HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - No. 91-170RESOLUTION NO. 91-170
-----------------------
-----------------------
A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL
ESTABLISHING CRITERIA AND A POINT SYSTEM
FOR PROCESSING TENTATIVE MAPS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the Lodi City Council, by Ordinance No. 1521, adopted
September 18, 1991 has provided for the establishment of certain
development criteria and a point system for processing of tentative
maps, parcel maps, and other approvals under the Subdivision Map Act,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Lodi City Council that the
following criteria/point system is established:
Evaluation Criteria. (The criteria listed below have been developed
to be consistent with current City policies and State laws.)
A. Agricultural Land Conflicts Score
1. Project does not require conversion of vacant
agricultural land 10
2. Project is adjacent to agricultural land on
one side 7
3. Project is adjacent to agricultural land on
two sides 5
4. Project is adjacent to agricultural land on
three sides 3
5. Project is surrounded by agricultural land 0
B. On-site Agricultural Land Mitigation
1. Project needs no agricultural land mitigation 10
2. Adequate on-site buffer has been provided as a
part of site layout for all adjacent agricultural
land 7
3. On-site buffer provided as a part of site layout
for only part of the project 5
4. No buffer between project and adjacent
agricultural land 0
C. General Location - A map showing such priority shall be
adopted or updated from time to time by the Council, and
shall be available for inspection in the office of the
City Clerk.
1.
Project
located
within
Priority
Area
1
200
2.
Project
located
within
Priority
Area
2
100
3.
Project
located
within
Priority
Area
3
0
-2-
D. Relationship to Public Services
1. General Location
a. Project abuts existing development on four sides 10
b. Project abuts existing development on three sides 7
c. Project abuts existing development on two sides 5
d. Project abuts existing development on one side 3
e. Project is surrounded by undeveloped land 0
2. Wastewater
a. Project is located adjacent to existing Master
Plan sanitary sewers or mains designed to serve
the project 10
b. Project will extend a Master Plan line within
its boundaries
c,
c. Project will extend a Master Plan line outside
of its boundaries but within existing right -of
way (0 if right-of-way is necessary) 4
-3-
d. Project requires construction of a new lift
station for which funds are available in the
Sewer Impact Fee Fund 0
e. Project requires construction of a new lift
station for which funds are not available
in the Sewer Impact Fee Fund
3. Water
a. Project is located adjacent to existing Master
Plan water mains or mains designed to serve
the project 10
b. Project will extend Master Plan lines within its
boundaries 8
c. Project will extend Master Plan lines outside its
boundaries, but within existing right-of-way
(0 if outside right-of-way) 4
d. Project requires construction of a new water
well for which funds are available in the Water
Impact Fee Fund 0
IME
e. Project requires construction of new water well
for which funds are not available in the Water
Impact Fee Fund
f. Project improves the existing system (i.e.,
eliminates dead -ends, loops master plan lines,
provides a well site) +1 to 3
4. Drainage
a. Project is served by an existing drainage basin
and Master Plan line or mains designed to serve
the project 10
b. Project will extend a Master Plan line or expand
an existing basin within its boundaries 8
c. Project will extend a Master Plan line or expand
an existing basin outside of its boundaries but
within existing rights-of-way (0 points if
right-of-way is necessary
d. Project requires construction of a new basin for
which funds are available in the Master
Drainage Impact Fee Fund
-5-
4
0
E.
e. Project requires construction of a new basin
for which funds are not available in the
Master Drainage Impact Fee Fund
Promotion of Open Space
Points shall be awarded on the basis of the percentage of
coverage of the total loss of project area by roof area
and paved areas on-site (exclusive of streets).
20%
or less
10
points
30%
or less
8
points
40%
or less
6
points
50%
4
points
60%
2
points
70%
or greater
0
points
Project owner shall submit an analysis of the percentage of
impervious surface of the site. This section shall not apply to
single-family residential.
F. Traffic
1. Project widens or improves an existing facility
2. Project will extend Master Plan streets within
its boundaries
10
0
3. Project will extend Master Plan streets outside
its boundaries, but -within existing right-of-way
(0 if outside right-of-way)
4. Project requires roadway improvements for which
funds are available in the Street Impact Fee
Program
5. Project requires roadway improvements for which
funds are not available in the Street Impact Fee
Program
6. Project improves circulation by providing additional
access to adjacent development (including
non -vehicular access)
G. Housing
1. Low and Moderate Income housing. A point credit
will be awarded with the following schedule:
-7-
4
I
+1 to 5
25% or more of units low and moderate 10
20%-24% - 8
15%-19% 6
10%-14% 4
5%-9% 2
Less than 5% low and moderate or
low and moderate housing proposed 0
* Indicates project cannot proceed without provision
for construction of the appropriate facility.
H. Site Plan and Project Design --Bonus Points (These
criteria shall only apply to multi -family projects).
1. Landscaping_ (Planning Commission shall evaluate
and provide between 10 and 0 points)
(These criteria shall only apply to multi -family
projects).
2. Architectural Design. (SPARC Committee shall
evaluate and provide between 10 and 0 points)
(These criteria shall only apply to multi -family
projects.)
so
I. Schools
1. Project is within 1/4 mile of an existing
(or proposed) elementary school 10
2. Project is within 1/2 mile of an existing
(or proposed) elementary school 5
3. Project is more than 1/2 mile from an existing or
proposed elementary school 0
4. Project is within 1/2 mile of an existing (or
proposed) middle school. 10
5. Project is within 1 mile of an existing or
proposed middle school 5
6. Project is more than 1 mile from an existing or
proposed middle school 0
7. Project is within 1 mile of an existing or proposed
high school 10
8. Project is within 2 miles of an existing or proposed
high school 5
Mst
J. Fire Protection. (Proximity to fire protection services)
- Within 3 minute emergency vehicle driving time from
the nearest fire station 10
- Within 4 minute emergency vehicle driving time from
the nearest fire station 5
- Beyond 4 minute emergency vehicle driving time from
the nearest fire station 0
Dated: September 4, 1991
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 91-170 was passed and
adopted by the Lodi City Council in a regular meeting held September 4,
1991 by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members - Pennino, Pinkerton, Sieglock, Snider
and Hinchman (Mayor)
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Alice M. Reimche
City Clerk
91-170
RES91170/TXTA.02J
-10-