HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - May 5, 2010 H-02 PHAGENDA ITEM 9OWL
yOF�CITYOFLODI
��FORCOUNCIL COMMUNICATION
AGENDA TITLE: Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider the Appeals of Brandt -
Hawley Law Group on behalf of Charles and Melissa Katzakian
Regarding the Decision of the Planning Commission to Approve:
• SPARC Review and Use Permit for COSTCO Wholesale
Development; and
• SPARC Review for Reynolds Ranch Shopping Center
includingthe Home Depot
MEETING DATE: May 5,2010
PREPARED BY: Community Development Director
RECOMMENDEDACTION: Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider the Appeals of
Brandt -Hawley Law Group on behalf of Charles and
Melissa Katzakian Regarding the Decision of the Planning
Commission to Approve:
• SPARC Review and Use Permitfor COSTCO Wholesale Development; and
• SPARC Reviewfor Reynolds Ranch Shopping Center including the Home Depot
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The appellant, Brandt -Hawley Law Group, represents
property owners Charles and Melissa Katzakian. The
appeals have been filed for two separate Planning Commission actions that pertain to the
Reynolds Ranch commercial center. The first appeal was filed following the Planning
Commission approval on February 10, 2010 of a Use Permit and SPARC review for the
COSTCO Wholesale portion of the center. The second appeal was filed following the Planning
Commission approval on March 24, 2010 of a SPARC review for the Reynolds Ranch
commercial center, which includes the proposed Home Depot. Pursuant to Lodi Municipal Code
Section 17.72.110 and 17.81.070, the appeals were filed in a timely manner and the appropriate
fees were paid.
The Katzakians own and reside in the property that is bounded on the north, west and south by
the development along the Highway 99 frontage Road. The house is also known as the Morse -
Skinner Ranch House, which was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1986. It is
this background that the Katzakians are basing their appeal. They argue that the original
Reynolds Ranch project and Environmental Impact Report anticipated that the property would
be converted from residential use to some commercial land use that would be more compatible
with the proposed commercial center. This reuse has not taken place, nor is it planned in the
immediate future. The attorney representing the Katzakians believes this constitutes a change
in circumstance and therefore a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report should be required.
APPROVED: 1
Blair i�' y Manager
The Katzakians were aware of the original Reynolds Ranch application. Their property was
included in the project description environmental document and all subsequent approvals. The
Final Environmental Impact Report did consider the historic resource and mitigation measures
were adopted consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act. The Katzakians did not
protest these actions. Since the approval of the project, the negotiations between the applicant
and the Katzakians have not been successful. At this time, the residence is a legal non-
conforming use that has the required commercial entitlements to be used for other activities.
The environmental review was appropriate and still provides the required review for these
contemplated approvals to proceed. There is nothing contained in the documents that require
the conversion of this property at the time of adjacent development. In fact, the project was
always thought to be a multi -phased endeavor. We believe that at some point in the future, the
property will be used for commercial purposes and the anticipated development of Reynolds
Ranch will be completed.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not Applicable
FUNDING AVAILABLE: Not Applicable
Ao t iBa�rtlam
Community Development Director
KB/kjc
Attachments:
1. Planning Commission Resolution PC 10-06 and 10-07
2. Staff Reportsfrom the February 10,2010 and March 24,2010, Planning Commission meeting
3. Minutesfor the February 10,2010 and March 24,2010, Planning Commission meeting
4. Appeal letters
RESOLUTION NO. P.C. 10-06
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LODI FOR THE APPROVAL
OF THE REQUEST OF DAVID BABCOCK, ON BEHALF OF COSTCO WHOLESALE FOR A USE
PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR AN OFF -SALE BEER, WINE AND DISTILLED SPIRITS ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGE CONTROL LICENSE AND SPARC REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED COSTCO
WHOLESALE WAREHOUSE LOCATED 322 EAST HARNEY LANE
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi has heretofore held a duly noticed public
hearing, as required by law, on the requested Use Permit and Site Plan and
Architectural Review in accordance with the Government Code and Lodi Municipal
Code Chapter 17.84, Amendments; and
WHEREAS, an application was filed by David Babcock, on behalf of COSTCO Wholesale, 3581
Mount Diablo Blvd., Suite 235, Lafayette, CA 94549; and
WHEREAS, the project site is located at 322 East Harney Lane, more particularly described as
Assessor's Parcel Numbers 058-130-09 and 058-130-10 and portion of 058-130-11;
and
WHEREAS, the project site is zoned Planned Development 39; and
WHEREAS, the Project is consistent with all elements of the General Plan, and in particular, the
following General Plan Goals and Policies:
A. Land Use and Growth Management Element, Goal E, "To provide adequate land
and support for the development of commercial uses providing goods and
services to Lodi residents and Lodi's market share."
B. Land Use and Growth Management Element, Goal E, Policy 7, "In approving new
commercial projects, the City shall seek to ensure that such projects reflect the
City's concern for achieving and maintaining high quality."
C. Land Use and Growth Management Element, Goal E, Policy 3, "The City shall
encourage new large-scale commercial centers to be located along major arterials
and at the intersections of major arterials and freeways."
WHEREAS, the design and improvement of the site is consistent with all applicable standards
adopted by the City. Specifically, the project has met the requirements of the Lodi
Zoning Ordinance with particular emphasis on the standards for large retail
establishments; and
WHEREAS, approval of the requested architectural drawings will allow the construction of a
commercial building that will comply with the City's Zoning Ordinance and Building
Code regulations; and
WHEREAS, the design of the proposed project and type of improvements are not likely to cause
public health or safety problems in that all improvements will be constructed to the City
of Lodi standards; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department prepared an Environmental Impact Report
(EIR), consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, the Final EIR, including comments and responses to comments, was certified by the
City Council on August 30, 2006; and
WHEREAS, an Addendum to the certified and Final EIR, including comments and responses to
comments, was certified by the City Council on September 17, 2008; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the approval of this request have occurred.
Based upon the evidence in the staff report and project file, the Planning Commission makes the
following findings:
1. The approval of the project to construct a new 148,234 square foot COSTCO Wholesale
warehouse and associated 16 -pump gasoline station was considered as part of a previously
approved EIR, whereby it was determined that there would not be significant impacts on the
environment, cumulative or otherwise, provided mitigation measures were implemented. Those
mitigation measures, which consists of intersection upgrades, will be implemented prior to a
Certificate of Occupancy.
2. No new impacts were identified in the public testimony that were not addressed as normal
conditions of project approval in the Initial Study.
3. The development takes into consideration physical and environmental constraints in that the new
warehouse and gasoline station have been designed to take advantage of the existing grades
and be integrated with the planned overpass improvements.
4. The development complies with the intent of the City development policies and regulations in
that the General Plan, Goal E, Policy 3, which encourages increasing the tax base, creating
employment opportunities for residents and attracting new businesses. The proposed Costco
warehouse and associated gasoline station will not only add to the city's tax base but will also
provide employment opportunities for residents.
5. The proposed development will be operated in a manner determined to acceptable and
compatible with surrounding development in that conditions have been added that require the
operator to maintain the property.
6. The sale of alcoholic beverages for off -premise consumption as part of a COSTCO Wholesale
warehouse is a permitted use in the Planned Development 39 zoning District.
7. The sale of alcoholic beverages for off -premise consumption is a normal part of COSTCO
Wholesale business operations and provides a convenience for customers of the business.
8. Steps can be taken by the Applicant/Operator to reduce the number of incidents resulting from
the over -consumption of alcohol including the proper training and monitoring of employees
serving alcohol; the careful screening of IDs of customers to avoid sales to under -aged
individuals; limiting the number of drinks sold to individual customers to avoid over -consumption;
providing properly trained on-site security to monitor customer behavior both in and outside of
the COSTCO Wholesale; and working with the Lodi Police Dept. to resolve any problems that
may arise.
9. The sale of alcohol beverages at COSTCO Wholesale warehouse is compatible with the
surrounding use and neighborhood if the business is conducted properly and if the
Applicant/Operator works with neighboring businesses and residents to resolve any problems
that may occur.
10. The sale of alcoholic beverages at this location can meet the intent of the Planned Development
39 zoning district and can provide a public convenience or necessity for customers of the
business.
11. No variance from the Lodi Municipal Code is approved by this action.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DETERMINED AND RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the
City of Lodi that Use Permit Application No. 09-U-15 and SPARC Application No. 09 -SP -06 is
hereby approved, subject to the following conditions:
Community Development Department, Planning_
1. The developer will defend, indemnify, and hold the City, its agents, officers, and employees
harmless of any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul this approval, so
long as the City promptly notifies the developer of any claim, action, or proceedings, and the City
cooperates fully in defense of the action or proceedings.
2. No outside storage of material, crates, boxes, etc. shall be permitted anywhere on site, except
within the trash enclosure areas as permitted by fire codes. No material shall be stacked higher
than the height of any trash enclosure screen wall and gate.
3. No outdoor storage or display of merchandise shall be permitted at the project unless a specific
plan for such display is approved by SPARC (approved plan attached). At no time shall outdoor
storage or display be allowed within the parking area, drive aisle or required sidewalks of the
center.
4. All storage of cardboard bales and pallets shall be contained within the area designated for such
use. No storage of cardboard or pallets shall be visible from public right the way.
5. The project proponent shall take reasonable necessary steps to assure the orderly conduct of
employees, patrons and visitors on the premises to the degree that surrounding residents and
commercial uses would not be bothered and that loitering is not permitted.
6. A minimum of two trash receptacles shall be placed at the customer entry to the Costco warehouse.
Trash receptacles shall be a decorative, pre -cast concrete or metal type with a self-closing metal lid.
Design of the receptacles shall be submitted with the building permit application for tenant
improvements for approval by the Community Development Director.
7. Trash enclosures shall be designed to accommodate separate facilities for trash and recyclable
materials. Trash enclosures having connections to the wastewater system shall install a
sand/grease trap conforming to Standard Plan 205 and shall be covered.
8. The owner shall maintain in good repair all building exteriors, walls, lighting, trash enclosure,
drainage facilities, driveways and parking areas. The premises shall be kept clean. Any graffiti
painted on the property shall be painted out or removed within 48 hours of occurrence.
9. Vending machines, video games, amusement games, children's rides, recycling machines,
vendor carts or similar items shall be prohibited in the outside area of all storefronts. The
storefront placement of drinking fountains and ATM machines shall be permitted subject to the
review and approval of the Community Development Director.
10. The applicant shall submit appropriate plans to the Community Development Department for
plan check and building permit. The final plans shall include the architectural features such as
the approved colors, the building elevations including the cornice, trim caps, and curbed canopy,
and other elements approved by the Planning Commission. Any significant alteration to the
building elevations as approved by the Planning Commission shall require approval by the
Planning Commission.
11. The finished building shall be consistent with the plans approved by the Planning Commission
and as conditioned herein.
12. All buildings shall comply with the requirements of Planned Development 39 zoning district and
meet setback requirements. All buildings shall implement building elements and materials
illustrated on the submitted elevation or otherwise consistent with the architectural theme
presented on the submitted elevation of the major tenant building.
13. A final color palette shall be submitted with the building permit application and shall be in
substantial conformance with colors and materials approved by the Lodi Planning Commission
for the balance of the Reynolds Ranch development and shall be reviewed and approved by the
Community Development Director.
14. The proposed building must comply with all Planning Commission requirements; as well as the
requirements of the Community Development, the Public Works, the Electric Utility and the Fire
Departments; and all other utility agencies.
15. The location and details of the cart corrals within the parking lot shall be submitted with the
building permit application for review and approval by the Community Development Director. Cart
corrals shall be provided in the parking lot adjacent to COSTCO Wholesale building and
distributed evenly throughout the lot rather than concentrated along the main drive aisle. In
addition, physical measures to prevent the removal of carts from the property shall be provided.
Such measures shall be submitted with the building permit application. Further, cart corrals shall
be permanent with a design that is consistent with the theme of the COSTCO Wholesale
building. Portable metal corrals shall be prohibited.
16. All signage shall be in compliance with a detailed Sign Program that shall be submitted to the
Development Community Director for review and approval with the first building plan review.
Said program shall require all signs to be individual channel letter at the standards provided by
the zoning ordinance.
17. Any bollards installed in a storefront location shall be decorative in style and consistent with the
theme of the shopping center. Plain concrete bollards, or concrete filled steel pipe bollards shall
not be permitted.
18. Hardscape items, including tables, benches/seats, trashcans, bike racks, drinking fountains, etc.
shall be uniform for all stores throughout the shopping center
19. All roof mechanical equipment and any satellite dish equipment shall be fully screened from
ground -level view within 150 feet of the property.
20. The loading area shown in front of the plans shall be stripped and posted with "NO PARKING —
LOADING ONLY' signs to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.
21. A photometric exterior lighting plan and fixture specification shall be submitted for review and
approval of the Community development Director prior to the issuance of any building permit.
Said plans and specification shall address the following:
a) All project lighting shall be confined to the premises. No spillover beyond the property
line is permitted.
b) The equivalent of one (1) foot-candle of illumination shall be maintained throughout
the parking area.
c) All parking light fixtures shall be a maximum of twenty-five 25 feet in height.
d) All fixtures shall be consistent throughout the center.
22. Exterior lighting fixtures on the face of the buildings shall be consistent with the theme of the
center. No wallpacks or other floodlights shall be permitted. All building mounted lighting shall
have a 90 -degree horizontal flat cut-off lens unless the fixture is for decorative purposes.
23. All exterior construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday
through Saturday. No exterior construction activity is permitted on Sundays or legal holidays.
24. A reciprocal agreement for ingress, egress, and parking shall be executed between all parties
within the proposed shopping center and that document shall be provided to the City prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
25. Sidewalks and parking lots must be kept free of litter and debris to minimize the amount of wind-
blown debris into surrounding properties. If pressure washed, debris must be trapped and
collected to prevent entry to the storm drain system. No cleaning agent may be discharged to
the storm drain. If any cleaning agent or degreaser is used, washwater shall not discharge to the
storm drains; wash waters should be collected and discharged to the sanitary sewer.
Discharges to the sanitary sewer are subject to the review, approval, and conditions of the City
wastewater treatment plant.
26. The applicant shall install a decorative concrete block wall, a minimum of six feet in height and a
maximum of eight feet in height at the top of slope for the length of the northern and eastern
boundary line at the time of ultimate Harney Lane improvements. Said decorative wall shall be
provided with creping vine or similar landscape treatment in order to discourage graffiti and other
types of vandalism. In the interim, the landscape plan for the project shall concentrate screening
material along the northern property frontage adjacent to Harney Lane.
27. The applicant shall submit a landscaping and irrigation plan to the Community Development
Department for review and approval. Landscaping materials indicated on the conceptual
landscape and irrigation plan may be changed per the review of the Community Development
Director or designee but shall not be reduced in amount.
28. The applicant shall select and note on all plans common tree species for the parking lot and
perimeter areas from the list of large trees as identified in the Local Government Commission's
"Tree Guidelines for the San Joaquin Valley".
29. Project must receive and comply with all terms of the Cal Trans encroachment Permit necessary.
Any conditions imposed by Cal Trans for the encroachment permit that result in site plan
modifications shall be reviewed by City staff for consistency with Project approvals.
30. All landscaped area shall be kept free from weeds and debris, maintained in a healthy growing
condition and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Unhealthy, dead,
or damaged plant materials shall be removed and replaced promptly.
31. No seasonal, temporary or permanent outdoor storage or display of merchandise shall be
permitted.
32. COSTCO Wholesale shall operate and abide by the requirements and conditions of the State of
California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control License Type 21. The Type 21 License
shall be limited to the sale of beer, wine, and liquor (distilled spirits) for consumption off the
license premised where sold during the hours that the business is open.
33. COSTCO Wholesale shall insure that the sale of alcohol does not cause any condition that will
cause or result in repeated activities that are harmful to the health, peace or safety of persons
residing or working in the surrounding area. This includes, but is not limited to: disturbances of
the peace, illegal drug activity, public intoxication, drinking in public, harassment of people
passing by, assaults, batteries, acts of vandalism, loitering, excessive littering, illegal parking,
excessive loud noises, traffic violations or traffic safety based upon last drink statistics, curfew
violations, lewd conduct, or police detention and arrests.
34. The Lodi Police Department may, at any time, request that the Planning Commission conduct a
hearing on the Use Permit for the purpose of amending or adding new conditions to the Use
Permit or to consider revocation of the Use Permit if the Use Permit becomes a serious policing
problem.
35. The Use Permit shall require COSTCO Wholesale to secure an Alcoholic Beverage Control
License Type 21 Off -Sale General — Package Store.
36. This Use Permit is subject to periodic review to monitor potential problems associated to the sale
of alcoholic beverages.
37. Prior to the issuance of a Type 21 license by the State of California Alcoholic Beverage Control
Department, the management of the COSTCO Wholesale store shall complete the Licensee
Education on Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD) as provided by the State Alcoholic Beverage Control
Department. In the event that COSTCO has training that is equivalent to the LEAD program,
such documentation shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for review and
approval.
38. No person who is in a state of intoxication shall be permitted within the business nor shall an
intoxicated patron be sold additional alcoholic beverages. It is the responsibility of the business
owner/operator to ensure no patron in state of intoxication is allowed into the building.
39. The operator of the business shall police the area surrounding the business to prevent patrons
from congregating/loitering outside the premises and to prevent excessive noise or other
objectionable behavior. Noise levels shall be monitored to insure that noise shall not violate the
City's Noise Ordinance Section 9.24.020 and Section 9.24.030.
40. The project shall incorporate all mitigation measures as specified in the adopted Final
Environmental Impact Report for Reynolds Ranch Project (State Clearinghouse Number
2006012113)
41. The operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal
Code.
42. Prior to any ground disturbance, the applicant shall notify the San Joaquin County Council of
Governments (SJCOG, Inc), and shall schedule a pre -ground disturbance survey, to be
performed by an SJMSCP biologist, to determine applicable Incidental Take Minimization
Measures (ITMMS). The City shall not authorize any form of site disturbance until it receives an
Agreement to Implement ITMMS from SJCOG, Inc.
43. The City shall not issue a building permit for the proposed project until the San Joaquin County
Council of Governments determine what, if any, Incidental Take Minimization Measures (ITMMS)
apply to the project and until the San Joaquin County Council of Governments verifies all
applicable ITMMs have been fully and faithfully implemented.
44. No variance from any City of Lodi adopted code, policy or specification is granted or implied by
this approval.
45. This resolution does not constitute a complete plan check. Complete plan check shall be
completed during building permit process.
Community Development Department, Building:
46. All plan submittals shall be based on the City of Lodi Building Regulations and currently adopted
2007 California Building code.
47. Cooking equipment that generate grease laden vapors, including but not limited to ranges,
griddles, fryers, ovens and pizza ovens shall be required to be equipped with a Type I hood.
Equipment that generates heat, steam or odors only shall be required to be equipped with a
Type II hood. 2007 CMC, Chapter 5.
48. Each structure including, underground fuel tank, canopy, signage, and main building are required
to be submitted under separate permits. 2007 CBC, Appendix Chapter 1 Administration, Section
105.1
49. The canopy and supports over the fuel pumps shall be of non-combustible, fire resistive treated
wood, 1 hour rated construction or Type IV construction. 2007 CBC, Section 406.5.2
50.2007 CBC, Section 406.5.1 requires that motor fuel dispensing facilities meet the construction
requirements of the California Fire Code. The facility shall meet the requirements of Chapter 22
of the CFC and the requirements of the Fire Chief.
51.2007 CBC, Section 413.1 requires that high pile or rack storage meet the requirements of the
California Fire Code. Sprinkler system, fire detection system, building access, smoke and heat
venting and draft curtains shall be provided as required by 2007 CFC, Chapter 23 and Table
2306.2 and all requirements of the Fire Chief.
52. Storage racks over 6' high shall be submitted under separate permit and cover. Structural
calculations required for racks over 8' high. Policy and Procedure No.: B-[08]-[09].
53. Walkways and sidewalks along accessible routes of travel shall be in compliance with the 2007
CBC, Section 1133B.8.5.
54. Number of Accessible parking spaces shall be provided as specified in 2007 CBC, Table 11 B-6.
55. All entrances and ground floor exits must be provided with an accessible path of travel to the
public way. 2007 CBC, Section 1133B.1.1.1.1
Public Works Department:
56. Provide specifications and calculations for the Kristar Stormwater System. The Stormwater
Development Standards Plan Worksheet must be provided before the issuance of the Building
Permit.
57. Outdoor loading/unloading dock areas must conform to City of Lodi's Stormwater Development
Standards Plan section 3.1.5.
58. The trash enclosure shall conform to the Stormwater Design Standards section 3.1.4. The trash
enclosure should be wide enough to provide separate containers for recyclable materials and
other solid waste.
59. Reduce the number of connections into the City water main to one connection, conforming to
Standard Plan 407 for the fire/domestic/irrigation service.
60. All project design and construction shall be in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA). Project compliance with ADA standards is the developer's responsibility.
61. Payment of the following prior to building permit issuance unless noted otherwise:
a) Filing and processing fees and charges for services performed by City forces per the Public
Works Fee and Service Charge Schedule.
b) Habitat Conservation Fee.
c) Stormwater Compliance Inspection Fee prior to building permit issuance or commencement
of construction operations, whichever occurs first.
62. Payment of the following prior to temporary occupancy or occupancy of the building unless noted
otherwise:
b) Development Impact Mitigation Fees
c) Wastewater Capacity Impact Mitigation Fee.
d) County Facilities Fees.
e) Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF).
f) Water Treatment Facility Impact Mitigation Fee.
Electric Utility Department:
63. The project proponent shall prepare and submit legal description for easements for review and
approval. Said legal description shall be submitted to the Lodi Electric Department, Electric
Engineering Section.
64. Harney Lane street widening plans shall be submitted to the Electric Utility Department.
65. The applicant shall submit load calculations and Electric drawings to Electric Utility as part of a
building permit process. Load calculations and Electric drawings are needed for service
equipment location, PUE requirements, and service sizing. Should the load calculations and
Electric drawings require a change of site plan, the Planning Department shall forward the site
plan to the Planning Commission for review and approval.
66. The Developer shall pay for Electric Utility Department charges in accordance with the Electric
Department's Rules and Regulations.
Dated: February 10,2010
I certify that Resolution No. 10-06was passed and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City
of Lodi at a regular meeting held on February 10, 2010 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Heinitz, Hennecke, Kirsten, Kiser, Olson, and Chair Cummins
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: Mattheis
ATTEST:
SecWary, Planning Commission
Floor Plan • New Building Area = 148,234 SF
RESOLUTION NO. P.C. 10-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LODI FOR THE APPROVAL OF
THE REQUEST OF JENNIFER KRAUTER, RMB ARCHITECTS ON BEHALF OF SAN JOAQUIN
VALLEY LAND CO., FOR SPARC REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED REYNOLDS RANCH SHOPPING
CENTER LOCATED 322 EAST HARNEY LANE
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi has heretofore held a duly noticed public
hearing, as required by law, on the requested Use Permit and Site Plan and Architectural
Review in accordance with the Government Code and Lodi Municipal Code Chapter 17.84,
Amendments; and
WHEREAS, an application was filed by Jennifer Krauter, RMB Architects on behalf of San Joaquin Valley
Land Co., LLC., 227 Watt Avenue., Second Floor., Sacramento, CA; and
WHEREAS, the project site is located at 322 East Harney Lane, more particularly described as
Assessor's Parcel Numbers 058-130-17, 058-130-18, 058-130-19, portion of 058-130-16
and portion of 058-110-55; and
WHEREAS, the project site is zoned Planned Development 39; and
WHEREAS, the Project is consistent with all elements of the General Plan, and in particular, the
following General Plan Goals and Policies:
A. Land Use and Growth Management Element, Goal E, "To provide adequate land and
support for the development of commercial uses providing goods and services to Lodi
residents and Lodi's market share."
B. Land Use and Growth Management Element, Goal E, Policy 7, "In approving new
commercial projects, the City shall seek to ensure that such projects reflect the City's
concern for achieving and maintaining high quality."
C. Land Use and Growth Management Element, Goal E, Policy 3, "The City shall
encourage new large-scale commercial centers to be located along major arterials
and at the intersections of major arterials and freeways."
WHEREAS, the design and improvement of the site is consistent with all applicable standards adopted
by the City. Specifically, the project has met the requirements of the Lodi Zoning Ordinance
with particular emphasis on the standards for large retail establishments; and
WHEREAS, approval of the requested architectural drawings will allow the construction of a commercial
buildings that will comply with the City's Zoning Ordinance and Building Code regulations;
and
WHEREAS, the design of the proposed project and type of improvements are not likely to cause public
health or safety problems in that all improvements will be constructed to the City of Lodi
standards; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR),
consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, the Final EIR, including comments and responses to comments, was certified by the City
Council on August 30, 2006; and
WHEREAS, an Addendum to the certified and Final EIR, including comments and responses to
comments, was certified by the City Council on September 17, 2008; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the approval of this request have occurred.
Based upon the evidence in the staff report and project file, the Planning Commission makes the
following findings:
1. The approval of the proposed commercial development was considered as part of a previously
approved EIR, whereby it was determined that there would not be significant impacts on the
environment, cumulative or otherwise, provided mitigation measures were implemented.
2. No new impacts were identified in the public testimony that were not addressed as normal conditions
of project approval in the Initial Study.
3. The project site is physically suitable for the proposed type of developed and proposed builing
configurations.
4. The development complies with the intent of the City development policies and regulations in that the
General Plan, Goal E, Policy 3, which encourages increasing the tax base, creating employment
opportunities for residents and attracting new businesses. The proposed commercial shopping
center will also provide employment opportunities for residents.
5. The design of the proposed project and type of improvements are not likely to cause public health or
safety problems in that all improvements will be constructed to the City of Lodi standards.
6. The proposed development will be operated in a manner determined to acceptable and compatible
with surrounding development in that conditions have been added that require the operator to
maintain the property.
7. No variance from the Lodi Municipal Code is approved by this action.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DETERMINED AND RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of
Lodi that SPARC Application No. 10 -SP -02 is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions:
Community Development Department, Planning:
1. The developer will defend, indemnify, and hold the City, its agents, officers, and employees harmless
of any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul this approval, so long as the
City promptly notifies the developer of any claim, action, or proceedings, and the City cooperates fully
in defense of the action or proceedings.
2. No outside storage of material, crates, boxes, etc. shall be permitted anywhere on site, except within
the trash enclosure areas as permitted by fire codes. No material shall be stacked higher than the
height of any trash enclosure screen wall and gate.
3. All storage of cardboard bales and pallets shall be contained within the area designated for such use.
No storage of cardboard or pallets shall be visible from public right the way.
4. Outdoor display and/or sale of merchandise shall be limited to the specific area for such display is
approved by SPARC (marked as attachment A). At no time shall outdoor storage or display be
allowed outside of the specifically approved area or within the parking area, drive aisle or required
sidewalks and ADA path of travel of the center.
5. No seasonal, temporary or permanent outdoor storage or display of merchandise shall be permitted
within the parking lot, except as otherwise permitted by the City through the special events review
process.
6. The project proponent shall provide a trash enclosure or compactor for each building. The said
enclosures shall be constructed of split face C.M.U. block and shall match the color of the buildings
so that the visual and acoustic impacts of these functions are fully contained and out of view from
adjacent properties and public streets, and no attention is attracted to the functions by the use of
screening materials that are different from or inferior to the principal materials of the building and
landscape. The enclosures shall also have metal gates and shall have roof features per the City's
Stormwater Design Standard Plan requirements.
7. Trash enclosures shall be designed to accommodate separate facilities for trash and recyclable
materials. Trash enclosures having connections to the wastewater system shall install a sand/grease
trap conforming to Standard Plan 205 and shall be covered.
2
8. A minimum of two trash receptacles shall be placed at a customer entry to each building. Trash
receptacles shall be a decorative, pre -cast concrete or metal type with a self-closing metal lid. Design of
the receptacles shall be submitted with the building permit application for tenant improvements for review
and approval by the Community Development Director.
9. The project proponent shall take reasonable necessary steps to assure the orderly conduct of
employees, patrons and visitors on the premises to the degree that surrounding residents and
commercial uses would not be bothered and that loitering is not permitted.
10. No recreational vehicles, including trailers, shall be parked or stored overnight at the shopping center.
Further, no vehicle, including trailers, shall be parked at the shopping center for the principal purpose
of advertising or display. It shall be a prim facie violation if the advertising medium utilized on the
vehicle is a sign, device, or structure separate from the vehicle, or if the sign or device is integrally
affixed to the vehicle and the copy is readily changeable and such sign, device or structure exceeds
nine square feet in area and the vehicle is parked on the business premises for which the advertising
relates, or in reasonable proximity thereto, and the location of the advertising is reasonably calculated
to direct an observer towards the business. It shall still be considered that advertising was the
principal purpose of the parking, notwithstanding the fact that the vehicle is driven to and from the
business premises on daily basis.
11. The owner shall maintain in good repair all building exteriors, walls, lighting, trash enclosures,
drainage facilities, driveways and parking areas. The premises shall be kept clean. Any graffiti
painted on the property shall be painted out or removed within 48 hours of occurrence.
12. Vending machines, video games, amusement games, children's rides, recycling machines, vendor
carts or similar items shall be prohibited in the outside area of all storefronts. The storefront
placement of drinking fountains and ATM machines shall be permitted subject to the review and
approval of the Community Development Director.
13. The applicant shall submit appropriate plans to the Community Development Department for plan
check and building permit. The final plans shall include the architectural features such as the
approved colors, the building elevations including the cornice, trim caps, and curbed canopy, and
other elements approved by the Planning Commission. Any significant alteration to the building
elevations as approved by the Planning Commission shall require approval by the Planning
Commission.
14. The finished building shall be consistent with the plans approved by the Planning Commission and as
conditioned herein.
15. All buildings shall comply with the requirements of Planned Development 39 zoning district and meet
setback requirements. All buildings shall implement building elements and materials illustrated on the
submitted elevation or otherwise consistent with the architectural theme presented on the submitted
elevation of the major tenant building.
16. A final color palette shall be submitted with the first building permit application and shall be in
substantial conformance with colors and materials approved by the Lodi Planning Commission.
17. The proposed building must comply with all Planning Commission requirements; as well as the
requirements of the Community Development, the Public Works, the Electric Utility and the Fire
Departments; and all other utility agencies.
18. The location and details of the cart corrals within the parking lot shall be submitted with the building
permit application for review and approval by the Community Development Director. Cart corrals shall
be provided in the parking lot adjacent to buildings and distributed evenly throughout the parking lot
rather than concentrated along the main drive aisle. In addition, physical measures to prevent the
removal of carts from the property shall be provided. Such measures shall be submitted with the building
permit application. Further, cart corrals shall be permanent with a design that is consistent with the
theme of the Reynolds Ranch shopping center. Portable metal corrals shall be prohibited.
19. All signage shall be in compliance with a detailed Sign Program that shall be submitted to the
Development Community Director for review and approval with the first building plan review. Said
program shall require all signs to be individual channel letter at the standards provided by the zoning
ordinance.
20. Any bollards installed in a storefront location shall be decorative in style and consistent with the
theme of the shopping center. Plain concrete bollards, or concrete filled steel pipe bollards shall not
be permitted.
21. Hardscape items, including tables, benches/seats, trashcans, bike racks, drinking fountains, etc. shall
be uniform for all stores throughout the shopping center.
22. All roof mechanical equipment and any satellite dish equipment shall be fully screened from ground -
level view within 150 feet of the property.
23. The loading area shown in front of the plans shall be stripped and posted with "NO PARKING —
LOADING ONLY" signs to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.
24. Fire Lanes shall be identified and marked per Lodi Municipal Code Sec 15.40.100 in locations
determined by the Fire Marshall. Plans with marked fire lanes shall be returned to planning and copy
kept at the Fire Prevention office.
25. A photometric exterior lighting plan and fixture specification shall be submitted for review and
approval of the Community development Director prior to the issuance of any building permit. Said
plans and specification shall address the following:
a) All project lighting shall be confined to the premises. No spillover beyond the property line
is permitted.
b) The equivalent of one (1) foot-candle of illumination shall be maintained throughout the
parking area.
c) All parking light fixtures shall be a maximum of twenty-five 25 feet in height.
d) All fixtures shall be consistent throughout the center.
26. Exterior lighting fixtures on the face of the buildings shall be consistent with the theme of the center.
No wallpacks or other floodlights shall be permitted. All building mounted lighting shall have a 90 -
degree horizontal flat cut-off lens unless the fixture is for decorative purposes.
27. All exterior construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through
Saturday. No exterior construction activity is permitted on Sundays or legal holidays.
28. A reciprocal agreement for ingress, egress, and parking shall be executed between all parties within
the proposed shopping center and that document shall be provided to the City prior to the issuance of
a Certificate of Occupancy.
29. Sidewalks and parking lots must be kept free of litter and debris to minimize the amount of wind-
blown debris into surrounding properties. If pressure washed, debris must be trapped and collected
to prevent entry to the storm drain system. No cleaning agent may be discharged to the storm drain.
If any cleaning agent or degreaser is used, washwater shall not discharge to the storm drains; wash
waters should be collected and discharged to the sanitary sewer. Discharges to the sanitary sewer
are subject to the review, approval, and conditions of the City wastewater treatment plant.
30. The applicant shall submit a landscaping and irrigation plan to the Community Development
Department for review and approval. Landscaping materials indicated on the conceptual landscape
and irrigation plan may be changed per the review of the Community Development Director or
designee but shall not be reduced in amount. The applicant shall provide, at minimum, 433 large
parking lot trees to be distributed within the parking lot.
El
31. The applicant shall select and note on all plans common tree species for the parking lot and
perimeter areas from the list of large trees as identified in the Local Government Commission's "Tree
Guidelines for the San Joaquin Valley".
32. Project must receive and comply with all terms of the Cal Trans encroachment Permit necessary. Any
conditions imposed by Cal Trans for the encroachment permit that result in site plan modifications
shall be reviewed by City staff for consistency with Project approvals.
33. All landscaped area shall be kept free from weeds and debris, maintained in a healthy growing
condition and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Unhealthy, dead, or
damaged plant materials shall be removed and replaced promptly.
34. The operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code.
35. The project shall incorporate all mitigation measures as specified in the adopted Final Environmental
Impact Report for Reynolds Ranch Project (State Clearinghouse Number 2006012113).
36. Prior to any ground disturbance, the applicant shall notify the San Joaquin County Council of
Governments (SJCOG, Inc), and shall schedule a pre -ground disturbance survey, to be performed by
an SJMSCP biologist, to determine applicable Incidental Take Minimization Measures (ITMMS). The
City shall not authorize any form of site disturbance until it receives an Agreement to Implement
ITMMS from SJCOG, Inc.
37. The City shall not issue a building permit for the proposed project until the San Joaquin County
Council of Governments determine what, if any, Incidental Take Minimization Measures (ITMMS)
apply to the project and until the San Joaquin County Council of Governments verifies all applicable
ITMMs have been fully and faithfully implemented.
38. The project shall incorporate all mitigation measures as specified in the adopted Final Environmental
Impact Report for Reynolds Ranch Project (State Clearinghouse Number 2006012113). Specifically,
Mitigation Measure 3.2.2 subjects the Reynolds Ranch development to participate in the San Joaquin
County Multi -Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP). This includes payment
of Open Space Conversion fees in accordance with the fee schedule in -effect at the time construction
commences. The applicant shall pay, in accordance with the SJMSCP fee schedule, the fees based
on the gross acreage of the overall Reynolds Ranch project as described above, and include all
public use acreage as outlined in a "per acre" schedule to be prepared in cooperation with the
developer, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of
the next building permit within the project by the applicant or any subsequent property owner.
39. All ground level utilities shall be screened from public view. All screening shall be done using
materials that are architecturally compatible with the buildings(s) or shall be screened by landscape
40. No variance from any City of Lodi adopted code, policy or specification is granted or implied by this
resolution.
41. This resolution does not constitute a complete plan check. Additional comments and conditions will
be provided when more complete plans are submitted for building permit application review for the
project.
Community Development Department, Building:
42. All plan submittals shall be based on the City of Lodi Building Regulations and currently adopted
2007 California Building code.
43. Southwest Quadrant: It appears the following sites will require additional accessible parking spaces
as required by CBC 1129B Table 11 B-6
a) Major D & Major C providing 288 parking spaces 4 H/C parking spaces shown 7 H/C Parking
Spaces Required.
b) Shops 5, Shops 6a, Shops 6 providing117 parking spaces 4 H/C parking spaces shown 5 H/C
Parking Spaces Required.
c) Shops 7 providing 87 parking spaces 2 H/C parking spaces shown 4 H/C Parking Spaces
Required.
d) Shops 8 providing 87 parking spaces 2 H/C parking spaces shown 4 H/C Parking Spaces
Required.
44. Walkways and sidewalks along the accessible routes of travel (1) shall be continuously accessible,
(2) have maximum 1/2" changes in elevation, (3) are minimum 48" in width, (4) have a maximum 1/4"
per foot side slope, and (5) where necessary to change elevation at a slope exceeding 5% (i.e., 1:20)
shall have ramps complying with 2007 CBC, Section 1133B.5. Where a walk crosses or adjoins a
vehicular way, and the walking surfaces are not separated by curbs, railings or other elements
between the pedestrian areas and vehicular areas shall be defined by a continuous detectable
warning which is 36" wide, complying with 2007 CBC, Section 1133B.8.5.
45. All entrances and exterior ground floor exit doors to buildings and facilities shall be made accessible
to persons with disabilities. Such entrances shall be connected by an accessible rout (complying with
Section CBC 1114B1.2) to public transportation stops, to accessible parking and passenger loading
zones and to public streets or sidewalks. All accessible routs are also required to comply with
Detectable warnings at hazardous vehicular area CBC 1133B.8.5. Currently the partial site plans fails
to show how any of the requirements will be achieved around the following buildings. Major B, Major
A-1, Major, A-2, Major A-3, Major D, Major C and Drug 1.
46. Fire rated construction of walls and protection of openings shall be provided where required due to
construction type, occupancy and location on property or proximity to other structures. 2007 CBC,
Sections 702, 704.3, 704.8 and Tables 601, 602, 704.8
Public Works Department:
47. The applicant shall provide specifications and calculations for the Kristar Stormwater System. The
Stormwater Development Standards Plan Worksheet must be provided before the issuance of the
Building Permit.
48. Remove the eastbound stops located at the four-way stop just east of the Reynolds Ranch Pkwy and
Rocky Lane intersection. By removing the stops at this intersection the traffic will have less of a
chance to backup into Reynolds Ranch Pkwy.
49. The site must conform to the Stormwater Development Standards Plan (DSP) requirements. The
DSP Worksheet must be provided before the issuance of the Building Permit.
50. Outdoor loading/unloading dock areas must conform to City of Lodi's Stormwater Development
Standards Plan section 3.1.5.
51. The applicant shall provide a truck route for the entire site with the building permit plans for review
and approval by the Public Works Department. The entrances shall be STAA Long truck compliant
(see Highway Design Manuel pg 400-11).
52. The applicant shall provide locations of all utilities throughout the site with the building permit plan for
review and approval by the Public Works Department. Utilities along the truck routes must be
protected.
53. All offsite improvements must be completed or substantially completed and bonded at or before the
time of the first Certificate of Occupancy within the project.
54. Payment of the following prior to building permit issuance unless noted otherwise:
a. Filing and processing fees and charges for services performed by City forces per the Public
Works Fee and Service Charge Schedule.
b. Habitat Conservation Fee.
31
C. Stormwater Compliance Inspection Fee prior to building permit issuance or commencement
of construction operations, whichever occurs first.
55. Payment of the following prior to temporary occupancy or occupancy of the building unless noted
otherwise:
a. Development Impact Mitigation Fees
b. Wastewater Capacity Impact Mitigation Fee.
C. County Facilities Fees.
d. Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF).
e. Water Treatment Facility Impact Mitigation Fee.
Electric Utility Department:
56. The project proponent shall prepare and submit legal description for easements for review and
approval. Said legal description shall be submitted to the Lodi Electric Department, Electric
Engineering Section.
57. Harney Lane street widening plans shall be submitted to the Electric Utility Department.
58. The applicant shall submit load calculations and Electric drawings to Electric Utility as part of a
building permit process. Load calculations and Electric drawings are needed for service equipment
location, PUE requirements, and service sizing. Should the load calculations and Electric drawings
require a change of site plan, the Planning Department shall forward the site plan to the Planning
Commission for review and approval.
59.The Developer shall pay for Electric Utility Department charges in accordance with the Electric
Department's Rules and Regulations.
Dated: March 24, 2010
1 certify that Resolution No. 10-07 was passed and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Lodi at a regular meeting held on March 24, 2010 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Heinitz, Hennecke, Kirsten, Kiser, Olson, and Chair Cummins
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: Mattheis
Attachment:
A. Outdoor Display Area Plan
ATTEST:
ecretary, Planning Commission
7
Reynolds Ranch ■
T -H &R At IE Y
Exhibit A: Outdoor 01aft Am
LODI
PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
MEETING DATE: February 10, 2010
APPLICATION NO: Use Permit 09-U-15
Site Plan and Architectural Review 09 -SP -06
REQUEST: Request for Planning Commission approval of a Use Permit to allow
the sale of alcoholic beverages and approve the SPARC application
concerning the COSTCO Wholesale building. (Applicant: David
Babcock, on behalf of COSTCO Wholesale. File Number: 09-U-15
and 09 -SP -15).
LOCATION: 322 East Harney Lane. Approximately 15 acres located at the
southwest corner of Harney Lane and State HWY 99.
APPLICANT: David Babcock, 3581 Mount Diablo Blvd., Suite 235, Lafayette, CA,
CA 94549
PROPERTY OWNER: San Joaquin Valley Land Company LLC, 1420 S. Mills Ave., Suite K,
Lodi, CA 95242
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Use
Permit and SPARC requests subject to the conditions listed in the attached draft resolution.
PROJECT/AREA DESCRIPTION
General Plan Designation: NCC- Neighborhood Community Commercial.
Zoning Designation: Planned Development (39).
Property Size: Approximately 15 acres
Adjacent General Plan, Zoning and Land Use:
General Plan
Zone
Land Use
North
LDR, Low density residential;
Planned Development
Residences
MDR, Medium density residential
(39)
South
NCC, community commercial and
Planned Development
Vacant parcels and Blue
O —Office
(39)
Shield office.
East
GA, General Agriculture (San
AG -40, Agricultural
State Highway 99, and east
Joaquin County)
Uses (San Joaquin
of that Agricultural,
County)
residential and cemetery
uses.
West
NCC, community commercial and
Planned Development
Agricultural Uses and east
O —Office
(39)
of that are residential uses
within the Reynolds Ranch
annexation.
BACKGROUND:
The Reynolds Ranch project was annexed in to the City of Lodi in 2006 as a mixed-use
development. As part of the annexation process, an environmental impact report was prepared and
certified, new General Plan and zoning designations were approved and a Development Agreement
was signed. The development includes retail and residential uses, public park, fire station, self -
storage facility, and the Blue Shield office complex, a major component of the development.
Subsequently, portions of the project site have been developed, including the 20.5 acre Blue Shield
office complex as well as some of the street and infrastructure improvements. Surrounding uses to
this component consist of residential uses to the north, office uses to the south, commercial zoned
vacant land to the west, and State Hwy. 99 as well as a single family dwelling to the east.
In the summer of 2008, the developer submitted applications for a General Plan Amendment that
would increase the size of the commercial acreage from 40.5 acres to 75.6 acres, reduce the
residential acreage from 96.6 acres to 78 acres, eliminate the school site, amend the environmental
impact report (EIR), amend the Land Use map for Planned Development (39) to reflect the general
plan changes requested, and approve a Vesting Tentative Map. The applicant's request was first
considered by the Planning Commission at its hearing of August 27, 2008 and continued to
September 10, 2008. At that hearing, the Planning Commission approved the Vesting Tentative
Map and recommended the City Council amend the General Plan for the Reynolds Ranch
development. The City Council, acting upon the Planning Commission's recommendation for
approval, amended the General Plan at their meeting of September 17, 2008.
ANALYSIS
Use Permit-
COSTCO Wholesale is seeking approval of a Use Permit that would allow a Type 21 Off -Sale
General ABC license. Type 21 ABC license authorizes the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits for
consumption off the license premised where sold. Typically, grocery stores, gas stations and
neighborhood stores have Type 21 ABC licenses. The Planning Commission has previously found
that the sale of alcoholic beverages is incidental to a grocery store operation and that is what is
being requested.
The project area belongs to Census Tract 41.02. Census Tract 41.02 covers the area Curry
Avenue, east of Lower Sacramento Road, South of Harney Lane and north of Hogan Lane
(approximately .16 miles north of Hogan Lane). According to ABC, Census Tract 41.02 contains 3
existing off -sale licenses with 5 licenses allowed based on the ABC criteria. Because this census
tract is not over -concentrated, the Planning Commission a does not need to make a finding of
public necessity and/or convenience in order to approve the Use Permit.
Site Plan and Architecture Review:
The petitioner requests approval of site plan and architecture of the proposed COSTCO Wholesale
warehouse and the surrounding site improvements. The project site consists of the Costco
Wholesale building as well as associated gas pumps and parking areas on an approximately 15.35
acre lot located at 322 East Harney Lane. The applicant has submitted preliminary elevations,
landscape plans, conceptual signage for the development and location of a gas station. As
illustrated on the plans, COSTCO Wholesale warehouse would measure 148,234 square feet and
includes a gas station with six one-way lanes for fuel dispensing (16 -pump stations). The COSTCO
building would be located on the northeast portion of the project site, and the building entrance
would face southwest toward the main interior parking lot and Reynolds Ranch Parkway. The
architectural theme of the building is a contemporary style and uses construction materials
commonly used in commercial shopping center developments such as concrete masonry block and
metal panels. The body of the building includes split face concrete masonry block, architectural box-
ribbed and textured metal wall panels with accent awnings in warm earth tone colors. The store
would have one customer entrance located at the southwest corner. Lighting fixtures are distributed
approximately every 40 feet around the exterior of the building. The proposed COSTCO Wholesale
warehouse is subject to the requirements of the City's Section 17.58 of the Municipal Code Design
Standards for Large Retail Establishments.
The intent of the building design is to emulate similar materials, colors, and textures of Costco
warehouse and gasoline stations located elsewhere. The body of the building is broken up by an
offset parapet, articulated entry vestibule, and accent wall materials and colors. These architectural
articulations are applied throughout the building. The northern elevation, which is adjacent to
Harney Lane and residential property across the street, receives identical architectural treatment as
the rest of the building. Due to the uncertainty of the timeframe for final development of a shopping
center, Staff has analyzed the proposal to determine if the project can function as a stand alone
development while at the same time, be incorporated into the final shopping center site design and
layout. Although no application has been made for the rest of the shopping center, staff expects the
rest of the shopping center to establish visually harmonious architectural theme and identity as
required by the City's large scale retail ordinance which mandates the architecture and signs of a
shopping center work together to establish a coherent visual identity.
As mentioned previously, the COSTCO Wholesale warehouse includes an associated gas station.
The gas station includes a 2,816 square foot canopy and will be located in the southeast corner of
the site along the main Reynolds Ranch Development drive and adjacent to Highway 99. A 75
square foot controller enclosure will be on the north side of the fuel station. It will be built with steel
walls and finished with paint to match the warehouse building colors. There will be four covered
fueling bays, each with two gas pumps which could fuel two cars each. The gas station will thus
have fueling capacity for 16 cars at a time. The fueling station will also have eight stacking lanes
which will allow 40 cars to wait for pumps at any given time in addition to the 16 at the fueling
pumps. The gas station is automated and self-serving facility requiring a membership card. The gas
station hours are identical to the warehouse hours of operation, which is Monday through Friday
from 10:00 am to 8:30 pm, Saturday from 9:30 am to 6:00 pm, and Sunday from 10:00 am to 6:00
pm. Since the gas station functions as a complimentary use to the retail, there are a large
proportion of shared trips between the two, which indicates that there is a minimal amount of
additional trips generated by the gas station. While staff is generally supportive of the proposed
architectural articulations, there are few site plan modifications that are being recommended.
Traffic Circulation/Parking
The site plan indicates two access points along the frontage on Harney Lane. The main access to
the proposed shopping center is provided from Harney Lane via Reynolds Ranch Parkway. The
main entrance to the project parking lot is from the proposed signaled drive which intersects
Reynolds Ranch Parkway. A secondary access point is provided from Harney Lane, which is
restricted to right in/right out movement. Traffic access to the shopping center is also provided from
the south, though this has limited access at the moment. The project necessitates off-site
improvements such installation of sidewalks, curbs and gutter along Harney Lane. Improvements to
Harney Lane are proposed to occur in two phases. The initial phase will widen the street from
roughly Stockton Street to the entry into the shopping center east of Reynolds Ranch Parkway.
Transitional improvements will occur from that drive to the Hwy. 99 overpass. These improvements
will need to be implemented prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. The ultimate
improvements will include a new overpass and ramps. There will be a grade difference between the
existing condition and the northeast corner of the shopping center of approximately 15 feet.
Onsite parking is provided on the south and west of the COSTCO building in order to reduce the
visual impact of one large paved surface. The Costco development, including the proposed gas
station, requires a total 742 parking spaces (General Retail 5/1000), 755 spaces are being provided
(5.09/1000), which includes fifteen ADA compliant parking stalls are also provided. The City's large
box ordinance states that maximum number of off-street parking spaces cannot exceed five spaces
for every one thousand square feet of building space. In this case, the applicants have provided
thirteen (13) more spaces than the maximum allowable parking spaces. As shown on the site plan,
there are a total of nine cart corrals distributed throughout the parking lot. Staff recommends the
applicants provide at least one cart corral per driving isle in order to reduce the total number of
parking spaces to conform to applicable City rules and to provide safe and pleasant shopping
experience to their customers. In addition, the proposed cart corrals should be permanent with a
design that is consistent with the theme of the COSTCO Wholesale building and the balance of the
center.
Landscape/Signage
Projects of this size are required to provide one tree for every 500 square feet of open space and
one shade tree for each 4 parking spaces. The applicant has submitted a generic landscape plan,
which calls for various large shade trees, smaller trees, shrubs and ground covers distributed
throughout the parking lot and on the north and east edges of the project site. Given the size of the
building, the project proponent is required to provide 193 larger shade (parking lots trees)
distributed within the parking lot interior and additional one tree for every 500 open space.
According to the applicant project description, a substantial amount of the proposed plant material
for the new site is drought tolerant and will use less water than other common species. The
proposed irrigation system will use deep root watering bubblers for parking lot shade trees to
minimize usage and ensure that water goes directly to the intended planting areas.
The approval of project signage is not a part of the current review and would be subject to City of
Lodi codes and requirements to ensure they complement the building architecture and landscaping
of the building. Signage applications and approvals would be completed separately. However, the
applicant have illustrated the location and design of the signs they intend to use. The wall signs
consist of the trademark red and blue raised reverse pan metal letters. It is unclear at the moment if
the project will include free standing signs.
The proposed development is consistent with the City's General Plan and is an attractive addition to
the City in that the proposed Costco warehouse and gasoline station will provide much needed
services to the City of Lodi and enhance the City's economic viability and increase the tax base.
The proposed Costco warehouse and associated gasoline station will not only add to the city's tax
base but will also provide employment opportunities for residents. The COSTCO building is in full
conformance with the City's Section 17.58 of the Municipal Code Design Standards for Large Retail
Establishments. These standards were adopted in 2004 specifically to deal with the design of large
scale retail establishments like COSTCO. The applicant has met or exceeded each of these
standards as presented and conditioned. Therefore, staff is recommending that the Planning
Commission approve this request.
As mentioned previously, the Costco building has frontage along Harney Lane, but ultimately this
frontage will be separated by as much as 15 feet. The interim and ultimate conditions will be quite
different. We believe the City code requires that a decorative masonry wall be constructed at the
top of slope along this frontage. However, this will have to be done with the ultimate improvements
as the grade difference will not exist until this project is complete. A condition of approval has been
included in the Resolution to accommodate this situation.
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE:
Legal Notice for the Use Permit was published on January 27, 2010. 52 public hearing notices were
sent to all property owners of record within a 300 -foot radius of the subject property as required by
California State Law §65091 (a) 3. Public notice also was mailed to interested parties who had
expressed their interest of the project. No protest letter has been received.
ALTERNATIVE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS:
• Approve with additional/different conditions
• Deny the Use Permit/SPARC
• Continue the requests
Respectfully Submitted,
Immanuel Bereket
Assistant Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Vicinity Map
B. Site Plan
C. Resolution
Concur,
Konradt Bartlam
Community Development Director
m
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
LOD1 , CALIFORNIA
COSTCO WHOLESALE
HARNEY LANE AND H l G HIJAY 99
L DI, CALIFORNIA
NIA
SPARC & CUP APPLICATION
f
k
I srm
lk--
REGIONAL MAP
N.T s.
SHEET INDEX
1 tiTfI-E SHaT
2 SCFt; UTUVATION MAP
3 COPyOEPT WE PLAN
L2 tRUCXS4tiEPrPATFIS
4 CONCV'rr-LOdiPLAN
5 CONCEPT ELEVATIONS
d CONCI nLANOSCAPE PLAN
TITLE SHEET
NOMH
HARNEY I -N, A HM. 99
LODI CA
DAvlo BAB x x
� Assocurr�s
...m p�nrit. mew
�,uavnart+rr�.wtiww
oaoa�.� 1 g
FEBRUARYS 2M
TITLE SHEET
ZONING LEGEND
OWN MAP UK 9-2 ON= r-AWY fW913184TAL
000 9M cow% %N% D
The vuw PD. PLANNED D VEWPMEHT
1
P040.
rw
- - LME
.--------------• - — frop
jj
-
;;; I DIHIII♦I
El
,r IHNNIHOIN D
AII wNf
I�NHHIIHI�H
MINNOW
OH#IHHH#I
" CD
z
Cpj
ra
iF' ' II I
p IPill q IIk1LMww1 IM#r N
ap "j
IRI WI � ■
� MI I � � • rt�r in st
�k pi -
irllr �f +
wo
01 [L-1
0`,1 -
0 l PIN Vol
{
600'MAP LINE kWtNEY LN. & HWr. N
L001. CA
�I� 4
7
4
4
............ As c ►7 rt3
PA I 14A
why "X�rl4w
NrM l nLeATIM
'IAP
SITE UTILIZATION MAP
LODI , CALIFORNIA
- - — — � 12 PUE EASEMENT
--�------"w.—.
—
1 I 30' DRIVEAISLE y
it i, nN — Ahn ri ii' itjl it �i II I' II .� 444 1
I is U i.
30' DRIVEAISLE' \
LLI\,
I �J w ,
J ISI o
a III{ wI
ii....l +- i I{.. 1�... ��.. 1Q I IL�_ �cbsmo
> I N \
148k a
P
L9
.
TI:
,I'
vl i I ; I
LII
.L--- (E) WATERLINE EASEMENT I.J
Ij
n i I f
J �IIn- I4=- o o 0
I_ I
II
II o R
P ,; 11
I I o O
c
L. I
L—fllil T I I a
1 I I
CbS7W
ESME
LODI, CALIFORNIA
,,-12'PUE
EASEMENT
!I'!IillU .
xs
OpGB l \
PROJECT DATA
CLIENT:
COSTCO WHOLESALE
999 LAKE DRIVE
ISSAQUAH,WA 98027
PROJECTADDRESS:
HARNEY LANE AND HWY 99
LODI, CALIFORNIA
PROPOSED
COSTCO PARCEL:
15.05 ACRES (655,761.87 S.F.)
JURISDICTION:
CITY OF LODI
BOUNDARIES
THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED
INFORMATION:
BYUSING DIGITAL DATA PROVIDED
BY RSC ENGINEERING.
BUILDING DATA
TOTAL BUILDING AREA
148,234 S.F.
PARKING DATA
PARKING PROVIDED
10' WIDE STALLS
740 STALLS
t(#
# HCmHANDICAPSTALLS 15 STALLS
TOTAL PARKING
(5 09/1000) 755 STALLS
CITY PARKING REQUIRED (5.011000 MAX) 742 STALLS
VICINITY
MAP
CONCEPT SITE PLAN - 148K
NORTH
0u10 w 440'
HARNEY LN. & HWY. 99
LODI, CA
DAVID BABCOCK
& ASSOCTATES
<.x4Mr. AA T.n RI.w..&UW.z.4s
nrw
].AFAll CAIIFtMNA9J519
EL: IJ'JeJeu'iu I�nx-(>rrJ)trJ-tlru
mmxtlNMxksam
OO8.P.119
DIARY 5, 2010
ONCEPT
ITE PLAN 1.30
3
0
�VMMMM"E
LODI , CALIFORNIA
Car
z
9
6n
0
z
E H A R N E Y L A N E
fL
444'
COMO %
u
S".l 1YiIIII,
77. j
J[5,7 1- —.7
P,j u
4.
.77
TRUCK SWEPT PATH -WAREHOUSE
HARN EY LAN E
NORTH
z:L
cbgrco
0
n i I 'n—I
cbsrco
0
i 1'j JN C
c -
HARNEY LN. & HWY. 99
-T E M
LODI, CA
.71
A.... .. .. ..
DAVID BABcOCK
& AsSOCIATES
TRUCK SWEPT PATH - FUEL STATION
OOOB.P.119
FEBRUARY 5, 2010
TRUCK
SWEPT PATHS
TRUCK SWEPT PATHS 3.2
Olt
. ........ ....... .... ..
MINNS
IAMP me 13E31
AM
SON
INN
NSW ON
MEZZANINE PLAN IN
SON T"r-i
Rm
WISF
- | � |AODMMKAIitTIREWINSTORM f2 SIPSa
APPROVED BY:
. =.�- =~
OK
FRESIN to"WMWMP"TO�m, PROJECT DATA
LOD|. CALIFORNIA FEBRUARY 5, 2010
2 VAWELE%dAiM
Salo IT I -
TUN
( Ww a a=voaa aaar+,
COSTCO WHOLESALE
CONCEPT ELEVATIONS
L.ODI, CALIFORNIA FEBRUARY 6, 2010
KEY PLAN
0
I
Lana, CA
07444"1
FEBRUARY b M U
CONCOPT
GLEMONS
5
E H A R N E
��4;�'�fl'r'"fir}V��II911D1i '
� i I .•
L yI rL�} �oyl' n '� • Ij j!r� R
' I ' H"H,
III
FIL
M
L A E
TRFZLWEW
IRRIGATION SYSTEM STATENWWT
THE MPKATON SVKFM Ix4L WAYMEr1 ¢FbMLWT LJ7WF�M.
L7M'9fLu L`OFvysTWb9n0mWMPhOMEADMATJi
µSPURT aF ftAW UROWMAIOWKWE QEFJiYFffl0W0ftAU
YAT6r�4 fAa14161ras�OpCssw,SpeMeaf".tlrior4 Tet
W&MMM44 ■R PPDW AM&V I , A44N&n CFMT10H PLWJW
HYO VWP(MATIM TKM UMPULS &PUd*WDFEA TH9
Ott MIN MhjXj t 4;4j 1rE RRM OPIJI OA&FN NO L I$
of LWH7E141Hq.L
}
SHRUB LEGEND
NttOF pMµpLAHk811U1MlOGUhiJiiJr41L
ME PMYMG01HCLJ6f#7!f FUUMM10
pTEH14y, 1'Uy{F ¢F'rypFJY�E.I}�W,
SHR1. DS +IANDRrzNNKLS
IWr+tOk4etieWst
_ Yarwcrr +wrt
11
'./'
akr fmTrr
SIMR`d"W Wma-"
mmooFwm6wwftN p
Ij/r� 6aGFrIf�Y
C.«MAA
La�eragti'rNerr'J
Ol#+~i1+r 4 %pww t
ihYCMxf �iyF1}74
GffmQNNAmlAWB~0
PlfYdro��+�lfyf
lJ�i`4+�IJIrp
eaYrrlr.�.
OInM�nn11f�7�FMtlJ
1FM
a0 w Erb
Gw*k M'I.Mdbef
1vF
Jyha�NCrl�
iJ�i prNW �rrUNrf J
tmlMf*1
7nwor�wchnw� tYy
�aYfar+rr�Ffp erre r
z6okw FW tFi Ulr
'�P 4rwJ,Frw� tfbaw
IRRIGATION SYSTEM STATENWWT
THE MPKATON SVKFM Ix4L WAYMEr1 ¢FbMLWT LJ7WF�M.
L7M'9fLu L`OFvysTWb9n0mWMPhOMEADMATJi
µSPURT aF ftAW UROWMAIOWKWE QEFJiYFffl0W0ftAU
YAT6r�4 fAa14161ras�OpCssw,SpeMeaf".tlrior4 Tet
W&MMM44 ■R PPDW AM&V I , A44N&n CFMT10H PLWJW
HYO VWP(MATIM TKM UMPULS &PUd*WDFEA TH9
Ott MIN MhjXj t 4;4j 1rE RRM OPIJI OA&FN NO L I$
of LWH7E141Hq.L
}
SHRUB LEGEND
NttOF pMµpLAHk811U1MlOGUhiJiiJr41L
ME PMYMG01HCLJ6f#7!f FUUMM10
pTEH14y, 1'Uy{F ¢F'rypFJY�E.I}�W,
SHR1. DS +IANDRrzNNKLS
IWr+tOk4etieWst
�
YNrNr4y glllNy olwl t
s N
SIMR`d"W Wma-"
mmooFwm6wwftN p
150
C.«MAA
Ol#+~i1+r 4 %pww t
1 po
GffmQNNAmlAWB~0
740
lJ�i`4+�IJIrp
OInM�nn11f�7�FMtlJ
1FM
a0 w Erb
Gw*k M'I.Mdbef
1vF
tmlMf*1
z6okw FW tFi Ulr
iod
blur wIFW %4dow r
1E M
V- -l- fat" Lk
mmmmud 11 hm mw t
1 P4
YrrrC�elb awa9ww
lar��llf� McralMa�la �wfi+
1 �/
flW 4�rtiwr�
Ltw islFwsh't
1i�
elw. Mur P,PA YI
lra"M�.F�r.o�+t
16 FII
8�. V bm
y?*b mlwc0fw.R7Mlw
1iod
VdL�Vkw�Rw
410
,��
slo
Yrl �� OL%A +
M
Ih*k*'�1P+r
o-`I
sir
ftdbone
a,Inw F/A1�47♦iFYlr t
I �+I
YGiyatrlW�r+Fi�i w
GROU 1d COVER
Mww�l iwFrw6..C..,yr t ,1w
Lrwxm"wdFF HM AxrrrY
p� Nr� 9dpmvmdd I v 7 ffid
{�p+K+lllii'M }t
PRIAM AL cP+llss
FNHs mmr irk
Alm Fr
P�we.,,,M r ■ Pr
tiaw+r��o�..l
i nrnTn
,f} C7i
'_ tR
'4Y 4 my M .r f n a i w
�m
4:06mm
CONCEPT LANDSCAPE PLAN.
L001 , CALIFORNIA
Hh Wr LN, & HW. 61;
Lola
MVM BMK)OCK
de �SS4G7+177R
xu �R411�1a�1+4+� I�x
CDN.P-1$o
FEBRUARY E- 2010
LANDSCAPE
PLM
6
LODI
PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
MEETING DATE: March 24, 2010
APPLICATION NO: SPARC: 10 -SP -02
REQUEST: Request for Planning Commission approval of a SPARC application
concerning the Reynolds Ranch Shopping Center. (Applicant: Jennifer
Krauter, RMB Architects on behalf of San Joaquin Valley Land Co.,
LLC. File No. 10 -SP -02).
LOCATION: 322 East Harney Lane. Approximately 15 acres located at the
southwest corner of Harney Lane and State HWY 99.
APPLICANT: Jennifer Krauter, RMB Architects on behalf of San Joaquin Valley
Land Co., LLC., 227 Watt Avenue., Second Floor., Sacramento, CA.
PROPERTY OWNER: San Joaquin Valley Land Company CO.,LLC, 1420 S. Mills Ave.,
Suite K, Lodi, CA 95242
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the site and
architectural plan of the proposed Reynolds Ranch shopping center, subject to the conditions listed
in the attached draft resolution.
PROJECT/AREA DESCRIPTION
General Plan Designation: NCC- Neighborhood Community Commercial.
Zoning Designation: Planned Development (39).
Property Size: Approximately 50 acres.
Adjacent General Plan, Zoning and Land Use:
SUMMARY
The project proponent requests approval of site plan and architecture of the Reynolds Ranch
shopping center. The City's Zoning Code requires all plot plans for projects within the commercial
zoning districts receive site plan and architecture review approval. The proposed Reynolds Ranch
General Plan
Zone
Existing Conditions
North
NCC- Neighborhood Community
Planned Development
COSTCO site and further north
Commercial.
(39)
are residences
South
NCC, community commercial and O
Planned Development
Vacant parcels and Blue
—Office
(39)
Shield office.
East
GA, General Agriculture (San
AG -40, Agricultural
State Highway 99, and east of
Joaquin County)
Uses (San Joaquin
that Agricultural, residential
County)
and cemetery uses.
West
NCC, community commercial and O
Planned Development
Agricultural Uses and east of
—Office
(39)
that are residential uses within
the Reynolds Ranch
annexation.
SUMMARY
The project proponent requests approval of site plan and architecture of the Reynolds Ranch
shopping center. The City's Zoning Code requires all plot plans for projects within the commercial
zoning districts receive site plan and architecture review approval. The proposed Reynolds Ranch
commercial development involves the construction of approximately 345,795 square feet of
commercial retail uses, representing a variety of retail sales and services, to be contained in 19
buildings of varying sizes. The primary use will be a Home Depot. Since the Planning Commission
approved the COSTCO, and since this project is within the same shopping center, staff feels the
Planning Commission should review the site plan and architecture of the remainder of the shopping
center to ensure consistency and architectural coherence.
BACKGROUND:
The Reynolds Ranch project was annexed in to the City of Lodi in 2006 as a mixed-use
development. As part of the annexation process, an environmental impact report was prepared and
certified, new General Plan and zoning designations were approved and a Development Agreement
was signed. The development includes retail and residential uses, Public Park, fire station, self -
storage facility, and the Blue Shield office complex, a major component of the development.
In the summer of 2008, the developer requested to amend previous approvals. Specifically, the
developer requested a General Plan Amendment to increase the size of the commercial acreage
from 40.5 acres to 75.6 acres and reduce the residential acreage from 96.6 acres to 78 acres. The
applicant's request was first considered by the Planning Commission at its hearing of August 27,
2008 and continued to September 10, 2008. At that hearing, the Planning Commission approved
the Vesting Tentative Map and recommended the City Council amend the General Plan for the
Reynolds Ranch development. The City Council, acting upon the Planning Commission's
recommendation for approval, amended the General Plan at their meeting of September 17, 2008.
On February 10, 2010, COSTCO Wholesale requested approval of a Use Permit to allow the sale of
alcoholic beverages and approval of site plan and building elevation of the COSTCO Wholesale
warehouse. At their regular hearing of February 10, 2010, the Planning Commission approved the
COSTCO Wholesale's request for a Use Permit and SPARC application. The COSTCO Wholesale
site is immediately north of the project site.
ANALYSIS:
Site Plan:
The project proponent requests approval of site plan and architecture of the Reynolds Ranch
shopping center. The City's Zoning Code requires all plot plans for projects within the commercial
zoning districts receive site plan and architecture review approval. Over time, this review has been
done through the Use Permit process for shopping centers and through SPARC review for
individual buildings. This item has been brought to the Planning Commission because it requires
site plan and architecture review and approval. Since the Planning Commission approved the
COSTCO warehouse, and since this project is within the same shopping center, staff feels the
Planning Commission should review the site plan and architecture of the remainder of the shopping
center to ensure consistency and architectural coherence.
The proposed Reynolds Ranch commercial development involves the construction of approximately
345,795 square feet of commercial retail uses, representing a variety of retail sales and services, to
be contained in 19 buildings of varying sizes (excluding the COSTCO building). The site layout
places buildings close to streets and access points. The primary use will be Home Depot, which will
occupy approximately 106,154 square feet of floor area, including approximately 28,086 square feet
for a garden center. Two moderate sized retailers would be located on in the eastern portion of the
center. Three moderately sized spaces ranging in size from 22,000 to 33,000 sq. ft. will be located
southwest of the site (west of the proposed Home Depot). The remaining shell buildings will be
distributed throughout the site and will range in size from 13,225 square feet to 3,200 square feet.
These buildings will be occupied by fast food franchises, sit-down restaurants, financial
services/bank, professional/business services, and other retail sales and services.
The Home Depot warehouse proposes seasonal and permanent outdoor display and sales area.
The proposed seasonal outdoor display and sales area would be located within the parking lot north
of the building (10,000 sq. ft), a permanent outdoor storage area would be located within the
parking lot west of the building (170 sq. ft), and permanent display area immediately outside of the
building. The larger seasonal outdoor display and sales area would displace approximately 40
parking spaces while the western storage area would be permanent and would occupy 17 parking
stalls (attachment C). The seasonal display and sales area would be for seasonal items such as
Christmas trees, trees, plants, and nursery materials etc. The permanent outdoor display area
would be for items such as propane, and promotional items.
In the past the City's Planning, Building, and Fire departments have all worked diligently with
applicants on concerns regarding the location of outdoor display areas. Outdoor sale and display
area often cause concerns regarding safety. Outdoor display and sale of items within a parking lot
of a store disrupt traffic circulation, and force patrons to load their purchases within the fire lane
whereby fire lanes could be blocked, which would threaten public safety by restricting emergency
vehicle access. Further, items displayed in outdoor display and sales area often cause non -storm
water flows and other deleterious materials to enter the storm drain system. The most effectively
way to reduce non-stormwater discharges to the stormwater drainage system is to eliminate
sources of pollutants. In addition, outdoor merchandise could spill out into the drive aisles and
disrupt vehicle and pedestrian circulations patterns, thereby creating safety issues.
In the past the Planning Commission has approved similar requests for outdoor display areas,
particularly for home improvement businesses such as Lowe's and Lodi Shopping Center. In both of
those cases the approved outdoor display area is limited to the area immediately outside of the
buildings. Outdoor display, storage or sale of merchandise within the parking lot has been explicitly
prohibited. Staff recommends that conditions be placed on the proposed project to limit outdoor
sales immediately outside of the building (similar to Lowe's) and no additional permanent or
seasonal outdoor storage/display area be permitted, unless the design is made permanent with
appropriate fencing, landscaping, etc.
Architecture:
The architectural theme of the shopping center is early agricultural style articulated by canopies,
overhangs, wood type siding, recessed columns, metal roofing, red bricks, and tower elements.
Additionally, there is a free standing arch element provided. Sample elevations are provided under
Attachment D. The proposed colors for the Home Depot include shades of gray and silver,
accented with awnings, metal roof and decorative architectural elements designed to break up the
mass appearance. Although the proposed architectural design of the center is consistent with the
building design standards and design elements established in the LMC 17.58 Design Standards for
Large Retail Establishments, architectural design of the previously approved COSTCO building
drastically differs from the remainder of the shopping center. Staff will work with both applicants to
ensure architectural coherence for the site is achieved consistent with the municipal code and
conditions placed on the COSTCO approval.
Signage:
The approval of project signage is not a part of the current review and would be subject to City of
Lodi codes and requirements to ensure they complement the building architecture and landscaping.
Signage applications and approvals would be completed separately. However, the applicants have
illustrated the location and design of the signs they intend to use. All wall mounted signs will have to
be individual letters and no cabinet "canned" signs would be permitted. This would be consistent
with previously approved shopping centers (condition #19). It is unclear at the moment if the project
will include free standing signs. One free standing sign per shopping center is permitted under the
LMC 17.63 Signs. A free standing sign will require a separate building permit and, if necessary,
SPARC review and approval.
Traffic Circulation/Parking:
As shown the site plan, the primary access to the proposed shopping center is provided from
Harney Lane via Reynolds Ranch Parkway. As shown on the site plan, the main entrance to the
project parking lot is from the proposed signaled drive which intersects Reynolds Ranch Parkway.
Three secondary access points are also provided from Reynolds Ranch Parkway, located further
south. These access points provide satisfactory traffic circulation in and out of the shopping center.
In accordance with Lodi Municipal Code (LMC) Section 17.58.110, buildings are located close to
streets and parking is provide behind the buildings, which reduces the undesirable visual impact of
the paved parking surface. Parking spaces are distributed around all buildings. The City's large
design standards for large retail establishments allows a maximum parking stalls five spaces for
every one thousand square feet of building space. The proposed shopping center contains total of
345,795 square feet of tenant spaces. The proposed development allows a total 1,729 parking
spaces (General Retail 5/1000), 1,728 spaces are being provided, which includes ADA compliant
parking stalls for each building. Consistent with the COSTCO approval conditions and the existing
Blue Shield development, parking lot light fixtures must be a maximum of twenty-five feet in height
and no spillover beyond the property line will be permitted. This would ensure all light fixtures
throughout the center are consistent. A condition has been added to require the applicant to provide
a photometric plan prior to the issuance of building permits (condition # 25).
Landscaping:
In accordance with Lodi Municipal Code (LMC) Section 17.58.110, landscaping requirements for
these types of projects are one shading tree per four parking spaces, one large tree per 500 sq. ft. of
open space, 25% of all trees must be 15 gal. or larger, 25% of all shrubs must be 5 gal. or larger, and
groundcover must be provided where necessary. Landscaping must achieve minimum fifty percent
shading requirement within five years of planting. The applicant has submitted a generic landscape
plan, which calls for various large shade trees, smaller trees, shrubs and ground covers distributed
throughout the parking. Given the size of the building, the project proponent is required to provide
433 larger shade (one tree per four stalls) distributed within the parking lot interior and additional
one tree for every 500 sq. ft. open space. As shown the plans, the applicant provides 418 large
parking lot trees and 353 open space shading tree. Supplementing the trees, there would also be a
variety of medium to small shrubs, ground cover and special grasses for swale areas for the Home
Depot parking lot. Conditions of approval require the applicant to provide additional parking lot trees
to reduce island -heat effect and to meet the City's standards (condition # 30). As shown the
landscape palette, substantial amount of the proposed plant material for the new site would be
drought tolerant and would use less water than other common species. The proposed irrigation
system uses deep root watering bubblers for parking lot shade trees to minimize usage and ensure
that water goes directly to the intended planting areas.
Once site development and construction is completed, the proposed Home Depot alone will employ
approximately 100 to 150 employees during three daily shifts (the store proposes to be open 24
hours a day, 7 days a week). The proposed development is consistent with the City's General Plan
and is an attractive addition to the City in that the proposed commercial development will provide
much needed services to the City of Lodi, enhance the City's economic viability, increase the tax
base and provide employment opportunities for residents. The proposed development is in full
conformance with the applicable City regulations, including LMC Section 17.58 of the Municipal
Code Design Standards for Large Retail Establishments. These standards were adopted in 2004
specifically to deal with the design of large scale retail establishments. The applicant's project
meets or exceeded each of these standards as presented and conditioned. Therefore, staff is
recommending that the Planning Commission approve this request.
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE:
Legal Notice for the Use Permit was published on March 13, 2010. 52 public hearing notices were
sent to all property owners of record within a 300 -foot radius of the project site as required by
California State Law §65091 (a) 3. Public notice also was mailed to interested parties who had
expressed their interest of the project. No protest letter has been received.
ALTERNATIVE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS:
• Approve with additional/different conditions
• Deny the SPARC request
• Continue the request
Respectfully Submitted,
Immanuel Bereket
Assistant Planner
Concur,
Konradt Bartlam
Community Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Vicinity Map
B. Site Plan (including truck path and landscape plans)
C. Color Elevation
D. Resolution
Rd
� v
:
I N _ •9S
CO
3
0
aer Rd.f �'''' E) Turner d.
r �-
Lockeford St.
Elm St. L
Im St.
Elm St.
Pi a St.
Q N
0 ine St.
C
0
I-jJ
1
0
C
N
E
2
0
(4
N
3
0
J
N
W E
S
0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
Miles
Av.
U)
c
J
D
St. m Pine
MIN
WNW
FIltlernall Ln.
Ono Poll.. ..
Vicinity Map Legend
322 East Harney Lane
Lodi, CA 95240 Reynolds Ranch Shopping Center
PROJECT STATISTICS
BUILDING
SF
MAJOR Al
22,000
MAJOR A2
28,000
MAJOR A3
33,000
MAJOR B
134,240
MAJOR C
18,000
MAJOR D
26,860
MAJOR E
148,000
DRUG 1
13,225
REST 1
3,200
BANK 1
5,300
SHOPS 1
5,300
BANK 2
5,300
SHOPS 2
5,600
SHOPS 3
8,400
SHOPS 4
5,000
SHOPS 5
7,000
SHOPS 6a
4,635
SHOPS 6b
5,735
SHOPS 7
7,500
SHOPS 8
7,500
TOTAL
493,795
TOTAL PARKING ALLOWED AT 5IK
2,469
TOTAL PARKING AVAILABLE
2,464
0 40 80 160 320
[�]
Reynolds Ranch " dli, Caligwayfor iaarney Lane II _
Scale: 1 - 80'-0"N
Project:
Reynolds
Ranch
Highway 9'& Hamey Lane
WWI,Callfornla
Developer:
San Joaquin Valley Land Company
1420 South Mills Avenue, Ste. 1
Lodi, CA 95242
(P) 209.333.3400
(F) 209.333.3430
Overall Site Plan
Preliminary
Job Number: A07-150
Date: 01.05.09
Drawn By: BOSKO
Revised: Iteration -A5 01.27.10
Sheet: S P . 01
; W.
RAUSCHENBACH MARVELLI BECKER
architects + engineers
2277 watt AWwa • Bawnd Floor • e00114nm • CA • 96825
P. 918.488.8500 • F. 918.488.8566 • ne—hlfaeta.wm
SEE SHEET SP.01 D
NORTHWEST QUADRANT
0
w
LU
rn
LU
LU
NORTHWEST
QUADRANT
SOUTHWEST
QUADRANT
N
offieWHIMM
KEY PLAN [�
0 20 40 80 160
Reynolds Ranch " dli, Calfor iaarney Way
Scale: 1"=40'—O" N
SEE COSTCO
DRAWINGS
SOUTHEAST
QUADRANT
Project:
Reynolds
Ranch
Highway 99 & Harney Way
Lodi, Callfornla
Developer:
San Joaquin Valley Land Company
1420 South Mills Avenue, Ste. 1
Lodi, CA 95242
(P) 209.333.3400
(F) 209.333.3430
Partial Site Plan
Northwest Quadrant
Job Number: A07-150
Date: 01.05.09
Drawn By: BOSKO
Revised: Iteration -A4 01.27.10
Shea SP.01 A
; W.
RAUSCHENBACH MARVELLI BECKER
architects + engineers
2277 watt A—us • 8lwnd Floor • 3e0114- • CA • 96826
P. 918A88.8800 • F. 9-488.8888 • 110ar01Nfseta.mm
SEE SHEET SP.01A
❑ ❑ --U F1�
_---------- ---- v- r i
90'94' I 140' TE ---- — ��
BANK 2 SHOPS 2 . °.. SHOPS 3 29
5,300 SF5,600 SF 8,400 SF $I
❑°n
36 36 �
} } is IN
VTE 27 28 -- --
IT � I 29 � 82 g2 I I I I
25'-a
_I F
I _ _ I I II I
TE
50' s
II a I s2 o i I I I I I
O CLN 0'-0° 0'-0'
Ig
uS a -0 v U .
T
TT
b I � 25-o"* I
rl n
25'-0" 3Cf0'
25 n v j
TE I I
T O
� x„25._0..
I I I I I ® I® ® I I® I
2 I ® I ® ® ~ I® W
I I 1 o I ® o ® I® ® I Ed W
2
fA
W
�W/�
1 1 I ,b VJ
1
1 98'-9" 107'-g" 136'-4"
\ MAJOR 'A-1' MAJOR 'A-2' MAJOR A-3'
22, 000± SF 28,000± SF 33, 000± SF
tV
N N
/
68•_9•' 13'
$n
30 56' dry.
v, \\ N 38,_6„
49'_2-
/
s / /
G /
SOUTHWEST QUADRANT - - LP
Reynolds Ranch " dli, Caligwayfor iaarney Way
___i_�_
iIPINIIIPII ' � I
'� � ' i!Ihlllllih'
l\ 1111 �
IF
KEY PLAN [�
Project:
Reynolds
Ranch
Highway 99 & Harney Way
Ladl, Callfornla
Developer:
San Joaquin Valley Land Company
1420 South Mills Avenue, Ste. 1
Lodi, CA 95242
(P) 209.333.3400
(F) 209.333.3430
Partial Site Plan
Southwest Quadrant
Job Number: A07-150
Date: 01.05.09
Drawn By: BOSKO
Revised: Iteration -A4 01.27.10
Shea SP.01 B
20 40 60 160
RAUSCHENBACH MARVELLI BECKER
architects + engineers
Scale • 1 " - 40'-0" N
2 7 Walt Awsus • Bew,d Floor • 300114- • CA • 95825
P. 918A88.8800 - F. 9-488.8888 - rm0e'elNfseta.wm
0
0
U)
W
LU
co
W
W
CO
SEE SHEET SP.01 B
I
I �
I NORTHWEST
I QUADRANT
� I
� I
I
QUADRANTT
� I
�I
LI
NG PAD
I
II
I
1 I
I/
I
✓^WITH
DA GARDEN CENTERrc = \ \ \
DATED 11/25/08 PART
13 I BUILDING 106,154S.F. \ \ \ \
n (INCLUDES TRC AND VESTIBULES) \ \ \
TRASH z m w \
COMPACTOR o \
mem
LOADING EQUIPMENT
DOCK ENCLOSURE
LUMBER LOADING PAD 17
• e \ \
11 rl 0 LJ
�� _ za 87
— — E ---- i
CID
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT
O S
iMATCH LINEIAI
.�.... .. ..... .. ..�....................:r..i,...............................
0 2a as ao 1.
u
Reynolds Ranch " l
Lodi, California Scale:
Lane or iaV=40'—O"
Scale: N
KEY PLAN [�]
SEE COSTCO
DRAWINGS
SOUTHEAST
QUADRANT
MATCH LINE IA'
Project:
Reynolds
Ranch
Highway 9'& Hamey Lane
WWI, Callfornla
Developer:
San Joaquin Valley Land Company
1420 South Mills Avenue, Ste. 1
Lodi, CA 95242
(P) 209.333.3400
(F) 209.333.3430
Partial Site Plan
Southeast Quadrant
Job Number: A07-150
Date: 01.05.09
Drawn By: BOSKO
Revised: Iteration -A4 01.27.10
Shea SP.01 C
W.
RAUSCHENBACH MARVELLI BECKER
architects + engineers
2277 Weft AWwe • Bew,d Floor • 3e0114nm • CA • 96826
P. 918A88.8800 • F. 9-488.8888 • ne—hlfeeta.wm
PLANT PALETTE
SYMBOL Botanical Name
WATER
SYMBOL Botanical Name
WATER
COMMONNAME
USE
COMMONNAME
USE
CATEGORY
CATEGORY
TREES - All trees will be 15 gallon size
Nandi.. d.'Gulfstream'
Low
cco
Trees 30'tllamalar Cetlrus tleatlare
Medium
GULFSTREAM HEAVENLY BAMBOO
canopy such as: DEODAR CEDAR
Pf
Low
Gingko bllobe'Aulumn Gold
Medium
JERUSALESSAGE
• AUTUMN GOLD GINGKO
O
------ --_
Smell Shrubs such as: Callistemon v.'Lidle John'
Low
ONAl191W1'9
�
Kosmuteria b;pinnata
Medium
LITTLE JOHN WEEPING BOTTLEBRUSHH�,RNEY
LANE
NORTHWEST
'
NORTHEAST
CHINESE FLAME TREE
QUADRANT
\\\`
QUADRANT
Dieter bicolor
Low
Emma. chimm.i.
Medium
FORTNIGHT LILY
_
WINNRINn \\
CHINESE PISTACHE
Euonymusj Slver Princess'
Low
Quercus agrifolla
Very Low
SILVER PRINCESS EUONVMUS
71
COAST LIVE OAK
Junlperus r. mnferla
Low
I i
Ulmus PaMfolia'Tme Green'
Medium
SHORE JUNIPER
\
O
TRUE GREEN CHINESE ELM19
I
SOUTHWEST
SOUTHEAST
Mahonia repens
Low
\\,
QUADRANT
Zelkovas.'V;IIageGeer'
Medium
CREEPING MAHONIA
®
® 0
_`UADRANT
VILLAGE GREEN ZELKOVA
®
°'
Nandina tl.'Harbor Dwad
Low
cer
Trees 25'di... ter Arubium'Red Sunset'
Medium
HARBOR DWARF HEAVENLY BAMBOO
14 2'-4
/
i
canopy such as: Red Sunset Maple
30'-0"
25 MIN
Rhaphlolepls u.'Mlnor
Lots
DRUG 1 �.
-- -
Gledn.iamaeantho.'s line'
kY
Medium
DWARF VEDDO HAWTHORN
13,225 SF W
II
SKYLINE HONEY LOCUST
•
O
PERENNIALS -will come from one gallon cans
18-0
\ -
\
Laurus N.'Ssratoga'
Medium
Perennials such as: Kniphofla uwma
Low
SARATOGA SWEET BAY
RED HOT POKER
KEY PLAN
Nyssa sylvatica
Medium
Lantana
Low
72
O
SOUR GUM
NON
I3
;I II
VVV Illi
II
UUU
Olea'Wllsonl'
Low
Pelargonium hortorum
Low
,I
WILSON OLIVE
GARDEN GERANIUM
.. $U' TE
l
REST. 1 25'-o•
3,200
IRRIGATION SYSTEM STATEMENT
Pym. c.'Red.pire
Medium
Penniseluma.'Hameln'
Low
•
SF 'r
REDSPIRE PEAR
HAMELN FOUNTAIN GRASS
8-
The Irrigation System will be a water efficient, low pressure,
r
subsurface system designed to provide adequate support
_
i
of plant growth and promote deeply rooted plant material.
Trees 20' diameter Lag.mucenAWDynamhe
Low
Salvia gregglll
Low
a _ _
® e `__
_
The irrigation controller will be programmable such that the
canopy such as: DYNAMITE CRAPE MYRTLE
AUTUMN SAGE
_
system can operate during early morning hours. The
48
--
��
< schedule will be based on historic and present-day
Lagereo-oem;e watcher
Low
Scaevola'Mauve Clusters'
Low
J
J
evapotranspiration data from CIMIS (the California Irrigation
Management System) so that the amount of water applied
NATCH-CRAPE MYRTLE
•
O
NON
z5'-0`
more closely approximates the amount of water needed by
'
the plant material. This will reduce over -watering
Pym. kaw mii
Medium
Stachys b.'S;Iver Carpet'
Low
'
c
c
c
—
_
EVERGREEN PEAR
SILVER CARPET LAMB'S EARS
•
PLANT PALETTE
THE OFFICE OF
VI�
JEFFREY F. GAMBONI
SHRUBS - 25% will be five gallon size and 75% will be one
gallon size
GROUNDCOVERS -will be from flats or one gallon cans
z
The plants have been chosen with a view toward limiting
5'-0"
the choices to those with relatively lower water
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 2702
Bembuse'AI h Kan'
Tall Shmb, such as: p Dose
Low
A t Rad
Ground..-. such ae: penia' Apple'
Low
I -o"
requirements while still reflecting the regional character of
3012 PACIFIC AVENUE
STOCKTON 95204
ALPHONSE KARR BAMBOO
RED APPLE APTENIA
C
C
'
our landscape. The trees are low to medium water users
209 948 8335
29
o
41
°�0
while the shrubs and perennials are primarily low water
Heteromeles erbutf.1i.
Low
Ard .mphylos'EmeraM Comet'
Low
users (based on WUCOLS, the Water Use Classifications
TOYON
EMERALD CARPET MANZANITA
®
® ® e
C of Landscape Species as published by UC Cooperative
Project:
Reynolds
000
_
_
Extension). Mown turf grass will not be part of this project.
is
7 X U I V W\ O H J U R X Q G F R Y H U V Z
L O O E H RQIIV� I U H H
Phormium lenax
Low
Coprosma p. verde Ysta'
Low
meadow grasses which have less demand for irrigation,
NEW ZEALAND FLAX
NON
90,
fertilization and maintenance. In particular, the plant palette
Highway 99 & Harney Way
9U
has been selected with a view toward minimizing
Lodi, California
Proms lusitanica
Low
Drosanihemum hiapidum.
Low
BANK 1
'�> SHOPS 1
maintenance as well as low water consumption.
PORTUGUESE LAUREL
NON
$,300 SF
O 5,300 SF
'
Developer:
San Joaquin Valley Land Company
.......
•
is
1420 South Mills Avenue, Ste. 1
Rhaphiolepis'Majestic Beauty'
Low
Lampramhus spectabilis
Low
........ .. ............:
dO1S
Lodi, CA 95242
NON
TRAILING ICEPLANT
, '`^��%'
(P) 209.333.3400
4 I`,
(F) 209.333.3430
Medium Shrubs such as: Euonymus j.'Green Spire'
Low
Mow Free Turf Grass Blend
Medium
GREEN SPIRE EUONVMUS
— •
�� — ""''�'
Myoporum parvlfollum
Low
r
Conceptual
Mahonia p.'Ken Hartman'
Low
NON
NORTHWEST QUADRANT:
Landscape Plan
KEN HARTMAN MAHONIA�
`
PARKING AND TREE SUMMARY
cce
oeteoapermum 5vnooaam
Low
'_ _
TOTAL PARKING SPACES: 190
Northwest Quadrant
Myreine africena
Low
TRAILING AFRICAN DAISY
90,
AFRICAN BOXWOOD
NUMBER OF PARKING LOT TREES: 61
Job Number: A07-150
BANK 2
SHOPS 2
NUMBER OF OTHER TREES: 79
Date: 01.05.09
Verbena'Tapien'
Low
o 0
Drawn By: BOSKO
Myrtus communis
Low
NON
TOTAL TREES: 146
Revised: Iteration -A401.19.10
MYRTLE
SEE SHEET L-2
Sheet: ■
VINES -will be one gallon or five gallon size
_�
L
Nandina d.'C—pacts'
Low
Vines such as: Gelsemium semp.,;rsns
Low
DWARF HEAVENLY BAMBOO
CAROLINA JESSAMINE
• • •
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN -
NORTHWEST QUADRANT;
0 20 40 80 160
RAUSCHENBACH MARVELBECKER
Re
Ranch
Highway 99 &Harney Way
architects + engineers
nolds
Lodi, California
1=40'-0"
N
277 wed W,-IN,-nw,.See-me-GA-96625SCale:
P. 9.8500 • F. 918A88.8688 • rmberehhxb.c•m
W X U
NOTE:
SEE SHEET L-1 FOR PLANT PALETTE
CONCEPTUAL LAN[
SEE SHEET L-1
M
J
H
W
W
2
V)
W
W
JL
NORTHWEST
QUADRANT
SOUTHWEST QUADRANT:
PARKING AND TREE SUMMARY
TOTAL PARKING SPACES:
NUMBER OF PARKING LOT TREES:
NUMBER OF OTHER TREES:
TOTAL TREES:
KEY PLAN [�]
NORTHEAST
QUADRANT
SOUTHEAST
QUADRANT
THE OFFICE OF
JEFFREY F. GAMBONI
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 2702
3012 PACIFIC AVENUE
STOCKTON 95204
209 948 8335
Project:
Reynolds
Ranch
Highway 99 & Harney Way
Lodi, California
Developer:
San Joaquin Valley Land Company
1420 South Mills Avenue, Ste. 1
Lodi, CA 95242
(P) 209.333.3400
(F) 209.333.3430
Conceptual
534 Landscape Plan
98 Southwest Quadrant
153
251 Job Number: A07-150
Date: 01.05.09
Drawn By: BOSKO
Revised: Iteration -A4 01.19.10
Sheet: ■ _A
0 20 40 SOHig160
Reynolds Ranch Lodi, Caliwayfor iaarney Way—FiI_
Scale: 1 II _ - 40'-0"
N
C W.
RAUSCHENBACH MARVELLI BECKER
architects + engineers
2277 Weft—, • eemnd Fl— • 6eoremerdo • Ce • 96625
P. e16A88.8500 • F. e16A88.8568 • rmUeroS—..
CV
J
H
W
W
2
W
LU
U)
I
1
1
I
I
I
�I
I
KEY PLAN [�]
SOUTHEAST QUADRANT:
PARKING AND TREE SUMMARY
TOTAL PARKING SPACES:
1,017
NUMBER OF PARKING LOT TREES:
253
I NUMBER OF OTHER TREES:
121
I TOTAL TREES:
I
1
374
1
I NOTE:
SEE SHEET L-1 FOR
PLANT PALETTE
MATCH LINE W
I„
Emil EQUiPMENT
:►
• -
�r-_an . - I. �►•r��Fww�wwwwa►ww � I - O
• I\ = 4i�' a >5 T1s � y ,�,o•, <, O °
LUMBER LOADING FAD Lip,
1 �°e�a gra►�*«.�.,�,�w+�«�*►�►�xar�+���-��:�„�� � �: � !�1
°O1/O 'bS 12.e ='.e.a',e• n. s °,.,a°...°�-fi sh ° O° :.: r.° °°.,P ._aa.s.°:.,°.I�e re, B;'•e '°1Ft r \[� ■ ■ ■ �r w
�j����� t,�Via.
a
-a+�wn�tt+istitt•tene�gwrc+�g-t+ t av'fl€+ 1r O
�� ill; � `�� \i► \i� \w� ►�i' �(�� �O
11 Zvi 112 � 1 � • m . 0 All,
NORTHEAST
QUADRANT
SOUTHEAST
QUADRANT
THE OFFICE OF
JEFFREY F. GAMBONI
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 2702
3012 PACIFIC AVENUE
STOCKTON 95204
209 948 8335
Project:
Reynolds
Ranch
Highway 99 & Harney Way
Lodi, California
Developer:
San Joaquin Valley Land Company
1420 South Mills Avenue, Ste. 1
Lodi, CA 95242
(P) 209.333.3400
(F) 209.333.3430
Conceptual
Landscape Plan
Southeast Quadrant
Job Number: A07-150
Date: 01.05.09
Drawn By: BOSKO
Revised: Iteration -A4 01.19.10
Sheet: ■ _3
.I
RAUSCHENBACH MARVELLI BECKER
architects + engineers
2277 Weft 6wnu• • 6enond Fl— • 6eorem•rdo • Cl1 • 96625
P. e16A88.8500 • F. e16A88.8568 • rmUeroS—..
—7 --------
I
-----_—
I
I
F�I
I II
I II
I II
I II
I III
I
I I
I I
I �
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I I
� I
� I
I I
} I
I Q I
I = I
I � I
I I
I = I
I I
I I /
J i /
I
I
I I
I
II
LI
I
I
I
I
I
I ,
/
II
I
II
I I
II
I
t
I
0 40 80 160 320
Highway &Harney Lane —"iIL� �]
Reynolds Ranch
Lodi, Californiao
Scale: 1" = 80'-0" N
Project:
Reynolds
Ranch
Highway 9'& Harney Lane
Lodi, Celifomia
Developer:
San Joaquin Valley land Company
1420 South Mills Avenue, Ste. 1
Lodi, CA 95242
(P) 209.333.3400
(F) 209.333.3430
Truck Path
Home Depot
Job Number: A07-150
Data: 01.05.09
Drawn By: BOSKO
Revised: Iteration -A502.26.10
Sheet: S P . 01
19.
RAUSCHENBACH MARVELLI BECKER
architects + engineers
2277 Watt Avenue • Second Floor • Sncremenlo • M • 95825
P. 818.488.8500 • F. 818.88.8588 • rmb—hifte ora
Truck Entry
Truck Exit
0 40 80 160 320
Highway &Harney Lane —"iIL� �]
Reynolds Ranch
Lodi, Californiao
Scale: 1" = 80'-0" N
Project:
Reynolds
Ranch
Highway 9'& Harney Lane
Lodi, Celifomia
Developer:
San Joaquin Valley land Company
1420 South Mills Avenue, Ste. 1
Lodi, CA 95242
(P) 209.333.3400
(F) 209.333.3430
Truck Path
Major/I
Job Number: A07-150
Data: 01.05.09
Drawn By: BOSKO
Revised: Iteration -A5 02.26.10
Sheet: s P . 01
19.
RAUSCHENBACH MARVELLI BECKER
architects + engineers
2277 Watt Avenue • Second Floor • Sncremenlo • M • 95825
P. 818.488.8500 • F. 818.88.8588 • rmb—hifte ora
—7 --------
I
-----_—
I
I
F�I
I II
I II
I II
I II
I III
I
I I
I I
I �
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I I
� I
� I
I I
} I
I Q I
I = I
I � I
I I
I = I
I I
I I /
J i /
I
I
I I
I
II
LI
I
I
I
I
I
I ,
/
II
I
II
I I
II
I
j
I
0 40 80 160 320
Highway &Harney Lane —"iIL� �]
Reynolds Ranch
Lodi, Californiao
Scale: 1" = 80'-0" N
Project:
Reynolds
Ranch
Highway 9'& Harney Lane
Lodi, Celifomia
Developer:
San Joaquin Valley land Company
1420 South Mills Avenue, Ste. 1
Lodi, CA 95242
(P) 209.333.3400
(F) 209.333.3430
Truck Path
Major C & Major D
Job Number: A07-150
Data: 01.05.09
Drawn By: BOSKO
Revised: Iteration -A5 02.26.10
Sheet: s P . 01
19.
RAUSCHENBACH MARVELLI BECKER
architects + engineers
2277 Watt Avenue • Second Floor • Sncremenlo • M • 95825
P. 818.488.8500 • F. 818.88.8588 • rmb—hifte ora
STUCCO
SW 6363 Gingery
Grown I,LAu rCuw IAL
111111111111111110
�EYNOLDS
CTI IfIfIf1
HC MUDDOX Monterey Bay Flash ^��v
STANDING SEAM
GUSSET `v
AEP SPAN Zincalume Plus
TIMBER
SW 2841 Weathered Shingle
JCTURE WITH
WISTERIA AND UPLIGHTS AT COLUMNS
Shop / Bank Buildings 1
-A, 17ANCH- Highway 99 & Harney Way 1
Conceptual Design ■ Lodi, CA
A0in50
RMB
02.03.10
RAUSCHENBACH MARVELLI BECKER
architects + engineers
2277 Watt Avenue, Secontl Floor • Sacramento, CA 95825
P. 916.488.8500 • F. 916.488.8566 • —b—hit-t—om
SW;
HC MUDDOX Monterey Bay Flash SW 2841 Weathered Shingle SUNBRELLA
f%0RA0AITITIAI IC LIAI017f%kITA 1 CIr%lKlf%-
TIDING
SW 6363 Gingery
P"
R:EYNOLDS
HC MUDDOX Monterey Bay Flash ENCLOSING SWITCHGEAR GUSSET
Shop / Bank Buildings 1
17ANCH-2
LmVA, Conceptual Design Highway 99 & Harney Way
p g Lodi, CA
°R
SW 2841 Weathered Shingle
A0in50
RMB
02.03.10
RAUSCHENBACH MARVELLI BECKER
architects + engineers
2277 Watt Avenue, Secontl Floor • Sacramento, CA 95825
P. 916.488.8500 • F. 916.488.8566 • —b—hit-t—om
WISTERIA AND UPLIGHTS AT COLUMNS
STUCCO
SW 2834 Birdseye Maple
RtYNOLDS
11M
METAL CANOPY
SW 6117 Smokey Topaz
FIRESIST FABRIC AWNING
SUNBRELLA
VVIt1%U%2P%1 CU IVIG 1/1L rPUIC-L 7
AEP Cool Zatique II
STANDING SEAM
AEP Cool Zatique II
BRICK CLAD PEDESTAL —
HC MUDDOX Monterey Bay Flash
STUCCO
SW 2833 Roycroft Vellum
STUCCO
SW 2834 Birdseye Maple
ri.k
DECORATIVE IRON TIMBER
GUSSET SW 2841 Weathered Shingle
Shops Buildings 5, 6A and 6B
17ANCH-3
Conceptual Design 0 Highway 99 & Harney Way
p g Lodi, CA
STUCCO
SW 6363 Gingery
ESIST FABRIC AWNING
SUNBRELLA
A07-150
STUCCO
SW 6363 Gingery
RMB
02.03.10
RAUSCHENBACH MARVELLI BECKER
architects + engineers
2277 Watt Avenue, S .... d Floor • Sacramento, CA 95825
P. 916.488.8500 • F. 916.488.8566 •—b—hitects.—
STUCCO
SW 2834 Birdseye Maple
STUCCO STUCCO
SW 2835 Craftsman Brown SW 7044 Amazing Gray
SPLIT FACE CMU - SOLDIER COURSE
Basalite D113
CEMENTITIOUS HORIZONTAL SIDING
SW 6165 Connected Gray
CEMENTITIOUS HORIZONTAL SIDING
SW 6192 Coastal Plain
STUCCO SPLIT FACE CMU
SW 6130 Mannered Gold Basalite D380
PjEYNOLDS
STANDING SEAM
AEP Cool Zatique II
BRICK CLAD PEDESTAL —
HC MUDDOX Monterey Bay Flash
STUCCO
SW 2833 Roycroft Vellum
Major Al, A2 and A3
RANCH -4
Conceptual Design 0 HighLodiCA 99 & Harney Way
TIMBER
SW 2841 Weathered Shingle
A07.150
RMB
02.03.10
RAUSCHENBACH MARVELLI BECKER
architects + engineers
2277 Watt Avenue, Becnntl Floor •Sacramento, CA 95625
P. 916.488.8500 • F. 916.488.8566 • rmbarchitects.com
STUCCO
SW 2835 Craftsman Brown
SPLIT FACE CMU - SOLDIER COURSE
Basalite D113
C� 1111 raTaTal
01 -LI i rm%oc t.mu
Basalite D380
SW 6180 Oakmossv SW 2835 Craftsman Brown SW 2841 Weathered Shingle
t3KIC:K ULAIJ Vt:UtJ IAL —
HC MUDDOX Monterey Bay Flash
bvv ui:su mannerea cjoia
Major Al, A2 and A3
5
Conceptual Design Highway 99 & Harney Way
p g Lodi, CA
TIMBER
SW 2841 Weathered Shingle
A07.150
RMB
02.03.10
RAUSCHENBACH MARVELLI BECKER
architects + engineers
2277 Watt Avenue, Second Floor • Sacramento, CA 95825
P. 916.488.8500 - F. 916.488.8566 - rmbarchloccle.co ,
C
SW 2841 Weathered Shingle HC MUDDOX Monterey Bay Flash Basalite D113 Basalite D380 v, ... SW 6180 Oakmossv
HC MUDDOX Monterey Bay Flash SW 6180 Oakmoss SW 2833 Roycroft Vellum Basalite D380
SW 2841 Weathered Shingle
R:EYNOLDS 17ANCH Major C and D
6
Conceptual Design Highway 99 & Harney Way
p 9 Lodi, CA
A07-150
RMB
02.03.10
RAUSCHENBACH MARVELLI BECKER
architects + engineers
2277 Watt Avenue, Secontl Floor • Sacramento, CA 95825
P. 916.488.8500 • F. 916.488.8566 • rmb—hit,—com
-M0Wr8 FY/ArnAW(P CANOPM
NORTH ELEVATION
3ChL+n1" •r.
SOUTH ELEVATION
zav;P.-V
FAST EL -EV TION
kia iiw-r
WEST ELEVATION
Approved Color Legend:
Paint 18harwin MUmms)
wma Roycmft mom
SWA41 Weaathamd Shim
Smem OMOWY
SMAW4 Bhdeeye MWS
SW8492Coastal Piein
SW8215 Renw kk Olive
SWOW4 Canyorr Clay
SW641 T Smokey Topaz
SW2m Cra tsman Brown
S 6430 Mann~ Gold
S"180 Oakmass (?`r#rrr aMy)
SWT 4 Amadog wry
swa ow Nwd*w)
Manterey Say Fhmh
MW Rou ng (AEP Span)
Cocl Fetfque i#
Terra fiats
Parchment
Pabrlc Awnhrg (Sunb"s)
Bkx*
Pmdmwnt
7ww-cous
Maturm
Miller Farms March 22, 2010
349 E. Harney Lane
Lodi, CA 95240-6839
Ph: 209-810-7399
To: Lodi City Council; Lodi Planning Commission
Re: Impact from Reynolds Ranch on Harney Lane
Dear Lodi City Council:
For 75 years our family (3 generations) has lived and farmed the land at 349
E. Harney Lane. Our headquarters for our farming/nursery business, shops and
residences are located here. For many years, the only traffic we experienced was
to and from the dump and the cemetery. However, over the course of the last 20
years, Harney Lane has become an expressway for those who are too impatient
to deal with all the stop lights on Kettleman Lane.
Our concerns are:
1. The amount of traffic from Reynolds Ranch that impacts our
property without adequate improvements from Highway 99 to West
Lane on Harney Lane.
2. How to access Harney Lane safely for our family, employees and
customers with whom we do business.
3. Loss of access and financial impact.
4. The Future Developmentof 349 E. Harney Lane.
1. On February 25, our family had a meeting with Mr. Bartlam and Mr. Sandelin
to discuss the time line for completion and proposed "improvements". My
understanding is that traffic lights will be installed before the opening of Costco
and that Harney Lane will be expanded to four lanes between Stockton St. and
Reynolds Ranch Parkway. What is not clear is the exact timeline for completion of
the Highway 99 overpass improvement and railroad underpass project.
Additionally, we are concerned if funding actually exists for engineering and
completion by the end of 2020. I requested from the City of Lodi engineering
maps for Harney Lane from Melby Lane to the Highway 99 overpass so that
could submit them to PG@E in order to inquire about the existing 60 kv power
lines. Mr. Day from PG@E could not answer my questions because the maps
submitted are not engineering road maps. After considerable research,
discovered that engineering maps for the proposed overpass/underpass either do
not exist or are for some reason being kept secret.
As local farmers, we must take a pragmatic approach to current issues. As
pragmatists, we view the current real estate glut, as an edict for our family to farm
this piece for at least the next 10 years. Our understanding is that once the
Reynolds Ranch development is complete, there will be an additional 50,000 car
movements daily on Harney Lane. However, our understanding is that the only
four lane stretch that will exist will be between Melby Lane and Stockton St.. The
question that my entire family banters about is: What will happen when the 30
trains that backup traffic each day increases by 50,000 vehicles? Question #2:
How will we access our property?
2. At the present time ingress and egress on our property is made safely by
both right and left hand turns. However, in the future, we will have no choice to
make left turns onto Harney or onto our property.. Instead, we will be forced to
maneuver our way so that only right hand turns will be made to access or leave
the farm. The amount of additional time (man hours) necessaryto complete this
task (30 to 40 times a day) will adversely affect our daily activities and the amount
of work able to completed.
3a. Although much of what we have addressed deals with monetary concerns,
what concerns us even more is the safety issues that 50,000 additional
automotive movements poses. Having safe access to our property and preventing
car crashes and loss of life must be a priority. A car movement of concern is our
mothers ability to back out of her garage. With the increased amount of traffic,
she will be backing out into oncoming traffic. Currently, we must navigate the
power poles that are on our side (the north) of the road. The power pole that is
located at the east end of our property (but on city of Lodi owned property
dedicated to the city by the Miller estate in 2005) is barricaded by barrels filled
with sand; obviously some person of influence has deemed this to be a safety
issue. Additionally, the pole on the west end of our land abuts the road, and we
must consider barricading it to avoid liability because of the proposed increased
traffic. However, if we barricade the pole, we will lose all access to our shop area.
In order to remedy this possibility, fruit bearing trees will have to be removed and
pavement laid down at an exorbitant cost. Please consider, that with increased
traffic, the possibility of ceasing our cherry fruit stand business becomes a stark
reality. Losing the fruit stand causes both an economic impact and the end to a
family treasured way of sharing our way of life with our community... all good for
Reynolds Ranch, not so good for the Miller's. As we shared with Mr. Bartlam
and Mr. Sandelin, we are willing to discuss the possibility of family access to our
property from Driftwood off of Melby Lane. And although this may temper some of
the safety concerns, it will not alleviate the financial impact imposed by the
Reynolds Ranch proposition.
3b. Another major concern for the Miller Farm family is safe daily access to all
parts of the farm. We traverse our property countless times each day to water our
green house (located on the east side of the property), plant crops, weed, and
harvest crops which must then be transported to the cold box (located on the
western edge of our property). Tillers, tractors, trailers, and trucks need to move
unimpeded from one part of the property to the other. Currently, we utilize Harney
Lane or the frontage shoulder on the north side of Harney Lane to complete these
necessary daily tasks. If Harney Lane is widened and a safety barrier constructed
to separate east -bound and west -bound traffic, our property will become virtually
land locked. We anticipate having to construct access roads at the cost of
removing crop -bearing trees and flower beds. We further anticipate the need for 5
gates (1 electric) to provide us safe access to Harney Lane and to alleviate the
inevitable "lost" trespasser and encroaching construction crew and equipment.
4. Eventually, this property will be developed, but the reality is development
may take some years since a resurgence in the housing market is not being
predicted anytime in the near future. Until such a resurgence, we must continue
to work the farm and access Harney Lane safely. Our position has never been
against the Reynolds Ranch Development; we are a sensible, hardworking family
with no history of delusional behavior. As long as the project managers mitigate
the impact of their development on the surrounding owners and the City of Lodi,
we are willing to negotiate. Considering the size of the organizations and
companies that will profit for years, I believe some mutually acceptable, safe
culmination is possible.
Please, if any portion of our understanding of the development process is
mistaken, we invite clarification. We are not lawyers, we are farmers who have
always and intend to continue to work in good faith with our neighbors whoever
they may be.
Yours Very Truly:
da�y
Craig Miller
Miller Farms
Charles & Melissa Katzakian
Kari Chadwick
Subject: Planning commsion meeting Statement
From: Katzakian [mailto: chaskat@sbcg lobal.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 4:57 PM
To: Kari Chadwick
Subject: Fw: Planning commsion meeting Statement
Charles & Melissa Katzakian
P.O. Box 2484
Lodi, CA. 95241
3-24-10
Dear Planning Commission,
Page 1 of 1
We are the owners of the Morse Skinner Ranch House, the historic property located on the Reynolds
Ranch site. We object to the proposed discretionary site plan and architectural review approval of the
Reynolds Ranch Shopping Center, which relies on the 2006 project description and EIR. Supplemental
environmental review is triggered by the developers' failure to comply with mitigations requiring
protections of our historic property via conversion to commercial use.
Your proposed findings are not supported by substantial evidence, because the continued residential use
of our property is not compatible with the commercial development on this site and was not studied in
the prior EIR or Initial Study. There is no evidence supporting a finding that the development will be
compatible with surrounding development. The Home Depot, in particular, provides access directly to
the rear of our residential property, and parking surrounds us. The City's Resolution 2006-162 approving
this project said that the project would "adaptively reuse the Morse Skinner Ranch House and water
tower, a significant historic resource." Yet at this time the historic house remains in residential use, NOT
adaptive reuse, and we have been given no viable alternative but to stay there.
We note that although we brought this problem to the Commission's attention last month relative to the
Costco SPARC approval, the current staff report makes no mention of the historic Morse Skinner Ranch
House or our land use incompatibilities.
Since the project description for Reynolds Ranch always described commercial reuse of the historic
property, such as for a restaurant; there has never been any EIR analysis of the incompatibility of
continued residential land use. Yet that is what the developers now propose. The current application
therefore cannot be approved due to this significant project change to remove a key project component
affecting our historic property, and a supplemental EIR is required before you can consider approval of
the Home Depot or other commercial development of Reynolds Ranch.
Charles & Melissa Katzakian
Susan Brandt -Hawley
Brandt -Hawley Law Group
W 707.938.3900
03/23/2010
LODI PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING
CARNEGIE FORUM, 305 WEST PINE STREET
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2010
1. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
The Regular Planning Commission meeting of February 10, 2010, was called to order by
Chair Cummins at 7:00 p.m.
Present: Planning Commissioners — Heinitz, Hennecke, Kirsten, Kiser, Olson, and Chair Cummins
Absent: Planning Commissioners — Mattheis
Also Present: Community Development Director Konradt Bartlam, Deputy City Attorney Janice
Magdich, Assistant Planner Immanuel Bereket, Public Works Director Wally Sandelin
and Administrative Secretary Kari Chadwick
2. MINUTES
"January 27, 2010"
MOTION /VOTE:
The Planning Commission, on motion of Commissioner Kirsten, Kiser second, approved the
Minutes of January 27, 2010 as written. (Commissioner Olson and Chair Cummins abstained
because they were not in attendance of the subject meeting)
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a) Notice thereof having been published according to law, an affidavit of which publication is on file in
the Community Development Department, Chair Cummins called for the public hearing to consider
the request to certify the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 08 -ND -03 as adequate
environmental documentation for the proposed project; request for a Tentative Parcel Map to divide
one parcel in to two lots and approve the site plan and architecture of the proposed development
including affordable housing development standard concessions at 2245 Tienda Drive. (Applicant:
Eden Housing. File Number 09 -MND -03, 09-P-01 and 09 -SP -04)
Director Konradt Bartlam gave a brief PowerPoint presentation based on the staff report. There is
one concession that is being asked for and that is for the number of parking spaces. There
currently is not a separate parking requirement for senior housing. The closest requirement is for
multi -family housing which is two spaces per unit. The applicant is asking for three-quarters of a
space per unit. Staff has reviewed this and compared it to comparable projects and believes it is a
reasonable standard for the project proposed. Staff is recommending approval of the project as
presented.
Commissioner Heinitz stated his concerns regarding the lack of parking and the nature of Tienda
Drive as a thoroughfare to the Target Shopping Center. There is also the school directly across the
street. Tienda Drive is somewhat of an upscale neighborhood entering into Sunwest. He also
added that if he were to bring a project before staff for an apartment building two covered parking
spaces would be required per unit. The parking that is being recommended isn't even covered.
The units on Wimbledon which closely resembles this project seems to have more parking spaces
and with all the empty hard spaces that are on the plan he fells that there could be more parking
provided. Director Bartlam stated that there are examples in town, like the Arbor project and the
Vintage, that supply less than two parking spaces per unit and they are straight senior projects with
no income restriction. The project located in Manteca which Mr. Bartlam visited a couple of times
has the same situation as this project and has less than one space per unit and not all of the
spaces are being utilized. The average age of the tenants is close to 80 and the income is in the
very low range. Heinitz stated that there are transportation and other amenities that are being
supplied to those other projects that are not being offered with this project.
Continued
Commissioner Olson stated her concerns regarding the parking also and would like to know which
demographic sector is being targeted. Mr. Bartlam stated that the demographics here will be the
same as the demographics in Manteca, income earnings will be $10,000-$15,000 per year in most
cases. Rents will be gauged to be no more than thirty percent of their income. The target group
that is in need and the one that staff and Eden Housing feels will be reached is the single female in
their seventies. Olson asked what kind of stock Lodi currently has. Bartlam stated that there are
only a couple of projects just for seniors, the Arbors and the LOEL Center has sixteen units mostly
within walking distance of the center. The downtown hotel is also an example that would be at the
same income level and it has no parking. Olson asked if overflow parking would be on the street.
Mr. Bartlam stated that it would, but overflow parking is not anticipated.
Hearing Opened to the Public
• Faye Blackman, Eden Housing representative, came forward to answer questions. Ms.
Blackman gave a brief presentation of the company's assets and introduced the rest of the
team that accompanied her here tonight. The target tenant is the single female in her
seventies.
• Chair Cummins asked if the target age is over 70 years of age. Ms. Blackman stated that
that is correct.
Commissioner Heinitz asked about the other developments managed by Eden and what
types of amenities are offered in and around the property. Ms Blackman stated that other
projects are in and around public transport. Eden also creates relationships with local
senior centers and has reached out to the LOEL Center and the Senior Center located at
Hutchins Street Square and is looking forward to working with them. Heinitz asked about
transportation for grocery shopping, doctor's appointments, etc. Ms Blackman stated that
there is a bus stop about a quarter mile away that services four lines and for the seniors
that don't use the bus , or the City's Dial -a -Ride system Eden feels there will be other
support groups to assist them.
Vice Chair Hennecke asked if there will be more demand for the 55 to 70 in the near future.
Ms Blackman stated that she does not foresee any demand issues in this category.
Hennecke asked if any one bedroom units have couples living in them. Ms Blackman
stated that there are few couples living in the one bedroom units. Eden allows up to three
people living in the one bedroom units, a couple with their care provider, but this is not very
common. Hennecke asked if in the case where there are two or more people living in the
residence does only one of them have to be 55 or older. Ms Blackman stated that only one
needs to be 55 years of age.
Commissioner Kiser stated his concerns with the lack of parking, his concern over a senior
having to walk a quarter mile to catch a bus, and his concern over three people sharing a
one bedroom apartment. Ms Blackman stated that three people in a one bedroom
apartment is very rare and isn't expected, but is allowed. Kiser asked if there will be a bus
service to take the residents to the LOEL Center for dinner since this project does not
provide dinners. Ms Blackman stated that Eden is working with the LOEL Center to provide
this type of service. Kiser stated that he will have a problem approving the project if those
amenities are not in place.
Commissioner Olson stated that she is hearing a great deal of support by City staff and is
confident that staff will make sure that the transportation is provided. Olson pointed out the
potential PV System and asked why it is just a potential system. Ms. Blackman stated that
the PV system is very expensive and Eden is trying to identify a funding source. Mr.
Bartlam stated that Staff has been working with the Electric Utilities Department to help find
a funding source.
Commissioner Heinitz stated his concern with three people living in a one bedroom unit and
whether or not that is legal under the Uniform Housing Codes, and if there are three people
one would probably be a support staff that will have need of a vehicle. Peter Waller,
architect for the project, came forward to address the concerns with the lack of parking
2
Continued
spaces. There is a strong push for an open space concept with this project and adding
additional parking contradicts that goal. One of the reasons is for on site storm water
management. This allows for less impact on the City wide storm drainage system. If this
was a regular multi -family complex then two parking spaces per unit would be provided, but
it isn't and Eden is just asking for the project to be pictured as what it is. Mr. Waller
explained some of the items that will be used to make this project as green as possible.
Heinitz stated that he is in total support of this project, but has an issue with the lack of
parking because of the overflow being on Tienda Drive. Mr. Waller stated that there has
not with all of the other projects done by Eden been parking issue. It would not be
beneficial for Eden to not supply enough parking for their tenants, or supply too much
parking.
Commissioner Kiser stated that in addition to concerns with parking there is a concern with
the PV System being shown that may not happen and the roofing material that is being
used is not going to fit in with the surrounding area. Kiser is concerned that what is being
shown to the Commission isn't going to happen. Mr. Waller stated that the roofing shingles
will be a thirty or forty year shingle. Kiser stated that what is shown is not a thirty or forty
year composition shingle and the PV System that is shown may not be used. Mr. Waller
stated that the solar is being shown because the intention is to put them on the buildings
and there may have been objections if they were not shown and added later and the roofing
shingles will be a thirty or forty year asphalt shingle. Kiser would like to be shown what is
going to be done not what could be.
• Commissioner Hennecke asked about the spaces next to the office being designated as
visitor parking. Mr. Waller stated that they will be designated for visitors.
• Commissioner Heinitz stated his concern for the quality of the project being presented for
this area and the emphasis that is being placed on expense. Mr. Waller asked if there is a
specific answer that would be more satisfactory that would be satisfactory for the roof.
Heinitz stated that he doesn't want a verbal promise, he wants it in writing.
Director Bartlam stated that this is the site plan and architectural review and if the
Commission wishes to require architectural changes to the project then they have discretion
to do so. Mr. Bartlam pointed out that the Wine and Roses project used an asphalt shingle.
This is a two phase project, so maybe the Commission could place conditions for one
parking space per unit on the first phase and at the appropriate time Eden can bring back
the second phase for any alterations, but conditioning it this way could cost valuable living
units. If there are specific conditions the Commission wants to place on the type of roofing
shingles or the PV System used, then that is your prerogative and now is the time to do it.
Commissioner Olson stated that she is very excited about the project and that she feels the
Commission's questions are valid. She also stated that the City could have made this go a
little easier by showing that there would be support services going to this location, and then
.75 parking spaces would be great. Mr. Bartlam stated that the City has a very
accomplished Dial -A -Ride program. Staff is bringing forward a recommendation for what is
believed to be a project that is in the best interest of the community based on staff's
experience. Olson stated that she is all for giving the builder the benefit of the doubt, but
believes that there are other support issues beyond the building that will make this a
successful project. She is inclined to work with Eden through the first phase rather than not
have the senior housing that is so desperately needed.
• Commissioner Kiser stated his agreement with Commissioner Olson, but would like to see
a condition requiring an architectural roofing shingle.
Katie Lamont, representative for Eden Housing, came forward to address concerns. The
seniors that come to live at an Eden project stay with Eden until they can no longer live on
their own. The facilities are staffed with a coordinator that is there to make sure that the
amenities that are needed get supplied. This project when put to an internal test for green
point scale rating rated a 127, so the commitment to green building is a very high priority.
Solar isn't the first item that is looked at for a project because there are so many other items
that are higher on the green scale. The parking has been determined by past experiences
with all the projects that Eden has done, and would not be brought to the Commission for
Continued
approval with inadequate parking as suggested. After having many discussions with Tracy
Williams with the LOEL Center there is transportation services to and from the project site
to the center through the public bus transportation system and Dial -A -Ride. The LOEL
Center has five vans at their disposal that Eden is in discussions with Ms. Williams for the
use of one of them to help with the transportation of Eden's residents to and from the
Center and home. There will also be other support areas such as family and friends that
will provide transportation.
Commissioner Kirsten asked if there is a demand for senior housing in Lodi. Ms. Lamont
stated that the City sending out a RFP (Request For Proposals) for the project indicates the
need. Ms Blackman stated that there is a waiting list with 150 people on it for the current
senior housing units in Lodi. Kirsten stated that the market drives this type of project. Ms
Blackman agreed. Kirsten stated his understanding of the cost factor for the affordability
and wanted to know if the concerns that are being expressed could drive up the cost or are
the items doable from an affordability aspect. Ms Blackman stated that there is a point that
will put the project out of the affordability range. Eden is an owner/builder/manager
company and the projects are built to a lasting standard. Kirsten stated that he is
concerned about the lack of parking also, but will defer that to Eden at this time. He would
not like to see the project loose units at the cost of parking. Kirsten asked about other
projects having PV systems and the return they have had. Ms Blackman stated that there
is one project that is currently having a PV system installed.
Keith Land, former board member for the LOEL Center, came forward to support the
project. The LOEL Center has 16 units and only 7 parking spaces are utilized because of
the cost of maintaining the vehicles. The Center offers congregational meals and currently
serves 53 meals per day. Through the CDBG program offered by the City of Lodi the
Center has received enough money to remodel the kitchen and with the remodel the meal
capacity will be 500 meals per day. The goal of the LOEL Center is to start providing
Meals -On -Wheels to seniors all around the City. Mr. Land stated that he sat on the board
that chose Eden Housing for this project and stated that in his opinion Eden is the cream of
the crop. Mr. Land has been to the Manteca project site five times and there is always
parking even during the grand opening.
• Commissioner Hennecke asked how the seniors get around town. Mr. Land stated that
there is a combination of ways, family, bus, and Dial -A -Ride that get the seniors around to
their various appointments.
Public Portion of Hearing Closed
• Commissioner Hennecke asked if there is a way to incorporate a bus stop in front of this
project. Director Sandelin stated that a bus route does not currently go down Tienda Drive.
A route study would have to be done to determine the need, but based on the clientele
being served here Mr. Sandelin feels they would much rather use Dial -A -Ride.
• Chair Cummins stated that Commissioner Mattheis and he were a part of the group that
picked Eden for this project and feels that this is a benefit to the City. He does not feel that
this project should be held to the same standards as a single family custom built home like
the ones you will find in the adjacent development. Cummins shared that his mother lives
in a similar type development in Michigan and it is very nice.
• Commissioner Heinitz stated that his main concern is the lack of parking. If the
Commission were to leave the condition at .75 spaces per unit for phase one would phase
two come back, so that it can be determined if that was adequate. Mr. Bartlam stated that
he recommends changing the condition to reflect the one space per unit for the first phase
then let Eden come back to request less if they find that one space is more than enough.
Worst case scenario Eden looses a few units in the back on phase two.
• Commissioner Kirsten stated that there is an urgent need for this type of housing in our
area and is comfortable with the parking assessments provided by Eden and would hesitate
to increase the parking at this time. Kirsten would like the Commission to not condition the
project out of the affordability range or to take away any of the green space.
Continued
• Commissioner Olson stated her agreement with Commissioner Kirsten and would support
the project with the current parking so as to not loose any units and with an added condition
for the architectural roofing shingles if that is something the other Commissioners felt
strongly about.
• Commissioner Heinitz agreed with his fellow Commissioners other than erring on the side
of caution for the first phase and requiring one parking space per unit and then going with
the .5 spaces per unit on the second phase which would then equal out to be .75.
• Commissioner Hennecke stated his agreement with Commissioner Kiser regarding the
architectural roof shingles and as far as the parking he is comfortable with the plan as
proposed. He then asked if staff new what the utilization of the bus transit and Dial -A -Ride
system is for the other senior housing projects. Mr. Bartlam and Sandelin stated that they
did not have those numbers directly in front of them, but could get them and bring them
back.
• Commissioner Kiser stated appreciation to his fellow Commissioners in their support for the
architectural roofing shingles. He would also like to err on the side of caution for the
parking spaces and require one per unit now and let Eden come back and ask to alter it for
phase two.
• Director Bartlam stated the possible added language for the altered condition #5:
o At a minimum a thirty year architectural grade shingle will be used.
• Commissioner Kirsten added to condition #4; that there be a 1 to 1 ratio for parking for
phase one.
MOTION /VOTE:
The Planning Commission, on motion of Kirsten, Kiser second, approved the request of the
Planning Commission to certify the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 08 -ND -03 as
adequate environmental documentation for the proposed project at 2245 Tienda Drive subject
to the conditions in the Resolution. and;
Approved the request of the Planning Commission for a Tentative Parcel Map to divide one
parcel in to two lots and approve the site plan and architecture of the proposed development
including affordable housing development standard concessions at 2245 Tienda Drive subject
to the conditions in the Resolution with the added verbiage as stated above. The motion
carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Commissioners — Heinitz, Hennecke, Kirsten, Kiser, Olson, and Chair Cummins
Noes: Commissioners — None
Absent: Commissioners — Mattheis
b) Notice thereof having been published according to law, an affidavit of which publication is on file in
the Community Development Department, Chair Cummins called for the public hearing to consider
the request for a Use Permit to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages and approve the SPARC
application concerning the COSTCO Wholesale building. (Applicant: David Babcock, on behalf of
COSTCO Wholesale. File Number: 09-U-15 and 09 -SP -15)
Director Konradt Bartlam gave a brief PowerPoint presentation based on the staff report. Mr.
Bartlam provided a look at what is proposed for the balance of the center that was submitted after
the packet delivery.
Commissioner Kiser asked what the time line is for the reconstruction build out for Harney Lane.
Director Sandelin stated that the widening of Harney Lane west of Stockton Street running easterly
to a point east of the second Costco driveway should be completed prior to the store opening.
There are some additional interchange improvements that will be complete prior to the store
opening. Kiser asked when the store is projected to be open. Mr. Bartlam stated no later than late
summer. Kiser asked if the Haney Lane improvements would be complete in time. Mr. Sandelin
stated they would.
Commissioner Heinitz asked about the Highway interchange improvements making the traffic more
difficult. Director Sandelin stated that one of the original mitigation measures was to make
improvements to the two wrap intersections, one on the east side of the interchange and the other
5
Continued
on the west side. Staff is working with CalTrans and has received a verbal commitment from them
to have those improvements done by late summer.
Director Bartlam pointed out that there have been a few changes made to the Resolution which are
shown on the Resolution provided on the Blue Sheets.
Hearina Opened to the Public
• David Babcock, Real-estate Development Director for Costco, came forward to answer
questions. Mr. Babcock provided some background information on the Costco Company
and the positive effects that the company has on the communities that they reside.
• Commissioner Kirsten asked if having the Costco visible from the freeway will help attract
traffic that wouldn't normally stop in Lodi into the shopping center helping to create sale tax
dollars for Lodi. Mr. Babcock stated that if you are a Costco member you are able to stop
at any center to do your shopping and when you purchase something the zip code related
to that card is recorded and there are many occasions that an out of the area member is
found shopping at other out of their area warehouses. Kirsten stated that he and his family
shop at the Costco in Stockton as do other families from Lodi, so this should help to bring
those tax dollars back to our town.
• Commissioner Heinitz asked if the numbers of how many shoppers from the 95240 area
shop at the Stockton store. Mr. Babcock stated that he does not have access to those
numbers.
• Commissioner Hennecke asked if this store is likely to bring in customers from outside the
immediate area. Mr. Babcock stated that it is projected to serve not only Lodi, but the
surrounding area.
• Chair Cummins asked how many new stores that are being built or in the planning stages of
being built in California. Mr. Babcock stated that this is the only store currently being built in
northern California.
• Commissioner Olson stated her concerns over the amount of asphalt and would like to here
more about the areas that are being addressed in regards to sustainability. Mr. Babcock
stated that the lighting inside the store is being supplemented with skylights and the heating
and cooling are regulated very closely with very sophisticated controls. Landscaping is a
major part of the project that will help to deflect heat from the outside to inside. This all
lends a hand in reducing the energy consumption of the building.
• Commissioner Hennecke asked if there will be any additional items such as solar panels
being used on the project. Mr. Babcock stated that with the amount of skylights that are
proposed with this project it would be unbeneficial to cover them up with solar panels.
• Melissa and Charles Katzakian, owners of the Morse -Skinner Ranch, came forward to
object to the project. The project is relying on the 2006 project description and EIR. The
developer has failed to comply with mitigations which require protection of the historical
property, Morse/Skinner Ranch, via conversion to commercial use. Condition number five
of the resolution has not been met because of the residential use of our property being
surrounded by the commercial development with this project and future projects to the site.
As part of the City's Resolution 2006-162 which approved the original project states that the
project would adaptively reuse the Morse -Skinner Ranch and water tower, but to date this
has not happened. There has not been an EIR analysis to consider the incompatibility of
the continued residential land use of our property. Mrs. Katzakian does not believe that this
project can be approved until a supplemental EIR has been done to take in to account the
residential use of the property.
• Kathy Curley, property owner on Harney Lane directly north of the project, came forward to
request clarification on the timeline of the project being finished and the improvements
made to Harney Lane. Mr. Bartlam stated that the questions will be addressed once the
public hearing is closed to the public.
IN
Continued
Public Portion of Hearing Closed
Director Sandlin stated that there are two different improvement projects that are scheduled
to occur prior to the opening of the first use at the Reynolds Ranch Project. The four lane
widening generally between Stockton Street and just east of the driveway entering the
project site. The second improvement project which is being processed now as an
encroachment permit through CalTrans will add turn lane improvements on both ends of the
interchange and will also add signalized intersection improvements at the intersections of
the existing ramps.
Hearinq Re -opened to the Public
• David Babcock came forward to question a few of the conditions in the Resolution.
o #3 — Costco would like to have an outdoor display area.
o #15 — While accommodating this condition a few parking spaces may need to be
sacrificed. This may limit any expansion requests in the future which would
require more parking spaces to be sacrificed. Chair Cummins stated that
Costco currently has thirteen more spaces than required. Mr. Babcock
stated that that is correct.
o #21 c — The parking lot light fixture height is set at 25 feet; Costco would like to put
theirs up at 35 feet.
o #53 and 55 — These two items talk about specific ADA requirements and the
concern is that they may be too specific in their verbiage. ADA
requirements are legal requirements that Costco will follow to the legal letter.
• Chair Cummins asked about the parking lot fixtures being increased to a height of 35 feet.
Bartlam stated that the 25 foot height is typical of what has been required in the Lodi area.
When you get to the 35 foot level there is more light spilling over into the outlining areas.
• Chair Cummins asked for clarification on what the request is on outside storage. Babcock
stated that he would like to be able to take care of the occasional outside displays on an
administrative level. Cummins asked if the concern on condition number 53 and 55 was
with the specific language not the requirements to ADA. Mr. Babcock stated that that is
correct.
• Commissioner Kiser stated the understanding for wanting the 35 foot high light fixtures but
is concerned with the light spilling over into the residential windows at night. Mr. Babcock
stated that every precaution would be taken to ensure that light would not be spilling over
into the surrounding residential areas. Kiser asked if staff prefers the 25 foot standard.
Bartlam stated that the recommendation is at the 25 foot level because staff feels that is
adequate.
• Commissioner Heinitz asked about the clarification on the outside storage based on past
experiences. Mr. Babcock stated that the outside storage would be on a temporary part-
time basis. Heinitz asked if the verbiage regarding the outside storage being on a
temporary part-time basis. Mr. Bartlam stated that the condition does not state that there
can not be any outdoor storage just that the area for storage needs to be approved by
SPARC.
• Commissioner Olson asked if the rest of the center is desirous of having the lighting
standards at the 35 foot level. Mr. Babcock stated that yes they are. Mr. Bartlam stated
that staff has not had a chance to take a good look at the plans for the rest of the shopping
center, but staff will want the lighting to be consistent throughout the center.
• Commissioner Hennecke asked if the outdoor display would be similar to the one at the
Stockton store near the tire shop. Mr. Babcock stated that it would. Hennecke asked if
there were any special conditions placed on the Lowes outdoor storage. Bartlam stated
that Lowes currently has an outdoor storage plan that has been approved by the City.
7
Continued
Public Portion of Hearing Closed
• Director Bartlam stated that there is enough flexibility in condition number 15 to allow for
outdoor storage with the plan submitted by Costco. The concerns regarding condition 53
and 55 comes down to the fact that the ADA requirements will have to be met and
approved by the Building Division. Condition number 53 can be shortened if it is the desire
of the Commission to read:
o Walkways and sidewalks along accessible routes of travel shall be in
compliance(4) GGRUnuously aGGegSible, 0have mwimun4 11-2" shun
e/e alien (3) are minimum 49" in wirlfh (4) hada a m ximum : /4" eF feet dire
0
slope,
.
not separated+' re^�ili F other- ele gents betweenthepee. tl4an
whiGh is " wide, Gempl with the 2007 CBC, Section 1133B.8.5.
• Chair Cummins asked for clarification on the language allowing the outdoor storage. Mr.
Bartlam stated that the floor plan slide from the PowerPoint which shows the outdoor
storage could be added to the resolution as an attachment constituting the approval of the
outdoor storage if that is the Commissions desire.
Commissioner Kiser stated his concerns with the request in increasing the height of the
light standards. The Blue Shield project has the light standards at 25 foot.
MOTION /VOTE:
The Planning Commission, on motion of Commissioner Kirsten, Kiser second, approved the
request of the Planning Commission for a Use Permit to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages
and approved the SPARC application concerning the COSTCO Wholesale building located at
the SW corner of Harney Lane and Hwy 99 subject to the conditions in the Blue Sheet
Resolution with the changes discussed above. The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Commissioners — Heinitz, Hennecke, Kirsten, Kiser, Olson, and Chair Cummins
Noes: Commissioners — None
Absent: Commissioners — Mattheis
4. PLANNING MATTERS/FOLLOW-UP ITEMS
None
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND CORRESPONDENCE
None
6. ACTIONS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Director Bartlam referenced the memo in the packet and stated that staff is available for questions.
7. GENERAL PLAN UPDATE/DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE
None
8. ACTIONS OF THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
None
9. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
None
Continued
10. COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC
None
11. COMMENTS BY STAFF AND COMMISSIONERS
None
12. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, the meeting was adjourned
at 9:37 p.m.
ATTEST:
Konradt Bartlam
Planning Commission Secretary
x
LODI PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING
CARNEGIE FORUM, 305 WEST PINE STREET
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 24, 2010
1. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
The Regular Planning Commission meeting of March 24, 2010, was called to order by Chair Cummins
at 7:00 p.m.
Present: Planning Commissioners — Heinitz, Hennecke, Kirsten, Kiser, Olson, and Chair Cummins
Absent: Planning Commissioners — Mattheis
Also Present: Community Development Director Konradt Bartlam, Deputy City Attorney Janice
Magdich, Assistant Planner Immanuel Bereket, and Administrative Secretary Kari
Chadwick
2. MINUTES
"February 10, 2010"
MOTION /VOTE:
The Planning Commission, on motion of Commissioner Heinitz, Kiser second, approved the
Minutes of February 10, 2010 as written.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a) Notice thereof having been published according to law, an affidavit of which publication is on file in
the Community Development Department, Chair Cummins called for the public hearing to consider
the request for approval of a SPARC application concerning the Reynolds Ranch Shopping Center.
(Applicant: Jennifer Krauter, RMB Architects on behalf of San Joaquin Valley Land Co., LLC. File
No. 10 -SP -02)
Director Bartlam gave a brief PowerPoint presentation based on the staff report.
Commissioner Olson asked if the Morse/Skinner Ranch is on a historical registry or if the
owners have a State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Letter. Director Bartlam stated that it
is on a federal registry.
Commissioner Kiser asked if the timeline for the Harney lane improvements is still gong to be
on schedule with the opening of the center. Director Bartlam stated that the off site
improvements for Harney Lane are included in condition number 53.
Hearinq Opened to the Public
• Dale Gillespie, applicant, came forward to answer questions. Mr. Gillespie asked to revise
condition number 38 of the resolution which pertains to the Habitat Fees. He would like to
create a schedule for the Community Development Director showing the fees for the roads
and detention basin distributed evenly amongst all of the permits for the project.
• Commissioner Heinitz asked when the first planning for this project started. Gillespie stated
that the planning of this project started in late 2005 early 2006.
• Kiser asked for clarification regarding the fees being distributed. Mr. Gillespie stated that
for all of the public spaces he would like to have a schedule dividing those spaces evenly
amongst all of the permits within the project area.
• Hennecke asked if there was a fee schedule already presented. Mr. Bartlam stated that the
fee schedule that is referenced in the condition is the San Joaquin COG schedule. The fee
Continued
schedule that Mr. Gillespie is referring to is something he is going to be presenting. Mr.
Bartlam stated that he will read into the record the proposed language at the appropriate
time. Hennecke asked if this will impact the construction of the basin or other public
spaces. Mr. Bartlam stated that the basin and pumping station were constructed at the time
of the Blue Shield project. Mr. Gillespie added that it isn't the intention to have any of the
fees frozen, just distributed evenly.
• Kiser asked if this is similar to what Manteca is proposing to help spur the economy. Mr.
Bartlam stated that this is not similar. This is meant to be more of a fair share proposal for
the entire project.
Chair Cummins asked if there is a groundbreaking date set. Mr. Gillespie stated that
possibly in July of this year.
Public Portion of Hearing Closed
Commissioner Kiser stated his appreciation of the architecture of the project and
recommends approval.
• Commissioner Kirsten stated that there are legitimate concerns regarding the traffic, but
doesn't feel that there is anyone that would like to stand in the way of the project. He also
feels that the traffic issues will get worked out in the end.
Commissioner Hennecke asked to hear the revised verbiage for condition number 38. Mr.
Bartlam stated that:
o The project shall incorporate all mitigation measures as specified in the adopted
Final Environmental Impact Report for Reynolds Ranch Project (State
Clearinghouse Number 2006012113). Specifically, Mitigation Measure 3.2.2
subjects the Reynolds Ranch development to participate in the San Joaquin County
Multi -Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMHCP). This
includes payment of Open Space Conversion fees in accordance with the fee
schedule in -effect at the time of construction commences. Prior to issuance of
s+t;--(20aGre) and—easeenen 24aGres) the applicant shall pay in
accordance with the San Joaquin Multi -Species Habitat Plan fee schedule the fees
based upon the gross acreage of the overall Reynolds Ranch Project as described
and include all public use acreage as outlined in a per acre schedule to be
prepared with the developer which will be subject to the approval of the Community
Development Director prior to the next building permit issuance within the project
by the applicant or any other subsequent property owner.
MOTION /VOTE:
The Planning Commission, on motion of Kiser, Heinitz second, approved the request of the
Planning Commission for a SPARC application concerning the Reynolds Ranch Shopping
Center subject to the conditions in the Resolution. The motioned carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Commissioners — Heinitz, Hennecke, Kirsten, Kiser, Olson, and Chair Cummins
Noes: Commissioners — None
Absent: Commissioners — Mattheis
4. PLANNING MATTERS/FOLLOW-UP ITEMS
None
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND CORRESPONDENCE
2
Continued
None
6. ACTIONS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Director Bartlam referenced the memo in the packet and stated that staff is available for questions. Mr.
Bartlam added that the appeal that was filed on the Costco approval is set to go to the City Council on
May 5th
7. GENERAL PLAN UPDATE/DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE
Director Bartlam stated that the General Plan is scheduled for adoption on the April 7th City Council
meeting. Within the next thirty days a draft Housing Element should be ready for the Commission's
review.
8. ACTIONS OF THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
None
9. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Commissioner Kirsten stated that the Committee met today and the donation of the "Right to Spring"
sculpture may have hit a snag. The owner has decided to place some conditions on the donation that
would place penalties on the project if it wasn't in place where they wanted it placed by a certain date.
The owner also mentioned that the item is still for sale, so if the City doesn't act in time the donation
could just go away.
10. COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC
None
11. COMMENTS BY STAFF AND COMMISSIONERS
Director Bartlam stated that the 700 Forms are due by April 1 st in the City Clerk's office.
12. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, the meeting was adjourned
at 7:35 p.m.
ATTEST:
Konradt Bartlam
Planning Commission Secretary
Mayor Phil Katzakian and
Members of the City Council
c% Randi Johl, City Clerk
City of Lodi
221 W. Pine Street
Lodi, CA 95240
Chauvet House PO Box 1659
Glen Ellen, California 95442
February 23,2010
Subject: Appeal of Planning Commission Action
File No. 09-U-15 and 09 -SP -15
Use Permit and SPARC for COSTCO
Dear Honorable Mayor Katzakian and Councilmembers:
Lec. it As515tant
Jeanie Stapleton
On behalf of Charles and Melissa Katzakian, owners of the Historic Morse
Skinner Ranch House on the Reynolds Ranch site, and Lodi Tomorrow, I appeal
the referenced actions of the Planning Commission taken on February 10, 2010.
This is filed within the 10 business day period required by the Municipal Code.
The original Reynolds Ranch approvals were based on a project
description that stated in relevant part that "the proposed project would adaptively
reuse the Morse Skinner Ranch House and water tower, a significant historic
resource I isted on the National Register of Historic Places and eligible for listing
on the California Register of Historical Resources." The EIR analysis and project
approvals always anticipated that the historic site would be adaptively reused in a
manner compatible with the big box retail planned for the commercial site, such
as a restaurant, following federal standards for rehabilitation and reuse.
Thus, the land use incompatibilities of continued residential use on the
Reynolds Ranch site were not anticipated and have never been studied as
required by the California Environmental Quality Act.
707.938.3900 fax 707.938.32001° 5u5anbh0Pre5ervati0nfawyer5,C0ra
0XI
rn
c
�
On behalf of Charles and Melissa Katzakian, owners of the Historic Morse
Skinner Ranch House on the Reynolds Ranch site, and Lodi Tomorrow, I appeal
the referenced actions of the Planning Commission taken on February 10, 2010.
This is filed within the 10 business day period required by the Municipal Code.
The original Reynolds Ranch approvals were based on a project
description that stated in relevant part that "the proposed project would adaptively
reuse the Morse Skinner Ranch House and water tower, a significant historic
resource I isted on the National Register of Historic Places and eligible for listing
on the California Register of Historical Resources." The EIR analysis and project
approvals always anticipated that the historic site would be adaptively reused in a
manner compatible with the big box retail planned for the commercial site, such
as a restaurant, following federal standards for rehabilitation and reuse.
Thus, the land use incompatibilities of continued residential use on the
Reynolds Ranch site were not anticipated and have never been studied as
required by the California Environmental Quality Act.
707.938.3900 fax 707.938.32001° 5u5anbh0Pre5ervati0nfawyer5,C0ra
COSTCO APPEAL
February 23, 2010
Page 2
The bases for this appeal include, among other things, that the COSTCO
approvals, including the use permit and SPARC review, require analysis in a
supplemental EIR becausethere are unstudied land use and historic resource
incompatibilities with continuing residential use of the Morse Skinner Ranch
House. The developers' change of the project to continue residential use rather
than to adaptively reuse the Morse Skinner Ranch House has not been approved
or subjected to environmental review. The owners of the historic property have
requested relocation in light of the imminent development of the large-scale retail.
Unless and until that occurs in a manner consistent with the approved project
description, the land use incompatibilities require the City to conduct
supplemental CEQA review prior to consideration of approval of the CQSTCQ
permits or other retail approvals. Further, the Planning Commission's findings,
including that the proposed development will be "acceptable and compatible with
surrounding development," are not supported by substantial evidence.
We will provide further evidence and testimony at the appeal hearing.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
�4)�q
Susan Brandt -Hawley
cc: City Attorney Steve Schwabauer
Steve Herum
BRAN L,)T-H LwEY LA { Gf,'.ouP
Chauvet House Fid Box 1659 Legal Assistant
Jeanie Stapleton
Swan Bvar)M-Hawley Glen Ellen, California 95442
April 2, 2010
0
�
Mayor Phil Katzakian and
�;
Members of the City Council'"
r-
c% Randi Johl, City Clerk
rn
o
�
City of Lodi
N)
221 W. Pine Street
Lodi, CA 95240
Cityclerklodi.gov
Subject: Appeal of Planning Commission Action of
March 24, 2010
SPARC 10 -SP -02
322 East Harney Lane; Reynolds Ranch Shopping Center
Dear Honorable Mayor Katzakian and Councilmembers:
On behalf of Charles and Melissa Katzakian, owners of the Historic Morse
Skinner Ranch House on the Reynolds Ranch site, and Lodi Tomorrow, I appeal
the referenced actions of the Planning Commission taken on March 24, 2010.
This is filed within the 10 business day period required by the Municipal Code.
The original Reynolds Ranch approvals were based on a project
description that stated in relevant part that "the proposed project would adaptively
reuse the Morse Skinner Ranch House and water tower, a significant historic
resource listed on the National Register of Historic Places and eligible for listing
on the California Registerof Historical Resources." The EIR analysis and project
approvals always anticipated that the historic site would be adaptively reused in a
manner compatible with the big box retail planned for the commercial site, such
as a restaurant, following federal standards for rehabilitation and reuse.
Thus, the land use incompatibilities of continued residential use on the
Reynolds Ranch site were not anticipated and have never been studied as
required by the California Environmental Quality Act.
This discretionary site plan and architectural review approval of the
707.938.3900 : fax 707.938.3200 = susanbb0preservationlawyers.Com
M
rn
0
Reynolds Ranch SPARC Appeal
April 2, 2010
Page _2
Reynolds Ranch Shopping Center relies on the 2006 project description and EIR
Supplemental environmental review is triggered by the developers' failure to
comply with mitigations requiring protections of our historic property via
conversion to commercial use.
The Planning Commission's findings are not supported by substantial
evidence, because the continued residential use of our historic property is not
compatible with the commercial development on this site and was not studied in
the prior EIR or Initial Study. The Home Depot, in particular, provides access
directly to the rear of our residential property, and planned parking will
substantially surround us. Our historic house remains in residential use, NOT
adaptive reuse, and we have been given no viable alternative but to stay there.
We note that although we brought this problem to the Commission's
attention last month relative to the Costco SPARC approval, the current staff
report makes no mention of the historic Morse Skinner Ranch House or land use
incompatibilities. The current application cannot be approved due to the removal
of a key project component affecting our historic property. A supplemental EIR is
required before you can consider approval of the Home Depot or other Reynolds
Ranch commercial development.
We will provide further evidence and testimony at the appeal hearing.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Susan Brandt -Hawley
cc: City Attorney Steve Schwabauer
Steve Herum
April 26, 2010
Randi )ohl, City Clerk
City of Lodi
221 W. Pine St.
Lodi, CA 95240
Facsimile: (209) 333-6807
cityclerk(&Jodi,t�nv
RE: WITHDRAWALWITH PREJUDICE OF TWO ADMINISTRATIVE
APPEALS TO THE LODI CITY COUNCH,
Dear Ms. lohl,
We are writing to withdraw with prejudice uur pending administrative appeal of
the PlanningCornmission's approval on crabout February 10, 2010, of Use Permit to
allow the sale of alcohol and Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee ("SPARC')
application concerning the COSTCO Wholesale building proposed fur the Reynolds
Ranch mixed use developmentproject ("Development"), identified as applications 09-U-
15 and 09 -SP -15, respectively (the "Costco Approvals").
We are also withdrawingwith prejudiceour pendingadministrative appeal of the
Planning Commission's approval on or about March 24,2010, of SPARC application
for the remainder of the Development (the "Development SPARC Approvals').
Sincerely, y
files an Mels
on behalf of themselves and Lodi Tomorrow
cc: D. Stephen Schwabauer, City Attorney
Steven A. Herum
Please immediately confirm receipt
of this fax by calling 333-6702
CITY OF LODI
P.O. BOX 3006
LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910
ADVERTISING INSTRUCTIONS
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPEALS OF BRANDT-HAWLEY
LAW GROUP ON BEHALF OF CHARLES AND MELISSA KATZAKIAN
REGARDING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO
APPROVE: 1. SPARC REVIEW AND USE PERMIT FOR COSTCO
WHOLESALE DEVELOPMENT; AND 2. SPARC REVIEW FOR
REYNOLDS RANCH SHOPPING CENTER AND HOME DEPOT
PUBLISH DATE: SATURDAY, APRIL 24,2010
TEAR SHEETS WANTED: One (1) please
SEND AFFIDAVIT AND BILL TO:
DATED: THURSDAY, APRIL 22,2010
ORDERED BY: RANDI JOHL
CITY CLERK
JENNIFER M. ROBISON, CMC
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
RANDI JOHL, CITY CLERK
City of Lodi
P.O. Box 3006
Lodi, CA 95241-1910
MARIA BECERRA
ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK
Faxed to the Sentinel at 369-1084 at • b ` time) on LIMO (date) (pages)
LNS Phoned to confirm receipt of all p ges at (time JMR GF MB (initials)
forms\advins.doc
DECLARATION OF POSTING
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDERAPPEALS OF BRANDT-HAWLEY LAW GROUP
ON BEHALF OF CHARLES AND MELISSA KATZAKIAN REGARDING THE
DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE: 1. SPARC REVIEW
AND USE PERMIT FOR COSTCO WHOLESALE DEVELOPMENT; AND 2. SPARC
REVIEW FOR REYNOLDS RANCH SHOPPING CENTER AND HOME DEPOT
On Friday, April 23, 2010, in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, a Notice of
Public Hearing to consider appeals of Brandt -Hawley Law Group on behalf of Charles
and Melissa Katzakian regarding the decision of the Planning Commission to approve:
1. SPARC review and Use Permit for Costco Wholesale Development; and 2. SPARC
review for Reynolds Ranch Shopping Center and Home Depot (attached and marked as
Exhibit A) was posted at the following locations:
Lodi Public Library
Lodi City Clerk's Office
Lodi City Hall Lobby
Lodi Carnegie Forum
declare under penalty of perjurythat the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on April 23, 2010, at Lodi, California.
OaAAA�
--
RNNIFERP. ROBISON, CMC
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
N:Wdministration\CLERK\Forms\DECPOSTCDD.DOC
ORDERED BY:
RANDIJOHL
CITY CLERK
MARIA BECERRA
ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK
DECLARATION OF MAILING
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDERAPPEALS OF BRAN DT-HAWLEY LAW GROUP ON
BEHALF OF CHARLESAND MELISSA KATZAKIAN REGARDING THE DECISION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE: 1 SPARC REVIEW AND USE PERMIT FOR
COSTCO WHOLESALE DEVELOPMENT; AND 2. SPARC REVIEW FOR REYNOLDS
RANCH SHOPPING CENTERAND HOME DEPOT
On Friday, April 23, 2010, in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, I deposited in the
United States mail, envelopes with first-class postage prepaid thereon, containing a Notice of
Public Hearing to consider appeals of Brandt -Hawley Law Group on behalf of Charles and
Melissa Katzakian regarding the decision of the Planning Commission to approve: 1. SPARC
review and Use Permit for Costco Wholesale Development; and 2. SPARC review for Reynolds
Ranch Shopping Center and Home Depot, attached hereto Marked Exhibit A. The mailing list
for said matter is attached hereto, marked Exhibit B.
There is a regular daily communication by mail between the City of Lodi, California, and the
places to which said envelopes were addressed.
declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on April 23, 2010, at Lodi, California.
Forms/decmail.doc
ORDERED BY:
RANDI JOHL
CITY CLERK, CITY OF LODI
MARIA BECERRA
ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK
.:. Y.1.tFF':.�w..r,...'?i �"%=:S' e.sfri �.._::MiS'd�>,..�.5'x.R '..:x�.c::.;ti•. •,x':�:<:., .. :.
CITY OF LODI
Carnegie Forum
305 West Pine Street, Lodi
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Date: May 5,2010
Time: 7:00 p.m.
For information regarding this notice please contact:
Rand! Johl
City Clerk
Telephone: (209) 333-6702
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE S HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, May 5, 2010, at the hour of
7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the City Council will
conduct a public hearing at the Carnegie Forum, 305 West Pine Street, Lodi, to
consider the following matter:
a) Appeals of Brandt -Hawley Law Group on Behalf of Charles and
Melissa Katzakian Regarding the Decision of the Planning
Commission to Approve:
1. SPARC Review and Use Permit for Costco Wholesale
Development; and
2. SPARC Review for Reynolds Ranch Shopping Center and Home
Depot
Information regarding this item may be obtained in the Community Development
Department, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, (209) 333-6711. All interested persons
are invited to present their views and comments on this matter. Written
statements may be filed with the City Clerk, City Hall, 221 W. Pine Street, 2nd
Floor, Lodi, 95240, at any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein, and oral
statements may be made at said hearing.
If you challenge the subject matter in court, you may be limited to raising only
those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk, 221 West Pine
Street, at or prior to the close of the public hearing.
y rder of the Lodi City Council:
ohl
City Clerk
Dated: April 21,2010
D. Stephen Schwabauer
City Attorney
CLERK\PUBHEAR\NOTICES\notcdd2.doc 4/20/10
Appeal of Reynolds Ranch & Costco PC approvals (5-5-10 City Council Meetin4 E& H I B. I T B
OWNER
ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
KATZAKIAN, CHARLES S &
MELISSA
PO BOX 2484
LODI
CA
95241
ROBERT L & C W REYNOLDS FAM
LL
23290 N PEARL RD
ACAMPO
CA
95220
SKINNER RANCH HOLDINGS LP
1420 S MILLS AVE SUITE
LODI
CA
95242
SOUTH RIVER RANCH LLC
4920 E HOGAN LN
LODI
CA
95240
ROBERT & CAROLYN REYNOLDS
ETAL
PO BOX 725
WOODBRIDGE
CA
95258
MILLER, DONALD W & NANCY C TR
4071 E HARNEY LN
LODI
CA
95240
LOGAN, WENDELL & DORATHEA
311 E HARNEY LN
LODI
CA
95242
THAYER, WALTER A & JOANNE M j325
TR 1
E HARNEY IN
ILODIjCA
`
j95240
`
MILLER, DONALD W & NANCY C TR
349 E HARNEY IN
LODI
CA
95240
MILLER, DONALD W & NANCY C TR
349 E HARNEY LN
LODI
CA
95240
CHUGHTAI, AFTAB & F.IRHAT ETAL
12350 DEL AMO BLVD APT
1610
LAKEWOOD
CA
90715
WARREN, FRANK L & MAXINE
308 DRIFTWOOD DR
LODI
CA
95240
BUSTILLOS, ANDREW L & STACEY
314 DRIFTWOOD DR
LODI
CA
95240
HABER, BONIFACIO A JR &
RIZALI
PO BOX 51525
PALO ALTO
CA
94303
M4ARI, VIJAY & SARITA
PO BOX 18085
SAN JOSE
CA
95158
SINGH. KASHMIR ETAL
2513 MERCATO IN
LODI
CA
95240
GAWEL, JASON & KIMBERLY
PO BOX 411
SEASIDE
CA
93955
AIELLO, KEN & JENNIFER
2506 MARANO LN
LODI
CA
95240
TROXCLAIR, CRAIG & ELIZABETH
2512 MARANO LN
LODI
CA
95240
LOPEZ, ROBERTO & GUADALUPE
2511 MARANO LN
LODI
CA
95240
MENDOZA, ELVIS O
2505 MARANO LN
LODI
CA
95240
BARAZON, LITA V
2504 VALLINI IN
LODI
CA
95240
ELECTRONIC MORTGAGE SERVICING
2756 E BIDWELL ST STE
300
FOLSOM
CA
95630
HERRERA, JESUS RAMIREZ & I
MARIA
2509 VALLINI LN
ILODI
ICA
195240
TROXCLAIR, CRAIG & ELIZABETH
2512 MARANO LN
LODI
CA
95240
MEZA, JOSEFINA ETAL
437 PORTA ROSSA WAY
LODI
CA
95240
EIGHT DIGITS LLC
6777 EMBARCADERO DR #3
STOCKTON
CA
95219
LAMA, JOSE
2450 MONTEBELLO WAY
LODI
CA
95240
WILSON, GERMAYNE ETAL
2458 MONTEBELLO WAY
LODI
CA
95240
YOUNG, GARVIN & STEPHANIE
1824 VICTORIA DR
LODI
CA
95242
KERLIN, DELRAY & CYNTHIA J G
1808 AUTUMN WAY
LODI
CA
95242
KHAN, JOHER M
1112 RIVERGATE DR
LODI
CA
95240
ROMAN CATHOLIC WELFARE CORP
ST
1105 N LINCOLN ST
STOCKTON
CA
95203
DELTA PACKING COMPANY PTP
6021 E KETTLEMAN IN
LODI
CA
95240
FELKINS, JEANETTE L TR 123480
N DEVRIES RD
LODI
CA
95242
JACommunity Development\Planning\ListsWgenda Mailing ListsWGENDAI .DOC Page 1
04/22/2010
Company
FirstName
LastName
Addressl
City
State
PostalCode
Minutes
1.
Keith
Selleseth
2350 St.
Lodi
CA
95242
Anton
Drive
2.
Senator
Cogdill
1308W.
Ripo
CA
95366
Dave
Main St.,
n
Suite C
3.
Arne M.
Cerney
900 W.
Lodi
CA
95240
Vine Streei
4.
Ernest
Golladay
1924
Lodi
CA
95242-2305
Edgewood
Dr.
5.
Bertha
Castro
2912
Lodi
CA
95242
Fernwood
Lr.
6.
Baumbach
Steve
Pechin
323 W.
Lodi
CA
95240
& Piazza,
Elm Street
Inc.
7.
CalTrans,
Attn: IGR
Planning
P.O. Box
Stock
CA
95201
District 10
2048
ton
8.
Coldani
Leonard
Bull
1806 W.
Lodi
CA
95242
X
Realtors
Kettleman
Lane
9.
Lew-
Mr. Gary S.
Davis
P.O. Box
Ceres
CA
95307-1033
Garcia-
1033
Davis
10.
Lodi
24S.
Lodi
CA
95240
X
District
School St.
Chamber
Of
Commerce
11.
Lodi
P.O. Box
Lodi
CA
95241
Improveme
3006
nt
Committee
12.
Lodi
Attn: Art
Hand Jr.
1305 E.
Lodi
CA
95240
X
Unified
Vine Street
School
District
13.
San
Attn:
Garretson
24S.
Stock
CA
95202
Joaquin
Debbie
Hunter
ton
county
Street,
Assessor's
Room 303
Office
14.
S.J.
1810E.
Stock
CA
95205
X
county
Hazelton
ton
Planning
Avenue
Depart.
15.
Teichert
Terry
Miles
PO Box
Stock
CA
95201
Constructi
1118
ton
on
16.
Western
500S.
south
CA
94080-9881
Real Estate
Airport
San
News
Blvd.
Franc
JACommunity Development\Planning\ListsWgenda Mailing ListsWGENDAI .DOC Page 1
04/22/2010
I Comnanv I FirstName I LastName I Addressl I Citv I State I PostalCode I Minutes I
isco
JACommunity Development\Planning\Lists\Agenda Mailing Li sts\AGENDA I .DOC Page 2
04/22/2010
Kari Chadwick —S 4
Distribution List Name: Reynolds Ranch project
Members:
C. Griff
GaryTsutsumi
J. Kurt Roberts
Janna Scott
Mark Hogenhout
Melissa Katzakian
Paula Fernandez
Wally Sandelin
cgriff44@comcast.net
Teeingoff2002@yahoo.com
j kurtroberts@scbglobal.net
jannascoft@yahoo.com
Mhogenhout@colliersparrish.com
chaskat@sbcglobal.net
PJF@lodi.gov
wsandelin@lodi.gov
1
Kari Chadwick — C _
Distribution List Name:
Members:
Bill Cummins
Bill Cummins -Work
Dave Kirsten
Debbie Olson
Randy Heinitz
Steven Hennecke
Tim Mattheis-Work
Timothy Mattheis
Planning Commission
pastorbillc@aol.com
pastorbill@bearcreekchurch.com
dave@kirsten.com
Debbie.Olson@pacbell.net
dhntzrdy@sbcglobal.net
shenecke@pacbell.net
TM@wmbarchitects.com
tkmhome@sbcglobal.net
Kari Chadwick -- e-�tcrjA( .
Distribution List Name: Planning Commission Agendas
Members:
Anne Cemey
acemey@inreach.com
CaliforniaPoso
CaliforniaPoso@yahoo.com
Carmen Bais
carmenbais@mypermail.com
Chris
Chdssenkeresty@Yahoo.com
Connie O'Brien
Cobden@metrostudy.com
Crystal Kirst
ckirst@gmail.com
Daniel Thigpen
dthigpen@recordnet.com
Demy Bucaneg (Lodi EUD)
dbucaneg@lodielectdc.com
Eileen St Yves (LIC)
EileenSt.Yves@comcast.net
ErinArago
earago@sheppardmullin.com
Erin Arago
earago@yahoo.com
Greg Harp
gharp@sjconstruction.com
Jacki Roth
jackijr@yahoo.com
Janet L. Hamilton
jhamiiton@iodi.gov
Janice Magdich
jmagdich@lodi.gov
Jeff Hood
jhood@lodi.gov
John Beckman
johnb@biadelta.org
John Johnson
john@johnejohnson.com
Joseph Wood
jwood@lodi.gov
Kevin Donnelly
kdonnelly@lodi.gov
LindyCombs
mecombs@sjcphs.org
Maggie Creamer
maggiec@lodinews.com
Marty Willett
mwillett@g-rem.com
Melissa Katzakian
chaskat@sbcglobal.net
Michael Caruba
Michael@Duncanda.com
Patty Anderson
panderson@firstam.com
Pete Gibson
pgibson@fcbhomes.com
Ron DuHamel
duhamel@sbcglobal.net
Sandy Meyers
SMeyers@pd.lodi.gov
Scott Kime
SKime@flintco.com
Steve Pechin
bpengineers@sbcglobal.net
Susan Lake
slake@lodi.gov
Tammy M. Minatre
tminatre@agspanos.com
Ted Deehr
tdeehr@surewest.net
Terri Lovell
tlovell@lodi.gov
Wes Reed
wreed@mve.net
Kari Chadwick �- '
Distribution List Name: SPARC Members
Members:
Keith Selleseth carkei@sbcglobal.net
Mitchell Slater mslater@lodiusd.net
Reyes Jaramillo ray—pridelands@yahoo.com
Roger Stafford staf4ds@comcast.net