HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - January 7, 1981 PHPUBLIC
HEARINGS Notice thereof having been published in accordance
with law and affidavit of publication being on
P_EAL`RE file in the office of the City Clerk, Mayor Katnic
xinAwE TO called for the Public Hearing to consider the
T appeal of William E. Ruff of the Planning Commis
STIWCTION op ston's denial of his request for a variance to
A FOUR-PLEX AT permit the construction of a four-plex at
1324 S..HtITCms, 1324 S. Hutchins Street, Lodi.
LODI
Mayor Pro Tempore McCartyasked to abstain from
discussion and voting on the matter because of _
a possible conflict of .interest.
The matter was introduced by Community Development
Director Schroeder who_pr-esented-a diagram of the
subject area. As requested by the Lodi City
Council at its October 15, 1980 meeting, a report
detailing those parcels and buildings on South
Hutchins Street where variances have been granted
was presented.for.Council's perusal. An exhibit
which listed All structures -built in the subject
area since -1962 was also presented for Council's
perusal. A-dagram depicting- all the variances -
which had been granted in the subject area was
also presented and detailed for Council's infor-
mation.
Speaking on behalf of his appeal was Mr. William E.
Ruff, P.O. Box 14, Lodi, California.
There being no other persons wishing to speak on
the matter, the public portion of the hearing was
closed.
Avery lengthy discussion followed with questions
being directed to Staff and to Mr. Ruff.
On motion of Councilman Murphy, Pinkerton second,
Council denied the appeal of William E. Ruff of
the Planning Commission's denial of his request
for a variance to permit the construction,of a
fOur_Dlex-. at -1324_S__ Hutcbi ifi—Street _ Lodi , The __-.-
motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes:Councilmen - Murphy, Pinkerton, and
Katnich
Noes: Councilmen - None
Absent: Councilmen - Hughes
Abstain: Councilmen - McCarty
AWN COUNCIL
7.
WATER XATNKN,,_Mayor
NAMES /1. MCCARTY. Mayor ho Tan
RKHARD L. HUG"ES
RPURT a MURMIY
MMES W. MNKERTOK It.
Q
CITY OF, LODI
CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET
LOOT, CALIFORNIA 95240
(209) 334-5634
January 9. 1981
Mr. William E. Ruff
P.O. Box 14
Lodi., CA 95241
Re: Zoning Variance - 1324 S. Hutchins Street
Dear Mr. Ruff:
HENRY A. CLAVES„ it.
Clly Mamow
ALICE AL uimcHE
C*y Ckrk
RONALD M6 STI N
Clay Atlormy
At its meeting. of Wednesday, January 7, 1981, the
Lodi City Council denied your appeal of the Planning
eommiss ones denial of your request for a v-ariance.
to permit the construction of a four --plea at 1324
South Hutchins Street on. -a parcel. 11- a- Wig_ 6300
-square feet where the zoning ordinance requires 7000
square feet in an area zoned R -M, Medium Density
Multiple -Family Residential.
In denying your request, the City Council determined
that a "hardship" as defined in the zoning ordinance
did not exist and therefore no basis could be found for
the approval of the variance
Should you have any questions regarding this action,
please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
Alice M. Re the��r✓
City Clerk
AR:dg
cc: Community Development Director
NOT -ICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF.LODI TO CONSIDER THE APPEAL OF MR. WILLIAM E.
RUFF, P.O. BOX 14, LODI, OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S
DENIAL OF HIS REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO PERMIT THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A FOUR-PLEX AT 1324 S. HUTCHINS
STREET, LODI
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, January 7,,
1981, at the hour,of 8:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the
matt er may be heard, the Lodi City Council will conduct a public
hearing in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 221 West Pine
Street, Lodi, California, to consider the appeal of Mr.
William E. Ruff, P.O. Box 14, Lodi, of the Planning Commission's
denial of his request for a variance to permit the construction
of -a four-plex-at 1324 S.. Huthcins Street, Lodi, on a Parcel:
contari=ring 630:II sg�xare feet where the zoning ordinance reggites
7000 square feet in an area zoned R -MD, Medium Density Multiple -
Family Residential.
Dated: December 17, 1980
By Order- of the City Council
ALICE M. REIMCHE.
City Clerk
7 NOW A. GLAVM J&
.
Cur MN"W
CITYOF LODI A&KI W REV*AO*
Cky C*&
CM HAL4 Z"-Vfi" r** smff
NONA�
L001, CALWOMW M. SUINIA 9S240 CIV MUMWF
aM 3U-S6M
October 27., 1980
Mr. William Ruff
P. 0. Box 14
Lodi, CA 95240
Mr. Ruff:
This -letter - wi 11, confirm action taken by the Lodi
City CouncnIat Its regular meeting of October 15,
1980# following a public hearing on your appeal of
the Planning, Commissioe a denial of your, request for
a variance to'permit the construction of a four-plex
at 1324- --&. 2-utchwins-, Street -9. zoft'l, whereby -Council
directed Staff: to, prepare- a report on structures
Which had beeh'., constructed on South Hutchins Street
for which -variances, were granted; referred the matter
to the Planning., -Commission for recommended changes
or refinement,, to the subject ordinances; and asked
that this matter -again be placed on the Council
ag
Agenda for the'regular. Council Meeting of December
17# 1980.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter,
please do not hesitate to ask.
Very truly yours,
-
ICE M.
City Clerk
AR:dg
CC: James B. Schroeder
Community Development Director
SOUTH HUTCHiNS STREET STUDY t.
- r
Prepared..by
City of Lodi Community Development Department
At the request of the Lodi City Council
December 2, 1980
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
On October 15, 1980,`the Lodi City Council, directed staff to prepare a
report detailing those parcels and buildings on South Hutchins Street
where variances have been granted.
PARTS OF THE STUDY
The complete. study consists of 1) thi-s written- report, including background,
ordinances -and a ,summary of use permits, variances, and significant construc-
tion along South Hutchins Street; 23 a ii -sting of use permits and variances
keyed to the map; 3) a listing of significant construction since 1967
keyed to the nap; 4) a display map- locat-ing the- use permits, variances,
and dedicat'i'ons for street purposes on South Hutchins Street between Lodi
Avenue and Kettleman Lane; 5) an aerial photo strip map for display; and
0- supplementary transparencies of plot pians for 1041 South Hutchins
Street (for display)
i3ACKGROUND
On August 25, 1980 the Lodi City Planning. Commission denied the requests
of William E. Ruff and Marnie L. Ruff (A-80-37) to vary the required 7000
square foot minimum parcel size to 6255 square feet, and to vary the
required five foot sideyards to 2.5 feet each at 1324 South Hutchins Street,
as shown on Exhibit A. The latter request was withdrawn by the applicants
at the meeting.
1The second request for reduced sideyards (which was withdrawn) related
to the parking. Parking requirements in the R -MD zone are 11 spaces per
unit. In residential zones the approved parking area Is not permitted -In.
the
the required yard areas without a variance. in this case the required
sideyard is five feet on each side. The width of the parcel is 61 feet =
and the required six spaces, designed to City standards, requires 56 feet.
it should be noted 'that after the street is widened cars exiting the park—
Ing lot as currently designed will have to back onto the sidewalk. or
directly into the street.
-1-
:The parcel currently contains 7170 square feet, which would permit the
'construction of a fourplex, as planned by Mr. Ruff; however, a 15 -foot
dedication of property is required for the widening of Hutchins Street,
thereby reducing the lot size to 6255 square feet. The parcel is In
A the R -MD zone which requires 7000 square feet for a fourplex (6000 square
feet for a triplex). 'There is -a negative difference of 745 square feet or
11%. in denying the area variance request, the' Panning Commission deter-
wined that a "hardship!', as defined in the zoning ordinance did not exist,
and therefore no bas i -s could be found- for . ti:e
approval -of the variance.
The denial was subsequently appealed to the Lodi City Council for hearing
oa October 15, 1980. At that time the Council directed staff to prepare
a study, and referred the matter to the Planning Commission for recommended
. changes or refinement to the subject ordinances.
ORDINANCES
On November 7, 1962 the Lodi City Council passed Ordinance 738 (Exhibit 8)
{ which established the Hutchins Street setback line at 40 feet on each
..idw of.'centerline. This ordinance was recordedwiththe San: Joaquin County
r Recorder. on November 15, 1962 (Instrument number 52815, book 2621, page 78•)
}.
ti" -on made the setback line a part of the deeds of all affected
property owners to assur- that future buyers;°etc. woulfi 6e aware of the
f set.-ack'and possible dedication conditions. 10storica-lly, the front yard
setback was determined by the average setback of -existing structures in
the block.
F_. Ordinance 629 (Exhibit C) approved December 3:, 19%. provided for the
establishment of setback lines and prohibited. the erection of buildings
and structures within the setback area. The ordinance designated the
specific setback lines as precise plans.2
The`Lodi Community Development Department has a record of 15 use permit
requests along Hutchins Street between Lodi Avenue and Kettleman Lane
(Exhibit D) Two were for parking adjoining a"commercial use; three for
signs; one each for pony rides, child care in the home, the Milk Stop and
a church; and five are for beauty shops in the home. Excludinq;the Ruff
request, there Is a'record of six Variance requests: two for signs; one,
for a carport; one for a reduction in minimum lot width and lot size3'; and
Section 6 of Ordinance 629 states that all applicable zoning yard require-
ments and building code requirements shall be.based on the future curb line
of -the street.
SUMMARY OF MAP AND LISTING INFORMATION
.Precise plans were defined by State law. The pertinent State law
has not been located. -
3A variance of 3% - does not include square footage between Hutchins
Street setback as defined by Ordinance 738, which was approved only six
months before this application (Milligan A-63-13).
-2-
1-1
I re
;:
�:.
a
��
-3-
' 3
1
two for yard setbacks and parking, both of, which were on the Hess u rcel.
i
Variancesofltr.`iiess (Map Number 8a) was denied,, and thels, project
redesigned t6 'meet the minimum required 20 footfront yard setback;
however,aa�second-application was required because adjoining homes_on.'
Park:-Street`were-constructed with:& 25 foot setback. The transparencies
pertain 'to -this variance. -
Since 1962 there have been a total of 23 building projects .along South
Hotchfins Street between:. Lodi Avenue and Kett Ieman Lane,• t5'bf=v&ch are
residential .(three permlts were for the same project to have been-con-
sidered'one`project). A listing of projects is given in Exhibit E, which
'also indicates these projects conforming to the adopted 40 -foot -to center -
enter-°`tine
11 -1 nosetbac those which conform to the maximum density after OW future
right-af- fssubtracted, and those which conform to the average
setbacc , tn` the block, in l leu of- conformity to the a�pted setback. Eight
of the',projjects conform to the adopted setback. Ali of those which do
"not conform--to,the latter (except the Milligan project, which maintained
20 feet from property line) do, however, conform to the average setback
establ hed b existt structures in the block. Twelve of the projects
� . ng R j t
wVTI'confpra� tor the maxiWA density permitted after future- right -of --way r
is-substracted. Of the three projects which will not conform to density
requTrements;, one -was granted a variance (Milligan); the --second', an eight :_-
untt apartment, will be goo square feet- short; and the third, 'w fourplex,
Will'be 500 square feet (8%) short. Both of the latter are In'conformance
p:
at --present, not considers -ng the future right-of-way.
L
EXHiBIT B
ORDINANCE NO. 629
AN ORDIAAACS MOMIAG FOR TRS.ESTABLISAMMT OF SEMCK MWES
AND PROgIRMING TRS ERSCTION- -OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES W17WIN
288 SEMCK AREA
The City Council of the City of Lodi does ordain as follows:
Section 1. Purpose and Authority
This ordinance -ts-_adopted to promote the public. health, safety
and general welfare by providing for the establ-i-shment of set-
back l -Ines to protect the future rights-of-way for existing
and planned streets. The specific setback lines which are
provided for Inthisordinance are hereby designated precise
plans as authorized in Section 65601 of the Government Code.
Section 2. Definitions
For the purpose of this ordinance, the following words shall
have the meaning indicated.
1.- Bullding-- any structure having a roof supported by
columns or wa ts.
2. Setback Line - a line parallel to the future centerline
of a street and -designating the future right-of-way fiine
of the street.
3. Setback Area - the area lying between setback lines
established on each side of a street or planned street
and including the full width of the future right-of-way.
4. Structure - anything constructed or erected which requires
permanent location on the ground or which is attached to
something requiring permanent location on the ground.
Section 3. Procedure for the Establishment of Setback Lines
1. When the Planning Commission or the City Council determines
that a setback line is desirable and necessary in the public
Interest, either body may initiate proceedings by declaring
Its intention to establish a specific setback line.
2. The Planning Commission shall then hold at least one public
hearing on the proposed setback line and shall make a
recommendation and report to the City Council. Notice of
the hearing shall be published at least 10 days prior to
the hearing.
-5-
tiea�s.+x�F.v�y'-'...:•y,-.,,�t meµ ....g � -.,s, aL'tf.?lKnc�ta+% F.- • .� - -..
RFs
rt
o the- reeiaidat ton and repast from
_ r
_ _ ...,... _t , _ _.. ,.- ,.._ .
�Ouiri rhR
iC $ i intention ,
r�atwsen the- declaration of In e�tt to
t#saiiae �nd'#be aff�ect�tr date of ae 3
°� +�tdtaaats �sta6� i ping - leer' s tback' l ie�e no- I ]Ad nqg - Peruit
L
a#1 i tssu for the ereet.la� oUa hutldt g or structure
` x
'1_6716e proposed ieibackarea:°
;Section `4, Applicabiiity of Setback Lines
w
10 After the _adoptiori_of .4 specific setback l Ins of an existing
ovpian C str"Wet}leo'bufiid rwbr ttructure'or .addition
thereto A811.1 ' be, .:ers tad closer to' the':ceaterl ine of the
street:,:thae ..:the setback tins so=establ#shed, except as
-nth m se- prom in''tl s ordinance.
iupt
tons_ frcm-tfis 3etbsck Line
i:`' Cornices,:°`eaves, canopies, ind- similar archiaecturai X.
fatures af,.a budding confoiwinq to section 6 e ,
of thyis mrd i nose. t
2, llkiti eradd tirraces and paved areas.--,
3. ;Fences and walls not exaadln9 2 inches to height.
supported back of thr' setback. l ha ' ol" ;
r CDOnfOM'o tb Section 6' of this i1lanCe. �.
s,
=i S. publ le street "leprowMenta and` fat Ill iVy strncturesv.,";
section S. EnCrt�scirients'
�l►ffer� �trhi_ eroctloa of "a- b�i id�tor�stiriicturoiwi th�� t�
:aback area if the followtng requireeents'are met
, `.• .. l . l
strict appi lcation" of the` ordinance ;wilrasvt
Y uta�ecesssry hardship to `the property owner awauntit�g to p�
'°+'�, ^"• h T ` r ' -`' prscticai` 'Cd'Iti scab on _of prt�pierty
�r' r. .. !'r {•a r,l <" .� k "' � ms's. y,9., �N _.<
6
day, prior` to ,the liee r �
r
- _'
proposes a d►�nge in the .
setback itns
}rtY�ioc
ti 1 -la ie� towstss tbn `ths e
t s1►a11`
#Wy
be=`tserred `to the=Piannieg CaMission for a`
repoft before
f
thio ordinance l s adopted. --
.
�Ouiri rhR
iC $ i intention ,
r�atwsen the- declaration of In e�tt to
t#saiiae �nd'#be aff�ect�tr date of ae 3
°� +�tdtaaats �sta6� i ping - leer' s tback' l ie�e no- I ]Ad nqg - Peruit
L
a#1 i tssu for the ereet.la� oUa hutldt g or structure
` x
'1_6716e proposed ieibackarea:°
;Section `4, Applicabiiity of Setback Lines
w
10 After the _adoptiori_of .4 specific setback l Ins of an existing
ovpian C str"Wet}leo'bufiid rwbr ttructure'or .addition
thereto A811.1 ' be, .:ers tad closer to' the':ceaterl ine of the
street:,:thae ..:the setback tins so=establ#shed, except as
-nth m se- prom in''tl s ordinance.
iupt
tons_ frcm-tfis 3etbsck Line
i:`' Cornices,:°`eaves, canopies, ind- similar archiaecturai X.
fatures af,.a budding confoiwinq to section 6 e ,
of thyis mrd i nose. t
2, llkiti eradd tirraces and paved areas.--,
3. ;Fences and walls not exaadln9 2 inches to height.
supported back of thr' setback. l ha ' ol" ;
r CDOnfOM'o tb Section 6' of this i1lanCe. �.
s,
=i S. publ le street "leprowMenta and` fat Ill iVy strncturesv.,";
section S. EnCrt�scirients'
�l►ffer� �trhi_ eroctloa of "a- b�i id�tor�stiriicturoiwi th�� t�
:aback area if the followtng requireeents'are met
, `.• .. l . l
strict appi lcation" of the` ordinance ;wilrasvt
Y uta�ecesssry hardship to `the property owner awauntit�g to p�
'°+'�, ^"• h T ` r ' -`' prscticai` 'Cd'Iti scab on _of prt�pierty
�r' r. .. !'r {•a r,l <" .� k "' � ms's. y,9., �N _.<
6
agreemen,r,-, Troe pw' property, owner to ,Fcmr. xne encroacninent
at no expens'67:� 61the"CIty or State Agency at such time that
It becomes necessary to -"widen the street.
tz
Section Effect on Zoning: and OW1ding- Requirements
Where A setback tine has been established on a street, all
applicable zoning yard irequirem, requirements and building code require-
ments shall be measured from the setback Itne and shall be
basedt where applicabte, on the future curb line of the street.
Section 7. Specific Setback'Llnes-
1. All setback lines previously adopted and now In affect In
the City -of Lodi are hereby continued.
2. All setback I Ines, adopted in the future shall be established
In accordance w;ItIv the -provisions -of this ordinance..
Section 8. Eractment
This ordinance shall be published once In the Lodi News -Sentinel
and shal1 be 1n full' force and --take ,=effect thi-rty- (30) days from
and after Its passage -and appreval.
Approved this 3rd -day of December. 1958.
/s/ Sozant Katzaklan
Mayor of the City of Lodi
-7-
EXHIBIT D
SOUTH HUTCHINS STREET STUDY
12-2-80
A listing of Variances and Use Permits
lreyed to the 1"=200' dieplW map)
No. ,on
Map Permit No., Applicant, Request, location, Action
1 Use Perm1ts 57-44 and 67-42 - request of Douglas Oil for
signs at ;0o Vest Lodi Avenue. Approved.
,2 Variance request A-67-7 of Hanna Meyer to increase sign area
at 400 West Lodi Avenue. Approved.
3 -Use-Permi-t request 57-37 and 58-2 of The Milk Stop. to permit
drive-in -retail milk sales and a sigh at 321 South Hutchins.
Street. Approved.
Use Permit request 58-18 of Mr. Bayles for pony rides. at
701 N. Hutchins. Denied.
$ Use Permit request 59-11 for an in-home beauty shop at
800 South Hutchins Street, Approved.
6
7
8 a.
Use Permit request 58-38 of Mr. Colvin for a child care
home at 918,South Hutchins Street Approved.
Use Permit request 64-32 of. Mr. Helwig to permit parking at
1012 South Hutchins Street for an adjoining restaurant in the
C-1 zone. Approved.
Variance request A-76-59 of Oskar Hess to reduce required
sideyard from 5 feet to 2.5 feet to permit parking and stall
overhang; to reduce required rear yard from 7.5 feet to 5 feet;
reduce the number of offstreet parking stalls from nine starts
to six; and to reduce the required Hutchins Street front yard
setback (after dedication) from 20 feet to 15 feet in conjunc-
tion with the construction of a six unit.aparIment at 1041
South Hutchins Street 1519 Vest Park Street). Denied by
Planning Commission.
Property dimensions before dedication were 75 feet x 125 feet
9,375 square feet. There was a five foot dedication along Hutchins
Street in conformance with the setback established by Ordinance 738,
thereby decreasing the parcel size to 8,750 square feet. A negative
difference of 250 square feet (9,000 - 8,750), or 31.
-9-
No. on
e off- Permit No., Applicants Request, Location, Action_
8 b. Variance request A-77-10 of Oskar Hess to reduce the required
front yard from 25 feet (the average of the adjoining front
yards on Park Street) to 20 feetat 519 hest Park Street.2
Approved by the Planning Commission. Appealed to the City
Council by a neighbor on the grounds the 25 foot setback should
be-maintaloed. .Appeal denied by Council.
9
Variance request A-71-9 of Foursquare Colonial Gospel Church to
reducethesetback requirements for Installation of a sign at -
-500- Vast Park Street.
10.
Variance. request -A-63-13 of Samuel and Victoria Milligan to
reduce the minimum lot area from 22,000 square feet to 21,390
squats -feet _(a negative difference of 610 square feet, or 3%)
and to. #educe- the minimum requt red lot width f rom 150 feat to
-144 feet,'to.permit construction of a 10 unit apartment at
1112 South- Hutchins. Street. Approved. Letter states, "A
major-1tV.of the Planning Commis"slon felt that the proposal
presented for the development of the property justified the
granting of a variance in this situation since it would permit
the deveiopmen-t of this property on an economical basis and
would not adversely affect the surrounding property." A
4,
dedication of` -property was not made; however, a 25 foot front
setback -and 15 foot rear setback were maintained, consistent
with adjoining properties. See Summary in the report.
/1
Use Permit requests 59-3 and 64-39 of M. Dickoff for an in-home
beauty shop at 1206 South Hutchins Street. Approved.
12
Use Permit request 63-26 of M. Cotta for an in-home beauty
Shop at 1321 South Hutchins Street. Approved.
13
Use Permit request 63-4 for an in-home beauty salon at 1318
South Hutchins Street. Approved.
14
Variance request A-80-37 of Mr. Ruff (subject parcel). Denied
by Planning Commission; Appealed to City Council.
15
Use Permit.request U-69-46 of Church of God for conversion of
existing structure to a church at 510 Rimby Avenue and con-
struction of a parking lot with a driveway on Hutchins Street.
Approved with parking conditions.
After redesign Hutchins Street became the sides yard, necessitating
only
a 10 foot setback, after dedication of the five feet.
_10-
the parcel at 1332 South Hutchins Street. Approved.
r-------------------
' EXHIBIT E
SOUTH HUTCHINS STREET STUDY
,c 1Z-2-80
' A Listing of Structures Built Since 1962
r w,
i ♦ A
}F, F (Keyed to the It -100t diePZay map)
i
Density xr,
x
Conforms to OK after Conforms'. -to
s T { #,Uttar 0th.,Nutchins Building 40' to center- setback -aria August. set- 1
Stt'iat Ad�rdss Pae'ri�i t No. Date Structure line setbackl subtracted back ;Zn block
' f'< ;Z1 2585 5/65 Storage n/a n/a n/a
' 4/ ►9A 8/68 Addn to Milk Stop
gi,il a X10. CMstntt 10/77 8 unit apartment yes Yes -
,, 11�
107 17$6A 2/64 sgl favO dweliling -- yes yes
' X05 95=15A 8�7 Q•lbt 1 ln+s duvet l ing yes Yes -
t`' 607 6546A yes yes
JA 3/79 a yes yes -
6" it
`99 `3�9 : yes -
1t162A VIPyes yes
1*3A 5/79 yes yes
F , ,' � $�►A,
11/68 8 fA l t 0"r""t no Wk
J r
i$A `54 todl'shod n a nJa n!a ,
h'Y °,-2iA S/ stbrag n/a n/a
t3n/s „Ja nJe u
11171 bell te'rief.jrtt+
F '
3/7t
10 Unit Apert" t, no
9.'unit # t add
ii
rt Odd It;oh.,
3 i
r
unitno
;• . q � dray, ;... .,, j} `.. ;: A c nK g� xS. „hr's ry,�.uy r ",. a. .,. a } ,, .... .. •- erg- - ..,(%.' .s - i
TTTTTT
9= irk { 8 2%77 6 uni t' ipartm�nt yes
h> %� ,�l��'«?�A�,•},« �}S It t - `� -.:t a ;�� =,�,'{ �i
: Conttnu d .
z"
t �'.:`�f • rr. a 1 t .:ma1ns",•'n«: j' ! f_ it 1"''Nt .I i . . - - 'r'3�'�'J,
��iisl _�`��-
l8ssed on Calculations Using 1" 100' base nap and IIWQ' serial photo
.nz, fit. � _ „f. 7<'.0'. � i h.�l:•. Ri- Y. -rlba ra.- .zit {�.'.u{o >+{ ' it �'
Con tInued from page
12
Letter.
South Hutchins
Building
on Map
Street Address
Permit No.
Date
Structure -
0
1030
6727A
9/73.
Sign
OK aftor
P
1112
3725A
6/67
August SOt•
i' biotk
line setback
and 4117A
6/68
10 -unit apartment
Q
1128
4368A
2/69
duplex
no
R
1204
7470A
5/75
4 -unit apartment
l8ssed on Calculations Using 1" 100' base nap and IIWQ' serial photo
.nz, fit. � _ „f. 7<'.0'. � i h.�l:•. Ri- Y. -rlba ra.- .zit {�.'.u{o >+{ ' it �'
Density
Conforms to
OK aftor
Conforms to
40' to cantar
setback or
August SOt•
i' biotk
line setback
subtracted
back
n/a
n/s
n/a
no
Ya r.
no
no
yes
yes
no
no
yes
l8ssed on Calculations Using 1" 100' base nap and IIWQ' serial photo
.nz, fit. � _ „f. 7<'.0'. � i h.�l:•. Ri- Y. -rlba ra.- .zit {�.'.u{o >+{ ' it �'