The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Report - November 1, 1989 PH (10)COUNCIL C 0 M M U N I C A I 1 0 N I TO: THE CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 1, 1989 FROM: THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE SUBJECT: C REQUESTS OF DARYL GEWEKE FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE " ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN AND A PREZONING P,11CATED ACEON That the City Council conduct public hearings or. the following requests of Daryl Geweke: 1. to amend the Land Use Element of the Lodi General Plan by redesignating a 51 acre parcel at the northeast corner of Kettleman Lane and Beckman Road from Unclassified Industrial to Light Industrial. s' 2. to prezone the parcel of 'land at the northeast corner of Kettleman Lane and Beckman Road, M-1, Light Industrial. The public hearings may be conducted concurrently, but the items must be acted on separately. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The purpose of this request is to provide the zoning so that the developer can build a 51 acre commercial industrial complex adjacent to Highway 99. At the Planning Commission public hearing the proponents stated that the center will have several automobile dealerships as well as retail commercial and light industrial development. A specific development plan has not been submitted to the City. ; At the Planning Commission hearing, much of the discussion centered on the potential traffic problems that may result from the project. Nide of the traffic generated by the project will flow through the Kettleman Lane/Beckman Road ; intersection. This intersection is not designed to handle the projected volumes. Caltrans has expressed a concern that traffic waiting to turn left from Kettleman Lane onto Beckman Road could back up all the way to Cherokee Lane during peak periods. This would adversely affect the on and off ramps of Highway 99 as well as traffic on Kettleman Lane and Cherokee Lane. Based on the potential traffic problem, the Planning Commission has recommended that the City Council consider realigning Beckman Road further to the east. This would move the intersection away from the highway on and off ramps, reducing the potential traffic conflicts. It would also facilitate the future installation of traffic signals at the Beckman/Kettleman intersection. The question of who is responsible for funding the realignment of Beckman Road was not resolved. The Planning Commission felt that the cost could be funded by the development fees being proposed by the Public Works Department that would be collected from this project and future projects in the City to pay for needed infrastructure improvements. At the Planning Commission hearing, the proponents also expressed the willingness to work with Caltrans on a Park E Ride commuter lot on the site to help reduce traffic volumes. CC8921/ XTD.OIC October 25, 1989 City Council November 1, 1989 Page 2 Based on the testimony they received at the hearing, the Planning Commission voted to recommend a different General Plan and zoning designation from the one requested by the applicant. The Planning Commission is recommending a General Plan designation of Commercial and a prezoning to C-2, General Commercial. The Planning Commission felt the commercial designation was more appropriate for the location and would be a better use adjacent to the future park/basin to the north and the houses to the south. The C-2 zoning will also accommodate most of the uses proposed by the applicant, including the automobile dealerships. Since the EIR reflects a mix of commercial and industrial uses, it can not be certified as adequate for a full commercial project. A total commercial project will have greater traffic volumes which must be analyzed in the environmental document. At the October 18, 1989 meeting, the staff recommended that the General Plan Amendment and Prezoning be re -advertised to reflect the Light -Industrial and Commercial -Light Industrial uses reflected in the Final EIK. If the City Council approves the requests, the Public Works Department should be authorized to negotiate with the developer on the amount of sewer capacity that will be available to the project pending completion of the White Slough expansion. In addition, the Public Works Department should also be authorized to negotiate a fair share payment of development fees and/or charges. The development fees are part of a comprehensive fee structure being developed by Public Works in conjunction with the General Plan Update to fund future infrastructure and public facility improvements. K A S B. SCHR01 ER muni ty Development Director CC8921/TXTD.O!C October 25, 198° PROPOSSO LANO USE MAP OF THE KETTLEMAN PROPERTY PROPERTIES Neale 1"s - k11GHWAY N0. 99 ' - �' Ytaelr►tQ'f } FRONTAOR ROAD STORM DRAINAGE CNANNEI 1 BECKMAN ROAD f AnSA 11,let AnaA® I� Q -Y ►b"+of U+Mft Q•Y ... 04 Use Ilo•Ipt r1*0004 vael 0.1 1• LQ Mr• ►•aof! 1 U I Itrp /Btdf (f�llIM+11^t1► hM•of Vat I 1p� Af/f /Irlfil W ' Y I -I Hwygq f VVNIT-'• MAIC AitaAQ hfa"V 1p"1"ft Q -Y /ffMlrrt b1or CITT FOND 5.00 At/. SITt ACRR CITY FOND LU(FF •ITL S AVE. 1 . ...... Kettleman Properties Geweke Prooerties EIR/Prezone as M-1 Edi 85.2 S•t�•89 �. t Z AnsA® AnZA hM•of Vat I 1p� Af/f /Irlfil �../ I F- n•++•f vat I 1 atr+Per l:• W ' Y I -I Hwygq f VVNIT-'• MAIC AitaAQ hfa"V 1p"1"ft Q -Y /ffMlrrt b1or CITT FOND 5.00 At/. SITt ACRR CITY FOND LU(FF •ITL S AVE. 1 . ...... Kettleman Properties Geweke Prooerties EIR/Prezone as M-1 Edi 85.2 S•t�•89 �. t ° ° CITY OF LORI CARNEGIE FORUM C,t,FOa~`t 305 West Fine Street, Lodi DTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Date: Wednesday, November 1, 1989 Time: 7:30 p.m. J For information regarding this Public Hearing Please Contact: Alice M. R31mche City Clerk Teleohone: 333.6702 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING November 1, 1989 NOTICE S HEREBY GIVEN that'on Wednesday, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the City Council will conduct a public hearing to consider the following matter: a ) Amending the Land Use Element of the Lodi General Plan to accommodate the Kettleman Properties project by redesignating the property from Unclassified Industrial to Light Industrial and that the property be pretoned M-1, Light Industrial or C -M, Commercial Light Industrial. Information regarding this item may be obtained in the office of the Community Development Director at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California. All interested persons are invited to present their views and comments on this matter. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk at any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein, and oras Mptements may be made at said hearing. Ifyou challenge the subject matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk, 221 West Pine Street, at or prior to the Public Hearing. By Order Of ?he Lodi City Council: Alice M. Reim;he City Clerk Dated: Oi : ,+ er 18, 1989 Approved as to form: ---'Bobby W. NicNali- �"�✓ ``" City Attorney f s t ORDINANCE NO. 1467 AN ORDINANCE OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AMESDNG THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE LODI GENERAL PLAN BY RIDESIGNATING A 51 -ACRE PARCEL AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF KETTLEMAN LANE AND BECKMAN ROAD FROM UNCLASSIFIED INDUSTRIAL TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL; AND PREZONNG SAID PROPERTY M-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. BE IT ORDANED BY THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Land Use Element of the Lodi General Plan i s hereby amended by redesignating a 51 -acre parcel at the northeast corner of 5 Kettleman Lane and Beckman Road from Unclassified Industrial to Light Industrial, as shown on Project Map (Exhibit A), APN 049-070-26, 049-070-28, 049-070-29, and 040-070-65. SECTION 2. The parcel of land at the northeast corner of Kettleman Lane and Beckman Road is hereby prezoned M-1, Light Industrial. =i SECTION S. A71 ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed insofar as such conflict may exist. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall be published one time in the "Lodi Ids Sentinel", a daily newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the City of Lodi and shall be in force and take effect thirty days from and after its passage and approval. i ALICE M. REIlVICHE City Clerk i State of California County of San Joaquin, ss. I, Alice M. Reimche, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1467 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi held November 1, 1989 and was thereafter passed, adopted and ordered to print at a regular meeting of said Council held by the following vote: Ayes: Council Mernbets - Noes: Council Members - Y ' 7 Absent: Council Members - Abstain: Council Mernbers - f I further certify that Ordinance No. 1467 was approved and signed by the Mayor on the date of its passage and the same has been published pursuant to law. ALICE M. REIMCHE City Clerk Approved as to Form BOBBY W. McNATT City Atturney 02D1467/TXTA.01LV u Y.'L— PROPOSED LAND USE MAP OF THE . KET'T'LEMAN PROPERTY for:EICE PROPERTIES soots:a"Too' STATE HIGHWAY NO. 99 IetADCMAIO'A iRC`NTAOE ROAD STORM DRAINAGE CNANNE 1 -j BECKMAN R 0 X0 I AT18A O AREAO AREA ,1 PtAn.•1 f•nln�, C -w ►100"#1 i.nlnIl C -w ►ILntj Z.nle#tC-w PUnn f1 Vu 1 P1tnn•t use, PIAnn1A .VI.1 O! 11 Is At's ►•rt N• t b 3 Acre ►vtel• 7 Acre Ppt•tt I intrr� tlr..tl CITY POND Z { i O 5.00 ACs. S I T E Q : AREA B I { ►1tAn•/ Z••tn9: w-1 FROIO M z J ARBA ® I ( P1•nn•t ur•: 11*3 Acre ►trt•ll 5 ACRE ►1400.4 L•nin111h1 1 A•r•P•rt•L1 ( I SITE 5 GUFF AVE. Kettieman Properties Geweke Properties Gen'I Pian Amendment nnri Pm7nnp o nr. en MEMORANDUM, City of Lodi, Community Development Department TO: ALICE REIMCHE, CITY CLERK FROM: NORMAN HOM, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT COORDI NATO R AAK DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 1989 SUBJECT: URBAN COUNTY CDBG SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING ASREEMENT Attached is a copy of the Urban County Community Development Block Grant Supplemental Funding Agreement (SFA). The SFA is a certification to San Joaquin County that Lodi uses CDB -3 funds in accordance with all program requirements. Such a certification its now required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development .(HLJD)...f6r all recipients and subrecipients of federal funds even though;----in.the' it was simply understood that grantees were to abide by the forth in 24 CFR 570. The attached agreement needs to be signed by the Mayor and by youIf-this requires Council action, please call me at Extension 649 and I will:.prepare, - - - - - - - - - - - - a Council Communication. Attachment