The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolutions - No. 91-29RESOLUTION NO. 91-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE CITY OF LODI'S REVISED 1989-90 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIM FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS WHEREAS, on September 6, 1989, the Lodi City Council adopted Resolution No. 89-115 approving the City's 1989-90 Transportation Development Act (TDA) claim for Local Transportation Funds (LTF), and State Transit Assistance (STA); and WHEREAS, subsequent to approval of the City's 1989-90 TDA Claim by the San Joaquin County Council of Governments, the Council of Governments advised the City that they wished to have the Claim revised and resubmitted to more clearly reflect how the City actually used the funds received; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lodi City Council hereby approves the City of Lodi's revised 1989-90 Transportation Development Act (TDA) claim in the amount of $1,778,790, which transfers $4,927 of STA funds from Transit purposes to Streets and Roads purposes; and which transfers $4,927 of Local Transportation Funds from Streets and Roads to Transit purposes. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Lodi City Council does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute the revised Claim on behalf of the City of Lodi. Dated: February 20, 1991 -------------------------- -------------------------- I hereby certify that Resolution No. 91-29 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held February 20, 1991 by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Pennino, Pinkerton, Sieglock, Snider and Hinchman (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None '`fi Alice M. Reim�che City Clerk 91-29 RES9129/TXTA.02J FISCAL YEAR 1989-90 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY COG TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIM FORMS AND GUIDELINES FOR STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND (STA) AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND (LTF - TDA) C 3 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND TO: San Joaquin County Council of Governments 1860 East Hazelton Avenue Stockton, CA 95205 FROM: Applicant: City of Lodi Address: 221 W. Pine St., P. 0. Box 3006, Lodi, CA 95241-1910 (City, Zip) Contact Person: Jerry L. Glenn Phone: 209/333-6700 Assistant City Manager The City of Lodi hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes 1971 and applicable rules and regulations, that its annual transportation claim be approved in the amount of $ 1,778,790 for fiscal year 1989-90 , to be drawn from the Local Transportation Fund. When approved, please transmit this claim to the County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to this applicant is subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan. The claimant certifies that this Local Transportation Fund claim and the financial information contained therein, is reasonable and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634 and 6734. APPROVED: San Joaquin County Council of Governments By: PETER D. VERDOORN Title: Executive Director Date: 19 Applicant- CITY OF LODI Signe Name: Thnmnc A. PeteFS8- Title: City Manager Date: n oZ 19_� -5- CAL TRANSPORTATION FUND TO: San Joaquin County Council of Governments 1860 East Hazelton Avenue Stockton, CA 95205 FROM: Applicant: City of Lodi Address: 221 W. Pine St., P. 0. Box 3006, Lodi, CA 95241-1910 (city, Zip) Contact Person: Jerry L. Glenn Phone: 209/333-6700 Assistant City Manager The City of Lodi hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes 1971 and applicable rules and regulations, that its annual transportation claim be approved in the amount of $ 1.778.790 for fiscal year 1989-90 , to be drawn from the Local Transportation Fund. When approved, please transmit this claim to the County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to this applicant is subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan. The claimant certifies that this Local Transportation Fund claim and the financial information contained therein, is reasonable and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634 and 6734. APPROVED: San Joaquin County Council of Governments By: PETER D. VERDOORN Title: Executive Diregt:or Date: 19 Applicant: ITY OF LODI Signe I Name: Thnrnac A Pe�pFSOH Title: City Manager Date: „� I-/ 1.921 C STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE CLAIM TO: San Joaquin County Council of Governments 1860 East Hazelton Avenue Stockton, CA 95205 FROM: Applicant: City of Lodi Address: 221 W. Pine St., P. 0. Box 3006, Lodi, CA 95241-1910 (City, zip) Contact Person: Jerry L. Glenn Phone: 209/333-6700 Assistant City Manager This claimant, qualified pursuant to Section 99203 and 99315 of the Public Utilities Code, hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes of 1971 as amended, and applicable rules and regulations, that an allocation be made in the amount of $ 4,927 for fiscal year 1989-90 , to be drawn from the State Transit Assistance trust fund of San Joaquin County for the following purposes and in the following respective amounts: Purposes Streets and Roads Amounts S4,927 Allocation instruction and payment by the County Auditor to this claimant are subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved claim. The claimant certifies that this State Transit Assistance Fund Claim and the financial information contained herein, is reasonable and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634 and 6734. APPROVED: San Joaquin County Council of Governments By: PETER D. VERDOORN Title: Executive Director Date: 19 Applicant: CITY LODI Sign I Name: ThErmas ArP.@Ferscn Title: City Manager Date: J . 02 -191/ / -6- C C TO: FROM: STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE CLAIM San Joaquin County Council of Governments 1860 East Hazelton Avenue Stockton, CA 95205 Applicant: City of Lodi Address: 221 W. Pine St., P. 0. Box 3006, Lodi, CA 95241-1910 (City, Zip) Contact Person: Jerry L. Glenn Phone: 209/333-6700 Assistant City Manager This claimant, qualified pursuant to Section 99203 and 99315 of the Public Utilities Code, hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes of 1971 as amended, and applicable rules and regulations, that an allocation be made in the amount of $ 4,927 for fiscal year 1989-90 , to be drawn from the State Transit Assistance trust fund of San Joaquin County for the following purposes and in the following respective amounts: Purposes Streets and Roads Amounts 54,927 Allocation instruction and payment by the County Auditor to this claimant are subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved claim. The claimant certifies that this State Transit Assistance Fund Claim and the financial information contained herein, is reasonable and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to EAC Section 6634 and 6734. APPROVED: San Joaquin county council of Governments By: PETER D. VERDOORN Title: Executive pirector CDate: 19 Applicant: CITY QE -L,0 I Sign I Name• A. Title: City Manager Date: A -a. J-/ 19� -6- C PART I - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Please Circle either: Article 4 operator QT Article 8 contractor FINANCIAL INFORMATION 1988-89 Please Circle 1989=90 I. OPERATING REVENUE ACTUALX0,v&XESTiIIMTL% Budget*_9 401 Passenger Fares 39,450 39,313 402 Special Transit Fares 403 School Bus Service Revenues 404 Freight Tariffs 405 Charter Service Revenues 406 Auxiliary Transportation Revenues 407 Non -Transportation Revenues 1,225 113 408 Taxes Levied Directly by Transit System (Specify) 409 Local Cash Grants & Reimbursements (Specify) Local Transportation Fund (LTF) 201,460 245,200 410 Local Special Fare Assistance 411 State Cash Grants & Reimbursements (Specify) State Transit Assistance Fund (STA) 6,950 412 State Special Fare Assistance 413 Federal Cash Grants & Reimbursements (Specify) UMTA Grants 430 Contributed Services Sale of Property 1,600 440 (Specify) Reimbursements — 4.65fL— TOTAL �5��a� �Aa,FZ6 II. CAPITAL REVENUE 464 Federal Capital Grants & Subsidies (Specify) State Capital Grants & Subventions (Specify) State Transit Assistance Funds (STA) Local Capital Provisions (Specify) Local Transportation Fund (LTF) 65,000 55,100 Non -Governmental Donations Sale of Property 29,759 TOTAL 65,000 84,859 -9- Reflects Actual Receipts III. OPERATING EXPENSES 1988-89 Please Circle 1989-Q0 1 Actual Budge 501 Labor 53 Operators Salaries/Wages Other Salaries/Wages 502 Fringe Benefits 32 503 Services 504 Materials/Supplies Fuels/Lubricants Tires/Tubes Other 505 Utilities 506 Casualty/Liability Costs 49,793.75 51,208 507 Taxes 508 Purchased Transportation Service 210,446.80 224,104 509 Miscellaneous Expenses 2,234.23 988 510 Expense Transfers 511 Interest Expense 512 Leases and Rentals 513 Depreciation/Amortization -Operator Funds Grant Funds 262,474.78 276,385 (2) TOTAL IV. CAPITAL EXPENSES* Debt Service Land/Property Acquisition Vehicles 30 ,303.97 84,185 Construction Other 583 TOTAL 30,303.97 84,768 (3) *Allowable capital expenses are limited for Article 8 claimants; see E �400 1I e Reflc s actual expenditures. (2) Revenue exceeds expenditures by $8,241 - unexpended carry-over will be reclaimed in —10— FY91 (3) Revenue exceeds expenditures by S91 - unexpended carry-over will be reclaimed in FY9 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT APPORTIONMENTS I. Local Transportation Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment 1989-90 $ 926,652 B. Pedestrian/Bicycle Apportionment 19,305 C. Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment 41,933 D. Unexpended Carryover 790,900 E. Total Available for 1989-90 Claim(s) 1,778,790 F. less any LTF Already Claimed 1989-90 -0- G. TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM $ 1,778,790 (Also enter on page 8, 1st column) ZI. State Transit Assistance Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment 1989-90 $ B. Special Transit Apportionment 1989-90 4,927 C. Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment -0 D. Unexpended Carryover E. Total Available for 1989-90 Claim(s) 4,927 F. less any STA Already Claimed 1989-90 -0 G. TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM $ 4,927 (Also enter on page 8, 2nd column) =A: TPWNSPQRTATION DEVELOPMENTACT ALLOCATIONS Claim Purpose I. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Article 4 (99260) -Operator 300,300 Article 8 (99400(c)) Contractor operating Article 8 (99400(e)) Contractor capital II. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE N/A Article 3 (99234) Article 8 (99400(a)) 19,305 III. ROADS AND STREETS Article 8 (99400(a) ) 1,459,185 4,927 IV. OTHER Article 8 (99400(b) N/A or 99400(d) TOTAL THIS CLAIM 1,778,790 4,927 TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM (from page 7, I. and II. G.) 1,778,790 4,927 UNCLAIMED APPORTIONMENT (TOTAL AVAIL. less TOTAL THIS CLAIM) _0_ _0_ IMPORTANT: To avoid accidental overpayment, please identify in the space below any unexpended carryover included in the amounts being claimed above. Road and Streets includes $790,900 of unexpended LTF money. -8- *Attach additional pages as necessary to alter or complete description (1) Relfects actual performance -11- OPERATIONAL INFORMATION* Actual Actual/Est. Proposed (1) FY 1987-88 FY 1988-89 FY 1989-90 1. Patronage a. Total Passengers 76,207 73,115 77,605 b. Revenue Passengers 5,510 4,935 6,928 C. Youth Passengers d. Elderly Passengers 70,697 65,907 68,610 County e. kI61S44 Passengers 2,273 2,067 2. Vehicle Miles a. Total Vehicle Miles 140,069 141,767 156,104 b. Revenue Vehicle Miles 3. Revenue Vehicle Hours 4. Revenue Vehicle Fuel consumption a. Diesel b. Gasoline 13,819 13,714 14,183 c. Liquid Natural compressed Gas S. Fare Structure .50 .50 .50 a. Base b. Zone c. Youth .50 .50 .50 d. Senior .50 .50 .50 e. Handicapped f. Monthly Pass 1.00 1.00 1.00 g. Other .54 .54 .52 h. Average Fare *Attach additional pages as necessary to alter or complete description (1) Relfects actual performance -11- C Operating Expenses Operating Revenues Sources: LTF STA Federal Fares General Fund Other Total Capital Expenses Capital Revenue Sources: LTF STA Federal Other Total THREE YEAR FISCAL PLAN 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 $ 278,640 $ 300,000 $ 330,000 $ 229,565 $ 248,475 $ 275,950 5,220 5,400 5,600 43,750 46,000 48,300 105 125 150 $ 278,640 $ 300,000 $ 330,000 $ 64,500 $ 18,000 $ 38,000 $ 64,500 $ 18,000 $ 38,000 $ 64,500 - $ 18,000 $ 38,000 -12- C C' *fake & Model Chev. Impala Chev.CapricE Chev.CapricE Chev. Impalz Dodge Caravi CITY OF LODI FLEET INVENTORY (Transit Vehicle owners only) ********(SEE ATTACHED SHEET)****"�v Production Year 1985 1985 1986 1982 n 1989 T of Veh. I 3 1 1 2 :uel Type Seat Capacity 6 ISDec AC X gas gas 6 X gas 6 X gas 6 X gas 7 X •a� WC "Z -es Other TO}:XX ( 8 I }:?::XX I I I I Vehicles to be Purchased in =Y 1989-90 'Jan Station wag n AC = Ai_ Conditioned _? = Environmental Package WC = wheelchair Li -t Station wagor Station wagor Station wagor Station wagor Van .I -Z3- -Z3- C17v CF LGDI Attachment to Page - 13 - of Fleet Inventory Fiscal Year 1989-90 TDA Claim It is the intent of the City of Lodi to purchase from Dial -A -Ride the two Dodge Caravans. These vehciles are inadequate for our present usage. We intend to purchase five station wagons in the 1989-90 fiscal year. Two of these will be to replace the vans. Two of the vehciles will be used to replace the oldest and most expensive vehicles. The fifth will be either an addition to the fleet or to replace an existing vehicle. The handicap van is included in an amendment to the 1988-89 claim. Arricle 4 Operator TOA Requirements 1. Fare Ratio/Local Support Requirements All Article 4 claimants are required to maintain a specified ratio of fare revenue to operating cost. In addition, SMTO only is required to maintain a ratio of fare revenue plus local support to operating cost of 32%. See 99268.2 - 99268.19 for details and exemptions pertaining to ratios. A. What is this system's required farebox recovery ratio? 101. B. Does the attached budget demonstrate that this system will meet its required farebox recovery and for SMTD its farebox plus local suppo_t ratios? VeS C. Has this system utilized its grace year? D. Has this system been in non-co=pliance with its required ratio(s)? no If yes, identify the year or years 2. Extension of Service/New Service An extension of service or new service is exempt f=aa the required farebox and local support ratios if: A. The extension of service or new service has been in operation for less than two full fiscal years. The tvo- year extension of services exclusion applies until taro Years after the end of the fiscal year in which the extension of services was put into operation. B. The claimant submits a report on the extension of ser- vices to the COG within 90 days atter the end of the I iscal year. (For details of the report, see 6633.8(b)). Is an extension of service/new service being claimed? No If so, has the required report been submitted for the most recently completed full fiscal year? If not, that report must accompany this claia. -14- L C 3. Fifteen Percent Expenditure Increase (6632) If anv of the line items on the attached budget exceed by more than 15% the expendit:L:e for that sane item in the pre- vious year's budget, then an explanation for that increase must be given below. Attach an extra page if necessarf. The addition to the fleet will require additional expense for insurance. The purchase of four replacement vehicles necessitates the addition of capital funds. 4. Nar-ative Description (6632) Please describe in the space below any changes in service characteristics from the previous fiscal year. This should specifically include any substantial increase or decrease in the geographic area served, major changes to the scope of operations, or addition of =ajar new fixed facil_ties. Please attzch an additional page if necessary. SPECIAL NO= FOR RATTO CILCUIJ+' IONS S�'.'rD - Exclude ceain costs and :ares as specified in the mos:. recent Compliance Agdij ae=o_ i�c` - Exclude county service when calculating fares and expenses. -15- Article 8 Contractor TDA Requirements For contracted transportation service providers, the San Joaquin County Council of Governments' Executive Board has waived the farebox and local support ratios as it is empowered to do by 99405(c). The COG Board has established a two-step process. 1. Match Requirement For any Article 8 transit claim, no more than 90% of the total operating funds (minus depreciation) in the budget may be TDA (LTF and STA) derived. The ten percent or more match- ing funds may come from any other source available to the claimant besides TDA. 2. Operating Cost Per Passenger Objective To receive an amount of TDA operating funds (LTF and STA com- bined) in excess of what was claimed the previous fiscal year, the claimant must establish an operating cost per pas- senger objective for the fiscal year of the claim. The objective should be a realistic one based on current and past system performance, but should be low enough to represent an "improvement" when warranted. The COG Executive Board will adopt the systemwide operating cost per passenger objective for the fiscal year of the claim. If the system failed to meet its operating cost per passenger objective in the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year of the claim, then the claimant is only eligible to file a claim for the level of TDA operating funding received in that prior fiscal year. In the case of a unified transit system, each claimant would be limited to the prior year's level of TDA operating funding. If a system wishes to be eligible for increased TDA operating funding in a future fiscal year, then the claimant should identify an operating cost per passenger objective. i. What was the level of TDA operating funding received in the previous fiscal year for this system by this claimant (LTF plus STA)? $ ii. Does the attached budget information demonstrate at least a 10t match of non -TDA funds? iii. Is this claim requesting more TDA operating funds than were received for this system by this claimant in the previous fiscal year? iv. If yes, did the system meet its operating cost per passenger objective in the previous fiscal year? An affirmative answer should be documented in Part v. on the next page. :X= V. What was last year's operating Cost per Passenger Objective? What was the actual operating cost per passenger? . . . a. FY 1988-89 Operating Cost $ b. Total Passengers c. Operating Cost Per Passenger (a / b) $ vi. what is the operating Cost per Passenger Objective for this claim? . . . d. Budgeted Operating Cost $ e. Estimated Total Passengers f. Calculated Operating Cost per Passenger (d / e) $ g. FY 1989-90 OPERATING COST PER PASSENGER OBJECTIVE $ h. If this claim is for a unified transit system (see footnote), has the contributing claimant been appraised of the planned systemwide objective set in g. above? 3. Fifteen Percent Expenditure Increase (6632) If any of the line items on the attached budget exceed by more than 15% the expenditure for that same item in the previous year's budget, then an explanation for that increase must be given below. Attach an additional page if necessary. 4. Narrative Description (6632) Please describe on an attached page any changes in service characteristics from the previous fiscal year. This should specifically include any substantial increase or decrease in the geographic area served, major changes to the scope of operations, or addition of major new fixed facilities. IMPORTANT: If this claim is for a unified transit system (per definition p. 17a), all calculations and numbers on (2)iv. and (2)v. must include both City and County totals. Also, contribut- ing claimants to unified transit systems should not use this page: use page 17a instead. -17- ARTICLE 8 CONTRACTOR TDA REQUIREMENTS (CONTRIBUTING CLAIMANTS) I. In the case of a "unified transit system," this page is to be used by the "contributing claimant" rather than page 17. A "unified transit system" is defined as one which has the same fare structure throughout the service area, but whose TDA expenses are claimed separately by two different TDA claim- ants. Additionally, to qualify as a unified transit system, all system TDA funding must be claimed under Article 8 (both claimants). "Contributing claimant" is defined as the claim- ant contributing a minority of the unified transit system's TDA funds. The claimant furnishing the majority of TDA funds is defined as the "primary claimant." Currently, the following local transit services qualify as unified transit systems: FY 1989-90 Unified Transit Systems Tracy Trans Tracy Taxi Escalon Public Transit System II. 1. Name of unified transit system This Pane Used by: County County County 2. Systemwide operating cost per passenger objective for FY 1989-90 identified in primary claimant's adopted transit claim (from that claim, page 17, (2) vi. g.) 3. Date of primary claimant's adopted transit claim (or anticipated future date, if not yet adopted) IMPORTANT• The operating cost per passenger objective identified in•3. above will be applied uniformly to the total of City and County TDA funds used by the unified transit system, to determine eligibility for increased TDA funding as explained on page 16. Separate calculations will not be done for City and County. -17a- C PART II - PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROJECTS LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND LTF Cost STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND STA Cost -18- C PART 1 Z - ROAD ANDSTR..�'`"'I PRO. -C' --S ?lease provide the requested information for each project being identified for T-amsportation Developaent Act funding. LZC?.L TRANSPORTATION FUND L'''am Cost " 4 tle and Desc= intion Drop e(:7-- rLts ''_'otal Cost Adninistration STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FQND 3,000 l,a64,11'2 2,049,5» (Use Additional Page i1 Necessarj) STA Cost Title and Description ?�o� ems: Lim: is Total cost Q- I I (Use Additional page if Necessary) -19- PART III - ROAD AND ST LEMET PROj—z.0 'S please provide '..he requested in-forssation for each project, being identi-fied for Transportation Developaent Act finding. ACA,. TRMSPORTATION F 7ND 1 -c; PC-- '"=tle and Desc ; ,;4 0n Harney Lane Overlay Lockeford St. Overlay Ham Lane Overlay & Operational Improvements Pacific Ave. Overlay Walnut & Oak St. Overlay Tokay St. Voerl ay Railroad Crossing Improvements Overlay Analysis/Design Street Maser Plan Street Maintenance *Work in progress STATr. IMAMS= ASSISTANCE FUND *Hutchins to 400' w/Stockton *SPRR to Cherokee Ln. *Highway 12 to Vine St. *Walnut to Elm *Ham to Pacific Lower Sacramento to dills *Loma Or 'Cherokee Ln. C1 uff Ave. LTF Cosy Tn^a t r•-,�- 75,000 115,000 195,000 95,000 33,000 3,V100 9,000 12,000 6,007 20,000 149,555 (Use additional Page is Necessary) y STA Cos— Tn-n 1 rn-- (Use Additional page :L Necessary) -19- PART III - ROAD AND SZREL T ?RC.� �C:'S ?lease provide the requested information for each project being identified :or T_ ansportation Development Ac'` funding. ZACAI. TRANSPORTATION FUND T= cps- Title and Descrinftion ?�-VjeCt T.4-4-5 T=,11 cos,:. Traffic Signals *Victor std. & Cluff Ave. � 5 90,000 (FAU Match) *Lodi Ave. & Lower Sacramento 12,700 (FAU Match) -Elm St. & Lower Sacramento Rd. 18,000 Turner Rd. & Stockton St. , 31,000 Hutchins Street Improvements Lower Sacramento Rd. Operational Imorovements (FAU match) Pine Street Overlay Stoc<ton Street Overlay li Ave./Ham Lane Intersection Overlay Lodi Ave. Overlay Lodi Ave. Overlay Church St. Overlay -fork in oroaress STATE TRANSIT ASSISTP,NC„ FUND Tokay St. to Lodi Ave Lodi Ave. to Pine St. St. Mortis to Turner Rd. S?RR to Cherokee Lane Lodi Ave. to Lockefo-rd St. Beckman to Kelly c1tain to Central *Highway 12 to Mendicino 3C-0,000 76,000 30,000 cZ., , 000 175,000 19,000 25,000 152,000 71,000 (Use additional Page if Necessa:f) STA Cost ?-o,iec : T4 `Ze and Description :Total cost (Use Addltlonal page if Necessar-- -19- PART II - PEDESTRIAN AND BICY Y PROTECTS :,OC;LL TRANSPORTATION iVND L'_''r Cost STATE TRANSIT .ASSISTANCE FUND STA Cost ?-eject Title and Desc'i vtion ?-ai ect Li='.xs Total Cost -la- C PART IV - OTHER PURPOSES It is possible that a claimant may wish to expend TDA funds for purposes allowed within the Act, but not covered by the three previous parts. For instance, TDA funds may be claimed under Article 8, 99400(b) to subsidize AMTRAK service in a community, or under 99400(d) for administration and planning costs for Article 8 transit services. To complete this section, please identify the project, the purpose of the project, the estimated cost, and the fund from which money is being claimed. It is advisable to communicate with COG staff before completing this section. MUM