HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - May 5, 1982 PH (5)•
i
J
t
4 NA i• #
5
Z
�•o- `Y
�( ..
�n )7J,�. �.:y�21�' X r } Y
_ yr YX "Ybi501
PUBLIC HEARINGS Section 3 o eral Plan Land Use Element Amendment No. -
CONTINUED GPA -LU -82-1 heretofore set forth, was considered simul-
GENERAL PLAN taneously with consideration of the recommended approval of
LAND USE ELEMENT the request of Al Haro to rezone the parcel at 301 North
NO. GPA -LU -82-1 Pleasant Avenue, Lodi, from R -C -P. Residential -Commercial
Professional. to G-2. Genual. Commercial and the
w....--•+- � n r! 1 L11' matin a_.r.f...i$ , lr?. ���. , 1 4y!
n,T i f. .. t �'• 1 � t? j ."'fir `�+
1.
✓ ` t qt �r„ r,7i
+
Par t
i s r
R, V
"
I /♦
t F�
f A
f
yy �tr1.M
:r t
R,I`_'
r �mF t%A..YrY.r.•.. _._ .... . ... . ....__ .._...�........ w••.rn4.dOMraprssYM./-l{�1
GENERAL PLAN Notice thereof having been published in accordance
LAND. USE ELEMENT with law and affidavit of publication being on file in
AMENDMENT NO. the office of the City Clerk, Mayor Reid called for
GPA -LU -82-1 the Public Hearing to consider the recommended
approval of General Plan - Land Use Element Amendment
No. GPA -LU -82-1 consisting of the following sections;
Section 1 - Request of Luis Arismendi on behalf of
Grupe Communities to redesignate a portion of 1600
West Kettleman Lanefrom Low Density Residential
to Office -Institutional.
Section 2 - Request of Paul Haus'_er and Sara A.
Hausler. et at to redesignate the parcels at 428.
440. 448. 452, 458 and 464 Almond Drive from Low
Density Residential to Medium Density Residential.
Section 3 - Request of Al Haro to redesignate the parcel
at 301 North Pleasant Avenue from Medium Density
Residential to Commercial.
Section 4 - Action initiated by the Planning Commission
to redesignate 105 East Turner Road (i. e. Scenic Over-
look Property) from Recreational to Low -Density
Residential.
Section 1 of General Plan Land Use Element Amendment
No. GPA -LU -82-1 heretofore set forth was considered
simultaneously with consideration of the recommended
approval of the request of Luis Arismendi on behalf of
the Grupe Communities to amend P-1)(21). Planned
Development District No. 21. by eliminating Single -
Family Development and permitting professional offices
and condominiums at 1600 West Kettleman Lane and
1500 through 1S24 Lakeshore Drive. and the certification
of the filing of Negative Declaration ND -82-3 by the
Community Development Director.
The matter was introduced by Community Development
Director Schroeder. who presented a detailed presentation
regarding the matter and presented diagrams of the subject
area.
Speaking on behalf of the matter was Mr. Luis Artsmendi
of Grupe Communities, 2291 West March Lane, Stockton.
California. Mr. Arismendi presented renderings for
Council's perusal.
Mrs. Barbara Kern. 448 Almond Drive. Lodi address -d
the Council posing questions regarding density in the
subject area.
There being no other persons wishing to speak on the matter,.
the public portion of the hearing was closed.
Following discussion. with findings hereinafter set
forth.. Council took the following actions;
e
Continued May S. 1982 n
° On motion of Councilman Pinkerton, Murphy second, -1
Council certified the filing of the Negative Declaration
ND -82-3 - Grupe/Lakeshore Village, General Plan v
Amendment (No. 2) by the Community Development Director.
On motion of Councilman Pinkerton, Murphy second,
Council approved Saction 1 of General Plan Land Use
Element Amendment No. GPA -LU -824, heretofore set forth.
Councilman Pinkerton then moved for introduction of
Ordinance No. 1258 amending P-D(2l), Planned Develop-
ment and perraittitis professional offices and
condomini►uns at 1600 West Kettleman Lane and 1500
through 1524 Lakeshore Drive. The motion was
seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Murphy and carried
by unanimous vote.
Section 2 of General Plan Land Use Element Amendment
No. GPA -LU -82-1 heretofore set forth was considered
simultaneously with consideration of the recommended
approval of the request of Paul Hausler and Sara A.
Hausler. et al to rezone the parcels at 428, 440, 448.452.
458. and 464 Almond Drive from Low Density
Residential to Medium Density Residential. and the
certification of the filing of Negative Declaration
ND -82-4 by the Community Development Directot.
The matter was introduced by Community Development
Director Schroeder. who presented a detailed presentation
regarding the matter and presented diagrams of the
subject area.
Speaking on behalf of the matter was Paul Hausler,
464 Almond Drive, Lodi.
Speaking in opposition to the matter was Mrs. Barbara
Kern, 448 Almond Drive. Lodi.
There being no other persons wishing to speaking on the. }
matter, the public portion of the hearing was closed.
Following discussion, with findings hereinafter
= set forth. Council took the following actions:
On motion of Council Member Olson, Raid second,
Council certified the filing of the Negative Declaration,.
ND -82-4 Hausler/Almond Terrace Rezoning and General
-•ern-r e-,�u
Plan Amendment by the Community Development Director.
On motion of Council Member Olson, Murphy second,
Council approved Section 2 of General Plan Land Use
Element Amendment No. GPA -LU -82-1. heretofore: set forth``'K
Council Member Olson then moved for introduction of '*
Ordinance No. 1259 rezoning the parcels at 428, 440, 448,
.452.458. and 464 Almond Drive. Lodi, from Low Density
Residential to Medium Density Residential. The mot€on .
was seeonded by Mayor Reid and carried by unanimous vote;
�75
Continued May 5. 1982
ND -82-6 by the Community Development Director.
The matter was introduced by Community Development i
Director Schroeder, who presented a detailed presentation
regarding the matter. and presented diagrams of the
subject area.
There were no persons in the audience wishing to speak
on the matter, and the public portion of the hearing was
closed.
FOLLOWING DISCUSSION, WITH FINDINGS HEREINAFTER
SET FORTH. COUNCIL TOOK THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS:
On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Murphy. Olson second,
Council certified the filing of the Negative Declaration
ND -82-6 - Haro General Pian Amendment by the Community
Development Director.
On motion of Councilman Pinkerton, Olson second. Council
approved Section 3 of General Plan Land Use Element
Amendment No. GPA -LU -82-i, heretofore set forth.
Councilman Pinkerton then moved for introduction of i
Ordinance No. 1260 rezoning the parcel at 301 North
Pleasant Avenue from R -C -P. Residential -Commercial-
Professional, to C-2. General Commercial. The motion
• was seconded by Mayor Pro Tamp ore Murphy and carried f
by unanimous vote. t
• F .
Section 4 of General Plan Land Use.Elemeut Amendment
`- No. GPA -LU -8Z-1 heretofore set forth,., was considered
simultaneously with consideration of the recommendation
that the parcel at I05. East Turner Road (i. e. Scenic
Overlook Property) be rezoned from. F -P. Floodplain, to
R-1. Single Family. Residential and the certification of
the filing of Negative Declaration ND -82-1 by the Community
Development Director. -
The matter was introduced by Community Development
Director Schroeder, who presented a detailed report;,.; 4
regarding :the matter, andpresenteddiagram's_ of the }
subject area.
There were no persons wishing to speak on the matter,
and the public portion of the hearing was closed.
FOLLOWING DISCUSSION, WITH FINDINGS. HEREINAFTER
SET FORTH, COUNCIL TOOK THE FOLLOWING A CTICIS:
On motion of Councilman Pinkerton,_ Murphy second. ,
Council certified the filing of the Negative Declaration
• ND -82-7 -Scenic Overlook/Redesignate from Flood Plains
to Low Density Residential.
On motion of Council member Olson. Murphy second,
Council approved Section 4 of General Plan Land Use.
Element Amendment No. GPA -LU -82-1, heretofore
set forth.
7131 ,
Continued May 5. 1982
ORDINANCE NO.
1257. 1258, 1259.
1260, and 1261
INTRODUCED
Councilman Pinkerton then moved for introduction of
Ordinance No. 1161 - rezoning the parcel at 105 East Turner
Road (Le.,Scenic Overlook Property) from F -P, Floodplain.
to R-1.: Single -Family Residential. The motion was
seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Murphy and carried by
u..animous .vote.
Councilman Pinkerton then moved for introduction
of Ordinance No. 1157 - General Pian Land Use Element
Amendment No. GPA -LU -82-1, including all four
sections with findings hereinafter set forth. The motion
was seconded by Mayor Pro Tempore Murphy and
carried by unanimous vote. Ordinance No. 1257 is hereby
set forth in its. entirety.
Findings to be established by Lodi City
Council on General Plan - Land Use
Element Amendment No. GPA -LU -82-1
1. Negative Declarations filed by Community Development
Director on all sections are in order.
2. All proposed sections of the General Plan Amendment
s;
Are in the public's interest.
f
3. 1600 West Kettlemau Lane (Grupe Communities) -
There is a need for additional condominium property
(higher density and office area) in the Lodi area, and
subject lends itself to these land uses.
-
4. 428.440.448.452.458 and 464 Almond Avenue (Hausler)-
Property along Almond Drive is adjacent to other
multi -family residential designation' aid therefore
this would lend itself to that designatio in,,
`
S. 301 North Pleasant Avenue' (Haro)'- `y -
'
This property is adjacent to already existing commercial
property, and this change would therefore"be made to
make this property consistent with other surrounding
property. r
6. 105 E. Turner Road (Le Scenic Overlook Property
-is
This property no longer in.the F'looii Plain, and it
wroAd be reasonable to redesignate this property to
Low -Density Residential.
An Ordinance amending the land use -element of
the General Plan of the City of Lodi by a):; ,
_rte
redesignating a portion of 1600 West; Kettleman �m
Lane. Lodi, from Low=Density Residential
to Office -Institutional b) redesignating'the;1�
parols at 428. 440. 448. .452., 458 and,464 Almond
„
Drive. Lodi, from Low -Density Residential to
Medium -Density Residential c) Rede'signating '
the parcel at 301 North Pleasant Avenue. Lodi, from
Medium-Deusity Residential to Commercial;
and redesignating 105 E. Turner Road, Lodi,
(i. e. Scenic Overlook Property) from Recreational
wy
to Low -Density Residential
The City Council of the City of Lodi does ordain as
+ r :
follows:
Section 1. The Land Use Element of the General
`
?Ian of the City of Lodi is hereby amended by a)
redesignating a portion of 1600 West Kettleman Lane.
Continued May 5. 1982
Lodi. from Low -Density Residential to Office -Institutional
b) redesignating the parcels at 428.440, 448.452.458 and
464 Almond Drive. Lodi. from Low -Density Residential
to Medium -Density Residential c) redesignating the
parcel at 301. North Pleasant Avenue. Lodi. from Medium -
Density Residential to Commercial; and redesignating
' 105 East Turner Road, Lodi. (i.e. Scenic Overlook
Property) from Recreational to Low -Density Residential.
Section 2. - All ordinances and parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith are repealed insofar as such conflict
may exist.
0
Approved, as to form
RONALD M. STEIN
City Attorney
Section I. - This ordinance shall be published one
time in the "Lodi Life and Times", a twice weekly news-
paper of general circulation printed and published in the
City of Lodi and steal i be in force and take effect thirty
days from and after its passage and approval.
Approved this 19th day of May, 198Z
Name
Mayor
Attest:
ALICE M. REIMCHE
City Clerk
State of California
County of San Joaquin. ss.
j Alice M. Reimche, City Clerk of the City of Lodi.`.::
do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1257 was i,ntrodticei
at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City.
of Lodi held May S. 1982 and was thereafter passed.,
adopted and ordered to print at a regular meeting of
said Council held May 19. 1982 by the following votet ,.
Ayes: Council member - Olson. Snider. Pinke rto
Murphy and Reid
Noes: Council member - None
Absent: Council member - None
Abstain: Council member - None
I further certify that Ordinance No. 1257 was approved
and signed by the Mayor on the date of its passage and
the ►:ame has been published pursuant to law.
ALICE M. REIMCHE
City Clerk
140TICE'11- 7 PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CI� COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF LODI TO CONSIDER THE RECOMMENDED
APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST -OF LUIS ARISMENDI ON
BEHALF OF GRUPE COMMUNITIES TO AMEND P -D(21),
PLANNED.DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 21, BY
ELIMINATING SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND
PERMITTING PROFESSIONAL OFFICES AND COND014INIUMS
AT 1600 WEST KETTLEMAN LANE AND 1500 THROUGH 1524
LAKESHORE DRIVE, AND THE CERTIFICATION OF THE
FILING OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION ND -82-3 BY THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOP14ENT DIRECTOR
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, May 5, 1982
at the hour of 8:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter
may be heard, the Lodi City Council will conduct a public
hearing in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 221 West Pine
Street, Lodi, California, to consider the recommended approval.
of the request of Luis Arismendi on behalf of Grupe
Communities to amend P -D(21), Planned Development District No.
21, by eliminating single' -family development and permitting �r
professional offices and condominiums at 1600 West Kettleman
Lane and 1500 through 1524 Lakeshore Drive, and the
certification of the filing of Negative Declaration ND -82--3 by
the Community Development Director.
Information regarding this item may be obtained in the
office of the Community Development Director at 221 West Pine
Street, Lodi, California. All interested persons are invited
to present their views either for or against the above
-f
proposal. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk
at any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein and oral
statements may be made at said hearing.
Dated: April 7, 1982
By Order of the City Council
ALICE M. REIMCKE
City Clerk
Findings to be established by Lodi City Council on
General Plan - Land Use Element Amendment No. GPA -LU -82-1
1. Negative Declarations filed by Community Development Director on all sections
are in order.
2. All proposed sections of the General Plan Amendment are in the public's interest.
3. 1600 West xettleman Lane (Grupe Communities) There is a need for additional
condominium property (higher density and office area) in the Lodi area, and
subject parcel lends itself to these land uses.
4. 428,440,448,452,458, and 464 Almond Avenue (Hausler) - Property along Almond
Drive is adjacent to other multi -family residential designation and therefore,
this would lend itself to that designation.
S. 301 North Pleasant Avenue (taro) This property is adjacent to already. exist",
commercial property, and this change would therefore be made to. make. ,this property
consistent with other surrounding property.
6. 105 R. Turner Road (i. e. Scenic Overlook Proper This property is no longer in
the Floodplain, and it would be reasonable to redesignate this property to
Low -Density Residential.
Findings to be established by Lodi City Council on
General Plan - Land.Use Element Amendment No. GPA -LU -82-1
f
i
i
i
t
j.
1. Negative Declarations filed by Cor._wnity Development Director on all
sections are in order.
2. All proposed sections of the General Plan Amendment are in the public's
interest
t- ( 3.
-2,4.
V 6.
105 E. Turner Road (i.e. Scenic Overlook Property -This property is no
longer in the Flood Plain and it would be reasonable redesignated to
Low -Density Residential.
428,440, 448, 452, 458, and 464 Almond Avenue (Hausler) Property along
Almond Drive is adjacent to other multi -family residential designation and
therefore,.this would lend itself to that designation.
301 North'Pleasant Avenue (Harv) - This property is, adjacent to, already
existing ,cosmsercial property, and this change Would therefore be made to
make this property consistent with other surrounding property.
1600"st xettleman Lane (Grupe Communities) -- Thsre is a need for additional,
�_
condominium "property (higher density and office area): in the Lodi'-ar`
and subject parcel lends itself to these land uses.,�
at
GRUPE COMMUNITIES
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIALTO OFFICE/
•
IJ
ION
REZONING
TO CHANGE PORTION OF •r FROM o •• • TO R- I ZONE TO
PROFESSIONAL OFFICES AND RESIDENTIAL• so
0
to 11
I'LAKESHORE
VILLAU
X111■
VASA
,
ROME
e
�aasa�
L.,a3
aEG.KM11
IMW
W
#Ah
ND -82-3
Notice is hereby given that the City of Lodi Planning Department has
determined that the following proposal will have no "Significant
Impact on the Environment". Supporting documentation is available
in the form of a "Preliminary Environmental Assessment" and is avail-
able for public review in the Planning Department Office, City Nall
Building, 221 W. Pune Street. Anyone wishing to appeal the issuance
of this Declaration to the Planning Commission may do so no later than
the date indicated as "Last date to Appeal".
Date 3/8/82 Project Title: GROPE/LAKESHORE VILLAGE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (No. 2)
Responsible Agency: Lodi Planning Dept. Contact Person: David Morimoto
NAME OF PERSON, FIRM, OR AGENCY UNDERTAKING PROJECT:
GRUPE COMMUNITIES, INC.
-Address: City: County:
P. 0. BOX 7576 STOCKTON, CA SAN JOAQUIN
Area Code: Phone;
(209) 951-6660
PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, PURPOSE, AND LOCATION
The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Lodi General Plan and a change in
the planned development for Lakeshore Village. The amendment.to the planned develop-
ment
evelop ment will eliminate -72 single-family lots and replace them with 76 units of cluster
housing and 5.2 acres of office/professional uses. The offlceJprofessional- portion
wiil require an amendment of the general plan from low density resi.dentiai. to -
office institutional. The proposed project is located in the northeast.corne r of
Lakeshore Viliage, adjacent to K,ettleman La b the W.I.D. canal -(057 580=,3: 057=640.05
Project Location City Project Locition CounFy
LODh SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
3-18-82
Address where Preliminary.71nvi
Assessment is Availibles,`�
LODI CITY PLANNING DEPT.
221 W. Pine St.,'Lodi, CA
Phone: (209) 334-5634
ronmen
95240 '
- a.
Pon Acr.
-- °
1001. CALIFORNIA
..
e
�A
K tea.
LAKC
LAND USE INFORMATION
r Et _ ' Dwelling Density
v • i Description Units DU' AC .
EA SFR 199 5.49
B Muni -Family 132 16.0
! :: Residential
A Four -Plea 107
*Wee- Insik"41"
A , Recreation Site - -
Totals 4 '57
r1}
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF LODI TO CONSIDER THE RECOMMENDED
APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST OF PAUL HAUSLER AND
SARA A. HAUSLER, ET AL TO REZONE THE PARCELS AT
428, 440, 448, 4521 458 AND 464 ALMOND DRIVE FROM
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL, AND THE CERTIFICATION OF THE FILING
OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION ND -82-4 BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, May 5, 1982
at the hour of 8:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter
may be heard, the Lodi City Council will conduct a public
hearing in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 221 West Pine
Street, Lodi, California, to consider the recommended approval
of the request of Paul Hausler and Sara A. Hausler, et al to
rezone the parcels at 428, 440, 448, 452, 458 and 464 Almond
Drive from Low Density Residential to Medium Density
Residential, and the certification of the filing of Negative
Declaration ND -82-4 by the Community Development Director..
Information regarding this item may be obtained_in'the
office of the Community Development Director at 221 West Pine
Street, Lodi, California. All interested persons are invited
to present their views either for or against the above
r
proposal. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk
at any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein and oral
statements may be made at said hearing.
-4
Dated: April 71 1982
By Order of the City Council
ALICE M. REIMCHE
City Clerk
HAUSLEi XLMOND TERRACE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REQUEST GPLU82-1
Change tow Density Residential to Medium Density Residential
AND
REZONING REQUEST Z-82-4
Unclassified Holding (UH) to Residential Medium Density (RMD)
APO's 057-16D-21,22,23,24,25,26
Addresses 428,440,448,452,458,464, ALMOND DRIVE
ND -82-4
r k�
WN
Proposed Subdivision Proposed Condos4
PD -19 PD -20
t r _
Proposed Subdivision =
P D-19 p_+
i� 1 t 1 R � s 1 S ay y {d•"�'Z;�.ba, ii'�gg
U
ND -82-4
Notice is hereby given that the City of Lodi Planning Department has
determined that the following proposal will have no "Significant
Impact on the Environment*. Supporting documentation is available
in the form of a "Preliminary Environmental Assessment" and is avail-
able for public review in the Planning Department Office, City Nall
Building, 221 W. Pine Street. Anyone wishing to appeal the issuance
of this Declaration to the Planning Commission may do so no later than
the date indicated as "Last date to Appeal".
Date 2/26/82 Project Title: HAUSLER/ALMOND TERRACE REZONING
& GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
Responsible Agency: Lodi Planning Dept. Contact Person: DAVID MORIMOTO
NAME OF PERSON, FIRM, OR AGENCY UNDERTAKING PROJECT:
SANDALWOOD DEVELOPMENT CORP - APPLICANT;PAUL & SARA HAUSLER - PROPERTY OWNER
Address: Ci ty: County:
114 E. SHAW AVENUE, SUITE 204, FRESNO, CA 93710
Area Code: (209) Phone; 225-2722
PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, PURPOSE, AND LOCATION
The Hausier's, 464 Almond Drive, are requesting a General Plan 'Amendment and rezoning
for a 16,500 ♦ square foot parcel in order to construct a 10 -unit apartment.. The
City will also consider including 5 additional adjacent parcels -in the general plan :
amendment and rezoning. The project would amend the General Plan and~rezone the
properties from U -H, unclassified holding to R -MD, residential medlum density. The -<
parcels each currently contain a single family residence.
ect Location City Pro
ect Location County
ro
LODI SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
Last Bate o Appeal: ress Where Preliminary Environment `
3_13.82 Assessment is Available:
LODI CITY PLANNING DEPT.
221 W. Pine St., Lodi, CA 95240 Y_
Phone: (209) 334-5634
yMHAUSLEF/ALMOND TERRACE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REQUEST GPLU82-1
Change Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential
AND
REZONING REQUEST Z-82-4
Unclassified Holding (UH) to Residential Medium Density (RMD)
APO's 057-160-21,22,23,24,25,26
Addresses 428,440,448,452,458,464, ALMOND DRIVE
ND -82-4
VICINITY MAP
_> >rri r-.;--
1
i
r
HAUSLEi�(ALMOND TERRACE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REQUEST GPLU 82-1
Change Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential
AND
REZONING REQUEST Z-82-4
Unclassified Holding (UH) to Residential Medium Density (RMD)
APf,s 057-160-21,22,23,24,25,26
Addresses 428,440,448,452,458,464 ALMOND DRIVE
ND -82-4
IN N
1G3—)
6 S 5 147
ALMOND DRIVE
Abtw
so 50
14 J10
t
74 ...•'kers}� i '' .� } ti -. - ',i ��'
• -
413
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Environmental Assessment
INITIAL STUDY
PROJECT TITLE HAUSLERIALMOND TERRACE REZONING b GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
LOCATION 428, 440, 448, 452, 458 b 464 Almond Drive (APN 057-160-21 thru 25)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Rezoned six existing parcels from U -H, Unclassified
Holding to R -MD, residential -medium density. The applicant is proposing to
construct a 10 unit apartment on their parcel. The remaining properties have
no plans to develop their property beyond the existing single-family residences.
General Plan Designation (A) Existing (city), (B) Proposed (A) Unclassified
holding; (B). Medium Density Residential (10-40 units/acre)
Site description and surrounding land use The six parcels each have on it
a single family dwelling. There is a mobilehome park and 160 unit condo
grolget to the
i DrOD
i s he as a 0 -unit condo proiect
6� 2on°inge(�sEx�s ing B�n roposed� a an agriculture o ' iwes .
11.,U "aclasci ed No dam,
(B) R -MD, Residential medium density (max 40 units/acre).
7. a. Substantial alteration of natural topography, soil
or subsoil features... * ...............................
b. Substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality..
Substantially deplete surface or groundwater
resources .............................................
Substantially interfere with groundwater flow
orrecharge ...........................................
Cause a significant affect related to flood, erosion
or siitation ...........................................
Substantial interference with the habitat of any
species of fish, wildlife or plant ....................
Violate ambient air quality standards or create
substantial air emissions or objectionable odors......
Substantlally Increase ambient noise or glare
levelfor adjoining areas .............................
Substantial reduction of existing cropland............
Expose individuals or property to geologic, public
health, traffic, flood, seismic or other hazards......
Ma be
Z
.._ '
X
X
_s
t
t. Conflict with adopted plans, goals or policies of X
the City of Lodi ....................................
Adverse impacts of project and their magnitude:
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS
rz-
Impacts Identified by Initial Study:
Yes No Maybe
k.
Have a substantial, demonstrable, negative aesthetic
,fix a.
effect.' :.............................................
X
A.
Result in the disruption or alteration of an
X
archeological, historical or paleontological site....
{ F
i'
m.
Cause or allow substantial increase in consumption In
X
any natural resources...... ..........................
y ,
n.
Results in the use or waste of substantial amounts of
X
fuel or energy .......................................
o.
Necessitate major extensions of water, sewer, storm
X
Negative Declaration
drain, electrical lines or public roads ..............
p.
Substantially increase demand for or utilization of
AREA COVERED IN EIR 79-3 SOUTHEAST
public services such as schools or fire or police
X
protection ...........................................
q.
Substantially change transportation patterns related
r
to existing traffic load, street capacity, parking
X
availability or traffic safety .......................
r.
Induce substantial growth, concentration or displace-
ment of population ...................................
X
s.
Result in an alteration or conflict with existing or
planned land uses ...................................
X
t. Conflict with adopted plans, goals or policies of X
the City of Lodi ....................................
Adverse impacts of project and their magnitude:
NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS
Mitigation Measures to Reduce Adverse
Impacts Identified by Initial Study:
,fix a.
t
{ F
i'
y ,
f+
RECOMMENDATION'r
,
Negative Declaration
EIR Conditional Negative
Declaration
AREA COVERED IN EIR 79-3 SOUTHEAST
LODI EIR-1979.
r
JAMES B. SCHROEDER
Environmental Review Officer
By Date_:
EIR/ V41
David Morimoto
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COU17CIL
OF THE CITY OF LODI TO CONSIDER THE RECO14MENDED
APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST OF AL HARD TO REZONE
THE PARCEL.AT 301 NORTH PLEASANT AVENUE_FROM
R -C -P, RESIDENTIAL- COMMERCIAL -PROFESSIONAL,
TO C-2, GENERAL COMMERCIAL, AND THE CERTIFICATION
OF THE FILING OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION ND -82-6
BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, May 5, 1982
at the hour of 8:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter
may be heard, the Lodi City Council will conduct .a..public
hearing'in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 221 'West Pine
Street., Lodi, California, to consider the recommended approval
of the request of Al Haro to rezone the parcel:at 301 North
Pleasant Avenue from R -C -P, Residential -Commercial-
Professional, to C-2, General Commercial, and the
.certifie ation`of the filing of Negative Declaration `ND=82-6�by
��^•'}iX sl L iG
the Community Development Director.
Jnformati6n regarding this•item may.. be obtained n'.the
office of the Community Development Director at 221 West' Pine.
1. �;•� -
Street ,"°Lodi, California. All interested-; person sare- invited;
to present theirA►iews either for or against the above
proposa3.''Written statements may -be filed with the -Cit Clerk
. at any time prior to the hearing 'schedlled rherein.�::andn
statementsf may be made at said°hearing. • .
Dated: vApri1,7, 1982.
By Order of the City Council
�CAM ^W .4v sinti
h1-
ALICE�M. REIMCHE
City Clerk. ; £.
Is
z.
t
5
-i
'
a
2.
S
ME ��
Mon _..
,
,' ' 1i
MN LRUN :111 11111 ��� 1�
®■ In" �11111t�■ .t1
Vol low
�iMe 12 WS ;'4LW
,
.ME mollM
i
1•1NINI =
■NINIINIF;�� �_ minAVAPAM
I:NIN:I■11.911 !1! J!�� �:
7J Illi 1t::Illli� �I
elm
.. F:1
HARD GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REQUEST GP LU 82-1
Medium Density Residential to Commercial
301 North Pleasant Avenue 041-090-33
ND 82-6
MI.l'FI� � Jr
LEGATIVE DE(QARATIM ND -82-6
Notice is hereby given that the City of Lodi Planning Department has
des^rmined that the following proposal will have no "Significant
Impact on the Environment". Supporting documentation is available
in the form of a "Preliminary Environmental Assessment" and is avail-
able for public inview in the Planning Department Office, City Hall
Building, 221 W. Pine Street. Anyone wishing to appeal the issuance
of this Declaration to the Planning Commission may do so no later than
the date indicated as "Last date to Appeal".
Date March 9, 1982
Project Title:
HARD GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT
Responsible Agency:
Lodi Planning Dept.
Contact Persan:
DAVID MORIMOTO
NAME OF PERSON, FIRM, OR AGENCY UNDERTAKING PROJECT:
AL HARO
-Address: City: County:
1825 W. WALNUT STREET LODI- SAN JOAQUIN
Area Code: Phone;
209 368-0261
PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, PURPOSE, AND LOCATION
The applicant is requesting a general plan change from office -institutional
to commercial and a rezoning from R -CP, residential -commercial professional to
C-1, neighborhood commercial. The parcel at 301 N. Pleasant Street currently
Is occupied by a real estate office. The proposed zoning would permit retail
commercial uses in addition to office uses.
Project Location City Project Location County
LODI SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
E-ast Daie toAppeal: Address Where Preliminary Environment
3-19-82 Assessment is Available:
LODI CITY PLANNING DEPT.
221 W. Pine St., Lodi, CA 95240
Phone: (209) 334-5634
Environmental Assessment
INITIAL STUDY
1. PROJECT TITLE HARD GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (Z-82-7/0-82-6/GPA-LU-82-1)
2. LOCATION 301 N. Pleasant Street
3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Rezone single -parcel from R -CP residential-commereial-
professional to C-1, neT—ggg—orhood commercial. so change General plan
designation from office -institutional to commercial.
4. General Plan Designation (A) Existing (city), (B) Proposed (A) Office-
Institutionai; (8) Commercial.
5. Site description and surrounding land use Existing residence that has been
converted to real estate office. Commercial uses to the south, residential
uses to the north.
6. Zar.ing (A) Existing, (B) Proposed (A) R -CP; (B) C-1
Will the Project Have a Significant Effect
Through ny of the FoT ow ng ImpgctslF
7. a. Substantial alteration of natural topography, soil
or subsoil features ..................................
b. Substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality..
c. Substantially deplete surface or groundwater
resources.............................................
d. Substantially Interfere with groundwater flow
or recharge ...........................................
e. Cause a significant affect related to flood, erosion
orsiltation ..........................................
f. Substantial interference with the habitat of any
species of fish, wildlife or plant ....................
g. Violate ambient air quality standards or create
substantial air emissions or objectionable odors......
h. Substantially increase ambient noise or glare
levelfor adjoining areas .............................
I. Substantial reduction of existing cropland............
J. Cxpose individuals or property to geologic, public
health, traffic, flood, seismic or other hazards......
Yes No Haybe
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
0
JAMES B. SCHROEDER
Enviro ntal Review Officer r`
By7D4 Gate
Yes
No
Maybe
f
k. Have a substantial, demonstrable, negative aesthetic
f -
effect ...............................................
X
I. "!suit in the disruption or alteration of an
archeological, historical or paleontological site....
X
M. Cause or allow substantial increase in consumption in
any natural resources ................................
X
1.
n. Results in the use or waste of substantial amounts of
fuel or energy .......................................
X
o. Necessitate major extensions of water, sewer, storm
!
drain, electrical lines or public roads ..............
X.
P. Substantially increase demand for or utilization of
`
public services such as schools or fire or police
X
protection. .
q. Substantially change transportation patterns related
to existing traffic load, street capacity, parking
X
availability or traffic safety .......................
r
r. Induce substantial growth, concentration or displace-
ment of population ...................................
s. Result In an alteration or conflict with existing or
planned land uses ...................................
X
t. Conflict with adopted plans, goals or policies of
the City of Lodi .................................... X
Adverse Impacts of project and their magnitude: Requires rezoning
and
2eneral plan amendment. No significant Environmental impacts.
_
Mitigation Measures to Reduce Adverse Impacts identified by initial
Study:
City will evaluate whether request has merit.
¢i
t
-
S
RECOMMENDATION
f
XXX Negative Declaration EIR Conditional Negative
Declaration
t
JAMES B. SCHROEDER
Enviro ntal Review Officer r`
By7D4 Gate
Mitigation Measures to Reduce Adverse Impacts identified by Initial Study:
City will evaluate whether request has merit.
RECOMMENDATION
XXX Negative Declaration _ EIR Conditional Negative
Declaration
i
JAMES B. SCHROEDER
Enviro mental Review Officer
By Date_.�_ • ?_ rz_
EIR/1-81 �_.
Yes
No Maybe
k.
Have a substantial, demonstrable, negative aesthetic
effect...............................................
X
1.
Result in the disruption or alteration of an
archeological, historical or paleontological site....
X
m.
Cause or allow substantial increase in consumption in
any natural resources................................
X
n.
Results in the use or waste of substantial amounts of
fuelor energy.......................................
X
o.
Necessitate major extensions of water, sewer, storm
drain, electrical lines or public roads..............
X
p.
Substantially increase demand for or utilization of
publ;c services such as schools or fire or police
X
protection...........................................
q.
Substantially change transportation patterns related
to existing traffic load, street capacity, parking
X
availability or traffic safety.......................
r.
Induce substantial growth, concentration or displace-
mentof population...................................
S.
Result in an alteration or conflict with existing or
planned land uses...................................
X
t.
Conflict with adopted plans, goals or policies of
the City of Lodi.................................... X
Adverse
impacts of project and their magnitude: Requires rezoning
and
general plan amendment. No significant environmental impacts.
Mitigation Measures to Reduce Adverse Impacts identified by Initial Study:
City will evaluate whether request has merit.
RECOMMENDATION
XXX Negative Declaration _ EIR Conditional Negative
Declaration
i
JAMES B. SCHROEDER
Enviro mental Review Officer
By Date_.�_ • ?_ rz_
EIR/1-81 �_.
O
Ave"Ut
1�
+t
t•OGK �
t
t
W
y
NARO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT R
REQUEST
ES a Q' LU E2-1Medium Density Residential
301 North Pleasant Avenue 041-090-33
ND 82-6
aIIIIIIIV IN1111 �•••
F/.Elff
GIITY YA"
i
=1! : Nis
IF
01111i' �'.'
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF LODI TO CONSIDER THE RECOMMENDATION
THAT THE PARCEL AT 105 EAST TURNER ROAD (i.e.
SCENIC OVERLOOK PROPERTY) BE REZONED FROM F -P,
FLOODPLAIN, TO R-11 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL,
AND THE CERTIFICATION OF THE FILING OF NEGATIVE
DECLARATION ND -82-7 BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, May 5, 1982
at the hour of 8:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter
may be heard, the Lodi City Council will conduct a public
hearing in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 221 West Pine
Street, Lodi, California, to consider the recommendation that
the parcel at 105 East Turner Road (i.e. Scenic Overlook
Property) be rezoned from F -P, Floodplain, to R-1,
Single -Family Residential, and the certification of the filing
of Negative Declaration ND -82-7 by the Community Development
Director.
Information regarding this item may be obtained in the
office of the Community Development Director at 221 West.Pine
Street, Lodi, California. All interested persons are invited
to present their views either for or against the above
proposal. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk
at any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein and oral
statements may be made at said hearing.
Dated: April 7, 1982
By Order of the City Council
ALICE M. REIMCHE
City Clerk
CITY OF LODI SCENIC OVERLOOK
Amend General Plan Land Use Element and Open Space/Conservation Elements from
FLOOD PLAIN TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/URBAN
and Rezone from
FLOODPLAIN to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL/R-I
105 East Turner Rood (Z-82-5) 041-250-11
lay
A5P A4 c3a 06o 1300
Qk
M
+
C40P
yrneKaad
1011SLAUS 15MET
NDGAj M •'AMTION
ri
ND -82-7
Notice is hereby given that the City of Lodi Planning Department has
determined that the following proposal will have no "Significant
Impact on the Environment". Supporting documentation is available
in the form of a "Preliminary Environmental Assessment" and is avail-
able for public review in the Planning Department Office, City Hall
Building, 221 W. Pine Street. Anyone wishing to appeal the issuance
of this Declaration to the Planning Commission may do so no later than
the date indicated as "Last date to Appeal".
Date 3/9/82 Project Title: "SCENIC OVERLOOK'/ Redesignate from
flood plain to Icw Density Residential
Responsible Agency: Lodi Planning Dept. Contact Person: _Mamie Storr
NAME OF PERSON, FIRM, OR AGENCY UNDERTAKING PROJECT:
Ci ty of Lodi
Address: City: County:
221 W. Pine Lodi San Jooquin
Area Code: Phone;
209 334-5634
PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, PURPOSE, AND LOCATION
.. M.
disposal site. The parcel is currently designated as a portion of the flood plain in the Lodi
General Plan. The most recent Federal Flood Hazard. Mna :hours the area eut=Ida of th.
Flood Plain. The redesignation will bring the City's General Plan into conformance with
the Flood Hazard Maps. The low Density Residential designation will conform to adjacent
land uses.
Pro ect locati6n tyProject Location County
LODI SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
Last Date to Appea : Address Where Preliminary Environment
Assessment is Available:
3-22-82
LODI CITY PLANNING DEPT.
221 W. Pine St., Lodi, CA 95240
Phone: (209) 334-5634
o
. Environmental Assessment
INITIAL STUDY
1. PROJECT TITLE "SCENIC OVERLOOK" General Plan Redesignation.
2. LOCATION 10; E. Turner Road
3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Remove a City -owned parcel from the Mokelumne River
floodplain. Although parcel Is shown as part of the floodplain in City
._ General Plan, the most recent Federal Flood Hazard Maps show the area
outside of the floodplain.
�. General Plan Designation (A) Existing (city), (B) Proposed (A) Floodplain;
(B) low Density Residential.
5. Site description and surrounding land use Currently the property is vacant.
Mokelumne River to the north, S.P.R.R. to the west and residential subdivision
to the south and east.
6. Zoning (A) Existing, (B) Proposed (A) F -P, Floodplain; (B) Residential Single -
Family.
Will the Project Have a Si nnfiiccant Effect
Through Any of Impacts'f Yes No Maybe .
i. a. Substantial alteration of natural topography, soil X
or subsolI features ..................................
b.
Substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality.. ^_
X
e.
Substantially deplete surface or groundwater
X
resources .............................................
d.
Substantially Interfere with groundwater flow
orrecharge...........................................
X
e.
Cause a significant affect related to flood, erosion
X
or siltation ..........................................
f.
Substantial inter`erence with the habitat of any
X
species of fish, wildlife or plant ....................
g.
Violate ambient air quality standards or create
X
substantial air emissions or objectionable odors......
—_ ,
h.
Substantially increase ambient noise or glare
levelfor adjoining areas .............................
X
1.
Substantial reduction of existing cropland............
X
J.
Expose individuals or property to geologic, public
health, traffic, flood. seismic or other hazards......
X
'
Yes No
Maybe
k.
Have a substantial, demonstrable, negative aesthetic
X
effect...............................................
1.
Result in the disruption or alteration of an
X
archeological, historical or paleontological site....
m.
Cause or allow substantial increase in consumption in
X
any natural resources.* ...............................
n.
Results in the use or waste of substantial amounts of
X
fuelor energy.......................................
o.
Necessitate major extensions of water, sewer, storm
X
drain, electrical lines or public roads..............
p.
Substantially increase demand for or utilization of
public services such as schools or fire or police
protection..........................................
X
q.
Substantially change transportation patterns related
to existing traffic load, street capacity, parking
X
availability or traffic safety.......................
r.
induce substantial growth, concentration or displace-
ment of population...................................
X
s.
Result in* an alteration or conflict with existing or
planned land uses...................................
X
t.
Conflict with adopted pians, goals or policies of
the City of Lodi....................................
X
Adverse impacts of project and their magnitude: NONE
Mitigation Measures to Reduce Adverse Impacts Identified by initial Study:
RECOMMENDATION
X Negative Declaration EIR Conditional Negative
Declaration
i
JAMES B. SCHROEDER
Environmental Review Officer
IEIR/1-$1
Adverse impacts of project and their magnitude:: NONE
Mitigation Measures to Reduce Adverse impacts Identified by Initial Study: - 'Y
_
A
t
}
RECOMMENDATION
X Negative Declaration EIR Conditional Negative
Declaration
k.
JAMES B. SCHROEDER
Environmental Review Officer c
By�ll�/'[.f Date-9--�'i
EiR/i-81 ����
Yes No Haybe
k.
Have a substantial, demonstrable. negative aesthetic
effect
X
...............................................
1.
Result in the disruption or alteration of an
archeological, historical or paleontological site....
X
m.
Cause or allow substantial increase in consumption in
X
any natural resources.* ...............................
n.
Results in the use or waste of substantial amounts of
X
fuelor energy .......................................
o.
Necessitate major extensions of water. sewer, storm
X
drain, electrical lines or public roads ..............
p.
Substantially increase demand for or utilization of
public services such as schools or fire or police
protection ...........................................
X
q.
Substantially change transportation patterns related
to existing traffic load, street capacity, parking
X
availability or traffic safety .......................
r.
Induce substantial growth, concentration or displace-
ment of population.......... 0 ................ 0.......
X
s.
Result in an alteration or conflict with existing or
planned land uses..... --o ..........................
X
t.
Conflict with adopted plans, goals or policies of
the City of Lodi ....................................
X
Adverse impacts of project and their magnitude:: NONE
Mitigation Measures to Reduce Adverse impacts Identified by Initial Study: - 'Y
_
A
t
}
RECOMMENDATION
X Negative Declaration EIR Conditional Negative
Declaration
k.
JAMES B. SCHROEDER
Environmental Review Officer c
By�ll�/'[.f Date-9--�'i
EiR/i-81 ����