HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - No. 92-57RESOLUTION NO. 92-57
--------------------
--------------------
A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL
CONFIRMING THE COST OF CONSTRUCTION REPORT AND CONFIRMING THE
ASSESSMENT AGAINST THE REAL PROPERTY FOR SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION
AT 1911 SOUTH CHURCH STREET, LODI, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, the State of California Streets and Highways Code
Section 5616 et seq. provides that the City Council set a public
hearing to hear and pass upon the Cost of Construction Report (Exhibit
A), filed with the City Council for sidewalk construction, and to hear
objections or protests from property owners liable to be assessed for
the cost of such construction at 1911 South Church Street, Lodi,
California; and
WHEREAS, on April 1, 1992, at a regular meeting of the Lodi City
Council, a public hearing was held to hear and pass upon the Cost of
Construction Report and to hear objections or protests from property
owners liable to be assessed for the cost of such construction at 1911
South Church Street, Lodi, California; and
WHEREAS, no objections or protests were raised by the property
owner liable to be assessed for the work of making such repair, nor
from any other interested persons; and
WHEREAS, Streets and Highways Code Section 5616 et seq. provides
that the property owner be given a five-day period after confirmation
of the cost by the City Council in which to pay the assessment;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Cost of Construction
Report and the assessment against the real property is hereby confirmed
by the Lodi City Council.
Dated: April 1, 1992
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 92-57 was passed and adopted
by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held
April 1, 1992 by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members - Hinchman, Pennino, Sieglock, Snider
and Pinkerton (Mayor)
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
U& 'k - 6W,4,1
Alice M. Reimche
City Clerk
92-57
RES9257/TXTA.02J
CITY COUNCIL
JAMES W PINKERTON, Mayor
PHILLIP A. PENNINO
Mayor Pro Tempore
DAVID M. HINCHMAN
JACK A. SIECLOCK
JOHN R. (Randy) SNIDER
TO: City Council
CITY OF LODI
CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET
P.O. BOX 3006
LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910
(209) 334-5634
FAX (209) 333.6795
REPORT OF COSTS
INSTALLATION OF SIDEAALKS
CITY OF LODI
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
SUBJECT: Ray Litchfield, Owner
1911 S. Church Street
Lodi, California
APN 062-020-23
IEThHO�MASA.
PETERSON
City Manager
ALICE M. RElMCHE
City Clerk
803 McNATT
City Attomey
Pursuant to the requirement of Chapter 27 of the Streets and Highways Code
of the State of California, I hereby certify that the following costs were
incurred by the City of Lodi to install sidewalk at the subject property:
Cost $4,200.75
Amount Paid 3/12/92 21800.50
Balance Due $1,400.25
Administrative Costs 70.04
Total $1,470.29
fe. Jack L. "nsko
Superintendent of Streets
City of Lodi
Filed this day of 2kU46,
1992, in the office of the City Clerk
of Codi, California
Alice M. Reimche
City Clerk
_=C,;URCI.R0C/7XTd.02M
=tj1RK /
W. P1NKM=N. Mawr
7 A. *e4NINO
r sero Kereaoem
%k '.4iNC�MAN
SEC r -CIC
i OtWACM SNIM
Mr. :Ray L.tcz,"field
Cour-.:: SL_
Loci , C.; 952-40
= OF LODI
CTY HAU _ = WES, PINE 57 i
Aa 3=3006
LOCI, UL MRNIA 95241-39m
MW r;4-5rQ4
Ax z= sst ops
,Marut 12, Taal
C c" R r F ,g
S*dSJEC : ?as-,,onement el Public Hearings and New Billing
11'14If��.l I� r�iG�A-
AUC 5A, iF.7AQ*
Qtr C erk
3CS MQ4Arr
Qtr AMM"M
:mss discussed with you this a i tarnoon, we are enclosing a new billing -For
_:fie i ns ra l l a ti an of c:zrb , aur -tar and s i dewa 1 k at 11-311 South C:iur-cJ Siert.
i ni s bill shows the ba i anca due.
As exniaine_, :::e amount youwere billed in January was an incorr—
amount_ -i,nat error was not discovered until last week when I, -,e public
hear -Ina not ' crs 'wer-e bei na prepared- S i nc_ the:,;te seed i ed -or payment
of z:e bill had passed, we did not rush to torr -t it. i have enclosed the
nese bi i i ina 'with the carr°rt amount of S4,200.i5 whica was originally shown
in our le -czar rz you dat`d August 13, MI. We also silos« the amount paid
on March :2, 1942 and the baiance due_ in the Report of Cast, whicl was
zrai 1 ed to you and postad on your proaer^y an Marga 6, 1992, the cost of the
imnrcvement was shown as S4,200_75 as well as an administrative cost or
liening zhe oracer-y or S2'_0.04. fine Sill enclosed wit't this lettar is in
the amount of S4,200.7z_ less payment rade of leaving a balance
or S1,40.25.
Also enclosed is caoy al; the Ccunc i l C-m=ni c3ti an -,-r= tate City Manager
stating chat the oub i i c hearings whi ct we"_ schedu i ed tar :Marta 18 have
been pas—"cned until April 1. Because or this pos=onement, ill: will be
necessary -Far us to again no -r, -,-f you or tte public hearing and post the
p.--aoeT-^y . ; he Repar- or Cost wn' i ca ;rou r—e-ai ve wi tt the next noxi cr -will
shaw a credit 'or the amount paid. Ft will also show an adminis-crative
cost 5ased an the baianc=_ i -I- that balanca has not been paid by tte t;me
given in c`te l e=ar you receive after the public hearing, tate
aami ni st:-at , ve. ccs t will 1 be added tz the amount or `he i ien_
We are sorr.i tar the i ncanveniencs zhe it roper amount shown an the bill
las c_usea. i t you have any quest i ons , please call me or Sharon 31 au us at
_Z-2. 5706
Wes a tam -
Senior Cavi i _icineer
'4K' /85/11
nciosur9s
_==°8 '�ann gid.
:C�TDC
Zcc.
1