The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolutions - No. 86-138RESOLUTION NO. 86-138 RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDED 1985-86 TRANSIT ASSISTANCE CLAIM RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lodi does hereby approve the amended 1985-86 Transit Assistance Claim, a copy of which is attached hereto, identified as Exhibit "A" and thereby made a part hereof. BE IT CHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lodi does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute the subject documents on behalf of the City of Lodi. Dated: September 3, 1986 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 86-138 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a Regular Meeting held September 3, 1986 by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Hinchman, Olson, Pinkerton, and Reid (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - Snider Abstain: Council Members - None ALICE M. REIMCHE City Clerk 86-138 6Y1L4&& /7 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND TO: San Joaquin County Council of Governments 1860 cast Hazelton Avenue - - Stockton, CA 95205 FROM: Applicant: City of Lodi Address: P.O. Box 3006, Lodi, CA, 95241-1910 (City, zip) Contact Person: Sharon B1 aufus Phone :333-6706 The City of Lodi hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes 1971 and applicable rules and regulations, that its annual transportation claim be approved in the amount of $ 1,102,490 for fiscal year 1985-86 , to be drawn from the Local Transportation Fund. When approved, please transmit this claim to the County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auua for Co this applicant is subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan. The claimant certifies that this Local Transportation Fund claim an t -he -'financial information contained therein, is reasonable and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634 and 6734. APPROYFD: San Joaquin County Council of Governments By: I PETER D. VERDOORN I Title: Executive Director i Date: 19 I -5- Applicant: City of Lodi By: t --o-C --1 Assistant City Manager Titl For: City Manager TCM Peterson Date: 7/y 19 ?/ STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE CLAIM T0: San Joaquin County Council of Governments 1960 East Hazelton Avenue Stockton, CA 95205 FROM: Applicant: City of Lodi Address: P.O. Box 3006, Lodi. CA. 95241-1910 (City, Zip) Contact Person: Sharon Blaufus Phone: 333-6706 This claimant, qualified pursuant to Section 99203 and 99315 of the Public Utilities Code, hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes of 1971 as amended, and applicable rules and regulations, that an allocation be made in the amount of $ 93,859 for fiscal year 1985-86 , to be drawn from the State Transit Assistance trust fund of San Joaquin County for the following purposes and in the following respective amounts: Purposes Amounts Dial -A -Ride Services $93,859 Allocation instruction and payment by the County Auditor to this claimant are subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved claim. The claimant certifies that this State Transit Assistance Fund Claim and the financial information contained herein, is reasonable and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 5634-an6 6734. APPROVED: San Joaquin County Council of Governments By: PETER D. VERDOORN Title: Executive Director Date: 19 Q- Applicant: C i tv of Lodi By: Assistant City Manager Titl Fnr- City Manager Trm Peterson Date. I — Y 199( I. TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT APPORTIONMENTS Local Transportation Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment 1965-86 B. Pedestrian/Bicycle Apportionment C. Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment D. Unexpended Carryover E. Total Available for 1985-86 Claim(s) F. less any LTF Already Claimed 1985-86 G. TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR Tulj CLAIM 1,093,051 1093,051 $ -0- II. State Transit Assistance Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment 1985-86 $ 62,485--.--- B. Special Transit Apportionment 1985-86 7$9 C. )pAMx)jxxxa 1985-86 Unclaimed Apportionment 20L724_____ D. Unexpended Carryover �L861 ---- E. Total Available for 1985-86 Claim(s) 93,859 F. less any STA Already Claimed 1985-86 _73-L135 LU -L- G. TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM $ 20,724 -7- TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ALLOCATIONS Claim Purpose I. LTF II. STA* I. Public Transportation Article 4 ( 99260 )-Operator 119,498 Article 8 (99400(c)) -Contractor II. Pedestrian and Bicycle Article 3 (99234) Article 6 (99400(a)) III. Roads and Streets Article 8 (99400(a)) IV. Other N/A 38,565 934,988 N/A Article 8 (99400(b) or 994 0 0 (d) ) -- - ----- ---- ----- TOTAL THIS CLAIM 1,093,051 93,.859 ----- *$47,971 Streets -& Roads to Transit---!_---_ ------------ a. TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM 1,093,051 93,859 b. TOTAL THIS CLAIM c. UNCLAIMED APPORTIONMENT 1985-86 (a - b) 1,093,051 ---- -93-859- --- 0 0 *This Will automatically be classified as Article 6.5 (99313.3) for purposes of the Act. IMPORTANT: Please identify any unexpended carryover included in the amounts being claimed above. -8- PART I - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Please Circle either: Article 4 operator or Article 8 contractor FINANCIAL INFORMATION I. OPERATING REVENUE 1984-85 1985-86 Actual Budget Revised 401 Passenger Fares 30,939 37.853 _ 402 Special Transit Fares (Woodbridge) 403 School Bus Service Revenues 404 Freight Tariffs 405 Charter Service Revenues 406 Auxilliary Transportation Revenues 407 Non -Transportation Revenues 408 Taxes Levied Directly by Transit System (Specify) 409 Local Cash Grants & Reimbursements (Specify) Local Transportation Fund (LTF) 54,539 79,319 410 Local Special Fare Assistance 411 State Cash Grants & Reimbursements (Specify) State Transit Assistance Fund (STA) 107,761 93,859 412 State Special Fare Assistance 413 Federal Cash Grants & Reimbursements (Specify) UM]TA Grants . 430 Contributed Services 440 (Specify) Interest 271 TOTAL _ 192;839 211.302 II. CAPITAL REVENUE 464 Federal Capital Grants & Subsidies (Specify) State Capital Grants & Subventions (Specify) State Transit Assistance Funds (STA) Local Capital Provisions (Specify) Local Transportation Fund (LTF) 26,000 40.179 Non -Governmental Donations TOTAL 26,000 40,179 M= III. OPERATING EXPENSES 501 Labor Operators Salaries/Mages Other Salaries/Wages 502 Fringe Benefits 503 Services 504 Materials/Supplies Fuels/Lubricants Tires/Tubes Other Vehicle & Radio Repair 505 Utilities 506 Casualty/Liability Costs 507 Taxes 508 Purchased Transportation Service 509 Miscellaneous Expenses 510 Expense Transfers 511 Interest Expense 512 Leases and Rentals 513 Depreciation/Amortization Operator Funds Grant Funds TOTAL IV. CAPITAL EXPENSES Debt Service Land/Property Acquisition Vehicles Construction Other Radios TOTAL. 1984-85 1985-86 Actual x=xEsy*4aam2* Budget Revised 6,000 745 175,293 --1 3 182,978 23,187 765 23,952 85 31 1,693 4.004 2o4,780 709 *Please circle either "actual" or "estimate". as appropriate. -",For purchase of three new gasoline powered vehicles. See page 13. -10- 211,302 39,459 * 720 40,179 OPERATIONAL INFORMATION* 1. Patronage * a. Total Passengers b. Revenue Passengers c. Youth Passengers d. Elderly Passengers e. handicapped Passengers 2. Vehicle Miles - -• a. Total Vehicle Miles b. Revenue Vehicle Miles 3. Revenue Vehicle Hours 4. Revenue Vehicle Fuel Consumption a. Diesel b. Gasoline C. Liquid Natural Compressed Gas 5. Fare Structure Actual Estimated Actual FY 1983-84 FY 1984-85 FY 1985-86 61,755 58,869 70,480 1,877 1,045 2,745 59,878 57,824 65,854 106,140 107,869 107,971 106,140 107,869 107,971 19,448 9,342 = 9,042 8,104 8,194 5,437 3,497 a. Base 2.00 2.00 1.00 b. Zone c. Youth d. Senior .50 .50 .50 e. Handicapped .50 .50 .50 f. Monthly Pass g. Other h. Average Fare 54 .54 .55 =There are no County passengers includeTin these totals. *-".Includes miles for County service. All other figures reflect City service only. *Attach additional pages as necessary to alter or complete description -11- 1 , THREE YEAR FISCAL PLAN 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 Operating Expenses $ 213,355 $ 219,755 $ 226,350 Operating Revenues Sources: LTF $ 170,050 $ 175,130 $ 180,410 STA Federal Fares 36,550 _ 37,645 38,775 General Fund Other 6,755 6,980 7,165 Total $ 213,355 $ 219,755 $ 226,350 Capital Expenses $ 27,000 $ -0- $ -0- Capital Revenue Sources: LTF $ 27,000 $ -0- $ -0- STA Federal Other Total $ 27,000 $ -0- $ -0- -12- FLEET INVENTORY (Article 4 Operator Only) I I Productionj ;l otj Fuell Seat I Make & Modell Year I Veh. 1 Type I Capacity I I I ( # I- 11982 Chev. I I I 1 I ;Station Wagon 1 1982 1 2 IDiesel1 6 11985 Chev. I I I I 1 Station Wagon 1 1985 1 5 ,Gasoline; 6 ! I f I I I I ! ! I ! I I ! I I I I I I 1 I I I ! ! I ! I 1 1 1 I 1 i 1 I I I 1 1 t i I I I I AC J EP J WC ]Other I I I x ! I 1 I I I xl I 1 ITOTAL +xxxxxxxxxxx1 Ixxxxxl I I I I I I 1 I I .I I I I I 1 � I vehicles to be Purchased in FY 1986-87 _-T Station Wagon f 1986 1 2 `asol.i n4 6 1 x i I i I AC = Air Conditioned EP = Environmental Package WC = wheelchair Lift *It may be feasible to purchase and install .two new gasoline engines rather than purchas two entirely new vehicles; 1986-87 TDA Claim will address this. -13- r iv. Has this system been in non-compliance with its required local support ratio? No If yes, identify the year or years: 3. Extension of Service An extension or new service is exempt from the required farebox and local support ratios if: A. The extension of service has been in operation for less than two years at the end of the fiscal year. B. The claimant's operating cost for the fiscal year, after excluding the operating cost of the extension of service, exceeds its operating cost for the prior fiscal year. C. The claimant submits a report on the extension of service to COG. (For details of the report, see 6633.8(c)). i. Is this a new service? ii. Is there an extension of service being claimed? If so, please identify the extension of service: 4. Fifteen Percent Ex..oanditure Increase If any of the line items on the attached budget exceed by more than 15% the expenditure for that same item in the previous year's budget, then an explanation for that increase must be attached. 5. Narrative Description Describe any changes in service characteristics from the previous fiscal year. Please attach an additional page if necessary. Outdated; One additional vehicle was purchased in 1984-85, Saturday service was initiated will be and fares lowered for non -elderly and non -handicapped persons. These were all updated for accomplished late in the fiscal year so it is impossible to ascertain the affect 1986-87 TDA of service. Claim A replacement vehicle is included in this year's budget to continue the replace- ment of diesel -powered vehicles to gasoline. _1r_ Article 8 Contractor TDA Requirements For contracted transportation service providers, the San Joaquin County Council of Governments' Executive Board has waived the farebox and local support ratios as it is empowered to do and established a two-step process. 1. Match Requirement To receive the same amount of TDA funds (LTF and STA combined) that a service received in the previous year, no more than 90% of the operating funds (minus depreciation) in the budget may be TDA derived. The ten percent or more for increased TDA matching funds may come from any other source available to the community as long as it is not TDA. 2. Operating Cost Per Passenger Objective To receive an amount of TDA funds (LTF and STA combined) in excess of what was claimed the previous fiscal year, the claimant must establish a specific service objective for the fiscal year of the claim. This specific objective must be the operating cost per passenger for the fiscal year of the claim. The objective should be a realistic one based on current and past system performance, but should be low enough to represent an "improvement" when warranted. The COG Executive Board will adopt the operating cost per passenger figure that a claimant must meet in the fiscal year of the claim. If the system failed to meet its operating cost per passenger objective in the fiscal year prior to the claim, then it would only be eligible to file a claim for the level of TDA funding received in that fiscal year. If a system wishes to be eligible for increased TDA funding in a future fiscal year, then it should identify an operating cost per passenger objective. i. What was the level. of TDA funding _received in the previous fiscal year for this system (LTF and STA)? ii. Does the attached budget information demonstrate at least a 10% match of non -TDA funds? iii. Is this claim requesting more TDA funds then were received in the previous fiscal year? If yes, how much more? -15- iv. What was last year's Operating Cost per Passenger Objective? What was the actual operating Cost per Passenger? a. FY 1984-85 operating Cost $ b. Total Passengers c. Operating Cost Per Passenger (a y b) $ V. What is the Operating Cost per Passenger Objective for this claim? d. Budgeted Operating Cost $ e. Estimated Total Passengers f. Operating Cost per Passenger (d -t e) $ g. FY 1985-86 OPERATING COST PER PASSENGER OBJECTIVE $ 3. Fifteen Percent Expenditure Increase If any of the line items on the attached budget exceed by more than 15% the expenditure for that same item in the previous year's budget, then an explanation for that increase must be attached. 4. Narrative Description Describe any changes in service characteristics from the previous fiscal year. Please attach an additional page if necessary. -17- PART II - PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROJECTS LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND Project Title and Description *Ham Lane Street Improvements I ( -Work in progress ( I I ( STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND Project -Title and Description Project Limits Lodi Avenue to Elm Street I Project Limits -18- LTF Cost Total Cost $38,565 I STA Cost Total Cost I I ( I I I I ( I ( I ( I I 1 I I 1 1 S I PART III - ROAD AND STREET PROJECTS Please provide the requested information for each project be5_ng identified for Transportation Development Act funding. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND Project Title and Description Miscellaneous Widening * Miscellaneous Curb & Gutters R.R. Grade Crossing Protection @ SPPJ Turner Road @ Mills M Cherokee Lane Washington Street Traffic Signals Lodi Ave. & Church St. Hutchins & Tokay Miscellaneous Locations { RR Xing Approach Improvements Tokay Street Locust Street Loma Drive Stockton Street Improvements Century Blvd/WID Box Culvert & Crossi * Hutchins Street Improvements * Cherokee Lane Improvements * Pavement Vanagement System Street Maintenance Administration/Planning STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND LTF Cost Project Limits Totai GosF -- $ 50,000 70,000 4 15,000 10,000 14,000 I 100,000 40,000 ' 80,000 1 30,000 47,000 6,000 Vine to Tokay 262,000 I j 100,000 Rimby to Vine Tokay to Lodi R/W Lockeford to S/Murray Use Additiona 58,000 15,000 75,000 5,000 128,000 2,000 age is Necessary) ___. STA Cost 19 -(Use+dditional Fa,,e if Necessary) PART III - ROAD AND STREET PROJECTS Please provide the requested information for each project being identified for Transportation Development Act funding. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND Project Title and Description Project Limits LTF Cost Total Cos_t Miscellaneous Asphalt Overlay=_ I I ( I Projects - 1986 ; i $ 175,000 J Turner Rd. Curb, Gutter & Street I I I Replacement @ Lodi Lake i j 11,000 Ham Lane Median i Century/Kett 1 eman + .34,000 f I Lockeford Street I Pleasant to Sacramento I 204,000 I I I J Sacramento to Cherokee I 53,000 I J ! J Tokay Street I I SPRR to Cherokee ! I 271,000 j J ! California Street, Lockeford to I Turner i I 66,000 I J t 1 TOTAL J S 934.988 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I $1,926,000 1 I 4 f I J 1 I ! i (Use Additional Page if 1 i I ! f i Necessary) STATE' TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND STA Cost _ Project Title and Descriotion Project Limits Total Cost I l I I II I I (Use Additional page 1t Necessary -29- PART IV - OTHER PURPOSES It is possible that a claimant may wish to expend TDA funds for purposes allowed within the Act, but not covered by the three previous parts. For instance, TDA funds may be claimed to subsidize AMTRAK service in a community. To complete this section, please identify the project, the purpose of the project, the estimated cost, and the fund from which money is being claimed. It is advisable to communicate with COG staff before completing this section. -20-