HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - July 24, 1985 PH (8)The matter was introduced by Staff who presented
diagrams of the subject area and responded to
questions as were posed by Council.
The following persons spoke in favor of permit
parking in the subject area:
a) Mr. Ben Kauk, 209 Maple Street, Lodi
b) Ms. Inez Villa, 817 S. Washington Street,
Lodi
c) Mr. Albert Castro, 206 Maple Street, Lodi
d) Pastor Loren G. Stacy, Church of God -
Seventh Day, 245 E. Vine Street, Lodi
e) Mss. Darrell Mueller, 412 N. Ham Lane, Lodi,
owner of property at 735 - 731 S. Washington
Street, Lodi
f)
Mr. Dale Baumbach, 1453 W. Tokay Street
Lodi, owner of property at 814 S.
Washington Street, Lodi
a) Mrs. Arnold Schnaible, 728 S. Washington
Street, Lodi
rk) persons were in the audience wishing to speak
in opposition to permit parking in the subject
area.
Mr. Mike Bradley, Executive Manager of the Lodi
District Chamber of Commerce, addressed the
Council regarding the various actions that had
been taken by Pacific Coast Producers over the
years in attempting to alleviate parking problems
in the area of their facility.
There being no other persons in the audience
wishing to speak on the matter the public portion
of the hearing was closed.
Council Member Pinkerton proposed various
alternatives that could be implemented to remedy
the present parking and traffic problems which
included amendn nts to the present ordinance;
limited time parking alternatives; a combination
of limited time parking and permit parking.
Council Member Pinkerton proposed a permit
parking fee of $1.00 for three years; suggested
police department monitoring of the subject area;
and proposed that the restrictions be implemented
for the yearly 9 month period that the cannery is
in operation.
A lengthy discussion followed with questions
being directed tv those who had given testimony
and to Staff. The following alternatives were
recapped as possible solutions to the situation:
1) No parking for 1 hour
a) 2 times/day
b) 3 times/day
2) 1 hour time limit duri.rg 2 hour period
a) 2 times/day
b) 3 times/day
3) Resident Permit plus no parking as set forth
in item 1 above
4) Resident Permit plus limited parking as set
forth in item 2 above. `
S) Permit Parking with one guest pass per
resident
6) 2 hour time limit - all day or some portion
of day
Additional discussion followed.
On motion of Council Member Snider, Olson second,
Council directed Staff to bring back to Council,
at the 2nd Council meeting in October, a
written report detailing the various proposed
solutions . and alternates discussed at this
meeting and included in testimony received at the
this
Public Hearing regarding `matter.