The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolutions - No. 85-118RESOLUTION NO. 85-118 RESOLUTION APPROVING CITY OF LODI 1985-86 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIM FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND AMID STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lodi does hereby approve the City's 1985-86 Transportation Development Act Claim for Local Transportation Fluid and State Transit Assistance, a copy of which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and thereby made a part hereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lodi does hereby authorize the City Manager and City Clerk to execute the subject dociunent on behalf of the City of Lodi. Dated: September 4, 1985 I hereby certify that Resolution. No. 85-118 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a Regular Meeting held September 4, 1985 by the following vote: AYES: Council Members - Olson, Pinkerton, Reid, Snider, and Hinchman (Mayor) NOES: Council Members - None ABSENT: Council Menbers - None O�w �h i Ci ALICE M. REIlMCHE City Clerk 85-118 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND TO: San Joaquin County Council of Governments 1860 East Hazelton Avenue Stockton, CA 95205 FROM: Applicant:_ City of Lodi Address: Call Box 3006, Lodi, CA 95241-1910 (city, zip -T -- Contact Person: Sharon Blaufus 4114(lord'c / . LTF Phone: 333-6706 The City of Lodi hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes 197r and applicable rules and regulations, that its annual transportation claim be approved in the amount of $ 1 102,490 for fiscal year 1985-86 to be drawn from the to ar transportation fund. When approved, please transmit this claim to the County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to this applicant is subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan. The claimant certifies that this Local Transportation Fund claim and the financial information contained therein, is reasonable and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634 and 6734. APPROVED: San Joaquin County Council of Governments By PETERR OORi Title Executive Director Date 19 Applic City odi B, 4.cyy Title City Manager Date September 4 19 85 Attest:Alice./M. Riemche City Clerk - 5 - STA STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE CLAIM TO: San Joaquin County Council of Governments 1860 East Hazelton Avenue Stockton, CA 95205 FROM: Applicant: City of Lodi Address (City, Zip) : Call Box 3006, Lodi, CA 95241-1 91 0 Contact Person, Phone: Sharon Blaufus 333-6706 This claimant, qualified pursuant to Section 99203 and 99315 of the Public Utilities Code, hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes of 1971 as amended, and applicable rules and regula- tions, that an allocation be made in the amount of $73,135 for fiscal year _1985-86 to be dra-.,m from the State Transit Assistance trust fund of San Joaquin County for the following purposes and in the following respective amounts: Purposes Amounts Dial -a- Ride $73,135 Allocation instruction and payment by the County Auditor to this claimant are subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved claim. The claimant certifies that this State Transit Assistance Fund Claim and the financial information contained herein, is reasonable and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634 and 6734. APPROVED: San Joaquin County Council of Governments $v ' . a Title City Manager Date Sputa ber 4r 19�- Title Executive Director Date 19 Attest: Alice M. Reimche City Clerk 6 - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT APPORTIONIKENTS I. Local Transportation Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment (85-86) $ 673,117 B. Pedestrian/Bicycle Apportionment 14,023 C. Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment 74,000 D. Unexpended Carryover 341,350 (includes $2,048 of Transit Capital) Total Available for 1985-86 Claim 1,102,490 II. State Transit Assistance Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment (85-86) $ 62,485 B. Special Transit Apportionment (85-86) 789 C. Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment D. Unexpended Carryover 9,861 Total Available for 1985-86 Claim $ 73,135 - 7 - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ALLOCATIONS Claim Purpose I. Public Transportation Article 4 (99260) - Operator Article 8 (99400(c)) - Contractor II. Pedestrian and Bicycle Article 3 (99234) Article 8 (99400(a)) II. Roads and Streets Article 8 (99400(a)) IV. Other Article 8 (99400(b)) Total Claimed Total Available Apportionment Total Claimed Unclaimed Apportionment (1985-86) I. LTF I I . STA* 94,715 73',135 38,565 969,210 ,102,490 1,102,490 102 4 0 0 73035 -'This will automatically be classified as Article 6.5 (99313.3) for purposes of the Act. PART I PUBLIC TRANSPORTA-- ON Please Check One: Article 4 Operator ❑ ❑ Article 8 Contractor I. OPERATING REVENUE FINANCIAL INFORMATION 1984-85 1985-36 ® ."actual jA�e p Budget 401 Passenger Fares 402 Special Transit Fares 403 School Bus Service Revenues 404 Freight Tariffs 405 Charter Service Revenues 406 Auxilliary Transportation Revenues 407 Non -Transportation Revenues 408 Takes Levied Directly by Transit System (Specify) 409 Local Cash Grants and Reimbursements (Specify) Local Transportation Fund (LTF) 410 Local Special Fare Assistance 411 State Cash Grants and Reimbursements (Specify) State Transit Assist. Fund (STA) 412 State Special Fare Assistance 413 Federal Cash Grants & Reimbursements (Specify) UMTA Grants 430 Contributed Services 440 (Specify) TOTAL II. CAPITAL REVENUE 464 Federal Capital Grants & Subsidies (Specify) State Capital Grants & Subventions (Specify) State Transit Assist. Funds Local Capital Provisions (Specify) Local.Transportation Fund (LTF) Non -Governmental Donations TOTAL - 9 - (STA) 30.539 32,000 54,539 82,215 107,761 73,135 192,839 187,350 26,000 12,500 26,000 12,500 - 10 - 1984-85 1985-86 III. OPER.%TING EXPENSES Actual/Estimates Budget 5C1 Labor Operators Salaries/Wages Other Salaries/Wages 159 250 502 Fringe Benefits 58 100 503 Services 504 Materials/Supplies Fuels/Lubricants Tires/Tubes Other _ 505 Utilities 506 Casualty/Liability Costs 6,000 6,000 507 Taxes 745 508 Purchased Transportation Service 175,293 180,000 509 Miscellaneous Expenses 723 1,000 510 Expense Transfers 511 Interest Expense 512 Leases and Rentals 513 Depreciation/Amortization Opera=or Funds Grant Funds TOTAL 182,978 187,350 IV. CAPITAL EXPENSES Debt Service Land/Property Acquistion _ 765 Vehicles 23,187 12,500 Construction. Other TOTAL 23,952 12,500 - 10 - OPERATIONAL INFOR, IATIONX Act ua 1 Actual T-4&Yt(d Proposed FY 1983-84 FY 1984-85 FY 1985-86 1. Patronage -`Attach additional pages as necessary to alter or complete description a. Total Passengers 62,812 60,238 62,000 b. Revenue Passengers 1,877 — 1,045 2,000 C. Youth Passengers - d. Elderly Passengers 59,878 57,824 60,000 e. Handicapped Passengers 2. *Vehicle Miles a. Total Vehicle Miles 106,140 107,869 113,000 b. Revenue Vehicle Miles 106,140 107,869 113,000 3. Revenue Vehicle Hours 9,448 9,342 10,800 4. Revenue Vehicle Fuel Consumption a. Diesel 8,104 8,194 7,785 b. Gasoline 3,115 C. Liquid natural Compressed Gas S. Fare Structure a. Base 2.00 2.00 1.00 b. Zone c. Youth d. Senior _ .50 .50 .50 e. Handicapped .50 .50 .50 f. Monthly Pass g Other h. average Fare .54 .54 .53 `Includes miles for County service. All other figures reflect City service only. -`Attach additional pages as necessary to alter or complete description i c� 0 0 0 0 co u, 0 0 Ul 0 0 Ln I M .o O co o — co O O N --r 00 q O _ O O O CO Ul N rn M M 0", U)- rO — %D CD O N ^ O O N U1 U} C! ) U1 N N U} p N U} G} VIL p U-% O O O M u'1 Ln v O O /r�- r ::IW V O S J ani w a n c X Q>1 OG` S h —4 —4 Q1 rJ c[i U 1J 1.3 }4 �--I �. N �- a N O U U N i co 1 l7 O S O O O 1 N O N O Q\ N N NM N N cl m U} U} U} r� W cn cn Qj Q) C-) m cc� 4 ��` I4 �f .r (9) �4 Q/ rr-- f4 1� Q V CO CO � � 0 •r1 •rl V cc �4 co Q1 C) O 41 C. M O O O H - 12 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 U-% Ul Lr% M M M O O O O O O O O O M M M V'Y U)- rO CD O O O O O U1 U1 U1 N N N U} G} VIL M 4 �4 v co /r�- r ::IW V ani w a n c X Q>1 h —4 —4 Q1 rJ c[i U 1J 1.3 }4 �--I �. �. O 11 a N O U U H Article 4 Operator Onl- Make & Model Chevrolet -Caprice Station Wagon Chevrolet -Caprice Station Wagon FLEET INVENTORY Production I1!", of Fuel Seat Year I Veh. I Tvpe lCavaci 1979 5 Diesel 6 1984 2 I f Gasoline i { 6 i al Vehicles to he Purchased in FY 1985/86 Spe,ciLFeatures AC EP WC Other X station Wagon' 1985 1 Gasoline 6 1 teplacement for 1979 Vehicle 4 i AC = Air Conditioned £P = Environmental Package '111C = Wheel Chair Lift Article 4 Operator TDA Requirements 1. Fare Ratio Requirement A. For an operator serving a non -urbanized area and/or providing exclusive service to the elderly and handicapped, the ratio of fare revenues to operating cost (minus depreciation) must equal at least 10%, or the ratio the operator achieved in FY 1978/79, whichever is greater. B. For an operator serving an urbanized area, the ratio of fare revenues to operating cost (minus depreciation) must equal at least 20%, or the ratio the operator achieved in FY 1978/79, whichever is greater. i. What is this system's required farebox recovery ratio? ink ii. Does the attached budget demonstrate that the system will meet its required farebox recovery ratio? Yes iii. Has the system utilized its grace year? No iv. Has this system been in non-compliance with its required farebox recovery ratio? If yes, identify the year or _years: 2. Local Support Ratio A. For an operator serving a non -urbanized area, and/or pro- viding exclusive service to the elderly and handicapped, the ratio of fare revenue plus local support (local taxes, general fund, etc. 6611.3) to operating cost, (minus de- preciation) must equal at least 10`/0, or the ratio the operator achieved in FY 1978/79, whichever is greater. B. For an operator serving an urbanized area, the ratio of fare revenues plus local support to operating cost must equal at least 2O%, or the ratio the operator achieved in FY 1978/79, whichever is greater. i. What is this system's required local support ratio? 10 % ii. Does the attached budget demonstrate that the system will meet this required local support ratio? Yes - 14 - iii. Has this system utilized its grace year? iv. Has this system been in non-compliance with its required local support ratio? No If yes, Identify the year or years: 3. Extension of Service An extension or new service is exempt from the required farebox and local support ratios if: A. The extension of service has been in operation for less than two years at the end of the fiscal year. B. The claimant's operating cost for the fiscal year, after excluding the operating cost of the extension of service, exceeds its operating cost for the prior fiscal year. C. The claimant submits a report on the extension of service to COG. (For details of the report, see 6633.8(c)) . i. Is this a new service? ii. Is there an extension of service being claimed? I` so, please identify the extension of service: 4. Fifteen Percent Expenditure Increase If any of the line items -on the attached budget exceed by more than 15% the expenditure for that same item in the previous year's budget, then an explanation for that increase must be attached. 5. Narrative Description Describe any changes in service characteristics from the previous fiscal year. Please attach an additional page if necessary. One additional vehicle was purchased in 1984-85, Saturday service was initiated and fares lowered for non -elderly and non -handicapped persons. These were all accomplished late in the fiscal year so it is impossible to ascertain the affect on service. A replacement vehicle is included in this year's budget to continue the replace- ment of diesel -powered vehicles to gasoline. - 15 - Article 8 Contractor TDA Requirements For contracted transportation service providers, the San Joaquin County Council of Governments' Executive Board has waived the farebox and local support ratios as it is empowered to do and established a two-step process: 1. Match Requirement To receive the same amount of TDA funds (LTF and STA combined) that a service received in the previous year, no more than 90% of the operating funds (minus depreciation) in the budget may be TDA derived. The ten percent or more matching funds may come from any other source available to the community as long as it is not TDA. 2. Operating Cost Per Passenger Objective To receive an amount of TDA funds (LTF and STA combined) in excess of what was claimed the previous fiscal year, the claim- ant must establish a specific service objective for the fiscal year of the claim. This specific objective would be the oDeratir.e cost per passenzer for the fiscal year of the claim. The objective should be a realistic one based on current and past system performance, but should be low enough to represent an "improvement" when warranted. The Transportation Planning Policy Committee will adopt the operating cost per passenger figure that a claimant must meet in the fiscal year of the claim. If the system failed to meet is operating cost per passenger objective in the fiscal year prior to the claim, then it would only be eligible to file a cliarz for the level of TDA funding received in that fiscal year. i. What was the level of TDA funding received in the previous fiscal year for this system (LTF and STA) $ ii. Does the attached budget information demonstrate at least a 10% match of non -TDA funds? iii. Is this claim requesting received in the previous If yes, how much more? $ more TDA funds then were fiscal year? iv. What was last year's Operating Cost per Passenger Objective? ghat was the actual Operating Cost per Passenger? - 16 - Operating Cost (minus depreciation) $ Total Passengers Operating Cost per Passenger $__ v. What is the Operating Cost per Passenger Objective for this claim? Budgeted Operating Cost (minus depreciation) $ Estimated Total Passengers Operating Cost per Passenger 3. Fifteen Percent Expenditure Increase If any of the line items on .the attached budget exceed by more than 15`/o the expenditure for that same item in the previous year's budget, then an explanation for that increase must be attached. 4. Narrative Description Describe any changes in service characteristics from the previous fiscal year. Please attach an additional page if necessary. - 17 - PART II - PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROJECTS 1ILOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND I I IProject Title and Description * Nam Lane Street Improvement * Work in Progress STATE TRANSIT ASS=AN Project Title and Desc Pro-1---.—ect Limits --- Lodi Ave to Elm St. LTF Cost Total Cost S 38,565 PART III - ROAD AND STREET PROJECTS Please provide the requested information for each project being identified for Transportation Development Act funding. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND Project Title and Description Miscellaneous Widening * Miscellaneous Curb & Gutters I R.R. Grade Crossina Protection @ SPP Turner Road @ Mills Cherokee Lane Washington Street Traffic Signals Lodi Ave. & Church St. j Hutchins & Tokay Miscellaneous Locations RR Xing Approach Improvements Tokay Street Locust Street Loma Drive Stockton Street Improvements Century Blvd/W7 D Box Culvert & Crossi * Hutchins Street. Improvements * Cherokee Lane Improvements * Pavement Management System Street Maintenance Administration/Planning STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND Project Limits LTF Cost Total CosF $ 50,000 70,000 15,000 10,000 14,000 I 100,000 40,000 80,000 30,000 47,000 6,000 Vine to Tokay ; 262,000 i Ig 100,000 Rimbv to Vine 290,000 Tokay to Lodi R/W 15,000 Lockeford to S/Murray 75,000 5,000 128,000 2,000 Use Additional Page if Necessary Project Limits STA Cost Total—Cost 10 _(Use=ddi=fonal P2;'e if Necessary) PART III - ROAD AND STREET PROJECTS Please provide the requested information for each project being identified for Transportation Development Act funding. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND Project Title and Description Miscellaneous Asphalt Overlays Projects - 1986 Turner Rd. Curb, Gutter & Street Replacement @ Lodi Lake Nam Lane Median Lockeford Street Tokay Street I STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNND LTF Cost Project Limits Total Cost S 175,000 11,000 Century/ Kett I eman ! 34,000 I Pleasant to Sacramentol 86,000 Sacramento to Cherokee] 58,000 SPPR to Cherokee 271,000 TOTAL i $ 91;9,21 n $1,974,000 — _79se Additional Page is Necessary STA Cost Proiect Limits Total Cost 19 -(Use Additional Page if Necessary) PART IV - OTHER PURPOSES There is the possibility that a claimant may wish to expend TDA funds for purposes allowed within the Act, but not covered by the three previous parts. For instance, TDA funds may be claimed to subsidize Amtrak service in a community. To complete this section, please identify the project, the ur ose of the pro.ect, the estimated cost, and the fu3—from which monev is being claimed. It is advisable to communicate with COG staff before completing this section. - 20 -