12,000 Locust Street 16,000 Lockeford Street 13,000 Lower Sacramento Road'Widening Street Maintenance Administration Work -in -Progress * Primary Bicycle Route STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND Lodi -Elm $ 165,000 Century-Kettleman 54,000_ Kettleman-Lodi 50,000 245,000 • Vine-Tokay , 129,000 • Kettleman-Rimby (C&R/W) j 55,000 Tokay-Lodi R/W Acquisition 6,000 Construction 220,000 Harney -Vineyard I 10,000 1000' W/Cluff-C_luff 57,000 Downtown Area I 100-,000 95,000 Elm Street North 70,000 { 52,000 5,000 . Useditional Page if Necessary STA Cost 19 --(Use Additional Page if Necessary) S w PART IV - OTHER PURPOSES There is the possibility that a claimant may wish to expend TDA funds for purposes allowed within the Act, but not covered by the three previous parts. For instance, TDA funds may be claimed to subsidize Amtrak service in a community. To complete this section, please identify the project, the _PPurpPo--se of theproject, the estimated cost, and the £un rom whihmoney is being claimed. It is advisable to communicate with COG staff before completing this section. - 20 - f F (r PART III - ROAD AND STREET PROJECTS /Please provide the requested information for each project being identified for Transportation Development Act funding. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND Proiect Title and Description Miscellaneous Widening 'Miscellaneous Overlay Miscellaneous Curb & Gutter Miscellaneous Subdivision Paving Miscellaneous Traffic Appurtenance Upgrade Traffic Signals 'Pine and Cherokee (upgrade) °Lockeford and Cherokee (new) 'Victor and Cherokee (upgrade) *Ham and Lockeford•(new) I *Lodi Avenue Signal System Modificati n l`Church Street Signal System Modificatlion I= *Pine and Sacramento I Other Miscellaneous New Signal l i Railroad Grade Crossing Protection *Turner Road @ Mills *Loma Drive *California Street °Cherokee Lane - *Washington Street Calaveras Street Curb, Gutter & Paving @ Post Office Work -in -progress Primary bicycle route STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND Proiect Title and Description LTF Cost Project Limits Total Cost $ 50,000 80,000 71,000 15,000 10,000 Lockeford - 200' S/Murray School & Walnut Total Use Ac�ditiona: PrC1lP[`r l.imific 90,000 110,000 90,000 80,000 10,000 10,000 70,000 80,000 14,500 8,000 9,200 9,000 7,000 an,ml 31,000 $1,622,587 $2,187,700 age ar necessary STA Cost Total Cost 19.1 ...(Use Additional Page if Necessary) Attachment for A, Page 15 of Claim Expenditures for labor and fringe benefits during the '82-'83 fiscal year amounted to only $545; however, we had budgeted $2,000 for these expenses in the '82-'83 claim. We had also estimated our miscellaneous expenses to be $2,000 in '82-'83, but nothing was charged to that line item during last fiscal year. This year we expect to print brochures, which cost will be charged to that account, and we have budgeted $1,000 for the '83-184 fiscal year.