The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolutions - No. 92-65RESOLUTION NO. 92-65 -------------------- -------------------- A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF A REVISED TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) CLAIM FOR TRANSIT SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lodi City Council does hereby authorize the submittal of a revised Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim for transit services for Fiscal Year 1990-91; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Lodi City Council does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute the subject revised Claim on behalf of the City of Lodi. Dated: April 15, 1992 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 92-65 was passed and adopted by the Lodi City Council in a regular meeting held April 15, 1992 by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Hinchman, Pennino, Sieglock, Snider and Pinkerton (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None Alice M. Reimche City Clerk 92-65 RES9265jTXTA.02J s LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND TO: San Joaquin County Council of Governments 1860 East Hazelton Avenue Stockton, CA 95205 FROM: Applicant: City of Lodi Address: P. O. Box 3006, Lodi, CA 95241 (City, Zip) Contact Person:JerrY Glenn/Sharon Blaufus Phone:333-6700 The City of Lodi hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes 1971 and applicable rules and regulations, that its annual transportation claim be approved in the amount of $ 1,411,480 for fiscal year 1990-91, to be drawn from the Local Transportation Fund. When approved, please transmit this claim to the County Auditor for. payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to this applicant is subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan. The claimant certifies that this Local Transportation Fund claim and the financial information contained therein, is reasonable and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634 and 6734. APPROVED: San Joaquin County Council of Governments By: BARTON MEAYS Title: Executive Director Date: 19 Applicant: 't of Lodi Signe / . Q Name: Thomas A. Peterson Title: City Manager Date: April 15, 1992 -5- c I STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE CLAIM TO: San Joaquin County Council of Governments 18.60 East Hazelton Avenue Stockton, CA 95205 FROM: Applicant: City of Lodi Address: P. O. Box 3006, Lodi, CA 95241 (City, Zip) Contact Person:. Jerry Glenn Phone•333-6700 This claimant, ._qualified -pursuant to Section 99203 and 99315 of the Public Utilities Code, hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400, -Statutes of 1971 as amended, and applicable rules and regulations-, that: an -allocation be made in the amount -of $ 5,221 • .:� for fiscal year 1990-91, to be drawn from the State Transit Assistance trust fund of San Joaquin County for the follow- ing purposes and in the following respective amounts: Purposes• Amounts Transit ,_ $5,221 Allocation instruction -and payment by the County Auditor to this claimant.are-subject to such monies being on hand and available for distri-bution.-;_.and -to -the.. provisions. that such -monies will .be used only in.accordance with the terms of the approved claim. The claimant certifies that this State Transit Assistance Fund Claim and the financial information contained herein, is reasonable and accurate to the. best of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimantfor funds for_ the fiscal year of the application pursuant --to CAC Section 6634 and 6734. APPROVED: San Joaquin County Council of Governments By: BARTON MEAYS Title: Executive Director Date: 19 Applicant: Signed: Name: Title: Date: -6- 19 TRANSPORTATION'DEVELOPMENT ACT APPORTIONMENTS I. Local Transportation Fund.Available Apportionment A. ^Area:_Apportionment`1990-91 $ 1,022,380 B. .Pedestrian/Bicycle_Apportionment 21,300 C. Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment 78,800 D. VUnexpended Carryover 297,000 E.• Total Available for 1990-91 Claim(s) 1,419,480 F._ ..1ess;:any LTF,.Already ..Claimed 1990-91 0 G. .TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM $ 1,419,480 (Also enter on page 8, 1st column) II. State Transit Assistance Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment 1990-91 $ . Apportionment 1990-91 .___._C..__Previo.us Years' Unclaimed Apportionment - D. Unexpended Carryover 5,221 4,927 E. Total Available for 1990-91 Claim(s) 10,148 F. less any STA Already Claimed 1990-91 0 G. TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM $ 10,148 (Also enter on page 8, 2nd column) -7- C TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ALLOCATIONS Claim Purpose I. LTF II. STA I. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Article 4 (99260) -Operator, Article 8 (99400(c)) .:Contractor -operating Article 8 (99400(e)) Contractor capital II. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE Article 3 .(.99234).._•_ Article 8 (99400(a)) III. ROADS AND STREETS . .. Article 8.(99400(a)) $ 301,065 $ 5,221 29,000 $ 21,300 $1,060,115 N/A IV. OTHER Article 8 (99400(b) N/A j or..99400(d) TOTAL THIS CLAIM $1,411,480 $ 5,221 TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR THIS CLAIM (from page 7, I. and II. G.) 1,419,480 10,148 UNCLAIMED APPORTIONMENT (TOTAL AVAIL. less TOTAL THIS CLAIM) $ 8,000 $ 4,927 IMPORTANT: To avoid accidental overpayment, please identify in the space below any unexpended carryover included in the amounts being claimed above. $297,000 unexpended LTF carryover: reclaimed for streets/roads $ 4,927 unexpended STA carryover: reclaimed for transit art. 4 1. Operators claiming STA funds must complete and pass the eligibil- ity test on page 15. -8- -9- PART I - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION `. Please Circle either: Article 8 contractor FINANCIAL INFORMATION 1989-90 Please Circle 1990-91 I. OPERATING REVENUE ACTUAL or ESTIMATE Budget 401 Passenger -Fares' . ' $ 29,200 402 Special Transit Fares 403 School -Bus Service Revenues 404 Freight Tariffs 405 Charter Service Revenues 406 Auxiliary Transportation Revenues 407 Non=Transportation Revenues 408 Taxes Levied Directly by Transit System (Specify) 409 Local Cash Grants & Reimbursements (Specify) Local Transportation Fund (LTF) 410 Local •Special Fare Assistance 28.707 411 State Cash Grants & Reimbursements f(Specify) State Transit Assistance Fund (STA) 412 State Special Fare Assistance 413 Federal Cash Grants & Reimbursements (Specify) UMTA Grants 430 Contributed Services 440 •.. (Specify) TOTAL $ 57,907 II. CAPITAL REVENUE 464 Federal Capital Grants & Subsidies _= (Specify) State Capital Grants & Subventions (Specify) State Transit Assistance Funds (STA) Local Capital Provisions (Specify) Local Transportation Fund (LTF) Non -Governmental Donations i ` TOTAL -9- Q'� PART -I - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION f {� Please -Circle. either: Article 4 operator er-Art3ele-6-eenbreetar FINANCIAL INFORMATION 1989-90 Please. -Circle 1990-91 I. OPERATING'REVENUE ACTUAL.or ESTIMATE Budget. 401 -. Passenger=:Fares . $ 39,313 $ 43,575 402'' Spe i -al_ -Transit _Fares 403- School Bus Service Revenues 404 Freight Tariffs 405 Charter Service Revenues 406` Auxiliary -Transportation -Revenues 407 Non -Transportation Revenues 3,266 408 Taxes.Levied.Directly by Transit System (Specify) 409 Local Cash Grants & Reimbursements (Specify) Local..Transportation Fund (LTF) 236,959 239,411 410 Local Special Fare Assistance 411- StaeCash-.Grants-& Reimbursements (Specify) State Transit Assistance Fund -•(STA). 4,927* 5,221 412 State Special Fare Assistance 413 Federal.Cash'Gr.ants & Reimbursements (Specify) UMTA Grants 430 Contributed Services 440 (Specify) 113 TOTAL $2.81,312 $291,473 II. CAPITAL REVENUE 464 Federal Capital Grants & Subsidies (Specify) - State Capital Grants & Subventions (Specify) State Transit Assistance Funds (S'S'A) Local Capital Provisions (Specify) Local Transportation Fund (LTF) $ 55,009 $ 61,654 Sale of Property 29,759 TOTAL $ 84,768 $ 61,654 �. (*$4,927 is unexpended carryover re-claimed for transit in FY 1991) Q'� *Allowable capital expenses are limited for Article 8 claimants; see 99400 (e). ARTICLE 4 - DAR -10- III. OPERATING EXPENSES 1989-90 Please Circle 1990-91 - Actual or Estimate* Budget 501 Labor Operators Salaries/Wages 53 289 Other Salaries/Wages - 502 Fringe_ Benefits 32 76. 503 Services - • . - . 2,589 504 - Materials/Supplies- - ...... Fuels/Lubricants Tires/Tubes Other -505 Utilities - 506 Casualty/Liability Costs 51,208 30,414 507 Taxes 508 Purchased Transportation Service 224,104 244,906 509 Miscellaneous Expenses 988 10, 510 *Expense Transfers -511 'Interest Expense - - 512 Leases -and Rentals 513 Depreciation/Amortization Operator Funds - Grant Funds TOTAL $276,385 $288,768 IV. CAPITAL EXPENSES* Debt Service Land/Property Acquisition Vehicles 5 84.185" 5 61,650 Construction Other - Radios 583 TOTAL 5 84,768 5 .61 , 650 *Allowable capital expenses are limited for Article 8 claimants; see 99400 (e). ARTICLE 4 - DAR -10- III: OPERATING EXPENSES 1989-90 Please Circle 1990-91 Actual or Estimate* Budget 501 Labor Op�!.rators..salaries[Wages Other 502: Fringe -Benefits 503' Services 504 Materials[Supplies Fuels/Lubricants Tires/Tubes Other 505• Utilities 506. Casualty/Liability Costs 507 Taxes 508 Purchased.Transportation Service $ 57,907 509 Miscellaneous Expenses 510 Expe'nse..Transfers 511 Interest Expense 512 Leases andRentals 513 Depreciation/Amortization Operator.Funds ` Grant Funds TOTAL $ "S" 57:907 IV. CAPITAL EXPENSES* Debt Service. Land/Property Acquisition Vehicles Construction Other - Radios TOTAL $ $ *Allowable capital expenses are limited for Article 8 claimants; see i 99400 (e) ARTICLE 8 - TAXI -10- OPERATIONAL INFORMATION* Actual Actual/Est. Proposed FY 1988-89 FY 1989-90 FY 1990-91 1. Patronaae a. Total Passengers See FY 1991-92 TDA Claim for information __ . ._. _ related to passengers, RVH, etc., b. Revenue Passengers for both DAR and the Article 8 Taxi service C. Youth Passengers d. Elderly Passengers e. Handicapped Passengers 2. Vehicle Miles a. Total Vehicle Miles b. Revenue Vehicle Miles 3. Revenue Vehicle Hours 4. Revenue Vehicle Fuel consumption a. Diesel b. Gasoline c. _Liquid Natural compressed Gas 5. Fare Structure B b. Zone C. Youth d. Senior e. Handicapped f. Monthly Pass g. Other h. Average Fare *Attach additional pages as necessary to alter or complete description -11- Total THREE YEAR FISCAL PLAN 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 See Three -Year Fiscal Plans presented in-.original•.FY_.1990-91 TDA -claim -and in the FY 1991-92 TDA claim (for both DAR and taxi service) -12- Operating Expenses Operating Revenues Sources: LTF STA Federal Fares General Fund Other Total— ota1Capital CapitalExpenses Capital Revenue Sources: LTF STA Federal Other Total THREE YEAR FISCAL PLAN 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 See Three -Year Fiscal Plans presented in-.original•.FY_.1990-91 TDA -claim -and in the FY 1991-92 TDA claim (for both DAR and taxi service) -12- 0 FLEET INVENTORY (Transit Vehicle Owners Only) Make & Model Production Year # of Veh. Fuel Type Seat Capacity 5 ecial Features AC EP Other JWC See fleet inventory information in original FY 1990-91 TDA Claim Vehicles to be Purchased in FY AC = Air Conditioned E? = Environmental Packaqe .:C = Wheelchair Lift -13- Article 4 Operator TDA Requirements 1. Fare Ratio/Local Support Requirements - All Article- _4 claimants are required to maintain a specified ratio of fare revenue to operating cost. In addition, SMTD only is required to maintain a ratio of fare revenue plus 'local support 'to operating cost, of 32%. See 99268.2 - 99268.19 for details and exemptions pertaining to ratios. A. What is this system's --required farebox recovery ratio? 10% B. Does the attached budget demonstrate that this system will meet its required farebox recovery and for SMTD its farebox plus local support ratios? YES C. Has this system utilized its grace year? NO D. Has this system been in non-compliance with its required ratio(s)? NO If yes, identify the year or years 2. Extension of Service/New Service An extension of service or new service is exempt from the required farebox and local support ratios if: A. The extension of service or new service has been in oper- ation for less than two full fiscal years. The two-year extension of services exclusion applies until two years after the end of the fiscal year in which the extension of services was put into operation. B. The claimant submits a report on the extension of ser- vices to the COG within 90 days after the end of the fiscal year. (For details of the report, see 6633.8(b)). Is an extension of service/new service being claimed? NO If so, has the required report been submitted for the most recently completed full fiscal year? If not, that report must accompany this claim. 3. Operator's STA Qualifying'Criteria (99314.6) STA funds may not be claimed if the budgeted subsidy per revenue vehicle hour exceeds the sum of last year's subsidy per revenue vehicle hour and. an amount equal to- ninety percent of the change in the Consumer Price Index multiplied by last year's subsidy per -revenue vehicle hour. Please complete the following worksheet to determine eligibility. 1989-90 Budget Projected 1990-91 Budget a. 401.0001: $ 39,313 a. $ 43,575 b. 402.000 b. c. 403.000 C. d. 404.000 d. e. 406.000 e.. f. 407.000 f. 3,266 g. 440.000 g. If the projected subsidy per revenue vehicle hour f -or budget year 1990-91 ("m") is greater than "p", an STA claim for transit operation cannot be allowed. That portion of increased costs of fuel, insurance and compliance with state and federal mandates that exceeds 90% of the CPI on-line "i" may be excluded. If the claimant uses these exemptions show all work, exclusions and reasons on an attached page. 1. Accounting categories taken from the uniform system of accounts and records. -15- REVENUE Sum "a" through "g": h. $ 39,313 h. $ 46,841 OPERATING COST: i. $276,385 i. $288,411 SUBSIDY (S) Subtract "h" from "i": j. _ _ • -..-.- _ • $236,959.. j- $241,570 REVENUE VEHICLE HOURS (annual) (RVH): k. 13,580 k. 14,930 SUBSIDY PER REVENUE VEHICLE.HOUR (S/RVH) Divide "j" by "k": M. $17.45 $16.18 900 of change in Consumer Price Index (6/89 to 6/90): n. (0.9 * 0.048) = 0.0432 For 1989-90 budget only calculate: (1+n)*m P. 1.0432 * m = $18.20 If the projected subsidy per revenue vehicle hour f -or budget year 1990-91 ("m") is greater than "p", an STA claim for transit operation cannot be allowed. That portion of increased costs of fuel, insurance and compliance with state and federal mandates that exceeds 90% of the CPI on-line "i" may be excluded. If the claimant uses these exemptions show all work, exclusions and reasons on an attached page. 1. Accounting categories taken from the uniform system of accounts and records. -15- 4. Fifteen Percent Expenditure Increase (6632) If any of the line items on the attached budget exceed by more than 15% the expenditure for that same item in the previous year's budget., then. an explanation for that increase must be given below. Attach an extra page if necessary. #501 & # 502: Did not charge adequate administrative time to DAR #503 (Services up to $2,539, from $0 prior year): SEE ATTACHMENT #509 (Mise. Expenses up 930%): SEE ATTACHMENT 5. Narrative Description (6632) Please describe in the space below any changes in service characteristics from the previous fiscal year. This should specifically include any substantial increase or decrease in the geographic area served, major changes to the scope of operations, or addition of major new fixed.facilities. Please attach an additional page if necessary. SPECIAL NOTES FOR RATIO CALCULATIONS SMTD - Exclude certain costs and fares as specified in the most recent Compliance Audit_Renort. Lodi - Exclude County service when calculating fares and expenses. -16- 503) Included in this account are the following expenses. Printing $1,138.50 tickets Advertising 145.60 Training 487.24 State requirement New -Year's Eve - -- 616.00 new program CHP Inspection 150.00 State requirement Miscellaneous - 50.-00 - 31 55 509) The items included here are: $2,187 repairs to damaged vehicle $8,308 recovery of shop maintenance overhead $ 52 repair to radio The damaged vehicle is hopefully a one-time cost. The City is now attempting to fully recover all its operating costs. Presently we are charging Dial -A -Ride approximately 3% of the costs of the equipment repair overhead function. Article 8 Contractor TDA Requirements For contracted transportation service providers, the San Joaquin County Council of Governments' Executive Board has waived the farebox and local support ratios as it is empowered to do by 99405(c). The COG Board has established a two-step process. 1. Match Requirement For any Article 8 transit claim, no more than 90% of the total operating funds (minus depreciation) in the budget may be TDA (LTF and STA) derived. The ten percent or more match- ing funds may come from any other source available to the claimant besides TDA. 2. Operating Cost Per Passenger Objective To receive an amount of TDA operating funds (LTF and STA com- bined) in excess of what was claimed the previous fiscal year, the claimant must establish an operating cost per pas- senger objective for the fiscal year of the claim. "Operat- ing cost" is defined as in the TDA statutes and regulations. The objective should be a realistic one based on current and past system performance, but should be low enough to repre- sent an "improvement" when warranted. The COG Executive Board will adopt the systemwide operating cost per passenger objective for the fiscal year of the claim. If the system failed to meet its operating cost per passenger objective in the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year of the claim, then the claimant is only eligible to f ile a claim for the level of TDA operating funding received in that prior fiscal year. In the case of a unified transit system, each claimant would be limited to the prior year's level of TDA operating funding. If a system wishes to be eligible for increased TDA operating funding in a future fiscal year, then the claimant should identify an operating cost per passenger objective. i. What was the level of TDA operating funding received in the previous fiscal year for this system by this claimant (LTF plus STA)? $ 0 ii. Does the attached budget information demonstrate at least a 10% match of non -TDA funds? YES iii. Is this claim requesting more TDA operating funds than were received for this system by this claimant in the previous fiscal year? YES iv. If yes, did the system meet its operating cost per passenger objective in the previous fiscal year? Not Applicable An affirmative answer should be documented in Part v. -17- V. What was last year's operating Cost per •Passenger Objective? $0.00 (no service) What was the actual operating cost per passenger? . a. FY 1989-90 Operating Cost $ b. Total Passengers C. Operating Cost Per Passenger (a / b) . $ vi. What is the operating Cost per Passenger objective for this claim? . d. Budgeted Operating Cost $ 58,200 e. Estimated Total Passengers 18,653 f. Calculated Operating Cost per Passenger (d / e) $ 3.12 g. FY 1990-91 OPERATING COST PER PASSENGER OBJECTIVE $ 2.17 h.. If this claim is for a unified transit system (see footnote), has the contributing claimant been appraised of the planned systemwide objective set in g. above? 3. Fifteen Percent -Expenditure Increase (6632) If any of the line items on the attached budget exceed by more than 15% the expenditure for that same item in the previous year's budget, then an explanation for that increase must be given below. Attach an additional page if necessary. 4. Narrative Description -(6632) Please describe on an attached page any changes in service characteristics from the previous fiscal year. This should specifically include any substantial increase or decrease in the geographic area served, major changes to the scope of operations, or addition of major new fixed facilities. This claim provides support to the taxi company on a per pas- senger basis. Supporting the Taxi company in this manner will ensure that there is some form of public transit avail- able, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. IMPORTANT: If this claim is for a unified transit system (per definition p. 18a), all calculations and numbers on (2)iv. and (2)v. must include both City and County totals. Also, contribut- ing claimants to unified transit systems should not use this page: use page 18a instead. -is- L PART II - PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROJECTS LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND LTF Cost STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND STA Cost -19- PART III - ROAD AND STREET -PROJECTS Please provide the requested information for each project being identifie for Transportation Development Act funding. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND _ • .... _. LTF Cost See pages 20a and 20b from original FY 1991 TDA claim for project titles and decriptions STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND $1,060,115 $2,323,000 (Use Additional Page if Necessary) STA Cost Use Additional page if Necessary) =4610