Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - May 1, 1985 PH (6)WIN -Is �I`N URN $180,000 Shade Structure 25,000 Garfield Street Storm Drain PtELIC HEARINGS Notice thereof having been published in accordance with I aw and affidavit of publication being on file in the office of the City Clerk, Mayor ffinchnan called for the Public Hearing Development to consider proposed uses of 1985-86 CaTnmity 167,000 Block Grant Funds in the amount of $432,000. 1985-86 CUVUNI'IY City Manager Peterson introduced the matter advising DEVELOPMWr BLOCK Council that Staff had received direction from the City GRWr R14DS Council to present a reccffmendation concerning the expend i- ture of the City's 1985 allocation of Ccmxiity Development Block Grant Funds. The recon-mendation is as- follows: Blakely Pool $180,000 Shade Structure 25,000 Garfield Street Storm Drain 25,000 Handicap Access to City Hall and Carnegie Library Bldg. 167,000 Administrative Costs 35,000 $432,000 Associate Planner Gaye Papais further viewed the projects, an and responded to questions as were posed by the Council. d responded toquest Mrs. Carol Marvel, 1232 Lakewood Drive, Lodi, addressed the Council proposing that a portion of the Cammi ty Development Block Grant Funds be expended on public transportation and more specifically on a fixed route system. There being no other person in the audience wishing to speak on the matter, the public portion of the hearing was closed. A lengthy discussion followed with questions being directed to Staff and to Ws. Marvel. Ch rmtIon of Cotmell Member Pinkerton, Snider second, Council approved the expenditure of the City's 1985 allocation of Conni-mity Development Block Grant Funds on the following projects: Blakely Pool $180,000 Shade Structure - Salas Park 25,000 Garfield Street Storm Drain 25,000 Handicap Access to City Hall and Carnegie Library 167,000 Administrative Costs 35,000 $432,000 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TO: - THE CITY COUNCIL DAT NO. FROM: THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE pril 2�,, 1985 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS That the City Council conduct a public hearing REC01/1MENDED—ACTION: on the proposed expenditure of the City's 1985 Community Development Block Grant Funds and take action as deemed appropriate. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Staff has received direction from the I resent at this meeting a recommendation concerning ounci to p the expenditure of the City's 1985 allocation o f Community Development Block Grant Funds. This recommendation is as follows: Blakely Pool $180,000 Shade Structure 25 000 Garfield Street Storn, Drain 25,000 Handicap Access to City Hall and Carnegie Library Building 167,000 Administrative Costs 35,000 $432,000 S t a f f will be prepared to discuss the specifics recommendation at Wednesday night'S meeting. Resp I I mi t ted, Thomas A. Peterson City Manager TAP: j j of thi s LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE LODI CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODI TO CONSIDER PROPOSED USES OF 1985-86 COWJNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS I N THE ANO-UNT OF $ 4 3 2, 0 0 0 The Lodi City Council will hold a public hearing on Wedncsday, May 1, 1985 in the Lodi City Hall Council Chambers, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi,, to consider the proposed uses of 1985-86 Community Development Block Grant Funds in the amount of $.432,000. A copy of the eligible and proposed uses of the -Community Development Block Grant funds is on file in the Community Development Department at City Hall and can be examined between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Anyone interested in obtaining information regarding the CDBG program or in providing written or oral comments is invited to attend. For more information call Gaye Papais, Lodi Community Development Department, 333-6.711. By Order of the Lodi City,Council Alice M. Rei'mche City Clerk Dated: April 17, 1985 0 MEMORANDUM, City of -Lodi, Community Dev2lopment Department TO: MAYOR DAVID HINCHMAN FRED REID EVELYN OLSON JAMES PINKERTON RANDY -SNIDER FROM: GAYE PAPAIS, Associate Planner DATE: APRIL 22, 1985 SUBJECT: CDBG PROGRAM PROJECTS Included in the attached submittal is a list of possible projects to be funded by the Community Development Block Grant of $432,000 in fiscal year 1985-86. .As you know, San Joaquin County is the lead agency in the direct submittals to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The City of Lodi will submit the final list of projects to the County to be presented at a public hearing at the May 22nd Board of Supervisors meeting. In your evaluation of the proposed projects, it is important to keep in mind that current budget negotiations in Washington D.C. indicate that it is highly probable that the FY 86-87 grant amount will be 24% less than FY 85-86, a reduction of approximately $104,000. TARGET DATES: May 22, 1985 - Public Hearing San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors. June 1, 1985 - San Joaquin County submittal of Finai Statement to HUD. July 1, 1985 - Program Year begins. June 30, 1986 - Program Year ends. aRespectfu GA PA ciae P ner Attachments PROPOSED PROJECT (AND LOCATION) 1. Blakely Park Swimming Pool' (Mission St. & South Stockton St.) Completion: June 1986 2. Salas Park Shade Structure (South Stockton St.) Completion: Oct. 1, 1985 3. Garfield Street Storm Drain (Garfield Street between East Locke - ford Street and East Elm Street) Completion: Oct. 1, 1985 ESTIMATE PROJECT DESCRIPTION $180,000 Construction of an additional pool 48'x75'. Depth would vary from 3.5' to 8'. $ 25,000 $ 25,000 301 diameter steel,concrete slab tile roof. Installation ol, 1811 storm drain. PROS I - Eligible project located in low income target area- - Will alleviate over- crowding at City's only publicly -owned and operated pool- - Eligible project located in low income target area. - Will complete Salas Park improvements. - Plans are complete and project could start immediately. - Relief of flooding in Central Avenue and Lockeford Street by - directing water to the Garfield Street trunk line. - Easy project to administer. - 42% of all Grant funds - Summer use only. 'PROPOSED PROJECT (AND LOCATION) 4.- Handicapped Access to City Hall Completion: ESTIMATE PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROS $165,000 Construction of - Would facilitate elevator, handicapped handicapped access restrooms and ramping. to City Hall. - Would bring City Hall into compliance with Federal Standards. 5. Watson Street Water $ 65,000 Main (Stockton Street to Central Avenue; Washington Street, Mission to Watson St.) Completion: July 1, 1986 6. Water tank replacement (Locust Street between Main and Stockton Street. Completion: June 30, 1986. installation of 6" watermain and 3 new fire hydrants. - Designated priority in in Master Water Plan. - Will provide needed fire' protection in low income target area. - Will improve water pressure in area. - Easy project to administer. CONS rompletion date may make this project a higher priority for FY 86-87. Estimate may be adjusted up or down dep2nding on ultimate City Hall expansion plans. $333,000 Replacement of - Elimination of structural - Design must be 70 year old elevated hazard and OSHA maintenance paid by City. tank with a small requirement violations. standpipe. - Provide more uniform water pre5sure and higher pressure during peak fire demands. PROPOSED PROJECT (AND LOCATION) ESTIMATE PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7. Sidevialk/Curb & $150,000 Following a staff conducted assessment, Gutter Replacement a systematic replace - Program. (low income target rpent of hazardous sidewalk in the low area.) Completion: 'income target arc!a June 30, 1986. 8. 'Sewer Renovation $10C,OOO implementing the results of HUD funded and Replacemen�t televideo analysis, a Program. (low income target comprehensive program line replace - area). of sewer ment and repair in low Completion: June 30, 1986 income target area. -9. Revolving Loan $ 50,000 The creation of a of low interest Fund for Store source funds to be made Front Rehab in available to property Downtown Target owners in the downtown Area. Completion: target area for store June 30, 1986 front renovation. PROS . _11fn CONS J., Estimate easily adjusted - Once deficiencies if priority shifts to are assessed, I[he other projects. city must commit Eliminates a potential to completing.the liability for the City. program. - A continuation of FY 84-85 project. - Will provide -a needed improvement*to target area homes. Will provide an incentive for invest- ment in downtown buildings. Could lead to creation or retention of jobs for low income persons. - May be premature - Relatively difficult to administer - Only a smail number of build- ings would' benefit. PROPOSED PROJECT (AND LOCATION) 10. Acquisition of Southern Pacific property to buil( permanent City parking lot. 11. Vine Street Storm Drain 12 Acacia Street Storm Drain 13. Fl ora Street Storm Drain ESTIMATE PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROS $300,000± Purchase of SP Will alleviate property in the low parking con.gestion income target area in downtown. (adjacent to May provide incentive Sacramento Street) for investment in the for the purpose of downtown area especially building a City on Sacramento Street. parking lot. $ 95,000 Upgrading the Will relieve flooding existing storm in project area. drain and replace- ment of curb & gutter. $ 92,000 Installation of Will relieve flooding 211, & 18" storm in project area. drains to replace existing undersized lines. $ 74,000 Installation of WI -11 relieve flooding 181, storm drain and in project area. catch basins as required. CONS - Cost dependent on negotiations with SP. - Timing of acquisition dependent on SP Cost estimate is for acquisition only. Parking lot construction is not, included. - May be premature until recently completed'storm drains can be thoroughly evaluated. V,:iy be premature until recently completed storm drains can be thoroughly evaluated. - May be premature until recently completed storm drains can be thoroughly evaluated. PROPOSED PROJECT (AND LOCATION) 14. Social Programs (Child Care, Counseling Senior Citizens, Handicapped Facilities). 15. Transportation (Dial -a -Ride, etc.) T -ION ESTIMATE PROJECT DESCRIP"i UNKNOWN Provision of various social programs tar- geted to low and moderate 'income recipients. UNKNOWN Provision of additional transportation alterna- tives for persons of low and moderate income. 16. Residential UNKNOWN A city-wide program of Rehab grants or low interest loans to be made avail- able to low income households for rehab- ilitation of existing residences. 17. Adminstrative $ 35,000 All Staff work Costs (Maximum associated with allowed implementing projects is $86,000) includes fees for mail ings, legal ads and salaries. PROS - May augment or replace replace services presently provided by other agencies. - May add needed services not presently available. - May provide additional or more efficient transportation choices. - Preserves existing housing stock. - San Joaquin County may administer the program - May be a cost effective method of preserving low and moderate income housing. N/A CONS - May be difficult and costly to administer - - No proposals have been submitted to Staff on potential projects. - Compliance with submittal deadlines may not be possible in FY 85-86. - May be costly and difficult to administer. - May require increases in City staff. - Compliance ' with sub- mittal deadlines may not be possible in FY 85-86. - May be premature until program guidelines are adopted. N/A LOW AND K"'-)DERATE INCOME TA'71GET AREA