HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - August 20, 1986 PHCITY CM CIL MEETING
AUGUST. 2Q, 1986
PCiBLIC HEARING TO
OONSIDER REQUEST OF
LOREN PERRY TO AMEND
THE SPECIFIC PLAN OF
HOWARD STREET BY RE-
ALIGNING THE BtEI.B
350 NORTH I.,OMA DRIVE
AND 360 NORTH LOMA
DRIVE
OC -45(a)
OC -53 (b)
Notice thereof having been published and posted according
to law, an affidavit of publication being on file in the
office of the City Clerk, Mayor Reid called for the Public
Hearing to consider the Planning Cmuassion's
reommendation for the denial of the request of Loren Perry
to amend the Specific Plan of Howard Street by re -aligning
the bulb turn -around between 350 North Loma Drive and 360
North Lana Drive in an area zoned R-2, Single -Family
Residential.
The matter was introduced by City Manager Peterson.
Further background information and diagrams of the subject
area were provided by Cam mity Development Director
Schroeder.
There were no persons in the audience wishing to address
the Council regarding the matter.
City Clerk Reimche read into the record a letter that had
been received from Duane M. Lindstrom, 360 North Lama
Drive, Lodi, regarding the matter.
Mayor Reid closed the public portion of the hearing.
Following discussion, on motion of Council Member Hincimtian,
Olson second, Council denied the request to amend the
Specific Plan of Howard Street, Lodi, as heretofore set
forth
f 2
CITY OF LODI
COUNCIL COM1-tUNICATION
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
TO: City Council
FROM: City Manager
DATE: August 12, 1986
SUBJECT: Requested Amendment to Howard Street Specific Plan
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council hold the scheduled public hearing on
the propose amen ment to the Howard Street Specific Plan and take the
appropriate action.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In 1969, the City of Lodi Planning Commission and City
Council approved the presently adopted Specific Plan.
The requested amendment is located at the south end of Howard Street. Attached
is a letter from Loren Perry dated June 11, 1986, requesting an amendment to the
south end of Howard Street.
The existing Specific Plan and the proposed amendment are shown on the attached
Exhibit A. The attached Exhibit B shows the parcel and street layout in the area
of Howard Street. On Exhibit B, the shaded two parcels, which the amendment
would affect, currently take access off of Loma Drive by means of a 20' access
easement.
The .proposed amendment would reduce the amount of right-of-way dedication from
Parcel A and increase the amount of right-of-way dedication and street
improvements to Parcel B. Shown below are the approximate changes in
right-of-way square footage and lineal feet of right-of-way, which approximates
the amount of curb, gutter, and sidewalk installation required:
RIGHT-OF-WAY AREA
EXISTING PROPOSED
SPEMTTZ KAN AMENDMENT
Parcel A 1040 SF 240 SF
Parcel B 5580 SF 7300 SF
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINEAL FOOTAGE
EXISTING PROPOSED
SPEUTF"LAN AREAORM
88 LF 56 LF
172 LF 223 LF
The Planning Commission action at its public hearing of July 28, 1986 was to
recommend to the City Council denial of the request of Loren Perry to amend the
APPROVED:
FILE NO.
THOMAS A. PETERSON, City %anager
Specific Plan of Howard Street. Attached is a letter from Mr. Jim Schroeder to
Loren Perry dated July 29, 1986, outlining the decision of the Lodi City Planning
Commission.
Also attached is a letter from Duane M. Linstrom to the Planning Commission dated
July 28, 1986. Mr. Linstrom is the owner of Parcel 8 and the letter outlines his
concern as it relates to a change in the alignment of the Howard Street Specific
Plan.
r
r N
Jack L. Ronsko.
Pub] c Works Director
achments
cc: Community Development Director
Loren Perry
Duane M. Linstrom
JLR/ma
EXISTING
LExWbit " I -
AMENDMENT TO HOWARD
STREET SPECIFIC PLAN
Z ss 11 T.-28- W-
LOMA
w
m
0
cc
'PROPOSED
r;.
.�. JW^g`hi'6'P✓.:ra. nrn.•�w.-.'�n�eweKYt�.^s ¢tn+"� . ^z^b;.ic ..
LOMA
tu
R-
8
HOWARD
.�. JW^g`hi'6'P✓.:ra. nrn.•�w.-.'�n�eweKYt�.^s ¢tn+"� . ^z^b;.ic ..
,e
20'AcceA----
�au�i
-
-
E Exhibit if Y
HOWARD
o
�i
L_
! Y
I
®;sem
=
W�TVita6�Ib
r
41
n
`�
M M
ni
6!L•
!!w
1
a
i.
Y
r- m
r
9
MA
`
�
�
�'
11
�
�
t
1
>d
it
l
I �
a trflwll►i�
a
•
-
� !
tI
Gr,;
s �
►,
i z
IIY
c� cm.,
�.
.D
I
b
1
� ID
r
R
Y-
,
l--
w ;L
o
,D
=
.OMA
D21VE
_
,e
20
is
1 1
a
&H EE
a
rl,r �®I��
i
6
20'AcceA----
�au�i
HOWARD
L_
! Y
I
®;sem
=
W�TVita6�Ib
•
20
is
1 1
a
&H EE
a
rl,r �®I��
i
6
CITY COUNCIL
FRED M. REID. Maya
EVELYN M. OLSON
Mavor Pro Tempore
DAVID M. HINCHMAN
JAMES W. PINKERTON. Jr.
JOHN R. (Randy) SNIDER
July 29, 1986
Mr. Loren Perry.
1225 E. Acampo Road
Acampo, CA 95220
Dear Loren:
CITY OF I,ODI
CITY HALL. 221 WEST PINE STREET
CALL BOX 3006
LOW. CALIFORNIA 95241-1910
(209) 334-5634
RE: Amend Howard Street Specific Plan
THOMAS A. PETERSON
City Manager
ALICE M. REIMCHE
City Clerk
RONALD M.STEHV
City !lorry
At its meeting of Monday, July 28, 1986 the Lodi City Planning
Commission recommended to the City Council that your request to amend
the Specific Plan of Howard Street by realigning the bulb turnaround
between 350 and 360 North Loma Drive, in an area zoned R-2, Single -
Family Residential be denied.
It was the Planning Commission determination that the existing plan
best served both properties and provided a higher degree of equity in
paying for the street improvements.
The Planning Commission's recommendation has been forwarded to the City
Council for final hearing and determination. The City Clerk will
inform you of the time and place of the Council's hearing.
Sincerely,
JES B. SCHRO ER
pity Development Director
cc: Duane M. Linstrom
City Clerk
C July 28, 1986
To: Members of the Planning Commission for the City of Lodi
From: Duane N. Linstrom, Purcbaser/Owner of 360 N. Loma Dr., Lodi
Subject: Proposed Cul de Sac for the North termination of Howard Street
It is my request that the proposed and previously accepted plan to intrude
into the properties at 350 and 360 be maintained, as is, for these reasons,:
1. Wben the original petition was circulated and areas determined in our com-
munity for garden apartments, Mr. Ray Welsh and I did Dot participate, as we
regarded our homes for residences and not for investments.
2. When the City commenced issuing permits to build the multiple dwellings,
they consulted with we to determine if I wanted to potentially run Howard St.
through our lot, or would I afford Mr. Welsh access to 350 by 8 otential
cul-de-sac? We opted to be "good neighbors` and to "live and le live".
t
3. Accordingly, I employed the services of Mr. Piazza, who came to the res-
idence and made a careful survey and drawing. His design allowed for three
lots, each of minimal legal sizes for R-1 Dwellings,, for wb4:n; the zoning on
both pieces of property remains.
4. Because of the costs of the items of work necessary to make this imp-
rovement, it will be necessary for me to have the proceeds from.selling the
other two lots to pay for it. In that way, I can continue to live there.
At my age, I could not qualify for sufficient improvent loans.
5. I would appreciate your consideration of both the aesthetics involved
in the eventual improvement. As proposed, it will have a certain beauty to
it, which will enhance the community. (There is a similar arrangement on
Pacific Avenue, north of Lockeford Street). A plain "bulb" will cheapen
the neighborhood, and be an eye sore.
6, A "bulb" will also enlarge the lot at 3509 at the expense of our property,
and make it more desirable for multiple units, negating our efforts, Mr. Welsh
and myself,, to afford a buffer for our friends and neighbors.
7. And finally, there is the real issue of economics. The proposed cul -de -
Sac was a part of public records, accessible to all potential purchasers of
350 North Loma Drive. There was considerable interest shown once the property
was advertised as being available. Clearly that property was shown to be en-'
cumbered with at least twenty -percent of the cost of the improvement. That
obligation was considered to be a part of the cost of the lot.
Respectfully submitted,
Duane M. Linstrom
360 North Loma Drive
Lodi, CA 95240
(209 368 7550)
- PROOF. OF PUBLIOe _^PK -
(2013.5 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
County of San Joaquin.
I am'* citizen of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen
years, and not a party to or Interested in the above -
entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the
printer of the Lodi News-SentUA a newspaper of
Central circulation. printed and published daily.
except Sundays and holidays, in the City of Lodi,
California, County of San Joaquin, and which news.
paper has been adjudged a newspaper of general
circulation by the Superior Court, Department 3, of
the County of San Joaquin. State of California,
under the date of Way 26th, 1953, Case Number
65990; that. the notice, of which the annexed Is a
printed copy (set in type not smaller than non -
pared), has been published in each regular and
entire issue of said newspaper and not in any sup•
plement thereof on the following dotes„ wwit:
Aug. 9,
86
all in the year 19.........
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true aM correct
Dated at Lodi, California, this ........9th day of
Aug. 86
........................................................., 19.........
......................
Signature
-Ti"- see c -..4r the County Clerks W;I::..,g ot&aiip_
CITY CLERK
Proof of Publication of
.PUBLIL..kiF.MING..H011C.E........... .._ ............. .................
DENIAL OF THE REQUEST OF LOREN PERRY
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
On August 7 1986 in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, I
deposited in the United States mail, envelopes with first-class postage
prepaid thereon, containing a copy of the Notice attached hereto, marked
Exhibit "A"; said envelopes were addressed as is -more particularly shown
on Exhibit "B" attached hereto.
There is a regular daily ccummucation by mail between the City of Lodi,
California, and the places to which said envelopes were addressed.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on August 7, 1986, at Lodi, California.
t
itati`�f. iiTM�a
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE IADI CITY 00t=IL OF THE PLANNIMG
CQNMISSION' S RECCIENDATION FOR THE DENIAL OF THE REQUEST OF
LOREN PERRY Ta AMEND THE SPECIFIC PLAN OF HOWARD STREET BY
RE -ALIGNING THE BULB M N-AROUM) BE'I %UN 350 NORTH LCMH DRIVE
AND 360 NORTH L M DRIVE IN AN AREA ZONED R-2,
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
NOTICE IS ICY GIVEN that on Wednesday, the 20th day of August,
1986, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., the Lodi City Council will conduct a Public
Hearing in the Chambers of the Lodi City Council at 221 West Pine Street,
Lodi, California, to consider the Planning Commission's recd miendation for
the denial of the request of Loren Perry to amend the Specific Plan of Howard
Street by re -aligning the bulb turn -around between 350 North Loma Drive and
360 North Loma Drive in an area zoned R-2, Single -Family Residential.
Information regarding this item may be obtained in the office of
the Community Development Director at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California,
or by phoning (209) 333-6711.
All interested persons are invited to present their views either
for or against the above proposal. Written statements may be filed with the
City Clerk at any time prior to the Hearing scheduled herein and oral
statements may be made at said Hearing.
If you challenge the above matter in Court you may be limited to.
raising'only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearin}
described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City
Clerk at, or prior to, the Public Hearing.
By Order of the Lodi City Council
ba, )�&4xzj---,
Alice M. Reifirhe
City Clerk
Dated: August 6, 1986
n
EXISTING
AMENDMENT TO HOWARD
STREET SPECIF=IC PLAN
LOMA ST
cn
r�cr-
, so HOWARD
O% ---
PROPOSED
LOMA ST
1RD
l
•
W
co
O.
1RD
l
rim
f/7Ir71elaf�� _ a r � � � L ' � + f• I 4 r � �'.iS`�
lie ���i'nTt . -�'t�.��1 - �_• • r. G�•*-�.1�.�������._!��'!'.�����
/�� �..i" YJtii:..�U� ! /I ► + ' r • r. : .1 ! ■LTL_jii7�
/[9i����.,►�[rLYii•!l�:��►Y�I/7/��It I r • I
tiY7®IarY.L7 OZ -.=A Ar., I ..I. FA S r • a►� /. / T W �' iLrSiLr�
�i • �� N.AMM
mr.yl Pi.Mm.. rx-"W
M 1.+ _L/ ►. ! it
I. g M,
66fi6E�i6E
!zt
J
To: Members of the Ct- Council of the City of L 1 8/18/86
From: Duane M. Linstrom, Purchaser/Owner of 360 No. Loma Drive, Lodi
Subject: Proposed Cul de Sac for termination of Howard Street
Although Mr. Loren Perry has told me that he will no longer press the issue
of re -aligning the Subject potential project to becoming a Bulb Turn -Around,
to be situated completely on the property of 360 North Loma Drive, because
your mailed Letter to me includes the statement that only those issues raised
at the Public Hearing may be considered in Court, should that be necessary,
I would like for you to consider these same seven reasons that the City of
Lodi Planning Commission deemed reasonable:
1. When the original petition to re -zone part of our community for garden
apartments, Mr. Ray Welsh and I did not participate, as we were purchasing
our homes for residences, and not as investments.
2. When the City commenced issuing permits to build the multiple dwellings,
they consulted with me to determine if I wanted to potentially run Howard St.
through our lot, or would I afford Mr. Welsh access to 350 by a potential
Cul de sac?
3. Acsordiagly, I employed the services of Mr. Piazza, who came to our res-
idence and madde a careful survey and drawing. His design allowed for three
lots, each of minimal legal size for R-1 Dwellings, for which the zoning on
both pieces of property were.
4. Because of the costs of the items of work necessary to make this imp-
rovement, it will be necessary for me to have the proceeds from selling two
lots to pay for it. In that way, I can continue to live there. At my age,
I could not qualify for any improvemnt loans.
5. I would also appreciate your consideration of both of the aesthetics in-
volved in the eventual improvement. As proposed, it will have a certain
beauty to it, which will enhance those people living around it. (There is a
similar arrangement on Pacific Avenue, North of Lockeford Street).
A plain "Bulb" will cheapen the neighborhood.
6. A "Bulb" will also enlarge the lot at 350, at the expense of our property
and make it more desirable to place multiple units, negating our efforts,
Mr. Welsh and myself, to afford a buffer for our friends and neighbors.
7. And finally, there is the real issue of economics. The proposed cul-de-
sac was a part of public records, accessible to all potential purchasers of
350 North Loma Drive. There was considerable interest shown, once thepropert:
was advertised as being available. Clearly that property was shown to be en-
cumbered with at least twenty -percent of the cost of the improvement.
That obligation was considered to be a part of the cost of that lot.
Respectfully submitted, �f
Duane M. Linstrom, 360 North Loma Drive, Lodi, CA 95240 (209 368 7550)
cc: File (2)
To: Members of the Ci Council of the City of Lr -' 8/19/86
From: Duane M. Linstrom, Purchaser/Owner of 360 No. Loma Drive, Lodi
Subject: Proposed Cul de Sac for termination of Howard Street
Although Mr. Loren Perry has told me that he will no longer press the issue
of re -aligning the Subject potential project to becoming a Bulb Turn -Around,
to be situated completely on the property of 360 North Loma Drive, because
your mailed Letter to me includes the statement that only those issues raised
at the Public Hearing may be considered in Court, should that be necessary,
I would like for you to consider these same seven reasons that the City of
Lodi Planning Commission deemed reasonable:
1. When the original petition to re -zone part of our community for garden
apartments, Mr. Ray Welsh and I did not participate, as we were purchasing
our homes for residences, and not as investments.
2. When the City commenced issuing permits to build the multiple dwellings,
they consulted with me to determine if I wanted to potentially run Howard St.
through our lot, or would I afford Mr. Welsh access to 350 by a potential
Cul de sac?
3. Aceerlimgly.. I employed the services of Mr. Piazza, who came to our res-
idence and made a careful survey and drawing. His design allowed for three
lots, each of minimal legal size for R-1 Dwellings, for which the zoning om
both pieces of property were.
4. Because of the costs of the items of work necessary to make this imp-
rovement, it will be necessary for me to have the proceeds from selling two
lots to pay for it. In that way, I can continue to live there. At my age.
I could not qualify for any improvemnt loans.
5. I would also appreciate your consideration of both of the aesthetics in-
volved in the eventual improvement. As proposed, it will have a certain
beauty to it, which will enhance those people living around it. (There is a
similar arrangement on Pacific Avenue, North of Lockef ord Street).
A plain "Bulb" will cheapen the neighborhood.
6. A "Bulb" will also enlarge the lot at 3509 at the expense of our property
and make it more desirable to place multiple units, negating our efforts.
Mr. Welsh azd myself. to afford a buffer for our friends and neighbors.
7. And finally, there is the real issue of economics. The proposed cul-de-
sac was a part of public records, accessible to all potential purchasers of
350 North Loma Drive. There was considerable interest shown, once the propert;
was advertised as being available. Clearly that property was shown to be en-
cumbered with at least twenty -percent of the cost of the improvement.
That obligation was considered to be a part of the cost of that lot.
Respectfully submitted, �f
Duane M. Linstrom, 360 North Loma Drive, Lodi, CA 95240 (209 368 7550)
cc: File (2)
f:
Members of the Lodi City Council
Alice M. iReimche
City Cleric
August 25, 1986
Mr. Loren Perry
1225 East Acanpo road
Acampo, CA, 95220
Dear Mr. Perry:
This letter will confirm the action taken by the Lodi City Council at
its Regular Meeting of August 20, 1986 whereby, following a Public
Hearing on the matter, Council denied your request to amend the
Specific Plan of Howard Street by re -aligning the bulb turn -around
between 350 North Loma Drive and 360 North Lana Drive in an area zoned
R-2, Single -Family Residential.
Should you have any questions concerning this action, please do not
hesitate to call thisoffice.
Very truly yours,
ALICE M. PZ1MME
City Clerk
cc: James B.Schroeder
Community Development Director
City of Lodi
CITY COUNCIL
THOMAS A. PETERSON.
FRED M. RECD, Mayor
CITY OF LODI
City Manager
EVELYN M. OLSON
ALICEM. REIMCHE
MaVor Pro Tempore
CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET
City Clerk
DAVID M. HINCHMAN
CALL BOX 3006
RONALD M. STEIN
'AMES W. PINKERTON, )r
LODI. CALIFORNIA 95241-1910
City Attorney
IOHN R. (Randy) SNIDER
(209) 334-5634
August 25, 1986
Mr. Loren Perry
1225 East Acanpo road
Acampo, CA, 95220
Dear Mr. Perry:
This letter will confirm the action taken by the Lodi City Council at
its Regular Meeting of August 20, 1986 whereby, following a Public
Hearing on the matter, Council denied your request to amend the
Specific Plan of Howard Street by re -aligning the bulb turn -around
between 350 North Loma Drive and 360 North Lana Drive in an area zoned
R-2, Single -Family Residential.
Should you have any questions concerning this action, please do not
hesitate to call thisoffice.
Very truly yours,
ALICE M. PZ1MME
City Clerk
cc: James B.Schroeder
Community Development Director
City of Lodi